HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-06-09 - AGENDA REPORTS - NEWHALL AVE HOUSING COMPLEX (2)Agenda Item: 15
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Q) AGENDA REPORT
NEW BUSINESS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE:
June 9, 2015
SUBJECT:
APPROVAL OF A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT WITH NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE
OF CALIFORNIA AND NEWHALL AVENUE HOUSING
PARTNERS, L.P., FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 30 -UNIT
HOUSING COMPLEX WITH 13 INCOME -RESTRICTED UNITS ON
NEWHALL AVENUE
DEPARTMENT:
Community Development
PRESENTER:
Erin Lay
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
I. Adopt a resolution approving the Disposition and Development Agreement with National
Community Renaissance of California and Newhall Avenue Housing Partners, L.P., and
making findings regarding the application of Article XXXIV to the project;
2. Appropriate $3.8 million from the City Housing Successor fund balance to expenditure
account 13405-5161.001; and
3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute all required documentation to
execute the Disposition and Development Agreement, subject to review by the City Attorney,
BACKGROUND
Need for Affordable Housing
There is a need for affordable housing for low- and moderate -income residents in the City of
Santa Clarita. This need was quantified when the State of California conducted its Regional
Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the years of 2013 to 2021. The RHNA identified a
need for over 5,700 housing units for low- and moderate -income residents. The State of
California and the federal government require the City to address the need for affordable housing
in a number of ways:
!� L^?�oLf_% -�{(�Page 1
���OWED�A���`� °---m Packet Pg. 154
The State of California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD)
requires the City to create policies and programs to address the housing needs of low- and
moderate -income residents as part of the Housing Element of the General Plan.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires that the Commuity
Development Block Grant (CDBG) 5 -Year Consolidated Plan consider and address the
housing needs of low- and moderate -income residents in the use of CDBG funds.
The HUD -required Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) identifies a
lack of affordable housing as a main impediment to fair housing in the City of Santa
Clarita. HUD requires the City to address each impediment identified in the Al.
Redevelopment AQenev
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Santa Clarita (RDA) was created in 1997 to address
the economic and physical blighting conditions in the Newhall Redevelopment Project Area
(Project Area) and the lack of affordable housing. In 2008, the RDA issued tax-exempt housing
bonds, secured by the Low- and Moderate -Income Housing Fund, to generate funds to develop
the needed affordable housine.
Selection ofAffordable Housing Developer
In 2006, the City and RDA issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to identify potential
developers to build affordable housing in the Project Area. Because of their extensive
experience with producing high-quality projects, The Related Companies of California (Related)
and Southern California Housing Development Corporation of Los Angeles (SCHDCLA), were
selected to work together with the City. Subsequently, SCHDCLA changed their name to
National Community Renaissance of California (CORE).
On November 23, 2010, the City Council and RDA jointly approved an Exclusive Negotiation
Agreement (ENA) with CORE and Related (together: the Developers) to develop affordable
housing. The ENA called for a more detailed and specific Disposition and Development
Agreement (Agreement) detailing the scope and terms for the development of a specific
affordable housing project once a location was identified.
Acquisition ofLand for Affordable Housine
In 2010, the City and RDA acquired two adjacent parcels, the Caltrans parcel and the Jana,
parcel, in the Project Area with the intent of using them for the development of affordable
housing. The parcels are in an ideal location for affordable housing given their proximity to
transit, schools, a major transportation corridor, and other services. They are also zoned
appropriately for multi -family rental housing and are located in an area with housing of a similar
density.
The two parcels were acquired using two funding sources: Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) entitlement funds and Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) funds, which
the City had received from the State in a competitive process. The CDBG and NSP funds
imposed specific deadlines on the development of affordable housing.
Page 2
Packet Pg. 155
Caltrans Parcel - A 1.6 -acre parcel used as a park-and-ride lot on Newhall Avenue. The terms
of the acquisition require this parcel to be used for a public purpose. Acquisition of the parcel
used:
• $1,050,123 in NSP funds
Deadline for development of affordable housing: December 2013
• $45,877 in CDBG funds
Deadline for development of affordable housing: June 2016
Jang Parcel - A privately -owned parcel of land. This .45 -acre parcel was acquired by the City
and RDA through an Assignment and Assumption Agreement in which the Developers
negotiated an acquisition agreement with the owner. Acquisition of the parcel used:
• $45,877 in CDBG funds
Deadline for development of affordable housing: June 2016
• $438,249 in RDA housing funds
In 2010, the Developers entered into negotiations with the owner of a third parcel located
between the Jang and Caltrans parcels in order to create one contiguous parcel on which to build
mixed-use affordable housing development.
Newhall Avenue Development Entitlements
In 2011, the Developers worked with staff to create a concept for a two-phase, mixed-use project
called Newhall Avenue Development (Project). This project was designed so each phase could
be built independently of the other, and yet be complementary and consistent. Phase One was
designed as a multi -family housing development on the Caltrans parcel alone. Phase Two was a
mixed-use development on the adjacent Jang parcel and the third parcel, which was still under
negotiation. Attached are an aerial map showing the property ownership; an illustrative plan
showing the two-phase concept; and an architectural illustration of Phase One. Ultimately, the
Developers were unable to reach an agreement with the property owner and Phase Two of the
Project is on hold.
The Entitlement Application for Phase One, including a 3 percent density bonus and an Oak Tree
Permit for encroachment and pruning, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 19,
2011. Phase One consists of 30 units of family rental housing, with 29 affordable units and one
unit reserved for an on-site property manager. The Project is comprised of two-story townhomes
over single story, three-bedroom flats. Eight of the units are three-bedroom units and 22 are two-
bedroom units. Parking includes 75 resident and guest parking spaces, which meets the most
stringent City standard for parking in a multi -family development. Phase One also has a
recreational amenity package, including a tot -lot, landscaped open space, laundry facilities, and a
community center to be used for management and social services.
As provided for by law, the following steps were taken to ensure the public was aware of the
Planning Commission Hearing for the Project entitlements:
• Signage was posted on the Caltrans parcel
• Property owners within 1,000 feet of the project were notified by mail
• A legal notice was placed in The Signal
Page 3
Packet Pg. 156
Staff met with residents of the area on May 5 and June 22 of 2011. Residents expressed
concerns related to the lack of street parking in the area due to the restriping of Newhall Avenue
in 2006. Staff continued to work with residents of the Oak Creek condominiums through the fall
of 2011 to help address their concerns regarding the parking in their complex.
Dissolution of Redevelopment
The negotiation of the Agreement for Phase One was nearing completion when ABx1 26 and 27
were passed and signed into law by the Governor on June 28, 2011. This legislation dissolved
Redevelopment Agencies in California and froze the housing bond proceeds which were needed
to finance Phase One. Phase One was put on hold, and the Agreement was not brought to the
City Council for consideration.
As part of the RDA dissolution process, the City opted to become the Housing Successor to the
former RDA, with responsibility for the existing housing bond proceeds and housing assets, and
for carrying out housing activities. In 2013, legislation passed which set forth additional
regulations for the RDA wind -down process and provided a process to recapture housing bond
funds. In 2013, the City completed the recapture process, and on January 1, 2014, a total of
$5,056,509 in housing bond proceeds became available to use on Phase One of the Project. '
Neighborhood Stabilization Fund Repayment
Because the funds needed to construct the Project were unavailable from 2010 to 2013, the City
was unable to meet the NSP deadline of December 2013 for the development of affordable
housing units on the Caltrans parcel. In 2014, the City paid back the NSP grant using
$1,050,123 of the recaptured housing bond proceeds. This funding shift did not result in any
ownership change on the Caltrans parcel since the City was the recipient of the NSP funds and
is the Housing Successor with responsibility for the housing bond proceeds. The Housing
Successor's deadline for the development of affordable housing using the recaptured housing
bond proceeds is August 2017, with an option for a five-year extension to August 2022.
PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
When the Housing Successor recaptured the housing bond proceeds in January 2014, staff began
a new negotiation process on an Agreement for the development of Phase One. The attached
Agreement spells out the terms for Phase One, including:
• Project budget and schedule
• Amounts and conditions for the contribution of City -controlled funds
• Terms of the conveyance of the property
• Requirements for application for other non -City funds
• Maintenance and management of the development
• Levels and length of the affordability for each proposed affordable unit
The key points in the Agreement are described in more detail below.
Ownership and Proiect Manazement
The development will be owned by Newhall Avenue Housing Partners, L.P., a Limited
Partnership of Related and CORE. The property will be professionally managed by the
Page 4,
Packet Pg. 157
15'
Developer's own management company. The Developers have an excellent track record of
long-term management of affordable housing projects. However, the Agreement allows the City
to choose a different management company for the Project if it is not being managed to the
City's standard.
Affordability
The Agreement will control 13 of the 30 units through a 55 -year affordability covenant. The
covenant restricts rent and occupancy to households earning at or below 30 percent, 40 percent,
or 50 percent of the Area Median Income (AMI). Currently, 50 percent AMI for a family of four
is $42,500. Rent for a two-bedroom unit for that family of four would be $641 per month. A'
table showing the income limits and rental rates for these 13 restricted units is attached. Other
non -City funding sources specified in the Agreement will restrict the remaining 16 affordable
units in a similar fashion.
Pursuant to section 37001 of the California Health and Safety Code, a project is not subject to
Article XXXIV where no more than 49 percent of the units in the project are required to be
occupied by persons of low income. The project is exempt from Article XXXIV based on the
fact that only 13 of 30 units (43 percent of the units) will be subject to affordability restrictions.
Tenant Screening
Tenants will be required to complete a thorough application and screening process, including a
criminal background check, credit check, landlord references, verification of employment, and
verification of other income. Applicants will be required to prove they have sufficient resources
to pay the rent, typically a stable monthly income at least twice that of the rent amount. The
Agreement also allows the City to inspect the development annually and review tenant eligibility
documentation and waiting lists.
Development Financing
The City -owned parcel will be sold to the Partnership for one dollar for the purpose of
developing Phase One. The cost to construct Phase One is $14,397,605. The Agreement
requires the Developers to apply for an allocation of $9,844,981 in Low Income Housing Tax
Credits (Tax Credits) from the State of California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC).
The allocation of Tax Credits is competitive, and the first application does not always result in
funding. The Agreement requires the Developers to submit at least three consecutive
applications for Tax Credit funding. A permanent loan of $449,263, repaid from rental income
generated by the property, will also be obtained. The size of this loan is limited due to the
reduced amount of rental income generated from the affordable rents.
Typical to affordable housing development, there is a gap in the financing structure after other
available sources are utilized. The funding gap for the Project is $4,103,361. The Agreement
proposes to fund this gap in part using a $3,800,000 grant of housing bond proceeds. In addition,
the Agreement proposes $303,361 in a 0 percent interest residual receipts loan of 2015-2016
CDBG funds. Per federal regulations, the CDBG loan will be limited in the Agreement to
demolition and off-site improvement costs. The funding structure for the Project is shown
below:
Page 5
Packet Pg. 158
Funding Source
Housing
Bond Proceeds
Amount
Tax Credit Allocation
$
9,844,981
Permanent Loan
$
449.263
City Grant (housing bond proceeds)
$
3,800,000
City Loan (CDBG)
$
303,361
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
$14,397,605
Contribution of Caltrans parcel (value)
$
1,096,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
$15,493,605
A full proforma, showing financing, sources and uses, unit numbers and sizes, and calculations
for Tax Credits, is attached. A full project budget is included as Exhibit D to the Agreement.
FUNDING SHIFT
As previously noted, the City owns the Jang parcel, which was intended to be part of Phase Two
of the Project. The Jang parcel is not scheduled to be developed at this time and is not included
as part of the Agreement. However, the Jang parcel is still subject to a June 2016 deadline for
development, based on the use of CDBG funds for the original acquisition. to order to best meet
development deadlines imposed by the funding -source and provide the greatest flexibility to the
City, a funding shift to move the CDBG obligation into the Caltrans property is proposed as
shown below:
This shift will result in the deadline for development of the Jang parcel to be extended to 2017,
with the potential for a five-year extension to 2022. This shift will not affect the ownership on
either parcel; both parcels will be owned by the City. Staff has consulted the City's bond
counsel, the City Attorney, HUD (for the CDBG funds), and the City's Finance Manager, and all
parties are confident the funding shift meets all statutory and regulatory guidelines.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as directed by the City Council
Page 6
Packet Pg. 159
Housing
Bond Proceeds
CDBG
TOTAL
Curren! Funding Split
Caltrans Acquisition
$1,050,123
$ 45,877
$1,096,000
Jang Acquisition
$ 438,249
$293,123
5 731,372
Proposed NEW Funding Split
Caltrans Acquisition
$ 757,000
$339,000
$1,096,000
Jang Acquisition
$ 731,372
$ 0
$ 731,372
This shift will result in the deadline for development of the Jang parcel to be extended to 2017,
with the potential for a five-year extension to 2022. This shift will not affect the ownership on
either parcel; both parcels will be owned by the City. Staff has consulted the City's bond
counsel, the City Attorney, HUD (for the CDBG funds), and the City's Finance Manager, and all
parties are confident the funding shift meets all statutory and regulatory guidelines.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as directed by the City Council
Page 6
Packet Pg. 159
FISCAL IMPACT
A total of $303,361 in 2015-2016 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds will be
appropriated for this project with the approval of the proposed 2015-2016 City budget (account
13343-5161.001). Upon approval of the recommended appropriation of $3.8 million in City
Housing Successor fund balance, there will be adequate funds for the obligations contained in
the Agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
Ownership Map/Two-Phase Concept/Phase One Illustrative
Newhall Avenue Development Income Limits and Rental Rates
Project Proforma
Disposition and Development Agreement (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Page 7
Packet Pg. 160
15.a
RESOLUTION NO. 15
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS ROLE AS HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH NATIONAL COMMUNITY
RENAISSANCE OF CALIFORNIA AND NEWHALL AVENUE HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P.
WHEREAS, in 2006, the City conducted a Request for Qualifications for developers
to assist in identifying a site and financing plan to construct a family affordable housing
development, and identified National Community Renaissance of California (CORE) and The
Related Companies of California, LLC, (Related) (together: the Developers) to assist in the
execution of the Redevelopment Plan through the development of affordable housing at 23610
Newhall Avenue (Site); and
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2010, the City and the Former Redevelopment Agency
entered into an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement (ENA) with the Developers for the negotiation
of a Disposition and Development Agreement (Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the City owns property located at the Site that was purchased with
Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds made available as part of the Housing and Economic
Recovery Act of 2008, and which the City wishes to use for the construction of an affordable
housing development; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2012, the California Legislature passed, and the Governor
signed, Assembly Bill 1484 (AB 1484), which, among other things, made certain revisions to
certain of the statutes added by Assembly Bill x 26 (ABx1 26) (together with AB 1484: the
Dissolution Act). AB 1484 amended Health and Safety Code Section 34176, added by Part
1.85, by, among other things, adding subdivision (g) thereto, which sets forth a process by
which housing bond proceeds from bonds issued prior to January 1, 2011, for affordable
housing purposes, and backed by an agencys low- and moderate -income housing fund that
remains after satisfaction of enforceable obligations approved in a Recognized Obligation
Payment Schedule (ROPS) (Excess Housing Bond Proceeds), may be used by the Housing
Successor for affordable housing purposes, but which states that no such intended use or
commitment is valid and binding on the Housing Successor until the intended use and
commitment is included in an approved and valid ROPS; and
WHEREAS, the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Santa Clarita (Successor Agency) took to its Oversight Board on September 26, 2014, a
Transfer Agreement whereby the Oversight Board agreed that the Housing Successor could
utilize Excess Housing Bond Proceeds and report back to the Oversight Board rather than
having to place each expenditure of Excess Housing Bond Proceeds on the BOPS, and the
transfer of Excess Housing Bond Proceeds, pursuant to the Transfer Agreement, was itself
placed on the appropriate ROPS, approved by the Oversight Board, and tacitly approved by the
California Department of Finance; and
Packet Pg. 161
15.a
WHEREAS, the Housing Successor will report the use of Excess Housing Bond
Proceeds to the Oversight Board via a resolution brought to it by the Successor Agency
consistent with the terms of the Transfer Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Successor has already utilized Excess Housing Bond
Proceeds to "buy out" certain Federal Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds that were
originally used to purchase the Site but which had to be refunded due to the lengthy delays in
Site disposition caused by the effects of the Dissolution Act; and
WHEREAS, The Related Companies of California, LLC, and National Community
Renaissance of California have formed Newhall Avenue Housing Partners, L.P., to construct,
own, and operate the affordable housing development at the Site (Project); and
WHEREAS, Newhall Avenue Housing Partners, L.P., is a single -purpose affiliate of
the Developers with whom the ENA was entered into and the City is willing to work with this
affiliate on the development of the Site; and
WHEREAS, Newhall Avenue Housing Partners, L.P., has proposed a project that
consists of a 30 -unit housing community, with 29 rental housing units and one manager's unit,
on approximately 1.62 acres, with eight (8) of the units being three-bedroom units and twenty-
two (22) being two-bedroom units, comprised predominantly of two-story townhomes over
single story three-bedroom flats; and
WHEREAS, the Project will feature at least seventy-five (75) on -grade and tuck -
under resident and guest parking spaces distributed about the Site, as well as a recreational
amenity package including a tot -lot, landscaped open space, and a community center that will be
used for management, social services, and laundry facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Housing Successor, in exchange for its contribution of grant finds to
the Project, will require thirteen (13) of the twenty-nine (29) rental units to be restricted through
the use of affordable housing covenants, which covenants will operate to restrict the rent on the
units for a period of at least fifty-five (55) years from the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy, in compliance with the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California;
and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared on the Project, in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which included the publication of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration that was adopted along with the land use approvals for the Project; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment was prepared on the Project in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), including a Finding of No
Significant Impact.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, acting in its role as
Housing Successor to the former Redevelopment Agency, does hereby resolve as follows:
Packet Pg. 162
15.a
SECTION I. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Project is consistent
with the authority of the former Redevelopment Agency under Community Redevelopment Law,
as it will provide affordable housing within the Project Area. Further, that the Project, as
contemplated in the Agreement, is consistent with the Implementation Plan for the Project Area,
as the goals and programs in that plan provide for the production and rehabilitation of affordable
housing in a manner consistent with the affordable housing projects as set forth in the
Agreement.
. SECTION 2. The City hereby finds and determines that the Project proposed by the
Agreement is exempt from the requirements of Article XXXIV ofthe California Constitution.
This exemption is based on the fact that, under the Agreement, only thirteen (13) of the thirty
(30) units (43 percent of the units) will be subject to affordability restrictions. Pursuant to
Section 37001 of the California Health and Safety Code, a project is not subject to Article
XXX IV where no more than 49 percent of the units in the project are required to be occupied by
persons of low income.
SECTION 3. The City hereby approves the Agreement, and hereby authorizes and directs
the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, subject to any minor,
technical, or clarifying changes that may be approved by the City Attorney. The City Council
hereby further authorizes and directs the City Manager to take all actions and execute all
documents as necessary to carry out the Agreement and accomplish the Project, including, but
not limited to, execution of all subsequent documentation called for by the Agreement.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
N
N
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this `h day of 2015.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DA
Packet Pg. 163
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
1, Kevin Tonoian, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a
regular meeting thereof, held on the -`h day of 2015, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
15.a
Packet Pg. 164