HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-11-27 - AGENDA REPORTS - APPROVAL OF FM ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS OF DEDICATION, (2)Agenda Item: 6
DATE: November 27, 2018
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP, ACCEPTANCE OF OFFERS
OF DEDICATION, ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING EASEMENT,
AND APPROVAL OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT FOR OFFSITE
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR TRACT NO. 50283-02 - NEEDHAM RANCH
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Shannon Pickett
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Approve Final Tract Map for Tract No. 50283-02.
2. Accept on behalf of the public the offer of dedication of easement for public use and road
purposes; the offer of dedication of easement for sight distance; and the right to prohibit any
and all allowable uses within open space.
3. Abandon the existing easement for slope purposes.
4. Make findings as follows: This project is consistent with the provisions of Sections 66474
and 66474.1 of the Subdivision Map Act and should be approved.
5. Instruct the Director of Administrative Services to endorse the Special Assessment Statement
on the face of Final Tract Map for Tract No. 50283-02, which indicates all special
assessments levied by the City of Santa Clarita (City) are paid.
6. Instruct the City Clerk to endorse the City Clerk's Statement on the face of Final Tract Map
for Tract No. 50283-02, which embodies the approval of said map, the acceptance of the
dedications shown thereon, and the abandonment of the easements shown thereon.
7. Instruct the City Engineer to endorse the City Engineer's Statement on the face of Final Tract
Map for Tract No. 50283-02, which provides for verification of substantial conformance with
Page 1
the Tentative Tract Map and all provisions of local ordinances and state laws applicable at
the time of approval.
8. Instruct the City Surveyor to endorse the City Surveyor's Statement on the face of Final
Tract Map for Tract No. 50283-02, which provides for verification that the map is technically
correct.
9. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the Acquisition Agreement between the
City of Santa Clarita and Center at Needham Ranch Land, LLC for right-of-way acquisition,
subject to City Attorney approval.
BACKGROUND
The Final Tract Map for Tract No. 50283-02, an exhibit of which is attached hereto, has been
reviewed by staff and found to be in substantial conformance with the principles and standards
required by the Unified Development Code and State Subdivision Map Act. The Needham
Ranch project was originally approved by the City Council on June 24, 2003, as a part of Master
Case 99-264 including the certification of the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the
project, along with the following entitlements: Tentative Tract Map 50283; the Development
Agreement; General Plan Amendment; Zone Change; Conditional Use Permit; Hillside Review;
and Oak Tree Permit. The project was also approved as Tentative Tract No. 50283 by the City of
Santa Clarita's Planning division on January 18, 2017. This Final Tract Map consists of a
subdivision of 40.05 acres into 11 lots, including six open space lots and five
industrial/commercial lots. The subject property is located west of Sierra Highway, south of
Newhall Avenue.
The Final Tract Map was reviewed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Surveyor
and found to be in substantial conformance with the previously approved tentative tract map. The
conditions of approval established by the City of Santa Clarita were also met and fees have been
and/or will be paid as indicated on the attached Fact Sheet. Therefore, the Final Tract Map is
ready for City Council approval and acceptance of the dedications shown thereon.
Pursuant to Section 66474.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, a legislative body shall not deny
approval of a final or parcel map if it was previously approved as a tentative map for the
proposed subdivision and if it finds the final or parcel map is in substantial compliance with the
previously approved tentative map.
The Acquisition Agreement, a draft copy of which is attached hereto, is necessary to construct
offsite improvements in accordance with the certified environmental impact report.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Staff has not identified alternative actions that would conform to requirements set forth in the
Subdivision Map Act.
Page 2
FISCAL IMPACT
The public streets shown on the Final Tract Map for Tract No. 50283-02 will be dedicated to the
City. The maintenance of this additional pavement will have minimal impact on the City's street
maintenance budget. All applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare fees have been paid.
ATTACHMENTS
Exhibit Map
Fact Sheet
DRAFT offsite acquisition agreement
Page 3
FACTSHEET
PARCEL MAP 50283-02
Location: West of Sierra Highway and south of Newhall Avenue
Acreage: Approximately 40.05 acres
Number of Lots: Eleven (11)
Use: Industrial/Commercial
Owner: Center at Needham Ranch Land, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
and Needham Ranch Land Company, LLC, a California Limited Liability
Company
Trails/Paseos: No new trails are being dedicated to the City by this map.
Streets: This map is dedicating portions of Needham Ranch Parkway and Pine Street.
B&T Fees: The applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) fee(s) have been paid.
Transit Fees: Transit fee(s) are not applicable to commercial developments.
Quimby Fees: Quimby fee(s) are not applicable to commercial developments.
School Fees: School fee(s) are not applicable to commercial developments.
AGREEMENT REGARDING ACQUISITION OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY
(AGT18-00003)
This Agreement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA, a municipal corporation ("City"), and CENTER AT NEEDHAM RANCH LAND,
LLC, a Deleware Limited Liability Company ("Developer") (hereinafter, City and Developer
shall collectively be referred to as the "Parties").
WITNESSETH:
The Parties do agree as follows:
Section 1 Recitals. This Agreement is entered into with respect to the following facts, which
the Parties agree are true and correct:
A. Developer is the current owner in fee simple of certain real property in the City of
Santa Clarita, as shown in Exhibit A ("Property").
B. The Property is located within the City of Santa Clarita.
C. The Property was entitled on June 24, 2003 as Master Case No. 99-264 for the
Gate King Industrial Park project (now the Needham Ranch Business Park). The
entitlement process resulted in the certification of an Environmental Impact
Report that included a mitigation measure to construct a right -turn lane at the
intersection of Sierra Highway and Newhall Avenue ("Improvement").
D. The Improvement requires an offsite right-of-way easement for access over and
across property owned by Mike Redmond, SFXS Group ("ROW Easement"),
which is legally described and depicted on Exhibits B and C attached hereto.
E. Developer has been unable to acquire the ROW Easement and has thus been
unable to construct the Improvement related to said ROW Easement.
F. Pursuant to Sections 66462 and 66462.5 of the Government Code, City has
required that, as a condition precedent to approval of the final map consistent with
the VTTM and Master Case No. 99-264, Developer enter into an agreement upon
mutually agreeable terms to complete Improvement related to the ROW Easement
at such time as the City acquires the ROW Easement, and that Developer pay the
cost of acquiring the ROW Easement.
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -1-
DRAFT 11/9/15
J
Q
z
M
LU
0
a
a
Q
G. As of the Effective Date of this Agreement, Developer requests that the City use
its best efforts to acquire the ROW Easement either by negotiation or by
commencing proceedings pursuant to Title 7 of Part 3 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, at Developer's sole expense.
Section 2 Acquisition by City.
A. Developer shall complete at its sole cost the Improvement within 90 days after
City certifies in writing to Developer that it owns or has the right of possession to
the ROW Easement.
B. Commencement of Proceedings. On July 12, 2018, CBRE Valuation and
Advisory Services submitted an Appraisal Report for the Property and concluded
its value to be $179,000. Developer understands and agrees that City shall utilize
that appraisal for initial acquisition purposes, but that City reserves its right, in its
sole and unfettered discretion, to select, retain and use a separate appraiser for
litigation and trial.
In the event City staff is unable to acquire the ROW Easement by negotiation,
Q
City staff shall within 90 days thereafter recommend to the Santa Clarita City
Council that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Necessity pursuant to Code
v
of Civil Procedure §§1245.310 et seq. for the acquisition of the ROW Easement.
If after holding a hearing and giving judicious consideration to relevant testimony,
the City Council elects to adopt the proposed Resolution of Necessity, City shall
Q
Z
then commence an eminent domain proceeding for the acquisition of the ROW
M
Easement within 60 days after the adoption of the Resolution of Necessity.
>
0
C. Deposit of Probable Compensation. If an eminent domain action is filed and
a
Developer desires to obtain possession of the ROW Easement prior to judgment
Q
pursuant to Section 1255.410 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure, the
Developer shall provide City with an amount sufficient under Section 1255.010 et
E
seq. to make a deposit of probable compensation with the Los Angeles County
Superior Court for the purpose of obtaining such an order with respect to the
ROW Easement. Developer shall also provide on a timely basis any further
c
monetary amounts for any additional court deposits as may be directed by the
court pursuant to Section 1255.030 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the eminent
domain action.
D. Pavment of Purchase Price or Just Compensation for Acauisition of the ROW
Easement. Should the ROW Easement be acquired by agreement through
negotiation, Developer shall be solely responsible for payment of the purchase
price of the ROW Easement. Likewise, if the ROW Easement is acquired through
the eminent domain process, Developer shall be solely responsible for depositing
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -2-
DRAFT 11/9/15
with the court the amount of just compensation to be awarded for the taking of the
ROW Easement. In the event of any eminent domain action, Developer shall be
solely responsible for payment to the defendants in said action for any and all
Acquisition Costs (as defined below) associated with the taking of the ROW
Easement.
E. Right To Terminate Agreement. Upon written notice to City, Developer shall
have the right, at any time, to request that this Agreement be terminated . Upon
its receipt of such notice, City shall attempt to terminate the proceedings for
acquisition of the ROW Easement and shall refund any unused deposit money to
Developer; provided, however, that Developer shall be liable and shall reimburse
the City for any and all Acquisition Costs (as defined below) incurred to the date
of termination, as well as any and all further damages, costs or expenses required
to be paid for abandoning the acquisition including, but not limited to, all such
damages and costs pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1268.610. The
Parties understand the court may preclude City from abandoning the eminent
domain proceedings and, if this occurs, this Agreement shall remain in place, and
Developer shall remain liable to City for all further Acquisition Costs associated
with the completion of the eminent domain action.
F. Right To Amend Acquisition. Developer shall have the right, at any time
following written notice to and approval by the City, to have the acquisition of the
ROW Easement amended to include additional interests or exclude a portion of Q
the ROW Easement. Upon its receipt of such written notice and the City's z_
approval, City shall modify the necessary documents and/or pleadings to reflect
LU
the interests to be acquired as amended. Developer shall be liable and shall
reimburse the City for any and all damages, costs or expenses required to be paid
for amending the acquisition including, but not limited to, such damages and costs Q
pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1250.340(a). y
G. Settlement Offers. The Parties agree and understand that all offers of settlement
made voluntarily, or as may be required by law (including those required under
Section 1250.410(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure), will be so made in the sole
and unfettered discretion of the City, and Developer shall have no input
whatsoever in the decision to make settlement offers or accept settlement
demands from the property owner. Developer understands that if, for any reason, a
settlement offer by City made pursuant to Section 1250.410 is subsequently found
by a court to be unreasonable within the meaning of the provisions of, inter alia,
Section 1250.410(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, Developer shall, in addition
to all of its other obligations pursuant to this Agreement, promptly reimburse City
for all court awarded costs and litigation expenses paid by the City to the owners
of the ROW Easement ("Owners") pursuant to Section 1250.410(b).
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -3-
DRAFT 11/9/15
H. Litigation Discretion Vested Solely In City. If necessary in the City's sole
discretion, City may consult with Developer in regard to any proposed material
communications with Owners regarding the ROW Easement to be acquired
pursuant to this Agreement, which communications Developer shall keep
confidential to the extent permitted by law. However, City and its counsel shall,
in their sole and unfettered discretion, direct all decisions regarding the litigation
and trial of any eminent domain matter, including decisions regarding discovery,
law and motion, retention and use of experts and witnesses.
Section 3 Payment by Developer.
A. Acquisition Costs. The term "Acquisition Costs" as used herein shall include but
U)
not be limited to costs and payments incurred for attorneys' fees; expert witness
w
fees including appraisers, whether or not said expert witnesses are called to testify
U_
at trial; fees paid to non-party or adverse expert witnesses, court costs; litigation
expenses as defined by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1235.41; relocation costs;
w
costs and fees charged by acquisition and relocation agents; any court awards
v
including but not limited to compensation for the value of the property taken, any
Q
severance damages, any loss of goodwill, any delay damages, interest on the
<
Q
award, interest for immediate possession of the property taken; sanctions, if any,
awarded to the owner of the property being taken; costs for trial exhibit
preparation without regard to whether an exhibit was actually offered into
evidence or used at trial; filing and recordation fees; court costs awarded to the
Q
owner or payable to the court; court reporter fees; court costs awarded to the
z_
owner for abandonment or dismissal for all or any part of any condemnation
w
action; jury fees and fees for official reporting of testimony and proceedings
o
during trial and after judgment; all fees and costs recoverable pursuant to Code of
Civil Procedure sections 1250.410(b), 1235.140, 1268.610, 1268.620, 1268.710,
Q
and 1268.720; all arbitration, mediation, and other alternative dispute resolution
r
fees; the costs associated with any appeal of a judgment; costs and payments
incurred for any out-of-court settlements providing for compensation in avoidance E
of trial of any issue, and Fees & Costs (defined below). 2
Developer shall be liable for any and all such Acquisition Costs whether City
acquires the ROW Easement through a negotiated transaction, or through a
settlement or judgment in an eminent domain proceeding. Further, Developer
shall also be liable for such Acquisition Costs actually incurred by City in the
event that: [1] the City Council does not adopt a Resolution of Necessity, [2] an
eminent domain action is commenced and the action is abandoned at the direction
of Developer, [3] the acquisition is abandoned due to Developer's failure to
reimburse and/or pay the City as set forth herein, and/or [4] it is ultimately
adjudged that the City is not entitled to acquire the ROW Easement.
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -4-
DRAFT 11/9/15
B. Fees & Costs. Developer shall reimburse the City for all fees and costs incurred
by the City in connection with the acquisition of the ROW Easement by the City,
including but not limited to, attorney's fees by counsel for the City, costs for City
Staff, direct and indirect administrative costs (including fees fixed by law or
assessed by public agencies, long distance telephone calls, messenger and other
delivery fees, postage, parking and other local travel expenses, photocopying and
other reproduction costs, word processing charges, fax charges, charges for
computer research, court reporter fees, and other similar items), transportation and
travel expenses, attorneys' fees, and services of experts, such as appraisers
(collectively, "Fees & Costs").
C. Deposit. Developer shall deposit with the City within 10 days after the execution
of this agreement each of the following:
A faithful performance bond in a form approved by the City in an amount
determined by the City to assure (i) performance of the obligations to
reimburse the City for all Acquisition Costs; and (ii) construction of the
Improvements; and
2. An initial amount of EIGHTY FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100
DOLLARS ($85,000.00) in the form of a cashier's or certified check,
v
which will be applied by the City toward the Acquisition Costs
("Deposit"). The Deposit shall be made with the City prior to any public
hearing by the Council to consider the adoption of a Resolution of
z
Necessity pursuant to the Eminent Domain Law. Upon termination of this
M
Agreement, City shall refund any unused portion of the Deposit to
Uj
Developer within 90 days, without interest.
City may, but shall be under no duty to, proceed with the proposed acquisition of
a
a
Q
the ROW Easement until the faithful performance bond and Deposit or any other
funding deposits required under the terms of this Agreement have been delivered
E
to the City. No time periods required in this agreement for the City to take any
actions required herein or by statute shall commence to run against the City until
the faithful performance bond, Deposit and any other required advanced payment
o
deposits have been deposited with the City. Neither the failure to deposit said
u
faithful performance bond and Deposit, nor the failure to make any other funding
deposits required under the terms of this Agreement, shall relieve Developer of
a
the duty to construct the Improvement required in VTTM and Master Case No.
99-264 when the City certifies that it owns or has the right of possession to the
c
ROW Easement, or constitute a waiver of any City condition for approval related
to the construction of the Improvements.
Z
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -5-
DRAFT 11/9/15
D. Expenditure of Deposit. City may deduct from the Deposit such sums as are
necessary to reimburse it for Acquisition Costs incurred in the acquisition process
City shall give written notice to Developer of all Acquisition Costs so reimbursed
within 30 days after such reimbursement.
E. Replenishment of Deposit. Developer shall replenish the Deposit so as to keep it
at a minimum balance of FORTY THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
($40,000.00) during the term of this Agreement. City will notify Developer when
the amount on deposit is approaching this minimum amount.
Section 4 Compliance with Eminent Domain Procedures.
The Parties acknowledge that, notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the w
contrary, City in exercising its power of eminent domain is required to do so in strict accordance U-
with the provisions of the Eminent Domain Law. This includes, but is not limited to,
0
establishing the project's compliance with CEQA prior to the adoption of a Resolution of
a
w
Necessity, the conducting of the hearing for a Resolution of Necessity authorizing the formal
v
U
commencement of eminent domain proceedings against the ROW Easement ("Resolution") and
Q
being able, based upon competent evidence presented thereat, to make the findings required
°-
Q
under, inter alia, Chapter 3 of Title 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure (beginning with Section
1240.010) as a condition precedent to the adoption of such Resolution. The Parties acknowledge
v
that the City cannot promise or guarantee the outcome of such hearing on the Resolution; rather
the Council will act in its sole and unfettered discretion upon such evidence as is presented to it
-J
at the said hearing. If the Council is able to make the findings required for the adoption of a
z
Resolution based upon the evidence so presented, and does in fact adopt such a Resolution in the
M
exercise of its discretion, then the City will prosecute an eminent domain action in regard to the
LU
ROW Easement in the time and manner contemplated pursuant to this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Government Code section 66462.5, the Parties agree that
Q
City's failure to adopt a resolution of necessity or otherwise acquire any property hereunder shall
not be a breach of this Agreement, nor shall it be deemed a waiver of any development condition
or obligation imposed upon Developer that requires such property interests.
Section 5 Defense and Indemnity.
Developer agrees to hold harmless, defend (with counsel selected by City) and indemnify
City, its employees, agents and assigns, from and against any and all claims arising out of
Developer's breach of this Agreement or Developer's negligent or wilfull conduct or any third
party challenges to the legality of this Agreement. In the event that City is required to defend
itself against any such claim, Developer shall maintain an adequate deposit to cover the costs of
such defense, consistent with the provisions of Sections 3.13 and 3.0 of this Agreement
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -6-
DRAFT 11/9/15
Section 6 Entire Agreement.
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties with respect to
the acquisition of ROW Easement by the City, superseding all negotiations, prior discussions,
and preliminary agreements or understandings, whether oral or written.
Section 7 Amendment.
This Agreement may not be amended except in writing by the Parties or their successors
or assigns.
Section 8 Applicable Law.
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with California law and
shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement.
Section 9 Notices.
All notices with respect to this Agreement, or concerning matters arising out of this
Agreement, shall be in writing and shall be given by personal service, facsimile, or by deposit of
the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service or its lawful successor, as registered
mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the respective Parties, as follows:
For Developer:
Center at Needham Ranch Land, LLC
2221 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 200
El Segundo, CA 90245
Attn: Gregory Ames, Vice President
For the City of Santa Clarita:
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Boulevard
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Fax: (661) 259-8125
Attn: Mike Hennawy, City Engineer
With a copy to:
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
444 S. Flower St., 24th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Fax: (213) 236-2700
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -7-
DRAFT 11/9/15
Attn: Joseph M. Montes, Esq.
Notices shall be deemed, for all purposes, to have been given on the date of personal service or
facsimile, or three (3) consecutive calendar days following deposit of the same in the custody of
the United States Postal Services.
Either party may change its address for service hereunder by serving written notice on the other
in the manner provided herein.
Section 10 Binding Effect.
ffect.
The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and their respective
successors in interest.
Section 11 Section Headings.
The section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and identification
only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the contents of the sections to which they relate.
Section 12 No Presumption Re: Drafter.
The Parties acknowledge and agree that the terms and provisions of this Agreement have
been negotiated and discussed between the Parties and their attorneys, and this Agreement
reflects their mutual agreement regarding the same. Because of the nature of such negotiations
Q
and discussions, it would be inappropriate to deem any party to be the drafter of this Agreement, z
and therefore no presumption for or against validity or as to any interpretation hereof, based upon w
the identity of the drafter shall be applicable in interpreting or enforcing this Agreement. p
a
Section 13 Assistance of Counsel. a
Q
Each party to this Agreement warrants to each other party, as follows:
(1) That each party either had the assistance of counsel or had counsel available to it,
in the negotiation for, and execution of, this Agreement, and all related
documents; and
(2) That each party has lawfully authorized the execution of this Agreement.
Section 14 Severability.
If any term or provision of this Agreement is, to any extent, held invalid or unenforceable
by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected.
Section 15 Modification.
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -$-
DRAFT 11/9/15
This Agreement shall not be modified except by written agreement of the Parties.
Section 16 Effective Date.
The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the last party executes
this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
written by their signatures.
CENTER AT NEEDHAM RANCH LAND, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company ("Developer"):
By: Lion -TCC Development H, LLC,
A Delaware corporation,
its Managing Member
By: TC Industrial Associates, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation,
its Managing Member
an
Gregory Ames, Vice President
Dated:
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
a municipal corporation ("City"):
Kenneth W. Striplin, City Manager
Dated:
LA #4831-5874-9225 v4 -9-
DRAFT 11/9/15
EXHIBIT "B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
DEDICATION AND GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC USE AND ROAD PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THAT PORTION OF LOT 33, IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP OF ST. JOHN SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN BOOK 196, PAGES 304
THROUGH 309 INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT COURSE IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE
OF NEWHALL AVENUE, FORMALLY SAN FERNANDO ROAD, SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 225,
PAGE 10, OF RECORD OF SURVEY, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AS
HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF NORTH 72°08'19" WEST 280.48 FEET, AND FOR THE PURPOSE
OF THIS DESCRIPTION SHALL BEAR NORTH 72°02'56" WEST;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF NEWHALL AVENUE, SOUTH 72°02'56" EAST 15.97
FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF NEWHALL AVENUE, SOUTH 70°21'36" WEST 27.34
FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,929.51 FEET, A
RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 62°10'46" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°51'44" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 298.45 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY
HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06°18'54" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 14.33 FEET;
v
THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, SOUTH 25°16'24" WEST 101.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°16'58" AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 19.74 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SIERRA HIGHWAY, AS
Q
Z
SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY, SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY
LL
HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,946.51 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 75°00'34"
>
WEST;
0
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SIERRA HIGHWAY AND ALONG
a
SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12°39'09" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 429.84 FEET TO AN
Q
ANGLE POINT IN SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SIERRA HIGHWAY;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SIERRA HIGHWAY, NORTH 67°55'34"
EAST 30.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. E
EXHIBIT "C" L-
EXHIBIT MAP
DEDICATION AND GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC USE AND ROAD PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
N�wNq �
AND
90 O
* L.S.5642 * / 15.97
°02
56
F OF CAL\ F / ,,�j / W 280 48
N62°10'46"W (R) �►
i
/ RS 225-10
O h
/ ON
0). Q"
v �
'
W
W
A PORTION OF LOT 33
^o ow
ST. JOHN SUBDIVISION
a
�°'°' /
BOOK 196 PAGES 304-309
a
N
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS
a
/
E
L
N71002'30"W
(PRC)
c
rn
tri o
a
DATA TABLE
N0.
DELTA RADIUS LENGTH
C1
06018'54" 130.00' 14.33'
C2
10°16'58" 110.00' 19.74'
0
LEGEND
��
50,
POB
POINT OF BEGINNING
E
N75°00'34"W
(R)
FEET
R=1946.51'
so' 30' o'
sc Q
R=110'
1 O" 1"
INC
Packet Pp. 42