HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-11-24 - AGENDA REPORTS - MC 15-047 UDC 15-002 (2)Agenda Item: 13
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Q) AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7,
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: 1 j=�
DATE: November 24, 2015
SUBJECT: MASTER CASE 15-047 (UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 15-002)
AMENDMENT (2015 UDC Update)
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
PRESENTER: Mike Marshall
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing.
2. Introduce and pass to a second reading an ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER CASE 15-047
(UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 15-002) AND AMENDING THE SANTA CLARITA
UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE."
BACKGROUND
On June 11, 2013, the City Council adopted the first comprehensive update to the City of Santa
Clarita's Unified Development Code (UDC) to be consistent with the Santa Clarita General Plan
(General Plan) that was adopted on June 14, 2011. Periodically, City staff will initiate
amendments to the UDC to satisfy regulatory demands from federal, state, and local government
agencies, to clarify inconsistencies, and to rectify typographical errors. The 2015 UDC Update
is a set of teat amendments consisting of regulatory compliance items related to wireless
telecommunications facilities and the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, new
code sections related to alternative fuel charging stations, and updates addressing inconsistencies
in the UDC.
City Council Development Subcommittee
The City Council Development Subcommittee (Subcommittee), including Mayor Pro Tem Kellar
and Councilmember Boydston, held a duly noticed meeting on September 24, 2015. At this
meeting, City staff provided the Subcommittee with an overview of the proposed amendments.
Page 1
PacketPg. 60
Planning Commission
The proposed 2015 UDC Update was considered by the Planning Commission at a public
hearing held on October 20, 2015. The Planning Commission requested the proposed text be
amended to clarify code requirements regarding:
1. The prohibition of electronic reader -board signs on properties less than 25 acres in size; and
2. The pruning of trees on commercial properties for the purpose of improving visibility of
buildings and signage to be consistent with International Society of Arboriculture (ISA)
standards.
By a 5-0 vote, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt the Negative
Declaration prepared for the project and approve the 2015 UDC Update with the requested
clarifications.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
The 2015 UDC Update consists of text amendments that serve to implement the goals and
policies of the General Plan. The 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory act and does not include a
proposal for development. A copy of the 2015 Draft Redline Amendments (Exhibit A) is
attached to the ordinance. The following is a description of the proposed amendments.
1. Regulatory Compliance Updates
A. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities - All nronerty other than Citv Right-of-Wav
Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 provides that a
state or local government "may not deny and shall approve" any request for co -location,
removal, or replacement of transmission equipment on an existing wireless tower or base
station, provided that this action does not substantially change the physical dimensions of the
tower or base station. The 2015 UDC Update incorporates new code language to ensure
consistency with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ruling regarding Section
6409(a) by reinforcing the specific development standards set forth by the FCC.
The regulations mandate that proposals for co -locations or modifications on privately owned
property must be approved by local jurisdictions if the proposal meets the following
standards:
1. The height of the tower would increase by less than 10% or 20 feet, whichever is greater;
2. The proposed antenna would protrude from the edge of the existing tower by less than 20
feet or the width of the tower structure, whichever is greater;
3. The base station (building) would increase by less than 10% or 10 feet in height above
the originally approved height, whichever is greater; and
4. The base station (building) would protrude from the edge of the originally approved
structure less than six feet.
Page 2
Packet Pg. 61
In summary, if a proposed modification or co -location on property other than City right-of-
way is consistent with the above standards, the project must be administratively approved by
means of an over-the-counter approval. Projects that are not consistent with the above
standards must proceed through the entitlement process currently established in the UDC.
B. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities - City Right -of -Way
Currently, the UDC does not contain language regulating the placement of wireless
telecommunications facilities within the City right-of-way. Staff conducted research of a
variety of Southern California cities to establish appropriate development standards for
facilities within the City right-of-way that would be compliant with Section 6409(a) of the
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012.
Further, Public Utilities Code sections 7901 and 7901.1 allow atelephone company with a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the Public Utilities Commission to
place "telephone" equipment in the public right of way, subject to the local jurisdiction's
ability to impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on that equipment. It is this
provision that allows telephone poles to be placed within the right-of-way. Until recently,
wireless telecommunications facilities were large structures that could not be reasonably
placed in the public right-of-way. With the advancement of smaller wireless
telecommunications structures and because the definition of "telephone" in the Public
Utilities Code is very broad, the provision is now interpreted to include wireless
communications providers. Therefore, local jurisdictions are required to adopt reasonable
time, place, and manner restrictions to regulate the placement of those facilities, and a
process by which providers can apply for permits to place their facilities.
Staff has made an effort to draft standards that are consistent with the Public Utilities Code.
The following development standards are proposed to apply to wireless telecommunications
facilities within the City right-of-way:
1. The height of the existing utility pole does not increase more than six feet;
2. The width of the additional equipment does not exceed 36 inches or the width of the
existing pole, whichever is greater;
3. Wireless telecommunications facilities located within the City right-of-way shall not be
within 250 feet of the property lines of any residential use or zone, unless location of a
facility on private property is not feasible and a significant gap in coverage exists; and
4. Wireless telecommunications facilities are not allowed within the City right-of-way on
any local street or local/collector street within a residential area which provides direct
residential driveway access unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible
and a significant gap in coverage exists.
As proposed, applicants for wireless telecommunications facilities within the City right-of-
way must first demonstrate that the proposed project complies with the above standards, and
show that the applicant has a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued by the
Public Utilities Commission. The applicant must then obtain an encroachment permit from
Page 3
Packet Pg. 62
the Development Services Division to conduct work within the City right -of ay.
These regulations are designed to encourage location of wireless facilites in the non
-
residential areas of the City, to preserve the aesthetics of the residential streetscape
Additional or expanded utility structures within the public right of way are more
appropriately placed in nonresidential portions ofthe City where the majority ofpeople pass
by these structures in vehicles, or do not spend a great deal of nine looking at them, and
where signage and a greater proliferation of other utility structures already occupies the
vievescape ki residential zones where people are more likely to walk around their
neighborhoods orview the streetscape from their homes andyards, the aesthetic goal is to
minimize overheadutlity structures. Much ofthe Qrys power and cable television
infrastructure is undegrounded formst these reasons. Where the placement of wireless
facilites in or near residential zones is necessary to fill a significant gap in coverage private
property options should first be explored, as those usually create more opportunities for
screening and aesthetic treatment Only when non residential and residential private property
options have been exhausted should intrusion into the residential streetscape be considered
Since the Planning Commission review, additional language has been incorporated into the
proposed code language including a footnote to the permitted use charts balancing the Qty's
aesthetic concerns against the federal requi rem ent that carriers not be prohibited from
competing in the marketplace
The following photo ism example of a wireless telecommunications facility within the
public right of way of anotherrynsdicton thatwould notbe approved in the City of Santa
Clarita ifthe proposed amendments were to be approved, as the additional equipment
exceeds 36 inches in width.
13
Page 4
PackN Pg.63
13
In contrast, the photo below is an existing wireless telecommunications facility in another
Southern California city that would be consistent yarn the proposed standards detailed above.
l
C State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
Asa part of the proposed 2015 UDC Update, existing code language would be modified to:
1) reflect compliance with, and 2) adopt the standards found in the State Model Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance A recent revision to the ordinance increases water efficiency
standards fornew and retrofitted landscapes through more efficient irrigation systems,
greywaterusage on-site storm water capture, and by limiting the portion of landscapes that
can be covered in mR Adorn on of the proposed code language will ensure the City s
ongoing compliance with the ordinance therefore eliminating the need for future code
amendments as the state ordinance is amended in the future
2. New Code Section
The 2015 UDC Update furthers the goals and policies of the General Plan by incorporating a
new code section that encourages the installation of alternative fuel charging stations. The new
language establishes guidelines to ensure the display areas associated with such stations do not
result in simile curt impacts to the surrounding visual aesthetic
3. Updame Regarding AconietenneE
The balance of the 2015 UDC Update incorporates new language that provides clarity and
consistency in various areas of the existing UDC including, but not limited to, the following
items
Page 5
PackN Pg.6d
1. Application processing procedures
Staff proposes an amendment to the existing code language that would create consistency
with other portions of the code by allowing the Hearing Officer to refer projects to the
Planning Commission for further review. Current code language requires approval or denial
of a project heard by the Hearing Officer. This is inconsistent with other portions of the code
that allow an approval body to refer a project to the next higher level of review, such as from
the Planning Commission to City Council.
2. Temporary Signs
Staff proposes language to clarify the intent of existing code language as it applies to non-
commercial temporary signs. Current code language only allows for these sign types to be
freestanding. The proposed code language would allow for temporary non-commercial signs
to be mounted.
3. Home Occupations
Staff proposes new language that would permit only one home occupation per residential
dwelling unit. Further, staff has added language to the list of prohibited businesses to include
cabinet making and dispatch facilities.
4. Land Use Definitions
Included in the proposed 2015 UDC Update is language modifying the definitions of
"Instructional School" to include a broader scope of scholastic businesses, and additional
language to the definition of "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" to prohibit mobile marijuana
dispensaries.
5. Typographical Errors
Additional modifications to the existing UDC have been proposed to rectify grammatical and
formatting errors and inconsistencies.
ENVIRONMENTAL
An Initial Study was prepared for this project in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). The initial study determined that all impacts related to the proposed
project are considered to be less than significant. Therefore, a Negative Declaration was
prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of CEQA. The Negative Declaration and Initial
Study were made available during a 21 -day public review period from September 29, 2015 to
October 20, 2015. Documents were posted in the City Clerk's Office at the City of Santa Clarita
City Hall and the City of Santa Clarita Public Library, Valencia Branch.
NOTICING
All noticing requirements for a public hearing have been completed as required by Section
17.06.110 of the Unified Development Code. A 1/81h page advertisement was placed in the
Signal Newspaper on November 3, 2015.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
Page 6
Packet Pg. 65
FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS
Public Hearing Notice
Ordinance
Exhibit A- 2015 UDC Update Draft Redline Amendments
Exhibit B- Negative Declaration & Initial Study
Planning Commission Staff Report & Resolution (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Planning Commission Correspondence (available in City Clerk Reading File)
Page 7
Packet Pg. 66
13.a
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICATION: Master Case No. 15-047 (2015 Unified Development Code Update)
Unified Development Code 15-002; Initial Study 15-007
PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Santa Clarita
PROJECT LOCATION: Citywide in
r
N
N
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The City of Santa Clarita is updating its zoning regulations within the u�
Unified Development Code (UDC) to be consistent with the General Plan adopted in June 2011. $
Periodically, City staff will initiate amendments to the UDC based upon the necessity to satisfy regulatory a
demands from federal, state, and local govermnent agencies, to clarify inconsistencies, and to rectify
w
typographical errors. The 2015 UDC update is a set of textual amendments to the existing UDC Q
consisting of: 1) Regulatory compliance updates; 2) New code language addressing alternative fuel U
charging stations; and 3) updates addressing existing inconsistencies. The proposed project is regulatory 0
in nature and does not include a proposal for physical development of any kind.
N
N
co
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: On October 20, 2015, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to r
recommend that the City Council certify the Negative Declaration prepared for the project and approve
the proposed project c
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:A DRAFT NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared for this
proposed project and was made available for a public review period, during which the City of Santa
Clarita Community Development Department received comments, beginning at 12:00 p.m. on September
29, 2015, and ending at 12:00 p.m. on October 20, 2015. During the public review period, a copy of the
Negative Declaration and all supporting documents were located at the City Clerk's Office in the City
Hall Building at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 120, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. A copy of the draft
Negative Declaration (without all supporting documents) was posted at the Santa Clarita Library,
Valencia Branch during the public review period noted above.
The City of Santa Clarita City Council will conduct a public hearing on this matter on the following date:
DATE: Tuesday, November 24, 2015
TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m.
LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers
23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice, or written
correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings.
For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa
Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Telephone: (661) 255-
4330. Website: www.santa-clarita.com/plate. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd.,
Packet Pg. 67
Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Mike Marshall, Assistant Planner II,
mmarshall(o.s anta-carita. com.
Kevin Tonoian, City Clerk
Published: The Signal, November 3, 2015
13.a
Packet Pg. 68
zo
13.b
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING MASTER CASE 15-047 (UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 15-002)
AND AMENDING THE SANTA CLARITA UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The City Council does hereby make the
following findings of fact:
A. The City of Santa Clarita General Plan (General Plan) requires the implementation of
the City of Santa Clarita Unified Development Code (UDC) to be in compliance with
the Government Code of the State of California,
B. On March 16, 2015, the City of Santa Clarita (Applicant) initiated an application
(Master Case 15-047 and UDC 15-002) to create the 2015 UDC Update (project) to
ensure consistency with federal and state regulations and the General Plan, as required
by state law. A complete copy of the proposed 2015 UDC Update is incorporated to
this ordinance as Exhibit A;
C. The 2015 UDC Update has been created in response to recent changes to Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) regulations regarding the co -location of wireless
telecommunications facilities and the State Model Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance;
D. On June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted the General Plan by adoption of
Resolution No. 11-63. The General Plan provides a vision that will guide future
development in the City of Santa Clarita through a set of goals, objectives, and
policies;
E. The City Council Development Subcommittee held a duly -noticed meeting to review
the proposed UDC amendments on September 24, 2015, in accordance with the City's
noticing requirements. The meeting was held at City Hall, Orchard Room, located at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita;
F. The Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing on October 20, 2015, in
accordance with the City's noticing requirements. The project was advertised in The
Signal newspaper on September 29, 2015. The hearing was held at City Hall, Council
Chambers, located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:00 p.m.;
G. At the October 20 public hearing described above, the Planning Commission
considered the staff report, staff presentation, and public testimony on the proposal,
and in a 5-0 vote, approved Resolution P 15-13, recommending the City Council adopt
a Negative Declaration and approve Master Case 15-047;
Packet Pg. 69
N
0
O
N
m
Y
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
r
co
13.b
Master Case 15-047
Ordinance 15 -
November 24, 2015
Page 2 of 6
H. The location of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of
proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based for the
Master Case 15-047 project file is with the Community Development Department; the
record specifically is in the custody of the Director of Community Development;
L On November 24, 2015, the City Council held a duly -noticed public hearing in
accordance with the City's noticing requirements. The public hearing was advertised
in The Signal newspaper on November 3, 2015, and was held at City Hall, Council
Chambers, located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:00 p.m.;
J. The City Council received a staff presentation summarizing the proposed project,
N
c
opened the public hearing, received public testimony regarding the project, and closed
m
Y
the public hearing;
w
E
K. The City Council conducted a first reading on an ordinance for the 2015 UDC Update
a
and passed the ordinance to a second reading on December 8, 2015; and
E
L. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon
U
which the decision of the City Council is based is the Master Case 15-047 project file
which is located in the Community Development Department, the file record being
M
specifically in the custody of the Director of Community Development.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS.
Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the City Council hereby finds as follows:
A. An Initial Study and a Negative Declaration for this project have been prepared in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
B. The Initial Study has been circulated for review and comment by affected government
agencies and the public, and all comments received have been considered. The
Negative Declaration was advertised and posted on September 29, 2015, in accordance
with CEQA. The public review period was open from September 29, 2015, through
October 20, 2015;
C. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City
of Santa Clarita;
D. The documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon
which the decision of the City Council is made is the Master Case 15-047 project file,
located within the City Clerk's office and is in the custody of the City Clerk; and
E. The City Council, based upon the findings set forth above, hereby finds that the
Negative Declaration for this project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA.
Packet Pg. 70
13.b
Master Case 15-047
Ordinance 15 -
November 24, 2015
Page 3 of 6
SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR UDC 15-002. Based on the above findings
of facts, recitals, and the entire record, including, without limitation, oral and written
testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals
from City staff to the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the City
Council, the City Council finds as follows:
A. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan.
The project is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed 2015 UDC
Update carries out a number of General Plan policies and objectives, including the
expansion of wireless telecommunications facilities. The Land Use Element of the
General Plan dictates that the City expand infrastructure to attract and sustain new
business. Land Use Policy LU 4.4.1 encourages the extension of state-of-the-art
communication facilities to serve commercial and industrial areas, including wireless
telecommunications facilities. The 2015 UDC Update is consistent with this policy by
incorporating language that ensures compliance with the FCC ruling, Section 6409(a)
of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, which establishes
guidelines to expedite the deployment of wireless telecommunications infrastructure
by establishing standards for the streamlined processing of co -location and
modification projects. Further, Conservation and Open Space Policy CO 1.3.1
encourages the exploration, evaluation, and implementation of methods to shift from
using non-renewable resources to the use of renewable resources in all aspects of land
use planning and development. The 2015 UDC Update is consistent with this policy
by providing language that encourages the installation of alternative fuel charging
stations.
B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all
other applicable provisions of the UDC.
The 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory document that would modify applicable
sections and provisions of the UDC to ensure compliance with federal and state
regulations, encourage the installation of alternative fuel charging stations, and
address inconsistencies within the existing UDC and does not include a proposal for
physical development.
C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the
public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially
detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity
and zone in which the property is located.
Nothing contained in the proposed 2015 UDC Update would endanger, jeopardize, or
otherwise constitute a hazard to the public because the project is regulatory in nature,
and the resulting document would modify applicable sections and provisions of the
UDC to ensure compliance with federal and state regulations, encourage the
Packet Pg. 71
N
0
0
N
Y
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
N
N
co
Master Case 15-047
Ordinance 15 -
November 24, 2015
Page 4 of 6
installation of alternative fuel charging stations, and address inconsistencies within the
existing UDC. Further, the 2015 UDC Update would not result in the disturbance of
land or the physical development of any property and would be consistent with the
provisions of the General Plan.
D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's
physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for
the proposed use;
2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width
and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such
proposal would generate;
3. Public protection service (e.g., Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) is
readily available; and
4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, schools, solid waste collection
and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal,
etc.) is adequate to serve the site.
The 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory document that implements policies and
objectives of the General Plan and incorporates code language to ensure compliance
with federal and state regulations. The 2015 UDC Update does not propose land uses
that would generate traffic volumes in excess of that anticipated in the General Plan
and does not propose changes to the existing highways or streets that provide access to
sites throughout the planning area. The City of Santa Clarita is currently served by the
Los Angeles County Fire Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's
Department, both of which provide adequate service levels. The City of Santa Clarita
is likewise served by all applicable utilities. Nothing in the proposed 2015 UDC
Update would increase the need for fire or police protection services, nor would the
project increase demand for utilities.
SECTION 4. ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR UDC 15-002. Based on the above
findings of facts, recitals, and the entire record, including, without limitation, oral and written
testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals
from City staff to the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the City
Council, the City Council finds as follows for UDC 15-002, in accordance with Unified
Development Code Section 17.28.120.L
A. The amendment is consistent with the adjacent area, if applicable;
13.b
Packet Pg. 72
N
r
0
N
N
Y
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
N
N
co
Master Case 15-047
Ordinance 15 -
November 24, 2015
Page 5 of 6
B. The amendment is consistent with the principles of the General Plan;
C. Approval of the amendment will be in the interest of public health, convenience,
safety, and general welfare and in conformity with good zoning practice;
D. The amendment is consistent with other applicable provisions of this code; and
E. The amendment is necessary to implement the General Plan, and/or that the public
convenience, the general welfare, or good zoning practice justifies such action.
The proposed 2015 UDC Update modifies the existing UDC for the City of Santa
Clarita and serves to implement the General Plan. The project is consistent with the
General Plan because the proposed 2015 UDC Update carries out a number of General
Plan policies and objectives, including the expansion of telecommunications facilities.
The Land Use Element of the General Plan dictates that the City expand infrastructure
to attract and sustain new business. Land Use Policy LU 4.4.1 encourages the
extension of state-of-the-art communication facilities to serve commercial and
industrial areas, including wireless telecommunications facilities. The 2015 UDC
Update is consistent with this policy by incorporating language that ensures
compliance with the FCC ruling, Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and
Job Creation Act of 2012, which establishes guidelines to expedite the deployment of
wireless telecommunications infrastructure by establishing standards for the
streamlined processing of co -location and modification projects. Further,
Conservation and Open Space Policy CO 1.3.1 encourages the exploration, evaluation,
and implementation of methods to shift from using non-renewable resources to the use
of renewable resources in all aspects of land use planning and development. The 2015
UDC Update is consistent with this policy by providing language that encourages the
installation of alternative fuel charging stations. The approval of the 2015 UDC
Update would result in a document that is consistent with the General Plan and would
therefore be justified by serving the general welfare of the public and serve as good
zoning practice.
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration (Exhibit B)
prepared for the project, and approves the amendments to the UDC, which includes Master
Case 15-047, consisting of the 2015 UDC Update (Exhibit A).
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from its
passage and adoption.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall
cause the same to be published as required by law.
13.b
Packet Pg. 73
N
r
0
N
Y
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
N
N
co
Master Case 15-047
Ordinance 15 -
November 24, 2015
Page 6 of 6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
2015.
MAYOR
I, Kevin Tonoian, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance 15- was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2015. That thereafter,
said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of , 2015 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance
and was published in The Signal newspaper in accordance with State Law (G.C. 40806).
CITY CLERK
13.b
Packet Pg. 74
N
0
O
N
N
Y
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
13.c
EXHIBIT A
2015 UDC UPDATE DRAFT REDLINE AMENDMENTS
17.06.150 Decision after Administrative Hearing or Public Hearing
A. Hearing Officer Action. At the conclusion of an administrative hearing, the Hearing Officer
shall take action on the application to approve, deny or refer the application to the Commission.
'T''�TA decision to approve or denv is final unless the decision is appealed to the
Commission.
17.11.020 De£mitions
Definitions, `Z. "
"Landscaping" means an area set aside from structures and parking/driveway uses, which is
developed to include predominately living, thriving, trees, vines, shrubs, flowers, grasses,
t*'�and other plants. Porous materials, such as rock, mulch, decomposed granite, and
svnthetic turf can be used in conjunction with living plant materials; however, landscaped areas
must be predominantly of living materials.
Definitions "W"
"Wireless communications facilities" means the site, support structures, antennas, accessory
equipment structures, and appurtenances used to transmit, receive, distribute, provide or offer
wireless telecommunications services. Wireless communications facilities include, but are not
limited to, antennas, poles, towers, cables, wires, conduits, ducts, pedestals, vaults, buildings,
electronic, and switching equipment.
The following terms and phrases are defined for the purposes of Chapter 17_69 (Wireless
Communications Facilities and Satellite Dish Antennas):
1. "Base Station" means the transmission equipment and non -tower support structure at a
fixed location that enable FCC -licensed or authorized wireless communications between
user equipment and a communications network. A "non -tower support structure" means
anv structure (whether built for wireless purposes or not) that supports wireless
Packet Pg. 75
N
0
N
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
N
N
M
r
13.c
Page 2 of 53
transmission equipment under a valid permit at the time the applicant submits its
application.
2_`Building-mounted" means mounted to the side of a building, to the facade of a building
or to the side of another structure such a water tank, church steeple, freestanding sign or LO
0
similar structure, but not to include the roof of any structure. m
Y
C
W
3. "Camouflaged wireless communications facility' means a wireless communications a
C
facility that is designed to mask or blend with the surrounding environment in such a E
manner to render it generally unnoticeable to the casual observer. These types of facilities o
may include antennas located on light poles and power poles, ground mounted or
r
building mounted antennas that blend with the surroundings, and base station equipment M
screened by landscaping. 0
4"Co-location" means the locating of wireless communications equipment from more than
one (1) provider on a single building -mounted, roof -mounted, or ground -mounted
POMMIRRiefftieffwireless communications facility.
5. "Ground Mounted" means mounted to a pole, monopole, lattice tower, or other
freestanding structure specifically constructed for the purpose of supporting such
antenna. These antennas do not use a building or ancillary structures for mounting
purposes.
6. "Monopole" -means a structure composed of a single spire used to support antennas or
related equipment.
7. "Stealth facility" means any communication facility which is designed to blend into the
surrounding environment, typically one that is architecturally integrated into a building or
other concealing structure. Also referred to as concealed antenna.
8 "Transmission equipment" means anyequipment that facilitates transmission for an FCC -
licensed or authorized wireless communications service, including, but not limited to,
radio transceivers, antennas and other relevant equipment associated with and necessary
Packet Pg. 76
13.c
Page 3 of 53
to their operation, including coaxial or fiber-optic cable, and regular and backup power
supply.
9. "Wireless communications support structures" means any structure erected to support
N
telephone communications services. Wireless communications support structures may N
include, but are not limited to, lattice tower, monopoles, and guyed towers. c
w
E
a
c
10."Wireless communications systems" means the sending and receiving of radio frequency
transmissions and the connection and/or relaying of these signals to land lines and other
U
sending and receiving stations (cell sites), and including, but not limited to, cellular radio,
telephone, personal communications services (PCS), enhanced/specialized mobile radio M
(ESMR), commercial paging services, wi-fi, and any other technology which provides
m
Y
similar services.
11. "Wireless tower" means any structure built for the sole or primary purpose of supporting
FCC -licensed antennas and their associated facilities. This does not include structures
that were installed to replace or co -locate upon existing utility poles, energy transmission
towers, and buildings.
17.26.130 Ridgeline Alteration Permit
B. Applicability. A ridgeline alteration permit shall be filed as a Class V application, subject to
this chapter. The reviewing authority shall review an application for a ridgeline alteration permit
for any development including but not limited to grading permits, building permits and land use
entitlements, in the vicinity of a generally designated significant ridgeline designated on the
ridgeline preservation overlay zone. Exceptions include minor improvements to existing,
developed. sinele-familv homes and propertv. where the Director may approve proiects that
require minor grading or are limited in scope such as those regarding vard areas for pool/spa
construction, landscaping, additions to existing structures or construction of accessory structures.
When limited in scope and associated with existing single-family residences, the Director may
also review projects, or may refer proiects to the Planning Commission and/or City Council that
require grading of large, flat areas, such as sports courts or riding rings.
Packet Pg. 77
Page 4 of 53
17.35 Mixed Use Zones
17.35.010 Mixed Use Corridor (MXC) Zone
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where a "T" appears; an
administrative permit is required where the symbol "AP" appears; and a hillside development
review is required where an "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited use in this
zone. The Director may deem additional uses to be permitted based on a finding that the use is
similar in nature and operation to the permitted uses listed in this subsection, in accordance with
Chapter 17.04 (Interpretations). Land use descriptions are contained in Division 5 of this title
(Use Classifications and Required Parking). Parking requirements for mixed uses shall be subject
to Section 17.55.050 (Parking Requirements).
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Community Care Facility
C
3.
Dwelling
a.
Single -Family
P
b.
Two (2) Family
P
c.
Multifamily
P
4.
Family Day Care Homes
P
5.
Home -Based Cottage Food Operation
AP
6.
Home Occupation Business
P
7.
Joint Living/Working Quarters
M
8.
Model Homes
MT
9.
Residential Health Care Facility
C
10.
Residential Service/Care Home
C
11.
Second Unit
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 78
N
0
O
N
N
Y
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
r
N
CO
r
Page 5 of 53
12.
Supportive Housing
C
13.
Transitional Housing
C
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Community Assembly
C
2.
Heliport/Helipad
C
3.
Museums, Private
M
4.
Parks, Public and Private
C
5.
Public Parking Facilities
P
6.
Public Services, General
P
7.
Public Services, Specific
a.
Flood Control Facilities
P
b.
Paramedic and Ambulance Dispatch
M
c.
Park and Ride Lots
M
d.
Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
e.
Utility Substations
C
8.
Schools, Public and Private
a
Private Primary and Secondary Schools
C
b.
Public Primary and Secondary Schools
C
9.
Small Wind Energy System
P
10.
Wireless Communication Facilities
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet
C
b.
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet
M
c.
Flush -Mounted
M
d.
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facilitv on all property other than City right -of -
13.c
Packet Pg. 79
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
r
M
r
Page 6 of 53
1 Unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.35.020 Mixed Use Neighborhood (MXN) Zone
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where a "T" appears; an
administrative permit is required where the symbol "AP" appears; and a hillside development
review is required where an "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited use in this
zone. The Director may deem additional uses to be permitted based on a finding that the use is
similar in nature and operation to the permitted uses listed in this subsection, in accordance with
Chapter 17_04 (Interpretations). Land use descriptions are contained in Division 5 of this title
(Use Classifications and Required Parking). Parking requirements for mixed uses shall be subject
to Section 17.55.050 (Parking Requirements).
13.c
Packet Pg. 80
N
0
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
r
CO
r
way:
i. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant
P
to Section 17.69.030.F.
ii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a
M
Minor Use Permit.
iii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a
Conditional Use Permit, consisting of less than a 50%
cumulative expansion.
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F and was originallv approved as a
Conditional Use Permit, consisting of greater than a
50% cumulative expansion.
e.
Wireless communications Facilities within Citv Right-of-Wav
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of any residential use or zones
X
ii. hi excess of 250 feet from anv residential use or zone
AP
1 Unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.35.020 Mixed Use Neighborhood (MXN) Zone
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where a "T" appears; an
administrative permit is required where the symbol "AP" appears; and a hillside development
review is required where an "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited use in this
zone. The Director may deem additional uses to be permitted based on a finding that the use is
similar in nature and operation to the permitted uses listed in this subsection, in accordance with
Chapter 17_04 (Interpretations). Land use descriptions are contained in Division 5 of this title
(Use Classifications and Required Parking). Parking requirements for mixed uses shall be subject
to Section 17.55.050 (Parking Requirements).
13.c
Packet Pg. 80
N
0
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
r
CO
r
Page 7 of 53
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Community Care Facility
C
3.
Dwelling
a.
Single -Family
P
b.
Two (2) Family
P
c.
Multifamily
P
4.
Family Day Care Homes
P
5.
Home -Based Cottage Food Operation
AP
6.
Home Occupation Business
P
7.
Joint Living/Working Quarters
M
8.
Model Homes
MT
9.
Residential Health Care Facility
C
10.
Residential Service/Care Home
C
11.
Second Unit
P
12.
Supportive Housing
C
13.
Transitional Housing
C
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Community Assembly
C
2.
Heliport/Helipad
C
3.
Museums, Private
M
4.
Parks, Public and Private
C
5.
Public Parking Facilities
P
6.
Public Services, General
P
7.
Public Services, Specific
13.c
Packet Pg. 81
N
0
O
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
co
Page 8 of 53
13.c
Packet Pg. 82
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
r
CO
r
a.
Flood Control Facilities
P
b.
Paramedic and Ambulance Dispatch
M
c.
Park and Ride Lots
M
d.
Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
e.
Utility Substations
C
8.
Schools, Public and Private
a.
Private Primary and Secondary Schools
C
b.
Public Primary and Secondary Schools
C
9.
Small Wind Energy System
P
10.
Wireless Communication Facilities
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet
C
b.
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet
M
c.
Flush -Mounted
M
d-
Ce-lesabed
114
d.
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facilitv on all property other than Citv right-of-
way:
iv. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant
P
to Section 17.69.030.F.
V. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a
M
Minor Use Permit.
vi. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a
M
C
Conditional Use Permit, consisting of less than a 50%
cumulative expansion.
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a
Conditional Use Permit, consistingof greater than a 50%
13.c
Packet Pg. 82
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
r
CO
r
Page 9 of 53
1 Unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.35.030 Mixed Use Urban Village (MXUV) Zone
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where a "T" appears; an
administrative permit is required where the symbol "AP" appears; and a hillside development
review is required where an "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited use in this
zone. The Director may deem additional uses to be permitted based on a finding that the use is
similar in nature and operation to the permitted uses listed in this subsection, in accordance with
Chapter 17.04 (Interpretations). Land use descriptions are contained in Division 5 of this title
(Use Classifications and Required Parking). Parking requirements for mixed uses shall be subject
to Section 17.55.050 (Parking Requirements).
Residential Use Types
1.
cumulative expansion.
P
2.
e.
Wireless communications Facilities within the Citv Right -of -Way
3.
Dwelling
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of anv residential use or zones
X
Single -Family
P
ii. In excess of 250 feet from any residential use or zone
AP
1 Unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.35.030 Mixed Use Urban Village (MXUV) Zone
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where a "T" appears; an
administrative permit is required where the symbol "AP" appears; and a hillside development
review is required where an "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited use in this
zone. The Director may deem additional uses to be permitted based on a finding that the use is
similar in nature and operation to the permitted uses listed in this subsection, in accordance with
Chapter 17.04 (Interpretations). Land use descriptions are contained in Division 5 of this title
(Use Classifications and Required Parking). Parking requirements for mixed uses shall be subject
to Section 17.55.050 (Parking Requirements).
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Community Care Facility
C
3.
Dwelling
a.
Single -Family
P
b.
Two (2) Family
P
c.
Multifamily
P
4.
Family Day Care Homes
P
5.
Home -Based Cottage Food Operation
AP
6.
Home Occupation Business
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 83
N
O
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
N
N
CO
Page 10 of 53
7.
Joint Living/Working Quarters
M
8.
Model Homes
MT
9.
Residential Health Care Facility
C
10.
Residential Service/Care Home
C
11.
Second Unit
P
12.
Supportive Housing
C
13.
Transitional Housing
C
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Community Assembly
C
2.
Heliport/Helipad
C
3.
Museums, Private
M
4.
Parks, Public and Private
C
5.
Public Parking Facilities
P
6.
Public Services, General
P
7.
Public Services, Specific
a.
Flood Control Facilities
P
b.
Paramedic and Ambulance Dispatch
M
c.
Park and Ride Lots
M
d.
Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
e.
Utility Substations
C
8.
Schools, Public and Private
a
Private Primary and Secondary Schools
C
b.
Public Primary and Secondary Schools
C
9.
Small Wind Energy System
P
10.
Wireless Communication Facilities
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet
C
13.c
Packet Pg. 84
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
N
M
r
13.c
Page 11 of 53
N
0
N
.4
C
CW
C
C
W
E
U
D
r
N
Co
r
i Unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.36.010 Open Space (OS) Zone.
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where the symbol "T"
appears; an administrative permit is required where an "AP" appears; and a hillside development
review is required where the symbol "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited
Packet Pg. 85
b.
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet
M
c.
Flush -Mounted
M
d-
Ce-lesa4pd
114
d.
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facility on all property other than Citv right-of-
way.
i. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant to
P
Section 17.69.030.F.
ii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.030.F and was originallv approved as a Minor Use
M
Permit.
iii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.030.F and was originallv approved as a Conditional
M
C
Use Permit, consisting of less than a 50% cumulative
expansion.
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a
Conditional Use Permit, consistingof greater than a 50%
cumulative expansion.
e.
Wireless communications Facilities within City Right -of -Way
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of anv residential use or zones
X
ii. In excess of 250 feet from anv residential use or zone
AP
N
0
N
.4
C
CW
C
C
W
E
U
D
r
N
Co
r
i Unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.36.010 Open Space (OS) Zone.
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where the symbol "T"
appears; an administrative permit is required where an "AP" appears; and a hillside development
review is required where the symbol "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited
Packet Pg. 85
Page 12 of 53
use in this zone. Land use descriptions and parking requirements are contained in Division 5 of
this title (Use Classifications and Required Parking).
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Dwelling Single -Family
P
3.
Home -Based Cottage Food Operation
AP
4.
Home Occupation Business
P
5.
Family Day Care Homes Adult
P
6.
Family Day Care Homes Family
P
7.
Residential Service/Care Home
P
8.
Second Units
P
9.
Supportive Housing
P
10.
Transitional Housing
P
Commercial Use Types
1.
Animal Sales and Services Animal Menagerie
C
2.
Animal Sales and Services Animal Shelter
C
3.
Animal Sales and Services Riding Academies
C
4.
Animal Sales and Services Commercial Stables
C
5.
Funeral Home
C
6.
Recreation, Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
C
7.
Recreation, Commercial Recreation Facilities
C
8.
Recreation, Commercial Residential Recreation Facilities
C
9r,
RV Park/Campground
C
13.c
Packet Pg. 86
N
0
N
N
N
Y
C�
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
N
N
co
r
Page 13 of 53
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Heliport/Helipad
C
2.
Museums, Private Historic Site
P
3.
Parks, Private
C
4.
Parks, Public
P
5.
Public Services, General
C
6.
Public Services, Specific Ambulance and Paramedic Station
C
7.
Public Services, Specific Cemeteries
C
8.
Public Services, Specific Flood Control Facilities
P
9.
Public Services, Specific Park and Ride Lots
C
10.
Public Services, Specific Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
11.
Public Services, Specific Utility Substations
C
12.
Public Primary or Secondary Schools
P
13.
Small Wind Energy System
P
14.
Wireless Communications Facilites
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
C
L
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
RC
c.
Flush -Mounted
C
E
d.
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facility on all provertv other than Citv ri ht-of-wa :
i. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F.
ii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
P
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Minor Use
M
Permit.
iii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional Use
M
13.c
Packet Pg. 87
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
C
w
E
U
D
r
M
r
Page 14 of 53
13.c
Packet Pg. 88
N
0
N
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
CO
r
Permit, consisting of less than a 50% cumulative expansion.
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional Use
C
Permit, consisting of greater than a 50% cumulative
expansion.
e.
Wireless communications Facilities within Cit Ri t-of-Wa
X
AP
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of anv residential use or zones
ii. In excess of 250 feet from any residential use or zone
15.
Zoos Zoo
C
16.
Zoos Petting Zoo
C
Agricultural Use Types
1.
Horticulture Residential Use Only
P
2.
Horticulture For Commercial Sale
P
3.
Horticulture Within Public Utility Easements
P
4.
Farmer's Markets
P
5.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—One (1) to Three (3) Beehives
P
6.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—Four (4) or More Beehives
P
7.
Keeping of Animals Large Animals
P
8.
Keeping of Animals Small Animals
P
9.
Keeping of Animals Wild, Exotic or Nondomestic Animals
P
10
Keeping of Animals for Educational Purposes Large or Small Animals
P
11.
Riding Trails
P
12.
Wildlife Preserves/Sanctuaries
P
13.
Holiday Sales
T
14.
Temporary Uses in Accordance with This Code
T
Accessory Structures and Uses Use Types
1.
Accessory Structures
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 88
N
0
N
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
CO
r
13.c
Page 15 of 53
2.
Accessory Uses
P
3.
Incidental Services for Employees
P
4.
Live Entertainment
M
Development Activities/Miscellaneous Use Types
1.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Less Than Ten Percent (10%)
P
2.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Ten Percent (10%) to Fifteen
Percent (15%)
H
3.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Greater Than Fifteen Percent
(15%)
H
4.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) One Hundred (100) to One Thousand
Five Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
H
5.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) Greater Than One Thousand Five
Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
H
6.
Transportation of Earth Less Than Ten Thousand (10,000) Cubic Yards
P
7.
Transportation of Earth Ten Thousand (10,000) to One Hundred
Thousand (100,000) Cubic Yards
M
8.
Transportation of Earth Greater Than One Hundred Thousand
(100,000) Cubic Yards
C
9.
Railroad Rights -of -Way Operational Activities
P
10.
Railroad Rights -of -Way Accessory Activities/Uses
P
N
0
O
N
Y
C�
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
co
1 Unless location of a facilitv on private provertv is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in Coverage.
17.36.020 Open Space—Agriculture (OS -A) Zone.
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
Packet Pg. 89
Page 16 of 53
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where the symbol "T"
appears; an administrative permit is required where an "AP" appears; and a hillside development
permit is required where the symbol "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited
use in this zone. Land use descriptions and parking requirements are contained in Division 5 of
this title (Use Classifications and Required Parking).
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Dwelling Single -Family
P
3.
Home -Based Cottage Food Operation
AP
4.
Home Occupation Business
P
5.
Family Day Care Homes Adult
P
6.
Family Day Care Family
P
7.
Residential Service/Care Home
P
8.
Second Units
P
9.
Supportive Housing
P
10.
Transitional Housing
P
Commercial Use Types
1.
Animal Sales and Services Riding Academies
C
2.
Animal Sales and Services Commercial Stables
C
3.
Recreation, Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
C
4.
Recreation, Commercial Recreation Facilities
C
5.
Recreation, Commercial Residential Recreation Facilities
C
6.
RV Park/Campground
C
Industrial Use Types
1.
Studios, Recording Movie
C
13.c
Packet Pg. 90
N
0
N
N
N
Y
C�
C
C�
C
U
0
N
N
co
r
Page 17 of 53
2.
Studios, Recording Music
C
3.
Studios, Recording Radio
C
4.
Studios, Recording Television
C
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Heliport/Helipad
C
2.
Museums, Private Historic Site
P
3.
Parks, Private
C
4.
Parks, Public
P
5.
Public Services, General
C
6.
Public Services, Specific Flood Control Facilities
P
7.
Public Services, Specific Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
8.
Public Services, Specific Utility Substations
C
9.
Small Wind Energy System
P
10.
Wireless Communications Facilities
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
C
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
RC
c.
Flush -Mounted
C
E
I
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facilitv on all Proyettv other than Citv ri t-of-wa :
i. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F.
ii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
P
17.69.0301 and was originally approved as a Minor Use
M
Permit.
iii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.0301 and was originally approved as a Conditional
M
Use Permit, consisting of less than a 50% cumulative
13.c
Packet Pg. 91
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
C
w
E
U
D
r
CO
r
Page 18 of 53
13.c
Packet Pg. 92
N
0
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
CO
r
expansion.
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
C
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional
Use Permit, consisting of greater than a 50% cumulative
expansion.
L
Wireless communications Facilities within Citv Ri t-of-Wa
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of anv residential use or zones
X
AP
ii. In excess of 250 feet from anv residential use or zone
11.
Zoos—Zoo
C
12.
Zoos—Petting Zoo
C
Agricultural Use Types
1.
Horticulture Residential Use Only
P
2.
Horticulture For Commercial Sale
P
3.
Horticulture Within Public Utility Easements
P
4.
Farmer's Markets
P
5.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—One (1) to Three (3) Beehives
P
6.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—Four (4) or More Beehives
P
7.
Keeping of Animals Large Animals
P
8.
Keeping of Animals Small Animals
P
9.
Keeping of Animals Wild, Exotic or Nondomestic Animals
P
10
Keeping of Animals for Educational Purposes Large or Small Animals
P
11.
Riding Trails
P
12.
Wildlife Preserves/Sanctuaries
P
Accessory Structures and Uses Use Types
I.
Accessory Structures
P
2.
Accessory Uses
P
3.
Incidental Services for Employees
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 92
N
0
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
CO
r
13.c
Page 19 of 53
4.
Live Entertainment
M
5.
Shared Water Well
C
Development Activities/Miscellaneous Use Types
1.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Less Than Ten Percent (10%)
P
2.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Ten Percent (10%) to Fifteen
Percent (15%)
H
3.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Greater Than Fifteen Percent
(15%)
H
4.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) One Hundred (100) to One Thousand
Five Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
H
5.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) Greater Than One Thousand Five
Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
H
6.
Transportation of Earth Less Than Ten Thousand (10,000) Cubic Yards
P
7.
Transportation of Earth Ten Thousand (10,000) to One Hundred
Thousand (100,000) Cubic Yards
M
8.
Transportation of Earth Greater Than One Hundred Thousand
(100,000) Cubic Yards
C
9.
Railroad Rights -of -Way Operational Activities
P
10.
Railroad Rights -of -Way Accessory Activities/Uses
P
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
co
1 Unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.36.030 Open Space National Forest (OS -NF) Zone.
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where the symbol "T"
appears; an administrative permit is required where an "AP" appears: and a hillside development
Packet Pg. 93
Page 20 of 53
review is required where the symbol "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited
use in this zone. Land use descriptions and parking requirements are contained in Division 5 of
this title (Use Classifications and Required Parking).
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Dwelling Single -Family
P
3.
Family Day Care Homes Adult
P
4.
Family Day Care Homes Family
P
5.
Residential Service/Care Home
P
6.
Second Units
P
7.
Supportive Housing
P
8.
Transitional Housing
P
Commercial Use Types
1.
Animal Sales and Services Riding Academies
C
2.
Animal Sales and Services Commercial Stables
C
3.
Recreation, Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
C
4.
Recreation, Commercial Recreation Facilities
C
5.
Recreation, Commercial Residential Recreation Facilities
C
6.
RV Park/Campground
C
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Heliport/Helipad
C
2.
Museums, Private Historic Site
P
3.
Parks, Private
C
4.
Parks, Public
P
5.
Public Services, General
C
6.
Public Services, Specific Flood Control Facilities
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 94
N
0
N
Y
C�
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
r
N
co
r
Page 21 of 53
7.
Public Services, Specific Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
8.
Public Services, Specific Utility Substations
C
9.
Small Wind Energy System
P
10.
Wireless communications Facilities
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
C
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
PC
c.
Flush -Mounted
C
b
e.
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facilitv on all Provertv other than Citv ri t-of-wa :
i. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F.
ii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
P
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Minor Use
M
Permit.
iii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional Use
M
Permit, consisting of less than a 50% cumulative expansion.
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional Use
C
Permit, consisting of greater than a 50% cumulative expansion.
Wireless communications Facilities within Citv Right -of -Way
X
AP
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of any residential use or zones
ii. In excess of 250 feet from anv residential use or zone
11.
Zoos—Zoo
C
12.
Zoos—Petting Zoo
C
Agricultural Use Types
1.
Horticulture Residential Use Only
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 95
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
C
w
E
U
D
7
r
M
r
Page 22 of 53
2.
Horticulture For Commercial Sale
P
3.
Horticulture Within Public Utility Easements
P
4.
Farmer's Markets
P
5.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—One (1) to Three (3) Beehives
P
6.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—Four (4) or More Beehives
P
7.
Keeping of Animals Large Animals
P
8.
Keeping of Animals Small Animals
P
9.
Keeping of Animals Wild, Exotic or Nondomestic Animals
P
10.
Keeping of Animals for Educational Purposes Large or Small Animals
P
11.
Riding Trails
P
12.
Wildlife Preserves/Sanctuaries
P
Accessory Structures and Uses Use Types
1.
Accessory Structures
P
2.
Accessory Uses
P
3.
Incidental Services for Employees
P
4.
Live Entertainment
M
5.
Shared Water Well
C
Development Activities/Miscellaneous Use Types
1.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Less Than Ten Percent (10%)
P
2.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Ten Percent (10%) to Fifteen
Percent (15%)
P
3.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Greater Than Fifteen Percent
(15%)
P
4.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) One Hundred (100) to One Thousand Five
Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
P
5.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 96
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
r
co
r
Page 23 of 53
1 Unless location of a facilitv on private provertv is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.36.040 Open Space Bureau of Land Management (OS-BLM) Zone.
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where the symbol "T"
appears; an administrative permit is required where an "AP" appears: and a hillside development
review is required where the symbol "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited
use in this zone. Land use descriptions and parking requirements are contained in Division 5 of
this title (Use Classifications and Required Parking).
Residential Use Types
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) Greater Than One Thousand Five
Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
Caretaker's Residence
6.
Transportation of Earth Less Than Ten Thousand (10,000) Cubic Yards
P
7.
Transportation of Earth Ten Thousand (10,000) to One Hundred
Thousand (100,000) Cubic Yards
M
8.
Transportation of Earth Greater Than One Hundred Thousand (100,000)
Cubic Yards
C
9.
Railroad Rights-of-Way—Operational Activities
P
Wo,
Railroad Rights-of-Way—Accessory Activities/Uses
P
1 Unless location of a facilitv on private provertv is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.36.040 Open Space Bureau of Land Management (OS-BLM) Zone.
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where the symbol "T"
appears; an administrative permit is required where an "AP" appears: and a hillside development
review is required where the symbol "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited
use in this zone. Land use descriptions and parking requirements are contained in Division 5 of
this title (Use Classifications and Required Parking).
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Dwelling Single -Family
P
3.
Family Day Care Homes Adult
P
4.
Family Day Care Homes Family
P
5.
Residential Service/Care Home
P
6.
Second Units
P
7.
Supportive Housing
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 97
N
0
N
Y
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
r
N
co
r
Page 24 of 53
8.
Transitional Housing
P
Commercial Use Types
1.
Animal Sales and Services Riding Academies
C
2.
Animal Sales and Services Commercial Stables
C
3.
Recreation, Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
C
4.
Recreation, Commercial Recreation Facilities
C
5.
Recreation, Commercial Residential Recreation Facilities
C
6.
RV Park/Campground
C
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Heliport/Helipad
C
2.
Museums, Private Historic Site
P
3.
Parks, Private
C
4.
Parks, Public
P
5.
Public Services, General
C
6.
Public Services, Specific Flood Control Facilities
P
7.
Public Services, Specific Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
8.
Public Services, Specific Utility Substations
C
9.
Small Wind Energy System
P
10.
Wireless communications Facilities
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
C
K.
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
K
Lc
Flush -Mounted
C
d-
Go laeeAed
E
d.
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facility on all property other than City right-of-way:
i. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant to
13.c
Packet Pg. 98
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
r
N
CO
r
Page 25 of 53
13.c
Packet Pg. 99
N
0
O
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
CO
r
Section 17.69.030.F.
ii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
P
17.69.0301 and was originally approved as a Minor Use
M
Permit.
iii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.0301 and was originallv approved as a Conditional Use
M
Permit, consisting of less than a 50% cumulative expansion.
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional Use
C
Permit, consisting of greater than a 50% cumulative expansion.
e.
Wireless communications Facilities within Citv Ri t-of-Wa
X
AP
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of anv residential use or zones
ii. In excess of 250 feet from anv residential use or zone
11.1zoos
Zoo
C
12.
oos Petting Zoo
C
Agricultural Use Types
1.
Horticulture Residential Use Only
P
2.
Horticulture For Commercial Sale
P
3.
Horticulture Within Public Utility Easements
P
4.
Farmer's Markets
P
5.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—One (1) to Three (3) Beehives
P
6.
Keeping of Animals—Beehives—Four (4) or More Beehives
P
7.
Keeping of Animals Large Animals
P
8.
Keeping of Animals Small Animals
P
9.
Keeping of Animals Wild, Exotic or Nondomestic Animals
P
10.
Keeping of Animals for Educational Purposes Large or Small Animals
P
11.
Riding Trails
P
12.
Wildlife Preserves/Sanctuaries
P
13.c
Packet Pg. 99
N
0
O
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
CO
r
Page 26 of 53
Accessory Structures and Uses Use Types
1.
Accessory Structures
P
2.
Accessory Uses
P
3.
Incidental Services for Employees
P
4.
Live Entertainment
M
5.
Shared Water Well
C
Development Activities/Miscellaneous Use Types
1.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Less Than Ten Percent (10%)
P
2.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Ten Percent (10%) to Fifteen
Percent (15%)
H
3.
Development Activity on Natural Slopes Greater Than Fifteen Percent
(15%)
H
4.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) One Hundred (100) to One Thousand Five
Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
H
5.
Grading Cut and Fill, or Any Combination Thereof, on Natural Slopes
Exceeding Ten Percent (10%) Greater Than One Thousand Five
Hundred (1,500) Cubic Yards
H
6.
Transportation of Earth Less Than Ten Thousand (10,000) Cubic Yards
P
7.
Transportation of Earth Ten Thousand (10,000) to One Hundred
Thousand (100,000) Cubic Yards
M
8.
Transportation of Earth Greater Than One Hundred Thousand (100,000)
Cubic Yards
C
9.
Railroad Rights-of-Way—Operational Activities
P
10,
Railroad Rights-of-Way—Accessory Activities/Uses
P
13.c
N
r
0
N
Y
C�
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
r
N
co
Packet Pg. 100
Page 27 of 53
1 Unless location of a facility on private provertv is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.37.020 Public/Institutional (PI) Zone.
B. Permitted Uses. The following uses shall be permitted where the symbol "P" appears; a
minor use permit is required where the symbol "M" appears; a conditional use permit is required
where the symbol "C" appears; a temporary use permit is required where the symbol "T"
appears: an administrative permit is required where an "AP" appears: and a hillside development
review is required where the symbol "H" appears. Any use not listed is considered a prohibited
use in this zone. Land use descriptions and parking requirements are contained in Division 5 of
this title (Use Classifications and Required Parking):
Residential Use Types
1.
Caretaker's Residence
P
2.
Dwelling Single -Family
P
3.
Family Day Care Homes Adult
P
4.
Family Day Care Family
P
5.
Fraternity/Sorority Houses
C
6.
Residential Service/Care Home
P
7.
Second Units
P
8.
Supportive Housing
P
9.
Transitional Housing
P
Commercial Use Types
1.
Aircraft Services Airport
C
2.
Aircraft Services Heliport
C
3.
Animal Sales and Services Kennels
M
4.
Animal Sales and Services Animal Shelter
M
5.
Animal Sales and Services Riding Academies
C
6.
Animal Sales and Services Commercial Stables
C
13.c
N
0
N
Y
E
a
c
E
U
D
r
N
CO
r
Packet Pg. 101
Page 28 of 53
7.
Day Care Centers
P
8.
Medical Services
P
9.
Recreation, Commercial Indoor Entertainment
C
10.
Recreation, Commercial Indoor Sports and Recreation
C
11.
Recreation, Commercial Outdoor Entertainment
C
12.
Recreation, Commercial Outdoor Sports and Recreation
C
13.
Recreation, Commercial Recreation Facilities
P
14.
Recreation, Commercial Residential Recreation Facilities
C
15.
Schools, Specialized Vocational Schools
C
16.
Schools, Specialized Instructional Schools
C
17.
Vehicle Sales and Services Fuel Sales
M
18.
Vehicle Sales and Services Repair and/or Maintenance
M
Industrial Use Types
1.
Landfill
C
2.
Recycling Materials Recovery Facility
C
Public and Semi -Public Use Types
1.
Airports
C
2.
Community Assembly Churches, Temples, Synagogues and Other Places
of Worship
C
3.
Community Assembly Public and Private Nonprofit Clubs, Lodges,
Fraternal Organizations and Meeting Halls
C
4.
Community Assembly Community Centers
P
5.
Helipad
C
6.
Homeless Shelters
P
7.
Hospital Services
C
8.
Museums, Private
M
13.c
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
r
M
r
Packet Pg. 102
Page 29 of 53
9.
Parks, Private
C
10.
Parks, Public
P
11.
Public Parking Facilities
P
12.
Public Services, General
P
13.
Public Services, Specific Ambulance and Paramedic Station
P
14.
Public Services, Specific Cemeteries
C
15.
Public Services, Specific Corporation Yards
P
16.
Public Services, Specific Flood Control Facilities
P
17.
Public Services, Specific Incarceration Facilities
C
18.
Public Services, Specific Park and Ride Lots
P
19.
Public Services, Specific Preservation of Historic Landmarks
P
20.
Public Services, Specific Utility Substations
C
21.
Rehabilitation Facility
M
22.
Schools, Public or Private College or University
C
23.
Schools, Public or Private Private Primary or Secondary Schools
C
24.
Schools, Public or Private Public Primary or Secondary Schools
P
25.
Small Wind Energy System
P
26.
Wireless communications Facilities
a.
Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
C
b.
Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
gC
c.
Flush -Mounted
C
Ice laeeAed
E
I
Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless
communications facilitv on all Provertv other than Citv ri t-of-wa :
i. That does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant to
Section 17.69.030.F.
ii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
P
13.c
N
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
C
w
E
U
D
r
CO
r
Packet Pg. 103
13.c
Page 30 of 53
1 Unless location of a facility on private provertv is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.42.010 Residential Use Types.
9. Model Homes
Parking
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Minor Use
M
Section 17.67.030.0 (Temporary Uses).
NU1
Permit.
iii. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
NU3
NU4
NU5
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional Use
M
UR3
UR4
Permit, consisting of less than a 50% cumulative expansion.
CR
CC
CN
iv. That constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section
I
MT
`114
17.69.030.F and was originally approved as a Conditional Use
C
TM
TM
Permit, consisting of greater than a 50% cumulative expansion.
Tl4
TM
e.
Wireless communications Facilities within Citv Right -of -Way
X
AP
TM
i. Between 0 and 250 feet of anv residential use or zones
ii. In excess of 250 feet from anv residential use or zone
32.
Koos—zoo
C
33.
oos Petting Zoo
C
1 Unless location of a facility on private provertv is not feasible to address a demonstrated
significant gap in coverage.
17.42.010 Residential Use Types.
9. Model Homes
Parking
Includes dwellings initially constructed for the purposes of displaying
the different housing models offered for sale within a residential
development. Model Homes shall be developed in accordance with
3 spaces per model
Section 17.67.030.0 (Temporary Uses).
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
MT
`114
TM
TM
TM
TM
Ti14
Tl4
TM
TM
TM
TM
TM
X
X
17.43.010 Commercial Use Types
11. Hookah Bar/Cigar Club
Parking
Includes establishments that are primarily engaged in the on-site
Feefeatieaa4-use of tebaeee-smokingproducts.
1 space per 250 square
feet
N
0
O
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
r
N
CO
r
Packet Pg. 104
13.c
Page 31 of 53
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
URI
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
C
C
X
X
X
14. Medical Marijuana Dispensary
Parking
Shall mean any site, facility, location, use, cooperative or business,
N/A
including vending machines, which distributes, sells, exchanges,
X
processes, delivers, gives away, or cultivates marijuana for medical
X
purposes to qualified patients, health care providers, patients' primary
X
caregivers, or physicians. "Marijuana" shall also mean cannabis and all
X
parts of that plant. This shall include mobile delivery services.
X
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NUS
URl
UR2
UR3
UR4
URS
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
23. Schools, Specialized
b. Instructional Schools includes specialized non degree ,...,.*6 ff .
1 space per 200 square
schools that provide instructional classes in areas including, but not
feet of instructional area
limited to, music, martial arts, dance, gymnastics, language, and -tutoring
(dance floor,
and scholastic instruction. Includes facilities that focus on the physical
aerobic/martial arts
and mental development of early childhood through the use of exercise
instruction, classroom
equipment, toys, music and other age-appropriate stimuli. This use type
area, etc.); plus 1 space
does not include health clubs or similar uses where initial instruction is
per 250 square feet of
given and then members/participants are free to participate and/or utilize
office floor area, plus
the facility's equipment outside of an instructional class.
required parking for
additional uses on site
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
URI
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CCCN
BP
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
M
M
M
M
M
17.45 Public and Semi -Public Use Types
13. Wireless Communication Facilities
Parking
Includes commercial and private electromagnetic and photoelectric
As determined by
transmission, broadcast, repeater and receiving stations for radio, television,
the Director
telegraph, telephone, cellular telephone, microwave communications and
N
0
N
Y
E
a
c
E
U
D
r
CO
r
Packet Pg. 105
13.c
Page 32 of 53
data network communications; including commercial earth stations for
satellite -based communications. Includes antennas (dish and satellite),
telecommunication towers, monopoles and equipment buildings. Wireless
communication facilities shall be in accordance with Chapter 17.69 (Wireless
Communications Facilities and Satellite Dish Antennas). Does not include
accessory structures, including home television and radio receiving antennas,
ham radio antennas, residential satellite dishes in accordance with Chapter
17.69 (Wireless Communications Facilities and Satellite Dish Antennas), and
communications facilities for community services provided by a public
agency.
a. Above Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
b. Up to Thirty -Five (35) Feet in Height
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
M
M
M
M
M
c. Flush -Mounted
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
M
M
M
M
M
sit'_
NUI
NU2
NU3
NU4
N1�5
URI
UR2
UR3
UR4
U#5
GR
CG
C—N
1P
4
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
114
M
114
114
M
d. Co -location or modification to an existing approved wireless communications facilitv on all
property other than Citv right-of-wav that:
i. Does not constitute a "substantial change" pursuant to Section 17.69.030. F.
NUl
NU2
NU3
NU4
NUS
URl
UR2
UR3
UR4
URS
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
N
0
N
N
N
c
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
N
N
CO
r
Packet Pg. 106
Page 33 of 53
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
ii. Constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section 17.69.0301 and was originally
approved as a Minor Use Permit.
NUl
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
iii. Constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section 17.69.030.F and was originallv
approved as a Conditional Use Permit, consisting of less than a 50% cumulative expansion.
NUl
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
iv. Constitutes a "substantial change" pursuant to Section 17.69.030.F and was originally
approved as a Conditional Use Permit, consisting of greater than a 50% cumulative
expansion.
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
e. Within the City Ripht-2LWay
i. New or modification to existing wireless communications facility between 0 and 250 feet
of anv residential use or zone
NU1
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
ii.New or modification to existing wireless communications facility in excess of 250 feet from
anv residential use or zone
NUl
NU2
NU3
NU4
NU5
UR1
UR2
UR3
UR4
UR5
CR
CC
CN
BP
I
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
17.51.030 Landscaping and Irrigation Standards.
Subsections:
A. Purpose.
13.c
N
0
N
Y
C�
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
r
N
CO
r
Packet Pg. 107
13.c
Page 34 of 53
B. Applicability.
C. Landscape Standards
D. Tree Retention.
N
EE. Maintenance of Landscaping. N
A. Purpose. The specific purpose of this section is to: c
w
E
1. Encourage quality landscape designs;
E
2. Enhance the appearance of all development by requiring the design, o
installation, and proper maintenance of landscaping and by providing standards
r
relating to the quality, quantity, and functional aspects of landscaping and M
landscape screening; N
3. Conserve energy by the provision of shade trees over streets, sidewalks,
parking areas and other paving;
4. Ensure that new landscaping would be consistent with any applicable design
guidelines and that important resources (e.g., specimen trees and oak trees) are
retained;
5. Protect public health, safety, and welfare by minimizing the impact of various
forms of physical and visual pollution, controlling soil erosion, screening
incompatible land uses, preserving the integrity of existing residential
neighborhoods, and enhancing pedestrian and vehicular traffic and safety;
6. Encourage the protection of landmark, native, and specimen trees;
7. Encourage the efficient use of water through appropriate low -water -using plant
materials, water conserving irrigation design, and regular maintenance of
landscaped areas;
8. Encourage the appropriate design, installation, maintenance, and management
of landscapes so that water demand can be decreased, runoff can be retained, and
flooding can be reduced without a decline in the quality or quantity of landscapes;
Packet Pg. 108
Page 35 of 53
13.c
9. Promote the conservation of potable water by maximizing the use of recycled
water and other water conserving technology for appropriate applications; and
10. Adopt and conform to the State mandated Model watefWater ef€teie
landseap H4 to
Government Code Section 65595 and as published at the 23 California Code of
Regulations 490, et seq.
B. Applicability.
1. All projects that require approval of either an administrative land use permit or
a discretionary land use permit shall provide and maintain landscape in compliance
with the provisions of this section. Applicants for such projects shall submit
landscape and irrigation plans per Section 17.23.150 (Landscape Plan Review).
2. in ..A� All projects that require landscape and irrigation plan review as
required by he Model Wwater Eefficient Llandscape Ordinance
apply to the felle s
Sections 490, et seq. Applicants for such projects shall submit landscape and
irrigation plans compliant with the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance.
N
0
N
In
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
r
N
co
Packet Pg. 109
Page 36 of 53
13.c
C. Landscape Standards. Landscape areas and materials for commercial, industrial, hillside,
mixed use and multifamily projects shall be designed, installed, and properly maintained in
compliance with the following requirements:
3. Artificial or Synthetic Turf. Any use of artificial or synthetic turf is permitted as a Class I
annlication.
The use of artificial and synthetic turf may count towards required
landscaping as long as it does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the required landscaping. The
installation and type of requirements shall meet the requirements as listed in this section, unless
otherwise approved by the Director.
6. Standards for Single -Family Residential Development. Each single-family residential project
shall be landscaped, irrigated, and maintained in compliance with the requirements of this
section.
b. Front Yard Landscape Requirements.
i. For single-family residential areas, a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the
square footage of the front yard area between the principal dwelling unit and the
front public or private street curb, and between the side property lines, must be
Packet Pg. 110
Page 37 of 53
13.c
landscaped with natural plants such as lawns, ground cover, succulents, shrubs,
and trees. See definition of "landscaping" in Section 17.11.020 (Definitions).
ii. No more than one-half (1/2) of the landscaped area may consist of
decorative features such as boulders, river and lava rock, fountains, ponds, rock Lo
0
riverbeds, synthetic turf, pedestrian bridges or other features, as determined by m
Y
the Director, that are consistent with this section. See definition of "landscaping" w
E
in Section 17.11.020 (Definitions). w
E
iii. Mulch maybe used as an integral part of the natural plantings. o
iv. The public sidewalk and driveway aprons are excluded from the landscape N
Co
percentage calculation.
EE. Maintenance of Landscaping.
1. Maintenance Required.
a. Where a landscape plan is required, all installed landscaping shall be permanently
maintained in compliance with this section.
b. Once installed, no landscaping shall be removed, unless it is replaced with
landscaping of a similar design, character, and coverage at maturity, to the satisfaction
of the Director.
Packet Pg. 111
Page 38 of 53
Once installed, no landscaping shall be allowed to die; replacement shall occur in
a timely manner.
d. Once installed in a parking area or adjacent to a commercial building, all tree
pruning activities shall meet the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) pruning
standards. In addition, the property owner shall prune vegetation to maintain vehicle
and pedestrian clearance. No 4fees shall beAll p nruninQ conducted to improve
visibility of adjacent buildings or signage shall be consistent with ISA pruning
standards.
2. Homeowners' associations (HOAs) and assessment districts or other acceptable legal
entities are required in Santa Clarita. All landscaped slopes not included within a landscape
maintenance district (LMD) shall be maintained by an HOA or a property owners'
association (POA) for the permanent maintenance of slopes and other areas. An HOA/POA
should be required to establish a maintenance district with responsibility for landscape
maintenance, should the HOA disband. The City should retain development rights in such a
maintenance district.
3. Maintenance shall consist of regular fertilizing, clearing of debris, trash and weeds,
monitoring for pests and disease, mowing, pruning, the removal and timely replacement of
dead or dying plants, spraying, treating for disease or injury, watering, the repair and
timely replacement of irrigation systems and integrated architectural features, or any other
similar act(s) which promotes growth, health, beauty, and the life of plants, shrubs, trees, or
turf.
4. With the exception of single-family residential units, if atree is pruned to the extent
that is detrimental to the life and health of the tree, as determined by the City arborist, the
property owner is responsible to replace the tree with a similar and comparable tree. (Ord.
13-8 § 4 (Exh. A), 6/11/13)
17.51.080 Sign Regulations (Private Property)
U. Prohibited Signs. The following signs shall be prohibited in all zones:
1. Signs which contain or utilize any of the following:
13.c
N
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
r
N
co
r
Packet Pg. 112
13.c
Page 39 of 53
a. Any exposed light source : a . 'amp i'vith a rated wa#a ge in excess of
fei4 ' 0) w 50 lumens;
b. Any exposed incandescent lamp with an external metallic reflector;
N
r
c. Any revolving beacon light; N
m
Y
d. Any continuous or sequential flashing operation. E
a
c
w
e. Anv electronic readerboard sign or changeable message sign unless otherwise E
approved pursuant to Section 17.51.080.P.8 (Electronic Readerboard Signs). U
0
r
K. Incidental Business Signs. Incidental business signs are permitted in the C, MX, PI, and I CO
zones and for commercial and other nonresidential uses in the R and OS zones subject to the W
following regulations: a
1. Each business establishment may be permitted an incidental business sign provided:
a. The sign is a window �- a'�sign; and
b. The sign does not exceed two (2) square feet in sign area.
2. This provision shall not be interpreted to prohibit the use of similar signs of a larger
size or in greater numbers where otherwise permitted by this code or computed as part of
the sign area permitted for commercial signs provided in this section.
3. Sign Copy. Name of incidental businesses indicating credit cards accepted, trading
stamps offered, trade affiliations, and similar matter may be permitted.
P. Special -Purpose Signs. The following special-purpose signs are permitted as provided in
this subsection:
4. Banner Signs. Banner signs include grand opening banner signs and special event banner
signs of a commercial nature and are permitted in the C, I, MX, and PI zones subject to the
following regulations:
Packet Pg. 113
13.c
Page 40 of 53
R. Temporary Freestanding or TemporaryMounted Signs. Temporary freestanding or
Temporary Mounted Signs are permitted in all zones subject to the following regulations:
1. Number and Time Limits
N
r
a. In the C, MX, PI, I and OS Zones. No temporary freestanding or temporary N
m
mounted commercial signs permitted at any time.
E
a
b. In the R Zone. No temporary freestanding or temporary mounted commercial
signs permitted at any time. ¢
U
D
7
2. Area.
r
N
CO
r
a. In the C, MX, PI, I and OS Zones. A maximum area for each temporary
freestanding or temporary mounted noncommercial sign of thirty-two (32) square feet
and a maximum aggregate area for all temporary freestanding or temporary mounted
w
noncommercial signs on an individual parcel or within a commercial center of two E
hundred (200) square feet is permitted. c
b. In the R Zone. A maximum area for each temporary freestanding or temporary
mounted noncommercial sign of thirty-two (32) square feet and a maximum aggregate
area for all temporary freestanding or temporary mounted noncommercial signs on an
individual parcel of land of one hundred (100) square feet is permitted.
3. Location. Signs may be placed in the front yard or side yard of any property; provided,
that the signs do not encroach into any public right-of-way. Unless otherwise authorized in
this section, temporary signs shall not extend over or into any public right-of-way, street,
alley, sidewalk or other public thoroughfare.
4. Lighting. Signs shall not be lighted.
5. Removal. All temporary freestanding or temporary mounted signs must be removed
within ten (10) days after the event for which they are intended.
6. Sign Copy. Information related to noncommercial use that is advertising a temporary
event may be permitted. Telephone numbers, web addresses, prices and other information
Packet Pg. 114
13.c
Page 41 of 53
which makes the sign appear to be advertisement for a commercial use or purpose are
prohibited.
S. Wall Signs. Wall signs are permitted in the C, MX, PI, and I zones and for commercial and
other nonresidential uses in the R and OS zones subject to the following regulations:
0
N
N
5. Lighting.
E
a
a. In the C, MX, PI, and I zones, wall ��efA signs may be internally or
externally lighted.
U
D
7
17.57.040 Accessory Buildings and Structures
N
CO
L. Second Units. The purpose of this subsection is to provide for the creation of second units, r
pursuant to Section 65852.2 of the Government Code. A second unit is a residential use that is c
w
consistent with the residential zone designations. E
T
A second unit is either a detached or attached dwelling unit, other than the primary unit, that
provides complete independent living facilities for one (1) or more persons. It shall include
permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking (kitchen) and sanitation on the same
parcel on which a primary dwelling unit is situated. A second unit shall be subject to the issuance
of an administrative permit per Section 17.23. 100 (Administrative Permit).
g. Parking. The second unit shall be provided one (1) standard parking space (nine (9) feet by
eighteen (18) feet). The required parking space shall be located on the parcel upon which the
second unit is located and shall "F4 w. lee at d in the feEtuiredF w 1 .hat : appheable t
t48 Prifflflff d @14ffg ....:t 4t4...r@Pe.h_, The parking space may be a tandem space and may be
uncovered. Said parking space shall be surfaced and accessed pursuant to Section 17.51.060(E)
(Parking Standards).
17.57.050 Distance Between Buildings
B. Distance Between Main and Accessory Buildings. With the exception of natio covers, and
except where a greater distance is required by this code, a minimum distance of six (6) feet shall
be required between any main residential building and an accessory building.
17.57.060 Setbacks
Packet Pg. 115
13.c
Page 42 of 53
All setbacks shall meet the requirements of the underlying zone and as shown below in Figure
17.57-3 (Residential Setbacks), unless specifically allowed in this section.
® Key Lot
®
Guesthouse
0 Reversed Comer Lot*
®
Second Unit
0 Comer Lot
®
Covered Patio
® Flag Lot
0
Detached Garage
0 Multi -family Residence
0
Pool
17.65 Home Occupations
17.65.020 Applicability
* 10' - 20' depending upon zone
F. Home crafts, such as model making, rug weaving, quilting and needlework, and wood
working, limited to the uses of tools and equipment commonly available for personal residential
use, b0t..p,.,.:c:,...45,.,.i..a:...,_,...biff.........v:„,_
Packet Pg. 116
13.c
Page 43 of 53
17.65.030 Prohibited Uses
The following businesses shall not be operated out of a home and shall not be permitted by home
Lo
occupation permits: alcohol sales, food preparation (not including home-based cottage food o
N
operations), firearm and ammunition sales and services, on-site massage therapists, hairdressers, 4
C
retail sales, vehicle storage, vehicle sales and vehicle repair, vehicle dispatch (taxis, towing, etc.). E
a
furniture or cabinet making, commercial kennels, commercial stables, breeding facilities and w
E
forensic testing. (Ord. 13-8 § 4 (Exh. A), 6/11/13)
U
D
7
17.65.040 Regulations.
r
N
Co
Subject to approval of a home occupation permit, all home occupation businesses shall conform
to the following requirements: r
A. There shall be no more than one home occupation permitted for each dwelling unit.
B=There shall be no exterior storage of materials in the conduct of a home occupation.
C.H. A home occupation shall be conducted entirely within a dwelling. Materials and goods
incidental to the home occupation shall not be stored, and no permanent work area, work bench
or structure shall be built, within either required ten (10) foot by twenty (20) foot garage parking
area.
IDG. No exterior alterations of the dwellings shall be made which would change the residential
character of the home to accommodate the home occupation.
ED. Electrical or mechanical equipment which creates visible or audible interference in radio
or television receivers or causes fluctuations in line voltage outside the dwelling unit shall be
prohibited.
FH. Only the residents of the dwelling unit maybe engaged in the home occupation.
GE. There shall be no sale of goods on the premises.
H6. The establishment and conduct of a home occupation shall not change the principal
character or use of the dwelling unit involved.
Packet Pg. 117
13.c
Page 44 of 53
111. No signs shall be permitted for home-based businesses.
J1. The required residential off-street parking shall be maintained.
K3. A home occupation shall not create vehicular or pedestrian traffic in excess of that which is Lo
normal for the zone in which itis located. N
m
Y
LK. No vehicles or trailers (including pick-up trucks and vans) or construction or other E
a
equipment, except those normally incidental to residential use, shall be kept on the site.
ML. Vehicle or engine repair shall not be permitted as a home occupation. p
r
NM. Visitation and deliveries incidental to the home occupation shall be limited to the hours of M
seven a.m. to seven p.m. Monday through Friday, eight a.m. to six p.m. Saturdays and Sundays,
and shall not be permitted on holidays.
a
c
OAF. Businesses that incorporate food preparation, firearm sales and alcohol sales are not E
permitted in residential zones and are not permitted by home occupation permits. w
c
a
P9. The home-based business shall cease, and the home occupation permit shall become null
Y
W
and void, when the use becomes detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, or o
constitutes a nuisance, or when the use is in violation of any statute, ordinance, law or regulation.
a
CL
(Y. Additional conditions may be applied as deemed necessary by the Director. (Ord. 13-8 § 4 U
0
(Exh. A), 6/11/13)
Chapter 17.66
OTHER SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
Sections:
17.66.010 Purpose.
17.66.020 Alcohol Sales.
17.66.025 Cottage Food Operations.
17.66.030 Drive -Through Uses.
17.66.040 Electrical and Cogeneration Facilities.
17.66.050 Gating of Access and Roadways.
17.66.060 Hazardous Waste Facilities.
Packet Pg. 118
Page 45 of 53
17.66.070
Homeless Shelters.
17.66.080
Joint Living and Working Quarters.
17.66.090
Kennels.
17.66.100
Long -Term Vendors.
17.66.110
Self -Storage Facilities.
17.66.120
Small Wind Energy Systems.
17.66.130
Solar Panels.
17.66.140
Vehicle Charging Stations (Alternative Fuels)
17.66.140 Vehicle Charging Stations (Alternative Fuels)
Vehicle charging stations (Alternative Fuels) that are free to the public, free of advertising, and
conveniently located. are encouraged in all zones. Vehicle charging stations (Alternative Fuels)
that are free to the public but that offer limited advertising or sponsorships may be approved
through the Sign Review process for enhanced signage provided that:
1. The charging station is located on a privately -owned parcel and not in the public
right-of-way.
2. The gross displav area does not exceed a maximum of 12 square feet per face
with a maximum of two faces.
3. The charging apparatus or kiosk does not exceed 8' in height or a total of 24
square feet per face, including the display area.
4. Onlv the names of up to two (2) sponsoring businesses per face, along with
incidental signage related to the charging station owner, shall be allowed on a
charging station itself.
5. No -cost alternative fuel vehicle charging shall be available at all times while
advertising or sponsorship information is displayed. Should the charging station
become inoperative, sponsorship displays shall be removed within 14 calendar
days.
6. At no time shall individual items or services for sale be displayed.
7. No flashing or moving displays are allowed.
8. The charging apparatus shall be removed within 30 days of permanent cessation
of public charging -
13.c
U)
0
0
N
N
c
w
E
a
C
E
U
D
r
N
CO
r
Packet Pg. 119
13.c
Page 46 of 53
These provisions listed above shall only apply to alternative fuel vehicle charging stations
that are free to the public. Advertising or sponsorship language shall not be allowed for
charging stations that require a fee, subscription, or that otherwise charge for alternative
fuels.
17.69 Wireless Communications Facilities and Satellite Dish Antennas LO
17.69.030 Development Standards (All Property Other Than City Right -Of -Way).
All wireless communication facilities which are installed, erected, or modified following the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter (besides those exempted in Section
17.69.020 (Exemptions)) shall conform to the following requirements:
D. Noise Standards.
1. Within residential zones and properties adiacent to residential zones, sound proofing
measures shall be used to reduce noise caused by the operation of wireless facilities and all
accessory equipment to a level which would have a no -net increase in ambient noise level.
2. All wireless communications facilities and accessory wireless facility equipment shall
comply with the applicable provisions of the City's noise ordinance.
F. Co -locations and modifications on all property other than Citv right-of-way. For the purpose
of proposed co -locations and modifications, a "substantial change" shall mean any of the
following as applied to an existing wireless communications facilitv on all property other than
Citv right-of-way.
Packet Pg. 120
0
N
N
Sections:
17.69.010
Purpose.
a
17.69.020
Exemptions.
c
E
17.69.030
Development Standards (All Propertv Other Than City Right -Of -Way).
o
17.69.035
Development Standards (City Right-Of-Wav).
17.69.040
Abandonment.
r
M
17.69.050
Additional Submittal Requirements.
17.69.060
Satellite Dish Antennas.
w
17.69.030 Development Standards (All Property Other Than City Right -Of -Way).
All wireless communication facilities which are installed, erected, or modified following the
effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter (besides those exempted in Section
17.69.020 (Exemptions)) shall conform to the following requirements:
D. Noise Standards.
1. Within residential zones and properties adiacent to residential zones, sound proofing
measures shall be used to reduce noise caused by the operation of wireless facilities and all
accessory equipment to a level which would have a no -net increase in ambient noise level.
2. All wireless communications facilities and accessory wireless facility equipment shall
comply with the applicable provisions of the City's noise ordinance.
F. Co -locations and modifications on all property other than Citv right-of-way. For the purpose
of proposed co -locations and modifications, a "substantial change" shall mean any of the
following as applied to an existing wireless communications facilitv on all property other than
Citv right-of-way.
Packet Pg. 120
Page 47 of 53
13.c
1. Wireless tower:
a. Height.
i. The nronosed co -location or modification would increase the height by more
than 10% of the height of the existing wireless tower: or
N
ii. The height of one additional antenna array would be more than 20 feet above N
the height of the nearest existing antenna (whichever is greater). .4
C
W
b. Width. E
C
C
i. The proposed co -location or modification would protrude from the edge of the E
tower more than 20 feet; or
U
ii. The proposed co -location or modification would protrude more than the width
of the tower structure at the level of the appurtenance (whichever is greater). N
2. Base Station:
a. Height. The proposed co -location or modification would increase the height of
the base station more than 10% or 10 feet (whichever is greater) above the
originally approved height.
b. Width. The proposed co -location or modification would protrude from the edge
of the originally approved structure by more than six feet.
3. The proposed co -location or modification would involve more than the standard number
of new equipment cabinets for the technology involved, but not to exceed four equipment
cabinets.
4. A proposal that includes excavation or deployment of equipment outside the current
wireless communications facility site. For the purposes of this provision. "outside of the
current wireless communications facility site" means:
a. Outside the boundaries of the controlled, leased or owned property
surrounding the wireless tower and base station and anv access or utilitv
easements related to the site as shown on the approved plans with respect
to afacility outside of apublic right-of-way: and
M
r
Packet Pg. 121
Page 48 of 53
b. Outside the proximity of the footprint of the existing ground mounted
transmission equipment with respect to a facility that extends into the
public right-of-way.
13.c
N
5. A proposal to alter or expand the exterior of any wireless communications facility or base N
station that was originallv approved as stealth or camouflaged that defeats the originallv .4
c
w
approved stealth or camouflaged design elements. For the pumoses of this provision, the E
c
term "defeat" means to change a stealth or camouflaged wireless communications facility
in such a manner so that it may no longer be considered stealth or camouflaged.
U
D
7
6. The proposed co -location or modification would violate an existing condition of N
CO
approval, unless the non-compliance is due to an increase in height, increase in width.
m
Y
addition of cabinets, new excavation, or aesthetic change that does not exceed the
w
corresponding "substantial change" thresholds identified in subsections 1-5 above with
w
respect to a wireless tower or base station. E
7. Anv proposed co -location or modification that would constitute a "substantial change"
under Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, as it
may be amended, as such term is defined or intemreted by anv rule, order, ruling, or other
decision of the FCC or decision of a court with iurisdiction over the area of the Citv.
8. A proposal that would prevent or obstruct full implementation of the Citv's standard
street or parkway sections.
9. A proposal that would alter required access, parking, or landscaping from that shown on
the approved site plans.
10. A proposal to replace the wireless tower or foundation.
11. A proposal to alter the width, bulk, or arrangement of a wireless communications facility
that may violate anv law, rule, regulation, or other requirement intended to protect public
health and safetv.
Packet Pg. 122
13.c
Page 49 of 53
17.69.035 Development Standards (City Right -of Way).
All wireless communications facilities which are installed. erected. co -located. or modified
N
within Citv Right-of-Wav following the effective date of the ordinance codified in this chapter c
N
(besides those exempted in Section 17.69.020 (Exemptions)) shall conform to the following .4
C
W
requirements: E
a
C
W
A. General Wireless communications Facilitites Standards. E
U
D
1. Wireless communications facilities shall not bear anv signs or advertising devices
other than certification, warning, or other required seals or required signage. CO
2. No permittee shall unreasonablv restrict access to an existing antenna location if .4
C
W
required to co -locate by the Citv, and if feasible to do so. E
3. All antennas shall be designed to prevent unauthorized climbing.
4. All antennas shall meet the minimum siting distances to habitable structures required
for compliance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations and
standards governing the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions.
B. Wireless communications Facilities within City Right -of --Way
The following procedures and design standards shall be reauired for issuance of a public
works encroachment permit for the installation of wireless telecommunications facilities
within Citv rights-of-way. These criteria are intended to guide and facilitate applicants in
locating and designing facilities and supporting equipment in a manner that will be
compatible with the purpose, intent, and goals of this section. It is the intent of the Citv to
use its time, place, and manner authority to protect and preserve the aesthetics of the Citv
and the health and safety of pedestrians and occupants of vehicles in City rights-of-way.
1. Permit and Insurance Reouired. Installation of wireless communications facilities
within City rights-of-way will be permitted subject to issuance of an
encroachment permit and pavment of applicable permit fees. The Citv Engineer
or his designee will review and approve encroachment permit applications from
carriers which hold a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity(CPCN)
Packet Pg. 123
Page 50 of 53
from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), subject to the criteria
contained in this section. A certificate of general liabilitv insurance and
commercial automobile liability insurance in a form and amount acceptable to the
Citv must be submitted prior to issuance of the permit_ and maintained for as lone
13.c
b. Undergrounding of Equipment. To preserve community aesthetics, all facility
equipment, excluding antennas, above ground vents, and the smallest possible
electrical meter boxes. shall. to the ereatest extent possible. be reauired to be
located underground, flush to the finished grade, shall be fully enclosed, and
not cross provertv lines. Equipment may include, but is not limited to, the
following: meter pedestals, fiber optic nodes, radio remote units or heads,
power filters, cables, cabinets, vaults, junction or power boxes, and gas
generators. Wherever possible, electrical meter boxes related to wireless
Packet Pg. 124
N
as the facilities exist within the Citv right-of-way.
N
m
Y
C
2. Design Standards.
a
C
a. Location. Facilities may be located on Major Highways, Secondary
w
Highways, Limited Secondary Highways, Collector Streets or Local Streets
U
with no direct residential access, as defined by the General Plan. Facilities
shall be prohibited within 250 feet of anv parcel of land zoned or used for
N
CO
residential habitation and shall not be permitted on any local street or
m
local/collector street within a residential area which provides direct residential
Y
w
drivewav access unless location of a facility on private property is not feasible
w
to address a demonstrated significant gap in coverage. Encroachment permits
will not be issued for proposed facilities which:
w
c
i. Conflict with existing utilities:
w
a
ii. Interfere with traffic visibility;
iii. Result in vehicular access problems:
w
iv. Result in a safety hazard:
Y
a
v. Interfere with existing or future City use of the right-of-waand
v
0
vi. Are inconsistent with American's with Disabilities Act accessibility
:3
N
requirements or anv other State or Federal law, code, or regulation.
o
b. Undergrounding of Equipment. To preserve community aesthetics, all facility
equipment, excluding antennas, above ground vents, and the smallest possible
electrical meter boxes. shall. to the ereatest extent possible. be reauired to be
located underground, flush to the finished grade, shall be fully enclosed, and
not cross provertv lines. Equipment may include, but is not limited to, the
following: meter pedestals, fiber optic nodes, radio remote units or heads,
power filters, cables, cabinets, vaults, junction or power boxes, and gas
generators. Wherever possible, electrical meter boxes related to wireless
Packet Pg. 124
Page 51 of 53
13.c
communications facilities shall be appropriately screened, not visible to the
general public, and located in less prominent areas within the public right-of-
way. Where it can be demonstrated that undergrounding of equipment is
infeasible due to conflict with other utilities. the Citv Eneineer may annrove
N
alternative above -grade equipment mounting, including pole mounting as N
described in Section 3(G) below, when adequatelv screened from public view. .4
C
W
Anv approved above- grade equipment must be located so as not to cause anv E
a
C
vhvsical or visual obstruction to pedestrian or vehicular traffic, or to otherwise E
inconvenience public use of the right-of-way, or create safety hazards to
U
pedestrians or motorists.
r
N
CO
c. Within residential zones, and properties adjacent to residential zones, sound r
proofing measures shall be used to reduce noise caused by the operation of r
C
W
wireless communications facilities and all accessory equipment to a level E
a
which would have a no -net increase in ambient noise level. a
3. Antennas and Other Pole -Mounted Equipment.
Antennas located above ground on an existing Joint Utility Pole, as defined by CPUC
General Order 95 Section II, shall conform to the following criteria:
a. Facilities installed on existing utility poles or street lights shall be appropriately
scaled and aesthetically designed such that the new facility is not substantiallv
larger, more obtrusive, or more readilv visible than the existing facilities or utilitv
devices affixed to utility Doles in the immediate vicinity of the DroDosed
installation
b. No more than one antenna array may be attached to a utility or street light pole
unless it is a co -location.
C. An antenna enclosure attached to a utility or street light pole, shall be cylindrical in
shape, and shall not have a diameter greater than 36 inches, or the width of the
pole, whichever is greater.
d. An antenna enclosure shall be attached directly to the top of the pole or mounted
around the main pole circumference. Antenna enclosures shall not be mounted
Demendicular to the main pole structure and shall not be mounted on cross
members or outrigger structures extending from the main pole.
Packet Pg. 125
13.c
Page 52 of 53
e. Antennas may not exceed six feet above the pole tip height, unless additional
separation is required for conformance with CPUC General Order 95 clearance
requirements.
f No portion of the antenna or transmission eauiDment mounted on a Dole may be
less than 16 feet above any road surface. N
r
0
g. Pole -mounted equipment, other than the antenna, may not exceed six cubic feet in m
volume and must be compatible in structure, scale, color and proportion to the C
w
existing streetlight or utilitv pole equipment. a
C
w
h. No new poles may be installed except as replacements for existing poles.
U
i. No poles may be installed on a public right-of-wav where there are presently no 0
overhead utilitv facilities unless the CPUC has authorized the applicant to install
such facilities and the applicant demonstrates that no other feasible options exist. M
i. All wireless communications facilities mounted on a utility pole must comply with 0
CPUC General Order 95, as it may be amended. a
k. All facilities may only have subdued colors and non -reflective materials that blend
with the surrounding area.
1. Conduits shall not be exposed and must be concealed within the support pole.
C. Additional Modification Standards. The following additional development and design
standards apply to co -location and modifications to existing wireless communications facilities:
1. The co -location of facilities, and support equipment, located in the public right-
of-way. shall be disfavored if that co -location substantiallv chanties the Dhvsical
dimensions of the facilitv or if the co -location reduces the existing camouflage or
does not match the existing facility. For the purposes of this section, a substantial
change in the phvsical dimensions of a wireless tower or base shall be measured
against the wireless tower or base station as originallv approved. The intent of this
provision is to disfavor serial changes that cumulatively constitute a substantial
change to the phvsical dimensions of the wireless communications facilitv.
2. The modified facility must comply with all applicable approvals and conditions of
the permit for the host wireless communications facilitv.
Packet Pg. 126
Page 53 of 53
13.c
3. The stealth or camouflage techniques approved and used for the existing wireless
communications facility must be extended to all proposed new transmission
equipment.
17.69.050 Additional Submittal Requirements
0
N
N
Y
1-4. Under Vhp Cali4wnia Quality J
impaets,
41... ««l.....«4 ..1...11 ..4.«4
...l «..«4 .. 1....1. .W.... «... �..4.. .. F...�.�
C
or Cd
C
Q
U
D
r
N
CO
r
a
B. As a part of the application submittal, applicants for a wireless communications facilitv shall
be required to submit a radio frequencv emissions studv and confirmation that proposed facility
will meet Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations and standards governing the
environmental effects of radio frequencv (EMF) emissions.
Packet Pg. 127
EXHIBIT B
NEGATIVE DECLARATION & INITIAL STUDY
MASTER CASE NO
PERM T/PROJECT NAME:
APPLICANT:
PROJECT LOCATION:
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NEGATIVE DECLARATI0N
[X] Proposed [ ] Final
Master Case No. 15-047
Unified Development Code 15-002
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvd. Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Citywide
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The 2015 UDC Update is a set of textual updates to the existing UDC that will
serve to maintain compliance with federal and state regulations, incorporate new
code language encouraging the installation of alternative fuel charging stations, and
provide clarity and consistency throughout the UDC. No development is proposed
in conjunction with this project. All future development activity would be analyzed
in accordance all applicable regulations.
The 2015 UDC update consists of the following three focal points:
1. Regulatory compliance updates
2. New code sections
3. Updates regarding inconsistencies
Based on the information contained in the Initial Study prepared for this project, and pursuant to the requirements of
Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Santa Clarita
[ ] City Council [X] Planning Commission [ ] Director of Community Development
finds that the project as proposed or revised will have no significant effect upon the environment, and that a Negative
Declaration shall be adopted pursuant to Section 15070 of CEQA.
Mitigation measures for this project
[X] Are Not Required [ ] Are Attached [ ] Are Not Attached
JEFF HOGAN, AICP
PLANNING MANAGER
Prepared by: Mike Marshall, Assistant Planner II
(Signature) (Name/Title)
Approved by: James Chow, Senior Planner
(Signature) (Name/Title)
------------------------------
Public Review Period From September 29, 2015 To October 20, 2015
Public Notice Given On September 29, 2015.
[X] Legal Advertisement [ ] Posting of Properties [ ]Written Notice
CERTIFICATION DATE:
13.d
N
0
N
N
Y
E
a
c
E
Q
U
D
7
N
M
r
Packet Pg. 128
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Project title/master case number:
Lead agency name and address
Contact person and phone number:
Project location:
Applicant's name and address:
General Plan designation:
INITIAL STUDY
Master Case 15-047
UDC 15-002
Initial Study 15-007
City of Santa Clarita
Community Development Department
23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Mike Marshall
Assistant Planner II
(661)286-4045
Citywide
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Not applicable
Zoning: Not applicable
13.d
N
0
N
m
Y
C�
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
Packet Pg. 129
Description of project and setting:
13.d
In July, 2013, the City of Santa Clarita completed a
comprehensive update to the Unified Development Code
(UDC) to be consistent with the General Plan that was
adopted on June 14, 2011. Periodically, City staff will
initiate amendments to the UDC based upon the necessityto
satisfy regulatory demands from federal, state, and local
government agencies, to clarify inconsistencies, and to
rectify typographical errors. The 2015 UDC update is a set
of text amendments to the existing UDC and consists of the
following three focal points:
1. Regulatory compliance updates
2. New code sections
3. Updates regarding inconsistencies
This initial study shall serve as the environmental analysis
in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) for the 2015 UDC updates.
General Plan Consistency
The approval of the 2015 UDC update is implementing the
General Plan by maintaining consistency with federal, state,
and local regulation; incorporating new code sections that
will serve to facilitate the use of alternative fuel vehicles;
and by including new code language to provide clarity and
consistency throughout the UDC to better facilitate the
goals and policies established within the General Plan.
Proposed Project
The 2015 UDC Update is a set of textual updates to the
existing UDC that will serve to maintain compliance
with federal and state regulations, incorporate new code
language encouraging the installation of alternative fuel
stations, and provide contextual clarity and consistency
throughout the UDC.
The 2015 UDC update is a set of textual amendments to
the existing UDC and consists of the following three
focal points:
4. Regulatory compliance updates
5. New code sections
6. Updates regarding inconsistencies
Regulatory pliance updates
Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012 provides that a state or local
government "may not deny and shall approve" any
request for co -location, removal, or replacement of
N
0
0
N
0
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
Packet Pg. 130
transmission equipment on an existing wireless tower or
base station, provided that this action does not
substantially change the physical dimensions of the
tower or base station. The 2015 UDC Update
incorporates new code language to ensure consistency
with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)
ruling regarding Section 6409(a) by reinforcing the
specific development standards set forth by the FCC.
Further, as a part of the proposed 2015 UDC Update,
existing code language would be modified to reflect
compliance with and adopt the State Model Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The recent revision to
the ordinance would increase water efficiency
standards for new and retrofitted landscapes through
more efficient irrigation systems, greywater usage,
onsite storm water capture, and by limiting the portion
of landscapes that can be covered in turf.
New code sections
The 2015 UDC Update furthers the goals and policies
of the General Plan by incorporating a new code
section that encourages the installation of alternative
fuel stations. The substance of the new language
focuses on establishing guidelines to ensure that the
display areas typically associated with such stations do
not result in significant impacts to the surrounding
visual aesthetic.
Updates regarding inconsistencies
The balance of the 2015 UDC Update incorporates new
language that provides clarity and consistency in various
areas of the existing UDC including, but not limited to
the following items:
1. Application processing procedures
2. Temporary Signs
3. Home occupations
4. Land use definitions
5. Typographical errors
Surrounding land uses: Not Applicable
Other public agencies whose Not Applicable
approval is required:
13.d
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
r
N
co
r
Packet Pg. 131
FIGURE 1— REGIONAL LOCATION
13.d
N
0
O
N
N
Y
C�
C
C�
C
Q
U
D
7
N
N
co
r
Packet Pg. 132
San Luis
Obispo
Santa Maria
tm
Lompoc
rsaliersnela
—"'
Cavizo Plain N, v�
National Monument
Santa Barbara
Santa Paula
Channel Islands
National Park
Oxnard Moorpark
Thousand o Los Angeles Rancho
Oaks n Cucamonga
Santa Monica _ Whittier
Lan aster
Palmdale
Santa Clarita a
Angeles National Forest
13.d
P = 95
e
Claw
- Mojave National Preserve
�a
Victorvllle
'AppleValley
Hesperia
San Bernardino YuccaValleySheephole Valley
o Wilderness
'Redlands
Riverside
Corona ° °Moreno Valley,�.
Torrance Anaheim Palm Springs (�
° ° Perris ` Joshua Tree
-Santa
Hemet Indio National Park
Long Beach SQ nta Ana Menifee Palm Desert=
Irvine '.® La Dal
Temecula
San Clemente
Pollbrook
FIGURE 2— CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
.n
Z.
Packet Pg. 133
13.d
IV
A. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' or "Less Than Significant Impact
With Mitigation' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Aesthetics [ ] Agriculture and Forestry [ ] Air Quality
Resources
Packet Pg. 134
E
"m �rvy%aa
uum"niaan
� uuvus
4x
'aTa
MAY'
rvaameamve
enwevo-+
mom`
E
rumrvxmc,
M'*nria,.,n.a
Via.
Santa Ciaiita
WEE a
a01O nig
pye�m b
codex
u[ww, y
'bZ//q"e
nm. wrym
IV
A. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' or "Less Than Significant Impact
With Mitigation' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Aesthetics [ ] Agriculture and Forestry [ ] Air Quality
Resources
Packet Pg. 134
[ ] Biological Resources [
] Cultural Resources [ ]
[ ] Greenhouse Gas [
] Hazards & Hazardous [ ]
Emissions
Materials
[ ] Land Use/Planning [
] Mineral Resources [ ]
[ ] Population/Housing [
] Public Services [ ]
[ ] Transportation/Traffic [
] Utilities/Service Systems [ ]
B. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
Geology /Soils
Hydrology/Water Quality
Noise
Recreation
Mandatory Findings of
Significance
[X] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been
made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
Packet Pg. 135
13.d
[ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[ ] Ifind that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2)
has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on
attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze
only the effects that remain to be addressed.
[ ] I find that although the proposed proj ect could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including
revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further
is required.
Signature
Date
Mike Marshall, Assistant Planner II
Signature
James Chow. Senior Planner Date
C. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
L AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
[l [l [l [Xl
N
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
D
7
N
N
M
Packet Pg. 136
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, [ ] [ ] [X]
but not limited to, primary/secondary ridgelines, trees,
rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
N
C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] N
or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0
c
W
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare[ ] [ ] [ ] [X] E
that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in
the area?
U
D
e) Other [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
IL AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES — hi determining whether impacts to
agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland,
are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory offorest land,
including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and
forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California
Air Resources Board. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
or a Williamson Act contract?
C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
rezoning of, forestland (as defined in Public Resources
Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by
Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland
zoned Timberland Production (as defined by
Government Code Section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forestland or conversion of [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
forestland to non -forest use?
Packet Pg. 137
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or
conversion of forestland to non -forest use?
III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the [ ]
applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute [ ]
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
nonattainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting asubstantial
number of people?
f) Other
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the
proj ect:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US
Fish and Wildlife Service?
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
D
7
Packet Pg. 138
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian [ ] [ ]
habitat or other sensitive natural community identified
in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by
the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US
Fish and Wildlife Service?
C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally [ ] [ ]
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any [ ] [ ]
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances [ ] [ ]
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance, including oak trees?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat [ ] [ ]
conservation plan, natural community conservation
plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
g) Affect a Significant Ecological Area (SEA) or
Significant Natural Area (SNA) as identified on the [ ] [ ]
City of Santa Clarita ESA Delineation Map?
g) Other [ ] [ ]
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the [ ]
significance of a historical resource as defined in
Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
Section 15064.5?
[X]
[X]
[X]
[l [l [Xl
[l [l [Xl
N
0
O
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
D
7
Packet Pg. 139
C) Directly or indirectly destroy or impact a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
e) Other
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial wind or water soil erosion or
the loss of topsoil, either on- or off-site?
C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of
the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or
collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
[l [l [l [Xl
[l [l [l [Xl
[l [l [l [Xl
[l [l [l [Xl
[l [l [l [Xl
[l [l [l [Xl
N
0
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
Packet Pg. 140
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the [ ] [ ]
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal
systems where sewers are not available forthe disposal
of wastewater?
f) Result in a change in topography or ground [ ] [ ]
surface relief features?
g) Result in earth movement (cut and/or fill) of [ ] [ ]
10,000 cubic yards or more?
h) Involve development and/or grading on a slope [] []
greater than 10% natural grade?
i) Result in the destruction, covering, or [ ] [ ]
modification of any unique geologic or physical
feature?
j) Other [ ] [ ]
VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS — Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emission, either directly [ ] [ ]
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation [ ] [ ]
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the [] []
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the [] []
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving explosion or the release
of hazardous materials into the environment
(including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals,
fuels, or radiation)?
N
0
N
N
0
Y
C�
C
a
c
E
U
0
Packet Pg. 141
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public orthe
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing
or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized
areas or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
i) Expose people to existing sources of potential [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
health hazards (e.g., electrical transmission lines, gas
lines, oil pipelines)?
j) Other [l [l [l [l
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
discharge requirements?
N
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
Packet Pg. 142
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or [ ] [ ] [] [X]
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would U)
drop to a level which would not support existing land N
uses or planned uses for which permits have been r
granted)? E
a
C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would U
0
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
the site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map?
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area [] [] I [X]
structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
k) Result in changes in the rate of flow, currents, or [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
the course and direction of surface water and/or
groundwater?
Packet Pg. 143
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
1) Other modification of a wash, channel creek, or [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
river?
m) Impact stormwater management in any of the [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
following ways:
i) Potential impact of project construction and project [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
post -construction activity on stormwater runoff?
ii) Potential discharges from areas for materials [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or
equipment maintenance (including washing), waste
handling, hazardous materials handling or storage,
delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work
areas?
iii) Significant environmentally harmful increase in [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff?
iv) Significant and environmentally harmful increases [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas?
v) Stormwater discharges that would significantly [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
impair or contribute to the impairment of the
beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that
provide water quality benefits (e.g., riparian
corridors, wetlands, etc.)?
vi) Cause harm to the biological integrity of drainage [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
systems, watersheds, and/or water bodies?
vii) Does the proposed project include provisions for [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
the separation, recycling, and reuse of materials both
during construction and after project occupancy?
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the
proj ect:
a) Disrupt or physically divide an established [] [] I [X]
community (including a low-income or minority
community)?
N
0
O
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
Packet Pg. 144
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
plan, natural community conservation plan, and/or
policies by agencies with jurisdiction overthe project?
XI. MINERAL AND ENERGY RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
mineral resource that would be of value to the region
and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
important mineral resource recovery site delineated on
a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use
plan?
C) Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and [] [] I [X]
inefficient manner?
XII. NOISE — Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise [] [] I [X]
levels in excess of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
N
0
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
Packet Pg. 145
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
e) For a project located within an airport land use [ ]
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private [ ]
airstrip, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, [ ]
either directly (for example, by proposing new homes
and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, [ ]
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere (especially affordable housing)?
C) Displace substantial numbers of people, []
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES — Would the project result in:
a) Substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times, or other performance objectives for any of the
public services:
[X]
[X]
i) Fire protection? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
ii) Police protection? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
iii) Schools? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
iv) Parks? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
N
0
O
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
D
7
v) Other public facilities? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Packet Pg. 146
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
XV. RECREATION — Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and [ ]
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
b) Include recreational facilities or require the []
construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or []
policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation system, taking into
account all modes of transportation including mass
transit and non -motorized travel and relevant
components of the circulation system, including but
not limited to intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion [ ]
management program, including, but not limited to,
level of service standards and travel demand measures,
or other standards established bythe county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including [ ]
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design []
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections)
or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [ ]
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, orprograms [ ]
regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian
facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or
safety of such facilities?
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
N
0
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
Q
U
D
7
[X]
E
t
U
R
Q
[X]
[X]
[X]
Packet Pg. 147
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the []
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water [ ]
or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
C) Require or result in the construction of new [ ]
stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve [ ]
the project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater [ ]
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted [ ]
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and [ ]
regulations related to solid waste?
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the [ ]
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
[X]
E
[X] o
r
N
M
a
a
[Xl N
[X]
[X]
[X]
Packet Pg. 148
13.d
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Impact Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
b) Does the project have impacts that are
[ l 1XI
individually
limited, but
cumulatively
considerable?
("Cumulatively
in
considerable"
N
means that the
0
incremental effects
w
of a project are
E
considerable when
c
viewed in
E
connection with
the effects of past
p
projects, the effects
of other current
N
projects, and the
M
effects of probable
future projects.)
a
C) Does the project have environmental effects which [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
Packet Pg. 149
13.d
D. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND/OR EARLIER ANALYSIS
Section and Subsections I Evaluation of Impacts
L AESTHETICS a.) No Impact: The City of Santa Clarita is located within Southern
California's Santa Clarita Valley, which is bound by the San Gabriel
Mountains to the south and east, the Santa Susana Mountains to the
southwest, and the mountains of the Los Padres and Angeles National
Forests to the north. The surrounding natural mountains and ridgelines,
some of which extend into the City, provide a visual backdrop for much
of the City. Other scenic resources within or visible from the City
include the Santa Clara River corridor, forested/vegetated land, and a
variety of canyons and natural drainages in portions of the City. The
proposed 2015 UDC Update is aregulatory act. No development would
be approved with the adoption of the amendments. Therefore, no impact
to scenic vistas is anticipated and no further analysis is required.
b.) Less than significant impact: Current code language prevents
homeowners with property located within the Ridgeline Preservation
Overlay Zone from making minor improvements to their property
without obtaining approval of both the Planning Commission and City
Council via the approval of a Ridgeline Alteration Permit. The proposed
2015 UDC Update includes language that would allow for an exception
to the existing ridgeline preservation ordinance and would allow owners
of existing single family homes located within the existing Ridgeline
Preservation Overlay Zone to make minor improvements including, but
not limited to decks, patio covers, and pools within existing graded
areas of the subject property. However, all improvements within the
Ridgeline Protection Overlay Zone that propose development activity on
existing natural slopes would be subject to both the Hillside
Development Ordinance and all provisions of the Ridgeline Protection
Overlay Zone. No development is approved with this project and any
potential impacts would be considered in conjunction with each
proposed project. Therefore, a less than significant impact is anticipated
in conjunction with the approval of the 2015 UDC Updates.
c) No Impact: The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory
act and does not include a proposal for development at this time. The
proposed amendments focus on regulatory compliance updates, new
code language encouraging alternative fuel charging stations, and
updates regarding inconsistencies existing in the current code language.
Therefore, no impact related to visual character or quality of the site
and surroundings is anticipated with the adoption of the 2015 UDC
Update.
) No Impact: The 2015 UDC Update does not propose to regulate any
iehtine within the Dlan area. The Citv's Unified Development Code
N
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
N
M
r
Packet Pg. 150
13.d
N
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
N
M
Packet Pg. 151
addresses lighting, providing regulations that require that all lights are
directed downward and are screened from neighboring properties. In
addition, the UDC requires that there is no spill-over of light onto
sensitive biological areas or neighboring properties. Since no
development is proposed and no changes are proposed to lighting
regulations, no impact is anticipated in conjunction with the adoption of
the 2015 UDC Update.
IL AGRICULTURE
a. -e.) No Impact—There is no farmland or agriculturally zoned property
AND FORESTRY
of any kind located within the planning area The planning area is
RESOURCES
predominantly developed with amixture of residential, commercial, and
service related uses. The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update will
therefore not impact any farmland, forest areas, or other agricultural
uses.
Therefore, because there is no development proposed as a part of this
project, and the 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory act including new text
language addressing regulatory compliance, alternative fuel charging
stations and code inconsistencies, no impact to agricultural, farmland, or
forest resources is anticipated and no analysis is required.
III. AIR QUALITY
a. -e.) No Impact: The City of Santa Clarita is within the South Coast
Air Basin (SCAB), which is bounded by the San Gabriel, San
Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east, and the
Pacific Ocean to the south and west. The air quality in the SCAB is
managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD).
The SCAB has ahistory of recorded air quality violations and is an area
where both state and federal ambient air quality standards are exceeded.
Because of the violations of the California Ambient Air Quality
Standards (CAAQS), the California Clean Air Act requires triennial
preparation of an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The AQMP
analyzes air quality on a regional level and identifies region -wide
attenuation methods to achieve the air quality standards. These region -
wide attenuation methods include regulations for stationary -source
polluters; facilitation of new transportation technologies, such as low -
emission vehicles; and capital improvements, such as park-and-ride
facilities and public transit improvements.
The most recently adopted plan is the 2012 AQMP, adopted on February
1, 2013. This plan is the South Coast Air Basin's portion of the State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This plan is designed to implement the
California Clean Air Act an in turn implement the Federal Clean Air Act
administered by the EPA. The AQMP accommodates population
growth and transportation projections based on the predictions made by
the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Thus,
projects that are consistent with employment and population forecasts
are consistent with the AQMD.
N
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
w
E
U
0
N
M
Packet Pg. 151
13.d
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
N
M
PacketPg. 152
The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update will not alter any of the
aforementioned measures. The General Plan for the City outlined the
land use designations in the City, including the establishment of
commercial and residential densities within the various zones in the
City.
Since the 2015 UDC Update would implement the General Plan by
ensuring compliance with recent federal, state and local regulations,
encouraging alternative fuel stations, and providing clarity and
consistency to the existing UDC that serves to implement the General
Plan, no further mitigation would be required. Future projects would be
subject to appropriate CEQA analysis to determine project -specific
impacts, if any, to air quality to ensure compliance with the General
Plan.
Therefore, no further impact to air quality is anticipated with the
proposed amendments and no further analysis is required.
IV. BIOLOGICAL
a. -g.) No Impact—The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is regulatory
RESOURCES
in nature and does not include a proposal for development activities of
any kind. Therefore, the proposed amendments are not anticipated to
impact any special status species of flora or fauna. The 2015 UDC
Update would implement the General Plan by ensuring compliance with
recent federal, state and local regulations, encouraging alternative fuel
stations, and providing clarity and consistency to the existing UDC that
serves to implement the General Plan. Development in the planning area
is speculative at this time, however must be consistent with the densities
outlined in the General Plan for both residential and commercial land
uses. All future projects would be required to be analyzed under CEQA
to determine any project specific impacts to biological resources as a
result of the project would exist.
The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update proposed at this time is a
regulatory act and is not development specific. Therefore, the proposed
UDC amendments are not anticipated to have an impact to biological
resources and no analysis is required.
V. CULTURAL
a. -d.) No Impact — The General Plan identifies resources of historic
RESOURCES
significance to the City of Santa Clarita, as well as resources that have
historical significance to the State of California. To further protectthese
resources, as well as provide for regulations for the treatment of
historical structures in the City, the City Council adopted a Historic
Preservation Ordinance on January 8, 2013. The City of Santa Clarita is
within a portion of northern Los Angeles County that is urbanized with
a mixture of commercial, residential and service related uses. None of
the resources identified in the General Plan, or the Historic Preservation
Ordinance would be impacted as a result of the adoption of the 2015
UDC Update. Historic resources within the planning area would still be
subjectto the Historic Preservation Ordinance for any properties that are
designated as historic resources in the future. The adoption of the 2015
UDC Update will not have any further impact on cultural resources in
the City of Santa Clarita as it will not alter any unique geological
feature, paleontological resource, any human remains or affect an
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
N
M
PacketPg. 152
13.d
N
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
D
7
N
M
Packet Pg. 153
historical or archeological resource.
Therefore, no impact to archeological, historical or cultural resource is
anticipated and no further analysis is required.
VI. GEOLOGY AND
a. -i.) No Impact — Southern California has numerous active and
SOILS
potentially active faults that could affect the City. As stated in the
City's General Plan, the City is susceptible to geologic hazards in the
event of a major earthquake (magnitude 8.3) along the San Andreas
Fault. This could result in ground failure and liquefaction. However,
the adoption of the 2015 UDC Update would not change the
requirements of future development to follow all state and Citybuilding
codes/regulations. The 2015 UDC Update would implementthe General
Plan by ensuring compliance with recent federal, state and local
regulations, encouraging alternative fuel stations, and providing clarity
and consistency to the existing UDC that serves to implement the
General Plan. The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is regulatory in
nature and implements the General Plan.
Therefore, no impact related to geology and soils is anticipated and no
further analysis is required.
VII. GREENHOUSE
a) Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Santa Clarita's Climate
GAS EMISSIONS
Action Plan (CAP) identifies the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG)
emitted within Santa Clarita and establishes a set of strategies that
reduces the amount of greenhouse gases produced in the city to a level
that is consistent with the reduction goals identified in the California
Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32) (Health and Safety
Code Sections 38500, 38501, 28510, 38530, 38550, 38560, 38561-
38565, 38570, 38571, 38574, 38580, 38590, 38592 38599). The
proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan and Zoning
Ordinance. Because goals, objectives, and policies approved under the
General Plan are forecast to meet the GHG emission reduction targets
mandated by AB 32, development projects that are able to demonstrate
consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance are by
association consistent with the CAP. Since the project is consistent with
the General Plan, no impacts relating to GHG emissions are anticipated
and no further analysis is required.
b) Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would be
consistent with the CAP. The CAP must achieve emission reduction
goals consistent with those outlined by the California Global Warming
Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32). Therefore the proposed project would
not conflict with any applicable plans or policies adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG and no impacts are
anticipated.
VIII. HAZARDS AND
a. -i.) No Impact — The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update would not
HAZARDOUS
directly expose people to health hazards or hazardous materials,
MATERIALS
interfere with any emergency response plans, or any land use within 2
miles of an airport, airfield, or otherwise impact any airport land use
plan. The 2015 UDC Updates do not include any proposal for
development and the project is regulatory in nature. The 20
N
0
N
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
D
7
N
M
Packet Pg. 153
13.d
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
N
M
Packet Pg. 154
Update will implement the goals and policies of the General Plan and
will not have an impact of the environment.
Therefore, no impact related to hazards and hazardous materials is
anticipated and no further analysis is required.
IX. HYDROLOGY
a. -m.) No Impact — The City of Santa Clarita has an interconnected
AND WATER
system of waterways that lead to the Santa Clara River. Development in
QUALITY
the City is required to reduce the alteration of flows, impeding flows,
and further changing flows of water that would impact properties and
resources both up and/or down -stream. Prior to the installation of any
improvements, developers must demonstrate that the improvements will
not have an impact on the path or velocity of water flow off of the site.
Further, development in the City must comply with the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) having the
responsibility to ensure that water is properly treated prior to leaving a
project site and discharging into any stormwater drainage facility. The
proposed 2015 UDC Update is not changing any development standards
that would impact these requirements.
The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory act and is not
anticipated to change any ofthese standards as they currently exist in the
UDC or in the Municipal Code of the City of Santa Clarita. The 2015
UDC Update will not result in direct impacts on hydrology and water
quality. Further, the 2015 UDC update is not anticipated to impact any
100 -year flood hazard area, tsunami, drainage pattern, or runoff of
Stormwater Management systems.
Therefore, no impact to hydrology and water quality is anticipated and
no further analysis is required.
X. LAND USE AND
a.) No Impact—The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is aregulatory
PLANNING
act and no development activity is connected to its adoption. The 2015
UDC Update would implement the General Plan by ensuring
compliance with recent federal, state and local regulations, encouraging
alternative fuel stations, and providing clarity and consistency to the
existing UDC that serves to implement the General Plan. Future
development throughout the planning area as a result of the adoption of
the 2015 UDC Update will not impact any established community that
would be disrupted or physically divided due to the proposed
amendments, and therefore, no impact is anticipated.
b.) Less than significant impact- The proposed 2015 UDC Update is
regulatory in nature. The proposed updates consist of text changes
addressing regulatory compliance with Federal Communications
Commission regulations, alternative fuel charging stations, and
inconsistencies within the exiting text of the UDC. The 2015 UDC
Update does not include a proposal for development. Further, any
potential impacts to future development would be analyzed at the time
of proposal. Therefore, a less than significant impact to applicable land
use plans or policies is anticipated in conjunction with this project and
no further analysis is required.
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
N
M
Packet Pg. 154
13.d
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
r
N
co
Packet Pg. 155
c.) No Impact- The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update will not affect
current City standards regarding habitat conservation plans, natural
community preservation plans, and/ or the policies of agencies with
jurisdiction over resources and resource areas within the City since no
development is proposed at this time. All future development would be
subject to the standards established by the City, at the time development
is proposed.
Therefore, no impact to land use and planning is anticipated and no
further analysis is required.
XI. MINERAL AND
a. -c.) No Impact — Gold mining and oil production historically have
ENERGY
been the principal mineral extraction activities in and around the Santa
RESOURCES
Clarita Valley. Other minerals found in the General Plan planning area
include construction aggregate, titanium, and tuff. Mineral resources
and extraction areas are shown in Exhibit CO -2 of the City's General
Plan. The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory act and no
development is proposed and therefore, is not expected to affect mineral
resources in the planning area, or throughout the City.
Therefore, no impact to mineral and energy resources is anticipated and
no further analysis is required.
XII. NOISE
a. -f) No Impact — The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update will not
expose persons to the generation of a significant increase in noise levels,
groundborne vibration, or increase ambient noise. The adoption of the
2015 UDC Update is a regulatory act and does not propose any
development at this time and therefore, there would not be a direct
impact to noise levels in the city. Further, the 2015 UDC Update does
not propose to alter any noise standards in the Unified Development
Code, or the City's Municipal Code that would impact
development/redevelopment within the jurisdictional boundaries of the
City of Santa Clarita. Since the 2015 UDC Update implements the
General Plan and is not proposing any alterations to 11.44 of the
Municipal Code regarding noise standards in the City, no impacts to
noise are anticipated. The proposed 2015 UDC Update is consistent
with the General Plan and will not require any further analysis under
CEQA. However, all future development will be subject to CEQA and
would be required to analyze possible project specific noise impacts and
incorporate all feasible mitigation measures to reduce any identified
impacts.
Therefore, no impact to noise is anticipated and no further analysis is
required.
XIII. POPULATION
a. -c.) No Impact — The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is not
AND HOUSING
anticipated to induce substantial population growth in the Santa Clarita
Valley beyond what was considered as a part of the General Plan. The
2015 UDC Update would implement the General Plan by ensuring
compliance with recent federal, state and local regulations, encouraging
alternative fuel stations, and providing clarity and consistency to the
existing UDC that serves to implement the General Plan. The adoption
of the 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory act and will not include an
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
r
N
co
Packet Pg. 155
13.d
N
0
0
N
Y
C�
C
a
c
E
U
0
N
M
Packet Pg. 156
development activity. Therefore, the adoption ofthe 2015 UDC Update
would not alter the City's population projections and would be
consistent with the City's General Plan.
Therefore, no impact to population and housing is anticipated and no
further analysis is required.
XIV.
a)i.-iv No Impact — The proposed 2015 UDC Update will not directly
PUBLICSERVICES
increase the need for additional fire, police, schools, or libraries. The
2015 UDC Update would implement the General Plan by ensuring
compliance with recent federal, state and local regulations, encouraging
alternative fuel stations, and providing clarity and consistency to the
existing UDC that serves to implement the General Plan; and no
development is proposed.
Therefore, no impact to mineral and energy resources is anticipated and
no further analysis is required.
XV. RECREATION
a. -b.) No Impact— The proposed 2015 UDC Update will not have any
impact on recreational amenities within the City of Santa Clarita. The
2015 UDC Update would implement the General Plan by ensuring
compliance with recent federal, state and local regulations, encouraging
alternative fuel stations, and providing clarity and consistency to the
existing UDC that serves to implement the General Plan. The proposed
project does not include any development activities.
Therefore, no impact to recreation is anticipated and no further analysis
is required.
XVI.
a. -f) No Impact— The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update is regulatory
TRANSPORTATION/
in nature and is not anticipated to have direct developmental impacts
TRAFFIC
that alter traffic load or capacity on street systems. The 2015 UDC
Update focuses on three primary areas including regulatory compliance
with FCC and the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance,
new code language encouraging alternative fuel charging stations, and
updates providing clarity and consistency to existing code language.
Further, no development is proposed in conjunction with the 2015 UDC
Update.
Since no new development is proposed at this time, no further study is
required regarding traffic and transportation. Therefore, no impact to
traffic and transportation is anticipated and no further analysis is
required.
XVII. UTILITIES AND
a. -g.) No Impact— The 2015 UDC Update does not include a proposal
SERVICE SYSTEMS
for any new development at this time. The 2015 UDC Update would
implement the General Plan by ensuring compliance with recent federal,
state and local regulations, encouraging alternative fuel stations, and
providing clarity and consistency to the existing UDC that serves to
implement the General Plan. Therefore, the project would not directly
result in the construction of new water facilities, expansion of existing
electric or natural gas facilities, affect drainage patterns, watertreatment
services, and furthermore, no impacts to landfill capacity would occur
beyond what was analyzed in the General Plan FIR.
N
0
0
N
Y
C�
C
a
c
E
U
0
N
M
Packet Pg. 156
13.d
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
N
N
co
r
Packet Pg. 157
Any subsequent development would be required to comply with the
City's General Plan and the requirements of the Regional Water Quality
Control Board and all applicable utility purveyors. Compliance with
these requirements would ensure all federal, state and local statutes and
imposed regulations are met. Since the 2015 UDC Update is
implementing the General Plan, no impact to utilities and services are
anticipated.
Therefore, no impact to utilities and service systems is anticipated and
no further analysis is required.
XVIIL MANDATORY
a. -c.) No Impact—The adoption of the 2015 UDC Update will not have
FINDINGS OF
a significant impact on the environment that would lead to a substantial
SIGNIFICANCE
reduction in habitat of afish or wildlife species, or reduce or restrict the
number of rare, threatened or endangered species. The planning area
consists of the entire City of Santa Clarita which is largely urbanized
area of northern Los Angeles County. Since the 2015 UDC Update
would be implementing the General Plan, no impacts beyond those
considered under the EIR prepared for the General Plan are anticipated.
N
0
0
N
Y
w
E
a
c
E
U
0
N
N
co
r
Packet Pg. 157
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
STAFF REPORT
2015 UDC Update
MASTER CASE NO. 15-047
UDC 15-002
INITIAL STUDY 15-007
DATE: October 20, 2015
TO: Chairperson Ostrom and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jeff Hogan, AICP, Planning Manager
CASE PLANNER: Mike Marshall, Assistant Planner II
APPLICANT: The City of Santa Clarita
LOCATION: Citywide
REQUEST: This is a request to update the City of Santa Clarita's Unified
Development Code (UDC) to ensure consistency with federal and state
regulations, and the General Plan, as required by State Law.
BACKGROUND
In July, 2013, the City Council adopted the first comprehensive update to the UDC to be
consistent with the General Plan that was adopted on June 14, 2011. Periodically, City staff will
initiate amendments to the UDC to satisfy regulatory demands from federal, state, and local
government agencies, to clarify inconsistencies, and to rectify typographical errors.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/ANALYSIS
The 2015 UDC Update consists of text amendments that serve to implement the goals and
policies of the Santa Clarita General Plan. The 2015 UDC update is a set of text amendments to
the existing UDC and consists of the following three focal points:
1. Regulatory compliance updates
2. New code sections
3. Updates regarding inconsistencies
The 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory act and does not include a proposal for development. Any
future development proposals would be evaluated for its consistency with the UDC, City of
Santa Clarita General Plan and the regulations of applicable agencies. A copy of the 2015 Draft
Redline Amendments are attached (Exhibit A).
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 2 of 11
Regulatory Compliance Updates
A. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities -All property other than City Right -of -Way
Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 provides that a
state or local government "may not deny and shall approve" any request for co -location,
removal, or replacement of transmission equipment on an existing wireless tower or base station,
provided that this action does not substantially change the physical dimensions of the tower or
base station. The 2015 UDC Update incorporates new code language to ensure consistency with
the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) ruling regarding Section 6409(a) by reinforcing
the specific development standards set forth by the FCC.
The regulations mandate that proposals for co -locations or modifications on privately owned
property must be approved by local jurisdictions if the proposal meets the following standards:
1. The height of the tower would increase by less than 10% or 20 feet, whichever is greater;
2. The proposed antenna would protrude from the edge of the existing tower by less than 20
feet or the width of the tower structure, whichever is greater;
3. The base station (building) would increase less than 10% or 10 feet in height above the
originally approved height; and
4. The base station (building) would protrude from the edge of the originally approved
structure less than six feet.
In summary, if a proposed modification or co -location on property other than City right-of-way
is consistent with the above standards, the project must be administratively approved by means
of an over-the-counter approval. Projects that are not consistent with the above standards must
proceed through the entitlement process currently established in the UDC.
B. Wireless Telecommunications Facilities- City Right -of -Way
Currently, the UDC does not contain language regulating the placement of wireless
telecommunications facilities within the City right-of-way. Staff conducted research of a variety
of Southern California cities to establish appropriate development standards for facilities within
the City right-of-way that would be compliant with Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax
Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012.
Further, Public Utilities Code sections 7901 and 7901.1 state in effect that any telephone
company with a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) has the right to place "telephone" equipment in the public right of way,
subject to the local jurisdiction's ability to impose reasonable time, place, and manner
restrictions on that equipment. It is this provision that allows telephone poles to be placed within
the right-of-way. Until recently, wireless telecommunications facilities were large structures that
could not be reasonably placed in the public right of way. With the advancement of smaller
wireless telecommunications structures, and because the definition of "telephone" in the Public
Utilities Code is very broad, to the provision is now interpreted to include wireless
communications providers. Therefore, local jurisdictions are required to adopt reasonable time,
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002; IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 3 of 11
place, and manner restrictions to regulate the placement of those facilities and a process by
which providers can apply for permits to place their facilities.
Staff has made an effort to create legally defensible standards that are consistent with the Public
Utilities Code. The following development standards are proposed to apply to wireless
telecommunications facilities within City right-of-way:
1. The height of the existing utility pole does not increase more than six feet,
2. The width of the additional equipment does not exceed 36 inches or the width of the
existing pole, whichever is greater,
3. Wireless telecommunication facilities located within City right-of-way shall not be within
250 feet of the property lines of any residential use or zone,
4. Wireless telecommunications facilities are not allowed within the City right-of-way on
any local street or local/collector street within a residential area which provides direct
residential driveway access.
As proposed, applicants for wireless telecommunications facilities within the City right-of-way
must first demonstrate that the proposed project complies with the above standards and show that
the applicant has a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity issued by the Public Utilities
Commission, then the applicant must obtain an encroachment permit from the Development
Services Division to conduct work within the City right-of-way.
The photo below is an example of a wireless telecommunications facility within the public right-
of-way of another jurisdiction that would not be approved in the City of Santa Clarita if the
proposed amendments were approved.
Prg;ell of 11
In c the photo below Is along wrelese let emmmw,m t,oae f..My i¢ mother
Southam Celifomia low Mar world be ......tent with the purposed standard, departed be,,
C State Model Water EMM mI Landscape Olorm, oe
Further, as ,pert of me proposed 2015 UDC Threat a exisloag cede lmguege would be motifled
r,fl,R..mpl, an,, with and adopt the Stare Model Water Fhfinmt Lmdsoepe Crdumm,. 1Te
o the ordlnenoe welld 1111,11, water IM111,oy stanartr
throw for new end It,
m
Id,,,pess
thewgh mere efuhmt,mgetlon systems, geywareruse w onsite storm water
capture, and by l immng the porion of lends,apes that an be owered,n turf Adoptol of me
proposed..de language will ensureongoingmplmme with me ordame therefore
im
elmat,ng me need for future ..
e amendments as me stare erd ame 1s emended 1n me future.
New code sacro..
The 2015 UDC Update tlssmers me goals and polices of the Cenral Hen by i1..Rorat ng a
new code section that encourages me install at of of eltemet,a fuel charging sta ions. The
substa,me of the new language focuses on establishing guidelines to ensure met me dsplay areas
typically asso¢ared wim such sta ions do not resulrn sigmfioantimpects to me suamrldlg
,,suel eesthom
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 5 of 11
Updates regarding inconsistencies
The balance of the 2015 UDC Update incorporates new language that provides clarity and
consistency in various areas of the existing UDC including, but not limited to the following
items:
1. Application processing procedures
Staff has proposed an amendment to the existing code language that would create consistency
with other portions of the code by allowing the Hearing Officer to refer projects to the Planning
Commission for further review. Current code language requires approval or denial of a project
heard before the Hearing Officer. This is inconsistent with other portions of the code that allow
an approval body to refer a project to the next higher level of review such as from the Planning
Commission to City Council.
2. Temporary Signs
Staff has proposed language to clarify the intent of existing code language as it applies to non-
commercial temporary signs. Current code language only allows for these sign types to be
freestanding. The proposed code language would allow for temporary non-commercial mounted
signs.
3. Home occupations
Staff has proposed new language that would permit only one home occupation per residential
dwelling unit. Further, staff has added language to the list of prohibited businesses to include
cabinet making and dispatch facilities.
4. Land use definitions
Included in the proposed 2015 UDC Update is language modifying the definitions of
"Instructional School" to include a broader scope of scholastic businesses and the incorporation
of additional language to the definition of "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" to prohibit mobile
marijuana dispensaries.
5. Typographical errors
Additional modifications to the existing UDC have been proposed to rectify grammatical and
formatting errors and inconsistencies.
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 6 of 11
SUMMARY
In summary, the proposed 2015 UDC Update is a set of text amendments to the existing UDC
that consists of three areas of focus including: 1) FCC Regulatory Compliance and State Model
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance; 2) New code sections encouraging the installation of
alternative fuel charging stations; and 3) New language addressing inconsistencies within the
existing code language. The proposed 2015 UDC Update does not include a proposal for
development, and any future proposed development would be analyzed for consistency with all
applicable regulations.
ENVIRONMENTAL
An Initial Study was prepared for this project in accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). The initial study determined that all impacts related to the proposed project
are considered to be less than significant. Therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared in
accordance with Section 15070 of CEQA. The Negative Declaration and Initial Study have been
made available during a twenty-one public review period from September 29, 2015, to October
20, 2015. Documents were posted in the City Clerk's Office at the City of Santa Clarita City
Hall, and the City of Santa Clarita Public Library, Valencia Branch.
NOTICING
All noticing requirements for a public hearing have been completed as required by Section
17.06.110 of the Unified Development Code. A 1/8th page advertisement was placed in the
Signal Newspaper on September 29, 2015.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
1) Open the public hearing;
2) Receive testimony from the public;
3) Provide comments and direction to staff;
4) Close the public hearing; and
5) Adopt Resolution P15-13, that recommends that the City Council adopt the Negative
Declaration prepared for the project and approve the 2015 UDC Update, which includes
Master Case No. 15-047, UDC 15-002.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution P15-13
2015 UDC Update Draft Redline Amendments (Exhibit A)
Draft Negative Declaration/Initial Study for the 2015 UDC Update
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 7 of 11
RESOLUTION NO. P15-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR THE PROJECT AND
APPROVE MASTER CASE NO. 15-047 (UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 15-002),
AMENDING THE SANTA CLARITA UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The Planning Commission does hereby make the
following findings of fact:
A. On June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted the Santa Clarita General Plan by
adoption of Resolution No. 11-63. The General Plan provides a vision that will guide
future development in the City of Santa Clarita through a set of goals, objectives, and
policies;
B. On July 9, 2013, the City Council adopted the first comprehensive update to the
Unified Development Code (UDC), by adoption of Ordinance No. 13-08;
C. The 2015 UDC Update is a citywide project located within the City of Santa Clarita
in the County of Los Angeles;
D. The City of Santa Clarita's proposed project consists of UDC 15-002 to update the
UDC to ensure consistency with the General Plan and federal and state regulations;
E. The City Council Development Subcommittee held a duly -noticed meeting on
September 24, 2015, in accordance with the City's noticing requirements. The
meeting was held at City Hall, Orchard Room, located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard,
Santa Clarita;
The Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing on October 20, 2015, in
accordance with the City's noticing requirements. The project was advertised in The
Signal newspaper on September 29, 2015. The hearing was held at City Hall, 23920
Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:00 p.m.;
G. That at this public hearing, the Planning Commission received staffs presentation
summarizing the proposed project, opened the public hearing, received public
testimony regarding the project, provided comments to staff and closed the public
hearing. Staff presented the necessary approval documents (resolution and associated
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 8 of 11
attachments), and the Planning Commission took action on the resolution of
recommendation to the City Council;
H. Based upon the staff presentations, staff reports, and public comments and testimony,
the Planning Commission finds that the 2015 UDC Update will not adversely affect
the health, peace, comfort, or welfare of persons residing in the area; nor will the
2015 UDC Update jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the
public health, safety, or general welfare; and
L The location of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of
proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based for the
Master Case No. 15-047 project file is with the Community Development
Department; the record specifically is in the custody of the Director of Community
Development.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDINGS. Based
upon the foregoing facts and findings, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council
hereby find as follows:
A. An Initial Study and a Negative Declaration for this project have been prepared in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
B. The Initial Study has been circulated for review and comment by affected
governmental agencies and the public, and all comments received have been
considered. The Negative Declaration was advertised and posted on September 29,
2015 in accordance with CEQA. The public review period was open from September
29, 2015, through October 20, 2015;
C. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment. The Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City
of Santa Clarita;
D. The documents and other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon
which the decision of the Planning Commission is made is the Master Case No. 15-
047 project file, located within the Community Development Department and is in
the custody of the Director of Community Development; and
E. The Planning Commission, based upon the findings set forth above, hereby finds that
the Negative Declaration for this project has been prepared in compliance with
CEQA.
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 9 of 11
SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE NO. 15-047. Based on the
foregoing facts and findings for Master Case No. 15-047, the Planning Commission recommends
the City Council hereby find as follows:
A. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan;
The project is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed 2015 UDC
Update carries out a number of General Plan policies and objectives, including the
expansion of telecommunication facilities. The Land Use Element of the General
Plan dictates that the City expand infrastructure to attract and sustain new business.
Land Use Policy LU 4.4.1 encourages the extension of state-of-the-art
communication facilities to serve commercial and industrial areas, including
telecommunication facilities. The 2015 UDC Update is consistent with this policy by
incorporating language that ensures compliance with the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) ruling 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation
Act of 2012 which establishes guidelines to expedite the deployment of wireless
telecommunications infrastructure by establishing standards for the streamlined
processing of co -location and modification projects. Further, Conservation and Open
Space Policy CO 1.3.1 encourages the exploration, evaluation, and implementation of
methods to shift from using non-renewable resources to the use of renewable
resources in all aspects of land use planning and development. The 2015 UDC Update
is consistent with this policy by providing language that encourages the installation of
alternative fuel charging stations.
B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all
other applicable provisions of the UDC;
The 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory document that would modify applicable
sections and provisions of the UDC to ensure compliance with federal and state
regulations, encourage the installation of alternative fuel charging stations, and
address inconsistencies within the existing UDC and does not include a proposal for
physical development.
C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the
public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially
detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity
and zone in which the property is located; and
Nothing contained in the proposed 2015 UDC Update would endanger, jeopardize, or
otherwise constitute a hazard to the public because the project is regulatory in nature
and the resulting document would modify applicable sections and provisions of the
UDC to ensure compliance with federal and state regulations, encourage the
installation of alternative fuel charging stations, and address inconsistencies within
the existing UDC. Further, the 2015 UDC Update would not result in the disturbance
of land or the physical development of any property and would be consistent with the
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 10 of 11
provisions of the General Plan.
D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's
physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the
proposed use;
2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and
are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal
would generate;
3. Public protection service (e.g., Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) are readily
available;
4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, schools, solid waste collection and
disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is
adequate to serve the site.
The 2015 UDC Update is a regulatory document that does not supersede but rather enacts
the provisions of the General Plan. The 2015 UDC Update does not propose land uses
that would generate traffic volumes in excess of that anticipated in the General plan and
further does not propose changes to the existing highways or streets that provide access to
sites throughout the planning area. The City of Santa Clarita is currently served by the
Los Angeles County Fire Department and the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department,
both of which provide adequate service levels. The City of Santa Clarita is likewise
served by all applicable utilities. Nothing in the proposed 2015 UDC Update would
increase the need for fire or police protection services, nor would the plan increase
demand for utilities.
SECTION 4. The Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the
Negative Declaration prepared for the project and approve the 2015 UDC Update, which
includes Master Case No. 15-047, UDC 15-002, as noted on the Draft Redline UDC
Amendments (Exhibit A).
SECTION 5. The Planning Commission Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution and certify this record to be a full, complete, and correct copy of the action taken.
Master Case 15-047; UDC 15-002, IS 15-007
2015 UDC Update
October 20, 2015
Page 11 of 11
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 2015.
DENNIS OSTROM, CHAIRPERSON
PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
JEFF W. HOGAN, SECRETARY
PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Jeff W. Hogan, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 20th of October, 2015, by the
following vote of the Planning Commission:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY
Kimberly Luepke
From: rtrivit@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 5:34 PM
To: Kimberly Luepke
Cc: gbeit1001@yahoo.com
Subject: Wildwood Hills Homeowners
To Kimberly Luepke,
I am writing to voice my concern and opposition of the City's oversite in issuing a "Brush Clearance" permit in
clear violation of the City's own Protected Ridgeline Ordinance.
Specifically, my fellow homeowners and I on Jeffers Lane in Saugus, object to the illegal clearance of the north -
facing hillside which runs parallel to Jeffers Lane. The resident at 27919 Ron Ridge Drive, directly behind said
hillside, owns a parcel that extends over the protected ridgeline and down to the property line of several
Jeffers Lane homes.
In addition to the violation of the Protected Ridgeline Ordinance, we homeowners on Jeffers Lane are greatly
concerned about, but not limited to, the following:
• The possible erosion and soil destabilization of the hillside due to the removal of the ground cover
• The loss of the natural scape and habitat of hillside
• The eye -sore of the ravaged land including probable future development
• The negative impact of our property vale
I urge your action on this matter and help us preserve the integrity and natural beauty of our community.
Respectfully,
Richard and Patricia Trivitt
21972 Jeffers Lane
Saugus, CA 91350
Sent from Windows Mail
Kimberly Luepke
From: jerry <jerry@sound-sales-mktg.com>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 9:21 PM
To: Kimberly Luepke
Subject: Jeffers Lane ridgeline
Dear Ms. Luepke,
I am writing to you in opposition of the City's issuing a "Brush Clearance" permit to clear any
brush on the Jeffers Lane ridgeline. I believe this a protected ridgeline and this type of
development is in violation of the City's own Protected Ridgeline Ordinance.
My specific objection is to the illegal clearance of the north -facing hillside which runs parallel
to Jeffers Lane. The resident at 27919 Ron Ridge Drive, directly behind said hillside, owns a
parcel that extends over the protected ridgeline and down to the property line of several
Jeffers Lane homes. My property faces this hillside and my neighbors (and myself) would be
visually impacted by the loss of this beautiful and natural landscape.
In addition to the violation of the Protected Ridgeline Ordinance, we homeowners on Jeffers
Lane are greatly concerned about, but not limited to, the following:
• The possible erosion and soil destabilization of the hillside due to the removal of the
ground cover
• The loss of the natural landscape and habitat of hillside
• The eye -sore of the ravaged land including probable future development
• The negative impact of our property vale
I urge your action on this matter and help us preserve the integrity and natural beauty of our
community.
Respectfully,
Jerry Zemming
22030 Rodeffer PI.
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
805-231-5001
1
Kimberly Luepke
From: jill <jill@sound-sales-mktg.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 5:32 AM
To: Kimberly Luepke
Subject: Fwd: Jeffers Lane ridgeline
Dear Ms. Luepke,
I am writing to you in opposition of the City's issuing a "Brush Clearance" permit to clear any brush
on the Jeffers Lane ridgeline. I believe this a protected ridgeline and this type of development is in
violation of the City's own Protected Ridgeline Ordinance.
My specific objection is to the illegal clearance of the north -facing hillside which runs parallel to
Jeffers Lane. The resident at 27919 Ron Ridge Drive, directly behind said hillside, owns a parcel
that extends over the protected ridgeline and down to the property line of several Jeffers Lane
homes. My property faces this hillside and my neighbors (and myself) would be visually impacted by
the loss of this beautiful and natural landscape.
In addition to the violation of the Protected Ridgeline Ordinance, we homeowners on Jeffers Lane
are greatly concerned about, but not limited to, the following:
• The possible erosion and soil destabilization of the hillside due to the removal of the ground
cover
• The loss of the natural landscape and habitat of hillside
• The eye -sore of the ravaged land including probable future development
• The negative impact of our property vale
I urge your action on this matter and help us preserve the integrity and natural beauty of our
community.
Respectfully,
Jill Zemming
22030 Rodeffer PI.
Santa Clarita, CA 91350
805-279-5967
Kimberly Luepke
From: Kevin <kevinscvll@aol.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:32 AM
To: Kimberly Luepke
Subject: Ridgeline preservation
I moved to Santa Clarita from Minnesota over 25 years ago. What appealed to me about SCV was the small-town feel,
the wide open spaces, and the beautiful undeveloped landscape.
Much has changed since that time with the addition of the mall, Stevenson Ranch, widened roads, 10,000 new stop
lights (slight exaggeration) and unending residential development.
This brings me to my point. SCV has begun to resemble the city Los Angeles more than Minnesota and certainly more
than SCV of old.
I am opposed to ANY further unnecessary development and support the preservation of ALL natural spaces that remain -
such as the ridgelines that run throughout our community. Stop the building of ugly unnecessary fences such as the one
being discussed in City Council today. Enforce the existing codes, keep the hillsides and ridgelines beautiful and help
maintain our property values.
Sincerely,
SCV resident,
Kevin Lundby
Sent from my iPhone
Kimberly Luepke
From: Jeff Hogan
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:32 AM
To: Mike Marshall; Kimberly Luepke
Subject: FW: Ridgeline in Wildwood Hills Tract
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
From: Ruth Zehfuss[mailto:zteachesC&sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 6:31 PM
To: Jeff Hogan
Subject: Ridgeline in Wildwood Hills Tract
It has come to my attention that a Ron Ridge homeowner has secured a permit to clear an area near the ridgeline. I have
multiple concerns both environmental and aesthetic. The Ridgeline Code needs to be enforced and any unclear areas
need to be clarified. This ridgeline has been a part of the beauty of this area and should be preserved as such. The
natural habitat would be substantially impaired by this clearing. Environmentally, this clearance has the potential to cause
mud slides and damage to residences below the area being cleared. Should the scope of the predicted EI Nino be as
severe as predicted this action could also bring human injury,
I respectfully request that the City of Santa Clarita reconsider their issuance of a clearance permit.
Thank you,
Ruth Zehfuss
28065 Kenton Lane
Santa Clarita, 91350
Kinnberi Luepke
From: Jeff Hogan
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:32 AM
To: Kimberly Luepke; Mike Marshall
Subject: FW: Ridgeline
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
From: Patti Paganelli[mailto:patti1023Cabhotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 6:50 PM
To: Jeff Hogan
Subject: Ridgeline
I understand that a permit has been issued for brush clearance to the homeowner 27919 Ron Ridge. This has
the potential of some serious problems. With the prediction of a serious EI Nino, will the hillside come flowing
down to the homes below? This is potentially dangerous for both humans and their homes. Additionally the
ridgeline has a code attached to it that should protect this area. The natural habitat has been untouched and
should remain so within the parameters of the code.
Please reconsider your permit issuance.
Thank you,
Patti & Joe Paganelli
22034 Jeffers Lane
Santa Clarita
Kimberly Luepke
From: Jeff Hogan
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 8:33 AM
To: Mike Marshall; Kimberly Luepke
Subject: FW: Protectted Ridgeline
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
-----Original Message -----
From: David Brook [mailto:davidbrook@vahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:29 AM
To: Kimberly Luepke
Cc: Jeff Hogan
Subject: Protectted Ridgeline
As a resident of the Wildwood Hills and an active member of our community in many ways, I write to protest the issuing
of brush clearance permits that may have a negative impact on our protected ridgeline. This ridgeline is a unique
benefit of our estate, homes and community and I ask that a thorough understanding of the request be made and
boundaries to the request be clear, so as to both protect this valuable asset and ensure that there are no future dangers
to our homes due to overclearing of the brush; especially, given the protracted weather we all face this coming winter.
Sincerly,
David and Bernice Brook
28029 Kenton Lane
91350
661 297 3419
Kimberl Luepke
From: David Brook <davidbrook@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 7:29 AM
To: Kimberly Luepke
Cc: Jeff Hogan
Subject: Protectted Ridgeline
As a resident of the Wildwood Hills and an active member of our community in many ways, I write to protest the issuing
of brush clearance permits that may have a negative impact on our protected ridgeline. This ridgeline is a unique
benefit of our estate, homes and community and I ask that a thorough understanding of the request be made and
boundaries to the request be clear, so as to both protect this valuable asset and ensure that there are no future dangers
to our homes due to overclearing of the brush; especially, given the protracted weather we all face this coming winter.
Sincerly,
David and Bernice Brook
28029 Kenton Lane
91350
661 297 3419
Kimberl Luepke
From: Luis Delgado <luis@nchal.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 2:26 PM
To: Kimberly Luepke; Jeff Hogan
Subject: Brush clearing permit
Attachments: Brush Clearance Permit.pdf
Dear Mr. Hogan and Ms. Kluepke,
I am writing to you in opposition of the City's issuing a `Brush Clearance" permit to clear any brush on the
Jeffers Lane ridgeline. I believe this a protected ridgeline and this type of development is in violation of the
City's own Protected Ridgeline Ordinance.
Specifically, my fellow homeowners and I on Jeffers Lane and Kenton Lane in Saugus, object to the illegal
clearance of the north -facing hillside which runs parallel to Jeffers Lane. The resident at 27919 Ron Ridge
Drive, directly behind said hillside, owns a parcel that extends over the protected ridgeline and down to the
property line of several Jeffers Lane homes. He has already begun construction of a fence that is now just an
eyesore.
In addition to the violation of the Protected Ridgeline Ordinance, we homeowners in the immediate area are
greatly concerned about, but not limited to, the following:
• The possible erosion and soil destabilization of the hillside due to the removal of the ground cover. This
could lead to extensive property damage especially in light of the recent "El Nino" warnings.
• The loss of the natural scape and habitat of hillside affecting the ecosystem and wild animal habitats.
• The eye -sore of the ravaged land including probable future development directly behind private residences
therefore encroaching on privacy.
• The negative impact of our property values if a protected area is allowed to be developed.
• Setting a precedent for subsequent actions that may cause further concerns.
I urge your action on this matter and revoke any permits that have been issued and to carefully consider any
future requests for any changes to or development of this protected area. Please help us preserve the integrity
and natural beauty of our community.
Respectfully,
Luis D Delgado
28019 Kenton Lane
Santa Clarita CA 91350
Kimberly Luepke
From: Mike Chalmers <mlcschalmers@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 6:13 PM
To: Jeff Hogan; Kimberly Luepke
Subject: Jeffers Lane Ridgline
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
I am a resident of Santa Clarita and own a home on Kenton Lane in the Wildwood Neighborhood.
I'm writing to add my concerns to the murky lines being drawn around the Ridgeline Code that we in Santa
Clarita find so important. Property values and safety issues are my primary reasons for supporting the
Wildwood Neighborhood residents (residing on Jeffers Lane) who are opposing fencing and vegetation
clearance efforts by home owners on Ron Ridge Lane. Unsightly fencing is a threat to our property values. In
addition, modification of the hillside, especially with the anticipated El Nino weather systems that are looming
over us this winter, could very well lead to flood and mudslide dangers.
Lastly, the Ridgeline Code should be strictly enforced, they are rules set down by city fathers to preserve the
integrity of our beautiful valley.
Thanks for reading,
Mike Chalmers