Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-03-23 - AGENDA REPORTS - METROWALK SP - MC 20-045 (2)Agenda Item: 10 P CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY MANAGER APPROVAL:1 DATE: March 23, 2021 SUBJECT: METROWALK SPECIFIC PLAN - MASTER CASE 20-045 DEPARTMENT: Community Development PRESENTER: Erika Iverson RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council: 1. Receive the staff report, presentation, and conduct the public hearing. 2. Adopt a resolution certifying the MetroWalk Specific Plan Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (State Clearinghouse Number 2020120433), adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and making the appropriate findings under the California Environmental Quality Act. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 20-045 (General Plan Amendment 20-001, Tentative Tract Map 83087, Zone Change 20-001, Development Review 20-005, and Architectural Design Review 20-007) and the MetroWalk Specific Plan Document for the development of the MetroWalk Specific Plan, subject to the final Conditions of Approval. 4. Introduce and pass to second reading an ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 20-001 (MASTER CASE 20-045) TO AMEND THE CITY' S ZONING MAP AND CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 2840-004-009 FROM BUSINESS PARK TO SPECIFIC PLAN." BACKGROUND The Metro Walk Project (Project) area is a 20.4-acre, relatively flat parcel of vacant land located at the southeastern corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive. The site has been previously disturbed, formerly used for agricultural purposes, and has little remaining vegetation. The site is situated just south of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area and immediately north and west of the Metrolink rail line. Lost Canyon Road is elevated above the site to the west, with a Page 1 Packet Pg. 92 landscaped slope (to be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District) that descends from Lost Canyon Road to the site. The future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center, which includes a seven -bay bus transfer station and the Vista Canyon Metrolink Station, is located immediately east of the site. INITIAL APPLICATION The applicant, Bluemax Santa Clarita, LLC, has worked to refine the proposal over the past year and a half based on input from City staff through the One Stop review and formal entitlement application process. On April 3, 2020, an application was submitted for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan, including a request for a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment, a Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Architectural Design Review, to allow for the subdivision of land and construction of 503 residential units within four planning areas, including 179 market -rate apartments, 124 market -rate senior apartments, 150 for -sale townhomes, as well as incorporating 50 deed -restricted affordable senior apartments and a nearly one -acre publicly accessible community park. After receiving comments from staffs initial review, the applicant revised the site plan and decreased the overall number of units from 503 to 498, enhanced the pedestrian circulation on site, and addressed architectural comments. Staff processed the application, which included three rounds of review by the Development Review Committee and a Planning Commission meeting on February 16, 2021. P UBLIC O UTREACH Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the applicant was not able to host traditional in -person community presentations. However, the applicant hosted Zoom meetings with the Sand Canyon Home Owners Association, The Ranch at Fair Oaks Home Owners Association, and the Canyon Country Community Advisory Committee in October and November 2020. Subsequent Zoom conferences were set up with interested residents from The Ranch at Fair Oaks in January 2021. In addition, the applicant has met via Zoom with the Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation, the Santa Clarita Valley Senior Center, the Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce, the Southland Regional Association of Realtors and has shared their proposal with the adjacent Vista Canyon development team. GENERAL PLANNING AND ZONING AND SURROUNDING USES The General Plan and Zoning designation for the subject property is Business Park (BP), with a portion of the Project site located in a Significant Ecological Area (SEA) Overlay. The surrounding land uses include the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, the Colony Townhomes development, and the Metrolink rail line. The Ranch at Fair Oaks is located further south, beyond the Metrolink rail line, and is improved with multi- and single-family units. Table 1 summarizes the General Plan land use designation, zoning, and land uses for the properties surrounding the site: Page 2 Packet Pg. 93 TABLE 1: Surrounding Properties Land Use Designation and Zoning Project General Plan Zoning Land Use Site North Specific Plan Specific Plan Vista Canyon Specific Plan - Planning Area-1 (Multi -family apartments) South Public/Institutional Public/Institutional Metrolink Rail Line East Specific Plan Specific Plan Vista Canyon Specific Plan - Planning Area-2 (future Metrolink Rail Line Station and Town Center Planning Area of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan) West Urban Urban Multi -family Residential Residential Residential The Vista Canyon Specific Plan, located immediately north and east of the site, was approved by the City Council in 2011 and includes potential development for 1,100 residential units, 950,000 square feet of commercial floor area, as well as the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with a seven -bay bus transfer station and future Vista Canyon Metrolink Station. The applicant is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Specific Plan (SP) for the 20.4-acre Project site, which would consist of multi -family development and associated community park and pedestrian linkages. PROJECT SUMMARY SPECIFIC PLAN The applicant's proposal is to establish the MetroWalk Specific Plan (Specific Plan) for multi- family residential uses and a plaza on the 20.4-acre site. The Specific Plan would establish four planning areas and two zoning designations within the Specific Plan area for Residential (R) and Open Space (OS) land uses. Primary uses permitted in the R zone include multi -family dwellings and would permit rental or sales offices, as well as model homes. The R zone would also permit secondary uses, which are incidental to the primary use, to include private residential recreational facilities including community rooms/clubhouses, fitness rooms, pools, courtyards, as well as public or private pedestrian trails, plazas, parks, and food trucks (subject to applicable Sidewalk Vendor Permit). Primary uses permitted in the OS zone include uses as permitted by Section 17.36.010 of the Unified Development Code (UDC). Secondary uses permitted in the OS zone include bicycle rentals, community garden, farmer's market, and food truck/outdoor events (subject to applicable Sidewalk Vendor or Temporary Use Permits). The Specific Plan would establish the site development standards governing the R zoning Page 3 Packet Pg. 94 designation, including, but not limited to density, setbacks, landscaping, building height, open space, and parking. The Specific Plan will be implemented primarily through the process of subdivision maps. All land subdivision maps of any type (e.g., tentative or final, vesting or non -vesting, tract or parcel) shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved in accordance with the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) and Subdivision Map Act. Where the provisions or procedures of the SCMC conflict with the provisions of this Specific Plan, the Specific Plan shall apply. The buildout of the Specific Plan is estimated to occur over five years in three construction phases: (1) grading, (2) infrastructure improvements, and (3) building construction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project would construct up to 498 residential units organized into four planning areas, consisting of a variety of housing types including market -rate apartments, market -rate senior apartments, deed -restricted affordable senior apartments, and for -sale townhomes. Each planning area would include common open space areas and private recreational amenities. An approximately 0.93-acre portion of the site would be improved with a publicly accessible park adjacent to the future Metrolink Station. Planning Area 1 (PA-1), approximately 7.54 acres, is located on the western portion of the site and consists of 179 market -rate apartment units within two four-story buildings. Floor plans range from studio to two -bedroom units and vary in size from approximately 575 square feet to 1,040 square feet. Each building is oriented around a central outdoor courtyard with private residential amenities. Residential parking is provided in a combination of tuck -under parking stalls along the ground floor, as well as carports. Planning Area 2 (PA-2), approximately 2.33 acres, is located centrally on the site and consists of 119 market -rate, senior apartments (for ages 55 and above) within a four-story building. Unit sizes range from approximately 675 square feet to 1,041 square feet in a mix of one- and two - bedroom units. The building is organized around a central courtyard, with private residential amenities, and provides residential parking in tuck -under parking stalls and carports. Planning Area 3 (PA-3), approximately 1.08 acres, is located centrally along the southern portion of the site and consists of 49 deed -restricted, affordable (65 percent area median income) senior apartments, and one manager unit in a four-story building. The deed -restricted units are one - bedroom units, each 650 square feet. The manager unit is two bedrooms and 950 square feet. An outdoor courtyard with private residential amenities is located along the southern edge of the building. Parking is provided in a ground -level parking garage. Planning Area 4 (PA-4), approximately 9.47 acres, is located on the eastern portion of the site and consists of 150 for -sale townhome units and a nearly one -acre community park. The townhome units are three stories, offering a mix of two- and three -bedroom units ranging from approximately 1,340 square feet to 2,290 square feet, each with individual garages at the ground level. A common -area pool and community clubhouse are provided for the townhome units. Page 4 Packet Pg. 95 Site grading will consist of 50,000 cubic yards of cut and fill, and over -excavation of 400,000 cubic yards, all to balance on site. Community landscape elements would include a neighborhood parkway along Harriman Drive with trees and low vegetation, an entry monument at Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, a landscaped slope adjacent to Lost Canyon Road, a 0.93-acre community park, and a network of tree -lined pedestrian sidewalks throughout the Project site. Surface and carport parking fields are located throughout the Project site to support the residential uses and guests. VEHICULAR CIRCULATION The main access to the 498 residences will be taken from Harriman Drive, a private street, connecting to Lost Canyon Road. Harriman Drive provides a 28-foot drive aisle, with an eight - foot -wide parallel parking lane, five-foot parkway, and five-foot sidewalk on either side. The Project is located within a high fire hazard area which limits development to no more than 150 residential units on a single means of access. A secondary point of access is provided by way of Cooper Street, a private street, to Humphreys Parkway. The internal Project drive aisles maintain a minimum of 26-foot unobstructed drive aisle width, with a majority of the drive aisle network maintaining a minimum of 28 feet, as required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was prepared for the Project and indicates that the traffic impacts related to the Project would be less than significant; however, the TIA made recommendations for a number of improvements that would improve the traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Project. The Project conditions require the following recommended improvements prior to Certificate of Occupancy: • Signalization at Lost Canyon Road and Medley Ridge Drive; • Signalization at Lost Canyon Road and Canyon Park Boulevard; and • Median at Lost Canyon Road and Winter Pine Way to prohibit left -turn movements out of Winter Pine Way. PROPOSED ENTITLEMENTS Implementation of the Project will require the approval of the following entitlements: Tentative Tract Mab 83087 The Project includes a request to subdivide the Project site to create six parcels. Lots designated for multi -family residential use may be further subdivided for condominium purposes. Any subdivision in excess of four lots requires the approval of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM) in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. In accordance with Section 17.25.110 of the UDC, the Planning Commission is required to review and approve all requests for a TTM. General Plan Amendment 20-001 The Project includes a request for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from BP to SP. In accordance with Section 17.26.110 of the UDC, the Planning Commission is Page 5 Packet Pg. 96 required to hold a public hearing and forward their recommendation to the City Council. Zone Change 20-001 The Project includes a request for a Zone Change to amend the City's Zoning Map in order to designate the site as SP. In accordance with Section 17.28.120 of the UDC, the Planning Commission is required to hold a public hearing and forward their recommendation to the City Council. Development Review 20-005 In accordance with Section 17.23.120 of the UDC, a Development Review application is required to ensure that the Project complies with all of the provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, and other applicable requirements. In order to achieve this, the review authority is empowered to grant approval with conditions for uses in zones, as prescribed by the UDC. Architectural Design Review 20-007 In accordance with Section 17.23.110 of the UDC, an Architectural Design Review is required to ensure that the architecture complies with the provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, and other applicable requirements. In order to achieve this, the review authority is empowered to grant approval with conditions for uses in zones, as prescribed by the UDC. SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The City of Santa Clarita (City) prepared a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) for the Project. Senate Bill 375 established a streamlined environmental review process under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for transit priority projects (TPP) that are consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Regional Transportation Plan. A TPP is any project that contains at least 50 percent residential uses, provides a minimum net density of 20 dwelling units per acre, and is located within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high -quality transit corridor. The proposed Project meets these criteria for a TPP and is eligible for evaluation under a SCEA. The Draft SCEA was circulated for review and comment by affected governmental agencies and the public, in compliance with CEQA. Specifically, the Notice of Availability for the Draft SCEA was filed, posted, and advertised on December 22, 2020, and the 30-day public review period ended on January 21, 2021, in accordance with CEQA. The Draft SCEA includes an Environmental Impact Analysis for the following areas: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, energy consumption, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, transportation/traffic, tribal cultural resources, utilities and service systems, and wildfire. The SCEA review process does not require response to comments received through the public notice period, only that comments are considered in the determination for certification. Nonetheless, the Final SCEA was prepared for the Project after the review period had concluded, and includes the Draft SCEA, comments and responses on the Draft SCEA, Errata Section, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. The Final SCEA was made available in advance of the February 16, 2021, Planning Commission meeting, as it was included as an attachment to Planning Commission agenda report. Additional comments on the Draft SCEA were received Page 6 Packet Pg. 97 after the close of the public comment period and after the Planning Commission public hearing for Master Case 20-045. Response to the additional comments received are included in the record as an attachment to this agenda report. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission held a public meeting and closed the public hearing on February 16, 2021. The Planning Commission, in a 5-0 vote, recommended approval of the Project and certification of the Final SCEA by the City Council. NOTWING All notices required by law were completed, which consisted of a legal advertisement in The Signal newspaper on March 2, 2021, and notification of the public hearing by mail to all property owners and occupants within a 1,000-foot radius of the Project site (1,110 notices). A sign was also posted at the Project site on March 2, 2021. As of the writing of this agenda report, staff has received a total of 51 emails, letters, written comment cards, and speaker cards. These individuals or groups have expressed their positions with 44 in support of the Project and 7 in opposition. The letters of support reference the need for senior housing, affordable housing, entry level housing, and housing proximate to transit service. The letters of opposition express concerns about crime, density, home values, and traffic. All letters and comments received during the Planning Commission meetings are included in the City Clerk's reading file. ALTERNATIVE ACTION Other actions as determined by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT The Project would not have a negative fiscal impact on the City's General Fund. The applicant would be required to pay various development impact fees, including, but not limited to, Bridge and Thoroughfare fees, transit impact fees, and library impact fees. ATTACHMENTS Public Notice Ordinance with Exhibit A Project Resolution with Exhibit A CEQA Resolution with Exhibits A & B Tentative Tract Map 83087 Site Plan -Renderings -Preliminary Landscape Plan -Pedestrian Circulation Final SCEA ARCHITECTURAL PACKAGE (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Page 7 Packet Pg. 98 Draft SCEA (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) MetroWalk Specific Plan (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) SSUSD Comment Letter Response (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Comment Letters (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Planning Commission Staff Report 2-16-2021 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Planning Commission Resolution P21-02 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Planning Commission Resolution P21-03 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Page 8 Packet Pg. 99 10.a PROJECT TITLE: MetroWalk Specific Plan Project APPLICATION: Master Case 20-045; General Plan Amendment 20-001, Zone Change 20-001, Tentative Tract Map 20-002, Development Review 20-005, Architectural Design Review 20-007, Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment SCH Number 2020120433 PROJECT APPLICANT: Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast Corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive. Assessor Parcel Number 2840-004-009. The City of Santa Clarita City Council will conduct a public hearing on this matter on the following date. The City Council meeting will be conducted remotely, consistent with public health orders issued by the State of California and the County of Los Angeles. DATE: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m. LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers 23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor Santa Clarita, CA 91355 WEBSITE: http://santaclaritaciiyca.igm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting entitlements for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan. The development proposal consists of 498 residential units within four Planning Areas on a 20.4- acre, vacant parcel, to include 179 market rate all -ages apartments; 119 market rate age -qualified apartments; 50 deed -restricted affordable senior apartments; and 150 for -sale townhomes. In addition, the development proposal includes a 0.93-acre lot for open space to be improved with a park plaza. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: On February 16, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to adopt a resolution recommending the City Council certify the Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) and associated documents, and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and approve Master Case 20-045; General Plan Amendment 20-001, Zone Change 20-001, Development Review 20- 005, Architectural Design Review 20-007and Tentative Tract Map 83087 for the development of the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, in the City of Santa Clarita, subject to the Conditions of Approval. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) has been prepared for this proposed pro] ect and was posted for public review from December 22, 2020, to January 21, 2021. A Final SCEA was prepared for the proposed project after the close of the public review period and includes the Draft SCEA, comments and responses on the Draft SCEA, Errata Section, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). A copy of the Draft SCEA and all supporting documents are available at the City Clerk's Office, by appointment, located in the City Hall Building at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 120, Santa Clarita, California, 91355. To make an appointment, please call (661) 259-CITY. The Draft SCEA and Final SCEA are also available for public review on the City of Santa Clarita website at: http://www.santa-clarita.com/planning/environmental. If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings. Packet Pg. 100 For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clanita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clanita, CA 91355. Telephone: (661) 255-4330. Website: www.santa-clarita.com/planning. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Erika Iverson, Associate Planner, eivers rQ] ion ()sqnta-claritaxom. Mary Cusick, MMC City Clerk Publish Date: The Signal, March 2, 2021 I Packet Pg. 101 1 10.b ORDINANCE NO. 21- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONE CHANGE 20-001 (MASTER CASE 20-045) TO AMEND THE CITY' S ZONING MAP AND CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 2840-004-009 FROM BUSINESS PARK TO SPECIFIC PLAN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact: A. An application for Master Case 20-045, the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, was filed by the project applicant, Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC (the "applicant"), with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on April 3, 2020, for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan, consisting of 498 residential units, associated recreational facilities and privately maintained park. The entitlement requests (collectively "Entitlements") include: 1. General Plan Amendment 20-001 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as Specific Plan (SP). 2. Zone Change 20-001 to amend the zoning map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as SP. 3. Tentative Tract Map 83087 to subdivide the 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site into six lots. In addition, lots designated for multi -family housing may be further subdivided for condominium purposes. 4. Development Review 20-005 to allow for the construction of a multi -family residential development in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, the MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. 5. Architectural Design Review 20-007 for the review of the project architecture to ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. 6. MetroWalk Specific Plan Document for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan consisting of 498 residential units, community park, and associated site improvements. B. The approximately 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project (Project) site is located at the southeast corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, a private street, and is located within the Business Park (BP) zone and General Plan land use designation. The easternmost portion of the site is within the Santa Clara River Significant Ecological Area (SEA), designated by Los Angeles County and included in the City's SEA Overlay Zone. Page 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 102 10.b C. The current BP land use and zoning designation does not permit the development of multi- family residential units. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan. D. Zone Change 20-001 will change the zoning designation of APN 2840-004-009 from BP to SP. E. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA;" Public Resources Code, §21000 et seq.), the City is the lead agency and the City Council is the decision -making body for the Project. F. The City determined that a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) could be prepared for the Project. The City determined that the following areas must be addressed in the SCEA for the Project: aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, mineral and energy resources, noise, population and housing, parks and recreation, fire protection, police protection, schools, library services, traffic and circulation, solid waste, tribal resources, wastewater and water supply, and wildfire. G. The City prepared a Draft SCEA for the Project. The Draft SCEA was circulated for review and comment by affected governmental agencies and the public, in compliance with CEQA. Specifically, the Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft SCEA was filed, posted, and advertised on December 22, 2020, and the 30-day public review period ended on January 21, 2021, at 5:00 p.m., in accordance with CEQA. Comments received on the Draft SCEA have been fully responded to and those comments received after the Planning Commission's review of the Project have been fully responded to prior to certification and approval of the project by the City Council, if granted. H. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed hearing on Master Case 20-045 on February 16, 2021. At the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission, in a 5-0 vote, recommended the City Council certify the SCEA prepared for the proposed Project and approve Master Case 20-045 and its associated entitlements. The City Council held a duly noticed hearing on Master Case 20-045 on March 23, 2021. At the close of the public hearing, the City Council certified the SCEA prepared for the Project and approved Master Case 20-045 with associated entitlements for the Project. The City Council approved, and passed the ordinance to a second reading on April 13, 2021. SECTION 2. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 20-045. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports, and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission and the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council finds as follows: Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 103 10.b A. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The Project is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan of the City. More specifically, the Project is consistent with the following portions of the General Plan: Urban Form Goal LU1: An interconnected Valley of Villages providing diverse lifestyles, surrounded by a greenbelt of natural open space. The Project is consistent with Goal LU1 as a project that proposes to develop a multi -family project in a transit -oriented and urban portion of the City. The City's General Plan identified properties in the City that were either underutilized or appropriately situated for mixed -use development to concentrate orderly development in an urban environment, while preserving natural open spaces. The Project site is located immediately adjacent to the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area which has development potential of up to 1,100 residential units and 950,000 square feet of commercial floor area, and proximate to the future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with local and regional public transit opportunities. It is largely surrounded by existing residentially developed land. The site is currently vacant, previously disturbed by agricultural activities, and has little remaining vegetation. Development of the site will allow for a residential project consistent with the surrounding properties, providing a variety housing types. Developing the disturbed site will further preserve rural portions of the City and Santa Clarita Valley, concentrating uses in the urbanized area supported by necessary infrastructure. Mixed Land Uses Goal LU2: A mix of land uses to accommodate growth, supported by adequate resources and maintaining community assets. The Project includes 498 residential units in a range of housing types, including for -rent apartment units, townhomes for sale, as well as senior apartments and deed -restricted affordable senior apartments, to provide a variety of living options for existing and future residents of the City. The Project site is within walking distance of the future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with public bus and rail transit opportunities. In addition, the site is located adjacent to the Town Center planning area of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, which will offer commercial and retail services within walking distance of the planned residential development. The pedestrian connectivity to public transit and commercial services will reduce vehicle trips to other portions of the City. Healthy Neighborhoods Goal LU3: Healthy and Safe Neighborhoods for all residents. As previously discussed, the Project will provide a mix of residential housing types to serve the diverse housing needs of the existing and future City residents. The Project incorporates a network of pedestrian paths and a community park, providing a walkable and safe pedestrian environment, creating connections to public transportation options and commercial services, encouraging healthy lifestyle habits consistent with the General Plan. Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 104 10.b Mobility Goal LU5: Enhanced mobility through alternative transportation choices and land use patterns. The Project locates higher density housing adjacent to the Multi -Modal Vista Canyon Center, which includes a seven -bay bus transfer station and future Vista Canyon Metrolink Station. The Project incorporates a network of pedestrian paths to provide connectivity to transit opportunities and adjacent commercial service opportunities being developed as part of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan. Adequate Sites Goal H1: Provide adequate sites to accommodate the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of new housing units between 2013 and 2021. The RHNA for the City is mandated by State Housing Law and used by local jurisdictions in land use planning to assist in determining how to address existing and future housing needs. The Project site would provide 498 housing units, including age -restricted senior apartments and affordable senior apartments, contributing to the City's RHNA targets for market -rate and affordable housing units. Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing Goal H2: Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low, very low, low- and moderate -income households. The Project provides 49 deed -restricted affordable senior apartments to be rented to low- income households at or below 65 percent of the Area Median Income. The Project conditions require the applicant to enter into an Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement governing and encumbering the Project to ensure long-term affordability of the low-income senior apartments. Equal Housing Opportunities Goal H6: Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability. The Project provides a variety of housing types, including market -rate apartments, senior apartments, affordable senior apartments, and for -sale townhomes. The mix of housing types serves to provide units for the diverse housing needs in the community. Multi -Modal Circulation Network Goal C1: In interconnected network of circulation facilities that integrates all travel modes, provides viable alternatives to automotive use and confirms with regional plans. The Project locates higher density housing adjacent to the Multi -Modal Center with local and regional public bus and rail transportation opportunities. This offers residents a convenient and viable alternative to automotive use. Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 105 10.b Pedestrian Circulation Goal C7: Walkable communities in which interconnected walkways provide a safe, comfortable and viable alternative to driving for local destinations. The Project is designed with a network of pedestrian connections throughout the site and to adjacent Vista Canyon Specific Plan trails and walkways. The pedestrian paths provide linkages to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center and the planned Town Center area of Vista Canyon that will provide commercial services. B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this code; The Project requires the approval of entitlements consisting of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Development Review and Architectural Design Review, in accordance with the City's UDC. Section 17.37.030 of the UDC establishes the Specific Plan zoning designation. Allowable uses, density, and development standards would be determined by the adopted Specific Plan. With approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change to SP, and the approval of the associated entitlements, the proposed Project would follow the underlying zone and all other applicable provisions of the UDC. C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and The Project has been evaluated in accordance with the UDC, as well as the City's General Plan. The Project has been designed to be in keeping with the provisions of the UDC, as well as the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The Project has been designed to complement the surrounding development, specifically the Vista Canyon Specific Plan development immediately north and east of the site. Pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent Vista Canyon development has been incorporated into the Project to promote walkability by providing direct links to public transit and commercial services and reduce vehicle trips. Finally, the Project has been designed to be consistent with all applicable requirements for law enforcement and emergency services for the site. Therefore, the Project will not impact the public health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity of the Project site. D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use; The Project proposes the establishment of a Specific Plan which will determine the allowable uses, density, and development standards for the site. The Project has been designed to be consistent and compatible with the adjacent Vista Canyon Specific Plan, specifically to provide linkages to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center, as well as to the existing and planned pedestrian trails through Vista Canyon Specific Plan area. With Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 106 10.b the Conditions of Approval, the Project will be suitable for the site and the uses entitled with the Project. 2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are ofsufcient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate; A detailed traffic analysis was completed to evaluate the impacts of the Project. The traffic analysis has identified signalization and other roadway improvements to ensure the public roadways are sufficiently improved to support the additional Project traffic. The Project Conditions of Approval require the applicable improvements prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Public protection services (e.g., Fire protection, Sheriprotection, etc.) are readily available; and The Project site is located in an established, urban environment that is serviced by existing law enforcement and fire protection services. The applicant will pay applicable fees to the law enforcement and fire protection agencies to assist in offsetting any impacts to the services necessary to properly service the Project. 4. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site. The Project is in a portion of the City that is surrounded by developed communities with access to the necessary utilities to service the site. The Specific Plan includes an infrastructure development plan to identify necessary on -site and off -site infrastructure improvements to connect to existing supply and support the future development. In addition, a hydraulic analysis was completed for the Project determining that adequate water is available to meet the needs of the Project site. SECTION 3. ZONE CHANGE FINDINGS FOR ZONE CHANGE 20-001. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission and the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council finds as follows: A. Principles and Standards for Zone Changes. The Council shall approve a Zone Change only after the applicant substantiates all of the following required findings: That modified conditions warrant a revision in the zoning map as it pertains to the area under consideration; The Project site is located immediately south and west of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan has a development potential of 1,100 residential units, 950,000 square feet of commercial floor area, and includes the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with a seven -bay bus transfer station and future Vista Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 107 10.b Canyon Metrolink Station. While the Project site was not included as part of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area, its situation, east of Lost Canyon Road and north of the Metrolink rail line, is contiguous with Vista Canyon. As such, the Project site warrants consideration of a revision to the zoning map as shown on the Zone Change Exhibit (Exhibit A). 2. That a need for the proposed zone classification exists within such area; The proposed change to the zone classification is necessary to allow for the development of the transit -oriented community where higher density housing will be located proximate to local and regional public transportation opportunities. The approval of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan in 2011 has changed the land use in the immediate vicinity, such that the current BP zoning designation on the Project site is out of character with the surrounding land uses. That the particular property under consideration is a proper location for said zone classification within such area: a. That placement of the proposed zone at such location will be in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare, and inconformity with good zoning practice; and The proposed Zone Change would permit the multi -family residential project that is consistent with the surrounding land uses and supports the goals and objectives of the General Plan as described above in Section 2. As such, the proposed Zone Change is in conformance with good zoning practice. b. That the proposed change is consistent with the adopted General Plan for the area unless a General Plan Amendment is filed concurrently and approve with said zone change. A General Plan Amendment has been filed concurrently with the Zone Change request. For the reasons provided above, the Planning Commission can recommend the City Council make this finding. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby approves this ordinance to allow for a Zone Change for the MetroWalk Specific Plan as described herein and shown on Exhibit A. SECTION 5. The list of specific plans found in Section 17.28.110Q) of the Unified Development Code is amended to include reference to the MetroWalk Specific Plan. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from its passage and adoption. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 108 10.b PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 131h day of April, 2021. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2 1 - was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of March 2021. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 131h day of April, 2021, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL,MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the forgoing is the original of Ordinance No. 21- and was published in The Signal newspaper in accordance with State Law (G.C. 40806). CITY CLERK Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 109 H (sro-oeow and yvJs WaM°•NWI 6 v I"'WM »uvmwo 9vwuuaeµv g Y 10.c RESOLUTION NO.21- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER CASE 20-045 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20- 001; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 83087; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 20-005; AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 20-007) AND THE METROWALK SPECIFIC PLAN DOCUMENT, AND APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE METROWALK SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact: A. An application for Master Case 20-045, the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, was filed by the project applicant, Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC (applicant), with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on April 3, 2020, and deemed complete on August 12, 2020. The property for which this application was filed (hereinafter "project site") is located at the southeast corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, in the community of Canyon Country; Assessor's Parcel Number: 2840-004-009. The entitlement requests (collectively, "Entitlements") include: 1. General Plan Amendment 20-001 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as Specific Plan (SP). 2. Zone Change 20-001 to amend the zoning map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as SP. 3. Tentative Tract Map 83087 to subdivide the 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site into six lots. In addition, lots designated for multi -family housing may be further subdivided for condominium purposes. 4. Development Review 20-005 to allow for the construction of a multi- family residential development in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, the MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. 5. Architectural Design Review 20-007 for the review of the proposed architecture to ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. 6. MetroWalk Specific Plan Document for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan consisting of 498 residential units, a community park, and associated site improvements. B. A Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held on June 11, 2020. DRC comment letters were issued to the applicant on September 21 and November 19, 2020. Packet Pg. I I I 10.c C. The approximately 20.4-acre Project site is located at the southeast corner of LostCanyon Road and Harriman Drive, a private street, and is located within the Business Park (BP) zone and General Plan land use designation. The easternmost portion of the site is within the Santa Clara River Significant Ecological Area (SEA), designated by Los Angeles County and included in the City's SEA Overlay Zone. D. On June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-61, adopting the General Plan of the City, and Resolution No. 11-62 certifying the Environmental Impact Report. The City's General Plan presently designates the project site BP. Approximately 5.3 acres on the eastern portion of the Project site are located within the SEA Overlay Zone. E. The current BP land use and zoning designation does not permit the development of multi- family residential units. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan (Project). F. Surrounding land uses include primarily multi -family residential development. The Colony Townhomes, a multi -family residential community, is directly west of the Project site. The Fair Oaks Ranch community, which is comprised of multi -family and single-family residential uses, is located to the south and west of the Project site. The existing Metrolink rail line is immediately south of the Project site. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan area is located north and east of the Project site, with multi -family apartments under construction immediately north of the Project site. The future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center, with a seven -bay bus transfer station and the future Vista Canyon Metrolink Station, is located just east of the project site. G. The Project site is an approximately 20.4-acre site located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive (a private street). The Project includes the development of 498 residential units within four planning areas as follows: Planning Area 1 (PA-1) is located on the western portion of the Project site. This area consists of two apartment buildings, each four -stories in height, with 179 market -rate apartments and associated residential amenities and parking. 2. Planning Area 2 (PA-2) is located centrally on the Project site and consists of one four-story apartment building, with 119 market -rate, senior (age 55 and older) apartments, and associated residential amenities andparking. 3. Planning Area 3 (PA-3) is located along the southerly portion of the Project site and consists of one four-story apartment building, including 49 deed -restricted, affordable apartments for low-income (65 percent area median income) seniors, and associated residential amenities andparking. 4. Planning Area 4 (PA-4) is located on the eastern portion of the Project site. This area consists of 150 for -sale townhomes, associated residential amenities, parking, and a 0.93-acre community park that is accessible to the public. H. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City is the lead agency and the City's Planning Commission is a recommending body for the Project. The City Council is the decision- making body for the Project. 2 Packet Pg. 112 10.c L The City determined that a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) must be prepared for the Project. The City determined that the following areas must be addressed in the SCEA for the Project: aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, mineral and energy resources, noise, population and housing, parks and recreation, fire protection, police protection, schools, library services, traffic and circulation, solid waste, tribal resources, wastewater and water supply, andwildfire. The City prepared a Draft SCEA for the Project. The Draft SCEA was circulated for review and comment by affected governmental agencies and the public, in compliance with CEQA. Specifically, the Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft SCEA was filed, posted, and advertised on December 22, 2020, and the 30-day public review period ended on January 21, 2021, in accordance with CEQA. Comments received on the Draft SCEA have been fully responded to, and those comments received after the Planning Commission's review of the Project have been fully responded to prior to certification and approval of the Project by the City Council, if granted. K. The Planning Commission held a duly -noticed public hearing on February 16, 2021, in accordance with the noticing requirements of the entitlements. The Project was advertised in The Signal newspaper, through on -site posting, and by direct first-class mailing to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property. The hearing was conducted virtually and held at City Hall, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:00 p.m. At this meeting the Planning Commission received a presentation on the Project from staff and the applicant, and received public testimony regarding the Project. L. On February 16, 2021, the Planning Commission, by a vote of 5-0, recommended certification of the Final SCEA, which consists of the Draft SCEA (December 2020) and Planning Commission Final SCEA (February 2021), as adequate under CEQA, andapproval of the Project to the City Council. M. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project and Final SCEA on March 23, 2021, virtually and at City Hall, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:00 p.m. At this meeting, the City Council received a presentation on the Project from staff and the applicant, and received public testimony regarding the Project. At the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council closed the public hearing adopted all of the necessary approval documents (resolutions, findings of fact, responses to comments, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Conditions of Approval, etc.) for certification of the MetroWalk Specific Plan Final SCEA and for approval of the Project. N. The location of the documents and other materials, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the City Council is based, is within the Master Case 20-045 file, located in the Community Development Department and in the custody of the Director of Community Development. SECTION 2. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 20-045. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and 3 Packet Pg. 113 10.c other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission and the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council finds as follows: A. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The Project is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan of the City. More specifically, the Project is consistent with the following portions of the General Plan: Urban Form Goal LU1: An interconnected Valley of Villages providing diverse lifestyles, surrounded by a greenbelt of natural open space. The Project is consistent with Goal LU1 as a project that proposes to develop a multi -family project in a transit -oriented and urban portion of the City. The City's General Plan identified properties in the City that were either underutilized, or appropriately situated for mixed -use development, to concentrate orderly development in an urban environment, while preserving natural open spaces. The Project site is located immediately adjacent to the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area, which has development potential of up to 1,100 residential units and 950,000 square feet of commercial floor area, and proximate to the future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with local and regional public transit opportunities. It is largely surrounded by existing residentially -developed land. The site is currently vacant, previously disturbed by agricultural activities, and has little remaining vegetation. Development of the site will allow for a residential project consistent with the surrounding properties, providing a variety of housing types. Further, developing the disturbed site will further preserve rural portions of the City and Santa Clarita Valley, concentrating uses in the urbanized area supported by necessary infrastructure. Mixed Land Uses Goal LU2: A mix of land uses to accommodate growth, supported by adequate resources and maintaining community assets. The Project includes 498 residential units in a range of housing types, including for -rent apartment units, townhomes for sale, as well as senior apartments and deed -restricted affordable senior apartments, to provide a variety of living options for existing and future residents of the City. The Project site is within walking distance of the future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with public bus and rail transit opportunities. In addition, the site is located adjacent to the Town Center planning area of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, which will offer commercial and retail services within walking distance of the planned residential development. The pedestrian connectivity to public transit and commercial services will reduce vehicle trips to other portions of the City. Healthy Neighborhoods Goal LU3: Healthy and Safe Neighborhoods for all residents. As previously discussed, the Project will provide a mix of residential housing types to serve the diverse housing needs of the existing and future City residents. The Project incorporates M Packet Pg. 114 10.c a network of pedestrian paths and a community park, providing a walkable and safe pedestrian environment, creating connections to public transportation options and commercial services, encouraging healthy lifestyle habits consistent with the General Plan. As previously discussed, the Project will provide a mix of residential housing types to serve the diverse housing needs of the existing and future City residents. The Project incorporates a network of pedestrian paths and a community park, providing a walkable and safe pedestrian environment, creating connections to public transportation options and commercial services, encouraging healthy lifestyle habits consistent with the General Plan. Mobility Goal LU5: Enhanced mobility through alternative transportation choices and land use patterns. The Project locates higher -density housing adjacent to the Multi -Modal Vista Canyon Center, which includes a seven -bay bus transfer station and the future Vista Canyon Metrolink Station. The Project incorporates a network of pedestrian paths to provide connectivity to transit opportunities and adjacent commercial service opportunities being developed as part of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan. Adequate Sites Goal H1: Provide adequate sites to accommodate the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of new housing units between 2013 and 2021. The RHNA for the City is mandated by State Housing Law and used by local jurisdictions in land use planning to assist in determining how to address existing and future housing needs. The Project site would provide 498 housing units, including age -restricted senior apartments and affordable senior apartments contributing to the City's RHNA targets for market -rate and affordable -housing units. Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing Goal H2: Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate -income households. The Project provides 49 deed -restricted affordable senior apartments to be rented to low- income households at or below 65 percent of the Area Median Income. The Project conditions require the applicant to enter into an Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement governing and encumbering the Project to ensure long-term affordability of the low-income senior apartments. Equal Housing Opportunities Goal H6: Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status or disability. The Project provides a variety of housing types including market -rate apartments, senior apartments, affordable senior apartments and for -sale townhomes. The mix of housing types serves to provide units for the diverse housing needs in the community. Packet Pg. 115 10.c Multi -Modal Circulation Network Goal Cl : An interconnected network of circulation facilities that integrates all travel modes, provides viable alternatives to automotive use and confirms with regional plans. The Project locates higher -density housing adjacent to the Multi -Modal Center with local and regional public bus and rail transportation opportunities. This offers residents a convenient and viable alternative to automotive use. Pedestrian Circulation Goal C7: Walkable communities in which interconnected walkways provide a safe, comfortable and viable alternative to driving for local destinations. The Project is designed with a network of pedestrian connections throughout the Project site and to adjacent Vista Canyon Specific Plan trails and walkways. The pedestrian paths provide linkages to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center and the planned Town Center area of Vista Canyon that will provide commercial services. B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this code; The Project requires the approval of entitlements consisting of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Development Review and Architectural Design Review, in accordance with the City's UDC. Section 17.37.030 of the UDC establishes the SP zoning designation. Allowable uses, density, and development standards would be determined by the adopted SP. With approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change to SP, and the approval of the associated entitlements, the proposed Project would follow the underlying zone and all other applicable provisions of the UDC. C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and The Project has been evaluated in accordance with the UDC, as well as the City's General Plan. The Project has been designed to be in keeping with the provisions of the UDC, as well as the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The Project has been designed to complement the surrounding development, specifically the Vista Canyon Specific Plan development immediately north and east of the Project site. Pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent Vista Canyon development has been incorporated into the Project to promote walkability by providing direct links to public transit and commercial services and reduce vehicle trips. Finally, the Project has been designed to be consistent with all applicable requirements for law enforcement and emergency services for the Project site. Therefore, the Project will not impact the public health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity of the Project site. D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to theproposal's physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, thefollowing: C01 Packet Pg. 116 10.c 1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use; The Project proposes the establishment of a Specific Plan which will determine the allowable uses, density, and development standards for the Project site. The Project has been designed to be consistent and compatible with the adjacent Vista Canyon Specific Plan, specifically to provide linkages to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center, as well as to the existing and planned pedestrian trails through the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area. With the Conditions of Approval, the Project will be suitable for the site and the uses entitled with the Project. 2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are ofsufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate; A detailed traffic analysis was completed to evaluate the impacts of the Project. The traffic analysis has identified signalization and other roadway improvements to ensure the public roadways are sufficiently improved to support the additional Project traffic. The Project Conditions of Approval require the applicable improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Public protection services (e.g., Fire protection, Sheriprotection, etc.) are readily available; and The Project site is located in an established, urban environment that is serviced by existing law enforcement and fire protection services. The applicant will pay applicable fees to the law enforcement and fire protection agencies to assist in offsetting any impacts to the services necessary to properly service the Project. 4. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc) is adequate to serve the site. The Project is in a portion of the City that is surrounded by developed communities with access to the necessary utilities to service the Project site. The Specific Plan includes an infrastructure development plan to identify necessary on -site and off -site infrastructure improvements to connect to existing supply and support the future development. In addition, a hydraulic analysis was completed for the Project determining that adequate water is available to meet the needs of the Project site. SECTION 3. SPECIFIC FINDINGS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20-001. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission and the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council finds as follows: 7 Packet Pg. 117 10.c A. Properties which benefit from increased density or intensity of development resulting from the General Plan Amendment shall fully mitigate their increased sewer impact at the time that development occurs on the properties. A sewer area study was prepared for the Project and reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure there is adequate capacity for the Project's increased sewer impact. The Specific Plan includes an infrastructure development plan, which identifies the necessary extension of wastewater infrastructure to connect to the existing pipelines. B. The proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with other elements of the City's General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65300.5; The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of other elements of the City's General Plan, and will maintain integrated, consistent and compatible policies. Specifically, the Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Circulation Element of the General Plan include goals, objectives, and policies that contemplate a development consistent with the proposed Project, whereby higher -density housing is located in proximity to local and regional public transportation opportunities and commercial services in an effort to reduce vehicle trips. Pedestrian linkages are provided to promote a walkable and healthy lifestyle. A variety of housing types are provided to address housing needs of all segments of the community, including age -restricted units, affordable units, as well as apartment rentals and for -sale townhomes. SECTION 4. SPECIFIC FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 83087. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission and the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council finds as follows: A. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The Project will not obstruct any public access as a result of the proposed subdivision. No public lands are identified on, or adjacent to, the Project site that currently require access through the site. However, development of the proposed Project will require certain easements, which are shown on the proposed Tentative Tract Map 83087 as follows: • Landscape easement to the City of Santa Clarita, for the landscape maintenance on the slope east of Lost Canyon Road; • Road easement to the City of Santa Clarita, for Lost Canyon Road; • Storm drain egress easement to the City of Santa Clarita; and • Road easement for Harriman Drive. Packet Pg. 118 10.c The on -site roadways necessary for the Project will be installed and accessible for the future residents, and any law enforcement and emergency services. Therefore, the Project will not obstruct any public access with the subdivision of the site. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby approves Master Case 20-045 (General Plan Amendment 20-001, Tentative Tract Map 83087, Development Review 20-005, and Architectural Design Review 20-007), approves the MetroWalk Specific Plan Document, and approves the development of the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project in the City of Santa Clarita, subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and certify this record to be a full, complete, and correct copy of the action taken. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of March, 2021. MAYOR CITY CLERK DATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk, of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 21-_was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23rd day of March, 2021, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCIL,MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL,MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL,MEMBERS: 0 CITY CLERK Packet Pg. 119 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 1 of 23 March 23, 2021 EXHIBIT A MASTER CASE 20-045: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20-001, ZONE CHANGE 20-001, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 83087, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 20-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 20- 007, AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT SCH NO. 2020120433 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (as approved by Resolution No. 21- ) GENERAL CONDITIONS GC1. The approval of this project shall expire if the approved use is not commenced within two (2) years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Santa Clarita Unified Development Code (UDC). GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval shall be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre -commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of one -hundred eighty (180) calendar days or more shall terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use shall not be re-established or resumed after the one hundred eighty (180) day period. Discontinuation shall include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume. GC3. The applicant may file for an extension of the conditionally approved project prior to the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed no later than sixty (60) days prior to expiration. GC4. The applicant shall be responsible for notifying the Director of Community Development in writing of any change in ownership, designation of a new engineer, or change in the status of the developer within thirty (30) days of said change. GCS. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term "applicant" shall include the applicant and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Santa Clarita (City), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City shall promptly notify the applicant. If the City fails to notify the applicant or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys' fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good Packet Pg. 120 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 23 March 23, 2021 faith. The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the applicant. GC6. The property shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the approvals granted by the City. Any modifications shall be subject to further review by the City. GC7. The applicant and property owner shall comply with all inspections requirements as deemed necessary by the City of Santa Clarita. GCB. The owner, at the time of issuance of permits or other grants of approval, agrees to develop the property in accordance with City codes and other appropriate ordinances including, but not limited to, the California Building Code (Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, Green Building, and Energy Codes), Fire Code, Unified Development Code (Grading Code and Undergrounding of the Utilities Ordinance), Utilities Code (Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance), and Highway Permit Ordinance. GC9. This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the applicant has filed their affidavit (Acceptance Form) with the Director of Community Development stating that they are aware of, and agree to accept, all of the conditions of this grant. GC10. Details shown on the site plan are not necessarily approved. Any details which are inconsistent with the requirements of state or local ordinances, general Conditions of Approval, or City policies, and not modified by this permit, must be specifically approved. GC11. It is hereby declared and made a condition of this permit that if any condition hereof is violated, or if any law, statute, or ordinance is violated, the City may commence proceedings to revoke this approval. PLANNING DIVISION PL1. The applicant is hereby granted approval for the following entitlements for the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project associated with Master Case 20-045: a. Tentative Tract Map 83078; b. General Plan Amendment 20-001; c. Zone Change 20-001; d. Development Review 20-005; and e. Architectural Design Review 20-007. PL2. The applicant shall be granted approval to construct the proposed project in accordance with the approved Specific Plan and plans on file with the Planning Division. The applicant shall comply with all of the requirements of the Specific Plan, including the project's Sustainability Plan. The project shall be limited to maximum of 498 residential units, and shall include a minimum of 50 income -restricted, senior units, inclusive of one Packet Pg. 121 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 23 March 23, 2021 manger unit. The project shall include a minimum area of 0.93-acres designated as open space. PL3. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) prepared for the Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment prepared for the project (SCH No. 2020120433). PL4. The applicant shall have approval to construct the 498 residential units within the Planning Areas with the following breakdown: a. Planning Area 1: 179 apartments; b. Planning Area 2: 119 senior apartments (age 55 and over); c. Planning Area 3: 49 Low -Income (65% or below area median income) senior apartments (age 55 and over), and one manager unit; and d. Planning Area 4: 150 townhome units. Subject to the approval of a Substantial Conformance Review by the Director of Community Development, the applicant may transfer up to 20 percent of the units between Planning Areas so long as the transfer does not result in more than 120 percent of the original units for any Planning Area and that a minimum of 80 percent of the units is maintained in any Planning Area. The transfer of units shall only be permitted between Planning Area 1, Planning Area 2, and Planning Area 4. At no time shall the total number of units within the Specific Plan exceed 498 units. PL5. The community park shall be a minimum of 0.93 acres and shall be improved and maintained with passive and active recreational opportunities in conformance with the preliminary landscape plans approved with the project. PL6. Parking shall be required at a ratio of 1.5 covered spaces per all -ages market -rate unit; 0.5 covered space per age -restricted unit; 0.5 covered space per deed -restricted affordable senior unit; and 2 enclosed spaces per townhome unit; plus 0.5 space per unit for guest parking within the specific plan area. PL7. Bicycle parking shall be required at a ratio of 1 bicycle space per 5 residential units. PL8. Open space shall be provided for each residential unit at a ratio of 200 square feet for each studio unit, 300 square feet for each one -bedroom unit, 400 square feet for each two- or more -bedroom unit, and 650 square feet for each townhome unit. Open space shall be provided in a combination of private and common areas in conformance with the MetroWalk Specific Plan Open Space Plan. PL9. The applicant shall install a minimum six-foot decorative block wall along the southerly property line with a minimum seven -foot -wide landscaped planter along the base to provide a visual and sound buffer from the Metrolink rail line. The landscaped planter shall be maintained with mature trees or shrubs, appropriate for screening of the Metrolink rail line. Packet Pg. 122 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 23 March 23, 2021 PL10. A minimum 15-foot building setback shall be required along the southerly property line. PL11. The half -width of Harriman Drive, adjacent to the project frontage, shall be designed with a 14-foot drive aisle, an eight -foot parallel parking lane, a five-foot parkway, and five-foot sidewalk. PL12. A minimum 10-foot building setback shall be required along the northerly property line. A minimum five-foot landscape planter shall be maintained within the 10-foot setback. PL13. A minimum 20-foot setback to be landscaped and maintained shall be required along the project frontage of Lost Canyon Road. PL14. All lighting shall be directed down and shielded from neighboring uses. The applicant shall prepare a photometric study for review and approval for each planning area and the public plaza that demonstrates that no light will spill over property lines, except that lighting at the public plaza where lighting of the plaza intersects with adjacent public walkways or public areas upon approval by the Director. PL15. Pedestrian connections shall be provided throughout the development in conformance with the pedestrian plan and conceptual landscape plan approved with this application. A final pedestrian plan shall be submitted for each planning area to ensure connections to the adjacent planning areas, recreational facilities, the on -site park, and adjacent Vista Canyon development. PL16. The architecture of the proposed project shall be consistent with the approved conceptual architectural plans on file with this application and conform to the MetroWalk Specific Plan Design Guidelines and the Community Character and Design Guidelines (CCDG) for the Canyon Country community. PL17. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from public view. PL18. All ground -mounted mechanical equipment shall be identified on the site plan and screened from view. PL19. All utility connections shall be designed to coordinate with the architectural elements of the building. Power lines and over -head cables less than 34 KV shall be installed underground. PL20. No signage is included within this approval and is subject to a separate permit. The applicant shall provide a sign program prior to the installation of signs on the project site. PL21. The project, and all construction related activity associated with the project, shall comply with UDC Section 11.44.040, the City of Santa Clarita Noise Ordinance. PL22. Construction shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and between 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturdays, unless traffic volumes or public Packet Pg. 123 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 23 March 23, 2021 safety issues warrant otherwise (as determined by City, County, or State officials). No construction on Sundays and holidays shall occur. PL23. The applicant shall provide informational pamphlets to future residents to disclose that they are moving adjacent to an active rail line and Metrolink station. PL24. The applicant shall obtain all necessary approvals or permits from the Southern California Regional Rail Authority and Metro for any work that impacts the operation of the adjacent rail line or encroaches into the rail right-of-way. PL25. The applicant shall coordinate with the City of Santa Clarita Technology Services Division regarding installation of infrastructure for fiber optic cable services. The applicant can contact the Technology Services Manager at (661) 286-4086 regarding the City's fiber optic initiative. Affordable Senior Housing PL26. The applicant shall construct fifty (50) senior dwelling units, forty-nine (49) of which shall be income -restricted and one of which shall be a manager unit. All income - restricted senior dwelling units will be rented to households at or below 65% of the Area Median Income for a period of fifty-five (55) years. The applicant shall comply with all state and federal housing laws related to senior housing. PL27. Prior to recordation of a Final Map, the City Manager, or designee, shall approve an Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement governing and encumbering the project and ensuring long term affordability of income -restricted senior dwelling units as noted above. The Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement shall be executed by the City Manager, or designee, and the applicant prior to recordation of the Final Map and recorded concurrently with the recordation of the Final Map. PL28. The construction of the income -restricted senior apartments (Planning Area 3), shall commence concurrent with or prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 180th unit and shall obtain a certificate of occupancy for all 50 units within the income - restricted building prior to or concurrent with the certificate of occupancy for the 298th unit. Landscape Conditions LR1. Prior to final landscape plan approval, plans shall be approved by the County of Los Angeles Fire Dept Fuel Modification Unit. LR2. Prior to issuance of grading permit(s) the applicant shall provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans in conformance with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance for Planning Division review and approval. The plan must be prepared by a California - registered landscape architect and shall be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20' to 30' F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105' F Packet Pg. 124 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 23 March 23, 2021 to 110' F). The landscape design plan shall meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other current Municipal Code / Unified Development Code requirements. LR3. Final landscape plans shall contain all elements as listed in the checklist for preliminary landscape plans, and shall conform to the Landscaping and Irrigation Standards (§17.51.030) in the Unified Development Code. The following elements need to be addressed on the final landscape plans: (a) Landscape plans shall show plant material to screen at maturity all trash enclosures, transformer boxes, vault boxes, backflow devices, and other exterior mechanical equipment. Screening material may include trees, shrubs (15-gallon minimum size), clinging vines, etc. Masonry block (concrete masonry unit) trash enclosures shall be screened with both shrubs and clinging vines; (b) Landscape plans shall show all lighting fixtures, base dimensions, and typical finish elevations; (c) An earthen berm or headlight hedge, measuring thirty-six (36) inches in height, shall be installed where vehicle lights on the property are directed towards public streets or residential properties. The headlight hedge must be a dense growing, minimum 15-gallon, evergreen shrub, measuring a minimum of thirty- six (36) inches in height and touching leaf to leaf at the time of landscape inspection; (d) The applicant shall place water -conserving mulching material on all exposed soil in planting areas not covered by turfgrass. Mulching material may include, and is not limited to, shredded bark, river rock, crushed rock, pea gravel, etc., and must be at least two (2) inches deep; (e) Prior to occupancy for each planning area, the applicant shall install all proposed irrigation and landscape, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection; and (f) Prior to occupancy for each planning area, the applicant shall submit to the Director of Community Development a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation have been installed and function according to the approved landscape plans. ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION General Requirements ENl . At issuance of permits or other grants of approval, the applicant agrees to develop the property in accordance with City codes and other appropriate ordinances such as the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Grading Code, Highway Permit Ordinance, Mechanical Code, Unified Development Code, Undergrounding of Utilities Ordinance, Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste Ordinance, Electrical Code, and Fire Code. EN2. Prior to building final, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site shall be installed underground. Packet Pg. 125 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 23 March 23, 2021 Subdivision Requirements EN3. Prior to issuance of building permits, a Tract Map prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California shall be filed in the Office of the County Recorder, in compliance with applicable City of Santa Clarita, County of Los Angeles, and State of California Codes. EN4. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall dedicate any necessary easements for public improvements ENS. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall label driveways as "Private Driveway and Fire Lane" on the map, as directed by the City Engineer. EN6. At map check submittal, the applicant shall provide a preliminary subdivision report. A final subdivision guarantee is required prior to Tract Map approval. EN7. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall provide a Will Serve Letter stating that Community Antenna Television service (CATV) will be provided to this project. EN8. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall provide a Will Serve Letter from all necessary utilities, stating that service will be provided to this property. EN9. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall show on the map all Los Angeles County Flood Control District Easements. A permit will be required for any construction affecting the right-of-way or facilities. EN10. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall show on the map Right -of -Way dedication of Lost Canyon Road to the City of Santa Clarita, as directed by the City Engineer. ENl 1. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall show on the map slope easement along Lost Canyon Road, dedicated to City of Santa Clarita, as required by the City Engineer. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions Requirements EN12. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall obtain approval from the City Engineer and the City Attorney for Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for this development. The applicant shall reimburse the City for the City Attorney's review and approval fee. The CC&Rs shall include a disclosure to comply with the Geologist's recommendations in the Geology Report concerning restrictions on watering, irrigation, and recommend plant types. The CC&Rs shall grant the City the authority to review and approve/disapprove amendments (including dissolution) of the CC&Rs/association. The CC&Rs shall grant the City the right (though not the obligation) to enforce the CC&Rs (at a minimum those provisions related to City -required items). EN13. Prior to first building permit, the applicant shall record the approved CC&Rs with the Los Angeles County Recorder's office. EN14. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall establish a Property/Home Owners' Association (POA/HOA), or similar entity, to ensure the continued maintenance of all shared/common lots and drainage devices not transferable to the County Flood Control District. EN15. Prior to 85th certificate of occupancy for each planning area, the applicant shall transfer ownership of open space lots in the applicable planning area to the HOA. Prior to map Packet Pg. 126 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 23 March 23, 2021 recordation, grant deed shall be submitted to Engineering Services for review and approval by the City Engineer. Access Requirements EN16. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall record a reciprocal access easement and maintenance agreement for shared private driveway (Harriman Drive) with Vista Canyon, as directed by the City Engineer. EN17. Prior to Tract Map approval, the applicant shall record a covenant for easement of all shared driveways and drive aisles, and common landscaping/slope maintenance areas, as directed by the City Engineer. This condition may be satisfied by incorporating the appropriate provisions into the CC&Rs. Grading and Geology Requirements EN18. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall submit a grading plan consistent with the approved Plan, oak tree report, and conditions of approval. The grading plan shall be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction. EN19. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer. EN20. Prior to grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a notarized Letter of Permission for grading over all easements. EN21. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a Letter of Permission for grading outside of the property lines/tract boundary from the adjacent property owner(s), including Southern California Reginal Rail Authority (SCRRA). Drainage Requirements EN22. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a Letter of Permission from SCRRA for altering the existing drainage pattern by the construction of block wall at the property line and construction of a storm drain on their property as shown on the preliminary grading plans of TTM 83087. EN23. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Land Development Division/Construction Division, as appropriate, to connect the proposed storm drain from SCRRA site to MTD 1851, Line -A as shown on the preliminary grading plan of TTM 83087. EN24. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, Land Development Division/Construction Division, as appropriate, to remove the debris basin and headwall inlet and replace with manhole as well as replace the MTD 1851, Line -A easement for the debris basin with an access easement to the proposed Line -A manhole. EN25. The Plan shows connection of the on -site storm drain system to a public storm drain system (MTD 1851, Line A) downstream that has not transferred to the County for maintenance and ownership. Should MTD 1851 Line -A not be transferred by Vista Canyon Ranch prior to MetroWalk Project's first occupancy, the applicant shall post a Packet Pg. 127 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 23 March 23, 2021 bond for the remainder work necessary to complete and transfer Line -A to LA County. Prior to final occupancy, applicant shall complete the transfer of Line -A to LA County. The applicant or subsequent property owners shall also be responsible for providing regularly scheduled maintenance of the storm drain infrastructure, as directed by the City Engineer, until such time that full maintenance be assumed by the Flood Control District. EN26. Prior to recordation of the Tract Map, the applicant shall form an assessment district to finance the future ongoing maintenance and capital replacement of WQT Basin and other SUSMP devices/systems identified on the latest approved Storm drain plan/Plan. The applicant shall cooperate fully with the City in the formation of the assessment district, including, without limitation, the preparation of the operation, maintenance, and capital replacement plan for the SUSMP devices/systems and the prompt submittal of this information to City for review and approval. The applicant shall pay for all costs associated with the formation of the assessment district. SUSMP devices/systems shall include but are not limited to catch basin inserts, debris excluders, biotreatment basins, vortex separation type systems, and other devices/systems for stormwater quality. The applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance of all SUSMP devices/systems until the district has been established. EN27. Specific drainage requirements for the site will be established at building permit application. Prior to Building Permit, the applicant shall submit a precise grading plan. Water Quality Requirements EN28. This project will disturb one acre or more of land. Therefore, the applicant must obtain coverage under a statewide General Construction Activities Stormwater Permit (General Permit). In accordance with the General Permit, the applicant shall file with the State a Notice of Intent (NOI) for the proposed project. Prior to issuance of grading permit by the City, the applicant shall have approved by the City Engineer a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall include a copy of the NOI and shall reference the corresponding Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number issued by the State upon receipt of the NOI. EN29. This project is a development planning priority project under the City's NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit as a development with equal to one acre or greater of disturbed area that adds more than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface area. Prior to issuance of grading permit, the applicant shall have approved by the City Engineer, an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (USMP) that incorporates appropriate post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs), maximizes pervious surfaces, and includes infiltration into the design of the project. Refer to the Low Impact Development ordinance and the County of Los Angeles Low Impact Development manual for details. Street Light Requirements EN30. Prior to street plan approval, the applicant shall submit a Street Light Plan to the Engineering Services Division for review and approval. Street -lighting systems shall be designed as City -owned and maintained on the LS-2 rate schedule, using LED fixtures approved by the City's Landscape Maintenance District Division. Packet Pg. 128 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 23 March 23, 2021 Street Improvement Requirements EN31. Prior to any construction (including, but not limited to, drive approaches, sidewalks, sewer laterals, curb and gutter, etc.), trenching or grading within public street right-of- way, the applicant shall submit a street improvement plan consistent with the approved Plan, oak tree report, and conditions of approval; and obtain encroachment permits from the Engineering Services Division. EN32. Prior to street plan approval, the applicant shall submit a street tree location plan to the City's Urban Forestry Division for review and approval. The location of the street trees shall not conflict with sewer or storm drain infrastructure. The plan shall include proposed sewer lateral locations and storm drain infrastructure for reference. EN33. Prior to building final, the applicant shall construct full street improvements within/along the frontage of the project site, as directed by the City Engineer: Sidewalk Landscaped Street Name Inverted Shoulder Curb & Gutter Base & Paving Street Lights Street Trees (5'min) Median Harriman Drive (Private) x x x x x All Interior Private Driveways & Fire Lane x x EN34. Prior to building final, the applicant shall construct wheelchair ramps at intersection of Lost Canyon Road & Harriman Drive, as directed by the City Engineer. Sewer Improvement Requirements EN35. Prior to Map approval, the applicant shall dedicate all necessary sewer easements. The sewer plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (Sewer Maintenance Division), Los Angeles County Sanitation District, and the City Engineer. EN36. Prior to Map approval, the applicant shall send a print of the land division map to the County Sanitation District with the request for annexation in writing. EN37. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall annex the property into the County Sanitation District. The applicant shall provide the City's Building & Safety Division with written confirmation from the Sanitation District that the property has been annexed. EN38. The on -site sewer laterals shall be a privately maintained system. Prior to Grading Plan approval, the applicant shall submit an "on -site sewer plan." The "on -site sewer plan" shall be designed per the California Plumbing Code and approved by the City's Building and Safety division prior to Grading Plan approval. EN39. The on -site sewer main shall be a publicly maintained sewer. The public sewer plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (Sewer Maintenance Division), Los Angeles County Sanitation District, and the City Packet Pg. 129 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 23 March 23, 2021 Engineer; and all necessary easement for maintenance of the sewer shall be dedicated to the City of Santa Clarita. EN40. Prior to building final, the applicant shall construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Bonds, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements EN41. Prior to issuance of encroachment permits for public improvements (Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drain), the applicant, by agreement with the City Engineer, shall guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means. Building final shall be withheld if the improvements are not completed. TRAFFIC DIVISION TR1. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall acquire and dedicate to the City the right-of-way required for all street improvements as identified in the traffic study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. TR2. Prior to issuance of first building occupancy permit, the applicant shall construct all street improvements as identified in the traffic study required to adequately serve this project. Improvements shall include, signalizing Lost Canyon Road / Medley Ridge Drive, Lost Canyon Road / Canyon Park Boulevard, and a median at Lost Canyon Road / Winter Pine Way to prohibit left -turn movements out of Winter Pine Way. TR3. Adequate sight visibility is required at all project driveways and shall follow the latest Caltrans manual for applicable requirements. This shall be shown on all applicable plans prior to issuance of first building permit. TR4. The site shall be designed to adequately accommodate all vehicles (e.g. automobiles, vans, trucks) that can be expected to access the site. This includes, but is not limited to, adequate maneuvering areas around loading zones and parking spaces, and appropriate turning radii. TRS. The location, width and depth of all project driveways and drive aisles shall conform to the approved site plan. This shall be shown on all applicable plans prior to issuance of first building permit. No additional driveways shall be permitted. TR6. Minimum width of all interior drive aisles shall be 26 feet and shall be shown on all applicable plans prior to issuance of first building permit. Minimum widths of driveways along Harriman Street shall be 30 feet. TR7. All project driveways shall intersect with the adjacent roadway at 90 degrees or as close to 90 degrees as topography permits (no less than 80 degrees). This shall be shown on all applicable plans prior to issuance of first building permit. TR8. Prior to street plan approval, the applicant shall show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110-2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details shall be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum. Packet Pg. 130 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 12 of 23 March 23, 2021 TR9. Per the City's UDC (Section 17.53.020), all driveways shall have a minimum stacking distance of 20' from the face of curb. This is to be measured from the final curb line (flow line) to the first parking stall or drive aisle. TRIO. Prior to issuance of the first building occupancy permit, the applicant shall obtain approval from the L.A. County Fire Department for any private driveway sections. TR11. Prior to issuance of the first building occupancy permit for each phase, the applicant shall post "No Parking— Fire Lane" signs along all driveways with a curb -to -curb width of less than 34 feet. This shall be shown on all applicable plans prior to issuance of first building permit. TR12. All dead-end driveways shall extend five feet beyond the last parking stall or garage to provide back-up area. This shall be shown on all applicable plans prior to issuance of first building permit. TR13. Sidewalks shall be provided on all internal roadways that are not alley -type driveways, unless an alternative internal pedestrian network is provided. This shall be shown on all appropriate cross sections. TR14. Prior to issuance of building permits, new conduit with or without fiber shall be installed as necessary to complete connection for communication infrastructure. These improvements shall be installed per City specifications and shown on all applicable development plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. TR15. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Eastside B&T District. The current rate for this District is $20,140. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment. Standard B&T Fee Calculation: Townhome = the number of units (150) x the district rate ($20,140) x 0.8 = $2,416,800 Apartment = the number of units (179) x the district rate ($20,140) x 0.7 = $2,523,542 Age Restricted Apt. = the number of units (119) x the district rate ($20,140) x 0.4 = $958,664 Senior Apt. = the number of units (50) x the district rate ($20,140) x 0.3 = $302,100 Total = $6201,106 Packet Pg. 131 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 13 of 23 March 23, 2021 BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION Plans and Permits BS1. Construction drawings shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Division for plan review and building permit issuance. Supporting documents; such as structural and energy calculations, and geotechnical reports shall be included with the plan submittal. BS2. Construction drawings submitted for plan review shall show full compliance with all applicable local, county, state and federal requirements and codes. The project shall comply with the building codes in effect at time of building permit application. The current state building codes are: the 2019 California Building (CBC), Mechanical (CMC), Plumbing (CPC), and Electrical (CEC) Codes, the 2020 County of Los Angeles Fire Code, 2019 California Energy Code, and the 2019 California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen). BS3. Construction drawings submitted for plan review shall be complete. Submitted plans shall show all architectural, accessibility, structural, mechanical, plumbing, and electrical work that will be part of this project. Civil, landscape, interior design and other plans not related to the building code are not reviewed by the Building and Safety Division. BS4. Construction drawings shall be prepared by qualified licensed design professionals (California licensed architects and engineers). BS5. The City of Santa Clarita has amended some portions of the California Building Codes. A copy of these amendments is available at the Building and Safety public counter and on our website at: http://www.santa-clarita.com/Home/ShowDocument?id=17773 BS6. Construction drawings may be submitted electronically or by submitting paperplans. In either case an "eService Account" must be created to use our permitting system. Please log on to: www.santa-clarita.com/eservice and create an account by clicking "register for an Account." BST Construction drawings submitted to building and safety shall have a complete building code analysis and floor area justification for the proposed building per chapter 5 and 6 of the California Building Code. Storage areas/closets shall not be located within a corridor system. Exit stairs shall not exit through a corridor system. BS8. When any dwelling units are located adjacent to a major noise source, a noise study will be required in order to limit the interior noise levels of habitable rooms to a maximum of 45dB. Mitigation measures (if needed) shall be shown on the submitted plans. The project shall also comply with the Noise Element of the City's Development Code. (CBC 1207.4) BS9. The submitted site plan shall show all parcel/lot lines, easements, fire separation distances, restricted use areas, etc. Any construction proposed in an easement shall obtain the easement holder's written permission or the easement shall be removed. Parcel lines that overlap any proposed buildings shall be removed (lot line adjustment) prior to building permit issuance. BS I0. For an estimate of the building permit fees and the estimated time for plan review, please contact the Building and Safety Division directly. Packet Pg. 132 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 14 of 23 March 23, 2021 BS 11. Prior to submitting plans to the Building and Safety Division, please contact a Permit Specialist at (661) 255-4935, for project addressing. Electric Vehicle Parking per CalGreen BS12. Electric Vehicle Charging Spaces (future EV Charging Stations) shall be provided within parking facilities for new residential multi -family buildings per the California Green Building Standards Code section 4.106.4. Ten (10) percent of the total number of parking spaces provided shall be EV charging spaces for future electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE). At least one EV space shall be located in a common use area and available for use by all residents. BS13. The townhouse units with attached private garages shall have a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt, 40-amp minimum branch circuit. Each end of the raceway shall be marked "EV CAPABLE." [(CalGreen 4.106.4.1)] Agency Clearances BS14. Prior to issuance of building permits, clearances from the following agencies will be required: a. Santa Clarita Planning Division, b. Santa Clarita Engineering Services (soil report review and grading), c. Santa Clarita Environmental Services (Construction & Demolition Plan deposit), d. Santa Clarita Urban Forestry Division (for construction near any Oak Trees), e. Los Angeles County Fire Prevention Bureau, f. Los Angeles County Environmental Programs (Industrial Waste), g. Los Angeles County Sanitation District, h. Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency, i. William S. Hart School District and appropriate elementary school district, An agency referral list with contact information is available at the Building and Safety public counter. Please contact the agencies above to determine if there are any plan review requirements or fees to be paid. Clearances from additional agencies may be required and will be determined during the plan review process. Accessibility BS15. All multi -family residential buildings (ground -floor dwelling units and all dwelling units in buildings with elevators) shall be accessible and comply with the Housing Accessibility requirements per CBC Chapter 11A. BS16. All common use areas such as lobbies, laundry facilities, community rooms, clubhouse, swimming pools, fitness rooms, elevator, interior and exterior routes of travel, etc. shall be fully accessible for the disabled per CBC Chapter 1 IA. BS17. Accessible parking spaces shall be provided for each type of parking facility; including garages, carports, assigned and unassigned parking, and guest/visitor parking as follows: a. Where assigned parking spaces are provided, accessible parking spaces shall be provided at the rate of 2% of all assigned parking. b. Where unassigned and visitor parking spaces are provided, accessible parking spaces shall be provided at the rate of 5% of all unassigned parking. Designated Packet Pg. 133 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 15 of 23 March 23, 2021 guest or visitor parking shall be provided with at least one accessible parking space. c. Accessible parking spaces shall be located and dispersed to be on the shortest possible accessible route to accessible building entrances. BS18. Buildings containing multi -family dwelling units shall also follow all applicable accessibility regulations including federal requirements that may be more restrictive. Please refer to the following: a. Joint Statement of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued April 30, 2013 (www.hud.gov). b. Dwelling units constructed as senior citizen housing may also be subject to the Unruh Civil Rights Act. Refer to Division 1, Part 2 of the California Civil Code. For additional information regarding application, interpretation and enforcement, contact the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing. FHA, HUD and DOJ regulations are not enforced by the local building and safety jurisdictions, however, are the responsibility of the designer, architect, owner and developer of the project. BS19. Upon resubmittal, show all disabled access requirements, including site accessibility information and details on the architectural plans versus any civil plans. Civil plans are not reviewed or approved by the Building and Safety Division. Soil Reports and Grading BS20. A complete soils and geology investigation report will be required for this project. The report shall be formally submitted to the Engineering Services Division for review and approval. The recommendations of the report shall be followed and incorporated into the plans for the project. A copy of the report shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Division at time of plan submittal. BS21. When the soils/geology report recommends grading and/or recompaction, the following shall be completed prior to issuance of building permits: a. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Division and all rough grading and/or re -compaction shall be completed. b. A final compaction report and a Pad Certification for each new building shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Services Division prior to issuance of any building permits. Hazard Zones BS22. The project is located within the City's Fire Hazard Zone. New buildings shall comply with the California Building Code Chapter 7A: MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS FOR EXTERIOR WILDFIRE EXPOSURE. A summary of these requirements are available at the Building and Safety's public counter. The submitted plans to Building & Safety shall show all Fire Zone requirements. Packet Pg. 134 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 16 of 23 March 23, 2021 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ES1. The proposed project utilizes trash rooms and compactors for service of the multi -family units. The applicant shall be required to submit the trash and recycling plan to the Environmental Services Division and the waste hauler for approval prior to issuance of building permits. ES2. The individual townhome units shall provide space (out of public view) for two 90-gallon trash carts, one each for trash, and recycling. ES3. All greenwaste shall be collected and disposed of by the Homeowner Association. ES4. All demolition projects regardless of valuation, all commercial construction projects valuated greater than $200,000 or over 1,000 square feet for new construction, all new residential construction projects, and all residential additions and improvements that increase building area, volume, or size must comply with the City's Construction and Demolition Materials (C&D) Recycling Ordinance. ES5. C&D Materials Recycling Ordinance a. A Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (C&DMMP) must be prepared and approved by the Environmental Services Division prior to obtaining any grading or building permits. b. A minimum of 65% of the entire project's inert (dirt, rock, bricks, etc.) waste and 65% of the remaining C&D waste must be recycled or reused rather than disposing in a landfill. c. For renovation or tenant improvement projects and new construction projects, a deposit of 2% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. For demolition projects, a deposit of 10% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. The full deposit will be returned to the applicant upon proving that 65% of the inert and remaining C&D waste was recycled or reused. ES6. Per the California Green Building Standards Code, 100 percent of trees, stumps, rocks and associated vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reused or recycled. For a phased project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed. ES7. All projects within the City not self -hauling their waste materials must use one of the City's franchised haulers for temporary and roll -off bin collection services. Please visit GreenSantaClarita.com for a list of approved haulers PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICE DIVISION PR1. Prior to the recordation of an applicable final tract/parcel map, the applicant shall pay the required Park Dedication Fee equal to the value of the amount of land established per the City's General Plan, "Parks and Recreation Element." An estimate is attached as Packet Pg. 135 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 17 of 23 March 23, 2021 Appendix B. The applicant may be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. SPECIAL DISTRICTS DIVISION Landscape Maintenance District SD1. This parcel is located within Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) Areawide Zone, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscaped medians on major thoroughfares throughout the City of Santa Clarita. Applicant is required to financially contribute to Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this LMD zone's assessment methodology. SD2. These parcels shall be required to annex into the local LMD Zone 32, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of parkways, slopes and parks in the Vista Canyon Ranch area. SD3. All LMD landscaping impacted by the project shall be restored to "pre -project condition" and any damage to existing LMD irrigation caused by the project shall be replaced or repaired by the applicant (at no charge to the City) and approved by the Deputy City Manager & Director of Neighborhood Services before the occupancy permit is issued. SD4. The applicant shall be required to prepare landscape plans for the revised LMD slope area to be provided for discussion and approval by Special Districts and the master developer. Landscape to match in character adjacent LMD maintenance areas and meet LMD standards. Urban Forestry SD5. Applicant shall be required to preserve and protect all existing and landscape within the public right-of-way and the tree irrigation system throughout the construction of the project. If at any point during the process it is determined that a City tree will be encroached upon, it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the City's Urban Forestry Division to discuss protection and/or mitigation options prior to encroachment or removal. Applicants are encouraged to reference ANSI (American National Standards Institute) A300 Part 5: Tree, Shrub, and Other Woody Plant Maintenance- Standard Practices (Management of Trees and Shrubs During Site Planning, Site Development, and Site Construction) as well as the companion publication Best Management Practices - Managing Trees During Construction. SD6. If at any time, throughout the construction of the project, the irrigation to these trees is interrupted, the applicant shall provide water to the trees by any other means necessary. SD7. At no time shall any materials or equipment be stored or placed near parkway trees, nor shall any liquids or waste be disposed in parkway tree wells or within their dripline. SD8. No root pruning of parkway tree roots over 2 inches in diameter is permitted unless discussed with and approved by the City's Urban Forestry Division. Packet Pg. 136 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 18 of 23 March 23, 2021 SD9. The applicant shall be required to show all existing parkway trees and landscape which fronts the project on Lost Canyon Road on all future site plans. SDI 0. All required future site plans shall include parkway tree and landscape preservation plan and / or notes indicating that parkway trees and shrubs are to be protected in place. SDI 1. In the event that any trees are damaged or lost during the construction, applicant shall be responsible for replacing the trees with a tree of the same size or International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) value. SD12. Applicant shall be required to install additional trees within the public right-of-way where tree vacancies exist. Parkway trees shall be approved by the City of Santa Clarita Urban Forestry Division and must meet/exceed the minimum requirements of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protections "Guideline Specifications Selecting, Planting, and Early Care of Young Trees". SD13. Applicant shall be required to install and maintain irrigation to all trees planted within the public right of way. Irrigation to trees shall be bubbler type irrigation only and shall be installed as per City detail sheet. SD14. All trees shall be planted according to the City of Santa Clarita tree planting and staking detail sheet and/or the American Public Works Association (APWA) standard plans for Public Works construction (Section 5,520-3). SD15. Parkway trees shall be a minimum 24-inch box. SDI 6. All trees shall be placed a minimum of 5 feet from any underground utilities and walkways, 10 feet from hydrants and driveways, 20 feet from utility poles (including but not limited to light poles, telephone poles, and traffic signals). Spacing of parkway trees shall be compliant with the latest edition of the APWA (American Public Works Association) Standard Plans for Public Works Construction. SD17. All tree species are to be determined by Urban Forestry staff. SD18. All tree plantings shall require a pre -site and nursery stock inspection, and a post completion inspection. Trees selected for the public right-of-way shall not have been topped or headed from the nursery. Trees that are diseased, infested, or have girdled root systems will not be accepted and shall be returned to the nursery at no cost to the City of Santa Clarita. All trees planted within the public right-of-way shall be inspected and approved by a member of the Urban Forestry Division prior to planting. SD19. All trees planted within a landscaped parkway that consist of lawn shall have a minimum 36-inch round tree well installed at the base of each tree with 3-inches of natural bark or woodchips. Lineal root barriers shall be installed along the edge of both sidewalk and curb at a minimum distance of 10 lineal feet. Root barriers shall be a minimum height of 18-inches. Each tree planted shall have an 8 to 9-inch arbor guard placed at the base of each tree. SD20. All trees planted within a concrete type tree well shall have root barriers installed at the edge of the concrete to eliminate the possibility of "girdling" the roots of the tree. Each root barrier in this installation shall be 24 inches in height and installed level with the top of the tree's root ball. All concrete tree wells shall be a minimum of 3 feet deep by 4 feet wide. Larger tree wells shall be installed where public rights -of -way allow without compromising ADA accessibility. Such tree wells shall be 4 feet deep by 5 feet wide. Packet Pg. 137 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 19 of 23 March 23, 2021 SD21. Prior to issuance of grading permits the applicant shall have submitted a final landscape plan which shall include a detailed planting legend identifying all proposed street trees, size, species and number of trees being planted. SD22. Upon completion of the project and prior to issuance of final occupancy / sign -off, the applicant shall provide the City of Santa Clarita Urban Forestry Division with a GPS coordinates and a spread sheet which identifies all parkway trees planted within the public right of way. A detailed legend showing the species and number of trees planted and address shall be included on the GPS spread sheet. LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT Final Map Requirements FD 1. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to recordation. The Final Map shall be submitted online to the Land Development Unit through epicla.lacounty.gov. The applicant will need to apply for the following Plan Type: Fire — Land Development — City Request — Final Map — Tract. The applicant shall follow the steps and upload the required digital information. FD2. Access as noted on the Tentative and the Exhibit Maps shall comply with Title 21 (County of Los Angeles Subdivision Code) and Section 503 of the Title 32 (County of Los Angeles Fire Code), which requires an all-weather access surface to be clear to sky. FD3. The driveways required for Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall be indicated on the Final Map as "Private Driveway and Fire Lane" with the widths clearly depicted. FD4. A common access agreement is required for the private driveway since multiple units are sharing the same access. Such language shall be included in the Covenant, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R) document and shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review prior to Final Map clearance. FD5. Submit a copy of the Grading Plan to the Fire Department for review and approval. Compliance required prior to Final Map clearance. The grading plan shall be submitted online to the Land Development Unit for review. Please visit epicla.lacounty.gov to upload a digital copy of the grading plan. The applicant will need to apply for the following Plan Type: Fire — Land Development — City Request — Grading. The applicant shall follow the steps and upload the required digital information. Access Requirements FD6. Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be installed and maintained in a serviceable manner priorto and during the time of construction. Fire Code 501.4 FD7. All fire lanes shall be clear of all encroachments, and shall be maintained in accordance withthe Title 32, County of Los Angeles Fire Code. FD8. The Fire Apparatus Access Roads and designated fire lanes shall be measured from flow line to flow line. Packet Pg. 138 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 20 of 23 March 23, 2021 FD9. For buildings where the vertical distance between the access roadway and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet, an approved Fire Apparatus Access roadway with a minimum width of 28 feet, exclusive of shoulders, shall be provided in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof. This roadway shall have an unobstructed clearance of clear to the sky. The highest roof surface is determined by the measurement of the vertical distance between the access roadway and the eave of a pitched roof, the intersection of the roof to the exterior wall, or the top of parapet walls, whichever is greater. A minimum of one access route meeting this condition is required to be located at the edge of the Fire Apparatus Access Roadway, not including shoulders, that is closest to the building being served, is between 10 feet and 30 feet from the building, as determined by the fire code official, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the fire apparatus access road is positioned shall be approved by the fire code official. Fire Code 503.2.1.2.2.1. FD10. The dimensions of the approved Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall be maintained as originally approved by the fire code official. Fire Code 503.2.2.1. FD 11. Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing 75,000 pounds, and shall be surfaced so as to provide all- weather driving capabilities. Fire Apparatus Access Roads having a grade of 10 percent or greater shall have a paved or concrete surface. Fire Code 503.2.3. FD12. Provide approved signs or other approved notices or markings that include the words "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE". Signs shall have a minimum dimension of 12 inches wide by 18 inches high and have red letters on a white reflective background. Signs shall be provided for fire apparatus access roads, to clearly indicate the entrance to such road, or prohibit the obstruction thereof and at intervals, as required by the Fire Inspector. Fire Code 503.3. FD 13. Fire Apparatus Access Roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including by the parking of vehicles, or the use of traffic calming devices, including but not limited to, speed bumps or speed humps. The minimum widths and clearances established in Section 503.2.1 and Section 503.2.2 shall be maintained at all times. Fire Code 503.4. FD 14. Traffic Calming Devices, including but not limited to, speed bumps and speed humps, shall be prohibited unless approved by the fire code official. Fire Code 503.4.1. FD15. A minimum 5-foot wide approved firefighter access walkway leading from the fire department access road to all required openings in the building's exterior walls shall be provided for firefighting and rescue purposes. Fire Code 504.1. FD16. Security barriers, visual screen barriers or other obstructions shall not be installed on the roof of any building in such a manner as to obstruct firefighter access or egress in the event of fire or other emergency. Parapets shall not exceed 36 inches on at least two sides of the building. These sides should face the access roadway, or yard, to accommodate ladder operations. Fire Code 504.5. FD 17. Approved building address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification shall be provided and maintained so as to be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. The numbers shall contrast with their background, Packet Pg. 139 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 21 of 23 March 23, 2021 be Arabic numerals or alphabet letters, and be a minimum of 4 inches high with a minimum stroke width of 0.5 inch. Fire Code 505.1. FD18. Multiple residential and commercial buildings having entrances to individual units not visible from the street or road shall have unit numbers displayed in groups for all units within each structure. Such numbers may be grouped on the wall of the structure or mounted on a post independent of the structure and shall be positioned to be plainly visible from the street or road as required by Fire Code 505.3 and in accordance with Fire Code 505.1. Water System Requirements FD19. All fire hydrants shall measure 6"x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and shall be installed in accordance with the County ofLos Angeles Fire Code. FD20. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and accepted prior to beginning construction. Fire Code 501.4 FD21. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 3125 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 3 hours. Three (3) public fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow. Fire Code 507.3 & Appendix B105.1 a. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed buildings within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval prior to installation. FD22. The required fire flow for more than one on -site fire hydrant is 2500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 2 hours. Two (2) on -site fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow with one being located the furthest from the public fire hydrant. Fire Code C106.1. Each individual on -site fire hydrant is required to flow 1250 GPM @ 20 psi residual pressure for 2 hours. Fuel Modification FD23. This property is located within the area described by the Fire Department as a Fire Hazard Severity Zone. A "Fuel Modification Plan" shall be submitted to the Fuel Modification for review by the Fuel Modification Unit prior to the issuance of the building permit. Please contact the Department's Fuel Modification Unit for details. The Fuel Modification Plan Review Unit is located at 605 North Angeleno Avenue in the City of Azusa CA 91702-2904. They may be reached at (626) 969-5205 or visit https://www.fire.Iacounty.,zov/forestry-division/forestry-fuel-modification/ TRANSIT DIVISION TD1. Although there is currently no fixed route service along Lost Canyon Road, there is planned service in the area with the development of the adjacent Vista Canyon project. TD2. The Transit Impact Fee does apply. Currently the rate is $200 per residential unit. This fee is currently under revision. Applicant shall pay the fee in place at the time of building permit issuance. Packet Pg. 140 10.c Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 22 of 23 March 23, 2021 TD3. If the project will be gated, it should be noted that Dial -a -Ride and Access Services vehicles will be unable to enter the project and serve citizens residing within. Dial -a - Ride and Access provide curb to curb bus service for elderly and disabled patron. Policy prohibits vehicles from entering the project unless the gate is "manned" by aperson. TD4. Due to the proposed use of the project (age -qualified apartments/senior apartments), the applicant shall provide, at each location, a dedicated passenger loading and unloading area on site capable of accommodating a van with the approximate dimensions of: 9' height x 8' width x 23' length. In addition, there should be an 8' free and clear area for wheelchair access to the front door of the van. Passenger loading area shall be in a main location for each complex. Please contact the Transit Division for additional information regarding this comment/condition. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY (SCRRA) RA1. All drainage from the development must drain away from the railroad corridor. This includes any irrigation runoff for landscaping along the railroad corridor. Existing drainage from railroad corridor must be mitigated to continue to drain the railroad corridor as it does today. This includes any offsite water from the south that drains to and through the railroad corridor to the Santa Clara River. A storm drain system from the railroad corridor to the Santa Clara River may need to be provided to properly drain the railroad right of way RA2. All trees must be set back from the railroad right of way line so that when fully mature, the trees do not hangover the right of way line onto railroad property. RA3. A minimum six-foot fence is required along the railroad Property line. Since this will be a medium/high density residential development, it is recommended that a 6' minimum high block wall is constructed along the railroad corridor instead of a fence to better secure access to the railroad right of way. RA4. Any proposed roadway/railroad or pedestrian/ railroad crossing improvements, whether at -grade or grade separated, must be coordinated with the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and SCRRA. RA5. Any proposed utility crossings with the railroad must be coordinated with LA Metro and SCRRA. RA6. To assess any requirements for construction (including demolition or alteration of structures) adjacent to the railroad, plans for construction should be sent to the SCRRA Engineering Department at the following address: SCRRA Engineering Department Attn: Joe McNeely, Principal Engineer 2558 Supply Street Pomona, CA 91767 Plans may be sent to Joe and questions addressed via email at �11c i e..y 1, ,, S:ACDA!PLANNING DIVISIONVCURRENT\2020AMC20-045 (Metrowalk Specific Plan)A5. CCACC Resolution\MC20-045 CC Draft Conditions.doc Packet Pg. 141 Master Case 20-045 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 23 of 23 March 23, 2021 APPENDIX B City of Santa Clarita Park Dedication Fee Requirement Description; Petro Walk TracUMC#: 20-046 TOTAL FEES DUE W17 H 30% C R EIDIT$5,411,388 TOTAL (FEES DU E WITHOUT C R EDIT$7,730,564 Estimate Reviewed by: Terry, Rfmp, Date: L,4WIXA) -The applicant witl be required to provide a certified MAI real estate aWaisat to establish the Fair Market Value (FMV) of an acre of land within this Efpject. Mi4hod cif calkallatial P&'the atof Swft Denta 3&iffal Ran . Paks and R�snt tw Bmwvt DLJ x POPUIaWn X 5 =106 PN X "FMV m Sublotal X 12 - Ini_aouFor 'PPE 7 M,20 I Packet Pg. 142 1 10.d RESOLUTION NO. 2 1 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SCH NO. 2020120433) FOR MASTER CASE20-045 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20-001; ZONE CHANGE 20-001; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 83087; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 20-005; AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 20-007), INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS OF FACT AND ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM THE CITY OF COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact: A. An application for Master Case 20-045, the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project was filed by the project applicant, Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC (applicant), with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on April 3, 2020, and deemed complete on August 12, 2020. The property for which this application was filed (hereinafter "Project site") is located at the southeast corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, in the community of Canyon Country; Assessor's Parcel Number: 2840-004-009. The entitlement requests (collectively, "Entitlements") include: i. General Plan Amendment 20-001 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as Specific Plan (SP). ii. Zone Change 20-001 to amend the zoning map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as SP. iii. Tentative Tract Map 83087 to subdivide the 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site into six lots. In addition, lots designated for multi -family housing may be further subdivided for condominium purposes. iv. Development Review 20-005 to allow for the construction of a multi- family residential development in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, the MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. v. Architectural Design Review 20-007 for the review of the proposed architecture to ensure compliance with the applicable provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. B. The approximately 20.4-acre Project site is located at the southeast corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, a private street, and is located within the Business Park (BP) zone and General Plan land use designation. The easternmost portion of the site is within the Page 1 of 7 Packet Pg. 143 10.d Santa Clara River Significant Ecological Area (SEA) designated by Los Angeles County and included in the City's SEA Overlay Zone. C. On June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-61, adopting the General Plan of the City, and Resolution No. 11-62 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The City's General Plan presently designates the project site BP. Approximately 5.3 acres on the eastern portion of the Project site are located within the SEA Overlay Zone. D. The current BP land use and zoning designation does not permit the development of multi- family residential units. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan (Project). E. Surrounding land uses include primarily multi -family residential development. The Colony Townhomes, a multi -family residential community, is directly west of the Project site. The Fair Oaks Ranch Community, which is comprised of multi -family and single-family residential uses, is located to the south and west of the Project site. The existing Metrolink rail line is immediately south of the Project site. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan area is located north and east of the Project site, with multi -family apartments under construction immediately north of the site. The future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center, with a seven - bay bus transfer station and the future Vista Canyon Metrolink Station, is located just east of the Project site. F. The Project site is an approximately 20.4-acre site located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive (a private street). The Project includes the development of 498 residential units within fourplanning areas as follows: Planning Area 1 (PA-1) is located on the western portion of the Project site. This area consists of two apartment buildings, each four stories in height, with 179 market -rate apartments and associated residential amenities and parking. ii. Planning Area 2 (PA-2) is located centrally on the Project site and consists of one four- story apartment building, with 119 market -rate, senior (age 55 and older) apartments, and associated residential amenities andparking. iii. Planning Area 3 (PA-3) is located along the southerly portion of the Project site and consists of one four-story apartment building, including49 deed -restricted, affordable apartments for low-income (65 percent area median income) seniors, and associated residential amenities andparking. iv. Planning Area 4 (PA-4) is located on the eastern portion of the Projectsite. This area consists of 150 for -sale townhomes, associated residential amenities, parking, and a 0.93-acre community park that is accessible to the public. G. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA;" Public Resources Code, §21000 et seq.), the City is the lead agency and the City's Planning Commission is a recommending body for the Project. The City Council is the decision- making body for the Project. Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 144 10.d H. Pursuant to CEQA and Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21155.2(b)(5), a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) may be approved by the lead agency after conducting a public hearing, reviewing the comments received, and finding that: (a) all potentially significant or significant effects required to be identified in the Initial Study have been identified and analyzed; and (b) with respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the Initial Study, either: (i) changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance; or (ii) those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency, and have been, or can and shouldbe, adopted by that other agency. L The City, the CEQA lead agency, finds and declares that the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines The City Council finds and certifies that the SCEA was reviewed and information contained in the SCEA, along with all comments received on the Draft SCEA, were considered prior to approving the Project. Based upon its review of the SCEA, the City Council finds that the SCEA is an adequate assessment of the environmental impacts of the Project and represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 2. TRANSIT PRIORITY PROJECT FINDINGS. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission and to the City Council, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council find, as follows: A. Pursuant to CEQA and PRC Sections 21155 and 21155.2, a project is eligible for evaluation under a SCEA if it: i. Is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in the Sustainable Communities Strategy (see PRC Section21155(a)). ii. Meets the definition of a "transit priority project" (TPP) described inPRC Section 21155(b). iii. Incorporates all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the prior applicable environmental impact reports (see PRC Section 21155.2(a)). The Project meets all three criteria for SCEA eligibility. This finding is based on the information contained within the Project's SCEA, particularly Section 3.0, Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Eligibility, and Appendix A: Mitigation Measure Feasibility/ Applicability Analysis. The following paragraphs summarize the justification for finding that the Project meets the three criteria for SCEA eligibility. Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 145 10.d The Project is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS explicitly lays out ten goals related to housing, transportation technologies, equity, and resilience. One goal specifically encourages development of diverse housing types in areas that are supported by multiple transportation options (Goal 9). The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS identified Priority Growth Areas (PGAs), which primarily include Job Centers, Transit Priority Areas (TPAs), High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Livable Corridors, and Spheres of Influence (SOIs). TPAs and HQTAs are where transit -oriented development (TOD) can be realized — where people can live, work, and play in high density, compact communities, with ready access to a multitude of safe and convenient transportation alternatives. While the scale of Exhibits 3.4, 3.7, and 3.8 in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS do not show the precise boundaries of PGAs, the Project site appears to be within a PGA, specifically within an HQTA and a TPA, and is consistent with SCAG's intention for PGAs given its location adjacent to the planned Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan. As set forth in the Draft SCEA, the Project is a TPP in that it: (1) contains at least 50 percent residential use, based on total building square footage; (2) provides a minimum net density of at least 20 units per acre; and (3) is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high - quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. In addition, the City complied with PRC Section 21155.2 by reviewing all of the mitigation measures in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), the City of Santa Clarita One Valley One Vision PEIR Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan EIR MMRP for imposition on the Project. Although mitigation measures from these documents have been considered by the City, only a few of them are applicable to the Project. The Project -specific mitigation measures identified for those Project impacts that have been determined as potentially significant consider the mitigation measures from the prior applicable EIRs and incorporate the relevant requirements from those measures. Notably, the Project -specific mitigation measures themselves are adequate to reduce the Project's potentially significant impacts to a Iess-than-significant level. Appendix A of the Draft SCEA explained the applicability of each mitigation measure from the prior applicable EIRs and generally identified which component(s) of the mitigation measure was comparable to the Project -specific mitigation measures and/or to codes and regulations. SECTION 3. CEQA FINDINGS. The City Council does hereby find that the Final SCEA, which consists of the Draft SCEA (December 2020) and Planning Commission Final SCEA (February 2021), for Master Case 20-045 (General Plan Amendment 20-001, Zone Change 20-001, Tentative Tract Map 83078, Development Review 20-005, and Architectural Design Review 20-007) identifies and discloses all Project -specific impacts. Environmental impacts identified in the Final SCEA, findings, and facts in support of findings are herein incorporated as "Findings Required by CEQA," referred to as Exhibit "A," and identified as follows: Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 146 10.d A. The Final SCEA identifies significant but mitigated impacts, as set forth in Section 5.c of Exhibit "A" of this Resolution. Changes or alterations have been required in, orincorporated into, the Project that will avoid or reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. B. The Final SCEA also finds that the Project would have a Iess-than-significant impact without mitigation on a number of environmental topics. Environmental topics, forwhich impacts were determined to be less than significant without mitigation measures, are identified in Section 5.b of Exhibit"A." C. The Final SCEA also found that the Project would have no impact on a number of environmental topic areas listed in Section 5.a of Exhibit"A." D. The MMRP, attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference, isrequired to mitigate Project impacts. SECTION 4. FINDINGS FOR CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL SCEA. Based upon the above recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the MetroWalk Final SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings held on the Project and the Draft Final SCEA, upon studies and investigation made by the Planning Commission and the City Council, and upon reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council finds: A. It has reviewed and considered the Draft and Final SCEAs prior to approving theProject. B. The Draft and Final SCEAs are an accurate and objective statement that fully complieswith CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local environmental guidelines. C. The Draft and Final SCEAs reflect the independent judgment of the lead agency. The City Council approves the Final SCEA based on the findings and conclusions herein. D. That the additional information provided in the Final SCEA, in the evidence presented in the administrative record, does not alter the analysis or conclusions of the Draft SCEA and does not involve any new significant impacts, does not involve a substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impacts, does not require substantial revisions to the SCEA, and does not add significant new information. None of the information presented to the City after circulation of the Draft SCEA has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment on a substantial environmental impact of the Project or a feasible mitigation measure that the City has declined to implement. SECTION 5. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Final SCEA (SCH No. 2020120433), and hereby determines that it is adequate and in compliance with CEQA. The City Council hereby certifies the Final SCEA and associated documents, and adopts the MMRP. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and certify this record to be a full, complete, and correct copy of the action taken. Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 147 10.d PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of March, 2021. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk, of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 21- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23" day of March, 2021, by the following vote of the City Council: AYES: COUNCIL,MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL,MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL,MEMBERS: CITY CLERK Page 6 of 7 Packet Pg. 148 10.d EXHIBIT A FINDINGS REQUIRED BY CEQA (as adopted by Resolution No. 21- ) INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21155.2(b)(5), a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) may be approved by the lead agency after conducting a public hearing, reviewing the comments received, and finding that (a) all potentially significant or significant effects required to be identified in the Initial Study have been identified and analyzed; and (b) with respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the Initial Study, either (i) changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance; or (ii) those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. The City of Santa Clarita (City), the CEQA Lead Agency, finds and declares that the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The City of Santa Clarita City Council finds and certifies that the SCEA was reviewed and information contained in the SCEA, along with all comments received on the Draft SCEA, were considered prior to approving the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, herein referred to as the "Project." Based upon its review of the SCEA, the City of Santa Clarita City Council (City Council) finds that the SCEA is an adequate assessment of the environmental impacts of the Project and represents the independent judgment of the City. PROJECTSUMMARY The Project would include development of up to 498 residential units in four planning areas, on an approximately 20.4-acre site in the City in northern Los Angeles County. The Project Site is generally located north and west of the Metrolink train tracks and east of Lost Canyon Road in the Canyon Country community of the City. The proposed residential units would comprise a mix of housing types, including market -rate apartments and townhomes, age -qualified apartments, and affordable senior apartments. A multi -use path would link the Project Site with the future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station to the east and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan Project to the north while connecting various private amenities throughout the Project Site, including park nodes, open space, a central clubhouse, and a playground. The multi -use path would terminate at a public plaza at the far eastern area of the Project Site, which would provide a publicly accessible outdoor amenity adjacent to the future Metrolink station and a connection to commercial uses, trails, and other amenities within the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area. The average density of the Project Site would be 24.6 units per acre, while the maximum allowable density permitted within the Specific Plan area would be 30 dwelling units per acre. The floor area ratio for the Project would be 0.76. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings Packet Pg. 149 10.d The Project would require the following discretionary actions from the City: (1) a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan land use designation from Business Park to Specific Plan; (2) a Zone Change to change the zoning designation from Business Park to Specific Plan; (3) approval of the MetroWalk Specific Plan to establish specific development standards in support of a development of up to 498 total residential units; (4) Tentative Tract Map 83087 to subdivide the property for the development of up to 498 total residential units; (5) a Development Review Permit for all new development and construction projects; and (6) an Architectural Design Review. The Project would also require the annexation of the Project Site into the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts' Jurisdictional Boundary for which approvals from the City, as well as the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and the Local Agency Formation Commissions, are needed. III. FINDINGS REGARDING TRANSIT PRIORITY PROJECT Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21155 and 21155.2, a project is eligible for evaluation under a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) if it: • Is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in the Sustainable Communities Strategy (see PRC Section 21155(a)). • Meets the definition of a "transit priority project" (TPP) described in PRC Section 21155(b) • Incorporates all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the prior applicable environmental impact reports (see PRC Section21155.2(a)). The City Council finds that the Project meets all three criteria for SCEA eligibility. This finding is based on the information contained within the Project's SCEA, particularly Section 3.0, Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Eligibility, and Appendix A: Mitigation Measure Feasibility/Applicability Analysis. The following paragraphs summarize the justification for finding that the Project meets the three criteria for SCEA eligibility. The Project is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS explicitly lays out 10 goals related to housing, transportation technologies, equity, and resilience. One goal specifically encourages development of diverse housing types in areas that are supported by multiple transportation options (Goal 9). The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS identified Priority Growth Areas (PGAs), which primarily include Job Centers, Transit Priority Areas (TPAs), High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Livable Corridors, and Spheres of Influence (SOls). TPAs and HQTAs are where transit -oriented development (TOD) can be realized — where people can live, work, and play in high density, compact communities with ready access to a multitude of safe and convenient transportation alternatives. While the scale of Exhibits 3.4, 3.7, and 3.8 in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS do not show the precise boundaries of PGAs, the Project Site appears to be within a PGA, specifically within an HQTA and a TPA, and is consistent with SCAG's intention for PGAs given its location adjacent to the planned Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 2 Packet Pg. 150 10.d As set forth in the Draft SCEA, the Project is a TPP in that it (1) contains at least 50 percent residential use, based on total building square footage; (2) provides a minimum net density of at least 20 units per acre; and (3) is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high -quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. In addition, the City complied with PRC Section 21155.2 by reviewing all of the mitigation measures in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), the City of Santa Clarita One Valley One Vision PEIR Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan EIR MMRP for imposition on the Project. Although mitigation measures from these documents have been considered by the City, only a few of them are applicable to the Project. The Project -specific mitigation measures identified for those Project impacts that have been determined as potentially significant consider the mitigation measures from the prior applicable EIRs and incorporate the relevant requirements from those measures. Notably, the Project -specific mitigation measures themselves are adequate to reduce the Project's potentially significant impacts to a less -than - significant level. Appendix A of the Draft SCEA explained the applicability of each mitigation measure from the prior applicable EIRs and generally identified which component(s) of the mitigation measure was comparable to the Project -specific mitigation measures and/or to codes and regulations. IV. RESOLUTION REGARDING APPROVAL OF THE SCEA The City Council certifies that (1) it has reviewed and considered the Draft and Final SCEAs prior to approving the Project, (2) the Draft and Final SCEAs are an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local environmental guidelines, and (3) the Draft and Final SCEAs reflect the independent judgment of the lead agency. The City Council approves the Final SCEA based on the findings and conclusions herein. The City Council finds that the additional information provided in the Final SCEA, in the evidence presented in the administrative record, does not alter the analysis or conclusions of the Draft SCEA and does not involve any new significant impacts, does not involve a substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impacts, does not require substantial revisions to the SCEA, and does not add significant new information. None of the information presented to the City Council after circulation of the Draft SCEA has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunityto comment on a substantial environmental impact of the Project or a feasible mitigation measure that the City has declined to implement. V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND FINDINGS a. Resolution Regarding Environmental Topics Determined to Have No Impact in the SCEA The MetroWalk Specific Plan Project Draft SCEA found that the Project would have no impact on a number of environmental topic areas listed below. A detailed analysis of the topic areas is provided in the Draft SCEA. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 3 Packet Pg. 151 10.d FINDING: The City of Santa Clarita City Council finds that based on substantial evidence in the record, there would be no impacts, to the extent they result from the Project, for the environmental topics identified below. Aesthetics a) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenicvista? b) Would the Project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, primary/secondary ridgelines, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) In non -urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Would the Project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Agriculture and Forestry Resources a) Would the Project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? b) Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Would the Project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Would the Project result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? e) Would the Project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or conversion of forestland to non -forest use? Air Quality a) Would the Project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Biological Resources c) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 4 Packet Pg. 152 10.d pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? f) Would the Project conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? g) Would the Project affect a Significant Ecological Area (SEA) or Significant Natural Area (SNA) as identified on the City of Santa Clarita ESA Delineation Map? Cultural Resources a) Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Geology and Soils a) Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. iv) Landslides? e) Would the Project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? i) Would the Project result in the destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? Hazards and Hazardous Materials c) Would the Project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, orwaste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Would the Project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or theenvironment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Projectarea? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Projectarea? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 5 Packet Pg. 153 10.d Hydrology and Water Quality g) Would the Project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Would the Project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Would the Project result in inundation by seiche, tsunami, ormudflow? 1) Would the Project result in other modification of a wash, channel creek, or river? Land Use and Planning a) Would the Project disrupt or physically divide an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? c) Would the Project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, and/or policies by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? Mineral and Energy Resources a) Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Would the Project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Noise e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noiselevels? Population and Housing b) Would the Project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere (especially affordable housing)? c) Would the Project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 6 Packet Pg. 154 10.d Recreation b) Would the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Transportation/Traffic b) Would the Project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to, level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Would the Project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safetyrisks? d) Would the Project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? b. Resolution Regarding Environmental Impacts Determined to be Less Than Significant without Mitigation The City Council finds that the Project would have a less -than -significant impact without mitigation on a number of environmental topics. For some of these topics, compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is assumed to ensure that impacts remain less than significant, as discussed in the SCEA. Environmental topics, for which impacts were determined to be less than significant without mitigation measures, are identified below. A detailed analysis of the topic areas is provided in the Draft SCEA. Air Quality b) Would the Project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Would the Project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? e) Would the Project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Biological Resources b) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? d) Would the Project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 7 Packet Pg. 155 10.d e) Would the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, including oak trees? Cultural Resources d) Would the Project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Energy a) Would the Project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Geology and Soils a) Would the Project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? b) Would the Project result in substantial wind or water soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, either on- or off -site? c) Would the Project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, orcollapse? d) Would the Project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life orproperty? f) Would the Project result in a change in topography or ground surface relief features? g) Would the Project result in earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? h) Would the Project involve development and/or grading on a slope greater than 10% natural grade? Greenhouse Gas Emissions a) Would the Project generate greenhouse gas emission, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on theenvironment? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 8 Packet Pg. 156 10.d b) Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Hazards and Hazardous Materials a) Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Would the Project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving explosion or the release of hazardous materials into the environment (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals, fuels, or radiation)? g) Would the Project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Would the Project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed withwildlands? i) Would the Project expose people to existing sources of potential health hazards (e.g., electrical transmission lines, gas lines, oil pipelines)? Hydrology and Water Quality a) Would the Project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Would the Project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- oroff-site? d) Would the Project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off - site? e) Would the Project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Would the Project otherwise substantially degrade waterquality? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 9 Packet Pg. 157 10.d k) Would the Project result in changes in the rate of flow, currents, or the course and direction of surface water and/or groundwater? m) Would the Project impact stormwater management in any of the following ways: i) Would the Project result in potential impact of project construction and project post - construction activity on stormwater runoff? ii) Would the Project result in potential discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? iii) Would the Project result in significant environmentally harmful increase in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff? iv) Would the Project result in significant and environmentally harmful increases in erosion of the Project Site or surrounding areas? v) Would the Project result in stormwater discharges that would significantly impair or contribute to the impairment of the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits (e.g., riparian corridors, wetlands, etc.)? vi) Would the Project cause harm to the biological integrity of drainage systems, watersheds, and/or water bodies? vii) Does the Proposed Project include provisions for the separation, recycling, and reuse of materials both during construction and after project occupancy? Land Use and Planning b) Would the Project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Mineral and Energy Resources c) Would the Project use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? Noise a) Would the Project result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Would the Project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 10 Packet Pg. 158 10.d c) Would the Project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) Would the Project result in s substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Population and Housing a) Would the Project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Public Services a) Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the publicservices: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? Recreation a) Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Transportation/Traffic a) Would the Project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? e) Would the Project result in inadequate emergency access? f) Would the Project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 11 Packet Pg. 159 10.d Utilities and Service Systems a) Would the Project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Would the Project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Would the Project require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Would the Project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Would the Project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Would the Project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Would the Project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Wildfire a) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of awildfire? c) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the Project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes? Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 12 Packet Pg. 160 10.d Mandatory Findings of Significance b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) C. Resolution Regarding Environmental Impacts Determined to be Less Than Significant with Mitigation The City Council having reviewed and considered the information contained in the Draft and Final SCEAs and the administrative record, finds pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b)(5) that changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project, that avoid or mitigate the significant effects identified in the SCEA to a level of insignificance. The City Council finds that the potentially significant adverse impacts identified below can be mitigated to a level that is considered less than significant after implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Draft and Final SCEAs. AIR QUALITY The Project's potential air quality impact that can be mitigated is discussed in the response to the Initial Study Checklist Question Ill.d starting on page 4-42 in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA. The identified potentially significant impact relates to the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial toxic air contaminant (TAC) concentrations during Project construction. d) Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Facts in Support of Findings Project construction would potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial TAC concentrations, and construction -related impacts would be potentially significant prior to mitigation. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would be required to reduce the impact to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would require all diesel -fueled equipment used during construction to be equipped with Tier 4 Final engines or their equivalent. As shown in the Draft SCEA, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1, the cancer and non -cancer health risk at both the off -site and on -site Most Exposed Individual Resident (MEIR) would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD) health risk criteria. Additional actions required pursuant to Mitigation Measure AQ-1, such as staging and haul route restrictions, would further reduce health risks at sensitive receptors. With implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1, the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations related to CO hotspots or TACs, and impacts would be less than significant. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 13 Packet Pg. 161 10.d Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure AQ-1: The project applicant or contractor shall select equipment during construction to minimize emissions. The Project applicant shall submit a construction management plan to the City of Santa Clarita for review and approval, prior to issuance of any grading and building permits. The construction management plan shall demonstrate that the off - road equipment used on site to construct the project would include the following: • All diesel -fueled equipment used during project construction shall be equipped with Tier 4 Final engines. In the event that Tier 4 Final engines are not commercially available, use of alternatively fueled (i.e., non -diesel) equipment or other control technology (i.e., diesel - particulate filters) may suffice, as long as an overall average fleet exhaust PM2.5 emissions reduction of 89 percent below emission levels estimated for the standard fleet mix in the California Emissions Estimator Model can be demonstrated. • Construction equipment staging shall be situated as far from existing residential receptors as possible. • Construction haul routes shall be limited to paved roads and minimize travel adjacent to existing residences. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Project's potential impact to biological resources that can be mitigated is discussed in the response to the Initial Study Checklist Question IV.a starting on page 4-47 in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA. The identified potentially significant impact relates to the removal of existing habitat and direct effects of construction on three sensitive species, specifically the San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, the coastal whiptail, the coast horned lizard, and the California horned lark. a) Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Facts in Support of Findings During construction, the Project would remove all existing habitat, including on -site shrubs that provide nesting habitat, from the 20.4-acre Project Site. The San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit is a mobile species, and most individuals would be expected to avoid construction equipment. However, in the event that jackrabbits are not able to escape, injury or mortality to individual jackrabbits could occur due to being struck or crushed by vehicles. This impact would be especially acute if mother jackrabbits were injured or killed while tending their young. Similarly, Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 14 Packet Pg. 162 10.d since coastal whiptails and coast horned lizards are low -mobility species, it is unlikely they would be able to escape injury or mortality during site grading. Without mitigation, the Project's impacts on the San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptails, and coast horned lizards would be potentially significant. These impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level by the relocation efforts required by Mitigation Measure BIO-1, during which qualified biologists would survey the Project Site for these species and usher them off -site if encountered. Because the habitat to be removed is largely in a degraded condition, and because habitats for the black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptails, and coast horned lizards are abundant regionally, loss of habitat would not significantly impact these special -status species. If site preparation occurs outside the bird breeding season (typically February 1 through August 31), California horned lark and other protected native bird individuals present would be able to fly and avoid contact with construction equipment. However, if vegetation removal or site preparation occurs during the breeding season, birds may be committed to tending nests with eggs or nestlings and unable to avoid contact with equipment. In these cases, the Project could lead to mortality of adults, eggs, and nestlings. Additionally, effects, such as noise, dust, and human presence during construction, could agitate birds and cause nest abandonment even if nests are not directly destroyed. These impacts would be significant without mitigation. Mitigation Measure 113I0-2 would require preconstruction nesting bird surveys to be conducted during the breeding season, along with avoidance of any active nests that are detected and an appropriate buffer. This mitigation measure would reduce impacts to the California horned lark and other protected native birds to a less -than -significant level and would also serve to ensure compliance with federal and State laws protecting birds' nests. Because the habitat to be removed is largely in a degraded condition, and because habitats for the California horned lark and protected native birds are abundant regionally, loss of habitat would not significantly impact these species. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) submitted comments on the Draft SCEA. CDFW recommended that the City, in consultation with a qualified biologist, prepare a worker environmental awareness training as an effective additional means of minimizing impacts on biological resources. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure 113I0-3 has been added in response to Initial Study Checklist Question IV.a on page 4-50 of the Draft SCEA as presented in Section 3.0, Errata and Clarifications, of the Final SCEA. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through 113I0-3, the Project would not have a substantial effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, and impacts would be less than significant. Mitiaation Measures Mitigation Measure 113I0-1: Sixty days prior to grading activities, a qualified biologist shall contact and consult with City staff regarding the timing of preconstruction surveys. In any event, within 30 days prior to grading activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey within appropriate habitat areas to relocate individual coastal whiptail, coast horned lizard, and San Diego black - tailed jackrabbit in order to avoid or minimize take of these sensitive species. Relocation will occur through live capture and release, or in the case of black -tailed jackrabbits, by encouraging the animals to leave the site. Individuals shall be relocated to nearby undisturbed areas with suitable habitat, as identified by the qualified biologist in consultation with City staff. Results of the surveys Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 15 Packet Pg. 163 10.d and relocation efforts shall be provided to the City. Collection and relocation of animals shall only occur with the proper handling permits, asapplicable. Mitigation Measure 113I0-2: Beginning 30 or more days prior to the removal of any suitable nesting habitat that will occur during the bird breeding and nesting season of February 1 through August 31, the applicant shall arrange for weekly bird surveys to detect the California horned lark or any other nesting bird species protected by the California Fish and Game Code or Migratory Bird Treaty Act, in the habitats to be removed and any other suitable nesting habitat within 300 feet of the construction work areas. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist using industry -accepted survey protocols. The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis, with the last survey being conducted no more than 7 days prior to the initiation of any construction work involving vegetation removal and/or within 300 feet of off -site nesting habitat. If an active nest is found, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest shall be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, and when there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Limits of construction to avoid a nest site shall be established in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the ecological sensitivity of the area. Incursion into the protective buffer shall only occur at the discretion of a qualified biologist, and only if monitoring and other protective measures are implemented to ensure that work activities are not affecting the nest. Results of the surveys, including surveys to locate nests, shall be provided to the City. The results shall include a description of any nests located and measures to be implemented to avoid nest sites. Mitigation Measure 113I0-3: Worker Environmental Awareness Program: Prior to initiation of all construction activities (including staging and mobilization), all personnel associated with project construction shall attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training, conducted by a qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status biological resources potentially occurring in the Project area. This training will include information about San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptail, coast horned lizard, California horned lark, loggerhead shrike, as well as other special -status species with potential to occur in the Project area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of special -status species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of special -status resources, review of the limits of construction and measures required to avoid and minimize impacts to biological resources within the work area, and all reporting requirements. A fact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employees, and other personnel involved with construction of the project. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer documenting they have attended the WEAP and understand the information presented to them. The crew foreman shall be responsible for ensuring crew members adhere to the guidelines and restrictions designed to avoid impacts to special -status species. CULTURAL RESOURCES The Project's potential impacts to cultural resources that can be mitigated are discussed in the responses to the Initial Study Checklist Questions IV.b and IV.c starting on page 4-70 and page 4-74, respectively, in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA. The identified potentially significant impacts relate specifically to archaeological and paleontological resources. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 16 Packet Pg. 164 10.d b) Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Facts in Support of Findings The Project Site is a vacant infill site that has been previously disturbed. The Project would require a maximum excavation depth of approximately 12 feet. A records search conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center indicated no known archaeological resources on the Project Site. However, construction activities could have the potential to encounter previously undiscovered archaeological resources. The Project would implement Mitigation Measure CUL-1, which requires a qualified archaeologist to provide archaeological awareness training at the construction kickoff meeting to ensure proper identification and treatment of inadvertent discoveries. In the event of discovery, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified specialist can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether additional study is warranted. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would ensure that the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5, and impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant in the unlikely event that archaeological resources are encountered during Project construction. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure CUL-1: Prior to the commencement of any construction activities on -site, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist to provide archaeological awareness training at the construction kickoff meeting to ensure proper identification and treatment of inadvertent discoveries. In the event that archaeological resources (e.g., sites, features, artifacts, or fossilized material) are exposed during construction activities for the Project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified specialist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether additional study is warranted. Depending upon the significance of the find, the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may bewarranted. c) Would the Project directly or indirectly destroy or impact a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 17 Packet Pg. 165 10.d Facts in Support of Findings Although the Project Site has been previously disturbed and no paleontological resources were identified on -site, given the proximity of past fossil discoveries in the surrounding area and the Mint Canyon Formation, the Project Site was determined to be highly sensitive for paleontological resources. The Project would implement Mitigation Measure CUL-2, which requires a qualified paleontologist to prepare a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) and provide a worker environmental awareness training at the construction kick-off meeting to ensure proper identification and treatment of inadvertent discoveries. In the event of discovery, all construction work occurring within 50 feet of the find shall immediately stop and be roped off. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would ensure that impacts are reduced to a less -than -significant level in the event that paleontological resources are discovered on the Project Site during construction. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measure CUL-2, the Project would not directly or indirectly destroy or impact a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature, and impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure CUL-2: Prior to the commencement of any grading activity on -site, the applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist per the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) 2010 guidelines. The paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the SVP guidelines and shall outline requirements for preconstruction meeting attendance and worker environmental awareness training; where monitoring is required within the Project area based on construction plans and/or geotechnical reports; procedures for adequate paleontological monitoring and discoveries treatment; and paleontological methods, reporting, and collections management. The qualified paleontologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and a paleontological monitor shall be on -site during all rough grading and other significant ground -disturbing activities in previously undisturbed Mint Canyon Formation materials. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed during grading, the paleontological monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources. The area of discovery will be roped off with a 50-foot radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES The Project's potential impact to tribal cultural resources that can be mitigated is discussed in the responses to the Initial Study Checklist Question XVlll.a starting on page 4-192 in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA. The identified potentially significant impact relates specifically to construction impacts during ground disturbance to tribal cultural resources that may exist on the Project Site. a) Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 18 Packet Pg. 166 10.d and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Facts in Support of Findings During tribal consultation pursuant to Assembly Bill (AB) 52, the Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians (Tataviam) expressed concerns about the Project Site's location in a culturally - sensitive area and its potential to contain tribal cultural resources. This consultation initiated by the City resulted in the identification of potential tribal cultural resources on -site. To address any inadvertent discovery of tribal cultural resources during Project construction, Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-3 have been identified to reduce impacts to tribal cultural resources to a less -than -significant level by having a professional Native American monitor observe all ground disturbing activities and by implementing Archaeological Treatment Plan if cultural resources are discovered. With implementation of mitigation measures, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and impacts to tribal cultural resources would be less than significant. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure TCR-1: The Project shall retain a professional Native American monitor procured by the Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians to observe all ground -disturbing activities, including, but not limited to, excavating, digging, trenching, plowing, drilling, tunneling, quarrying, grading, leveling, clearing, driving posts, auguring, backfilling, blasting, stripping topsoil or a similar activity, and any archaeological work conducted during Project construction. If cultural resources are encountered, the Native American monitor shall have the authority to request ground -disturbing activities to cease within 60 feet of discovery to assess and document the potential finds in real time. Mitigation Measure TCR-2: If significant pre -contact and/or post -contact cultural resources, as defined by CEQA, are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop an Archaeological Treatment Plan (ATP), the drafts of which shall be provided to the Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 19 Packet Pg. 167 10.d Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians for review and comments. The ATP shall provide details regarding the process for in -field treatment of inadvertent discoveries and the disposition of inadvertently discovered non -funerary resources. Mitigation Measure TCR-3: The City and applicant shall, in good faith, consult with the Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians on the disposition and treatment of any tribal cultural resource encountered during all ground -disturbing activities. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The Project's impacts identified in the mandatory findings of significance that can be mitigated are discussed in the responses to the Initial Study Checklist Questions XVI Il.a and XVI I I.c starting on page 4-212 and page 4-213, respectively in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA. The identified potentially significant impacts relate specifically to impacts to biological resources addressed in Initial Study Checklist Section IV, cultural resources addressed in Initial Study Checklist Section V, Cultural Resources, and tribal cultural resources addressed in Initial Study Checklist Section XVI I I of the Draft SCEA. a) Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Facts in Support of Findings With the incorporation of Project -specific Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-3, the Project would not have substantial impacts to special -status species or protected native birds. Further, the Project would not affect the local, regional, or national populations or ranges of any plant or animal species and would not threaten any plant communities. Similarly, with incorporation of Project -specific Mitigation Measures CUL-1, CUL-2, and TCR-1 through TCR-3, any potential impacts to archaeological/paleontological resources and tribal cultural resources, respectively, would be reduced to a less -than -significant level in the event of inadvertent discovery. Thus, the Project would not eliminate any important examples of California history or prehistory. Therefore, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the Project would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history orprehistory. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 20 Packet Pg. 168 10.d Mitigation Measures Please refer to Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-3, CUL-1 and CUL-2, and TCR-1 through TCR-3 above. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly orindirectly? Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Facts in Support of Findings Construction activities associated with the Project would produce criteria pollutant concentrations and toxic air contaminants (TACs) in proximity to the residents of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan Project, which are considered sensitive receptors. However, it was determined that with implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 (specifically for construction), the amount of criteria pollutant concentrations and TACs generated during construction of the Project would not be considered significant given the nature of vehicle use associated with the land uses included in the Project and because emissions of other criteria pollutants would be below SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, development of the Project would not expose sensitive receptors to significant construction and operational criteria pollutant and TAC emissions, and, as such, the Project would not have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Mitigation Measures Please refer to Mitigation Measure AQ-1 above. Master Case 20-045 MetroWalk Specific Plan March 23, 2021 CEQA Findings 21 Packet Pg. 169 10.d EXHIBIT B MITIGATION MONITORING and REPORTING PROGRAM (as adopted by Resolution No. 21- ) The following environmental mitigation measures identified in Table 4-1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, were incorporated into the approval for this Project in order to mitigate potentially significant environmental impacts. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that the mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented and fulfills the City of Santa Clarita's monitoring requirements with respect to PRC Section 21081.6. The mitigation measures are numbered as presented in the Draft SCEA. Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program tntiironmental Issue Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency' Timing status of Implementation AIR QUALITY Mitigation The project applicant or contractor Issuance of City of Santa Pre - Measure AQ-1 shall select equipment during applicable Clarita Public construction construction to minimize building permit Works and emissions. The Project applicant and field Department/ construction shall submit a construction inspection sign- Development phases management plan to the City of off Services Santa Clarita for review and Division approval, prior to issuance of any grading and building permits. The construction management plan shall demonstrate that the off -road equipment used on site to construct the project would include the following: • All diesel -fueled equipment used during project construction shall be equipped with Tier 4 Final engines. In the event that Tier 4 Final engines are not commercially available, use of alternatively fueled (i.e., non -diesel) equipment or other control technology (i.e., diesel - particulate filters) may suffice, as long as an overall average fleet exhaust PM2.5 emissions reduction of 89 percent below emission levels estimated for the standard Master Case 20-045 March 23, 2021 MetroWalk Specific Plan MMRP Packet Pg. 170 10.d Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Method of Environmental ReVieW Responsible Status of Issue Mitigation Measure Verification Agency' Timing Implementation fleet mix in the California Emissions Estimator Model can be demonstrated. • Construction equipment staging shall be situated as far from existing residential receptors as possible. • Construction haul routes shall be limited to paved roads and minimize travel adjacent to existing residences. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mitigation Sixty days prior to grading Qualified City of Santa 60 days Measure BIO-1 activities, a qualified biologist biologist to Clarita prior to shall contact and consult with consult with the Community grading City staff regarding the timing of City regarding Development activities; no preconstruction surveys. In any timing of pre- Department/ later than 30 event, within 30 days prior to construction Planning days prior to grading activities, a qualified surveys; Division grading biologist shall conduct a survey qualified biologist activities within appropriate habitat areas to conduct to relocate individual coastal surveys whiptail, coast horned lizard, and San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit in order to avoid or minimize take of these sensitive species. Relocation will occur through live capture and release, or in the case of black -tailed jackrabbits, by encouraging the animals to leave the site. Individuals shall be relocated to nearby undisturbed areas with suitable habitat, as identified by the qualified biologist in consultation with City staff. Results of the surveys and relocation efforts shall be provided to the City. Collection and relocation of animals shall only occur with the proper handling permits, as applicable. Mitigation Beginning 30 or more days prior Qualified City of Santa No later Measure BIO-2 to the removal of any suitable biologist to Clarita than 30 nesting habitat that will occur consult with the Community days prior to during the bird breeding and City regarding Development grading nesting season of February 1 timing of pre- Department/ activities Master Case 20-045 March 23, 2021 2 MetroWalk Specific Plan MMRP Packet Pg. 171 10.d Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Issue Mitigation Measure Method of ReVie* Verification Responsible Agency' Timing Status of Implementation through August 31, the applicant construction Planning shall arrange for weekly bird surveys; qualified Division surveys to detect the California biologist to horned lark or any other nesting conduct surveys bird species protected by the California Fish and Game Code or Migratory Bird Treaty Act, in the habitats to be removed and any other suitable nesting habitat within 300 feet of the construction work areas. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist using industry - accepted survey protocols. The surveys shall continue on a weekly basis, with the last survey being conducted no more than 7 days prior to the initiation of any construction work involving vegetation removal and/or within 300 feet of off -site nesting habitat. If an active nest is found, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest shall be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, and when there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Limits of construction to avoid a nest site shall be established in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the ecological sensitivity of the area. Incursion into the protective buffer shall only occur at the discretion of a qualified biologist, and only if monitoring and other protective measures are implemented to ensure that work activities are not affecting the nest. Results of the surveys, including surveys to locate nests, shall be provided to the City. The results shall include a description of any nests located and measures to be implemented to avoid nest sites. Master Case 20-045 March 23, 2021 3 MetroWalk Specific Plan MMRP Packet Pg. 172 10.d Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Issue Mitigation Measure Method of ReVie* Verification Responsible Agency' Timing Status of Implementation Mitigation Prior to initiation of all Qualified City of Santa Pre - Measure BIO-3 construction activities (including biologist to Clarita construction staging and mobilization), all conduct training Community personnel associated with Development project construction shall attend Department/ a Worker Environmental Planning Awareness Program (WEAP) Division training, conducted by a qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status biological resources potentially occurring in the Project area. This training will include information about San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptail, coast horned lizard, California horned lark, loggerhead shrike, as well as other special -status species with potential to occur in the Project area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of special -status species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of special -status resources, review of the limits of construction and measures required to avoid and minimize impacts to biological resources within the work area, and all reporting requirements. A fact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employees, and other personnel involved with construction of the project. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer documenting they have attended the WEAP and understand the information presented to them. The crew foreman shall be responsible for ensuring crew members adhere to the guidelines and restrictions designed to avoid impacts to special -status species. Master Case 20-045 March 23, 2021 4 MetroWalk Specific Plan MMRP Packet Pg. 173 10.d Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Method of Environmental ReVieW Responsible Status of Issue Mitigation Measure Verification Agency' Timing Implementation CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation Prior to the commencement of Qualified City of Santa Pre - Measure CUL-1 any construction activities on- archaeologist to Clarita construction site, the applicant shall retain a conduct training Community qualified archaeologist to provide Development archaeological awareness Department/ training at the construction Planning kickoff meeting to ensure proper Division identification and treatment of inadvertent discoveries. In the event that archaeological resources (e.g., sites, features, artifacts, or fossilized material) are exposed during construction activities for the Project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified specialist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether additional study is warranted. Depending upon the significance of the find, the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. Mitigation Prior to the commencement of Qualified City of Santa Pre - Measure CUL-2 any grading activity on -site, the paleontologist to Clarita construction applicant shall retain a qualified conduct training Community paleontologist per the Society of Development Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) Department/ 2010 guidelines. The Planning paleontologist shall prepare a Division Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the SVP guidelines and shall outline requirements for preconstruction meeting attendance and worker Master Case 20-045 March 23, 2021 5 MetroWalk Specific Plan MMRP Packet Pg. 174 10.d Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Method of Environmental ReVieW Responsible Status of Issue Mitigation Measure Verification Agency' Timing Implementation environmental awareness training; where monitoring is required within the Project area based on construction plans and/or geotechnical reports; procedures for adequate paleontological monitoring and discoveries treatment; and paleontological methods, reporting, and collections management. The qualified paleontologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and a paleontological monitor shall be on -site during all rough grading and other significant ground - disturbing activities in previously undisturbed Mint Canyon Formation materials. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed during grading, the paleontological monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources. The area of discovery will be roped off with a 50-foot radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation The Project shall retain a Professional City of Santa During the Measure TCRA professional Native American native American Clarita excavation monitor procured by the to observe all Community and grading Fernandeno Tataviam Band of ground- Development phases of Mission Indians to observe all disturbing Department/ construction ground -disturbing activities, activities Planning including, but not limited to, Division excavating, digging, trenching, plowing, drilling, tunneling, quarrying, grading, leveling, clearing, driving posts, auguring, backfilling, blasting, stripping topsoil or a similar activity, and any archaeological work Master Case 20-045 March 23, 2021 MetroWalk Specific Plan MMRP Packet Pg. 175 10.d Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Method of Environmental ReView,' Resportisible Status of Issue Mitigation Measure Verification Agency' Timing implementation conducted during Project construction. If cultural resources are encountered, the Native American monitor shall have the authority to request ground - disturbing activities to cease within 60 feet of discovery to assess and document the potential finds in real time. Mitigation If significant pre -contact and/or Qualified City of Santa Upon Measure TCR-2 post -contact cultural resources, archaeologist to Clarita discovery of as defined by CEQA, are prepare ATP Community resources discovered and avoidance Development cannot be ensured, the Department/ archaeologist shall develop an Planning Archaeological Treatment Plan Division (ATP), the drafts of which shall be provided to the Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians for review and comments. The ATP shall provide details regarding the process for in -field treatment of inadvertent discoveries and the disposition of inadvertently discovered non -funerary resources. Mitigation The City and applicant shall, in Qualified City of Santa Upon Measure TCR-3 good faith, consult with the archaeologist to Clarita discovery of Fernandeno Tataviam Band of assist in Community resources Mission Indians on the coordination with Development disposition and treatment of any the tribe on the Department/ tribal cultural resource disposition and Planning encountered during all ground- treatment of Division disturbing activities. resources Master Case 20-045 March 23, 2021 MetroWalk Specific Plan MMRP Packet Pg. 176 4 3 -fEl G/11, a1 ie AE1 a 6 ¢ 4 :hI Al fliflfliillsffffff3�� ��� �Ef111 �e e;ltgil� E ii � �j E If 8f 11f E11fE€E�S4E:esei �f i{{1 iill f ii i Ia 1 YYY s i 1 U 1+ tt E.Sas@e4:.NJ jIl I A Ifj j 'r Ilk€i1; 1ga E!$laPIN �E�€9E1 5'E1 1 f a e rA�e F41� 4SSEd Sa ! I 44 l = E: � r 1 �:g #y �� �� � � ••� � j �- � �� 1� ��I�., IFf E$f� E�CI �_Et€E IPpp1i �1:° Se1eF i �a1 4,e� y q e a 3f p§ �1 i t of • E€ 3 q !/ pg 0iiiiixp if 4 if l \ 1 V eyff G°3 1 !4-Sa1e[ is, } E14 E tilll ... AAAV(Q F tiSSeg9941N101, � LS �Ep P1E;Ee1S6� f'fp a 11gEEI�'l.Ef`f6'EE4� � 1 ig s;ifaj:°f� Iili 1lS °l E ��I !4 S .E IN _ Ig Erz j pg �g 6Y v — �; i w,pEli i_ ldiiiN'b n�� �'---11��11f eL n neeF�Einsleie: �,. �, l 0 \ —0000000 I� & i F L-------------------- rE — 0 J oll a w z VW g C.tK gi 'z a Lud SI S 0 J Q Z1 O`s GJ ' B I ■ � 4 w § / ; | w | F § w I w H 3 2:6 uul �B LU LU g x r�eg 3<� s ;Z� WmW= Z°`3_ H e �a Zln I •Y " j Alt s 1 Al z n Y y _ a i 9 Y d E 8i 000000000000 i 5 �. a out p£ U -j a Wuli �a L 000000 A z I : 6\%`•! � �| « j • ! ! i ! #; ` moil - 8 .| \ ( LU x u§! E.-! �| \ � , ( ` � 0 �i I � oul uj, ui 0 3<se `] 3x H 4 v z=_ t�► � . � ', ;� ;_ x ;;' fy., _ `�:.' �: 'it Y rh �� ��� �� �� rw •�� ,4.� ��,� �-, ,ti-Y' � : .� G f }ti" � 3:- �' �� � ' �i v1 ✓�`w' V 5 ��4II.� #� ¢ ° I �P,i � �' 1 � " ��I .� t%� rrra ���; �" �'� 'y .r' :- .�- . � "ri '�- �, -'- "'�.• a; t, "'- p � � � i, e r .� �� 1 _ ' i ct "� 4� �� J 0 ii � �3, - � F + z 9 �� �� �i E�" �� `�i �. .;i. 111 asa � w k r '1111 NEWEIIIINFIN 2 --- � ob'oa Nonnrootsoi -------------------- oz as �r l9 z u �O U _ aU L)p Qn' 6 `VU Wz"LU z Mai $ 3<€R PROPERTY LINE ---... � - s6 H �vmecv ww.ux.�woni wm.ia.w.w.s.vae.wn �.m ®�.r.vaww+.w a a - w ..... § 138.... a l K\ z Z g Z I Z d`s 0 �u <� aP-� N z V Lu LU = oil <a �a AP•.t 6�>3 7 z ' s O W oil g F-�pg 3<€ 8 2::E€ a s� PROPERTY LINE -- JIM 0 n � $ � k y P Pon a a$ � aaaaa g $I�a2s � Eff � H w a0® cO ® o o ® ® O § §|� •� (� @A� §•/ (_ ■ k 9 �) 0 F &b! g' gg gQ6 l� Iis'g11.1111 , ill b ppgpppg� lit Igg gh ` C ow.a 87 e� yJ11 et� <Ji r i g a.; e Wz^ W F5e 3"a �u 3— i ] a #+\ƒ % K q/k !| / | •m. If. H||� �( k, u « 2,( ))A k L/! m �| $ �) �| , -� ;°;0Z / 0 P )i ®a;a) uoilepoa'o u 'a;s8p ®u a ospuAJeu1w118Jd-s6u1j8PuqN-uejd ap ajuak IIIII I � � w a a a a a~ _O _O l7 V V in iD 60 I� 60 °n�° � � 1 I IIIII III 1 II � � 1 IIIII III 1 II � II IIIII III 1 II �© II IIIII III 1 II �uvomou 1gpq, u a \ 1 H9 _ �a€ t A 1V\M i ir \ \ A i00 .: Fa€ - 1 w P 4�111V13 � 1\\ ® ® ® — -- — — 1 — �� ��movaa�uuuuuuruu min 1 n. I Fend) - - Joe: 10.g CITY OF SANTA CLARITA METROWALK SPECIFIC PLAN FINAL SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for: mi:�llV�III 1u� ll, of ERIKA IVERSON ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF SANTA CLARITA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 23920 VALENCIA BOULEVARD, SUITE 302 SANTA CLARITA, CA 91355 EMAIL: EIVERSON@Q SANTA-CLARITA.COM PHONE: (616) 255-4962 Prepared by: IMTERM;A710 N AL 3760 KILROY AIRPORT WAY, STE 270 LONG BEACH, CA 90806 FEBRUARY 2021 Packet Pg. 211 I A-6, 5 I Packet Pg. 212 1 10.g TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Summary..............................................................................................1-1 1.2 Required Findings.............................................................................................1-1 1.3 Organization of the Final SCEA........................................................................1-2 2.0 Comments on the Draft SCEA and Responses........................................................2-1 2.1 List of Commenters...........................................................................................2-1 2.2 Comments and Responses to Comments.........................................................2-1 3.0 Errata and Clarifications............................................................................................3-1 �. 3.1 Changes to the Draft SCEA in Response to Public Comments .........................3-1 C1) N 0 3.2 Staff -Initiated Changes to the Draft SCEA........................................................3-1 e 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.........................................................4-1 a. U LIST OF TABLES Ua -19 Table 2.1-1 List of Commenters on the Draft SCEA.............................................................2-1 Table 2.2-1 Summary of Estimated Vegetation/Land Cover Types for the Project Area ..... 2-20 Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program...................................................4-1 0 U) U n City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment i Packet Pg. 213 10.g TABLE OF CONTENTS This page intentionally left blank. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 ii Packet Pg. 214 10.g 1.0 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Section 21155.2 of the Public Resources Code (PRC), a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) was prepared for the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, a 30-day public review and comment period commenced on December 22, 2020 and ended on January 21, 2021. Six public comments were received during the comment period. These comments are included as part of this document. No new significant environmental issues or impacts, beyond those already covered in the SCEA, were raised during the comment period. While no provisions of CEQA require a response to the comments received on the Draft SCEA, responses to the comments received have been provided below. The comments received and the corresponding responses do not (1) alter the analysis or conclusions of the Draft SCEA, (2) involve any new significant impacts, (3) involve a substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impacts, (3) require substantial revisions to the SCEA, or (4) add significant new information. 1.1 PROJECT SUMMARY The MetroWalk Specific Plan Project would include development of up to 498 residential units in four planning areas, on an approximately 20.4-acre site in the City of Santa Clarita (City) in northern Los Angeles County. The Project Site is generally located north and west of the Metrolink train tracks and east of Lost Canyon Road in the Canyon Country community of the City. The proposed residential units would comprise a mix of housing types, including market -rate apartments and townhomes, age -qualified apartments, and affordable senior apartments. A multi- use path would link the Project Site with the future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station to the east and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan Project to the north while connecting various private amenities throughout the Project Site, including park nodes, open space, a central clubhouse, and a playground. The multi -use path would terminate at a public plaza at the far eastern area of the Project Site, which would provide a publicly accessible outdoor amenity adjacent to the future Metrolink station and a connection to commercial uses, trails, and other amenities within the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area. The average density of the Project Site would be 24.6 units per acre, while the maximum allowable density permitted within the Specific Plan area would be 30 dwelling units per acre. The floor area ratio for the Project would be 0.76. The Project would require the following discretionary actions from the City: (1) a General Plan Amendment to change the General Plan land use designation from Business Park to Specific Plan; (2) a Zone Change to change the zoning designation from Business Park to Specific Plan; (3) approval of the MetroWalk Specific Plan to establish specific development standards in support of a development of up to 498 total residential units; (4) Tentative Tract Map 83087 to subdivide the property for the development of up to 498 total residential units; (5) a Development Review Permit for all new development and construction projects; and (6) an Architectural Design Review. The Project would also require the annexation of the Project Site into the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts' Jurisdictional Boundary for which approvals from the City, as well as the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and the Local Agency Formation Commissions, are needed. 1.2 REQUIRED FINDINGS The City of Santa Clarita finds, upon review of the entire administrative record, that: • The Project qualifies as a transit priority project pursuant to PRC Section 21155; City of Santa Clarita MetroWalk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 1-1 Packet Pg. 215 10.g 1.0 INTRODUCTION • The Project is consistent with the general use designations, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG); • The Project contains more than 50 percent residential use, provides a minimum net density greater than 20 units per acre, and is within 0.5 mile of a major transit stop or high - quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan; • The Project is a residential or mixed -use project as defined by PRC Section 21159.28(d); • The Project incorporates all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the prior environmental reports, including the SCAG 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR), the City of Santa Clarita One Valley One Vision PEI R, and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan EI R; • An Initial Study was prepared to identify all significant or potentially significant impacts of the Project based on substantial evidence in light of the whole record; • All potentially significant or significant effects required to be identified and analyzed pursuant to CEQA in an Initial Study have been identified and analyzed in the Initial Study prepared for the Project; and • With respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the Initial Study, changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance. Therefore, the City of Santa Clarita finds that the Project complies with the requirements of CEQA for using a SCEA as authorized pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2. Section II, Comments on the Draft SCEA and Responses, has been prepared in support of this SCEA. 1.3 ORGANIZATION OF THE FINAL SCEA This Final SCEA is organized into four sections as follows Introduction. This section (above) provides introductory information summarizing the key elements of the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act and information about the Project. Comments on the Draft SCEA and Responses. This section presents all comments received by the City during the 30-day public review period for the Draft SCEA (December 22, 2020 through January 21, 2021), as well as responses to those comments. Errata and Clarifications. This section consists of minor revisions and clarifications to the Draft SCEA in response to comments received, as well as minor staff edits. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. This section provides the full MMRP for the Project. The MMRP lists the mitigation measures by environmental topic and identifies the method of review verification, responsible agency, and timing for each measure. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 1-2 Packet Pg. 216 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES This section provides a list of commenters and copies of the comments received with responses to those comments. 2.1 LIST OF COMMENTERS Table 2.1-1, List of Commenters on the Draft SCEA, assigns a number to identify the commenter and notes the general topic area covered by each comment letter. Table 2.1-1 List of Commenters on the Draft SCEA Letter No. Ind ividual/S gnatory Affiliation, Date Comment Topics 1 Erin Wilson-Olgin California Department of 01/20/2021 Biological Resources Environmental Frog. Manager I Fish and Wildlife South Coast Region 2 Miya Edmonson California Department of 01/15/2021 Transportation and IGR/CEQA Branch Chief Transportation — District 7 Parking Office of Regional Planning 3 Ronald M. Durbin County of Los Angeles 01/19/2021 Fire Protection Services, Chief, Forestry Division Fire Department Erosion Control, Prevention Services Bureau Watershed Management, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Oak Trees, and Hazardous Materials 4 Shine Ling, AICP Los Angeles County 01/21/2021 Metrolink Facilities, Metro Manager, Transit Oriented Metropolitan Right -of -Way, Access, Communities Transportation Authority Construction Monitoring, Transportation and Transit, Parking, and Signage 5 Adriana Raza Los Angeles County 01/21/2021 Wastewater Collection Customer Service Specialist Sanitation Districts and Treatment Facilities Facilities Planning Department 6 Rick Vasilopulos Santa Clarita Valley Water 01/07/2021 Water Supply Associate Water Resources Agency Planner 2.2 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS This subsection includes copies of the comment letters received on the Draft SCEA, as identified in Subsection 2.1, List of Commenters, with the comments numbered for reference and responses to the comments. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-1 Packet Pg. 217 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-2 Packet Pg. 218 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No1 DucuSign Eryw1upe 11 Z5UA3Ba5-C1GC-4FDD-AF:8F-51A gat, te at LillifornL3 - Nap4ra I kev22urra,r 8gnlcNYEffj0W_.., Lrroor DEPARTMENT OF If AND WILDLIFE CIIARL Tom H. BONHAM-Mrac tar SaLith Coast Reqori 388-3 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 467-42011 wWwIwdIdflfP.r,8,;UoV .ha nuary, 2101, 20,21 Ms. Erika Iverson City of Santa Clarita 239120 Valencia SoUe'vard, Suite 302 Santa larll'ta® CA 913155 Subje,cl: Draft Sustalinable Communities Environmental Assessment for the Metrowalk Spe,cifilic Plan Project, CRY of Santa Claritia, Los Angeles County Dearr MS, Iverson, - 'The Ca I ifarnia IDepartmient of Fss,lt a nd W ildfife (CO FW), has reviewed the Draft Sustai nable COM MU nities IFnvironnaental Assessment (DS CFA) from the City of Santa C larita (1C ity,,, Lead Agericy) forthie Metrowalk Specific Plan Project {Protect). Thank you for the opportunity to, provide core menifis and recommendations Iregarding, those activities involved in the Project tha, t may, aff ect Ca Itfornha fish and wfldlif e, 1, ikewise, wo japprociate the opportunity to provide cornments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW,fay lawrnaq be required to carry Quit or approve through, the exercise of its own regulatory authority undoo the Fish and Game Code, ,OM is California's, Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife reS0UTCeS,and holds those resources, in trust by statule for a I I the people of the State (Fish & Game Corlee 7 I'L 7, s ubd i'vilisior (a '1802i Public Resources Code, § 21070; California EnvironmentM, Qualify Art (CEQA) Guidelines, § 151386, subdivisiori CDF:VV, in its trustee capairity, has itirisdiction ovier, the ronservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife. native plants, and Nabilall necessary for Wilogically suslal,nable populations of those species (Id,, § 1802), imilady, for gxirposes of CEQA,, CDFW is charged by I,aw to provide, as available, biological experfisc dUring public agency onviran mental review efforts, focusing spietifitally on ptolielcts atnd rollated activities that have the potential to adversely affect state fish and wildlife resources, CD,FW is alsos0rniffing comments as a Responsible Agency older CEOA (Public Resources Code, § 210691" CEOA, Guidelines, § 1,5381). C()rW expects that it lmay need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code, including lake and strearnbed alteration, regulaloryauMority (Fish & Game Code, § 1600 el seq.),, UkewJse. to the extent implorneintatOn of the Project as proposed may result in Iake"as define<i by Slate law, of any species protected! under the California Endarigiered Species Act (CESA) (Fish ame Code, § 2050 el seqj, or CESA-listed rare plant pursuant to the Native Plant Protection Act (NPPAII- Fish & Game Code, 1900 et seq.), FW recommends the, Project proponent obtain appropriate authorlization under the Fish and Game Code,, 1-1 City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-3 I Packet Pg. 219 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES ������������������������L ��e tt �e ��r ��������N ��o ��.��������������1 �������������(��C �o ��n �t �I ���n ����u ��e ��� ���) ���������������������� DazuSign Envelope 0: ------------------------- Ms, Erika Iverson City of Santa Clarita January 20, 2021 Page 2 of 14 Project IDesciripation and Surn!mary 00jective: The IproposNed Project consists of the development of up to 4198 residential units in four planning areas on an approximately 20,A-acre site in the City of Santa C[orlta, The proposed Project .,would illdUde a niuld-use patl i that would fink the Project site with the future motroll,4 Vista Canyon station to the east and the Vk� ta Caoyo,,rl Sp ocific P,lan Pirojoirt to the north, Among the residential units and paths, found throughout the Project site Will be open spa(;e, as cer)trrjl clubhouse, and a, pWygiround. The rn0fi-,use: path wouiciterrninate at a plaza at the far eastern area of the Project, site, providing access, to the future Metrolink station and a 0onneotion to the nengfrtboririg Vista Canyon SpuWkc Plan area.. Other ProjeO-relatod aafivifie,s involve the removal of existing vegetation, grading of the Project site, installation of utifity infrastructure, and road cxmstruction. Location: The Project site is SitUaled a: tittle under 1,.000 feet sojuth, of the Santa Clara (River in the Canyon Gouniry con-pnilundy of the City of Santa ClaTita in Northern, Loo Angeles County, The site its general ly bound on the west by Lost CainyOn Road ant on the south and east by the Metrollink train tr-acks, "'rho A,%%eswr's, Parcoll Niumberas%oclalad with the Projwt is 2840-004- 0139, Comments and Recommendations CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist the City inail eqwately identifying, a -voiding and)or mitigating the Projod's significant, or potenbal,ly significant, &ecl, and indorect impacts, on fish and wddlife (biologiical) resources. Project Description and Related Impact Shortcoming Comment 91: Impacts, to Sensitive Vegetation C ornmu riffles Issue. Section 4,2 of Appendix D,, Biotogical; Resources Assessment (BRA) describes "SonsiVve Plant Communities and Critical HahltaW" found on and adjaoont to the Prof act Site, Page 17 states that `approxrnately 3,5 acres COMPrises fragmented stands of big sagebrUSh sonjh_. Artemism tridendala scalp. pa rishY is not itself a rare plaint, but a, startd of this subsapecios is con&dered ,a sensitive natural community by CDFW (C D FW 21020a) due to its relative rably across the state," Arxording to California Native Plant Society (CNPS), big sagob,ru,5h scnjb (Artemisia tridendatassp paroshie) has a rarity ranking of S2, Specific impacts: Pmject-related gmunddisturbing activities,, such as grading and grulabing, may result iin the lass of a sensitive natural commonity and habitat destruction. Why impacts would occur., Project it includes grading, vegetation clearing, construcWn, and, other activities, 'This may result in; permanent loss anal potentially cfe0ino or local extirpation of a sensitive plant co,mmunity. 1-1 (Continued) 1-2 Evidence impacts would be significant, GDFW coflsiders plant cornmiunifles, alfiances, and assaciations with a statewirte rankkig of S1, S21, $3, and S4 as son sitive and doclining at the local; and regional I&ve,l (Sawyer, Lat. al, 2008),An S3 ranking indicates there are 21 to 80 1-3 occurrences of this corrimunily in existence in California, S2 has 6 to 20 occurrences, arid S1 has less than 6, occurrences, Impacts to sensitive vegetation communitiesshould be considered Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-4 I Packet Pg. 220 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES ued Ouvo8q,pil $-nmlugAa 10� our-AFBF: Ms, Erika Iverson City of Santa Clarita January 20, 2021 Page 3 of '14 significant under GE10A unless they are clearly niftigated below a level of significance. Inadequate avoidance., Tninimization, aind rnAlgation rneasures for impacts to sensw,live plant species will rc%,ull 6 the Pr9ject having a substantiaill adverse diroct, indirect,, and CUMUlat'live 1-3 effect, either directly or through habitat rnodffi,,cafions, on any species identified as a can,didate, (Continued) sensitive, orsped;al status species in local or reglonM plans, (policies, or regulations, or by CD,FW or US, Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). I Page 4- ate' of the DSCEA states tham, "[aj portiop of the Project sito is within the Santa Giara River SEA rfes ignated by the County and included in the City's, Overlay Zone."' Aczardlag to Table & Recommended Preserwation Ratios for SEA CUP of the t.,eri Anqo[es Gounty Rim, 0;1zaJ Pli'Jl2P-Jr1g ai2rlif'L'cant. Erojggc, 2,1 Implementation Guido (Los Angeles CU'Unly 2020), riatural corl'imunities ranked S2 sh0U1kJ be mitigated at a ratio, of at least 4A., Additkma0y, Table 5 also indicates that S'PQGier5 , of Special Concern (SSC) and th6r habit'als, sfiould also be m ifiga ted by at [,east a ratio of 4 1:1. 1-4 'rhe DSCEA describes the Project site as having formefly been used for agricultuireand currently disturbed, CDFW avoids applying vallue judgement on whothor a disturbed naturall 1-5 cornrnUnily ShOlUld be mitigated and to wbrai extent ' so long as the vegetation community meets, alliance criteria, regardless of presence or level of diStUftince Retornimendod Potentially Feasible Mitigatioo Wasure(s) Mitigation Measuire, #1. CQFW r%on,hrr"tends rriapping vegetation Wrnirnunities. Surveys stwuld be conducted by is qualified botani,st with approph ate experience and knowledge of southern Califoroila flora, Surveys should follow CDFW's IgL aylygXjL1g ro1�01W;Q 1-6 LQ blalU�Ld[ QU111MUOilill, (CD FW 2018). SUNOYS should be ca,rnpletod prior to imp[em�entinq ProIect-related ground disturbing activities. Mitigation Measure #2, If the Protect cannot feasibly avoid irnpacts to, sensitive vegetAlition communities. either during Project activities or over the life of tb,o Project, the Cityshould rniligato for impacts at no loss than 6-111 for S2 mx rnrminities. Utilizing a ropilacorne. nt of at beast 6-11 for ear'v"as irnpaictorl' by adivftie,% will attempt to, rem w�lly an assorti-rent of irnpacts-,, Bass of habitat located in the Saro-a Clora River SEA (which requires at least 411 ratio) the lass of Ube, sensitive vegetalion itself (which only has, 6 to 20 o(x,,urrencemin existen!ce) the loss of function of that vegetation, as habitat for SSC loss of riparian habitat in, the Santa Clara River floodplain temporal loss of ftinc3ionhiq sensitive habitat R"ornimendation 0M., In 2007, the State Legislature required CDFW to develop aiml maintain a vogelation mapping %laridard for the St:,ate (Fish & G, Code, § 194()), This, sl ndard Gomplie% za a with the, C'05'5iift'atio'n Sy-Mem, which i itilizes alliance and based clasosificatiort of un iq tie veg etatio,n st,ainds. C DFW utilizes viigetalbri dosoriptions found in the Manual of Calftmi"'a Vw1Q10UQn (MC'V) (CNIPS, 2020-, Sawyer etal, 2008)� To, dielorrnine the rarily rankirig of vegetation corarriuniliwi on the Project site, the MCA oom M u1nily nornes should be provided as,,CDFW only tracks rare natural communities using this 1-7 1-8 City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-5 I Packet Pg. 221 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES DoiruSignEnvabpe ID, Us. iErika Iverson City of Santa Clarita January 20, 2021 Page 4 of 14 classification syslem, This, would allow CI FW to appropriately comirrient on potential impacts to, sensitive plaii ar'l,d vegetation comr-nunities, Com,ment #,2 -. Impacts tea Nesting Birds Issue-, Portions of the Pmject site were hisluriciall'y used for algritulture, Page 15 of the BRA indicates that California hornod lark (EreunophM afposfiri,,�actia), a California la des of Spedal Con,cenn (S SC) , has a moderate polelifia I to be found on the Project site. It states, that "I'll hie bi,pecieb- is known to Wilize rm. overing agricultural hiabitats aart was, detecI(XJ,, during surveys for the adjacent Vista Canyon profect."' lIn a6dition, a review of California Natural ICrurersit^w, Database iCNDQQ) indicates that there, are historic observations of cmastal CaUfornia gnal-calcliler (Pairoptda cafforutcacafifonnica), an Endangered Species Act (ESA-) 4islied threatened species and an SSC, in fiTe immediate Vid ll i ly Of Irliv Project site (C:DFW 2020b y Specific impact: Project construction al'id related aclivitiles rimy result in increased nesting mod'ality,due, to mist abandonrni�,,mt or detrew,.(xl feeding frequency.. The, Projoct may rpsuft in teirnporal or permanent lbss of bird nesting habitat. Why impacts wou11d occur'. Goastal California gnalticalicher (griaticatcher) is, a non-migratoi Y, aongbmrd that occurs in or near coastal scrub vegetation corrinitinities throughout plortions of Ventura, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, and, San Diego Gwrifies-and extends, 8,0LI'th ill to n'01111WO'Stern Baja California -At the til-ne of I isting gnatcatcher Lay U SFW S in 19913, thely esfirnate(jabe,(it 2,562 pairs of ginatioalchers rentaining ilni the United Staties, (USFWS 11993). IIn a snore recent study using more riq0IMUS sampling techniquies, it,was esdinated thait there wore, 1,324 gnat(,wcher pairs in Orange and San Diego, Counfies �,Wiinchell arid Dollerly 2008). With as hrrifted rartige and the steady urbanization of Southern Cafifoi nia, the loss of coastal sage habitat is ilikelly to inhibit the racovwy,i the popkilabon, Construction ac.0vilies, mrqllinued usage of bails,. and rokitine maintenance during the breeding seasori fol, nes4rig birds could result in the truss i of fertile eggs or nes,thrigs or othierwise lead to nest abandonment, [mpacts, could result from, noise disturbances„ increased hurnan activity,, dust, grour"Nd diilurbing autiviti'e�s (e.g., staging, nouss, ex(,avaflori, and gradinU), aind vibrations caused by heavy eqWipment . The Fq'oiect as proposed WOUld clear vegetaflon that could provide bird grolind cover and shrubci)i The Wirnpiorall or permaniont IIQris of vegetabonirimy substantially i rnpact birds Olaf could return to the Project site year after year (Figueira et al. 2020; Haas 1998j, Site fidelity exhibited across the avian Umn reffects the beriefits associated with previous knowledge of a paftioular, loi Ilikely wrinprovirlg territ" acquisition. foraging efficiency, potential breeding pairtiners, and predator avoidan", fl-Iqueira et al, 2020,)- Evidence impacts would be significant: Nests of all biirtf5 and raptors are protected UrWier State laws and regulatians, ill,Ckidinq Pish and Game Code, sections 3,503 and 3503,5. Take or posses-5i,on of migratory n,Drlgarne bird5 designatiod, in the F"JeirW Migratory Bird Treaty Art of 19,18, (Code of Federal Requilations, Title 50, § 'I (). 13), Is prohibited under Fish and Game Code section 351:3 . .... I'he lozzufoccupied hiabRat oar radlictiong., in thie number of sensifive and spedial status bird) species, either directly or, indirectly through nest abandorinwerlt or reprodUCtive !suppressb,on, would constitute a significant impact absent appropriate m1figation. 1-8 (Continued) 1-9 Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-6 I Packet Pg. 222 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 1 (Continued) KuN,01K)PO 0: MIA3835,C,, Uls, Erika lversion City of Santa Clarita January 20, 2021 Page, 5 of I �4 Recommended Potentially Feasible NlitiqaUon Measuire�s) Mitigation Measure fl: C,DFVV recornmends Vie City retain a qualifled biolog[st with a griatrat(.fier survey hermit.. The quialif0d biologi,,g s4ould sory ey the, Project site to delermine, pres,enceiabsence of grialcatclier. The qualified biologist should conduct surveys according to QSFWS C Pre— Aoe _L_ J _U2L b 'en .. Survei Guidielinies (USFWS 1,997)-Tlie survey protocol requires a minimarn of six surveys 1-10 conducted at least one week apart from March 115, through June 30, and a rnlniirnum of nine sr.wvey,s at [Past lwo weeks apart from Jh�ily 1 through March 141. The 1w.lotoco. Is, ho.LJ[d he foliloweb for All Surveys unlbs,s otherwise, authorized by the USFWS in wrfti:ng,(USFW3 11997). CDFVV rucon'imends gnatGatcher survey si be cunducted, and US�FWS notified (Per [X010cW guidance) prior to throe City issuance of a grading perrnil, Mitigation MeaSUM #2': CDIPW recommends that no construction orxLAr from Flebruary 15 �Jan uary 1 for raptors through, Augu st 31 - Mitigab on Measure #3. C,DF'W recommends that a qualified avlan bilollogist with survey experileoce wndu(11 a thorough suFVOY Of ell SUitable ne,stibg, Suirveys shou Id be (,,Ompleto d no moTethan,7 days prior to the beginning of an Projoct- related ground­d1stk,jrbing actjviOes or vegetation removal Sorveys silr)Uld be ill the imatediate area pl:us a 500-fool buffer, Positive delectioas should be reported to, (',D,FW pribr tothe any Projecl- related ground disturbing act�ivities, or vagetat[on removal. Miltigation Was ure #4: If niest[ag b[rds, or raptors, are idientif red , a quallfied bioloqjsl 5 llould determine the nesting status, and set up species, -appropriate no -work buffers for construction activities, Dr- r000mmun,dt ithe folilowing minimurn ao-disturbance, buffers be implemented; 300 feot arou nd. active passerlm (perching birds and songbirds) nosts, 500, f oet arotj r1d, artive nloo-listed raptor rro'4vs and 0.5 mile around activo CESA-4imed bird mums. No, Project c-hould be aflowed inside these buffers until the qualifie d biolog isl lias diele. rmined thirst t1te birds have fledged and are no longer reliant upon the most: or parental care for, suiniwal',_ These buffers shOUld be, increased rf needed. to, protect the nesting birds. Buffers stilould be clearly delineated and marked around the active nest site as directed by the qualified biologist Temporary fencing and signageshould be maintained for the duration of the Project as deterniined by the qualified biologist A qualified biologistsh(ould advise workers of the sensitivity of than buffered areas. Workers should be advised not to, work, trospiass, or, tungage in activifies, that would disturb wresting birds inear or irlside theta buffer, Mitigation Measure #5. It should be noted that the ternporary exclusion of Project activities within nesting buffers during nesting season ma' rrot constitute effective mitigation for the, purposes of offsetting Protect impacts associated with loss ofibreeding and nesting habitat. Effective ntifigation for impacts to nesting habitat for birds requires structurally (eg., ground Cover,, SUlbqhtrubs, shrubs, and trees) And spe(jes, diverse vagetation as a pact of habitat rastoralion Additiional rnifigatijon, separate frorn impacts lo vegetation wrnrriuriities, wou[d be neCj-.$Sary to cornpensate for (tie ter nparal or" permanent loss of occupied nestirig habitat within the, Project Site. COFW recommends the qua lified bilologisUCity consult with CDFW to determine proper rndigallan for impacts, to occupied habitat 10itigation would be, based on acreage of impact and vegetation composiflon, Depending on the status of the bird species impacted, replacement of 1-12 City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-7 I Packet Pg. 223 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 1 (Continued Ms. Erika Iverson City of Santa Clarita January 20, 2021 Page, 6 of 14 habilat acres should iricrease with the OCCUrrence of an SSC. Replacement acres would further 1-12 increase with'the occurrence of a CESA-listed species, I (Continued) Recommendation #'t.: Take Underthie, ESA is more broadly defined than, CES& take under ESA also, includes, significant habitail rxi;odffication or degradation that could result in death, or injury ko a listed species !by interfering with essential behamoral patterns such as lbreeding, 1-13 foraghg, or nesting. Consultation wOlt the USFWS, in order to comply with ESA, ils advised well in advance of any ground -disturbing acfivitles and)or vegetation removal thfat may impact grkalcatcfier I Comment #3; Impacts to California Species of Special Concern Issue: CDr-W is concerned thal (Project -related activities may, result in significant impacts, to the foillowhig Species of Special Concern (SSC)-. ■Rqptifps: coastal whiptail (Aspidnsrelis 6gris steJoieged) and coast horned lizard (P'Nynosorna MammMsl- Swo Diego bWck-tailed ja(*rabbd (Le us calffiarr irwr benaeftfl) As indicaled on Page 15, of the BRA., the above 88,C have a moderate potential for occurrence on the Project site, The BRA states that coast horned lizard and San Diego jackrabbit were detected during, surveys, for the adjacent Vista Canyon Project in 2008. A review, of CNDDS shows historic records, of coastal whiptail as recentlty as 2015 on the iProject site. Specific Impact., Project oonstrartion k',md related activities,, dirpp,dy or through habitat may result ins direct il"TiLAry ar moftallity of SSG, Why impact would loccur: Project implementation includes grading,'vegetation clearing, and other activifies that may reSUR in direct mortafty, population declines, or local extirpation of: SSC reptile and niammalspecies. Evidence impact wootd be significant. An 3SC is a species, subspecies, or disfinct populafiori of an animal native to Californiiafimt carrently satisfies, ofle or (nore or u ie,rouovviing (not rieoessarily tnvtually exotasive) <xiteha'. is extirpated frorn the, State or, in the case of birds, is extirpated in its piriimary season or breediog role, is lWorfas ESA,-, btit not CESA-i, thmawriod or endatngvrod, meets the Stale defini4lori of thr(witenod or, ond.,,,wqered but has-, not formally been fisfwt is experienOng, or formefly experieriw0t, se6ovs Oioncy<Jkal) poputation, or range! rehadions (riot reversed) that, J 4orlitfrwed or resumed, could qualify it for State threatened or endangered status. has naturally sma4 populaffons, exhiblting high susceptibility to risk from any factoqs), that 0 realIzed, could lead to clecAines that would qUillify it for CES A status, (CU-W 2'020c), Project constroction and activities, directly or through habitat aimliftcation. imay res0t in direct martallity, reduced reprodoctive t"apacity, popolation deb -lines., or local extirpatibn of S,SC- CEQ pfovides protection not only for State and federally listed species, but for any species; inducling 1-14 Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-8 I Packet Pg. 224 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES DocuSign Envelope �D: 250XM35-ClOC41FDLLetter No. 1 (Continued) J Ms. Erika Iverson City of Santa Clar[ta January 20, 20121 Page 7 of 14 brut not limited to SSC , WIfliCh Can be, shown, to meet thie criteria for State listing. These SSC meet the CEQA definition of rare, threatened, or enidangiered species (CEQA Gu[delines, § 15065),. Take of SSC could require a mandatoryfinding of significance by the City, (C,EQA G Welines, § 150615),, Recornmended Potentially Feasibte Mitigation Measure(s) M[figation MeasureI: Pursuant to the Gi111foraii-tCode of Regidatioris, title i section 650, One Cllylqoalifleltj biologist must obtain appropriate handling pernijits to oaptore, temporarily possess, and relboate wildtife to avoid harm or moirtalily in connection with Pri constariction and activities, Please visit CD,FW"s Scientific Collection Permits webpage fir information (CiDrW 2020d), An LSD Agreement may Provide similar take or possession of specles as described in the conditions of the agreerneriiL CDFW has theatithiority to issue rkeirrnitsfor the take, or possession, of wildlife, indludiniq irnammals, birds, nests, and eqgsi reptiles, �,imphibians, fish, piants, apd invertebrates (Fish & G� Cocle,§§ 1002, 10021,5, 1003). Effective October 1, 2018, a Scientific Collecting Permill is requ1ired to monitor project limplacts on wddlife resources, as, required by environmental diocus,nen4s, 1permits, or Wier legal authorizations; and, to capihoe, ternporar"fly possess, and reloicalle wildlife to avoid hartin Or mortality jo-1 con'nectior"i with oithierwise lawful aclivitle% (Cal. Code Regs,, hL 114, § 6,50).. Mitigation Measure #2: The City sh,i retain a qualified bioloi with experience surveying for or is fainiliar with the life, history of each of the follawing species, coastal whiptail, coast horried Uard, and San Oiego black -tailed jackrabbit, The qkmfifibd biologist stimdd coriduct, facused surveys for SSC and suitablie habitat no mare lboa one, month front thestartof any ground -disturbing acdYkiles, or vegetation removal where thiere may be impacts to SSC. In addrtibni, the qualified biologist should conduct daily biological monitoring during any activities involvingvegelation clearing or modificii of natural habilat. Positive detections of SSC airld sk,iitablehabitat at the detection location should Ibe jrnaplped and pholographed., The qualified biologist shiould provide a summary ireport of SSC surveys to the City Prior to imptemendnig any Project-relailed gfOLIflid-disturbing activibes and velgetation renioval. IC epending, on the s,urvey resuRs, a qualified biologist should develop !species -specific mitigation rneasures rair implemierita1k.m during the Project,, 1-14 (Continued) 1-15 1-16 Mitigation Measure #3., Wildlife should be protected, alliowed to movo aw,ay on its own (rion- invasive, Passive relocation),, or relocated to, adjacent appropriate habitat on site, or to suitable habitat adjacent to the project area. SSC shoal- d be captured only Ib,y a qualified fied biologist: with proper handling pern'tits, T["w qaalifieid biologist should prepare, a species spedific bsit for plan), of 1-17 proper hand I in g and re loratiorl protocx)l s a rid a rni Of $ UJURNO il nd safe, relocatiou areas. A relocation, plan should be submitted to the City pricir to iimplernenting any Prm ct-re[ ted gmund- le a disturbing arfivities and vegetation removaiL Mifigatiort Measure, #4, The City, k-1 COMIL11tati011 With a qualified bioli should praparea'i awarieriess tririrmirug. The qualified biolbgist shorn ild to 1-18 workers, that upon en,counteir wilh an SSC (e,gj,, during canstruction or equilPM011 inspections), work must stop, a qualifier)) biologist must be notified, and work may only resurne once a quallified biologist has d , 'etermined that it is safe to do, so. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-9 I Packet Pg. 225 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 1 (Continued) 1,'100,k$400 K'UVV0k,*(1, 10s, Erika Iver.5on City of Santa Clarita January 20, 2021 Page 8 of I 4 Mittgation Measure #5: It any SSC are harmed dUring relocation or a dead or injured animal is foundl,, work to the Omodiate area StIOU111b stop immodiately, thoquafified bla,logist should be notifled, arid dead or irfured wildlife &xrj!n,,ienled. A formal repcord shoold be,",,rgt to C,DF'W and 1-19 the City willbinthraeralend,,ar day-s of the irgoideni or finding. Work in the immediate (3rWI May onty resurne oncle the proper notifications have been rnade and additibn6l rnifigation meaSLffes, have been identiffed to prevent additional injury or 4eaffi. l Filling Fees The Project', ais proposerf, wui flid have an imp',Ilct on fisflii zindlor wildlife, and aszessirnent of filing f ems is flecvs,�safy, Ftms are payable m.,Apon fifing of fige, Notice of De lermi riation by t he Lenart Agency and serve, to help defray the oast of environmentall review by CE)FW, IPayrament or thefee 1-20 is, required'Jinni orderfor the underlying Project approval to be operative, vested, and,finaL(Cal. Code Regis, tl. 14, § 753.5;, Fish & Garise Code, § 711.4,", iPub. Resources Code!, § 2108,9)- Conclusion We approll6atothe opporl'UnillY 1,0, ('OMM6111, On tho Pmject to a%sist tho City of Santa Oarita in, adoquately analyzing and mi,'nirniziogli-oftilgiting impaicts, to biological reSrokrroe$, CDFW rfM�kje'm'S an opportunity to review,and coinrrtenl on army response that the City li,as to our con'unents and 1-21 to rec6ve nolification of any forthcorr"Ong ttearing date(s,) fog, the Project [CEQA Guid:elirne% § 'I.5073(e)]- If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter, please, contact Andrew, Valand, Envimnmiental Scientist, at,kndrew Vaand t.')'wifldl!fe.Ga.gav or (562) 342-2142, Sin!Cdffely„ ur Erinn Wilm)n-Olgirg Environmerital Program Manager 1I South Coast Region ec: CDFW Victoria Tarig, Los,Alamilvs QwRdkh-,xa,,,aQ Amdrew Va[and, Uxs A[amilus - Andle 20W, Felicia SOva, Lm Atairniilos Ruby Kwart-Qavis, t os Xamitos - Susan Howell, San Diego CE.O,,A Pro rare Coordiinator, Sacrarnento -- CEgAcornrnerttletters L&W.1ellife.ca.gov State Clearinghouse, Sacrarnento - State,Cl,e�rir,ilr°jiflitgous.e(ib"D - - - - I -I Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-10 I Packet Pg. 226 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 1 (Continued) OrI(xiSign Ii Irsga r IT Y A Ms,- Erika Ilverson it o:f Santa Clarita ,JATI Uary 20 2021, Page 9 of 14 References Calif ovlia Clelaartrrr uut of Fish and Wildlife, [CDFW], 10,41rc4i 20,20,18, Ptolo(,,ohs for Surveying and Lvaluating Impacts to SperJM Status Native Plaint PopulatIons, and Natural ommunities (see [CDFWbl Caftriiia Dopartment of FFsh and WiOdlffe, 210120, Galil`Orda Natumiral Diversify Datalbase_ Avail ab[e frorn, h i 11,wildlif P,.ca. nvfDa4al NDID13 [CDFWa] Califomia Department of: 11sh and Oidlite-2020,. Natural Communities, Accessed at: l,M;)s)/wijdRe,r 1,fi�oviDitiiVeiGAMPIN,rltkir,,1;11, [fCDFWd] California IDepartment QIFish and Wildlife. 210,20- Scientific Calleching Permit. Available from, httr.)s:.flwfli ca [CDFW(,,) Cralifofnjiia Departmeril of Fi.0 and Wildlife, 2020, Sg)eci,es of Spe(,,ial Conoern Accessed at" California Native Plaint Society, 2020. Rare Plant ranks, Available from h4tys, Rgaleira L et aL 2020 Effects of bireediirq and niolt activity on songbird site fide5ty., The Auk, htIiPs:,//doI,ouw,l 0,, 1 0931aukJu kaaO 53, Haas, C, IWJ8- of Prior Nes-I[iing on Sitiii Fideidy ond rr.r uiuirrr D�spersai: An Dperariental Approach, The Auk, Vo�brne '115, Isstie 41 (.Ictober 1998, Pages 929-936. Los Ang,elens Cou My De partment of Regional Planning. 2020. Sig nificaM Ecolog ical Areas Program. Ayaiilab[ii from-, juj [j,Qg­d Qld-g Ij J, Sawyer, N Keeler Wolf, T., and Evens J,M, 2008,,A mi of California Vagetation, 2"J ed. ISSN 978 0 943460 49 9 [US,FWS] UrRiteil 511 Fisih amid Wildlife Service. 19,97, Coaslwl Caldomia Griat'"(0,ar (Polioptila cah(ornica caMornica) PresencelAbsence Survey Quideliines February 28, 1997, Available from: litt�p,s,,Iiwww,fws.g!ovlve,nt�uraidocs/saeciels/protoco,ls/c�aagn�c.oas;t�al- [USEWS] U. S. Fish and Wildiffe Service. 11993. Enda ngered andAhreatened wildIffe a nd plants, determination of threatened status for the coastal California gnatcalcher, Mard') 30, 19,93. Final rule. Fedlerall Register 58,; 16742-1675t Winchell, C.S., anxi P.F. Diolherty. 2008. Using California gnalcatcherto test underlyin,g rnodelis of habitat conservation ,Flans.. Journal of"WtIdNfe, Management 72., Ill 32 2- 132 7, City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-11 I Packet Pg. 227 1 (3 0 10 0 0 �7, —0 2 ;P-m >' :IF 54- 0 D w 0 CD -05 E 4 w.a .j ft 'E q 0 VO -0 cm 1 4� Yz� 21. - a 0 0 UM V) m LD 0 0 m IL c w do Z c 0 0 CL q��:7�M E im ....... . ... M 0 0 A, .2 0, C, > —� 0 -0 CL -0 EL ij') E v F-i mu Q E Kv ) m o M I10 r -- 0 E Aj 1, w -DO — E 2 u cn t to 10 E tiar m CL U) C7 r- CL A), . ..... 06 -z > . E to 0 m F, "Z7 E 75 # 0 D M 0 u > m V) UJ U) u m o' E, z- u U ii 5 0) 'a do IS 13 E C u o' > Z 0 lilo 2 0) U) w 10 0 �20 � 00 t71 O P '^ w z O a w 0 z Q W H LL 2 H z O H z w U O N 0 Li 9 N C N p U N ,CL, u CL u m 6 qh mGa�",M0 V) E Iz w CL If 0 CL (A -C M, 0 6 0 r6 8 c > m Kn -cn cL 0 fj 4z 2 n 0 (0, V) CL 0 0 _j ra c M = 10, C4, Z CL cn— c E Jo 0 it6 ra . . ............. . r; m o 01 CL Z E 0 W R, in — 0 m LL, 0 0 xz c mm, 0 Lu m rM, q, a] EL t5 0, 10L ,b p W S, '4� 8 c 0 o I M-, ..Q C E1152, la) Q a 0 E om w W, 5 -.p w E c '19 E- v L) c F- fn w U 16- E 4� 4) Z" CL 0 Q.- EL 0 E 2 m iLl c-1 1: "1 0a 0 1 , a] OL 7 CZ CL 0 E u c rh CL u a o r- n. (D m m L) u (n tom,cc LD S E �c 0 N t71 O P '^ W z O a W 0 z Q U LLLL L�G W L2 r z O H z W U 0 N W C_ N0 0 P U 152 2 - o 0 .2 . .�4q r Z ILL., a- IQ �47 r a ;_ CZ,4 wCL L,1,prL ] a `�CL �2� C E I�K X Ea �. r ° 0.f ,_� tu:0 , im - E MCD a ;� �o ur �5 ,. 'dim ' , , ,,a�� .b 0 7 �a i 2 a ., '�` X Q OF A LW� .. era . E 0 .,al � 1� a D ,��sa° CD 0'2cl o 2 E E E �a"� 4-04 , �, IcWL�», �. m ��� m era N 1 o Qtm 6tn inI W 14 0 N U, U, U, 2; Cc Cc IS r W) Q) 0 w'rn, 2. V's C M 0 C) F) 0Atia 0 44 0,m CL W E c rq c Z, ZED t LL to . 5 I —,. 'a c 0 m M a C Cl 0 EO Z-7, =_ - c Q m = F . 0) 0 m Ln uj tQ 1= 0) E ru 10 U_ c V) CID 0 w c c) M; 0 44 'a F -a c 0 L)S 0 0 con, -u M 73 0 a 2 (f) 0 "0 E w E 10 E Z 0 tf , > W, 0 0 "EL -0 — 0 . . ...... . > > CD IFL 0 OL 611 va -E imL 14, E E M 0 @ 0 0 N r a" 12 2 rA 0— M M > E 8� cn, -0 LO Z y rya V) > z m V� 7D CD M M 0 0 W 0 0 (13 a) m C (D J= W uj 'V E > 7r N t5 0 0— far a G. lo 01— U), eAl t LU 5 E 04 F > 0 C m ci m C) C) -5 rl. -0 II !tz l a 04 0 v ml 0 1. 4w Co W, W m 3 2 !� w 0 01) 0 MAO, 0 It 0 0 �= 0 10 �20 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 1 Erin Wilson-Olgin Environmental Prog. Manager I South Coast Region California Department of Fish and Wildlife 3883 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA 92123 Comment No. 1-1 This introductory comment acknowledges receipt of the Draft SCEA for the Project and introduces specific comments from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). This comment also identifies the statutory responsibilities of CDFW as California's Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. In addition, the comment summarizes the Project Description. Comment No. 1-2 The Project Site contains approximately 3.5 acres of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridendata) scrub, including a mix of subspecies of A.t. parishii (Parish's big sagebrush). While this is not a rare plant, A.t. parishii scrub is a habitat designated sensitive by CDFW due to its relative rarity across the State. CDFW asserts that Project -related impacts to the on -site vegetation would be significant and recommends that this impact be mitigated by mapping on -site vegetation and by compensating for impacts to big sagebrush scrub at ratio. As stated in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA and the Metro Walk Project Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. in October 2020, which was included in Appendix D of the Draft SCEA, impacts to sensitive vegetation communities would be less than significant because the on -site big sagebrush scrub is in degraded condition. CEQA only requires mitigation measures if substantial evidence exists of potentially significant environmental impacts. In particular, Section 15126.4(a)(4)(A) of the CEQA Guidelines states that there must be an essential nexus between the mitigation and a legitimate government interest (i.e., potential significant impact). Furthermore, even though no mitigation measures are necessary, the mitigation ratio recommended by CDFW is excessive because it is not proportional to the Project's less -than - significant impact. Moreover, the CDFW-proposed mitigation ratio substantially exceeds recent ratios for higher quality habitats of this type of vegetation community in the Santa Clarita Valley. Higher quality habitats are areas that contain high -quality resources, such as contiguous areas of structurally diverse vegetation with food and water sources, or areas that support a disproportionately higher density of nesting birds (e.g., habitat selection or habitat occupancy).' Comment No. 1-3 Stands of A.t. parishii are listed as a Provisional Association with an S2 ranking. The provisional label is assigned when CDFW has fewer than 10 stands sampled but which they expect will prove to be more widespread.2 During the survey, big sagebrush was in bloom, and the shrubs were identifiable to the subspecies level. Based on the survey, it was determined that approximately Johnson, Matthew D., Measuring Habitat Quality: A Review, The Condor, Vol. 109, No. 3, 2007, pp. 489-504. 2 California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Natural Communities website, available at https://wildlife.ca.gov/DataNegCAMP/Natural-Communities/List, accessed on January 27, 2021. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-17 Packet Pg. 233 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES 50 percent of big sagebrush individuals possessed characteristics of A.t. parishii. Because the stands are not dominated by A.t. parishii, and the ecological significance is further diminished by their limited acreage, isolation from intact habitats, and the fact that most of the stands on -site have been disturbed (refer to Figure 4 of the BRA), the standardized quantitative rarity and threat parameters and weighted scores for rarity and threats should not be applied to this isolated population. Comment No. 1-4 While the Project is located within the designated Los Angeles County Santa Clara River Significant Ecological Area (SEA), County SEA standards do not apply to incorporated cities; instead, project proponents within the City are subject to the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (Section 17.38) and General Plan, and projects must undergo a Conformance Review. The Santa Clara River was designated an SEA primarily because of the threat of loss of suitable habitat for the unarmored threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus williamsoni), a federally and State -listed endangered species.3 This species formerly occurred in the Los Angeles, San Gabriel, and Santa Ana rivers but is now restricted to San Francisquito Canyon, three areas in the Santa Clara River, and San Antonio Creek on Vandenberg Air Force Base. The adjacent floodplain of the Santa Clara River was included in this SEA to preserve this habitat. The Project area, while it currently supports a mixed and isolated population of big sagebrush, has routinely been disturbed for agricultural purposes, and neither population of big sagebrush provides suitable habitat for three-spined stickleback nor supports natural riparian vegetation that decreases runoff (e.g., erosion, siltation) of stickleback habitats downstream. In fact, because of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan development, the intervening urban development, including buildings and roadways, interrupts connectivity with the Santa Clara River. The Project would not contribute significantly to any direct or indirect impacts to the Santa Clara River. Given the prevalence of non-native species, the disturbed condition of the Project Site and routine agricultural history, along with the adjacent construction, the Project site should not be considered SEA under the City's SEA definition. Furthermore, CDFW's recommendation is not in line with the requirements for other projects in the area or as described in the Los Angeles County SEA guidelines. As described in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA and on page 18 of the BRA, it is clear that although a portion of the Project Site is within the Santa Clara River SEA, the Project Site is distinct from the Santa Clara River hydrologically and ecologically and is also physically separated. The Project Site does not exhibit unique physical or biological diversity, and no offset is warranted here. Comment No. 1-5 Please refer to responses to Comment Nos. 1-3 and 1-4 above. Comment No. 1-6 CDFW recommends mapping of vegetation communities by a qualified botanist with appropriate experience and knowledge of southern California flora, following CDFW's 2018 Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive 3 California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Special Animals List, November 2020, available at: https:Hnrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentlD=109406&inline, accessed on January 27, 2021. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-18 Packet Pg. 234 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Natural Communities.4 CDFW asserts that surveys should be completed prior to implementing Project -related ground disturbing activities. Vegetation communities within the Project area have been mapped and are illustrated in Figure 4, Vegetation and Land Cover Types (page 11 of the BRA). As described in the BRA, the Project Site is regularly maintained and consists primarily of ruderal habitat. Scattered patches of big sagebrush have emerged on the Project Site, as shown on the BRA's vegetation map. As described on page 17 of the BRA, two recognized subspecies of Artemisia tridentata: A.t. tridentata and A.t. parishii were observed on the Project Site. Because the two subspecies are difficult to differentiate, pursuant to the Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities, a focused visit to the Project Site was conducted on in September 2019, when the plants were in flower for the sole purpose of determining which subspecies was/were present and to obtain an indication of the prevalence (e.g., estimated total numbers, percent cover, density) of A.t. parishii in the Project area. As indicated in the BRA, the Project Site contains big sagebrush scrub, the mapping of which was based on a supplemental focused protocol survey. Therefore, additional vegetation surveying and mapping are not warranted. Given the chronic disturbance at the Project Site, the prevalence of non-native species, the small acreage of native habitat present, the mixing of the sagebrush subspecies within the habitat patch, the Project Site's position surrounded by existing development, and the survey already conducted, there is no need for another vegetation community survey, as requested by CDFW. Comment No. 1-7 CDFW asserts that the City should offset impacts to the sagebrush community at a 6:1 ratio. However, as stated above, CEQA only requires mitigation measures if substantial evidence exists of potentially significant environmental impacts. Nevertheless, even if mitigation would be necessary to reduce a significant impact to less than significant, the CDFW-proposed 6:1 ratio is grossly disproportionate to much higher quality suitable habitat present in the area. For example, with the Newhall Ranch project, a major development project on which CDFW served as the CEQA lead agency,5 where, unlike the Project, there were intact, high quality examples of this type of habitat, CDFW required mitigation at a ratio of 2.5:1, substantially less than the 6:1 ratio that it now proposes. In addition, please refer to responses to Comment Nos. 1-3 and 1-4 above Comment No. 1-8 CDFW recommends that, to determine the rarity ranking of vegetation communities on the Project Site, the Manual of California Vegetation (MCV) alliance/association community names be provided as CDFW only tracks rare natural communities using this classification system. CDFW 4 California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Sensitive Natural Communities, March 20, 2018. 5 California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Newhall Ranch Resource Management and Development Plan and Spineflower Conservation Plan EIS/EIR (SCH # 2000011025), available at https://wildlife.ca.gov/Regions/5/ Newhall, accessed on January 27, 2021. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-19 Packet Pg. 235 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES asserts that this would allow them to appropriately comment on potential impacts to sensitive plants and vegetation communities. Vegetation communities within the Project area are illustrated on Figure 4, Vegetation and Land Cover Types (page 12 of the BRA). The MCV alliance/association community names are listed in Table 2.2-1, Summary of Estimated Vegetation/Land Cover Types for the Project Area, below. Table 2.2-1 Summary of Estimated Vegetation/Land Cover Types for the Project Area Habitat Class Plant Community or Land Cover (MCV/CDPW CA Code) Conservation Status, Rank Acres Scrub/Shrubland Parish's Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. parishii) Shrubland Association [35.110.16] [Disturbed] Provisional G2/S2 3.5 Herbaceous Non -Native Grasses and Forbs Mapping Unit Not Ranked 16.8 Source: Rincon Consultants, Inc., Metro Walk Project Biological Resources Assessment, May 2020. The conservation status rank (G2S2) is diminished by limited acreage, isolation from intact habitats, and on site disturbance. Therefore, application of the standardized quantitative rarity and threat parameters and weighted scores for rarity and threats are not appropriate for this isolated population. Comment No. 1-9 CDFW asserts that Project construction and related activities may result in increased nesting mortality due to nest abandonment or decreased feeding frequency. CDFW states that the Project may result in temporal or permanent loss of bird nesting habitat. CDFW recommends five mitigation measures and provides additional clarification of the definition of harm under the Endangered Species Act. The referenced section of the BRA states that CDFW has designated the California horned lark as a Watch List species. The comment's reference to this species as a California Species of Special Concern (SSC) is not accurate. Based on the literature review and field surveys performed, the horned lark has a moderate potential to occur within the Project Site as identified on page 15 of the BRA. Potential impacts to California horned lark are described on page 22 of the BRA. As identified in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA and the BRA, the Project Site does not support habitat suitable for nesting coastal California gnatcatchers (CAGN). The Project Site is disturbed, and remaining on -site vegetation is big sagebrush scrub and not the coastal sage scrub preferred by this species. The Project Site is also surrounded by development and lacks topography. As described in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA and on page 16 of the BRA, if CAGN is in the vicinity, it would most likely occupy undeveloped areas to the south of the Fair Oaks residential development where large contiguous intact stands of coastal sage scrub occur. Historic occurrences in the vicinity of the Project Site were located in habitat that consists of coastal sage scrub, which is absent from the Project Site. As such, the species is not expected to occur, and protocol surveys are not warranted. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-20 Packet Pg. 236 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Comment No. 1-10 CDFW states that the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) has historic observations of coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), an Endangered Species Act (ESA) -listed threatened species and an SSC, in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site. CDFW adds that "with a limited range and the steady urbanization of Southern California, the loss of coastal sage habitat is likely to inhibit the recovery of the population," which would lead to a significant impact absent appropriate mitigation. Mitigation Measure #1 under Comment #2 requests that the City retain a qualified biologist with a gnatcatcher survey permit. The qualified biologist should survey the Project Site to determine presence/absence of gnatcatcher. The qualified biologist should conduct surveys according to USFWS. As discussed in response to Comment No. 1-9 above, CAGN is not expected to occur on -site. Additionally, as described in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA and on page 23 of the BRA, federal and State laws prohibit the destruction of birds and their nests, eggs, and nestlings. If bird species are nesting on the Project Site, construction activities could inadvertently cause mortality or destruction of the nest in violation of these laws. Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would prevent this by requiring pre -construction nesting bird surveys in advance of construction activities in the nesting season and installation of an avoidance buffer if nests are encountered. Thus, additional mitigation is not warranted. Comment No. 1-11 CDFW recommends three mitigation measures to address potential impacts related to nesting birds. The measures recommend limiting the timing of construction, pre -construction surveys, and implementation of avoidance measures, including no -disturbance buffers. These recommended actions are already incorporated into Mitigation Measure BIO-2 in the Draft SCEA. Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would require pre -construction nesting bird surveys to be conducted during the breeding season, along with avoidance of any active nests that are detected and an appropriate avoidance buffer. As such, additional mitigation is not warranted. Comment No. 1-12 CDFW states that temporary exclusion of Project activities within nesting buffers during nesting season may not constitute effective mitigation for the purposes of offsetting Project impacts associated with the loss of breeding and nesting habitat and adds that additional mitigation, separate from impacts to vegetation communities, would be necessary to compensate for the temporal or permanent loss of occupied nesting habitat within the Project Site. The overall habitat quality of the Project Site is low, and the loss of the on -site ruderal and disturbed sagebrush scrub vegetation would not significantly reduce the extent of available nesting bird habitat in the region. There are large swaths of high -quality and contiguous areas of nesting habitat to the south of the Project area. Therefore, the temporary exclusion of nesting birds that may utilize the Project Site is not considered a significant impact warranting additional mitigation or compensation. Comment No. 1-13 CDFW cites a portion of the federal definition of "take" under the ESA related to indirectly or directly harming a listed species. Harm in the definition of "take" in ESA regulations means, "an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such act may include significant habitat modification or City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-21 Packet Pg. 237 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES degradation, where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering." As described in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA and the BRA, no wildlife species are expected to occur on the Project Site that are listed, proposed for listing, or candidates for listing as threatened or endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under the ESA or the CDFW under California ESA (CESA). Given the current environmental setting (i.e., baseline conditions) on the Project Site, development would not result in a significant habitat modification or degradation where it would actually kill or injure wildlife, indirectly or otherwise. In addition, per Mitigation Measure BIO-2, a pre -construction survey is required to ensure Project actions would not result in the direct injury or killing of a listed bird species. Therefore, consultation with the USFWS to comply with the ESA is not warranted in this case. Furthermore, construction of the Project would be subject to all applicable federal, state, and local regulations to protect nesting birds, including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Section 3503. Comment No. 1-14 CDFW has stated that Project implementation includes grading, vegetation clearing, and other activities that may result in direct mortality, population declines, or local extirpation of SSC reptile and mammal species. As addressed in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA and the BRA, the Project would remove all existing habitat, including on -site shrubs that provide nesting habitat, from the 20.4-acre Project Site. The black -tailed jackrabbit is a mobile species, and most individuals would be expected to avoid construction equipment. In the event that jackrabbits are not able to escape, injury or mortality to individual jackrabbits could occur due to being struck or crushed by vehicles. This impact would be especially acute if mother jackrabbits were injured or killed while tending their young. Similarly, since coastal whiptails and coast horned lizards are low -mobility species, it is unlikely they would be able to escape injury or mortality during site grading. Without mitigation and consistent with CDFW's comment, the Project's impacts on the black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptails, and coast horned lizards would be potentially significant. However, these impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level by the relocation efforts required by Mitigation Measure BIO-1, during which qualified biologists would survey the Project Site for these species and usher them off -site if encountered. Because the habitat to be removed is largely in a degraded condition, and because habitats for the black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptails, and coast horned lizards are abundant regionally, loss of habitat would not significantly impact these special -status species. Comment No. 1-15 CDFW recommends that the City retain an authorized and qualified biologist(s) with appropriate handling permits to capture, temporarily process, and relocate wildlife to avoid harm or mortality during Project construction activities. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 in the Draft SCEA stipulates that collection and relocation of animals shall only occur with the proper handling permits. Comment No. 1-16 CDFW recommends that the City retain an authorized and qualified biologist(s) with experience surveying for or is familiar with the life history of the coastal whiptail, coast horned lizard, and San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-22 Packet Pg. 238 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Mitigation Measure BIO-1 in the Draft SCEA requires a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for special -status species 30 days prior to grading activities and that the results of the surveys be provided to the City. CDFW's recommendation is noted, but no additional mitigation measures are necessary because the pre -construction survey by a qualified biologist and acquisition of proper handling permits would result in a less -than -significant impact. Comment No. 1-17 Mitigation Measure BIO-1 requires a qualified biologist to conduct surveys for special -status species 30 days prior to grading. The measure also states that relocation will occur through live capture and release, or in the case of black -tailed jackrabbits, by encouraging the animals to leave the site. Individuals shall be relocated to nearby undisturbed areas with suitable habitat, as identified by the qualified biologist in consultation with City staff. With approval from City staff of the proposed relocation area, a separate relocation plan would not be warranted. CDFW's recommendation is noted, but no additional mitigation measure is necessary. Comment No. 1-18 CDFW recommends that the City, in consultation with a qualified biologist, prepare a worker environmental awareness training. Mitigation Measure BIO-2 requires construction personnel instructed on the ecological sensitivity of nesting bird protective buffer areas. Nevertheless, the following mitigation measure (Mitigation Measure B1O-3), which involves a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) as an effective additional means of minimizing impacts on biological resources, has been added in response to Initial Study Checklist Question IV.a on page 4-50 of the Draft SCEA (see Section 3.0, Errata and Clarifications, of this Final SCEA, for this addition): Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Worker Environmental Awareness Program. Prior to initiation of all construction activities (including staging and mobilization), all personnel associated with project construction shall attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training, conducted by a qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status biological resources Potentially occurring in the Project area. This training will include information about San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptail, coast horned lizard, California horned lark, loggerhead shrike, as well as other special -status species with potential to occur in the Project area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of special -status species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of special -status resources, review of the limits of construction and measures required to avoid and minimize impacts to biological resources within the work area, and all reporting requirements. A fact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employees, and other personnel involved with construction of the project. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer documenting then have attended the WEAP and understand the information presented to them. The crew foreman shall be responsible for ensuring crew members adhere to the guidelines and restrictions designed to avoid impacts to special -status species. This change does not result in the Project creating any new or increased significant environmental impact already identified in the Draft SCEA. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-23 Packet Pg. 239 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Comment No. 1-19 Should an SSC be inadvertently harmed during construction, the Project applicant, in coordination with the biological monitor, will comply with all necessary federal, State, and local regulations, including providing notification to CDFW. In addition, contractors will be required to attend a WEAP training that would discuss avoidance and minimization measures to protect special -status species and how to report observations of said species, should they occur. As such, no additional mitigation measures are warranted. Comment No. 1-20 The Project would comply with the payment of fees upon filing of the Notice of Determination Comment No. 1-21 CEQA does not impose the same requirements on a project that is eligible for evaluation under a SCEA as a mitigated negative declaration (CEQA Guidelines Section 15073(e)) as cited in CDFW's comment. CEQA does not require preparation of responses to comments received on the Draft SCEA. Pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21155.2(4) and (5), the lead agency shall consider and review all comments received prior to acting on the SCEA. Nonetheless, responses were provided to each comment received on the Draft SCEA as presented in this Final SCEA and will be included in the administrative record for consideration by the decision makers prior to acting on the Project. Comment No. 1-22 As identified in responses to Comment Nos. 1-6 through 1-8, 1-10 through 1-13, and 1-15 through 1-17, no additional mitigation measures are necessary. Mitigation Measure MM-BIO-11, regarding SSC Worker Training and presented as Mitigation #4 under Comment #3 in CDFW's comments above, has been incorporated as Mitigation Measure 131O-3 in the Final SCEA (see Section 3.0, Errata and Clarifications, of this Final SCEA, for this addition). Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-24 Packet Pg. 240 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES 5EQQLIJ�4 0'aj� 7 UaUrEQ A 4213.117, 1 1 ICI� DISTR [CT 7- 0 FF[CE OF REtZONAL PLANNI NGI ,100 S NIAI Ni SI RE El'. SUTE 100 ANGEL ES, 0A W01 2 PRONE Q131266 3674 FAX l213)8-97-1337 TTY 7 11 January 15, 2�021 City of Santa Clarito Planning Division Atin, Erika Iversom. Associate Planner 23920 Valen6a Boulievard, Suite 302 Santa Qarita,, CA 9,11355 RE: MetroWalk Spedfic Plan Projod - Sustainable Con"irnurdfles Environmental Assessment (SCEA), SCH# 20201204,33 G-rs-A 07-11-A-2,020413461 Vic- LA- 14 PM R32.027 Dear Erika , Nerso,n, Th@nk you for including the California 0epairtmont of Transportation (Cailtrzms) in tho envirenmen'tal review process for the above referenced project. 11"he MetroWatkr Spe("KiC P1811 Project would iin,ciumde development of up to 49,8 re&denbal arritg that WOUldl comprise a mix of hosisibg types, including market -rate apartments and townhomes, age -qualified apartments, arud affordable senior alpartmenis. A multij-use pallor w)tald [ink the Projer.1 9mtp with Mar future, Metro knk Vista Canyon Stalion to the east and time Vista Canyon Spacific Plan Project to the north while (3onner�tJng various privale amanibcji3 throughout the, Projeot Site, imliuding park nodes, opan space., a central clbbhouso, and a playground. The rnul4use path, would teiTHrrate at a plaza at the far easterq'm,,Lirea of the Pmject Site, whid'i would provide as publicly accessible Outdoor, arnerl'tY 2-1 adpacent to the future Metrolink station anti a connection lo cornirnercW, uses, trails, and other amonities within,thy: Vista Canyon Specific Flan area. Giverm tho Project's, density and proximity , to Vansit, it is considiRred a Transit Priority Project JPP), el ogili)le ter CEQA csVearniming Ilaamrauant toCalifornia Public Resouums Code (PIRC) SeGtion 21156. Th& nearest State facility In the proposed project us State Rbute 14. After reviewinq the SCEA, Galtrans has ff ie friftwinq cornrnerits� Cattrans. acknorMDdgas @nd supportsinfilll development Mail prioritizes nearby transit service, lillk,e the proposed IProjamct Wins to facilitale. However, fte to MR amount of -car parking, than MetroWaW Speck Plan lProject is stNII designed in a way that induoes dernand for additionall vehicle trips. 2-2 This defnand should be addressed with apprupHate design and FrIanagegrient principlJes. caltrarls supports redUCing the annount. of parking whenever (possible, Research looking at the re-lations'llip between land -use, parking, and transportation indiCales that car parking prioritizes driving above, all nither tfavel modes, and undermines a corrmunity';' abiffly Io choose public transct and ac-tivel City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-25 I Packet Pg. 241 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter.............................................................. ............................................................ Pnka Iverson January 15, 20,21 P,age 2 modes of traosportation,. For anyicomrrilunity or city to be.ffor 5upport all, modes al' Iran sportal lion 2-2 Management (TIDM) measures as an alternative to requiring car parking. � (Continued) A,ddifionaKy, any transporlatjon of heavy construction equiprnent andior inaterials whid'1 equires use of aversized-Irans port. veliicles w,i State highways will require a Caltrans vansportallorl 2-3 pern"rit., Ariy work Itial would affect. tine freeways and its fa('J'lifies, Caltrarts, Vnas t1tejurisdidion. far review ar"Pid approval, We recorrirriend tame size truck triips, be inkited to off-peak 1001TIMUte period ei.. If you have any questions, please contact pro.iect coo4,ft@tOrr AnMorry Higgins, at airitl,iony,higgins,,qdot ,ca. gov,aindrefer tc)GTS#107-LA-202�0-103461 MIYA EDIVONSON IGRICEQA Branch Chief M Scott Morga n, State, Clcarin,q house dAro'��Vuh�i W'P�d"#''rwws aijkfi""Wu " or"vomm, ,And h"O'Oov Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-26 I Packet Pg. 242 1 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 2 Miya Edmonson IGR/CEQA Branch Chief California Department of Transportation — District 7 Office of Regional Planning 100 S. Main Street, Suite 100 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Comment No. 2-1 This introductory comment summarizes the Project Description and identifies the Caltrans facility near the Project Site. No specific comment regarding the contents of the Draft SCEA was provided. Comment No. 2-2 This comment asserts that the Project is currently designed to provide an amount of car parking that induces demand for additional vehicle trips and suggests design and management principles that prioritize other travel modes over driving to encourage the use of public transit and active modes of transportation. As identified in the Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA, parking supply for new developments in the City of Santa Clarita is regulated by the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC). However, the Project's parking requirements would be regulated by the MetroWalk Specific Plan. The Project would include a total of 498 dwelling units. Per the SCMC, the Project would be required to provide a total of 966 parking spaces, but the Project proposes to provide approximately 902 parking spaces, resulting in 64 parking spaces fewer than required by the SCMC. Parking regulations in the Specific Plan are intended to provide the requisite number of parking spaces for all uses, while reinforcing the pedestrian -oriented character and accessibility to transit, amenities, and daily services intended to minimize vehicle trips and parking demand. As also presented in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA, the Project satisfies all four criteria established under the City's and the California Governor's Office of Planning and Research's (OPR) Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) guidelines and thresholds to allow the City to screen out VMT impacts using project -specific characteristics, such as project location, project size, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing. More specifically, Criterion No. 2 relates to the whether the Project would "include more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees than other typical nearby uses, or more than required by the City." As discussed above, the Project's parking supply would be less than the required number of spaces by the SCMC, and, as such, the Project meets Criterion No. 2. In addition, to support all modes of transportation and reduce VMT, pedestrian and bicycle access to the Project Site would be provided via sidewalks at the two unsignalized driveways along Harriman Drive and connect the eastern corner of the Project Site to the adjacent (Vista Canyon) trail system. To facilitate pedestrian access from the Project Site at the driveways, sidewalks are proposed on all public roads adjacent to the Project Site, including Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive. Marked pedestrian crossings would be constructed at the driveway intersections. The Project would also connect to a series of mixed -use trails, including the Santa Clara River trail at the intersection of Lost Canyon Road and Jakes Way. On -site pedestrian and bicycle circulation would be provided by a series of walkways and trails that join the two driveway entrances to the Vista Canyon trail system, as well as the proposed Metro Plaza and the future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station. City of Santa Clarita MetroWalk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-27 Packet Pg. 243 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Comment No. 2-3 This comment states that transportation of heavy equipment and/or oversized vehicles on State highways requires a permit from Caltrans and recommends that truck trips be limited to off-peak commute periods. The Project would comply with any Caltrans permit requirements regarding transportation of equipment or materials to and from the Project Site. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-28 Packet Pg. 244 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES UARYL L., 05B rY IA Ii 04 NgCIF FQKE',5T1F,R & OIRUVARDEN, Januaq, 19, 2,021 Letter No. 3 COUNTY OF LOS, ANGELES U*'A&%0 or Burrnmenp, flh,DA I. FIRE, DEPARTMENT r R. 3 7 M,157 R C7 $,1.'U NLYN, F Ii LAb EHN AVEHVk� 'I N"n W�u�. I CAS ANGEL E.9, CAg-YF0WaA SECOND IMTZIIII (121) M'1-24M SHNILA WEHL THIRD DO MG7 -["Voud PrPloWuni; of Life, Nupv"yand fto rawb*mm000- JANICE W KI-11IN IVOU"'ITH NVPRICIT KMHRIN RAVAGER nrTim Erika Wet'Son, Associate ['Ianner City of Santa Cladta Planning Division 23920 Valentia Bni'.Oevard Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear Nis, Iverson': The Notice of AvaOability of a Draft Sustainable FrivitnnnioIntAl Aq%AO'simeni hq,'.; . s been rev[ewed by ffie Planning DivislDn, Land Development Unit, Forestry Division, and Hoofth Hazardous Materia[s IDivisio,n of the County ref Los Angeles Fire Department, 3-1 The following are fflelrconnnient$,� PLANNING VIVISIOM, 4,0 Initial Study Check Ugt XV. PubUc Serv�,cjes, Fire Protection a) I, Paragraph one, sentence two, should ble, corrected t: slate "Speoficallyl, 15 fire stations with 14 eng[ne cion',panies, 5 paramedi,,,,f,'.sqL1ods, I ha4al'Jolub ru'divrid1bquact, and 2 [afjder (mcks serve the Santa GlOrlta'Vatley," fmmof any qtiestions regarding this response„ ia'ease contact Loretta Baqwe,14, PlanNng Analyst, at (323) 661-2404 OF `~"rQVOJIMTIO! I'UWWflW'C6PP0PA7rD NMEAS CY'VA AIACCLES 00vWTV AA43THL CaifriA Cwr 3-2 ArRAIMA 141 J'Al", ""010�'M)Iq CA W�tflt PrOGIEWYCOD LAMURALE FIG10 P1111VIERA S112MA. HFU Cir.'4Af"01011 PAPMUO NR)WiDALE L IM"'I"A Pew4fiA $0 VI'm rx WIWI k G6.ARE6NA,1141 M EWNWA, W,A V.hmo'JA' r I, lhd1N7pqj""' 11 "INW09 KAAK40 IPhLON -4.RDEF SIUUMM QA7E 9141 r"W14 FXRX CV39AWNCE RAIMIDEVIN LA KhBRAI Wh NO RM OW., RLIA, T4;1Wj'k'r' nwf SEIA 1 wm 11 WPrwg. LA W"'001b"N' 11MYVIKMAU ROULING HU-8 P'51A I E'S VflFiWffl BIE1.1 G00049 CUDAHY I4FRMnFA Ilr,1kCA LA, PUI 141M V410tM4LE, RQUAMAD, SEUR.01AFR 5°."AAAR11map rwW HEM1114 WA 5 LAKYAWMID FM WALE $Ahl dftm$ vx""""T 'IrjI 1, -OM'P(AI1 0OWNi1mv 'GAR TV-' KA WOU14"11,4 0-- kAW"'q*11 UN PRV5 OLHIA",i U tiA l,,W 2 SMIA, U, AM LA Im"A", 4 H AM vq'M A CANA)BASIAS um1g;rize F"ARIWAAMIM10 lomfffiES City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-29 I Packet Pg. 245 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 3 (Continued) Erika Iverson„ Associate Planner January 1, 2021 Page 2 The devokipment of this protect must corn ply with all applicable code avid ord[nance. re,quifernants lor constri iction, access, avatar mains, fire flbws,, and ,fire hydrants, This property is locate tt within thearea des floe by tie Fi'Te Department as a Fire Hazard 3-3 SeverityZone A "FuelMlodification Plan" sball be stibmitted to, the Feet Modificatiorr (ex review by the Fuet Modification Unit, prior W buildIng plan check approval, Please cord =t the Depairtirwril's Fuel Modifficaborl Unit for detaills, The Fatal Modiftatbri plan Review [Jnd is lbca4od at 6,05 North Anqe[eno, Avenue in the GRY of Azusa CA 91702-2,1904. Tire y inay tre reached at (626) V39-5205, arvisit hltps,-//WwwAjre.lacqj �y,aq M,� - _Wisjanlforost—fue- moMGMan The Lan,d Development Und appreciates, the opporturrity, to, wrnment on this project, Sirould ;,g,,ny questlons arise ll please contact 'Wally Collins at ('323) 890 4243 or 1 M -M 11111111111110 07.7711 1 _InrM �= The statutory resporisibififles of the County of Lots Ang,,Mes Fire Department's P�"ojreslry Diviwwi irl&iide arosilon roolroi,, watershed nnanageiineiit, iamarid endanququldspecies, vaq0tation, fuel mod ificalion,fo r Very High Piro Hazard Severity, Zonos archeiolbqical and culUAr,cipresourr,es,,an,dlt:i,ieCol,LjnlyO,ak'TreL-rdiina.nee Potential iin,ipactsinth,,Oseareas should be Under the Los Angeles County Oak tree Ordinance, a permit is required to out, diestroy, 3-4 remove, relocate, in110, d1amage or encroarti into the, protected zone of any tree of the Oak genus which is 25, inches or rrtwe in cir,curnference (eight inches In diarneter), asrneas,ured 4 112 feet above Mean natura I g random itOak trees, are known to exist in the proposed project area forth er fiald %tutlkaq 9hatild twe, conducted to delermme the presence of this speoies on the project site, I he COUnty of Los Angeles Fire, Dopartmen't's Porestry Division has noturther cornivients regardinq this projecr. For any questions regarding ffik,,, fea,ponsall P](Jn[Ser contact Forwtry Assistarit, Joseph Brunel at (8118) 990-57119. HEALTH HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Df I&JQN: The Hleafth Hazardous Materials IDivirainnn of the L.oq Angetes C.',lounty Rre Departineint has no 3-5 comments err reqWrennents fbr ihe project at this firne. Please contact HHMQ1 sonlor lyp0m-C,100, Perla Garcia at (323) 890-4035, or Peftgq!rcr#,% I y japQ91t 1' �giqy If you have any qupastlons, Metro Walk Specific Plan Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-30 City of Santa Clarita February 2021 I Packet Pg. 246 1 F 1-0.9-1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 3 (Continued) .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Erkai Iverson, Associate Plannoir j an um, 19, if a2 ii Page 3 If yrju have any addiflonal questions, please oontacfthis, office, at (323) 8904330- Veq My yam, WX RONALD WIL DURBIN, CIIIE, FORESIrRY DIVISION PREVENPON SERVCES WREAU RMD,c City of Sank ClarMita UetroA510k Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment T31 I Packet Pg. 247 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 3 Ronald M Durbin Chief, Forestry Division Prevention Services Bureau County of Los Angeles Fire Department 1320 North Eastern Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90063-3294 Comment No. 3-1 This comment acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Availability of a Draft SCEA for the Project and introduces specific comments from the different divisions within the County of Los Angeles Fire Department (LACoFD). Comment No. 3-2 This comment corrects the information presented in the Draft SCEA regarding LACoFD facilities. The second sentence in response to Initial Study Checklist Question XV.a.i on page 4-169 of the Draft SCEA has been revised as follows (see Section 3.0, Errata and Clarifications, of this Final SCEA, for this revision): Specifically, 4�15 fire stations with 4�14 engine companies, 5 paramedic squads, 1 hazardous materials squad, and 2 ladder trucks serve the Santa Clarita Valley. This change does not result in the Project creating any new or increased significant environmental impact already identified in the Draft SCEA. Comment No. 3-3 As discussed in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA, the Project would be constructed to stringent standards to resist ignition and slow the spread of fire per LACoFD standards, and no building permits would be issued by the City until construction plans have been reviewed and determined to be in full compliance with all applicable standards for development in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, including a Fuel Modification Plan for LACoFD review. It should be noted that the Project would change the existing conditions of the Project Site, as the entire Project Site would either be developed with impervious surfaces or managed landscape areas. As such, the risk of wildfire on the Project Site would be reduced through development of the proposed structures and improvements as compared with existing conditions. By converting the flammable landscape currently existing on the Project Site to a development featuring hardscapes, multiple residential facilities, and irrigated/managed landscaped areas, the Project would reduce fuel loads found on the Project Site and, thus, reduce the chances of a wildfire occurring or intensifying on -site and threatening surrounding properties. Further, because the Project would not involve storage, use, or disposal of significant quantities of hazardous materials, there would be no significant sources of hazardous materials that could add to the fuel load and produce harmful pollutants in the event of a wildfire. Comment No. 3-4 This comment identifies the statutory responsibilities of LACoFD's Forestry Division, including erosion control, which is addressed in the responses to Initial Study Checklist Question Vll.b on Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-32 Packet Pg. 248 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES page 4-92, Initial Study Checklist Question X.a on page 4-127, Initial Study Checklist Question X.c on page 4-133, Initial Study Checklist Question X.f on page 4-137, of the Draft SCEA; watershed management, which is addressed in response to Initial Study Checklist Question X.a on page 4-128 of the Draft SCEA; rare and endangered species and vegetation, which are addressed in response to Initial Study Checklist Question IV.a on page 4-47 of the Draft SCEA; fuel modification for VHFHSZ, which is addressed in response to Initial Study Checklist Question XX.b on page 4-208 of the Draft SCEA; archaeological and cultural resources, which are addressed in response to Initial Study Checklist Question V.b on page 4-70 of the Draft SCEA; and oak trees, which are addressed in response to Initial Study Checklist Question IV.e on page 4-62 of the Draft SCEA. There are no oak trees existing on the Project Site. Comment No. 3-5 This comment acknowledges that LACoFD has no comments or requirements for the Project related to hazardous materials. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-33 Packet Pg. 249 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-34 Packet Pg. 250 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 4 UVrair rrr�gtmrrwartatian tr;rari�y, e,o January 2'1„ 20211 Erika Ivversolii ily c4'trrllia clatrila; 23520'Valerncia Bbii Suite 120 Santa Clarita, CA, 91555; Sent by Errnad,i elveirsaorn a Moarwt,a•rlar�ta.com rn One C ap.prraaay p l"u'j Girl 9� To tr.r°rAro w,k w,„rA a= 2"ia irruritro.u�et RE twleta°cs"Walk Spedfic Oarj Prcject Notice of Avaallalnrlity f ()r„rrfN Suawsn rzaalnle Cprnnnvnnflesi Environmental Anse , nent (SCEA) bear Ms.lnrernson! Tltailrk you fear t;t'artrdirna'tiirspnriutRrn ^tine t,Oa An�nt,le"a Co anty Metrrattita14an Tr;arn gac),rtaltitaun Ara:tt°nerrty jh,rletr'ot aegaarding IN!, propoised 'M ttoWa1k Specific Plan Prd. ivict 1proje t) 1 cared in 010 City 01'''S'arrtal clatita Metro is connnnAtcd towodkisngiwith local muunicipahties, developers aind other stakeholders across Los Angeles County on transA-su"pporwi developrnents to grow, rndersllnwp., reduce dtiving, and praamno'te walkabe area hbolITC;,ods, °I'n"IrisilOriented Corn I OCs) are plaicies'such ais corridor or rnead.hlmrihnii that, Y their dmixgrn allow peoplie to drive tr ss and ,access& traanriit rn ore. TOCs rrnraxirrnize equitalal,rn arr.rr{i tra a Mulllti.. rronodal Iran sit arretnnrrark as a key orkarnizin:lf priruc'ipfe of larnd uses plan rling and holistic corrnrrnunitfr deyt6prrnernt. Per etro's area. of statutory res,porisihility purswua nt to s;ectiorrs T!50U(b,) and 1150$5l,aj� of the Guideliiuures for #rrnl tle�° e'nt,�rticn,n ofthe Ca4forriia Quality Ai i, `�" ; Code P le M, Ot, the prarpo,, n rnft,hn5 trttrcr k, to provide the City with specific detail on the tsrope and conte.nt oferumrrdnniroer�irtal information that ahoWd be irre[udlM ism tlta. SlAS,taaintable onnrrnranitties IrirvironJirnon't al As,. s,,imo nt (SCEA) for the Prefect. Iirn parl',i aalar, tfni fi letter outkirrpay topucs, rogarding the Pa'tajtxt's lrnp+ ,cl s on the Metrohrtk Vista Canyon Statuon ,arid I' etrotirnir lacillitmes and services which should be analyzed in the SCEA,, and proOdes. re,nomrnewmdatiions frir mitigation n'reasurres as aplproprmate, fffi era$ a projector transit sirsterr,;s and trrfi awt'.rrxlwe ary withman the scolpe of tr'aarn,spaartalr:on mr'n�aaets Irn be ev,allua.a'ted urmdvr (IfC; X' 4-1 4-2 In addition tip the sfrec fie cornryie,nts eduthned Ibedcw, m0o is Prow dirafwthe City and WhoMax Santa Clarda., U C (Appl'icaarat) With the Mr-,'IroAdj2cenit Development Haarndl'act.)k (amich&J), swOfrlckr provides xn overview of common iis for development adjacent to Metro dght-of'-way (ROW) and tr;ansat facilities, a'vail@Ne at 4-3 sty uyrnn� t�1a npet qp? �;je f:m fl.� 1y ��Tre r 10"e aappiecwate the coorrd,araartion between die Applicant, ("Ay, arid t:he camrt ern C,rlillnrndaa Re jonral Rrad Awthordy (SC RCA) with a c.sped, tma the lruturr Morohink Vista Canyc,wi Stahon, and erilcmvarl;at! contnnaat^rf1 wtlahttraGon as this Projeo progresses, Project Description The Project irnc.lumdes developing up to 498 residential units, oilganizeid into four plaanrnlrnR areas, on an �app,fox arcre site on, the City of Santa E`1;ant,a, Project development nwsnua�ld be guided h the nro, o,r d mrrnar�tr l� "�... y 1 Ip - i" y" � l p `.:" , MetroWalk'Spi Ran, wlhnich would provide dewelolpment plans, infraistruclune development, pllans dt-slgnn 4-4 durdelirn.es and thie irriplwrientatiorl piraigrarn for the Project,. The Pio: Cl Site is, k3cated diir'ecdy ` itxitlh o t,he Vls[ Carsl+ora 5pecipc Plain arci a, wNcka allo +ws for the bi)Rdouat of rews'udprntial, nafflce„ wind corrnrrercatrl ur,;crrs-'I he Metrcllnlw tracks that nnake up the southern and eastem Project:Site ktourndaries vary in elevation fronn 6 Soo ii t,4rh✓thrw, 15064 4"O f. c'va0`<'rrcvs°a officiw ob' plJannv ne,wid 141,11,v rth aa0naaic:al Advi,,oip nr, FVAw xb HirCr, 'PWIi4W?,'U uI,n our �:.Nx to r tQA, tn-rviapbii rt2018, a 19K Paige 1i of° City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-35 Packet Pg. 251 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 4 (Continued) Nle,tl Specific Flail Prl Notice of A-nibbiUry ofSCE — meno Cornprel jalzvaa'y 21" 2021 Nee (5) reet above, the, Pi0j,LNd Site ir) ble sol.6"wester'll corl Of the, Project silize to appp'(3xill 115 feet a Love thv proed Site at the northewitern corner of ille, sirte. I 4e, Pil Site ick dirwrlyadjaceM to pilarlred Vi�,la caryorl MuW-Mcrdal l which will i"l a Meu'cdirik swior� diat is SWed for ccivirilelian tn 2023 The Vista ('. all h1ulli'Modal 11,11rance wid be locat 'IP d drecdX easi cil"Jie ProfeclSil would Ihe Cxqlre(-U?<J IrO 14"C'. l Site Iny a wk,kmg path, vud w,11 unclude a r'lew passel l suatiai, wlfiicll, willl fewturl C'Dflty'"AU p�atfoiirn, pedest6afir Urldefcross�018' "-i "&-ierl bay 1xis Lirarisremsl.'Aion (slated�efi fcip cowript>n, il 202 1), and a paw'4-aiid.wlde �Iot. The Vista (.Al MlJ[i4Jx.x'I;,d C&I�Ier wiH sel ffi,e ini Santa Clarilaji'Antvlopv Valley comml line, wfixfi �jruwides scivice betweer the Cily, ul' Lancaswr gri dire All Valley, l and downtown Los Angeles. Recommendatilions fbi, SCEA Scope and Content Merralank Aaatoceqcy OperaliolrAs� The ProJect sile-, o s 2d)actrft to WVete o owned ROW opera ted all ril lried by 'SC RRA to l the Metruhirl#k tornrli li lervite The Apjphc.Ar,,I is Aldviscmd that rail sorvite optl iin both dlrrcticjns, and thiat l l openjitle. 24 hquirs a day, sil days aweek, in i KO'Wadaceriitto it PrNect- tqt.I All Dike to the Projel proxilrili,ty lo metl ROW ,lirld Rittwe Meqicilink Vist,,A[ Carlyoo Stabic,ro. Ilse SC EA i al palerikial effects tars rafl ol.x2,i'a6(jris al irle,.riilli6y ?'rU1.1aSi4TTS aOli aFipicipi C-rfltic�jl in`-lpad'S 10 be Sil slicauld urwlude (willioul: impact's cAProjercl al cipolitionri far,( and putel clarnage to the 5tFRA(Ii and systerrm iintegl oftracilks and Pdalr.,inri'251FUCturip, dkimpli to lafl, serw4x-' arid Iferripcnary ardlor chainges to clu,51r,mmei, acfejs and c-irculation tq�N the statl,on. S:pKlfic and rnitigation nwaswes th'at �,hoqjld ~a toned i fill SlIrJCtLJI'12' SeLback Strucluten that all livirritl kkdhiaccrtk to the railroad ROW carl) pose siF,My hazards arvid rriaydisl ti strimce al damage Meh'ollil lnfraStFUCALAFe. Sal conffids: Lain orr.iji- di Project canAftiction aridlor opel Tfte Apph,cal gtmeraUy not be per'mittll to acce,-,s Mwotink NO'NIca mwntarn phwale, dvi0QjpmP,nt, Tecfinicaf ReOel#a Tlre Applicant shall wbril erpineerilrig drawirgs rrfrtl caludwio,l as WeO as con5trixtioil p�aris al inetfiodls inchidiagal plicement an,d radkis, to l any frirlpacts rcj fl,,e Santa Clarira,u*,itelope Ull corril hae iii regaliionsfhil;) to the Pril Before issuarite budding per n,k fi>r the prow eel, theApplicariit obuAlri SCRRA'q,appravifl offlnji corlsairl cl Sobac k� Wbere Oi,e Prolto pri,rperq may adkil to Metrokl R QW �owr,ied [Ay k+ elrra), alp Pi structi shall be �s(4 bai+ Five a r6rarrurri (if fwe (5) foxi fora ;Ifoperly lik,le 1,0 allow �4)at'p fr'0' property pi'ainleakww'.e ki. Acgrtis.: Arly aexe%& to railroad f)rirpe.,,rty N 50.l A than discwtion Or Puletro and 5 f,PPA Ihe Affphcwit 0-141ill obwiln spec&c, teil perrnits, frorr SCIRRA for any, carol perf6firred on the Pr-ojea's strUCtUfPS Or 13i'l ar,ce e hcant OuA ri,airlwiri, I'll ancl .s5 o,) the railrmid ROW, Wht�re feasllbk, Of App w9k at or p,,l Iiines, from the private property Sde% ly, Constrwition M iuxfu Z:: the ,Appf�car l pel Nletim and/or-SiCRIZA qtaffto niDnaor con"nictioii xtivity lo asol any ornpact to The ROW, Durang cori5tructioil the Appllicaiu 5hall corstfi,icl a protectior barrier to pl obuil i ordebris from fadingonlo the ROW, The Appkcaiv shaill notify Metto and Metro Walk Specific Plan Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Pagr. 2 of'A 4-4 (Continued) 4-5 City of Santa Clarita February 2021 911 I arm 5 2-36 Packet Pg. 252 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 4 (Continued) McAroWalk Spuciiruc Phiri Pro�,ud ja1iLi,'aTY21, 2021 SCIRRA r)F a ny ch a nges to tl,',e constroc toon/budding, P1 ans fluAl rnay af oray riot irrlpact 4-5 the ROW I (Continued) 1, Ad rispraC-s c LP'd� zqq Tlhe,. Applic,Ant shItmlid continue 625igri oor61malioIrr of tho. f�ulurb Metfdlirllk �Pp V usta Ca nyo n Sta ticir withh SCR RA- "I App ficii n t should al go he advi sed of the fol low4ig: 'I' Is 'a f el, 1 I! !'-iMr1,RtJr,Nr fq5t aod/Ix excavahori work inn proxirorty to NlelrohiOr ROW with rx,,itential to daroupe rail tirackfi and i0akA infrIvArudute rray be siul.ijetl to additictra'i 0,91A SA(dy rr.�,,qiuiiernenh. Tigi-inical WI M0,rQ aq,4 M40ql 1�onk charg�r for lime 51"not urrgmneering and . ...... . . ..... . ---- coristruction fronitoririp, ROW ALceo;s: rihieAplrcarit should, toro:ad S,CRRA for Righi:-&'Lelry requireirnerits. ,nfDrmatmn can br foron,d at www Otheir requirernicntI; maymclUde peirrriit5 i - 6r congtirricti on of bugl,i;iings and randy futu re repairs, painting, gr;j,fflrj fernoval, etc, mclu,ding the use of overhca4 I or airy othcr eqi-liprnent 1111"'t WLMI�hllY "I rvIrr,rad opqqratjorjq and safely,, Ervq;j,I acI for irairm,',nance tasks suOi as g�raffiti rem owal„ will neces5itale, an acli've hcer-5ie agreerrent, This agreernert will mndude an arI hcen;,e fee wrid other (equiiiernerts; that rne&, siI standards for access to a RCVW with artiII,,e, rail operahbls. CDsk c!: 1hu Apphcarlt willi 6e replarl"Alfle (br cw&,.5 tincurred by Metro andjor issues 0-rat cause delay or, hari-ra to Metrolink service delivery Dr infiastructiore. I Applicantwid also bear all costs for iny noise nirrigati,cm rvqwied Fox Ow, project" Trangit Supporlive PlainniiinW, Recanimendatiams and Reourcvs Metro encou'rages the pity an,d the Applicant to contnue to coordinate and cciflabofate with Metrohak staffo,n her apes tb the, futtite MAtrofik,Ik Vista. Cwiyort Statio,ri, III would lilke to Aentily [the pate-titial ,lhergies associated,I tr8na it-oFierited developi-rent: Irr—r'Ll 54oppqrli,ye Planning TpolkirMetro qtfong[y rerommencls that the Al,.)1plocant review flie Trafisit S:upportive flan -arcing, TooWt hiamha identifies lGelennents oftiransit,supportive, places and, apphed ciuflettdwely, has been shown to reduice velkde rrieiles traveled; by establishf),Irig dII &Iierse I'land use rmix, corrIbirwir3n of affoird,"Ible housing and infrastIructure projects for pedestrians, biqydists, and peuple of 81111 argII ab,4ities. This mesource is available at M aI understarrds, that 4,,,Ciredsiilv, develw,II I stations Iel)resents as rnulually l erericral opport,a,Iillily to iryrII ride,iI arx.l e'rill.'I apt6irs for the ,.,I Miebm UK:0111rages the City arid Aipphcant tic lye r,,iI or tfie Project's jDruXi7TIi1Y LO 111M 6AAARIE! Metrolink Vista Cariyon Station, Including, ariII 1)eclvstriaia pa&II towards the siatilcm. 7 r iin 5 it Cori rec t4'"'Ins a III d Access'� M 0 e 5 11 (111 �y erica f,� 4 r,,,� ges� lilw I j< a,pt to i nst ;of arld co,ove,ir pedi-sorrars., pimat.fle 6e,.,hog and trmsit use,rs 1.0/6ornffie the City Oi,ouldi considu Tequinng the installation (.),r !,uch li^sftirvs as part cAlhe conditions ofar.ipiroval f:rr t1ir, ProyI inclu,ding: WMe,abOlqyu The praOsion of wide sidemalks, pedestnan Ilmghrting, a con0nmug, canapy ofshade vees, enfianced CrOLSSV'Valk,s 'qVjIi[r ADA,cornp4ant curb rarnps, and Iother arrferikies aloing all Pape 3 of 4 4-6 4-7 City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 911 I 5 2-37 Packet Pg. 253 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 4 (Continued) MetroWillk Si Plan i l oilAwailabffity (35SCUA Metro Cow mments Ian uary �1, 2021 yxjblll -itleo fimrlape,a of Ole dewfloprrwrA sil�e U,knpfowe l-kede5l 5afety anrl cornfon to access the aearl Nletrr.A4 Vista Ci,,inyofi Sta6,on L gig Vse ard l0icrnr-ril re V, , "'T h I � I n afadciq u ate s hQrt tc rm lb� cydq �arkrng, -- — , —, - " RLihty i , . prlpVmpo such a5 grm.md-lemfl bi�rycl- rack.;,,, an, wcu're, acres r.ruwtralled endogrd long-term h4cyc1l parking for fegidentg, employees, and guest Hlqcle parking faclliitie,5 511,rould be degilgined with br5l! prac;,11,nr,,s in rrind, inchidinl Vi'5ible, 5ajtrlg, effective rve,i Ilia rtrxl, c,45,v tv locale, equipme'nt onstallniiorr with preferred sj)aclq 5obicyde can be safe y and corrveriiently accessed. Similar provisions For rTkr&rnoNNty dejices are ako encouragedi, c- Fir:tit& Last IAir Aires; Then Prolvd shouId addross N,5t-last mHe cQnnections to txjn�.t: and is einr.km-aged tea q,u,,pppofitl cQnirwTtlanq wO wayfinding,5ilgnage. h1rlw5ivf,. of all r7l<kd,es of transportation. Forre'l please review the Fjfs!r IlLast We 5trxtegic, i authored by Menlo and The Soinhern Cal6arnia,Associationof Gmernrnent's �SCAG), availabl-e oaBerme ate; hnp��,�',rnw--d ia, rtietfo �rlalbi I it)y pd� 4-7 (Continued) Al. die iicoirporali:oin offiansit oirienilvd, l;wdeslrian-orm',inted i prov" %irxl Ofate&; , ,Ictn as 141'e, redliction or reirnrywal of #111iniinorn lxjikirog requirernent% ar"I the exproralion of 4-8 fliared parl%ir% opperno-Oes, 1h,e-!,e 511r,al coij1d be lxorsued l,o redoce in des,gn and joavf9 rlerraii& 5. Wayf`ranqing: Any lclrnl or lierrridslent wayl signage with contcml: rcf�rcnciirj h4clirc-link 4-9 wyrm.,i or &MUriq the MetrolIhilk brand arldior asscar.Jated, Eral si bciclaordin4ed wilh Wnrolw1k Staff If you halve any qu�ctions rcgardirig 6,y errall at g tH s, ldter, i toritact rne by i at 213-922-271, b or by vrta,l at the lol1lowing addre,�,S. NiCtrD VCVf,'I0l ReViCW One CoRway, i NIS 919,ZZ,1 Lo,s Angeles„ (A 90612,29,52 Shine 1,ilil AIIC Nlanager, Trari 06ented Commtjnitues W l' k D az,, Dpirectoir of'Pllari ri i n lg, SC i �ay Fullirroan, Marager, Mctrt) Regional RAH Attachments and fink,,,5: rr Adjacent Developrnpnt HarAbcwk� w fir P I ge 4 of 4, Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-38 I Packet Pg. 254 1 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 4 Shine Ling, AICP Manager, Transit Oriented Communities Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza, MS 9902201 Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 Comment No. 4-1 This comment affirms the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority's (Metro) commitment to transit -supportive developments and Transit Oriented Communities (TOCs). No specific comment regarding the contents of the Draft SCEA was provided. Comment No. 4-2 This comment identifies Metro's statutory responsibility regarding transit systems and infrastructure. The comment introduces Metro's concerns regarding the Project's potential impacts on the future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station and Metrolink facilities. Please refer to responses to Comment Nos. 4-5 and 4-6 below. Comment No. 4-3 This comment confirms Metro's provision of its Metro Adjacent Development Handbook (A Guide for Cities and Developers) to provide information and guide for projects located adjacent to, below, or above Metro Transit facilities, including rights -of -way (ROWs), stations, bus stops, and services. The City acknowledges receipt of this handbook, which has been included as part of the administrative record for the Project. Comment No. 4-4 This comment summarizes the Project Description and the Project's location directly adjacent to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center. No specific comment regarding the contents of the Draft SCEA was provided. Comment No. 4-5 Although the Project Site is located adjacent to Metro -owned ROW that is operated and maintained by the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), the limit of ground disturbance associated with Project construction would be at a minimum distance of 30 feet from the Metro -owned ROW with the structure setback of approximately 15 feet from the property line. As identified in the Draft SCEA, the Project proposes excavation to a maximum depth of 12 feet below ground surface. The extent of on -site grading and excavation and ground disturbance associated with Project construction is not anticipated to create any potential damage to the structural and systems integrity of tracks and related infrastructure, result in any disruption to rail service, or result in temporary and/or permanent changes to customer access and circulation to the future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station. In addition, the Project applicant would be required to obtain a notarized Letter of Permission for grading outside of the property lines/tract boundary from the adjacent property owner(s), including the SCRRA, to avoid any impacts on rail operations in the adjacent ROW. As such, no mitigation measures, such as those identified in the comment (e.g., measures related to setback, access, construction monitoring) are required. CEQA only requires mitigation measures if substantial evidence exists of potentially significant environmental City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-39 Packet Pg. 255 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES impacts. In particular, Section 15126.4(a)(4)(A) of the CEQA Guidelines states that there must be an essential nexus between the mitigation and a legitimate government interest (i.e., potential significant impact). Comment No. 4-6 The future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station is not part of the Project; therefore, this comment, which relates to the Applicant's continued design coordination with SCRRA, is not applicable to the development of the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project. Comment No. 4-7 The Project has been designed to include direct and convenient access to the Vista Canyon Multi - Modal Center, including the future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station. The Project would be a pedestrian -oriented community that would have convenient access to nearby services and amenities, including the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area to the north, which would feature a mix of office, commercial, retail, and residential uses surrounded by a Main Street thoroughfare (Vista Square). Proximity to Vista Canyon would offer Project residents accessibility to pedestrian - oriented shops, restaurants, and services within walking distance. Pedestrian circulation and access would be provided through sidewalks, trails, and multi -use paths proposed within the Project Site, which would also connect residential areas to the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area, the proposed Metro Plaza, the Metrolink Station, and the City's existing trail system along the Santa Clara River. The Project would support first/last mile connections to transit by providing a multi -use pathway system, an ideal first/last mile connection to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center directly east of the Project Site within easy walking/biking distance. The Project would also include an internal roadway system with extensive sidewalks and 100 bicycle parking spaces to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel throughout the Project Site. The Project would include signage for each planning area and building, recreation areas, Metro Plaza, and the Metrolink station, as well as ground -level wayfinding signage. All proposed signage would be designed in conformance with the applicable requirements set forth in the MetroWalk Specific Plan. Comment No. 4-8 Please refer to response to Comment No. 2-2 above Comment No. 4-8 Please refer to response to Comment No. 4-7 above. MetroWalk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-40 Packet Pg. 256 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 5 Rohert C. Ferrante LOS ANZ,ELES COUNTY l -ev, e I E ir, g era �, a, r NJ K.2�e ri o, a4 M all i a ;,mm gg glam. SANITATION DISTRICTS �1,955 "Morkrrian Nfili kc?�§d, OP"Vlff�ec, C"A 90450,-Moo 104 kgp r" offftvw M�sf,o lxaeej pose.Juro"s Moiffirig AardW',e ,u I a,Y. Box 499F3, wllkt;w(-.A 90(15h 7_49w f 56 T) r,99 -1411 - vveew,kic avi, org hamialy 2],, 2021 Rd' 1)(,K'6007400 Nis. 1'-IflpC.a h"Orscli-I Xs,soc kile 11'hu lriei, N1 eel ro �Nl ii I k. 5' EA 0�tV l�) t, salr*"t (' lal-i ua 2.3920 VMcricia Bwdc,%qw& Si6ic 302 Sar,ila Clmita, CA 91355 Deal- N-1s, Iversoii: klalKILHAWIL �t Uylul sunto Ckjril,�l ValIq I'Di5f6cl (Doflo� m.76vixI, a 11>!�,jfl, stwstOlablv tlwrrKlal.lilhrrlNssesstneni (S(TA) f6r �hx skot�jcvj, p-o.jw ori rXxx-nibect- 21, 2020. We (­41" the 5-1 cora,ttieWs i,egardhig sewell­a�le seJ.-vice: I . Thc pnrja.°i areli is owside dic j4irisdivional b(xlDdAffiCS (4 dw Disiriel aittl will rccitplire aiwiexalioit inlo DiSlrkl 601wl1V S,0AVl%Nge er,viee eaa be pio% ided llodie jwrklsed Fcw a oop��P o17,11w I )k:trfet's Agl11exn,64)1,t hetfbritvifloti atid Nwessiiif`ee eit, i t%ve.L Sovl, 5-2 apd dick on Miwxzai,oi:i Nagram, weer njorr SITV64-1c 4061-lnal*jlr a-Cgdl-jjllj,g flIC P":N:,Cjjljl7(! Secs, Ukasc cmilact NIS Doilm at (5(,12), 908-42 M, exqeol!ision 27W 2, Bccalwsc Ohl, lhc llrwalioll, the fl*rw owip-iwtiling froln Ow proposcxj PFUJOV W01,143 haw 'lo tic ti-ansparted to the District's lnanksce-wer by local sewelIS) thaat alTINIT 1110lDtl1iiewd by dic Distiler,. Ifilo focal soweir hines catrcii:dy exist, it is t[w n!spiaiisibilily al" rhe ode^ ,,ekqwr to colwq arly "rastiewater gencrated h Solcda d Cany(liit 1"I'Llilak, Scufl,kni, 4, 10akNll Nil jViV,,,ltc rigtli-W-way, iri G: Soda Ri%ecr N-vwljCw0 of dle sollth lei-111huls of, fljdaway, A),reriue The Districts" 15, iwich dia.[TIeter ti-ttlak sew -el- has r1 j 5-3 2.7 rlliffioll clay onodl. Iie.CWhse [10ttion% of t1his 1ji,1iink sewer at,e iiearug C.."11,14acit 111ia'.r District k, owto,laking 10T)rls tbr, ll�siv Mid ole ,I I'did, KCJS, Miikkow, schudide we flw wdormpick] to a1si4ru flit liniitLg ofibc proposud proicct is R�n i.-dalkyn to 1he Inning of' Lherehef scwur, 11,w availabdiif of" capadt�r withill qlw L.Xisixico's semnage -sysivat .Awtild, be ckniffinled as flLie vehq,9Il liml arlhe, jnoiecl lwoceeedl, .1. 1"he District opel'al.es Mcl watel- rodallialiall plallis OVIU,$), dw, liaiulgus WRV and fl1e Valencia WRII, Vw'hidl jel114:r%ide. wasiewata itvarjimil 41 the SLIC1,111 (.Jujita VAlley. These [�'acihties are 0 Fe'g40111A OVO4Twok sy"will, kll�oml as 114V Soma (11,61a Vnjlev�i Jwill( 5��wimtgv S)'swlwl (5,3,CV)9S 1 �Dv, 5-4 S( "VISS 11,15, a callacity 01"118,1 lllio aii4l cijuc.w].% prx-icesses aii a%,,ci-age flow of 19,6 n1gd 41� 'Thc, expCOW ovvragv 111.1-4wr 1ioln 111C ill ffic asW:SSFTKj% 4ts jj jokal (if' 348 reside atial ajYw1i'Riews wid [ 54) lam nh(!l1­lws, is 81538 gallons per day, hlr a copy of Oic Diisli-ict's alvci,agk� waslewawr ge,Miur.ioti fact.Aii,s, ,.I) to widet Services, ditii Wastewa:rei, hx.�gl,al,Nls alld 5-5 Afll S',�-rve wvlH dk* ol�i dw, 14W,P4JL e1i Ilk, [N)CO01 1408 S(`V1YfQ City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-41 I Packet Pg. 257 1 F 1-0.9-1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 5 (Continued) Nls. 1�,,rika Iverson Jorntary 21, 202 11 TV Wrier k ernpowmvd by the,(alifornia Healffi.and S,af ly (Axie lo chata. fce to, Connect facifilies (dire(J]y orntdiuoictly) W to DNW4 Wwrap: symemWo incrolsethQ antronojror quNnitly disclunged fromn conitected, 1,`acifities. 1,1-iis, connection fee 6.2 Capital LKilibeS lie dMI is used by the Ditrio is peryniftcd to w ffic Rklrict's Soveragc Sysimn. Fur niorc infiannaniun cop.y of'ffic:-, Connection Fec Infiannation Slreel:, go to 1�rU, umdrr SoNkc, dwn Wmtovatej, (Sewage) and �,eleei 170es. In deterininirig theirnI.xi'Ll to ate ."';'e1xerLq;e syslerill mid. al')JI'lic"11.40 conneelic"In, fees, the: [Nato W demmirw the tiwr. unegory Qg ChwhWMunn, Singly Fartily horm, eta tNat 11,ca rerm*a%, [ticactual ar an,ticijimed LUC Of Me pOrCily) Ur QiHfiCS 011 the Imrcelts) in thc dc%relopment. Far ntcorc qx!6lik", nift"nluolton 1vg;mth'1,,g 1'1V con'tm""tion 1 amMd Me Diswict's Wamcumer Fie IhIlk-Thunwr at (562) 908 4288, cxwnshmi 2727 It mdu hn dw D690 co conform to Ole Tcquirernerips of' flic Federal (1cut AirAd Liu, capacilics of Me DWAa% wmwwmer Ire,1111aeat facilit,im mv bmMnn he tvgicaial grovaflt fixecast aillo[)ted by Me Six,dl-wn,i CaliRwnw Assooation aad §Cddif Spoc= MAides induded in the dOOMMML, of be SCACKLuouinal grumb Anceast Marc hxuMarated Wo, CIMILlir Plaits, wNIIICII WC 11repaDO'd bthe �ijuth Cbast and AMOVe Wky Air OmMy Managemov Distrkis in order to Qrave air quabily W Me Sowh Onto and Nkyvc Dcscrt Ahlbsks as mak%d by fltc C(7A, All cNpaosi,ons of Wrial NWAs mum be sized and or& o Qwd in a mmma MM wild bc eonsi ste at with 11te SCA(i rigi onal pvwth Wean for Me cowks of 1A% Aripbles, (WmVy, San Beimardirm, Rhemik, Venwm, and ImpmAL Ile a"%We growth ides0hul by Sdt. NG, As such ON I citer macs not cons itule, a. guarn ntee, of wastewater scrvic c, but fs to ade i SC th(- (tv vaq PrWr IJKLL q Ito D istrid bonds I o pmn W 0 s sav to Lap mp Me We It dw am leplI y l?ermided aauf to inform flic dCve1K1,jWr Of the currenfly cxisting callyacity and any pwpmcd expansion o' bd Ws. If IwOui have any quegiorm, jAease o, Nmact Me uticlemipwd at 062) 9(.W-jQNK exlensiori 27 0� or at Voy hAY yum, Adrianj: (:'usiountr Flwdkics jhwm- TxW MMMOMM09 5-6 5-7 Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Sank C/arMita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 242 I Packet Pg. 258 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 5 Adriana Raza Customer Service Specialist Facilities Planning Department Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts 1955 Workman Mill Road Whittier, CA 90607-4998 Comment No. 5-1 This comment acknowledges receipt of the Draft SCEA for the Project and introduces specific comments from the Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District (District) regarding sewerage service. Comment No. 5-2 This comment identifies the Project area to be outside the District's jurisdictional boundary and requires the Project Site to be annexed into the District before sewerage service can be provided to the Project. The Project Site's annexation into the District's jurisdictional boundary has been added to the required approvals by the City, the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and the Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCo) in this Final SCEA (see Section 3.0, Errata and Clarifications, of this Final SCEA, for this addition). Comment No. 5-3 The Vista Canyon Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) would treat the wastewater generated by the Project. The proposed wastewater system on the Project Site would consist of a network of sewer pipeline of varying sizes that would generally follow the proposed internal roadways. Project sewer pipelines would deposit collected sewage from the Project Site to the two existing 10-inch- diameter sewer pipelines north of the Project Site. The Vista Canyon WRP would treat the wastewater generated by the Project, with all solids conveyed to the District's Valencia WRP for processing and disposal through the Sand Canyon Trunk Sewer Section 4 mentioned in the comment. However, the District is currently in design phase for a relief line to increase capacity of this trunk line to adequately serve the Project area. The construction of this relief line is anticipated to be completed prior to the opening and occupancy of the Project in 2027. The only wastewater improvements required for the Project are on -site connections to the infrastructure systems in place within Harriman Drive, Lost Canyon Road, and Cooper Street, which are subject to connection fees. Comment No. 5-4 The comment provides information regarding the District's facilities, including the Saugus WRP and Valencia WRP with a combined capacity of 28.1 million gallons per day (mgd) and which currently process an average of 19.6 mgd. Although the comment does not raise an issue regarding the content of the Draft SCEA, the information is noted for the administrative record and forwarded to the decision makers for consideration. Comment No. 5-5 The comment estimates the average wastewater flow from the Project to be 83,538 gallons per day (gpd). Although the comment does not raise an issue regarding the content of the Draft SCEA, City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-43 Packet Pg. 259 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES the information is noted for the administrative record and forwarded to the decision makers for consideration. Comment No. 5-6 The Project would be required to pay a fee to connect to the local sewer network. The City would not issue connection permits to the sewer system if it cannot be demonstrated that sufficient capacity exists to serve the proposed development. Comment No. 5-7 The comment does not pertain to the Draft SCEA. The comment is primarily made to inform the developer that the District intends to provide sewerage service up to the levels that are legally permitted based on existing capacity and any proposed expansion of District facilities. The comment is noted for the administrative record and forwarded to the decision makers for consideration. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-44 Packet Pg. 260 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 6 ........... S-Q-V W A'T ER jainuairy 7,2021 City of Santa Clanta PlanMng Division Am; Erikii, Iverl Assoc,[Wo Plannor-tletroWalk SCEA 2,3920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 02 Santa Clarita, CA 91355, j,Y:, 11 -IbUID l �y("�R 1'1"Ic, [ell cyrn Re: Response to the Notice of Availability ofa, Draft Sustainable 001MMUnIties E,nivironmienta I Assessment (DS CEA) Meta oftl k Specif ic Plan Project - (Master Case No, 201-45) Dear Ms, Iversom The projrnet appficant is, prcpos,nq to develop approximately 204 acxes of land comprised of a residential dlevelopment profect of approximately 4.98 units, into, the Santa Clarita Valley Water Ageocy (SCVWA) ,orvioo area,, SCV'WA wokdd bo the water wholestWer and relailer, for the 6-1 project, SCVWA has reviewed the Notice of Availl ability (NON) for the Develo,prnevl a ad WOUld l*e to sohrnit the, 1`01lowing comMents regarding the (SS CCX On June 8, 20,16., the fomier C LWA Beard of Directors and the former Board of 0 irectors of' Newf.tall Gotinty Water District (the foreroiriners of Ittle SCVWA) adopted Ote 2015 Urban, Water Management Ran (LJ'WMP). This docurnerift serves as thir:"N basis for the evalluation of water 6-2 suppIly impacts fbr inewdevelopi-nents and in any Water SL,jpiply. Assessment (WSA) for the projort jif required), The Drat Skistaiinab le Cornmu n1tiels E nvironerent6l A:ssessrnent notels, that the project will have a le,s, than, onvilroomenital Jimpact to Utilifies and Service Systems,, The 4111al assessment should evalluate the following potential, impacts to water lutilitues: 1, Prior to evWuating -wh1oh,er, the new water supply requiredfor tine project will have a less than significant environiment6l impact, an estimiatilon of the anticipated demand from the project shoulid be determiincad wl assistance from the SCVVVA. Per r-Alifornia Water Code, S I If larM a, oc-3ion 109121, if the project has a dernand equall lea or girciztter ftitin�a 500-Ljoit resk 1 i I project, the preparation of Water Supply Assessment l must be requested by the City of Santa Clarilla. S,CVVVA will prepare aWSA within 90 dlays of reoeil of reqoest, Viough it may extend the time if needed,, if the demand Is less thar) that of a 5,00-i.ind residenfial project,, no WSA is required,, though am evaluation of the project's water demand is sti I I required to deteirmin(,,rtine proposed pirojeol's impact to water supply, 6-3 City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-45 I Packet Pg. 261 1 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 6 (Continued) 2, The proposed proJect site is within the $CVVVA's Santa Clarita Water" District ($CWD) service area and 1he evaluation of impacts shoufd addimss any needed new facitifleseiIher onsile or oftite to serve the, ,pro, osed projW,' . .... The neededfacifilies should be included in 6-4 ,P P the final proiect description and included in the evaluation, of the proposed project's impacts, in the, rjnalusWInable Communities Environmental Assessment,. 3. To avoid any potentially signffioant einvironrnental impacts, mitigation mwisures, sh,ould be required in the IFinal Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for the 6-5 payment of 60 water su pply related fees prior toy the issuance of building permits- The project's conditi oris of approval should also reflect Iftese requirements Th e UW'MP states that pogable water de ma nd be red LICed from both existing and future users by no less than 20 perce'nt in response to the State of California Urban Water Use Targets, for SBX7-7. Therefore, it is, critical, if the project is to avoid s�lgnffi"Pl: curnulative irnpaclsto water skq'tply, that It incorporates a,,ter conservation measures into the pirojea design, Toonsure this occurs, the entitlements should include water consrvation measures, as 0ondifions of project approval, 6-6 In pa,dicular, all manufactured slopes and newly lands,capOd should imorporato appropriate Irrigation Best Management Priactices as recommended by the IrTilgation AsscciaUon Water IManagement Conimflitee in the revised 2'0 14 Landscape [rrigation Best M-a nagement Practices docu ryient- These measures can incluide , but acre not Illonited to, * [n1gatilon system, &sjgn elficienfly uses,water resources. * Install the irrigation systern to meet the design ffiteiri,8- * Manage landscape water reSOUrces, to mairktain a htxalthy and; fandiorral lat"idscape. SCVWA appre ci atess your of these corrirne,ri Is and reques1stha twe be provid ed a 6-7 colyy of all notioas related to this pwject, I If you 1"iave, any questionis or oominients, please contact me at (661) 705-7912'. sincerely, Rick Vasil,opulos Associate Water Resources fllarv)er cc�; Steve Cole, Assistant General Mamager Dirk. Marks, Director ol''dater Resouroes Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-46 I Packet Pg. 262 1 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES Letter No. 6 Rick Vasilopulos Associate Water Resources Planner Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency 26501 Summit Circle Santa Clarita, CA 91350-3049 Comment No. 6-1 This comment acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Availability of a Draft SCEA for the Project and introduces specific comments from Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency (SCVWA). Comment No. 6-2 This comment states that the SCVWA 2015 urban Water Management Plan was adopted in June 2016, which serves as the basis for evaluation of water supply impacts for new developments and preparation of Water Supply Assessments for projects that are subject to the Senate Bill (SB) 610, which include residential developments of more than 500 dwelling units. Since the Project proposes no more than 500 units (i.e., 498 units), preparation of a WSA is not required. Comment No. 6-3 As identified in response to Initial Study Checklist Question XIX.d in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA, a demand analysis was conducted by SCVWA for the Project (se Appendix N of the Draft SCEA). The analysis indicates that the Project would generate an average daily water demand of 116 gallons per minute, which would represent approximately 0.3 percent of current water supply and available water supply in 2050. Since the existing water supplies are sufficient to serve the Project, the Project would not require new or expanded water entitlements, and impacts would be less than significant. Comment No. 6-4 As described in Section 2.0, Project Description, of the Draft SCEA, the proposed water delivery system would consist of a network of water mainlines of varying sizes that would generally follow major roadways. Project potable water pipelines would obtain water from the existing 12-inch- diameter potable water pipeline maintained by the SCVWA in Harriman Drive at the following two locations: 1) Approximately 440 linear feet east of the intersection of Harriman Drive and Lost Canyon Road 2) The intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street A network of smaller lines would be located within the planned roadway network and would distribute the water for connection to laterals located on individual buildings. Potable water storage would be supplied from the existing SCVWA infrastructure system. Non -potable water demand would be met through the use of recycled water from the Vista Canyon Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) located adjacent to the western boundary of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area, directly north of Humphreys Parkway. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 2-47 Packet Pg. 263 10.g 2.0 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT SCEA AND RESPONSES As discussed in response to Comment No. 6-3 above, the demand analysis conducted by SCVWA for the Project indicates that existing water supplies are sufficient to serve the Project. As such, the Project would not require new or expanded water entitlements, and impacts to water supply would be less than significant. Comment No. 6-5 CEQA only requires mitigation measures if substantial evidence exists of potentially significant environmental impacts. In particular, Section 15126.4(a)(4)(A) of the CEQA Guidelines states that there must be an essential nexus between the mitigation and a legitimate government interest (i.e., potential significant impact). Since the demand analysis conducted by SCVWA for the Project indicates that existing water supplies are sufficient to serve the Project, no mitigation measures are required. The only improvements required for the Project are on -site connections to the infrastructure systems in place within Harriman Drive, Lost Canyon Road, and Cooper Street, which are subject to connection fees imposed as part of the required clearance from SCVWA prior to the issuance of building permits. Comment No. 6-6 As discussed in response to Comment No. 6-3 above, the demand analysis conducted by SCVWA for the Project indicates that existing water supplies are sufficient to serve the Project. As described in Section 2.0, Project Description, of the Draft SCEA, the Project would incorporate water conservation features, such as high -efficiency irrigation, low -flow faucets and toilets, and use of non -potable water from the newly constructed Vista Canyon WRP. Comment No. 6-7 SCVWA will be provided a copy of all notices related to the Project. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 2-48 Packet Pg. 264 10.g 3.0 ERRATA AND CLARIFICATIONS This section consists of minor edits and changes to the Draft SCEA in response to public comments received, as well as minor staff edits, to revise or clarify the information in the Draft SCEA. The changes provide clarification and additional information for the Draft SCEA but do not alter the analysis or conclusions of the document. Changes were made to the following pages as noted below and are identified with revision marks (underline for new text and strike through for deleted text). 3.1 CHANGES TO THE DRAFT SCEA IN RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS The following required approval has been added to page 2-31 in Subsection 2.4.4, Project Approvals, in Section 2.0, Project Description, of the Draft SCEA: Project Site Annexation into the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts' Jurisdictional Boundary (approvals by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts and the Local Agency Formation Commissions also required). The following mitigation measure has been added to page 4-50 in response to Initial Study Checklist Question IV.a of the Draft SCEA: Mitigation Measure 1310-3: Worker Environmental Awareness Program. Prior to initiation of all construction activities (including staging and mobilization), all personnel associated with project construction shall attend a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training, conducted by a qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status biological resources Potentially occurring in the Project area. This training will include information about San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptail, coast horned lizard, California horned lark, loggerhead shrike, as well as other special -status species with potential to occur in the Project area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of special -status species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of special -status resources, review of the limits of construction and measures required to avoid and minimize impacts to biological resources within the work area, and all reporting requirements. A fact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employees, and other personnel involved with construction of the project. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer documenting then have attended the WEAP and understand the information presented to them. The crew foreman shall be responsible for ensuring crew members adhere to the guidelines and restrictions designed to avoid impacts to special -status species. The information presented in response to Initial Study Checklist Question XV.a.i on page 4-169 of the Draft SCEA has been revised as follows: Specifically, 4�15 fire stations with 4�14 engine companies, 5 paramedic squads, 1 hazardous materials squad, and 2 ladder trucks serve the Santa Clarita Valley. 3.2 STAFF -INITIATED CHANGES TO THE DRAFT SCEA The following discussion regarding the future of the Metrolink Via Princessa Station has been revised and clarified based on the City's agreement with Metrolink: City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 3-1 Packet Pg. 265 10.g 3.0 ERRATA AND CLARIFICATIONS • Fourth sentence on page 2-1 in Section 2.0, Project Description, of the Draft SCEA: The planned Metrolink Vista Canyon Station at the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center w4-May replace the Metrolink station located 1.6 miles west of the Project Site on Via Princessa.' The Metrolink Via Princessa Station was originally constructed as a temporary station in 1994 to provide a public transportation service immediately after the Northridge Earthquake. It is located upon a curve and does not meet current safety and customer service standards. Pursuant to the City's agreement with Metrolink, within two years of the Metrolink Vista Canyon Station becoming operational, the City and the Southern California Railroad Authority (SCRRA) agreed to work together to determine whether the Metrolink Via Princessa Station will remain open. If so, the station will need to be improved to comply with current safety standards and meet customer service requirements. • Fifth sentence in the last paragraph on page 4-179 of the Initial Study Checklist Question XVll.a in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA: Once the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center is complete, a new Metrolink station 444 may replace the existing Via Princessa Metrolink Station. • First sentence in the last paragraph on page 4-184 of the Initial Study Checklist Question XVll.a in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA: Regarding Criterion No. 3, the SCAG 2020-2045 RTP/SCS identifies projects in development, such as the Vista Canyon Transit Center, `"'hir h ;AVei I'd relr\n-a+o the exiStiRg Via DririGesS o4rr.liRk statiOR to the Vista !�`a RYGR ar girl iRGIUde vrscu�rryv ri—crre� ,�rta—rrt including a bus transfer station and an adjacent parking structure with up to 750 parking spaces. References to "Century City/Westwood" have been added to the discussion of regional bus service provided by the City of Santa Clarita Transit as follows: • Third and fifth sentences on page 2-1 in Section 2.0, Project Description, of the Draft SCEA The Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center will serve the Santa Clarita/Antelope Valley commuter line, which provides service between the City of Lancaster in the Antelope Valley, Santa Clarita, Century City/Westwood, and downtown Los Angeles.... Santa Clarita Transit provides local and regional (Commuter Express) bus service, operating local routes within the Santa Clarita Valley and regional routes to and from downtown Los Angeles, Century City/Westwood, Antelope Valley, Van Nuys, and the Warner Center. • Third and fourth sentences in the Consistency Assessment of Goal 2 in Table 3.1-1, Consistency Analysis with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Strategy Policies, on page 3-3 in Section 3.0, Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Eligibility, of the Draft SCEA: The Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center will serve the Santa Clarita/Antelope Valley commuter line, which provides service between the City of Lancaster in the Antelope Valley, Santa Clarita, Century City/Westwood, and downtown Los Angeles. Santa Clarita Transit will provide local and regional (Commuter Express) Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 3-2 Packet Pg. 266 10.g 3.0 ERRATA AND CLARIFICATIONS bus service within the Santa Clarita Valley and to and from downtown Los Angeles, Century City/Westwood, Antelope Valley, Van Nuys, and the Warner Center. • First sentence in the Consistency Assessment of Strategy 1(a) in Table 3.1-1, Consistency Analysis with the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Strategy Policies, on page 3-6 in Section 3.0, Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Eligibility, of the Draft SCEA: Consistent. The Project would develop a variety of new housing types, including affordable senior housing, adjacent to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center, which provides regional rail and bus service to the City of Lancaster in the Antelope Valley, Santa Clarita, Century City/Westwood, an4-downtown Los Angeles, Van Nuys, and the Warner Center. • First sentence in the first full paragraph on page 4-145 of the Initial Study Checklist Question Xl.b in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA: The Project would be immediately adjacent to the future Metrolink Vista Canyon Station and the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center, which will include a bus transfer station that will accommodate local routes within the Santa Clarita Valley and regional routes to and from Los Angeles, Century City/Westwood, Antelope Valley, Van Nuys, and the Warner Center. The checked box on page 4-17 for Initial Study Checklist Question XXI.c in Section 4.0, Initial Study Checklist, of the Draft SCEA has been corrected from "Less Than Significant Impact' to "Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation" to match the impacts discussion starting on page 4-213 of the Draft SCEA: XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: Potentially Significant Impact c) Does the project have environmental [ ] effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Less Than Impact With Significant No Mitigation Impact Impact City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 3-3 Packet Pg. 267 10.g 3.0 ERRATA AND CLARIFICATIONS This page intentionally left blank. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 3-4 Packet Pg. 268 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The following environmental mitigation measures identified in Table 4-1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, were incorporated into the approval for this Project in order to mitigate potentially significant environmental impacts. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that the mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented and fulfills the City of Santa Clarita's monitoring requirements with respect to PRC Section 21081.6. The mitigation measures are numbered as presented in the Draft SCEA. Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Issue Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification' Responsible Agency Timing Status of Implementation AIR QUALITY Mitigation The project applicant or contractor Issuance of City of Santa Pre - Measure AQ-1 shall select equipment during applicable Clarita Public construction construction to minimize building permit Works and emissions. The Project applicant and field Department/ construction shall submit a construction inspection sign- Development phases management plan to the City of off Services Santa Clarita for review and Division approval, prior to issuance of any grading and building permits. The construction management plan shall demonstrate that the off -road equipment used on site to construct the project would include the following: • All diesel -fueled equipment used during project construction shall be equipped with Tier 4 Final engines. In the event that Tier 4 Final engines are not commercially available, use of alternatively fueled (i.e., non -diesel) equipment or other control technology (i.e., diesel - particulate filters) may suffice, as long as an overall average fleet exhaust PM2.5 emissions reduction of 89 percent below emission levels estimated for the standard fleet mix in the California Emissions Estimator Model can be demonstrated. • Construction equipment staging shall be situated as far from existing residential receptors as possible. • Construction haul routes shall be limited to paved roads and minimize travel adjacent to existing residences. City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 4-1 Packet Pg. 269 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Method of Environmental Review Responsible Status of Issue Mitigation Measure Verification Agency Timing implementation BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mitigation Sixty days prior to grading Qualified City of Santa 60 days Measure BIO-1 activities, a qualified biologist biologist to Clarita prior to shall contact and consult with consult with the Community grading City staff regarding the timing of City regarding Development activities; no preconstruction surveys. In any timing of pre- Department/ later than 30 event, within 30 days prior to construction Planning days prior to grading activities, a qualified surveys; Division grading biologist shall conduct a survey qualified biologist activities within appropriate habitat areas to conduct to relocate individual coastal surveys whiptail, coast horned lizard, and San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit in order to avoid or minimize take of these sensitive species. Relocation will occur through live capture and release, or in the case of black -tailed jackrabbits, by encouraging the animals to leave the site. Individuals shall be relocated to nearby undisturbed areas with suitable habitat, as identified by the qualified biologist in consultation with City staff. Results of the surveys and relocation efforts shall be provided to the City. Collection and relocation of animals shall only occur with the proper handling permits, as applicable. Mitigation Beginning 30 or more days prior Qualified City of Santa No later Measure BIO-2 to the removal of any suitable biologist to Clarita than 30 nesting habitat that will occur consult with the Community days prior to during the bird breeding and City regarding Development grading nesting season of February 1 timing of pre- Department/ activities through August 31, the applicant construction Planning shall arrange for weekly bird surveys; Division surveys to detect the California qualified biologist horned lark or any other nesting to conduct bird species protected by the surveys California Fish and Game Code or Migratory Bird Treaty Act, in the habitats to be removed and any other suitable nesting habitat within 300 feet of the construction work areas. The surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist using industry - accepted survey protocols. The surveys shall continue on a Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 4-2 Packet Pg. 270 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Issue Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Timing Status of implementafion weekly basis, with the last survey being conducted no more than 7 days prior to the initiation of any construction work involving vegetation removal and/or within 300 feet of off -site nesting habitat. If an active nest is found, clearing and construction within 300 feet of the nest shall be postponed until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, and when there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. Limits of construction to avoid a nest site shall be established in the field with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the ecological sensitivity of the area. Incursion into the protective buffer shall only occur at the discretion of a qualified biologist, and only if monitoring and other protective measures are implemented to ensure that work activities are not affecting the nest. Results of the surveys, including surveys to locate nests, shall be provided to the City. The results shall include a description of any nests located and measures to be implemented to avoid nest sites. Mitigation Prior to initiation of all Qualified City of Santa Pre - Measure 113I0-3 construction activities (including biologist to Clarita construction staging and mobilization), all conduct training Community personnel associated with Development project construction shall attend Department/ a Worker Environmental Planning Awareness Program (WEAP) Division training, conducted by a qualified biologist, to aid workers in recognizing special status biological resources potentially occurring in the Project area. This training will include information about San Diego black -tailed jackrabbit, coastal whiptail, coast horned lizard, California horned lark, City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 4-3 Packet Pg. 271 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Method of Environmental Review Responsible Status of Issue Mitigation Measure Verification Agency Timing implementation loggerhead shrike, as well as other special -status species with potential to occur in the Project area. The specifics of this program shall include identification of special -status species and habitats, a description of the regulatory status and general ecological characteristics of special -status resources, review of the limits of construction and measures required to avoid and minimize impacts to biological resources within the work area, and all reporting requirements. Afact sheet conveying this information shall also be prepared for distribution to all contractors, their employees, and other personnel involved with construction of the project. All employees shall sign a form provided by the trainer documenting they have attended the WEAP and understand the information presented to them. The crew foreman shall be responsible for ensuring crew members adhere to the guidelines and restrictions designed to avoid impacts to special -status species. CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation Prior to the commencement of Qualified City of Santa Pre - Measure CUL-1 any construction activities on- archaeologist to Clarita construction site, the applicant shall retain a conduct training Community qualified archaeologist to provide Development archaeological awareness Department/ training at the construction Planning kickoff meeting to ensure proper Division identification and treatment of inadvertent discoveries. In the event that archaeological resources (e.g., sites, features, artifacts, or fossilized material) are exposed during construction activities for the Project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 4-4 Packet Pg. 272 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Issue Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Timing Status of implementafion specialist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether additional study is warranted. Depending upon the significance of the find, the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. Mitigation Prior to the commencement of Qualified City of Santa Pre - Measure CUL-2 any grading activity on -site, the paleontologist to Clarita construction applicant shall retain a qualified conduct training Community paleontologist per the Society of Development Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) Department/ 2010 guidelines. The Planning paleontologist shall prepare a Division Paleontological Resources Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Project. The PRIMP shall be consistent with the SVP guidelines and shall outline requirements for preconstruction meeting attendance and worker environmental awareness training; where monitoring is required within the Project area based on construction plans and/or geotechnical reports; procedures for adequate paleontological monitoring and discoveries treatment; and paleontological methods, reporting, and collections management. The qualified paleontologist shall attend the preconstruction meeting and a paleontological monitor shall be on -site during all rough grading and other significant ground - disturbing activities in previously undisturbed Mint Canyon Formation materials. In the event that paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are unearthed City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 4-5 Packet Pg. 273 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Method of Environmental Review Responsible Status of Issue Mitigation Measure Verification Agency Timing implementation during grading, the paleontological monitor will temporarily halt and/or divert grading activity to allow recovery of paleontological resources. The area of discovery will be roped off with a 50-foot radius buffer. Once documentation and collection of the find is completed, the monitor will remove the rope and allow grading to recommence in the area of the find. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation The Project shall retain a Professional City of Santa During the Measure TCR-1 professional Native American native American Clarita excavation monitor procured by the to observe all Community and grading Fernandeno Tataviam Band of ground- Development phases of Mission Indians to observe all disturbing Department/ construction ground -disturbing activities, activities Planning including, but not limited to, Division excavating, digging, trenching, plowing, drilling, tunneling, quarrying, grading, leveling, clearing, driving posts, auguring, backfilling, blasting, stripping topsoil or a similar activity, and any archaeological work conducted during Project construction. If cultural resources are encountered, the Native American monitor shall have the authority to request ground - disturbing activities to cease within 60 feet of discovery to assess and document the potential finds in real time. Mitigation If significant pre -contact and/or Qualified City of Santa Upon Measure TCR-2 post -contact cultural resources, archaeologist to Clarita discovery of as defined by CEQA, are prepare ATP Community resources discovered and avoidance Development cannot be ensured, the Department/ archaeologist shall develop an Planning Archaeological Treatment Plan Division (ATP), the drafts of which shall be provided to the Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians for review and comments. The ATP shall provide details regarding the Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 4-6 Packet Pg. 274 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Environmental Issue Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Timing Status of implementation process for in -field treatment of inadvertent discoveries and the disposition of inadvertently discovered non -funerary resources. Mitigation The City and applicant shall, in Qualified City of Santa Upon Measure TCR-3 good faith, consult with the archaeologist to Clarita discovery of Fernandeno Tataviam Band of assist in Community resources Mission Indians on the coordination with Development disposition and treatment of any the tribe on the Department/ tribal cultural resource disposition and Planning encountered during all ground- treatment of Division disturbing activities. resources City of Santa Clarita Metro Walk Specific Plan February 2021 Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment 4-7 Packet Pg. 275 10.g 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This page intentionally left blank. Metro Walk Specific Plan City of Santa Clarita Final Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment February 2021 4-8 Packet Pg. 276 n oj 10 . . . . . . . . . . 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 z E 0 0 an 1 E nRR Lu O LLJ LU01 um t j F —11 M < < AM Al o of(P gbo co J-Efv I a a �° �uvn u i)1 Vi U N c c c c c y F R F Uo H aY U c aY m c c d m N c E° Z m Q� (J m Z 2 r U O '. 2 U > W W W .0 E' W {� N I Aa o ~ W S" � QW J iY C'f Ol O) Yl C 11 S 'i> Q W g a = Vd mmo V l0 N JO QQdNLOOW��OYj EN .E O N R7 d' JO NLOp WW 0.mC W ON m N U U f0 W N O t QNrn ON "J�NO I co 0 Z U d- U QQ OcOW�rlfot3 mOMN cU O(� W N W W �N U0Qi@) UW mOoO)�QC03O no w„�3,ryrty<ieu!W,%. N W ~m` Cai..Y1i, O O - 'O a NO 3 QUNU QNU QNNii W NO (2°U)N YnYtt K�" N Q � a !: o N N O }Y m ° N N - c o N a o� a c o E E > Okv10W0l I0Nc.° �Nm �mO0 O� O y OO>mi OQ l ' - 0UQO O(6Om c0MN Q S<0 �N U I O 1) N m< 0 U W OLU Q y o N. -EU CfE O C om cCmtf O OZ C Aw O� �3 ,O °6 O§QD `c >ON C'(r- O Z C6rOiCj QC QCOh Qm OW..O-c 10 O W@ "O a fJMa O E "U NNNUm �MW0GNc�dUG VZmc° EO 0 a Ma OW N O N N N u O N @ N N N N @ Cy E fj i o U) mm Q m 0 Q m Q m Q m Q m pQNo >O1 d QN� 0.tlIJt Nd coCd5 OOQO NCa pMOQO [fN.Jr OmQO llUFm N am Q m 'O N W^O °Op0jZQiYS OpU0 NOOa Nm NmQO� N U a N Al EUc J9Nj OO Q J�Um Q QG UNOQ-�mOc) ( JUmNo 66 lONoon iN O rOVm O No 0 (Ut>$ Ncm C djN ` WNo C4ff,1�i ae`w a rOm °O � aUNO) �m N a� N3m E O�O 0 o O OOON O (ri::3: moNnl O Et`b mooar`E ON o J N C) U-NNNUOUmN Nci UQNN< C (D NU) UQNoaLLNNWNYrn ai 0 U Y U m N c O N U 100 p O W O [l j N d c N yJ N d m u=i NN m �OUQ�mw @ ON N @03 rlY @ N ONi El N C a j �o VfYUmO W..`N'@ NUmp°�WWN .mNo> mN UJJ U C3 U OpU O E 2N,) E N �OON^ M O O , O m N O O COl v? Cio yLN2 zOm OEp `vf-il °p@> CsUUl�-U ` oo mrn �W Do YL yip W - c x H W N O RI d N O U' LL a J O 6 w @ O (0 M m q5 N N M @N .'�. W N O LL N .... N m LL r` N G..) O~ O O m G° N CO).. U- N a a ON N N a L m U Z W cQ E U N QOYN N�Or U� E^vo cz E mUm� c7 m�-ci > U �m m4 o'Sif .0Q W O cIl Y O 'C N m Q Jm E LOLL 30 3Z�v Q N W CO W Z zw3— oaa mad 'YJN l �'rrrF aaaa- �a¢¢a a¢a¢4� err aa�a p �r QN wJ NCn Vi N(r0� �FF u, N N NN pmm far NNfr!]N �'�ma�r z z ymy z ¢ r J J N _ 6 h Tw Ox N (� Q 0 QHQCJ W !nm m 4 t+Y3 l—N 4 UJ Wa� O JZ� Ow W rC5 V�i m U Q pp>� NN J Ct G F 4 �u Cu N� WN Wy��j! m (J> K h UL f�up Ada as p3p N N 54i�i� J O7 F0- C3� Fp- m0 a 8S ¢�z¢ Q¢¢ W9m Qmm K ¢ �N dm �idm � a r 1. r T, Jp cu p a p- 0 rj N N n. ���� Wuai� Wmuoi 9 cc N oG r o0 r.N vO ?.o o T f 4 2 a z r0 r z r0 r z O r am n, a o �4 � m3S a a Q J > mmm �Nr �, M r¢ rasTNM � Oer a � U ❑ W ) J o y o W c— m a � W s a, W Z "Z Z ry N iv ca YL n, WY 2� y�n - Ar WO and O y �. H " ro � O X_ Z m o Z zNcl c5 V m dm mLtl llm--dm SR pcLLJc[( J QJ¢ qqJ ¢Jd �I Z NxTTxS 0(.1 m Z6u=.0 u❑. � �t=i. i 0 �zam�N ❑ rn a N�NNm mm ro.. ro NN "'m m w m a w za 3 W Y a mJ e3 LLQm ml{q- w `4 a t r W W qm qN N 2 2 2 x 2 a s ❑ s a�GFG exe((x oFs W QC�C� m w N � z 4m mdrym �� ❑2. 9m m.< p�z�i 5 mo�� O w I`i�� 2. 0 L Do 0 0 Doc 0 0 Om 2 Z 3¢ m2222 CjNdm IIJd m ¢dm 2 J K U uu uu a u SJMhNN CNN N N HST s� o M� O r i on / } } ( § \ \ ( ( } } <:vddyd«III 9y9 � x -------------- J !n !n (n !n J tJ (n Q Q Q Q < Q Q Q w SC < 1~n m m J Z V j Y CF_ i Q LLJ = Q a LU J i J = V a m O J J Q O z = ~ ue m O a O F m ¢ w O LU � ❑ m J � w W mwamu Z LU O Q (q W J w w> U) u F Q O Q .0 LU W J O w O>> O --"-II-b - m------- 3 � D _— — _ _�------. - ----------- ---- X"I w p b o o � z¢ J�8"; a oo Q ouv�;l W O) Y II J 3 N Q W z o o w olQ Q zz Qd ~ z0d QwQ z WOO W<> x" o g a o z QOo w°a j < Q z � W S =um m QY� Cl) d z 01 m 0 g Q d� �Qoz ao 0 W o > za wig �z� Z O w a 3< 0 O0 0 < z W CD m a0 O > 0 m 0 R 0 Q w Q `" d rwuumuw n � W� W \\\ �� >00'0w > w o .uA r J ME O O< d �row✓^�" 11111!IIIIIIII 11!IIIIIIIIIII S - - z Q a co co w O Q w CE o � z Y CJ w c Z ¢ z O Lil O 0 Z <W Q W <� � W mu¢i z Zd�m ��0� D�Q d Z, IZ � 000 �Z,. 00 - - ZZ 00 �Z �0 dew <PON O~0 01 Qom QOuii 0 m Om� 0 m Omww 0 a Oz 0�m Omro �zN ON �zdd or � m Oro lZm a0 a0�- m0N o2 I I I I I I I S MbE J�E a' ouv i i; J W Lu W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v �mw r z Q a z w w Q z co CE M"E x J�E a' O u v \i Vo i; JW= Lu W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v '20 i -r~ A �I e E All n ° 1. 1 1 mo+i'T (IIIIIIIIII n n T 1\ ✓ . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 Jill lo o - IIII�IIIIIIIIII v,� IIII NII� v� 0 9Vlqul �, � IIIIIIiIVI kkk �� IIIIIIIII `1 ��' fPP Pes wee IIIIII. 1 � I kk} k44 — g IIII, \ \ I^ IIIIIIIII L Y �— �x yY �I at+ is o o ;7, IIIIII 0 T •e �� O m 3 � � e ° HW ' m IIIII I III ®IIIIIIIII IIIII � m u �f �I-TIT -1I1 I1I-1 I-1-1�lz� coW Z z3— =_� - ------- 2-,, 0u8n� a W Q F w ~ CE C — 2 ¢ Q o w Z W = ¢ >ZJ ti Qd z� W $mo� =uQ QZZ Qzz O O O O z z Otwwn zw O» z O<OWWOOwwO—W G � J darcwwcnaccwwv� 3<� 6C7 C5OOO60000 zzzzzzzzzzz Q ws�>,m "�` noon000000o O I—J J JJJJ_IJ J J Jm0m xo - = m m m m m m ¢] ¢] m m m Q Q Q rmzxxzzzzzzzzaaw � Jr-M rr-MMD DDDD w �row✓rt�^ OOOOwww_>OOOZZ Q h O O O O O O O O O O O Z Z Q Z Z z z Z z cn in in in cn » 2 4— O Nc V to t01001 'N .: M2 O O O O O O O O O O r aaaaaaaaaiaaaaa (D z 0 J m D O U) Q a_ +T TLLLLII1'1[TI TI ITITIl� 1 WII III111LC�������T���Srir�r�rlr�trlri� ����� � ,t r Lh ��,u'}lili"�, 0 W gbo F J U zll a W �uvn 0- CO CE Q� w w �— Q W s o �[ W s F =um m ±]]HIS NIVA JIU S °) ): .f / —<} 0-w o x u}} z _j / \ EE 0 � \ »999 z�u !2z ;»— gbo 0 0 ❑ro❑ JIE a u v n J W F LU W s o =um o 3<_ �mrcmu v 3Z�v Q N W m W Z z�3- : z 7 \ \ } \ ) ( j \ � : } : : : : : : } : ( § ( : \\\\\\\\Sdy\ / \ \ a� � \� � � \ z�u !2z ;»- w a z Q o 0 o a o< J W a w o w° 3 i Y a 0 zQ>o =�m z oo o � > w ❑❑9❑❑❑❑❑❑❑0❑❑ z O Q w J W co W co O O J a 0 z F LLLLLIw U v n J o o I LU z g m �um ' � z �v � _ �o 3 a o `v V / \ j j \ z Iz : z \ _ - \ } ( \ ( } } } \ ( \ . i ( . § y3»y»S«FT] SS } / \ 2 -;\ -8 S °) .f: « -;) � -<} w { x u}: 3<)� : \ co M-E z —i I i\ S °\� z ) = LU \ LU °}) o ° 3<)� � \ � \ z�u !2z ;»— z Q a LL O CE 0 z 0 J ED m O co 0 0 ❑ro❑ JIE a U v n J W � LU W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v �mw 3Z�v Q N W m W Z z�3- > \ - _ _ } } : § t \ j § } } } / ) ( 0 j _ _ } ) \ and\\d\dd\S9y9» � a� � \� � � \ z�u !2z ;»- z z Q °o 'a � z a o � z o ° x z 0 ma > 0 >jO o w 0ao QQQm ° o ° z ww oaa 3 a m m J ❑ ❑7 ❑J ❑ W❑ LL❑ C9❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ z O Q W W co W A i (Y) co O g u J a _ Z ou, W Z Q m mum Oco w mmew v z O Q W W O co co z O Q W J W 0 W Q CE O O 0 z 0 J_ ED CO F O co z ¢ 0 0 0 o z 0 a z O oo ° 3 w a z 0 z z a 0 o a . z m 0 o z > w 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Q gbo J�8 a u v n Jo W W = o W S =um 3<_ �mrcmu v rmrc N z�v co Z �3- LL LL LL LL cncn(j)O O r(0 BOO I- (`') N In Ln r LL LL LL LL COCOCOU r r r- � � O CO CO CO LL LL LL L L 0 N Nr(y)(pCC) O 0 co g�oG z J E Q a 0uvn� J W j C � LLLI x LU S =um 3<_ �mrcmu v [[[® aca=e / G%°Z z�u !2z ;»- 0 e 1-1 B a p o �g z =z 0 O O Z� i I 1'0? CJ H � a o m x ° 1-1 1-1 1-1 0 ° � J�E 0 O a U v n m 2 m �~ m LLl Q W s 3<_ �mrcmu v "At"a 0 o°a o�z ~4irv�0 0 Z�v co Z �3— 2-, CV Q W .mm O z z z O ? zz m- OO ooOzzQ mzzz= a-QaO< d owU~ m , , w h W 5 5-5 J J W z Q ammm—mO2 N r�vmmnrorn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q � �ll11LWJ1'1TLI�lifITVT�T1Tf'�'iTl'N " .� � � � YITITITIT14fITlTITIT11V1TITITITITI�, fs 70 \ \ } } \ \ \ } } \ } \ \ \ \ Sy»y3yy»y9««999 zr _ z 0 a a z O O m x O =z z= 0 o w o > w o 0 ° a z Q> o Q Q Q z w o o> m m w m J ❑ ❑] ❑J ❑ W❑ ❑ ❑9 ❑ ❑ z O Q W W co W i a z 4N z O Q W W F O co N z O Q W W z 0 J_ ED CO 2-, O 8, u v n Jo W Wx� W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v j > j ! - \ } 2 { t ( } ( / - )\\\\\\\\\\ / \ \ \� 4^ 2 -;\ -8 S °) .f: « -;) � -[{ w } x u}: 3<)� : \ � ■ 2 - ;\ : j Z - j \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } y3»y»S«FT] S } \j -8 S °) « -;) � -<} w { x u}: 3<)� : \ � ■ z « 7° o v 1: \ / oo, § J §} \�$\° 7 co §z;»— / LL LL LL LL cncnco0 r r N N N N (D(CC) O EEo roroYa m m o 0 0<< ° mopco m z LL LL LL LL co co co 0 N Nr(')(pcc) ()) ()) O O 0) r EEmmYa')' N N (J CR O O Q Q D m 0 N 0] z C7 LL LL LL CO CO CO L L 0 N NNr(0O ()) C co z Q a z O 8, U v n Jo W Wx� W S =um 3<_ �mrcmu v EEmmYm N N J O O Q Q D m�Oz co M C7 C Ei 3 z ZaNv co Z �3— (; d y d d d << \\ }j } :} §}§:: d »4§ z;»� \\ }j } :} §}§:: d »4§ z;»� 4 MaE J E 8 U E n J J W ;; w Q w Lu QF � � Q — w O Q LLJ o a LU g m o 3 o � Ow w�mrc�u v N � > d m z m rnaz GQam w w rnrrc rH •.N O +-Nch V NtD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M M T M Q Q Q Q Q Q Q o d o a a a a ., .e ,._., ...., la gbo J e 0 a u v n JW= LLJ W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v Do Do 5 zD \\\/\ \ 8 S °)f z -f% \ g -<} = LLJ LU u}} 3<)� � \ \ \� Z/ /i ; - Iz : } ; - [ 0o - §\\\\\\\\\\\ (� -8 S « -;) e —<} z LLJ \ LU u}} 2 6 3c z / E / � Zo o z�u !2z ;»— v . \ M.E -E, : — S °),l -- �-f: « -;) co / LLJ _ \ Lu u}} 2 6 3<)� \ / E / ( /_ _ 2 ( o , ,< \ \\\\\\\\\\\\ j } j \ co o, Z Q J E' 8 , 0uEE,� J W j C � LLJ W s =uE 3<_ �mrcmu v LL LL LL LL CO (0 CO 0 �mw✓^"" r r N 0 0 N N Ln(00 Ln Ln r E 0 6 Y N N N J O O Q Q D CO 07m OZ 0 b o LL LL 11 LL (j) (j) (j)0 N NCC) CC) (OCC) N(0(D0 CC) r (; d y d \\ y d \ �z y y A�/�2dd3 y ■ | z�u !2z ;»- U) W 0 z 0 a a' m 0 m o O1z0 m �uEf, V m0 a J O -j "' - o a JJo a s 0 Q OJ Q Q� o o F- D a❑ , z a a LU cn00M O w 0= n 0 0 g Q - o CO m N m w O z Z Z W s" u. cn CC 4- g a �f� cncn° �� a =um m x x x x x x x x o_o_> �nv J J J J J W J J I— I— J a a a a a a a a Q m Z<< w <O r rNch� » mm(n[n �mnW gWw+o v z z z z z z z z F F F a w w Z< �rrcrc ;S<ggwwn<< mm�������Ww�gm zz zzzzzzzzz n,g » > J C)(D0 0 D000ou000—<<<<<000,< a 00FDOa<O00 QQaaaaaaa=_=O �J J J J»JJJJ»i-hi-h�-�-i-m mma W m - - - - w w - - - - a' w - - - - - - - > > > m F Z Z Z Z Z Z Z J J J< Q ror�r,N^N W J J 7 D D D J J ammmmwwmmmmww » >>ww000UO2 NM 71n (0 f� D�d)Or NCJ 7ln (0 f� oJmO Nco V In O O O O O O O O O r r N N N N N N d' d' V' d' d' d' d' d' d' QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ a aaaaaaaaaaamammmaaaaaaaa { .,., Il TITITITI V TIT�IlTTI, w > o z J E 4/ U5 8, 0uvnl a cnm t[T w aw QF �— J W = m a LU sol =um 3<_ fin% N rn 9 w a z Q d C3 z 0 m J�8 O8 U v n J W F Lu W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v »co� z z;»- z a o 0 0 0 0 w 00 0 o w 3 w o ° i ow o < z Q Q 0 a w oz oz 5 u 0 © 0❑ of ❑0 ❑w ❑LL ❑C7 ❑I co Z O 8 r1 J a' --- `-- Q U v n v o w J "' �o J N 'T x J WLU um a 3<_ N w " z z O 00 o 1. z ¢ 0 'o z o o < ' o < z z z 0 Q o LL o w z i Q Q Q o o z z m 5 o o ® o❑ o❑ o❑ ❑W ❑LL ❑C7 ❑o C7 ' co MqE z FE 0 8 1 Q Ouvo w J "= o J LU LU x LV s 0 � =um a 3<_ "At"" ; 3z�V a� W ca W Z � z,3— -8 S °) « -;) � -<} w { x u}: 3<)� : \ »co� z z;»- »2§u z z;»- -8 S °) « -;) � -<} w { x u}: 3<)� : \ »co� z z;»- M -,? -8 S °) « -;) � —<} w { x u}: 3<)� : \ co z .7\ O 0)\ « LU d LU ) » j ��}/ � x u(} � � \ a z a o 0 00 o 0 0 0 o w 00 z a 0 o w w 0 ° z 0 ' o < a z o Q Q 0 a w oz 0z 5 u 0 © 0❑ of ❑0 ❑w ❑LL ❑C7 ❑I co z O Q w J W r X W d gbo »4§z z;»- = faƒzzz i *\\\ z } % R R / __ LL [[//2 gg<< / sect 3//z 0 _ 0 0 z z 0 \ 0 \ z } \ \ 8 O0E z �.\\ § � -<} w x u(} 3<)� � \ \ co z J E Q 8 d 0uvn� j C � LLJ W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v CC N cy) = LL LL LL LL O 1 N (n (n (n (n OJ F +LOB —CCO LL LL I� (fl N F N r r co LL E E c6 c6 O Y O O m mt m o 2QQap m U)�o mmozo 0 c� rT- O O J LL 0 z O O Lu CO O O J LL 0 F ore r� N II �x YN sr �D� �o a CE O 0 LL F rr rr LL CE O O LL 0 z O O w co CE O O LL LL 0 F LL LL LL LL N co co co co + � N N O LL N r N N r r E E c6 co -z O N N o t 0 oQQpn pZ m m�z 0 co gb z J E Q 8 , 0uEE,� J W j C � LLJ W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v CE O O J LL CO rT— LL o,o o-ov m O O J LL 0 F (Y) = LL LL LL LL N CO CO CO CO +� CO 0O N C N N c6 c6 Y O O 0 o Q Q p a -C U m ° oZ m 0 co gbo, Z J E Q 8 d 0uvn� j C � LLJ W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v o-av 0 \ \ G z _ 0 0 z e 0 \ co ^}[[[[ < 8 *y/22 \ U�}\ za=a agg �.}\ / ...... EE$@jf o o w.:\ LU . °(} \/\f§° )/ A.I> 3<{1 g z � � \ � � \ o Zo \ \ , � } ) \ } j ( : \ } \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ « -8 S °) .f: « -;) � -[{ LLJ LU u}} 3<}1 : \ z�u !2z ;»— co z O Q w J W W co D O ED 2"o O 8, u v n Jo W W = o W S =um 3<_ �mrcmu v m co z O Q w J W W co D O ED 2 - , ,,� O 8, u vn Jo LLJ W W S =um 3<_ �mrcmu v z � � . O J E d 8 Q U n�. JW- 'T z'o �~ Q LLJ W=s N g EE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �D////////////////////% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNN�i�M�N��������������n� 0 0 0 0 '' O z �EE ZLL } CC Z_ Q0 � f ; O Z 0 U) J w Z Q a z Z W w w U I 0] LL 1-1 w Z O F w O 0 J 1-1 0 m C) o U) o 1-1 METROWALK DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE hllps://www.santa-clarita.com/cily-hall/departinents/communily- devel opment/pTanning-division/environmental-impact-re orts-under- review/metrowalk-SDecifiC-Dlan MetroWalk Specific Plan Prepared for: Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC 2001 Wilshire Boulevard, Ste. 401 Santa Monica, California 90403 Contact: Adam Browning Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Shannon Wages FEBRUARY 2021 Printed on 30% post -consumer recycled material. TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Intent and Purpose of Specific Plan................................................................1-1 1.2 Organization of the Specific Plan...................................................................1-2 1.3 Project Location.................................................................................................1-3 1.3.1 Location..................................................................................................1-3 1.3.2 Surrounding Uses.................................................................................1-3 1.3.3 Site Characteristics................................................................................1-4 1.4 Authority............................................................................................................1-4 1.5 The Specific Plan's Relationship to the General Plan and Santa Clarita MunicipalCode.................................................................................................1-4 1.5.1 Relationship to the General Plan........................................................1-4 1.5.2 Relationship to the Santa Clarita Municipal Code ...........................1-5 1.6 Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act ...........................1-5 1.6.1 Senate Bill 226 CEQA Streamlining....................................................1-5 1.6.2 Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013)..........................................................1-6 1.7 Compliance with Other Laws and Regulations............................................1-6 1.7.1 Global Warming Solutions Act...........................................................1-6 1.7.2 The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act ...........1-6 1.7.3 Southern California Association of Governments ...........................1-7 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Specific Plan Objectives.................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Land Use Plan.................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.1 Land Use Designation Zones.............................................................. 2-4 2.3.2 Planning Areas...................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Mobility Plan..................................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 2-9 2.4.2 Existing Regional Circulation and Access.........................................2-9 2.4.3 Local Roadway Circulation and Access .......................................... 2-10 2.4.4 Parking Plan......................................................................................... 2-11 2.5 Landscape Plan................................................................................................2-31 2.6 Open Space, Parks and Recreation Plan......................................................2-31 2.7 Sustainability Plan.......................................................................................... 2-32 2.7.1 Introduction......................................................................................... 2-32 2.7.2 Application of Project Design Features ........................................... 2-32 MetroWalk Specific Plan TOC-i February 2021 3.0 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ...................................................... 3-1 3.1 Purpose and Intent............................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Grading Plan......................................................................................................3-1 3.2.1 Existing Conditions.............................................................................. 3-1 3.2.2 Proposed Conditions............................................................................ 3-1 3.3 Drainage/Water Quality................................................................................... 3-2 3.3.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................... 3-2 3.3.2 Proposed Conditions............................................................................ 3-2 3.4 Water Service/Recycled Water........................................................................3-4 3.4.1 Existing Conditions.............................................................................. 3-4 3.4.2 Proposed Conditions............................................................................ 3-4 3.5 Wastewater Service........................................................................................... 3-5 3.5.1 Existing Conditions............................................................................... 3-5 3.5.2 Proposed Conditions............................................................................ 3-5 3.6 Dry Utilities........................................................................................................ 3-6 3.6.1 Existing Conditions.............................................................................. 3-6 3.6.2 Proposed Conditions............................................................................ 3-6 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS..........................................................................4-1 4.1 Purpose and Intent............................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 Consistency with Adopted Plans.................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Relationship to City's Unified Development Code ...................................... 4-1 4.4 Existing Uses and Severability........................................................................4-1 4.5 Administration.................................................................................................. 4-2 4.6 Land Use Designations.................................................................................... 4-2 4.6.1 Land Use Plan and Zones.................................................................... 4-2 4.7 Allowed Land Uses/Permit Requirements.................................................... 4-2 4.7.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 4-2 4.7.2 Residential (R) Use Types....................................................................4-3 4.7.3 Open Space (OS) Use Types................................................................ 4-4 4.8 Site Development Standards........................................................................... 4-5 4.8.1 Purpose and Intent................................................................................ 4-5 4.8.2 Development Standards....................................................................... 4-5 4.9 Transfer Adjustment Regulations................................................................... 4-7 4.9.1 Planning Area Transfers...................................................................... 4-7 4.9.2 Planning Area Boundary, Acreage, and Adjustments .................... 4-8 4.10 Signage Regulations......................................................................................... 4-9 4.10.1 Purpose and Intent................................................................................ 4-9 4.10.2 Applicability and Conformance......................................................... 4-9 4.11 Parking Regulations........................................................................................ 4-10 4.11.1 Purpose and Intent.............................................................................. 4-10 MetroWalk Specific Plan TOC-ii February 2021 4.11.2 Parking Regulations............................................................................ 4-10 5.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES.............................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Purpose and Intent............................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 General Guidelines........................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 Design Themes...................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.2 Site Planning.......................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.3 Architecture........................................................................................... 5-2 5.2.4 Fencing....................................................................................................5-2 5.3 Other Applicable Architectural Guidelines .................................................. 5-2 5.3.1 Application Process Guidelines.......................................................... 5-3 6.0 SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Purpose and Intent............................................................................................ 6-1 6.2 Implementation Procedures............................................................................ 6-1 6.3 Phasing............................................................................................................... 6-1 6.4 Relationship with The City's Unified Development Code ......................... 6-1 6.4.1 Substantial Conformance for Minor Deviations ............................... 6-2 6.4.2 Substantial Conformance Procedure; Adjustments, Variances, and Minor Use Permit for Parking Reductions Procedure ..................... 6-3 6.4.3 Specific Plan Amendments and Major Modifications ..................... 6-4 FIGURES Figure 1.0-1 Regional Location Figure 1.0-2 Site Vicinity........................................................... Figure 1.0-3 Plan Area Aerial ..................................................... Figure 1.0-4 Development Surrounding Specific Plan ............... Figure 1.0-5 Project Site Photos ................................................. Figure 2.0-1 Land Use Plan ........................................................ Figure 2.0-2 Mobility Plan ......................................................... Figure 2.0-3 Pedestrian Pathways ............................................... Figure 2.0-4 Lost Canyon Road .................................................. Figure 2.0-5 Harriman Drive ...................................................... Figure 2.0-6 Cooper Street Section ............................................ Figure 2.0-7 Drive Aisle Entry ................................................... Figure 2.0-8 Private Drive Section Carport ................................ Figure 2.0-9 Private Drive Parallel Parking ............................... Figure 2.0-10 Private Drive Section No Parking .......................... Figure 2.0-11 Conceptual Landscape Plan ................................... Figure 2.0-12 Conceptual Landscape Plan ................................... Figure 2.0-13 Conceptual Open Space Plan ................................. .......................................... 1-9 ........................................ 1-11 ........................................ 1-13 ........................................ 1-15 ........................................ 1-17 .......................................... 2-7 ........................................ 2-13 ........................................ 2-15 ........................................ 2-17 ........................................ 2-19 ........................................ 2-21 ........................................ 2-23 ........................................ 2-25 ........................................ 2-27 ........................................ 2-29 ........................................ 2-35 ........................................ 2-37 ........................................ 2-39 MetroWalk Specific Plan TOC-iii February 2021 Figure 2.0-14 Conceptual Park and Recreation Enlargements ................................................. 2-41 Figure 2.0-15 Conceptual Parks and Recreation Enlargements ............................................... 2-43 Figure 2.0-16 Conceptual Parks and Recreation Enlargements ............................................... 2-45 Figure 2.0-17 Conceptual Park Illustrative Plan....................................................................... 2-47 Figure 2.0-18 Multi -Use Trail Plan.......................................................................................... 2-49 Figure 3.0-1 Conceptual Grading Plan..................................................................................... 3-7 Figure3.0-2 Drainage Plan....................................................................................................... 3-9 Figure 3.0-3 Conceptual On -Site Potable and Non -Potable Water Systems .......................... 3-11 Figure 3.0-4 Conceptual Wastewater Systems....................................................................... 3-13 Figure 3.0-5 Conceptual Dry Utilities.................................................................................... 3-15 TABLES 2.0-1 Specific Plan Summary................................................................................................. 2-3 2.0-2 Land Use Plan Statistical Summary........................................................................... 2-3 2.0-3 Parking Summary....................................................................................................... 2-12 4.0-1 Site Development Standards Matrix (PA-1, PA-2, PA-3 and PA-4) ...................... 4-7 4.0-2 Parking Requirements Matrix', 2,1 ............................................................................. 4-10 APPENDICES 1.0-1 Legal Description 1.0-2 General Plan Consistency Analysis 1.0-3 Tentative Tract Map No. 83087 4.0-1 Conceptual Landscape Plan 5.0-1 Plan Renderings MetroWalk Specific Plan TOC-iv February 2021 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 INTENT AND PURPOSE OF SPECIFIC PLAN The MetroWalk Specific Plan (Specific Plan) contains the development plans, infrastructure development plans, development regulations, design guidelines, and implementation program necessary to achieve the orderly and compatible development of MetroWalk, a new transit - oriented residential community directly south of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan that was approved by the City of Santa Clarita (City) in 2011. The Specific Plan facilitates additional high - quality, attainably priced, multi -family residential apartments and townhomes in proximity to the new City/Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station and Vista Canyon Town Center amenities and services. While separate and standalone, this Specific Plan serves as a natural extension of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan and is consistent and compatible with the provisions contained in the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, as well as the goals and policies of the City of Santa Clarita General Plan (General Plan). The MetroWalk Specific Plan has been prepared in conjunction with a zone change request to change the zoning of the site from Business Park (BP) to Specific Plan (SP). The City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), Section 17.37.030 (Specific Plan (SP) Zone), establishes the Specific Plan zoning designation, and indicates that specific allowable uses, maximum intensity standards, and development standards shall be determined by the adopted specific plan. Therefore, this Specific Plan will achieve the purposes of the City's SP Zone, and will serve as the zoning code for the Specific Plan site (described more fully in Section 2.0, Development Plan). In April 2020, the applicant filed a development application (Master Case No. 20-045) with the City. As required by the City, the applicant is requesting the following discretionary land use entitlement approvals to facilitate adoption of the Specific Plan: (a) General Plan Amendment and Zone Change (GPA/ZQ. The property is currently zoned and designated Business Park (BP) in both the City's Zoning Code and General Plan. To accommodate the project, the applicant requests that the City approve a Zone Change and General Plan Land Use Element Amendment to revise the land use zone/designation for the property from Business Park (BP) to Specific Plan (SP). A new SP land use zone/designation for the property will ensure that the development of the site is consistent and compatible with the Vista Canyon Specific Plan to the north. (b) Metro Walk Specific Plan. The applicant is proposing the adoption of this Specific Plan, which would establish the zoning, development plans, regulations, guidelines, and implementation provisions governing development within the Specific Plan site. The Specific Plan serves as a guide to implementation of the City's General Plan goals, policies, and objectives. Key components of the proposed Specific Plan include the land use plan, permitted use chart, development standards, circulation plan, conceptual landscape plan, pedestrian plan, trails plan, and sustainability plan. MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-1 February 2021 (c) Tentative Tract Map No. 83087. The applicant is proposing to organize the property into four Planning Areas (PA), one for each residential product type, and subdivide the property to facilitate construction of up to 498 residential units (including 179 market -rate apartments, 119 age -qualified apartments, 50 affordable senior apartments, inclusive of one manager unit, and 150 townhomes). Other components of the Specific Plan include parking, courtyards, community rooms, parks and playground, landscape/open space, club houses, trails, paths and private drives. (d) Development Review and Architectural Design Review. The applicant is proposing development plans for a new multi -family residential apartment and townhome development. As such, a development review and architectural design review are proposed by the applicant in accordance with the provisions of SCMC Chapter 17.23, Sections 17.23.110 and 17.23.120, in order to safeguard and enhance the appearance and quality of development in the City. 1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN The Specific Plan is divided into six sections. The content of each section is described below. Section 1.0, Introduction, describes the intent, purpose, structure, and organization of the Specific Plan. The section also describes the Specific Plan location, surrounding land uses, and site characteristics, including existing and planned land use designations. In addition, the section describes the site's characteristics and existing conditions, and discusses the Specific Plan authorization. The section also addresses the relationship between the Specific Plan and the Santa Clarita General Plan, SCMC, and other laws and regulations. Section 2.0, Development Plan, identifies the Specific Plan objectives and development plans, including the land use plan, land use plan statistics, mobility plan, sustainability plan, landscape plan, parks and recreation plan, and phasing plan. Each plan is described in detail in this section. Section 3.0, Infrastructure Development Plan, describes the infrastructure and utilities needed to serve the Specific Plan site. Specifically, the section describes the backbone infrastructure systems (sewer, water, recycled water, water quality, and storm drainage), and utilities (e.g., gas, electricity), needed to support the Specific Plan site. Sections 4.0, Development Regulations, sets forth the land use designations, site development standards, allowed land uses and permit requirements, permitted accessory uses, parking, and signage restrictions, and other regulations. Section 5.0, Design Guidelines, address design themes, site planning, and architectural themes for each of the major land use designations within the Specific Plan. MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-2 February 2021 Section 6.0, Specific Plan Implementation, describes the Specific Plan implementation procedures. The Specific Plan, Volume II, includes appendices supporting the Specific Plan, including a legal description of the property (Appendix 1.0-1); General Plan Consistency Analysis (Appendix 1.0- 2); Tentative Tract Map No. 83087 (Appendix 1.0-3); and Renderings of the development contemplated by the Specific Plan (Appendix 5.0-1). 1.3 PROJECT LOCATION 1.3.1 Location The Specific Plan site consists of approximately 20.4 gross acres located in the northeastern portion of the Santa Clarita Valley within the City of Santa Clarita. The City, located in the center of the Santa Clarita Valley, is approximately 35 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. The City generally is bound by Interstate 5 (I-5) and State Route 14 (SR-14) to the east, west, and south, and is about 1 mile from the Angeles National Forest boundary to the north and east. The Santa Clarita Valley planning area encompasses several distinct communities both within the City limits and in the surrounding unincorporated areas. The existing communities within the City include most of Newhall, Valencia, Saugus, and Canyon Country, with sub -communities of Sand Canyon and Placerita Canyon. The communities within the unincorporated areas are Stevenson Ranch, Castaic Junction, Val Verde, Hasley Canyon, and Castaic. The Specific Plan site is located within the Canyon Country community of the Santa Clarita Valley planning area. Figure 1.0-1, Regional Location, depicts the Specific Plan site in relation to the region. Figure 1.0- 2, Vicinity Map, illustrates the Specific Plan vicinity. Figure 1.0-3, Plan Area Aerial, illustrates the physical characteristics of the Specific Plan site and vicinity. 1.3.2 Surrounding Uses The Specific Plan site is located immediately south of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area, which is approved for residential and mixed -use transit -oriented development and is currently under construction. Colony Townhomes, a multi -family residential community, is directly west of the Specific Plan site. To the south is the existing Metrolink rail line and the Fair Oaks Ranch/West Sand Canyon Annexation area, which consists of single-family and multi -family residential units, an elementary school, community park, and vacant land. A commercial horse breeding facility with accessory residential and barn structures are located to the east of the Specific Plan site. Additionally, the eastern half of the Specific Plan site is within the Significant Ecological Area Overlay Zone (SEA). Figure 1.0-4, Development Surrounding Specific Plan, depicts the surrounding development in relation to the Specific Plan site. MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-3 February 2021 1.3.3 Site Characteristics The Specific Plan site is a 20.4-acre vacant infill site directly accessible by one existing roadway, Lost Canyon Road, which borders the site to the west. Regional access to and from the MetroWalk Specific Plan site will also be made possible through the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area to the north. Vista Canyon Road Bridge, currently under construction in the Vista Canyon Specific Plan site as of the date of this Specific Plan, will connect the Vista Canyon Plan Area with Soledad Canyon Road and Antelope Valley Highway. The Specific Plan site is bordered by the Metrolink rail to the south, which is held by the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) for Los Angeles County. This rail corridor includes the Metrolink Santa Clarita/Antelope Valley commuter line and freight service. Figure 1.0-5, Site Photographs, illustrates the existing conditions within the Specific Plan site. The site is irregularly shaped and generally flat. From the rail corridor the site drains northwest toward the Santa Clara River. With the exception of various utility easements on site, there are no other natural or historic conditions of significance. Existing site elevations range from a high of 1,505 elevation in the central southeast portion of the Specific Plan site to a low of 1,481 elevation in the northwest portion of the site. 1.4 AUTHORITY The Specific Plan has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of the California Government Code, Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457. The California Government Code authorizes jurisdictions to adopt specific plans by resolution as policy documents or by ordinance as regulatory documents. The law allows preparation of specific plans, as may be required for the systematic execution of the General Plan and further allows for their adoption and amendment. The Specific Plan is regulatory in nature and will serve as the zoning code for the Specific Plan site. The Specific Plan is prepared in accordance with SCMC, Section 17.37.030 (Specific Plan (SP) Zone), which establishes the specific plan zoning designation and indicates that specific allowable uses, maximum intensity standards, and development standards shall be determined by the adopted specific plan. Development plans, tract maps, parcel maps and other entitlement requests processed in conjunction with the Specific Plan must be consistent with both the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan. 1.5 THE SPECIFIC PLAN'S RELATIONSHIP TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND SANTA CLARITA MUNICIPAL CODE 1.5.1 Relationship to the General Plan The Specific Plan implements the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. Appendix 1.0-2, General Plan Consistency Analysis, contains an analysis of the Specific Plan's consistency with the City's General Plan. MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-4 February 2021 1.5.2 Relationship to the Santa Clarita Municipal Code The Specific Plan will be incorporated into the SCMC and provide the allowable land uses, development regulations, design guidelines, and implementation procedures for the property within the boundary of the Specific Plan. The regulations contained within the Specific Plan are in addition to those set forth in the planning, zoning, and subdivision provisions of the SCMC, and do not convey any rights not otherwise granted under the provisions and procedures contained in the SCMC or other ordinances, except as specifically provided for herein. Whenever the Specific Plan contains provisions that establish regulations, including, but not limited to, uses, densities, intensities, heights, parking, signage, open space, and landscaping requirements, which are different from, or more restrictive or permissive than would be allowed pursuant to the provisions of the SCMC, the Specific Plan shall prevail and supersede the applicable provisions of the SCMC. 1.6 COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The MetroWalk Specific Plan project qualifies as a Transit Priority Project per Senate Bill (SB) 375's CEQA reform provisions and is consistent with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) and its associated climate goals. As such, the MetroWalk Specific Plan project will use a streamlined review and analysis of the project consistent with the SCS. As part of this modified environmental review and analysis, an expedited Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment for Transit Priority Projects, consistent with the SCS, will be prepared. Under SB 375s streamlined review and analysis, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan/SCS Environmental Impact Report serves as a first -tier environmental document under CEQA. 1.6.1 Senate Bill 226 CEQA Streamlining In 2011, Governor Jerry Brown signed into legislation SB 226, which became effective in 2013. SB 226 streamlined the environmental review process for eligible infill projects by limiting the topics subject to review at the project level where the effects of infill development have been addressed in a planning level decision or by uniformly applicable development policies. Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.3, a project may be eligible for streamlining if it does the following: • Is located in an urban area on a previously developed site or surrounded by urban uses (75% of perimeter); • Satisfies performance standards in CEQA Guidelines Appendix M; and • Is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies in SCAG's SCS. MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-5 February 2021 1.6.2 Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013) SB 743 made several changes to CEQA for projects located in areas served by transit. SB 743 proposes to eliminate auto delay, level of services, and other similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant impacts. It also creates a new exemption for certain projects that are consistent with a Specific Plan, and eliminates the need to evaluate aesthetic and parking impacts of a project in some circumstances. 1.7 COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS 1.7.1 Global Warming Solutions Act The Global Warming Solutions Act (Assembly Bill [AB] 32) of 2006 established a comprehensive program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change. AB 32 requires the California Air Resources Board to develop regulations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. As of January 1, 2012, the greenhouse gas rules and market mechanisms adopted by the California Air Resources Board took effect and are legally enforceable. The reduction goal for 2020 is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 25% of the current rate to meet the 1990 level, and a reduction of 80% of current rates by 2050. The AB 32 Scoping Plan contains the main strategies California will use to reduce greenhouse gases. The Scoping Plan has a range of greenhouse gas reduction actions that include direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and nonmonetary incentives, voluntary actions, market -based mechanisms such as a cap -and -trade system, and an AB 32 program implementation regulation to fund the program. 1.7.2 The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act The Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act (SB 375) of 2008 provides incentives for cities and developers to bring housing and jobs closer together and improve public transit. The goal behind SB 375 is to reduce automobile commuting trips and thus help meet the statewide targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions set by AB 32. This mandate requires the California Air Resources Board to determine per capita GHG emission -reduction targets for each metropolitan planning organization (MPO) in the state at two points in the future-2020 and 2035. In turn, each MPO must prepare an SCS that demonstrates how the region will meet its GHG reduction target through integrated land use, housing, and transportation planning. MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-6 February 2021 1.7.3 Southern California Association of Governments The Southern California Association of Governments' Regional Council adopted Connect SoCal, the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. Connect SoCal is a long- range visioning plan that balances future mobility and housing needs with economic, environmental, and public health goals. Connect SoCal charts a course for closely integrating land use and transportation so that the region can grow smartly and sustainably. What is at the heart of Connect SoCal are over 4,000 transportation projects —ranging from highway improvements, railroad grade separations, bicycle lanes, new transit hubs and replacement bridges. In addition, Connect SoCal is supported by a combination of transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve state greenhouse gas emission reduction goals and federal Clean Air Act requirements, preserve open space areas, improve public health and roadway safety, support our vital goods movement industry and use resources more efficiently. The Specific Plan is consistent with the Connect SoCal in that it also embodies the vision of integrating land use with planned mobility improvements by creating a transit -oriented residential community that connects residents to the new City/Metrolink transit center and new Bus Transfer Station. The Specific Plan also provides open space and recreational resources and accessibility to employment and day-to-day services that support a healthy and balanced quality of life. MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-7 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-8 February 2021 I i i i K EVIZI,V"d) c.d�krt L I d/ A S M' � I 14 �138 ) / A ,', l p, �118j � I r-•J nn,,, � ��„ti 485 y 10 5 210,E 4y "� //4 a m��no" 1 .,♦ r.._..J 5 r �• ♦ �..J f�405� C � 1`4 �. a i AI" % 1 'lloaffo" �i,, t, �� I F,11, "011 1 hA © NOT TO SCALE rii 5 in, INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-10 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-12 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-14 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-16 February 2021 v u INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MetroWalk Specific Plan 1-18 February 2021 2.0 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2.1 INTRODUCTION The Specific Plan is designed to deliver a premier transit -oriented residential community that serves as a functional and visual extension of the new mixed -use Vista Canyon Specific Plan directly north. The MetroWalk Specific Plan is designed to achieve a unified vision with a cohesive architectural theme and an integrated vehicular and pedestrian mobility system connected to the new Vista Canyon Metrolink transit station and Bus Transfer Station. Both Specific Plans are guided by a shared goal of creating a unique community where residents enjoy accessibility to transit, recreation, nearby employment, shopping, and services. The 20.4-acre site of the MetroWalk Specific Plan provides the opportunity to develop up to 498 residential units, with a diversity of attainably priced residential typologies, including market rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable senior apartments, and market rate townhomes. The site design concept is intended to maximize walkability and encourage day-to-day interaction within the community. A unifying multi -use path is centrally located and links the Specific Plan with the Metrolink station and Vista Canyon to the north while connecting various private amenities throughout the community, including parks nodes, open space, a central club house and a playground. In addition, the multi -use path terminates at a public plaza at the far eastern area of the Specific Plan, which provides an outdoor publicly accessible amenity adjacent to the Metrolink transit station as well as shopping, trails, and other amenities to the north. 2.2 SPECIFIC PLAN OBJECTIVES The Specific Plans design is based on the following objectives: 1. Create a new transit -oriented community that provides a diversity of attainably -priced residential uses in close proximity to transit, retail/commercial, office, hotel, and recreational uses. 2. Enhance the housing market and support the City of Santa Clarita's Regional Housing Needs Assessment by providing a variety of housing types and densities to meet the varying needs of future residents. 3. Provide development and a land use pattern that serves as an integrated extension of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan to the north, with coordinated and attractive streetscapes and a high -quality architectural design theme. 4. Arrange land uses to support safe and convenient access to nearby transit and amenities to reduce vehicle miles traveled and energy consumption, and to encourage walking and the use of transit. 5. Design the community to achieve an integrated neighborhood feel and unique sense of place. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-1 February 2021 6. Provide a rich set of shared outdoor spaces, including parks, courtyards, pathways and a public plaza. 7. Implement sustainable development principles, including greater energy efficiency, waste reduction, drought -tolerant landscaping, use of water efficiency measures, and use of recycled materials and renewable energy sources. 8. Create and enhance opportunities for non -vehicular travel and encourage pedestrian mobility by providing an internal pedestrian circulation system that links the residential community to the nearby Metrolink station, Bus Transfer Station, schools, parks, trail systems, shopping and employment opportunities. 9. Provide a landscape design that emphasizes a pleasant neighborhood character and inviting streetscapes and gives MetroWalk its own unique outdoor aesthetic. 10. Adopt development regulations that provide a measure of flexibility to respond and adjust to changing economic and market conditions. 2.3 LAND USE PLAN The Specific Plans objectives, above, guide the overall Land Use Plan. The Land Use Plan (Figure 2.0-1) and the Specific Plan Summary (Table 2.0-1) provide the framework for development of the Specific Plan site. This section establishes the Specific Plans land use designations by Planning Area and uses/acreage. Table 2.0-2, Land Use Plan Statistical Summary, also is provided to show the Land Use Plan statistical summary broken down by Planning Area and land use designation (Residential (R) and Open Space (OS)), each of which are linked by a system of pathways and private drives. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-2 February 2021 Table 2.0-1 Specific Plan Summary )Tanning Area No., Dwelling Units Other Land Uses, A+&ea e,(gross) Planning Area — 1 (PA 1) 179 Private Drives, Private 7.54 Recreation Areas, Paths, Landscape Areas, Parking Planning Area — 2 (PA 2) 119 Private Drives, Private 2.33 Recreation Areas, Paths, Landscape Areas, Parking Planning Area — 3 (PA 3) 50 Private Drives, Private 1.08 Recreation Areas, Paths, Landscape Areas, Parking Planning Area — 4 (PA 4) 150 Private Drives, Private 9.47 Recreation Areas, Public Plaza, Playground, Passive Play Area and Gathering Space, Paths, Landscape Areas, Water Easement Parking Total 498 20.42 Source: Appendix 1.0-3 Note: The Specific Plan allows for a transfer of units between Planning Areas; however, in no event shall the project be permitted to exceed a maximum of 498 residential units. Table 2.0-2 Land Use Plan Statistical Summary hand Use Ages Dwelling Planing Area. No, ]Designation' Use Type (gross) Units Planning Area — 1 (PA 1) R Attached Market -Rate All -Ages 7.54 179 Apartments, Private Recreation Areas Planning Area — 2 (PA 2) R Attached Market -Rate Age- 2.33 119 Qualified Apartments, Private Recreation Areas Planning Area — 3 (PA 3) R Attached Deed -Restricted 1.08 50 Affordable Senior Apartments Planning Area — 4 (PA 4) R Attached For -Sale Townhomes 8.54 150 OS Public Plaza 0.93 N/A Total 20.42 498 Sources: Appendix 1.0-3; Tentative Tract Map No. 83087 1 R = Residential; OS = Open Space MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-3 February 2021 2.3.1 Land Use Designation Zones The following two land use designation zones are established by this Specific Plan, and are applied to property within the Specific Plan site, as shown on the Specific Plan Land Use Plan (Figure 2.0-1): 1. Residential (R). The R land use designation zone is applied to areas appropriate for a variety of attached, attainably -priced residential units, including market rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable senior apartments, for -sale townhomes, and other similar residential product types, with parking garages, carports, and surface parking. The R designation includes for rent and for sale units and both market rate and affordable units. The designation also allows recreation uses, including club houses, parks, playgrounds and pathways, as well as landscaped areas and courtyards. 2. Open Space (OS). The OS land use designation zone is applied to the public plaza area at the far eastern end of the Specific Plan site, which connects to the new Metrolink station. 2.3.2 Planning Areas The Specific Plan site is divided into four Planning Areas, as shown on Tentative Tract Map No. 83087. Each Planning Area is described below. Planning Area 1 (PA-1). PA-1 consists of approximately 7.54 acres located within the western portion of the Specific Plan site. This area consists of 179 attached, market -rate all -ages apartments for lease. Units range in size from approximately 500 to 1,100 gross square feet (GSF) and provide a mix of studio/1 bathroom, 1 bedroom/1 bathroom and 2 bedroom/2 bathroom units. PA-1 also includes private pool/recreation areas, including courtyards and a community room, as well as parking areas and private drives. The maximum building height in PA-1 is 50 feet (excluding architectural elements, which can extend up to a maximum of 60 feet). Building footprints, building locations, and residential product types shown on Figure 2.0-1 within PA-1 can be modified consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan. Planning Area 2 (PA-2). PA-2 consists of approximately 2.33 acres located within the central portion of the Specific Plan site. This area consists of 119 attached, market -rate age -qualified apartments for lease. Units provide a mix of 1 bedroom/1 bathroom and 2 bedroom/2 bathroom units measuring approximately 600 GSF and 1,100 GSF, respectively. PA-2 also includes private pool/recreation areas, including a park node, multi -use pathway and a community room, as well as parking areas and private drives. The maximum building height in PA-2 is 50 feet (excluding architectural elements, which can extend up to a maximum of 60 feet). Building footprints, building locations, and residential product types shown on Figure 2.0-1 within PA-2 can be modified consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-4 February 2021 Planning Area 3 (PA-3). PA-3 consists of approximately 1.08 acres located within the central portion of the Specific Plan site, south of PA-2. This area consists of 50 attached, deed -restricted affordable senior apartments for lease, inclusive of one manager unit. Units are all 1 bedroom/1 bathroom and approximately 650 GSF, with the exception of the Manager's unit which is a 950- GSF 2 bedroom/2 bathroom unit. PA-3 also includes private recreation areas, including a courtyard and a community room, as well as parking areas and private drives. The maximum building height in PA-3 is 50 feet (excluding architectural elements, which can extend up to a maximum of 60 feet). Building footprints, building locations, and residential product types shown on Figure 2.0-2 within PA-3 can be modified consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan. Planning Area 4 (PA-4). PA-4 consists of approximately 9.47 acres located within the eastern portion of the Specific Plan site. This area consists of 150 attached, for -sale townhomes. Units range in size from approximately 1,300 to 2,300 GSF and provide a mix of 2 bedroom/2.5 bathroom, 3 bedroom/2.5 bathroom and 3 bedroom/2 full, 2 half bathroom units. PA-4 also includes private pool/recreation areas, including park nodes, a club house, playground, and a multi -use path, as well as a public plaza, private drives, and parking garages. The maximum building height in PA-4 is 40 feet (excluding architectural elements, which can extend up to a maximum of 50 feet). Building footprints, building locations, and residential product types shown on Figure 2.0-1 within PA-4 can be modified consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-5 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-6 February 2021 z O � wLU •N c� G N c N O N Z W z z O , L.---.-.-----------•--------- INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-8 February 2021 2.4 MOBILITY PLAN 2.4.1 Introduction The Specific Plans Mobility Plan provides for a transportation/circulation system using private vehicular and non -vehicular modes of transportation in a system of private roadways and pedestrian pathways. The Mobility Plan seeks to implement street sections that slow traffic, create a pleasant walking environment and reduce the urban "heat island" effect.2.0-1 The Specific Plan s circulation network described below is conceptually shown on Figure 2.0-2, Mobility Plan. Pedestrian pathways are shown on Figure 2.0-3, Pedestrian Pathways. The Specific Plan is guided by its proximity and access to the new Metrolink transit center and the new Bus Transfer Station, which provide residents of the Specific Plan an option of riding the train or using transit to travel to and from work and other destinations. Proximity to transit reduces automobile trips and the associated greenhouse gas emissions, thus contributing to local and regional emissions reduction goals. The Mobility Plan connects the community to nearby transit amenities through a central multi -use path that terminates at Metro Plaza, a public plaza, at the far eastern area of the site near the Metrolink transit station. The multi -use path and public plaza are key features of the Specific Plan. The multi -use path connects various recreational amenities across the site, thus creating and enhancing further opportunities for non -vehicular travel and pedestrian mobility. The public plaza features outdoor amenities including outdoor seating, shaded areas, a play area, and pathways to bring residents and the community together in an attractive, lively atmosphere. The Specific Plan is designed as a pedestrian -oriented community that is easily accessible to nearby services and amenities, including Vista Canyon to the north which features a mix of office, commercial, retail, and residential uses surrounded by a Main Street thoroughfare (Vista Square). Proximity to Vista Canyon offers residents accessibility to pedestrian -oriented shops, restaurants, and services all within walking distance. The Specific Plan is linked to Vista Canyon through Cooper Street and a second private street to the west, which intersect with Harriman Drive, the main east -west private entrance into the Specific Plan from Lost Canyon Road. 2.4.2 Existing Regional Circulation and Access The City is served by an existing network of highways, roadways, multi -use trails, commuter rail, and transit service. Primary regional access in the Santa Clarita Valley is provided by I-5, located south and west of the Specific Plan site. SR-14, located north of the Specific Plan site, also provides a regional link between the Los Angeles basin and the high desert communities of Palmdale and Lancaster. SR-14 connects to I-5 southwest of the Specific Plan site. Soledad Canyon Road 2.1-1 The term "heat island" describes built environment areas that are hotter than nearby rural or open areas. Heat islands can affect communities by increasing summertime peak energy demand, air conditioning costs, greenhouse gas emissions, heat -related illness and mortality, and water quality (see http://www.epa.gov/heatisland/index.htm, last updated January 23, 2020). MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-9 February 2021 provides secondary regional access, paralleling SR-14 along the northern boundary of the Specific Plan site and extending north to Palmdale and Lancaster. Sierra Highway, which intersects Soledad Canyon Road east of the Specific Plan area, also provides secondary regional access north to Palmdale and Lancaster. The Metrolink Antelope Valley line serves the region by connecting the Antelope Valley with points south, including Santa Clarita, to Union Station in downtown Los Angeles. The City also presently is served by a City -owned and operated bus service. Santa Clarita Transit (SCT) provides local and regional bus service, operating local routes within the Santa Clarita Valley and regional routes to and from Los Angeles, Antelope Valley, Van Nuys, and Warner Center. The Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) also provides commuter service with stops in the Santa Clarita Valley. 2.4.3 Local Roadway Circulation and Access The Specific Plan Mobility Plan roadway network is designed as an orderly extension of the existing regional circulation pattern in the Santa Clarita Valley and the new local roadway system of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan to the north. The proposed development pattern within the Specific Plan site, integrated with existing roadway alignments, form the basis for this network. The Mobility Plan is designed to integrate modes of travel, accommodate anticipated traffic demands generated by the Specific Plan, and provide important private roadway improvements that ultimately will connect the Specific Plan to the Vista Canyon Specific Plan and out to Lost Canyon Road, which provides access to the rest of the Santa Clarita Valley. Primary vehicular access to and from the Specific Plan site will be from Harriman Drive, a new east -west private road that forms the northern boundary of the Specific Plan site. Harriman Drive extends from the approved westerly extension of Lost Canyon Road. As part of the approved Vista Canyon Specific Plan, Lost Canyon Road south of Jakes Way was extended (approximately 800 feet) north from its previous terminus at the northerly abutment of the bridge over the Metrolink rail tracks within Fair Oaks Ranch, past the Specific Plan site to the south and west of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan site. This segment, a public street, has a maximum 90-foot-wide right-of-way and provides two vehicular lanes in each direction with a raised median, and curbs and gutters, parkways, and sidewalks on both sides. Cross sections for each street servicing the Specific Plan site are shown in Figures 2.0-4 through 2.0-10 and described below. 2.4.3.1 Lost Canyon Road Lost Canyon Road from Via Princessa to Jakes Way is designated as a "Major Highway" in the Santa Clarita General Plan Circulation Element and the Los Angeles County Master Plan of Highways. Per the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, Lost Canyon Road was extended north (approximately 800 feet), from its previous terminus at the northerly abutment of the bridge over the Metrolink rail tracks within Fair Oaks Ranch. This segment, a public street, has a maximum 90-foot-wide right-of-way and provides two vehicular lanes in each direction with a raised median, and curbs and gutters, parkways, and sidewalks on both sides. This road is depicted in cross-section and plan view in Figure 2.0-4, below. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-10 February 2021 2.4.3.2 Harriman Drive Harriman Drive is a two-lane, private street providing primary vehicular access to and from the Specific Plan site and internal circulation for the residential land uses. It has a maximum 54-foot- wide right-of-way, with curbs and gutters, as well as a sidewalk and parkway on one side. Harriman Drive is depicted in cross-section and plan view in Figure 2.0-5, below. 2.4.3.3 Cooper Street Cooper Street is a two-lane, private street, and provides internal circulation for the residential and open space land uses in PA-4. The street has a maximum 44-foot-wide right-of-way with parking, sidewalks, curbs and gutters on both sides. Cooper Street is depicted in cross-section and plan view in Figure 2.0-6, below. 2.4.3.4 Other Internal Private Drives Internal private drives will be two-lane private streets providing internal circulation for the residential land uses. There are four typical types of internal drives: one that is 28-feet wide with one 14-foot lane in each direction and a 5-foot-wide sidewalk and 4-foot wide parkway on both sides providing access between residential buildings; one that is 26 feet wide, with one 13-foot lane in each direction providing access to residential carports; one that is 38 feet wide, inclusive of a 14-foot lane in each direction and 10-foot parallel parking on one side, and 4-foot sidewalk on one side and a 6-foot meandering sidewalk on the other; and one that is 28-feet wide inclusive of a 14-foot lane in each direction, and a 4-foot sidewalk on one side. Each private drive contains curbs and gutters on both sides. Private drives are depicted in cross-section and plan view in Figures 2.0-7 through 2.0-10, below. 2.4.4 Parking Plan The Specific Plan parking plan consists of private residential and guest parking. Under the Specific Plan's parking plan, the required residential parking supply is 902, including guest parking. This supply is based on a parking demand study provided as part of this project and SCMC parking standards (see SCMC, Chapter 17, Division 5, Use Classifications and Required Parking). Parking regulations are provided in Chapter 4 of this Specific Plan. All parking will be reserved for residents and their guests. A percentage of total parking will include electric vehicle charging stations. Table 2.0-3, Parking Summary, provides the required parking supply for each Planning Area by residential product type, based on the parking regulations outlined in Chapter 4. The Specific Plan allows for modifications to the residential product types and parking plan consistent with the provisions of this Specific Plan, including all corresponding development regulations and parking regulations set forth in Chapter 4. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-11 February 2021 Table 2.0-3 Parking Summary Residential Product Type Units Per T3nit Guest Required PA-1 Market Rate All -Ages Apartments S1: Studio/1 Bath 26 1.5 0.5 52 A-1: 1 Bedroom/1 Bath 108 1.5 0.5 216 A-2: 2 Bedroom/2 Bath 45 1.5 0.5 90 Subtotal 179 358 PA-2 Market Rate Age -Qualified Apartments A-1: 1 Bedroom/1 Bath 86 0.5 0.5 86 A-2: 2 Bedroom/2 Bath 33 0.5 0.5 33 Subtotal 119 119 PA-3 Deed Restricted Affordable Senior Apartments A-1: 1 Bedroom/1 Bath 49 0.5 0.5 49 A-2: 2 Bedroom/2 Bath 1 0.5 0.5 1 Subtotal 50 50 PA-4 For -Sale Townhomes TH-1-A: 2 Bedroom/2.5 Bath 28 2.0 0.5 70 TH-1-B: 3 Bedroom/2.5 Bath 31 2.0 0.5 77.5 TH-2: 3 Bedroom/2 full, 2 half Bath 6 2.0 0.5 15 TH-3: 3 Bedroom/2 full, 2 half Bath 32 2.0 0.5 80 TH-4: 3 Bedroom/2 full, 2 half bath 47 2.0 0.5 117.5 TH-5: 3 Bedroom/2.5 Bath 6 2.0 0.5 15 Subtotal 150 375 Total Required Parking Stalls 498 902 MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-12 February 2021 I 10 am Xymid I - % % \ \ I I ti \ I I I \ I amm mvmw am RLVNN INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-14 February 2021 II \ \ W V in iD 60 I� 60 °n�° � � 1 I IIIII III 1 II � � 1 IIIII III 1 II � II IIIII III 1 II �© II IIIII III 1 II jjjjuvomou 1gpq, u 3 a \ 1 H9 _ 1 1-j Tn© \ �a€ t =�aals I m tee, uwR Do Fo 13 €ea m s 1 — �� � ���`�mn�ovaa�uuuuuuruu min I�®® ®®®®®® ° n. I Fend) - - uarDr INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-16 February 2021 METROWALK ROAD CROSS SECTION (LOST CANYON ROAD) WEST C/L R/W 9b' 43.5' 1 46.5' 2' 10' 27' 1327' MIN. 5, 5, MEDIAN 5' SIDEWALK (TYP) 1 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) LOST CANYON ROAD (PUBLIC) �. NOT TO SCALE I I I I J I I IL c Z LL ...IL II I 1 I I I I II I I III I � PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE R 13' 2' MIN. 6' 7' �q L7' SIDEWALK (TYP) RB & GUTTER (TYP) INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-18 February 2021 M ETROWAL K ROAD SECTION (HARRIMAN DRIVE) SOUTH C/L NORTH R/W 54' R/W 32' I 22' 2' 10' 8' 14' 14' 8' MIN. 5' PARK NGL LANE LANE PARKING PKWY 2% 2' CURB & GUTTER HARRIMAN DRIVE (PRIVATE) NOT TO SCALE PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE 5' SIDEWALK (TYP) (TYP) INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-20 February 2021 METROWALK ROAD SECTION (COOPER STREET) WEST R/W CA EAST R/W (LOT LINE) (LOT LINE) 5' I 44' 15' 5' :SIDEWALK 5' SIDEWALK (TYIBBON GUTTER (TYP) (TYP) CURB (TYP) CURB (TYP) COOPER STREET (PRIVATE) NOT TO SCALE I I I I I� � � W � }� O C) I �I PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE 22' 22' � 8' 14' 14' 8' � PARALLEL LANE LANE PARALLEL PARKING � PARKING 2q I 1% 1MIN I �. INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-22 February 2021 M ETROWALK 5' SIDEWALK (TYP)J CURB & GUTTER HARRIMAN DRIVE ON -SITE ROAD SECTION TYPICAL DRIVE AISLE (ENTRY) C/L 28' 4' 1 14' I 14' 1 4' PKWYl IPKWY TYPICAL DRIVE (PRIVATE) NOT TO SCALE PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE -'-5' SIDEWALK (TYP) & GUTTER (TYP) INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-24 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-26 February 2021 10' 14' 14' PARALLEL DRIVE LANE DRIVE LANE PARKING 2% 2% INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-28 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-30 February 2021 2.5 LANDSCAPE PLAN The MetroWalk Conceptual Landscape Plan is shown on Figure 2.0-11 and Figure 2.0-12, Conceptual Landscape Plan. The Conceptual Landscape Plan focuses primarily on the use of native and drought - tolerant tree and plant species to create a natural and vibrant environment. The landscape will be varied in texture and scale to soften surrounding architecture and create comfortable, inviting outdoor spaces. All plant species listed, both native and non-native, have been chosen due to their ability to thrive in the Santa Clarita climate. Drought -tolerant species will be used in a creative way throughout the Specific Plan area to limit water usage. Plants listed that are non-native or not drought tolerant will be used sparingly and only in areas that require their unique properties. Turf will be primarily used at the Metro Plaza and limited to locations where it will serve for passive or active recreation, and to small pockets intended for pet use along the pedestrian pathways and/or trail. The irrigation systems will be designed, installed, operated, and maintained in conformance with the State Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. The main objective for the irrigation design is to minimize water use, maximize efficiency, and explore the feasible uses of recycled water. These objectives will be met through the use of Smart ET Based controllers, hydro -zoning, moisture sensors, rain -shut-off devices, cisterns, and drip irrigation. Although much of the native planting areas may receive temporary irrigation, a permanent irrigation system is important for a majority of the landscape planting to comply with the Los Angeles County Fire Department Fuel Modification Guidelines. 2.6 OPEN SPACE, PARKS AND RECREATION PLAN The Specific Plan includes extensive open space, recreation opportunities, and public/private parks featuring 147,854 square feet of common open space, including a gym, pool, parkways, and trails, and 63,986 square feet of private open space dedicated to rear yards and private patio decks/balconies. The Specific Plan provides approximately 296 square feet of common open space per unit. Figure 2.0-13, Open Space Plan, illustrates the locations of private and common open space areas within the Specific Plan area. Development regulations for Open Space are provided in Chapter 4, Development Regulations. The Specific Plan's parks and recreation component provides active and passive recreational opportunities for its residents. Figure 2.0-14, Conceptual Parks and Recreation Plan, Figures 2.0- 15 through 2.0-16, Conceptual Park and Recreation Enlargements, and Figure 2.0-17, Conceptual Park Illustrative Plan illustrate the locations of private parks, playgrounds and recreation facilities in relation to other designated open space within the Specific Plan area, and provide close-up visuals of the major amenities. The major Specific Plan recreational amenities include an approximately 1,125-foot-long meandering and centrally located multi -use path, four swimming pools serving each residential product type, and a 0.93-acre Metro Plaza. Figure 2.0- 18, Multi -Use Trail, shows how the multi -use path connects with Metro Plaza, Metrolink Station, Vista Canyon, and the City Master Trail System. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-31 February 2021 2.7 SUSTAINABILITY PLAN 2.7.1 Introduction The Specific Plan's location and design enhance the project's sustainability and help realize regional GHG reduction targets as well as local conservation goals as reflected in the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan is located adjacent to the planned Metrolink station and bus transfer station. The concentration of attainably priced, multi -family residential apartments and townhomes, including affordable senior apartments, in proximity to public transit facilities, as well as near employment opportunities, commercial uses, and other transit -oriented mixed -uses associated with the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, supports pedestrian activity and contributes to a land use pattern that reduces vehicle trips and air pollution. The Specific Plan is designed to be pedestrian and bicycle oriented, both within the Plan area and to adjacent areas including paths to Vista Canyon, and the City's master trail system. Energy - saving features and sustainable design are incorporated throughout the Plan area and proposed development. The project applicant will require that each building be designed to meet the requirements of the California Building Code, which incorporates the Cal Green and Title 24 Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). In doing so, the Specific Plan will be developed to achieve energy efficiency, water efficiency, material conservation, and resource efficiency in compliance with the CALGreen Code. 2.7.2 Application of Project Design Features The design features that contribute most to reductions in GHGs are the Plans walkability and accessibility to the planned Metrolink station and bus transfer station, as well as to employment, the trail system and day-to-day amenities as described above. The walkability of the site and accessibility to day-to-day services by foot, bike, or by transit, reduces the need to drive and thereby supports a low carbon, sustainable community. Additionally, the Specific Plan will incorporate various components of a sustainable community in the development of the site and individual buildings, including the following: Water Conservation • High efficiency irrigation. • Use of native/drought-resistant landscaping. • Use of recycled water for non -potable water from the Vista Canyon Water Reclamation Plan. • Low -flow -rate faucets. • Low flow -rate toilets • High -efficiency clothes washers and dishwashers. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-32 February 2021 Energy Conservation and Efficiency • Use of roof overhangs, low -energy outdoor lighting, and passive solar systems to enhance energy conservation. • High -efficiency heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. • Light -emitting diode (LED) lighting. • Lighting controls, including occupancy sensors, daylighting controls. • Energy Star —labeled equipment (e.g., clothes washers, refrigerators, dishwashers, dryers, ceiling fans). Transportation • For multi -family residential units, 10 percent of the total number of parking spaces will be EV charging spaces capable of supporting future EV supply equipment, equating to a total of approximately 53 EV spaces for PA-1, PA-2, and PA-3. For townhomes, each new townhome will provide capability for EV charging by installing a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt branch circuit, equating to approximately 150 EV spaces for PA-4. • On -site bicycle storage for residents and guests. • Accessibility to multiple public transportation options. Air Quality • Provision of filtered outside air meeting ASHRAE 62.1 (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air -Conditioning Engineers) requirements for all residential systems. • Prohibited use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs). • Use of adhesives, sealants, paints, finishes, and other materials that emit low quantities of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Water Quality • Installation of Low Impact Development (LID) on -site water treatment for treating stormwater runoff wherever feasible. • Installation of sustainable drainage/water quality technologies, such as retention and detention systems, biofiltration areas, vegetated swales, and hydromodification. • Implementation of best management practices (BMPs) and project design features to minimize pollutant runoff during construction and operation. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-33 February 2021 • Use of permeable paving materials (where applicable), reduction in land coverage of buildings by constructing multi -story structures, and incorporation of biofiltration to reduce impervious surfaces. • Directing runoff from impervious areas to vegetated areas (e.g., landscaped areas, vegetated swales). • Use of appropriate building materials (e.g., roof gutters and downspouts without copper or zinc) to reduce the generation and discharge of pollutants of concern in runoff and, therefore, act as a source control BMP. Solid Waste • Trash collection that will facilitate separation of organic, recyclable, and non -recyclable trash streams. MetroWalk Specific Plan 2-34 February 2021 w w d Q d X O o K K ¢ o K r O _ Caw Q KU' o o f aw X o w000 O?aJa - ¢¢ate CQJ d o w� �o o¢ oJ�oo Qm¢ �mw� O Qzd� r� �¢¢¢J-'---�� mo (¢9 - _o x,00=i o�-m `w -o�w ��zg mmwv K¢i�� �ooW¢w -oo - X ¢¢oo¢.a`. - o� wwwaQ - _ oo�oi �33mmo� K U' Q O - mooS�� _ m�-o off¢¢ CJ m�LL z3ocxiz 00 x=oo¢ Q¢¢zo ¢mLL� Kz¢� ¢zd�¢a ¢ ¢oc�wo QW�ox ZO�Q wzw¢z w�oz¢r��o Kr�i�o dxwz�¢ Oo�xwa o¢`i' da Q d >ow� Z=z oo'om¢ C¢J¢zoz� - - ww¢o Uc�i zd¢o to oxc�i rJi�owxU~�a�� LLJ <x to -tea --_ �orwi�w Jo rx Zz w �o¢�oo¢oz 0000r�w Y=¢ooz ow Q 30� d- O000000 om¢Sgz oar �n c�c�aa woowwS m¢ Q¢m¢wcxiSwa oowo xm� d �o K 0 A d� I IIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIII,IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I 1 I 1 I 1 ;Irt I 1 I 1 } K W I a 1 0 I O O 's` zogQ Q goo w wg� Q � a 'z x s mg WZ KVco m oo ooc� m�=� x2. O o �¢� w c KQ w- oaf `�owoo w� C way' o �a ¢ ¢ o<x x h �o ¢a� - a-,-,- z� C� x oo w��=v"� w�w�o xo TI W �_Q�,wo �.� m �-¢ W Kw ¢ mo� 3. �r moom��o wz�ioow Wow "'�w Dw�o�z m�=m i w oozo Fi,� ww�� =o�Jow�J Wxooa ¢awzc¢i �zoao UzzX� wa�zw��¢ zw ¢v Yzai W - ti - - <<cwi �_ ¢zw� WQoo� - � �z w o` UQowwm�o U $ Via= - W z �_` ti ���,�wza Lb o o� U QOQo �Vaz Kolo�a K O ac3aaaa ¢Soap tnooaa w� o o S¢ ��wocxiSLLJa ���o�c�i d g¢i EL a as ¢p z w ¢ W W Vd I ddJ dI11 IHJ1VVV I ®io.�naIN I I I v v Q V N N c O � N d O � N T ` o a o y s+ N N U h L , 1 C C r� ' ...... z, .... 6 �d 1 ; J j / 1' � rIN IMMUNE Z s � s rr o r y r r ki Ir t 1 r i r 5 , � . ,. I_ ✓��G / � 1 /� �/1 ✓ i i MANfif%f�f%%� � Fi 47 1/1 e..� amm U"MeMm rn r r / j �„ I I II II y I ill I ers o„ ol�, �I T' S '�� IIIIIIII I 3.0 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT This section addresses the Specific Plans infrastructure development plans for grading, drainage, water quality, water service/recycled water, wastewater service, and dry utilities. The Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment accompanying the Specific Plan also addresses this infrastructure and includes additional requirements to help ensure that the infrastructure can support the community envisioned by the Specific Plan. The plans presented in this section are preliminary and are subject to change as detailed engineering designs are prepared, reviewed, and approved by the City of Santa Clarita as part of the final construction or grading plans. With that said, the plans presented in this section do describe the extent of the proposed infrastructure and associated improvements, and the designs intended to establish the standards by which the final infrastructure/improvement plans must conform. 3.2 GRADING PLAN 3.2.1 Existing Conditions The 20.4-acre Specific Plan site is shaped irregularly, and the topography is relatively flat. The Specific Plan site includes a small elevated terrace on the central northeastern portion of the site. This terrace drains toward the Santa Clara River. Elevations on the Specific Plan site range from a high of 1,505 feet above sea level at the central southeast portion of the site, to a low of 1,481 feet above sea level in the northwest portion of the site. The Specific Plan site is comprised of undeveloped land. Within the Specific Plan boundary, topography along the western and northern boundaries has recently been altered. Lost Canyon Road was extended north of the bridge along the western boundary, creating a 2:1 slope to the road elevations of approximately 1,525 feet above sea level to 1,490 feet above sea level. Along the northern boundary, Harriman Drive (approximately 870 linear feet of road beginning at the western boundary) was built with road elevations of approximately 1,490 feet above sea level. Conditions on the Specific Plan site have been altered by historic uses of the property, including agricultural cultivation and raising of livestock. On site there is little remaining natural vegetation, with the exception of some California big sage scrub and introduced grasses. 3.2.2 Proposed Conditions Just south of Harriman Drive, a drainage ditch flowing from the northeastern edge of the site (1,494 feet above sea level) to the northwestern corner (1,476 feet above sea level; where Lost Canyon Road meets Harriman Drive) will be created. MetroWalk Specific Plan 3-1 February 2021 Within the Specific Plan boundary, the earthwork will consist of approximately 60,000 cubic yards of cut, up to 60,000 cubic yards of fill, and approximately 300,000 cubic yards of overexcavation. The Specific Plan site's cut and fill areas are shown on Figure 3.0-1, Conceptual Grading Plan. No dirt will be hauled on or off the site. 3.3 DRAINAGEMATER QUALITY The MetroWalk Drainage and Water Quality Plan incorporates methodologies to meet or exceed the ongoing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit requirements. The Drainage and Water Quality Plan includes a comprehensive series of drainage and water quality improvements designed to allow for a system to both protect development and preserve the Santa Clara River. 3.3.1 Existing Conditions The Specific Plan site consists of minor contributing sheet flow that independently drains to the Santa Clara River located northerly of the Specific Plan site. 3.3.2 Proposed Conditions The Specific Plan will require construction of new drainage and water quality features to allow for a system that protects development from erosion and potential flooding and preserves the Santa Clara River. In addition to construction of conventional drainage improvements like storm drains and retention/detention systems, the Specific Plan envisions using sustainable drainage and water quality technologies, such as biofiltration areas, vegetated swales, and filter strips. The primary objectives of the Specific Plans drainage concept and stormwater management program are as follows: (a) Incorporate low -impact development (LID) practices wherever feasible; (b) Effectively manage wet and dry weather runoff water quality by limiting increases in runoff pollutants and flows at the source through Project Design Features (PDFs) and best management practices (BMPs); (c) Avoid or minimize impacts to water quality through site design and use of sustainable drainage/water quality technologies; (d) Comply fully with the local and regional NPDES permit requirements Figure 3.0-2, Drainage Plan, illustrates the Specific Plan's drainage related improvements. The plan incorporates methodologies to meet or exceed NPDES permit and LID requirements. It also includes a comprehensive series of drainage and water quality facilities designed to allow for a system to protect development and preserve the Santa Clara River. MetroWalk Specific Plan 3-2 February 2021 The Specific Plan's drainage concept is designed to provide drainage and maintain stormwater flows from the Specific Plan during and after buildout. As proposed, on- site surface runoff will be conveyed to a network of treatment structures, including detention and retention systems, biofiltration areas, vegetated swales, and water quality basins. In the planning areas, parking lot and roof runoff will be directed through landscaped parkways and grassy swales, or through sections of permeable pavement, to provide initial treatment prior to discharge into the drainage system. The Specific Plan will incorporate PDFs to address water quality and hydrologic impacts, including site design, source control, treatment control, and hydromodification control BMPs. As currently planned, stormwater runoff from all developed areas within the Specific Plan site will be routed to sustainable drainage improvements, such as retention and detention systems and biofiltration areas. The Specific Plan will incorporate numerous source -control BMPs to address pollutants of concern. These practices are designed to minimize introduction of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, and will include education programs, animal waste bag stations, street sweeping, and catch basin cleaning. In addition, the Specific Plan will use LID practices and treatment control BMPs as part of the final drainage/water quality design for the project area. The primary goals of LID practices are to maintain a landscape functionally equivalent to pre -development hydrologic conditions, and to minimize the generation of pollutants of concern. LID principles include the following: (a) Minimize Impervious Area/Maximize Permeability. Principles include reducing impervious surfaces (through reduced road width, for example), using permeable paving materials (where applicable), reducing land coverage of buildings by constructing multi -story structures, and incorporating biofiltration into the Specific Plan's landscape design. (b) Minimize Directly Connected Impervious Areas. Minimizing directly connected impervious areas can be achieved by directing runoff from impervious areas to vegetated areas (e.g., landscaped areas, vegetated swales). (c) Select Appropriate Building Materials. Use of appropriate building materials (e.g., roof gutters and downspouts without copper or zinc) reduces the generation and discharge of pollutants of concern in runoff; and, therefore, acts as a source control BMP. Further, the Specific Plan will incorporate numerous treatment control BMPs that are designed to remove pollutants once mobilized by rainfall and runoff. These treatment control BMPs include the following: (a) Biofiltration. Biofiltration areas are vegetated (i.e., landscaped) shallow depressions that provide storage, infiltration, and evapotranspiration. Bioretention areas also remove pollutants by filtering stormwater through plants adapted to the local climate and soil MetroWalk Specific Plan 3-3 February 2021 moisture conditions and an engineered soil mix. Biofiltration will be considered for use, wherever feasible, as part of the Specific Plants landscaping plan. (b) Vegetated Swales. Vegetated swales treat stormwater runoff through both vegetative treatment and infiltration. Swales treat the water quality design flow as the runoff sheet - flows through grassy vegetation on the swale surface, removing pollutants by filtering stormwater through plants adapted to the local climate and soil moisture conditions. Incidental infiltration occurs into native soil when water is present. Plants use soil moisture and promote the drying of the soil through transpiration, thereby promoting volume reduction. (c) Hydromodification Control Measures. Hydromodification control measures will be accomplished through connection to an existing downstream drainage and discharge system, previously designed to accept conveyance from the Specific Plan area to prevent and control hydromodification impacts to the Santa Clara River. 3.4 WATER SERVICE/RECYCLED WATER 3.4.1 Existing Conditions The Specific Plan site currently is undeveloped; as such, most of the site is not served by water or recycled water facilities. There is an existing 48-inch-Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency (SCVWA) potable water pipeline that crosses the project site from the southeast to the intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street. Surrounding the project site there is an existing 12-inch-diameter SCVWA potable water pipeline in Harriman Drive that turns north on Cooper Street. This 12-inch-diameter pipeline is also connected to an existing 16-inch-diameter SCVWA potable water pipeline on the west side of Lost Canyon Road. Surrounding the project site, SCVWA has existing 6-inch-diameter recycled water in Lost Canyon Road, Harriman Drive, and Cooper Street. 3.4.2 Proposed Conditions Based on detailed water demand estimates prepared for the project, the Specific Plan will generate a potable demand of 165 acre-feet per year (afy). Potable water demand will be met by the SCVWA through a combination of State Water Project water and local groundwater from wells located primarily in the Alluvial aquifer. The Alluvial aquifer and the Saugus Formation comprise the two - aquifer system known as the Santa Clara River Valley Groundwater Basin, East Subbasin (Basin), located in the Santa Clarita Valley. The amount delivered from each source varies year-to-year due to hydrologic and other conditions. Non -potable water demand will be met through use of recycled water from the Vista Canyon Water Reclamation Plant (WRP) located adjacent to the western boundary of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan site, directly north of Humphreys Parkway. MetroWalk Specific Plan 3-4 February 2021 Figure 3.0-3, Conceptual On -Site Potable and Non -Potable Water Systems, depicts the on -site potable and non -potable water system and associated infrastructure to serve the Specific Plan. As shown on Figure 3.0-3, the potable water delivery system consists of a network of varying sized water mainlines that generally follow major roadways. Project potable water pipelines will pull off of the existing 12-inch-diameter SCVWA potable water pipeline in Harriman Drive at the following two locations: 1. Approximately 440 linear feet east of the intersection of Harriman Drive and Lost Canyon Road 2. The intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street A network of smaller lines would be located within the planned roadway network and would distribute the water for connection to laterals located on individual buildings. Potable water storage will come from the existing SCVWA infrastructure system. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan's WRP will be sized to treat approximately 400,000 gallons per day, and is owned and operated by the City of Santa Clarita. As such, it is considered a "municipal wastewater treatment plant" or publicly owned treatment work. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan site is currently within the boundary of the SCVWA. The WRP was constructed in conjunction with the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, and provide a turnkey facility to the City. The City will likely contract for operation of the WRP, and all costs associated with the ongoing maintenance of the plant will be paid for by future residents and property owners within the property through the formation of an assessment district. 3.5 WASTEWATER SERVICE 3.5.1 Existing Conditions The Specific Plan site is mostly undeveloped, and will require wastewater infrastructure to serve the site. Because the Specific Plan site is surrounded by existing development, the provision of wastewater services to the site will not require considerable extension of distribution infrastructure. Existing south -to -north flowing 10-inch-diameter sewer pipelines are located just north of the Specific Plan site at the following two locations: 1. Approximately 440 linear feet east of the intersection of Harriman Drive and Lost Canyon Road 2. The intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street 3.5.2 Proposed Conditions The Vista Canyon WRP will treat the wastewater generated by the project. All solids from the WRP will be sent to the Santa Clarita Valley Sanitation District's existing Valencia WRP for processing and disposal. Recycled water from the WRP will be delivered to the SCVWA as the MetroWalk Specific Plan 3-5 February 2021 wholesale water agency for the Santa Clarita Valley to offset existing water demands. This water will be distributed by SCVWA through its reclaimed water distribution system both within and outside of the project boundary. Initially, some of the water may be directed to the percolation pond, or infiltration basin, adjacent to the WRP until the SCVWA recycled system is operational. Figure 3.0-4, Conceptual Wastewater Systems, depicts the on -site wastewater system and associated infrastructure to serve the Specific Plan. The proposed wastewater system on the Specific Plan site consists of a network of varying sized sewer pipeline that generally follow proposed project roadways. Project sewer pipelines will deposit collected project site sewage to the two existing 10-inch-diameter sewer pipelines north of the Specific Plan site. 3.6 DRY UTILITIES 3.6.1 Existing Conditions The Specific Plan site currently is mostly undeveloped, and will require electric, natural gas, and telecommunication infrastructure to serve the project. Because the Specific Plan site is surrounded by existing development, the provision of electricity, natural gas, and telecommunication services to the site will not require considerable extension of distribution infrastructure. 3.6.2 Proposed Conditions As discussed in further detail below, electric, natural gas, and telecommunication infrastructure will be installed to serve the Specific Plan. These "dry' utilities will be located within underground conduits in the public or private street corridors/rights-of-way in general conformance with the phasing of the Specific Plan. Consultation with all appropriate utilities to determine the extent of the "dry" utilities needed to serve the site will be required prior to and during the final infrastructure/improvement plan stages. With respect to electricity, the Specific Plan site is located within the Southern California Edison service area. Primary service will come from the intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street. This existing line will be extended to serve the Specific Plan's initial development phases. Phone service will be provided by AT&T. Primary service will come from the intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street. Telephone lines will be constructed underground throughout the site within phases as development commences. Existing service lines are also located within Lost Canyon Road. These localized lines may also be extended to the site and used for the early phases of the project. The Specific Plan site is within the Charter cable service area. Existing service lines are located at the intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street. Existing service lines are also located within Lost Canyon Road. These localized lines may be used for the early phases of the project. As to natural gas, the Specific Plan site is within the Southern California Gas Company service area. Existing service lines are located at the intersection of Harriman Drive and Cooper Street. Gas service to the site will be extended from one of these existing sources. MetroWalk Specific Plan 3-6 February 2021 I J�o w a o ^ ar o l l y J O a O O Q s� x � w Ir o III J i ve ovs � �ee y � S _ � o 4 � 8 � m C e r j J ra ra w =I j Z�ALI U ~ l - -®� -� -ML-----m_ ra IIIf � .Itlil - III llillllllillal.��� - L_I® ra INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-16 February 2021 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT This section provides regulations for the development and land uses within the Specific Plan and describes how these development regulations will be used as part of the City's development review process. Proposed development, subdivisions, and new land uses within the Specific Plan area must comply with all applicable requirements of this Specific Plan. 4.2 CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED PLANS As required by Government Code Sections 65454 and 65455, upon adoption, the Specific Plan would be consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. Appendix 1.0-2, General Plan Consistency Analysis, of this Specific Plan discusses this consistency in detail. All subsequent land use entitlements and permits (e.g., tentative Tract Maps, Parcel Map, General Plan Amendment, or Zone Change), implementing the Specific Plan must also be consistent with the Specific Plan. 4.3 RELATIONSHIP TO CITY'S UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE The Specific Plan, including the development regulations, are intended to provide a comprehensive set of regulations governing the use and development of the land within the Specific Plan area. These Development Regulations replace the requirements of the City's Unified Development Code, Titles 16 and 17 of the SCMC. Any matter or issue not specifically and directly covered by this Specific Plan shall be subject to the nonconflicting regulations and procedures of the SCMC. If a conflict arises between the Specific Plan and the City's Unified Development Code, the provisions of this Specific Plan shall control. 4.4 EXISTING USES AND SEVERABILITY Existing uses within the Specific Plan area as of the effective date of this Specific Plan are addressed as follows: (a) Any development or land uses that were lawfully established and existing as of the effective date of this Specific Plan may continue, and may be altered or replaced, only in compliance with this Specific Plan; and (b) Existing land uses that may continue within the Specific Plan area include water supply well operations and maintenance, and maintenance and operation of all existing easements and pipelines. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-1 February 2021 If any term or provision of this Specific Plan, or the application of any provision of this Specific Plan to a particular situation, shall for any reason be found to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such term or provision will remain in force and effect to the extent allowed by such ruling, and all other terms and other provisions of this Specific Plan or its application shall remain in full force and effect. 4.5 ADMINISTRATION The regulations, standards, and other requirements of this Specific Plan shall be administered and enforced by the City's Community Development Department, Planning Commission, and City Council in the same manner as the provisions of the City's Unified Development Code. 4.6 LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 4.6.1 Land Use Plan and Zones The following two land use designation zones are established by this Specific Plan, and are applied to the property within the Specific Plan area as shown on the Land Use Plan (Figure 2.0-1): 1. Residential (R). The R land use designation zone is applied to areas appropriate for a variety of attached residential units, including market rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable senior apartments, townhomes, and other similar residential product types, with parking garages, carports, and surface parking. The R designation includes for rent and for sale units and both market -rate and affordable units. The designation also allows recreation uses, including club houses, parks, playgrounds, and pathways, as well as landscaped areas and courtyards. 2. Open Space (OS). The OS land use designation zone is applied to the public plaza area at the far eastern end of the Specific Plan site, which connects to the new Metrolink station. 4.7 ALLOWED LAND USES/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS 4.7.1 Introduction This section sets forth the permitted land uses within the R and OS land use designation zones. Each Land Use Type identified in this section is defined in Unified Development Code, Chapter 17, Division 5 (Use Classifications and Required Parking). These definitions shall be applied within the Specific Plan area. Any one or more land uses identified in this section as allowed land uses within a specific land use designation zone may be established on any parcel within that zone, subject only to the planning permit requirements. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-2 February 2021 The City's Director of the Community Development Department (Director) may determine that a proposed land use type not listed in this section is an allowed land use in accordance with Section 6.4.1, Consistent Projects. Temporary uses are allowed within the Specific Plan area in compliance with the Temporary Use Permit requirements of the SCMC. 4.7.2 Residential (R) Use Types The following uses shall be permitted by right in the Residential (R) land use designation zone within the Specific Plan area. 4.7.2.1 Primary Uses A primary use is the main principal use of land or structures on the site. The following uses are permitted by right as Primary Uses in the R zone: 1. Dwelling - Multi -family 2. Model Homes, Rental, Sales Offices4.1-2 4.7.2.2 Secondary Uses Where a primary use is established on a development site, secondary uses may also be permitted. A secondary use is a use that is not the primary use and not the main use of land or structures on the development site. A secondary use is incidental to or in support of the primary use(s) on the same development site or another development site within the R zone of this Specific Plan. The following categories of uses that are allowed in the R zone are permitted by right as secondary uses. 1. Clubrooms and Community Rooms, private 2. Courtyards and Plazas, public and private 3. Food Trucks4.1-3 4. Health/Fitness Facilities, private 5. Home Occupation4.0-4 a. Telecommuting/Business and Professional Offices4.1-1 6. Parking Lots, accessory to principal use 4.11-2 Model homes shall be developed in accordance with Section 17.67.030(C) (Temporary Uses) 3.11-3 Food Truck Vendors shall be in accordance with the provisions of SCMC Section 11.37.080 (Peddlers of Prepared Food Products from Motor Vehicles Permitted). 4.11-4 Home occupation businesses shall be in accordance with Chapter 17.65 (Home Occupations). 4.1-9 Home occupation businesses shall be in accordance with Chapter 17.65 (Home Occupations). MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-3 February 2021 7. Parks, public and private 8. Residential Recreation Facilities 9. Swimming Facility, private 10. Trails, Biking 11. Trails, Equestrian 12. Trails, Pedestrian 4.7.3 Open Space (OS) Use Types The following uses shall be permitted by right in the Open Space (OS) land use designation zone within the Specific Plan site. 4.7.3.1 Primary Uses A primary use is the main principal use of land or structures on the site. The primary uses permitted by right as Primary Uses in the Open Space (OS) land use designation zone shall be those permitted in the Open Space (OS) Zone of SCMC Chapter 17.36 of the Zoning Regulations. 4.7.3.2 Secondary Uses Where a primary use is established on a development site, secondary uses may also be permitted. A secondary use is a use that is not the primary use and not the main use of land or structures on the development site. A secondary use is incidental to or in support of the primary use(s) on the same development site or another development site within the OS zone of this Specific Plan. The following categories of uses that are allowed in the OS zone are permitted by right as secondary uses. 1. Bicycle Rentals 2. Community Garden 3. Farmer's Market 4. Food Truck4.0-6 5. Outdoor events4.0-7 4.11-6 Food Truck Vendors shall be in accordance with the provisions of SCMC Section 11.37.080 (Peddlers of Prepared Food Products from Motor Vehicles Permitted). 4.11-7 Outdoor events includes temporary, predominantly spectator uses conducted in the open or partially enclosed or screened facilities, such as outdoor movie screenings, "live' theaters or concerts with limited spectator capacity, as determined by the Director. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-4 February 2021 4.8 SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 4.8.1 Purpose and Intent This section sets forth the Development Standards governing the R land use designation zone shown on the Land Use Plan (Figure 2.0-1), and described in Section 4.6, above. The Specific Plan's Development Standards are set forth in the Site Development Standards Matrix (Table 4.0-1). 4.8.2 Development Standards The Site Development Standards Matrix (Table 4.0-1) below provides the standards for maximum building heights, minimum distance between buildings and open space requirements, as appropriate to each land use designation zone. In addition to these development standards, the overall maximum density of the Specific Plan Area is 30 dwelling units per acre; however, in no event shall the project be permitted to exceed a maximum of 498 residential units. 4.8.2.1 Setback Requirements In order to create development regulations that are sensitive to adjacent uses, the Specific Plan contains setbacks for development along the entire site perimeter. As indicated in the City's Zoning Code, a setback is defined as the distance from a defined point or line governing the placement of buildings, structures, parking or uses on a lot. No habitable structures or buildings are allowed within setback areas. The following minimum setback requirements, are as follows: 1. Front Setback40-1 (along Lost Canyon Road) shall be 20 feet, landscaped and maintained. 2. Reverse Corner4.0-9 Lot Setback (along Harriman Drive) shall be 10 feet with a minimum five-foot landscaped planter to be maintained. 3. Rear4.0-11 Setback (RR easement) shall be 15 feet, inclusive of a seven -foot wide maintained landscaped planter, including six-inch curbs, which is sufficient in size for mature trees. 4.8.2.2 Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements within the Specific Plan area shall be addressed as follows: 1. On -site trees and landscaping shall be completed in accordance with the Conceptual Landscape Plan, provided in Appendix 4.0-1. 4.11-8 As defined in the SCMC, the front yard setback shall be measured from the ultimate street right-of-way or the line established by the General Plan, whichever is greater, and be removed therefrom by the perpendicular distance prescribed for the front yard setback 4.0-9 As defined in the SCMC, the rear or side yard setback shall be measured from the property line, removed therefrom by the perpendicular distance prescribed for the yard setback. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-5 February 2021 2. Additional landscape requirements are listed for parking areas in Section 4.11.2, Parking Regulations. 3. On -site and parking lot landscaping shall be completed in accordance with the Conceptual Landscape Plan, provided in Appendix 4.0-1. 4.8.2.3 Storage Space Requirements If a fully enclosed garage is not provided, a minimum of two hundred fifty (250) cubic feet per unit of lockable, enclosed storage space shall be provided. Storage areas may be located in -unit or elsewhere within a residential building. Multiple storage areas may be provided. 4.8.2.4 Open Space Requirements Open space for active recreation and passive leisure space shall be provided for each residential unit within the Specific Plan and shall be provided through a combination of common and private space in accordance with the approved architectural and open space plans. Modifications to the approved open space plans may approved by the Director in accordance with Section 6.4.1, Consistent Projects. Open Space shall be provided for each residential unit as follows: 1. Studio units — two hundred (200) square feet; 2. One -bedroom units — three hundred (300) square feet; 3. Two or more -bedroom units - four hundred (400) square feet; 4. Townhome units -six hundred fifty (650) square feet. Common open spaces may include, but are not limited to, outdoor areas such as plazas, outdoor dining areas, rooftop gardens, and landscaped areas designed for active or passive use. Land required for setbacks or occupied by buildings, streets, driveways or parking spaces may not be counted in satisfying the open space requirement; however, land occupied by any recreational structures may be counted as required open space. Private open space may include, but is not limited to, outdoor patios, balconies, or decks, but in no case shall an area dedicated for private open space be less than 60 square feet. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-6 February 2021 Table 4.0-1 Site Development Standards Matrix (PA-1, PA-2, PA-3, and PA-4) Site Development Standards' Land Use Designation Minimum Distance between Maximum Building Heights Building (in feet) (in feet) 1,2 PA-1 Residential (R) Multi -Family (Market Rate Apartments) 10 50 PA-2 Residential (R) Multi -Family (Age- Qualified Apartments) 10 50 PA-3 Residential (R) Multi -Family (Affordable Senior Apartments) 10 50 PA-4 (R) Residential (R) Multi -Family (Townhomes) 10 40 Roof Projections: In all zones, building's architectural elements such as hips, gables, and spires, may not project more than 10 feet above the permitted standard height limit, without approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. Buildings and structures exceeding the maximum building height in the planning area may be permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and shall conform to the requirements of the SCMC (Chapter 17.25, Section 17.25.100 - Conditional Use Permit). 4.9 TRANSFER ADJUSTMENT REGULATIONS 4.9.1 Planning Area Transfers This section sets forth regulations intended to provide land use flexibility in the implementation of the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan permits the transfer of residential dwelling units between the Specific Plan Planning Areas, so long as a transfer still retains a minimum of 80% of the original units and does not exceed 120% of the original units approved under the Specific Plan for any Planning Area, and all other development standards applicable to the Planning Area and associated residential product type are complied with, including parking regulations set forth in this Chapter, unless a parking reduction is permitted subject to the approval of a minor use permit as outlined in Section 6.4.2., Adjustments, Variances, and Minor Use Permits for Parking Reductions, and a new parking demand study is provided if there is a proposed deviation from the parking ratios provided in this Chapter. In no case shall the Specific Plan Area exceed a total of 498 residential units. In all cases, the number of restricted affordable senior units within the Specific Plan Area shall not be less than 50 units, inclusive of one manager unit. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-7 February 2021 4.9.2 Planning Area Boundary, Acreage, and Adjustments Precise Planning Area boundaries and acreages shall be established at the subdivision map recordation phase. A subdivision map, or phased map, submittal may incorporate an adjustment in the gross acreage of each Planning Area, as shown on the Land Use Plan Statistical Summary (Table 2.0-2), without necessitating a Specific Plan amendment or a Development Review, provided that each Planning Area affected by the boundary or acreage adjustment does not exceed 120% of the original gross acreage approved under the Specific Plan. The City and the applicant (or its designee) will retain certain flexibility with respect to the details of the Specific Plan provided that no new environmental impacts occur and, therefore, agree that the following Administrative Modifications for each Planning Area shall, unless otherwise provided in the Specific Plan, be approved by the Director: (a) In order to accommodate the needs of third party purchasers, the size and configuration of lots or parcels and dimensions and/or locations of improvements may be modified at the discretion of the applicant, and the City shall fully cooperate therewith, subject to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, and provided that the aggregate total density and intensity of the Specific Plan is not increased, the permitted uses are not modified from those approved, and the parcels and lots and improvements thereon are consistent with the applicable rules and project approvals, including all development standards contained within this Specific Plan. (b) The design and configuration of lots and related improvements within the Specific Plan site may be reconfigured and redesigned by the applicant provided the number of residential units is not increased. Such reconfiguration and redesign may include making one or more Planning Areas less dense and modifying the design of streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage and affected utilities to be consistent with such reconfiguration and redesign so long as each reconfiguration and redesign is otherwise consistent with the design and configuration standards and requirements in the Specific Plan and Conditions of Approval. (c) Any subsequent revision to the tentative tract map that is submitted for review and approval shall be approved by the City provided the residential design and configuration complies with the Specific Plan and Conditions of Approval. (d) Upon adoption of the Specific Plan, the applicant shall have the vested right to develop the Specific Plan site that is consistent with the project approvals and the Specific Plan. The City agrees to process and administratively approve any modifications to the tentative tract map, including modifications in the size, design and configuration of the lots and improvements as provided in the Specific Plan and Conditions of Approval, required for the applicant to develop the Specific Plan site consistent with the Specific Plan and project approvals, and such administrative approvals are deemed to constitute ministerial acts implementing the Specific Plan and the project approvals. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-8 February 2021 4.10 SIGNAGE REGULATIONS 4.10.1 Purpose and Intent The signage regulations in this section shall govern the design and maintenance of all signage within the Specific Plan area. The regulations are intended to result in functional, attractive signage that incorporates a uniformly high level of design, graphics, continuity, consistency, and maintenance throughout the Specific Plan area. All signage is intended to be consistent with the architectural and landscape character of the specific parcel development and with the design intent of the Specific Plan as a whole. Consistency shall be determined in terms of materials, scale, size, and placement on buildings or in landscaping; integration with the buildings' architectural design, texture, color, relation to other signage in the immediate vicinity and in the public spaces; and type of illumination, if any. The scale and proportion of graphics used in signage shall be consonance with the design of buildings, individual stores, landscape, and site design. Bold or inharmonious colors or color combinations shall not be used. The purposes of the signage regulations are to: (a) Avoid traffic safety hazards to motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians caused by visual distractions and obstructions; (b) Promote the aesthetic values of the Specific Plan community by providing for signs that do not impair its attractiveness; (c) Provide for signs as an effective channel of communication while ensuring that signs are aesthetically proportioned in relation to adjacent buildings/structures and the buildings/structures to which they are attached; and (d) Safeguard and protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 4.10.2 Applicability and Conformance Consistent with the intent and purpose provisions set forth above, all signage within the Specific Plan area shall conform to the requirements of the SCMC provisions regulating signage on private property (Chapter 17.51, Section 17.51.080). No person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure, or cause or permit the same to be done, contrary to or in violation of the provisions of this Specific Plan and Chapter 17.15, Section 17.51.080 of the SCMC (Sign Regulations (Private Property)). Conformance shall be strictly enforced. All non -conforming or unapproved signs shall be brought into conformance at the expense of the person(s) responsible for installation of the sign or sign structures. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-9 February 2021 4.11 PARKING REGULATIONS 4.11.1 Purpose and Intent Parking regulations within the Specific Plan are intended to provide the requisite number of parking spaces for all uses, while reinforcing the pedestrian -oriented character and accessibility to transit, amenities and daily services intended to minimize vehicle trips and parking demand. The overall purpose, therefore, of the Specific Plans Parking Regulations is to create a well - planned community that provides for the sufficient parking needs of each resident, while in turn promoting the community as a place with all of the advantages within walking distance to live, work, play, and shop and enjoy a high quality of life. 4.11.2 Parking Regulations The Specific Plan establishes a parking ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit for all Market Rate, All -Ages Apartments, consistent with Vista Canyon Specific Plans residential use parking requirements of 1.5 spaces per unit. Guest parking for Market -Rate, All -Ages Apartments and parking for all other uses are consistent with SCMC parking standards (see SCMC, Chapter 17, Division 5, Use Classifications and Required Parking). The Specific Plans Parking Regulations governing the site are provided in Table 4.0-2. Table 4.0-2 Parking Requirements Matrix', 2, 3, 4 Unit Type Parking Requirements Market Rate All -Ages Apartments 1.5 enclosed parking space or carport parking per unit Market Rate Age -Qualified Apartments 0.5 enclosed parking space or carport parking per unit Affordable Senior Apartments 0.5 enclosed parking space or carport parking per unit Townhomes 2 enclosed parking spaces per unit All Unit Types Guest parking — 0.5 parking space per unit ' Accessible parking stalls shall be required in accordance with the Building Code. 2 Additional parking for secondary uses shall not be required. 3 Parking for temporary uses shall be as determined by the Director. 4 If a transfer of residential dwelling units occurs between the Specific Plan Planning Areas consistent with Section 4.9 Transfer Adjustment Regulations, parking must be provided in accordance with the parking regulations set forth in this table, unless a parking reduction is permitted subject to the approval of a minor use permit as outlined in Section 6.4.2., Adjustments, Variances, and Minor Use Permits for Parking Reductions, and a new parking demand study is provided if there is a proposed deviation from the parking ratios provided in this Chapter. (a) Parking Space Specifications. Unless otherwise noted in the Specific Plan, all required parking spaces shall be designed in accordance with the specifications set forth in the SCMC Chapter 17.51, Section 17.51.060(E) - Specifications for Development of Parking Facilities. Carports shall be provided in accordance with the approved architectural plans. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-10 February 2021 (b) Parking Landscaping Standards. 1. Assigned parking spaces shall be shaded by a carport. 2. Guest parking spaces shall be shaded by trees and/or screening hedges with a landscaped island at least 5 feet wide; each tree shall provide a minimum of 40 SF of cumulative root planting area. 3. Shrub and ground coverage shall be installed in and near carport areas to provide additional visual relief from concrete hardscape in parking areas. 4.11.2.1 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (a) Multifamily Dwellings. In accordance with Section 4.106.4.2 of the California Green Building Standards Code, for new multifamily dwellings where residential parking is available, ten (10) percent of the total number of parking spaces shall be electric vehicle (EV) charging spaces capable of supporting future EV supply equipment. Calculations for the required number of EV spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. (b) Townhouses with Attached Private Garages. In accordance with Section 4.106.4.1 of the California Green Building Standards Code, each new townhome with attached private garage must provide capability for EV charging by installing a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240-volt branch circuit. 4.11.2.2 Bike Parking (a) Number of Bicycle Spaces Required. Every use shall provide on -site bicycle parking spaces in accordance with the following ratio of 1 space per each 5 residential units consistent with the SCMC Chapter 17.51, Section 17.51.060(I) On - Site Bicycle Parking Requirement. (b) Bicycle Parking Facilities. Parking facilities shall be conveniently located throughout the Specific Plan Area and may include the following: 1. Covered, lockable enclosures with permanently anchored racks for bicycles; 2. Lockable bicycle rooms with permanently anchored racks; and 3. Lockable, permanently anchored bicycle lockers. MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-11 February 2021 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MetroWalk Specific Plan 4-12 February 2021 5.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 5.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of the Specific Plan's Design Guidelines is to describe the visual character that is desired for the residential development within MetroWalk, and the manner in which developed areas should relate to other elements of the MetroWalk community. As this Specific Plan site is an extension of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, the intent of these guidelines are to be consistent with the Vista Canyon Design Guidelines for residential development, to achieve a common aesthetic and high -quality design in both the public and private realm. The Design Guidelines address issues that are primarily aesthetic in nature and subject to a variety of solutions. Due to varying interpretations of aesthetic design, flexibility should be permitted to encourage design innovations and changes in design standards that occur over time. For these reasons, rigid adherence to the Specific Plan's Design Guidelines is not intended. Instead, it is intended that developments within MetroWalk be evaluated for their substantial conformance to the general intent associated with the applicable "General Guidelines" and the other applicable guidelines set forth below. 5.2 GENERAL GUIDELINES The following General Guidelines are intended to allow flexibility and innovation throughout the Specific Plan site. 5.2.1 Design Themes (a) Consistent with the Vista Canyon Specific Plan adopted by the City of Santa Clarita in April 2011, MetroWalk will retain and encourage architectural variety and promote quality development. The overarching design objectives are to create a sense of timelessness, ownership, place and identity, and community. (b) Neighborhood design concepts will encourage sustainable planning and design practices, including the smart growth, new urbanism, and sustainability principles described in Chapter 2 of the 2009 Santa Clarita Community Character and Design Guidelines. (c) Siting and design of structures should consider views relative to the Specific Plan area. 5.2.2 Site Planning (a) Residential streets should be designed so that traffic to the highway system flows as directly as possible. Circuitous street patterns and very long residential streets should be avoided. (b) Creative siting, design, and landscaping solutions should be used to blend structures into the site, to the extent possible. MetroWalk Specific Plan 5-1 February 2021 (c) Pedestrian and vehicular circulation should be designed to create a consistent community image. (d) Entries to residential buildings should be visibly reinforced through techniques such as landscape treatments, monument signage, and/or pavement details. 5.2.3 Architecture A diversity of architectural styles is encouraged to enhance the character of the community. (a) Use of roof overhangs, low -energy outdoor lighting, and passive solar systems to enhance energy conservation is encouraged. (b) Roof equipment should be screened from view where feasible. (c) Utility and service areas should be treated (i.e., color, landscaping, screening) to minimize visual effects. (d) Variations in height within and among buildings is encouraged to create visual interest and avoid a monotonous street scene. (e) Siting variations in building facades, articulation, height, mass, and scale is encouraged to create and enhance architectural interest. (f) Elements such as stairways should be architecturally compatible and integrated into buildings. 5.2.4 Fencing (a) Fencing should be compatible with the architectural theme and character of the neighborhood. (b) Fencing should be consistent in style and color. (c) Wall or fencing sections should be horizontally offset at regular intervals to provide visual relief and landscape opportunities. (d) Fencing and landscaping should be designed as an integral part of the overall site design. 5.3 OTHER APPLICABLE ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES The MetroWalk Specific Plan also incorporates by reference the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, adopted by the City of Santa Clarita in 2011. The architectural style will be consistent with the Vista Canyon Specific Plan Design Guidelines, which incorporate numerous elements, including wall articulation, roof elements, attached elements, openings, accents, exterior building materials, and colors, all of which are described in Chapter 3 of the 2009 Community Character and Design Guidelines. MetroWalk Specific Plan 5-2 February 2021 5.3.1 Application Process Guidelines This Specific Plan will utilize the "Application Process" set forth in the 2009 Community Character and Design Guidelines, including the Development Review Committee process. For all projects/developments within the Specific Plan, design review determinations shall be made by the City's Director of Community Development, and those determinations shall be considered the final decision, consistent with SCMC Chapter 17.23, Section 17.23.110 - Architectural Design Review. MetroWalk Specific Plan 5-3 February 2021 INOIOkiI NCONVOMy&0aIIIwool RAWI � MetroWalk Specific Plan 5-4 February 2021 6.0 SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 6.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT This section sets forth the Specific Plan's implementation procedures. The section contains procedures to implement the regulatory provisions of the Specific Plan, which are set forth in Section 4.0, Development Regulations. Included are provisions unique to the Specific Plan for the implementation of the Transfer Adjustment Regulations in Section 4.0. The section also contains criteria under which the City's Director of Community Development (Director) may make a determination of whether a proposal is in substantial conformance with the Specific Plan; or whether, an amendment to the Specific Plan is required. In addition, the section provides a discussion of the California Government Code provisions governing the amendment of specific plans. 6.2 IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES The Specific Plan may be implemented primarily through the process of subdivision maps. All land subdivision maps of any type (e.g., tentative or final, vesting or non -vesting, tract or parcel) shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved in accordance with the SCMC and Subdivision Map Act. Where the provisions or procedures of the SCMC conflict with the provisions of this Specific Plan, the Specific Plan shall apply. 6.3 PHASING Subject to market and economic changes and conditions, the rate of growth in the immediate vicinity and region, and changes in infrastructure/public facilities requirements, conditions and needs, initial construction is estimated to begin in 2022. Subject to market conditions, Buildout of the project is estimated to occur over approximately 5 years ending in 2027. It is anticipated that buildout would occur in three phases: (1) grading, (2) infrastructure improvements, and (3) building and remaining construction. The grading phase and infrastructure improvements phase would each occur over the entire planning area, with the grading phase first, and the infrastructure improvements phase following. The building and remaining construction phase would follow for each Planning Area. 6.4 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY'S UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE While the Specific Plan includes land use diagrams, additional details regarding subsequent development are required with subsequent application submittals. The Specific Plan includes development and design standards and guidelines but cannot foresee every potential condition requiring decisions within the Use Permit process. Any subsequent discretionary approval or amendment to the Specific Plan must be consistent with the General Plan, as amended and/or MetroWalk Specific Plan 6-1 February 2021 updated. Future development applications will be processed that are in substantial conformance with the Specific Plan or that may require an amendment to the Specific Plan as determined by the Director. 6.4.1 Substantial Conformance for Minor Deviations The following items may deviate, within specified limitations, from the adopted Specific Plan but shall be considered in substantial conformance with the Specific Plan. Review of such proposed modifications shall occur at staff level, through the Development Review, Administrative Permit, or over the counter review process if so determined by the Director. The Director, however, shall have the discretion to refer any such request for modification to the City Council and/or Planning Commission as a Major Modification to the Specific Plan. (a) Modification to the Approved Building Types, Unit Mix, Unit Size. Modification to the approved building types, unit mix, and unit size may vary provided the use is permitted under this Specific Plan, the overall 498 unit count is not exceeded, with no new significant environmental impacts. In all cases, the number of restricted affordable senior units within the Specific Plan Area shall not be less than 50 units, inclusive of one manager unit. (b) Residential Development Transfer Option. As specified in Section 4.9.1, The Specific Plan permits the transfer of residential dwelling units between the Specific Plan Planning Areas, so long as any Planning Area still retains a minimum of 80% of the original units and does not exceed 120% of the number of original units approved under the Specific Plan for any Planning Area, and all other development standards applicable to the Planning Area and associated residential product type are complied with. In no case shall the project site exceed a total of 498 residential units. In all cases, the number of restricted affordable senior units within the Specific Plan Area shall not be less than 50 units, inclusive of one manager unit. (c) Planning Area Boundary and/or Acreage Adjustment. As specified in Section 4.9.2, a subdivision map, or phased map, submittal may incorporate an adjustment in the gross acreage of each or any Planning Area, as shown on the Land Use Plan Statistical Summary (Table 2.0-2), provided that each Planning Area affected by a boundary or acreage adjustment does not exceed 120% of the original gross acreage approved under the Specific Plan. (d) Landscaping Plan Modifications. Modifications to the approved Landscaping Plan, or requirements set forth in Sections 4.8.2.2, Landscaping Requirements, and 4.11.2.b, Parking Landscaping Standards, may be permitted, so long as they do not exceed a 10% deviation from total tree and plant species. (e) Open Space Plan or Parks and Recreational Amenities Modifications. Modifications to the approved Open Space Plans design and layout, as well as proposed parks and recreational amenities, may be permitted, so long as the amount of open space provided MetroWalk Specific Plan 6-2 February 2021 and the number of recreational amenities remain consistent with the required open space and Conceptual Parks and Recreation Plan approved under the Specific Plan. (f) Alignment, Location and Design of Vehicular and Pedestrian Pathways and/or Parking Spaces. Modifications to the approved alignment, location, and design of vehicular and pedestrian pathways, and/or layout of the parking, may be permitted, provided that such adjustments do not change the requirement of providing adequate infrastructure and/or public facilities within the Specific Plan. (g) Changes in the Exterior Building Color or Material. Changes to the approved exterior building color or material, may be permitted, so long as the changes in building material or colors are similar to and have the same general appearance comparable to or of a higher quality as the material approved. (h) Interpretation for Unlisted Uses. The Director may determine that a use that is not listed in Section 4.7, Allowed Land Uses/Permit Requirements, substantially complies with the land use designation in which the use is requested; and, therefore, is permitted within that land use designation. (i) Other administrative items determined to be appropriate by the Director within the scope of authority of the MetroWalk Specific Plan and SCMC. 6.4.2 Substantial Conformance Procedure; Adjustments, Variances, and Minor Use Permit for Parking Reductions Procedure (a) Substantial Conformance Determination. The Director shall review a request for a determination of Substantial Conformance through the Development Review, Administrative Permit, or over the counter review process. The Director, however, shall have the discretion to refer any such request for modification to the City Council and/or Planning Commission as a Major Modification to the Specific Plan. (b) Adjustments and Variances. Requests for Adjustments or Variances may be granted pursuant to the procedures and requirements of the SCMC provisions set forth in Chapter 17.24, Section 17.24.100 - Adjustments, and Chapter 17.25, Section 17.25.120 - Variances. Adjustments and Variances are considered a form of relief from the development standards identified in Chapter 4 of this Specific Plan and the applicable development standards in the Unified Development Code. (c) Minor Use Permit for Parking Reductions. Pursuant to the procedures and requirements of the SCMC provisions set forth in Chapter 17, Section 17.51.060(N)(2) - Reduction of Parking. A reduction in the number of parking spaces required by this Specific Plan may be permitted by up to 20% with approval of a minor use permit. Parking reductions greater than 20% may be permitted subject to the approval of a minor use permit by the Planning Commission. MetroWalk Specific Plan 6-3 February 2021 6.4.3 Specific Plan Amendments and Major Modifications Amendments may be requested at any time pursuant to Chapter 17, Section 17.28.110(H) - Adoptions and Amendments, of the SCMC. Any proposed modification to the Specific Plan that is deemed major by the Director will be processed as an Amendment to the Specific Plan. Depending upon the nature of the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan, additional environmental analysis may be required, pursuant to Section 15162 of CEQA. (a) Amendment Procedures. The California Government Code (Sections 65453-65454) sets forth the manner in which Specific Plans are to be prepared, adopted, and amended. Amendment(s) to the Specific Plan shall not require a concurrent General Plan amendment unless it is determined by the Director that the proposed Specific Plan amendment is inconsistent with the General Plan. (b) Major Modifications. Requests for a Major Modification may be granted pursuant to the procedures and requirements of the SCMC provisions for Class VII application set forth in Chapter 17, Section 17.28.030 - Review Authority and Related Procedures. Major Modifications to the Specific Plan shall reflect the same comprehensive analysis which was undertaken in the adoption of the Specific Plan and the application shall demonstrate that the proposed modification meets the goals and objectives of the Specific Plan and General Plan, and ensure that any significant impacts from the amendment can be satisfactorily mitigated. MetroWalk Specific Plan 6-4 February 2021 APPENDIX I Owl Legal Description PRELIMINARY REPORT Chicago Title Company YOUR REFERENCE: ORDER NO.: 00108576-021-JH5-KD EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED SANTA CLARITA, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT OF SAID LAND FILED IN THE DISTRICT LAND OFFICE MARCH 29, 1877, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST 124.57 FEET FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 20 SECONDS EAST TO A POINT DISTANT THEREON NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST 150.99 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHERLY LINE WITH THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 100 FOOT WIDE STRIP OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED DATED APRIL 22, 1890 FROM JOHN T. HUMPHREY'S TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; RECORDED APRIL 26, 1890, IN BOOK 650, PAGE 125 OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 53 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST 421.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53 DEGREES 59 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST 157.20 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2764.82 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 35 SECONDS (TANGENT TO SAID CURVE AT THE LAST MENTIONED POINT) BEARS SOUTH 56 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST AND NORTH OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 59 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 22 SECONDS WEST 469.59 FEET) AN ARC DISTANCE OF 470.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 25 DEGREES 11 MINUTES 20 SECONDS WEST 50.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE RIGHT (TANGENT TO SAID CURVE AT THE LAST MENTIONED POINT BEARS SOUTH 64 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 40 SECONDS WEST) HAVING THE FOLLOWING RADII, CENTRAL ANGLES AND ARC LENGTHS; 2714.82 FEET, 10 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 36 SECONDS (CENTRAL ANGLES), 500.36 (ARC), 1759.91 FEET, 8 DEGREES 01 MINUTES 14 SECONDS (CENTRAL ANGLES), 246.36 (ARC), TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED FIRST IN DEED DATED APRIL 26, 1890, FROM JOHN T. HUMPHREY'S TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RECORDED APRIL 26, 1890, IN BOOK 642, PAGE 277, OF DEEDS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY LINE TO A LINE HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 2 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST THAT PASSES THROUGH THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 2 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. APN: 2840-004-009 CLTA Preliminary Report Form — Modified (I 1/17/06) Page 3 APPENDIX I Om2 General Plan Consistency Analysis City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Table 1. Project's Consistency with City of Santa Clarita's General Plan Goal and Policies Lend Use Element !Urban Form Goal LU 1: Interconnected Valley of Villages providing Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to diverse lifestyles, surrounded by a greenbelt of natural the City of Santa Clarita. However, the project does assist open space. with the implementation of this Goal as it creates a village in the eastern Santa Clarita Valley that would provide for diverse housing types and open space. Policy LU 1.1.1: Where appropriate, protect mountains Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and foothills surrounding the Valley floor from urban directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Moreover, the project development by designating these areas as Open Space site is not located immediately adjacent to any mountains or Non -Urban uses on the Land Use Map. or foothills. Policy LU 1.1.2: On the Land Use Map, concentrate urban Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to development within flatter portions of the Santa Clarita the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project site is Valley floor in areas with limited environmental mostly flat and surrounded by existing development and constraints and served with infrastructure. development under construction. Further, the site is served with some existing infrastructure and the project would be developed on disturbed portions of the project site with limited environmental constraints. Policy LU 1.1.3: Discourage urban sprawl into rural areas Consistent: The proposed project would be located by limiting non-contiguous, "leap -frog" development adjacent to existing residential and commercial outside of areas designated for urban use. developments. Policy LU 1.1.4: Preserve community character by Consistent: Under the proposed project, the Santa Clara maintaining natural features that act as natural River corridor would be preserved as open space and boundaries between developed areas, including dedicated to the City of Santa Clarita. Additionally, the significant ridgelines, canyons, rivers and drainage project would be developed on an infill site that lacks courses, riparian areas, topographical features, habitat natural features; thus, preserving community character. preserves, or other similar features, where appropriate. Policy LU 1.1.5: Promote infill development and re -use of Consistent: The project site, which is adjacent to existing underutilized sites within and adjacent to developed residential and commercial areas, is currently designated urban areas to achieve maximum benefit from existing for business park uses. The project site is currently infrastructure and minimize loss of open space, through vacant, and thus, would promote infill development and redesignation of vacant sites for higher density or mixed reuse of underutilized sites. The project would is located uses, where appropriate. in proximity to existing infrastructure and would not minimize availability of open space, but rather would develop higher density housing and associated open space. Policy LU 1.1.6: Preserve the rural lifestyle in canyons and Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and low -density, outlying areas of the Santa Clarita Valley, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Moreover, the project through designating these areas as Non -Urban on the site is not located in a canyon or low -density, Land Use Map, where appropriate. outlying area of the Santa Clarita Valley. Policy LU 1.1.7: Preserve and protect important Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and agricultural resources, including farmland and grazing directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Further, the project land, through designating these areas as Open Space and site does not contain important Farmland.1 Non- Urban on the Land Use Map, where appropriate. Policy LU 1.2.1: In Newhall, provide opportunities for new Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Newhall. 1 California Department of Conservation. 2016. "California Important Farmland Finder." Updated 2016. Accessed December 1, 2020. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 1 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis business and housing by implementing the Downtown Newhall Specific Plan, provide incentives to promote infill development and re -use of underutilized sites, and continue to plan for future development of North Newhall. Policy LU 1.2.2: In Valencia, promote business Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Valencia. development, job creation, and expansion of regional commercial, civic, cultural, and entertainment uses, to create a vibrant Town Center serving as a community focal point for the entire Santa Clarita Valley. Policy LU 1.2.3: In Saugus, promote revitalization of older Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Saugus. commercial areas; relieve traffic congestion; look for opportunities to minimize cut -through traffic; and enhance streetscapes with landscaping, lighting, benches and other fixtures. Policy LU 1.2.4: In Canyon Country, promote revitalization Not Applicable: While the project site is located in the along Sierra Highway from Soledad Canyon Road to Canyon Country area of the Santa Clarita Valley, the Vasquez Canyon Road by encouraging retail and service project site is not located along Sierra Highway, nor is it uses, and enhance on and off ramps along the Antelope adjacent to on and off ramps along SR-14. Valley Freeway with landscape amenities and appropriate uses. Policy LU 1.2.5: In Sand Canyon, ensure compatibility of Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Sand development with existing rural, equestrian lots and the Canyon as it is not included in the Sand Canyon Special adjacent National Forest land; provide additional Standards Area. That said, portions of the project site are recreational trail links; minimize impacts to the Santa located adjacent to northern portion of Sand Canyon. Clara River; and maintain community character consistent Consistent with this Policy, the project includes extensive with applicable special standards. open space, recreational opportunities, and parks. Further, the project design has minimized traffic impacts through implementation of street sections that slow traffic and create a pleasant walking environment. The portion of the project closest to Sand Canyon would be townhomes, at lower density than other uses within the project site. Policy LU 1.2.6: In Placerita Canyon, ensure compatibility Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Placerita of development with existing rural, equestrian lots and the Canyon. adjacent National Forest land; maintain community character consistent with applicable special standards; provide an orderly transition between existing rural and low -density residential uses and proposed new development; and encourage provision of needed infrastructure. Policy LU 1.2.7: On the Whittaker-Bermite site, continue to Not Applicable: The project site is not located on the work with the property owner to facilitate master planning, Whittaker-Bermite site. remediation, and the economic re -use of the property to include roadway infrastructure and transit -oriented development around the Metrolink station. Policy LU 1.2.8: In Castaic, promote expansion of Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Castaic. neighborhood commercial uses to serve local residents; address traffic congestion; and ensure compatibility between highway -oriented commercial uses and nearby residential uses. Policy LU 1.2.9: In Val Verde, protect the existing rural Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Val Verde. lifestyle and small town community character while providing residents with additional access to needed services; and ensure compatibility between existing MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 2 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis residential areas and the nearby landfill. Policy LU 1.2.10: In Agua Dulce, recognize the scenic and Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Agua environmental qualities of Vasquez Rocks in future Dulce. planning; protect the existing rural lifestyle while providing opportunities to enhance the village center; and provide additional services to residents. Policy LU 1.2.11: In Pico Canyon, recognize the historic Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Pico significance of Mentryville in future planning; preserve the Canyon. existing rural development pattern; and ensure compatibility of new development with the adjacent Significant Ecological Area and habitat. Policy LU 1.2.12: In the Fair Oaks community, facilitate Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the Fair location of commercial and community services in Oaks community. However, the project site is located proximity to residences to serve local needs. adjacent to Fair Oaks. The construction of housing near the Fair Oaks community would not prevent the City from locating commercial and community services in proximity to the area because the residential land use would also be compatible with such uses. Policy LU 1.2.13: Encourage use of the specific plan Consistent: The project applicant is proposing a Specific process to plan for cohesive, vibrant, pedestrian -oriented Plan (SP) designation for the project site. The MetroWalk communities with mixed uses, access to public transit, Specific Plan implements this Policy as it is designed to and opportunities for living and working within the same provide a transit -oriented neighborhood for the eastern community. Santa Clarita Valley. Policy LU 1.3.1: Encourage subdivision design techniques Consistent: The proposed project would not substantially that reflect underlying physical topography or other unique alter the underlying physical topography of the site, which physical features of the natural terrain. is generally flat. Policy LU 1.3.2: Substantially retain the integrity and Not Applicable: The proposed project would not alter natural grade elevations of significant natural ridgelines natural ridgelines or landforms that form the Valley's and prominent landforms that form the Valley's skyline skyline as it would be developed along a terrace of the backdrop. Santa Clara River in a flatter area of the Valley. Policy LU 1.3.3: Development on ridgelines and land Not Applicable: The project site is not located on ridgelines containing 50% slopes shall be discouraged and or land containing 50 percent slopes. maintained as natural open space. Policy LU 1.3.4: Encourage density transfers where Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to appropriate to facilitate development in more suitable the City of Santa Clarita. However, the project would assist locations while retaining significant natural slopes and in the implementation of this Policy through the provision areas of environmental sensitivity. of residential density and jobs with transit in an infill area with adjacent infrastructure. Policy LU 1.3.5: Encourage flexible citing and design Not Applicable: The project site is not located within a techniques within hillside areas designated as Non -Urban hillside area designated as Non -Urban. in order to preserve steep slopes or other unique physical features, including clustering of residential units provided all of residential lots are maintained with a usable two - acre minimum lot size. Policy LU 1.3.6: Encourage retention of natural drainage Consistent: The project site would not cross the Santa patterns and the preservation of significant riparian areas, Clara River, thus, would not alter existing drainage both of which are commonly located in hillside areas. patterns. Additionally, the project site is generally flat and not located in a hillside area. The Specific Plan would require construction of new drainage and water quality features to allow for a system that protects development from erosion and potential flooding and preserves the Santa Clara River. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 3 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Mixed Lend Uses Goal LU 2: A mix of land uses to accommodate growth, Consistent: The proposed project would include a mix of supported by adequate resources and maintaining residential land uses, including multi -family residential community assets. and townhomes, and would provide open space opportunities to support the residential uses. Policy LU 2.1.1: On the Land Use Map, designate a Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and balance of land uses in appropriate amounts to meet directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the future community needs, while ensuring that no use proposed project would assist in the implementation of designation is over -represented in a manner that is not this Policy through its inclusion of a mix of residential land economically viable. uses in close proximity to transit. Policy LU 2.1.2: On the Land Use Map, integrate land use Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and designations in a manner that promotes healthy, walkable directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project communities, by providing an appropriate mix of does assist with the implementation of this Policy through residential and service uses in proximity to one another. construction of new residential land uses in proximity to a mixed -use development and the Metro line extension. Policy LU 2.1.3: Provide a range of land use types and Consistent: The project would introduce a mix of densities to reflect the special characteristics, lifestyles, residential land use types in an area surrounded by single - and opportunities that differentiate various communities family residences. The range of multi -family apartment - and villages in the Santa Clarita Valley, including types and for -sale town homes would differentiate the urban, suburban, and rural living environments. community from the more suburban and rural areas. Policy LU 2.1.4: Adopt a compatible set of land use Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and designations between the City of Santa Clarita and the directed to the City of Santa Clarita and County of Los County of Los Angeles for land in the Santa Clarita Valley, Angeles. That said, the proposed project would assist in to be implemented through standards and zones applied the implementation of this Policy through its development by each agency to ensure compatibility with the character of land uses in a manner that is compatible with the of each area and with the goals of the City's General Plan character of surrounding areas. and the County's Area Plan. Policy LU 2.1.5: Identify areas with hazardous conditions Consistent: Prior to construction of the project, hazardous and ensure that uses in or adjacent to these areas pose conditions would be identified and compliance with minimal risk to public health or safety. federal, state, and local regulations would ensure that these uses pose minimal risk to public health or safety. . Policy LU 2.2.1: Identify areas of scenic or aesthetic value Consistent: Section 4.16, Visual Resources, of the Vista to the community, and minimize designating uses in these Canyon Draft El concludes that, with mitigation, the areas that would diminish the aesthetic quality of these project would not result in any significant visual impacts. areas. Policy LU 2.2.2: Identify sites and areas with historical or Consistent: There are no historic conditions of significance cultural value to the community, and ensure that uses in on the site. or adjacent to these areas will not impact their historical integrity. Policy LU 2.2.3: Consistent with adopted plans, ensure Consistent: The Specific Plan includes extensive open that adequate open space is set aside and protected from space, recreation opportunities, and public/private development throughout the planning area in order to parks. The project site would not extend into existing provide the benefits of watershed management, habitat waters, or areas of habitat preservation. preservation and connectivity, and recreational opportunities. Policy LU 2.3.1: In a mixed -use development, residential Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a densities at the higher end of the allowed range shall be mixed -use development. allowed only if the development incorporates a robust mix of non-residential uses. Policy LU 2.3.2: Either vertical or horizontal integration of Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a uses shall be allowed in a mixed -use development, with mixed -use development. However, the project would an emphasis on tying together the uses with appropriate incorporate pedestrian linkages. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 4 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis 3 Policy LU 2.3.3: Manufacturing, processing of goods and materials, and warehousing shall not be allowable uses in a mixed -use development. Some light manufacturing and warehousing may be appropriate in second story units. Policy LU 2.3.4: Adequate public spaces and amenities shall be provided in a mixed -use development to support both commercial and residential uses, including but not limited to plazas, landscaped walkways, village greens, and greenbelts. Policy LU 2.3.5: Mixed -use developments shall be designed to create a pedestrian -scale environment through appropriate street and sidewalk widths, block lengths, relationship of buildings to streets, and use of public spaces. Policy LU 2.3.6: Encourage provision of parking alternatives in mixed -use developments, including subterranean parking and structured parking to limit the amount of surface area devoted to vehicle storage. Healthy Neighborhoods Goal LU 3: Healthy and safe neighborhoods for all residents. Policy LU 3.1.1: On the Land Use Map, designate adequate land for residential use at various densities to provide a mix of housing opportunities for all segments of the population, including attached, detached, senior, and mixed -use housing types, which are consistent with community character and meet the region's housing goals. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a mixed -use development. Manufacturing uses are not proposed by the project. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a mixed -use development. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a mixed -use development. Nonetheless, the project would include a pedestrian -scale environment through appropriate street and sidewalk widths, block lengths, relationship of buildings to streets, and use of public spaces. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a mixed -use development. Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project design would provide for a healthy and safe neighborhood for future residents. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would assist in the implementation of this Policy through its provision of a mix of housing types, all of which would be consistent with community character and assist in meeting the region's housing goals. Policy LU 3.1.2: Promote a mix of housing types within Consistent: The proposed project would provide a mix of neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied housing types that would accommodate income levels. households with varied income levels. Policy LU 3.1.3: Promote opportunities for live -work units to accommodate residents with home -based businesses. Policy LU 3.1.4: Promote development of workforce housing to meet the needs of those employed in the Santa Clarita Valley. Policy LU 3.1.5: Promote development of housing affordable to residents, including households with incomes in the very low, low, and moderate income classifications, through provision of adequate sites on the Land Use Map, allowance for density bonuses and other development incentives, and other means as appropriate. Policy LU 3.1.6: Promote development of housing suitable to residents with special needs, including but not limited to senior citizens and persons with disabilities. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include live -work units. Consistent: The proposed project would include various housing types that would accommodate households with various income levels. It is envisioned that all of these housing types could provide housing opportunities for persons employed in the Santa Clarita Valley. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would assist in the implementation of this Policy through its inclusion of various housing types that would accommodate households with varied income levels. Consistent: The proposed project would assist in the implementation of this Policy through its inclusion of various housing types that would accommodate households with varied income levels and age-restric MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis units for senior citizens. Further, nothing in the site design would preclude individuals with special needs from residing at the project. Policy LU 3.1.7: Promote development of housing for Consistent: It is anticipated that students attending local students attending local colleges, in consideration of colleges may reside in the project. access to campuses to the extent practicable. Policy LU 3.2.1: Require provision of adequate walkways Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan provides in urban residential neighborhoods that provide safe and for a comprehensive pedestrian circulation system accessible connections to destinations such as schools, throughout the project's planning areas. parks, and neighborhood commercial centers. Policy LU 3.2.2: In planning residential neighborhoods, Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan provides include pedestrian linkages, landscaped parkways with for a comprehensive pedestrian circulation system sidewalks, and separated trails for pedestrians and throughout the project's four planning areas, linking these bicycles, where appropriate and feasible. areas to each other and the proposed open space areas. The proposed project would include pedestrian linkages and landscaped parkways. Policy LU 3.3.1: Identify areas subject to hazards from Consistent: Prior to construction of the project, the areas seismic activity, unstable soils, excessive noise, subject to hazards would be identified and mitigated, as unhealthful air quality, or flooding, and avoid designating appropriate. residential uses in these areas unless adequately mitigated. Policy LU 3.3.2: In areas subject to wildland fire danger, Consistent: The construction of the proposed project ensure that land uses have adequate setbacks, fuel would eliminate fire hazards associated with the natural modification areas, and emergency access routes. vegetative cover found on the project site due to replacement with urban landscape vegetation. Additionally, the proposed project would comply with the Los Angeles County Fire Department Fuel Modification Guidelines. Further, the project would provide emergency access through the vehicular access roads within the project site. Policy LU 3.3.3: Identify neighborhoods in which uses that Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and pose a potential hazard to human health and safety may directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Further, the land uses be over -concentrated, and address public safety through contemplated by the proposed project (e.g., residential) use of buffer areas, policies on siting decisions for such are not traditionally perceived to constitute a hazard to uses, changing land use designations, or other means as human health. deemed appropriate. Policy LU 3.3.4: Evaluate service levels for law Consistent: Projected law enforcement and fire protection enforcement and fire protection as needed to ensure that service levels are evaluated and would be mitigated, as adequate response times are maintained as new appropriate. residential development is occupied. Policy LU 3.3.5: Through the development review process, Consistent: The proposed project would be reviewed by ensure that all new residential development is provided the City's Development Review Committee to ensure with adequate emergency access and that subdivision compliance with emergency access requirements. and site designs permit ready access by public safety personnel. Policy LU 3.3.6: Ensure adequate street -lighting in all Consistent: The proposed project would include urban residential neighborhoods, as appropriate, for each appropriate street lighting per City of Santa Clarita community. requirements. Policy LU 3.3.7: Ensure adequate addressing in all Consistent: The proposed project would include adequate residential neighborhoods for emergency response addressing in its residential neighborhoods per City of personnel. Santa Clarita requirements. Policy LU 3.3.8: Within multiple family residential projects Consistent: The proposed project design reflects the comprised of multiple buildings, ensure that project inclusion of the various safety features described in this MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 6 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis designs include crime prevention measures such as Policy. delineating public and private open space, designs for defensible space, easy surveillance by residents of all outdoor and indoor common areas, lack of dead end aisles or paths, and similar measures. Policy LU 3.4.1: Promote the inclusion of green spaces, Consistent: The open space plan for the proposed project neighborhood parks, and other gathering places that incorporates a gym, pool, parkways, and trails, all of allow neighbors to meet one another and encourage which provide for passive and active recreation "eyes on the street" for safety purposes. opportunities and would encourage "eyes on the street" for safety and security purposes. Policy LU 3.4.2: Ensure provision of street trees in urban Consistent: The proposed project's Landscape Plan residential areas where appropriate, to provide shade, ensures the provision of street trees in urban residential comfort, and aesthetic enhancement. areas to provide shade, comfort, and aesthetic enhancement. Policy LU 3.4.3: Provide appropriate levels of code Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and enforcement to ensure maintenance of neighborhoods in directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the a clean, healthy, and safe condition. covenants, conditions & restrictions (CC&Rs) developed for the proposed project would ensure the overall maintenance of the neighborhood. Policy LU 3.4.4: Within higher density housing Consistent: The parks and open space plan for the project developments, ensure provision of adequate recreational incorporates a gym, pool, parkways, and trails, along and open space amenities to ensure a high quality living with 63,554 square feet of private open space. These environment. recreational components would provide for passive and active recreation opportunities for future residents and would ensure a high quality living environment.. Policy LU 3.4.5: Ensure compatibility between single Consistent: The proposed project's design and family and multiple family residential developments architectural standards would ensure compatibility through consideration of building height and massing, between single-family and multi -family residential units. architectural treatment, connectivity, privacy, and other Elements such as massing, building height, architectural design considerations. treatment connectivity and other design considerations would be addressed by the proposed Specific Plan. Policy LU 3.4.6: Promote mixed -density residential Consistent: The project site is surrounded by the Fair Oaks neighborhoods that are consistent with community Ranch community to the south, the existing Colony character, and avoid over -development of high density Apartments to the west and the northern portion of the multiple family units in any particular location. Sand Canyon community to the east. Fair Oaks Ranch is a residential community consisting of single- and multi- family dwelling units. The Colony Apartments consists of higher density, attached dwelling units. The portion of Sand Canyon closest to the project site includes single- family detached residential units and two schools. The proposed project would locate higher density residential units in the western portion of the project site, adjacent to the Colony Apartments. The easterly portion of the project site would be developed with less dense town -home residential units. In summary, the proposed project would develop higher density housing near the existing Colony Townhomes and proposed Vista Canyon Specific Plan area, and develop less dense residential units in the easterly portion of the project site. Policy LU 3.4.7: Minimize the prominence of areas Consistent: Parking within the project site would be largely devoted to automobile parking and access in the design shielded from the street and other residential of residential neighborhoods. neighborhoods. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 7 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy LU 3.4.8: Require architectural design treatment Consistent: The proposed project would include four - along all sides of new housing to promote continuity of sided architecture consistent with this Policy. architectural scale and rhythm and avoid the appearance of blank walls (360 degree enhancement). Policy LU 3.4.9: Street cross -sections that locate Consistent: Roadways within the proposed project would landscaped parkways between the curb and the sidewalk provide a landscaped parkway between the curb and are encouraged to create a visually pleasing streetscape sidewalk in order to provide a buffer for and provide pedestrian protection. pedestrians. Economic Vitality Goal LU 4: A diverse and healthy economy. Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project would assist in the implementation of this Goal through the provision of residents to contribute to the tax base of the City. Policy LU 4.1.1: Promote expansion and enhancement of Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Valencia. the Valencia Town Center to provide a focal point for cultural, civic, educational, and shopping activities serving the entire Santa Clarita Valley. Policy LU 4.1.2: Promote creation of village commercial Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and centers throughout the Santa Clarita Valley to meet the directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the local and convenience needs of residents. proposed project would not prevent the City from promoting village commercial centers. Policy LU 4.1.3: Encourage business creation and Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to expansion for larger companies within and adjacent to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project existing and planned business centers and major would assist in implementing this Policy as the project site transportation corridors. is located adjacent to a Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station along with its business center. Policy LU 4.1.4: Promote economic opportunity for all Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to segments of the community, including small businesses the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project and new businesses. would assist in implementing this Policy through its provision of residential uses, whom would patronize small businesses and new businesses Policy LU 4.1.5: Provide a clear and consistent planning Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to and permitting process to encourage new development the City of Santa Clarita. However, as determined by this that conforms to the General Plan. consistency analysis, the proposed project would be consistent with the One Valley One Vision Goals and Policies. Policy LU 4.2.1: Pursue business attraction and expansion Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and programs for clean industries that provide job directed to the City of Santa Clarita. opportunities for local residents, particularly in the areas of film/entertainment, biotechnology, aerospace, and technology. Policy LU 4.2.2: Achieve a balanced ratio of jobs to Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to housing through business expansion and economic the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project development programs, with a goal of at least 1.5 jobs would expand housing opportunities in proximity to the per household. Metrolink Station and future employment opportunities within the City. Policy LU 4.2.3: Encourage businesses to locate in all Not Applicable The proposed project would not provide appropriate areas of the community to encourage job businesses. creation in closer proximity to workforce housing. Policy LU 4.2.4: Coordinate with local colleges to promote Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 8 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis job training programs for Santa Clarita Valley residents. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy LU 4.2.5: Through the Santa Clarita Enterprise Zone Not Applicable This Policy is a responsibility of and and other business assistance programs as appropriate, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. The proposed project promote development of uses that create job would not provide businesses. opportunities for residents. Policy LU 4.3.1: Promote redevelopment in Old Town Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Old Town Newhall through construction of public improvements Newhall. pursuant to the Downtown Newhall Specific Plan and future area planning efforts. Policy LU 4.3.2: Promote business development in Castaic Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Castaic or and Val Verde to provide a greater range of goods and Val Verde. services to area residents. Policy LU 4.3.3: Promote revitalization of commercial uses Not Applicable: The project site is not located along Sierra along Sierra Highway between Soledad Canyon Road and Highway. Vasquez Canyon Road, to encourage businesses serving the Canyon Country neighborhoods and support services for the College of the Canyons east campus. Policy LU 4.3.4: Promote business development that Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the upgrades and revitalizes older commercial corridors, immediate vicinity of these commercial corridors. including Lyons Avenue, Railroad Avenue/Newhall Avenue, Main Street and Soledad Canyon Road, in a manner that reflects each area's character, architecture, and history. Policy LU 4.3.5: Coordinate with property owners and Not Applicable: The project site is a part of the Whittaker environmental agencies, and provide assistance as Bermite property. appropriate, to promote clean up and redevelopment of the Whittaker Bermite property as a business and employment center. Policy LU 4.3.6: Coordinate with property owners and Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the oil environmental agencies, and provide assistance as fields west of SR-14. appropriate, to promote clean up and remediation of oil fields west of State Route 14. Policy LU 4.3.7: Promote revitalization and reuse of the Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the older industrial areas east of the railroad, adjacent to the Springbrook or Honby areas. intersection of Springbrook and Drayton Avenues and in the Honby area adjacent to the Santa Clara River. Policy LU 4.4.1: Promote extension of state-of-the-art Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to communication facilities to serve commercial and the City of Santa Clarita. industrial areas, including fiber optic cable, telecommunication facilities, and other technology as deemed appropriate. Policy LU 4.4.2: Improve flood control facilities along Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the Sierra Highway north of Soledad Canyon Road to allow Sierra Highway corridor north of Soledad Canyon Road. increased use of this corridor for business and employment uses. Policy LU 4.4.3: Evaluate the feasibility of connecting Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to business activity centers throughout the Santa Clarita the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project Valley with light rail, to provide increased mobility and would have direct access to the Metrolink system and the access for customers and employees between the City's transit system though the inclusion of a Metrolink Valencia Town Center, Whittaker Bermite property, Station and Bus Transfer Station. Newhall, Valencia Industrial Center, Magic Mountain and Entrada, Newhall Ranch, and other areas as deemed appropriate. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 9 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy LU 4.4.4: Protect and enhance public utility facilities as necessary to maintain the safety, reliability, integrity, and security of essential public service systems for all Valley residents. Policy LU 4.5.1: Promote inclusion of employee amenities in the workplace, including but not limited to outdoor seating and break areas, child care services, wellness facilities, and facilities for bicycle commuters, including bike lockers and showers where appropriate. Policy LU 4.5.2: Encourage the provision of usable open space that is accessible to employees and visitors, and discourage the provision of large areas of water - consuming landscaping that are not usable or accessible. Policy LU 4.5.3: Promote the inclusion of state-of-the-art technology within business complexes for telecommunications, heating and cooling, water and energy conservation, and other similar design features. Policy LU 4.5.4: Encourage the provision of support services for employees within business park areas, such as dining and personal services where appropriate, to reduce vehicle trips and promote pedestrian -friendly work environments. Mobility Goal LU 5: Enhanced mobility through alternative transportation choices and land use patterns. Policy LU 5.1.1: Require safe, secure, clearly -delineated, adequately -illuminated walkways and bicycle facilities in all commercial and business centers. Policy LU 5.1.2: Require connectivity between walkways and bikeways serving neighborhoods and nearby commercial areas, schools, parks, and other supporting services and facilities. Policy LU 5.1.3: Ensure that adequate bus turnouts, served by walkways and comfortable, safe, and convenient waiting facilities, are provided for transit users within residential, shopping, and business developments. Policy LU 5.2.1: Designate higher -density residential uses in areas served by public transit and a full range of support services. Policy LU 5.2.2: Provide for location of neighborhood commercial uses in proximity to the neighborhoods they serve, to encourage cycling and walking to local stores. Policy LU 5.2.3: Promote location of non-polluting businesses providing employment opportunities in proximity to neighborhoods, to encourage walkingtowork. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would connect to and install public utility facilities. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include employees. Consistent: The parks and open space plan for the proposed project would be accessible to residents and visitors. Additionally, the project would include native/drought resistant landscaping to promote water conservation. Not Applicable: The project would not include business complexes. Not Applicable: The project would not include business pa rks. Consistent: The proposed project has been designed to provide a transit -oriented neighborhood for the eastern Santa Clarita Valley. The proposed project would develop higher density housing near the Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, with trails connecting users to residential areas. Consistent: The proposed project includes an extensive pedestrian mobility system consisting of trails, sidewalks and bicycle facilities consistent with this Policy. Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan provides for an extensive mobility system throughout the project's four planning areas, linking these areas to each other and trails and walkways. Consistent: The proposed project would provide transit - oriented neighborhood for the eastern Santa Clarita Valley. The proposed project would develop higher density housing near the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station, with trails and walkways connecting the residential areas to transit. Consistent: The proposed project would locate residential uses near the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station. Not Applicable: The project would not include commercial uses. Not Applicable: The project would not provide employment opportunities. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 10 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy LU 5.2.4: Encourage transit -oriented development (TOD) through designation of land uses that allow compact, mixed -use development in proximity to rail stations and multi -modal transit facilities, in conformance with applicable policies. Policy LU 5.2.5: Encourage the mix of compatible uses in areas where, though not served by rail or transit, mixed uses will achieve more walkable neighborhoods and trip reduction, in conformance with applicable policies. Consistent: The proposed project is a transit -oriented development as it consists of residential uses in proximity to the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station. Consistent: The proposed project would be served by rail and transit. Though this Policy is not directly applicable to the proposed project due to its transit accessibility, the project has been designed to be walkable. Community Appearance Goal LU 6: A scenic and beautiful urban environment that Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to builds on the community's history and natural setting. the City of Santa Clarita. Policy LU 6.1.1: Designate ridgelines throughout the Not Applicable: The project side does not include any planning area, and preserve these ridgelines from identified ridgelines. development by encouraging a minimum distance for grading and development from these ridgelines of 50 feet, or more, if determined preferable by the reviewing authoritv based on site conditions. Policy LU 6.1.2: On the Land Use Map, designate the Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to Santa Clara River corridor, along with its major tributaries, the City of Santa Clarita. as Policy LU 6.1.3: Ensure that new development in hillside areas is designed to protect the scenic backdrop of foothills and canyons enjoyed by Santa Clarita Valley communities, through requiring compatible hillside management techniques that may include but are not limited to clustering of development; contouring and landform grading; revegetation with native plants; limited site disturbance; avoidance of tall retaining and build-up walls; use of stepped pads; and other techniques as deemed appropriate. Policy LU 6.2.1: Promote the inclusion of plazas, courtyards, seating areas, public art, and similar features within commercial centers, business parks, and civic facilities visited by the general public. Policy LU 6.2.2: Provide and enhance trail heads where appropriate with landscaping, seating, trash receptacles and information kiosks. Policy LU 6.3.1: Promote planting of street trees throughout urban areas in the Santa Clarita Valley. Policy LU 6.3.2: Develop compatible landscape plans for major arterials traversing the Santa Clarita Valley, including landscaped medians and parkways, and implement these plans in both City and County areas, where feasible and appropriate based on right of way and other conditions. Policy LU 6.3.3: Enhance major entrance points to the community, including on and off ramps from Interstate 5 and State Route 14; entrances along State Route 126; and at the northern and southern entrance points on Not Applicable: The project site is not located in a hillside area. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include commercial centers, business parks, and civic facilities. Consistent: The project would improve any existing trailhead located on the project site. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would plant trees throughout the site consistent with City requirements. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, portion of the project near Lost Canyon Road would be appropriately landscaped. Not Applicable: The project site is not adjacent to or located along any of the referenced roadways. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 11 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Sierra Highway, where feasible and appropriate. Policy LU 6.3.4: Require undergrounding of utility lines for Consistent: Dry utilities will be located within underground new development where feasible, and plan for conduits, including telephone lines which will be undergrounding of existing utility lines in conjunction with constructed underground throughout the site within street improvement projects where economically feasible. phases. Policy LU 6.3.5: Restrict the establishment of billboards Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include within the planning area. any billboards. Policy LU 6.4.1: Maintain the historic buildings in Newhall, Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Newhall. including the William Hart Regional Park buildings, the Tom Mix cottages at Heritage Junction, the American Theater, the Melody Ranch, and various other commercial and residential structures designated as local historic resources, through implementation of preservation measures in the Downtown Newhall Specific Plan. Policy LU 6.4.2: Enhance the area around historic Lang Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the Lang Station by requiring a Specific Plan for redevelopment of Station area. this area. Policy LU 6.4.3: Maintain cultural resources from pre- Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to historical Native American habitation and historical the City of Santa Clarita. That said, all artifacts collected at settlement in the areas around Vasquez Rocks, Elsmere this site, would be conveyed to the Fernandeno Tataviam Canyon, and along the Santa Clara River, through Band of Mission Indians, consistent with State designation of these areas as Open Space on the Land requirements. Use Map. Policy LU 6.4.4: Maintain the historic site of Mentryville by Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the designating the site as Open Space on the Land Use Map. Metryville area. Policy LU 6.4.5: Maintain the historic area of the Rancho Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the San Francisco Estancia through implementation of historic area of the Rancho San Francisco Estancia. preservation measures in the Newhall Ranch Specific Plan. Policy LU 6.4.6: Through the environmental review and Consistent: The proposed project would evaluate impacts development review and environmental review processes, on historic and cultural sites during the environmental evaluate impacts on historic and cultural sites from review and development review process. proposed development and require appropriate mitigation. Policy LU 6.5.1: Require use of high quality, durable, and Consistent: The proposed project's Design Guidelines natural -appearing building materials. would require the use of high quality, durable and natural - appearing building materials. Policy LU 6.5.2: Encourage the use of designs and Consistent: The proposed project's Design Guidelines architectural styles that incorporate classic and timeless would require the use of designs and architectural styles architectural features. that incorporate classic and timeless architectural features. Policy LU 6.5.3: Require architectural enhancement and Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to articulation on all sides of buildings (360 degree the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project architecture), with special consideration at building would comply with this Policy through implementation of entrances and corners, and along facades adjacent to the project's Design Guidelines. major arterial streets. Policy LU 6.5.4: Evaluate new development in Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to consideration of its context, to ensure that buildings the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project create a coherent living environment, a cohesive urban would comply with this Policy through implementation of fabric, and contribute to a sense of place consistent with the project's Design Guidelines. the surrounding neighborhoods. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 12 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis EnvlronmentaW Responsible Development Goal LU 7: Environmentally responsible development Consistent: The proposed project is a compact, transit - through site planning, building design, waste reduction, oriented development with a mix of residential land uses. and responsible stewardship of resources. The proposed project design encourages walkability through its location of residential uses to existing transit. The proposed project also would incorporate energy efficiency measures and water recycling into the project design. Policy LU 7.1.1: Require shade trees within parking lots Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to and adjacent to buildings to reduce the heat island effect, the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project in consideration of Fire Department fuel modification would incorporate shade trees adjacent to buildings restrictions. consistent with City requirements. Policy LU 7.1.2: Promote the use of solar panels and other Consistent: The proposed project would include roof renewable energy sources in all projects. overhangs, low -energy outdoor lighting, and passive solar systems to enhance energy conservation. Policy LU 7.1.3: Encourage development of energy- Consistent: The proposed project's would include energy efficient buildings, and discourage construction of new conservation features such as those mentioned under buildings for which energy efficiency cannot be Policy LU7.1.1, high -efficiency heating, ventilation, and air demonstrated. conditioning (HVAC) equipment, light -emitting diode (LED) lighting, lighting controls, and Energy Star labeled equipment. Policy LU 7.1.4: Support the establishment of energy- Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to efficient industries in the Santa Clarita Valley. the City of Santa Clarita. However, as indicated above, the proposed project would be consistent with this Policy. Policy LU 7.2.1: Monitor growth, and coordinate with water Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to districts as needed to ensure that long-range needs for the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project potable and reclaimed water will be met. would monitor growth, and coordinate with water districts as needed to ensure that long-range needs for potable and reclaimed water will be met. Policy LU 7.2.2: If water supplies are reduced from Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to projected levels due to drought, emergency, or other the City of Santa Clarita. However, as indicated above, the unanticipated events, take appropriate steps to limit, proposed project would be consistent with Policy.. reduce, or otherwise modify growth permitted by the General Plan in consultation with water districts to ensure adequate long-term supply for existing businesses and residents. Policy LU 7.3.1: Promote the use of permeable paving Consistent: The proposed project would be designed to materials to allow infiltration of surface water into the include water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs), water table. such as bioretention areas, rain gardens, planter boxes, vegetated swales and permeable pavement to promote infiltration and mitigate any potential water quality impacts. Policy LU 7.3.2: Maintain stormwater runoff onsite by Consistent: The proposed project would be designed to directing drainage into rain gardens, natural landscaped include water quality BMPs, such as bioretention areas, swales, rain barrels, permeable areas, and use of rain gardens, planter boxes, vegetated swales drainage areas as design elements, where feasible and and permeable pavement to promote infiltration and reasonable. mitigate any potential water quality impacts. Policy LU 7.3.3: Seek methods to decrease impermeable Consistent: The proposed project incorporate sustainable site area where reasonable and feasible, in order to drainage and water quality technologies, such as reduce stormwater runoff and increase groundwater biofiltration areas, vegetated swales, and filter strips to infiltration, including use of shared parking and other reduce stormwater runoff and increase groundwater means as appropriate. infiltration. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 13 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy LU 7.3.4: Implement best management practices Consistent: BMPs would be implemented consistent with for erosion control throughout the construction and City requirements and this Policy. development process. Policy LU 7.3.5: Limit development within flood -prone Consistent: All site development would meet City of Santa areas to minimize down -stream impacts. Clarita, County of Los Angeles and FEMA requirements. Policy LU 7.4.1: Require the use of drought tolerant Consistent: The proposed project's landscape plan would landscaping, native California plant materials, and minimize high water areas and emphasize the use of evapotranspiration (smart) irrigation systems. native and drought tolerant plant species. Smart irrigation systems and recycled water would be utilized for all irrigated areas. Policy LU 7.4.2: Require the use of low -flow fixtures in all Consistent: The project would comply with City non-residential development and residential development requirements per this Policy. Additionally, the project with five or more dwelling units, which may include but are would include a water reclamation plant, which would not limited to water conserving shower heads, toilets, provide a recycled water supply equal to the project's total waterless urinals and motion -sensor faucets, and demand. encourage use of such fixtures in building retrofits as appropriate. Policy LU 7.5.1: Ensure that all new development provides Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to adequate space for recycling receptacles and bins on site. the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project would provide recycling receptacles consistent with City requirements. Policy LU 7.5.2: Promote the use of recycled building Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to materials. the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project would comply with City requirements related to the use of recycled building materials. Policy LU 7.6.1: Limit outdoor lighting levels to the Consistent: The proposed project would comply with City minimum needed for safety and security, and lighting standards and requirements. Lower level encourage lighting would be utilized in most on -site areas. lower lighting levels when businesses are closed. Policy LU 7.6.2: Preserve habitat connectivity in site Consistent: The proposed project would preserve the planning where feasible, and discourage the creation of surrounding Significant Ecological Area by developing on open space islands surrounded by paving. an infill site in proximity to other residential uses and the Metrolink Station. Policy LU 7.6.3: Protect wildlife corridors through site Consistent: The reach of the Santa Clara River corridor design and appropriate land use designations, including located to the north of the project site would be preserved mapped corridors and other corridors that may be as open space. The proposed project would preserve the identified through biological surveys. surrounding Significant Ecological Area (SEA) by developing on an infill site in proximity to other residential uses and the Metrolink Station. Policy LU 7.6.4: Encourage site designs that protect oak Consistent: There are no City -identified hillsides on the trees, hillsides, and biological resources through creative project site and the site is generally flat. The proposed solutions. project would preserve protected trees and biological resources to the extent feasible. The project would incorporate measures, as appropriate, to reduce impacts to these resources. Policy LU 7.7.1: Maintain a suitable distance and/or Not Applicable: The project site would not be located in provide buffering to separate aggregate mining and proximity to aggregate mining and processing activities. processing activities from nearby residential uses and other uses with sensitive receptors to noise and airborne emissions. Policy LU 7.7.2: Avoid designating land uses in areas with Not Applicable: There are no significant mineral resources significant mineral resources or utility facilities that would or utility facilities located on the project site. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 14 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis preclude the future extraction and use of those resources and facilities. Policy LU 7.8.1: Adopt and implement consistent policies for protection of oak woodlands and oak trees throughout the planning area. Policy LU 7.8.2: Protect all designated Significant Ecological Areas (SEA's) from incompatible development. Environmental Justice Goal LU 8: Equitable and convenient access to social, cultural, educational, civic, medical, and recreational facilities and opportunities for all residents. Policy LU 8.1.1: Coordinate plans for new residential development with affected school districts to ensure adequate mitigation of impacts on school facilities; provision of facilities and programs to promote academic excellence for Santa Clarita Valley students; coordination on joint use of facilities and transportation; and long- range planning. Policy LU 8.1.2: Implement a master plan for trails throughout the Santa Clarita Valley to serve all residents. Policy LU 8.1.3: Implement a master plan for parks, with special focus on provision of additional playfields for youth sports in locations accessible to underserved neighborhoods. Policy LU 8.1.4: Ensure that an adequate and diverse supply of child care facilities and services is available to parents who live and/or work in the Santa Clarita Valley, by promoting child care facilities in commercial and residential areas. Policy LU 8.1.5: Coordinate with the Los Angeles County Library System to assist in expanding library services as needed to meet the needs of the community. Policy LU 8.1.6: Coordinate with the Arts Alliance and other similar entities to promote access to cultural events and facilities for all residents. Policy LU 8.1.7: Work with medical service providers to facilitate preservation and enhancement of health Consistent: The proposed project would preserve protected trees and biological resources to the extent feasible. The project would incorporate measures, as appropriate, to reduce impacts to these resources. Consistent: Portions of the project site currently are located within a designated SEA boundary (i.e., SEA 23). However, the project proposes a General Plan amendment and a Specific Plan designation that would change the SEA boundaries to be consistent with identified sensitive biological resources. Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita, and is not directly applicable to the proposed project. Consistent: The project would coordinate plans with affected school districts as part of the development review process. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project would provide a multi -use path that terminates at a public plaza at the far eastern area of the Specific Plan, which provides an outdoor publicly accessible amenity adjacent to the Metrolink transit station as well as shopping, trails, and other amenities to the north. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would further implementation of this Policy through its provision of walkways connecting residential units, adjacent commercial uses, and the Metrolink Station. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, consistent with City requirements and this Policy, the project would mitigate impacts to library services through the payment of a library impact fee. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 15 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis services, including the Santa Clarita Valley's trauma center, provided applications are in conformance with applicable General Plan policies and environmental requirements. Policy LU 8.1.8: Work with social service agencies providing assistance to homeless persons to develop and maintain a suitable shelter in the Santa Clarita Valley. Policy LU 8.1.9: Assist persons and households with temporary housing needs by promoting transitional housing facilities for victims of domestic violence in multiple -family residential land use designations, subject to applicable zoning requirements. Policy LU 8.1.10: Coordinate with agencies that provide services to seniors and the elderly to expand senior facilities, which may include a new senior center. Policy LU 8.2.1: In making locational decisions for siting new community facilities, consider ease of access for all users (vehicular, pedestrian, and transit). Policy LU 8.2.2: Identify neighborhoods that are underserved by public facilities and community services, and plan for equitable distribution of these facilities. Policy LU 8.3.1: Require fair and equitable treatment in considering, adopting, implementing, and enforcing development regulations and policies, including but not limited to providing equal opportunity for public input and considering impacts from development approvals on all segments of the population. Public Facilities Goal LU 9: Adequate public facilities and services, provided in a timely manner and in appropriate locations to serve existing and future residents and businesses. Policy LU 9.1.1: Ensure construction of adequate infrastructure to meet the needs of new development prior to occupancy. Policy LU 9.1.2: Coordinate review of development projects with other agencies and special districts providing utilities and other services. Policy LU 9.1.3: Protect major utility transmission corridors, pumping stations, reservoirs, booster stations, and other similar facilities from encroachment by incompatible uses, while allowing non -intrusive uses such as plant nurseries, greenbelts and recreational trails. Policy LU 9.1.4: Develop and apply compatible standards within City and County areas for design and maintenance of utility infrastructure, in consideration of the character of Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project would further implementation of this Policy through its location near the adjacent Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station, which would provide transit accessibility for the project and surrounding areas. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project would provide affordable housing opportunities within the City and be located near the Metrolink Station. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project's phasing plan is consistent with this Policy as it would bring adequate public facilities and services on-line with residential uses. Consistent: The proposed project's phasing plan would bring adequate infrastructure on-line to meet the needs of each phase of development prior to occupancy. Consistent: The City's development review process conducted for the proposed project includes consultation with affected agencies and utilities. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Further, the project site is not located on or adjacent to any major utility transmission corridors, pumping stations, reservoirs, booster stations, or other similar facilities. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project's utility infrastructure design would consider the character of the community. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 16 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis each comm Policy LU 9.1.5: Work with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to expand law enforcement facilities to meet the needs of the Valley's growing Policy LU 9.1.6: Coordinate with appropriate agencies and organizations to ensure that landfill expansion needs are met while minimizing adverse impacts to Valley residents. Policy LU 9.1.7: Provide for location of additional waste transfer stations and other facilities to promote recycling and reuse of materials within Industrial designations on the Land Use Map, subject to applicable zoning reauirements. Consistent: The proposed project would pay the required sheriff facilities impact fee. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. I Multi -Modal Circulation Network I Goal C 1: An inter -connected network of circulation facilities that integrates all travel modes, provides viable alternatives to automobile use, and conforms with regional plans. Policy C 1.1.1: Reduce dependence on the automobile, particularly single -occupancy vehicle use, by providing safe and convenient access to transit, bikeways, and walkways. Policy C 1.1.2: Promote expansion of alternative transportation options to increase accessibility to all demographic and economic groups throughout the community, including mobility -impaired persons, senior citizens, low-income persons, and youth. Policy C 1.1.3: Work with local and regional agencies and employers to promote an integrated, seamless transportation system that meets access needs, including local and regional bus service, dial -a -ride, taxis, rail, van pools, car pools, bus pools, bicycling, walking, and automobiles. Policy C 1.1.4: Promote public health through provision of safe, pleasant, and accessible walkways, bikeways, and multi -purpose trail systems for residents. Policy C 1.1.5: Plan for efficient links between circulation systems at appropriate locations, including but not limited to bus -rail connections and pedestrian -bus connections. Policy C 1.1.6: Encourage multi -modal travel through provision of adequate facilities, including but not limited to bicycle parking and storage, expansion of park -and -ride lots, and provision of adequate station and transfer facilities in appropriate locations. Policy C 1.1.7: Consider the safety and convenience of the traveling public, including pedestrians and cyclists, in design and development of all transportation systems. Consistent: The proposed project would be located adjacent to the proposed multi -modal transit facility (Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, multi -purpose trails, and sidewalks) to serve the project's residential uses. Consistent: The proposed project would be located adjacent to the proposed multi -modal transit facility (Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, multi -purpose trails, and sidewalks) to serve the project's residential uses. Consistent: The proposed project would be located adjacent to the proposed multi -modal transit facility (Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, multi -purpose trails, and sidewalks) to serve the project's residential uses. Consistent: The proposed project would be located adjacent to the proposed multi -modal transit facility (Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, multi -purpose trails, and sidewalks) to serve the project's residential uses. Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan includes safe and pleasant multi -purpose trails, sidewalks, and bike lanes. Consistent: The proposed project would be located adjacent to the proposed multi -modal transit facility (Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, multi -purpose trails, and sidewalks) to serve the project's residential uses. Consistent: The proposed project is a transit -oriented development and would be located adjacent to the proposed Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, sidewalks, and multi -purpose trails. Bicycle storage would be provided for residents and guests. Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan would provide a safe, convenient, and comprehensive pedestrian/bicycle mobility system throughout the projecl MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 17 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis site Policy C 1.1.8: Acquire and/or reserve adequate right -of- Consistent: The proposed project is a transit -oriented way in transportation corridors to accommodate multiple development, and would be located adjacent to the travel modes, including bus turnouts, bus rapid transit Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, sidewalks, and (BRT), bikeways, walkways, and linkages to trail systems. multi -purpose trails. Policy C 1.1.9: Incorporate funding for all modes of Not Applicable This Policy is a responsibility of and transportation in the capital improvement program, and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. seek fundingfrom all available sources for multi -modal system development. Policy C 1.1.10: Provide for flexibility in the transportation Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and system to accommodate new technology as it becomes directed to the City of Santa Clarita. available, in order to reduce trips by vehicles using fossil fuels where feasible and appropriate. Policy C 1.1.11: Promote use of multi -modal facilities by Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and providing adequate and attractive way -finding programs directed to the City of Santa Clarita. directing users to transit stations, park -and -ride lots, bicycle storage, and other facilities. Policy C 1.1.12: Implement recommendations of the City's Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to Non -Motorized Transportation Plan to expand the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project opportunities for alternative travel modes. would assist in the implementation of the City's Non - Motorized Transportation Plan. Policy C 1.1.13: Activity centers should be designed or Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include improved to prioritize walking, bicycling and circulator activity centers, such as employment or commercial uses. transit for internal circulation of person -travel. Policy C 1.2.1: Develop coordinated plans for land use, Consistent: The proposed project would assist in the circulation, and transit to promote transit -oriented implementation of this Policy. The proposed project is a development that concentrates higher density housing, transit -oriented development and locates higher density employment, and commercial areas in proximity to transit housing in close proximity to a Metrolink Station and Bus corridors. Transfer Station. Policy C 1.2.2: Create walkable communities, with paseos Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan would and walkways connecting residential neighborhoods to include an extensive bicycle/pedestrian system multi -modal transportation services such as bus stops throughout the project site, linking residential land uses to and rail stations. the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station. Policy C 1.2.3: Require that new commercial and Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include industrial development provide walkway connections to commercial or industrial development. public sidewalks and transit stops, where available. Policy C 1.2.4: Consider location, availability, and Consistent: The proposed project is a transit -oriented accessibility of transit in evaluating new development development and locates higher density housing in close plans. proximity to a Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station. Policy C 1.2.5: Encourage compact development and Consistent: The proposed project is a compact, transit - mixed uses to locate housing, workplaces, and services oriented development that would place residential uses within walking or bicycling distance of each other. within walking distance of the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station Policy C 1.2.6: Provide flexible standards for parking and Consistent: The proposed project would include flexible roadway design in transit -oriented development areas to parking and roadway design standards to promote transit promote transit use, where appropriate. use. Policy C 1.2.7: In pedestrian -oriented areas, provide a Consistent: The project design would encourage highly connected circulation grid with relatively small pedestrian mobility through its highly connected blocks to encourage walking. circulation grid and small blocks. Policy C 1.2.8: Provide safe pedestrian connections Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan provides across barriers, which may include but are not limited to for safe pedestrian connections. major traffic corridors, drainage and flood control MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 18 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis facilities, utility easements, grade separations, and walls. Policy C 1.2.9: Emphasize providing right-of-way for non - vehicular transportation modes so that walking and bicycling are the easiest, most convenient modes of transportation available for short trips. Policy C 1.2.10: Protect communities by discouraging the construction of facilities that sever residential neighborhoods. Policy C 1.2.11: Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through the use of smart growth concepts. Policy C 1.2.12: Balance the anticipated volume of people and goods movement with the need to maintain a walkable and bicycle friendly environment. Policy C 1.3.1: Continue coordinating with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA or Metro) to implement the County's Congestion Management Program (CMP) for designated CMP roadways. Policy C 1.3.2: Through trip reduction strategies and emphasis on multi -modal transportation options, contribute to achieving the air quality goals of the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan. Policy C 1.3.3: Coordinate circulation planning with the Regional Transportation Plan prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), to ensure consistency of planned improvements with regional needs. Policy C 1.3.4: Continue coordination with Caltrans on circulation and land use decisions that may affect Interstate 5, State Route 14, and State Route 126, and support programs to increase capacity and improve operations on these highways. Policy C 1.3.5: Ensure consistency with the County's adopted Airport Land Use Plan as it pertains to the Agua Dulce Airport, in order to mitigate aviation -related hazards and protect airport operations from encroachment by incompatible uses. Street and Highway System Goal C 2: A unified and well -maintained network of streets and highways which provides safe and efficient movement of people and goods between neighborhoods, districts, and regional centers, while maintaining community character. Policy C 2.1.1: Protect mobility on arterial highways by limiting excessive cross traffic, access points, and turning movements; traffic signals on arterial highways should be spaced at least 1/2-mile apart, and the minimum allowable Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan encourages and promotes walking and bicycling through its extensive system of trails, bike paths, and sidewalks. Consistent: The proposed project would not sever existing residential neighborhoods; rather, through its pedestrian mobility system, mix of land uses and multi -modal transit facility, the proposed project would connect surrounding communities to the each other and the project. Consistent: The proposed project would assist in the implementation of this Policy. The proposed project utilizes various smart growth policies (e.g., compact development, transit accessibility, etc.) in its design. Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan would provide a comprehensive network of bicycle and pedestrian trails throughout the project site, linking the various uses together and connecting to the City's trail system. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The proposed project would include a multi - modal transit facility that would contribute to achieving the air quality goals of the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plant. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, coordination with Caltrans may be required as part of the environmental review process. Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the vicinity of Agua Dulce Airport. Consistent: The proposed project would further implementation of this Goal through designing an orderly extension from the local roadway system to the internal circulation system of the project site. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 19 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis separation should be at least 1/4-mile. Policy C 2.1.2: Enhance connectivity of the roadway Consistent: The proposed project would extend access network to the extent feasible given the constraints of from Lost Canyon Road through a new east -west private topography, existing development patterns, and road - Harriman Drive. environmental resources, by constructing grade separations and bridges; connecting discontinuous streets; extending secondary access into areas where needed; prohibiting gates on public streets; and other improvements as deemed appropriate based on traffic analysis. Policy C 2.1.3: Protect and enhance the capacity of the Consistent: The proposed project would implement roadway system by upgrading intersections to meet level measures, as necessary to ensure compliance with this of service standards, widening and/or restriping for Policy. additional lanes, synchronizing traffic signals, and other means as appropriate. Policy C 2.1.4: Ensure that future dedication and Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and acquisition of right-of-way is based on the adopted directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Circulation Plan, proposed land uses, and projected demand. Policy C 2.1.5: Periodically monitor levels of service, traffic Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and accident patterns, and physical conditions of the existing directed to the City of Santa Clarita. street system, and upgrade roadways as needed through the Capital Improvement Program. Policy C 2.2.1: Designate roadways within the planning Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and area based on their functional classification as shown on directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Exhibit C-2. Policy C 2.2.2: Adopt consistent standard street cross Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and sections for City and County roadways in the planning directed to the City of Santa Clarita. area, as shown on Exhibit C-3. Policy C 2.2.3: Coordinate circulation plans of new Consistent: The proposed project's circulation network development projects with each other and the would be coordinated with the surrounding street surrounding street network, within both City and County network. areas. Policy C 2.2.4: Strive to maintain a Level of Service (LOS) Consistent: The proposed project would implement D or better on most roadway segments and intersections measures, as necessary to ensure compliance with this to the extent practical; in some locations, a LOS E may be Policy. acceptable, or LOS F may be necessary, for limited durations during peak traffic periods. Policy C 2.2.5: Adopt common standards for pavement Consistent: The proposed project would be consistent with width in consideration of capacity needs to serve this Policy. Street widths within the project site projected travel demand, provided that a reduction in accommodate projected travel demand while enhancing pavement width may be allowed in order to reduce traffic pedestrian and bicycle mobility. speeds, protect resources, enhance pedestrian mobility, or as otherwise deemed appropriate by the reviewing agency. Policy C 2.2.6: Within residential neighborhoods, promote Consistent: The proposed project's circulation system the design of "healthy streets" which may include reduced would promote a "healthy street" design through the use pavement width, shorter block length, provision of on- of reduced street widths, on -street parking, traffic street parking, traffic -calming devices, bike routes and calming, bike routes, landscaped parkways and pedestrian connectivity, landscaped parkways, and pedestrian connectivity. canopy street trees. Policy C 2.2.7: Where practical, encourage the use of grid Consistent: The project would increase connectivity and MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 20 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis or modified grid street systems to increase connectivity walkability through the internal street sections that slow and walkability; where cul-de-sacs are provided, promote traffic and facilitate pedestrian access. the use of walkways connecting cul-de-sac bulbs to adjacent streets and/or facilities to facilitate pedestrian access; where street connectivity is limited and pedestrian routes are spaced over 500 feet apart, promote the use of intermediate pedestrian connections through or between blocks. Policy C 2.2.8: Local street patterns should be designed to Consistent: The proposed project's internal circulation create logical and understandable travel paths for users system would be designed as local street sections that and should provide access between neighborhoods for provide for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle connections local residents while discouraging cut -through traffic; cul- from the four planning areas to open space areas and the de -sac length should not exceed 600 feet, and "dog -leg" Metrolink Station. cul-de-sacs with one or more turns between the bulb and the outlet should be avoided where possible. Policy C 2.2.9: Medians constructed in arterial streets Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to should be provided with paved crossover points for the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project emergency vehicles, where deemed necessary by the Fire would comply with this Policy as required by the City. . Department. Policy C 2.2.10: The street system design, including block Consistent: The proposed project's street system design length, width, horizontal and vertical alignments, curves, would function safely and effectively without the and other design characteristics, should function safely subsequent need for excessive traffic control devices. The and effectively without the subsequent need for excessive proposed project's circulation system would include multi - traffic control devices to slow or deflect traffic. use path on internal, private streets. Policy C 2.2.11: For intersections of collector or larger Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to streets, four-way intersections are preferred over offset the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project intersections. would comply with this Policy as required by the City. Policy C 2.2.12: Private streets, other than driveways and Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to alleyways typically associated with multi -family the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project development, should be constructed to standards for would comply with this Policy as required by the City. public rights -of -way, except as otherwise approved by the reviewing agency. Policy C 2.2.13: Protect the community character of rural Not Applicable: The project site is not located in a rural areas by requiring use of rural street standards, which area. may include reduced pavement width, reduced street lighting to protect night skies, rolled curbs, or no curbs and no sidewalks. Policy C 2.2.14: Streets should be designed in context Consistent: The proposed project would also include an with the terrain and the natural and built features of the extensive and efficient pedestrian/bicycle mobility system. area, but excessively circuitous streets should be avoided to minimize unnecessary vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian mileage. Policy C 2.2.15: Adopt consistent standards for Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to implementation of Americans with Disabilities Act the City of Santa Clarita. However, the project would requirements such as curb ramp design and accessible comply with this Policy as required by the City. pedestrian signals. Policy C 2.3.1: Enhance community appearance through Consistent: The proposed project would include landscaping, street lighting, street furniture, bus shelters landscaping that would be visible to those within the and benches, and other aspects of streetscape design public right-of-way, near the project site. within the right-of-way, where appropriate. Policy C 2.3.2: Encourage unified treatment of arterial Consistent: The proposed project's internal roadways streets within both City and County areas, while permitting would preserve and enhance the village character. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 21 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis flexibility of streetscape design between neighborhoods and districts to preserve village character. Policy C 2.3.3: When evaluating road widening projects, Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to consider the impacts of additional traffic, noise, and the City of Santa Clarita. Impacts related to additional fumes on adjacent land uses and use context -sensitive traffic, noise, and fumes would be evaluated during the design techniques where appropriate. environmental review process. Policy C 2.3.4: Protect residential neighborhoods from cut- Consistent: The proposed project's internal roadways through traffic using local streets to avoid congested would not provide connections to other uses; thereby arterials, through use of street design and traffic control reducing the ability for cut -through in the residential devices. neighborhood. Policy C 2.4.1: Require design of pavement sections on Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and major and secondary highways to account for truck traffic, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. to prevent excessive pavement deterioration from truck use. Policy C 2.4.2: Establish adequate setbacks from major Consistent: The project's residential uses are setback and secondary highways for sensitive receptors and from major and secondary highways. sensitive uses, so as to minimize impacts on these individuals and uses from noise and air pollution caused by truck traffic. Policy C 2.4.3: Prohibit through truck traffic on designated Not Applicable: There are no designated scenic routes scenic routes. located on the project site. Policy C 2.4.4: Adopt regulations for truck parking on Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and public streets, to avoid impacts to residential directed to the City of Santa Clarita. neighborhoods. Policy C 2.5.1: Maintain a current evacuation plan as part Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and of emergency response planning. directed to the City of Santa Clarita Policy C 2.5.2: Ensure that new development is provided Consistent: The proposed project would be served by with adequate emergency and/or secondary access for adequate emergency and secondary access. The access purposes of evacuation and emergency response; require within the project site would be reviewed by the City as two points of ingress and egress for every subdivision or part of the development review process. phase thereof, except as otherwise approved for small subdivisions where physical constraints preclude a second access point. Policy C 2.5.3: Require provision of visible street name Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to signs and addresses on all development to aid in the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project emergency response. would provide visible street name signs and addresses consistent with this Policy per City requirements. Policy C 2.5.4: Provide directional signage to Interstate 5 Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to and State Route 14 at key intersections in the Valley, to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project assist emergency evacuation operations. would provide directional signage per City requirements. Policy C 2.6.1: Require that new development construct or Consistent: The project applicant either would construct or provide its fair share of the cost of transportation pay fair -share fees for transportation improvements. improvements, and that required improvements or in -lieu contributions are in place to support the development prior to occupancy. Policy C 2.6.2: Evaluate the feasibility of establishing a Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and joint City/County Intelligent Transportation Management directed to the City of Santa Clarita. System (ITMS) impact fee for new development that is unable to otherwise mitigate its impacts to the roadway system through implementation of the adopted Highway Plan. Policy C 2.6.3: Support local, regional, state and federal Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and agencies in identifying and implementing funding directed to the City of Santa Clarita. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 22 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis alternatives for the Valley's transportation systems. Policy C 2.6.4: Coordinate road construction with improvements to other utility systems in the right-of-wa} Policy 8.6: Encourage Green Building principles for new building and renovation projects. Vehicle Trip Reduction Goal C 3: Reduction of vehicle trips and emissions through effective management of travel demand, transportation systems, and parking. Policy C 3.1.1: In evaluating new development projects, require trip reduction measures as feasible to relieve congestion and reduce air pollution from vehicle emissions. Policy C 3.1.2: Promote home -based businesses and live - work units as a means of reducing home -to -work trips. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent The project applicant would require that each building be designed to meet the requirements of the California Building Code, which incorporates the Cal Green and Title 24 Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). In doing so, the Specific Plan wouldbe developed to achieve energy efficiency, water efficiency, material conservation, and resource efficiency in compliance with the CALGreen Code. Consistent: The proposed project is a transit -oriented development, such that it would create fewer vehicle trips than a typical, suburban residential development with the same number of residential units. The project would locate residential uses adjacent to the Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, trails, sidewalks and bike routes. Consistent: The project would locate residential uses adjacent to the Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station, trails, sidewalks and bike routes. The transit -oriented development would promote use of alternative transportation to reduce air pollution from vehicle emissions. Consistent: The proposed project would permit home occupation businesses; however, it would not include live - work units. Policy C 3.1.3: Promote the use of flexible work schedules Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and telecommuting to reduce home to work trips. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy C 3.1.4: Promote the use of employee incentives to encourage alternative travel modes to work. Policy C 3.1.5: Promote the use of van pools, car pools, and shuttles to encourage trip reduction. Policy C 3.1.6: Promote the provision of showers and lockers within businesses and employment centers, in order to encourage opportunities for employees to bicycle to work. Policy C 3.2.1: Adopt clean vehicle purchase policies for City and County fleets. Policy C 3.2.2: Continue to enhance signal timing and synchronization to allow for free traffic flow, minimizing idling and vehicle emissions. Policy C 3.2.3: When available and feasible, provide opportunities and infrastructure to support use of alternative fuel vehicles and travel devices. Policy C 3.3.1: Evaluate parking standards and reduce requirements where appropriate, based on data showing that requirements are in excess of demand. Consistent: The proposed project would encourage the use of alternative travel modes through its proximity to the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include such uses that would utilize van pools, car pools, or shuttles (i.e. employment centers). Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include business and employment centers. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include infrastructure, such as a parking structure, that would support the use of alternative fuel vehicles. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy C 3.3.2: In pedestrian -oriented, high density mixed Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a use districts, provide for common parking facilities to mixed -use development. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 23 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis serve the district, where appropriate. Policy C 3.3.3: Promote shared use of parking facilities Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include between businesses with complementary uses and hours, businesses. where feasible. Policy C 3.3A Within transit -oriented development Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include projects, consider providing incentives such as higher commercial uses. floor area ratio and/or lower parking requirements for commercial development that provides transit and ride - share programs. Policy C 3.3.5: Encourage convenient short-term parking Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include a in high -activity areas, and all day parking at the periphery high -activity area. of the development areas. Policy C 3.3.6: Site plans should prioritize direct Consistent: The proposed project would include pedestrian access between building entrances, sidewalks pedestrian access between buildings, sidewalks and and transit stops, by placing parking behind buildings transit stops. where possible, to the sides of buildings when necessary, and always away from street intersections. Rail Service Goal C 4: Rail service to meet regional and inter -regional Consistent: The proposed project would place a number of needs for convenient, cost-effective travel alternatives, residential uses in proximity to the Metrolink Station. which are fully integrated into the Valley's circulation systems and land use patterns. Policy C 4.1.1: Develop permanent Metrolink facilities with Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and an expanded bus transfer station and additional park -and- directed to the City of Santa Clarita. ride spaces at the Via Princessa station, or other alternative location as deemed appropriate to meet the travel needs of residents on the Valley's east side. Policy C 4.1.2: Coordinate with other agencies to facilitate Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and extension of a passenger rail line from the Santa Clarita directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Station to Ventura County, which may be used for Metrolink service. Policy C 4.1.3: Continue to expand and improve commuter Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to services, including park -and -ride lots, bicycle parking and the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project storage, and waiting facilities, at all Metrolink stations. would place residential uses in proximity to the Metrolink Station with parking, bicycle parking and storage, and waiting facilities. Policy C 4.1A Encourage the preservation of abandoned Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and railroad right-of-way for future transportation facilities, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. where appropriate. Policy C 4.1.5: Work with other agencies to increase rail Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and efficiency and public safety through street and track directed to the City of Santa Clarita. improvements, and grade separations where needs are identified. Policy C 4.1.6: Provide incentives to promote transit- Consistent: The proposed project would be a transit oriented development near rail stations. oriented development, and would place residential uses in proximity to the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station. Policy C 4.1.7: Facilitate coordination of planning for any Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and future high speed regional rail systems in the Valley with directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Metrolink services. Policy C 4.1.8: Minimize impacts to passenger rail service Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and the community from any proposed increase to freight directed to the City of Santa Clarita. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 24 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis rail service through the Valley. Policy C 4.2.1: Continue to work with the Orange Line Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and Development Authority (OLDA) to plan for development of directed to the City of Santa Clarita. an environmentally sensitive, high speed transportation system with a route through the Santa Clarita Valley, including a regional station hub with associated infrastructure that would provide connections to the Los Angeles Basin, Palmdale Regional Airport, and other destinations. Policy C 4.2.2: Coordinate with other agencies as needed Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and to facilitate planning for other high-speed rail alternatives directed to the City of Santa Clarita. in the Santa Clarita Valley. Policy C 4.2.3: Promote and encourage the expansion of Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and Amtrak Rail Service to the Santa Clarita Valley. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Bus Transit Goal C 5: Bus transit service as a viable choice for all Consistent: The project proposes residential uses in residents, easily accessible and serving destinations proximity to a Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer Station. throughout the Valley. Both transit facilities would make these alternative modes of transportation more accessible to residents in the eastern Santa Clarita Valley. Policy C 5.1.1: Require that new subdivisions provide for Consistent: The proposed project would have two means two means of access into and out of the development, in of access off Harriman Drive, as well as a connection to order to provide for transit access, where feasible. the new Metrolink Station. Policy C 5.1.2: For private gated communities, require the Not Applicable: The proposed project would not be a developer to accommodate bus access through the entry private, gated community. gate, or provide bus waiting facilities at the project entry with pedestrian connections to residential streets, where appropriate. Policy C 5.1.3: Consider the operational characteristics of Consistent: The proposed project would be adjacent to a buses when determining acceptable street designs, Bus Transfer Station. The proposed street designs near including grades and turning radii. bus routes would be reviewed and approved as part of the City's development review process. Policy C 5.1.4: Provide for location of bus stops within 1/4- Consistent: The Bus Transfer Station is within mile of residential neighborhoods, and include paved bus walking/biking distance of the project's residential units. waiting areas in street improvement plans wherever appropriate and feasible. Policy C 5.1.5: Location and design of bus turnouts should Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and not obstruct traffic and should provide sufficient merging directed to the City of Santa Clarita. length for the bus to re-enter the traffic flow. Policy C 5.1.6: Evaluate the feasibility of giving buses Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and priority at signalized intersections to maintain transit directed to the City of Santa Clarita. service level standards, where appropriate. Policy C 5.2.1: Require paved waiting areas, accessible by Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and paved walkways and reasonably direct pedestrian routes, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. for bus stops in new development; and provide for retrofitting of existing bus stops, where feasible and practicable. Policy C 5.2.2: Adopt and implement consistent design Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and standards for use in both City and County areas for bus directed to the City of Santa Clarita. shelters, bus benches, trash receptacles, lighting, and other improvements for transit stops that are aesthetically MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 25 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis pleasing and consistent with community character. Policy C 5.2.3: Adopt and implement common design standards for bus turnouts and merging lanes along arterial streets, in convenient, accessible locations. Policy C 5.2.4: Enhance way -finding signage along walkways and paseos to direct pedestrians to transit stops. Policy C 5.2.5: Complementary transportation modes should be interconnected at intermodal transit centers, including provisions for bicycles on buses, bicycle parking at transit centers, and park -and -ride at transit stops. Policy C 5.3.1: Continue to provide fixed route service to significant activity areas and neighborhoods with moderate to high density, and serve low -density and rural areas with dial -a -ride, flexible fixed routes, or other transit services as deemed appropriate. Policy C 5.3.2: Promote concentrated development patterns in coordination with transit planning to maximize service efficiency and ridership. Policy C 5.3.3: Evaluate the feasibility of providing "fly- away" bus transit service to airports located at Burbank, Palmdale, and Los Angeles, and implement this program when warranted by demand. Policy C 5.3.4: Evaluate the feasibility of providing bus rapid transit (BRT) for key transit corridors when light -rail is not feasible or cost effective. Policy C 5.4.1: Establish transit impact fee rates that are based on the actual impacts of new development on the transit system, and regularly monitor and adjust these fees as needed to ensure adequate mitigation. Policy C 5.4.2: Evaluate the feasibility of establishing a joint City/County transit impact fee to equitably distribute the capital costs of transit system expansion to meet the needs of new development in both County and City areas of the Valley. Policy C 5.4.3: Seek funding for transit system expansion and improvement from all available sources, including local, state, and federal programs and grants. Bikeways Goal C 6: A unified and well -maintained bikeway system with safe and convenient routes for commuting, recreational use and utilitarian travel, connecting communities and the region. Policy C 6.1.1: For recreational riders, continue to develop Class I bike paths, separated from the right-of-way, linking neighborhoods to open space and activity areas. C 6.1.2: For long-distance riders and those who Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The project applicant would work with the City of Santa Clarita to ensure that appropriate transit station way -finding signage is included on project walkways and trails. Consistent: The proposed project would connect to the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer station by walking or biking. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The proposed project is a transit -oriented development. The project would consist of residential uses in close proximity to transit and other uses. The design of the proposed project would assist in maximizing transit service efficiency and ridership. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project applicant would construct improvements or pay transit impact fees consistent with City requirements. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project applicant would construct improvements or pay transit impact fees consistent with City requirements. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The proposed project's Mobility Plan would provide a comprehensive network of bicycle and pedestrian trails, paths and sidewalks throughout the project site. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the project would ensure connectivity of bicycle facilities within the project site to the surrounding areas. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 26 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis bicycle to work or services, provide striped Class II bike lanes within the right-of-way, with adequate delineation and signage, where feasible and appropriate. Policy C 6.1.3: Continue to acquire or reserve right-of-way and/or easements needed to complete the bicycle circulation system as development occurs. Policy C 6.1A Where inadequate right-of-way exists for Class I or II bikeways, provide signage for Class 111 bike routes or designate alternative routes as appropriate. Policy C 6.1.5: Plan for continuous bikeways to serve major destinations, including but not limited to regional shopping areas, college campuses, public buildings, parks, and employment centers. Policy C 6.2.1: Bicycle parking, which can include bicycle lockers and sheltered areas, should be required at commercial sites and multi -family housing complexes for use by employees and residents, as well as customers and visitors. Policy C 6.2.2: Bicycle racks on transit vehicles should be provided to give bike -and -ride commuters the ability to transport their bicycles. Policy C 6.2.3: Promote the inclusion of services for bicycle commuters, such as showers and changing rooms, as part of the development review process for new development or substantial alterations of existing commercial or industrial uses. where appropriate. Pedestrian Circulation Goal C 7: Walkable communities, in which interconnected walkways provide a safe, comfortable and viable alternative to driving for local destinations. Policy C 7.1.1: In reviewing new development proposals, consider pedestrian connections within and between developments as an integral component of the site design, which may include seating, shading, lighting, directional signage, accessibility, and convenience. Policy C 7.1.2: For existing walled subdivisions, promote the extension of pedestrian access to connect these neighborhoods to transit and services through public education and by facilitating retrofitted improvements where feasible. Policy C 7.1.3: Where feasible and practical, consider grade separated facilities to provide pedestrian connections across arterial streets, flood control channels, utility easements, and other barriers. Policy C 7.1A Identify and develop an improvement program to connect existing walkways and paseos to transit and services, where needed and appropriate. Policy C 7.1.5: In new commercial development, provide for direct, clearly delineated, and preferably landscaped the City of Santa Clarita. However, the project would ensure connectivity of bicycle facilities within the project site to the surrounding areas. Consistent: The proposed project would provide the required bike paths required by the City of Santa Clarita consistent with this Policy. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the project would ensure connectivity of bicycle facilities within the project site to the surrounding areas. Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate bicycle parking/lockers for residents and guests. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include commercial uses or other employment opportunities that would require services for bicycle commuters. Consistent: The proposed project would assist in the implementation of this Goal as it would create a safe, walkable community, thereby providing a viable alternative to driving to local destinations. Consistent: The proposed project would include pedestrian connections within and between the project site. Seating areas, shading, lighting, directional signage, accessibility and convenience would be incorporated into the project design. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: The project site does not include barriers that would require grade -separated facilities. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. However, the proposed project would further implementation of this Policy through its inclusion of an extensive pedestrian/bicycle system that would provide direct access to transit and services. Not Applicable: The project does not include commercial development. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 27 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis pedestrian walkways from transit stops and parking areas to building entries, and avoid placement of uses (such as drive -through facilities) in locations that would obstruct Policy C 7.1.6: Encourage placement of building entries in locations accessible to public sidewalks and transit. Policy C 7.1.7: Promote use of pedestrian -oriented scale and design features in areas intended for pedestrian use. Policy C 7.1.8: Upgrade streets that are not pedestrian - friendly due to lack of sidewalk connections, safe street crossing points, vehicle sight distance, or other design deficiencies. Policy C 7.1.9: Promote pedestrian -oriented street design through traffic -calming measures where appropriate, which may include but are not limited to bulb -outs or chokers at intersections, raised crosswalks, refuge islands, striping, and landscaping. Policy C 7.1.10: Continue to expand and improve the Valley's multi -use trail system to provide additional routes for pedestrian travel. Noise Environment Goal N 1: A healthy and safe noise environment for Santa Clarita Valley residents, employees, and visitors. Policy N 1.1.1: Use the Noise and Land Use Compatibility Guidelines contained on Exhibit N-8, which are consistent with State guidelines, as a policy basis for decisions on land use and development proposals related to noise. Policy N 1.1.2: Continue to implement the adopted Noise Ordinance and other applicable code provisions, consistent with state and federal standards, which establish noise impact thresholds for noise abatement and attenuation, in order to reduce potential health hazards associated with high noise levels. Policy N 1.1.3: Include consideration of potential noise impacts in land use planning and development review decisions. Policy N 1.1A Control noise sources adjacent to residential, recreational, and community facilities, and those land uses classified as noise sensitive. Policy N 1.1.5: Monitor and update data and information regarding current and projected noise levels in the planning area. Policy N 1.1.6: Provide development review comments on projects proposed by other agencies and special districts that may generate noise impacts affecting land uses within the Santa Clarita Valley, including any freeway and high-speed rail projects. Consistent: The project would include design features that allow for easy access to public sidewalks and transit. Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate pedestrian -oriented scale and design features in pedestrian areas. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate pedestrian -oriented street design. Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate trails to connect to surrounding uses. Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would comply with City requirements regulating construction -related noise. Consistent: During the environmental review process, the Noise and Land Use Compatibility Guidelines would be used to assess the potential noise impacts of the project. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would comply with the Noise Ordinance requirements during project construction and operation. Consistent: The development review and environmental review process would consider potential noise impacts. Consistent: The environmental review process would ensure the proposed project controls noise sources generated during construction and operations. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 28 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Reduction of Noise from Traffic I Goal N 2: Protect residents and sensitive receptors from traffic -generated noise. Policy N 2.1.1: Encourage owners of existing noise - sensitive uses, and require owners of proposed noise sensitive land uses, to construct sound barriers to protect users from significant noise levels, where feasible and Policy N 2.1.2: Encourage the use of noise absorbing barriers, where appropriate. Policy N 2.1.3: Where appropriate, coordinate with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to ensure that sound walls or other noise barriers are constructed along Interstate 5 and State Route 14 in the immediate vicinity of residential and other noise sensitive developments, where setbacks and other sound alleviation devices do not exist. Policy N 2.1A Reduce significant noise levels related to through -traffic in residential areas by promoting subdivision circulation designs to contain a hierarchy of streets, which efficiently direct traffic to highways. Policy N 2.1.5: Encourage employers to develop van pool and other travel demand management programs to reduce vehicle trip -generated noise in the planning area. Policy N 2.1.6: Work with the City of Santa Clarita Transit to improve and expand current public transit services and routes to reduce vehicle trips and resulting noise levels. Policy N 2.1.7: Require vehicle owners to properly maintain their equipment to avoid generating excessive noise levels. Residential Neighborhoods Goal N 3: Protect residential neighborhoods from excessive noise. Policy N 3.1.1: Require that developers of new single- family and multi -family residential neighborhoods in areas where the ambient noise levels exceed 60 CNEL provide mitigation measures for the new residences to reduce interior noise levels to 45 CNEL, based on future traffic and railroad noise levels. Policy N 3.1.2: Require that developers of new single- family and multi -family residential neighborhoods in areas where the projected noise levels exceed 65 CNEL provide mitigation measures (which may include noise barriers, setbacks, and site design) for new residences to reduce outdoor noise levels to 65 CNEL, based on future traffic conditions. This requirement would apply to rear yard areas for single-family developments, and to private open Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project has been designed in a manner to minimize noise impacts from roadways on sensitive receptors. Consistent: The environmental review process would ensure noise sensitive land uses are protected from significant noise levels. . Consistent: The environmental review process would include such measures listed in this Policy, if appropriate. Consistent: Proposed residential uses within the project site are separated from SR-14 by the Santa Clara River; given the distance between these areas and SR-14, no noise absorbing barriers would be required. That said, the project applicant would coordinate with Caltrans on the identification of a fair- share mitigation fee for off -site sound walls or other noise barriers, if necessary. Consistent: Internal roads within the proposed project would be arranged in a hierarchy, organized by function, to facilitate access within and around the project site. Not Applicable. The proposed project would not generate employees. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. The proposed project would, however, locate residential uses in close proximity to transit options. These transit opportunities provided by the proposed project would reduce vehicle trips and subsequently resulting noise levels. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The proposed project is designed to minimize excessive noise levels in residential neighborhoods. Consistent: The increase in ambient noise levels would be evaluated as part of the environmental review process. The proposed project would comply with this Policy. Consistent: The increase in noise levels would be evaluated as part of the environmental review process. The proposed project would comply with this Policy. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 29 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis space and common recreational and open space areas for multi- family developments. Policy N 3.1.3: Through enforcement of the applicable Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and Noise Ordinance, protect residential neighborhoods from directed to the City of Santa Clarita. noise generated by machinery or activities that produce significant discernable noise exceeding recommended levels for residential uses. Policy N 3.1.4: Require that those responsible for Consistent: The proposed project would adhere to the construction activities develop techniques to mitigate or City's Noise Ordinance, which regulates the days and minimize the noise impacts on residences, and adopt times of construction activity. standards that regulate noise from construction activities that occur in or near residential neighborhoods. Policy N 3.1.5: Require that developers of private schools, Consistent: The increase in ambient noise levels would be childcare centers, senior housing, and other noise evaluated as part of the environmental review process. sensitive uses in areas where the ambient noise level The proposed project would comply with this Policy. exceeds 65 dBA (day), provide mitigation measures for these uses to reduce interior noise to acceptable levels. Policy N 3.1.6: Ensure that new residential buildings shall Consistent: The project site is not located within 150 feet not be located within 150 feet of the centerline for of the centerline for Interstate 5. Interstate 5. Policy N 3.1.7: Ensure that design of parks, recreational Consistent: The proposed project design would ensure facilities, and schools minimize noise impacts to that the design of parks and recreational facilities residential neighborhoods. minimizes noise impacts to residential neighborhoods. Policy N 3.1.8: As a condition of issuing permits for special Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and events, require event promoters to mitigate noise impacts directed to the City of Santa Clarita. to adjacent sensitive uses through limiting hours of operation and other means as appropriate, which may include notification to affected residents. Policy N 3.1.9: Implement a buyer and renter notification Consistent: The proposed project's disclosure documents program for new residential developments where would make potential buyers and renters aware of the appropriate, to educate and inform potential buyers and railroad tracks, Metrolink Station, Bus Transfer Station renters of the sources of noise in the area and/or new and commercial uses. sources of noise that may occur in the future. As determined by the reviewing authority, notification may be appropriate in the following areas: a. Within one mile of Six Flags Magic Mountain theme park, potential buyers and renters should receive notice that noise may occasionally be generated from this facility and that the frequency and loudness of noise events may change over time. b. Within 1,000 feet of the railroad, potential buyers and renters should receive notice that noise may occasionally be generated from this facility and that the frequency and loudness of noise events may change overtime. c. Within 200 feet of commercial uses in mixed -use developments, potential buyers and renters should receive notice that the commercial uses within the mixed -use developments may generate noise in excess of levels typically found in residential areas, that the commercial uses may change over time, and the associated noise MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 30 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis levels and frequency of noise events may change along with the use. d. Within 1,000 feet of the Saugus Speedway, in the event speedway operations are resumed in the future. I Commercial and Industrial Noise I Goal N 4: Protection of sensitive uses from commercial and industrial noise generators. Policy N 4.1.1: Implement and enforce the appropriate noise ordinance adopted by the City and the County to control noise from commercial and industrial sources that may adversely impact adjacent residential neighborhoods and other sensitive uses. Policy N 4.1.2: Require appropriate noise buffering between commercial/industrial uses and residential neighborhoods and other sensitive uses. Policy N 4.1.3: Adopt and enforce standards for the control of noise from commercial and entertainment establishments when adjacent to residential neighborhoods and other sensitive uses. Responsible Management of Environmental Systems Goal C0.1: A balance between the social and economic needs of Santa Clarita Valley residents and protection of the natural environment, so that these needs can be met in the present and in the future. Policy CO 1.1.1: In making land use decisions, consider the complex, dynamic, and interrelated ways that natural and human systems interact, such as the interactions between energy demand, water demand, air and water quality, and waste management. Policy CO 1.1.2: In making land use decisions, consider the impacts of human activity within watersheds and ecosystems, to maintain the functional viability of these Policy CO 1.1.3: In making land use decisions, encourage development proposals that preserve natural ecosystem functions and enhance the health of the surrounding community. Policy CO 1.3.2: Promote reducing, reusing, and recycling in all Land Use designations and cycles of development. Policy CO 1.2.1: Improve the communities' understanding of renewable resource systems that occur naturally in the Santa Clarita Valley, including systems related to hydrology, energy, ecosystems, and habitats, and the interrelationships between these systems, through the following measures: a. Through the environmental and development Not Applicable. The proposed project would not include commercial and industrial noise. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would not include commercial and industrial noise generators. Consistent: The project would be appropriately buffered from commercial uses to the north and the Metrolink Station to the west. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would not include commercial and industrial noise generators. Consistent: The project would balance the social and economic needs of Santa Clarita Valley residents while protecting the environment through developing within an area surrounded by development; thereby reducing urban sprawl. Consistent: This Policy is the responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would include energy efficiency measures, a water reclamation plant and use of recycled water, water quality improvements, and waste management measures. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project will consider impacts within the watershed and Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would preserve the environment through developing within an area surrounded by development; thereby reducing urban sprawl. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would comply with City requirements related to recycling. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the environmental review process would address impacts of the proposed development on traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 31 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis review processes, consider development proposals within the context of renewable resource systems and evaluate potential impacts on a system -wide basis (rather than a project - specific basis), to the extent feasible; b. In planning for new regional infrastructure projects, consider impacts on renewable resources within the context of interrelationships between these systems; c. Provide information to decision -makers about the interrelationship between traffic and air quality, ecosystems and water quality, land use patterns and public health, and other similar interrelationships between renewable resource systems in order to ensure that decisions are based on an understanding of these concepts. Policy CO 1.2.2: Working with other agencies as Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and appropriate, develop and apply models and other tools for directed to the City of Santa Clarita. decision -making to support the sustainability of renewable systems. Policy CO 1.3.1: Explore, evaluate, and implement Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to methods to shift from using non-renewable resources to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project use of renewable resources in all aspects of land use would include energy conservation and efficiency planning and development. features. Policy CO 1.3.2: Promote reducing, reusing, and recycling Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to in all Land Use designations and cycles of development. the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would comply with City requirements related to recycling. Policy CO 1.3.3: Provide informational material to the Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and public about programs to conserve non-renewable directed to the City of Santa Clarita. resources and recover materials from the waste stream. Policy CO 1.4.1: In cooperation with other appropriate Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and agencies, identify pollution sources and adopt strategies directed to the City of Santa Clarita. to reduce emissions into air and water bodies. Policy CO 1.4.2: In cooperation with other appropriate Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and agencies, abate or remediate known areas of directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Moreover, the project contamination, and limit the effects of any such areas on site is not known to be contaminated. public health. Policy CO 1.4.3: Encourage use of non -hazardous building Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and materials, and non-polluting materials and industrial directed to the City of Santa Clarita. processes, to the extent feasible. Policy CO 1.4.4: In cooperation with other appropriate Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and agencies, continue to develop and implement effective directed to the City of Santa Clarita. methods of handling and disposing of hazardous materials and waste. Policy CO 1.5.1: Promote the use of environmentally- Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to responsible building design and efficiency standards in the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project applicant new development, and provide examples of these will require that each building be designed to meet the standards in public facilities. requirements of the California Building Code, which incorporates the Cal Green and Title 24 Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). In doing so, the Specific Plan will be developed to achieve energy MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 32 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis efficiency, water efficiency, material conservation, and resource efficiency in compliance with the CALGreen Code. Policy CO 1.5.2: Design and manage public urban Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and infrastructure systems to reduce impacts to natural directed to the City of Santa Clarita. systems. Policy CO1.5.3: Consider life -cycles for buildings, Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to development patterns, and uses, and their long-term the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project effects on natural systems, through the following would incorporate energy efficiency measures, use measures: recycled water for irrigation purposes, and incorporate a. Through the environmental review and electric vehicle charging, all of which would reduce development review processes, consider the environmental impacts associated with the entire "life - impacts of new development on renewable cycle" of the project. systems through various phases including construction, use and operation, potential reuse, cessation of use, demolition, and reuse or restoration of the development site. b. Ensure that mitigation measures and conditions of approval intended to protect natural systems are adequately funded and monitored for the required timeframe. Policy CO1.5.4: Seek ways to discourage human behavior Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and that may be detrimental to natural systems and to directed to the City of Santa Clarita. encourage environmental responsibility, through education, incentives, removing barriers, enforcement, and other means as practicable and feasible. Policy CO 1.5.5: Promote concentration of urban uses Consistent: The proposed project is an infill development, within the center of the Santa Clarita Valley, through and is surrounded on all sides by existing development. incentives for infill development and rebuilding, in order to limit impacts to open space, habitats, watersheds, hillsides, and other components of the Valley's natural ecosystems. Policy CO 1.5.6: Through the development review Consistent: The proposed project would comply with this process, consider the impacts of development on the Policy entire watershed of the Santa Clara River and its tributaries, including hydromodification. Policy CO 1.5.7: Consider the principles of environmental Consistent: The proposed project is adjacent to a multi- sustainability, trip reduction, walkability, stormwater modal transit center (Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer management, and energy conservation at the site, Station) and trail system to reduce vehicle trips and neighborhood, district, city, and regional level, in land use improve walkability. Additionally, the project would decisions. incorporate BMPs to reduce water quality impacts; and, energy efficiency and conservation measures. Policy CO1.5.8: Consider environmental responsibility in Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and all procurement decisions, including purchasing policies directed to the City of Santa Clarita. and capital projects. Policy CO1.6.1: Identify environmental conditions that Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and represent a healthy, sustainable community. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy CO1.6.2: Use Geographic Information Systems, Consistent: Geographic Information Systems modeling will modeling, and other tools to indicate the locations of be used as appropriate during the environmental review natural systems such as floodplain and floodway areas, process. oak tree woodlands, significant ecological areas, and plant and animal species habitat Policy CO 1.6.3: Provide information on the condition of Consistent: The environmental review process will provide MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 33 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis natural systems to decision makers as part of the an analysis of existing natural conditions compared to decision -making process regarding land use and built conditions to inform decision makers. development. Geological Resources Goal CO 2: Conserve the Santa Clarita Valley's hillsides, Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to canyons, ridgelines, soils, and minerals, which provide the the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project is physical setting for the natural and built environments. an infill development and would result in the preservation of the Santa Clarita Valley's hillsides. Policy CO 2.1.1: Review soil erosion and sedimentation Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to control plans for development -related grading activities, the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project where appropriate, to ensure mitigation of potential would comply with City and State requirements related to erosion by water and air. erosion control. Policy CO 2.1.2: Promote conservation of topsoil on Consistent: Stockpiled native topsoil would be utilized development sites by stockpiling for later reuse, where over the bank stabilization for planting of native species. feasible. Policy CO 2.1.3: Promote soil enhancement and waste Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and reduction through composting, where appropriate. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy CO 2.2.1: Locate development and designate land Consistent: The proposed project site is generally flat. uses to minimize the impact on the Santa Clarita Valley's When graded, the project site would mimic natural topography, minimizing grading and emphasizing the use topography, to the extent feasible. of development pads that mimic the natural topography in lieu of repetitive flat pads, to the extent feasible. Policy CO 2.2.2: Ensure that graded slopes in hillside Not Applicable: The project site is not located in a hillside areas are revegetated with native drought tolerant plants area. or other approved vegetation to blend manufactured slopes with adjacent natural hillsides, in consideration of fire safety requirements. Policy CO 2.2.3: Preserve designated natural ridgelines Not Applicable: The project site does not include a from development by ensuring a minimum distance for designated ridgeline. grading and development from these ridgelines of 50 feet or more if determined preferable by the reviewing authority based on site conditions, to maintain the Santa Clarita Valley's distinctive community character and preserve the scenic setting. Policy CO 2.2A Identify and preserve significant Consistent: There are no significant geological or geological and topographic features through designating topographic features on -site, however the proposed these areas as open space or by other means as project would preserve open space areas on the western appropriate. portion of the site. Policy CO 2.2.5: Promote the use of adequate erosion Not Applicable: The project site is not located in a hillside control measures for all development in hillside areas, area. including single family homes and infrastructure improvements, both during and after construction. Policy CO 2.2.6: Encourage building designs that conform Consistent: The proposed project would utilize building to the natural grade, avoiding the use of large retaining designs that conform to the natural grade. The proposed walls and build-up walls that are visible from offsite, to the project would not include retaining walls visible to off -site extent feasible and practicable. properties. Policy CO 2.3.1: Identify areas with significant mineral Not Applicable: There are no significant mineral resource resources that are available for extraction through areas on or adjacent to the project site. appropriate zoning or overlay designations. Policy CO 2.3.2: Consider appropriate buffers near Not Applicable: There are no significant mineral resource mineral resource areas that are planned for extraction, to areas on or adjacent to the project site. provide for land use compatibility and prevent the MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 34 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis encroachment of incompatible land uses. Policy CO 2.3.3: Through the review process for any mining or mineral extraction proposal, ensure mitigation of impacts from mining and processing of materials on adjacent uses or on the community, including but not limited to air and water pollution, traffic and circulation, noise, and land use incompatibility. Policy CO 2.3.4: Ensure that mineral extraction sites are maintained in a safe and secure manner after cessation of extraction activities, which may include the regulated decommissioning of wells, clean-up of any contaminated soils or materials, closing of mine openings, or other measures as deemed appropriate by the agencies having jurisdiction. Policy CO 2.3.5: Promote remediation and restoration of mined land to a condition that supports beneficial uses, which may include but are not limited to recreational open space, habitat enhancement, groundwater recharge, or urban development. Biological Resources Goal CO 3: Conservation of biological resources and ecosystems, including sensitive habitats and species. Policy CO 3.1.1: On the land use map and through the development review process, concentrate development into previously developed or urban areas to promote infill development and prevent sprawl and habitat loss, to the extent feasible. Policy CO 3.1.2: Avoid designating or approving new development that will adversely impact wetlands, floodplains, threatened or endangered species and habitat, and water bodies supporting fish or recreational uses, and establish a buffer area as deemed appropriate through site specific review. Policy CO 3.1.3: On previously undeveloped sites ("greenfields"), identify biological resources and incorporate habitat preservation measures into the site plan, where appropriate. (This policy will generally not apply to urban infill sites, except as otherwise determined by the reviewing agency). Policy CO 3.1.4: For new development on sites with degraded habitat, include habitat restoration measures as part of the project development plan, where appropriate. Policy CO 3.1.5: Promote the use of site -appropriate native or adapted plant materials, and prohibit use of invasive or noxious plant species in landscape designs. Policy CO 3.1.6: On development project sites, preserve and enhance natural site elements including existing water bodies, soil conditions, ecosystems, trees, ve,qetation and habitat. to the extent feasible. CO 3.1.7: Limit the use of turf -grass on Not Applicable: Mining is not proposed on the project site. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not involve any mining operations. Not Applicable: The proposed project would not involve any mining operations, and the project site was not previously used for mining operations. Consistent: The proposed project is an infill development and would result in the preservation of biological resources and ecosystems. Consistent: The proposed project is an infill development, as the project site is surrounded on all sides by existing and proposed development. Consistent: The proposed project would not adversely impact the referenced environmental resources and would provide an adequate buffer between the project site and the Santa Clara River corridor. Consistent: The proposed project is infill. That said, the environmental review process identifies biological resources and includes mitigation measures, as necessary, that would require habitat preservation and creation. Consistent: The proposed project would enhance the open space areas within the site. Consistent: The proposed project's Landscape Plan would promote the use of native and drought tolerant species, and would prohibit the use of invasive or noxious plant species on the project site. Consistent: The proposed project would preserve and enhance natural site elements. Consistent: The proposed project's Landscape Plan would MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 35 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis development and promote use of native or adapted limit the use of turf and promote the use of native and plantings to promote biodiversity and natural habitat. drought -tolerant plants. Policy CO 3.1.8: On development sites, encourage tree Consistent: The proposed project would plant trees on the planting to provide habitat and shade to reduce the heat project site. island effect caused by pavement and buildings. Policy CO 3.1.9: During construction, ensure preservation Consistent: The environmental review process would of habitat and trees designated to be protected through ensure the proposed project would comply with this Policy. use of fencing and other means as appropriate, so as to prevent damage by grading, soil compaction, pollution, erosion or other adverse construction impacts. Policy CO 3.1.10: To the extent feasible, encourage the Consistent: The project would encourage open space use of open space to promote biodiversity. areas on the western portion of the project site. Policy CO 3.1.11: Promote use of pervious materials or Consistent: Pervious materials would be utilized on porous concrete on sidewalks to allow for planted area various walkways/trails within the proposed project. infiltration, allow oxygen to reach tree roots (preventing sidewalk lift -up from roots seeking oxygen), and mitigate tree -sidewalk conflicts, in order to maintain a healthy mature urban forest. Policy CO 3.2.1: Protect wetlands from development Consistent. The proposed project would not place the impacts, with the goal of achieving no net loss (or development on wetlands. functional reduction) of jurisdictional wetlands within the planning area. Policy CO 3.2.2: Ensure that development is located and Consistent: The proposed project would preserve a designed to protect oak, sycamore, and other significant protected oak, sycamore, and other significant indigenous indigenous woodlands. woodlands. Policy CO 3.2.3: Ensure protection of any endangered or Consistent: The environmental review process would threatened species or habitat, in conformance with State ensure compliance with this Policy. If necessary, and federal laws. measures would be implemented to ensure protection of any endangered or threatened species or habitat. Policy CO 3.2.4: Protect biological resources in the Consistent: Portions of the project site currently are designated Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) through the located within a designated SEA boundary (i.e., SEA 23). citing and design of development which is highly However, the project proposes a General Plan compatible with the SEA resources. Specific development amendment and a Specific Plan designation that would standards shall be identified to control the types of land change the SEA boundaries to be consistent with use, density, building location and size, roadways and identified sensitive biological resources. other infrastructure, landscape, drainage, and other elements to assure the protection of the critical and important plant and animal habitats of each SEA. In general, the principle shall be to minimize the intrusion and impacts of development in these areas with sufficient controls to adequately protect the resources. Policy CO 3.3.1: Protect the banks and adjacent riparian Consistent: The proposed project would provide adequate habitat along the Santa Clara River and its tributaries, to buffer between the project site and Santa Clara River. provide wildlife corridors. Policy CO 3.3.2: Cooperate with other responsible Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the area agencies to protect, enhance, and extend the Rim of the referenced by the Policy. Valley trail system through Elsmere and Whitney Canyons, and other areas as appropriate, to provide both recreational trails and wildlife corridors linking the Santa Susana and San Gabriel Mountains. Policy CO 3.3.3: Identify and protect one or more Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the area designated wildlife corridors linkingthe Los Padres and referenced bythe Policy. Angeles National Forests through the Valley (the San MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 36 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Gabriel-Castaic connection). Policy CO 3.3.4: Support the maintenance of Santa Clarita Not Applicable: The project site is not located in the area Woodlands Park, a critical component of a cross- referenced by the Policy. mountain range wildlife habitat corridor linking the Santa Monica Mountains to the Angeles and Los Padres National Forests. Policy CO 3.3.5: Encourage connection of natural open Consistent: The proposed project would maintain open space areas in site design, to allow for wildlife movement. space as part of the site design. Policy CO 3.4.1: Coordinate with the United States Forest Not Applicable: The project is not located within nor would Service on discretionary development projects that may it impact a U.S. National Forest. have impacts on the National Forest. Policy CO 3.4.2: Consider principles of forest management Not Applicable: The project site is not adjacent to a U.S. in land use decisions for projects adjacent to the National National Forest. Forest, including limiting the use of invasive species, discouraging off -road vehicle use, maintaining fuel modification zones and fire access roads, and other measures as appropriate, in accordance with the goals set forth in the Angeles National Forest Land Management Plan. Policy CO 3.4.3: On the Land Use Map, maintain low Not Applicable: The project site is not adjacent to forest density rural residential and open space uses adjacent to land. forest land, and protect the urban -forest interface area from overdevelopment. Policy CO 3.4.4: Participate as a stakeholder in planning Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and efforts by the United States Forest Service for land uses directed to the City of Santa Clarita. within the National Forest, providing input as appropriate. Policy CO 3.5.1: Continue to plant and maintain trees on Consistent: The proposed project would plant trees on the public lands and within the public right-of-way to provide project site. shade and walkable streets, incorporating measures to ensure that roots have access to oxygen at tree maturity, such as use of porous concrete. Policy CO 3.5.2: Where appropriate, promote planting of Consistent: The proposed project's Landscape Plan would trees that are native or climactically appropriate to the promote the use of climactically appropriate trees, such surrounding environment, emphasizing oaks, sycamores, as oaks, sycamores, and other native species, while maple, walnut, and other native species in order to limiting the use of introduced species. enhance habitat, and discouragingthe use of introduced species such as eucalyptus, pepper trees, and palms except as ornamental landscape features. Policy CO 3.5.3: Protect heritage oak trees pursuant to the Consistent: The proposed project would result in the zoning ordinance that, due to their size and condition, are preservation of a majority of heritage oak trees on the deemed to have exceptional value to the community. project site. Policy CO 3.6.1: Minimize light trespass, sky -glow, glare, Consistent: The proposed project conditions would ensure and other adverse impacts on the nocturnal ecosystem by that future lighting would not contribute to nighttime limiting exterior lighting to the level needed for safety and visual pollution and light and glare. comfort; reduce unnecessary lighting for landscaping and architectural purposes, and encourage reduction of lighting levels during non -business nighttime hours. Policy CO 3.6.2: Reduce impervious surfaces and provide Consistent: The proposed project would consider all of the more natural vegetation to enhance microclimates and design concepts listed in this Policy. provide habitat. In implementing this policy, consider the following design concepts: a. Consideration of reduced parking requirements, MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 37 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis where supported by a parking study and/or through shared use of parking areas; b. Increased use of vegetated areas around parking lot perimeters; such areas should be designed as bioswales or as otherwise determined appropriate to allow surface water infiltration; c. Use of connected open space areas as drainage infiltration areas in lieu of curbed landscape islands, minimizing the separation of natural and landscaped areas into isolated "islands"; d. Breaking up large expanses of paving with natural landscaped areas planted with shade trees to reduce the heat island effect, along with shrubs and groundcover to provide diverse vegetation for habitat. Policy CO 3.6.3: Restrict use of unauthorized off -road Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to vehicles within sensitive habitat areas through signage, the City of Santa Clarita. fencing, or other means as appropriate. Policy CO 3.6.4: Provide public information and support Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and with demonstration sites at City facilities on gardening directed to the City of Santa Clarita. and landscaping techniques to reduce spread of invasive species and pollution from pesticides and fertilizers that threaten natural ecosystems. Policy CO 3.6.5: Ensure revegetation of graded areas and Consistent: The proposed project would revegetate slopes adjacent to natural open space areas with native graded areas and slopes adjacent to natural areas with plants (consistent with fire prevention requirements). native plants. Policy CO 3.7.1: Support the public education programs Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and offered at the Placerita Canyon Natural Area and Ed Davis directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Park (Sonia Thompson Nature Center). Policy CO 3.7.2: Seek opportunities for partnerships with Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and schools, non-profit organizations, and volunteers, to directed to the City of Santa Clarita. increase public access to and information about natural areas. Water Resources Goal CO 4: An adequate supply of clean water to meet the Consistent: The environmental review process would needs of present and future residents and businesses, ensure consistency with this Policy. balanced with the needs of natural ecosystems. Policy CO 4.1.1: In coordination with applicable water Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to suppliers, adopt and implement a water conservation the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project strategy for public and private development. would incorporate water conservation strategies into the project design, including high efficiency irrigation, use of native/drought-resistant landscaping, use of recycled water for non -potable water from the Vista Canyon Water Reclamation Plan, low -flow -rate faucets, low flow -rate toilets. Policy CO 4.1.2: Provide examples of water conservation Consistent: The proposed project would utilize low water in landscaping through use of low water use landscaping use landscaping in public spaces. Additionally, these in public spaces such as parks, landscaped medians and areas would be served by recycled water. parkways, plazas, and around public buildings. Policy CO 4.1.3: Promote low water use landscaping Consistent: The proposed project would utilize low water design into new residential subdivisions and other private use landscaping and would minimize turf -grass areas. development projects, including a reduction in the allowable amount of turf -grass. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 38 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy CO 4.1.4: Provide informational materials to Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to applicants and contractors on the Castaic Lake Water the City of Santa Clarita. That said, as indicated above, Agency's Landscape Education Program, and/or other the proposed project would utilize recycled water for information on xeriscape, native California plants, and irrigation areas and utilize low water use landscaping. water -conserving irrigation techniques as materials become available. Policy CO 4.1.5: Promote the use of low -flow and Consistent: The proposed project would utilize low- flow waterless plumbing fixtures and appliances in all new fixtures and appliances in all residential areas. residential and non-residential development and residential development of five or more dwelling units. Policy CO 4.1.6: Support amendments to the building Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and code that would promote upgrades to water and energy directed to the City of Santa Clarita. efficiency when issuing permits for renovations or additions on existing buildings. Policy CO 4.1.7: Apply water conservation policies to all Consistent: As indicated above, the proposed project pending development projects, including approved would utilize water conservation measures in construction tentative subdivision maps to the extent permitted by law; and landscape design. where precluded from adding requirements by vested entitlements, encourage water conservation in construction and landscape design. Policy CO 4.1.8: Upon the availability of non -potable water Consistent: The proposed project would utilize recycled services, discourage and/or consider restrictions on the water for irrigation purposes. use of potable water for washing outdoor surfaces. Policy CO 4.2.1: In cooperation with the Sanitation District Consistent: As indicated above, recycled water would be and other affected agencies, seek to expand opportunities utilized by the proposed project for irrigation purposes. for use of recycled water for the purposes of landscape maintenance, construction, water recharge, and other uses as appropriate. Policy CO 4.2.2: Require new development to provide the Consistent: As indicated above, the proposed project infrastructure needed for delivery of recycled water to the would use non -potable water from the Vista Canyon Water property for use in irrigation, even if the recycled water Reclamation Plant. The project would construct main delivery lines have not yet reached the site, where appropriate infrastructure for the delivery of such water. deemed appropriate by the reviewing authority. Policy CO 4.2.3: Promote the installation of rainwater Consistent: The proposed project would implement capture and gray water systems in new buildings for sustainable drainage/water quality technologies, such as irrigation, where feasible and practicable. retention and detention systems, biofiltration areas, vegetated swales, and hydromodification. Policy CO 4.2.4: Identify and protect areas with Consistent: The proposed project would include various substantial potential for groundwater recharge, and water quality measures, such as permeable pavement, promote recharge of groundwater basins throughout the vegetated swales, and bioretention areas, which would watershed (excluding the river bed). promote groundwater recharge. Policy CO 4.2.5: Participate and cooperate with other Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and agencies to complete, adopt, and implement an directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Integrated Regional Water Management Plan to build a diversified portfolio of water supply, water quality, and resource stewardship priorities for the Santa Clarita Valley. Policy CO 4.3.1: On undeveloped sites proposed for Consistent: The proposed project would promote on -site development, promote onsite stormwater infiltration stormwater infiltration through the use of various BMPs. through design techniques such as pervious paving, draining runoff into bioswales or properly designed landscaped areas, preservation of natural soils and vegetation, and limiting impervious surfaces. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 39 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy CO 4.3.2: On previously developed sites proposed Not Applicable: The project site is currently vacant and for major alteration, provide stormwater management undeveloped. improvements to restore natural infiltration, as required by the reviewing authority. Policy CO 4.3.3: Provide flexibility for design standards for Consistent: The proposed project would include smaller street width, sidewalk width, parking, and other street sections, and the use of pervious materials. The impervious surfaces when it can be shown that such project's use of these flexible design standards would reductions will not have negative impacts and will provide benefit stormwater retention, groundwater infiltration, and the benefits of stormwater retention, groundwater other environmental areas while not creating negative infiltration, reduction of heat islands, enhancement of impacts. habitat and biodiversity, saving of significant trees or planting of new trees, or other environmental benefit. Policy CO 4.3.4: Encourage and promote the use of new Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate materials and technology for improved stormwater stormwater management into the project design through management, such as pervious paving, green roofs, the use of sustainable drainage/water quality raingardens, and vegetated swales. technologies, such as retention and detention systems, biofiltration areas, vegetated swales, and hydromodification. Policy CO 4.3.5: Where detention and retention basins or Consistent: The proposed project would integrate ponds are required, seek methods to integrate these detention basins into the project design. areas into the landscaping design of the site as amenity areas, such as a network of small ephemeral swales treated with attractive planting. Policy CO 4.3.6: Discourage the use of mounded turf and Consistent: The proposed project would minimize turf and lawn areas which drain onto adjacent sidewalks and lawn areas and primarily utilize native and drought parking lots, replacing these areas with landscape tolerant plant materials in a design that would retain designs that retain runoff and allow infiltration. runoff and permit infiltration. Policy CO 4.3.7: Reduce the amount of pollutants entering Consistent: The proposed project would include an the Santa Clara River and its tributaries by capturing and extensive water quality plan that would capture and treat treating stormwater runoff at the source, to the extent stormwater runoff at the lot and project levels. possible. Policy CO 4.4.1: Cooperate with the Los Angeles County Not Applicable: The Policy is a responsibility of and Sanitation District and Regional Water Quality Control directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Board as appropriate to achieve Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) standards for chlorides in the Santa Clara River. Policy CO 4.4.2: Support the cooperative efforts of Not Applicable: The project site is not located within or property owners and appropriate agencies to eliminate adjacent to the Whittaker-Bermite site. perchlorate contamination on the Whittaker-Bermite property and eliminate the use of any industrial chemicals or wastes in a manner that threatens groundwater quality. Policy CO 4.4.3: Discourage the use of chemical fertilizers, Consistent: The proposed project would utilize BMPs to herbicides and pesticides in landscaping to reduce water limit or eliminate the use of herbicides and pesticides on pollution by substances hazardous to human health and the project site. natural ecosystems. Policy CO 4.4.4: Promote the extension of sanitary sewers Consistent: The project would still connect to the sanitary for all urban uses and densities, to protect groundwater sewer system and dispose of all solids into the system. quality, where feasible. The project would not include the use of any septic systems. Cultural and Historical Resources Goal CO 5: Protection of historical and culturally Consistent: The project site does not include other natural significant resources that contribute to community identity or historic conditions of significance MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 40 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis and a sense of history. Policy CO 5.1.1: For sites identified on the Historical Not Applicable: The project site does not contain any sites Resources Map, review appropriate documentation prior identified on the referenced Historical Resources Map. to issuance of any permits for grading, demolition, alteration, and/or new development, to avoid significant adverse impacts. Such documentation may include cultural resource reports, environmental impact reports, or other information as determined to be adequate by the reviewing authority. Policy CO 5.1.2: Review any proposed alterations to Not Applicable: The project site does not contain any sites cultural and historic sites identified in the Historical listed in the referenced Santa Clarita Valley Planning Area Resources in the Santa Clarita Valley Planning Area Table Table. or other sites which are so designated, based on the guidelines contained in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Properties (Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Part 68, also known as 36 CFR 68), or other adopted City guidelines. Policy CO 5.1.3: As new information about other Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and potentially significant historic and cultural sites becomes directed to the City of Santa Clarita. available, update the Cultural and Historical Resources Inventory and apply appropriate measures to all identified sites to protect their historical and cultural integrity. Policy CO 5.2.1: In keeping with the Downtown Newhall Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Newhall. Specific Plan policies, ensure that the scale and character of new development is compatible with and does not detract from the context of historic buildings and block patterns. Policy CO 5.2.2: Support expansion and enhancement of Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and a city historical park adjacent to the Pioneer Oil Refinery directed to the City of Santa Clarita. to illustrate historic oil operations in the Valley. Policy CO 5.2.3: Ensure that all aspects of community Not Applicable: The project site is not located in Newhall. design in Newhall, including street furniture, lighting, trash collection and storage areas, seating, and other accessory structures, are of a design and scale appropriate for the historic character of the district, while maintaining a sense of authenticity. Policy CO 5.2.4: Continue to support "Heritage Junction" Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and the historical museum within William S. Hart Park as directed to the City of Santa Clarita. historical resources that illustrate the various phases of settlement within the Santa Clarita Valley. Policy CO 5.3.1: For any proposed general plan Consistent: As required by this Policy, the project applicant amendment, specific plan, or specific plan amendment, will consult with any California Native American tribes on notify and consult with any California Native American the contact list maintained by the Native American tribes on the contact list maintained by the California Heritage Commission that have traditional lands located Native American Heritage Commission that have within the City's jurisdiction, and consider the input traditional lands located within the City's jurisdiction, received in the development decision. regarding any potential impacts to Native American resources from the proposed action, pursuant to State guidelines. Policy CO 5.3.2: For any proposed development project Consistent: As required by this Policy, the City will consult that may have a potential impact on Native American with any California Native American tribe on the contact cultural resources, provide notification to California Native list maintained by the Native American Heritage MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 41 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis American tribes on the contact list maintained by the Commission that have traditional lands located within the Native American Heritage Commission that have City's jurisdiction, and consider the input received in the traditional lands located within the City's jurisdiction, and development decision. consider the input received in the development decision. Policy CO 5.3.3: Review and consider a cultural resources Consistent: The environmental review process with review study for any new grading or development in areas and consider a cultural resources study. identified as having a high potential for Native American resources, and incorporate recommendations into the project approval as appropriate to mitigate impacts to cultural resources. Scenic Resources Goal CO C: Preservation of scenic features that keep the Consistent: The dominant topographic feature near the Santa Clarita Valley beautiful and enhance quality of life, project site is the Santa Clara River, which would not be community identity, and property values. altered by the proposed project. Policy CO 6.1.1: Protect scenic canyons, as described in Not Applicable: The project site is not located in a scenic Part I of this element, from overdevelopment and canyon. environmental degradation. Policy CO 6.1.2: Preserve significant ridgelines, as shown Not Applicable: The project site is not located along or on the Scenic Resources Map, as a scenic backdrop adjacent to an identified significant ridgeline. throughout the community by maintaining natural grades and vegetation. Policy CO 6.1.3: Protect the scenic quality of unique Not Applicable: There are no unique geologic features geologic features throughout the planning area, such as located on the project site. Vasquez Rocks, by including these features within park and open space land, where possible. Policy CO 6.3.1: Support the efforts of Los Angeles County Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and to protect the shores of Castaic Lake to preserve its scenic directed to the County of Los Angeles. Further, the project quality from development. site is not located adjacent to Castaic Lake. Policy CO 6.3.2: Protect the banks of the Santa Clara River Consistent: The Santa Clara River would not be altered by and its major tributaries through open space designations the proposed project.. and property acquisitions, where feasible, to protect and enhance the scenic character of the river valley. Policy CO 6.4.1: Preserve scenic habitat areas within Consistent: The proposed project would provide open designated open space or parkland, wherever possible. space and recreational resources within the project site. Policy CO 6.4.2: Through the development review process, Consistent: The proposed project would provide open ensure that new development preserves scenic habitat space and recreational resource within the project site. areas to the extent feasible. Policy CO 6.5.1: In approving new development projects, Not Applicable: The project site is not located near or consider scenic views at major entry points to the Santa adjacent to an entry point to the Santa Clarita Valley. Clarita Valley, including gateways located at Newhall Pass and along Lake Hughes Road, Route 126, Bouquet Canyon Road, Sierra Highway, State Route 14, and other locations as deemed appropriate by the reviewing authority. Policy CO 6.5.2: Establish scenic routes in appropriate Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and locations as determined by the reviewing agency, and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Further, the project adopt guidelines for these routes to maintain their site is not located along a scenic route. scenic character. Policy CO 6.6.1: Enhance views of the night sky by Consistent: The proposed project would minimize or reducing light pollution through use of light screens, reduce light pollution consistent with the requirements of downward directed lights, minimized reflective paving this Policy. surfaces, and reduced lighting levels, as deemed MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 42 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis the reviewing autho Policy CO 6.6.2: Improve views of the Valley through various policies to minimize air pollution and smog, as contained throughout the General Plan. Policy CO 6.6.3: Restrict establishment of billboards throughout the planning area, and continue abatement efforts to remove existing billboards that impact scenic views. Policy CO 6.6.4: Where appropriate, require new development to be sensitive to scenic viewpoints and/or viewsheds through building design, site layout and building heights. Policy CO 6.6.5: Encourage undergrounding of all new utility lines, and promote undergrounding of existing lines where feasible and practicable. Air Quality Goal CO 7: Clean air to protect human health and support healthy ecosystems. Policy CO 7.1.1: Through the mixed land use patterns and multi -modal circulation policies set forth in the Land Use and Circulation Element, limit air pollution from transportation sources. Policy CO 7.1.2: Support the use of alternative fuel vehicles. Policy CO 7.1.3: Support alternative travel modes and new technologies, including infrastructure to support alternative fuel vehicles, as they become commercially available. Policy CO 7.2.1: Ensure adequate spacing of sensitive land uses from the following sources of air pollution: high traffic freeways and roads; distribution centers; truck stops; chrome plating facilities; dry cleaners using perchloroethylene; and large gas stations, as recommended by CARB. Policy CO 7.3.1: Coordinate with local, regional, state, and federal agencies to develop and implement regional air aualitv policies and Droarams. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goal CO 8: Development designed to improve energy efficiency, reduce energy and natural resource consumption, and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. Consistent: The project is a transit -oriented development that seeks to minimize emissions by developing residential uses in proximity to transit opportunities. Not Applicable: The project site would not include any billboards. Consistent: The proposed project is designed in a manner that is sensitive to scenic viewpoints and/or viewsheds through building design, site layout and building heights. Consistent: Dry utilities will be located within underground conduits, including telephone lines which will be constructed underground throughout the site within phases. Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. In addition, the project is a transit -oriented development that seeks to minimize emissions by developing residential uses in proximity to transit opportunities. Consistent: The proposed project would be a transit oriented development. The proposed project design promotes walkability through locating service and transit uses within walking distance of all residential uses on -site, thereby reducing air pollution from transportation sources. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would include electric vehicle charging stations. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would include electric vehicle charging stations. Consistent: The proposed project would not place any sensitive uses adjacent to high traffic freeways and roads, distribution centers, truck stops; chrome plating facilities, dry cleaners and large gas stations. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The project applicant will require that each building be designed to meet the requirements of the California Building Code, which incorporates the Cal Green and Title 24 Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). In doing so, the Specific Plan will be developed to achieve energy efficiency, water efficiency, material conservation, and resource efficiency in compliance with the CALGreen Code. As discussed previously, the project design MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 43 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis incorporates various water conservation measures and transit services that would reduce natural resource consumption. Policy CO 8.1.1: Create and adopt a Climate Action Plan Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and that meets State requirements and includes the following directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the components: proposed Specific Plan includes a Sustainability Plan that a. Plans and programs to reduce GHG emissions to identifies the project's sustainable development State- mandated targets, including enforceable attributes. reduction measures; b. Mechanisms to ensure regular review of progress towards the emission reduction targets established by the Climate Action Plan; c. Procedures for reporting on progress to officials and the public; d. Procedures for revising the plan as needed to meet GHG emissions reduction targets; e. Allocation of funding and staffing for plan implementation. Policy CO 8.1.2: Participate in the preparation of a Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and regional Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) Plan to directed to the City of Santa Clarita. meet regional targets for greenhouse gas emission reductions, per SB 375. Policy CO 8.1.3: Revise codes and ordinances as needed Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to to address energy conservation, including but not limited the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project applicant to the following: will require that each building be designed to meet the a. Strengthen building codes for new construction requirements of the California Building Code, which and renovation to achieve a higher level of energy incorporates the Cal Green and Title 24 Building efficiency, with a goal of exceeding energy Standards Code (CALGreen Code). In doing so, the efficiency beyond that required by Title 24; Specific Plan will be developed to achieve energy b. Adopt a Green Building Program to encourage efficiency, water efficiency, material conservation, and green building practices and materials, along with resource efficiency in compliance with the CALGreen appropriate ordinances and incentives; Code. c. Promote orientation of buildings to maximize passive solar heating during cool seasons, avoid solar heat gain during hot periods, enhance natural ventilation, promote effective use of daylight, and optimize opportunities for on- site solar generation; d. Encourage mitigation of the "heat island" effect through use of cool roofs, light-colored paving, and shading to reduce energy consumption for air conditioning. Policy CO 8.1.4: Provide information and education to the Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and public about energy conservation and local strategies to directed to the City of Santa Clarita. address climate change. Policy CO 8.1.5: Coordinate various activities within the Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and community and agency related to GHG emissions directed to the City of Santa Clarita. reduction activities. Policy CO 8.2.1: Ensure that all new City buildings, and all Not Applicable: The proposed project does not include any major renovations and additions, meet adopted green new, renovated or remodeled City buildings. building standards, with a goal of achieving the LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Silver rating or above, where appropriate. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 44 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy CO 8.2.2: Ensure energy efficiency of existing public Not Applicable: The project site does not include any buildings through energy audits and repairs, and retrofit existing public buildings. buildings with energy efficient heating and air conditioning systems and lighting fixtures, with a goal of completing energy repairs in City facilities by 2012. Policy CO 8.2.3: Support purchase of renewable energy Not Applicable: The proposed project does not include any for public buildings, which may include installing solar public buildings. photovoltaic systems to generate electricity for city buildings and operations and other methods as deemed appropriate and feasible, in concert with significant energy conservation efforts. Policy CO 8.2.4: Establish maximum lighting levels for Consistent: The project applicant would include provisions public facilities, and encourage reduction of lighting levels within the project covenant, codes and restrictions to the level needed for security purposes after business (CC&Rs) that would restrict outdoor lighting during hours, in addition to use of downward -directed lighting overnight hours to security lighting only. and use of low -reflective paving surfaces. Policy CO 8.2.5: Support installation of photovoltaic and Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to other renewable energy equipment on public facilities, in the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project would concert with significant energy conservation efforts. include EV charging spaces for the multifamily residential units. Policy CO 8.2.6: Promote use of solar lighting in parks and Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to along paseos and trails, where practicable. the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would promote the use of solar lighting in open space areas, where appropriate. Policy CO 8.2.7: Support the use of sustainable alternative Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and fuel vehicles for machinery and fleets, where practicable, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. by evaluating fuel sources, manufacturing processes, maintenance costs and vehicle lifetime use. Policy CO 8.2.8: Promote the purchase of energy -efficient Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and recycled products, and vendors and contractors who directed to the City of Santa Clarita. use energy -efficient vehicles and products, consistent with adopted purchasing policies. Policy CO 8.2.9: Reduce heat islands through installation Consistent: The proposed project would include the of trees to shade parking lots and hardscapes, and use of planting trees in accordance with the Landscape Plan, light-colored reflective paving and roofing surfaces. which would provide shade for parking areas and hardscapes. Additionally, the proposed project would utilize light- colored reflective paving and roofing surfaces, where appropriate. Policy CO 8.2.10: Support installation of energy -efficient Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to traffic control devices, street lights, and parking lot lights. the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project applicant is committed to working with the City of Santa Clarita and Southern California Edison to evaluate the feasibility of an energy efficiency municipal lighting program. Policy CO 8.2.11: Implement recycling in all public Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to buildings, parks, and public facilities, including for special the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project events. would comply with all City recycling requirements. Policy CO 8.2.12: Provide ongoing training to appropriate Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and City employees on sustainable planning, building, and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. engineering practices. Policy CO 8.2.13: Support trip reduction strategies for Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and employees as described in the Circulation Element. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy CO 8.3.1: Evaluate site plans proposed for new Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 45 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis development based on energy efficiency pursuant to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) would be located in an infill site that is surrounded by standards for New Construction and Neighborhood existing and proposed multi -family and single-family uses, Development, including the following: commercial, and transit. Thus, the proposed project is in a) location efficiency; an efficient location, away from habitat that would b) environmental preservation; contribute to urban sprawl. c) compact, complete, and connected neighborhoods; and d) resource efficiency, including use of recycled materials and water. Policy CO 8.3.2: Promote construction of energy efficient Consistent: The proposed project incorporates energy buildings through requirements for LEED certification or efficiency measures into the design. Additionally, the through comparable alternative requirements as adopted applicant is committed to use "Energy Star" equipment. by local ordinance. Policy CO 8.3.4: Encourage new residential development Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate to include on -site solar photovoltaic systems, or prewiring, designated spaces on the roof plans to allow for future in at least 50% of the residential units, in concert with roof panels, in concert with the energy efficiency other significant energy conservation efforts. measures summarized above (e.g., Title 24 exceedance; use of Energy Star appliances; recycled water use). Policy CO 8.3.5: Encourage on -site solar generation of Not Applicable: The proposed project would not include electricity in new retail and office commercial buildings retail and office commercial buildings. and associated parking lots, carports, and garages, in concert with other significant energy conservation efforts. Policy CO 8.3.6: Encourage new development to use Consistent: The proposed project would be designed in a passive solar heating and cooling techniques in building manner to encourage passive solar heating and cooling design and construction, which may include but are not techniques. be limited to building orientation, clerestory windows, skylights, placement and type of windows, overhangs to shade doors and windows, and use of light colored roofs and paving materials. Policy CO 8.3.7: Encourage the use of trees and Consistent: The proposed project would include the landscaping to reduce heating and cooling energy loads, planting of trees in accordance with the Landscape Plan, through shading of buildings and parking lots. which would reduce heating and cooling energy loads. Policy CO 8.3.8: Encourage energy -conserving heating and Consistent: The project applicant will require that each cooling systems and appliances, and energy -efficiency in building be designed to meet the requirements of the windows and insulation, in all new construction. California Building Code, which incorporates the Cal Green and Title 24 Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). In doing so, the Specific Plan will be developed to achieve energy efficiency, water efficiency, material conservation, and resource efficiency in compliance with the CALGreen Code. In addition, Energy Star major appliances would be utilized, where available. Policy CO 8.3.9: Limit excessive lighting levels, and Consistent: The proposed project would minimize lighting encourage a reduction of lighting when businesses are levels, consistent with this Policy and as required by the closed to a level required for security. City. Policy CO 8.3.10: Provide incentives and technical Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and assistance for installation of energy -efficient directed to the City of Santa Clarita. improvements in existing and new buildings. Policy CO 8.3.11: Consider allowing carbon off -sets for Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and large development projects, if appropriate, which may directed to the City of Santa Clarita. include funding off -site projects or purchase of credits for MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 46 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis other forms of mitigation, provided that any such mitigation shall be measurable and enforceable. Policy CO 8.4.1: Encourage and promote the location of Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and enclosed materials recovery facilities (MRF) within the directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Santa Clarita Valley. Policy CO 8.4.2: Adopt mandatory residential recycling Consistent: Recycling areas would be provided for future programs for all residential units, including single-family residents within the proposed project. and multi -family dwellings. Policy CO 8.4.3: Allow and encourage composting of Consistent: The proposed project would provide open greenwaste, where appropriate. space for active and passive recreation. Composting of greenwaste could occur within the project site, if appropriate. Policy CO 8.4.4: Promote commercial and industrial Not Applicable: The proposed project does not include recycling, including recycling of construction and commercial and industrial uses. demolition debris. Policy CO 8.4.5: Develop and implement standards for Consistent: The proposed project would provide recycling refuse and recycling receptacles and enclosures to areas as required by the City. accommodate recycling in all development. Policy CO 8.4.6: Introduce and assist with the placement Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and of receptacles for recyclable products in public places, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. including at special events. Policy CO 8.4.7: Provide information to the public on Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and recycling opportunities and facilities, and support various directed to the City of Santa Clarita. locations and events to promote public participation in recycling. Policy CO 8.4.8: Take an active role in promoting, Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and incubating, and encouraging businesses that would directed to the City of Santa Clarita. qualify under the Recycling Market Development Zone program or equivalent, including those that manufacture products made from recycled products, salvage, and resource recovery business parks. Park Recreation, and Trail Facilities Goal CO 9: Equitable distribution of park, recreational, and Consistent: The proposed project includes extensive open trail facilities to serve all areas and demographic needs of space, recreation opportunities, and public/private parks existing and future residents. featuring 147,854 square feet of common open space, including a gym, pool, parkways, and trails, and 63,554 square feet of private open space dedicated to rear yards and private patio decks/balconies. Policy CO 9.1.1: Common park standards shall be Consistent: The proposed project would comply with the developed and applied throughout the Santa Clarita City's policy of requiring five acres of parkland per 1,000 Valley, consistent with community character objectives, residents. with a goal of five acres of parkland per 1000 population. Policy CO 9.1.2: A range of parkland types, sizes, and uses Consistent: The proposed project includes extensive open shall be provided to accommodate recreational and space, recreation opportunities, and public/private parks leisure activities. featuring 147,854 square feet of common open space, including a gym, pool, parkways, and trails, and 63,554 square feet of private open space dedicated to rear yards and private patio decks/balconies. Policy CO 9.1.3: Provide local and community parks within Consistent: The proposed project's open space would be a reasonable distance of residential neighborhoods. within walking distance from the proposed residential units. Policy CO 9.1.4: Explore and implement opportunities to Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 47 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis share facilities with school districts, utility easements, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. flood control facilities, and other land uses, where feasible. Policy CO 9.1.5: Promote development of more playfields Consistent: The proposed project's open space includes for youth and adult sports activities, in conjunction with play areas for youth and adult activities. tournament facilities, where needed. Policy CO 9.1.6: Continue to upgrade and expand existing Not Applicable: The project site does not include any facilities to enhance service to residents, including existing park and recreation facilities. extension of hours through lighted facilities, where appropriate. Policy CO 9.1.7: Establish appropriate segments of the Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and Santa Clara River as a recreational focal point, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. encouraging a beneficial mix of passive and active recreational uses with natural ecosystems by providing buffers for sensitive habitat. Policy CO 9.1.8: Make available easily accessible park Consistent: The proposed project would provide passive and recreation facilities throughout the community. and active recreation. These areas would be readily accessible from the residential uses. Policy CO 9.1.9: Ensure that new development projects Consistent: The proposed project would comply with the provide a fair share towards park and recreational City's policy of requiring five acres of parkland per 1,000 facilities, phased to meet needs of residents as dwelling residents. units become occupied, pursuant to the Quimby Act (California Government Code Section 66477) and local ordinances as applicable. Policy CO 9.1.10: Where appropriate, use flexible planning Consistent: The proposed project would comply with the and zoning tools to obtain adequate park and open space City's policy of requiring five acres of parkland per 1,000 land, including but not limited to specific plans, residents. development agreements, clustering, and transfer of development rights. Policy CO 9.1.11: Locate and design parks to address Consistent: The open space would act as buffer between potential adverse impacts on adjacent development from the proposed project and the proposed Metrolink Station. noise, lights, flying balls, traffic, special events, and other The proposed project's other recreational areas would be operational activities and uses. integrated in the project and would provide active and passive recreational opportunities for future residents. Policy CO 9.1.12: Establish minimum design standards for Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and both public and private parks to provide for public safety directed to the City of Santa Clarita. and welfare through lighting, access, crime prevention through design, equipment, visibility, and other aspects of design. Policy CO 9.1.13: Provide passive areas for natural Consistent: The project's proposed open space would habitat, meditation, bird -watching, and similar activities in include passive areas for natural habitat, meditation, bird - parks, where feasible and appropriate, including watching and similar activities. meditation gardens, wildflower and butterfly gardens, botanic gardens, and similar features. Policy CO 9.1.14: Ensure adequate park maintenance, Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and encourage programs for volunteers to assist in directed to the City of Santa Clarita. maintaining local parks, where feasible and appropriate. Policy CO 9.1.15: Provide a wide variety of recreational Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and programs geared to all ages and abilities, including directed to the City of Santa Clarita. passive, active, educational, and cultural programs. Policy CO 9.2.1: Plan for a continuous and unified multi- Consistent: The proposed project would include use trail network for a variety of users, to be developed approximately 1,125-foot-long meandering and centrally with common standards, in order to unify Santa Clarita located multi -use path to connect with Metro Plaza, MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 48 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Valley communities and connect with regional and state Metrolink Station, Vista Canyon, and the City Master Trail trails such as the Pacific Crest Trail. System. Policy CO 9.2.2: Provide trail connections between Consistent: The proposed project would include paseos, bike routes, schools, parks, community services, approximately 1,125-foot-long meandering and centrally streets and neighborhoods. located multi -use path to connect with Metro Plaza, Metrolink Station, Vista Canyon, and the City Master Trail System. Policy CO 9.2.3: Use the Santa Clara River as a major Not Applicable: The Santa Clara River is not within the recreational focal point for development of an integrated project site. system of bikeways and trails, while protecting sensitive ecological areas. Policy CO 9.2.4: Ensure that new development projects Consistent: The proposed project would include provide trail connections to local and regional trail approximately 1,125-foot-long meandering and centrally systems, where appropriate. located multi -use path to connect with Metro Plaza, Metrolink Station, Vista Canyon, and the City Master Trail System. Policy CO 9.2.5: Promote the expansion of multi -use trails Consistent: The proposed project trails would be multi -use within rural areas of the Santa Clarita Valley. (bike, pedestrian, equestrian). Policy CO 9.2.6: Provide trails to scenic vistas and Consistent: The proposed project would include connect viewpoints. to existing trails, providing users with views from Mitchell Hill across the Santa Clara River. Policy CO 9.2.7: Explore joint use opportunities to Consistent: The project would include multi -use trails, combine trail systems with utility easements, flood control which could be utilized for flood control purposes, and facilities, open spaces, or other uses, where feasible. various utility easements. Policy CO 9.2.8: Ensure that trails are designed to protect Consistent: The multi -use trails would protect habitat, habitat, ecosystems, and water quality. ecosystems, and water quality. Policy CO 9.2.9: Pursue funding for trail maintenance and Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and encourage volunteer participation in trail maintenance directed to the City of Santa Clarita. programs, where appropriate. Open Space Goal CO 10: Preservation of open space to meet the Consistent: The proposed project includes extensive open community's multiple objectives for resource space, recreation opportunities, and public/private parks. preservation. Policy CO 10.1.1: Provide and protect a natural greenbelt Not Applicable: The project site is not located in areas buffer area surrounding the entire Santa Clarita Valley, referenced by this Policy. which includes the Angeles National Forest, Santa Susana, San Gabriel, and Sierra Pelona Mountains, as a regional recreational, ecological, and aesthetic resource. Policy CO 10.1.2: The Santa Clara River corridor and its Not Applicable: The project site is not located on the Santa major tributaries shall be preserved as open space to Clara River corridor. accommodate storm water flows and protect critical plant and animal species, as follows: a. Uses and improvements within the corridor shall be limited to those that benefit the community's use of the river in its natural state. b. Development on properties adjacent to, but outside of the defined primary river corridor shall be: i. Located and designed to protect the river's water quality, plants, and animal habitats, by controlling the type and density of uses, drainage runoff (water MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 49 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis treatment) and other relevant elements; and ii. Designed to maximize the full range of river amenities, including views and recreational access, while minimizing adverse impacts to the river. Policy CO1O.1.3: Through dedications and acquisitions, Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and obtain open space needed to preserve and protect wildlife directed to the City of Santa Clarita. corridors and habitat, which may include land within SEA's, wetlands, woodlands, water bodies, and areas with threatened or endangered flora and fauna. Policy CO1O.1.4: Maintain and acquire, where Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and appropriate, open space to preserve cultural and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. The project site does historical resources. not contain historical resources. Policy CO 10.1.5: Maintain open space corridors along Not Applicable: The project site is generally flat and does canyons and ridgelines as a way of delineating and not include canyons or ridgelines. defining communities and neighborhoods, providing residents with access to natural areas, and preserving scenic beauty. Policy CO1O.1.6: Delineate open space uses within Consistent: The project site is adequately buffered from hazardous areas to protect public health and safety, seismic ruptures, flooding wildfires, and unsafe levels of which may include areas subject to seismic rupture, noise or air pollution. flooding, wildfires, or unsafe levels of noise or air pollution. Policy CO 10.1.7: Acquire adequate open space for Consistent: The proposed project includes extensive open recreational uses, coordinating location and type of open space, recreation opportunities, and public/private parks. space with master plans for trails and parks. Policy CO1O.1.8: Encourage the use of vacant lots as Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and community gardens, where appropriate. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy CO 10.1.9: Preserve forested areas, agricultural Consistent: The proposed project would include lands, wildlife habitat and corridors, wetlands, approximately 147,854 square feet of common open watersheds, groundwater recharge areas, and other open space space that provides natural carbon sequestration benefits. Policy CO1O.1.1O: Ensure that the open space acquisition Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and plan developed pursuant to the 2007 Open Space District directed to the City of Santa Clarita. formation conforms to General Plan goals and objectives. Policy CO1O.1.11: Partner with conservation agencies Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and other entities to acquire and maintain open space, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. combining funding and other resources for joint -use projects, where appropriate. Policy CO1O.1.12: Identify, pursue, and ensure adequate Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and funding sources to maintain open space areas. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy CO1O.1.13: Provide reasonable accommodation to Consistent: The proposed project would include ensure that residents throughout the Santa Clarita Valley connections to Citywide trails, which would provide equal have equal access to open space areas, in consideration access to open space areas and health benefits to of the health benefits to residents from access to nature. residents from access to nature. Policy CO 10.1.14: Protect open space from human Consistent: The proposed project would develop on an activity that may harm or degrade natural areas, including infill site, thereby reducing human activity in open space but not limited to off road motorized vehicles, vandalism, areas. campfires, overuse, pets, noise, excessive lighting, dumping, or other similar activities. Policy CO1O.1.15: In conformance with State law, ensure Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 50 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis that any action by which open space land is acquired or disposed of, restricted, or regulated, be consistent with the open space plan contained in this element. Policy CO1O.1.16: In conformance with State law, ensure that all development is consistent with the open space plan contained in this element. Policy CO1O.1.17: Allow alternative energy projects in areas designated for open space, where consistent with other uses and values. Policy CO1O.2.1: Encourage provision of vegetated open space of a development project's gross site area, which may include shallow wetlands and ponds, drought resistant landscaping, and pedestrian hardscape that includes a vegetated area. Policy CO1O.2.2: Encourage that open space provided within development projects be usable and accessible, rather than configured in unusable strips and left -over remnants, and that open space areas are designed to connect to each other and to adjacent open spaces, to the extent reasonable and practicable. Policy CO1O.2.3: Where feasible, integrate open space areas with neighboring uses and parcels, to create shared amenities and green spaces. Policy CO1O.2.4: Seek opportunities to incorporate site features into the open space of a project design, which may include significant trees, vegetation, terrain, or water features, to provide thermal, acoustic, and aesthetic benefits. Policy CO 10.2.5: Where appropriate, allow density transfers and clustering to encourage retention of open Geological Hazards Goal S 1: Protection of public safety and property from hazardous geological conditions, including seismic rupture and ground shaking, soil instability, and related hazards. Policy S 1.1.1: Maintain maps of potentially active faults and fault zones, based on information available from the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone maps, United States Geological Survey, State Board of Geologists, State Mining and Geology Board, and other appropriate sources. Policy S 1.1.2: Maintain maps of areas subject to liquefaction and landslides, based on data provided by the State and other appropriate sources. Policy S 1.1.3: In the event of significant incidents of soil subsidence, compile data and prepare maps showing areas with potential for this hazard. Policy S 1.1.4: Maintain maps showing potential inundation areas from dam failure. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, it should be noted that the proposed project would include an on -site EV charging stations. Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate vegetated open space. Drought resistant landscaping and water quality features, such as shallow wetlands and vegetated swales, would be incorporated into these open space areas. Consistent: The proposed project would include an extensive system that would connect various useable and accessible open space areas. Consistent: Open space and recreational areas would be integrated with neighboring uses. Consistent: The proposed project would include the incorporation of site features into open space areas. Not Applicable. The project would not include clustering. Consistent: The environmental review process would address potential geotechnical impacts and mitigation measures, as required. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the project site does not include any potentially active faults. Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would mitigate any potential liquefaction impacts. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Moreover, there is no dam upstream of the project site. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 51 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy S 1.2.1: Implement requirements of the Alquist- Not Applicable: The project site is not located in an Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Priolo Earthquake fault area. Policy S 1.2.2: Restrict the land use type and intensity of Consistent: The environmental review process would development in areas subject to fault rupture, landslides, address potential geotechnical impacts and mitigation or liquefaction, in order to limit exposure of people to measures, as required. seismic hazards. Policy S 1.2.3: Require soils and geotechnical reports for Consistent: A geotechnical report will be prepared for the new construction in areas with potential hazards from proposed project. faulting, landslides, liquefaction, or subsidence, and incorporate recommendations from these studies into the site design as appropriate. Policy S 1.2.4: Enforce seismic design and building Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and techniques in local building codes. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy S 1.2.5: Consider the potential for inundation from Not Applicable: The project site would not be affected by a failure of the Castaic or Bouquet Canyon Reservoir dams failure of the Castaic or Bouquet Canyon Reservoir dams. when reviewing development proposals within potential inundation areas. Policy S 1.3.1: Identify any remaining unreinforced Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and masonry buildings or other unstable structures, and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. require remediation or seismic retrofitting as needed to meet seismic safety requirements. Policy S 1.3.2: Increase earthquake safety in all public Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and facilities through bracing of shelves, cabinets, equipment directed to the City of Santa Clarita. and other measures as deemed appropriate. Policy S 1.3.3: Provide informational materials to the Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and public on how to make their homes and businesses directed to the City of Santa Clarita. earthquake safe. Policy S 1.3.4: Cooperate with other agencies as needed Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and to ensure regular inspections of public infrastructure such directed to the City of Santa Clarita. as bridges, dams, and other critical facilities, and require repairs to these structures as needed to prevent failure in the event of seismic activity. Flood Hazards Goal S 2: Protection of public safety and property from Consistent: The environmental review process would unreasonable risks due to flooding. ensure risks to public safety and property related to flooding, and appropriate mitigation measures, are included. Policy S 2.1.1: On the Land Use Map, designate Consistent: The environmental review process would appropriate areas within the floodplain as open space for ensure risks to public safety and property related to multi -use purposes, including flood control, habitat flooding, and appropriate mitigation measures, are preservation, and recreational open space. Development included. in the floodplain will require necessary mitigation. Policy S 2.1.2: Promote Low Impact Development Consistent: The proposed project would include project standards on development sites, including but not limited design features that satisfy the Los Angeles County Low to minimizing impervious surface area and promoting Impact Development requirements for new development. infiltration, in order to reduce the flow and velocity of stormwater runoff throughout the watershed. Policy S 2.1.3: Promote the use of vegetated drainage Consistent: The proposed project would utilize vegetated courses and soft -bottom channels for flood control swales for flood control and water quality purposes. facilities to the extent feasible, in order to achieve water quality and habitat objectives in addition to flood control. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 52 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy S 2.1.4: Cooperate with other agencies as Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and appropriate regarding the related issues of flood control, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. watershed management, water quality, and habitat protection. Policy S 2.1.5: Promote the joint use of flood control Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and facilities with other beneficial uses where feasible, such directed to the City of Santa Clarita. as by incorporating detention basins into parks and extending trails through floodplains. Policy S 2.2.1: Prepare and maintain maps of floodways Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and floodplains based on information from the Federal directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other appropriate sources, in order to qualify for FEMA's National Flood Insurance Program. Policy S 2.2.2: Identify areas subject to localized short- Consistent: The environmental review process would term flooding due to drainage deficiencies. identify areas within the project site subject to flooding, and incorporate mitigation measures, if applicable. Policy S 2.3.1: Implement drainage master plans Consistent: The proposed project's flood protection designed to handle storm flows from the 100-year storm. infrastructure would be designed to accommodate the FEMA 100-year flood and the more conservative County Capital Flood. Policy S 2.3.2: Include fundingfor drainage and flood Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and control improvements in the annual City budget. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy S 2.4.1: Require that new development comply with Consistent: The proposed project would adhere to the FEMA floodplain management requirements. FEMA floodplain management requirements. Policy S 2.4.2: On the Land Use and Zoning Maps, restrict Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and the type and intensity of land use in flood -prone areas, or directed to the City of Santa Clarita. require flood -proof construction, as deemed appropriate. Policy S 2.5.1: Address drainage problems that cause Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and flooding on prominent transportation corridors by working directed to the City of Santa Clarita. with multi jurisdictional agencies and stakeholders to construct needed drainage improvements. Policy S 2.5.2: Provide for the maintenance of drainage Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and structures and flood control facilities to avoid system directed to the City of Santa Clarita. malfunctions and overflows. Fire Hazard Goal S 3: Protection of public safety and property from Consistent: The proposed project would protect public fires. safety and property from fire by complying with all City and County Fire Department regulations. Policy S 3.1.1: Coordinate on planning for new fire Consistent: The environmental and development review stations to meet current and projected needs. process would ensure coordinate for new fire stations and appropriate mitigation measures. Policy S 3.1.2: Program adequate funding for capital fire Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and protection costs, and explore all feasible funding options directed to the City of Santa Clarita. to meet facility needs. Policy S 3.1.3: Require adequate fire flow as a condition Consistent: The proposed project will meet all Fire of approval for all new development, which may include Department regulations. installation of additional reservoir capacity and/or distribution facilities. Policy S 3.2.1: Identify areas of the Santa Clarita Valley Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and that are prone to wildland fire hazards, and address these directed to the City of Santa Clarita. areas in fire safety plans. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 53 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Policy S 3.2.2: Enforce standards for maintaining defensible space around structures through clearing of dry brush and vegetation. Policy S 3.2.3: Establish landscape guidelines for fire - prone areas with recommended plant materials, and provide this information to builders and members of the public. Policy S 3.2A Require sprinkler systems, fire resistant building materials, and other construction measures deemed necessary to prevent loss of life and property from wildland fires. Policy S 3.2.5: Ensure adequate secondary and emergency access for fire apparatus, which includes minimum requirements for road width, surface material, and staaina areas. Policy S 3.2.6: For areas adjacent to the National Forest, cooperate with the United States Forest Service regarding land use and development issues. Policy S 3.2.7: Continue to provide information and training to the public on fire safety in wildland interface areas. Policy S 3.3.1: Plan for fire response times of five minutes in urban areas, eight minutes in suburban areas, and 12 minutes in rural areas. Policy S 3.3.2: Require the installation and maintenance of street name signs on all new development. Policy S 3.3.3: Require the posting of address numbers on all homes and businesses that are clearly visible from adiacent streets. Hazardous Materials Goal S 4: Protection of public safety and property from hazardous materials. Policy S 4.1.1: Continue to support clean-up efforts and re- use plans for the Whittaker-Bermite property. Policy S 4.1.2: Coordinate with other agencies to address contamination of soil and groundwater from hazardous materials on various sites, and require that contamination be cleaned up to the satisfaction of the City and other responsible agencies prior to issuance of any permits for new development. Policy S 4.2.1: On the Land Use Map, restrict the areas in which activities that use or generate large amounts of hazardous materials may locate, to minimize impacts to residents and other sensitive receptors in the event of a hazardous materials incident. Consistent: The proposed project would include a Fuel Modification Plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan consistent with Fire Department regulations for the project site. Consistent: The proposed project would include a Fuel Modification Plan, landscape plan, and irrigation plan consistent with Fire Department regulations for the project site. Consistent: The proposed project would meet all Fire Department regulations. Consistent: The proposed project would meet all Fire Department regulations. Not Applicable: The project site is not adjacent to a National Forest. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent: The proposed project would meet all Fire Department regulations. Consistent: The proposed project would meet all Fire Department regulations. Consistent: Potential impacts to public safety and property related to hazardous materials, and appropriate mitigation measures would be discussed as part of the environmental review process. Not Applicable: The project site is not located on the Whittaker-Bermite site. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Moreover, the project does not propose to generate large amounts of hazardous materials. Policy S 4.2.2: Through the development review process, Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and ensure that any new development proposed in the vicinity directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Moreover, the project of a use that stores or generates large amounts of site is not located adjacent to a use that stores or MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 54 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis hazardous materials provides adequate design features, generates large amounts of hazardous materials. setbacks, and buffers to mitigate impacts to sensitive receptors in the event of a hazardous materials incident. Law Enforcement Goal S 5: Protection of public safety through the provision Consistent: Projected needs for law enforcement services of law enforcement services and crime prevention would be evaluated as part of the environmental review strategies. process. Policy S 5.1.1: Participate in a multi jurisdictional task Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and force to evaluate alternatives for combining public safety directed to the City of Santa Clarita. services with administrative services within a centralized government complex serving the entire Santa Clarita Valley. Policy S 5.1.2: Provide staff assistance to assess future Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and law enforcement needs, and work together with the directed to the City of Santa Clarita. County, Sheriff's Department, and other partners to develop and implement plans for meeting these needs. Policy S 5.1.3: Cooperate on implementation of funding Consistent: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to mechanisms for law enforcement services. the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would pay the adopted sheriff facility fee in accordance with City requirements. Policy S 5.2.1: Promote and participate in the Business Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and Watch program to assist business owners in developing directed to the City of Santa Clarita. and implementing crime prevention strategies. Policy S 5.2.2: Promote and support Neighborhood Watch Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and programs to assist residents in establishing neighborhood directed to the City of Santa Clarita. crime prevention techniques. Policy S 5.2.3: Provide code enforcement services to Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and maintain minimum health and safety standards and as a directed to the City of Santa Clarita. deterrent to crime. Accidents Goal S 6: Reduced risk to public safety and property Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to damage from accidental occurrences. the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project would be designed in a manner to reduce risk to public safety and property damage. Policy S 6.1.1: Continue tree trimming and maintenance Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and programs for trees in the right-of-way and on public directed to the City of Santa Clarita. property, to limit damage from falling limbs. Policy S 6.1.2: Promote the planting of tree types Consistent: The proposed project would plant trees that appropriate to the local climate, to avoid breakage by are appropriate to the local climate. brittle, non-native trees. Policy S 6.2.1: In designing or reviewing development Consistent: The proposed project would include lighting plans, ensure that lighting levels are adequate to provide levels that are adequate to provide safe and secure use of safe and secure nighttime use of each site, while limiting each site, while limiting excessive or unnecessary light excessive or unnecessary light and glare. and glare. Policy S 6.2.2: Consider CPTED Principles (Crime Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and Prevention Through Environmental Design) in reviewing directed to the City of Santa Clarita. development proposals, to increase public safety through establishing defensible space, clearly delineated public and private areas, and effective surveillance of common areas. Policy S 6.2.3: In designing or reviewing development Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 55 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis plans, ensure that pedestrian pathways, stairs, steps and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. ramps are designed to provide clear and unimpeded passage in order to avoid trip hazards and conflicts with vehicles. Policy S 6.2.4: Continue to monitor traffic accident data in Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and order to evaluate and address any traffic control needs to directed to the City of Santa Clarita. enhance public safety. Policy S 6.2.5: Use traffic calming devices and reduced Consistent: The proposed project would incorporate traffic street widths to slow traffic speeds and reduce accidents, calming devices and reduced street widths throughout the where deemed appropriate. project site. Policy S 6.3.1: In cooperation with other agencies, ensure Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and adequate shelter for homeless persons to limit their directed to the City of Santa Clarita. exposure to accidental injury and illness. Policy S 6.3.2: Implement the provisions of the Americans Consistent: The proposed project would comply with the with Disabilities Act to ensure safe travel paths and requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. accommodations for persons with disabilities. Emergency Planning Goal S 7: Protection of the public through planning for Not Applicable: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed disaster response and recovery, in order to minimize to the City of Santa Clarita. damage from emergency incidents or terrorist activities. Policy S 7.1.1: Regularly update emergency preparedness Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and response plans that are consistent with State plans. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy S 7.1.2: Continue to provide regular training to Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and public officials and the public on emergency procedures. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy S 7.1.3: Ensure that evacuation routes are clearly Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and posted throughout the City. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy S 7.1.4: Strengthen communication and Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and cooperation between agencies, citizens and non-profit directed to the City of Santa Clarita. groups to plan for disaster response. Policy S 7.2.1: In cooperation with other agencies, plan for Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and temporary shelters for residents displaced by disasters directed to the City of Santa Clarita. and emergency incidents. Policy S 7.2.2: Plan for expedited plan check, permitting, Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and and inspection programs to aid recovery efforts involving directed to the City of Santa Clarita. the rebuilding of damaged structures. Policy S 7.2.3: Ensure that proper record -keeping Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and procedures are in place for purposes of obtaining directed to the City of Santa Clarita. reimbursement from State and Federal agencies. Policy S 7.2.4: Purchase disaster and recovery supplies Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and locally to assist local businesses in their recovery efforts. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Housing Element Mequate Sites Goal H 1: Provide adequate sites to accommodate 8,322 Consistent. The proposed project provides the opportunity new housing units between 2013 and 2021. to develop up to 498 residential units, with a diversity of attainably priced residential typologies, including market rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable senior apartments, and market rate townhomes. Objective: Provide adequate sites at a range of densities Consistent. The proposed project provides the opportunity to accommodate future housing needs. to develop up to 498 residential units, with a diversity of attainably priced residential typologies, including market rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 56 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis senior apartments, and market rate townhomes. Policy H1.1.1: Encourage a variety of housing types such Consistent. The proposed project provides the opportunity as single-family attached (townhouses), multi -family units, to develop up to 498 residential units, with a diversity of planned unit developments mixed use housing and other attainably priced residential typologies, including market housing types that make housing more affordable. rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable senior apartments, and market rate townhomes. Policy H1.1.2: Encourage the development of new Consistent. The proposed project would include affordable affordable units through the provision of incentives. senior apartments and affordable units within the residential areas. Policy H1.1.3: Replace housing units demolished by the Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and redevelopment agency for redevelopment projects. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy H1.1.4: Establish minimum densities for residential Consistent. The proposed project requests a zone change land use districts in the Land Use Element of the General from Business Park to the proposed Specific Plan. The Plan. Specific Plan establishes minimum densities for the project site. Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing Goal H.2: Assist in the development of adequate housing Consistent. The proposed project would include affordable to meet the needs of extremely low, very low, low and senior apartments and affordable units within the moderate income households (Government Code Section residential areas. 65583(c)(2)). Objective H 2.1: Assist in the development of new and Consistent. The proposed project would include affordable rehabilitated housing to provide at least 273 units for senior apartments and affordable units within the households with very low and low incomes. residential areas. Policy H 2.1.1: Target one third of housing subsidies to Consistent: This Goal is a responsibility of and directed to extremely low income households in new affordable the City of Santa Clarita. That said, the proposed project development. would be designed in a manner to reduce risk to public safety and property damage. Policy H 2.1.2: Require that all units developed under any Consistent. Any units developed under the City's of the City affordable housing programs remain affordable affordable housing program will remain affordable for at for the longest possible time or at least 55 years. least 55 years. Policy H 2.1.3: Encourage the development of housing Consistent. The proposed project would place affordable affordable to lower income groups in areas well served by units in walking distance to open space, multi -use trails., public transportation, schools, retail, and other services. and the Metrolink Station and Bus Transfer. Policy H 2.1.4: Encourage the transition of the homeless Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and population to stable housing. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Conserve and Improve the Existing Housing Stock Goal H.3: Conserve and improve the existing housing Consistent. The proposed project would introduce 498 stock through Community Preservation, rehabilitation residential units to the current housing stock on a loans, and a handy worker program. currently vacant parcel. Objective H 3.1: Bring existing housing units up to an Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and established standard of habitability. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy H 3.1.1: Enforce existing standards of habitability. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy H 3.1.2: Provide rehabilitation assistance to Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and income -eligible homeowners for repairs related to safety, directed to the City of Santa Clarita. habitability and accessibility standards. Policy H 3.1.3: Provide grants and loans to income -eligible Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and owner -occupants of single family homes for emergency directed to the City of Santa Clarita. and minor safety, habitability and accessibility repairs. MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 57 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis Preserve Units at Risk of Conversion to Market Rate Rents Goal H 4: Preserve affordability of existing homes that are at risk of converting to market -rate rents during the planning period. Objective H 4.1.1: Preserve 232 units at risk of losing their subsidies and converting to market rents between 2013 and 2021. Policy H 4.1.2: Monitor the status of at -risk units throughout the planning period to identify units which are at planned for imminent conversion to market rate units. Consistent. The proposed project would include affordable senior apartments and affordable units within the residential areas. Consistent. This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That being said, the proposed project would include affordable senior apartments and affordable units. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Policy H 4.2: Work with non-profit housing organizations to Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and preserve at -risk units. directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Address and Remove or Mitigate Constraints Goal H-5: Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove government constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing for all income levels. Objective H 5.1: Where possible, reduce or remove government restraints on housing as necessary and feasible. Policy H 5.1.1: Expedite application review, permitting, and inspection procedures for affordable housing Policy H 5.1.2: Consider fee reductions and/or deferrals for affordable housing projects when deemed appropria. Equal Housing Opportunities Goal 1­16: Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status or disability. (Government Code Section 65583(c)(5). Objective H 6.1: Promote fair housing practices and prohibit discrimination. Policy H 6.1.1: Ensure compliance with fair housing laws by adopting development guidelines that encourage the development of mixed -income housing in every zone district and in every area of the community. Policy H 6.1.2: Provide fair housing services that include public information, counseling and investigation Policy H 6.1.3: Prohibit discrimination in housing. Consistent. This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That being said, the proposed project would include affordable senior apartments and affordable units. Consistent. This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. That being said, the proposed project would include affordable senior apartments and affordable units. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the Citv of Santa Clarita. Consistent. The proposed project provides the opportunity to develop up to 498 residential units, with a diversity of attainably priced residential typologies, including market rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable senior apartments, and market rate townhomes. Consistent. The proposed project provides the opportunity to develop up to 498 residential units, with a diversity of attainably priced residential typologies, including market rate apartments, age -qualified apartments, affordable senior apartments, and market rate townhomes. The proposed project would promote fair housing practices and prohibit discrimination. Consistent. The proposed project would be in compliance with fair housing laws. Not Applicable: This Policy is a responsibility of and directed to the City of Santa Clarita. Consistent. The proposed project prohibit discrimination in housing. Persons With Disabilities Including Persons with Developmental Disabilities Goal H 7: The housing needs of persons with disabilities, I Consistent: The proposed project would assist in the MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 58 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis including persons with developmental disabilities are typically not addressed by Title 24 Regulations. The housing needs of persons with disabilities, in addition to basic affordability, range from slightly modifying existing units to requiring a varying range of supportive housing facilities. implementation of this Policy through its inclusion of various housing types that would accommodate households with varied income levels and age -restricted units for senior citizens. Further, nothing in the site design would preclude individuals with special needs from residing at the project. MetroWalk Specific Plan December 2020 12546 59 City of Santa Clarita General Plan Consistency Analysis INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MetroWalk Specific Plan 12546 December 2020 60 APPENDIX I Om3 Tentative Tract Map No. 83087 wo sii = a M-H-O o U------ F - u.., 0ur 92 Wwo 0 Z z 0 w wi Woo, w -- --------- oe vE A w�- Bo w 65 2 F 8 m T g, w m ffi's m ILL] z?� t7i� tj 1, �n, Wt w. co M,NbLL2;o— 80. 60 IM In Nt� 0, In 2�,ai� im t. S- Wl E 2, 'PI Rh ETJ 3 w zw 'f5 xv, o ApN— o el ...... ... jl ou4U -UmoF � odo8M� V i ir z Nif Ma zl zis _J9 APPENDIX 4.Oml Conceptual Landscape Plan c 0— 7 000000( .. . . . . — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — PROPERTY 71—NE - — - — - — - — M�E M�E J.a D� ub J W LU W sol =um 3<_ NFC� v Z w Z M�E LZ \§ _! \ § / ( y } > ± \ \\ \ ): \ < ~ % �\ s% z o y \ % . � \ % � % . \ M -E / \j \ . : . y . .7. \ % \ 3 0 m 4 m 0 0 u w w w I. 3o Q N z�3— I y p C o J�8 a r- z 0 Z o U v V r � J W 0 0 0 Lu o 3< 3o Q N I Z a S o o 6 J�E z = Ouv L < o V r � J W 0 0 0 LU o 2 u m 3<_ M�E a g�E o �E J a" VUv o J SQ a ` — a W x" s W s01 a =um T 3<_ 3 0 Q N z�3— z J ry LU W 0 0— o } ® Z w z Z Q w Z Z -- 'o - < Po O z - a - - Q a - w - z - z Q U a o w o o w o a U U w f o f o - - a ¢ a z o� N N Wm a�" c=i y } -- J ~¢ 0 � _� 0� F¢ Q� o Q �a���og�o o� 3 0�z z�z z�z z z oo W Q Z .... _ ... _ — ... �z _ .... �� O t~n8 zo zo zo zo zo 0 No, E Q PROPERTY LINE mnnnnnnnnnnnnniol mnnnnnnnnnn I I I I I I I I Z Z}} � W la I �If it I I l 3aN� W m W Z z�3- } ®z C N o z Z c o a < w zZ �uv� z U a - a Po ° z—— m a— Q Q J W i C�- —10 — — w U L— z z a a o a o > o a o z o U W= o a w�� ¢ �� a w�� Z $ W o m - Wo� N c� N y} e J - 0� _v, 0� og�o �w ¢��¢� ago Dr .uNlPrvmn�N w o z z - z 0. � z Qz� .:..g zoff• i�. . �o zo zo zo zg zo �a W- 0 wa wa z I / f ♦ �R II `� OHO" ` ♦ R ` n „ ` o w z ✓ ry oLj � �) I I '� `may ♦ �.... �; A 1.114 k 'd ... 4 u.,.. z _ �� ♦� 04 m {� i� a r7 VV .. .nm.... \ ` ♦ z r «pk 10 ry. m r stirzt�zrr� zz --tr'�` 3z�-� n' W y, 19Wu .... i iuuw inn nn Cif.! I�.. -nM1id I A in 11 =.�� �y nnni nnnni nnnin nnnin z mm — 60 6-Ol ]]S '3NIlH3iVN f w W d H Z Q d X m z Z C a o GO o ®.l m oo Z V E c� c� H. o oC¢oQJ oC� i ~ ¢ X wmao �om m oo o LJQ2u o m= w W �- oo iJ? - - 0m m - w� >-w - o - - mo _ �w�wa < a�11- 0 oho i i o Z - - - - - _ �=o oho o= ALL~ -w =<< �¢ �g Yw z cam z 3 - - w=xoow - - Q�poo - o =x< w= <= w�ow�oo ->=w=< g Q� <@ o Qogw- Q��o�m�� �g was o � g nv„ , Oo1.— m —<mao� QQQ < 8«wo ao � aOo d o o w w (D 0 ® O n N N � r Q N z�3— w H H W d H Z Q d X m z Z C a o Gog o O V v� JW o� Qw i xo00 .o om N o ao o-`` �w o �- - ���_� m=- w u W oo m w` �wa�m �� - - m� oho < ��J i z cam Q ov - - - - �_ _ ALL~ - - w=xoow - - Q�p.0 - o =x w= <= w1ow� Qogw- Q��o�m�� oo�� o�«wa �g g �- a �� - o �w s-o aog� zw J w nNWn., m <aa� �aLLo� a aaaa�� wa,�w d"At" o o w w K Q O K N 0 W L-d I dd5 dlVl IHJIVW W H LU w Q z a_ o. - o_ 0 0oE -oo - 000a c' - - o�000000 z MA o Wig_ wood o� o Soa ao� _ ¢�o-, - o00 - - oYo��- - - ogo- co�- oo< ---�� - -oho-a50-�o¢ _- -_ -o - a5 - -oo < _ o�J - - o�oo"awa ¢0 og��g�W -- oo w io -o oFoo _ �o _NO--- - - - o�a�a - ¢ga o� �� - oho o�00000a�o o tom om - Cow - _- - __- __ _- - - oo�o_ Qoo¢o¢��woor>��'d wzrgz z'�'�'o oo�oo gz= Q¢-zzda c�ig= Qw _ - <mmaLw ¢aa«. ooawo « o—o=o ��< �co ?oo�aa�. �o >oLL>000 0 o o o 0 o¢w¢ - o 0o � w oqw— o cc _. "aFi o �o= ¢mom a wo o o� _, o ¢¢� N,— �¢aa Xm_ � oa-" � m� ¢oaoo¢J - o I o �o omwv cc000m o�o�Wo a - - - R R _ �w�w¢ w� _w11�o U o room- _F4�000 o �`_'¢ aCD _��0000 `oho i w 'g'> U lo o 000¢ o� z� = z�a oa¢ z¢¢a >> z�¢ s"' R �¢ K z�a �zowo LL¢ �000 Q��oz�� �000� Do¢iwa as Qo ~ Om _ Q� o z� -o,�i,w ,n _ ,n s zogo �w N w a 3o as rooOKol asQo�W�w o O � o 11, go ww o g o o��o =g o o. o o g g -_o o00 o oo g ow -- <�< ono sago omg_ea<«aoil o= o�� �00 . . . . . . . . . . . . I.... . . . . . PROPERI iww U 2 E Q E 0 8 0 0 u z 'R 0 Lu LU 0 0 01 66 E00 Hm z m . . . . . . . . . . . Z o NO U I Vo> LU ry LU 0- [If IT YJ. ... ...... 17' x 'ol If ............. ................ .... ... . .... ...... . ...... . .... ......... .. ........ . .............. .......... ....... -1 ]IS IN11HOiVN 0 � HN p'o H!o Wo PH- APPENDIX 5.0-1 Plan Renderings 0 w �ag F J U zll a w �uvn 0- CO w Q� w w �— Q W s o �[ W s F =um m gbo J E 0 ,l u v n JW= LLJ W s =um 3<_ �mrcmu v w > o z J E 4/ U5 8, 0uvnl a cnm t[T w aw QF �— J W = m a LU sol =um 3<_ fin% N rn Late Letter No. 1 SulphUrSprings, Union School District Sembig Grades ]'K-0 27000 Weyerhaeuser Way, Santi Clarila, CA 91351 66 1 -252-5 131 %v\vw,sssd.k I 2,cams February 10, 2021 Erika Iverson Associate Planner City, ofSanta, Clatita 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302 City of Santa Clarita, CA 91335 Re: Draft Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment MetroWalk Specific Plan Protect (Case No. MC20-45) Dear Ms. Marcelo: ]'his is the District's response to the above Notice of Availability. WC Understand that a public hearing has not been scheduled on Case No. (MC20-45). We hereby request � U-1 notice of such public hearing. Associated Stndp.ntf.env raflom, From the ftq This Prcjed lies entirely within the Sulphur Springs Union School District,, It is our understanding that the pro iec,t is presently planned to consist o,f 179 attached, market -rate apartment units for lease located within txvo U shaped apartment buildings. 119 attached, nmrket-rate, age -qualified apartment Ullits; 50 attached, deed -restricted, afford,able senior apartment units 'amd 1,50 attached for -sale townhomes. Ll -2 The project will impact the District by generating new,v students at all grade levels. Student generation factors for the 150 single-11imily units f6r the District are,. Grade Level K-6,: .378 Student generati(,)n factors for the 179 new multi -family units for the District are: Grade Level K-6: .271 Oggpdol yptingt Cot) lefullito Sehaid - Fait OnAa, Rater* C'mmolullivy Srhmpl , GoIrkel Oak Schfool - LrOtero C"ax Cryrympffodoy� $(./Joey I e'Jhol ('delydm School - Aehell Cmleeptoolfiy $4'14pol - Pill e0rer O'limeme0y Srlmol - Sodploloe,Sprhogs Cereernmed(ySC11041 - Halley View ............ Late Letter No. 1 (Continued) Theretbre, it is anticipated that this project will generate approximately 1.05 K-6 students, It is assumed that the 1,19 age qualified apartilrents and 50 deed -restricted, affordable senior UllitS Will neat generate new students for purposes of this analysis, Inipact on the District", Vad _Jifi(-s The District currently operates 9 schools with. a cuiTent enrollment of approximately 5326 students, The existing district schools are already at or above capacity and Will not be able to accornniodate all of (he students expccted to be generated 'from this project in addition to students to be generated frOlTr other proJects, within the District in the next five years. The District's current en-rollnicrit capacity is only 5,362, The District's current cost of providing new grade K-6 facilities is at least $20,000 per new single-U-nily detached dwelling unit based on a 500 seat school expandable to 750 as described in the "Corriniurrity Facilities Report for the Sulphur Springs Union School District Community Facilities District No. 2019-1"The District currently collects $3.33, per square foot of accessible space on new residential construction pursuant to the "School Facilities Needs Analysis March 20, 20" and Government Code sections 65995, 65995.5 and 659,95,,6. However, for an average single-family detached residential unit of'2,369 square feet, the ainount raised froni the $333 per square root fee would be $ 7,889 as opposed to the actual cost of school fhei lities, ofat least $20,000. It is clear that the $3.33 per square loot fee will riot provide nearly enough fiands 1'or the District to provide the necessary school flicililies, The District's current minimum estiniated cost for an clernentary school is as fiollows: Elementary School: $15,000,000 (750 students at $20,000 firer student nunitnuni) The cost of the school tacilities necessary,, to serve this projcct can therefore be estirnated as follows: Elementitry School : (105 /750 X $1.3,00t 0,000) $2, 100,, 000 Ll -2 (Continued) Caouyon Springs Fait Oats Ranch Canwasyd(p Sehool - Ge*Oi Oak Commenity School - Leona "w ConnnuoydY Sehtpo� Aflar calyon Cap'lAffildrOU'r School - Afirchell Cuonirxuniay Schoo,l - Pinaree Sidplulf Srings ('012mund(p Schvd - *11c), rlew Conumodo, Schaal F, ............ I Late Letter No. 1 (Continued) Compared to, the ffill mitigation need for at least $20,000 per new single-family detached thvelling unit, the statutory school fiacifity fee of $3.33 per square fool generates (�rnfly $7,889 on an average new single-family detached unit of 2,,369 sqUare feet. This covers only 39 percent of the minim.um full impact, The District has few alternatives to requesting full mitigation rrom, the developers of residential projects. All other District funds are fully cornmitted to maintaining current operations,. The prqject will have signi,ficant unmitigated effects, As noted above, there Will be a significant shortfall in facilities, construction, funds to coasts ICI the school facilities needed due to this prqiec(, 'I"his project vvill add an estimated 105 students to the District's school system, already at capacity. SOP-QU ifities Impact Mi'tigatim The District will require payment of school, Ifiacility fees at oz- before the time building permits are issued in the anIOUnt of` $3.33 per square foot pursuant to Government Code sections, 65995, 65,995.5 and 65995.6. Mitigation rnay, alsobe arranged by the developer's participation in as separate initigation agreement including part i cipati on in a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (CFD,) for school facilities, Please contact the undersigned if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Dr, Catherine Kawagtwhi Superintendent L1-2 (Continued) L1-3 Sprblp School - Fair Oaks Randy (Ammmodry Stlmol - Golden Oak OnmomenhyScloaW - Leona C'ox Cotommmit), Sehool Afins cflltr'mo ("Onmullity School - Mitchell conomyfrdoSC&O - I'Maree OnnownWry School - Sulphur S'�?Hngv Commmi(p, Sebool - Mafiey, Plew Ommuni(y ScbepW 3 ............. I I Late Letter No. 1 (Continued) ME Cc: Madonna Marcelo EIR Pro.ject Manager Michael Baker International 3760 Kilroy Airport Wiy, Suite 270 Long Beach, CA 90806 BluMax Santa Clarita, 2001 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 401 Santa Monica, California 90403 Contau: Adam Browning Onyon SpInAn ("a"mmidly Se llool - Fifir Oaks Rand) Comvnuniv Sehavi - Geddeto Oak 6mmumio, Sehoeol - Loma Ow Cmunninhp Sehod Hh'a, C010YOn Comuntiffity Seh6ed - Mlehell M*M - Phielree C'mompavifif), "Vebool - 4,idlyh1or Springw Ndle), Weis, Sehovd Later Letter No. 1 Dr. Catherine Kawaguchi Superintendent Sulphur Springs Union School District 27000 Weyerhaeuser Way Santa Clarita, CA 91351 Comment No. L1-1 This introductory comment acknowledges Sulphur Springs Union School District's (District) receipt of the Notice of Availability of the Draft SCEA for the Project and requests for the District to be notified of public hearings for the Project. Comment No. L1-2 The commenter confirms the information presented in the Draft SCEA regarding the Project's location within the District's service boundaries. The commenter provides the District's student generation factors and estimates that the Project would generate approximately 105 students. Although the Draft SCEA did not identify the number of students that would be generated by the Project, it determined that the Project may increase enrollment in the District and affect the existing overcrowded capacity of the schools within the District. The Draft SCEA also identified the potential necessity for new school sites to accommodate population growth and increasing enrollments. The commenter also asserts that the Project will have significant unmitigated effects. However, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65995, the Project would be required to pay fees in accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 50. Payment of such fees is intended for the general purpose of addressing the construction of new school facilities, whether schools servicing the Project in question are at capacity or not. In addition, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65995(h), payment of such fees is deemed full mitigation of a project's development impacts. Accordingly, the Project's impacts on the District's school system have been appropriately deemed less than significant. Comment No. L1-3 As discussed in response to Comment No. L1-2 above, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65995, the Project would be required to pay fees in accordance with SB 50 and that payment of such fees is deemed full mitigation of a project's development impacts. CEQA only requires mitigation measures if substantial evidence exists of potentially significant environmental impacts. In particular, Section 15126.4(a)(4)(A) of the CEQA Guidelines states that there must be an essential nexus between the mitigation and a legitimate government interest (i.e., potential significant impact). Therefore, since the Project's impacts on the District's school system have been appropriately deemed less than significant, no additional mitigation is required. January 31, 2021 Mayor Bill Miranda City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd, Suite 300 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 RE: Metrowalk Dear Mayor Miranda and Councilmembers: VIA EMAIL On behalf of JSB Development and our team at Vista Canyon, I am writing to express our strong support for the MetroWalk project. MetroWalk has been thoughtfully designed to enhance and support the success of the Vista Canyon Master Plan. From the inception of the MetroWalk project, the team at New Urban West has been very neighborly and has closely coordinated with us in numerous meetings and phone calls to ensure that MetroWalk seamlessly integrate: and supports our efforts at Vista Canyon. As a result, we have an expansion of the Vista Canyon's extensive trail system and good connectivity between the various projects. Locating additional housing just steps to the new MetroLink station will support the nearly $50 million public investment in area transportation infrastructure provided by the City of Santa Clarita and allow MetroWalk residents easy access to office space and retail amenities just a short stroll away at Vista Canyon. Our retailers at Vista Canyon will benefit from the addition of new area residents and Vista Canyon office tenants will value the opportunity to offer employees the ability to live within walking distance to/from work. We are excited to see this project move forward and I respectfully request your support. Sincerely, 4 IaftesS. Backer" ---",-1 President Amok VISTA CANYON 27651 Lincoln Place, Suite 200 Santa Clarita, CA 91387 (661) 255.3275 Ro SANTA CLARITA Chamber of Commerce January 21, 2021 City of Santa Clarita — Planning Division Attn: Erika Iverson 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 RE: METROWALK DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT Dear Ms. Iverson, The Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce, which represents over 65,000 member -employees, has recently reviewed the SCEA document for the MetroWalk project and is in full favor of the proposed project. MetroWalk is laid out to be a well thought out plan and addresses the needs and concerns of the community, brings no significant impact, and delivers a solution to our City's need for smart development. MetroWalk is a transit -oriented development with a mix of apartments, townhomes, affordable homes and central plaza connecting its neighborhoods together. It is the newest development that will complete the Vista Canyon master plan. MetroWalk will bring much -needed senior housing and give our seniors the ability to not just live near their families throughout the Santa Clarita Valley, but provide walkable access to transit for easy access. The affordable senior housing units will meet local city need and provide seniors with a quality place to live. Furthermore, MetroWalk connectivity will eliminate residents need to drive. Under the current zoning, a business park will generate over 14,000 daily trips. MetroWalk's proposed zoning will eliminate over 11,000 trips with just their498 proposed units. More so, it will support the $46 million regional investment in the new transit center at Vista Canyon. It will deliver the vision for a more connected and sustainable Santa Clarita. MetroWalk is intended to Implement the City's General Plan by providing homes on an opportunity site as identified in the Housing Element. The fiscal impact of MetroWalk is estimated to reach $29.0 million. The largest portion of these taxes would be local, state, and federal income taxes which account for nearly 40 percent of the total fiscal impact. Once built, MetroWalk will have a persistent positive effect on the local Santa Clarita economy and throughout the rest of Los Angeles County economy. New resident households will make purchases at local businesses surrounding MetroWalk. MetroWalk presents an opportunity to meet continually high demand for housing for our city and the Santa Clarita Valley. This development addresses the needs of the senior residents of Santa Clarita, who are often overlooked. We are pleased to support the MetroWalk project. Sincerely, 01 Y „ hn Vance Chair, SCV Chamber Board of Directors From: Trov Hooper To: Erika Iverson Subject: Re: MetroWalk Project Date: Thursday, January 21, 2021 4:56:50 PM Attachments: Metro Walk Letter to Planning Commission.docx CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Mr. Iverson, Please find attached my letter of support for the MetroWalk project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Troy Hooper CEO The Kiwi Group of Companies January 21, 2021 TO: iiy ..r..so.n(: . .!::::::::.Il..u::!I::..::.c o m.. SUBJECT: MetroWalk Project — Support Dear Ms. Iverson, As a local businessman and resident of Santa Clarita, I have taken time to review the environmental document for the Metro Walk development plan presented by New Urban West and fully support the thoughtful design concept for this new community. Our City is need of housing. MetroWalk will bring 498 much -need units, comprised of apartments, townhomes and some age and income restricted units. Rather than developing the 20-acre site as another business park, which would potentially be in competition with Vista Canyon's corporate complex at an economically challening time, MetroWalk would introduce a new customer base and increased resident spending for the Vista Canyon development when needed most. With construction alone, MetroWalk is estimated to produce over 1,400 construction jobs. To be able to work and live here will create a significant increase in tax revenue. Employees will spend a portion of their incomes on groceries, rent, vehicle expenses, healthcare, and entertainment throughout our City. MetroWalk will only bring a positive effect to our City, both economically and creating much needed housing. Sincerely, J. Troy Hooper From: Andre Hollings To: Erika Iverson Subject: MetroWalk Development Date: Thursday, January 21, 2021 3:26:52 PM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. As a long-time resident of Canyon Country, I have been able to watch multiple developments that our City has been proposed with. Having reviewed the SCEA document for MetroWalk, I am proud to support the work our City and the developer have done to bring a much -needed project, such as this one. Our City is in need of two different investments: mass transit and affordable senior living. This project brings in both of those. It will be offering 50 deed -restricted affordable homes that will allow seniors to live in a walkable, transit -oriented community. It will redefine the community experience with its strategic location, directly adjacent from Vista Canyon. The MetroWalk development in full will help Santa Clarita meet our Regional Housing Needs Assessment goals. It will meet local city needs and provide seniors with a quality place to live. I applaud the City's efforts in continuously working with the developer and look forward to following the project's progress. Thank you, Andre Hollings 28085 Whites Canyon Rd. Apt 122 Canyon Country, CA 91351 From: Erin Anderson To: Erika Iverson Subject: I support the MetroWalk project Date: Thursday, January 21, 2021 3:35:23 PM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Dear Ms. Iverson, As a long-time resident of The Ranch at Fair Oaks, I have had the opportunity to sit one-on- one with the developer of MetroWalk After our meeting and review the environmental documents, I am pleased to support this project. With a background in development, I have seen proposed projects brought to different cities. I fully stand by the proposed plan for MetroWalk and believe the City has done well to ensure this development is viewed with a local lens. With the MetroWalk site originally intended to be part of Vista Canyon, I believe the developers have done an exceptional job at designing this project to fully complete the Vista Canyon master plan and deliver a more connected and sustainable project for Santa Clarita. This project is looking to bring attainably priced homes to help meet the City's regional housing needs allocation at multiple income levels. It will support the ideal jobs and housing balance within walking distance of 600,000 SF of office space in Vista Canyon. Finally, MetroWalk supports the $46 million regional investment in the new transit center at Vista Canyon. This project will contribute to expand new ridership and eliminate vehicles being traveled, as well as provide new families and seniors a community that will be steps away from our new Metrolink station. MetroWalk is a project our City needs, and I hope it gains the full support it deserves. Sincerely, Erin Anderson 17565 Poplar Point Ln. Santa Clarita, CA 91387 From: karina winkler To: Erika Iverson Subject: My Support for the MetroWalk Project Date: Friday, January 22, 2021 10:26:31 AM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Dear Ms. Iverson, I am writing to show my support for the MetroWalk project. I have taken time to review the environmental document and fully support the thoughtful design that is put together. With MetroWalk in close proximity and walkability to Vista Canyon, the added expenditures by MetroWalk residents within Vista Canyon's retail areas will boost our economy. The project will generate millions in economic output and associated sales taxes and will also provide a significant number of much needed new housing units. This project will complete the Vista Canyon master plan. Its price attained homes will fill in the missing piece for what our City desperately needs. The MetroWalk project is an example of smart, local development that the City of Santa Clarita strives for. I am eager to follow the progression of this project and look forward to the efforts the City and developer put in to ensure this MetroWalk becomes a reality. Thank you, Karina Winkler 25541 Fitzgerald Ave. — Stevensons Ranch — CA 91381 From: Liz Tolentino To: Erika Iverson Subject: Support for the MetroWalk Development Date: Friday, January 22, 2021 8:16:53 AM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Ms. Iverson... Good afternoon. The City of Santa Clarita is in serious need of additional housing, senior housing and a smart, transit -oriented development to help complete our vision. After reviewing the documents, I am pleased to witness the MetroWalk project and fully support its vision. MetroWalk is a transit -oriented development with a mix of apartments, townhomes, affordable homes and central plaza connecting its neighborhoods together. It is the newest development immediately adjacent to the existing Vista Canyon project. The development will include senior housing which allows seniors to be close to their families in the SCV, walkable to parks, trails, employment and train station for access to LA. The affordable senior housing units will meet local city need and provide seniors with a quality place to live. MetroWalk will generate millions in economic output and associated sales taxes and will also provide a significant number of much needed new housing units. Located on 20 acres, directly adjacent to Vista Canyon, this project will complete the Vista Canyon master plan. Its price attained homes will fill in the missing piece for what our City desperately needs. I look forward to the continued work between the City and the developer to ensure the MetroWalk vision becomes a reality. Thank you, Liz Tolentino REALTOR Text/Call 661.904.8471 Liz&RealEstateLiz,cQm Keller Williams VIP Properties CalBRE 01748524 27750 Walnut Springs Ave Canyon Country, CA 91351 From: Barbara Mvler To: Erika Iverson Subject: Support for the MetroWalk Project Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 6:14:44 PM CITY \r1 ARINI I\J< This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. SUBJECT: Support for the MetroWalk Project Dear Ms. Iverson, As a long-time (35+ yr) resident of the Santa Clarita Valley, I have been able to watch multiple developments that our City has been proposed with. Having reviewed the SCEA document for MetroWalk, I am proud to support this project. Below are just some reasons: • Our City is in need of housing. MetroWalk will bring 498 much -need units, comprised of apartments, townhomes and some age and income restricted units. • With construction alone, MetroWalk is estimated to produce over 1,400 construction jobs for local residents. • To be able to work and live here will create a significant increase in tax revenue. Employees will spend a portion of their incomes on groceries, rent, vehicle expenses, healthcare, and entertainment throughout our City. Furthermore, • The development will include senior housing which allows Seniors to be close to their families in the SCV, walkable to parks, trails, employment and train station for access to LA. The affordable senior housing units will meet local city needs and provide Seniors with a quality place to live. I applaud the City's efforts in continuously working with the developer and look forward to following the projects progress. Kindest Regards, Barbara C. Myler Presiclent/CEO Summit West Public Relations & Marketing Valencia Jazz & Blues Concert Series P.O. Box 55133 Valencia, CA 91385 office: 661.290.2911 cell: 661.373.8700 email: Elairbaira -)S��ummitW�estFl R�Z.com :: ... ........................................ (a — SUMMIT W E S T PUBLIC PILKTIONS & fAKp=NG From: Fred Arnold To: Erika Iverson Subject: Approve the MetroWalk Project Date: Friday, February 5, 2021 11:08:33 AM Attachments: ima e004.pn image010.pna image012.pnq ('IiY \N/`,rtl\dll\K_Ck This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Planning Commissioners, I would like to express my full support for the MetroWalk project. As a long-time resident of the Santa Clarita Valley, and an established business owner, I understand the need for a transit -oriented development, such as the one proposed. MetroWalk, which will complement the current Vista Canyon project, will deliver a more connected and sustainable project for Santa Clarita. Our City is in need of housing. MetroWalk will bring 498 much -needed units, comprised of apartments, townhomes and some age and income restricted units. With MetroWalk in close proximity and walkability to Vista Canyon, the added expenditures by MetroWalk residents within Vista Canyon's retail areas will boost our economy. Furthermore, new residents of MetroWalk will be a source of additional spending in the local area for Vista Canyon's retail, the development will provide additional multi -unit options for those working in Vista Canyon's corporate campus, and new residents will give rise to increased Metrolink ridership at the new station. I believe the developers have done an exceptional job at designing this plan and will be able to deliver a more connected and sustainable project for Santa Clarita. I ask for your recommended support to the City Council so construction may begin. Thankyou, Fred Arnold 28338 Constellation Road, Suite 900 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Need to send me a file securely?securely?C. I .ck.....H.er .'..W h....a.t..'..s......v.o u..r......h....®....e........w.......®..rt..h..?.:.'.. ➢E..'urnt;I Aurinm(D1(. Certified Mortgage Consultant (CMC) BRE License # 01215943/01173600 NMLS # 1850/214841 Direct: (661) 505-4300 Fax: (661) 284-1163 x P'roVisors f�,llrni e ui i s (.l:(Irn ➢II ,ui urnia t ➢II°" v w lirn tf m u m s a Division of American Pacific ,, er Mortgage Ari I f� i' ] C A J w A„Direct Lender„ u ,I 11), 2$338 Canst 11 rtian_FLaad `quite 900 N I n l Nn S.,mi r Cl r t<I CA 91,3..5.5. !,;.p .:y few WondeOng what hoinnes are 6IIIIIIiiin -for iiinrm your n6ighborhoods that you are IllooWnrmg? GIlIck b6lowto find out! Apply Now LOOKING 111 BUY) 11mulle"flim Licensed by the Department of Corporations under the California Residential Mortgage Lending Act. If you no longer wish to receive messages from American Family Funding, send an email to info,(a a„f,,,loans„com, with "Remove" in the subject line or call (661) 284-1150. , I14TA C LA Fl, IIIII Tm VA, IL 1iiiiiii lll: February 16, 2021 City of Santa Clarita Attn: Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 RE: METROWALK DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT Dear Planning Commissioners: The Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation has been working closely with the developers of the MetroWalk project and would like to give an overview on the economic benefits it will produce. MetroWalk, a proposed 498-unit residential development of 20 acres adjacent to Vista Canyon in the City of Santa Clarita, will place an emphasis on connectivity to the amenities provided within Vista Canyon and nearby transit. The land parcel is currently zoned as business park. Rather than developing the 20-acre site as another business park, which would potentially be in competition with Vista Canyon's corporate complex at an economically vulnerable time, MetroWalk would introduce a new customer base and increased resident spending for the Vista Canyon development when needed most. New residents of MetroWalk will be a source of additional spending in the local area for Vista Canyon's retail, the development will provide additional multi -unit options for those working in Vista Canyon's corporate campus, and new residents will give rise to increased Metrolink ridership at the new station. Once built, MetroWalk will have a persistent positive effect on the local Santa Clarita economy and new residents will make purchases at local businesses surrounding MetroWalk. Aside from the economic impact of the construction of MetroWalk, new resident spending will have a recurring economic impact for the Vista Canyon development and local region. Our economic impact study supports the assertion that future Vista Canyon businesses and other Santa Clarita merchants will benefit the most from this estimated household consumption from future MetroWalk residents. In a city that has struggled to meet regional and state goals for new housing units, market rate and otherwise, MetroWalk presents an opportunity to meet continually high demand for housing for the City of Santa Clarita. MetroWalk strictly offers housing, allowing the neighboring development Vista Canyon to maximize the use of its retail and office space in a post-COVID world. The project is estimated to produce: • 1,850 total jobs • Over $113 million in labor income • Nearly $257 million in output • $170 million in value added in gross county product MetroWalk offers a solution by inclusively housing 498 new households near regional mass transportation options, ample access to retail, and family -focused amenities such as schools and open space. MetroWalk will 26455 Rockwell Canyon Road I University Center, Suite 263 I Santa Clarita, CA 91355 (661) 288-4400 1 Fax (661) 288-4414 1 scvedc.org provide diversity to Santa Clarita's housing stock and allow it to cater to a wider spread of housing demand preferences. Sincerely, Holly Schroeder President & CEO Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation 26455 Rockwell Canyon Road I University Center, Suite 263 1 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 (661) 288-4400 1 Fax (661) 288-4414 1 scvedc.org From: Sue Nevius To: Erika Iverson Subject: MetroWalk - Planning Commission Hearing Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 8:18:55 AM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Planning Commissioners: eroal 's connectivity will eliminate residents the need to driven MetroWalk directly leverages existing a rolitl infrastructure to ferry the development's future residents to work, school and even other areas of our City. This will bring a substantial positive effect to commuters around Santa Chri sm Furthermore, new residents of MetroWalk will be a source of additional spending in the local area for Vise Ca yo 's retail, the development willprovide additional multi -unit options for rise working in Vise Ca yo 's corporate campus, and new residents will give rise to increased Metrolink ridership at the new station. I ask you support errs al rojec and recommend approval from e City Council. Sue Nevius Valencia, Ca. 91355 From: Dennis Verner To: Erika Iverson Cc: peterC6musellaoroup.com Subject: MetroWalk Project — I Support the MetroWalk Project Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 10:13:20 AM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Chair Masnada and Planning Commissioners: As a resident of the City of Santa Clarita, I write to express my full support of the proposed MetroWalk project. MetroWalk was originally intended to be part of Vista Canyon. I believe the developers have done an exceptional job at designing this project to fully complete the Vista Canyon master plan and deliver a more connected and sustainable project for Santa Clarita. Our City is in need of housing. MetroWalk will bring 498 much -needed units, comprised of apartments, townhomes and some age and income restricted units. Rather than developing the 20- acre site as another business park, which would potentially be in competition with Vista Canyon's corporate complex at an economically vulnerable time, MetroWalk would introduce a new customer base and increased resident spending for the Vista Canyon development when needed most. This project is looking to bring provide attainably priced homes to help meet the City's regional housing needs allocation at multiple income levels. It will support the ideal jobs and housing balance within walking distance of 600,000 SF of office space in Vista Canyon. Finally, MetroWalk supports the $46 million regional investment in the new transit center at Vista Canyon. The MetroWalk project is an example of smart, local development that the City of Santa Clarita strives for. I hope you will all fully support this project and allow for it to be approved by the City Council. Thank you, Dennis Verner SCV C011411411EIRCIA111,,,, ZEAL.. IE::ST.ATIE:a SIE::IIRVICIE::IS P.O. Box 801913 Valencia, CA 91380 27240 Turnberry Lane Suite 200 Santa Clarita, Ca 91355 661 857 3571 C den nis@)scvcQmrnerdal.cQm Broker License # 01523815 Sales - Leasing - Management - Financing - Business Opportunities From: 6rian Hiaains To: Erika Iverson Subject: Approve The MetroWalk Project Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 7:57:16 PM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Chair Masnada and Planning Commissioners: As a long-time resident of this community, I am pleased to support the MetroWalk project. Our City is need of two different investments: mass transit and senior living. This project brings in both of those. It will be offering 50 deed -restricted affordable homes that will allow seniors to live in a walkable, transit -oriented community. It will redefine the community experience with its strategic location, directly adjacent from Vista Canyon. The MetroWalk development in full will help Santa Clarita meet our Regional Housing Needs Assessment goals. It will meet local city need and provide seniors with a quality place to live. I applaud the City's efforts in continuously working with the developer and look forward to seeing final approvals for this project. Sincerely, Brian Higgins AAA FACILITY SERVICES. Brian Higgins Pirfindpai CAsp #616 800-892. -4784 x7755 R:.....................:.. www.000electric.com www €7€7€7corY1.)€7 11F ;,corYl...................................................................................................................... Please consider the environment before printing this email From: Cleve Mason To: Erika Iverson Subject: Re: MetroWalk Specific Plan Project MC20-045 Date: Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:31:13 AM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Good morning Erika, Thank you for taking the time to speak with me the other day in regards to proposed development Master Case No. MC20-45. Here's my comments: I believe it should've been originally incorporated with the Vista Canyon development, seems like an afterthought, i.e. a developer saw a leftover, maybe the ONLY leftover parcel of land, and a saw an opportunity for themselves, as it's definitely not going to be of any benefit to the existing residents living nearby. Speaking of which, us existing residents have already had to endure years, YEARS, of unrelenting construction -related traffic up/down Lost Canyon Road ALL day long, mostly starting as early in the morning as 5:00-6:00 AM, large trucks pounding down the roadway all day! Now that Vista Canyon is slowly reaching its buildout, it's greatly subsided, so I'm sure existing residents don't want it to start up all over again with this proposed new development. Vista Canyon appears to be already at max density in regards to housing, there's got to be hundreds, if not a thousand apartment homes alone, don't really think anymore housing is required in this specific area. Along those lines, at which point does the City of Santa Clarita reach maximum capacity from a population standpoint?: 500,000, 1,000,000 residents, as the existing roadways alone can't even handle the existing traffic loads during peak traffic hours?! In summary, this proposal seems a complete afterthought that'll only benefit the developers, it's going to increase traffic density around surrounding areas, possibly lead to increased crime in the area, which is currently low, it'll spoil the surrounding views for existing residents - all they'll be able to see are additional new homes, which doesn't compare to what they're able to view now! There should be an independent, thorough impact study, not just an environmental one conducted, to investigate any potential pitfalls to packing in so much dense urban housing in this specific area, and what possible negative outcomes could result, as it's extremely easy to tout all the positives without taking into consideration the possible negative consequences. Thank you for taking the time to read my additional comments, am sure I'll come up with more in the meantime, and please incorporate them into the record for the upcoming Planning Commission public hearing on Tuesday, February 16th. Best regards, Cleve Mason Fair Oaks Ranch, City of Santa Clarita resident since early 2005 Tel. (820) 200-9042 On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 11:49 Erika Iverson <EIYERSONCo) -daritasm> wrote: ,,santa Cleve, Thank you for your phone inquiry about the subject planning case. As discussed, the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting will be posted on Friday, February 12th with instructions on how to participate, virtually, at the public hearing should you decide to do so. You are also welcome to email me your written comments for incorporation into the record. Best, Erika Erika Iverson Associate Planner Planning Division City of Santa Clarita Phone: (661) 255-4962 Email: eiverson(o-),santa-clarita.com ( "irr of SAN,-rA CLARriA, From: Taauel Graves To: Erika Iverson Subject: Metro walk apartments Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 2:57:25 PM CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Hello Erica, I would like to reach out and give my opinion on additional apartments being built in the vista canyon/metro walk area. I believe we have enough apartments in our area and think that area could be part to use for additional shops/eatery etc instead of additional apartments and living. From: Fred Mir To: Erika Iverson Subject: Please NO Apartments Building in Canyon Country Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 8:20:59 PM CITY \r1 ARINI I`J( This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Hello Erika, As a loyal tenant here in beautiful Santa Clarita, Canyon Country area at Fair Oaks Ranch, I reach out to you to please voice out the concern for building additional apartment buildings here in Vista Canyon. This will only bring more crowd, pollution, trash and violence to the neighborhood... As we know apartments usually involve high traffic, gangs, violence and rising crime. Statistics indicate that people who rent usually brings down the value of the neighborhood and with it brings crowd of noise, chaos, and lots of problems. There should be more housing, more single family homes built in this area to support the already constructed single family dwelling style of living. Lets keep this place clean and property owned and single family dwelled. lets voice out to turn those apartment buildings into single family housing constructions. Thank you. Should you have additional questions, please feel free to contact me. Fred Mir From: Josephine Valeriano To: Erika Iverson Subject: Stop Building More Apartments Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 4:57:04 PM CITY \r1 ARINI I\J< This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. To Whom It May Concern, We have enough apartments around us already, there's no need to build 500 more apartments. Thank you for your time From: Ana O To: Erika Iverson Subject: Stop the apartment building Date: Thursday, February 4, 2021 11:23:48 AM CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Hello, I am requesting that there be a stoppage to more apartment buildings being built in the canyon country area. Santa Clarita is known for being safe and apartment complexes inherently bring crimes to the area. Thank you Ana Ochoa SCV home owner From: Joseph Kevin Ecalne To: Erika Iverson Subject: New Apartment Homes Date: Sunday, February 7, 2021 10:03:45 PM CITY \r1lARINI I\ Kj This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Good day, Ms. Iverson! How are you doing today? I hope you are doing well. The purpose of this email is to voice out my concern about the Metro Walk Apartments. I just bought our dream house in Santa Clarita just a couple of weeks ago. Santa Clarita is a very nice community to live in and that's what made me and my wife decide that we would purchase our dream house here. I want our family to live in a good community and not too crowded. In my opinion, we already have enough apartment homes here in Santa Clarita (e.g. River View, River Ranch, Park Sierra, The Colony, The Oaks, The Jefferson, the Townhomes at Lost Canyon to say the least) and in my opinion, adding another one would dilute our very nice community here. I hope you can feel me. This is coming from a concerned resident just want to live in a stress -free environment. I hope this email would suffice or help with what our concerns are. Thank you for your time and consideration. Have a wonderful evening! Respectfully, Joseph Kevin Ecalne From: Doris Garcia To: Erika Iverson Subject: PLEASE NO MORE Apartment Building Date: Monday, February 22, 2021 11:25:11 AM CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Santa Clarita has already too many Apartment Buildings, and the traffic is terrible for people to travel to San Fernando Valley or Los Angeles, for rich people o politicians that use air plain or helicopters is not a problem; but for common people that are thousands is a big problem. I moved to that area seven years ago, and I found out that traffic is horrible problem, and building more apartments is going to be worst. That's why I am writing you to stop this. Thank you, from one of the common person. Doris Garcia Sent from my iPhone IIf you wish tag speak Ibefore the Sainta Qlairita Coinniinnissioins, please coimpll to the follllo iiing iiinforrnatiioin tag the submitted tag the Coinninnissioin Seciretavy, Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee` Planning Commission Meeting Date` 2/1 is/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number` View agendas Ilhaire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description Me troWa I k Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Spealkeir Information III°°'OR.""'III"°AIll,JT • Coirnnirnniissiioirns require that speakers who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. • Ilirn order to participate in the tell ecoirnll'eire irnce, Speakers irnnust provide theiir 9'ullll irnairnne and the phoirne irnuirnnlbeir they intend to use to access the irnneetlirng„ Speakers who intend to use their coirnnputer audio to pairticiipate in the irnneetlirng irnnust allso provide their phoirne irnuirnnlbeir„ Full Name` Erika Bird Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX* MHEMMIUM Email Street Address city Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. IIIDIECILA1121E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IEIF01121E OII1M IIS'Tf112UIEAIMIDCO1121121ECT. Under State law, matters raised under Public; Comments cannot have immediate action. fhe Commission will refer the matter to staff, or it may be scheduled Can a subsequent Commission Agenda. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Presentation Filps i fhe'following presentation tips are provided in an effort to assist you in making your opinion known 'to'the Commission. Specific time allotments help ensure 'that all persons who wish to state their opinion have the opportunity to do so. IPlease take the time to organize and prepare a three (3) minute, or Iless, presentation„ 'To make the most efficient use of your time:: • Clearly state your name and city 'for 'the record. • Clearly state your concern - be concise. • At the conclusion of your remarks, summarize the action you desire. • If you wish to discuss an item can the Agenda, you may review the staff report and documentation 'for 'the appropriate meeting by visiting the Ci'ty's agenda management system at .:sai flta cllairiiiiru.ccim/Agelrflda s, fhe Request to Speak form must be 'filled out and given to the Commi,s,sion Secretary prior 'to'the Agenda Item being called. If you wish to speak Can an Item not on the Agenda, the form must be given to the Commission Secretary prior to public; participation. Should you wish not to ,speak before the Commission, you may use the Request to Register Written Comments form. Lobbyist Registration„ Under§ 7 .0 3.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. Reglisteir a s a o1b1byllst Ihelre >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the Course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. IIf you wish tag speak Ibefore the Sainta Qlairita Coinniinnissioins, please coimpll to the follllo iiing iiinforrnatiioin tag the submitted tag the Coinninnissioin Seciretavy, Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee` Planning Commission Meeting Date` 2/1 is/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number` View agendas Ilhaire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description Me troWa I k Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Spealkeir Information III°°'OR.""'III"°AIll,JT • Coirnnirnniissiioirns require that speakers who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. • Ilirn order to participate in the tell ecoirnll'eire irnce, Speakers irnnust provide theiir 9'ullll irnairnne and the phoirne irnuirnnlbeir they intend to use to access the irnneetlirng„ Speakers who intend to use their coirnnputer audio to pairticiipate in the irnneetlirng irnnust allso provide their phoirne irnuirnnlbeir„ Full Name` MEMEHEM Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX* Email Street Address city Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. IIIDIECILA1121E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IEIF01121E OII1M IIS'Tf112UIEAIMIDCO1121121ECT. Under State law, matters raised under Public; Comments cannot have immediate action. fhe Commission will refer the matter to staff, or it may be scheduled Can a subsequent Commission Agenda. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Presentation ,...Fii 1ps fhe'following presentation tips are provided in an effort to assist you in making your opinion known 'to'the Commission. Specific time allotments help ensure 'that all persons who wish to state their opinion have the opportunity to do so. IPlease take the time to organize and prepare a three (3) minute, or Iless, presentation„ 'To make the most efficient use of your time:: • Clearly state your name and city 'for 'the record. • Clearly state your concern - be concise. • At the conclusion of your remarks, summarize the action you desire. • If you wish to discuss an item can the Agenda, you may review the staff report and documentation 'for 'the appropriate meeting by visiting the Ci'ty's agenda management system at .:sai flta cllairiiiiru.ccim/Agelrflda s, fhe Request to Speak form must be 'filled out and given to the Commi,s,sion Secretary prior 'to'the Agenda Item being called. If you wish to speak Can an Item not on the Agenda, the form must be given to the Commission Secretary prior to public; participation. Should you wish not to ,speak before the Commission, you may use the Request to Register Written Comments form. Lobbyist Registration„ Under§ 7 .0 3.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. Reglisteir a s a o1b1byllst Ihelre >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the Course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. IIf you wish tag speak Ibefore the Sainta Qlairita Coinniinnissioins, please coimpll to the follllo iiing iiinforrnatiioin tag the submitted tag the Coinninnissioin Seciretavy, Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee` Planning Commission Meeting Date` 2/1 is/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number` View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description Me troWa I k Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Spealkeir Information III°°'OR.""'III"°AIll,JT • Coirnnirnniissiioirns require that speakers who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. • Ilirn order to participate in the tell ecoirnll'eire irnce, Speakers irnnust provide theiir 9'ullll irnairnne and the phoirne irnuirnnlbeir they intend to use to access the irnneetlirng„ Speakers who intend to use their coirnnputer audio to pairticiipate in the irnneetlirng irnnust allso provide their phoirne irnuirnnlbeir„ Full Name` Troy Hooper Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX* Email Street Address city Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. IIIDIECILA1121E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IEIF01121E OII1M IIS'Tf112UIEAIMIDCO1121121ECT. Under State law, matters raised under Public; Comments cannot have immediate action. fhe Commission will refer the matter to staff, or it may be scheduled Can a subsequent Commission Agenda. Speaker Signature` e 1p„ Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Presentation ,...Fii 1ps fhe'following presentation tips are provided in an effort to assist you in making your opinion known 'to'the Commission. Specific time allotments help ensure 'that all persons who wish to state their opinion have the opportunity to do so. IPlease take the time to organize and prepare a three (3) minute, or Iless, presentation„ 'To make the most efficient use of your time:: • Clearly state your name and city 'for 'the record. • Clearly state your concern - be concise. • At the conclusion of your remarks, summarize the action you desire. • If you wish to discuss an item can the Agenda, you may review the staff report and documentation 'for 'the appropriate meeting by visiting the Ci'ty's agenda management system at .:sai flta cllairiiiiru.ccim/Agelrflda s, fhe Request to Speak form must be 'filled out and given to the Commi,s,sion Secretary prior 'to'the Agenda Item being called. If you wish to speak Can an Item not on the Agenda, the form must be given to the Commission Secretary prior to public; participation. Should you wish not to ,speak before the Commission, you may use the Request to Register Written Comments form. Lobbyist Registration„ Under§ 7 .0 3.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. Reglisteir a s a o1b1byllst Ihelre >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the Course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. IIf you wish tag speak Ibefore the Sainta Qlairita Coinniinnissioins, please coimpll to the follllo iiing iiinforrnatiioin tag the submitted tag the Coinninnissioin Seciretavy, Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee` Planning Commission Meeting Date` 2/1 is/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number` View agendas Ilhaire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description Me troWa I k Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Spealkeir Information III°°'OR.""'III"°AIll,JT • Coirnnirnniissiioirns require that speakers who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. • Ilirn order to participate in the tell ecoirnll'eire irnce, Speakers irnnust provide theiir 9'ullll irnairnne and the phoirne irnuirnnlbeir they intend to use to access the irnneetlirng„ Speakers who intend to use their coirnnputer audio to pairticiipate in the irnneetlirng irnnust allso provide their phoirne irnuirnnlbeir„ Full Name` Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX* Email Street Address city Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. IIIDIECILA1121E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IEIF01121E OII1M IIS'Tf112UIEAIMIDCO1121121ECT. Under State law, matters raised under Public; Comments cannot have immediate action. fhe Commission will refer the matter to staff, or it may be scheduled Can a subsequent Commission Agenda. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Presentation ,...Fii 1ps fhe'following presentation tips are provided in an effort to assist you in making your opinion known 'to'the Commission. Specific time allotments help ensure 'that all persons who wish to state their opinion have the opportunity to do so. IPlease take the time to organize and prepare a three (3) minute, or Iless, presentation„ 'To make the most efficient use of your time:: • Clearly state your name and city 'for 'the record. • Clearly state your concern - be concise. • At the conclusion of your remarks, summarize the action you desire. • If you wish to discuss an item can the Agenda, you may review the staff report and documentation 'for 'the appropriate meeting by visiting the Ci'ty's agenda management system at .:sai flta cllairiiiiru.ccim/Agelrflda s, fhe Request to Speak form must be 'filled out and given to the Commi,s,sion Secretary prior 'to'the Agenda Item being called. If you wish to speak Can an Item not on the Agenda, the form must be given to the Commission Secretary prior to public; participation. Should you wish not to ,speak before the Commission, you may use the Request to Register Written Comments form. Lobbyist Registration„ Under§ 7 .0 3.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. Reglisteir a s a o1b1byllst Ihelre >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the Course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. If you wish -to speak Ibefore the Sainta Qlairita Coinniinnissioins, please coimplete the foll1lowiiing iin-formatioin -to The submitted -to the Coinninnissioin Seciretavy, Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Spealkeir Information HlWl°°'OR I All,JT • Cornirnissions require that speakers who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. • Ilin order to participate iiirn the tell econ'll' b ire in ce, Speakers irnust provide theirlifulill inairne and the phoine inuirnbeirthey intend to use to access the irneetling.. Speakers who intend to use their cornputer audio to pairtIcipate iiirn the irneetling irnust allso provide their phoine inuirnbeir. Full Name* Holly Schroeder Representing S(,'Vl:- DC, Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX* 818 -585 -1882 Email Street Address city Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. IIIDIECILA1121E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IEIF01121E OII1M IIS'Tf112UIEAIMIDCO1121121ECT. Under State law, matters raised under Public; Comments cannot have immediate action. fhe Commission will refer the matter to staff, or it may be scheduled Can a subsequent Commission Agenda. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Presentation ,...Fii 1ps fhe'following presentation tips are provided in an effort to assist you in making your opinion known 'to'the Commission. Specific time allotments help ensure 'that all persons who wish to state their opinion have the opportunity to do so. IPlease take the time to organize and prepare a three (3) minute, or Iless, presentation„ 'To make the most efficient use of your time:: • Clearly state your name and city 'for 'the record. • Clearly state your concern - be concise. • At the conclusion of your remarks, summarize the action you desire. • If you wish to discuss an item can the Agenda, you may review the staff report and documentation 'for 'the appropriate meeting by visiting the Ci'ty's agenda management system at .:sai flta cllairiiiiru.ccim/Agelrflda s, fhe Request to Speak form must be 'filled out and given to the Commi,s,sion Secretary prior 'to'the Agenda Item being called. If you wish to speak Can an Item not on the Agenda, the form must be given to the Commission Secretary prior to public; participation. Should you wish not to ,speak before the Commission, you may use the Request to Register Written Comments form. Lobbyist Registration„ Under§ 7 .0 3.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. Reglisteir a s a o1b1byllst Ihelre >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the Course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. IIf you wish tag speak Ibefore the Sainta Qlairita Coinniinnissioins, please coimpll to the follllo iiing iiinforrnatiioin tag the submitted tag the Coinninnissioin Seciretavy, Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee` Planning Commission Meeting Date` 2/1 is/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number` View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description Me troWa I k Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Spealkeir Information III°°'OR.""'III"°AIll,JT • Coirnnirnniissiioirns require that speakers who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. • Ilirn order to participate in the tell ecoirnll'eire irnce, Speakers irnnust provide theiir 9'ullll irnairnne and the phoirne irnuirnnlbeir they intend to use to access the irnneetlirng„ Speakers who intend to use their coirnnputer audio to pairticiipate in the irnneetlirng irnnust allso provide their phoirne irnuirnnlbeir„ Full Name` Nancy Starczyk Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX* Email Street Address city Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. IIIDIECILA1121E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IEIF01121E OII1M IIS'Tf112UIEAIMIDCO1121121ECT. Under State law, matters raised under Public; Comments cannot have immediate action. fhe Commission will refer the matter to staff, or it may be scheduled Can a subsequent Commission Agenda. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Presentation ,...Fii 1ps fhe'following presentation tips are provided in an effort to assist you in making your opinion known 'to'the Commission. Specific time allotments help ensure 'that all persons who wish to state their opinion have the opportunity to do so. IPlease take the time to organize and prepare a three (3) minute, or Iless, presentation„ 'To make the most efficient use of your time:: • Clearly state your name and city 'for 'the record. • Clearly state your concern - be concise. • At the conclusion of your remarks, summarize the action you desire. • If you wish to discuss an item can the Agenda, you may review the staff report and documentation 'for 'the appropriate meeting by visiting the Ci'ty's agenda management system at .:sai flta cllairiiiiru.ccim/Agelrflda s, fhe Request to Speak form must be 'filled out and given to the Commi,s,sion Secretary prior 'to'the Agenda Item being called. If you wish to speak Can an Item not on the Agenda, the form must be given to the Commission Secretary prior to public; participation. Should you wish not to ,speak before the Commission, you may use the Request to Register Written Comments form. Lobbyist Registration„ Under§ 7 .0 3.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. Reglisteir a s a o1b1byllst Ihelre >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the Course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Alen Warda Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: Phis is the type of development where I could afford to live and be near the Metrolink Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration„ Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lReglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Andre Hollings Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 661 -219 -4139 Email M-M-FITUMMI city Canyon Country Written comment: I live in Canyon Country and would like to live in a community like this. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II IDIEcILA11211E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IIEIF01121E-GOII1M IIS'Tf112UlEAIMIDCO1121121ECT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with 'the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Andrea Carpenter Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: I support this project. Please approve. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Barbara Myler Lnu�p Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: Senior housing close 'to'transit and within walking distance of local stores is important. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with 'the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Brian Higgins Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI city Canyon Country Written comment: As a Canyon Country resident, I support this project. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II IDIEcILA11211E'TfHA'Tf'Tf111IIEIF01121E-GOII1M IIS'Tf112UIIEAIMIDCO11211211ECT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with 'the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Brian Schlick Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX Street Address 23122 Yvette Lane city Santa Clarita Written comment: Phis is the type of duality development that keeps our City great. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®cII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®c'Tf„ Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lReglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Chris Raigosa Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: I support new housing in our city. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'tegll,:roi'eir as a o1b1ayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Dennis Sugasawara Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI city Santa Clarita Written comment: I support this item. Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®cII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®c'Tf„ Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Erika Bird Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX _.. an Written comment: I Crew up in this part of our community, and I'm excited about this evolution and support the Me'troVttalk project. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with 'the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lReglisteir a s a o1b1byllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Erin Anderson Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: I support this project. fhe senior housing will help Families live together in the same community. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Erin Hooper Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX Street Address 28631 N Pietro Dr city Santa Clarita Written comment:* Phis is the type of housing our young family is looking for in Santa Clarita. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. 11 II)II:--CII-AIIRII:--'TII-IA'T'Tll-lll:-- F0112IE-GO111MG ISTRUIEE AIMID COIR11RIEECT. Speaker Signature* Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any task force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the C ity for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lRegisteir as a 4:W1b1bylst Iheire >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an individual communicating on behalf of a group or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an individual communicating on their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneints -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Fred Arnold Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 661 -505-4300 Email M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: Available senior housing is important in our community. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a o1b1byllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Henry Rodriguez Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 661 -916 -1162 Email M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: I work in Canyon Country and think this is the right development for our community. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lReglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing. Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings. Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* ,Jeff Forrest Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 9_11" M-M-FITUMMI city Santa Clarita Written comment: Increasing diversity of housing type is important. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®cII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®c'Tf„ Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing. Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings. Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* ,Jennifer Yu Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 9_11" M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: I live at fhe Ranch at Fair teaks and support the MetroVttalk project. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® I1:-01121E-G0II1M IIS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing. Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings. Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* ,John Vance Representing Santa C larita Valley Chamber of Commerce Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 9_11" M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: As a 15 year resident of Santa Clarita, I support MetroVttalk. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Karina Winkler Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: Transit oriented development is important. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lReglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Lindsay Schlick Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: I support MetroVttalk. Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Liz Delgado Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: As a Santa Clarita resident, I value a transit -oriented development. Please support. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Liz Folentino Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI city Santa Clarita Written comment: I support this project. (hank you. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®cII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®c'Tf„ Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Nancy Starczyk Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 661 -803-0103 Email M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: Please approve. Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lReglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating on behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Pam Ingram Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: Our community needs more affordable senior housing. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Claritta Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with 'the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task 'force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir a s a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Paul De La Cerda Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX 661-481-8676 Email M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: Phis type ofdevelopment will people better use the Metrolink. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Sue Nevius Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX M-M-FITUMMI an Written comment: We need more senior housing like this in Santa Clarita. Attachments (optional) ('�) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. II II)II®CII_AII211® 'TfIIIA'Tf 'Tf11l11® F011RIE-GO111MG IS 'Tf RUNE® AIMID CO11211211®CT. Speaker Signature` Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any Individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any 'task Force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City'for 'the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. I'teglisteir as a 4:W1ta1tayllst IIhelre :>:> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an Individual communicating Can behalf of a Croup or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an Individual communicating on 'their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Please connplete this forinn -to register your written conninneruts -to the City of Sainta Clairita Coimimissioins, iiin Iliieu of spealkiiing., Your written coiminneints wiIIII The coinsidered Ipairt of the officiall proceediiings., Meeting Information Please Choose a Commission or Committee* Planning Commission Meeting Date* 2/16/2021 Please choose a meeting type:* Special Meeting Regular Meeting Please choose one: Public Participation Agenda Item Agenda Item Number* View agendas Iheire 2 (Only one agenda item can be selected per submission.) Description* MetroWalk Please choose one: Support Recommendation Oppose Recommendation Neutral Your IIinforimation Coirnirnissions irequiire that persons registering written cornirnents; who represent other individuals, groups or organizations disclose that relationship. Full Name* Troy Hooper Phone XXX-XXX-XXXX Street Address 28631 N Pietro Dr city Santa Clarita Written comment:* As a young family, we would live in this community. It has what we're looking for. Being close to transit and retail with an urban vibe. Attachments (optional) If you have supplemental materials to share with the Commission please attach them, and they will be made part of the record. 11 II)II:--CII-AIIRII:--'TII-IA'T'Tll-lll:-- F0112IE-GO111MG ISTRUIEE AIMID COIR11RIEECT. Speaker Signature* P111 1�e 17 1 W-1-11poll Please check here if you are a registered lobbyist with the City of Santa Clarita (see below for more information). Lobbyist Registration:: Under§ 7 .03.01 0 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, lobbyists are required to register with the City Clerk's Office. A "lobbyist" means any individual or entity employed, retained or otherwise engaged for compensation to communicate with any elective or appointed official, any officer or employee or any task force, committee, board, commission, or other body of the City for the purpose of influencing any legislative or administrative action. lRegisteir as a 4:W1b1bylst Iheire >> A regular employee of an organization, communicating to the City during the course of their employment, an individual communicating on behalf of a group or organization and not receiving compensation for such action, or an individual communicating on their own behalf would NO F be considered a lobbyist. Agenda Item: 2 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA �� PLANNING COMMISSION n��� l��rla AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING MANAGER APPROVAL: DATE: February 16, 2021 SUBJECT: Metro Walk Specific Plan - Master Case 20-045 APPLICANT: Bluemax Santa Clarita, LLC LOCATION: Southeast coner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive (APN 2840- 004-009) CASE PLANNER: Erika Iverson RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: Adopt Resolution P21-02 recommending to the City Council that it certify the MetroWalk Specific Plan Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (State Clearinghouse Number 2020120433) and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and make the appropriate findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and 2. Adopt Resolution P21-03, recommending the City Council approve Master Case 20-045 (General Plan Amendment 20-001, Zone Change 20-001, Tentative Tract Map 83087, General Plan Amendment 20-001, Zone Change 20-001, Development Review 20-005, and Architectural Design Review 20-007) and approve the MetroWalk Specific Plan document for the development of the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, located at the southeast corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive (Assessor's Parcel Number: 2840-004-009), subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). REQUEST The applicant, Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC, is seeking approval for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan consisting of 498 residential units within four planning areas, on a 20.4-acre site with associated private recreational facilities, a publicly accessible 0.93-acre plaza, and various site improvements (project). The project includes a General Plan Amendment and Page 1 Zone Change to amend the land use designation and zone from Business Park (BP) to Specific Plan (SP), a Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to allow for the subdivision of the property for residential condominium ownership purposes, a Development Review (DR) to allow for development of the site in compliance with the requirements of the Unified Development Code (UDC), and an Architectural Design Review to ensure the architectural design of the residential buildings are in conformance with the City of Santa Clarita's (City) Community Character Design Guidelines (CCDG). BACKGROUND The applicant has worked to refine the project proposal over the past year and a half based on input from City staff through the One Stop review and formal entitlement application process. One Stop Review In June of 2019, the applicant submitted a conceptual project proposal consisting of 151 attached three-story townhomes, 272 senior apartments, three to four stories tall, 51,000 square feet of commercial self -storage, a one -acre park, and private outdoor recreation space to be used by the residents of the community on the project site within the BP zone. Staff provided comments and the following key observations: • The project proposal did not comply with the Business Park zone and would require a zone change. • The project would need to include an added public benefit to substantiate a General Plan Amendment. • Provide additional trail connections to Vista Canyon. • Self -storage was not a supported use for the site. Formal Project Submittal On April 3, 2020, the applicant, applied for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan including a request for a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment, a Tentative Tract Map, Development Review, and Architectural Design Review to allow for the subdivision of land and construction of 503 residential units within four planning areas including 179 market -rate apartments, 124 market -rate senior apartments, 150 for -sale townhomes, as well as incorporating 50 deed -restricted affordable senior apartments and a nearly one -acre publicly accessible plaza to address community needs for these resources. Development Review Committee and Site Plan Revisions On June 4, 2020, the Development Review Committee (DRC) met with the applicant to review the original project proposal and site plan and TTM, requested revisions to the plans, and provided draft Conditions of Approval. Key issues with the original project proposal and site plan included: • Lack of strong street presence along project frontage at Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive due to the existing surface retention basin located at the northwest corner of the Page 2 project site. • Lack of prominent pedestrian circulation. Townhome architecture was not complementary to the balance of the development and was not consistent with the CCDG. • Lack of sufficient landscape along the southerly (Metrolink rail line) boundary. Following the June 2020 DRC meeting, the applicant worked closely with staff to address all site plan issues. The subsequent resubmittal included the following changes and improvements to the proj ect: • Redesign of the existing retention basin to provide for underground retention at the intersection of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive in order to create opportunity for landscape along the Harriman Drive frontage. • Utilization of landscape hedge along the southerly boundary and incorporation of additional finger planters along the southerly row of surface parking to accommodate new trees for added landscape layers and screening of Metrolink rail line. • Enhanced the pedestrian circulation throughout the development and created a prominent pedestrian promenade along the main drive aisle of the project with connections to the proposed community park and adjacent Vista Canyon pedestrian trails. • Refined townhome architecture to comply with the CCDG and complement the overall character of the proposed MetroWalk development. The current project description is summarized below under Project Description. Project Setting The project site is a 20.4-acre, relatively flat parcel of vacant land. The project site has been previously disturbed, formerly used for agriculture purposes and has little remaining vegetation. It is located at the southeastern corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive (a private street). The project site is situated just south of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area and immediately north and west of the Metrolink rail line. Lost Canyon Road is elevated above the project site to the west with a landscaped slope (to be maintained by the Landscape Maintenance District) that descends from Lost Canyon Road to the project site. The future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center which includes a seven -bay bus transfer station and the Vista Canyon Metrolink Station is located immediately east of the project site. GENERAL PLANNING AND ZONING The General Plan and zoning designation for the subject property is BP with a portion of the project site located in a Significant Ecological Area (SEA) Overlay. The surrounding land uses include the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, the Colony Townhomes development, and the Metrolink rail line. Fair Oaks Ranch, is located further south, beyond the Metrolink rail line, and improved with multi- and single-family units. Table 1 below summarizes the General Plan land use designation, zoning, and land uses for the properties surrounding the site: Page 3 TABLE 1: Surrounding Properties Land Use Designation and Zoning Project General Zoning Land Use Site Plan North SP SP Vista Canyon Specific Plan - Planning Area-1 (Multi -family apartments) South PI PI Metrolink Rail Line East SP SP Vista Canyon Specific Plan - Planning Area-2 (future Metrolink Station and Town Center Planning Area of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan) West UR3 UR5 Multi -family Residential The Vista Canyon Specific Plan located immediately north and east of the site, was approved by the City Council in 2011 and includes potential development for 1,100 residential units, 950,000 square feet of commercial floor area as well as the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with a seven -bay bus transfer station and future Vista Canyon Metrolink rail line station. The applicant is proposing a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Specific Plan (SP) for the 20.4 project site located adjacent to Vista Canyon Specific Plan. The Specific Plan would consist of multi -family development and associated community park and pedestrian linkages. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development Proposal The applicant is proposing to establish the MetroWalk Specific Plan for multi -family residential uses and a plaza on the 20.4-acre site. The project would construct up to 498 residential units organized into four planning areas, consisting of a variety of housing types including market -rate apartments, market -rate senior apartments, deed -restricted affordable senior apartments, and for - sale townhomes. Each planning area would include common open space areas and private recreational amenities. An approximately 0.93-acre portion of the site would be improved with a publicly accessible park adjacent to the future Metrolink rail line station. Planning Area 1 (PA-1), approximately 7.54 acres, is located on the western portion of the site and consists of 179 market -rate apartment units within two, four-story buildings. Each building is oriented around a central outdoor courtyard with private residential amenities. Floor plans range from studio to two -bedroom units and vary in size from approximately 575 square feet to 1,040 square feet. Residential parking is provided in a combination of tuck -under parking stalls along the ground floor as well as carports. Planning Area 2 (PA-2), approximately 2.33 acres, is located centrally on the site and consists of 119 market -rate, senior apartments (for ages 55 and above) within a four-story building, also organized around a central courtyard, with private residential amenities and offering residential parking in tuck -under parking stalls and carports. Unit sizes range from approximately 675 square feet to 1,041 square feet in a mix of one- and two -bedroom units. Page 4 Planning Area 3 (PA-3), approximately 1.08 acres, is located centrally along the southern portion of the site and consists of 49 deed -restricted, affordable (65% area median income) senior apartments, and one manger unit. The deed -restricted units are one -bedroom units, each 650 square feet. The manager unit is two bedrooms and 950 square feet. The building is four -stories with a ground -floor parking garage. An outdoor courtyard with private residential amenities is located along the southern edge of the building. Planning Area 4 (PA-4), approximately 9.47 acres, is located on the western portion of the site and consists of 150 for -sale townhome units and a nearly one -acre community park. The townhome units are three stories, offering a mix of two- and three -bedroom units ranging from approximately 1,340 square feet to 2,290 square feet, each with individual garages at the ground level. A common area pool and community clubhouse are provided for the townhome units. Site grading will consist of 50,000 cubic yards of cut and fill and over excavation of 400,000 cubic yards, all to balance on site. Community landscape elements would include a neighborhood parkway along Harriman Drive with trees and low vegetation, an entry monument at Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, a landscaped slope adjacent to Lost Canyon Road, a 0.93-acre community park, and a network of tree -lined pedestrian sidewalks throughout the project site. Surface and carport parking fields are located throughout the project site to support the residential uses and guests. Specific Plan The MetroWalk Specific Plan would establish four planning areas and two zoning designations within the Specific Plan area for Residential (R) and Open Space (OS) land uses. Primary uses permitted in the R zone include multi -family dwellings and would permit rental or sales offices as well as model homes. The R zone would also permit secondary uses, which are incidental to the primary use, to include private residential recreational facilities including community rooms/clubhouses, fitness rooms, pools, courtyards, as well as public or private pedestrian trails, plazas, parks, and food trucks (subject to applicable food vendor permit). Primary uses permitted in the OS zone include uses as permitted by Section 17.36.010 of the UDC, Open Space zone. Secondary uses permitted in the OS zone include bicycle rentals, community garden, farmer's market and food truck/outdoor events (subject to applicable food vendor or Temporary Use Permits). The Specific Plan would establish the site development standards governing the R zoning designation, including, but not limited to density, setbacks, landscaping, building height, open space, and parking. The Specific Plan will be implemented primarily through the process of subdivision maps. All land subdivision maps of any type (e.g., tentative or final, vesting or non -vesting, tract or parcel) shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved in accordance with the Santa Clarita Municipal Code Page 5 (SCMC) and Subdivision Map Act. Where the provisions or procedures of the SCMC conflict with the provisions of this Specific Plan, the Specific Plan shall apply. The buildout of the Specific Plan is estimated to occur over five years in three construction phases: (1) grading, (2) infrastructure improvements, and (3) building construction. Entitlement Summary Implementation of the project, will require the approval of the following entitlements: Tentative Tract Map 83087 The Project includes a request to subdivide the project site to create six parcels. Lots designated for multi -family residential use may be further subdivided for condominium purposes. Any subdivision in excess of four lots requires the approval of a TTM in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. In accordance with Section 17.25.110 of the UDC, the Planning Commission is required to review and approve all requests for a TTM. General Plan Amendment 20-001 The Project includes a request for a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from BP to SP. In accordance with Section 17.26.110 of the UDC, the Planning Commission is required to hold a public hearing and forward their recommendation to the City Council. Zone Change 20-001 The Project includes a request for a Zone Change to amend the City's Zoning Map in order to designate the site as SP. In accordance with Section 17.28.120 of the UDC, the Planning Commission is required to hold a public hearing and forward their recommendation to the City Council. Development Review 20-005 In accordance with Section 17.23.120 of the UDC, a development review application is required to ensure that the project complies with all of the provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, and other applicable requirements. In order to achieve this, the review authority is empowered to grant approval with conditions for uses in zones as prescribed by the UDC. Architectural Design Review 20-007 In accordance with Section 17.23.110 of the UDC, an architectural design review is required to ensure that the architecture complies with the provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, and other applicable requirements. In order to achieve this, the review authority is empowered to grant approval with conditions for uses in zones as prescribed by the UDC. ANALYSIS Land Use The project site is designated BP, which does not allow for the development of a multi -family community. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from BP to SP, which would allow for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan. Page 6 Section 17.37.030 of the UDC establishes the SP zoning designation which identifies lands in the planning area that are governed by an adopted specific plan. If adopted, the MetroWalk Specific Plan would guide development of the 20.4-acre site, including "specific allowable uses, maximum intensity standards, and development standards." The proposed SP seeks to establish a multi -family development that would permit multi -family residential uses at a maximum density of 30 units per acre in proximity to regional transit opportunities provided by the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center and provides the community with much needed deed -restricted affordable (65% area median income) senior apartments. Pursuant to Government Code section 65454, the proposed SP must be consistent with the General Plan by furthering the goals, objectives and policies of the General Plan. Specifically, the Housing Element and Land Use Element of the General Plan include the following goals, objectives, and policies that contemplate a development consistent with the proposed project. Goal LU 3: Healthy and safe neighborhoods for all residents. o Objective LU 3.1: Provide for a diversity of housing types available to provide safe and suitable homes for all economic levels, household sizes, age groups and special needs groups within the community. ■ Policy LU 3.1.1: On the Land Use Map, designate adequate land for residential use at various densities to provide a mix of housing opportunities for all segments of the population, including attached, detached, senior, and mixed -use housing types, which are consistent with community character and meet the region's housing goals. The proposed project provides a variety of housing types including market -rate apartment units for rent, senior market -rate apartments for rent, affordable senior apartments for rent, and townhome units for -sale. • Goal LU 5: Enhanced mobility through alternative transportation choices and land use patterns o Objective LU 5.2: Coordinate land use designations with support services and public transit in order to encourage vehicle trip reduction. ■ Policy LU 5.2.1: Designate higher -density residential uses in areas served by public transit and a full range of support services. The proposed project site is adjacent to the Town Center planning area of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan as well as the Multi -Modal Center which includes a seven -bay bus transfer station and future Metrolink rail line station providing residents access to local and regional public transit opportunities and commercial services that would encourage vehicle trip reduction. Goal H.2: Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate -income households. o Policy H 2.1.3: Encourage the development of housing affordable to lower income groups in areas well served by public transportation, schools, retail, and other services Page 7 The proposed project includes 49 affordable housing units for low income (65% area median income) seniors located adjacent to opportunities for local and regional public transportation and commercial services as noted above. The deed -restricted housing units contribute toward the City's goal of providing the much -needed low income units for the community. Architecture The Specific Plan includes architectural design guidelines and incorporates by reference the Vista Canyon Specific Plan Design Guidelines as well as the City's CCDG. The City's architecture design consultant, RRM Design Group, reviewed the architectural plans for consistency with the City's CCDG as well as neighborhood character and patterns. Three rounds of architectural review were conducted during the architectural review process. The proposed architectural style most closely resembles a "Rustic California" style identified by the CCDG as appropriate for the Canyon County Community of the City and consistent with the desired architecture for the Vista Canyon Specific Plan. Based on feedback from RRM Design Group, the applicant incorporated enhancements at the pedestrian level of the apartment buildings and worked to refine the roofline and massing of the townhome units for consistency and cohesiveness with the balance of the project. The result of these efforts produced elevations that are consistent with the City's CCDG, adjacent Vista Canyon Specific Plan and the desired Canyon Country Community design aesthetic. Project Access and Circulation As part of the development review process, the proposed site plan was reviewed by both the Traffic Division and the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The traffic impact analysis prepared for the project indicates that the traffic impacts related to the project and related projects would be less than significant, however, the traffic impact analysis made recommendations for a number of improvements that would improve the traffic circulation in the vicinity of the project. The project conditions require the recommended improvements prior to certificate of occupancy as follows: Sand Canyon Road & Lost Canyon Road: potential additions of right -turn slip lanes for the eastbound and westbound approaches. Lost Canyon Road & Canyon Park Boulevard: signalization of this intersection with a protected northbound left -turn phase on Lost Canyon Road. Soledad Canyon Road & Sand Canyon Road: widen this intersection to include a 100- foot eastbound right -turn pocket. Convert the southbound shared through/right-turn pocket into a right -turn pocket and one of the southbound left -turn pockets into a shared left/through-turn pocket. Convert one of the northbound left -turn lanes into a shared left/through lane The main access to the 498 residences will be taken from Harriman Drive, a private street, connecting to Lost Canyon Road. Harriman Drive provides a 28-foot drive aisle, with an eight - foot -wide parallel parking lane, five-foot parkway, and five-foot sidewalk on either side. The project is located within a high fire hazard area which limits development to no more than 150 Page 8 residential units on a single means of access. A secondary point of access is provided by way of Cooper Street, a private street, to Humphreys Parkway. The internal project drive aisles maintain a minimum of 26-foot unobstructed drive aisle width, with a majority of the drive aisle network maintaining a minimum of 28 feet, as required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. The project has been conditioned by the Los Angeles County Fire Department to install fourteen private fire hydrants throughout the project site. There are three existing public fire hydrants along the Harriman Drive frontage, and one public fire hydrant along the Lost Canyon Road project frontage. As designed, the project complies with the access standards required by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Private Outdoor Space/Project Amenities/Pedestrian Circulation The Specific Plan establishes a private outdoor space requirement of 200 square feet for each studio unit, 300 square feet for each one -bedroom unit, 400 square feet for each two -bedroom unit, and 650 square feet for each townhome unit. Private outdoor space can be provided in the form of common and/or private areas. In total, the Specific Plan would require 207,200 square feet of private outdoor space. As proposed, the project provides a total of 211,840 square feet of private outdoor space throughout the project site. The Project is organized into four Planning Areas, with a variety of housing types. A network of tree -lined pedestrian paths has been incorporated into the project to connect all project components as well as providing pedestrian connections to the existing Vista Canyon network of pedestrian paths. PA-1 includes 179 market -rate apartment units within two buildings. Each building is organized around a central courtyard with pool deck. All one- and two -bedroom units will provide private balconies with a minimum area of 60 square feet. The ground floor of building PA-1 North provides a ground -floor community room with kitchen that is accessible from the pool deck as well as a ground -floor fitness room for use by all the residents of the PA-1 apartments. In addition, PA-1 South provides a ground -floor office suite for use by all residents of PA-1. Both buildings provide lockable storage for each unit in a combination of in -unit storage closets and storage lockers located on the ground floor level. Bicycle storage rooms with bicycle lockers are located on the ground floor of each building. PA-2 provides 119 market -rate senior apartments within a four-story building, similarly organized around a central courtyard with pool deck. All units will provide a private balcony with a minimum of 60 square feet. The ground floor offers a community room with kitchen that opens to the pool area. Additional amenities include a media room and fitness room on the ground floor level. Lockable storage is provided for each unit in a combination of in -unit closets and storage lockers located on the ground floor. A bicycle locker room is provided on the ground floor level. PA-3 provides 50 deed -restricted affordable apartment units, inclusive of one manger unit. All units will provide a private balcony with a minimum of 60 square feet. The ground floor level offers a community room with a kitchen that opens onto an outdoor courtyard at the south side of the building. Storage is provided for each unit in a combination of storage closets and lockers above parking stalls. A bicycle locker room is provided on the ground floor, accessible from the Page 9 parking garage. PA-4 provides 150 for -sale townhome units. All three -bedroom townhome units will provide a private 210 square foot patio. Each two -bedroom townhome will provide a private balcony with a minimum of 60 square feet. A clubhouse with a community room and kitchen that opens to an outdoor community pool is provided for use by the townhome residents. Additional outdoor recreational amenities are provided in the community park located on the western portion of the site. The approximately 0.93-acre park is oriented around a central lawn with an elevated stage with a shade structure. The community park incorporates two playground areas with equipment for children ages 2-5 and children ages 6-12. Other elements include a walking path through a botanical garden, shade structure with seating, and an informal dog -use area. A plaza feature is located nearest the adjacent Vista Canyon development and offers space for seating and coffee kiosk (subject to applicable food vendor permit). Terraced seat walls are incorporated into the park design, with opportunities for seating and views over the plaza feature and the central lawn Parking Requirements The parking requirement for the project would be established by the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan parking ratio was based on a parking demand study prepared for the project as well as the parking standards of the UDC. The parking demand was calculated using the Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Shared Parking, 3rd Edition and accounts for the transit -oriented development located adjacent to local and regional public transportation opportunities. The weekday peak parking demand for residents and guest was 637 spaces with the peak weekend demand at 634 spaces. The project will provide a total of 902 parking spaces as prescribed in Table 2 below. TABLE 2: Parking Requirement Planning Area Number Parking Ratio Required of Units Parking Planning Area 1: Market -Rate 179 1.5/DU 0.5/DU 268.5 89.5 358 Apartment Guest Planning Area 2: Senior 119 0.5/DU 0.5/DU 59.5 59.5 119 Market -Rate Apartment Guest Planning Area 3: Affordable 50 0.5/DU 0.5/DU 25 25 50 Senior Apartment Guest Planning Area 4: Townhome 150 2/DU 0.5/DU 300 75 375 Guest Total 498 902 Residential parking for the market -rate apartment and senior market -rate apartments is provided in carports and tuck -under parking stalls located at the ground level of each apartment building. The residential parking for the affordable senior apartments is provided within a ground -level parking garage. The townhome units each provide a minimum 20-foot by 20-foot garage. Page 10 Surface parking is provided throughout the project site to accommodate guest parking. In total, the project provides 353 covered parking spaces, 249 surface parking spaces, and 300 parking spaces accommodated in private townhome garages. Bicycle parking is required at a ratio of one bicycle parking space per five residential units in accordance with the UDC. A total of 100 bicycle parking spaces will be provided throughout the site including bicycle locker rooms located on the ground floor of each residential apartment building. Setbacks/Landscape The setback requirements would be established by the Specific Plan. As proposed, the provided building setbacks would be as follows: Front setback (Lost Canyon Road) shall be 20 feet, maintained with landscaping. Reverse Corner Lot setback (Harriman Drive) shall be a 10-foot setback with a minimum five-foot landscape planter to be maintained. Rear setback (Metrolink rail line) shall be a 15-foot setback, with a minimum seven -foot - wide landscaped planter maintained with mature tree/hedge. The applicant submitted a conceptual landscape plan that has been reviewed by the City's Landscape Architect. Based on feedback from the Landscape Architect, the applicant has amended the plant palette to ensure the provided landscaping thrives in the Santa Clarita Valley climate. In addition, the applicant has worked to modify the proposed landscaping along the southerly property line in order to provide landscape screening adjacent to the Metrolink rail line. The Los Angeles County Fuel Modification Unit has also reviewed the conceptual landscape plan and provided a preliminary approval. The Fuel Modification Unit will review and approve the final planting plan prior to building permits to ensure compliance with all Los Angeles County Fire Department standards within the High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. ENVIRONMENTAL The proposed development constitutes a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Senate Bill 375 established a streamlined environmental review process under the CEQA for transit priority projects (TPP) that are consistent with the Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Regional Transportation Plan. A TPP is any project that contains at least 50% residential uses; provides a minimum net density of 20 dwelling units per acre; and is located within one half mile of a major transit stop or high -quality transit corridor. The proposed project meets these criteria for a TPP and is eligible for evaluation under a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA). Though it is a streamlined process, the SCEA does not circumvent the CEQA review process. The lead agency must prepare an Initial Study and find that all potentially significant impacts of a project have been identified, adequately analyzed, and mitigated to a less -than -significant level. Michael Baker International was contracted by the City to assist with the preparation of the Page 11 initial study to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the project and preparation of SCEA document. Various technical studies were prepared by the applicant's consultants and peer reviewed by Michael Baker International. The potentially affected environmental areas of the project include, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, and tribal cultural resources. A summary of areas of potential impact is provided below: Air Quality- Rincon Consultants, Inc., prepared an air quality and greenhouse gas study for the proposed project. The analysis and findings from the study concluded that the proposed project would have a less than significant impact with mitigation. Mitigation measure AQ-1 requires that the applicant to prepare a construction management plan prior to issuance of grading or building permits that would include selection of equipment to minimize emissions and a staging plan to locate equipment as far from residential, and limiting haul routes to paved roadways and minimizing travel adjacent to existing residential uses. Biological Resources- Rincon Consultants, Inc., prepared a biological resources assessment for the proposed project. The analysis and findings from these studies concluded that the proposed project would have a less than significant impact with mitigation. Mitigation measures include avoiding impacts during bird breeding season, conducting preconstruction nesting bird and raptor surveys, and flagging any nests that are found. • Cultural Resources- Dudek prepared a cultural resources inventory and a paleontological resources assessment for the proposed project. There are no known prehistoric or historic archaeological sites on the project site. However, if cultural resources are encountered during ground -disturbing activities, work in the immediate area shall be halted and contact shall be made to the appropriate agency. Tribal Cultural Resources- In accordance with Assembly Bill 52, a formal notification regarding this project and the City's environmental review process was initiated by the City with the Fernandeno Tataviam Band of Mission Indians. Communication received from tribal representatives indicate that there are a number of cultural and archaeological sites containing a range of cultural material throughout the Santa Clarita Valley. The area in which the proposed project is located has not been well understood and documented archaeologically therefore, the tribe has requested a Native American Monitor to be on site during grading activities. The following areas of concern were also analyzed for the project and found to have less than significant impact: • Aesthetics • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Energy • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions Page 12 • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Land Use and Planning • Mineral and Energy Resources • Noise • Population and Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation/Traffic • Utilities and Service Systems • Wildfire Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Based on the technical studies and Initial Study completed, a SCEA was prepared in accordance with the CEQA. A copy of the environmental document was placed at City Clerk's office, posted on the City's website, and notice was given to all affected agencies. Staff received comment letters from SCV Water on January 7, 2021, from the California State Transportation Agency dated January 15, 2021, from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on January 20, 2021, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority dated January 21, 2021, from the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts on January 21, 2021, and from the Los Angeles County Fire Department after the comment period on January 22, 2021. Responses to comments are included in the attached Draft Final SCEA. NOTICING All notices required by law were completed which consisted of a legal advertisement in The Signal newspaper on January 26, 2021, and notification of the public hearing by mail to all property owners and occupants within 1,000-foot radius of the project site (1,110 notices). A sign was also posted at the site on January 27, 2021. As of the writing of this staff report, staff has received ten letters of support via email and six letters in opposition via email, which are attached herein. Public Outreach Upon formal submittal of the project, City staff encouraged the applicant to conduct community outreach to surrounding neighborhoods and community stakeholders. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic traditional in -person community presentations were not possible. However, the applicant hosted Zoom meetings with the Sand Canyon Home Owners Association, The Ranch at Fair Oaks Home Owners Association, and the Canyon Country Community Advisory Committee in October and November of 2020. Subsequent Zoom conferences were set up with interested residents from the Ranch at Fair Oaks in January of 2021. In addition, the applicant has contacted and met via Zoom with the Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation, The Santa Clarita Valley Senior Center, the Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce and the Southland Regional Association of Realtors, and has shared their project proposal with the adjacent Vista Canyon development team. Page 13 CONCLUSION The proposed MetroWalk Specific Plan and associated plans are consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, Unified Development Code, Community Character and Design Guidelines and Subdivision Map Act with approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Therefore, staff has drafted the necessary findings for approval as set forth in Sections 17.25.110, 17.26.110, and 17.28.120 of the UDC. ATTACHMENTS Resolution P21-02 Resolution P21-02: Exhibit A - CEQA Findings Resolution P21-02: Exhibit B - MMRP Resolution P21-03 Resolution P21-03: Exhibit A - Draft Conditions Resolution P21-03: Exhibit B - GPA/ZC Exhibit Tentative Tract Map 83087 Site Plan Architectural Package Pedestrian Circulation Exhibit Preliminary Landscape Package Project Renderings MetroWalk Specific Plan Draft SCEA MetroWalk Specific Plan Draft -Final SCEA Notice of Public Hearing Public Comment Letters MetroWalk Specific Plan Document Page 14 RESOLUTION NO. P21-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SCH NO. 2020120433) FOR MASTER CASE 20-045 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20-001, ZONE CHANGE 20-001, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 83087, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 20-005, AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 20-007), INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS OF FACT, AND ADOPTION OF THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings of fact, and recommends that the City Council make the following findings of fact: An application for Master Case 20-045, the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, was filed by the project applicant, Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC (the "applicant"), with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on April 3, 2020. The entitlement requests (collectively "Entitlements") include: i. General Plan Amendment 20-001 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as Specific Plan (SP). ii. Zone Change 20-001 to amend the zoning map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as SP. iii. Tentative Tract Map 83087 to subdivide the 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site into six lots. In addition, lots designated for multi -family housing may be further subdivided for condominium purposes. iv. Development Review 20-005 to allow for the construction of a multi- family residential development in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, the MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. V. Architectural Design Review 20-007 for the review of the project architecture is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. Master Case 20-045 Resolution P21-02 February 16, 2021 Page 2 of 7 b. The approximately 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project (Project) site is located at the southeast corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, a private street, and is located within the Business Park (BP) zone and General Plan land use designation. The eastern most portion of the site is within the Santa Clara River Significant Ecological Area (SEA) designated by Los Angeles County and included in the City's SEA Overlay Zone. c. On June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-61, adopting the General Plan of the City of Santa Clarita, and Resolution No. 11-62 certifying the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The City's General Plan presently designates the project site BP. Approximately 5.3 acres on the eastern portion of the project site are located within the SEA Overlay Zone. d. The current BP land use and zoning designation does not permit the development of multi- family residential units. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan. e. Surrounding land uses include primarily multi -family residential development. The Colony Townhomes, a multi -family residential community, is directly west of the project site. The Fair Oaks Ranch Community, which is comprised of multi -family and single-family residential uses, is located to the south and west of the project site. The existing Metrolink rail line is immediately south of the project site. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan area is located north and east of the project site, with multi -family apartments under construction immediately north of the project site. The future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with a seven -bay bus transfer station and Metrolink rail line station is located just east of the project site. f. The project site is an approximately 20.4-acre site located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive (a private street). The project includes the development of 498 residential units within four planning areas as follows: PlanningArea 1 Planning Area 1 (PA-1) is located on the western portion of the project site. This area consists of two apartment buildings, each four -stories in height with 179 market -rate apartments and associated residential amenities and parking. Planning Area 2 Planning Area 2 (PA-2) is located centrally on the project site and consists of one, four- story apartment building with 119 market -rate, senior (age 55 and older) apartments and associated residential amenities and parking. Planning Area 3 Planning Area 3 (PA-3) is located along the southerly portion of the project site and consists of one, four-story apartment building including 49 deed -restricted, affordable apartments for low income (65% area median income) seniors, and associated residential amenities and parking. Master Case 20-045 Resolution P21-02 February 16, 2021 Page 3 of 7 Planning Area 4 Planning Area 4 (PA-4) is located on the eastern portion of the project site. This area consists of 150 for -sale townhomes, associated residential amenities, parking, and a 0.93-acre community park that is accessible to the public. g. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA;" Pub. Resources Code, §21000 et seq.), the City of Santa Clarita is the lead agency and the City Council is the decision -making body for the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project. The City's Planning Commission is a recommending body for the project. h. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21155.2(b)(5), a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) may be approved by the lead agency after conducting a public hearing, reviewing the comments received, and finding that (a) all potentially significant or significant effects required to be identified in the Initial Study have been identified and analyzed; and (b) with respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the Initial Study, either (i) changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance; or (ii) those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. The City of Santa Clarita (City), the CEQA Lead Agency, finds and declares that the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. The City of Santa Clarita City Council (City Council) finds and certifies that the SCEA was reviewed and information contained in the SCEA, along with all comments received on the Draft SCEA, were considered prior to approving the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, herein referred to as the "Project.". j. Based upon its review of the SCEA, the City Council finds that the SCEA is an adequate assessment of the environmental impacts of the Project and represents the independent judgment of the City. SECTION 2. TRANSIT PRIORITY PROJECT FINDINGS. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find, as follows: a. Pursuant to CEQA and Public Resources Code (PRC) Sections 21155 and 21155.2, a project is eligible for evaluation under a SCEA if it: Is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in the Sustainable Communities Strategy (see PRC Section 21155(a)). Master Case 20-045 Resolution P21-02 February 16, 2021 Page 4 of 7 Meets the definition of a "transit priority project" (TPP) described in PRC Section 21155(b). Incorporates all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the prior applicable environmental impact reports (see PRC Section 21155.2(a)). The Project meets all three criteria for SCEA eligibility. This finding is based on the information contained within the Project's SCEA, particularly Section 3.0, Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment Eligibility, and Appendix A: Mitigation Measure Feasibility/Applicability Analysis. The following paragraphs summarize the justification for finding that the Project meets the three criteria for SCEA eligibility. The Project is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS explicitly lays out 10 goals related to housing, transportation technologies, equity, and resilience. One goal specifically encourages development of diverse housing types in areas that are supported by multiple transportation options (Goal 9). The 2020-2045 RTP/SCS identified Priority Growth Areas (PGAs), which primarily include Job Centers, Transit Priority Areas (TPAs), High Quality Transit Areas (HQTAs), Neighborhood Mobility Areas (NMAs), Livable Corridors, and Spheres of Influence (SOIs). TPAs and HQTAs are where transit -oriented development (TOD) can be realized — where people can live, work, and play in high density, compact communities with ready access to a multitude of safe and convenient transportation alternatives. While the scale of Exhibits 3.4, 3.7, and 3.8 in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS do not show the precise boundaries of PGAs, the Project Site appears to be within a PGA, specifically within an HQTA and a TPA, and is consistent with SCAG's intention for PGAs given its location adjacent to the planned Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan. As set forth in the Draft SCEA, the Project is a TPP in that it (1) contains at least 50 percent residential use, based on total building square footage; (2) provides a minimum net density of at least 20 units per acre; and (3) is within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high - quality transit corridor included in a regional transportation plan. In addition, the City complied with PRC Section 21155.2 by reviewing all of the mitigation measures in the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), the City of Santa Clarita One Valley One Vision PEIR Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP), and the Vista Canyon Specific Plan EIR MMRP for imposition on the Project. Although mitigation measures from these documents have been considered by the City, only a few of them are applicable to the Project. The Project -specific mitigation measures identified for those Project impacts that have been determined as potentially significant consider the mitigation measures from the prior applicable EIRs and incorporate the relevant requirements from those measures. Notably, the Project -specific mitigation measures themselves are adequate to reduce the Master Case 20-045 Resolution P21-02 February 16, 2021 Page 5 of 7 Project's potentially significant impacts to a less -than -significant level. Appendix A of the Draft SCEA explained the applicability of each mitigation measure from the prior applicable EIRs and generally identified which component(s) of the mitigation measure was comparable to the Project -specific mitigation measures and/or to codes and regulations. SECTION 3. CEQA FINDINGS. The Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council find that the Draft Final SCEA for Master Case 20-045 (General Plan Amendment 20-001, Zone Change 20-001, Tentative Tract Map 83078, Development Review 20-005, and Architectural Design Review 20-007) identifies and discloses all project -specific impacts and cumulative project impacts. Environmental impacts identified in the Draft Final SCEA, findings, and facts in support of findings are herein incorporated as "Findings Required by CEQA," referred to as Exhibit "A," and identified as follows: a. The Draft Final SCEA identifies significant but mitigated impacts, as set forth in Section 5.c of Exhibit "A." Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project that will avoid or reduce these potential impacts to a less -than -significant level. b. The Draft Final SCEA also finds that Project would have a less -than -significant impact without mitigation on a number of environmental topics. Environmental topics, for which impacts were determined to be less than significant without mitigation measures, are identified in Section 5.b of Exhibit "A". c. The Draft Final SCEA also found that the Project would have no impact on a number of environmental topic areas listed in Section 5.a of Exhibit "A". d. The MMRP, attached as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference, is required to mitigate project impacts. SECTION 4. FINDINGS FOR CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL SCEA. Based upon the above recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the MetroWalk Draft Final SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings held on the Project and the Draft Final SCEA, upon studies and investigation made by the Planning Commission, and upon reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission further recommends the City Council find: a. It has reviewed and considered the Draft and Final SCEAs prior to approving the Project, b. The Draft and Final SCEAs are an accurate and objective statement that fully complies with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local environmental guidelines, and c. The Draft and Final SCEAs reflect the independent judgment of the lead agency. The City Council approves the Final SCEA based on the findings and conclusions herein. d. That the additional information provided in the Final SCEA, in the evidence presented in the administrative record, does not alter the analysis or conclusions of the Draft SCEA and does Master Case 20-045 Resolution P21-02 February 16, 2021 Page 6 of 7 not involve any new significant impacts, does not involve a substantial increase in the severity of any environmental impacts, does not require substantial revisions to the SCEA, and does not add significant new information. None of the information presented to the City after circulation of the Draft SCEA has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment on a substantial environmental impact of the Project or a feasible mitigation measure that the City has declined to implement. SECTION 5. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council review and consider the Draft Final SCEA (SCH No. 2020120433), and hereby determines that it is adequate and in compliance with CEQA. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council hereby certify the Draft Final SCEA and associated documents, and adopt the MMRP. SECTION 6. By the adoption of this Resolution, the Planning Commission has not granted any approval or entitlement on this project. SECTION 7. The Planning Commission Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and certify this record to be a full, complete, and correct copy of the action taken. Master Case 20-045 Resolution P21-02 February 16, 2021 Page 7 of 7 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16"' day of February, 2021. CHAIRPERSON PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: o� RACHELARK,) SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Rachel Clark, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 16"' day of February, 2021 by the following vote of the Planning Commission: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: ) .p�� 1 ��°1�f NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING CQMiV ISSION SECRETARY RESOLUTION NO. P21-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE MASTER CASE NO. 20-045 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20-001, ZONE CHANGE 20- 001, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 83087, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 20-005, AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 20-007) AND APPROVE THE METROWALK SPECIFIC PLAN DOCUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE METROWALK SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. The Planning Commission does hereby make the following findings of fact, and recommends that the City Council make the following findings of fact: a. An application for Master Case 20-045, the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, was filed by the project applicant, Blumax Santa Clarita, LLC (the "applicant"), with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on April 3, 2020. The entitlement requests (collectively "Entitlements") include: General Plan Amendment 20-001 to amend the General Plan Land Use Map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as Specific Plan (SP). ii. Zone Change 20-001 to amend the zoning map in order to designate the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site as SP. iii. Tentative Tract Map 83087 to subdivide the 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project site into six lots. In addition, lots designated for multi -family housing may be further subdivided for condominium purposes. iv. Development Review 20-005 to allow for the construction of a multi -family residential development in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, the MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. V. Architectural Design Review 20-007 for the review of the project architecture is in compliance with the applicable provisions of the UDC, the General Plan, MetroWalk Specific Plan, and other applicable requirements. b. The approximately 20.4-acre MetroWalk Specific Plan Project (Project) site is located at the southeast corner of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive, a private street, and is located within the Business Park (BP) zone and General Plan land use designation. The eastern most Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 2 of 11 portion of the site is within the Santa Clara River Significant Ecological Area (SEA) designated by Los Angeles County and included in the City's SEA Overlay Zone. On June 14, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-61, adopting the General Plan of the City of Santa Clarita, and Resolution No. 11-62 certifying the Environmental Impact Report. The City's General Plan presently designates the project site BP. Approximately 5.3 acres on the eastern portion of the project site are located within the SEA Overlay Zone. d. The current BP land use and zoning designation does not permit the development of multi- family residential units. Therefore, the applicant is seeking a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow for the establishment of the MetroWalk Specific Plan. e. Surrounding land uses include primarily multi -family residential development. The Colony Townhomes, a multi -family residential community, is directly west of the project site. The Fair Oaks Ranch Community, which is comprised of multi -family and single-family residential uses, is located to the south and west of the project site. The existing Metrolink rail line is immediately south of the project site. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan area is located north and east of the project site, with multi -family apartments Linder construction immediately north of the project site. The future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with a seven -bay bus transfer station and Metrolinkc rail station is located just east of the project site. f. The project site is an approximately 20.4-acre site located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Lost Canyon Road and Harriman Drive (a private street). The project includes the development of 498 residential units within four planning areas as follows: Planning Area 1 Planning Area 1 (PA-1) is located on the western portion of the project site. This area consists of two apartment buildings, each four -stories in height with 179 market -rate apartments and associated residential amenities and parking. Planning Area 2 Planning Area 2 (PA-2) is located centrally on the project site and consists of one, four- story apartment building with 119 market -rate, senior (age 55 and older) apartments and associated residential amenities and parking. Planning Area 3 Planning Area 3 (PA-3) is located along the southerly portion of the project site and. consists of one, four-story apartment building including 49 deed -restricted, affordable apartments for low income (65% area median income) seniors, and associated residential amenities and parking. PlanningArea rea 4 Planning Area 4 (PA-4) is located on the eastern portion of the project site. This area consists of 150 for -sale twnhomes, associated residential amenities, parking, and a 0.93- acre community park that is accessible to the public. Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 3 of 11 g. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA;" Pub. Resources Code, §21000 et seq.), the City of Santa Clarita is the lead agency and the City Council is the decision -making body for the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project. The City's Planning Commission is a recommending body for the project. h. The City determined that a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) must be prepared for the Project. The City determined that the following areas must be addressed in the SCEA for the Project: aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, mineral and energy resources, noise, population and housing, parks and recreation, fire protection, police protection, schools, library services, traffic and circulation, solid waste, tribal resources, wastewater and water supply, wildfire. The City prepared a Draft SCEA for the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project. The Draft SCEA was circulated for review and comment by affected governmental agencies and the public, in compliance with CEQA. Specifically, the Notice of Availability (NOA) for the Draft SCEA was filed, posted and advertised on December 22, 2020, and the 30-day public review period ended on January 21, 2021, 5:00 p.m. in accordance with CEQA. Comments received on the Draft SCEA have been fully responded to and those comments received after the Planning Commission's review of the Project will be fully responded to prior to certification and approval of the project by the City Council, if granted. j. The MetroWalk Specific Plan Project was duly noticed in accordance with the noticing requirements for each of the .Entitlements. The project was advertised in The Signal, through on -site posting 14 days prior to the hearing, and by direct first-class mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the Project site. SECTION 2. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 20-045. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find, as follows: a. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The MetroWalk Specific Plan Project is consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan of the City of Santa Clarita. More specifically, the project is consistent with the following portions of the General Plan: Urban Form Goal LU1: An interconnected Valley of Villages providing diverse lifestyles, surrounded by a greenbelt of natural open space. Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 4 of 11 The MetroWalk Specific Plan Project is consistent with Goal LU1 as a project that proposes to develop a multi -family project in a transit -oriented and urban portion of the City. The City's General Plan identified properties in the City that were either underutilized, or appropriately situated for mixed use development to concentrate orderly development in an urban environment, while preserving natural open spaces. The project site is located immediately adjacent to the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area which has development potential of up to 1,100 residential units and 950,000 square feet of commercial floor area, and proximate to the future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with local and regional public transit opportunities. It is largely surrounded by existing residentially developed land. The site is currently vacant, previously disturbed by agricultural activities and has little remaining vegetation. Development of the site will allow for a residential project consistent with the surrounding properties, providing a variety housing types. Further, developing the disturbed site will further preserve rural portions of the City and Santa Clarita Valley, concentrating uses in the urbanized area supported by necessary infrastructure. Mixed Land Uses Goal LU2: A mix of land uses to accommodate growth, supported by adequate resources and maintaining community assets. The Project includes 498 residential units in a range of housing types including for rent apartment units, townhomes for sale, as well as senior apartments, and deed -restricted affordable senior apartments to provide a variety of living options for existing and future residents of the City. The project site is within walking distance of the future Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with public bus and rail transit opportunities. In addition, the site is located adjacent to the Town Center planning area of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan, which will offer commercial and retail services within walking distance of the planned residential development. The pedestrian connectivity to public transit and commercial services will reduce vehicle trips to other portions of the City. Healthy Neighborhoods Goal LU3: Healthy and Safe Neighborhoods for all residents. As previously discussed, the Project will provide a mix of residential housing types to serve the diverse housing needs of the existing and future City residents. The project incorporates a network of pedestrian paths and a community park, providing a walkable and safe pedestrian environment, creating connections to public transportation options and commercial services, encouraging healthy lifestyle habits consistent with the General Plan. Mobility Goal LU5: Enhanced mobility through alternative transportation choices and land use patterns. The project locates higher density housing adjacent to the Multi -Modal Vista Canyon Center, which includes a seven -bay bus transfer station and future Vista Canyon Metrolink station. The project incorporates a network of pedestrian paths to provide connectivity to transit Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 5 of 11 opportunities and adjacent commercial service opportunities being developed as park of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan. Adequate Sites Goal H1: Provide adequate sites to accommodate the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation of new housing units between 2013 and 2021. The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the City is mandated by State Housing Law and used by local jurisdictions in land use planning to assist in determining how to address existing and future housing needs. The project site would provide 498 housing units, including age -restricted senior apartments and affordable senior apartments contributing to the City's RHNA targets for market -rate and affordable housing units. Assist in the Development of Affordable Housing Goal H2: Assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low, very low, low- and moderate -income households. The project provides 49 deed -restricted affordable senior apartments to be rented to low- income households at or below 65% of the Area Median Income. The project conditions require the applicant to enter into an Affordable Housing Regulatory Agreement governing and encumbering the project to ensure long-term affordability of the low-income senior apartments. Equal Housing Opportunities Goal H6: Promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status or disability. The project provides a variety of housing types including market -rate apartments, senior apartments, affordable senior apartments and for -sale townhomes. The mix of housing types serves to provide units for the diverse housing needs in the community. Multi -Modal Circulation Network Goal Cl: In interconnected network of circulation facilities that integrates all travel modes, provides viable alternatives to automotive use and confirms with regional plans. The project locates higher density housing adjacent to the Multi -Modal Center with local and regional public bus and rail transportation opportunities. This offers residents a convenient and viable alternative to automotive use. Pedestrian Circulation Goal C7: Walkable communities in which interconnected walkways provide a safe, comfortable and viable alternative to driving for local destinations. The project is designed with a network of pedestrian connections throughout the project site and to adjacent Vista Canyon Specific Plan trails and walkways. The pedestrian paths provide Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 6 of 11 linkages to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center and the planned Town Center area of Vista Canyon that will provide commercial services. b. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of this code; The MetroWalk Specific Plan Project requires the approval of entitlements consisting of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Development Review and Architectural Design Review in accordance with the City's UDC. Section 17.37.030 of the UDC establishes the Specific Plan zoning designation. Allowable uses, density, and development standards would be determined by the adopted Specific Plan. With approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change to SP, and the approval of the associated entitlements, the proposed project would follow the underlying zone and all other applicable provisions of the UDC. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and The MetroWalk Specific Plan Project has been evaluated in accordance with the UDC, as well as the City's General Plan. The project has been designed to be in keeping with the provisions of the UDC as well as the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The project has been designed to complement the surrounding development, specifically the Vista Canyon Specific Plan development immediately north and east of the project site. Pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent Vista Canyon development has been incorporated into the project to promote walkability by providing direct links to public transit and commercial services and reduce vehicle trips. Finally, the project has been designed to be consistent with all applicable requirements for law enforcement and emergency services for the project site. Therefore, the project will not impact the public health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity of the project site. d. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's physical suitabilityfor the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use; The project proposes the establishment of a Specific Plan which will determine the allowable uses, density and development standards for the project site. The project has been designed to be consistent and compatible with the adjacent Vista Canyon Specific Plan, specifically to provide linkages to the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center as well as to the existing and planned pedestrian trails through Vista Canyon Specific Plan area. With the Conditions of Approval, the project will be suitable for the site and the uses entitled with the project. Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 7 of 11 2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate; The project completed a detailed traffic analysis to evaluate the impacts of the project. The traffic analysis has identified signalization and other roadway improvements to ensure the public roadways are sufficiently improved to support the additional project traffic. The project Conditions of Approval require the applicable improvements prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 3. Public protection services (e.g., Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc.) are readily available; and The project site is located in an established, urban environment that is serviced by existing law enforcement and fire protection services. The applicant will pay applicable fees to the law enforcement and fire protection agencies to assist in offsetting any impacts to the services necessary to properly service the project. 4. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site. The project is in a portion of the City that is surrounded by developed communities with access to the necessary utilities to service the project site. The Specific Plan includes an infrastructure development plan to identify necessary on -site and off -site infrastructure improvements to connect to existing supply and support the future development. In addition, a hydraulic analysis was completed for the project determining that adequate water is available to meet the needs of the project site. SECTION 3. SPECIFIC FINDINGS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 20-001, Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find, as follows: a. Properties which benefit ftom increased density or intensity of development resulting from the General Plan Amendment shall fully mitigate their increased sewer impact at the time that development occurs on the properties. A sewer area study was prepared for the project and reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure there is adequate capacity for the project's increased sewer impact. The Specific Plan includes an infrastructure development plan which identifies the necessary extension of wastewater infrastructure to connect to the existing pipelines. Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 8 of 11 b. The proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with other elements of the City's General Plan pursuant to Government Code Section 65300.5; The proposed General Plan amendment is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of other elements of the City's General Plan and will maintain integrated, consistent and compatible policies. Specifically, the Land Use Element, Housing Element, and Circulation Element of the General Plan include goals, objectives, and policies that contemplate a development consistent with the proposed project whereby higher density housing is located in proximity to local and regional public transportation opportunities and commercial services in an effort to reduce vehicle trips. Pedestrian linkages are provided to promote a walkable and healthy lifestyle. A variety of housing types are provided to address housing needs of all segments of the community, including age -restricted units, affordable units, as well as apartment rentals and for -sale townhomes. SECTION 4. ZONE CHANGE FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 20-045. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find, as follows: A. Principles and Standards for Zone Changes. The Council shall approve a Zone Change only after the applicant substantiates all of the following required findings: 1. That modified conditions warrant a revision in the zoning map as it pertains to the area under consideration; The project site is located immediately south and west of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area. The Vista Canyon Specific Plan has a development potential of 1,100 residential units, 950,000 square feet of commercial floor area, and includes the Vista Canyon Multi -Modal Center with a seven -bay bus transfer station and future Metrolink rail station. While the project site was not included as part of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan area, its situation, east of Lost Canyon Road and north of the Metrolink rail line, is contiguous with Vista Canyon. As such, the project site warrants consideration of a revision to the zoning map as shown on The Zone Change Exhibit (Exhibit B). 2. That a need far the proposed zone classification exists within such area; The proposed change to the zone classification is necessary to allow for the development of the transit -oriented community where higher density housing will be located proximate to local and regional public transportation opportunities. The approval of the Vista Canyon Specific Plan in 2011 has changed the land use in the immediate vicinity, such that the current BP zoning designation on the project site is out of character with the surrounding land uses. Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 9 of 11 3. That the particular property under consideration is a proper location for said zone classification within such area: a. That placement of the proposed zone at such location will be in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare, and in conformity with good zoning practice; and The proposed Zone Change would permit the multi -family residential project that is consistent with the surrounding land uses and supports the goals and objectives of the General Plan as described above in Sections 3 and 4. As such, the proposed zone change is in conformance with good zoning practice. b. That the proposed change is consistent with the adopted General Plan for the area unless a General Plan Amendment is filed concurrently and approve with said zone change. A General Plan Amendment has been filed concurrently with the Zone Change request. For the reasons provided above, the Planning Commission can recommend the City Council make this finding. SECTION 5. SPECIFIC FINDINGS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 83087. Based on the above findings of fact and recitals and the entire record, including, without limitation, the entire MetroWalk Specific Plan Project SCEA, oral and written testimony and other evidence received at the public hearings, reports and other transmittals from City staff to the Planning Commission, and upon studies and investigations made by the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council find, as follows: a. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The project will not obstruct any public access as a result of the proposed subdivision. No public lands are identified on, or adjacent to the project site that currently require access through the project site. However, development of the proposed project will require certain easements, which are shown on the proposed Tentative Tract Map 83087 as follows: ® Landscape easement to the City of Santa Clarita, for the landscape maintenance on the slope east of Los Canyon Road, • Road easement to the City of Santa Clarita, for Lost Canyon Road, e Storm drain egress easement to the City of Santa Clarita, and • Road easement for Harriman Drive. Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 10 of 11 The on -site roadways necessary for the project will be installed and accessible for the future residents, and any law enforcement and emergency services. Therefore, the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project will not obstruct any public access with the subdivision of the site. SECTION 6. The Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council approve Master Case 20-045; General Plan Amendment 20-001, Zone Change 20-001, Tentative Tract Map 83087, Development Review 20-005, and Architectural Design Review 20-007, and approve the MetroWalk Specific Plan document for the development of the MetroWalk Specific Plan Project, in the City of Santa Clarita, subject to the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). SECTION 7. The Planning Commission Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and certify this record to be a full, complete, and correct copy of the action taken. Master Case 20-045 Resolution No. P21-03 February 16, 2021 Page 11 of 11 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 16th day of February, 2021. CHAIRPERSON PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: RACHEL CL R J S " RETARY PLANNING COMNiI�S ION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Rachel Clark, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 16"' of February, 2021, by the following vote of the Planning Commission: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: m ..,� *� ( NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 aw' PLANNING OMM ASSION SECRETARY SAMIPLANNING DIVISION\CURB) N1-\!2020\MC20-045 (Metrowalk Specific Plan)\4. PC\PC Resolution\20-045 Project Reso.docx