HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-01-12 - AGENDA REPORTS - FIRE PROTECTION DEVELOPER FEE (2)Agenda Item: 11
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Q) AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
i,
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: 1 j=�
DATE:
January 12, 2016
SUBJECT:
ADJUST CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
DEVELOPER FEE
DEPARTMENT:
Public Works
PRESENTER:
Gregory Hisel
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt a resolution to adjust Consolidated Fire
Protection District developer fees from $1.0574 per square foot to $1.0883 per square foot in
accordance with the Developer Fee Agreement between the City of Santa Clarita and the
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County.
BACKGROUND
In accordance with the City of Santa Clarita's (City) agreement with Los Angeles County
(County) to be part of the Consolidated Fire Protection District (Fire District), the City is
required to adopt the updated Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan (Attachment A) within a
reasonable period of time. The last increase to the Fire District developer fee became effective
February 1, 2015.
Fire District developer fees finance the construction of new (and replacement) fire stations and
related fire protection improvements in the City. The pending, new Fire Station 104, designed to
replace a temporary facility on Golden Valley Road will be financed by Fire District developer
fees. The construction of this new fire station is identified as a specific goal of the Santa Clarita
2020 Plan in the area of Public Safety.
The current proposed fee increase from $1.0574 to $1.0883 per square foot is consistent with the
fee increase adopted by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on November 24, 2015.
The Fire District developer fee is charged on new residential buildings, new detached residential
accessory structures, new commercial buildings, and residential or commercial additions over
2,000 square feet. The fee is collected at the time of building permit issuance.
Page 1
PacketPg. 77
The increased fee amount will ensure the City's Fire District developer fees are consistent with
the fees collected by the County in the unincorporated areas of the Santa Clarita Valley and will
satisfy the agreement with the County.
The Building Industry Association was notified of the public hearing. If approved by the City
Council, the adjusted fee will go into effect February 1, 2016.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the City as a result of this resolution. There are minor
administrative costs for collecting and transmitting Fire District developer fees to the County.
These costs would not be affected by the fee adjustment.
ATTACHMENTS
Notice of Public Hearing
Resolution
Total Developer Fees Collected
Developer Fee Program
Page 2
Packet Pg. 78
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A PROPOSED INCREASE IN
CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DEVELOPER FEES
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
A public hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita to consider an
increase to Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fees from $1.0574 to $1.0883 per
square foot of floor area of new buildings. The proposed fee adjustment reflects current average
costs associated with land acquisition for fire station sites, fire station construction, equipment,
and administrative costs associated with fee collection and project and facilities management. In
accordance with the City of Santa Clarita's agreement with the County of Los Angeles to be part
of the Consolidated Fire Protection District, the City of Santa Clarita is required to adopt the
updated Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan within a reasonable period of time. The
proposed fee adjustment is consistent with the fee increase adopted by the Los Angeles County
Board of Supervisors on November 24, 2015.
The public hearing will be held by the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers,
23920 Valencia Boulevard, first floor, the 12th day of January 2016, at 6:00 p.m.
If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may be heard on this matter at this time.
Further information regarding the proposed fee increase may be obtained by visiting the City of
Santa Clarita's Building & Safety division, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 140, Santa Clarita,
California, or by contacting Ruben Barrera, City Building Official, at (661) 255-4952.
Date: December 1, 2015
Kevin Tonoian,
City Clerk
Publish Date: December 23, 2015 and December 30, 2015
Packet Pg. 79
RESOLUTION NO. 16-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO DEVELOPER FEES
FOR FUNDING OF FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
WHEREAS, on July 14, 1992, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita adopted
Resolution No. 92-152, which established afinance plan to fund fire protection facilities in the
benefit area designated as the Santa Clarita Valley as part of the Consolidated Fire Protection
District of Los Angeles County; and
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 92-15, which
authorized the establishment of a fee to fund fire protection facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does hereby resolve
as follows:
SECTION 1. To repeal all fees set forth by prior resolutions for the Consolidated Fire
Protection District of Los Angeles County as originally established in Resolution No. 92-152 by
the City Council.
SECTION 2. Establish said Consolidated Fire Protection District fee of $1.0883 per
square foot of the new floor area of buildings, calculated as provided for in Resolution No. 92-
152.
SECTION 3. Except as herein modified, Resolution No. 92-152 shall remain in full force
and effect.
SECTION 4. This resolution shall go into full force and effect on February 1, 2016.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January 2016.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
Packet Pg. 80
0
Gl
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Kevin Tonoian, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a
regular meeting thereof, held on the 12th day of January 2016, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
Packet Pg. 81
il
TOTAL CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
DEVELOPER FEES
COLLECTED SINCE LAST ADJUSTMENT
The last adjustment to the Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fee occurred on
February 1, 2015. The fee implemented on that date was $1.0574 per square foot of floor area of
new buildings. The following fees were collected during the noted fiscal years:
FY 2010-11 - $111,670
FY 2011-12 - $354,926
FY 2012-13 - $269,107 Note: A refund of $204,160 was issued to Pardee Homes in Fiscal Year
2013-14 for the Golden Valley Ranch project.
FY 2013-14 - $221,279
FY 2014-15 - $651,513
The Consolidated Fire Protection District developer fee is charged on new residential buildings,
new detached residential accessory structures, new commercial buildings, and new commercial
additions over 2,000 square feet at the time the building permit is issued.
Packet Pg. 82
Packet Pg. 83
Q
Z
¢
0
a
U
oOC
a
0
W
LU
_N
u'a
Q
Cr
W
Z
N
=
O
Z
LL
H
7
W
O 0
U
O
0_C
J
O
WU
LL
W~
N
CO
w
>
J
LL
O
W
¢
Z
a
W
¢
LU
LLW
m
cc
Z
W
Q
w
W
ti
C3=acQ
en
H
LL
o
LL
Ir
0L
0
W
J
O
O
N
W
Z
O
Z
U
O
U
Packet Pg. 83
° a m m t a n o w m m
`gym nn� $ t 5 ga wm
m c
EL
Em
E«
m h o
cv 3 d Tn m W @ o- i
d o d m n °ryroc a c
mo cwm YS c8 05£ O c
k EO S a .. 2 v m m w 8 r a n
DE m $a E m c nW u°E`o w a " E
y?
a_wm QE c E- C oo $
AG ymm m e
.�
m m0 12 Wa o
LLynE
a0
m?
8
N> 'b
t N r
m m
5m pmt ' m 'o � �`° a-yd'Tsi omda m$ t Fo
N N
m3 ro90 m cc dTL- E` g m
cT m
do EiiLL W o m 5i mm c
El
m Em �°$`o nc �o'ow 9c d c o
m N{.N £m$4mp
w no0m
E CO 1 C L_ $>.
ccoram mm S c o._cw
o'& E2� g �a `o' ,9 >a°S0 E� a S m
m3 �`'
o y m W`m S, m'mo oro E
`cm Em0E m c
Ti 2° i g mE=m wan ea m;¢ 2 2'm >`
mm u aZ Te
d$ a.G@m 5 °c n 5.° Tc adc c
c E mu w m roo ,Pu 3°E m $.P 1 S
c m m �+ m m E c 8 > N m X g n
do Er 3 ` we E°'�d $n mmmc me c
aq Nva y.�+oo m$ Baum m'o g.
c q�
a
coQ �E $ P38p aS 'w m
aO�ii
m } c
Nt m`m�'•C°- 8 and mj[ mm E E. m Eo
to no>n mw w c no a C 'm
m g v
JE
oa ¢ r
a w
OW ba NU
u mma
m O
LL ` m C O N y W m D r E
nN Ec§m a Ubpi E
D a _C {a ? U U 41 E d $
>a
o m a 'a a E y .� u S 0 E c
12 if'D $ Ln
Packet Pg. 84
Packet Pg. 85
by
sm
'E
Ev
a&ffio?N
5$E
'n•keN
$E5$@�0Ee
�W2m
`e9
E•
$g2
Sm
�§�E
us g_3
0
g6g
�mmEF
im}fi
m8�¢�
LL�S�c
SioQ,Ec
cfi
9c
OMEE
SEI
NN
pm'iy9
E E
3gF�
55 o
r
Egg
F
L�
Z LL
}'
L
fl
w
a&
aE
E
E
m S
e
LL
U6
Ca
a
Ca
w
w
s
wN
w
w
w
.9aa
9a�
9a�
Sia
E
Smm
a
c
40m
E�
q
IT
9
IE-iV ¢ri
Packet Pg. 85
Packet Pg. 86
|
D
D
� {
� »
t|
G
|�
G,v
�
.�&
§
/
)Rom
\|
I!!
.!
\
/
AR
�{
)
/|
/! �
is
{
|;)}
.
}{
D
D
t|
\
/
AR
�{
)
/! �
is
{
.
}{
�
|!
{
!/
\�
!!
!!
■
;
(
/
\
•§\
!!
t
/
\
E
D
D
Packet Pg. 88
E
_= h
y
s
o b
�y
F d
€
yn
uvi
d w`
N
C
ry
S
9
Q
m g
a
w
�
�
g6
N �
Packet Pg. 88
Y'
Packet Pg. 89
D
D
!®!)
!
#
zU!
$k
�°
!!
!!\
!!
■|
;
;
a
)
§
!!
!!
!!
!/\
!/)
#ƒ!
D
D
Packet Pg. 91
m
w
mna
c�
�B
Y
am m9
s
g
9m
_
spp
9
s
E
yay
9 c
a
e y
m
'm a
m
n
¢
0
�o
c®
amwo
CS
F itz
LL'6
2 a
z 9 a
6 0 8
G
u4�
8w
o�
�b
8 EE
8 c_E
85
c
gw
o w
�w
w
w
N C
r
e_ W
u dF
N
y
gq[
bb
N
N
N
N
N
N
qq
NN
? }y
3
e 3
NN Sfs
o
d®
m
a v@
a
ay}
p
qq
>N
u
S
cs
�I€L avFah
°ei��<s �93
_lNp>IN
3�
ZNN
i ISN�
L (9eU
IL2
r€iZN
Ii
Packet Pg. 91
Packet Pg. 92
r
r
r
a
m�
v�
�R
E9
f8
f8
mi -y
¢ 2
m
�n
N
on
`c8
S
y
a`8g5
v
m
@
gg @
oe�m8a
rob_
83'c
gm �a
w$8
�a8
$Pc
F
58-
8
gi o
m
g
g�smg
m
s—o
Ysa
ygs`
AIR
8 'a
oQ�sm
mai
4 E
6�
ss
QQ
N C
i V
LL E
C
1.
Q
q
�
b
n6
O
'9i
N 2
w
P
05
E
E
@F�
�o
�m
wpm
LL%a
Packet Pg. 92
DEVELOPER FEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CONSOLIDATED
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF DEVELOPER FEE CALCULATIONS
2015 DEVELOPER FEE UPDATE
Developer Fee
Cost Component
Land
Station Development
Finance Charges
Equipment
Administrative Costs
Total Cost Per Station
Total Square Feet of
Development per Station
Cost/Fee per Square Foot
FI Wf$Fee L{Me 16 MV Fee Fo All¢tM Ae
Area 1 - Maltbul
I F--A-m-a 2
Area 3
Santa Monica Mtnsj
ISanta Clarita ValleA
jAntelope Valle
$ 1,306,800
$ 1,468,843
$ 361,548
8,1521100
8,441,479
8,441,479
-
1,663,364
-
914,636
999,441
914;636
85,000
87,649
85,000
$ 10,458,536
$12,660,776
9,802,663
11,633,307 11,633,307 11, 633, 307
$ 0.8690 $ 1.0883 $ 0.8426
Packet Pg. 93
E
U
N pR
p 6
Oam
1= z
ULLZ
Wq
Ir LL
IL IC Wr
cccc IL
WW N
LL
.pw
J V
y N
Z
V
n
O
w
s
r
�
N
W
AW
m
p m
r¢�
N m
m
mem—
m
Coro
o
LL CN
I� h
c
m
j
N
f0 10
YZ
ca
O
M
v
d0100 m
LL
02 r Oa
m
W m�
N
V
0
O in W'ca
N
> p m
M
N
}
d m j d
O LL 2 2
Q
pQUc
{�p1
m Fe 0 0
O O
a
N
5
I- F ♦- F- f-
IL
W`
m
n m
N Q_
m �p N
06
6
N i
01
c�NmN�
C7
aD
m
ILN O
bz
W
N
.246 pU
N
ui
N
Qg�
n
O
w
s
np
N
r
m
vrn
r¢�
�
m
W
?
�
LL dO
V
I� h
c
m
O
(O 100 0
N
M
ca
� «
m
LL
V
W m�
N
V
)
J �
O in W'ca
N
n
O
w
ro
m
N€ y
m N O 0
`w m o
a C ¢ N m N
N c
m m t 2 m
n V y 2 a LL
s- ��
O
m am o
w 3 an d c€ O N
m v F u 5 a m
60
b 0 m N N Fzi V _n N
d O U
O y m » c c c LL
m m&
NU U
ait 15 ¢ a v0
ytm� C'"LL R N
N C
.)E °? om a £
roma0 mmmm 12>
8 E s w 3 c n m S
`0N P"6 `�� S E c 9
C m m a V
5€ p v
cc m a m 3
o o T// N
c c
€ � P c
3 3 T
mpLm" amdmai 0^m'$c oZ€mc 'o
0 m
an 2m
POc
0 0 m
a $
Pi 8D c wg >p.>a cyN
C C Il C CJ n N a m
tp o
"'
€€ m LL N O t m m N m
.m m y LyJ 7 'O j O
o.m �m c
m a m o N 9 0 0 0 o E
m v > v
V U m V m m m m j M y
C c€ C
Packet Pg. 94
s
V
N
mm
U
m
�
m
W
?
�
c
m
c
m d
m
ca
� «
m
LL
V
W m�
N
V
O
N
O in W'ca
N
U
N
}
d m j d
O LL 2 2
}
{�p1
m Fe 0 0
O O
a
N
IL
I- F ♦- F- f-
IL
ro
m
N€ y
m N O 0
`w m o
a C ¢ N m N
N c
m m t 2 m
n V y 2 a LL
s- ��
O
m am o
w 3 an d c€ O N
m v F u 5 a m
60
b 0 m N N Fzi V _n N
d O U
O y m » c c c LL
m m&
NU U
ait 15 ¢ a v0
ytm� C'"LL R N
N C
.)E °? om a £
roma0 mmmm 12>
8 E s w 3 c n m S
`0N P"6 `�� S E c 9
C m m a V
5€ p v
cc m a m 3
o o T// N
c c
€ � P c
3 3 T
mpLm" amdmai 0^m'$c oZ€mc 'o
0 m
an 2m
POc
0 0 m
a $
Pi 8D c wg >p.>a cyN
C C Il C CJ n N a m
tp o
"'
€€ m LL N O t m m N m
.m m y LyJ 7 'O j O
o.m �m c
m a m o N 9 0 0 0 o E
m v > v
V U m V m m m m j M y
C c€ C
Packet Pg. 94