HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-11-26 - AGENDA REPORTS - AMEND EASTSIDE B&TDIST FEEO
Agenda Item: 1
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Li
'
DATE: November 26, 2024
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
PRESENTER: Ian Pari
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing to amend the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District.
2. Providing there is less than 50 percent written protest from the represented area of benefit,
adopt a resolution amending the adopted Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District, and instruct the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the adopted
resolution with the County Recorder.
BACKGROUND
The Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District (District) is a joint district covering
portions of the City of Santa Clarita (City) and Los Angeles County (County). The District was
last amended in March 2002. Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Districts are used to fund and
construct improvements that benefit new development within the District boundaries, including
new and improved roadways, bridges, intersections, and interchanges, as identified in the local
agency's adopted Circulation Element of its General Plan. On April 26, 2011, the City Council
adopted Resolution 11-23, which approved the Vista Canyon project (Master Case 07-127)
including the final Conditions of Approval, which required the developer to amend the District to
include Lost Canyon Road and the Vista Canyon Boulevard Bridge.
Updating the District will provide an equitable financing mechanism by which new development
within an identified area will pay their proportionate share of the costs of providing full -
mitigation transportation improvements serving the District. This type of funding district
imposes a fee in proportion to the estimated number of vehicle trips generated by the new
Page 1
Packet Pg. 12
O
development. Transportation infrastructure improvements within the District are also funded
through various grant sources.
The proposed District update addresses improvements that have been made since the District was
updated in 2002, in alignment with the City's Circulation Element and the construction of the
Vista Canyon Bridge, as follows:
• Added the completion of the Golden Valley Road extension and widening (except
sidewalk and street lights) and Skyline Ranch Road, Via Princessa improvements,
Soledad Canyon Road street lights, Sierra Highway street lights and improvements, Sand
Canyon Road widening, and numerous intersection upgrades;
• Removed planned improvements for Vasquez Canyon Road, Davenport Road, and
Placerita Canyon Road, and improvements for Shadow Pines Boulevard have been
reduced to two lanes, reflecting revised City and County highway plans;
• Adjusted names of street segments: replacing the Whites Canyon Road extension with
Skyline Ranch Road and replacing portions of Lost Canyon Road with Vista Canyon
Boulevard and Humphreys Parkway; and
• Added Vista Canyon Boulevard, including the Vista Canyon Bridge, and Humphreys
Parkway improvements.
The proposed amendments are necessary to update the District so that sufficient funds in the
amount of $228.9 million will be collected to construct the portion of the highway system
improvements that benefit development within the District boundaries, as identified in the
Circulation Element of the City's and County's General Plans.
Based on transportation needs in the Santa Clarita Valley and limitations of other funding
sources, staff has determined this funding method to be the best alternative to provide needed
transportation -related improvements that benefit new development.
Analysis of the District demonstrated that a fee increase is required to fully fund the necessary
transportation improvements. The proposed District fee is $23,980 per factored development unit
(FDU), which represents an increase of $2,450 per FDU as compared to the current fee.
Proposed fees for various land use types are shown in the table below.
Land Use Category
Current District Fee
Proposed District Fee
Residential:
Single Family (per unit)
$21,530
$23,980
Townhouse/Condo (per unit)
$17,224
$19,190
Apartment (per unit)
$15,071
$16,790
Non -Residential:
Commercial (per gross acre)
$107,650
$119,900
Industrial (per gross acre)
$64,590
$71,940
In addition to the above proposed rates, a rate sheet for non -typical land uses including, but not
limited to, churches, daycare/preschools, self -storage, accessory dwelling units, mobile homes,
housing development within a transit priority area, and senior housing has been developed.
Traffic impacts for each category were used to develop these rates.
Page 2
Packet Pg. 13
O
Currently, the fee is adjusted on July 1 of each year, based on the increase in the Los Angeles
Construction Cost Index (CCI), not to exceed two percent. The CCI indicates that since 2002,
construction costs in the Los Angeles region have increased by an average of 3.6 percent per
year. Therefore, the revisions to the District report will allow for a yearly increase or decrease of
up to five percent in the fee rate, based on the CCI. This revision should allow the fee to better
adapt to fluctuations in construction costs over the current cap of two percent.
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors (Board) is scheduled to consider this item in early
2025. The Board's adoption of the District's fee amendments would make the County fee
consistent with the fees being proposed by the City. The new fee schedule would go into effect
90 days after the Board's adoption.
It has been determined that a district fee revision does not constitute a "project" as defined in
California Environmental Quality Act guideline 15378(b)(4), in that the district fee establishment
is a financing mechanism which does not in itself create any impact on the environment to be
mitigated.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adopting the proposed fee amendments will provide the funding necessary to construct
transportation improvements needed to accommodate traffic generated by new development.
Should the City not adopt the proposed amendments to the District and continue to collect the
current fee, there will be insufficient funds to fully improve major roadways in the Eastside
District in accordance with the City's Circulation Element and General Plan.
ATTACHMENTS
Public Hearing Notice
Resolution
Eastside B&T District Update Report (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Page 3
Packet Pg. 14
1.a
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE
EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTURCTION FEE DISTRICT
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
A public hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita to consider the
proposed amendments to the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District
(District). The proposed amendments are necessary to update the District so that sufficient funds
will be collected to construct all of the highway system improvements identified in the
Circulation Element of the City and County General Plans.
Since the City approved the previous amendments to the Eastside District in March 2002, the fee
report has been revised. The proposed fee rate is $23,980 per Factored Development Unit (FDU),
an increase of $2,450 per FDU. The establishment of the District, located in the City of Santa
Clarita and the unincorporated area of Los Angeles County, sets a fee to be levied against future
subdivision and building permit activity for purposes of constructing bridge and highway
improvements. Existing developments are not subject to the fee. The District generally includes
Canyon Country, Fair Oaks Ranch, Friendly Valley, Sand Canyon, Vista Canyon, Mint Canyon,
and Vasquez Canyon areas of the Santa Clarita Valley.
It has been determined that the district fee revision does not constitute a "project" as defined in
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guideline 15378(b)(4), in that the district fee
establishment is a financing mechanism which does not in itself create any impact on the
environment to be mitigated.
The public hearing will be held by the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers, 23920
Valencia Boulevard, First Floor, on the 26th day of November 2024, at 6:00 p.m.
Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may be heard on this matter at this time.
Further information may be obtained by contacting the Public Works Department, 23920
Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, CA 91355; (661) 286-1402, Ian Pari, Senior Traffic Engineer
If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Dated: November 12, 2024
Mary Cusick, MMC
City Clerk
Published: The Signal, November 16, 2024 and November 21, 2024
Packet Pg. 15
1.b
RESOLUTION NO. 24-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita is authorized to enact and impose fees as a
condition of approval of new development to defray the fairly allocated actual or estimated costs
of constructing bridges and major thoroughfares, as set forth in Government Code Section 66484
and Santa Clarita Municipal Code Section 17.51.010(D); and
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2002, the City Council adopted the Eastside Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District (Eastside District) which establishes the amount of
"District Fees" that are required to be paid by new development within the "District
Boundaries"; and
WHEREAS, the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District was developed to
provide an equitable financing mechanism for the new development to pay a fee based on the
fairly allocated costs of providing the necessary roadway improvements that benefit new
development. This type of funding district imposes a fee in proportion to the estimated number
of vehicle trips generated by the new development; and
WHEREAS, the fees currently collected are not sufficient to construct the portion of
highway improvements identified in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan as
providing a benefit to new development within the District Boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the City directed the preparation of the Eastside Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Update Report, dated November 2024 (Eastside District
Update Report) incorporated herein by reference, to document the costs to fully improve those
major roadways identified in the City's and County's Circulation Elements that provide a benefit
to new development within the District Boundaries, including bridges, intersections, and
interchanges; and
WHEREAS, the total estimated cost for Eastside District improvements as identified in
the Eastside District Update Report is $228,897,247; and
WHEREAS, Eastside District Update Report documents the basis for including an annual
adjustment "inflation factor" to keep pace with fluctuations in construction costs based on the
Los Angeles Regional Construction Cost Index, subject to a 5 percent cap of any annual increase
or decrease; and
WHEREAS, proceedings have been instituted for these improvements under Section
17.51.010(D), Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fees, of the Zoning Code of the City of Santa
Clarita, California; and
Page 1 of 6
Packet Pg. 16
1.b
WHEREAS, the Eastside District Update Report by the City Engineer identifies the
boundaries of the District, the improvements to be built, the estimated costs, the method of
apportioning costs to the area of benefit, and other applicable information. The Eastside District
Update Report has been filed with the City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita; and
WHEREAS, the formation of the Eastside District was a joint effort between the City of
Santa Clarita and the County of Los Angeles; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the property included within the Eastside District boundaries is
within the City of Santa Clarita and a portion is within the unincorporated area of the County of
Los Angeles; and
WHEREAS, the formation of the Eastside District required mutual consent of the
governing boards of the City and County; and
WHEREAS, the Eastside District Update Report has been presented to and duly
considered by the City Council on the 26th day of November 2024; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the establishment of the District Fee pursuant to
this resolution does not constitute a "project" as defined in the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) guideline 15378(b)(4), in that the District Fee establishment is a financing
mechanism that does not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a
potentially significant impact on the environment; and
WHEREAS, there is an identified need for the additional improvements identified in the
Eastside District Update Report to serve the circulation needs of new development expected in
the area of benefit; and
WHEREAS, the improvements, including roads and bridges listed in the Eastside District
Update Report are identified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan of the City of Santa
Clarita; and
WHEREAS, any future subdivision within the Eastside District will benefit from these
improvements; and
WHEREAS, the fees authorized by this resolution, as identified on Exhibit "A," are
based on estimated impacts per unit of development for residential land uses and estimated
impacts per gross acreage of development for nonresidential land uses, and they are not based on
square footage of each unit. The square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the
District Fees for the reasons summarized in the Eastside District Update Report. The fees are
calculated for each land use category based on the proportionate impact of the estimated peak -
hour vehicle trips on the system as identified in the Los Angeles County Circulation Plan and the
City of Santa Clarita Circulation Element. Therefore, the District Update Report documents the
reasonable relationship between the Eastside District fees charged, and the proportionate burden
imposed by each land use category of new development on the improvements to be funded as a
part of the Eastside District. The reasonable relationship is based on the estimated number of
Page 2 of 6
Packet Pg. 17
1.b
vehicle trips generated by each land use category as summarized on Exhibit "A" of the District
Update Report. The traffic model used as the basis for the City and County's circulation
elements for this area does not factor in residential square footage to determine peak hour trips,
but instead estimates trips on the type of residential unit and the land use category of
nonresidential development. Since Government Code Section 66484 authorizes the City and
County to impose the District Fees as a condition of approval of a final map, the agencies will
not have adequate information at that stage to determine the square footage of proposed
residential units; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act has been
held on November 26, 2024, requesting written and oral comments; and
WHEREAS, such comments did not constitute a majority protest of landowners in the
area of benefit, as defined by Government Code Section 66484(c).
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. For the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District
(Eastside District), the City Council hereby approves the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report, dated November 2024 (Eastside District Update Report)
and its documentation of: (a) the boundaries of the area of benefit, particularly as identified on
Figure 1 and Attachment A; (b) the description and costs of the improvements to be funded by
Eastside District fees; and (c) the method of fee apportionment to fairly allocate costs to new
development within the area of benefit of the Eastside District.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves the fees for the Eastside District as set
forth on Exhibit "A." The City Manager (including a duly authorized designee) shall calculate
and impose the fees on new development within the Eastside District area of benefit in
accordance with the parameters set forth in the Eastside District Update Report, subject to the
requirements of state law including Government Code Section 66484, and subject to Santa
Clarita Municipal Code Section 17.51.010(D). In particular, the City Manager will, in
accordance with the parameters identified in the Eastside District Update Report: (a) make a
written determination of the amount and effective date of any annual adjustment to fee amounts
based on the Construction Cost Index; (b) make a written determination that a project is
authorized to construct improvements in lieu of paying fees or receive a credit award or cash
reimbursement (per Eastside District Update Report sections IV(G) and IV(H)); and (c) make a
written determination of the fee amount owed for any development project that is a "Special
Case", as identified in the Eastside District Update Report (section IV(F)). If the City Manager
determines that a particular development project is a "Special Case" and does not fit into one of
the land use categories set forth on Exhibit "A," a special fee calculation will be performed to
ensure the fee amount is reasonably related to the impacts of any project. Development projects
that include accessory dwelling units (under Government Code Section 66324), or housing
development within a transit priority area or within one-half mile of a convenience retail store
(under Government Code Section 66005.1), will be considered non -typical "Special Case" land
Page 3 of 6
Packet Pg. 18
1.b
uses due to a lesser impact on the transportation systems funded by the District Fee, and those
uses will be the subject of a special fee calculation.
SECTION 3. Revenue received by the City pursuant to this resolution will be used solely
for the purposes identified in the Eastside District Update Report, to fund the designated
improvements.
SECTION 4. That the Eastside District was formed with the mutual consent of the City of
Santa Clarita and the County of Los Angeles, and thereby will become effective only upon
approval by the governing boards of each political entity.
SECTION 5. That the Eastside District was formed in conformance with Section
17.51.010(D) of the Zoning Code of the City of Santa Clarita and Government Code Section
66484 of the State Subdivision Map Act.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this
resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council's adoption of
this resolution.
SECTION 7. That the proposed fee rates will become effective 90 days after approval
from both governing bodies of the City of Santa Clarita and County of Los Angeles.
SECTION 8. That the City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita is hereby directed to record
the adopted Resolution with the County Recorder.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this th day of 2024.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
MAYOR
Page 4 of 6
Packet Pg. 19
1.b
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 24- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita
at a regular meeting thereof, held on the th day of 2024, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
Page 5 of 6
Packet Pg. 20
1.b
EXHIBIT "A"
SUMMARY OF CURRENT AND PROPOSED FEES FOR EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
Land Use Category
Factor
Current Fee
Proposed Fee
Residential:
Single Family (per unit)
1.0 per unit
$21,530
$23,980
Townhome/Condo (per unit)
0.8 per unit
$17,224
$19,190
Apartment (per unit)
0.7 per unit
$15,071
$16,790
Non -Residential:
Commercial (per gross acre)
5.0 per acre
$107,650
$119,900
Industrial (per gross acre)
3.0 per acre
$64,590
$71,940
Page 6 of 6
Packet Pg. 21
EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT UPDATE REPORT
Prepared for:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
900 South Fremont Ave. Alhambra, CA 91803-1331
F1ii1
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
23920 Valencia Blvd
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
November 2024
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................................1
A.
NEED FOR DISTRICT UPDATE................................................................................................................ 1
B.
UPDATED DISTRICT FEE RATES............................................................................................................. 2
II.
THE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT ............................................ 5
A.
AUTHORITY...........................................................................................................................................
5
B.
PURPOSE...............................................................................................................................................5
C.
CONCEPT...............................................................................................................................................6
III.
EASTSIDE AREAACCESS......................................................................................................................... 6
A.
BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................................6
B.
EXISTING CIRCULATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS................................................................. 7
IV.
THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT .......................
22
A.
THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY...................................................................................................................
22
B.
DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................
22
C.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS.......................................................................
23
D.
IMPROVEMENT PHASING...................................................................................................................
24
E.
TRAFFIC AND LAND USE ANALYSIS.....................................................................................................
24
F.
THE DISTRICT FEE................................................................................................................................25
G.
CONSTRUCTION OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS IN LIEU OF PAYING FEES ..........................................
29
H.
CREDIT AWARD AND CASH REIMBURSEMENT...................................................................................
30
1.
RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION.............................................................................................................31
J.
PROVISIONS FOR UPDATING COSTS AND UNIT INFORMATION.........................................................
31
K.
PROPOSAL FOR DISTRICT CLOSURE....................................................................................................
32
L.
DISTRICT FUNDS..................................................................................................................................
32
M.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS........................................................................................................33
TOC-1
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Eastside Bridge and Thoroughfare District Existing and Proposed Developments ............. 4
Figure 2: Proposed Links and Bridges.............................................................................................. 20
Figure 3: Proposed Intersections..................................................................................................... 21
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Proposed District Fee............................................................................................................ 3
Table 2: List of Improvements............................................................................................................ 8
Table 3: Development Analysis........................................................................................................ 23
Table 4: Soft Cost Percentages......................................................................................................... 24
Table 5: District Fee Calculation....................................................................................................... 25
Table 6: Development Analysis of Filed Maps.................................................................................. 45
Table 7: Development Analysis of Vacant Land by Assessor Parcel Number .................................. 48
Table 8: Summary of Development Analysis.................................................................................... 59
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENTA: LEGAL DESCRIPTION............................................................................................. 34
ATTACHMENT B: SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATES FOR DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS ....................... 41
ATTACH MENT C: DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS.....................................................................................45
ATTACHMENT D: COUNTY AND CITY CODES PERTAINING TO B&T DISTRICTS ................................ 60
ATTACHMENT E: REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS................................................................................. 67
ATTACHMENT F: B&T CASH/CREDIT REQUEST FORM...................................................................... 69
TOC-2
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
I. SUMMARY
The Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Report presents
to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the City of Santa Clarita City Council
an update for their approval to an existing area of benefit for financing specific
improvements in the Eastside area of the Santa Clarita Valley, within the County Los
Angeles and City of Santa Clarita jurisdictions. Improvements include, but are not limited
to, new and improved roadways, bridges, intersections, and interchanges.
Updating the Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District,
hereinafter referred to as "District", will provide an equitable financing mechanism by
which new development within an identified area will share the costs of providing
full mitigation improvements.
State Subdivision Law and both the Los Angeles County and City of Santa Clarita Codes
authorize the use of bridge and major thoroughfare construction fee districts for the
funding and construction of improvements, provided these facilities are identified on the
local agency's adopted transportation element of its General Plan. Based on the
transportation needs in this area of the Santa Clarita Valley, and the limitations of
other funding sources, this funding method has been determined to be the best
alternative to provide needed improvements.
This report describes the concept and mechanics of the District. Information included in
this report will enable subject property owners to determine the fee to be assessed
against their property if and when it is developed. A map of the District including
proposed and existing developments is included as Figure 1.
A. NEED FOR DISTRICT UPDATE
Some major highway infrastructure improvements have been completed in the Eastside
District since it was last updated in 2002. Some of these improvements include:
completion of the Golden Valley Road extension and widening (except sidewalk and street
lights), Via Princessa improvements, Soledad Canyon Road street lights, Sierra Highway
streetlights and improvement, Sand Canyon Road widening, Skyline Ranch Road, and
numerous intersection upgrades. District improvements for Vasquez Canyon Road,
Davenport Road, and Placerita Canyon Road have been removed, and improvements for
Shadow Pines Boulevard have been reduced to two lanes as these highways have been
removed or revised in the City and County highway plans. Skyline Ranch Road, Vista
Canyon Boulevard, and Humphreys Parkway are new roadway improvements for the
District, and have been partially constructed. Skyline Ranch Road replaces the extension
of Whites Canyon Road, and Vista Canyon Boulevard and Humphreys Parkway now
replace portions of Lost Canyon Road. Skyline Ranch Road has been completed.
1
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
The major improvements that still remain to be completed in the district are: District -
wide bus turnouts, portions of Vista Canyon Boulevard and Humphreys Parkway, Golden
Valley Road sidewalk and streetlights, Via Princessa extension and widening, Soledad
Canyon Road median, Santa Clarita Parkway, Sand Canyon Road widening, Lost Canyon
Road, plus numerous intersection upgrades.
The District documentation is also being revised to allow for a yearly change ranging from
plus 5% to minus 5% in the fee rate based on the Construction Cost Index (Los Angeles
region as reported by the Engineering News Record). This should allow the fee to better
keep pace when there are fluctuations in construction costs. Previously, the District had
a built-in escalation clause that limits the yearly fee increase to a maximum of 2% based
on the local Construction Cost Index. However, over the years the construction cost
increase has exceeded 2% in several instances.
B. UPDATED DISTRICT FEE RATES
The remaining District improvements to roadways, bridges, and intersections total an
estimated $228.9 million. The Summary of Cost Estimates for District Improvements is
included as Attachment B. The scope of work has increased on some improvements, and
construction costs have gone up. Thus, the overall District estimate to complete the
improvements has not significantly since the last update. However, changes in the scope
of work for some of the projects have occurred as a result of changes in road
classifications due to County and City Circulation Element updates. In order for projects
to be adequately funded, the District fee needs to be updated to keep pace with the
significant changes in construction costs and project scope.
The cost of the remaining District improvements is less than the 2002 costs
(approximately $228.9 million versus $236.9 million) as many of the improvements that
were identified back then have been built.
To determine District build -out, a development analysis based on filed tentative maps and
the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan was performed. This analysis indicated that the amount
of remaining development is estimated at 7,972.7 factored development units (FDUs).
The remaining District developable area was analyzed for vacant land for which there is
no previously -recorded map. The Development Analysis is included as Attachment C. The
estimated FDUs are 56% of the factored developments units in the previously -updated
District (14,238 FDUs versus 7,972.7 FDUs).
Taking the potential funding and the cash in District into account, the proposed District
fee is proposed to be $23,980 per FDU. The analysis concludes that a District fee increase
would reflect the funding necessary to complete the remaining improvements in light of
2
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Undate Report
the construction costs versus the remaining development. The proposed District fees are
shown in Table 1.
Table 1: Proposed District Fee
Land Use Category
Factor
Proposed District Fee
per Unit or Gross Acre
Residential:
Single Family (per unit)
1.0 per unit
$23,980
Townhome/Condo (per
unit)
0.8 per unit
$19,190
Apartment (per unit)
0.7 per unit
$16,790
Non -Residential:
Commercial (per gross
acre)
5.0 per acre
$119,900
Industrial (per gross acre)
3.0 per acre
$71,940
SEE SHEET 2
LEGEND: 5000' 2500' 0 5000'
EASTSIDE DISTRICT BOUNDARY
OTHER DISTRICT FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY
CITY BOUNDARY NOT ALL ELEMENTS TO SCALE
WATER FEATURE FIGURE 1
vyvy APPROVED PROJECT DISTRICT MAP
PENDING PROJECT EASTSIDE B&T DISTRICT
VACANT (NO FILED MAP) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
RECORDED
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES
L O S A N G E L E S, 1 N C.
MAP DATA PROVIDED BY PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES PLANNING ENGINEERING •SURVEYING
26074 Avenue Hall, Suite #22 Valencia, CA 91355 DATE: 10/01/2024
G I S DIVISION (LA COUNTY & CITY OF SANTA CLAR I TA) Fx (661) 294.9890 PH: (661) 294•2211 SHEET 1 OF 2
EASTSIDE DISTRICT BOUNDARY
- - - -
OTHER DISTRICT
CITY BOUNDARY
0
WATER FEATURE
APPROVED PROJECT
PENDING PROJECT
VACANT (NO FILED MAP)
RECORDED/NOT BUILT (B&T FEES DEFERRED)
�j
RECORDED
MAP DATA PROVIDED BY PLANNING & BUILDING SERVICES
GIS DIVISION (LA COUNTY & CITY OF SANTA CLARITA)
SEE SHEET 1
5000' 2500' 0 5000'
FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY
NOT ALL ELEMENTS TO SCALE
FIGURE 1
DISTRICT MAP
EASTSIDE B&T DISTRICT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES
L O S A N G E L E S, 1 N C.
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
26074 Avenue Hall, Suite #22 Valencia, CA 91355
FX: (661) 294.9890 PH: (661) 294.2211
DATE: 0511312024
SHEET 2 OF
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
II. THE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
A. AUTHORITY
The State of California Government Code Section 66484, regarding Subdivisions, gives
local agencies the authority to adopt local ordinances that "may require the payment
of a fee as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building
permit for purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing bridges
over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, or constructing major thoroughfare."
The local adopted ordinance must refer to the circulation element of its General Plan,
provide for a public hearing, provide for the establishment of boundaries of an area of
benefit, and provide for the identification of the costs, a fair method of allocation of
costs to the area of benefit and a fair fee apportionment (to be disclosed at the
public hearing). Further, the local ordinance must provide that the payment of fees
shall not be required unless the major thoroughfares are in addition to or a
reconstruction of any existing thoroughfares serving the area at the time of district
adoption. It must further provide that if owners of more than one-half of the area of
property to be benefited by the improvement(s) file proper written protests, the
district proceedings as proposed shall be abandoned for at least one year. The local
ordinance allows acceptance of considerations in lieu of the payment of fees, permits
a local agency to advance money from its general fund or road fund to be reimbursed
from bridge and major thoroughfare funds, permits a local agency to incur an interest
bearing indebtedness for the construction of bridge or major thoroughfare facilities, and
does not preclude an agencyfrom providing funds for the construction of bridge or major
thoroughfare facilities to defray costs not allocated to the District.
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 82-0050 on March
2, 1982, adding Section 21.32.200 to the Los Angeles County Code, providing for the
establishment of bridge and major thoroughfare construction fees to be paid by
subdivider or building permit applicants (County Code Section 21.32.200 is included as
Attachment D). Within the City of Santa Clarita, payment of such fees was established
by City of Santa Clarita Subdivision Code Section 16.21.190 established on November 24,
1992 (now Section 17.51.010D). These codes are consistent with the requirements and
provisions of the State law.
B. PURPOSE
The District has been designed to accommodate the needs of future development
anticipated by the Los Angeles County Area Wide General Plan and the City of Santa
Clarita General Plan. Since the last District update, the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan
was updated and adopted by the Board of Supervisors on November 27, 2012, and
the City of Santa Clarita General Plan was adopted by the City Council on June 14,
2011. The District will provide local and regional benefits. Many of the District
5
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
improvements will be eligible for local, state and federal funding. The District intends to
pursue all potential sources of out -of- district funding for these improvements
including, but not limited to, State and Federal Gas Taxes, Propositions A and C Sales
Tax, Transportation Planning and Development Sales Tax on Gasoline, County
Transportation Tax, State Transportation Improvement Program funding, Federal
Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21s' Century funds, State and Federal Highway
Trust Funds, special grants, and other sources that may be available. The District will
provide the matching funds necessary to pursue greater funding from the
aforementioned sources.
C. CONCEPT
As authorized by statutes cited above, the adoption of a specific area of benefit permits
the County of Los Angeles and the City of Santa Clarita to levy a fee against future
development located within the area of benefit. This funding method appropriately
assesses developments, which create the need for additional improvements, for the
additional public facility costs. The charge is levied in proportion to the estimated
number of trips generated by the development which is translated into FDUs. FDUs are
described in more detail in "Development Analysis", Section IV. B, of this report.
The adoption of this type of funding district does not charge existing development. The
District fee is collected at the time of recordation of a final map or just prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
III. EASTSIDE AREA ACCESS
A. BACKGROUND
Historically, access to new development has been provided cooperatively by the County,
the City, and land developers. The County and City funded their share with Gas Tax
Funds. Land development was primarily concentrated in flatter areas, expanding away
from urban centers. Public facilities were constructed to accommodate this expansion.
Much of the development in recent years and that which is expected to occur in
the future is and will be in outlying areas where topography is more rugged and
restrictive. As a result, the cost of providing necessary public facilities, including
roadways will continue to increase.
0
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
B. EXISTING CIRCULATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The primary road network for the District consists of eleven arterials which are classified
as Major, Secondary, or Limited Secondary Highways on the Los Angeles County
Santa Clarita Valley Area Wide Circulation Plan and the City of Santa Clarita General Plan.
This report analyzes build -out development of the District and identifies the scope of
District improvements. The District proposes to provide full mitigation for many of the
roadways identified on the Los Angeles County and City of Santa Clarita Plans including
intersections and interchanges.
Full mitigation improvements will include full -width grading, base, pavement, curb,
gutter, sidewalks, medians, striping for capacity enhancement, bus turnouts or bus pads
(where applicable), bike lanes (where applicable), fully improved and signalized
intersections, signal interconnect (where applicable), street lighting, roadway -related
utility relocation, drainage structures within road right-of-way, full improvements for
bridges and interchanges, and slope stabilization landscape for roadway -related cut/fill
slopes.
Right-of-way is assumed to be dedicated by individual development projects, except for
State highway projects and roadway widening or roadway construction that are
unrelated to private development projects.
The City of Santa Clarita General Plan Circulation Element, dated June 2011, changed the
classification of some of the major thoroughfares in the District. Los Angeles County also
updated their Circulation Element in 2012 with the update of the Santa Clarita Valley
Area Plan. The road classification changes included:
1. Vasquez Canyon Road from Bouquet Canyon Road to Sierra Highway is reclassified
from secondary highwayto limited secondary highway. (Improvements are no longer
required)
2. Sand Canyon Road from City of Santa Clarita boundary to Sierra Highway, is
reclassified from a major highway to secondary highway along the existing alignment.
3. Shadow Pines Boulevard/Tick Canyon Road from Grandifloras Road to Davenport
Road is reclassified from secondary highway to a limited secondary highway.
4. Lost Canyon Road from Jakes Way to Sand Canyon Road is reclassified from a major
highway to a secondary highway, re -alignment, and a new bridge.
5. Skyline Ranch Road from Plum Canyon Road to Sierra Highway — Reclassify planned
major highway to a limited secondary highway (replaces previous alignment of
Whites Canyon Road).
7
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
6. Davenport Road was reclassified from a secondary highway to a limited secondary
highway. No further improvements are currently necessary for this highway.
7. Jakes Way was added as a limited secondary highway. No further improvements are
currently necessary for this highway.
8. Placerita Canyon Road was revised to a secondary highway from a limited secondary
highway. No roadway improvements are proposed for Placerita Canyon Road at this
time.
Below is a list of proposed District improvements. The proposed improvements consist
of links, bridges, and interchanges and are depicted in Figure 2. These Improvements
have been planned to accommodate forecasted traffic growth occurring both within the
District and cumulative traffic from outside the District. The extents of improvements
are described in Table 2 below, and the estimated costs are included in Attachment B.
Table 2: List of Improvements
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD
E-100
Via Princessa to south
Link Complete
side of SR-14 bridge
E-101
North side of SR-14
Link Complete
bridge to Green
Mountain Drive
E-102
Green Mountain Drive
Link Complete
o Sierra Highway
E-0103
Sierra Highway to
Construct sidewalk both sides
Via Princessa (City)
Street lights
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
E-0104
is Princessa to
Construct sidewalk one side and south of Sheriff's
Soledad/ Golden Valley
Station to Via Princessa (remaining sidewalk
Grade Separation
complete)
Street lights one side (complete one side)
E-105
Interchange at Soledad
Improvements complete
Canyon Road to
Northerly District
Boundary
WHITES CANYON ROAD
e-202
Westerly District
Link eliminated. Now Skyline Ranch Road (Link E-
Boundary to Vasquez
E-1400 and E-1401)
Canyon Road
VASQUEZ CANYON ROAD
E-0300
Westerly District
No Improvements Needed
E-0301
Boundary to Sierra Hwy
(County)
SANTA CLARITA PARKWAY
E-0402
Westerly District
Grading
Boundary to Sierra Hwy
6 Lane Street Construction
(City)
VIA PRINCESSA
E-0501
Santa Clarita Pkwy to
Grading
Golden Valley Road
6 Lane Street Construction
(City)
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
E-0502
Golden Valley Road to
Grading
Rainbow Glen Drive
6 Lane Street Construction (cost and scope of
(City)
improvements per PSRE)
E-0503
Rainbow Glen Drive to
Bus Turnouts
May Way (City)
Street Lights
Signing and striping from 4 to 6 lanes
Median Construction
E-0504
May Way to Whites
Signing and striping
Canyon Road(City)
Bus Turnouts
E-0505
Whites Canyon Road to
Signing and striping
Weyerhaeuser Way
Median
(City)
Bus turnouts
E-0506
Weyerhaeuser Way to
Bus Turnouts
Sierra Highway (City)
E-0507
Sierra Hwy to Antelope
Bus Turnouts
Valley Freeway (City)
E-0508
Antelope Valley
Median
Freeway to Golden
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Valley Road (City)
Bus Pads
SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD
E-0600
Westerly District
Bus Turnouts
Boundary to Ruether
Ave (City)
E-0601
Ruether Ave to
Bus Turnouts
Rainbow Glen Drive
(City)
E-0602
Rainbow Glen Drive to
Bus Turnouts
Langside Avenue (City)
10
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
E-0603
Langside Avenue to
Bus Turnouts
Camp Plenty Road
(City)
E-0604
Camp Plenty Road to
Bus Turnouts
Whites Canyon Road
E-0605
Whites Canyon Road to
Median
Crossglade Avenue
Bus Turnouts
(City)
E-0606
Crossglade Avenue to
Partial Median
Luther Drive (City)
Bus Turnouts
E-0607
Luther Drive to Shangri-
Bus Turnouts
la Drive (City)
E-0608
Shangri-la Drive to
Median
Sierra Hwy (City)
Bus Turnouts
E-0609
Sierra Hwy to Solemint
Bus Turnouts
Road (City)
E-0610
Solemint Road to
Median (approximately 700 feet)
Galeton Road (City)
Bus Turnouts
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
E-0611
Galeton Road to Anne
Bus Turnouts
Freda Street (City)
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
E-0612
Anne Freda Street to
Bus Turnouts
Kenroy Avenue (City)
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
E-0613
Kenroy Avenue to Sand
Bus Turnouts
Canyon Road (City)
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
E-0614
Sand Canyon Road to
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
SR-14 WB Ramps
(City)
11
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
SR-14 Westbound
Bus Turnouts
Ramps to Oak Spring
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
E-0615
Canyon Road (City)
E-0616
Oak Spring Canyon
Bus Turnouts
Road to Flowerpark
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Drive (City)
Flowerpark Drive to
Bus Turnouts
E-0617
Poppy Meadow Street
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
(City)
Poppy Meadow Street
Bus Turnouts
E-0618
to Shadow Pines
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Boulevard (City)
Shadow Pines
Bus Pads
E-0619
Boulevard to SR-14
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Ramps (County)
SR-14 Ramps to
Street Widening to 6 Lanes
E-0620
Easterly District
Grading
Boundary (County)
Signing and Striping
Bridge over Bee
Widen Bridge from 2 to 6 lanes
E-0620B
Canyon Creek (County)
SIERRA HIGHWAY
E-0700
Southerly District
Bus Turnouts
Boundary to Placerita
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Canyon Road (City)
E-0701
Placerita Canyon Road
Bus Turnouts
o Golden Valley Road
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
(City)
E-0702
Golden Valley Road to
Bus Turnouts
Rainbow Glen Drive
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
(City)
E-0703
Rainbow Glen Drive to
Bus Turnouts
Friendly Valley ParkwaySigning
and striping 4 to 6 lanes
(City)
12
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
E-0704
Friendly Valley Parkway
Bus Turnouts
o Whispering Leaves
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Drive (City)
E-0705
Whispering Leaves
Bus Turnouts
Drive to Via Princessa
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
(City)
E-0708
SR-14 off ramps to
Bus Turnouts
Canyon Park
Blvd./Jake's Way (City)
E-0709
Jakes Way to Sandy
Bus Turnouts
Drive (City)
E-0710
Sandy Drive to Soledad
Bus Turnouts
Canyon Road (City)
E-0711
Soledad Canyon Road
Median
o Scherzinger Lane
Bus Turnouts
(City)
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Interconnect
E-0712
Scherzinger Lane to
Median
Sierra Cross Road
Bus Turnouts
(City)
Signing and striping 4 to 6 lanes
Interconnect
E-0713
Sierra Cross Road to
Street Widening to 6 lanes
City Limit (City)
Median
Sidewalk- 2 Sides
Bus Turnouts
Signing and striping
Street Lights
Interconnect
Right-of-way acquisition
13
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
E-0714
City Limit to Sand
Street Widening to 6 lanes
Canyon Road (County)
Median
Sidewalk-2 Sides
Street Lights
Bus Pads
Signing and striping
Interconnect
E-0715
Sand Canyon Road to
Street Widening to 6 lanes
Vasquez Canyon Road
Median
(County)
Sidewalk- 2 sides
Street Lights
Bus Pads
Signing and striping
Interconnect
Right-of-way acquisition
E-715B
Sierra Highway Bridge
Due to the location of this bridge it has been
over creek
renamed E-716B and is included below.
E-0716
Vasquez Canyon Road
Street Widening to 6 lanes
o Davenport Road
Median
(County)
Sidewalk-2 sides
Street Lights
Bus Pads
Signing and striping
Interconnect
Right-of-way acquisition
E-0716B
Bridge Over Creek
Bridge Widening from 2 to 6 lanes
(County)
E-0717
Davenport Road to
Street Widening to 6 lanes
Northerly District
Median
Boundary (County)
Sidewalk-2 sides
Street Lights
Bus Pads
Signing and striping
Interconnect
14
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
DAVENPORT ROAD
E-0800-801
Sierra Highway to
No improvements necessary
Easterly District
Boundary (County)
SHADOW PINES BLVD
E-0900
Soledad Canyon Road
Interconnect
o Begonias Lane (City)
E-0901
Begonias Lane to
Sidewalk -two sides
Grandifloras Road
Curb and gutter (one side)
(City)
Street Lights (one side)
Interconnect
E-0902
Grandifloras Road to
Grading
Davenport Road
Construct 2-lane limited secondary highway
(County)
E-902B
Bridge over Creek
Construct Bridge — 2 lanes
(County)
SAND CANYON ROAD
E-1001
Soledad Canyon Road
Median
o SR-14 Eastbound
Signing and striping
Ramps (City)
Interconnect
E-1002
SR-14 Eastbound
Street Widening to 6 lanes
Ramps to Lost Canyon
Median
Road (City)
Sidewalk -two sides
Street Lights
Bus Turnouts
Signing and striping
Interconnect
E-1002B
Bridge over Santa
Widen Bridge
Clara River (City)
15
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
E-1003
Lost Canyon Road to
Street Widening to 2 lanes
Placerita Canyon Road
Construct storm drain
(City)
E-1003B
Bridge over Iron
Widen Bridge
Canyon Creek (City)
E-1004
Placerita Canyon Road
Street Widening to 2 lanes
o Easterly District
Boundary (City)
E-1005
Soledad Canyon Road
Roadway realignment
o City Limit (City)
Class I Bike Lane
Signing and striping
Retaining Wall
Bus Turnouts
2 Roundabouts
E-1006
City Limit to Sierra
4 Lane Street Construction (No Bike Lane)
Highway (County)
Grading
Right-of-way acquisition
LOST CANYON ROAD
E-1200
Canyon Park Boulevard
Replaced by Links E1203 and E-1204
o City Limit
E-1201
City Limit to Sand
Replaced by E-1500
Canyon Road (City)
E-1202
Sand Canyon Road to
Street widening to 2 lanes
Oak Spring Canyon
Signing and Striping
Road (City)
E-1203
Jakes way to Canyon
Signing and Striping
Park Blvd. (City)
16
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
HUMPHREYS PARKWAY (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS LOST CANYON ROAD)
E-1204
Jakes Way to Vista
4-Lane Street Construction
Canyon Blvd. (City)
(No Bike Lane) — Complete from Jakes Way tie in to
Lincoln Place
CANYON PARK BOULEVARD
E-1300
Railroad Tracks to
Complete
Lost Canyon Road
(County)
SKYLINE RANCH ROAD
E-1400
West District
Complete
Boundary to Sierra
Highway (County)
E-1400B
Skyline Ranch Road
Complete
Bridge over Mint
Canyon Creek
VISTA CANYON BLVD.
E-1500
Bridge to Soledad
Grading
Canyon Road (City)
2 Lane Street Construction
E-1500B
Vista Canyon Bridge
Bridge Construction
over Santa Clara
Bank Stabilization
River (City)
E-1501
Vista Canyon Bridge
Grading
south to transit
2 Lane Street Construction
station
PLACERITA CANYON ROAD
E-1601
Antelope Valley
No improvements proposed at this time.
Freeway to Easterly
County Line
(County)
17
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINKS
LINK#
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
E-1602
County Line to Sand
Canyon Road (City)
No improvements proposed at this time.
INTERSECTIONS
INTERSECTION #
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
EI-9
Sierra Highway and Soledad
Intersection augmentation for
Canyon Road
additional turn movements
EI-29
Sierra Highway and Sand
Intersection augmentation
Canyon Road (County)
Signal modification
Right-of-way acquisition
EI-31
Sierra Highway and
New 3-way signal
Davenport Road (County)
EI-33
Via Princessa and Golden
New 4-way signal
Valley Road (City)
EI-39
Davenport Road and Shadow
New 3-way signal
Pines Boulevard (County)
EI-42
Sand Canyon Road and
New 3-way signal
Placerita Canyon Road (City)
EI-49
Via Princessa and Lost
Intersection augmentation for
Canyon Road (City)
additional turn movements
EI-54
Lost Canyon Road and Jakes
Intersection augmentation
Way (City)
Roundabout
EI-55
Soledad Canyon Road and
Intersection augmentation
Sand Canyon Road (City)
Signal modification
In
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
INTERSECTIONS
INTERSECTION #
LOCATION
IMPROVEMENT
EI-56
Soledad Canyon Road and
Vista Canyon Blvd. (City)
Intersection augmentation
EI-57
Humphreys Parkway and
Vista Canyon Blvd. (City)
Construct roundabout
intersection
19
I I
E-717
I
DAVENPORT RD
E-800
E-801
VASQUEZ
CANYON RD
E�00
`— r
CITY O F I �o�
E-7168
SANTA CLARITA ��
PN
E-902
—
E-301 S��RP E-716
COPPER
I
HILL DR
SQ�y
/
COUNTY OF
— — /
LOS JNGELES f
E-902 Bridge
UM
E-715 I
r
CgNy
°NRD
Jr
I 1—''
E-902
I
�I
0000
H�F
EI714 E-1006 I
E-620 Bridge
E-901
°
�
I
w�
I�r --
I
lNj�7
E-900
SOLEDAD
E-619
E-620
0
CA�YONRp
CANYON RD E-618
E-1400
E-1005
E-713 E-1001 E-617
E-613 E-614 E-615 E-616
E-1400B
E-711
E-712 E-612
E-1002
I
E-601 E-602
E-608
�O
E-600 E-605
SOLEDAD
E-1500 E-611 - E-1202
59 o E-604
CANYON RD
E-609
E-610 E-1002 Bridge
0
E-104 ro E-603
HUMPHREYS PKWY
< E-606 E-607
z z E-503 E-710
0
Z E-1500
VISTA CYN BL
J� E-709
¢ Bridge
c
�SSP
E-504 E-505 E-708
OS� O E-1204 E-1501
0
E-502 VIA 506� E-1300
E-1203
�
E-1003
GOLD PRINCESSA
E-705 E-507
CANYON PARK BL
S E-704
vACCEYRD
CITY OF
E-501
E-702
E-103 E-703
E-508
SANTA CLARITA a I
o5
OLDEN JP��EI ROAD
—
v
E-1003 Bridge
E-701
o
i
E-402
-700 -
PLACERITA
CANYON RD E-1004
' COUNTY OF —?I
i
LOS ANGELES
I
I
I — LEGEND
• PROPOSED EASTSIDE LINKSAND BRIDGES
O COMPLETED EASTSIDE LINKS AND BRIDGES
M EASTSIDE B&T DISTRICT BOUNDARY
0 2,550 5,100 10,200 c _ CITY BOUNDARY
Feet FREEWAY FIGURE 2
FOR DISPLAY ONLY ROADS PROPOSED LINKS AND BRIDGES m
NOT ALL ELEMENTS TO SCALE EASTSIDE B&T DISTRICT
RAILROAD COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
fn
I
I
I
E I
EI-31 DAVRD
VASQUEZ
CANYON RD
CITY OF I
�°Q��
SANTA CLARITA
COPPER
I
HILL DR
SQ�y
Cg1v M
r EI-29
�aN yCRo
I
J I
J
_
ow 0 Cg�YN/TFS
o DNRO
c�
SOLEDAD
o CANYON R
m
<n
z
0
��P 5gP
.c� VIA
�OCDEN
SOLEDA@
CANVO
r\ VISTA
EI-54 CA CANYON BL YON BLHUMPHREYS n
PARKWAY N
LOST CANYON RD
CANYON PARK BL p
EI-49 i
I
CITY OF — -
- SANTA CLARITA
COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES
0 2,550 5,100 10,200
Feet
FOR DISPLAY ONLY
NOT ALL ELEMENTS TO SCALE
EI-42
PLACERITA
CANYON RC
LEGEND
® PROPOSED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
EASTSIDE B&T DISTRICT BOUNDARY
CITY BOUNDARY
FREEWAY
ROADS
RAILROAD
FIGURE 3
a
PROPOSED INTERSECTIONS
m
EASTSIDE B&T DISTRICT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES y
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
IV. THE EASTSIDE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE
DISTRICT
A. THE DISTRICT BOUNDARY
The legal description of the District (Area of Benefit) is included as Attachment A. It
encompasses those properties which have yet to be developed and which will receive
benefit from the improvements funded by the District. A map showing the location of
the District is included as Figure 1. The boundaries were determined by the
topographical features in the Eastside area, ownership/parcel lines, national forest land
boundaries, and existing and future access.
General Boundary Description
The District includes the existing Canyon Country community and lies generally within the
Friendly Valley, Mint Canyon, Sand Canyon, and Vasquez Canyon areas of the Santa Clarita
Valley. Generally, the District's northern, eastern, and southern boundary lines follow the
Angeles National Forest and private ownership boundary lines. The westerly District
boundary is shared with the Via Princessa and Bouquet Canyon Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Districts along a north -south ridgeline approximately through and northerly
of the intersection of Sierra Highway with Soledad Canyon Road and along the first and
second Los Angeles Aqueducts.
B. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
Considerable future development is expected within the District and can be measured in
terms of FDUs. The quantity of FDUs was estimated for all vacant land within the
District. Where a subdivision map has been filed, but not recorded, to develop
vacant land, the FDUs were calculated from the residential development units and non-
residential acreage specified in the filed map. Where no map has been filed, FDUs for
vacant land was estimated based on the General Plan designations for each vacant
parcel.
Table 3, Development Analysis, depicts the calculation of FDUs, including applicable land
use categories, estimated number of units/acres, and trip factors.
22
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Table 3: Development Analysis
LAND USE CATEGORY
Estimated Number of
Units/Acres
FACTOR
FDUs
Single Family
3,478.8
1.0
3,478.8
Condominium
554.0
0.8
443.2
Apartment
3,773.7
0.7
2,641.6
Total Residential
7,806.5
-
6,563.6
Commercial
247.4
5.0
1,236.8
Industrial
57.5
3.0
172.4
Total Non -Residential
304.8
-
1,416.1
TOTAL
7,972.7
C. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS
Improvements to be funded by the District are based on a determination of the traffic
needs of future development anticipated by the County and City General Plans, and
analysis of the improvements designated on the adopted City and County highway plans.
Improvements and associated costs have been estimated for purposes of determining
the District fee rates. Actual scope of work and costs may change as the improvements
approach the final design stage. The proposed improvements in the District are
estimated to cost approximately $228.9 million and are shown in Table 2.
The estimated costs of District improvements include construction costs based on
"prevailing wage", cost of materials, design costs and permitting fees (considered "soft
costs", shown in Table 4 below), and an administrative/management fee equal to 5% of
the wage, materials and soft costs.
23
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Table 4: Soft Cost Percentages
Storm
State
Hwys.
Description
Intersection
Road
Bridge
Drain
Road
Interchanges
Engineering-
9.5/o 0
6%
4%
7%
8%
7%
Design
Plan Check
3%
2.5%
2%
2%
3%
3%
Engineering-
3%
1%
2%
2%
7%
3%
Field
Survey
3%
3%
2%
2%
8%
2.5%
Soils
1%
1%
3%
2%
7%
1%
Geology
0%
0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0%
Bonds/Fees
1%
8%
8%
5.5%
10%
1%
Erosion
Control
0.5%
0%
0.5%
0%
0.5%
0.5%
(SWPPP)
Army Corps
Wildlife Env.
0%
3%
3%
4%
3%
3%
Inspections
TOTAL:
21.0%
24.5%
25.0%
25.0%
47.0%
21.0%
Several interchanges have been identified as "regional" improvements that will be
impacted by the developments in each of the Districts. Therefore, each District being
updated at this time will pay a portion of each regional improvement based on the
respective District's percent share of projected vehicle trips that encounter the
improvement.
Regional improvements, along with a description, percent share according to District,
total estimated cost, and estimated cost to the District, are included in Attachment E.
D. IMPROVEMENT PHASING
Generally, the timing and phasing of construction of District improvements will be
determined by when and where development occurs, as well as how many units. The
amount of funds received may also determine the timing of improvements.
E. TRAFFIC AND LAND USE ANALYSIS
The existing highway system generally handles the traffic generated by existing
development located within the District. As such, existing development would not
require the additional highway improvements if additional development did not occur.
Therefore, the improvements identified in this report are intended to accommodate the
24
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
circulation needs of future development within the District and are expected to improve
circulation for future development within the District. Regional improvements within, or
funded by, this District are expected to improve circulation for future development on a
Valley -wide basis.
It is estimated that an additional 7,972.7 residential units and 304.8 acres of non-
residential area will be developed within the District. The anticipated development
quantified in the Development Analysis section and categorized above will require an
expanded circulation system.
F. THE DISTRICT FEE
The District fee is calculated by dividing the estimated net cost of the remaining
improvements by the estimated number of FDUS. The net cost is the total estimated
cost of improvements less anticipated grant funding and funds available. The calculated
District fee is shown below:
Table 5: District Fee Calculation
DISTRICT FEE CALCULATION
A
LINKS
$205,162,224
B
INTERSECTIONS
$7,772,799
C
INTERCHANGES
$ -
D
REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS - DISTRICT'S SHARE OF
COSTS (ATTACHMENT E)
$15,962,224
E
TOTAL DISTRICT COSTS (ROW A+B+C+D)
$228,897,247
F
EXISTING FUNDS IN DISTRICT - LA COUNTY
$11,259,953
G
EXISTING CREDITS IN DISTRICT - LA COUNTY
$4,727,023
H
EXISTING FUNDS IN DISTRICT - SANTA CLARITA
$649,521
1
EXISTING CREDITS IN DISTRICT - SANTA CLARITA
$11,927,890
J
APPROXIMATE GRANT FUNDING
$42,491,219
TOTAL NET COST OF DISTRICT (ROW E-F+G-H+I-J)
$191,151,467
TOTAL FDUS
7,972.7
TOTAL COST PER FDU
$ 23,980
To ensure fairness in the method of allocating fees to each land use category within the
District boundaries, the fee amount is based on the number of trips measured in FDUS
that are generated by each land use category. Therefore, the proportionate share of fees
take into account the impacts of peak -hour vehicle trips on the system as identified in the
Los Angeles County Circulation Plan and the City of Santa Clarita Circulation element. The
peak hour vehicle trips are based on land use and for residential land uses peak hour trips
25
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
are based on type of unit, and not unit square footage. The traffic model used as the basis
for the City and County's circulation elements for this area do not factor in residential
square footage to determine peak hour trips, but instead base trips on the type of
residential unit. The traffic models make assumptions on type of units based on zoning.
Square footage of future units cannot be discerned based on zoning and is usually not
known until a development proposal gets submitted by a landowner. Therefore, in order
to develop a traffic mitigation fee for Bridge and Thoroughfare Districts, the appropriate
manner would be to use unit type rather than square footage, as the square footage is
not known at the time the mitigation fee is calculated. As summarized above, consistent
with Assembly Bill 602, square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate such fee.
Therefore, the City has identified other policies for equitably calculating the traffic
impacts and corresponding fees for developments with lesser impacts, as described in the
"Special Cases" at the end of this section IV(F).
Each of the six major land use categories have been assigned FDUs based on the average
impact for that category relative to a single-family residence as shown below:
• Single Family.............................................................1.0 FDU
• Condo/Townhome....................................................0.8 FDU
• Apartment.................................................................0.7 FDU
• Commercial (per gross acre) ................................... 5.0 FDUs
• Industrial (per gross acre) ....................................... 3.0 FDUs
• Mixed Use ................................... 0.7/DU res& 5.0/AC (com)
Future development units and/or acres are multiplied by the assigned FDUs and
multiplied by the District's adopted District fee per FDU resulting in a project's
proportionate share of District fees. The District fees for each of the six major land use
categories are included in Table 1.
The adoption of this type of funding district does not levy any fees against existing
development. FDUs for recorded subdivisions, which are located within the District, were
not included in the District fee calculation, as it has been assumed that District fees were
paid at recordation. If District fees were not paid at recordation for non-residential land
uses, then District fees may be collected for the issuance of a building permit.
SPECIAL CASES
Governmental Uses
Governmental improvements, such as those for schools, police, fire protection, and
libraries, specifically needed to support benefited development, have been excluded
from the development analysis as these uses are assumed to be exempt from
District payment.
26
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Lands with Physical Development Constraints
Lands with physical development constraints such as landslides, faults, or other
restricted use areas, were considered for future development according to their County
or City -assigned land use. This assumption was made since, in many cases, these types
of constraints can be mitigated. Furthermore, these restricted use areas can often be
used to accommodate development features such as parking lots and setbacks, and
residential densities or non-residential square footage can often be transferred from
landslide areas to other developable portions of a site.
Mixed Use (Residential and Commercial)
Within the District there are proposed development areas that include both residential
and commercial uses on the same lot. These "mixed use" areas cannot collect fees based
on a single use of the lot as is typical for fee collection in most all other cases. Therefore,
fee collection for these uses shall be as outlined henceforth. Fees for residential uses
on mixed use lots shall be based on number of units multiplied by the appropriate
factor (e.g. 0.8 FDU/unit for condos, 0.7 FDU/unit for apartments), then multiplied by
the fee in effect at the time of the project's map recordation. Fees for the non-
residential area shall be based on the building square footage divided by 43,560, then
multiplied by a factor of 5, then multiplied by the fee in effect at the time of the project's
map recordation.
Assisted Living Facilities
In the event that the District includes assisted -living facility uses, fees for this type of use
are to be collected at a commercial rate, based on the gross acreage of the associated
lot(s), as opposed to number of units.
Non -Residential Land Development not including a Land Division
The County code regarding bridge and major thoroughfare fee payment allows for
the collection of B&T fees at either the map recordation or building permit phases of a
project. It is the County's policy to collect only at the map recordation unless no land
division is proposed. District fees for land development not including a land division shall
be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. They City requires fees to be paid at
recordation of a subdivision map, unless a project falls under a City ordinance which
defers fee payment to the building permit phase, or unless a subdivision map is not
required for the project.
27
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
District fees for non-residential uses that are part of a land division will be calculated
based on the gross acreage of each non-residential lot.
District fees for non-residential uses on a vacant parcel that does not include a land
division will be calculated based on the gross acreage within the vacant parcel's
boundary.
District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a
land division will be calculated, at the discretion of the City and County, based on
one of the following calculations:
Retail Commercial
Gross building square footage
Total District Fee Obligation = 16,335 *5 * District Fee per FDU
A typical fee calculation of FDUs for a retail commercial development involving a land
division would assume gross commercial lot acreage times 5 FDUs times the District
fee per FDU. However, the above calculation determines the District fee obligation by
estimating the gross project acreage based on a proposed building's gross square
footage and an assumed Floor Area Ratio (FAR). For example, using an FAR of 0.375:1,
a retail commercial building on a one -acre (43,560 square feet) parcel would yield a
building square footage of 16,335 (43,560 x 0.375 = 16,335). Therefore, if a lease
project is submitted for District fee payment, an assumed gross acreage can be
determined by taking the building's gross square footage and dividing it by 16,335, which
has previously been established as generally being one acre of retail development.
Office Commercial/Business Park
Gross building square footage
Total District Fee Obligation = 43,560 *5 * District Fee per FDU
Using an FAR of 1.0:1, an office commercial or business park building on a one- acre
(43,560 square feet) parcel would yield a building square footage of 43,560 (43,560 * 1
= 43,560). Again, if a lease project is submitted for District fee payment, an assumed
gross acreage can be determined by taking the building's gross square footage and
dividing it by 43,560, essentially one acre of commercial office development.
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Industrial
Gross building square footage
Total District Fee Obligation = 29,403 * 3 * District Fee per FDU
Using an FAR of 0.675:1, industrial buildings on a one -acre parcel would yield a building
square footage of 29,403 (43,560*0.675=29,403). Again, if a lease project is submitted
for District fee payment, an assumed gross acreage can be determined by taking the
building's gross square footage and dividing it by 29,403, essentially one acre for
industrial development.
District fees for a lease building are not required if the underlying land paid District
fees based on gross acreage, including the land on which the lease building is to be sited.
It should be noted that if a project proposes an upgraded use from that which was paid
for the underlying parcel (e.g. commercial use proposed by fees at recordation were paid
based on industrial rate), that project would be subject to the difference in fees between
that which was paid and the proposed use. Underutilized parcels such as those that may
accommodate a future lease structure were not assumed in the development analysis, as
these parcels are difficult to identify at this stage.
Non -Typical Cases
If either Agency (City or County) determines in their discretion that a proposed
development project in their respective jurisdiction does not fit into one of the land
use categories identified on Table 1, that Agency may develop and have on file a rate
sheet for non -typical land uses based on the estimated number of trips generated by the
development project. Development projects that include accessory dwelling units (under
Government Code Section 66324), or housing development within a transit priority area
or within one-half mile of a convenience retail store (under Government Code Section
66005.1), will be considered non -typical "Special Case" land uses due to a lesser impact
on the transportation systems funded by the District Fee, and those uses will be the
subject of a special non -typical land use fee calculation.
G. CONSTRUCTION OF DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS IN LIEU OF PAYING FEES
If a developer constructs District -identified improvements prior to map recordation, that
developer becomes eligible for District credit which can be used to offset District fee
payments. If the cost of the completed and accepted improvements, along with the soft
costs and 5% administrative/management fee, exceeds the District fee obligation, the
developer would be given a credit, after improvement completion and acceptance,
which can be used to offset future District fee obligations within the District.
29
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
If adequate funds are available, the developer may receive a cash reimbursement, as
outlined in Section H below.
Thus, a developer has the following options with regard to construction of
District -identified improvements:
• Construct District -identified improvements for District credit.
• Construct District -identified improvements and receive cash
reimbursement from the District, if adequate funds are available.
Implementation of "prevailing wages" labor is required for the
construction of District improvements in order for a developer to receive
cash reimbursement from the District.'
H. CREDIT AWARD AND CASH REIMBURSEMENT
Credit is awarded upon review and approval of the costs to implement a District project
based on supporting documentation submitted by the developer. Generally, credit is
awarded after project completion and acceptance. However, the City or County may
issue credits at an earlier stage (nearly complete) if the cost documentation is
acceptable.
The City or County, in their discretion, may elect to provide cash reimbursement for
District credits. The determination of whether or not to provide cash reimbursement
for District credits will generally be made in accordance with the below guidelines.
1. The City and County may determine to make loans to a particular District from
non- District sources (e.g. County General Fund) or from other Districts. If a
loan has been made to a particular District, no reimbursement of District credits
will be made from that District until the loan(s) have been repaid by that District.
2. The City and County may determine to set aside previously collected funds or
earmark funds to be collected for the construction of a particular B&T project or
projects within a District. District funds that have been set aside or earmarked
for a particular B&T project will be excluded from consideration as a source of
funds for reimbursement of District credits.
3. In general, credits will be reimbursed according to the chronological order in
which credits were granted, i.e. older outstanding credits will generally be
reimbursed prior to credits that were granted more recently.
' Prevailing wages is defined as the commonly accepted rate paid to workers practicing in the same or similar
locality under the same or similar circumstances.
30
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
4. The City and County may elect to reimburse a block of credit holders at the same
time. In this case, all outstanding credit holders with the same or earlier credit
dates will be reimbursed an equal amount.
5. Where a particular District has previously loaned funds to another District, the
City and County will generally attempt to make all funds repaid to the lending
District available for credit reimbursement in accordance with Item Nos. 1, 2, 3,
and 4 above.
6. In general, reimbursement in the form of cash will only be issued when the
appropriate B&T District has a cash surplus in unobligated funds; however, it is
the sole discretion of the City and/or County to determine whether
developers/property owners will be issued reimbursement in the form of cash or
credit for B&T-eligible improvements.
7. Nothing in Items Nos. 1 to 5 above should be interpreted as requiring the City or
County to provide reimbursement at any given time. The C i t y o r County
may elect to continue to accumulate funds in order to fund planned projects.
8. Reimbursement in the form of cash requires prior approval by the City or County
and must be specified in the conditions of approval for the project.
If a developer constructs improvements beyond its conditioned obligation, District credit
and/or cash may be given subsequent to the improvement's completion and
acceptance as long as the improvement has been described in this report as a District
improvement.
L RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
If a condition of project approval requires a landowner to dedicate property as right
of way for a State improvement, then the landowner will receive credit at fair market
value for the property dedicated. If any local improvement requires land acquisitions
from a third party, the cost of the property will be added to the estimated cost of the
improvement for District credit. However, if right-of-way is required to be dedicated
for a County improvement, as a condition of project approval, the landowner receives
no credit for the value of the dedicated property. Therefore, the cost estimates prepared
for District improvement reflect costs for right-of-way as described above.
J. PROVISIONS FOR UPDATING COSTS AND UNIT INFORMATION
Projections for build -out development and the cost of the improvements located within
the area of benefit may change over time. Project scope may change due to refinement
and the need to comply with requirements imposed by other agencies, including, but
not limited to, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). A reasonable
31
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
amount of outside funding has been anticipated and formulated into the proposed
District fees. Outside funding, not anticipated in the District formation analysis or
update, may be received or funds anticipated may not be received. Therefore, in order
to equitably assess future development as well as collect sufficient funds to complete
the improvements, it will be necessary to periodically re-evaluate the net cost of the
improvements, the remaining land to be developed and the type of development being
constructed within the District and to adjust the fee accordingly.
On July 1 of every year the District fees shall be adjusted as follows: calculate the
percentage movement for the previous year in the Los Angeles Regional Construction
Cost Index (CCI) based on Engineering News Record data for that period. Then, if the
percentage movement equals or exceeds a five percent increase, the District fee per
FDU will be increased by five percent and rounded up to the nearest $10. If the
percentage movement increases less than five percent, the District fee per FDU will be
increased by the same percent as the percentage movement and rounded up to the
nearest $10. In the event that there is a negative adjustment in the CCI, then the fee
shall be adjusted downward by up to five percent.
A separate biennial review to reassess development trends, construction costs, grant
funding success, and refinement of project scope will also be conducted.
K. PROPOSAL FOR DISTRICT CLOSURE
In the event that District fees collected from developers exceed the cost of
improvements, the surplus funds, less administrative costs, will be refunded at District
closure by the City and/or County to current owners in proportion to District fees paid.
L. DISTRICT FUNDS
The County or City will maintain a separate District Fund for the Eastside District. Funds
may be loaned to or from the Eastside District provided that the loans are properly
recorded by no less than a Resolution approved by the County Board of Supervisors. The
County or City shall make all funds or credits available to the District, as necessary, for
the purpose of reimbursing or providing credit to developers/landowners, as outlined in
this report, once the improvements are completed, accepted, and the proper
documentation filed with the reimbursement request.
Upon annexation, any assets held in the B&T District under the ownership of the County
of Los Angeles, but located within the City of Santa Clarita, will be transferred to City of
Santa Clarita ownership; and any assets held in the District under the ownership of the
City of Santa Clarita, but located within unincorporated Los Angeles County, will be
transferred to County of Los Angeles ownership.
32
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
To receive credit for constructed and approved improvements, the proper
documentation must be submitted to the County or City. No documentation for soft
costs is necessary as they are already accounted for in the District fees.
Improvements will be accepted for maintenance by the County or City upon completion
and field acceptance. After field acceptance of constructed improvements, credit
withdrawal of District funds will be authorized. Along with the "B&T Cash/Credit Request
Form" included as Attachment F, copies of contracts, change orders, and purchase orders
which detail construction costs will be provided to the County or City. Upon submittal
of a request for the withdrawal of credits due, review and determination by the County
or City will be completed within 30 days.
M. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The County of Los Angeles and the City of Santa Clarita finds the establishment of the
proposed District Fees to be statutorily exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act under Public Resource Code Section 21080 (b)(8)(D).
33
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
ATTACHMENT A: LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE AREA OF BENEFIT KNOWN AS EASTSIDE BRIDGE
AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE
DISTRICT
THAT PORTION OF THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THAT PORTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED BOUNDARIES:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RAGE
15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16 TO THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 16;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER;
THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY LINES OF SAID
SOUTHWEST QUARTER TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 16;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE
NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 IN SECTION 21, SAID LAST MENTIONED TOWNSHIP AND
RANGE;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF
LOT 4 IN SAID LAST MENTIONED SECTION TO THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SIERRA
HIGHWAY, 120 FEET WIDE, AS SAME EXISTED ON MARCH 4, 2002;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE NORTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD, AS SAME EXISTED ON SAID DATE;
THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO A LINE 50 FEET EASTERLY OF AND PARALLEL
WITH, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLE TO,
34
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 23365, AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 760
PAGES 29 AND 30, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR- RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE TO THE MOST
SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 82 OF TRACT NO. 30317 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK
740, PAGES 97 TO 100, INCLUSIVE, OF SAID MAPS;
THENCE NORTHERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY,
NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY BOUNDARIES OF SAID LAST MENTIONED LOT AND
FOLLOWING THE SAME ALONG ALL ITS VARIOUS COURSES AND CURVES TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 57 OF TRACT NO. 30319 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN
BOOK 757 PAGES 43, 44 AND 45, OF SAID MAPS;
THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY LINES OF SAID
LAST MENTIONED LOT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 55 OF SAID LAST
MENTIONED TRACT;
THENCE SOUTHERLYALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACTTO
THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF TRACT NO. 8575 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 117
PAGES 64, 65 AND 66, OF SAID MAPS;
THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY RND WESTERLY BOUNDARIES
OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACT AND FOLLOWING THE SAME ALONG ALL ITS VARIOUS
COURSES TO THE MOST WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LAST MENTIONED
TRACT;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LAST MENTIONED TRACTTO
ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 2 AS SHOWN ON LICENSED
SURVEYOR'S MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 27 PAGE 40, OF RECORDS OF SURVEYS, IN SAID OFFICE
OF THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED NORTHERLY BOUNDARY TO ITS
INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHWESTERLY
BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 6449 PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 69 PAGES 8 TO
10, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION
TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY,
NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID PARCEL 4 TO THE NORTHWESTERLY
CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 4;
35
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION, AND
ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIRST LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCTAS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL
MAP NO. 6449 FOLLOWING THE SAME IN ALL ITS VARIOUS COURSES TO THE NORTHERLY LINE
OF LOT 62 OF ST. JOHN SUBDIVISION PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 196 PAGES 306 TO 309,
INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID REGISTRAR -RECORDER;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE
LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED JUNE 9, 1997, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 97- 855038 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID REGISTRAR RECORDER;
THENCE SOUTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY LINES OF SAID
LAND TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 62;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF FRACTIONAL
SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE EASTERLYALONG LASTSAID SOUTHERLY LINEAND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION
30, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE WESTERLY
BOUNDARY OF THE SECOND LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE NORTHEASTERLY
PROLONGATION OFTHE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OFTHE FIRST LOS ANGELESAQUEDUCT
WITHIN SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG LAST SAID PROLONGATION AND LAST SAID
SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE EAST -WEST CENTER LINE OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 3
NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID EAST -WEST CENTER LINE TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 5 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE
WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 5 TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 5;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST 15 ACRES
OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 5;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 OF SAID
SECTION 5;
36
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF
SAID SECTION 5;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION
4, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4 TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAID SECTION 3;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER
THEREOF;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 TO THE WEST LINE OF THE
EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION
3;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 3 A DISTANCE OF 15.00 CHAINS;
THENCE EAST 15.00 CHAINS;
THENCE SOUTH 5.00 CHAINS;
THENCE EAST 10.00 CHAINS;
THENCE SOUTH 5.00 CHAINS;
THENCE EAST 5.00 CHAINS;
THENCE SOUTH 5.00 CHAINS TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 3;
37
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 10.00 CHAINS MORE OR LESS TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 3;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 3 TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2;
THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 2;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST -HALF
OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 2;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST -HALF OF THE EAST -HALF OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 2 TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 2;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION
1, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 1;
THENCE EASTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY LINES OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE SOUTH -QUARTER CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 1;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE NORTH -SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 1;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1 TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN;
38
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINES OF SECTIONS 31, 30 AND 19 OF TOWNSHIP
4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 19;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 19 TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 TO THE WEST
QUARTER CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH -HALF OF SAID SECTION 17
TO THE EAST -QUARTER CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 17 TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST; SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINES OF SECTIONS 8 AND 5 OF TOWNSHIP 4
NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION 5 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 14
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 TO THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 14 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN;
THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINES OF SAID
SECTION 29 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 14
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 30 TO THE NORTH -
QUARTER CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE NORTH -SOUTH CENTER LINE OF SAID SECTION 30 TO THE
SOUTH -QUARTER CORNER THEREOF;
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 30 TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO
MERIDIAN;
39
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINES SECTION 36, 35 AND 34 OF TOWNSHIP 5
NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID SECTION 34;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG WESTERLY LINES OF SECTIONS 3 AND 10 OF TOWNSHIP NORTH,
RANGE 15 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
mm
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
ATTACHMENT B: SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATES FOR DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS
LINK -
INTERSECTION
Year 2002
Year 2024
Status
Cost Estimates
Cost Estimates
E-0100
$5,052,790
Complete
E-0101
$5,450
Complete
E-0102
$7,382,620
Complete
E-0103
$2,931,680
$1,442,347
Not Complete
E-0104
$13,000,140
$712,672
Not Complete
E-105
$585,640
Complete
E-202
$5,545,380
Complete
E-0300
$3,466,560
Improvements no longer
necessary
E-0301
$18,410,020
Improvements no longer
necessary
E-0402
$1,270,380
$3,597,667
Not Complete
E-0501
$2,820,400
$9,065,133
Not Complete
E-0502
$20,117,140
$27,156,811
Not Complete
E-0503
$2,098,490
$954,378
Partially Complete
E-0504
$77,430
$69,027
Partially Complete
E-0505
$290,350
$1,413,451
Partially Complete
E-0506
$32,180
$69,027
Not Complete
E-0507
$58,800
$138,054
Partially Complete
E-0508
$435,590
$1,706,281
Not Complete
E-0600
$85,200
$207,080
Not Complete
E-0601
$58,800
$138,054
Not Complete
E-0602
$28,400
$69,027
Not Complete
E-0603
$71,000
$172,567
Partially Complete
E-0604
$28,400
$69,027
Not Complete
E-0605
$278,730
$1,114,800
Not Complete
E-0606
$53,600
$199,028
Not Complete
E-0607
$28,400
$69,027
Not Complete
E-0608
$307,630
$555,994
Not Complete
E-0609
$16,930
$34,513
Not Complete
41
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINK -
INTERSECTION
Year 2002
Year 2024
Status
Cost Estimates
Cost Estimates
E-0610
$261,170
$493,794
Partially Complete
E-0611
$224,930
$269,676
Not Complete
E-0612
$67,020
$157,495
Not Complete
E-0613
$15,560
$37,106
Not Complete
E-0615
$49,420
$565,021
Not Complete
E-0616
$64,350
$152,418
Not Complete
E-0617
$48,850
$115,421
Not Complete
E-0618
$64,650
$152,986
Not Complete
E-0619
$14,260
$40,022
Not Complete
E-0620
$6,965,810
$11,654,392
Not Complete
E-0620B
$532,000
$1,333,500
Not Complete
E-0700
$48,170
$114,125
Partially Complete
E-0701
$162,320
$383,773
Partially Complete
E-0702
$33,140
$78,045
Partially Complete
E-0703
$48,640
$115,016
Partially Complete
E-0704
$47,370
$112,613
Partially Complete
E-0705
$33,519
$78,747
Partially Complete
E-0708
$14,200
$34,513
Not Complete
E-0709
$14,200
$34,513
Not Complete
E-0710
$28,400
$69,027
Partially Complete
E-0711
$468,420
$2,195,249
Partially Complete
E-0712
$487,660
$1,848,546
Partially Complete
E-0713
$3,776,930
$5,451,406
Not Complete
E-0714
$2,148,280
$8,940,716
Not Complete
E-0715
$1,509,850
$3,229,689
Not Complete
E-0715B
Now 716B
E-0716
$8,227,460
$23,701,588
Not Complete
E-0716B
$0
$1,200,150
Not Complete
E-0717
$2,267,710
$9,098,990
Not Complete
E-0800
$6,950,350
Roadway downgraded.
Improvements no longer
necessary
E-0801
$1,858,810
Roadway downgraded.
Improvements no longer
necessary
42
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINK —
INTERSECTION
Year 2002
Year 2024
Status
Cost Estimates
Cost Estimates
E-0900
$13,120
$24,386
Partially Complete
E-0901
$2,562,900
$597,583
Not Complete
E-0902
$10,148,600
$16,164,187
Not Complete
E-0902B
$518,700
$1,300,163
Not Complete
E-1001
$86,070
$294,509
Not Complete
E-1002
$764,750
$2,512,052
Not Complete
E-1002B
$4,256,000
$10,668,000
Not Complete
E-1003
$15,634,550
$2,532,188
Not Complete
E-1003B
$124,490
$312,039
Not Complete
E-1004
$174,750
$481,977
Not Complete
E-1005
$1,081,540
$1,960,234
Not Complete
E-1006
$9,906,520
$17,565,843
Not Complete
E-1200
$7,843,200
Complete
E-1200B
$11,970,000
Complete
E-1201
Replaced by E-1500
E-1202
$215,640
$775,636
Not Complete
E-1203
$1,217,646
Not Complete
E-1204
$0
Complete
E-1300
$345,200
Complete
E-1400
$0
Complete
E-1400B
$0
Complete
E-1500
$3,202,500
Not Complete
E-1500B
$22,932,656
Not Complete
E-1501
$2,008,125
Not Complete
E-1601
$0
Complete
E-1602
$0
Complete
LINKS SUBTOTAL
$186,617,609
$205,162,224
El-5
$1,215,500
Complete
El-9
$624,170
$632,625
Partially Complete
EI-19
$771,150
Complete
EI-21
$180,600
Complete
EI-29
$709,500
$1,437,514
Not Complete
EI-31
$154,800
$449,923
Not Complete
El-33
$180,600
$594,541
Not Complete
43
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
LINK —
INTERSECTION
Year 2002
Year 2024
Status
Cost Estimates
Cost Estimates
EI-38
$154,500
Complete
EI-39
$154,500
$449,923
Not Complete
EI-41
$923,640
$0
Not Complete
EI-42
$154,500
$449,923
Not Complete
EI-46
$224,980
Complete
EI-49
$154,500
$129,961
Partially Complete
EI-50
$154,500
$0
Complete
EI-53
$180,600
Complete
EI-54
$154,800
$0
Not Complete
EI-55
$363,596
Not Complete
EI-56
$1,240,393
Not Complete
EI-57
$2,024,400
Not Complete
INTERSECTION
SUBTOTAL
$6,802,340
$9,210,313
TOTAL
$193,419,949
$228,897,247
115%
m
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
ATTACHMENT C: DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
Table 6: Development Analysis of Filed Maps
Map
Number
Jurisdiction
Map Status
Single Family
Condos/Town
houses
Multi Family
Commercial /Business
Park
Industrial
Total
FDUs
Units
FDUs
@
1
Units
FDUs
@
0.8
Units
FDUs @
0.7
SF
Acres
FDUs
@
5.00
SF
Acres
FDUs @
3
PM 54043
City of Santa Clorito
Approved
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
4.0
PM 60821
City of Santa Clorito
Recorded -Fees Deferred
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
3.0
PM 68740
City of Santa Clorito
Recorded
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
4.0
PM068498
City of Santa Clorito
Recorded
0
0
0
0
0
0
63,960
8.23
41.15
0
0.00
0
41.2
PM65239
City of Santa Clorito
Approved
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
2.0
TR 53074
City of Santa Clorito
Approved
119
1 119
0
1 0
461
1 323
0.0
10.60
53.00
1 0
0.00
1 0
494.7
TR 63003
City of Santa Clorito
Approved
18
18
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
18.0
TR 65159
City of Santa Clorito
Pending
48
48
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
48.0
TTM 63022
City of Santa Clorito
Pending
354
354
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
354.0
TTM 67374
City of Santa Clorito
Recorded
9
9
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
9.0
TTM 68601
City of Santa Clorito
Approved
35
35
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
35.0
45
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Condos/Town
Commercial /Business
Single Family
Multi Family
Industrial
houses
park
Total
Map
FDUs
FDUs
FDUs
FDUs
Number
Jurisdiction
Map Status
Units
@
Units
@
Units
FDUs @
SF
Acres
@
SF
Acres
FDUs @
1
0.8
0.7
5.00
3
VTTM69164
City of Santa Clarita
Recorded
0
0
0
0
375
263
20.00
100.00
0
0.00
0
362.5
VTTM 75026
City of Santa Clarita
Pending
0
0
300
240
0
0
63.00
315.00
0
0.00
0
555.0
VTPM 78248
City of Santa Clarita
Denied
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41.00
205.00
0
0.00
0
0.0
PM 74160
City of Santa Clarita
Recorded
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
4.0
TPM 80287
City of Santa Clarita
Pending
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
4.0
TTM 82375
City of Santa Clarita
Pending
0
0
0
0
20
14
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
14.0
Soledad and
Lost Canyon
Gas/
Commercial
City of Santa Clarita
Approved
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,100
0.43
2.2
0
0.00
0
2.2
Chandler
Apartments
City of Santa Clarita
Approved
0
0
0
0
136
95
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
95.2
TTM 61924
City of Santa Clarita
Recorded
0
0
0
0
164
114.8
1 0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
114.8
TTM 83087
City of Santa Clarita
Recorded
0
0
150
120
348
244
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
363.6
Recorded -8&T
TR060922
City of Santa Clarita
Obligation Met
403
403
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
0.0
a.
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Condos/Town
Commercial /Business
Single Family
Multi Family
Industrial
houses
park
Total
Map
FDUs
FDUs
FDUs
FDUs
Number
Jurisdiction
Map Status
Units
@
Units
@
Units
FDUs @
SF
Acres
@
SF
Acres
FDUs @
1
0.8
0.7
5.00
3
18171
Soledad
City of Santa Clarita
Approved
Canyon Gas
Station
2,493
0.46
2.30
2.3
TTM 68203
City of Santa Clarita
Pending
73
58.4
9.20
46.00
104.4
Valley
Center
City of Santa Clarita
Approved
Skilled
Nursing
51,000
3.81
19.05
19.1
City
Subtotal
1,007
1,007
523
418
1,504
1,053
124,553
157
784
0
0
0
3,261.9
TR060259
County
Approved
492
492
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
492.0
TR060359
County
Approved
34
34
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
34.0
TR064989
County
Approved
24
24
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
24.0
TR066202
County
Approved
0
0
31
24.8
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
24.8
TR067233
County
Pending
51
51
1 0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
51.0
TR071216
County
Approved
0
0
0
0
0
0
27.68
138.40
0
0.00
0
138.4
TR45123
County
Approved
10
10
0
0
1 0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
10.0
TR47573
County
Approved
75
75
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
75.0
TR48086
County
Approved
492
492
0
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
492.0
PM 83283
County
Pending
4
4
0
0
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0
4.0
County
Subtotal
1182
1178
31
25
0
0
0
28
138
0
0
0
1,345.2
TOTAL BY
156,06
4,607.
USE
2,189
2,185
1554
443.2
1 1,504
1,052.8
124,553
184.4
922.1
0
2.3
6.9
1
47
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Table 7: Development Analysis of Vacant Land by Assessor Parcel Number
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2802003003
UR1
14.86
City
2
29.7
1
29.7
2802003004
UR1
4.97
City
2
9.9
1
9.9
2802004010
UR1
2.66
City
2
5.3
1
5.3
2802004090
UR1
0.90
City
2
1.8
1
1.8
2803032001
Site 9
MX-C
1.59
City
75.0
5
0.7
25.3
52.5
2803032026
Site 9
MX-C
0.90
City
2803032034
Site 9
MX-C
0.83
City
2803032035
Site 9
MX-C
1.09
City
2803032042
Site 9
MX-C
0.22
City
2803032043
Site 9
MX-C
0.42
City
2836013106-
Com
MX-N
4.93
City
5
24.6
2836013106-Res
MX-N
4.93
City
6.0
29.6
0.7
20.7
2836013107
Com
MX-N
9.90
City
5
49.5
2836013107 Res
MX-N
9.90
City
6
59.4
0.7
41.6
2836013117
UR2
5.27
City
5
26.4
1
26.4
2836013121
UR2
13.89
City
5
69.4
1
69.4
2836013128-
Com
MX-N
2.75
City
5
13.8
2836013128-
Res
MX-N
2.75
City
6.0
16.5
0.7
11.6
2836013135
Site 4
UR5
35.07
City
850.0
0.7
595.0
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2836013911
Site 4
UR5
1.01
City
2836013912
Site 4
UR5
0.42
City
2836013919
Site 4
UR5
22.29
City
2836014056
Site 3
UR5
9.25
City
Now VTTM
75062
2836014057
Site 3
UR5
30.63
City
Now VTTM
75063
2836014058
UR5
22.78
City
25
569.5
0.7
398.6
2836020058-
Com
MX-N
0.30
City
5
1.5
2836020058-
Res
MX-N
0.30
City
6.0
1.8
0.7
1.3
2836020077
UR2
0.01
City
5
0.0
1
0.0
2836020078-
Com
MX-N
0.18
City
5
0.9
2836020078-Res
MX-N
0.18
City
6.0
1.1
0.7
0.8
2836020084
UR2
0.34
City
5
1.7
1
1.7
2836020085
UR2
0.26
City
5
1.3
1
1.3
2836020086-
Com
MX-N
0.43
City
5
2.2
2836020086-Res
MX-N
0.43
City
6.0
2.6
0.7
1.8
2836020087-
Com
MX-N
0.30
City
5
1.5
2836020087-Res
MX-N
0.30
City
6.0
1.8
0.7
1.3
2836020270
UR2
0.53
City
5
2.7
1
2.7
2836020279
UR2
0.10
City
5
0.5
1
0.5
2836020281
UR2
0.19
City
5
0.9
1
0.9
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2839001020
NU4
13.03
City
0.5
6.5
1
6.5
2839002033
NU4
3.17
City
0.5
1.6
1
1.6
2839020001
Site 5
UR5
0.34
City
0.0
2839020002
Site 5
UR5
0.37
City
0.0
2839020003
Site 5
UR5
0.71
City
0.0
2839020004
Site 5
UR5
0.62
City
0.0
2839020005
Site 5
UR5
0.72
City
0.0
2839020006
Site 5
UR5
0.61
City
0.0
2839020007
Site 5
UR5
0.22
City
0.0
2839020008
Site 5
UR5
0.85
City
0.0
2839020009
Site 5
UR5
0.34
City
0.0
2839020010
Site 5
UR5
0.50
City
0.0
2839020011
Site 5
UR5
0.83
City
0.0
2839020012
Site 5
UR5
0.79
City
0.0
2839021006
Site 5
UR5
3.41
City
0.0
2839021007
Site 5
UR5
3.02
City
0.0
2839021008
Site 5
UR5
2.66
City
0.0
2839021009
Site 5
UR5
2.37
City
0.0
2839021010
Site 5
UR5
1.84
City
0.0
2839021016
Site 5
UR5
1.37
City
0.0
2839021017
Site 5
UR5
0.17
City
0.0
2839021018
Site 5
UR5
1.99
City
200.0
0.7
140.0
2840001106
UR1
18.09
City
2
36.2
1
36.2
2840001902
NU2
0.92
City
0.1
0.1
1
0.1
2840003027
UR5
1.34
City
25
33.6
0.7
23.5
50
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2840003900
UR5
0.79
City
25
19.8
0.7
13.9
2840003901
UR5
1.09
City
25.0
27.2
0.7
19.0
2840003902
UR5
3.33
City
25
83.2
0.7
58.2
2840004010
BP
3.90
City
3
11.7
2840004039
BP
0.30
City
3
0.9
2840004040
BP
0.26
City
3
0.8
2840006019
UR1
8.00
City
2.0
16.0
1
16.0
2840007019
CC
0.04
City
5
0.2
2840015025
UR1
6.56
City
2
13.1
1
13.1
2840016002
NU5
19.83
City
1
19.8
1
19.8
2842004023
UR2
12.40
City
5
62.0
1
62.0
2842004024
UR2
68.64
City
5
343.2
1
343.2
2842004030
UR2
0.43
City
5
2.2
1
2.2
2842004031
UR2
3.30
City
5
16.5
1
16.5
2842004032
UR2
4.10
City
5
20.5
1
20.5
2842033009
UR2
0.46
City
5
2.3
1
2.3
2842033010
UR2
0.18
City
5
0.9
1
0.9
2842033011
UR2
0.46
City
5
2.3
1
2.3
2842033017
UR2
0.20
City
5
1.0
1
1.0
2842033018
UR2
0.10
City
5
0.5
1
0.5
2842033019
UR2
0.36
City
5
1.8
1
1.8
2842036064
CC
1.29
City
5
6.4
2844001024
Site 11
MX-C
0.29
City
0.0
2844001025
Site 11
MX-C
0.29
City
0.0
2844001032
Site 11
MX-C
0.19
City
0.0
51
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2844001033
Site 11
MX-C
0.33
City
0.0
2844001038
Site 11
MX-C
0.73
City
0.0
2844001046
Site 11
MX-C
0.39
City
0.0
2844001056
Site 11
MX-C
1.09
City
0.0
2844001063
Site 11
MX-C
2.52
City
0.0
2844001068
Site 11
MX-C
1.64
City
0.0
2844001072
Site 11
MX-C
1.03
City
0.0
2844001804
Site 11
MX-C
1.52
City
0.0
2844003904
Site 11
MX-C
3.62
City
0.0
2844003004
Site 11
MX-C
0.40
City
0.0
2844003005
Site 11
MX-C
0.37
City
0.0
2844003006
Site 11
MX-C
0.63
City
0.0
2844003009
Site 11
MX-C
0.53
City
0.0
2844003902
Site 11
MX-C
2.16
City
0.0
2844005016
Site 11
MX-C
0.60
City
0.0
2844005907
Site 11
MX-C
2.39
City
5
108.1
2844005028
Site 11
MX-C
0.89
City
275.0
0.7
192.5
2844016009
CC
1.11
City
5
5.6
2844016012
CC
1.86
City
5
9.3
2844022014
UR5
0.10
City
25
2.6
0.7
1.8
2844042002
UR5
0.84
City
25
21.0
0.7
14.7
2848005044
NU5
25.69
City
1
25.7
1
25.7
2848005075
NU1
28.71
City
0.05
1.4
1
1.4
2848005076
NU1
27.15
City
0.05
1.4
1
1.4
2848008001
NU4
39.39
City
0.5
19.7
1
19.7
52
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2848008018
NU4
39.86
City
0.5
19.9
1
19.9
2848008024
NU4
39.10
City
0.5
19.5
1
19.5
2848008025
NU4
38.93
City
0.5
19.5
1
19.5
2848030008
NU4
10.35
City
0.5
5.2
1
5.2
2848030014
NU4
8.60
City
0.5
4.3
1
4.3
2848030015
NU4
5.33
City
0.5
2.7
1
2.7
2848031003
NU4
9.31
City
0.5
4.7
1
4.7
2848031004
NU4
18.54
City
0.5
9.3
1
9.3
2854001001
CC
0.18
City
5
0.9
2854001002
CC
0.21
City
5
1.0
2854001003
CC
0.06
City
5
0.3
2854001004
CC
0.07
City
5
0.3
2854001005
CC
3.04
City
5
15.2
2854001031
CC
2.13
City
5
10.6
2854001071
CC
0.71
City
5
3.5
2864003919
BP
1.89
City
3
5.7
SF Sub
829.3
Condo Sub
Apt Sub
2269.7
1588.8
Com AC Sub
51.8
3099.0
280.8
Ind AC Sub
6.3
19.0
City Subtotal
2717.9
2812001006
A-2-1
41.11
County
0.2
8.2
1
8.2
2812001007
A-2-1
4.71
County
0.2
1.0
11
1.0
53
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2812001008
A-2-1
20.41
County
0.2
4.1
1
4.1
2812001009
A-2-1
6.61
County
0.2
1.3
1
1.3
2812001010
A-2-1
10.04
County
0.2
2.0
1
2.0
2812001012
A-2-1
5.73
County
0.2
1.1
1
1.1
2812001013
A-2-1
14.50
County
0.2
2.9
1
2.9
2813015001
A-1-1
40.59
County
0.2
8.1
1
8.1
2813015007
A-1-1
44.30
County
0.2
8.9
1
8.9
2813015008
A-1-1
129.01
County
0.2
25.8
1
25.8
2813015009
A-1-1
21.70
County
0.2
4.3
1
4.3
2813015010
A-1-1
143.63
County
0.2
28.7
1
28.7
2813016011
A-1-1
102.72
County
0.2
20.5
1
20.5
2813017017
A-1-1
35.50
County
0.1
3.6
1
3.6
2813017028
A-1-1
2.49
County
0.5
1.2
1
1.2
2813017030
A-1-1
2.10
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017031
A-1-1
3.12
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017032
A-1-1
7.49
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017033
A-1-1
1.27
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017039
A-1-1
1.23
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017042
A-1-1
0.21
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017043
A-1-1
4.39
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017044
A-1-1
3.07
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017045
A-1-1
5.57
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813017046
A-1-1
0.63
County
0.0
1
0.0
2813017047
A-1-1
2.49
County
1.0
1
1.0
2813018006
C-3
0.11
County
5
0.5
54
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
2813018007
C-3
0.17
County
5
0.9
2813021015
A-1-1
0.00
County
0.5
0.0
1
Now PM
83283
2813024002
A-1-1
39.66
County
0.5
19.8
1
19.8
2813024004
M1
4.22
County
3
12.7
2839005027
A-2-1
9.10
County
0.2
1.8
1
1.8
2853001006
IL (Light
Ind)
3.84
County
3
11.5
2853002007
IL (Light
Ind)
0.58
County
3
1.7
2853008003
R-1-11000
32.31
County
2.6
84.0
1
84.0
2854004003
R-1-9000
0.36
County
2
1.0
1
1.0
2854004004
R-1-9000
18.35
County
2
36.7
1
36.7
2854004005
R-1-9000
0.28
County
2
1.0
1
1.0
2854004008
R-1-9000
1.80
County
2
3.6
1
3.6
2854004009
R-1-10000
3.92
County
2
7.8
1
7.8
2854004016
R-1-11000
22.91
County
2
45.8
1
45.8
2854004019
R-1-10000
5.02
County
2
10.0
1
10.0
2854061001
A-1-1
11.25
County
2
22.5
1
22.5
2854061002
A-1-1
9.02
County
2
18.0
1
18.0
3210014022
A-2-1
0.09
County
1
1
3210014024
A-2-1
2.50
County
1
1
3210014033
A-2-1
74.79
County
1
1
3210015026
M-1.5
27.04
County
3
1 81.1
3210015027
M-1.5
5.15
County
3
1 15.5
55
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
3210016005
10
3.50
County
3
10.5
3210016017
M-1.5
0.50
County
3
1.5
3210017059
10
6.29
County
3
18.9
3211008036
A-2-1
20.21
County
0.1
2.0
1
2.0
3211008037
A-2-1
9.41
County
0.1
1.0
1
1.0
3211008038
A-2-1
7.93
County
0.1
1.0
1
1.0
3211008039
A-2-1
20.49
County
0.1
2.0
1
2.0
3211008040
A-2-1
5.32
County
0.1
1.0
1
1.0
3211008041
A-2-1
15.60
County
0.1
1.6
1
1.6
3211008042
A-2-1
33.84
County
0.1
3.4
1
3.4
3211008043
A-2-1
78.90
County
0.1
7.9
1
7.9
3231001012
A-1-1
20.36
County
0.1
2.0
1
2.0
3231001013
A-1-1
19.91
County
0.1
2.0
1
2.0
3231002004
A-1-1
19.98
County
0.1
2.0
1
2.0
3231002013
A-1-1
17.94
County
1.0
17.9
1
17.9
3231006008
A-1-10000
1.12
County
1.0
1.1
1
1.1
3231006011
A-1-10000
4.07
County
1.0
4.1
1
4.1
3231007006
C-3
0.43
County
5
2.1
3231007020
C-3
0.65
County
5
3.2
3231007021
C-3
0.84
County
5
4.2
3231007036
C-3
0.23
County
5
1.2
3231007037
C-3
0.76
County
5
3.8
3231007061
A-1-10000
0.27
County
1
0.0
3231007065
CG
0.51
County
5
2.6
3231007066
C-3
1.70
County
5
8.5
56
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Assessor Parcel
No.
Housing
Element
Site
Number
ZONE
CODE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
3231008028
A-1-10000
0.89
County
1
1.0
3231008030
A-1-10000
1.37
County
1
1.0
3231008032
A-1-10000
1.97
County
1
1.0
3231008033
CG
2.22
County
5
11.1
3231008034
CG
1.84
County
5
9.2
3231009012
C-3
1.68
County
5
8.4
3231019003
A-1-10000
0.01
County
1
0.0
3231019004
A-1-10000
0.13
County
1
1.0
3231019021
A-1-10000
0.01
County
1
1.0
3231019022
A-1-10000
0.19
County
1
1.0
3231019024
A-1-10000
0.11
County
1
0.0
3231020015
A-1-10000
0.17
County
1
1.0
3231020016
A-1-10000
2.06
County
4
8.3
1
8.3
3231021002
A-1-10000
0.30
County
1
1.0
3231021004
A-1-10000
0.29
County
1
1.0
3231021013
A-1-10000
1.28
County
4
5.1
1
5.1
3231021019
A-1-10000
0.27
County
1
1.0
3231023004
R-3
0.12
County
1
1.0
3231023009
R-3
0.11
County
1
1.0
3231025012
R-3
0.17
County
1
1.0
3231025015
R-3
0.24
County
1
1.0
County single
family
460.5
460.5
Commercial AC
11.14
55.7
Ind AC
51.13
153.4
57
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Housing
Assessor Parcel
Element
ZONE
Area (AC)
Jurisdiction
DU/AC
Units
Factor
FDUs
No.
Site
CODE
Number
County Subtotal
669.5
TOTAL
3,387.48
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Table 8: Summary of Development Analysis
LAND USE
DEVELOPMENT UNITS
MULTIPLIER
FDUs
% OF TOTAL UNITS
FILED MAPS
COUNTY VACANT LAND
CITY VACANT LAND
TOTAL
Single Family
2,189.0
460.5
829.3
3,478.8
1.0
3,478.8
53.0%
Condominium
554.0
0.0
554.0
0.8
443.2
6.8%
Apartment
1,504.0
0.0
2,269.7
3,773.7
0.7
2,641.6
40.2%
Total Residential
4,247.0
460.5
3,099.0
7,806.5
-
6,563.6
100.0%
LAND USE
AREA (ACRES)
MULTIPLIER
FDUs
% OF TOTAL
FILED MAPS
COUNTY VACANT LAND
CITY VACANT LAND
TOTAL
Commercial
184.4
11.1
51.8
247.4
5.0
1,236.7
87.8%
Industrial
0
51.1
6.3
57.5
3.0
172.4
12.2%
Total Non -Residential
184.4
62.3
58.2
304.8
-
1,409.1
100.0%
TOTAL
7,972.7
59
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
ATTACHMENT D: COUNTY AND CITY CODES PERTAINING TO B&T DISTRICTS
COUNTY CODE: TITLE 58 Chapter 21.23 §32.32.200
21.32.200 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEES.
A. A subdivider, as a condition of approval of a final map for property within an area of
benefit, or a building permit applicant, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for
property within an area of benefit, shall pay a fee as hereinafter established to defray the
cost of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways and canyons, and/or
constructing major thoroughfares.
B. Definitions.
1. Area of benefit means a specified area wherein it has been determined that the
real property located herein will benefit from the construction of a bridge and/or
major thoroughfare.
2. Bridge facility means any crossing for a highway or local road, involving a railway,
freeway, stream or canyon, which is required by the General Plan in order to
accommodate new urban development within the area of benefit.
3. Construction means and includes preliminary studies, design, acquisition of right-
of-way, administration of construction contracts, and actual construction.
4. Major thoroughfare means those roads designated in the transportation
element of the General Plan, the primary purpose of which is to carry through traffic
and provide a network connection to the state highway system.
5. The singular number includes the plural, and the plural the singular.
C. The provisions herein for payment of a fee shall apply only if the bridge and/or major
thoroughfare has been included in an element of the General Plan adopted by the Board
of Supervisors at least 30 days prior to the filing of a map or application for a building
permit on land located within the boundaries of the area of benefit.
D. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any major thoroughfares are in addition
to, or a widening or reconstruction of, any existing major thoroughfares serving the area
at the time of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
.I
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
E. Payment of Fees shall not be required unless any planned bridge facility is a new bridge
serving the area or an addition to an existing bridge facility serving the area at the time
of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
F.
G.
1. Action to establish an area of benefit may be initiated by the Board of Supervisors
upon its own motion or upon the recommendation of the Road Commissioner.
2. The Board of Supervisors will set a public hearing for each proposed area of benefit.
Notice of the time and place of said hearing, including preliminary information
related to the boundaries of the area of benefit, estimated costs and the method
of fee apportionment shall be given pursuant to Section 65905 of the
Government Code.
1. At the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors will consider the testimony, written
protests and other evidence. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of
Supervisors may, unless a majority written protest is filed and not withdrawn,
determine to establish an area of benefit. If established, the Board of
Supervisors shall adopt a resolution describing the boundaries of the area of
benefit, setting forth the cost, whether actual or estimated, and the method of fee
apportionment. A certified copy of such resolution shall be recorded with the
County Recorder.
2. Such apportioned fees shall be applicable to all property within the area of benefit,
and shall be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of
issuing a building permit for such property or portions thereof. Where the area of
benefit includes lands not subject to the payment of fees pursuant to this section,
the Board of Supervisors shall make provisions for payment of the share of
improvement cost apportioned to such lands not subject to the payment of fees
pursuant to this section, the Board of Supervisors shall make provisions for payment
of the share of improvement cost apportioned to such lands from other sources.
3. Written protest will be received by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at any time
prior to the close of the public hearing. If written protests are filed by the owners
of more than one-half of the area of the property to be benefited by the
improvement and sufficient protests are not withdrawn to as to reduce the area
represented by the protests to less than one-half of the area to be benefited,
then the proposed proceedings shall be abandoned and the Board of Supervisors
shall not, for one year from the filing of said written protests, commence or carry
on any proceedings for the same improvement under the provisions of this section.
Any protest may be withdrawn by the owner making the same, in writing, at any
time prior to the close of the public hearing.
61
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
4. If any majority protest is directed against only a portion of the improvement, then
all further proceedings under the provisions of this section to construct that portion
of the improvement so protested against shall be barred for a period of one year,
but the Board of Supervisors shall not be barred from commencing new
proceedings not including any part of the improvement so protested against. Such
proceedings shall be commenced by a new notice and public hearing as set forth
in Subsection F above.
5. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Board of Supervisors, within such one-year
period, from commencing and carrying on new proceedings for the construction of
an improvement or portion of the improvement so protested against if it finds, by
the affirmative vote of four -fifths of its members, that the owners of more than
one-half of the area of the property to be benefited are in favor of going forward
with such improvement or portion thereof.
H. Fees paid pursuant to this section shall be deposited in a planned bridge facility and/or
major thoroughfare fund. A fund shall be established for each planned bridge facility
project and/or each planned major thoroughfare project. If the benefit area is one in which
more than one bridge and/or major thoroughfare is required to be constructed, a separate
fund may be established covering all of the bridge projects and/or major thoroughfares in
the benefit area. Moneys in such fund shall be expended solely for the construction or
reimbursement for construction of the improvement serving the area to be benefited and
from which the fees comprising the fund were collected, or to reimburse the County for
the costs of constructing the improvement.
I. The Board of Supervisors may approve the acceptance of considerations in lieu of the
payment of fees established herein.
J. The Board of Supervisors may approve the advancement of money from the General Fund
or Road Fund to pay the costs of constructing the improvements covered herein and may
reimburse the General Fund or Road Fund for such advances from planned bridge facility
and/or major thoroughfare funds established pursuant to this section.
K. If a subdivider, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, is required or desires to construct
a bridge and/or major thoroughfare, the Board of Supervisors may enter into a
reimbursement agreement with the subdivider. Such agreement may provide for
payments to the subdivider from the bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund
covering that specific project to reimburse the subdivider for costs not allocated to the
subdivider's property in the resolution establishing the area of benefit. If the bridge and/or
major thoroughfare fund covers more than one project, reimbursements shall be made on
a pro-rata basis, reflecting the actual or estimated costs of the projects covered by the
fund. (Ord.82-0240
62
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Sec. 1, 1982; Ord. 82-0050 Sec. 1, 1982)
22.48.235. MAJOR BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEES. Except as otherwise provided in
Section 22.48.280, a building or structure shall not be used on any lot or parcel of land, any
portion of which is located within a Bridge or Major Thoroughfare District established pursuant
to Section 21.32.200, unless the required district fee has been paid as a condition of issuing a
building permit.
(Ord. 85-0168, Sec. 33)
22.48280 EXEMPTIONS — EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. This Part 4 does not apply
to the use, alteration, or enlargement of an existing building or structure or the erection of one
or more buildings or structures accessory thereto, or both, on the same lot or parcel of land, if
the total value of such alteration, enlargement, or construction does not exceed one half of
the current market value of all existing buildings or structures on such lot or parcel of land.
(Ord. 1494 Ch. 4 Art. 4 & 497.1927.)
63
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
CITY CODE: 17-51.010 MAJOR BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEES
1. A subdivider, as a condition of approval of a final map for property within an area of
benefit, or a building permit applicant, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for
property within an area of benefit, shall pay a fee as hereinafter established to defray the
costs of constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, and/or
constructing major thoroughfares.
2. The provisions herein for payment of a fee shall apply only if the bridge and/or major
thoroughfare has been included in an element of the General Plan adopted by the Council
at least thirty (30) days prior to the filing of a map or application for a building permit on
land located within the boundaries of the area of benefit.
3. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any major thoroughfares are in addition
to or a widening or reconstruction of any existing major thoroughfares serving the area at
the time of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
4. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any planned bridge facility is a new bridge
serving the area or an addition to an existing bridge facility serving the area at the time of
the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
5. Establishing a New Area of Benefit.
a. Action to establish an area of benefit may be initiated by the Council upon its own
motion or upon the recommendation of the City Engineer.
b. The Council will set a public hearing for each proposed area benefited. Notice of
the time and place of said hearing, including preliminary information related to the
boundaries of the area of benefit, estimated costs and the method of fee
apportionment, shall be given pursuant to Section 65905 of the Government Code.
6. Process for a New Area of Benefit.
a. At the public hearing, the Council will consider the testimony, written protests and
other evidence. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council may, unless a
majority written protest is filed and not withdrawn, determine to establish an area of
benefit. If established, the Council shall adopt a resolution describing the boundaries
of the area of benefit, setting forth the cost, whether actual or estimated, and the
method of fee apportionment. A certified copy of such resolution shall be recorded
with the County Recorder.
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
b. Such apportioned fees shall be applicable to all property within the area of benefit,
and shall be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of
issuing a building permit for such property or portions thereof. Where the area of
benefit includes lands not subject to the payment of fees pursuant to this section, the
Council shall make provision for payment of the share of improvement cost
apportioned to such lands from other sources.
c. Any written protest will be received by the City Clerk at any time prior to the close
of the public hearing. If written protests are filed by the owners of more than one-half
(1/2) of the area of the property to be benefited by the improvement, and sufficient
protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the area represented by the protests to
less than one-half (1/2) of the area to be benefited, then the proposed proceedings
shall be abandoned and the Council shall not, for one (1) year from the filing of said
written protests, commence or carry on any proceedings for the same improvement
under the provisions of this section. Any protest may be withdrawn by the owner
making the same, in writing, at any time prior to the close of the public hearing.
d. If any majority protest is directed against only a portion of the improvement, then
all further proceedings under the provisions of this section to construct that portion
of the improvement so protested against shall be barred for a period of one (1) year,
but the Council shall not be barred from commencing new proceedings not including
any part of the improvement so protested against. Such proceedings shall be
commenced by a new notice and public hearing as set forth in subsection (D)(5) of this
section.
e. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Council, which in such one (1) year period,
from commencing and carrying on new proceedings for the construction of an
improvement or portion of the improvement so protested against if it finds, by the
affirmative vote of four -fifths (4/5) of its members, that the owners of more than one-
half (1/2) of the area of the property to be benefited are in favor of going forward with
such improvements or portion thereof.
7. Fees paid pursuant to this section shall be deposited in a planned bridge facility and/or
major thoroughfare fund. A fund shall be established for each planned bridge facility
project and/or each planned major thoroughfare project. If the benefit area is one in which
more than one (1) bridge and/or major thoroughfare is required to be constructed, a
separate fund may be established covering all of the bridge projects and/or major
thoroughfares in the benefit area. Moneys in such fund shall be expended solely for the
construction or reimbursement for construction of the improvement serving the area to be
benefited and from which the fees comprising the fund were collected, or to reimburse the
City for the costs of constructing the improvement.
65
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
8. The Council may approve the acceptance of considerations in lieu of the payment of
fees established herein.
9. The Council may approve the advancement of money from the general fund or road
fund to pay the costs of constructing the improvements covered herein and may reimburse
the general fund or road fund for such advances from planned bridge facility and/or major
thoroughfare funds established pursuant to this section.
10. If a subdivider, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, is required or desires to
construct a bridge and/or major thoroughfare, the Council may enter into a reimbursement
agreement with the subdivider. Such agreement may provide for payments to the
subdivider from the bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund covering that specific
project to reimburse the subdivider for costs not allocated to the subdivider's property in
the resolution establishing the area of benefit. If the bridge and/or major thoroughfare
funds cover more than one (1) project, reimbursements shall be made on a pro rata basis,
reflecting the actual or estimated costs of the projects covered by the fund.
11. Except as otherwise provided in this document, a building or structure shall not be
used on any lot or parcel of land, any portion of which is located within a major bridge or
thoroughfare district established by the City, unless the required district fee has been paid
as a condition of issuing a building permit.
12. This fee does not apply to the use, alteration or enlargement of an existing building or
structure or the erection of one (1) or more buildings or structures accessory thereto, or
both, on the same lot or parcel of land, if the total value of such alteration, enlargement or
construction does not exceed one-half (1/2) of the current market value of existing
buildings or structures on such lot or parcel of land.
ZONING CODE
City of Santa Clarita, California
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
ATTACHMENT E: REGIONAL IMPROVEMENTS
Percent Share According to District
Total
Total
Estimated
Via
Interchange
Description of
Estimated
Estimated Cost
Cost to
#
Location
Improvements
Bouquet
Eastside
Princessa
Castaic
Cost 2002
3/20241
District
Lyons
Bridge
Avenue
and
Signals
Railroad
Right-of-way
VP-0307R
Ave.
acquisition
9.8%
15.6%
72.8%
1.9%
$14,611,340
$30,099,360
$4,695,500
Newhall
Road and
VP-0811R
SR-14
Signals
3.6%
21.2%
75.2%
0.0%
$1,198,170
$2,468,230
$523,265
Widen under
crossing, Flood
control
channel,
retaining wall,
Signals, Right-
Calgrove
of -way
VP-0900R
and 1-5
acquisition
3.2%
8.4%
79.3%
9.2%
$8,528,300
$17,568,298
$1,475,737
Parker
Bridge
Road and I-
widening,
C-0501R
5
Ramps, Signals
3.4%
4.5%
7.0%
85.1%
$4,047,820
$8,338,509
$375,233
67
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
Percent Share According to District
Total
Total
Estimated
Via
Interchange
Description of
Estimated
Estimated Cost
Cost to
#
Location
Improvements
Bouquet
Eastside
Princessa
Castaic
Cost 2002
3/20241
District
Via
Widen under
Princessa
crossing,
E-0505R
and SR-14
Signals
4.9%
83.6%
11.3%
0.1%
$4,022,300
$8,285,938
$6,927,044
Placerita
Signals, Right -
Canyon
of -way
E-110011
and SR-14
acquisition
14.3%
47.6%
37.5%
0.6%
$2,004,410
$4,129,085
$1,965,444
TOTAL:
$34,412,340
$70,889,420
$15,962,223
1 Based on CCI from 12/2002 to March 2024
Eastside Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
Construction Fee District Update Report
ATTACHMENT F: B&T CASH/CREDIT REQUEST FORM
10#:
District Percentages:
Valencia
%
Amount:
$
❑
Cash
Credit
Bouquet Canyon
%
Amount:
$
Cash
Credit
Eastside
%
Amount:
$
Cash
❑
Credit
Castaic District
%
Amount:
$
Cash
❑
Credit
Via Princessa
%
Amount:
$
Cash
❑
Credit
Lyons Avenue/ McBean Parkway
%
Amount:
$
Cash
❑
Credit
Area Identification:
Link#(s): Intersection #(s): Interchange #(s):
Project Description:
ATTACHMENTS
Signature Page
Applicable District Formation Documents
Applicable District Values
County Project Acceptance Letter
75% Refund Calculations
Site Location Map
Contract & Change Orders
Purchasing Authorizations
Contract Summary
Payment Recap
Cancelled Checks & Supporting Documentation
Additional Documentation
Plans
Completed by:
Yes No N/A
Name Title - Developer Date
Submitted to:
Name Title — County Date
FOR COUNTY USE ONLY
Assigned to :
Name Title Date
Approved by:
Name Title Date
Sent to Fiscal by:
Name Title Date