HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-02-12 - AGENDA REPORTS - CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STUDY (2)5
Agenda Item: 5
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:
DATE: February 12, 2019
SUBJECT: CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STUDY
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Gus Pivetti
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution establishing prima facie speed limits on each roadway segment included
in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Study.
2. Direct the City Clerk to certify the Study.
3. Direct staff to implement the necessary speed limit signage changes brought about by
adopting the Study.
4. Request the Los Angeles County to continue the radar enforcement
program on City of Santa Clarita streets and highways covered in the Study as soon as the
signage changes are complete.
BACKGROUND
A Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey Study (Study) was completed as defined in Section
627 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The Study was performed in accordance with the
provisions of the CVC and as recommended by the California Department of Transportation
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The last citywide Study was adopted in October
2012. California cities, counties, and other state agencies are required to conduct a Study every
five years; however, a Study may be valid up to seven years if certain requirements are met. The
Study requirement assures speed limits on roads take into account driver behavior and allow for
the continued use of radar and laser enforcement. When adopted, the Study will establish the
prima facie speed limits on nearly every major, secondary, and collector roadway within the City
of Santa Clarita (City).
The adoption of the Study is vital to the continued use of radar or laser enforcement. Without a
Page 1
Packet Pg. 25
5
valid Study, the Los Angeles County Superior Court will not uphold a speeding violation issued
rely on less effective alternatives, such as pacing speeding offenders. Effective radar or laser
enforcement will promote the orderly movement of vehicles and reduce collisions.
The engineering and traffic surveys for the Study were conducted in mid-2018. Since completion
of the surveys, the Plum Canyon area was annexed into the City, and therefore, not included in
the Study. Staff will conduct engineering and traffic surveys for this area within the next few
months. Any proposed changes to speed limits will be presented for
consideration at a later date.
The Study also includes a summary of adjustments to existing posted speed limits. The speed
limit adjustments are listed below.
New Established Prima Facie Speed Limits
The following locations did not have an established engineering and traffic survey. Based on the
new Study, the appropriate speed limits are outlined below:
Road Segment Proposed
Canyon Park Blvd. (Jakes Way - Lost Canyon Rd.) 45
Fahren Ct. (Jakes Way - Sandy Dr.) 25
Decreases to Existing Prima Facie Speed Limits
Based on the Study, speed limits on the following sections are decreased as follows:
Road Segment Posted Proposed
- Avenida Rancho Tesoro) 55 50
Copper Hill Dr. (Avenida Rancho Tesoro - McBean Pkwy.) 55 50
Creekside Rd. (McBean Pkwy. - Auto Center Dr.) 35 30
Hercules St. (Kelly Johnson Pkwy. - Constellation Rd.) 45 40
Newhall Ranch Rd. (Bouquet Canyon Rd. - Santa Clarita Pkwy.) 55 50
Newhall Ranch Rd. (Santa Clarita Pkwy. - Golden Valley Rd.) 55 50
Ruether Ave. (Soledad Canyon Rd. - Santa Clara St.) 35 30
Increases to Existing Prima Facie Speed Limits
Based on the Study, speed limits on the following sections are increased as follows:
Road Segment Posted Proposed
Alta Vista Ave. (Constellation Rd. - Copper Hill Dr.) 40 45
Ave. Hopkins (Ave. Rockefeller - Ave. Stanford) 35 40
Canyon View Dr. (Calla Way - Discovery Park Driveway) 30 35
Lost Canyon Rd. (Via Princessa - Medley Ridge Dr. (N)) 35 45
Page 2
Packet Pg. 26
5
Nadal St. (Camp Plenty Rd. -Whites Canyon Rd.)3035
Nathan Hill Rd. (Shangri-La Dr. (N) - Shangri-La Dr. (S)) 30 35
Northpark Dr. (McBean Pkwy. - Copper Hill Dr.) 25 30
Santa Clarita Pkwy. (Newhall Ranch Rd. - Riverrock Way) 30 35
Via Princessa (Lost Canyon Rd. - End of Public Road (Gated Entry)) 35 40
Staff recommends the Council approval the adjustments as described above, which are based on
the results of the Study, for the continued use of radar and laser. It is not likely these adjustments
will result in higher prevailing speeds. Research shows the average driver is influenced by the
appearance of the roadway itself and prevailing traffic conditions and chooses to drive at a speed
they are comfortable with. These adjustments, when combined with an effective enforcement
program
reviewed the recommendations of this Study and concurs with its findings. Staff estimates the
cost of installing new signage and/or replacing signage for speed limits to be approximately
$5,000.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adequate Gas Tax Funds (Fund 230) are available in expenditure account 14401-5161.001 for
the installation of new signage and/or the replacement of existing signage related to speed limits,
as required.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution- Engineering and Traffic Survey
Location Map of Proposed Speed Limit Changes
Engineering and Traffic Survey Report (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Page 3
Packet Pg. 27
5.a
RESOLUTION NO. 19- _______
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
ON 199 ROADWAY SEGMENTS
WHEREAS, Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code permit local
authorities, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to establish prima facie speed
limits on roadways within their jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code requires speed limits be
justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five, seven, or ten years,
depending on certain requirements, to use radar and laser enforcement; and
WHEREAS, the effective and efficient use of radar and laser for traffic speed
enforcement can enhance roadway safety within the City of Santa Clarita, California (City).
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. That prima facie speed limits shall be established on 199 roadway
segments included in the Engineering and Traffic Survey Study (Study) dated December 2018.
SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify the Study and make copies available to
the Los Angeles County and courts.
SECTION 3. That City staff shall make the necessary signage changes to implement
the recommendations of the Study.
SECTION 4.
prima facie speed limits established by this resolution.
SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
Attachment: Resolution- Engineering and Traffic Survey (CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STUDY)
Page 1 of 2
Packet Pg. 28
5.a
th
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this __ day of ________ 2019.
______________________________
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_______________________________
CITY CLERK
DATE:__________________________
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution 19- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita,
th
California, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the __ day of ________ 2019, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
______________________________
CITY CLERK
Attachment: Resolution- Engineering and Traffic Survey (CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY STUDY)
Page 2 of 2
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: Location Map of Proposed Speed Limit Changes (CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC
5.b
Packet Pg. 30
Engineering and Traffic Survey
Prepared for the City of Santa Clarita
October 2018
TRAFFIC No. 1575
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
TABLEOFCONTENTS
SectionPage
1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Study Methodology .............................................................................................................. 2
3.0 Survey Results ..................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Street Surveillance ................................................................................................. 3
3.2 Accident Rate Analysis ........................................................................................... 4
3.3 Spot Speed Survey ............................................................................................... 11
4.0 Survey Findings and Recommendations ............................................................................ 18
4.1 Speed Limit Signing .............................................................................................. 18
5.0 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................ 20
Tables
1 Accident Survey Analysis ..................................................................................................... 6
2 Segment Spot Speed Summary ......................................................................................... 12
Appendices
ASpeed Zoning Regulations fromCaltrans California Manual o\\ Uniform Traffic Control Devices
BRegulations Governing Speed Limits (Excerpts from California Vehicle Code)
DEngineering and TrafficSurvey Summary Reports
EField Radar Survey Data Sheets (separate binder)
Pagei
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
SECTION1.0
I NTRODUCTION
The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey conducted to update
the speed limits on the City of Santa Clarita arterial and collector street network. The overall study was conducted
to comply with existing State regulations concerning the increasing or decreasing of speed limits within city
boundaries.
It is a common belief that posting of speed limit traffic signs will influence drivers to drive at that speed. However,
the facts indicate otherwise.
Driver behavioral research conducted in many parts of this country over a span of several decades shows that
the average driver is influenced by the appearance of the highway itself and the prevailing traffic conditions in
choosing the speed at which he or she drives. Recognizing this, the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that
speed limits be established in accordance with appropriate engineering practice and methods.
This report contains sufficient information to document that the conditions of the latest edition of the California
Vehicle Code Section 627 have been satisfied and that other conditions not readily apparent to a motorist are
properly identified. States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10
years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their
roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of
parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes,
changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes. The latest edition of the
CVC has highlighted bicycle and pedestrian safety as part of the traffic and engineering survey, and this aspect
was considered.
According to City records, the last citywide speed zone survey was prepared in 2012. The current study will
verify, increase, or decrease existing speed limits, as well as establish new segments, within the city based on
the data and results of this survey.
At 199 locations on the CityÓs network, spot speed surveys were taken in conformance with the State law for
conducting engineering and traffic surveys for the purpose of establishing prima facie speed limits. The data was
collected per the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) November 2014 Edition.
Sections of the CA MUTCD detailing regulations for conducting the required ÐEngineering and Traffic SurveyÑ
are presented in Appendix A (Section 2B.13). Also in Appendix A are definitions of terms used in speed zone
surveys. Excerpts from the CVC regarding regulations governing speed limits are presented in Appendix B.
The actual speed zone surveys were conducted by Albert Grover & Associates (AGA). A California registered
Traffic Engineer from AGA reviewed the streets.
Page1
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
SECTION2.0
S TUDY M ETHODOLOGY
The study involved three major categories of data collection and analysis. The three major components are: (1)
geometric and characteristic street surveillance; (2) spot speed survey; and (3) accident rate analysis.
The arterial and collector streets were surveyed by field observation to determine the existing roadway
characteristics, condition and placement of signs and markings, adjacent land uses, pedestrian and bicycle
activity, and to identify roadway characteristics that are not readily apparent to vehicle drivers.
Spot speed surveys, utilizing a calibrated radar gun, were conducted at 199 locations to determine existing
vehicular travel speeds. A minimum of 100 observations (when possible) were recorded. This data was used to
calculate statistical information such as the 85th percentile speed, 10 mile per hour pace speed, percent of
vehicles within the 10 mile per hour pace, median speed and other pertinent data for analysis.
Accident data was tabulated from the CityÓs Accident Records (Crossroads) for the period from January 1, 2016
to December 31, 2017 (two years) for all roadway segments. The accident rate was calculated and considered
in recommending the speed limits accordingly.
Page2
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
SECTION3.0
S URVEY R ESULTS
3.1S TREET S URVEILLANCE
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1) of the CA MUTCD 2014, states the following,
ÐStandard:
12a When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-
percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.
Option:
1.The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-
percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for
documentation requirements.
2.For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a
rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the
85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).
Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in
writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.
Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed
survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the
closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed
limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed
limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey
for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5
mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be
reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are
documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey
for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30
mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).
Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys
(E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with CaltransÓ Traffic Operations Policy Directive
Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.
Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(b).
Support:
Page3
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control
device standards is not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10
year criteria.
Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed
survey or in the accompanying engineering report.Ñ
The survey streets were reviewed by Mr. Mark Miller, P.E, Principal-in-Charge, who is a registered Civil and
Traffic Engineer in the State of California. The roadway characteristics, conditions not readily apparent to the
driver, type of area adjoining the street (commercial, residential, school zone, parks, etc.) and type of roadway
(divided, undivided, number of lanes, etc.) were reviewed as part of the study. The roadway characteristics
reviewed were used to determine if any physical conditions warranted consideration of an additional five mile per
hour reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with CVC Section 627.
The speed survey segment roadway characteristics for each segment are indicated on the Engineering and
Speed Survey Summary sheets in Appendix D (binder).
3.2 A CCIDENT R ATE A NALYSIS
The accident rate for each speed survey segment was determined by using the most recent accident records as
required by CVC Section 627. Based on a review of the CityÓs Accident Record System reports from January 1,
2016 to December 31, 2017, mid-block accident rates were calculated for each street surveyed.
The results of the accident rate calculations, including the Average Expected Accident Rates for each type of
roadway facility are shown in Table 1 on page 6 and in the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets
(Appendix D). The Average Expected Accident Rates are based on the latest average rate for each type of
roadway on California State Highways.
Arterial Streets Collector Streets
3 lanes 2 lanes < 45 mph
1.57 2.39
4 lane undivided < 45 mph 2 lanes 45 mph
2.04 1.32
4 lane undivided 45 mph
1.92
5-6 lane undivided < 45 mph
4.74
5-6 lane undivided 45 mph
1.07
4 lane divided < 45 mph
2.22
4 lane divided 45 mph
1.45
5-6 lane divided < 45 mph
1.48
5-6 lane divided 45 mph
1.48
The mid-block accident rate in terms of Ðaccidents per 1,000,000 vehicle miles of travelÑ for each street surveyed
was calculated and is shown in Table 1 and in the Engineering and Traffic Survey summary sheets (Appendix
D). The following shows a sample calculation.
Page4
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
Accident Rate Calculation:
The rate was calculated using the following equation:
6
Accident Rate = Number of Midblock accidents x 10
24-hour volume x 365 x segment length(mi) x number of years
Where: Number of mid-block accidents based on two years (January 1, 2016 to
December 31, 2017), 24-hour volume (both directions) in the survey
segment, and segment length in miles.
Example:
Accident rate on: Bouquet Canyon Road from Soledad Canyon Road to Camargo Drive:
6
Accident Rate = 36 x 10
61,500 x 365 x 1.71 x 2
= 0.685 accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM)
The Average Expected Accident Rate for the segment is 1.48. The calculated accident rate of 0.685 is below the
expected rate for this segment.
Page5
Excel97-ne-Accident & Speed Tables Revised v2.xlsx, 12/4/2018
Excel97-ne-Accident & Speed Tables Revised v2.xlsx, 12/4/2018
Excel97-ne-Accident & Speed Tables Revised v2.xlsx, 12/4/2018
Excel97-ne-Accident & Speed Tables Revised v2.xlsx, 12/4/2018
Excel97-ne-Accident & Speed Tables Revised v2.xlsx, 12/4/2018
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
3.3S POT S PEED S URVEY
Spot speed surveys were conducted at each street segment to establish a reasonable and effective speed limit
based on the premise that the speed limit thus established conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of
motorists. The speed limit should normally be established near the 85th percentile speed recorded for the
surveyed segment. However, engineering judgment and other factors such as Street Surveillance (Section 3.1)
and accident rates (Section 3.2) may indicate the need for further reduction in establishing reasonable and
effective speed limits.
The criteria used in conducting the radar survey are listed in Appendix A.
Appendix D contains the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary sheets for each of the 199 sections surveyed.
The information collected and data calculated for the radar speed survey are as follows:
Posted speed limit
Direction of survey
Date and time of speed survey
50th Percentile speed
85th Percentile speed
10 mph pace speed
Percent over pace speed
Range of speeds
Number of vehicles observed
Average speed
Accident History
Accident Rate
Average Daily Traffic
Road Description
Pedestrian and bicycle activity
The summary contains information about vehicular speed data observed, accident data, street classification, and
any unusual conditions at the location. In addition, Table 2 displays the Spot Speed Survey Summary for all
segments considered for this report.
Page11
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
SECTION4.0
S URVEY F INDINGSAND R ECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with the State-imposed speed limit establishment regulation, as defined by CVC Section 627
described in Appendix B, there are several factors that may be considered to justify setting the prima facie speed
limits more than five miles per hour below the observed 85th percentile speed.
The factors to be considered are:
Most recent accident record (mid-block)
Roadway design speed
Safe stopping sight distance
Super-elevation
Grades
Shoulder condition
Profile condition
Intersection spacing offsets
Commercial driveway characteristics (land use)
Pedestrian traffic with and without sidewalks
Pedestrian and Bicycle safety
The above factors for each roadway segment surveyed are listed in the Engineering and Speed Survey Summary
sheets in Appendix D. The 85th percentile speed and the above factors were considered in verifying existing
speed limits and recommending speed limit changes (increase or decrease). Additionally, discussions were held
with city staff in making decisions with respect to changing existing speed limits. This allowed for consideration
of any special knowledge of the segment. The Speed Zone Survey Î Accident Survey Analysis (Table 1) lists the
total number of accidents, calculated accident rate, and the expected average accident rate. Table 2 shows the
surveyed road segments with posted and recommended speed limits.
4.1S PEED L IMIT S IGNING
All California motorists are required to know the basic 15, 25, and 65 mph speed laws and are tested on the
subject when applying for a driverÓs license. The maximum speed limit on most California highways is 65 mph.
You may drive 70 mph where posted. Unless otherwise posted, the maximum speed limit is 55 mph on two-lane
undivided highways and for vehicles towing trailers. Consequently, speed limit signs covering these conditions
need not be posted on city streets. However, although not required by law, speed limit signs for these situations
may be posted on streets that have significant daily vehicular traffic volumes, a by-pass traffic situation, the
continued violation of a residential 25 mph speed zone, or with other applicable warrants.
It is normal policy to recommend the posting of speed limit signs only of streets that have been covered by the
City speed limit ordinance or by warranted situations covered above.
Page18
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
Speed limit signs should be installed at about one-half mile intervals on the city streets which have been speed
zoned. Signs are normally installed on the exit side of traffic signal controlled intersections and the more important
intersections where there is high side street vehicle entry. It is important that motorists be given adequate
information while not over signing, which tends to confuse the motorist.
The CA MUTCD outlines speed limit sign size specifications based on the type of roadway facility. Sign sizes
vary from a minimum of 24 inches by 30 inches on a single lane conventional roadway to 48 inches by 60 inches
on a freeway. It is also important to post signs in a manner that they are clearly visible to approaching traffic from
a distance. Care should be taken to maintain landscaping so that vegetation does not grow to block the motoristÓs
view of signs. In certain circumstances, when an engineer has determined that additional motorist awareness of
the speed limit is needed, the speed limit can also be painted on the street immediately adjacent to a speed limit
sign.
Enforcement problems can occur when, (a) the highway is posted with inappropriate speed limit signs, (b) the
highway is improperly or inadequately posted; or, (c) the highway is not posted nor covered by ordinance and
therefore falls under the basic speed law. In any of these events, the result is a debatable validity that may be
questioned in court cases where citations are issued and contested.
Page19
Engineering&TrafficSurvey
SECTION5.0
S UMMARYAND C ONCLUSIONS
1. The radar survey and the raw data collection was conducted per CVC Section 627.
2. A total of 199 sections on the CityÓs arterial, collector, and feeder roadway network were surveyed.
3.The accident rate (Table 1) for the majority of the street segments is well below the average expected
accident rate obtained from the latest California State Department of Transportation for various types of
roadway facilities.
4.It was concluded that speed limits on arterial and collector roadways in the City of Santa Clarita should be
increased, decreased, or established as follows:
I NCREASESTO E XISTING P RIMA F ACIE S PEED L IMITS
Existing/Recommended
Street From To
Speed Limits
Alta Vista Avenue Constellation Road Copper Hill Drive 40 to 45
Avenue Hopkins Avenue Rockefeller Avenue Stanford 35 to 40
Avenue Rockefeller Avenue Mentry Avenue Hopkins 35 to 40
Canyon View Drive Calla Way Discovery Park Driveway 30 to 35
Lost Canyon Road Via Princessa Medley Ridge Dr (N) 35 to 45
Nadal Street Camp Plenty Road Whites Canyon Road 30 to 35
Nathan Hill Road Shangri La Drive (N) Shangri La Drive (S) 30 to 35
Northpark Drive McBean Parkway Copper Hill Drive 25 to 30
Santa Clarita Parkway Newhall Ranch Road Riverrock Way 30 to 35
Via Princessa Lost Canyon Road End of Public Road 35 to 40
D ECREASESTO E XISTING P RIMA F ACIE S PEED L IMITS
Existing/Recommended
Street From To
Speed Limits
Copper Hill Drive 300Ó n/o Copperstone Drive Avenida Rancho Tesoro 55 to 50
Copper Hill Drive Avenida Rancho Tesoro McBean Parkway 55 to 50
Creekside Road McBean Parkway Auto Center Drive 35 to 30
Hercules Street Kelly Johnson Parkway Constellation Road 45 to 40
Newhall Ranch Road Golden Valley Road Santa Clarita Parkway 55 to 50
Newhall Ranch Road Santa Clarita Parkway Bouquet Canyon Road 55 to 50
Ruether Avenue Soledad Canyon Road Santa Clara Street 35 to 30
N EW E STABLISHED P RIMA F ACIE S PEED L IMITS
Street From To Recommended Speed Limit
Canyon Park Boulevard Jakes Way Lost Canyon Road 45
Fahren Court Jakes Way Sandy Drive 25
Page20
APPENDIXA
APPENDIXB
2!$!2 30%%$ :/.% 3526%93
I NTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a traffic and engineering study for establishment of speed limits on city
streets as required by Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code.The review included
radarsurveys of prevailing vehicle speeds at various locations along the length of each street, recent traffic
counts and an analysis of reported traffic accidents recorded during the specific interval.
In order to enforce speed limits by radar or other electronic devices, a study must be conducted every five
years.Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code defines a speed limit enforced by radar and “….which
speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years priorto the date
of the alleged violation…” constitutes a speed trap, unless the following criteria are met:
If officers have completed specialized training courses that are approved by the Commission on
Peace Officer Standards Training, the time span betweenstudies can be extended to seven years.
If after seven years, “…a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines
that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited
to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width,or traffic volume…” the time span
between studies can be extended to ten years.
Since speed traps are illegal, the lack of an adequate study effectively precludes the police from using
radar enforcement.Through adoption of this study, the police department will be able to enforce posted
speed limits with radar equipment.
It is a common belief that posting of speed limit traffic signs will influence drivers to drive at that speed.The
facts indicate otherwise.
Driver behavior research conducted in many parts of this country, over a span of several decades; shows
that the average driver is influenced by the appearance of the highway itself and the prevailing traffic
conditions, in choosing the speed at which he or she drives.Recognizing this, the California Vehicle Code
requires that speed limits be established in accordance with appropriate engineering practice and
methods.
R%'5,!4)/.3 G OVERNING S 0%%$ L IMITS
Under California law, the maximum speed limit for any passenger vehicle is 65 miles per hour (mph).All
other speed limits are called prima facie limits which “on the face of it”, are safe and prudent under normal
conditions.Certain prima facie limits are established by law and include the 25 milesper hour limit in
business and residential districts; the 15 miles per hour limit in alleys, at blind intersections and blind
railroad grade crossings; and a part-time 25 miles per hour in school zones when children are going to and
from school.
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 2
Intermediate speed limits between 25 and 65 miles per hour may be established by local authorities based
on traffic engineering surveys.Such surveys include the analysis of roadway conditions, accident records,
and the prevailing speed of prudent drivers using the highway under study.If speed limits are established
below what the majority of drivers consider reasonable, they are often not obeyed and consequently, are
difficult to enforce.Those drivers who do not comply with posted reasonable speed limits are, conversely,
subject to equitable enforcement action.
The Vehicle Code provides that the use of radar to enforce speed limits, which have not been based on a
traffic and engineering study within the preceding five years, constitutes a “speed trap”. Since speed traps
are also prohibited by the code, lack of the required study effectively prohibits local agencies from using
radar enforcement.
A PPLICABLE V EHICLE C ODE S ECTIONS
Business District
235. A “business district: is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side
of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent of more of the contiguous property fronting thereon
is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, for a
distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied.A
business district may be longer than the distance specified in this section if the above ratio of buildings in
use for business to the length of the highway exists.
Business and Residence District: Determination
240.In determining whether a highway is within a business or residence district, the following limitations
shall apply and shall qualify the definitions Section 235 and 515:
a)No building shall be counted unless its entrance faces the highway and the front of the building
is within 75 feet of the roadway.
b)Where a highway is physically divided into two or more roadways, only those buildings facing
each roadway separately shall be counted for the purpose of determining whether the roadway
is within a district.
c)All churches, apartments, hotels, multiple dwelling houses, clubs and public buildings, other than
schools, shall be deemed to be business structures.
d)A highway or portion of a highway shall not be deemed to be within a district regardless of the
number of buildings upon the contiguous property if there is no right of access to the highway by
vehicles from the contiguous property.
Residence District
515.A “residence district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a
business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 3
contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or
businessstructures, or (b) upon both sided of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a
quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate
dwelling housed or business structures.A residence district may be longer than one quarter of a
mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the
highway exists.
Engineering and Traffic Survey
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey” as used in this Code, means a survey of highway and traffic
conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use
by the state and local authorities.
(b)An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by
the department, consideration of all the following:
1)Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
2)Accident records.
3)Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Maximum Speed Limit
22349.(a) Except as provided in Section 22356, no person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a
speed greater than 65 miles per hour.
(b)Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person may drive a vehicle upon a two-lane,
undivided highway at a speed greater than 55 miles per hour unless that highway, or portion
thereof, has been posted for a higher speed by the Department of Transportation or
appropriate local agency upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. For purposes of
this subdivision, the following apply:
(1)A two-lane, undivided highway is a highway with not more than one through lane of travel
in each direction.
(2)Passing lanes may not be considered when determining the number of through lanes.
(c)It is the intent of the Legislature that there be reasonable signing on affected two-lane,
undivided highways described in subdivision (b) in continuing the 55 miles-per-hour speed limit,
including placing signs at county boundaries to the extent possible, and at other appropriate
locations.
Basic Speed Law
22350.No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent
having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and surface and width of, the highway, and in no
event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 4
Speed Law Violations
22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352
or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the
basic speed law.
(b)The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section
22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant
establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of saidlimits did not constitute a
violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.
Prima Facie Speed Limits
22352.The prima facie limits are as follows and the same shall be applicable unless changed as
authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a)Fifteen miles per hour:
1)When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the
crossing the driver does nothave a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any
traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway.This
subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human
flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical mechanical railway crossing signal device
is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
2)When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of his approach to
the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection
and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100
feet along all thosehighways, except at an intersection protected bystop signs or yield
right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
3)On any alley.
(b)Twenty-five miles per hour:
1)On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a
different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.
2)When passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and
posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the
school either during school hours or during the noon recess period.Such prima facie limit
shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the
highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children
and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
3)When passing a senior center or facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a
street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign.
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 5
Increase of Local Limits
22357.Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a
speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would
be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit
of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may be by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie limit of
25 miles per hours, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of
30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is
found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe.The
declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice
thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an
engineering and traffic survey.The provisions of this section shall not apply in respect to any 25-mile-per-
hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof.
Decrease of Local Limits
22358.Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the
limitof 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a
state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance
determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45,40,35,30, or 25 miles per hours,
whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and
safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are
erected upon the street.
22358.3.Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that
the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any
street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than is
reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima
facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is foundmost appropriate and is reasonable and
safe. The declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are
erected upon the street.
22358.4.(a)(1)Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey
that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of
Section 22352 is more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance
or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour,
whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2)An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until
appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the
case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of
Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(b)(1)Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by
ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 6
(A)A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a
posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of
less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school
building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that
indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the
school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie
limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or
passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or
other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is
posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B)A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a
posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of
500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a
highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25
miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school
hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when
approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not
separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the
grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign
that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour.
(2)The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet
all of the following conditions:
(A)A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B)A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and
after the school zone.
(3)The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected
highway, in both directions of travel.
(4)When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall
take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5)(A)An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until
appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in
the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of
Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway.
(B)For purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a
speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from
school grounds.
(C)For purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a
speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at any distance between 500 and
1,000 feet away from the school grounds.
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 7
(D)A local authority shall reimburse the Department of Transportation for all costs
incurred by the department under this subdivision.
Downward Speed Zoning
22358.5It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and
surface conditions or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would
not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to
such conditions.
Boundary Line Streets
22359.With respectto boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different
jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such
portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of thestreet concerned have approved the
same.This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways
within different jurisdictions.
Multiple-Lane Highways
22361.On multiple-lane highways with two or more separate roadways, different prima facie speed limits
may be established for different roadways under any of the procedures specified in Sections 22354 to
22359, inclusive.
Speed Trap Prohibition
40801.No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in
the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing
evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.
Speed Trap
40802. A “speed trap” is either of the following:
a)A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked,
designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by
securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
b)A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by
local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established
pursuant to Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, which speed limit is not justified by an
engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged
violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which
measures the speed of moving objects.This subdivision does not apply to local streets and
roads.
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 8
For purposes of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and
federal-aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration.When these maps have not
been submitted, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to
abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions:
1.Roadway widthof not more than 40 feet.
2.Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length.Interruptions shall include official traffic control
devices as defined in Section 445.
3.Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
Speed Trap Evidence.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon
the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of
a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a
speed trap
(b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where
enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of
moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima faciecase, that the
evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b)
of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section40802,
evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date
of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as
defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence
or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) 40802.
S 45$9 M ETHOD
Speed zones are established to inform drivers of the safe speed limit and to protect the general public from
unreasonable and reckless drivers. Research has shown that most drivers travel at speeds that are safe
and reasonable, therefore, speed limits are established primarily on the consensus of the majority of those
who use the roads.Speed limits are not based on the actions of few.The California Vehicle Code requires
the limits to be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey rather than by arbitrary
methods.
The study is conducted in accordance with the appropriate sections of the California Vehicle Code, the
Caltrans Traffic Manual (Chapter 8-03) and the Federal Manual on “Uniform Traffic Control Devices”,
(Section 2B-10).
2 £ ± 3¯¤¤£ :®¤ 3´±µ¤¸²
0 ¦¤ 9
Surveys are conducted on arterial streets and selected local streets.Each of the selected streets was
analyzed individually.
The accident analysis was based on a review of the City’s Traffic Accident Records (Crossroads).Only
non-intersection accidents are included since intersection accidents are considered correctable using
conventional intersection traffic controls such as stop signs or traffic signals.
Accident rates were computed using a formula that takes into account the number of accidents in the two-
year period, the length of roadway being studied, and the average daily traffic volume.The rate is
expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (Acc/MVM).The formula is:
Acc/MM = Number of Accidents x 1,000,000
Distance x ADT x No. of Days
In order to evaluate the accident rates for each street segment, the average rate for all surveyed arterial
street segments was calculated.Average rates were calculated for two-lane and four-or-more-lane arterial
streets, two-lane collector and two-lane local streets.The accident rates for each segment were compared
to the citywide average rates for streets with similar characteristics.
APPENDIXC
APPENDIXD
DATE
Filename: 1 16NewOrc.xls 12/26/2018
35
acc/mvm
0.312.39
10:47
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
09:47
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the existing bike lane, school, and pedestrian activity, it is recommended to post the speed limit on thissegment at 35 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
6,500
16th Street
Newhall Avenue to Orchard Village Road
23101 16th StreetGoodClearResidential/School. On-street parking, both sides. "No Stopping Any Time" for some sections.All-way STOP and School Xing at Newhall. Placerita Jr High School
on EB side. 25 mph school zone.1 lane each direction, Double Yellow Center Lane. Bike lane.42 mph36 mph32 mph38 mph33 - 42 mph71%15%14%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/7/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
0000000000000000000000001002522257699438543130001000000000
131811
124
Total
Vehicles
X
XX
XXX
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXX
XXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
X
EASTBOUND
X
XX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 3 AltConCop.xls 12/26/2018
45
acc/mvm
0.412.22
11:17
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
09:47
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the 85th percentile speed, it is recommendedto post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
40
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
1
0.48
6,900
Alta Vista Avenue
Constellation Road to Copper Hill Drive EB: 28202 Alta Vista Avenue; WB: 28202 Alta Vista AvenueGoodVery light cloudsResidential, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").2 lanes
each direction, Double Yellow Center Lane. Curvilinear.Bike lane.47 mph42 mph37 mph43 mph39 - 48 mph68%13%20%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/8/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
000000000000000000110352148896353101000010000000000
12111014151721161210
200
Total
Vehicles
X
XXX
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XX
XXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 7 AshWhiErm.xls 12/26/2018
30
acc/mvm
0.262.39
14:56
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
14:13
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the residential nature of the roadway, it isrecommended to post the speed limit on this segmentat 30 mph.
30
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
4,400
Ashboro Drive
Whites Canyon Road to Ermine Street
28220 Enderly StreetGoodOvercastResidential, on-street parking.25 mph curve at mid-segment.1 lane each direction, Double Yellow Center Line35 mph30 mph27 mph31 mph27 - 36 mph84%8%9%T.L.
HartmanMark Miller
5/11/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
000000000000000000000000000000000000134739957421200000000
14111012
104
Total
Vehicles
X
XX
XXX
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
NORTHBOUND
X
XX
XXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 12 HopRocSta.xls 12/26/2018
40
acc/mvm
0.602.39
08:56
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
08:30
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the industrial nature, level of service, curvewarning, and 85th percentile speed, it is recommendedto post the speed limit on this
segment at 40 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
3,500
Avenue Hopkins
Avenue Rockefeller to Avenue Stanford
27736 Avenue HopkinsGoodClearIndustrial, on-street parking1 lane each direction, dual left turn laneAll-way STOP at Tibbitts and Anza.43 mph39 mph33 mph39 mph36 - 45 mph68%9%23%T.L.
HartmanMark Miller
5/9/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
00000000000000000000000002023245996745352433111000000000000
1010
101
Total
Vehicles
X
XXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
NORTHBOUND
XX
XXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 15 RocMenHop.xls 12/26/2018
40
acc/mvm
0.442.39
09:59
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
08:59
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the industrial nature and level of service, it isrecommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
2
2.08
3,000
Avenue Rockefeller
Avenue Mentry to Avenue Hopkins 24834 Avenue RockefellerGoodClearIndustrial, on-street parking.1 lane each direction, Double Yellow Center Line (portion is dual left turn lane).42 mph34
mph28 mph35 mph29 - 38 mph59%29%12%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/9/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000000000000000000001001000114242333345647636620610001000000
85
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
X
SOUTHBOUND
XXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
X
NORTHBOUND
XX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 17 ScoTibMcB.xls 12/26/2018
45
acc/mvm
0.581.45
10:15
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
09:55
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the continuity of speed, it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
1
0.15
15,400
Avenue Scott
Avenue Tibbitts to McBean Parkway
27405 Avenue ScottGoodClearIndustrial, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").2 lanes each direction, dual left turn lane. Short portion is raised median at S end.Bike lane.50
mph45 mph40 mph46 mph41 - 50 mph70%19%11%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/16/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
00000000000000010120013295677765752220000000000000000000000
1010
100
Total
Vehicles
X
GRAND TOTAL
X
XXX
XXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 21 TibNewSco.xls 12/26/2018
45
acc/mvm
0.441.48
12:31
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
11:23
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the existing parking, driveways, and no sidewalks, it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
8,600
Avenue Tibbitts
Newhall Ranch Road to Avenue Scott NB: 24930 Avenue Tibbitts; SB: 24927 Avenue TibbittsGoodClearIndustrial, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").3 lanes each direction, raised
median with landscaping.50 mph44 mph39 mph45 mph42 - 51 mph69%11%21%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/16/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
00000000000000030021213986866511352130000000000000000
1012141417172416
200
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
X
XXX
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
XX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 26 BouMagSol.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
0.641.45
10:01
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
9:17
SEGMENT LENGTH:
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit:Based on the existing driveways and high accident rate,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segmentat 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
34
2.05
35,500
Bouquet Canyon Road
Magic Mountain Parkway to Soledad Canyon Road
NB - 26076 Bouquet Canyon, SB - 26111 Bouquet CanyonGoodClearCommercial/retail, on-street parking south of Cinema Dr3 lanes northbound, 2 lanes southbound, dual left turn laneHigh accident
rate52 mph45 mph40 mph46 mph41 - 50 mph64%20%16%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
4/11/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
000000000000000003444586695749526131000000000000000000
13151121191612
199
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
X
XXX
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 27 BouSolCam.xls 12/26/2018
45
acc/mvm
9:15
1.171.48
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
8:32
SEGMENT LENGTH:
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit:Based on the existing driveways and high accidentrate, it is recommended to post the speed limit on thissegment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
36
0.69
61,500
Bouquet Canyon Road
Soledad Canyon Road to Camargo Drive
NB - 26846 Bouquet Canyon, SB - 26859 Bouquet CanyonGoodPartly cloudyRetail/residential4 lanes each direction north of Espuella, 3 lanes each direction south of Espuella,raised median
with landscaping, bike lane on south side, "No Stopping Any Time"High accident rate51 mph46 mph41 mph47 mph42 - 51 mph73%16%11%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
4/12/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000000000000001243244664564411010000000000000000000
151622211314161112
198
Total
Vehicles
X
X
XXX
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
XX
XX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXX
XXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 30 BouUrbSte.xls 1/11/2019
50
acc/mvm
0.781.45
11:47
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
10:39
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the low accident rate it is recommendedto post the speed limit on this segment at 50 mph.
50
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
4
0.31
22,600
Bouquet Canyon Road
Urbandale Avenue to Steve Jon Street
NB - 27990 Bouquet Canyon, SB - 27901 Bouquet CanyonGoodPartly cloudyResidential/retail2 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping, bike lane, "No Stopping Any Time"52 mph47
mph42 mph48 mph43 - 52 mph70%17%13%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
4/12/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
000000000000000312317586476100110000000000000000000
11101221201019141115
199
Total
Vehicles
X
X
XX
XX
XXXX
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
X
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXX
XXX
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 50 CopSecHas.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
9:14
1.331.45
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
8:28
SEGMENT LENGTH:
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the existing bike lane, curves, and limited sight distance, it is recommended to post the speedlimit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
4
0.23
17,600
Copper Hill Drive
Seco Canyon Road to Haskell Canyon Road
21751 Copper Hill DriveGoodClearResidential2 lanes each direction, "No Stopping Any Time", bike lane, curvilinear,double yellow centerline west of Hidden Hills, dual left turn east of
Hidden Hills, 52 mph47 mph41 mph47 mph43 - 52 mph61%19%21%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
9/18/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000000000000000212199952752020000000000000000000
101213121415111011131013
200
Total
Vehicles
X
X
XXX
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 77 GolNewCla.xls 1/11/2019
50
acc/mvm
1.211.48
08:59
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
08:30
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 50 mph.
50
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
6
0.36
19,000
Golden Valley Road
Newhall Ranch Road to 70' North of Claremore Way
EB: 26931 Golden Valley Road; WB: 26931 Golden Valley RoadVery goodClearResidential/rural, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").2 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping.
Traffic signal at Five Knolls Drive.Bike path on EB side.56 mph51 mph45 mph52 mph48 - 57 mph70%10%21%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/3/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
000000001010033147478451110103000000000000000000000
17181515131618121110
200
Total
Vehicles
XXXX
XXXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XXX
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 82 HerKelCon.xls 1/11/2019
40
acc/mvm
0.221.45
12:23
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
11:20
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on the 15 mph curve at Hercules/Constellation,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
3,500
Hercules Street
Kelly Johnson Parkway to Constellation Road
28412 Constellation RoadGoodPartly cloudyIndustrial, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").2 lanes each direction, dual left turn lane. 15 mph curve at Hercules/Constellation
intersection.Bike lane.41 mph36 mph31 mph36 mph32 - 41 mph70%15%15%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/8/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
000000000000000000000000001010243487785667611211502020000000
10
100
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
WESTBOUND
XXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
X
XX
EASTBOUND
XXX
XXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 83 HilNewDee.xls 1/11/2019
35
acc/mvm
1.472.39
11:23
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
10:20
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on limited visibility,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 35 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
4
0.75
5,000
Hillsborough Parkway
Newhall Ranch Road to Deerfield Lane
27820 Hillsborough ParkwayGoodClearResidential, on-street parking. "No Stopping Any Time" in some sections.1 lane each direction, Double Yellow Center LineTraffic signal at Decoro Drive.
Curvilinear.42 mph37 mph31 mph37 mph34 - 43 mph67%11%22%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/10/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
000000000000000000000000001103424968296934624101110110000000
11
100
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
XX
XXX
XXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
NORTHBOUND
XXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 86 JasViaCan.xls 1/11/2019
35
acc/mvm
0.372.39
12:22
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
11:28
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on bike lane, pedestrians and mid-block crossingit is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 35 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
2
0.99
7,500
Jason Drive
Via Princessa to Canyon Park Boulevard NB: 27009 Jason Drive; SB: 27009 Jason DriveGoodClearResidential, on-street parking, both sides.Bike lane.1 lane each direction, Double Yellow
Center Line41 mph37 mph32 mph38 mph33 - 42 mph77%14%10%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/15/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
00000000000000000000001001101156663021100000000000
1115171311161318221514
200
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 90 LosViaMed.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
0.932.39
14:53
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
13:59
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on low accident rate,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
4
0.98
6,000
Lost Canyon Road
Via Princessa to Medley Ridge Drive (N)EB: 27316 Lost Canyon Drive; WB: 26932 Silverbell LaneGoodPartly cloudyResidential, NO on-street parking. "No Stopping Any Time".Fair Oaks Community
School on EB side near W end. School warning sign.25 mph school zone.2 lanes each direction, raised median.Traffic signal and School Xing at Wren Drive.47 mph42 mph36 mph43 mph37 -
46 mph69%21%11%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/29/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
00000000000000001111201256559997703020110000000000000
1121191712141513
200
Total
Vehicles
X
XX
XXX
XXXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
XX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXXXX
XXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 92 LosGolCed.xls 1/11/2019
40
acc/mvm
0.462.04
15:42
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
15:23
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.
40
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
3
2.23
4,000
Lost Canyon Road
Golden Valley Road to Cedar Valley Way
19001 Golden Valley RoadGoodPartly cloudyCommercial, NO on-street parking. "No Stopping Any Time".1 lane each direction (2/2 toward W end), Double Yellow Center Line47 mph41 mph37 mph42
mph37 - 46 mph74%16%10%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/29/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
00000000000000000000031122322749689743050011000000000000000
1010
100
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
X
WESTBOUND
XX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XXX
EASTBOUND
XXX
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 93 LyoI-5Wil.xls 1/11/2019
40
acc/mvm
0.401.48
09:35
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
08:56
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on high accident rate,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.
40
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
27
2.80
33,000
Lyons Avenue
I-5 to Wiley Canyon Road EB: 24432 Lyons Avenue; WB: 24431 Lyons AvenueGoodClearCommercial/Residential, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").3 lanes each direction, raised
median with landscaping (partially)Downhill grade in EB direction.47 mph41 mph37 mph43 mph38 - 47 mph71%15%15%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/17/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
00000000000000000020120235964650021010000000000000
1013191114211410121710
200
Total
Vehicles
XX
XX
XXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXX
XXXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 94 LyoWilRot.xls 1/11/2019
40
acc/mvm
0.711.48
16:15
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
15:41
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on limited visibility,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.
40
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
11
0.68
31,200
Lyons Avenue
Wiley Canyon Road to Avenida Rotella EB: 23736 Lyons Avenue; WB: 23710 Lyons AvenueGoodEB: Nearly clear; WB: 'Scattered cloudsCommercial/Residential, very limited on-street parking,
"No Stopping Any Time"Old Orchard Park on WB side at E end.3 lanes each direction (becomes 2/2 toward E end), raised median with landscaping.Traffic signal at Peachland Ave, and Everett
/ Avdnida Etrana.46 mph42 mph38 mph43 mph37 - 46 mph80%16%5%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/14/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
000000000000000010010010426674132000000000000000000
10161519191915191713
200
Total
Vehicles
XXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 95 LyoRotNew.xls 1/11/2019
35
acc/mvm
1:20
0.742.22
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
12:41
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on limited visibility,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 35 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
20
1.10
33,700
Lyons Avenue
Avenida Rotella to Newhall Avenue EB: 23502 Lyons Avenue; WB: 23351 Lyons AvenueGoodClearCommercial, on-street parking, "No Stopping Any Time" in small sections.25 mph school zone.
School Xings at Orchard Vill Rd / Valley St, Wayman, and Newhall.Our Lady of Perpetual Help School on WB side.2 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping.Traffic signals
at Apple Street, Orchard Vill Rd / Valley St, and Wayman St.41 mph36 mph30 mph37 mph32 - 41 mph67%16%18%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
9/18/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
00000000000000000000010001123553642863210000000000
1312191313141113141213
200
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
XX
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXX
XXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX
XXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 103 McBOrcVal.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
1.351.48
14:02
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
13:30
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
21
0.56
38,000
McBean Parkway
Orchard Village Road to Valencia Boulevard
NB: 26040 McBean Parkway; SB: 26147 McBean ParkwayGoodOvercastResidential, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").3 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping.Traffic
signal at Avenida Navarre, Granary Sq, Arroyo Park, and Del Monte Drive.50 mph45 mph40 mph46 mph41 - 50 mph72%16%13%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/21/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
0000000000000000004355725765811211010000000000000000
131322171514171411
200
Total
Vehicles
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
X
XX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 127 PlaSie2200.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
0.421.32
14:22
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
13:22
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
1,400
Placerita Canyon Road
Sierra Highway to 2200' w/o Sierra Highway (End of City Maintained Road)
20784 Placerita Canyon RoadGoodClearRural, on-street parking.1 lane each direction, Double Yellow Center Line, horse warning sign48 mph41 mph33 mph40 mph38 - 47 mph57%15%28%T.L. HartmanMark
Miller
4/25/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000000000000000001110001220222741314412220210000111100100000
53
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
WESTBOUND
XXXX
XXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
EASTBOUND
X
X
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 145 SanNewRiv.xls 1/11/2019
35
acc/mvm
0.312.39
10:48
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
08:59
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on low accident rate and bicycle activity,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 35 mph.
30
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
3,000
Santa Clarita Parkway
Newhall Ranch Road to Riverrock Way NB: 22397 Copper Mountain Court; SB: 22397 Copper Mountain CourtGoodClearResidential, "No Stopping Any Time"1 lane each direction, raised medianBike
path on SB side.42 mph37 mph32 mph38 mph35 - 44 mph66%9%26%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
6/5/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
000000000000000000000001001124888784151120100100000
13121114161616121313
200
Total
Vehicles
XX
XXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XX
XX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 152 SieSCLNew.xls 1/11/2019
55
acc/mvm
1.751.45
11:37
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
10:09
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on no curbs or sidewalks,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 55 mph.
55
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
5
0.24
16,500
Sierra Highway
South City Limit to Newhall Avenue
NB - 22650 Sierra Hwy, SB - 22662 Sierra HwyGoodClearUndeveloped/commercial2 lanes each direction, curvilinear, double yellow centerline from SCL to Remsen St, raised median from Remsen
St to Newhall Ave, "No Stopping Any Time"60 mph53 mph46 mph54 mph51 - 60 mph57%15%29%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
4/18/18
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
00000220233563396794855332610100000000000000000000000
1013101412171410
198
Total
Vehicles
X
XX
XX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 153 SieNewPla.xls 1/11/2019
50
acc/mvm
4:25
1.101.45
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
3:48
SEGMENT LENGTH:
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 50 mph.
50
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
13
0.83
19,500
Sierra Highway
Newhall Avenue to Placerita Canyon Road
NB - 24033 Sierra Hwy, SB - 24033 Sierra HwyGoodClearUndeveloped, on-street parking on east side2 lanes each direction, raised median, curvilinear, "No Stopping Any Time" on west side55
mph49 mph44 mph50 mph46 - 55 mph66%16%18%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
9/12/18
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000010010210212218877449631110000000000000000000000
111012211514181314
200
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
X
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XX
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 155 SieFriVia.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
1:59
0.661.45
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
1:00
SEGMENT LENGTH:
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed and driveways,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
11
0.86
26,700
Sierra Highway
Friendly Valley Parkway to Via Princessa
NB - 26668 Sierra Hwy, SB - 26699 Sierra HwyGoodPartly cloudyResidential/retail2 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping, "No Stopping Any Time"52 mph47 mph41 mph48 mph43
- 52 mph65%19%17%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
4/18/18
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000000000000411053427899773212100100000000000000000
101512111716141711
200
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 163 SolBouCom.xls 1/11/2019
50
acc/mvm
1.022.39
11:13
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
10:27
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on no sidewalks and multiple driveways,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 50 mph.
50
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
15
0.46
44,000
Soledad Canyon Road
Bouquet Canyon Road to Commuter Way
EB: 22630 Soledad Canyon Road; WB: 22527 Soledad Canyon RoadGoodOvercastCommercial, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").Saugus Speedway on EB side. Santa Clara River on WB
side.3 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping.Bike path on WB side.55 mph51 mph46 mph52 mph47 - 56 mph75%14%12%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/11/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
000000000000421136984340310000000000000000000000000
10131721112113161712
200
Total
Vehicles
X
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XX
XXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 170 SolSR-14.xls 1/11/2019
50
acc/mvm
2.231.45
10:31
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
9:31
SEGMENT LENGTH:
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 50 mph.
50
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
14
0.54
16,000
Soledad Canyon Road
SR-14 Sand Canyon On-Off Ramp to SR-14
EB - 14850 Soledad Canyon, WB - 14879 Soledad CanyonGoodClearResidential2 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping, "No Stopping Any Time", bike lane57 mph51 mph45 mph52
mph47 - 56 mph66%17%18%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
9/12/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
0000001002210267462986642301000000000000000000000000
151211171316171413
200
Total
Vehicles
X
XXX
XXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXX
XXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
XXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XXX
XXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 172 SunNorMcB.xls 1/11/2019
25
acc/mvm
0.212.39
10:04
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
09:26
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on adjacent school, park and use by pedestrians,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 25 mph.
25
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
3,500
Sunset Hills Drive
Northpark Drive to McBean Parkway 23392 Sunset Hills DriveGoodOvercastResidential/School/Park, on-street parking.Northpark Elem. School and Chesebrough Park make up entire WB side,School
Xing at Springtree, McBean and Northpark.1 lane each direction, Double Yellow Center Line.25 mph school zone.32 mph27 mph22 mph28 mph22 - 31 mph76%16%8%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
6/6/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000000000000000000000000000000010011011334195668464400000
111011
100
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
XXX
XXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
EASTBOUND
X
XXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 184 ViaViaOak.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
0.552.22
09:25
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
08:26
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on sidewalk gap and narrow bridge,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
7,000
Via Princessa
Via Pacifica to Oak Ridge Drive EB: 25317 Rolling Greens Way; WB: 23201 Via Barra(WB side: could not find address real close to location. GPS = N34 23.687' W118 32.499')GoodVery light
drizzle (pavement is dry)Residential, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").2 lanes each direction, Double Yellow Center Lane (raised median at endpoints)Bike path on EB side.50
mph44 mph39 mph45 mph42 - 51 mph66%9%25%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/30/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
00000000000000000131144598931200100000000000000000
1316111311141915131214
203
Total
Vehicles
X
X
XXXXX
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXX
XXXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
X
XX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XXX
XXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 185 ViaOakCla.xls 1/11/2019
40
acc/mvm
0.422.22
10:45
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
09:48
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on park and pedestrians,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 40 mph.
40
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
1
0.82
4,000
Via Princessa
Oak Ridge Drive to Claibourne Lane
EB: 25402 Sheffield Lane; WB: 25402 Sheffield LaneGoodOvercastResidential, on-street parking, "No Stopping Any Time" some sections.Circle J Ranch Park on WB side.2 lanes each direction,
raised median with landscaping.Curvilinear, including 15 mph curve at E end of segment.47 mph40 mph35 mph42 mph38 - 47 mph62%15%24%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/30/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
00000000000000000111133432569799873211000010000000000
1114161521121014
200
Total
Vehicles
XX
XX
XXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXX
XXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
X
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XXX
XXX
XXXXX
XXXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 188 ViaWhiSie.xls 1/11/2019
50
acc/mvm
0.681.48
12:22
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
11:42
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on no sidewalks,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 50 mph.
50
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
18
0.93
39,000
Via Princessa
Whites Canyon Road to Sierra Highway
EB: 19466 Via Princessa; WB: 19475 Via PrincessaGoodPartly cloudy.Some Commercial / Golf Course, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").Metrolink Station on WB side. Golf course
on EB side.3 lanes each direction, raised median from Weyerhaeuser to Sierra Hwy, and Double YellowCenter Line from Weyerhaeuser to Whites Canyon RoadTraffic signal at Weyerhaeuser.56
mph49 mph43 mph50 mph45 - 54 mph61%23%17%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/22/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
0000000000103334663894867513210000000000000000000000
101313151412121315
200
Total
Vehicles
X
XX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXX
XXXXXXXX
WESTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
EASTBOUND
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 191 WayLolLyo.xls 1/11/2019
25
acc/mvm
0.162.39
16:09
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
15:09
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on driveways and limited visibility,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 25 mph.
25
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
0
0.00
2,000
Wayman Street
Lola Lane to Lyons Avenue 23206 Lyons AvenueGoodClearResidential/Commerical, on-street parking, both sides. "No Stopping Any Time" for small sections.School Xing at Lyons1 lane each
direction, Double Yellow Center Line (most of segment is no median).Curvilinear (20 mph curve at S end)30 mph24 mph20 mph25 mph19 - 28 mph73%23%4%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/30/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
000000000000000000000000000000000000001111034323358467240300
10
71
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
X
XX
XX
SOUTHBOUND
XX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
X
NORTHBOUND
XXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 192 WesKelNew.xls 1/11/2019
30
acc/mvm
0.172.39
08:53
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
08:30
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on no sidewalk on west side,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 30 mph.
30
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
1
0.85
9,500
West Rye Canyon Road
Kelly Johnson Parkway to Newhall Ranch Road
25205 Rye Canyon LoopGoodClearIndustrial/Walmart, NO on-street parking ("No Stopping Any Time").2 lanes each direction, dual left turn lane36 mph32 mph28 mph33 mph29 - 38 mph83%5%12%T.L.
HartmanMark Miller
5/16/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
0000000000000000000000000000000000104574957754101100000000
111216
100
Total
Vehicles
GRAND TOTAL
X
XX
SOUTHBOUND
XXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XX
XX
XXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 195 WhiNadAsh.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
1.022.22
10:11
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
09:22
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
5
0.37
18,000
Whites Canyon Road
Nadal Street to 450' North of Ashboro Drive NB: 28098 Whites Canyon Road; SB: 28099 Whites Canyon RoadGoodVery light cloudsResidential, NO on-street parking. "No Stopping Any Time".25
mph school zone on SB side near S end. Todd Longshore Park on SB side.2 lanes each direction, raised medianTraffic signals at Canyon Crest Drive and Steinway Street.52 mph46 mph42
mph47 mph42 - 51 mph70%20%11%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
5/29/2018
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PAE
Pace C
00000000000000022166467587635330000110000000000000000
1414142420121313
200
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
X
XXX
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXX
XXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 197 WilOrcLyo.xls 1/11/2019
45
acc/mvm
1.051.45
10:33
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
9:40
SEGMENT LENGTH:
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on continuity of speed,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 45 mph.
45
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
2
0.15
17,500
Wiley Canyon Road
Orchard Village Road to Lyons Avenue
NB - 23946 Wiley Canyon, SB - 23901 Wiley CanyonGoodPartly cloudyResidential2 lanes each direction, raised median with landscaping, bike route, "No Stopping Any Time"50 mph44 mph42 mph46
mph42 - 51 mph77%13%10%T.L. HartmanMark Miller
4/24/18
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
00000000000000003011739968111000100000000000000000
1016121113141384141415
267
Total
Vehicles
X
X
X
X
X
XX
XXX
XXXXX
GRAND TOTAL
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
XX
XXXX
XXXXX
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
DATE
Filename: 198 WilLyoCal.xls 1/11/2019
35
acc/mvm
1.112.39
12:25
TIME STOP:
PROPOSED SPEED LIMIT:
EXPECTED RATE:
SEGMENT LENGTH:
12:08
Justification for the Proposed Speed Limit: Based on limited visibility,it is recommended to post the speed limit on this segment at 35 mph.
35
midblock collisions in 2 years (1-1-15 TO 12-31-16)acc/mvm
TIME START:
4
0.35
14,000
Wiley Canyon Road
Lyons Avenue to Calgrove Boulevard
24653 Wiley CanyonGoodClearResidential/retail, school2 lanes each direction, dual left turn lane, limited on-street parking42 mph39 mph35 mph39 mph34 - 43 mph85%11%4%T.L. HartmanMark
Miller
9/18/18
LOCATION:
ROADWAY:
DATE:SURVEY ADDRESS:ROAD CONDITION:WEATHER:ROAD DESCRIPTION:ROAD GEOMETRICS:CONDITIONS NOTREADILY APPARENT:AVERAGEDAILY TRAFFIC:ACCIDENT HISTORY:ACCIDENT RATE:85TH %:50TH %:15TH %:AVERAGE
SPEED:10 MPH PACE:% IN PACE:% OVER PACE:% UNDER PACE:EXISTING SPEED LIMIT:OBSERVED BY:REVIEWED BY:
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF A SPEED ZONE SURVEY AS ON FILE IN THEOFFICE OF THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA.
PE
AC
Pace
000000000000000000000000000111539964744000000000000000000
14101111
100
Total
Vehicles
X
X
GRAND TOTAL
X
X
XX
SOUTHBOUND
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
VEHICLES SURVEYED
X
XXX
XXX
XXXXX
NORTHBOUND
XXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
75747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615
(mph)
Speed
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING AND SPEED SURVEY
APPENDIXE
DEUNEVA
TRAIL RD
LRT ILAU QNOYNAC
ACGNI
A
TS ELE
ETS
CIDAR
R
AGLE
SET
A
W
L
L
V
C
CR
FIRE
T
VIE
ESORS
LPNU
JASMIN
UAROLF
EIPW
ODAHS
B
A
RD OTNIR
OC
CORALES
TSWOD
M
N
RD
EN
L
CA
NORIHTRON
DLES
ARYR
G
LIVNIAGUOB
RDNOTEC
L
ALN
WENALD
G
DR
M
ST
DGE
ALCRIC
ELBA
A
EH
N
RE
OHA
OYNACSGNIRPSKAO
ANRA
RPM
AC
DR EGDIR LIART
DRNOYNACYASDNIL
EVA LLIHANNAT
MRAC
EVA TIRG AES
P
D RHPMUIRT
EVA HPMIURT
A
ROYAVE
EEVEVAS
VATSELLLIHGNILLOR
R
KEVIN WAY
EVANEK
OL
EVANOTI
OH
NIAT
NUOM
E
V
E
P
KAEPELG
AE
TC
AV
UOCL
O
RC
I
R
L
ENAL EGDIRKRAP
NGS
LN
N
IC
RD
DRNOT
G
PL
TS EIXOLIB
DR TNIMALOS
CT
DR
SOL
TC
RA
B
N
NE
EVA TSERCELGAE
ISRO
EVA IN
ARCAY AVE
SEDR
E
EVAEROMSINN
NOTREKAB
DEER CTERTONAVE
ORDR
EVA
EREMATLA
HAXTOK
EVA EDALGSSORC
DENALX
RD ENALXOF
Y
AW ATIG
EVA YAWADIH
EVA PORDWED
DRNOY
R
DRIDD
A
RO
DR YTNELP PMAC
TC NAMOR
TC LAN
YELROHH
T
P
E
ADNO
YAW
RESSAL
G
EVA RESSALG
T
NL
YKSEUL
AI
NLTSERCRATS
ERD ALEMAP
EV AYRREHC
EKRD
E
MEAD
N
L
RE
EAVE
S
N
OLN
NORAVE
TH
AV
E
TC YERDUA
AVE
T
B CTO
HO
ALEBAL
ORADEV ASSERPYC
T
EV ATUNLAW
EVA YBNOH
UYELL
LAPINE
EVA LLAVINRUF
UB
R
ANIBO
T
BENA C
S
HC
RD
AREHTEUR
EVA KAO
TSIM
TC
E
G
L
D
DR
NL
YR
RET
HMSENS
CE
K
OH
C
ORB
DN
RE
DOAK
EGNITTE
DRN
Y
RAW
TA
A
THEIL
AT
LISAN
LRTGNIKREV
NL
TN
IM
REP
PE
OP
KO
A
R
DTTERABC
R
O
NLNOTGN
EDR
NO
Y
WA
A
TM
L
AHK
C
PY
IERRMARIAMEO WA
ATVAL
RL
LN
EVA SAILE
VAADARA
GILL
ARE
RBAC
A
W
A
AL
REPPEP
TC KRALC
SROHLP
TC MLE
R
YN
A
T
C
AR
R
C
D
RAITRAL
CATNAS
LEIFF
RD
ONTAGE
RD KEERYON FR
C YRREHECO CAN
CSS ST
CROS
YN
AB
RD K
EERC ER
OMACYS
TREECT
RICKE
ERC
O
DR
ENVE
GLJANEL A
VE
K A
ROO
GB
PRIN
NS
CANYODR
N
L
DR
E
DI
OTIU
QSICN
ARF ATSIRHC
NAS
ISTAPLE ST
AP
EW
NL
RE
DR
IR
R
ADA D
RAM
TRY
NLC
AI
B
C
RODEUS
RD
DOODLIE
WTRAEF
HINOZA
EN
AELD
EB
A
IELZ
R
AVE
HLAND
PEAC
E
RE
L
FOCT
REUH
NL
N
GRE
NGAV
IGHSPRI
EH
L
O
D
EELER R
WH
ATO
R
MONT D
VER
RETT DR
EVE
VD
WOOD BL
AT
A
OLFE RD
DR ROOMHCOLDE W
R
R
D
IV
DRROOMHCO
IAV
L RD
FOUR
YA WSEERT GNIREPSIHW
NA
VAIV
ALE
RD NALEV
AYWAY
B
YAW AUHSAN
DSLLIHGNIGNIS
OF
RD NAGOH
ICK
ASO
DS
SIR
B
SAL
L
N
YAL
RDPTC
TC
T
EH
R
EENCT
I
T
ST
S
TSDR
C
OCIH
DR
M
G
RD
RG
ZA
AI
YAW
YELNEH
DR
D
SONPKWYNAC LO
JOHN
ORE
AM
RIT
TAEK
IV
IR
SNEM
ELCE
EFL
TI
OLD
C
R
D
ITSK
N
N
REIR
L
UB
RD
WE
TSIEW
DRNOYNACA
O
OG
AL
ATIONAREA
AKERECRE
L
CASTIC
DR E
TUOTNEEST
EGDYORA
IRTS
YA WREDROG NAV
WEGNAR
TDR DOO
TSREDLA
TS YCNIUQ
L
TS NOCAEB
CIATSAC
NAO
NL SLOHCIN
N LN
LSO
PO
E
YRC
LP HAIBOTROFWA
D
R
SO
RD YRREHC
RD TNIOP WORRA
A
W
T
HIKRAP
LEB
PLYR
L
NA P
RCELO
BA
DO
LR
RENTO P
SOR
AC
LS
RD YENREK