Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-05-13 - AGENDA REPORTS - MC 24 134 NEWHALL MIXED USEO Agenda Item: 1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Li ' DATE: May 13, 2025 SUBJECT: NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134) - CONTINUED DEPARTMENT: Community Development PRESENTER: Erika Iverson RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council: 1. Continue the public hearing. 2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated and will comply with all mitigation measures established under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five -story, mixed -use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). BACKGROUND Request The proposed project is a request by Serrano Development Group, for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Architectural Design Review (ADR), and Development Review (DR) for the redevelopment of the project site into a new five - story, mixed -use project and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building located at 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831- 012-022 through -026), within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). Page 1 Packet Pg. 12 O Planning Commission Hearing On March 18, 2025, a public hearing was held before the Planning Commission. After receiving the staff presentation, testimony from the applicant and members of the public, the Planning Commission approved a resolution recommending the City Council approve the project with additional conditions of approval. A copy of the Planning Commission staff report is available in the City Clerk's Reading File. City Council Hearing On April 22, 2025, the City Council held a public hearing during which it received the staff presentation, opened the public hearing, and received comments from the applicant and members of the public. Public comments in support of the project generally expressed support for housing and commercial development in Old Town Newhall. Public comments of concern on the project included concerns regarding parking, potential construction noise impacts to the neighboring KHTS Radio Station building, and the demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. Following deliberation, the City Council voted to continue the item to May 13, 2025, with the comment portion of the public hearing remaining open. The City Council expressed that additional time was needed for the applicant to reach an agreement with the owners of the neighboring KHTS Radio Station, and that additional time was needed to review documentation that was provided by the applicant on April 22, the day of the meeting, which included: 1. A feasibility analysis and cost estimate, prepared by Pacific Empire Builders, for the relocation of the historically designated Masonic Lodge/Courthouse. 2. A technical memorandum, prepared by Westside Acoustics, regarding construction noise. The City Council also asked the applicant to work with the Council on additional architectural refinements, and to ensure that the Railroad Avenue building elevation be designed to ensure traffic safety. Applicant Letter of April 28, 2025 Following the City Council hearing, the applicant has continued discussion with the neighboring KHTS Radio Station to address the concerns. As a result of the discussions, the applicant has submitted an alternative proposal for a monetary contribution to the City to address the demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. Their original proposal was a contribution to the City of Santa Clarita (City) of $750,000 for future historic preservation efforts. As outlined in the attached applicant letter dated April 28, 2025, their alternative proposal is a contribution to the City of $300,000 for future historic preservation efforts, as they work with KHTS to address construction noise impacts. The staff recommendation continues to be the proposal as originally presented, with a contribution in the amount of $750,000 to the City for future historic preservation efforts, which is the recommendation made by the Planning Commission. If the City Council decides to accept Page 2 Packet Pg. 13 O the revised proposal by the applicant, the Council should direct staff to modify the applicable draft Condition of Approval (PL 7) and include the revised contribution amount in a motion to approve the project. Separately, the property owner of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building received a $22,440 grant (Grant) from the City for building maintenance in 2015. The grant funds would be required to be repaid to the City's General Fund if the building were to be demolished. If approved, the applicant's contribution would include repayment of the grant. Applicant Letter of May 7, 2025 The applicant submitted a second letter, requesting and offering their consent to the addition of a Condition of Approval that would place limitations on the hours of construction for drilling soldier piles and placing garage shoring, such that these activities would not occur within 20 feet of the KHTS Radio Station property line between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., as outlined the attached applicant letter dated May 7, 2025. If the Council decides to incorporate this as a Condition of Approval, the Council should direct staff to include the additional condition in a motion to approve the project. Pacific Empire Builders - Historic Building Relocation Feasibility Assessment A feasibility assessment by Pacific Empire Builders for the potential relocation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building was submitted by the applicant and is provided as an attachment to the agenda report. The scope of the assessment covers a potential relocation route and the technical components associated with demolition, separation, transport, site preparations, and reassembly of the historic building. In their assessment, Pacific Empire Builders outlines an estimated cost of $2.98 million to $4.04 million for relocation efforts of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building and recommends against relocation efforts for reasons of engineering difficulty, public infrastructure impacts, and potential risks to the preservation of the historic integrity of the building. Westside Acoustics - Construction Noise Review The applicant provided an evaluation of the expected construction noise levels for the proposed project, prepared by Westside Acoustics. Westside Acoustics relied on a 2016 acoustical analysis that was prepared for a previous project at Lyons Avenue and Railroad Avenue to evaluate existing noise exposure. Their assessment evaluated the existing noise exposure in the vicinity and the expected project construction noise exposure to provide a comparison. Westside Acoustics determined that the noise level exposure to the radio station, due to construction activities, was comparable to the noise levels that currently exist due to current train activities. Assembly Bill 2097 In addition to the items that the City Council requested of the applicant, there was discussion and questions by the City Council on the provided parking and the application of Assembly Bill (AB) 2097. Under AB 2097, the City cannot require parking minimums unless the City can make Page 3 Packet Pg. 14 O written findings, within 30 days of the receipt of a completed application, that not imposing or enforcing minimum automobile parking requirements on the development would have a substantially negative impact, supported by a preponderance of the evidence in the record, on the City's ability to meet its share of specified housing needs or existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the housing development. In order to assess the parking proposed by the project, the applicant was required to submit a parking demand study. The parking study provided for this project compared the parking demand for similar projects, in relation to the available parking in Newhall. The study concluded that the project, with the onsite parking as proposed, and payment of the in -lieu fee, would not have a negative impact on residential or commercial parking, and therefore would be sufficient for the proj ect. Separately, the City conducted a parking study of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan area in 2015, and re-evaluated that study in 2022. The City's survey evaluated the available public and private parking supply within the entire 22-block OTNSP and it evaluated the parking supply in the 15-block Main Street subarea. Based on the focused Main Street subarea analysis that was evaluated in 2022, there is an existing parking supply that exceeds the peak parking demand, leaving a surplus of 197 spaces. The applicant's parking demand study was reviewed in light of the City's existing parking study and reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineering division for methodology. The findings of the applicant parking demand study are consistent with the City's previous analysis of the parking demand and supply in the Main Street subarea. As a result of this analysis, no written findings were provided to the applicant requiring more parking than set forth in the applicant's study within the thirty (30) days after the applicant's application was deemed complete. Therefore, under AB 2097, the City cannot require parking above that proposed by the applicant. As new developments come forward, City staff will continue to track the parking supply. New projects relying on AB 2097 for reduced parking will be required to evaluate their project parking demand and provide project parking accordingly. Project Height There was some discussion about the height of the project. This project is subject to the provisions of the State Housing Accountability Act ("HAA"). A housing or mixed -use project that is consistent with the objective standards in the City's Municipal Code must be approved. Further, under the HAA the City must notify an applicant of any standards that the project does not meet within thirty (30) days of the project application being deemed complete. If no notice is given by that deadline, the project is deemed consistent with the City's objective criteria. The 55-feet height for this project is based upon an interpretation that this project, which spans the whole block of Market Street, between Main Street and Railroad Avenue, constitutes a whole block development, consistent with the prior approval of the Newhall Crossings project; accordingly, no notice of height inconsistency was provided to the applicant within thirty (30) days of the project application being deemed complete. Therefore, in addition to consistency with the prior interpretation of the specific plan, the project is also deemed consistent with the Page 4 Packet Pg. 15 O height requirements under the HAA. CONCLUSION The Newhall Mixed -Use Project is consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, Santa Clarita Municipal Code, and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. The applicant's commemoration proposal for the historic building is consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and mitigation measures in the OTNSP Environmental Impact Report. Therefore, Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134 (CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012) for the construction of a new five -story mixed -use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). As of the writing of this agenda report, one additional comment letter from the property owner of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building has been received and is provided as an attachment. ALTERNATIVE ACTION Other action as determined by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT The applicant would be required to pay various development impact fees, including, but not limited to, Bridge and Thoroughfare and park dedication (Quimby) fees. Upon receipt of a monetary contribution, $22,440 would be deposited into the General Fund (Fund 100) for historic preservation grant repayment, and the remaining money would be deposited into the Site Improvement Fee Fund (Fund 431) to support local historic preservation efforts. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Aerial and Zoning Map Site & Floor Plans Elevations & Renderings Parking Demand Study Historical Society Letter Proposal for Demo of Historic Resource Pacific Empire Builders - Historic Building Relocation Feasibility Assessment Westside Acoustics - Construction Noise Review Applicant Letter to Amend Proposed Contribution Applicant Letter to Request Additional Condition of Approval Comment Letter Page 5 Packet Pg. 16 O CEQA Notice of Determination MC24-134 Prior Hearing Documents (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Public Notice (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Page 6 Packet Pg. 17 1.a RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING MASTER CASE 24-134, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW FIVE -STORY MIXED -USE BUILDING AND DEMOLITION AND DELISTING OF THE MASONIC LODGE/COURTHOUSE BUILDING LOCATED AT 24300, 24308, 24316 MAIN STREET AND 22505 MARKET STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 2831-012-022 THROUGH -026), IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. The City Council makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: A. On June 28, 2024, the applicant (Serrano Development Group) initiated Master Case 24-134, consisting of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-007, Minor Use Permit (MUP) 24-015, Adjustment Permit (ADJ) 24-005, Architectural Design Review (ADR) 24-017, and Development Review (DR) 24-012. The properties affected by the initial application are Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-023 through -026; B. On November 27, 2024, the application was revised to include an additional property which is APN 2831-012-022; C. The application was deemed complete on November 27, 2024; D. The project site consists of five parcels totaling approximately three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. The project proposes to demolish three existing buildings on -site: Mac's Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Soundsations (24300 and 24308 Main Street), and the City Council -designated historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street); E. The project site is located within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP); F. The applicant proposes to delist and demolish the existing structures on -site to construct a new five -story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area and 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and first -floor parking level. The project includes the closure of one driveway on Main Street and would allow for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requests relief from the requirements of the OTNSP to include a 20-percent reduction from Pagel of 8 Packet Pg. 18 1.a the shared residential amenity space and to increase the allowable floor area ratio above 200 percent of the structure's first -floor footprint; G. In compliance with Assembly Bill 2097, the applicant is proposing to provide residential and on -street guest parking to avoid a negative impact on commercial and residential parking within one-half mile of the project site, as demonstrated in the parking demand study on file with the Planning Division. Specifically, the study proposes to provide a 1.56 residential parking ratio on -site instead of the 2.0 ratio required by the OTNSP. The study also proposes a 0.25 per unit ratio for guest parking to be accommodated on -street, instead of the required 0.5 per unit ratio. The proposed development is utilizing the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement; H. The project proposes to demolish a building designated as historic by the City Council under the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the OTNSP. The OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1, which governs the demolition of historical structures. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, which states that this structure is no longer historically significant. The applicant would fulfill the requirements of MM-CUL-1 by recording the building in accordance with a Historic Architectural Building Survey, installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts; I. On March 18, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; During this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending the City Council approve the proposed project. The Planning Commission recommended the addition of two conditions of approval to the project: PC requiring the creation of a Parking Management Plan, and PC2 requiring a construction plan to ensure the structural integrity of the neighboring building; K. On April 22, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) City Council at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; L. During this public hearing, the City Council considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony, and voted 4-0 to continue the public hearing to May 13, 2025; and M. The City Council continued the public hearing on Master Case 24-134 on May 13, 2025. At this public hearing, the City Council considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony. This resolution, and its findings, are based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, the staff reports, testimony, written evidence, and meeting minutes provided during the public hearings. Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 19 1.a SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 24-134. Based upon the foregoing facts and conclusions, the City Council finds as follows: A. The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. In particular, the applicant would fulfill the requirements of MM-CUL-1. As demonstrated by the letter on file from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse has been substantially altered and no further action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required. Consequently, a Notice of Determination was prepared for this project in compliance with CEQA; B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the City Council is based is the Master Case 24-134 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development Department in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the City Council hereby finds the Notice of Determination for this Project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows: A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation: The proposed project is consistent with the following policies of the General Plan: Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth. Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed -use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed -use zoning. Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels. The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed -use building in a walkable and transit -friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes and income levels. Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 20 1.a B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP); The proposed project would be consistent with the following findings of the OTNSP: OTNSP-1: That the proposed use or project is consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. OTNSP-2: That the proposed use or project meets the development requirements for the Zone within which it is located including parking, architecture, and ground -floor uses. A Stacked Dwelling building type is permitted -by -right in the AE zone of the OTNSP only as part of a vertical mixed -use project with upper floor residential. Any future tenants in the new commercial spaces constructed by the project are subject to the requirements of OTNSP Table 4.2-1, the permitted use chart for the AE zone. A CUP would allow an increase to the allowable FAR above 200 percent of the structure's first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. An ADJ is requested to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20-percent from OTNSP standards. The building is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. The proposed project complies with all other development standards for the AE zone and Stacked Dwelling building type. With the Conditions of Approval, the project will comply with Titles 16 and 17 of the SCMC and the OTNSP. C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and The proposed project is not located on a hazardous site and would not include any hazardous materials. Standard construction materials and methods would be utilized to ensure safety during construction. The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, including, without limitation: the California Building Standards Code and Fire Code. Sufficient access for firefighting purposes is provided and verified by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LACFD), and the applicant must comply with all LACFD requirements. D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use; The subject site includes existing commercial development and surface parking. The parking demand study for the project demonstrates that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed building. The proposed building complies with the City's standards for mixed -use development, including compliance with setbacks, building height, drive -aisle Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 21 1.a width, and landscaping. 2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are ofsufcient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate; The project is accessed via Market Street and Railroad Avenue, and improvements to the roadway are required for the proposed building. The applicant must comply with all City - imposed engineering requirements when constructing any improvements in the right-of- way, such as sewer laterals, parkway tree installation, and ADA paths of travel at the driveways. The project will not have a significant effect on vehicle miles traveled or traffic, and existing driveway ingress and egress from the site will be maintained. With the proposed improvements along the proj ect's frontage, the project will comply with all requirements of the City's Department of Public Works. 3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriprotection, etc.) are readily available; and The project will have public protection services provided by both the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) and LACFD, and will not require any additional resources or services from those organizations as a result of its operation. The proposal would also be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the LACFD and LASD. 4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc) is adequate to serve the site. The proposed use would be located within an existing commercial area, which is located within a developed urbanized area with available and adequate utilities to serve the site. The proposed project would connect to this existing infrastructure on -site. SECTION 4: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR THE RELOCATION OR DEMOLITION OF A HISTORIC RESOURCE. As required by SCMC Section 17.64.100, the City Council must approve the relocation or demolition of a property or structure that has been designated as a historic resource. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows: A. That the City Council must make findings to relocate a historic structure. Alternatively, upon completion of environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition. As identified in the letter provided by the Santa Clarita Historical Society, relocation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building is not feasible. In addition, the historical integrity of the building was compromised by a remodel in 1968. No interior features remain from its use as a Los Angeles County Courthouse. As described above, the project is consistent Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 22 1.a with the previously prepared FEIR for the OTNSP, including MM-CUL-1. The applicant is conditioned to record the building in accordance with a Historic Architectural Building Survey, install a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, place a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and make a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. Therefore, the requirements of the SCMC and the OTNSP for the delisting and demolition of a building designated as a historic resource are met. SECTION 5: FINDINGS FOR ADJUSTMENT PERMIT. As required by SCMC Section 17.24.100, based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows: 1. That the adjustment does not authorize a use or activity that is not allowed in the zone; The ADJ is consistent with the development standards of the OTNSP and will not authorize a use or activity that is prohibited under the zone. All proposed uses and activities remain within the scope of the OTNSP. The proposed project furthers the goal of creating a vibrant and active Main Street, and would further enliven the area by providing street -level retail space along with additional residential density in this urban environment. 2. That granting an adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which would otherwise be denied to the property for which the adjustment is sought; and The proposed project meets the intent and goals of the OTNSP, as described above, and provides meaningful shared amenity space as required by the specific plan. The applicant is providing 10,929 square feet of amenity space, 20 percent less than the 13,560 square feet required by the OTNSP. The provided amenities include an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and bike room for residents of the proposed development. The provided amenities meet the intent of the OTNSP and the provided square footage is appropriate given the compact, high -density nature of the development, while remaining within the height requirements of the OTNSP 3. That the granting of the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. As described above, the development, including the granting of the ADJ, will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property as it is providing a reduction to a development standard that has been evaluated and reviewed by all appropriate agencies. SECTION 6: APPROVALS. The City Council takes the following actions: Adopt this resolution approving Master Case 24-134, Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24- 017, and Development Review 24-012, for the construction of a new five -story mixed - use building at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 23 1.a and the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, subject to the conditions of approval (Exhibit A). SECTION 7: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 8: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact. SECTION 9: NOTICE. The City Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the City Council and any other person requesting a copy. SECTION 10: EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the City Council's final decision made on , 2025. SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025. ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: MAYOR Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 24 1.a STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-_ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 25 1.a EXHIBIT A MASTER CASE 24-134 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita's (City) approval of Master Case 24-134. GENERAL CONDITIONS GC1. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC. GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval must be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre -commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of 60 calendar days or more must terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use must not be re-established or resumed after the 60-day period. Discontinuation must include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume. GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally -approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration. GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term "permittee" includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys' fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee. GCS. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspection requirements as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director (Director). Packet Pg. 26 1.a GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the plans date -stamped on file, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein. GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon permittee's successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC. GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval. GC9. When Exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail. GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed. GC 11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020. GC12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the City Council. GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director. GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval. GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated. Packet Pg. 27 1.a GC16. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions. GC 17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the permittee. PLANNING COMMISSION PC1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee agrees to develop a parking management plan in a form approved by the Director for both construction and permanent parking. PC2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must provide a plan for the Director's approval to ensure structural integrity of immediately adjacent structures during construction. PLANNING DIVISION PL1. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Newhall Mixed -Use Project, including a five -story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 5,223 square feet of first -floor commercial space, 78 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 24-134. PL2. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans, elevations, colors, materials, and other elements on file with the Planning Division. Any modification to the approved project and plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director. PL3. The building is approved at the heights shown on the approved elevations and cannot exceed 55 feet in height. Architectural enhancements extending above the roofline are permitted only as shown on the approved plans and may not exceed an additional 12 feet in height. PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 122 parking stalls on -site (1.56 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 20 public on -street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio). PL5. In lieu of constructing 12 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $70,261.20 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building Packet Pg. 28 1.a permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid PL6. Before any permit is issued including, without limitation, a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, the permittee must complete all required recordation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, as required by the OTNSP FEIR MM-CUL-1 and the permittee's commitments to preserving the building's history as approved by the City Council. PL7. Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit, the permittee must donate $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. PL8. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install a commemorative plaque on the building exterior and provide an art installation within the lobby to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. PL9. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must obtain a Temporary Use Permit and install two murals on the North Elevation as shown on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division. PL10. The uses in the commercial building are subject to the permitted use chart for the AE zone of the OTNSP. PL11. All roof -mounted and ground -mounted equipment must be screened from public view PL12. No signage is approved by this permit. All future signage requires a sign permit application in accordance with the OTNSP. Exposed neon is not permitted. Landscaping Conditions LR1. Before the City Engineer issues grading permit(s), the permittee must provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans (Landscape Document Package) for the Director's review and approval. The Landscape Document Package must be prepared by a California -registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20' to 30' F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105' F to 110' F). The Landscape Document Package must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other SCMC requirements. LR2. The permittee is required to pay all associated fees to the City before the release of the approved Landscape Document Package for the project. LR3. The permittee must coordinate with the Director of Administrative Services regarding any landscaping installed on City right-of-way. The Director of Administrative Services must review the landscape and irrigation plans when submitted, and all such landscaping must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services before installation. The permittee must receive final approval for the installed landscape before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy. Packet Pg. 29 1.a LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection. LR5. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved Landscape Document Package. ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION General Requirements EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide an approval letter from Southern California Edison (Distribution Division and/or Transmission Division, as appropriate) and from all other affected utilities for the proposed grading and improvements adjacent to their existing facilities, as required by the City Engineer. EN2. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site must be installed underground by the permittee. Certificate of Compliance Requirements EN3. Before the Building Official issues any building permit, a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment encompassing all parcels within the boundaries of this project prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California must be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; in compliance with applicable law Grading and Geology Requirements EN4. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a grading plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. The grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations, including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction. ENS. Before the Building Official issues building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee. EN6. This project anticipates export of 18,972 CY of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation. Packet Pg. 30 1.a A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation: i. Obtain an encroachment permit for the work. ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee. C. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route. EN7. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Letter of Permission for review and approval for grading over easements/outside of the property lines from the affected easement holder/adjacent property owner(s). Drainage Requirements EN8. Before the City Engineer, or designee issues a grading permit, the permittee must have the site drainage study approved by the City Engineer demonstrating that post - development flows from the site will not be increased from pre -development flows, or mitigate for the increase. Water Quality Requirements EN9. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan. Packet Pg. 31 1.a Street Light Relocation Requirements EN10. Before street plan approval, the permittee must submit a revised Street Light Plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must relocate the existing street light along Railroad Avenue per the approved revised plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street Improvement Requirements EN11. Before the revised street plan approval and any construction within public street right-of- way, the permittee must submit to the City Engineer or designee a revised street improvement plan for review and approval to obtain encroachment permits from the City Engineer, or designee. EN12. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee is required to dedicate a portion of its property to City for public right-of-way to meet the requirements of SCMC Section 17.55, creating a clear sight triangle ensuring unobstructed views for drivers. Permittee may, but is not required to, reserve property rights to include all projections, such as awnings, within the airspace of the dedicated public right-of-way. Such reservation must be approved as to form by the City Attorney. EN13. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee must submit a street tree location plan to the Urban Forestry Administrator for review and approval. The plan must include proposed sewer lateral locations, storm drain infrastructure, and trees must not conflict with the proposed infrastructure. EN14. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant Curb Ramp (per the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) along the property frontage corner at the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street and dedicate necessary easement to the City, as directed by the City Engineer. EN15. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an ADA compliance Curb Ramp (per SPPWC Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) at all three other corners of the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street per the State of California DOT Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-06 and as directed by the City Engineer. Railroad Avenue is designated as a State Route and any modification at the intersection, requires existing nonstandard curb ramps to be reconstructed to current standards per DIB 82-06. EN16. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must dedicate sidewalk easements sufficient to encompass ADA requirements for sidewalks installed with drive approaches per the current SPPWC Standard Plan 110-2, Type C, or equivalent. EN17. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must replace the abandoned driveway(s) with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement in Packet Pg. 32 1.a accordance with SPPWC standards and in compliance with OTNSP, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A revised street plan and encroachment permit is required. EN18. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets abutting the project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sewer Improvement Requirements EN19. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the proposed building(s) lateral line(s) must connect to the existing public sewer main in Market Street (8" sewer per PC CI2520), and the permittee must coordinate with the Building & Safety Division regarding payment of additional annexation fees, if required, to annex the property into the County Sanitation District. EN20. The on -site sewer is a privately maintained. Before grading plan approval, the permittee must submit an "on -site sewer plan." The "on -site sewer plan" are designed per the California Plumbing Code and approved by the Building Official before Grading Plan approval. EN21. Before the Building Official issues Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. EN22. The permittee must also obtain a permit from LA County Building Official to install a new saddle on the existing public sewer by LA County Sewer Maintenance Division, if the wye does not exist on the existing public sewer. Bond, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements EN23. Before City Engineer, or designee issue encroachment permits for public improvements (Street), the permittee, by agreement with the City Engineer, must guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means in a form approved by the City Attorney. Certificate of Occupancy/Occupancies are withheld if the improvements are not completed. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TEL Before the City Engineer issues street plan approval, the permittee must show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110- 2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details will be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum. TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulb - out on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach. Packet Pg. 33 1.a TE3. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must restripe Market Street per the attached exhibit (Striping Exhibit — Market Street) to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. TE4. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee will pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Via Princessa B&T District. The current rate for this District is $22,710. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment. Standard B&T Fee Calculation: Apartments = the number of units (78) x the district rate ($22,710) x 0.7 = $1,239,966 B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division must be calculated as follows: Retail Commercial = 5,223 sf x $22,710 x 5 = $36,306 16,335 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FD 1. All fire lanes must be clear of all encroachments and must be maintained in accordance with Section 503 of County of Los Angeles Fire Code, Title 32, as adopted by the SCMC, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. FD2. Main Street, Market Street & Railroad Avenue serve as the Fire Apparatus Access roads for this project. For buildings where the vertical distance between the access roadway and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet from the lowest level of the Fire Apparatus Access Road, provide a minimum unobstructed width of 28 feet, exclusive of shoulders and an unobstructed vertical clearance "clear to sky" Fire Apparatus Access Roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. At least one required access route meeting this condition must be located such that the edge of the Fire Apparatus Access Roadway, not including shoulders, that is closest to the building being served, is between 10 feet and 30 feet from the building, as determined by the fire code official, and must be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the Fire Apparatus Access Road is positioned must be approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.1.1; 503.2.1.2; 503.2.1.2.2 & 503.2.1.2.2.1). FD3. The dimensions of the approved Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be maintained as originally approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.2.2.1). FD4. Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing 75,000 pounds and must be surfaced to provide all- weather driving capabilities (Fire Code 503.2.3). Packet Pg. 34 1.a FD5. A minimum 5-foot-wide approved firefighter access walkway leading from the Fire Department Access Road to all required openings in the building's exterior walls must be provided for firefighting and rescue purposes (Fire Code 504.1). FD6. Security barriers, visual screen barriers or other obstructions must not be installed on the roof of any building in such a manner as to obstruct firefighter access or egress in the event of fire or other emergency. Parapets must not exceed 42 inches from the top of the parapet to the roof surface on more than two sides. These sides should face an access roadway or yard sufficient to accommodate ladder operations (Fire Code 504.5). FD7. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4N 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD8. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 3500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 3 hours. Three public fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow (Fire Code 507.3 & Appendix B). FD9. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed buildings within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval before installation. FD10. Install 1 public fire hydrant as noted by the Fire Department. All required public fire hydrants must be installed, tested and accepted before beginning construction. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD11. A digital copy of the Water Plans for the required public fire hydrant must be submitted to the Fire Department's Land Development Unit for review and approval. Compliance is required before project construction. Submittal must be provided through EPIC -LA using the following Plan Type: Fire Land Development —Water Plan & System Review. BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION Plans and Permits BSI. Construction drawings must be prepared and submitted to the Building & Safety Division for plan review and building permit issuance. Supporting documents; such as structural and energy calculations, and geotechnical reports must be included with the plan submittal. BS2. The submitted site plan must show all parcel/lot lines, easements, fire separation distances, restricted use areas, etc. Any construction proposed in an easement must obtain the easement owner's written permission or the easement must be removed. Parcel lines that overlap any proposed buildings must be removed (lot line adjustment) before the Building Official issues a building permit. Packet Pg. 35 1.a BS3. Construction drawings must incorporate mitigation measures identified by a noise study prepared by a qualified noise engineer. Electric Vehicle Parking Spaces for the residential portion of the project per CalGreen BS4. EV Ready parking spaces with receptacles for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles at the rate of 40% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. For the receptacle power source and configuration see CalGreen 4.106.4.2.2. BSS. Additionally, EV Ready parking spaces with EV chargers for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with Level 2 EV chargers at the rate of 10% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. At least 50% of these EV chargers must be equipped with J1772 connectors. Accessibility for the residential portion of the project BS6. All applicable disabled access requirements of California Building Standards Code (CBSC) Chapter 11A, as adopted by the SCMC, must be shown on the architectural plans versus civil plans. BS7. If the project receives any public funds such as tax credits, incentives or similar programs the multi -family project must comply with the public housing requirements of the California Building Code, Chapter 11B. Soil Reports and Grading BS8. A complete soils and geology investigation report will be required for this project. The report must be formally submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The recommendations of the report must be followed and incorporated into the plans for the proj ect. Hazard Zones BS9. Indicate on the cover sheet of the plans this project IS NOT LOCATED in a Fire Hazard Zone, IS NOT LOCATED in the Flood Hazard Zone, and IS NOT LOCATED in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Additional Information BS10. Separate Demolition Permit will be required to raze any building to be removed on the site. Clearances from the City Planning Division, City Environmental Services (for construction demolition deposit) and AQMD will be required before the Building Official issues a demolition permit. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ES1. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must demonstrate appropriate, detailed safety measures for resident access to organics bins as well as to bins with chute connections. Packet Pg. 36 1.a ES2. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide confirmation to utilize "push -out" service provided by the waste hauler, to avoid the need for a bin staging area along Market Street. ES3. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide elevations and/or site plans for the chute system that identify the correct location and placement of both chutes and corresponding bins within the trash rooms. ES4. Before a building, demolition, or grading permit is issued, the permittee must submit a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) and receive approval from the Environmental Services Manager or Designee if the project meets the parameters below (S.C.M.C.§15.46.300): A. All demolition projects (regardless of valuation), all commercial projects of new construction or additions over 1,000 square feet and all tenant improvements, alterations or new construction valued greater than $200,000, all new residential construction projects and all residential additions and improvements that increase building area, volume, or size must comply with the City's Construction and Demolition Materials (C&D) Recycling Ordinance. S.C.M.C.§15.46.200 B. A minimum of 65% of the entire project's inert (dirt, rock, bricks, etc.) waste and 65% of the remaining C&D waste must be recycled or reused rather than disposing in a landfill. S.C.M.C.§15.46.610 and CALGreen sections 4.408, 5.408, 301.1.1 and 301.3 C. For renovation or tenant improvement projects and new construction projects, a deposit of 2% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. For demolition projects, a deposit of 10% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. The full deposit will be returned to the permittee upon proving that 65% of the inert and remaining C&D waste was recycled or reused. S.C.M.C.§15.46.400 ES5. All projects within the City that are not self -hauling waste materials must use one of the City's franchised haulers for temporary and roll -off bin collection services. S.C.M.C.§15.44.220 PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION PR1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must pay the required Park Dedication Fee equal to the value of the amount of land established per the City's General Plan, "Parks and Recreation Element." The permittee may be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Final Parkland dedication obligation calculation to be based on current density per dwelling and fair market value rates at time of payment. An estimate is attached. Packet Pg. 37 1.a TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DIVISION TS1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a Grading Permit, the permittee must demonstrate compliance with SCMC Section 17.51.007 (Connected City Infrastructure Program) requiring conduit from a location to be determined in the public right-of-way to the Minimum Point of Entry (MPOE) or similar location within the project area that serves as the main telecommunications closet. Conduit for this condition must be reflected on development plans. TRANSIT DIVISION TR1. The current Transit Impact Fee is $216 per residential unit. Permittee must pay the fee in place at the time of building permit issuance. SPECIAL DISTRICTS SD 1. This permittee is required to protect and preserve in place all existing Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) landscape located within the public right of way along Main Street and Market Street. For this project, landscape includes without limitation, trees, shrubs, irrigation, lighting, electrical outlets, pilasters with Trex / wood cross rails, decking, brick pavers, brick planters, raised planters, wrought iron, potted plants on city irrigation, and any other amenity items located within the existing landscape planters and walkways. SD2. This project is located within the Downtown Newhall Corridor and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. As a result, all required landscape improvements must be consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plans and design guidelines. SD3. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to install full landscape improvements along Main Street where the current drive approach to Mac's Pool supply is located. These improvements must close the gap, and connect the two existing planters located on opposite sides of the drive approach. The current preliminary plan is showing a Schinus molle "California pepper" tree as a proposed tree in this area. Schinus molle is not an approved tree and must be replaced with an approved species. SD4. New landscape includes without limitation: connecting to and extending the brick pavers (walkway), existing planters, irrigation, and the installation of new planters consisting of trees shrubs, lighting and other landscape features similar to those in the existing planters. SD5. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit final landscape plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect and receive approval by LMD. SD6. Existing parkway trees and landscape along Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue are required to be protected and preserved in place. This may include having to install approved temporary protective fencing around the edge of the planters to protect trees, shrubs, irrigation and other landscape amenities located within the planter during construction. Packet Pg. 38 1.a SD7. Unless waived by the Director of Administrative Services, the planter located at the back edge of the sidewalk shared by both Mac's Pool Supply and the adjacent KHTS building must be protected and preserved in place. If this planter cannot be protected in place, the permittee will be required to repair and / or replace this planter to the satisfaction of the Director of Administrative Services. SD8. Full parkway landscape improvements will be required along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. These landscape improvements must be consistent with the improvements currently along Railroad Avenue and 51h Street fronting the Hotel Lexen. This includes installing amenities such as bollard / hitching post, and protected electrical outlets. SD9. If at any time during the project, the irrigation to any existing landscape is turned off, the permittee and their contractors will be responsible to provide supplemental irrigation / water to all trees and shrubs throughout the duration of the project by any means necessary at no cost to the City. Trees and shrubs which die, or decline to a condition unacceptable by Director of Administrative Services, must be replaced by the permittee at no cost to the City. SD10. The permittee is responsible for replacing any missing landscape shrubs in the planters fronting the project site. SDI 1. The permittee is responsible for replacing or repairing any damaged or missing pavers or decking located within the public right-of-way fronting the project on both Main Street and Market Street. SD12. The permittee is required to show all existing landscape which fronts the project on Main Street to scale on all future sets of site plans including, without limitation; demolition, grading, construction and landscape plans (preliminary and final). SDI 3. At no time is any construction material, equipment or vehicles permitted to be stored or placed within a landscape planter where trees and shrubs exist. At no time is any form of hazardous material including runoff water from washing and cleaning of tools and equipment be permitted to enter any existing or proposed landscape planter. SD14. The permittee is advised that parkway trees are maintained by the City's LMD. At no time will any parkway tree be pruned for sign visibility. This information must be included with all paperwork for all future tenants. SD15. Any impacts to root system of an existing City maintained tree must be approved by the City Arborist. Work completed within the "Tree Protected Zone" (TPZ) must be completed by hand in the presence of a qualified consulting arborist with documented experience with monitoring trees during construction. The permittee will be required to retain the services of a qualified consulting arborist to perform all required monitoring. This will be completed at no cost to the City of Santa Clarita. Packet Pg. 39 1.a Landscabe Maintenance Districts SD16. These parcels are located within LMD Zone 28, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscapes located in the Newhall area. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to LMD Zone 28 in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. SD17. These parcels are located within LMD Areawide Zone 2008-1, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscaped medians on major thoroughfares located throughout the City of Santa Clarita. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to the Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. Streetlight Maintenance District SD18. These parcels were originally annexed by County of Los Angeles into a Lighting District with a maximum assessment of $12.38 per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Unit) without a cost of living index/escalator. The permittee will be required to annex all parcels into the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (SCLLD), Street -lighting Zone B. The District funds the operation and maintenance of various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District. SDI 9. As part of any required street improvements, the permittee may be required to add, relocate, or update streetlights along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. All streetlights and their locations must be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District (SMD). City of Santa Clarita Park Dedication Fee Requirement �a r '�'h r Project Description: Old Town Newhall Mixed -Use TractJMC#:24-134 1 � LJb Housing Units Density Dwelling 5Acres * FMV Per 1000 Sub Total 20hOff Site Improvements In Lieu Fee 78 2870 0.005 1 $220.000J $934,984 $196,997 $1,181,981 Total Density 224 Total Acres due 1.11930 30% Max. Park Credit 0.33579 With Park Credit 078351 $689,489 $137,898 $827,387 TOTAL FEES DUE WITH 30% CREDIT= $827,387 TOTAL FEES DUE WITHOUT CREDIT= $1,181,981 Potential Private Park Total Total Max. Credit Estimate Reviewed by: Katie Knyb Credit SQ. FT. Acres 30% $364,694 14.627 1 0.33579 1 0.33579 Date: 21612025 "The applicant will be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the Fair Market Value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Method of calculAm per the City of Santa Clarita General Plan - Pads and Recrea0on EI—L DU X Population x 5 acres per X "FMV = Subtotal X 12 = In Lieu Fee per DU 1000 people 6u idable acre Packet Pg. 40 1.a U) r-r CD CD 9 3 r B C S c� ro r Q Packet Pg. 41 1.b AERIAL AND ZONING MAP Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Aerial Map Packet Pg. 42 1.b Zoning Map ZONING KEY AE (OTNSP) I — Old Town Newhall Specific Plan — Arts & Entertainment N (OTNSP) 1- Old Town Newhall Specific Plan — Neighborhood S:\CD\!PLANNING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2024\MC24-134 (ADJ, ADR, DR, CUP, MUP Market & Main Mixed-Use)\5. Planning Commission\3. MC24-134 Aerial and Zoning Map.doc Packet Pg. 43 1.c SITE & FLOOR PLANS Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Packet Pg. 44 - UTILI TIES -- - ---- _ -- --- UTILITIES - -1 I'1 STAIRS II IILII W ° ® i 3 RAMP UP II_II EXIT TO RAILROAD �- -I 71- �I IL'I��ILI -IH�I �LI ll I H-n- I I ��I�-LI I) � 1111� II III II I�-II� =dICl-ld ld �III II II I ---CCI-1I I a x� �rc �!Urx _ w RESIDENTIAL PARKING -I 67STALLsS [a I _III ICI 1 11 M E € 12 Q Q 12 STAIRS it � � I 12 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES - 27 EV CHARGING SPACES -7 ACCESSIBLE EMS -I ACCESS BLE SPACES -I VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - I TANDAM SPACES - 52 (X SINGLE SPACE - 15 TOTAL BASEMENT PARKING - 67 STALLS �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submitta. BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN packet Pg. 45 PARKING ENTRY/EXIT (RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT ONLY) o Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development SERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa ciarita, CA ARE NiERIORS 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES -22 EV CHARGING SPACES -6 ACCESSIBLE EVCS - 1 ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 TANDEM SPACES - 36 (1& SINGLE SPACES - 19 TOTALGARAGE PARKING -55STALLS TOTAL RETAIL SQ. FT. - 5,223 SF �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 14 1 60' Planning Submftta FIRST FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 46 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (2ND FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 8 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 18 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal SECOND FLOOR PLAN packet pg. 47 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION ORD FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal THIRD FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 48 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION WTH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal FOURTH FLOOR PLAN packet pg. 49 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (5TH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal FIFTH FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 50 1.d ELEVATIONS & RENDERINGS Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Packet Pg. 51 WEST ELEVATION MAIN ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER is. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SOSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — 24I Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA MAX. HEIGHT ROOF LEVEL ffi LEVEL 5 LEVEL4 C � 1", LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 c> 1.d SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION - MAIN STREET (WEST) SOUTH ELEVATION MARKET ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER is. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SOSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d 4 SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. ELEVATION - MARKET STREET (SOUTH) Planning Submftta EAST ELEVATION RAILROAD AVE EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER 1S. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SOSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d a SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION - RAILROAD AVE (EAST) EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER 1S. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) 27. PAINTED WALL MURAL 4:"SERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP ua Ecna Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION (NORTH) PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA Main Street Elevation Elevations �_- SERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP 1.d Ism �RORITECTURE INTERIORS Packet Pg. 56 PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA Railroad Avenue Eleavtion Elevations ��- SERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP 1.d Ism ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS Packet Pg. 57 IIIIIII�� PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA Market Street Elevation Elevations �aSERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP 1.d Ism �RORITECTURE INTERIORS Packet Pg. 58 $Y0.�CS"Lttii`�C'CL«4 _ .. I c C t 6 PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA North Elevation Elevations 4�-SERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP 1.d Ism ARC ITECTRE INTERIORS Packet Pg. 59 February 5, 2025 Tai Lane Serrano Development Group 24 N. Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 LLG Reference No. 2.24.4807.1 Subject: Parking Demand Analysis for the Downtown Newhall Mixed -Use Project Santa Clarita, California Dear Ms. Lane: As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Demand Analysis for the proposed mixed -used project development in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. The project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue. The Project proposes to demolish three existing retail buildings to construct a 78-unit multifamily development, inclusive of 5,223 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail. Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces. Based on our understanding, a detailed parking assessment is needed to justify a reduced parking requirement for the site when compared to the City's code parking requirements. As such, the following items have been considered. ■ Parking requirements documented in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022 ■ Research of relevant parking reductions (i.e. Assembly Bill 2097, ITE, other comparable Cities, etc.) ■ Hourly off -site parking demand counts in the immediate area of the Project 2 Executive Circle Suite 250 1 rvi n e, CA 92614 949.825.6175 r 949.825.5939 F www.11gengineers.co Pasadena Irvine San Diego David S. Shender, PE John A. Boarman, PE Richard E. Berretta, PE Keil D. Maberry, PE KC Yellapu, PE Dave Roseman, PE Shankar Ramakrishnan, P An LGZWB Company Founded 19a5 Packet Pg. 60 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 2 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Location and Description The proposed Project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. Figure 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the overall Project site in the context of the surrounding street system. The proposed Project includes the development of a five -story building, with basement, consisting of 78 apartment units, above a two -level parking structure. The Project's unit mix will consist of 39 one -bedroom units, 35 two -bedroom units, and 4 three -bedroom units, with 5,223 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail space. Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces. Table 1, attached to this letter, provides a summary of the Project development, inclusive of the Project's proposed parking supply. Figure 2 presents the proposed Project site plan prepared by SAE Architecture Interiors. As shown on Figure 2, with the closure of the existing driveway on Main Street, an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided with the construction of the proposed Project. PARKING ANALYSIS Code Parking Requirements The code parking calculation for the residential component of the Project is based on the City's requirements as outlined in Chapter 17.42 Residential Use Types of the City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code while the commercial component of the Project is based on the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. Based on the above the City's Code specifies the following parking requirements: ■ Multifamily Residential: two (2) space per unit plus one-half (0.5) space per unit for guest parking ■ Retail: 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF O *Mk �fimL(N%WA Packet Pg. 61 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 3 On that basis, Table 2 presents the code parking requirements for the proposed Project. Review of the upper portion of Table 2 presents the residential component which identifies a 195-space requirement. When compared to the proposed on -site parking supply of 122 spaces, a 73-space code -calculated shortfall is indicated. It should be noted that based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Later in the letter provides further justification and recommendations. The lower portion of the Table 2 shows the commercial component which identifies that 12 spaces are required. The Old Town Newhall Specific Plan identifies a Parking In -Lieu Fee program for which the Project would be required to contribute to. The fee would be applied to the commercial parking component of the Project, as determined by the City. The fee shall be established by separate resolution of the City Council. Funds collected by the City from fee payments may be used to finance the creation or expansion of public parking through the purchase of property and the construction of new facilities, including debt service and signage that identifies the location of parking within the business district. As such, the Project's retail parking requirements will be satisfied via its contribution towards this Parking In -Lieu Fee program. Assembly Bill 2097 The City's residential parking ratio of 2.0 spaces per unit is considered high when compared to ITE, other Cities and based on empirical data. As such, it is recommended that a reduced parking ratio be applied to the residential component of the Project. Further, given the location of the Project, which is across the street from the Metrolink Train Station, Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097), which states the following, would be applicable to the Project. This bill would prohibit a public agency from imposing any minimum automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project, as defined, that is located within '/ mile of public transit, as defined. Due to the project's proximity to the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station, AB 2097 can be applied to the Project. However, per the City of Santa Claritia Director's Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, for AB 2097 to be applied to the Project it must demonstrate that the reduced parking requirement would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. As such, research of the following parking ratios was considered for the Project. O *Mk �fimL(N%ftm Packet Pg. 62 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 4 TOD Multifamily Residential Parking Ratios Research of multifamily residential code requirements has been conducted. Table 3 presents the parking requirements from ITE and other cities in the region. Review of the first column from Table 3 presents the residential parking requirements for Santa Clarita. The other columns presents the TTE parking requirements and other City parking requirements for Transit Oriented Developments (TOD's). Review of Table 3 shows that multiple sources have multifamily parking ratios well below the City of Santa Clarita code ratio. As such, it can be concluded that the City's ratio is considered high and a reduced parking ratio would be appropriate. It should be noted that the City code parking requirement for resident guest of 0.5 spaces per unit is also considered high. As such, it is recommended that a ratio of 0.25 spaces per unit be applied to the resident guest component of the Project. Empirical Parking Ratios For Multifamily Residential Individual multifamily residential projects and local settings may have unique parking characteristics that may not be well represented in typical city code requirements. There are increasing concerns among parking/traffic engineering and planning experts over City code parking ratios and parking minimums being outdated, causing multifamily developments to have either inadequate or excessive supply, and that the "one -size -fits -all" approach to estimating parking requirements inherent in city parking codes may not reflect actual, more current and realistic parking needs, operations, and management. Notwithstanding the requirements of Santa Clarita's City code, the actual parking requirements for multifamily residential uses have been found to be less than the City's own Code requirement as illustrated by LLG's previous field studies of actual parking demand at existing sites. Table 4 presents a comparison of site development and parking ratios from the thirteen (13) apartment communities in southern California, inclusive of the source of parking survey data. Additional details for the comparable sites are also provided inclusive of the location, development summary, parking facility type, and parking supply. It should be noted that the ratios provided in Table 4 include demand related to resident and resident guest. It should be noted that sites 12 and 13 in Table 4 were included per direction of the City to include additional comparable sites that are more aligned with the size of Project. O �Iimk I %mLG Packet Pg. 63 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 5 Both Edgeway and Newhall Crossings provide subterranean gated parking for their residents. Appendix A presents the parking demand count sheets for these sites. Review of the rightmost column of Table 4 presents the tenant and guest peak parking ratio (spaces per unit) for each of the comparable sites. This array of peak parking rates yields an average ratio of 1.28 spaces per unit, an 85' percentile ratio of 1.43 spaces per unit, and a 95th percentile ratio of 1.46 spaces per unit. Direct comparison between the 95th percentile ratio of 1.46 to what the Project is proposing, which is 1.56 spaces per unit shows the Project would exceed the 95th percentile by 0.10 spaces per unit. It should be noted that the 95th percentile ratio includes demand related to the resident guest component. Therefore, the projected surpluses in parking would be approximately 0.25 spaces per unit greater than what is identified. Given the above, LLG concludes that the parking ratios derived from the thirteen comparable sites are accurate representations for the unique parking characteristics of the proposed Project that are not reflected in the City code ratio and would be a good indicator of the parking demand of the proposed Project. It should also be noted that twelve (12) of the thirteen (13) sites observed were not directly across from a train station and as a result larger surpluses could occur. The thirteenth site observed is located approximately 650 feet north of the site along Main Street within walking distance to the train station. Closer inspection of the parking demand data shows that the resident component of that project is gated and does not allow for guest parking to occur within the gated areas. As such, the parking ratio for the residential component, excluding the resident guest component, of the Newhall Crossings apartment project is 1.07 spaces per units (gated demand 48 spaces divided by 45 occupied units = 1.07 spaces per unit). The ratio of 1.07 excludes any resident guest or commercial employee/guest since they park in the public parking structure. It should be noted that Newhall Crossing was approved at a ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit, but they provided 1.85 spaces per unit. The Newhall Crossings project is considered the most appropriate site for comparison since it has a similar number of units, is located in close proximity to the site, would likely have similar resident demographics and is located in walking distance to the Metrolink Station. As such, it can be concluded that the residential component of the Project is considered to have ample parking to support its needs. Resident Guest Parking Requirements As noted above, the project will not provide on -site parking to support the resident guest component of the project and will rely on public on -street parking within the vicinity of the project. The residential guest would require 20 spaces based on the assumption of 0.25 spaces per unit. O �Iimk I %mLG Packet Pg. 64 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 6 To further assess the parking requirements of the Project and the potential for the Project to utilize "off -site" parking within public on -street parking areas, parking demand surveys were conducted hourly within the vicinity of the site from 9:00 AM through 9:00 PM by AimTD on Thursday and again on Saturday (April 25 and 27, 2024). All parked vehicles during each hourly survey round were counted and recorded. In addition, the parking counts were conducted on a weekend while shows were scheduled at the Canyon Theatre Guild which would be representative of an "active evening". Figure 3 presents the key parking areas which would be available for use by the Project. Appendix B contains the weekday and weekend survey data. Tables 5 and 6 present the weekday and weekend shared parking approach for the proposed Project and compares the forecasted hourly parking demand of the Project against the available parking surplus in off -site areas, respectively. Column (1) presents parking survey data collected along the on -street spaces within the vicinity of the site. Column (2) presents the ULI shared parking demand of the resident guest. Column (3) presents the expected joint -use parking demand on an hourly basis, while Column (4) summarizes the hourly parking surplus/deficiency for the Project compared to the on -street parking supply of 135 based on the existing supply of 132 spaces plus 3 additional on -street spaces created by the project as a result of closing the driveway on Main Street. Appendix C presents the detailed shared parking table. As indicated in Column (4) of Table 5, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 112 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 23 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. As indicated in Column (4) of Table 6, the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, Tables 5 and 6 shows that based on the ULI shared parking profiles for the proposed Project, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on -street parking within the area of the Project. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) To ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company: ■ The PMP should identify where location of short-term parking spaces for potential tenants and use by the leasing office. O �Iimk I %mLG Packet Pg. 65 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 7 ■ The PMP should restrict residents to parking in their assigned garage spaces. ■ The PMP should provide rules of conduct for tenants and guests to abide by. Strict enforcement shall be adhered to. PMP Measures The following measures are available to the Project to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies in the event the proposed onsite parking supply is determined to be greater than what is provided. Residential Component 1. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit. Additional spaces may be assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces dependent on the number of bedrooms provided within said unit. Residents may not park more than two (2) vehicles in the complex. The 2nd access/tandem spaces should be assigned to two -bedroom and three -bedroom units, however the Property Owner/Property Management Company has the flexibility to assign the 2nd access/tandem spaces to one -bedroom units. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants. 2. Residents will be provided a transponder or similar device (fob or key card, etc.) for remote access to the gated residential parking area within the Project's apartment parking structure. 3. Every resident will be required to register their vehicle. The registered owner must be a lease holding resident. No permits will be issued to non -lease holders, or vehicles not registered to a lease holder. This registration will be updated annually at the time of recertification. 4. Vehicles lacking current registration will not be issued a permit. Vehicles that have lapsed registration will be towed by the Property Owner/Property Management Company. The storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles is prohibited. 5. Vehicles may not occupy unassigned spaces for more than twenty-four (24) hours, without contacting the leasing office in advance. Violators are subject to towing at the vehicle owner's expense. O �Iimk I %mLG Packet Pg. 66 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 8 6. If you obtain a new vehicle, you must provide new registration and will be given a new permit (transferring permits is not permissible). 7. Violation of the PMP strategies contained herein may result in the towing of the vehicle at the vehicle owner's expense. 8. The enforcement of resident on -site parking requirements summarized herein will be handled by the Property Owner/Property Management Company to ensure compliance. Through this monitoring and cooperation with the residents as a result of the annual review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available. CONCLUSIONS Based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Review of the data supports a reduced parking ratio. It can be concluded that the proposed residential ratio provided by the Project of 1.56 can adequately support the needs for the residential component. In addition, the commercial parking requirement of twelve (12) parking stalls will be waived via the parking in -lieu fee program identified in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. Furthermore, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 113 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 22 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. Additionally, the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on -street parking within the area of the Project. To ensure adequate parking is provided, the Project has the ability to implement a PMP, inclusive of assignment of tandem stalls for specific units, to maintain adequate parking for all residents of the Project. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Project would adhere to the City of Santa Claritia Director's Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, and would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. O %EEK �fimL(N%WA Packet Pg. 67 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 9 O �Iilm I �imnLrN%Um We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 825- 6175. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, EngineersD�ES51pti_ A M 15 Richard E. Barretto, P.E. O No. 2006 O Principal V - Exp.6/30/25 9fF TRAFFIC �tL` cc: Shane S. Green, PE., Senior Transportation Engineer nF �I %FO Attachments Packet Pg. 68 4 s �+ lop a 00 !t s ■: �(tNO 1%,§Ll� SCALE ! e .. ....... ... SOURCE: GOOGLE KEY = PROJECT SITE AN11 r 41 FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP NEWHALL MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Cl) N W U) a U Lu r— U) a W U) 0 W x J J Q 2 W Z 7 U) C Cu d 0 a� L Cu a. E ca Q Packet Pg. 69 1.e Tlliu RS�rTILITIES��r — —� T _ - - T T I L1ILIIITS ulll_u° m STAI ul ulllil ill - Ck �G yyyqZ ��ac„i�1 EXTTO RAILROAD IIIIII�I I��IWIIIIII 11 II LI II�J�II II uIIII II_ -Ta uIIIIUIIIIII LI_JII III11UIIIIIIIIII III T,TIIII III III IIIIII 1fIIill, 11PI IIIII11 Lo RAMP UP I I1111 1 -L I1FlllkI� V0TP4RT0FPR0lXCT , wo o �� l u °ull_m II I l ri'� I I u iilul llu�rr'I li l il- � �� LEI h o � LLLC RM r ® ® Ilya cD ❑� a ❑m = � g � LI` ` RETAIL � � L - 1,744SF DAVE M M 211 N cn d W Z RESIDENTIAL PARKING uJ LLI && �II!!� sssTas ® i v� o a I RESIDENTIAL PARKING W 67STALLS it w 1 0 ® 's � w L� 2 ED I I 7 I I i X Q Q 0! f i N Q $ R sosF 1 I A t Ls 1 9 i Q Q i, 3: I s i z I� 55 I� ii �✓ / r ME s' M' o RETAIL I � 'y, '. 4 'a � i 2,,019 SF a J a O W 'IEARH 1 re Q vv� a I i N II MARKETSTREET ^ W 0 E IE � � T - � a "III ADDITIONAL 3 DN-STREET PARKING SPACES o PROVIDED DUE TD DRIVEWAY CLOSURE v BASEMENT PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 1 (ANO SCALE FIGURE 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA Packet Pg. 70 1.e I a. 00, W �,,' 3 •,. Lu o ������y $ EB KEY C� = USABLE ON -STREET PARKING AREAS FIGURE 3 XD = PARKING ZONE = PROJECT SITE t,() SCALE KEY PARKING AREAS NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Packet Pg. 71 TABLE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY' DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Total Project Basement Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Land Use / Project Description Development ❑ Residential Component ■ 1 Bedroom -- -- 9 units 10 units 10 units 10 units 39 units ■ 2 Bedrooms -- -- 8 units 9 units 9 units 9 units 35 units ■ 3 Bedrooms -- -- 1 unit 1 units 1 units 1 units 4 units Total Residential Units: -- -- 18 units 20 units 20 units 20 units 78 units ❑ Retail/Commercial Component ■ Retail Shop A -- 1,744 SF - - -- -- 1,744 SF ■ Retail Shop B -- 1,460 SF - - -- -- 1,460 SF ■ Retail Shop C -- 2,019 SF - - -- -- 2,019 SF Total RetaiUConunercial Space: — 5,223 SF — — -- -- 5,223 SF ❑ Parking Structure Supply Is' Access Space 41 spaces 37 spaces -- -- -- -- 78 spaces 21 Access (Tandem) Space 26 spaces 18 spaces -- -- -- -- 44 spaces Total Parking Supply 67 spaces 55 spaces — — — -- 122 spaces i Source: SAE Architecture I Interiors, Site Plan dated November 4, 2024 I I 1.e Packet Pg. 72 TABLE 2 CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Spaces Land Use / Project Description Size Parking Ratio 2 Required Multifamily Apartments ■ One (1) Bedroom Units 39 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 78 ■ Two (2) Bedroom Units 35 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 70 ■ Three (3) Bedroom Units 4 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 8 ■ Resident Guest 78 DU 0.5 spaces per unit 39 Total 78 units 195 A. Total Residential Parking Code Requirement: 195 B. Proposed Residential Parking Supply: 122 C. Residential Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row B — Row A]: -73 Retail Commercial 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square Retail 5,223 SF footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF 12 Source: City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code, Chapter 17.42 — Residential Use Types. 3 Source: Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. II%No& ., 2-5-2025.doc Packet Pg. 73 TABLE 3 CITY CODE VS ITE AND DOWNTOWNITOD PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY IN MIXED -USE SETTING DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT. SANTA CLARITA ITE Parking Generation(5th Ed) Multifamily Housing(Hd-Rise) Cityof Redlands City of Long Beach Cityof Santa AB 2345:amends CA No Nearby Transit No Nearby Transit Near Transit Near Transit Downtown Long Beach Blwl I City of Santa Clarita Downtown, Cityof San Diego Monica (for TODs Density Bonus Law, TCRP Report 128 City of Los Angeles Cityof Sacramento Municipal Code (Average) (85th %ile) (Average) (85th %ile) Village Ctr & Gen Plan Redevelopment for TODs & Mixed Use) >10%low income) for TODs Code for TODs (Traditional District) Project Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Multi -Family Residential Studio 1 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 0.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.25 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 2-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.75 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 3-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 2 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit Resident Guest Parking Studio 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 1-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 2-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 3-Bedroom 1 0.5 sp/unit I me I me I me I me 1 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me inc PacketPg. 74 TABLE 4 EMPIRICAL PARKING DEMAND RATIOS DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Tenant& Tenant& Development Parking Peak Parking Saturday Peak Comparable Site City Address Parking Supply Survey Period Ratio Ratio Summary Facility Spaces per DU Spaces per DU (Peak Hour) (Peak Hour) 250 Unit Apartments 580 Anton 440 Spaces Wednesday & 1 Boulevard Costa 580 Anton • 5 Studio Units Garage • Residents - 419 sp. Saturday 1.28 1.24 Mesa Blvd • 168 1-Bedroom Units (@ 2:00 AM) (@ 3:00 AM) Apartments [a] • Public/Guests - 21 sp. 6PM-3AM • 77 2-Bedroom Units 481 Unit Apartments 1,020 Spaces Wednesday & Main Street 2 Irvne 2555 Main • 265 1-Bedroom Units Structure • Residents - 847 sp. Thursday 1.42 Village [b] Street • 200 2-Bedroom Units • Public/Guests - 173 (@ 12:00 AM) • 16 3-Bedroom Units sp. lOPM-12AM 700 S. 163 Unit Apartments Surface404 Spaces Wednesday & 3 Paragon at Old Monrovia Myrtle • 82 1-Bedroom Units Lot, On- , Residents - 329 sp. Thursday 1.48 -- Town [b] Street (@ 11:00 PM) Avenue • 81 3-Bedroom Units . Paz king •Pubfic/Guests - 75 sp. 6PM-12AM 44 N. 304 Unit Apartments Surface 480 Spaces Wednesday & Trio • 46 Studio Units Lot, On- 1.22 4 Pasadena Madison ' Residents - 450 sp. Thursday Apartments [b] Avenue • 141 1-Bedroom Units Street • Public/Guests - 30 sp. IOPM-12AM (@12:00 AM) • 117 2-Bedroom Units Parking Wednesday & Garage, 512 Spaces Thursday 0.97 Adagio on the Mission 2660 1.45 5 Green [c] Viejo Parkway ayOso 256 Unit Apartments Surface • Residents - 424 sp. 7PM-2AM (@12:00 AM) (@ 2:00 PM & Lot • Public/Guests - 88 sp. Saturday: 12PM-3PM, 3:00 PM) 7PM-2AM Wednesday & 284 Unit Apartments Apex Laguna Laguna 27960 Cabot • 32 Studio Units 539 Spaces Thursday 1.28 1.13 6 Garage • Residents - 461 sp. 7PM-2AM Niguel [c] Niguel Road • 161 1-Bedroom Units ' Public/Guests - 78 sp. Saturday: 12PM-3PM, (@ 2:00 AM) (@ 3:00 PM) • 91 2-Bedroom Units 7PM-2AM 254 Unit Apartments • 1231-Bedroom Units Gated 1901 E First Thursday & Saturday 1.354 1.346 7 Nineteen0l [d] Santa Ana , 125 2-Bedroom Units Residential 559 Spaces St 12AM-11:59PM (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) 6 3-Bedroom Structure Units 100 E 300 Unit Apartments Gated 660 Spaces 0.643 8 The Marke [d] Santa Ana MacArthur ' 155 1-Bedroom Units Residential • Residents - 600 sp. Thursday & Saturday 0.767 (@ 2:00 PM & ' 131 2-Bedroom Units 12AM-11:59PM (@12:00 AM) Blvd • 14 3-Bedroom Units Structure • Public/Guests - 60 sp. 3:00 PM) Core 1815 Thursday, Friday & 222 Unit Apartments 1.38 1.33 9 Apartments Anaheim Westside Structure 726 Spaces Saturday [d][e] Drive ' 328 Bedrooms 5PM-12AM (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) Thursday, Friday & Costa 125 Baker 240 Unit Apartments 1 1 10 Baker Block [d] Mesa Street • 349 Bedrooms Structure 466 Spaces Saturday (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) 5PM-12AM 1100 363 Unit Apartments Tuesday & Saturday 1.18 1.22 11 Rize [d] Irvine Structure 564 Spaces Synergy • 511 Bedrooms 5PM-12AM (Peak Hour N/A) (Peak Hour N/A) 91 Unit Apartments 137 Spaces 9735 Oak • 52 1-Bedroom Units Thursday 1.28 12 Edgeway [fJ Bellflower Street • 31 2-Bedroom Units Structure • Residents - sp. 12AM (@12:00 AM) • Guests - 8 sp. p. • 8 3-Bedroom Units 47 Unit Apartments Newhall Santa 22551 9th • 5 1-Bedroom Units Thursday 1.27 13 Structure 99 Spaces Crossings [g] Clarita Street • 32 2-Bedroom Units 12AM (@12:00 AM) • 10 3-Bedroom Units Average: 1.28 — 85th Percentile: 1.43 — 95th Percentile: 1.46 — Notes: [a] Source: Counts collected by Counts Unlimited on May 2023. [b] Source: Parking DemaudAnalcsisfor the ProposedFfh Avenue/Huntingtonhive Mixed-UseP ject City ofMourovia, California, prepared by LLG, Oct 2012 [c] Source: Courts collected by LLG on December 2016. [d] Source: RemsedParkrg Study for Brea Plaza Shopping Center, prepared by LSA, January2022. [e] At the tine of the surveys, 222 ofthe 400 unts were occupied. [f] At the time ofthe surveys, 89 ofthe 91 units were occupied. [g] At the tine ofthe surveys, 45 ofthe 47 units were occupied. Packet Pg. 75 TABLE 5 WEEKDAY SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1] DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Land Use Existing On- Street Demand Resident Guest Total Spaces = 32 Shared Parking Demand Comparison w/ Parking Supply 135 Spaces [2] Size Pkg Rate 78 DU 0.25 /DU Gross Spaces 20 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) 9:00 AM 53 4 57 78 10:00 AM 58 4 62 73 11:00 AM 58 4 62 73 12:00 PM 68 4 72 63 1:00 PM 81 4 85 50 2:00 PM 69 4 73 62 3:00 PM 62 4 66 69 4:00 PM 68 4 72 63 5:00 PM 75 8 83 52 6:00 PM 85 11 96 39 7:00 PM 92 19 111 24 8:00 PM 94 19 113 22 9:00 PM 68 19 87 48 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute " Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an existing on -street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided. Packet Pg. 76 TABLE 6 WEEKEND SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1] DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Land Use Existing On- Street Demand Resident Guest Total Spaces = 32 Shared Parking Demand Comparison w/ Parking Supply 135 Spaces [2] Size Pkg Rate 78 DU 0.25 /DU Gross Spaces 20 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) 9:00 AM 77 4 81 54 10:00 AM 85 4 89 46 11:00 AM 86 4 90 45 12:00 PM 87 4 91 44 1:00 PM 91 4 95 40 2:00 PM 96 4 100 35 3:00 PM 95 4 99 36 4:00 PM 95 4 99 36 5:00 PM 99 8 107 28 6:00 PM 103 12 115 20 7:00 PM 104 20 124 11 8:00 PM 111 20 131 4 9:00 PM 95 1 20 115 20 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute " Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an existing on -street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided. Packet Pg. 77 1.e APPENDIX A EDGEWAY AND NEWHALL CROSSINGS PARKING COUNTS LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers N:A4800A2244807 - Newhall Mixed -Use Project, Santa Clarita\ReportV4801 Packet Pg. 78 1.e Bellflower Edgeway Bellflower 9735 Oak Street, Bellflower, CA 90706 Friday, November 8th , 2024 Supply Demand Garage Regular 110 88 Handicap 3 2 Electric Vehicle 16 12 Subtotal 129 102 Total Occupancy 129 102 Total Percent 79% Supply Demand Guests Handicap 1 1 Guest [a] 8 Leasing / Guest 3 3 Subtotal -- 1 12 Total Occupancy I -- 1 12 Notes [a] Parking supply consists of guest parking provided in alleyway to the west of the building and on -street parking to the north and south of the building. Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 Packet Pg. 79 1.e Santa Clarita Newhall Crossings 22551 9th Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Friday, November 8th , 2024 Supply Demand Garage Regular 97 48 Handicap 2 0 Subtotal 99 48 Total Occupancy 99 48 Total Percent 48% Supply Demand Guests Street Parking [a] 9 Subtotal -- 9 Total Occupancy I -- 1 9 [a] Parking supply consists of spaces in the public portion of the parking structure and on -street parking along Main Street, 9th Street, and Railroad Avenue. Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 Packet Pg. 80 1.e APPENDIX B EXISTING COUNTS v M N W Q U w Q w 0 w X 2 J J Q 2 W Z r C E a� C Y L a r c m E r r Q LINSCOTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers N:A4800A2244807 - Newhall Mixed -Use Project, Santa Clarita\ReportV4801 Packet Pg. 81 1.e Santa Clarita Parking Study Thursday 4252024 Prepared by AimTD LLC cs aimtd.com 2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 713 713 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Total Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 4 4 3 4 0 0 1 0 5 0 9 0 1 2 9 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 53 10:00 AM 6 3 5 3 4 0 0 1 1 6 0 8 0 1 2 8 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 58 11:00 AM 7 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 4 2 1 7 1 1 3 9 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 2 58 12:00 PM 7 3 4 0 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 7 2 8 1 0 0 68 1:00 PM 6 3 4 1 4 0 2 0 5 9 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 0 6 2 12 1 0 1 81 2:00 PM 6 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 4 4 0 8 0 1 5 12 0 0 7 2 8 0 1 0 69 3:00 PM 4 3 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 4 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 5 0 1 1 62 4:00 PM 7 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 4 12 0 0 5 1 7 0 1 1 68 5:00 PM 6 3 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 7 1 8 1 1 3 12 0 1 6 3 12 0 3 2 75 6:00 PM 7 2 1 1 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 0 1 2 12 0 1 7 2 12 1 0 3 85 7:00 PM 6 4 1 2 5 0 3 0 6 10 1 10 0 1 3 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 1 5 92 8:00 PM 7 1 4 1 2 5 0 2 0 7 11 1 7 1 1 5 11 0 1 6 3 11 1 2 5 94 9:00 PM 7 4 0 1 3 0 2 0 2 8 0 6 0 1 5 8 0 0 5 3 10 1 0 2 68 Inventory 8 4 6 3 5 9 6 8 11 1 9 1 3 5 12 2 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parking 1 0 1 0 0 8 3 -1 1 0 0 -1 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 38 M N LU U) Q U LU U) Q LU D a LU X J J a W z U) c to E a� 0 c L (u CL d E C.) (u a Packet Pg. 82 1.e Santa Clarita Parking Study Saturday 4/27/2024 Prepared by AimTD LLC cs aimtd.com 2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 713 713 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Total Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 3 3 3 5 2 2 1 2 11 0 9 0 2 2 12 0 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 77 10:00 AM 7 3 4 3 5 0 3 1 3 11 0 8 0 3 4 12 0 1 5 2 10 0 0 0 85 11:00 AM 7 4 4 3 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 1 2 4 12 0 1 4 2 9 0 0 0 86 12:00 PM 6 4 2 1 5 1 2 0 7 10 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 5 3 12 1 0 1 87 1:00 PM 5 3 1 2 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 1 2 5 91 2:00 PM 7 4 2 2 5 0 4 0 6 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 0 3 7 96 3:00 PM 8 4 1 1 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 1 7 95 4:00 PM 7 4 0 1 5 0 5 0 7 10 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 5 2 11 0 4 6 95 5:00 PM 7 3 1 3 5 1 4 0 7 11 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 3 6 99 6:00 PM 7 4 1 2 5 2 4 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 1 0 6 2 12 1 3 7 103 7:00 PM 6 3 0 0 5 5 5 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 8 104 8:00 PM 6 j 4 1 1 5 7 5 0 7 11 1 1 9 1 2 4 11 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 10 111 9:00 PM 6 1 4 1 0 1 1 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 0 1 7 1 9 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 1 1 4 1 10 1 0 1 0 6 2 11 1 3 8 95 Inventory 8 1 4 1 6 1 3 1 5 1 9 1 6 1 1 8 1 11 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 12 1 2 1 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parkin 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 21 M N LU U) Q U LU Q 2 LU LU X J J a W z U) c to E a� 0 c L (u CL d E C.) (u a Packet Pg. 83 1.e APPENDIX C SHARED PARKING DEMAND v M N W Q U w Q w 0 w X 2 J J Q 2 W Z r C m E a� C Y L a r C m E r r Q LINSCOTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers N:A4800A2244807 - Newhall Mixed -Use Project, Santa Clarita\ReportV4801 Packet Pg. 84 1.e Appendix C RESIDENTIAL (Studio) WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [11 �m®aaa®aaaaaaaa®mmom00000000000000aa®aaa®sasses® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�e �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm� Notes: [1] Source: ULI-Urbar�Iand lnstiNk "Slaved Parking;'Tlrird F,ditioq 2020. [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [S] Percentage ofpeak parking demand factors reFlect relationslrips betwem weekday parking demar�d ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as smmnaized in Table 2-2 of the "Stored Parking' manual. PacketPg. 85 1.e Appendix C RESIDENTIAL (Studio) WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [11 �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm� Notes: [1] Source: ULI-Urbar�Iand lnstiNk "Slaved Parking;'Tlrird F,ditioq 2020. [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [S] Percentage ofpeak parking demand factors reFlect relationslrips betwem weekday parking demar�d ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as smmnaized in Table 2-2 of the "Stored Parking' manual. PacketPg. 86 1.f HISTORY —67 !I! CENTER February 28, 2025 To whom it may concern As a longtime supporter of the goals of the City of Santa Clarita's Downtown Newhall Specific Plan, and after careful consideration, the Board of Directors of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society ("the Board") voted unanimously on February 24, 2025, to support the redevelopment of the area of Newhall bounded by Railroad Avenue, Market Street, Main Street, and the building at 24316 Main Street (the former location of Mac's Pool Supply). To that end, the Board unanimously recorded its non -opposition to the removal of the building at 24307 Railroad Avenue/22505 Market Street, commonly known as "Ye Olde Courthouse." The building is listed as one of the City of Santa Clarita's Historic Resources. The City's Historic Preservation Ordinance (17.03.145 UDC) states that upon a finding that the removal of a Historic Resource is necessary to proceed with a development project consistent with and supportive of identified goals and objectives of the General Plan, ... the City Council shall direct the property owner to relocate the designated historic struc- ture to a site within the City of Santa Clarita and approved by the City Council. Such relo- cation may include the assistance of the developer, the City of Santa Clarita, the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society, or other entity as appropriate. Alternatively, upon comple- tion of appropriate environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the City Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition. The Board suspects it would be infeasible to relocate the building, whose historical integrity was severely compromised by an unfortunate 1968 remodel. Upon review, the Board is aware that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse (1932-1971). Should the City deem it necessary to issue a demolition permit, the Board believes it appropriate for the City to exact an impact fee from the applicant comparable in amount to the estimated cost of relocating and restoring the building to its original historical condition, such fee revenue to be restricted to the advancement of historical preservation goals within the City of Santa Clarita. Further, the Board urges the City to require the developer to cooperate with the City and the His- torical Society to add plaques in several locations throughout the project to identify the historical uses of the property. Alan Pollack President, Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society I PO Box 221925, Newhall CA 91322-1925 1 scvhs.uug Packet Pg. 87 1.g Proposal for Redevelopment of 24307 Railroad Ave (Old Courthouse) Background: The property at 24307 Railroad Ave, commonly known as the Old Courthouse, was constructed in 1931 to serve as both the Santa Clarita Courthouse on the ground floor and the Masonic Lodge on the second floor. In 1960, the Newhall Masonic Building Company liquidated the property, and the courthouse was relocated to Valencia in 1968. Since then, the building has undergone multiple renovations, including conversion of the ground floor to office space. At one point, a coffee shop operated there for train commuters, though it has since closed. The buildingwas designated as a historical structure following the adoption of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) in 2005, which included the establishment of a historical preservation ordinance. Due to its local significance, the buildingwas included among the structures to be preserved. It currently serves as office space for a law firm and as a meeting venue for the Rafter's AA group. Proposal: Old Town Main II, LLC proposes to redevelop this property, along with immediately adjacent parcels, into a 78-unit mixed -use apartment building with ground -floor retail along Main Street. This redevelopment will align with the requirements and guidelines established in the OTNSP, ensuring that the project enhances the continuity and vibrancy of Old Town Newhall's historical significance while embracing future growth. Findings: Section 17.64.100(B) of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code permits the relocation of a historic resource if such relocation is necessary for a project that aligns with and supports the identified goals and objectives of the General Plan. The relocation must not significantly impact the purposes of the code, or any impact must be outweighed by the benefits of the new project. Furthermore, the structure must be movable without compromising its historical or architectural integrity, as demonstrated by an expert in historic preservation or building relocation. This section also permits the demolition of a historical resource if relocation is infeasible and no feasible alternatives to demolition exist. The proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the General Plan and conforms to the intent and guidelines established in the OTNSR The project will add 78 dwelling units to Old Town Newhall, along with high -quality retail space consistent with the Arts and Entertainment (AE) zone designation for this site. This will contribute to the area's economic development, vibrancy, and vitality. The architectural features of the proposed building will draw inspiration from historical references to buildings that previously existed on the site and within its immediate neighborhood, paying homage to Old Town Newhall's historical character. Following an evaluation of relocation possibilities, the extensive modifications, additions, and alterations to the original structure render relocation infeasible based on discussions with local stakeholders and representatives from the Santa Clarita Historical Society. Packet Pg. 88 1.g Proposed Mitigation Measures: While the Old Courthouse structure is proposed to be demolished, we are committed to preserving its historical significance through the following measures: 1. Installation of a permanent commemorative plaque at a prominent location on the new building's exterior, identifying the site as the location of the Old Courthouse and describing its history. 2. Documentation and professional photography of the Old Courthouse in its current condition, with a display of these photographs and descriptive text as a collage within the lobby of the new mixed -use building. 3. A $750,000 monetary contribution from Old Town Main II, LLC to support the mission of the Santa Clarita Historical Society. We appreciate your consideration of this request and look forward to collaborating on a development that fosters the continued growth and vibrancy of Santa Clarita while respecting its rich historical heritage. Packet Pg. 89 1.h r lj L— Alt � 8 0 1 1 1) t R w Pacific Empire Builders 24 N. Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 License # 862568 Class B April 4, 2025 City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd #120 Valencia, CA 913SS Project: Feasibility and Quote for Relocation of Historical Building Portion Location: 22505 Market Street, Santa Clarito to Hart Park, Santa Clarita Scope of Work This report evaluates the feasibility of relocating the historical portion of the building located at 22505 Market Street in Santa Clarita to Fart Park, also in Santa Clarita. The historical section of the building measures approximately 47 feet in width, 47 feet in length, and 30 feet in height. Due to roadway constraints along the proposed haul route —including limited street widths, sharp turn radii, and numerous overhead obstructions —the building will need to be cut in half to allow for safe and legal transport. This process will require careful structural separation, temporary reinforcement of each section, and precise reassembly at the destination site. Before relocation, the non -historical portions of the building must also be selectively demolished and removed, ensuring no damage is done to the preserved structure. This report outlines the technical and environmental challenges associated with demolition, separation, transport, site preparation, utility connections, and reassembly. It also provides updated cost estimates to reflect these expanded requirements. Relocation Route Overview The proposed relocation route involves the following steps: Starting Location: 22505 Market Street, Santa Clarita The building is situated on Market Street, which connects directly to Railroad Avenue Turn onto Railroad Avenue (Southbound) From Market Street, the building would turn south onto Railroad Avenue, a primary road for access. 4/04/2025 Page 1 Packet Pg. 90 1.h 3. Continue South on Railroad Avenue The building would travel south on Railroad Avenue toward the intersection with Newhall Avenue. This route is heavily trafficked, with numerous obstructions such as power lines, traffic signals, and narrow roadways. 4. Turn Right onto 6th Street The building would make a short right turn onto 6th Street. Although less trafficked, 6th Street is a narrow, residential road that may present clearance challenges. Tree trimming, temporary parking restrictions, and close coordination with nearby property owners may be required to accommodate the building's width and turning radius. S. Turn Right onto Newhall Avenue (Heading Toward Hart Park) Upon reaching Newhall Avenue, the route would turn right toward Hart Park. The intersection may require temporary removal of signage or street furniture to allow for wide -turn clearance, 6. Enter Hart Park Upon reaching Hart Park, the building would encounter challenges due to the park's lack of a suitable, flat area for the structure. Extensive grading work would be required, and environmental concerns may arise. Challenges and Considerations 1. Demolition of Non -Historical Portions Before relocating the historical section, the non -historical portions must be carefully demolished to avoid damage to the remaining structure. Selective demolition will target specific building components while preserving the integrity of the historical section. Estimated Cost: $100,000 2. Building Separation for Transport Due to the structure's overall dimensions and the physical limitations of the haul route ---including road widths, turning radii, and overhead obstructions —the historical building must be cut in half to enable transport. This process introduces significant engineering, logistical, and preservation -related challenges: a Structural Stabilization: Each half of the building must be structurally stabilized to withstand transport stresses. This includes the installation of temporary internal bracing, external support frames, and vibration dampening systems to prevent structural distortion, cracking, or collapse during the move. o Separation Planning: The building must be surgically separated along structural lines that minimize damage to critical architectural or historical elements. This requires detailed engineering analysis, construction documentation, and the use of specialized contractors experienced in historical preservation. a Historic Preservation Risk: The separation process increases the risk of damaging historically significant materials, finishes, or features, which may be irreplaceable or require costly restoration. 4/04/2025 Page 2 Packet Pg. 91 1.h o Reassembly and Reconstruction at Hart Park: Once transported, the two halves of the building must be precisely aligned and rejoined on a newly constructed foundation at Hart Park. This involves custom connection detailing, reintegration of utilities and finishes, and conformance with current building codes and seismic requirements. o Estimated Cost: $400,000 to $600,000. 3. Obstructions Along Route: Power Lines and Traffic Signals The proposed relocation route is obstructed by overhead power lines and traffic signals, requiring temporary disconnections or relocations. Coordination with utility companies will be necessary, incurring significant costs. o Obstruction Details: The building will pass approximately eight (8) utility poles on along its route. Power lines and poles may require relocation or elevation to ensure safe clearance during the move. n Traffic Signal Modifications: Adjustments to approximately six (6) traffic signals may be required to accommodate the building's dimensions. o Estimated Cost: $1,400,000 to $2,400,000 Coordination with Southern California Edison (SCE): Early coordination with SCE is critical to determine the requirements for relocating or adjusting power lines and poles. SCE will assess feasibility and outline necessary modifications. 4. Site Preparation, Grading, and Foundation Work at Hart Park Hart Park's terrain presents significant challenges for relocation. The lack of a flat, stable area requires extensive site preparation before the building can be placed. Key concerns include steep slopes, unstable soil, and the need to accommodate a two-story structure. o Site Grading: Substantial earthwork is required to level the area, including removal of trees, boulders, and any existing infrastructure. Sloped and uneven terrain will need recontouring to create a buildable pad. o Foundation Construction: A custom -engineered foundation will be required to support the structure. This may include deep excavation, soil stabilization, and structural concrete systems designed to meet current seismic and building code standards. o Geotechnical Concerns: The park's natural soil conditions may reveal unforeseen challenges during grading or excavation, increasing risk of delays or cost escalations. Estimated Cost: $500,000 4/04/2025 Page 3 Packet Pg. 92 1.h 5. Provision of New Utilities New utility connections will be required for the relocated building, including water and electrical services: o Water Service: Coordination with Santa Clarita Valley Water (SCV Water) is required to extend water service to the building. o Electrical Service: Southern California Edison (SCE) will need to establish a new electrical connection. Estimated Cost: $50,000 each for water and electrical services, totaling $100, 000. 6. Fence Removal and Reinstallation at Hart Park The relocation will require removing and reinstalling approximately 40 linear feet of the existing fence at Hart Park, along with associated pilons, to accommodate the building's delivery and placement. Careful disassembly and restoration will be necessary to preserve the appearance and integrity of park infrastructure. Estimated Cost: $40,000 7. Tree Removal and Protection at Hart Park Relocating the building may necessitate the removal of certain trees at Hart Park, especially considering that some of the park's trees may be protected under Santa Clarita's general tree preservation policies or environmental guidelines for public parklands. A permit will be required for tree removal or any encroachment on protected zones. 8. Haul Route Impact and Roadway Damage The relocation of a large, heavy historical structure will exert significant stress on the haul route —particularly along Market Street, Railroad Avenue, 6th Street, and Newhall Avenue —none of which were designed to support extremely heavy, slow -moving loads for extended durations. Curbing, pavement surfaces, and underground utilities (such as sewer lines, water mains, and telecom conduits) are at elevated risk of cracking, displacement, or collapse due to the concentrated weight and movement of transport equipment. The use of specialized hauling vehicles with wide turning radii also increases the likelihood of damage to intersections, sidewalks, medians, and adjacent infrastructure. Of particular concern is the intersection of 6th Street and Newhall Avenue, which features a constrained turning radius that may require temporary roadway modifications to safely accommodate the oversized load. Sharp turns or limited clearance areas along 6th Street could necessitate removal or protection of curbs, signs, and landscaping to avoid damage during transport. To mitigate these risks, temporary structural reinforcements (e.g., steel plating or protective mats) may be needed on vulnerable road segments. Additionally, the City of 4/04/2025 Page 4 Packet Pg. 93 1.h Santa Clarita will likely mandate pre- and post -move inspections and require road use bonds or financial deposits to cover any damage -related remediation. Estimated Cost: $200,000 to 300,000 + Haul Route Deposit Bond Conclusion Based on the scope of work, site conditions, and route constraints outlined in this report, the proposed relocation of the historical portion of the building from 22505 Market Street to Hart Park presents significant logistical, structural, financial, and environmental challenges. The requirement to cut the building in half for transport, navigate narrow and obstruction -filled roadways, and perform extensive site grading and utility installations at Hart Park introduces a high degree of complexity and risk. Additional site -specific constraints —such as the removal and reconstruction of fencing and pilons at Hart Park to allow delivery access —further complicate the logistics and increase cost exposure. Combined with the anticipated total project cost of $2.84 million to $4.04 million, not including contingency allowances for unforeseen conditions, the relocation effort would represent a substantial financial undertaking for a project with multiple technical vulnerabilities — particularly regarding the preservation of historically significant materials. Given the combination of engineering difficulties, public infrastructure impacts, and risks to the structure's historical integrity, we strongly recommend against proceeding with the relocation as proposed. For any further questions or clarifications, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Dan Mahoney Principal 4/04/2025 Page 5 Packet Pg. 94 Exhibit A: Historic Two -Story Building This exhibit provides images and descriptions of the historic two-story portion of the building at 22505 Market Street that is proposed for relocation. Exhibit B: Path of Travel and Power lines and Utility Poles Map This map illustrates the proposed route from 2250S Market Street to Hart Park, highlighting the roads and intersections involved, and identifies the locations of overhead power lines and utility poles along the path of travel, emphasizing the potential obstructions that may require relocation or modification. Exhibit D: Hart Park Fence Removal Area This map highlights the section of the existing fence at Hart Park that would need to be removed and reinstalled to accommodate the relocated building. 4/04/2025 Page 6 Packet Pg. 95 Exhibit A: Removal of Non -Historical Portions CO M 04 10 LU U) kv LU 4 is brical Portion of U) the 420 Building �A 2 LU U) M LU �xy LU z Ilk t Op Red Shading Indicates the Non -historical Portions of 22505 Market Street. Green Indicates the historical portion of the structure F 4/04/2025 1 Packet Pg. 96 1 1.h Exhibit B: Proposed Haul Route 4/04/2025 w to 0 w X ' H C Potential Haul Route Q only if building is separated, 6th Street is = approximately 32 ft wide and cannot accommodate �{. the building for transportation. ` W t5 1 Z This route will pass I m - 8 Power Lines that need to be relocated *� - 6 Signals that need to Modified ` N Hart Park Fencing will need to be Demolished and I I I n expanded to accommodate the truck and building � I A minimum of two trees will need to be removed from I Q j the entrance. � JLL ti i«- Page 8 Packet Pg. 97 1.h Exhibit C: Proposed Haul Route - Current Conditions The intersection of Market Street and Railroad Avenue. There are numerous power lines and signals in the path of travel. 4/04/2025 Packet Pg. 98 1.h Exhibit C: Proposed Haul Route - Current Conditions There is one power line directly in front of the building on Market Street. There is a second power line across the street which may also be a problem. 4/04/2025 p. Packet Pg. 99 1.h Exhibit C: Proposed Haul Route - Current Conditions r Railroad Ave Directly in front of the building. There is one power line and one signal M N W N Q U W H N Q W 0 W x 2 J J Q 2 W Z 4/04/2025 P Packet Pg. 100 1.h Exhibit D: Hart Park Fence Removal Area - Current Conditions Current Conditions at Hart Park Entrance. Gated entrance is not large enough to accommodate the site of the structure. Approximately 40 linear feet of the existing fencing will need to be removed and replace. There is one existing power line in front of this entrance to Hart Park. 4/04/2025 P• Packet Pg. 102 Santa Clarita Development Construction Noise Review Project No. 25.0170 April 16, 2025 Tai Lane, Senior Development Manager Serrano Development Group 24 North Marengo Pasadena, California 91101 Dear Tai, Westside Acoustics and Vibration Engineering (Westside) has evaluated the subject project for expected exterior construction noise level production to the surrounding community; particularly to the nearby radio station (KHTS Radio), which has expressed concern over construction activities. Westside has evaluated expected construction noise levels to this particular receptor and compared these to existing environmental noise levels that the KHTS Radio experiences to opine on the true impact of the anticipated construction noise. This letter documents our findings and conclusions. 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The full analysis of existing noise exposure and future anticipated construction noise exposure to the nearby radio station to the subject project are included in the following sections. However, below is a brief summary of Westside's findings: • Due to the nearby railroad, which includes freight train passby's, the radio station is currently exposed to high noise levels. • Calculated construction noise level activities, assuming standard construction noise mitigation measures, are comparable to the existing noise environment. • It is Westside's professional opinion that construction noise should not substantially impact the radio station given it is not expected to be louder than the current noise environment. 2.0 EXISTING NOISE EXPOSURE As a benchmark for comparison, Westside has evaluated existing noise levels at the radio station in question from two separate sources. Anticipated construction noise levels will be compared to these results in the next section. 2.1 Newhall Mixed -Use Acoustical Report An acoustical analysis report, prepared by another consultant, was provided for a nearby project. The report is titled "Old Town New Hall Mixed -Use" and was prepared 801 S. Grand Ave., Suite 1020 Los Angeles, California www. Packet Pg. 103 2.2 November 8, 2016 by Christopher Jean & Associates Inc. This project is located at the corner of Railroad Avenue and Lyons Avenue, but is partially shielded from railroad and traffic noise along Railroad Avenue by another building. Based on data presented in this report, Westside expects the east facade of the radio station is subject to an average daytime hourly noise level of approximately 70 dB solely due to train activity (entirely controlled by freight train noise). Note there is no substantial difference in expected noise level at the radio station compared to the report subject building due to similar setback distances (< 1 dB). See Figure 1 below showing an aerial image of the subject project site and radio station relative to the nearby railroad. Freight Train Noise Analyses Per the nearest crossings inventory data provided by the Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Office of Safety Analysis website, train crossing events consist of both commuter and freight trains. For the purposes of this analysis, Westside has solely evaluated noise from freight train passby's. The crossing inventory report indicates that this area is not a "quiet zone;" which means that trains are required to sound their horns as they approach a crossing with a roadway. Train horns are generally the loudest part of a train operations when moving through a crossing. Westside Project No. 25.0170 W April 1 Packet Pg. 104 Westside utilized previously measured freight train noise data from other projects to evaluate expected noise levels from single -event train passby's at the radio station. After adjusting for appropriate measurement distance (185-feet, see previous section), freight train events are expected to be approximately between 76 dB and 82 dB. Freight train events can last anywhere from 120 seconds to over 5 minutes depending on the size, speed, length of train and whether or not there are delays in operations. 3.0 EXPECTED CONSTRUCTION NOISE EXPOSURE 3.1 Typical Construction Equipment Given the subject project size and scope, Westside has anticipated typical construction equipment used for a construction project of this nature but has limited analysis to the "noisiest" equipment pieces. Table 1 below is the list of equipment used in the following analysis. Construction phases are bundled based on types of equipment anticipated, not actual construction schedule. Equipment sound levels and analysis methodology are all per the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highway Construction Noise Handbook (August 2006, Final Version). Table 1: Expected Construction Equipment Construction Phase Anticipated Equipment Demolition Backhoe, Bulldozer, Crane, Excavator Backhoe, Bulldozer, Crane, Excavator, Grading/Excavation Front-end Loader, Generator, Grader, Jackhammer, Paver, Truck(s), Pile Driver (screw or vibration) Crane, Concrete Mixer Truck, Concrete Building Construction Saw, Generator, Pneumatic Tool(s), Truck(s) 3.2 Calculated Construction Noise Levels In addition to equipment being separated into different phases based on use, analysis of construction noise exposure was separated based on anticipated separation distances: average separation distance, minimum separation distance, and truck -route distances. The average separation distance analysis takes all equipment sound levels into consideration simultaneously and assumes they are all located at the project center. This is of course never the case but is the average physical distance each piece of equipment would likely be away from the radio station building at any given time, or over the course of the phase of construction. This could be considered the "average" noise exposure level. Westside Project No. 25.0170 April 1 Packet Pg. 105 2. The minimum separation distance only accounts for one equipment piece at a time and assumes the minimum separation distance between the project boundary and the radio station. This could be considered the "maximum" noise exposure level. 3. The truck route is unique because it is the only noise source that is not bound by the property boundary; trucks deliver materials to or remove materials from the site. Typical construction plans often include strategic truck routing to avoid sensitive receptors for noise, and other reasons. It is assumed that this will be implemented and therefore this noise source is not included in the analysis. Finally, this assessment assumes that typical construction mitigation measures are implemented, including but not limited to properly functioning, adjusted mufflers on appropriate equipment, limiting construction hours to those specified in the city municipal code, locating continuously running equipment (e.g., generators, pumps, etc.) away from sensitive noise receptors, strategic truck routes, and conducting a more in depth construction noise study. See Table 2 below for Westside's calculated construction noise exposure levels per the discussion items above. Table 2: Calculated Construction Noise Levels Construction Noise Level Calculated Freight Train Construction [dB] per Setback Distance Exposure Noise Levels [dB] Phase Average Minimum Average Maximum Separation Separation Demolition 77 79 Grading/Excavation 79 80 Building 76 82 Construction 77 79 These calculated noise levels are comparable to those of the typical train operations evaluated in section 2.0. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS Westside understands that a nearby radio station to the subject project has expressed concerns over construction noise exposure affecting their operations. Westside has conducted an evaluation of anticipated existing noise exposure to the radio station due to transit noise sources and compared these levels to calculated construction noise levels expected to reach the station. Existing noise exposure to the radio station is expected to be high, both on an hourly average noise level basis and a single event level basis, due to the adjacent railroad which has regular freight train passby's. Westside Project No. 25.0170 April 1 Packet Pg. 106 Construction noise level exposure to the radio station was calculated based on typical equipment expected for a project of this nature and assuming typical construction noise mitigation measures. Noise levels were found to be comparable to those already experienced due to train activities. Given the existing high -noise acoustic environment created by nearby train activity, it is Westside's professional opinion that construction noise will not substantially add to the noise environment and therefore would not represent a substantial acoustic impact. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Westside Acoustics John LoVerde, FASA Acoustician Westside Project No. 25.0170 W April 1 Packet Pg. 107 1.j April 28, 2025 VIA EMAIL Erika Iverson Senior Planner Planning Division City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Re: May 13, 2025 Council Meeting Newhall Mixed Use Protect Serrano Development. Master Case 24-134 — Historical and Noise Mitigation Dear Erika Iverson, As the applicant I am writing to formally request a reduction in the proposed historical impact fee from $750,000 to $300,000, This request is made in light of ongoing discussions regarding resolving the construction noise issues which have been raised by KHTS Radio Station and their owners, Carl and Jeri Goldman. We have previously stated at both the Planning Commission and the City Council that the $750,000 additional impact fee for mitigation was the most this project could sustain and still be economically viable. As you and the City Council knows our current fee requirements for all levels of government is $4,300,000. The reallocation of the originally proposed impact fee toward the resolution of noise issues with KHTS Radio Station will allow us deal with both of these issues and allow the project to proceed. We remain committed to fulfilling all necessary requirements and to working collaboratively with all stakeholders to ensure that both the historical impact fee and the noise issue are resolved in a fair and timely manner. Sin erely, Jason olleson Serrano Development Group Principal Packet Pg. 108 1.k May 7, 2025 VIA EMAIL Erika Iverson Senior Planner Planning Division City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Re: May t3, 2025 Council MeetinLZ Newhall Mixed Use Project Serrano Development. Master Case 24-134 --Noise Mitifyation Condition of Approval Dear Erika Iverson, As the applicant I am writing to formally request the below Condition of Approval to Master Case 24-134 to help mitigate noise impacts to the KHTS Radio Station property: "Developer shall not drill solider piles for subterranean garage shoring within 20 feet of K 4TS Radio Station property line between the hours of 7AM — 8AM, Monday through Saturday." Amongst other mitigation measures for the KHTS Radio Station property and other adjacent properties, the cost impact of this condition is part of the need for our request to reduce the impact fee from $750,000 to $300,000 as stated in my letter dated April 28, 2025. Serino Development Group Principal Packet Pg. 109 1.1 Mindy Bish, Esq 22505 Market St Suite 104 Newhall, CA 91321 (213) 392 - 3385 mindva-bishlaw.com April 28, 2025 The City Council of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd #120 Valencia, CA 91355 Honorable Members of the City Council of Santa Clarita: My name is Mindy Bish. I am the owner of the building on Market Street and Railroad Avenue that houses both my law firm and the Rafter's. Firstly, thank you all for doing the due diligence expected of you by the good people of Santa Clarita. As a resident of Santa Clarita since 1993, 1 appreciate the work to ensure the city grows responsibly and respectfully. I wanted to take the time to address your concerns about the inclusion of the building in the work being proposed by Serrano development: the historic nature of the building, the issue of parking, and the relocation of the Rafter's clubhouse. I thank you in advance for your time reviewing this letter. In regard to the historic nature of the building; unfortunately what remains is tenuous at best. Nothing exists documenting the original form of the building to determine if the building in its current form is, in any way, the same as it was. There is nothing to see on the exterior of the building. The building attracts no visitors based on its alleged historic value. No one showed any interest in the building as a historic landmark until the time it was up for inclusion by Serrano in their development plans. While I respect people's desire to keep important landmarks of the past, especially as a History major myself, this building simply is not the landmark, in any way, it's being ascribed to be. Parking is a major issue in Downtown Newhall. No one refutes this as an issue. However, that problem exists whether or not this development goes forward. Parking is a problem that needs to be resolved regardless of this development. That resolution should come quickly in the form of another parking structure. Placing the burden on Serrano to build much needed and required housing and fix a long-standing problem is an undue burden that will result in less housing not more parking. I would ask the council allow the parking to go forward as specified and move forward with a new parking structure to fix the current parking problem in the area. The Rafters has found a new place for its clubhouse. While the Rafters does good work in the community they have not been good tenants. They did not respond timely to requests to keep common areas clean or to ask their members to avoid loitering for prolonged periods. As such, they were asked to find a new place regardless of the building's inclusion in this development. Packet Pg. 110 1.1 Further, the Rafters stands to get an incredible amount of help for their move if the development proceeds. In that situation they'll be able to remove as much of the interior of their clubhouse as they'd like and get $25,000 in assistance to renovate their new space plus they'll also be provided with discounted contractor work from Hahn Contractors. Rafters stands to gain if the development is allowed to proceed. Lastly, while I have enjoyed my time in Santa Clarita, I have relocated to Florida for the past three years to help an elderly colleague transition to retirement. As such, I will be moving to sell the building regardless of the outcome of the development. In doing so, the building will likely, as the Mayor indicated, be sold to someone else trying to develop it. Someone who might not have the same kind of interest as Serrano in building something as mutually beneficial. And someone who may adhere to the letter of the law when it comes to what is required of them. I believe it will result in the best possible outcome for this building and the city for Serrano to take ownership, a known partner to the city, as opposed to leaving this work for someone else. Packet Pg. 111 1.m NOTICE OF DETERMINATION a° asxtA �< � t4 [X] County Clerk [ ] State Clearinghouse County of Los Angeles 1400 Tenth Street 12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 1007 Sacramento, CA 95815-.., Norwalk, CA 90650 PROJECT Newhall Mixed -Use Project: Master Case 24-134 NAME: PROJECT 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 2831-012- LOCATION: 022 through -026) PROJECT The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit DESCRIPTION: (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the Mac's Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Horseshoe on Main (24300 Main Street), and the potentially historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street) buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full -block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five -story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground -level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first -floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the on - site potentially historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20-percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. PROJECT Serrano Development Group APPLICANT: This is to advise that the City of Santa Clarita has made the following determinations regarding the project described above: 1) The project was approved by the [] Director of Community Development [ ] Planning Commission [X] Mayor and City Council on the following date: April 22, 2025. 2) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {a}). 3) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {b}). 4) [X] An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 5) [] An Addendum to the Final EIR was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6) The project [ ] WILL [X] WILL NOT have a significant impact on the environment. 7) Mitigation measures [X] WERE [ ] WERE NOT made a condition of project approval. 8) A Statement of Overriding Considerations [ ] WAS [X] WAS NOT adopted for this project. This is to certify that the [ ] NEGATIVE DECLARATION [X] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [ ] ADDENDUM with record of project approval is available for public review at: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 (661) 255-4330 Contact Person/Title: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I Signature: Packet Pg. 112 0 Agenda Item: I CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: �i�fl. .0 DATE: April 22, 2025 SUBJECT: NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134) DEPARTMENT: Community Development PRESENTER: Erika Iverson RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council: 1. Conduct the public hearing. 2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated and will comply with all mitigation measures established under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five -story, mixed -use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). BACKGROUND Request The proposed project is a request by Serrano Development Group, for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Architectural Design Review (ADR), and Development Review (DR) for the redevelopment of the project site into a new five - story, mixed -use project and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building located at 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831- 012-022 through -026), within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). Page 1 Packet Pg. 10 0 Project Setting The project site consists of five parcels within the OTNSP area, totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Newhall Metrolink Station. Three existing buildings on -site are proposed to be demolished: the Mac's Pool Supply building; the Horseshoe on Main building (previously known as Soundsations, a car stereo installation shop); and the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, which is identified as a historic structure in the City of Santa Clarita's (City) Historic Preservation Ordinance and the OTNSP. In 1968, the Courthouse use relocated to Valencia, and the building has been used as an office building since. Project Submittal On June 28, 2024, an application was submitted for the construction of a new five -story, mixed - use building consisting of 51 residential units, 3,400 square feet of commercial space, and two levels of parking, one subterranean and one at street level, within the Mac's Pool Supply and Horseshoe on Main properties. On November 27, 2024, the applicant expanded the project footprint to include the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse property, and revised the project scope to include a total of 78 residential units (apartments), and 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area. GENERAL PLAN. ZONING, AND LAND USES The project site has a General Plan designation of Specific Plan, and is located within the OTNSP. The project site has a zoning designation of AE zone under the OTNSP, which is applied to the central portions of Old Town Newhall, generally aligned with Main Street. The zone intends to promote a mixed -use, walkable neighborhood, with commercial uses along Main Street on the ground floor and residential units on the upper floors. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses (e.g., restaurant and retail use) to the north, west, and south, and the Metrolink station to the east. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development Proposal The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing buildings on -site for the full -block development of a new mixed -use building consisting of 78 apartments and 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area. The proposed building would be five stories, 52 feet in height, over one subterranean level of parking. Commercial storefronts would be located at the ground level facing Main Street, with garaged parking behind, within the building footprint. Apartment units would be located on the upper levels and oriented around an internal courtyard located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via two relocated driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. In addition, one existing driveway on Main Street would be closed, allowing for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. Page 2 Packet Pg. 11 0 Parking Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097) prohibits the City from requiring parking minimums on projects within a half -mile of a major transit stop, unless the project would have a negative impact on the existing parking supply. A parking demand study was prepared by the applicant to demonstrate that sufficient parking would be provided by the project to avoid a substantially negative impact on existing parking supply. A total of 122 parking stalls for the residential units are provided on - site, within ground -floor and subterranean parking levels. Residential guest parking will use public parking stalls and the applicant will utilize the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement. Below, Table 1 shows the required parking under the OTNSP, the proposed parking to be provided by the project, and the state baseline per AB 2097. Table 1: Required Proposed State Baseline Residential 156 spaces 122 on -site spaces 0 spaces Guest 39 spaces 20 public spaces 1 0 spaces Commercial 12 spaces (OTNSP in -lieu fee) OTNSP in -lieu fee 0 spaces e.g., street or public garage parking Removal ofMasonic Lodge/Courthouse The project proposes the demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, which is currently designated as a historic resource in the OTNSP and Historic Preservation Ordinance. Under the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section 17.64.090, an applicant can request to modify or demolish a historic resource with the application of an MUP, subject to approval by the City Council. As such, the applicant has requested an MUP to delist the building as a historic resource and to demolish it. In addition, the OTNSP, Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) addresses renovation or demolition of designated historic structures with mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1. Separately, the property owner of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building received a $22,440 grant (Grant) from the City for building maintenance in 2015. The grant funds would be required to be repaid to the City's General Fund if the building were to be demolished. The applicant submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society stating the building's historical integrity was compromised by a 1968 remodel, and that it is infeasible to relocate the building. In compliance with MM-CUL-1, the applicant has proposed to commemorate the Page 3 Packet Pg. 12 0 building by: (1) recording it through a Historic Architectural Building Survey; (2) installing a commemorative plaque on the new building; (3) placing a dedicatory art installation in the residential lobby; and (4) contributing $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. The payment of the $750,000 would be paid to the City for future preservation efforts, and is inclusive of the repayment of the Grant. These commemoration efforts are included as Conditions of Approval (PL6-PL8) for consideration by the City Council. Proposed Entitlements Implementation of the project will require the approval of the following entitlements: Conditional Use Permit 24-007 Required to increase the allowable floor area ratio above 200 percent of the structure's first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. Minor Use Permit 24-015 Required for the demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, and required for the export of 18,972 cubic yards of dirt. Adjustment Permit 24-005 Required to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20 percent from OTNSP standards, from 13,650 square feet to 10,929 square feet. Development Review 24-012 and Architectural Design Review 24-017 Required to ensure that the project, site plan, and architecture complies with all of the provisions of the Unified Development Code, the General Plan, and OTNSP. ENVIRONMENTAL The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR. As described, the project will comply with all required mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 18, 2025, where it received staff s presentation, opened the public hearing, and received comments from the applicant and members of the public. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending the City Council approve the proposed project. The Planning Commission's action included a recommendation for the City Council to consider the following Conditions of Approval, which are incorporated into the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A) for the project: PC1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee agrees to draft a parking management plan in a form approved by the Director of Community Development (Director) for both construction and permanent parking. Page 4 Packet Pg. 13 0 PC2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must provide a plan for the Director's approval to ensure structural integrity of immediately adjacent structures during construction. In addition to recommending the above conditions of approval, the Planning Commission advised that the City Council consider the following when evaluating the project: Consider possible assistance for relocation of the Rafters Alcoholics Anonymous Group, which currently meets in the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. 2. Consider possible accommodations that could be made during construction for the neighboring property owner (KHTS Radio Station). 3. Consider adjustments to the permitted construction schedule so there are not conflicts with City events in Old Town Newhall. A copy of the Planning Commission's staff report is available in the City Clerk's reading file. NOTICING All notices as required by law were completed. Property owners and occupants within a 1,000- foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing by mail. A public notice was placed in The Signal newspaper on April 1, 2025, and a sign was posted on the project site on April 8, 2025. As of the writing of this agenda report and issuance of the public notice for this City Council hearing, 37 comment letters have been received. All letters and comments that were received during the noticing period for the Planning Commission meeting are included in the Planning Commission staff report and letters received after publishing, prior to the Planning Commission meeting, are located in the City Clerk's reading file. CONCLUSION The Newhall Mixed -Use Project is consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, SCMC, and OTNSP. The applicant's commemoration proposal for the historic building is consistent with the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and mitigation measures in the OTNSP EIR. Therefore, Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134 (CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24- 012) for the construction of a new five -story mixed -use building delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). ALTERNATIVE ACTION Other action as determined by the City Council. Page 5 Packet Pg. 14 0 FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund. The applicant would be required to pay various development impact fees, including, but not limited to, Bridge and Thoroughfare and park dedication (Quimby) fees. Upon receipt of the $750,000 contribution, $22,440 would be deposited into the General Fund (Fund 100) for historic preservation grant repayment, and the remaining $727,560 would be deposited into the Site Improvement Fee Fund (Fund 431) to support local historic preservation efforts. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Aerial and Zoning Map Site & Floor Plans Elevations & Renderings Parking Demand Study Historical Society Letter Proposal for Demo of Historic Resource CEQA Notice of Determination Comment Letters MC24-134 Prior Hearing Documents (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Comment Letters after PC posting (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Page 6 Packet Pg. 15 1.a RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING MASTER CASE 24-134, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW FIVE -STORY, MIXED -USE BUILDING AND DEMOLITION AND DELISTING OF THE MASONIC LODGE/COURTHOUSE BUILDING LOCATED AT 24300, 24308, 24316 MAIN STREET AND 22505 MARKET STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 2831-012-022 THROUGH -026), IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. The City Council makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: A. On June 28, 2024, the applicant (Serrano Development Group) initiated Master Case 24-134, consisting of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-007, Minor Use Permit (MUP) 24-015, Adjustment Permit (ADJ) 24-005, Architectural Design Review (ADR) 24-017, and Development Review (DR) 24-012. The properties affected by the initial application are Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-023 through -026; B. On November 27, 2024, the application was revised to include an additional property which is APN 2831-012-022; C. The application was deemed complete on November 27, 2024; D. The project site consists of five parcels totaling approximately three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. The project proposes to demolish three existing buildings on -site: Mac's Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Soundsations (24300 and 24308 Main Street), and the City Council -designated historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street); E. The project site is located within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP); F. The applicant proposes to delist and demolish the existing structures on -site to construct a new five -story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area and 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and first -floor parking level. The project includes the closure of one driveway on Main Street and would allow for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requests relief from the requirements of the OTNSP to include a 20-percent reduction from Page 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 16 1.a the shared residential amenity space and to increase the allowable floor area ratio above 200 percent of the structure's first -floor footprint; G. In compliance with Assembly Bill 2097, the applicant is proposing to provide residential and on -street guest parking to avoid a negative impact on commercial and residential parking within one-half mile of the project site, as demonstrated in the parking demand study on file with the Planning division. Specifically, the study proposes to provide a 1.56 residential parking ratio on -site instead of the 2.0 ratio required by the OTNSP. The study also proposes a 0.25 per unit ratio for guest parking to be accommodated on -street, instead of the required 0.5 per unit ratio. The proposed development is utilizing the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement; H. The project proposes to demolish a building designated as historic by the City Council under the Historic Preservation Ordinance and the OTNSP. The OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1, which governs the demolition of historical structures. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, which states that this structure is no longer historically significant. The applicant would fulfill the requirements of MM-CUL-I by recording the building in accordance with a Historic Architectural Building Survey, installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts; I. On March 18, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; During this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending the City Council approve the proposed project. The Planning Commission recommended the addition of two conditions of approval to the project: PC requiring the creation of a Parking Management Plan, and PC2 requiring a construction plan to ensure the structural integrity of the neighboring building; K. On April 22, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City), City Council at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; and L. At this public hearing, the City Council considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony. This resolution, and its findings, are based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, the staff reports, testimony, written evidence, and meeting minutes provided during the public hearings. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 24-134. Based upon the foregoing facts and conclusions, the City Council finds as follows: A. The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR and the project will comply with all Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 17 1.a mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. In particular, the applicant would fulfill the requirements of MM-CUL-1. As demonstrated by the letter on file from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse has been substantially altered and no further action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required. Consequently, a Notice of Determination was prepared for this project in compliance with CEQA; B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the City Council is based is the Master Case 24-134 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development department in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the City Council hereby finds the Notice of Determination for this Project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows: A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation: The proposed project is consistent with the following policies of the General Plan: Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth. Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed -use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed -use zoning. Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels. The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed -use building in a walkable and transit -friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes and income levels. B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan); Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 18 1.a The proposed project would be consistent with the following findings of the OTNSP: OTNSP-1: That the proposed use or project is consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. OTNSP-2: That the proposed use or project meets the development requirements for the Zone within which it is located including parking, architecture, and ground -floor uses. A Stacked Dwelling building type is permitted -by -right in the AE zone of the OTNSP only as part of a vertical mixed -use project with upper floor residential. Any future tenants in the new commercial spaces constructed by the project are subject to the requirements of OTNSP Table 4.2-1, the permitted use chart for the AE zone. A CUP would allow an increase to the allowable Floor Area Ration (FAR) above 200 percent of the structure's first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. An ADJ is requested to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20 percent from OTNSP standards. The building is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. The proposed project complies with all other development standards for the AE zone and Stacked Dwelling building type. With the Conditions of Approval, the project will comply with Titles 16 and 17 of the SCMC and the OTNSP. C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and The proposed project is not located on a hazardous site and would not include any hazardous materials. Standard construction materials and methods would be utilized to ensure safety during construction. The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, including, without limitation: the California Building Standards Code and Fire Code. Sufficient access for firefighting purposes is provided and verified by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LACFD), and the applicant must comply with all LACFD requirements. D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use; The subject site includes existing commercial development and surface parking. The parking demand study for the project demonstrates that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed building. The proposed building complies with the City's standards for mixed -use development, including compliance with setbacks, building height, drive -aisle width, and landscaping. 2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are of sufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 19 1.a generate; The project is accessed via Market Street and Railroad Avenue, and improvements to the roadway are required for the proposed building. The applicant must comply with all City imposed engineering requirements when constructing any improvements in the right-of- way, such as sewer laterals, parkway tree installation, and ADA paths of travel at the driveways. The project will not have a significant effect on vehicle miles traveled or traffic, and existing driveway ingress and egress from the site will be maintained. With the proposed improvements along the project's frontage, the project will comply with all requirements of the City's Department of Public Works. 3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriff protection, etc) are readily available; and The project will have public protection services provided by both the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) and LACFD, and will not require any additional resources or services from those organizations as a result of its operation. The proposal would also be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the LACFD and LASD. 4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site. The proposed use would be located within an existing commercial area, which is located within a developed urbanized area with available and adequate utilities to serve the site. The proposed project would connect to this existing infrastructure on -site. SECTION 4: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR THE RELOCATION OR DEMOLITION OF A HISTORIC RESOURCE. As required by SCMC Section 17.64.100, the City Council must approve the relocation or demolition of a property or structure that has been designated as a historic resource. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows: A. That the City Council must make findings to relocate a historic structure. Alternatively, upon completion of environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition. As identified in the letter provided by the Santa Clarita Historical Society, relocation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building is not feasible. In addition, the historical integrity of the building was compromised by a remodel in 1968. No interior features remain from its use as a Los Angeles County Courthouse. As described above, the project is consistent with the previously prepared FEIR for the OTNSP, including MM-CUL-1. The applicant is conditioned to record the building in accordance with a Historic Architectural Building Survey, install a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, place a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and make a monetary contribution Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 20 1.a of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. Therefore, the requirements of the SCMC and the OTNSP for the delisting and demolition of a building designated as a historic resource are met. SECTION 5: FINDINGS FOR ADJUSTMENT PERMIT. As required by SCMC Section 17.24.100, based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the City Council determines as follows: 1. That the adjustment does not authorize a use or activity that is not allowed in the zone; The ADJ is consistent with the development standards of the OTNSP and will not authorize a use or activity that is prohibited under the zone. All proposed uses and activities remain within the scope of the OTNSP. The proposed project furthers the goal of creating a vibrant and active Main Street, and would further enliven the area by providing street -level retail space along with additional residential density in this urban environment. 2. That granting an adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which would otherwise be denied to the property for which the adjustment is sought; and The proposed project meets the intent and goals of the OTNSP, as described above, and provides meaningful shared amenity space as required by the specific plan. The applicant is providing 10,929 square feet of amenity space, 20 percent less than the 13,560 square feet required by the OTNSP. The provided amenities include an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and bike room for residents of the proposed development. The provided amenities meet the intent of the OTNSP and the provided square footage is appropriate given the compact, high -density nature of the development, while remaining within the height requirements of the OTNSP 3. That the granting of the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. As described above, the development, including the granting of the ADJ, will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property as it is providing a reduction to a development standard that has been evaluated and reviewed by all appropriate agencies. SECTION 6: APPROVALS. The City Council takes the following actions: Adopt this Resolution approving Master Case 24-134, Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012, for the construction of a new five -story, mixed -use building at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue and the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, subject to the conditions of approval (Exhibit A). Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 21 1.a SECTION 7: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 8: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact. SECTION 9: NOTICE. The City Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this resolution to the City Council and any other person requesting a copy. SECTION 10: EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the City Council's final decision made on April 22, 2025. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025. ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: MAYOR Page 7 of 8 Packet Pg. 22 1.a STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-_ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of April 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK Page 8 of 8 Packet Pg. 23 1.a EXHIBIT A MASTER CASE 24-134 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita's (City) approval of Master Case 24-134. GENERAL CONDITIONS GC1. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC. GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval must be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre -commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of 60 calendar days or more must terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use must not be re-established or resumed after the 60-day period. Discontinuation must include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume. GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally -approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration. GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term "permittee" includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys' fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee. GCS. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspection requirements as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director (Director). Packet Pg. 24 1.a GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the plans date -stamped on file, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein. GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon permittee's successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC. GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval. GC9. When Exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail. GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed. GC11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020. GC12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the City Council. GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director. GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval. GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated. Packet Pg. 25 1.a GC16. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions. GC17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the permittee. PLANNING COMMISSION PC1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee agrees to develop a parking management plan in a form approved by the Director for both construction and permanent parking. PC2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must provide a plan for the Director's approval to ensure structural integrity of immediately adjacent structures during construction. PLANNING DIVISION PL1. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Newhall Mixed -Use Project, including a five -story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 5,223 square feet of first -floor commercial space, 78 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 24-134. PL2. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans, elevations, colors, materials, and other elements on file with the Planning Division. Any modification to the approved project and plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director. PL3. The building is approved at the heights shown on the approved elevations and cannot exceed 55 feet in height. Architectural enhancements extending above the roofline are permitted only as shown on the approved plans and may not exceed an additional 12 feet in height. PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 122 parking stalls on -site (1.56 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 20 public on -street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio). PL5. In lieu of constructing 12 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $70,261.20 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building Packet Pg. 26 1.a permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid PL6. Before any permit is issued including, without limitation, a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, the permittee must complete all required recordation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, as required by the OTNSP FEIR MM-CUL-I and the permittee's commitments to preserving the building's history as approved by the City Council. PL7. Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit, the permittee must donate $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. PL8. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install a commemorative plaque on the building exterior and provide an art installation within the lobby to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. PL9. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must obtain a Temporary Use Permit and install two murals on the North Elevation as shown on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division. PL10. The uses in the commercial building are subject to the permitted use chart for the AE zone of the OTNSP. PL11. All roof -mounted and ground -mounted equipment must be screened from public view PL12. No signage is approved by this permit. All future signage requires a sign permit application in accordance with the OTNSP. Exposed neon is not permitted. Landscaping Conditions LR1. Before the City Engineer issues grading permit(s), the permittee must provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans (Landscape Document Package) for the Director's review and approval. The Landscape Document Package must be prepared by a California -registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20' to 30' F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105' F to 110' F). The Landscape Document Package must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other SCMC requirements. LR2. The permittee is required to pay all associated fees to the City before the release of the approved Landscape Document Package for the project. LR3. The permittee must coordinate with the Director of Administrative Services regarding any landscaping installed on City right-of-way. The Director of Administrative Services must review the landscape and irrigation plans when submitted, and all such landscaping must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services before installation. The permittee must receive final approval for the installed landscape before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy. Packet Pg. 27 1.a LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection. LR5. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved Landscape Document Package. ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION General Requirements EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide an approval letter from Southern California Edison (Distribution Division and/or Transmission Division, as appropriate) and from all other affected utilities for the proposed grading and improvements adjacent to their existing facilities, as required by the City Engineer. EN2. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site must be installed underground by the permittee. Certificate of Compliance Requirements EN3. Before the Building Official issues any building permit, a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment encompassing all parcels within the boundaries of this project prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California must be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; in compliance with applicable law Grading and Geology Requirements EN4. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a grading plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. The grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations, including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction. EN5. Before the Building Official issues building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee. EN6. This project anticipates export of 18,972 CY of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation. Packet Pg. 28 1.a A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation: i. Obtain an encroachment permit for the work. ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee. C. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route. EN7. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Letter of Permission for review and approval for grading over easements/outside of the property lines from the affected easement holder/adjacent property owner(s). Drainage Requirements EN8. Before the City Engineer, or designee issues a grading permit, the permittee must have the site drainage study approved by the City Engineer demonstrating that post - development flows from the site will not be increased from pre -development flows, or mitigate for the increase. Water Quality Requirements EN9. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan. Packet Pg. 29 1.a Street Light Relocation Requirements EN10. Before street plan approval, the permittee must submit a revised Street Light Plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must relocate the existing street light along Railroad Avenue per the approved revised plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street Improvement Requirements EN11. Before the revised street plan approval and any construction within public street right-of- way, the permittee must submit to the City Engineer or designee a revised street improvement plan for review and approval to obtain encroachment permits from the City Engineer, or designee. EN12. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee is required to dedicate a portion of its property to City for public right-of-way to meet the requirements of SCMC Section 17.55, creating a clear sight triangle ensuring unobstructed views for drivers. Permittee may, but is not required to, reserve property rights to include all projections, such as awnings, within the airspace of the dedicated public right-of-way. Such reservation must be approved as to form by the City Attorney. EN13. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee must submit a street tree location plan to the Urban Forestry Administrator for review and approval. The plan must include proposed sewer lateral locations, storm drain infrastructure, and trees must not conflict with the proposed infrastructure. EN14. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant Curb Ramp (per the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) along the property frontage corner at the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street and dedicate necessary easement to the City, as directed by the City Engineer. EN15. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an ADA compliance Curb Ramp (per SPPWC Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) at all three other corners of the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street per the State of California DOT Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-06 and as directed by the City Engineer. Railroad Avenue is designated as a State Route and any modification at the intersection, requires existing nonstandard curb ramps to be reconstructed to current standards per DIB 82-06. EN16. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must dedicate sidewalk easements sufficient to encompass ADA requirements for sidewalks installed with drive approaches per the current SPPWC Standard Plan 110-2, Type C, or equivalent. EN17. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must replace the abandoned driveway(s) with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement in Packet Pg. 30 1.a accordance with SPPWC standards and in compliance with OTNSP, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A revised street plan and encroachment permit is required. EN18. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets abutting the project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sewer Improvement Requirements EN19. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the proposed building(s) lateral line(s) must connect to the existing public sewer main in Market Street (8" sewer per PC CI2520), and the permittee must coordinate with the Building & Safety Division regarding payment of additional annexation fees, if required, to annex the property into the County Sanitation District. EN20. The on -site sewer is a privately maintained. Before grading plan approval, the permittee must submit an "on -site sewer plan." The "on -site sewer plan" are designed per the California Plumbing Code and approved by the Building Official before Grading Plan approval. EN21. Before the Building Official issues Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. EN22. The permittee must also obtain a permit from LA County Building Official to install a new saddle on the existing public sewer by LA County Sewer Maintenance Division, if the wye does not exist on the existing public sewer. Bond, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements EN23. Before City Engineer, or designee issue encroachment permits for public improvements (Street), the permittee, by agreement with the City Engineer, must guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means in a form approved by the City Attorney. Certificate of Occupancy/Occupancies are withheld if the improvements are not completed. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TE1. Before the City Engineer issues street plan approval, the permittee must show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110- 2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details will be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum. TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulb - out on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach. Packet Pg. 31 1.a TE3. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must restripe Market Street per the attached exhibit (Striping Exhibit — Market Street) to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. TE4. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee will pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Via Princessa B&T District. The current rate for this District is $22,710. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment. Standard B&T Fee Calculation: Apartments = the number of units (78) x the district rate ($22,710) x 0.7 = $1,239,966 B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division must be calculated as follows: Retail Commercial = 5,223 sf x $22,710 x 5 = $36,306 16,335 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FD1. All fire lanes must be clear of all encroachments and must be maintained in accordance with Section 503 of County of Los Angeles Fire Code, Title 32, as adopted by the SCMC, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. FD2. Main Street, Market Street & Railroad Avenue serve as the Fire Apparatus Access roads for this project. For buildings where the vertical distance between the access roadway and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet from the lowest level of the Fire Apparatus Access Road, provide a minimum unobstructed width of 28 feet, exclusive of shoulders and an unobstructed vertical clearance "clear to sky" Fire Apparatus Access Roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. At least one required access route meeting this condition must be located such that the edge of the Fire Apparatus Access Roadway, not including shoulders, that is closest to the building being served, is between 10 feet and 30 feet from the building, as determined by the fire code official, and must be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the Fire Apparatus Access Road is positioned must be approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.1.1; 503.2.1.2; 503.2.1.2.2 & 503.2.1.2.2.1). FD3. The dimensions of the approved Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be maintained as originally approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.2.2.1). FD4. Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing 75,000 pounds and must be surfaced to provide all- weather driving capabilities (Fire Code 503.2.3). Packet Pg. 32 1.a FD5. A minimum 5-foot-wide approved firefighter access walkway leading from the Fire Department Access Road to all required openings in the building's exterior walls must be provided for firefighting and rescue purposes (Fire Code 504.1). FD6. Security barriers, visual screen barriers or other obstructions must not be installed on the roof of any building in such a manner as to obstruct firefighter access or egress in the event of fire or other emergency. Parapets must not exceed 42 inches from the top of the parapet to the roof surface on more than two sides. These sides should face an access roadway or yard sufficient to accommodate ladder operations (Fire Code 504.5). FD7. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD8. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 3500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 3 hours. Three public fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow (Fire Code 507.3 & Appendix B). FD9. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed buildings within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval before installation. FD 10. Install 1 public fire hydrant as noted by the Fire Department. All required public fire hydrants must be installed, tested and accepted before beginning construction. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD11. A digital copy of the Water Plans for the required public fire hydrant must be submitted to the Fire Department's Land Development Unit for review and approval. Compliance is required before project construction. Submittal must be provided through EPIC -LA using the following Plan Type: Fire Land Development —Water Plan & System Review. BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION Plans and Permits BSI. Construction drawings must be prepared and submitted to the Building & Safety Division for plan review and building permit issuance. Supporting documents; such as structural and energy calculations, and geotechnical reports must be included with the plan submittal. BS2. The submitted site plan must show all parcel/lot lines, easements, fire separation distances, restricted use areas, etc. Any construction proposed in an easement must obtain the easement owner's written permission or the easement must be removed. Parcel lines that overlap any proposed buildings must be removed (lot line adjustment) before the Building Official issues a building permit. Packet Pg. 33 1.a BS3. Construction drawings must incorporate mitigation measures identified by a noise study prepared by a qualified noise engineer. Electric Vehicle Parking Spaces for the residential portion of the project per CalGreen BS4. EV Ready parking spaces with receptacles for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles at the rate of 40% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. For the receptacle power source and configuration see CalGreen 4.106.4.2.2. BS5. Additionally, EV Ready parking spaces with EV chargers for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with Level 2 EV chargers at the rate of 10% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. At least 50% of these EV chargers must be equipped with J1772 connectors. Accessibility for the residential portion of the project BS6. All applicable disabled access requirements of California Building Standards Code (CBSC) Chapter 11A, as adopted by the SCMC, must be shown on the architectural plans versus civil plans. BS7. If the project receives any public funds such as tax credits, incentives or similar programs the multi -family project must comply with the public housing requirements of the California Building Code, Chapter 1113. Soil Reports and Grading BS8. A complete soils and geology investigation report will be required for this project. The report must be formally submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The recommendations of the report must be followed and incorporated into the plans for the proj ect. Hazard Zones BS9. Indicate on the cover sheet of the plans this project IS NOT LOCATED in a Fire Hazard Zone, IS NOT LOCATED in the Flood Hazard Zone, and IS NOT LOCATED in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Additional Information BS 10. Separate Demolition Permit will be required to raze any building to be removed on the site. Clearances from the City Planning Division, City Environmental Services (for construction demolition deposit) and AQMD will be required before the Building Official issues a demolition permit. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ES 1. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must demonstrate appropriate, detailed safety measures for resident access to organics bins as well as to bins with chute connections. Packet Pg. 34 1.a ES2. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide confirmation to utilize "push -out" service provided by the waste hauler, to avoid the need for a bin staging area along Market Street. ES3. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide elevations and/or site plans for the chute system that identify the correct location and placement of both chutes and corresponding bins within the trash rooms. ES4. Before a building, demolition, or grading permit is issued, the permittee must submit a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) and receive approval from the Environmental Services Manager or Designee if the project meets the parameters below (S.C.M.C.§15.46.300): A. All demolition projects (regardless of valuation), all commercial projects of new construction or additions over 1,000 square feet and all tenant improvements, alterations or new construction valued greater than $200,000, all new residential construction projects and all residential additions and improvements that increase building area, volume, or size must comply with the City's Construction and Demolition Materials (C&D) Recycling Ordinance. S.C.M.C.§15.46.200 B. A minimum of 65% of the entire project's inert (dirt, rock, bricks, etc.) waste and 65% of the remaining C&D waste must be recycled or reused rather than disposing in a landfill. S.C.M.C.§15.46.610 and CALGreen sections 4.408, 5.408, 301.1.1 and 301.3 C. For renovation or tenant improvement projects and new construction projects, a deposit of 2% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. For demolition projects, a deposit of 10% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. The full deposit will be returned to the permittee upon proving that 65% of the inert and remaining C&D waste was recycled or reused. S.C.M.C.§15.46.400 ES5. All projects within the City that are not self -hauling waste materials must use one of the City's franchised haulers for temporary and roll -off bin collection services. S.C.M.C.§15.44.220 PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION PR1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must pay the required Park Dedication Fee equal to the value of the amount of land established per the City's General Plan, "Parks and Recreation Element." The permittee may be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Final Parkland dedication obligation calculation to be based on current density per dwelling and fair market value rates at time of payment. An estimate is attached. Packet Pg. 35 1.a TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DIVISION TS 1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a Grading Permit, the permittee must demonstrate compliance with SCMC Section 17.51.007 (Connected City Infrastructure Program) requiring conduit from a location to be determined in the public right-of-way to the Minimum Point of Entry (MPOE) or similar location within the project area that serves as the main telecommunications closet. Conduit for this condition must be reflected on development plans. TRANSIT DIVISION TR1. The current Transit Impact Fee is $216 per residential unit. Permittee must pay the fee in place at the time of building permit issuance. SPECIAL DISTRICTS SD1. This permittee is required to protect and preserve in place all existing Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) landscape located within the public right of way along Main Street and Market Street. For this project, landscape includes without limitation, trees, shrubs, irrigation, lighting, electrical outlets, pilasters with Trex / wood cross rails, decking, brick pavers, brick planters, raised planters, wrought iron, potted plants on city irrigation, and any other amenity items located within the existing landscape planters and walkways. SD2. This project is located within the Downtown Newhall Corridor and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. As a result, all required landscape improvements must be consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plans and design guidelines. SD3. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to install full landscape improvements along Main Street where the current drive approach to Mac's Pool supply is located. These improvements must close the gap, and connect the two existing planters located on opposite sides of the drive approach. The current preliminary plan is showing a Schinus molle "California pepper" tree as a proposed tree in this area. Schinus molle is not an approved tree and must be replaced with an approved species. SD4. New landscape includes without limitation: connecting to and extending the brick pavers (walkway), existing planters, irrigation, and the installation of new planters consisting of trees shrubs, lighting and other landscape features similar to those in the existing planters. SD5. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit final landscape plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect and receive approval by LMD. SD6. Existing parkway trees and landscape along Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue are required to be protected and preserved in place. This may include having to install approved temporary protective fencing around the edge of the planters to protect trees, shrubs, irrigation and other landscape amenities located within the planter during construction. Packet Pg. 36 1.a SD7. Unless waived by the Director of Administrative Services, the planter located at the back edge of the sidewalk shared by both Mac's Pool Supply and the adjacent KHTS building must be protected and preserved in place. If this planter cannot be protected in place, the permittee will be required to repair and / or replace this planter to the satisfaction of the Director of Administrative Services. SD8. Full parkway landscape improvements will be required along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. These landscape improvements must be consistent with the improvements currently along Railroad Avenue and 5m Street fronting the Hotel Lexen. This includes installing amenities such as bollard / hitching post, and protected electrical outlets. SD9. If at any time during the project, the irrigation to any existing landscape is turned off, the permittee and their contractors will be responsible to provide supplemental irrigation / water to all trees and shrubs throughout the duration of the project by any means necessary at no cost to the City. Trees and shrubs which die, or decline to a condition unacceptable by Director of Administrative Services, must be replaced by the permittee at no cost to the City. SD10. The permittee is responsible for replacing any missing landscape shrubs in the planters fronting the project site. SDI 1. The permittee is responsible for replacing or repairing any damaged or missing pavers or decking located within the public right-of-way fronting the project on both Main Street and Market Street. SD12. The permittee is required to show all existing landscape which fronts the project on Main Street to scale on all future sets of site plans including, without limitation; demolition, grading, construction and landscape plans (preliminary and final). SD13. At no time is any construction material, equipment or vehicles permitted to be stored or placed within a landscape planter where trees and shrubs exist. At no time is any form of hazardous material including runoff water from washing and cleaning of tools and equipment be permitted to enter any existing or proposed landscape planter. SD14. The permittee is advised that parkway trees are maintained by the City's LMD. At no time will any parkway tree be pruned for sign visibility. This information must be included with all paperwork for all future tenants. SD15. Any impacts to root system of an existing City maintained tree must be approved by the City Arborist. Work completed within the "Tree Protected Zone" (TPZ) must be completed by hand in the presence of a qualified consulting arborist with documented experience with monitoring trees during construction. The permittee will be required to retain the services of a qualified consulting arborist to perform all required monitoring. This will be completed at no cost to the City of Santa Clarita. Packet Pg. 37 1.a Landscabe Maintenance Districts SD16. These parcels are located within LMD Zone 28, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscapes located in the Newhall area. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to LMD Zone 28 in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. SD17. These parcels are located within LMD Areawide Zone 2008-1, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscaped medians on major thoroughfares located throughout the City of Santa Clarita. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to the Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. Streetlight Maintenance District SD18. These parcels were originally annexed by County of Los Angeles into a Lighting District with a maximum assessment of $12.38 per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Unit) without a cost of living index/escalator. The permittee will be required to annex all parcels into the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (SCLLD), Street -lighting Zone B. The District funds the operation and maintenance of various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District. SDI 9. As part of any required street improvements, the permittee may be required to add, relocate, or update streetlights along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. All streetlights and their locations must be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District (SMD). City of Santa Clarita Park Dedication Fee Requirement Project Description: old Town Newhall Mixed -use Tract/MC#: 24-1-34 j i `J b Rousing Units Density 1 Dwelling 5 Acres ""FMV Per 1000 Sub Total 20% Off Site Improvements In Lieu Fee 78 1 2.870 0.005 1 $880.000 1 $984,984 5196,997 $1.181,981 Total Density 224 Total Acres due 1.11930 30 % Max. Park Credit 0.33579 With Park Credit 078351 $689,489 $137,898 $827,387 TOTAL FEES DUE WITH 30%CREDIT= $827,387 TOTAL FEES DUE WITHOUT CREDIT-— $1,181,981 Potential Private Park Total Total Max. Credit Estimate Reviewed by: Katie Knyh Credit SQ. FT. Acres 30% $354,594 1 14.627 1 0.33579 1 0.33579 Date: 21&2025 —The applicant will be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the Fair Market Value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Method d ralcuht- per the Gdy d Sarrta Glanta General Plan - Packs and Recreation Element_ DU X. Population X 5 acres per X. "FIu1Y = Su1)t0ta1 X 2 = In Lieu Fee per DU 1000 people Buildable acre Packet Pg. 38 1.a 020 � w. ' • Ar � M N W U) a tU w W H a 5 w D 0 W x J J a x w z c 0 r 0 0 a� r c a� E a Packet Pg. 39 1.b AERIAL AND ZONING MAP Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Aerial Map Packet Pg. 40 1.b Zoning Map ZONING KEY AE (OTNSP) I — Old Town Newhall Specific Plan — Arts & Entertainment N (OTNSP) —Old Town Newhall Specific Plan —Neighborhood S:\CD\!PLAN NING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2024\MC24-134 (ADJ, ADR, DR, CUP, MUP Market & Main Mixed-Use)\5. Planning Commission\3. MC24-134Aerial and Zoning Map.doc Packet Pg. 41 1.c SITE & FLOOR PLANS Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Packet Pg. 42 UTILI TIES - ---- _ - -- --- UTILITIES - -1 III III11 STAIRS lily_ Llli-lii.l�ll. II IILII Lill.III.. IIIr.IIIr_II_III_Ii.Illlll W ° ® i 3 RAMP UP II_II EXIT TO RAILROAD �- -I 71- �I ILII��ILI -IH�I �LI ll I H-n- I I ��I�-LI I) � 1111� II III II I�-II�III =dICl-ld ld�---CCI-1I II II a x� �rc �!Urx _ w RESIDENTIAL PARKING -I 67STALLS _III III 1 11 M E € 12 Q Q 12 STAIRS it � � I 12 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES - 27 EV CHARGING SPACES -7 ACCESSIBLE EVCS -I ACCESS BLE SPACES -I VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - I TANDAM SPACES - 52 (X SINGLE SPACE - 15 TOTAL BASEMENT PARKING - 67 STALLS �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submitta. BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN packet Pg. 43 PARKING ENTRY/EXIT (RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT ONLY) S, SERRANO 4SAE Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development DEVELOPMENT GROUP aoa Santa Clarita, CA 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES -22 EV CHARGING SPACES -6 ACCESSIBLE EVCS - 1 ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 TANDEM SPACES - 36 (1& SINGLE SPACES - 19 TOTALGARAGE PARKING -55STALLS TOTAL RETAIL SQ. FT. - 5,223 SF �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 14 1 60' Planning Submftta FIRST FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 44 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (2ND FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 8 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 18 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal SECOND FLOOR PLAN packet pg. 45 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (3RD FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal THIRD FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 46 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION WTH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal FOURTH FLOOR PLAN packet pg. 47 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.c PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (5TH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal FIFTH FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 48 1.d ELEVATIONS & RENDERINGS Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Packet Pg. 49 WEST ELEVATION MAIN ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER is. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SGSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION - MAIN STREET (WEST) SOUTH ELEVATION MARKET ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER is. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SGSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d 4 SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. ELEVATION - MARKET STREET (SOUTH) Planning Submftta EAST ELEVATION RAILROAD AVE EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER 1S. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SGSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d a SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION - RAILROAD AVE (EAST) EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER 1S. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) 27. PAINTED WALL MURAL S6sERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION (NORTH) PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA Main Street Elevation Elevations �_- SERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP 1.d Ism �RORITECTURE INTERIORS Packet Pg.54 February 5, 2025 Tai Lane Serrano Development Group 24 N. Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 LLG Reference No. 2.24.4807.1 Subject: Parking Demand Analysis for the Downtown Newhall Mixed -Use Project Santa Clarita, California Dear Ms. Lane: As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Demand Analysis for the proposed mixed -used project development in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. The project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue. The Project proposes to demolish three existing retail buildings to construct a 78-unit multifamily development, inclusive of 5,223 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail. Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces. Based on our understanding, a detailed parking assessment is needed to justify a reduced parking requirement for the site when compared to the City's code parking requirements. As such, the following items have been considered. ■ Parking requirements documented in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updatedMay 2022 ■ Research of relevant parking reductions (i.e. Assembly Bill 2097, ITE, other comparable Cities, etc.) ■ Hourly off -site parking demand counts in the immediate area of the Project 2 Executive Circle Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92614 949.825.6175 r 949.825.5939 F www.11gengineers.co Pasadena Irvine San Diego David S. Shender, PE John A. Boa rman, PE Richard E. Barrette, PE Keil D. Maherry, PE KC Yellapu, PE Dave Roseman, PE Shankar Ramakrishnan, P An L62WB Company Founded 1966 Packet Pg. 58 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 2 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Location and Description The proposed Project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. Figure 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the overall Project site in the context of the surrounding street system. The proposed Project includes the development of a five -story building, with basement, consisting of 78 apartment units, above a two -level parking structure. The Project's unit mix will consist of 39 one -bedroom units, 35 two -bedroom units, and 4 three -bedroom units, with 5,223 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail space. Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 67 spaces, inclusive of 26 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 55 spaces, inclusive of 18 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 122 spaces. Table 1, attached to this letter, provides a summary of the Project development, inclusive of the Proj ect's proposed parking supply. Figure 2 presents the proposed Project site plan prepared by SAE Architecture Interiors. As shown on Figure 2, with the closure of the existing driveway on Main Street, an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided with the construction of the proposed Project. PARKING ANALYSIS Code Parking Requirements The code parking calculation for the residential component of the Project is based on the City's requirements as outlined in Chapter 17.42 Residential Use Types of the City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code while the commercial component of the Project is based on the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. Based on the above the City's Code specifies the following parking requirements: ■ Multifamily Residential: two (2) space per unit plus one-half (0.5) space per unit for guest parking ■ Retail: 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF 1.e �Iimk I M �N%WX Packet Pg. 59 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 3 On that basis, Table 2 presents the code parking requirements for the proposed Project. Review of the upper portion of Table 2 presents the residential component which identifies a 195-space requirement. When compared to the proposed on -site parking supply of 122 spaces, a 73-space code -calculated shortfall is indicated. It should be noted that based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Later in the letter provides further justification and recommendations. The lower portion of the Table 2 shows the commercial component which identifies that 12 spaces are required. The Old Town Newhall Specific Plan identifies a Parking In -Lieu Fee program for which the Project would be required to contribute to. The fee would be applied to the commercial parking component of the Project, as determined by the City. The fee shall be established by separate resolution of the City Council. Funds collected by the City from fee payments may be used to finance the creation or expansion of public parking through the purchase of property and the construction of new facilities, including debt service and signage that identifies the location of parking within the business district. As such, the Project's retail parking requirements will be satisfied via its contribution towards this Parking In -Lieu Fee program. Assembly Bill 2097 The City's residential parking ratio of 2.0 spaces per unit is considered high when compared to ITE, other Cities and based on empirical data. As such, it is recommended that a reduced parking ratio be applied to the residential component of the Project. Further, given the location of the Project, which is across the street from the Metrolink Train Station, Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097), which states the following, would be applicable to the Project. This bill would prohibit a public agency from imposing any minimum automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project, as defined, that is located within 112 mile of public transit, as defined Due to the project's proximity to the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station, AB 2097 can be applied to the Project. However, per the City of Santa Claritia Director's Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, for AB 2097 to be applied to the Project it must demonstrate that the reduced parking requirement would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. As such, research of the following parking ratios was considered for the Project. Packet Pg. 60 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 4 TOD Multifamily Residential Parking Ratios Research of multifamily residential code requirements has been conducted. Table 3 presents the parking requirements from ITE and other cities in the region. Review of the first column from Table 3 presents the residential parking requirements for Santa Clarita. The other columns presents the TTE parking requirements and other City parking requirements for Transit Oriented Developments (TOD's). Review of Table 3 shows that multiple sources have multifamily parking ratios well below the City of Santa Clarita code ratio. As such, it can be concluded that the City's ratio is considered high and a reduced parking ratio would be appropriate. It should be noted that the City code parking requirement for resident guest of 0.5 spaces per unit is also considered high. As such, it is recommended that a ratio of 0.25 spaces per unit be applied to the resident guest component of the Project. Empirical Parking Ratios For Multifamily Residential Individual multifamily residential projects and local settings may have unique parking characteristics that may not be well represented in typical city code requirements. There are increasing concerns among parking/traffic engineering and planning experts over City code parking ratios and parking minimums being outdated, causing multifamily developments to have either inadequate or excessive supply, and that the "one -size -fits -all" approach to estimating parking requirements inherent in city parking codes may not reflect actual, more current and realistic parking needs, operations, and management. Notwithstanding the requirements of Santa Clarita's City code, the actual parking requirements for multifamily residential uses have been found to be less than the City's own Code requirement as illustrated by LLG's previous field studies of actual parking demand at existing sites. Table 4 presents a comparison of site development and parking ratios from the thirteen (13) apartment communities in southern California, inclusive of the source of parking survey data. Additional details for the comparable sites are also provided inclusive of the location, development summary, parking facility type, and parking supply. It should be noted that the ratios provided in Table 4 include demand related to resident and resident guest. It should be noted that sites 12 and 13 in Table 4 were included per direction of the City to include additional comparable sites that are more aligned with the size of Project. 1.e �Iimk I M �N%WX Packet Pg. 61 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 5 Both Edgeway and Newhall Crossings provide subterranean gated parking for their residents. Appendix A presents the parking demand count sheets for these sites. Review of the rightmost column of Table 4 presents the tenant and guest peak parking ratio (spaces per unit) for each of the comparable sites. This array of peak parking rates yields an average ratio of 1.28 spaces per unit, an 85m percentile ratio of 1.43 spaces per unit, and a 95m percentile ratio of 1.46 spaces per unit. Direct comparison between the 95m percentile ratio of 1.46 to what the Project is proposing, which is 1.56 spaces per unit shows the Project would exceed the 95m percentile by 0.10 spaces per unit. It should be noted that the 95m percentile ratio includes demand related to the resident guest component. Therefore, the projected surpluses in parking would be approximately 0.25 spaces per unit greater than what is identified. Given the above, LLG concludes that the parking ratios derived from the thirteen comparable sites are accurate representations for the unique parking characteristics of the proposed Project that are not reflected in the City code ratio and would be a good indicator of the parking demand of the proposed Project. It should also be noted that twelve (12) of the thirteen (13) sites observed were not directly across from a train station and as a result larger surpluses could occur. The thirteenth site observed is located approximately 650 feet north of the site along Main Street within walking distance to the train station. Closer inspection of the parking demand data shows that the resident component of that project is gated and does not allow for guest parking to occur within the gated areas. As such, the parking ratio for the residential component, excluding the resident guest component, of the Newhall Crossings apartment project is 1.07 spaces per units (gated demand 48 spaces divided by 45 occupied units = 1.07 spaces per unit). The ratio of 1.07 excludes any resident guest or commercial employee/guest since they park in the public parking structure. It should be noted that Newhall Crossing was approved at a ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit, but they provided 1.85 spaces per unit. The Newhall Crossings project is considered the most appropriate site for comparison since it has a similar number of units, is located in close proximity to the site, would likely have similar resident demographics and is located in walking distance to the Metrolink Station. As such, it can be concluded that the residential component of the Project is considered to have ample parking to support its needs. Resident Guest Parking Requirements As noted above, the project will not provide on -site parking to support the resident guest component of the project and will rely on public on -street parking within the vicinity of the project. The residential guest would require 20 spaces based on the assumption of 0.25 spaces per unit. 1.e IV I W �N%WX Packet Pg. 62 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 6 To further assess the parking requirements of the Project and the potential for the Project to utilize "off -site" parking within public on -street parking areas, parking demand surveys were conducted hourly within the vicinity of the site from 9:00 AM through 9:00 PM by AimTD on Thursday and again on Saturday (April 25 and 27, 2024). All parked vehicles during each hourly survey round were counted and recorded. In addition, the parking counts were conducted on a weekend while shows were scheduled at the Canyon Theatre Guild which would be representative of an "active evening". Figure 3 presents the key parking areas which would be available for use by the Project. Appendix B contains the weekday and weekend survey data. Tables 5 and 6 present the weekday and weekend shared parking approach for the proposed Project and compares the forecasted hourly parking demand of the Project against the available parking surplus in off -site areas, respectively. Column (1) presents parking survey data collected along the on -street spaces within the vicinity of the site. Column (2) presents the ULI shared parking demand of the resident guest. Column (3) presents the expected joint -use parking demand on an hourly basis, while Column (4) summarizes the hourly parking surplus/deficiency for the Project compared to the on -street parking supply of 135 based on the existing supply of 132 spaces plus 3 additional on -street spaces created by the project as a result of closing the driveway on Main Street. Appendix C presents the detailed shared parking table. As indicated in Column (4) of Table 5, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 112 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 23 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. As indicated in Column (4) of Table 6, the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, Tables 5 and 6 shows that based on the ULI shared parking profiles for the proposed Project, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on -street parking within the area of the Project. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) To ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company: ■ The PMP should identify where location of short-term parking spaces for potential tenants and use by the leasing office. 1.e �Iimk I M �N%WX Packet Pg. 63 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 7 ■ The PMP should restrict residents to parking in their assigned garage spaces. ■ The PMP should provide rules of conduct for tenants and guests to abide by. Strict enforcement shall be adhered to. PMP Measures The following measures are available to the Project to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies in the event the proposed onsite parking supply is determined to be greater than what is provided. Residential Component 1. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit. Additional spaces may be assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces dependent on the number of bedrooms provided within said unit. Residents may not park more than two (2) vehicles in the complex. The 2nd access/tandem spaces should be assigned to two -bedroom and three -bedroom units, however the Property Owner/Property Management Company has the flexibility to assign the 2nd access/tandem spaces to one -bedroom units. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants. 2. Residents will be provided a transponder or similar device (fob or key card, etc.) for remote access to the gated residential parking area within the Project's apartment parking structure. 3. Every resident will be required to register their vehicle. The registered owner must be a lease holding resident. No permits will be issued to non -lease holders, or vehicles not registered to a lease holder. This registration will be updated annually at the time of recertification. 4. Vehicles lacking current registration will not be issued a permit. Vehicles that have lapsed registration will be towed by the Property Owner/Property Management Company. The storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles is prohibited. 5. Vehicles may not occupy unassigned spaces for more than twenty-four (24) hours, without contacting the leasing office in advance. Violators are subject to towing at the vehicle owner's expense. 1.e �Iimk I M �N%IA Packet Pg. 64 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 8 6. If you obtain a new vehicle, you must provide new registration and will be given a new permit (transferring permits is not permissible). 7. Violation of the PMP strategies contained herein may result in the towing of the vehicle at the vehicle owner's expense. 8. The enforcement of resident on -site parking requirements summarized herein will be handled by the Property Owner/Property Management Company to ensure compliance. Through this monitoring and cooperation with the residents as a result of the annual review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available. CONCLUSIONS Based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Review of the data supports a reduced parking ratio. It can be concluded that the proposed residential ratio provided by the Project of 1.56 can adequately support the needs for the residential component. In addition, the commercial parking requirement of twelve (12) parking stalls will be waived via the parking in -lieu fee program identified in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. Furthermore, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 113 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 22 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. Additionally, the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 131 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 4 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. As such, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on -street parking within the area of the Project. To ensure adequate parking is provided, the Project has the ability to implement a PMP, inclusive of assignment of tandem stalls for specific units, to maintain adequate parking for all residents of the Project. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Project would adhere to the City of Santa Claritia Director's Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, and would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. 1.e �Iimk I W �N%WX Packet Pg. 65 Tai Lane February 5, 2025 Page 9 We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 825- 6175. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers51pti_ m Richard E. Barretto, P.E. oc No. 2006 D Principal Exp.6/30/25 9f TRAFFIC cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., Senior Transportation Engineer 4FVF� Attachments Packet Pg. 66 4 s �+ lop a 00 !t s ■: �(tNO 1%,§Ll� SCALE ! e .. ....... ... SOURCE: GOOGLE KEY = PROJECT SITE AN11 r 41 FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP NEWHALL MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Cl) N W U) a U Lu r— U) a W U) 0 W x J J Q 2 W Z 7 U) C Cu d 0 a� L Cu a. E ca Q Packet Pg. 67 1.e Tlliu RS�rTILITIES��r — —� T _ - - T T I L1ILIIITS ulll_u° m STAI ul ulllil ill - Ck �G yyyqZ ��ac„i�1 EXTTO RAILROAD IIIIII�I I��IWIIIIII 11 II LI II�J�II II uIIII II_ -Ta uIIIIUIIIIII LI_JII III11UIIIIIIIIII III T,TIIII III III IIIIII 1fIIill, 11PI IIIII11 Lo RAMP UP I I1111 1 -L I1FlllkI� V0TP4RT0FPR0lXCT , wo o �� l u °ull_m II I l ri'� I I u iilul llu�rr'I li l il- � �� LEI h o � LLLC RM r ® ® Ilya cD ❑� a ❑m = � g � LI` ` RETAIL � � L - 1,744SF DAVE M M 211 N cn d W Z RESIDENTIAL PARKING uJ LLI && �II!!� sssTas ® i v� o a I RESIDENTIAL PARKING W 67STALLS it w 1 0 ® 's � w L� 2 ED I I 7 I I i X Q Q 0! f i N Q $ R sosF 1 I A t Ls 1 9 i Q Q i, 3: I s i z I� 55 I� ii �✓ / r ME s' M' o RETAIL I � 'y, '. 4 'a � i 2,,019 SF a J a O W 'IEARH 1 re Q vv� a I i N II MARKETSTREET ^ W 0 E IE � � T - � a "III ADDITIONAL 3 DN-STREET PARKING SPACES o PROVIDED DUE TD DRIVEWAY CLOSURE v BASEMENT PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 1 (ANO SCALE FIGURE 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA Packet Pg. 68 1.e I a. 00, W �,,' 3 •,. Lu o ������y $ EB KEY C� = USABLE ON -STREET PARKING AREAS FIGURE 3 XD = PARKING ZONE = PROJECT SITE t,() SCALE KEY PARKING AREAS NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Packet Pg. 69 TABLE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY' DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Total Project Basement Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Land Use / Project Description Development ❑ Residential Component ■ 1 Bedroom -- -- 9 units 10 units 10 units 10 units 39 units ■ 2 Bedrooms -- -- 8 units 9 units 9 units 9 units 35 units ■ 3 Bedrooms -- -- 1 unit 1 units 1 units 1 units 4 units Total Residential Units: -- -- 18 units 20 units 20 units 20 units 78 units ❑ Retail/Commercial Component ■ Retail Shop A -- 1,744 SF - - -- -- 1,744 SF ■ Retail Shop B -- 1,460 SF - - -- -- 1,460 SF ■ Retail Shop C -- 2,019 SF - - -- -- 2,019 SF Total RetaiUConunercial Space: — 5,223 SF — — -- -- 5,223 SF ❑ Parking Structure Supply Is' Access Space 41 spaces 37 spaces -- -- -- -- 78 spaces 21 Access (Tandem) Space 26 spaces 18 spaces -- -- -- -- 44 spaces Total Parking Supply 67 spaces 55 spaces — — — -- 122 spaces i Source: SAE Architecture I Interiors, Site Plan dated November 4, 2024 I I 1.e Packet Pg. 70 TABLE 2 CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Spaces Land Use / Project Description Size Parking Ratio 2 Required Multifamily Apartments ■ One (1) Bedroom Units 39 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 78 ■ Two (2) Bedroom Units 35 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 70 ■ Three (3) Bedroom Units 4 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 8 ■ Resident Guest 78 DU 0.5 spaces per unit 39 Total 78 units 195 A. Total Residential Parking Code Requirement: 195 B. Proposed Residential Parking Supply: 122 C. Residential Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row B — Row A]: -73 Retail Commercial 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square Retail 5,223 SF footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF 12 Source: City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code, Chapter 17.42 — Residential Use Types. 3 Source: Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. II%No& ., 2-5-2025.doc Packet Pg. 71 TABLE 3 CITY CODE VS ITE AND DOWNTOWNITOD PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY IN MIXED -USE SETTING DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT. SANTA CLARITA ITE Parking Generation(5th Ed) Multifamily Housing(Hd-Rise) Cityof Redlands City of Long Beach Cityof Santa AB 2345:amends CA No Nearby Transit No Nearby Transit Near Transit Near Transit Downtown Long Beach Blwl I City of Santa Clarita Downtown, Cityof San Diego Monica (for TODs Density Bonus Law, TCRP Report 128 City of Los Angeles Cityof Sacramento Municipal Code (Average) (85th %ile) (Average) (85th %ile) Village Ctr & Gen Plan Redevelopment for TODs & Mixed Use) >10%low income) for TODs Code for TODs (Traditional District) Project Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Multi -Family Residential Studio 1 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 0.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.25 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 2-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.75 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 3-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 2 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit Resident Guest Parking Studio 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 1-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 2-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 3-Bedroom 1 0.5 sp/unit I me I me I me I me 1 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me inc PacketPg. 72 TABLE 4 EMPIRICAL PARKING DEMAND RATIOS DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Tenant& Tenant& Development Parking Peak Parking Saturday Peak Comparable Site City Address Parking Supply Survey Period Ratio Ratio Summary Facility Spaces per DU Spaces per DU (Peak Hour) (Peak Hour) 250 Unit Apartments 580 Anton 440 Spaces Wednesday & 1 Boulevard Costa 580 Anton • 5 Studio Units Garage • Residents - 419 sp. Saturday 1.28 1.24 Mesa Blvd • 168 1-Bedroom Units (@ 2:00 AM) (@ 3:00 AM) Apartments [a] • Public/Guests - 21 sp. 6PM-3AM • 77 2-Bedroom Units 481 Unit Apartments 1,020 Spaces Wednesday & 2 Main Sheet Irvine 2555 Main • 265 1-Bedroom Units Struchue ' Residents - 847 sp. Thursday 1.42 Village [b] Sheet • 200 2-Bedroom Units • Public/Guests - 173 (@ 12:00 AM) • 16 3-Bedroom Units sp. IOPM-12AM 700 S. 163 Unit Apartments Surface 404 Spaces Wednesday & 3 Paragon Old Monrovia Myrtle • 82 1-Bedroom Units Lot, • Residents - 329 sp. Thursday 1 .48 Town [b] ] Sheet et (@ 11:0000 PM) Avenue • 81 3-Bedroom Units Paz •Public/Guests - 75 sp. 6PM-12AM 44 N. 304 Unit Apartments Surface 480 Spaces Wednesday & Trio . 46 Studio Units Lot, On- 1.22 4 Pasadena Madison ' Residents - 450 sp. Thursday Apartments [b] Avenue . 141 1-Bedroom Units Sheet • Public/Guests - 30 sp. IOPM-12AM (@12:00 AM) • 117 2-Bedroom Units Parking Wednesday & Garage, 512 Spaces Thursday 0.97 Adagio the Mission 2660 Oso 1 5 Green [c] ] Viejo Parkway 256 Unit Apartments Surface • Residents - 424 sp. 7PM-2AM 00 (@12:AM) (@ 2:00 PM & Lot • Public/Guests - 88 sp. Saturday: 12PM-3PM, 3:00 PM) 7PM-2AM Wednesday & 284 Unit Apartments Apex Laguna Laguna 27960 Cabot • 32 Studio Units 539 Spaces Thursday 1.28 1.13 6 Garage • Residents - 461 sp. 7PM-2AM Niguel [c] Niguel Road • 161 1-Bedroom Units • Public/Guests - 78 sp. Saturday: 12PM-3PM, (@ 2:00 AM) (@ 3:00 PM) • 91 2-Bedroom Units 7PM-2AM 254 Unit Apartments • 1231-Bedroom Units Gated 1901 E First Thursday & Saturday 1.354 1.346 7 Nmeteen01 [it] Santa Ana , 125 2-Bedroom Units Residential 559 Spaces St 12AM-11:59PM (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) 6 3-Bedroom Structure Units 100 E 300 Unit Apartments Gated 660 Spaces 0.643 8 The Marke [d] Santa Ana MacArthur ' 155 1-Bedroom Units Residential • Residents - 600 sp. Thursday & Saturday 0.767 (@ 2:00 PM & ' 131 2-Bedroom Units 12AM-11:59PM (@12:00 AM) Blvd • 14 3-Bedroom Units Structure • Public/Guests - 60 sp. 3:00 PM) Core 1815 Thursday, Friday & 222 Unit Apartments 1.38 1.33 9 Apartments Anaheim Westside Struchue 726 Spaces Saturday [d][e] Drive ' 328 Bedrooms 5PM-12AM (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) Thursday, Friday & Costa 125 Baker 240 Unit Apartments 1.30 1.24 10 Baker Block [it] Mesa Sheet • 349 Bedrooms Structure 466 Spaces Saturday (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) 5PM-12AM 1100 363 Unit Apartments Tuesday & Saturday 1.18 1.22 11 Rize [it] Irvine Struchue 564 Spaces Synergy • 511 Bedrooms 5PM-12AM (Peak Hour N/A) (Peak Hour N/A) 91 Unit Apartments 137 Spaces 9735 Oak • 52 1-Bedroom Units Thursday 1.28 12 Edgeway [fJ Bellflower Sheet • 31 2-Bedroom Units Structure • Residents - sp. 12AM (@12:00 AM) • Guests - 8 sp. p. • 8 3-Bedroom Units 47 Unit Apartments Newhall Santa 22551 9th • 5 1-Bedroom Units Thursday 1.27 13 Shuchue 99 Spaces Crossrtrgs [g] Clarita Sheet • 32 2-Bedroom Units 12AM (@12:00 AM) • 10 3-Bedroom Units Average: 1.28 — 85th Percentile: 1.43 — 95th Percentile: 1.46 — Notes: [a] Source: Counts collected by Counts Unlimited on May 2023. [b] Source: Parking Demand Analysisfor the Proposed FifthAvenue/Huntington Drive Mixed-UseProject City ofMoarovia, California, prepared by LLG, Oct2012 [c] Source: Counts collected byLLG on December 2016. [d] Source: Revised Parkuig Study for Brea Plaza Sbopphg Center, prepared by LSA, January2022. [e] At the tine of the surveys, 222 of the 400 units were occupied. [f] At the tine of the surveys, 89 of the 91 units were occupied. [g] At the tine of the surveys, 45 of the 47 units were occupied. Packet Pg. 73 TABLE 5 WEEKDAY SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1] DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA LandUse Existing On- Street Demand Resident Guest Total Spaces = 32 Shared Parking Demand Comparison w/ Parking Supply 135 Spaces [2] Size Pkg Rate 78 DU 0.25 /DU Gross Spaces 20 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) 9:00 AM 53 4 57 78 10:00 AM 58 4 62 73 11:00 AM 58 4 62 73 12:00 PM 68 4 72 63 1:00 PM 81 4 85 50 2:00 PM 69 4 73 62 3:00 PM 62 4 66 69 4:00 PM 68 4 72 63 5:00 PM 75 8 83 52 6:00 PM 85 11 96 39 7:00 PM 92 19 ill 24 8:00 PM 94 19 113 22 9:00 PM 68 19 87 48 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an existing on -street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided. W�4=k"4 I�i Packet Pg. 74 TABLE 6 WEEKEND SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1] DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Land Us a Existing On- Street Demand Resident Guest Total Spaces = 32 Shared Parking Demand Comparison w/ Parking Supply 135 Spaces [2] Size Pkg Rate 78 DU 0.25 /DU Gross Spaces 20 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) 9:00 AM 77 4 81 54 10:00 AM 85 4 89 46 11:00 AM 86 4 90 45 12:00 PM 87 4 91 44 1:00 PM 91 4 95 40 2:00 PM 96 4 100 35 3:00 PM 95 4 99 36 4:00 PM 95 4 99 36 5:00 PM 99 8 107 28 6:00 PM 103 12 115 20 7:00 PM 104 20 124 11 8:00 PM 111 20 131 4 9:00 PM 95 20 115 20 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an existing on -street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided. W�4=k"4 I�i Packet Pg. 75 1.e APPENDIX A EDGEWAY AND NEWHALL CROSSINGS PARKING COUNTS LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers N:1,4800A2244807 - Newhall Mixed -Use Project, Santa ClaritavRepow,4807 Packet Pg. 76 1.e Bellflower Edgeway Bellflower 9735 Oak Street, Bellflower, CA 90706 Friday, November 8th , 2024 Supply Demand Garage Regular 110 88 Handicap 3 2 Electric Vehicle 16 12 Subtotal 129 102 Total Occupancy 129 102 Total Percent 79% Supply Demand Guests Handicap 1 1 Guest [a] 8 Leasing / Guest 3 3 Subtotal -- 1 12 Total Occupancy I -- 1 12 Notes [a] Parking supply consists of guest parking provided in alleyway to the west of the building and on -street parking to the north and south of the building. Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 Packet Pg. 77 1.e Santa Clarita Newhall Crossings 22551 9th Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Friday, November 8th , 2024 Supply Demand Garage Regular 97 48 Handicap 2 0 Subtotal 99 48 Total Occupancy 99 48 Total Percent 48% Supply Demand Guests Street Parking [a] 9 Subtotal -- 9 Total Occupancy I -- 1 9 [a] Parking supply consists of spaces in the public portion of the parking structure and on -street parking along Main Street, 9th Street, and Railroad Avenue. Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 Packet Pg. 78 1.e APPENDIX B EXISTING COUNTS v M N W Q U w Q w 0 w X 2 J J Q 2 W Z r C E a� C Y L a r c m E r r Q LINSCOTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers N:1,4800A2244807 - Newhall Mixed -Use Project, Santa ClaritavRepow,4807 Packet Pg. 79 1.e Santa Clarita Parking Study Thursday 4252024 Prepared by AimTD LLC cs aimtd.com 2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 713 713 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Total Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 4 4 3 4 0 0 1 0 5 0 9 0 1 2 9 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 53 10:00 AM 6 3 5 3 4 0 0 1 1 6 0 8 0 1 2 8 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 58 11:00 AM 7 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 4 2 1 7 1 1 3 9 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 2 58 12:00 PM 7 3 4 0 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 7 2 8 1 0 0 68 1:00 PM 6 3 4 1 4 0 2 0 5 9 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 0 6 2 12 1 0 1 81 2:00 PM 6 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 4 4 0 8 0 1 5 12 0 0 7 2 8 0 1 0 69 3:00 PM 4 3 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 4 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 5 0 1 1 62 4:00 PM 7 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 4 12 0 0 5 1 7 0 1 1 68 5:00 PM 6 3 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 7 1 8 1 1 3 12 0 1 6 3 12 0 3 2 75 6:00 PM 7 2 1 1 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 0 1 2 12 0 1 7 2 12 1 0 3 85 7:00 PM 6 4 1 2 5 0 3 0 6 10 1 10 0 1 3 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 1 5 92 8:00 PM 7 1 4 1 2 5 0 2 0 7 11 1 7 1 1 5 11 0 1 6 3 11 1 2 5 94 9:00 PM 7 4 0 1 3 0 2 0 2 8 0 6 0 1 5 8 0 0 5 3 10 1 0 2 68 Inventory 8 4 6 3 5 9 6 8 11 1 9 1 3 5 12 2 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parking 1 0 1 0 0 8 3 -1 1 0 0 -1 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 38 M N LU U) Q U LU U) Q LU D a LU X J J a W z U) c to E a� 0 c L (u CL d E C.) (u a Packet Pg. 80 1.e Santa Clarita Parking Study Saturday 4/27/2024 Prepared by AimTD LLC cs aimtd.com 2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 713 713 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Total Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 3 3 3 5 2 2 1 2 11 0 9 0 2 2 12 0 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 77 10:00 AM 7 3 4 3 5 0 3 1 3 11 0 8 0 3 4 12 0 1 5 2 10 0 0 0 85 11:00 AM 7 4 4 3 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 1 2 4 12 0 1 4 2 9 0 0 0 86 12:00 PM 6 4 2 1 5 1 2 0 7 10 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 5 3 12 1 0 1 87 1:00 PM 5 3 1 2 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 1 2 5 91 2:00 PM 7 4 2 2 5 0 4 0 6 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 0 3 7 96 3:00 PM 8 4 1 1 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 1 7 95 4:00 PM 7 4 0 1 5 0 5 0 7 10 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 5 2 11 0 4 6 95 5:00 PM 7 3 1 3 5 1 4 0 7 11 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 3 6 99 6:00 PM 7 4 1 2 5 2 4 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 1 0 6 2 12 1 3 7 103 7:00 PM 6 3 0 0 5 5 5 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 8 104 8:00 PM 6 j 4 1 1 5 7 5 0 7 11 1 1 9 1 2 4 11 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 10 111 9:00 PM 6 1 4 1 0 1 1 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 0 1 7 1 9 1 0 1 8 1 0 1 1 1 4 1 10 1 0 1 0 6 2 11 1 3 8 95 Inventory 8 1 4 1 6 1 3 1 5 1 9 1 6 1 1 8 1 11 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 3 1 5 1 12 1 2 1 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parkin 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 21 M N LU U) Q U LU Q 2 LU LU X J J a W z U) c to E a� 0 c L (u CL d E C.) (u a Packet Pg. 81 1.e APPENDIX C SHARED PARKING DEMAND v M N W Q U w Q w 0 w X 2 J J Q 2 W Z r C m E a� C Y L a r C m E r r Q LINSCOTT, LAw & GREENSPAN, engineers N:1,4800A2244807 - Newhall Mixed -Use Project, Santa ClaritavRepow,4807 Packet Pg. 82 1.e Appendix C RESIDENTIAL (Studio) WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [11 �m®aaa®aaaaaaaa®mmom00000000000000aa®aaa®sasses® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmommmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Notes: [1] Source: ULI-Urbar�Iand lnstiNk "Slaved Parking;'Tlrird F,ditioq 2020. [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [3] Percentage ofpeak parking demand factors reFlect relationslrips betwem weekday parking demar�d ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as smmnaized in Table 2-2 of the "Stored Parking' manual. PacketPg. 83 1.e Appendix C RESIDENTIAL (Studio) WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [11 �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm� �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmm� Notes: [1] Source: ULI-Urbar�Iand lnstiNk "Slaved Parking;'Tlrird F,ditioq 2020. [2] Parking rates for all land uses based on City code. [S] Percentage ofpeak parking demand factors reFlect relationslrips betwem weekday parking demar�d ratios and peak parking demand ratios, as smmnaized in Table 2-2 of the "Stored Parking' manual. PacketPg. 84 1.f SANTA CLARITA HISTORY °:° CENTER February 28, 2025 To whom it may concern As a longtime supporter of the goals of the City of Santa Clarita's Downtown Newhall Specific Plan, and after careful consideration, the Board of Directors of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society ("the Board") voted unanimously on February 24, 2025, to support the redevelopment of the area of Newhall bounded by Railroad Avenue, Market Street, Main Street, and the building at 24316 Main Street (the former location of Mac's Pool Supply). To that end, the Board unanimously recorded its non -opposition to the removal of the building at 24307 Railroad Avenue/22505 Market Street, commonly known as "Ye Olde Courthouse." The building is listed as one of the City of Santa Clarita's Historic Resources. The City's Historic Preservation Ordinance (17.03.145 UDC) states that upon a finding that the removal of a Historic Resource is necessary to proceed with a development project consistent with and supportive of identified goals and objectives of the General Plan, ... the City Council shall direct the property owner to relocate the designated historic struc- ture to a site within the City of Santa Clarita and approved by the City Council. Such relo- cation may include the assistance of the developer, the City of Santa Clarita, the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society, or other entity as appropriate. Alternatively, upon comple- tion of appropriate environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the City Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition. The Board suspects it would be infeasible to relocate the building, whose historical integrity was severely compromised by an unfortunate 1968 remodel. Upon review, the Board is aware that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse (1932-1971). Should the City deem it necessary to issue a demolition permit, the Board believes it appropriate for the City to exact an impact fee from the applicant comparable in amount to the estimated cost of relocating and restoring the building to its original historical condition, such fee revenue to be restricted to the advancement of historical preservation goals within the City of Santa Clarita. Further, the Board urges the City to require the developer to cooperate with the City and the His- torical Society to add plaques in several locations throughout the project to identify the historical uses of the property. Alan Pollack President, Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society I PO Box 221925, Newhall CA 91322-1925 1 scvhs.org Packet Pg. 85 1.g Proposal for Redevelopment of 24307 Railroad Ave (Old Courthouse) Background: The property at 24307 Railroad Ave, commonly known as the Old Courthouse, was constructed in 1931 to serve as both the Santa Clarita Courthouse on the ground floor and the Masonic Lodge on the second floor. In 1960, the Newhall Masonic Building Company liquidated the property, and the courthouse was relocated to Valencia in 1968. Since then, the building has undergone multiple renovations, including conversion of the ground floor to office space. At one point, a coffee shop operated there for train commuters, though it has since closed. The building was designated as a historical structure following the adoption of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) in 2005, which included the establishment of a historical preservation ordinance. Due to its local significance, the building was included among the structures to be preserved. It currently serves as office space for a law firm and as a meeting venue for the Rafter's AA group. Proposal: Old Town Main II, LLC proposes to redevelop this property, along with immediately adjacent parcels, into a 78-unit mixed -use apartment building with ground -floor retail along Main Street. This redevelopment will align with the requirements and guidelines established in the OTNSP, ensuring that the project enhances the continuity and vibrancy of Old Town Newhall's historical significance while embracing future growth. Findings: Section 17.64.100(B) of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code permits the relocation of a historic resource if such relocation is necessary for a project that aligns with and supports the identified goals and objectives of the General Plan. The relocation must not significantly impact the purposes of the code, or any impact must be outweighed by the benefits of the new project. Furthermore, the structure must be movable without compromising its historical or architectural integrity, as demonstrated by an expert in historic preservation or building relocation. This section also permits the demolition of a historical resource if relocation is infeasible and no feasible alternatives to demolition exist. The proposed project meets the goals and objectives of the General Plan and conforms to the intent and guidelines established in the OTNSR The project will add 78 dwelling units to Old Town Newhall, along with high -quality retail space consistent with the Arts and Entertainment (AE) zone designation for this site. This will contribute to the area's economic development, vibrancy, and vitality. The architectural features of the proposed building will draw inspiration from historical references to buildings that previously existed on the site and within its immediate neighborhood, paying homage to Old Town Newhall's historical character. Following an evaluation of relocation possibilities, the extensive modifications, additions, and alterations to the original structure render relocation infeasible based on discussions with local stakeholders and representatives from the Santa Clarita Historical Society. Packet Pg. 86 1.g Proposed Mitigation Measures: While the Old Courthouse structure is proposed to be demolished, we are committed to preserving its historical significance through the following measures: 1. Installation of a permanent commemorative plaque at a prominent location on the new building's exterior, identifying the site as the location of the Old Courthouse and describing its history. 2. Documentation and professional photography of the Old Courthouse in its current condition, with a display of these photographs and descriptive text as a collage within the lobby of the new mixed -use building. 3. A $750,000 monetary contribution from Old Town Main II, LLC to support the mission of the Santa Clarita Historical Society. We appreciate your consideration of this request and look forward to collaborating on a development that fosters the continued growth and vibrancy of Santa Clarita while respecting its rich historical heritage. Packet Pg. 87 1.h NOTICE OF DETERMINATION et anar� �` • TR [X] County Clerk [ ] State Clearinghouse County of Los Angeles 1400 Tenth Street dk 12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 1007 Sacramento, CA 95815 Norwalk, CA 90650 PROJECT Newhall Mixed -Use Project: Master Case 24-134 NAME: PROJECT 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 2831-012- LOCATION: 022 through -026) PROJECT The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit DESCRIPTION: (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the Mac's Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Horseshoe on Main (24300 Main Street), and the potentially historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street) buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full -block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five -story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground -level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first -floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the on - site potentially historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20-percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. PROJECT Serrano Development Group APPLICANT: This is to advise that the City of Santa Clarita has made the following determinations regarding the project described above: 1) The project was approved by the [] Director of Community Development [ ] Planning Commission [X] Mayor and City Council on the following date: April 22, 2025. 2) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {a}). 3) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {b}). 4) [X] An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 5) [] An Addendum to the Final EIR was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6) The project [ ] WILL [X] WILL NOT have a significant impact on the environment. 7) Mitigation measures [X] WERE [ ] WERE NOT made a condition of project approval. 8) A Statement of Overriding Considerations [ ] WAS [X] WAS NOT adopted for this project. This is to certify that the [ ] NEGATIVE DECLARATION [X] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [ ] ADDENDUM with record of project approval is available for public review at: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 (661) 255-4330 Contact Person/Title: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I Signature: Packet Pg. 88 1.i Master Case 24-134 Rafters Relocation request With the loss of the building used for 50 years. Rafters and the Spanish Speaking group downstairs is in need of a new long-term home in the downtown Newhall area. With over 500 members our goal is to continue to serve our community. Our program enhances public safety and economic growth in the Newhall community. Relocation of the Rafters Group. Option 1 The Rodger Dunn building 24206 Main St Newhall CA If the City is willing to extend a long term lease for this location to Rafters. The Rafters Group will assist in the remediation of any mold in the location. With this location Rafters would also be able to extend the addition or Spanish speaking self help groups. The Rafters Group will recreate the downstairs with the hostorcal wood paneling and wood flooring from the old Masonic building. Thus keeping historic parts of Santa Clarita alive. Being of service to the community as a whole. Option 2 The Senior Center location. 22900 Market St Newhall CA 91321 With the cooperation from the city with a long term lease. Rafters will provide with city approval the dividing of the building interior so the location can accommodate Rafters with Spanish speaking groups, Veterans Center and any Art center that would benefit the cities usefulness of the property. The interior portion of the location used for the Rafters will be finished with the historic wood paneling and flooring from the old Masonic building, if possible recreate the celing with the original trusses (rafters) from the second floor of the old masonic building OR use the old trusses to create a solar covered parking area. Giving electricity to the entire center. The rents Rafters would be paying could be used to fund activities for the veterans or art center if the city found this idea acceptable . Benefitting the community as a whole. Option 3 With a condition from the city council for the developer to allow the removal of the roof trusses so they may be reused to recreate the entire second floor of the old masonic building as a single story structure all the wood paneling and wood floors and Rafters as it looks today. Packet Pg. 89 1.i The second part of this request is the assistance of the city to grant a long-term land lease as a location for the new building. The Rafters group would raise funds and apply for grants to complete the rebuild this historic structure. Or the possibility of a private entity to develop this project in the future. Possible locations Parking lot of the senior center. 22900 Market St Newhall CA 91321 Other locations APN 2831-019-901 APN 2827-002-028 APN 2833-014-904 APN 2827-001-902 Or any viable City property within the downtown Newhall area. Option 4 The removal of all 1 story attached structures surrounding the original 2 story masonic building. Leaving the 2 story building alone to be moved and restored as a hostorcal building. Either to be leased and occupied by our group the Rafters. Or set up as a piece of history and used at the discretion of the City. Location to be determined by the city with the hope of Newhall area. We are asking at the least from the City council to make a condition to the developer for the preservation and removal of the roof trusses from the old Masonic building. Doing this during the demolition of the building will not be a hard task for a contractor. We shall provide storage of these and all other historical parts removed from the building to be used at a future date to recreate this historic dance hall seen as the current upstairs of the the old masonic building. Also grant the Rafters group a lease at one of the mentioned city property or other location suggested by the city council. Option 5 The city council assistance in a long-term lease to be part of the senior center 22900 Market St Newhall CA 91321 or Old Rodger Dunn building 24206 Main St Newhall CA Shall be finished at the cities direction to accommodate the Rafters Group to fit with the cities planned usage of the property. Allowing Rafters to benefit the community as a whole. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely David Doyle Chairman, Rafters Group. Packet Pg. 90 1.i SS RE/MAX CRIMAN LOMMS S JLI1 1 April 9, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project: 24300 Main Street, Newhall, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, My name is Aaron Avila and I am writing to express my strong support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I lived in Newhall for over 20 years, and have watched the renaissance on Main Street unfold over the years. Newhall is the reason I became a Commercial Realtor and the reason why I remain passionate about small businesses. I have been fortunate enough to represent many local businesses and Landlords in Old Town Newhall over the last 9 years. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I have seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, AARON AVI LAM Con4Mf CRI-i$E0. .ISSMAN o`ficc (661) 295-9300 �, Cell (661) 993-9873 Senior Associate I CaIBRE LIC # 02037778 Packet Pg. 91 1.i Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Monday March 3, 2025 RE: Letter of Support for Proposed Project on the Corner of Market and Main Street Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Team, I am thrilled to express my enthusiastic support for the mixed -use project on Main Street in Newhall! As someone who has lived in Santa Clarita for over a decade, I am deeply invested in the community's growth and believe this development will bring exciting opportunities to our neighborhood. Newhall is more than just a location; it is the heart of our city. It has a unique blend of history, culture, and modern charm that makes it a special place to live, work, and visit. The proposed development at 24300 Main Street will contribute to this charm by introducing additional housing and retail options that will enhance our quality of life. One of the most exciting features of this project is the addition of 78 new apartment units. As our city continues to expand, it is essential to provide diverse housing options for families, young professionals, and individuals looking to make Santa Clarita their home. More housing means a stronger community, with residents who can live, shop, and dine locally. The 5,300 square feet of retail space is another highlight of this development. Small businesses are the backbone of our community, and creating new opportunities for them to thrive is a step in the right direction. A bustling commercial environment means more choices for residents and more job opportunities for locals. Looking at the success of Newhall Crossings, we can see how a well -executed project can breathe new life into a neighborhood. With new businesses, increased foot traffic, and an inviting atmosphere, the area has become a destination for both residents and visitors. The Main Street project will build upon this success, further revitalizing Newhall. For all these reasons, I wholeheartedly support this development and encourage others to do the same. I am excited to witness the continued growth of our city and the positive impact this project will bring. Best regards, Packet Pg. 92 1.i Monday March 31, 2025 Dear City Officials, As someone who grew up in ,Santa Clarita and is now raising a family here, I am writing to express my strong support for the mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street. I have seen firsthand how Newhall has evolved over the years, and I believe this project will continue to foster the positive growth that makes this city such a wonderful place to live and work. Newhall has always been a gathering place for our community. My family and I love attending events like Light Up Main and the weekly farmers markets, where we can connect with neighbors and support local businesses. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will further enhance this thriving district, providing more opportunities for both residents and businesses. With more families choosing to call Santa Clarita home, the demand for housing continues to rise. This project will help meet that need while maintaining the charm and character that make Newhall so special. Additionally, new retail spaces will give small businesses a chance to flourish, adding to the diverse and dynamic offerings in the area. Having witnessed the success of Newhall Crossings, I have no doubt that this development will bring similar benefits —more foot traffic, greater economic activity, and a stronger sense of community. I fully support this project and look forward to seeing Newhall continue to grow and succeed. Sine , Brandon Case Packet Pg. 93 1.i February 27, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. As a longtime resident of this city, I have witnessed its remarkable growth and believe that well -planned projects like this one contribute significantly to our community's economic and social prosperity. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 20 years, raising my family here and seeing firsthand the need for additional housing and commercial space. Newhall, in particular, holds historical and cultural significance within our city, and its continued development is essential for maintaining its vibrancy. This project presents an opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while preserving its charm. The introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining, and essential services. This is crucial in sustaining economic growth and creating a more self-sufficient local economy. The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian architectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence while incorporating modern functionality. This blend of old and new will ensure that the area remains an inviting and attractive destination. We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants, and retail shops have flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in foot traffic and local engagement has proven that thoughtful development leads to positive economic and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further establishing Newhall as a central hub within Santa Clarita. For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. The benefits of increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced community appeal cannot be overstated. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and the continued success of Newhall. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 94 1.i Tuesday March 4, 2025 Dear City Officials, i am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the mixed -use development project slated for Main Street in Newhall. I've been living in Santa Clarita for the past 5 years, and as a young professional, I'm always looking for ways to grow my roots in a community that values both progress and quality of life. The Newhall area has been a vital part of Santa Clarita for generations, and it's clear that continued growth is essential to meet the needs of both current and future residents. I'm especially excited about the addition of 78 new apartment units in this project. As someone who is considering settling down in the area, having more housing options in a central location is incredibly appealing. In addition to the housing component, the 5,300 square feet of retail space is another exciting feature. This project will help attract new businesses to the area, making it easier for residents like myself to shop, dine, and enjoy a greatervariety of services. The increased foot traffic wilt also benefit the local economy, making Newhall a more vibrant and appealing place to live. Having already seen the positive effects of Newhall Crossings, including the increased number of businesses and improved amenities, I believe this new proiect will only continue to build on that success. The more people who live and work in Newhall, the better it will be for everyone. Thank you for considering my thoughts. I am fully in favor of this development and look forward to seeing the continued growth of Newhall. Sincerely, clo� U)_�Ua M N LU a U a' W a w U) D 0 w x 5 J J a x w z L i J c as E E 0 U r c a� a Packet Pg. 95 1.i Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my full support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As a long-time resident of Santa Clarita, I have seen how growth and development can positively impact our city's economy, and I believe this project will bring significant benefits. The proposed development will not only provide 78 new apartment units but also 5,300 square feet of retail space. This combination of housing and commercial space wit[ support local businesses, create jobs, and attract new opportunities to Newhall, further strengthening the economic fabric of our community. Having observed the success of other revitalization efforts in the area, such as Newhall Crossings, I am confident this project will continue to drive economic growth and enhance Newhall's vibrancy. Thank you for considering this important initiative. Sincerely, Da4eC uervo Packet Pg. 96 1.i Wednesday, April 9, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120 Valencia, CA 91355 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, As a longtime resident of Santa Clarita, I'm writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development on Main Street in Newhall. This city has been an incredible place to live, raise a family, and engage with a community that continues to grow thoughtfully. I've seen firsthand howwell-planned projects, especially in Newhall, can uplift the entire city —creating new opportunities for local businesses, improving walkability, and adding vibrancy to an already historic part of town. Adding 78 new apartment units addresses a very real need for housing in our city, especially in a location that encourages a walkable lifestyle and access to downtown amenities. The accompanying 5,300 square feet of retail space is equally exciting —bringing new shops, services, and dining options to a part of town that has already proven its appeal through the success of Newhall Crossings. This project represents progress that's aligned with Santa Clarita's character: thoughtful, attractive, and community -driven. I believe it will not only enhance the neighborhood, but serve as a catalyst for continued growth —both economically and culturally. Thank you for your consideration and for your commitment to our city's continued development. Sincerely, Dan Granger 28174 Angelica Place, Valencia CA 91354 323.627.9058 Packet Pg. 97 1.i Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 February 27, 2025 Subject: Letter of Support for the Newhall Mixed -Use Project Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in Old Town Newhall. Having lived in Santa Clarita for over 40 years, I have had the privilege of watching this city grow and evolve while maintaining the sense of community that makes it so special. I raised my family here, built my career here, and continue to do business in this city that I am proud to call home. Seeing the progress and transformation of Newhall over the years has been truly inspiring, and I am excited about the new opportunities that Serrano Development Group's project will bring. Santa Clarita has done an incredible job revitalizing Old Town Newhall, making it a hub for dining, shopping, and entertainment while preserving its historic charm. The addition of Newhall Crossings has brought new energy to the area, attracting local businesses and providing a gathering place for residents. The next phase of growth through this new development will build upon that success, further enhancing Newhall's appeal and solidifying it as a destination for both residents and visitors. This project will provide much -needed housing and retail space, helping to support local businesses and keep our economy strong. With more people living in the heart of Newhall, our restaurants, shops, and services will see increased foot traffic, benefiting the entire community. The thoughtful design, which aligns with the character of Old Town Newhall, ensures that this growth will complement the area rather than change what makes it unique. As someone who has been a part of this community for decades, I know firsthand how important it is to embrace smart development that enhances our city while maintaining its identity. Serrano Development Group's project does exactly that —it honors the history of Newhall while preparing it for a vibrant and prosperous future. I am confident that this investment will continue to elevate the area and bring long- term benefits to residents, business owners, and visitors alike. For all these reasons, I fully support this development and encourage its approval. I look forward to seeing how it contributes to the continued success of Newhall and Santa Clarita as a whole. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Darlene Rendall Packet Pg. 98 1.i Wednesday March 18, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 40 years, and it has been an amazing place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. I remember when Main Street was a 45 mph road straight through the heart of Newhall, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Old Town Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community, and consideration. 22905 Beech Creek Santa Clarita, CA 91354 661-644-6120 dean@deancoxrealestate.com Packet Pg. 99 1.i Friday March 28, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. As a longtime resident of this city, I have witnessed its remarkable growth and believe that well -planned projects like this one contribute significantly to our community's economic and social prosperity. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 30 years, raising my family here and seeing firsthand the need for additional housing and commercial space. Newhall, in particular, holds historical and cultural significance within our city, and its continued development is essential for maintaining its vibrancy. This project presents an opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while preserving its charm. The introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining, and essential services. This is crucial in sustaining economic growth and creating a more self-sufficient local economy. The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian architectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence while incorporating modern functionality. This blend of old and new will ensure that the area remains an inviting and attractive destination. We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants, and retail shops have flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in foot traffic and local engagement has proven that thoughtful development leads to positive economic and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further establishing Newhall as a central hub within Santa Clarita. For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. The benefits of increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced community appeal cannot be overstated. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and the continued success of Newhall. Sincerely, Eric Sweetman Group One Investments Inc Packet Pg. 100 1.i CAR WASH Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Monday March 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to offer my full support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As a local business owner in the Newhall area, I understand the importance of continued growth and development in ensuring our community remains vibrant and economically strong. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 5 years, and throughout that time, I have watched Newhall transform into a thriving area. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide critical support to local businesses like mine by attracting more residents and visitors to the area. With more people living and working in Newhall, we will see an increase in foot traffic, which is essential for local businesses to succeed. The retail spaces in this development offer incredible potential for new businesses, and I'm excited to see what will open up in the area. Newhall has become a destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment, and this project will only enhance that appeal. Moreover, the successful revitalization seen with Newhall Crossings shows that smart development can drive economic growth while maintainingthe unique charm of the neighborhood. This new development is the kind of project that can bring positive change, not just for businesses, but for residents as well. I wholeheartedly support the project and look forward to the continued prosperity it will bring to Newhall. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Greg aul Canyon Car Wash 18727 Soledad Cyn Santa Clarita Ca 91351 Packet Pg. 101 1.i April 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Ciarita As a local business owner in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. I have seen firsthand the positive impact that thoughtful growth and development can have on the local economy. This project represents an exciting opportunity to continue that progress by bringing more residents, businesses, and energy to our vibrant district. One of the biggest challenges for businesses in Old Town Newhall is maintaining consistent foot traffic. The addition of 78 residential units will help address this by increasing the number of people living in and engaging with the area daily. More residents mean more customers, not only for my business but for all the shops, restaurants, and services that make Old Town Newhall unique. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will allow new businesses to join our community, further strengthening the commercial landscape and providing opportunities for entrepreneurs looking to invest in this growing district. The continued investment in Old Town Newhall demonstrates a commitment to the long-term success of our local economy. As more people choose to live, work, and shop here, the sense of community and economic vitality will continue to flourish. This project will not only provide much -needed housing and retail space but will also encourage further improvements to infrastructure, public spaces, and community engagement —ensuring that Old Town Newhall remains a premier destination for residents and visitors alike. We have already seen how projects like Newhall Crossings have revitalized the area by attracting new businesses and increasing community engagement. This development will build upon that success, ensuring continued growth and sustainability for businesses like mine. As a business owner, I welcome any opportunity that supports the local economy, brings in new customers, and fosters a thriving, self-sufficient community. For these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. 1 look forward to seeing the positive impact it will have on Old Town Newhall and am excited to continue being part of this growing, dynamic community. Respectfully, Packet Pg. 102 1.i IRIS A HOME LOANS WORKING TOGETHER FOR YOUR BEST INTEREST March 16, 2025 Dear City Officials, I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the mixed -use development project slated for Main Street in Old Town Newhall. The Newhall area has been a vital part of Santa Clarita for generations, and it's clear that continued growth is essential to meet the needs of both current and future residents. I'm especially excited about the addition of 78 new apartment units in this project. As a real estate professional, having more housing options in Santa Clarita is appealing, as I know the demand for housing is currently higher than the supply. In addition to the housing component, the 5,300 square feet of retail space is another exciting feature. This project will help attract new businesses to the area, making it easier for residents like myself to shop, dine, and enjoy a greater variety of services. The increased foot traffic will also benefit the local economy, making Newhall a more vibrant and appealing place to live. As a business and building owner on Main Street in Newhall, I have already seen the positive effects of Newhall Crossings, including the increased number of businesses and improved amenities, I believe this new project will only continue to build on that success. The more people who live and work in Newhall, the better it will be for everyone. Thank you for considering my thoughts. I am fully in favor of this development and look forward to seeing the continued growth of Newhall. Respectfully, Hady J Breidy Sr. Loan Consultant/President 24325 Main Street 4206, Newhall, CA 91321 Tel (661) 222-9555 Fax (661) 222-9550 Packet Pg. 103 1.i Wednesday March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 104 1.i Monday March 31, 2025 Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. As someone who grew up in this community and is now raising my own family here, I have a deep appreciation for the city's unique charm and the incredible sense of community that has only grown stronger over the years. Projects like this one are essential to maintaining that momentum and ensuring Santa Clarita continues to thrive for generations to come. Newhall has always been a special place for my family. We love attending city events such as Light Up Main and the weekly farmers markets. These gatherings bring people together, celebrate local businesses, and highlight the vibrant energy that makes Newhall such a treasured part of Santa Clarita. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will only enhance this atmosphere, bringing new residents and businesses to the area and further solidifying it as a hub for community activity. One of the most exciting aspects of this development is its ability to provide more housing opportunities for families like mine who want to stay and grow in Santa Clarita. The Western Victorian design will seamlessly blend with Newhall's historic character while providing modern living and retail spaces that will benefit the entire community. We've already seen how transformative Newhall Crossings has been in revitalizing the area, and I have no doubt that this new project will build upon that success. I am excited to see how this development will further enhance Newhall's role as the heart of Santa Clarita, creating even more opportunities for residents and businesses alike. For these reasons, I strongly support this project and encourage its approval. It represents smart, thoughtful growth that will benefit both current and future generations. Sincerely, J:M_ C��_ Jen Case Packet Pg. 105 1.i Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, As a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, I am excited to express my support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. This project promises to bring much -needed housing and retail opportunities, both of which will contribute to the vibrancy and overall quality of life in our community. The addition of new apartment units and retail space will offer fresh housing options and provide our residents with access to new services and businesses. The increased foot traffic will also make Newhall a more lively and dynamic place to live, work, and socialize. I've seen how projects like Newhall Crossings have revitalized the area, and I am confident this development will continue to make Newhall an even better place to call home. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jodi Morgenstern Packet Pg. 106 1.i Monday, March 171n Dear City Officials, am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the mixed -use development project slated for Main Street in Newhall. I've been living in Santa Clarita for the past 5 years, and as a young professional, I'm always looking for ways to grow my roots in a community that values both progress and quality of life. The Newhall area has been a vital part of Santa Clarita for generations, and it's clear that continued growth is essential to meet the needs of both current and future residents. I'm especially excited about the addition of 78 new apartment units in this project. As someone who is considering settling down in the area, having more housing options in a central location is incredibly appealing. In addition to the housing component, the 5,300 square feet of retail space is another exciting feature. This project will help attract new businesses to the area, making it easier for residents like myself to shop, dine, and enjoy greatervarietyof services. The increased foot traffic will also benefit the local economy, making Newhall a more vibrant and appealing place to live. Having already seen the positive effects of Newhall Crossings, including the increased number of businesses and improved amenities, I believe this new project will only continue to build on that success. The more people who live and work in Newhall, the better it will be for everyone. Thank you for considering my thoughts. I am fully in favor of this development and look forward to seeing the continued growth of Newhall. Sincerely, Joelyn Caprine 23801 Woodpark Ct Valencia, CA 91354 661.373.7453 //-OoeLyncaprineCc-ogmaiL.com Packet Pg. 107 1.i Jonathon Tillman P.O. Box 10818 Burbank, CA 91510 jt@theloee.com March 14, 2025 Santa Clarita City Planning Commission Santa Clarita, CA Dear Santa Clarita City Planning Commission, I'm writing to express my strong support for the mixed -use development proposed by Serrano Development Group. I've spent a lot of time in Santa Clarita over the years —working, spending time with friends, and supporting local businesses. If there's one thing that's always remained consistent, it's the people. Santa Clarita has a strong, growing community, and with that growth comes more opportunity for businesses to thrive. That's exactly why this project makes so much sense. Serrano Development Group has a reputation for creating developments that are not only well -designed but also bring new life and energy to the areas they build in. This project, with multiple levels of residential units above a vibrant commercial space, is a perfect example of smart, thoughtful growth. It provides much -needed housing while also supporting local businesses —something that benefits everyone in the long run. One of the best parts of this project is the inclusion of the Horseshoe Bar. It's been a staple in the community for years, a place where people come together in a positive way. Keeping it as part of this new development ensures that Santa Clarita retains its character while continuing to evolve. It's proof that we can embrace change without losing the places that make this city feel like home. At the end of the day, a growing city needs well -planned developments like this. More residents mean more foot traffic, more business, and more energy in the local economy. And let's be real —more customers for local businesses is never a bad thing. I fully support this project and hope to see it approved. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jonathon Tillman Packet Pg. 108 1.i April 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita, As the owner of a restaurant in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to build on the growth we've seen in recent years and continue strengthening our community through thoughtful, intentional development. Restaurants like mine thrive when there is consistent foot traffic throughout the week. While Old Town Newhall has become a popular destination on weekends, many of us still face challenges drawing in diners during the day, Monday through Friday. The addition of 78 new residential units would significantly increase the number of people living within walking distance of our businesses —people who are likely to stop in for lunch, grab dinner with family, or meet friends for a midweek bite. That kind of regular, local customer base is essential to our long-term success. Beyond the new housing, the project also includes 5,300 square feet of retail space, which will give more entrepreneurs the chance to join our business community. The introduction of new shops and services will add vibrancy to the district, giving people more reasons to stay, explore, and spend time in Newhall —which directly benefits all of us in the restaurant industry. We've already seen what targeted investment can do in this area. Projects like Newhall Crossings brought fresh energy and business to the neighborhood, setting a new standard for how development can serve the community. This new project continues that momentum and reflects a deep commitment to supporting the success of local businesses. I believe this development will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting, walkable, and thriving neighborhood —not just on the weekends, but every day of the week. 1 fully support this project and urge the City to approve it. C) Packet Pg. 109 1.i Monday March 3, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to offer my full support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As a local business owner in the Newhall area, I understand the importance of continued growth and development in ensuring our community remains vibrant and economically strong. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 15 years, and throughout that time, I have watched Newhall transform into a thriving area. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide critical support to local businesses like mine by attracting more residents and visitors to the area. With more people living and working in Newhall, we will see an increase in foot traffic, which is essential for local businesses to succeed. The retail spaces in this development offer incredible potential for new businesses, and I'm excited to see what will open up in the area. Newhall has become a destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment, and this project will only enhance that appeal. Moreover, the successful revitalization seen with Newhall Crossings shows that smart development can drive economic growth while maintaining the unique charm of the neighborhood. This new development is the kind of project that can bring positive change, not just for businesses, but for residents as well. I wholeheartedly support the project and look forward to the continued prosperity it will bring to Newhall. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 110 1.i Dear City of Santa Clarita As a local business owner in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. I have seen LV U) firsthand the positive impact that thoughtful growth and development can have on the local Q economy. This project represents an exciting opportunity to continue that progress by bringing V more residents, businesses, and energy to our vibrant district. W W One of the biggest challenges for businesses in Old Town Newhall is maintaining consistent foot H fn traffic. The addition of 78 residential units will help address this by increasing the number of people living in and engaging with the area daily. More residents mean more customers, not only for my business but for all the shops, restaurants, and services that make Old Town LV Newhall unique. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will allow new businesses to D join our community, further strengthening the commercial landscape and providing a opportunities for entrepreneurs looking to invest in this growing district. LV X The continued investment in Old Town Newhall demonstrates a commitment to the long-term success of our local economy. As more people choose to live, work, and shop here, the sense of J J community and economic vitality will continue to flourish. This project will not only provide Q much -needed housing and retail space but will also encourage further improvements to = W infrastructure, public spaces, and community engagement —ensuring that Old Town Newhall remains a premier destination for residents and visitors alike. Z We have already seen how projects like Newhall Crossings have revitalized the area by attracting i new businesses and increasing community engagement. This development will build upon that r success, ensuring continued growth and sustainability for businesses like mine. As a business J owner, I welcome any opportunity that supports the local economy, brings in new customers, 4+ and fosters a thriving, self-sufficient community, C y E For these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. I look forward to seeing the E positive impact it will have on Old Town Newhall and am excited to continue being part of this 0 CU growing, dynamic community. Respectfully, C d a Packet Pg. 111 1.i RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for almost 10 years and am raising my young kids here. It has been a wonderful place to start our family and build lasting relationships within the community. I had the pleasure of working as a sales representative for a wine distribution company and developed relationships with business owners all over this valley. Main Street has been the ideal location for so many small businesses, restaurants and retail spaces alike in the time I have been here. When the opportunity recently presented itself to become one of those business owners ON Main Street, I jumped at the chance. We took over The Newhall Press Room, a wine bar and eatery on Main Street. Our business and this community rely on the growth and continued development of this historic area. Projects like these impact the viability of our business and those around us and I am in full support. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kelly Thompson 24257 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 kelly@newhallpressroom.com 818-433-9098 Packet Pg. 112 1.i April 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita, As the owner of a restaurant in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St, and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to build on the growth we've seen in recent years and continue strengthening our community through thoughtful, intentional development. Restaurants like rnine thrive when there is consistent foot traffic throughout the week, While Old Town Newhall has become a popular destination on weekends, many of us still face challenges drawing in diners during the day, Monday through Friday. The addition of 78 new residential units would significantly increase the number of people living within walking distance of our businesses people who are likely to stop in for lunch, grab dinner with family, or sleet friends for a midweek bite. That kind of regular, local customer base is essential to our long-term success. Beyond the new housing, the project also includes 5,300 square feet of retail space, which will give more entrepreneurs the chance to join our business community. The introduction of new shops and services will add vibrancy to the district, giving people more reasons to stay, explore, and spend time in Newhall —which directly benefits all of its in the restaurant industry. We've already seen what targeted investment can do in this area. Projects like Newhall Crossings brought fresh energy and business to the neighborhood, setting a new standard for how development can serve the community. This new project continues that momentum and reflects a deep commitment to supporting the success of local businesses. I believe this development will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting, walkable, and thriving neighborhood —not just on the weekends, but every day of the week, I fully support this project and urge the City to approve it. Warm regards, Packet Pg. 113 1.i April 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita As a local business owner in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. I have seen firsthand the positive impact that thoughtful growth and development can have on the local economy. This project represents an exciting opportunity to continue that progress by bringing more residents, businesses, and energy to our vibrant district. One of the biggest challenges for businesses in Old Town Newhall is maintaining consistent foot traffic. The addition of 78 residential units will help address this by increasing the number of people living in and engaging with the area daily. More residents mean more customers, not only for my business but for all the shops, restaurants, and services that make Old Town Newhall unique. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will allow new businesses to join our community, further strengthening the commercial landscape and providing opportunities for entrepreneurs looking to invest in this growing district. The continued investment in Old Town Newhall demonstrates a commitment to the long-term success of our local economy. As more people choose to live, work, and shop here, the sense of community and economic vitality will continue to flourish. This project will not only provide much -needed housing and retail space but will also encourage further improvements to infrastructure, public spaces, and community engagement —ensuring that Old Town Newhall remains a premier destination for residents and visitors alike. We have already seen how projects like Newhall Crossings have revitalized the area by attracting new businesses and increasing community engagement. This development will build upon that success, ensuring continued growth and sustainability for businesses like mine. As a business owner, I welcome any opportunity that supports the local economy, brings in new customers, and fosters a thriving, self-sufficient community. For these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. I look forward to seeing the positive impact it will have on Old Town Newhall and am excited to continue being part of this growing, dynamic community, Respe Packet Pg. 114 1.i Monday March 31, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd # 120, Valencia, CA 91355 Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 911321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development project in Newhall. I have been a proud resident of Santa Clarita for over 10 years, and as a parent, I am deeply invested in seeing the area grow in a way that benefits families like mine. Newhall is an area that has always been close to my heart. It's a place that feels like home, and I want to see it continue to thrive. The addition of 78 new apartments will provide more housing options for our growing city, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will create new opportunities for local shops, restaurants, and businesses. As a resident, this development means more convenience for me and my family, with new places to shop and dine close to home. The impact of Newhall Crossings on Old Town Newhall has been overwhelmingly positive, with new businesses opening and revitalizing the area. The increase in foot traffic has made the neighborhood more active and inviting, and I'm excited to see how this new development will continue that trend. The mix of residential and retail spaces will make the area more vibrant, creating a more walkable and connected community. For these reasons, I fully support the project and encourage others to do the some. I believe it will have a lasting, positive impact on our community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Mike Hrezo Mike Hrezo Inc. Reinax Broker & Agent Packet Pg. 115 1.i Santa Clarita City Hall 23920 Valencia Blvd, Valencia, CA 91355 April 8, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, As the property manager of Newhall Crossings, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street in Newhall. Having had the opportunity to work closely with Serrano Development Group over the past several years, I can confidently say that they are thoughtful, collaborative partners who care deeply about the communities they help build. Newhall Crossings, which opened five years ago, continues to be a source of pride for our community. I regularly receive compliments on the quality of the building, its design, and the experience it provides for both residents and visitors. Our residents are happy with their homes, and our retailers love being a part of this dynamic, historic neighborhood. While we've seen great success --especially on weekends when Newhall is buzzing with visitors and community events --many of our retailers face challenges during the weekdays due to a lack of consistent foot traffic. The proposed addition of 78 new apartments is exactly the type of solution that will help address this issue. More residents living in the heart of Newhall means more customers during the day, more energy throughout the week, and ultimately, greater sustainability for local businesses. This new project will build on the success of Newhall Crossings by bringing in now residents and enhancing the overall vitality of the area. The added density will support a thriving, walkable neighborhood and provide a stronger foundation for the small businesses that are essential to Newhall's unique character. l fully support this development and look forward to seeing how it will complement and elevate everything we've built so far in Newhall. I encourage others to join me in supporting a project that will help secure the long-term success of our community. Sincerely, Mir lat > Diaz Moss & Co Property Manager, Newhall Crossings Packet Pg. 116 1.i Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing in enthusiastic support of the proposed mixed -use development project at 24300 Main Street in Newhall. Having lived in Santa Clarita for over two decades, I have seen how our community has grown, and I believe that continued investment in our city is essential for its future. Newhall holds a special place in the heart of our city, and this project is exactly what we need to keep it thriving. The addition of residential units and retail space will provide housing and create new job opportunities, benefiting the local economy and enhancing the quality of life for our residents. I've witnessed the positive changes in Newhall through projects like Newhall Crossings, and I am confident this development will contribute to a dynamic, welcoming neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Nicolas Macario Packet Pg. 117 1.i April 10, 2025 Dear City Council Members, I am writing as the owner of a salon in Old Town Newhall to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at Market St. and Main St. This project offers a valuable opportunity to support small businesses and continue the thoughtful revitalization of our district. Personal service businesses like salons rely heavily on steady, local clientele. While Old Town Newhall enjoys a vibrant weekend crowd, weekdays often lack the consistent foot traffic needed to keep appointment books full. By introducing 78 new residential units into the area, this project will help bring in more customers who are nearby throughout the week —not just on weekends. The additional 5,300 square feet of retail space included in the plan is another great asset. It will allow new businesses to enter the community and add even more reasons for people to live, shop, and spend time in Old Town. A more diverse mix of offerings supports all of us and strengthens the sense of place that makes this area special. We've seen successful models of this kind of growth before. Newhall Crossings helped usher in a new era of vitality for the district, proving that smart development leads to real benefits for local businesses. This project builds on that success and shows a clear commitment to the long- term economic health of the community. I fully support the approval of this development and am excited to see how it will further strengthen Old Town Newhall as a place to live, work, and thrive. Warm regards, Packet Pg. 118 1.i March 17, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development project in Newhall. I have been a proud resident of Santa Clarita for over 36 years, and have raised 2 children in this city. I am also the manager of a business on Main Street. I am deeply invested in seeing the area grow in a way that benefits families and businesses like mine. Newhall is an area that has always been close to my heart. It's a place that feels like home, and I want to see it continue to thrive. The addition of 78 new apartments will provide more housing options for our growing city, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will create new opportunities for local shops, restaurants, and businesses. As a resident, this development means more convenience, with new places to shop and dine close to home. The impact of Newhall Crossings on Old Town Newhall has been overwhelmingly positive, with new businesses opening and revitalizing the area. The increase in foot traffic has made the neighborhood more active and inviting, and I'm excited to see how this new development will continue that trend. The mix of residential and retail spaces will make the area more vibrant, creating a more walkable and connected community. For these reasons, I fully support the project and encourage others to do the same. I believe it will have a lasting, positive impact on our community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Serena 28031 Ermine Place, Canyon Country, CA 91351 661-547-5278 Packet Pg. 119 1.i Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support forth e mixed -use development project proposed for Main Street in Newhall. As a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, I have witnessed firsthand the city's growth, and I believe this development is key to ensuringthe continued prosperity of our community. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide much - needed housing and new opportunities for local businesses. This project aligns with Newhall's historical significance as the heart of Santa Clarita and will bring much -needed vitality and job creation to the area. Having seen the positive impact of similar projects, such as Newhall Crossings, I am confident this development will contribute to a stronger, more vibrant Newhall. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Silvana Cuervo Packet Pg. 120 1.i April 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita, As the owner of a restaurant in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to build on the growth we've seen in recent years and continue strengthening our community through thoughtful, intentional development. Restaurants like mine thrive when there is consistent foot traffic throughout the week. While Old Town Newhall has become a popular destination on weekends, many of us still face challenges drawing in diners during the day, Monday through Friday. The addition of 78 new residential units would significantly increase the number of people living within walking distance of our businesses —people who are likely to stop in for lunch, grab dinner with family, or meet friends for a midweek bite. That kind of regular, local customer base is essential to our long-term success. Beyond the new housing, the project also includes 5,300 square feet of retail space, which will give more entrepreneurs the chance to join our business community. The introduction of new shops and services will add vibrancy to the district, giving people more reasons to stay, explore, and spend time in Newhall —which directly benefits all of us in the restaurant industry. We've already seen what targeted investment can do in this area. Projects like Newhall Crossings brought fresh energy and business to the neighborhood, setting a new standard for how development can serve the community. This new project continues that momentum and reflects a deep commitment to supporting the success of local businesses. I believe this development will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting, walkable, and thriving neighborhood —not just on the weekends, but every day of the week. I fully support this project and urge the City to approve it. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 121 1.i Wednesday March 12, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 10 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. I am the owner of The Newhall Press Room, a wine bar and restaurant on Main Street. As such this project impacts the viability of our business and I am in full support. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Troy Hooper 24257 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 troy(0)krpusa.com 720-570-6169 Packet Pg. 122 1.i Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 April 10, 2025 Dear City Council, As the owner of a boutique shop in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. Thoughtful growth and revitalization efforts have made a visible difference in our community, and this project is a continuation of that positive momentum. It offers an exciting opportunity to bring even more residents, businesses, and energy into our district. One of the biggest challenges retail businesses face in Old Town Newhall is maintaining consistent foot traffic throughout the week. While weekends have become lively and well - attended, weekdays can be much quieter. The addition of 78 new residential units will help address this issue by increasing the number of people who live nearby and engage with the area on a daily basis. More residents mean more potential customers walking by my storefront, popping in regularly, and becoming familiar faces in the neighborhood. This project will also bring 5,300 square feet of new retail space to the area, allowing more small businesses to take root and grow here. That not only strengthens the commercial landscape but enriches the experience for residents and visitors alike. A thriving, diverse collection of businesses is part of what makes Old Town Newhall so special —and this development will help ensure that continues. Previous projects, such as Newhall Crossings, have already demonstrated the benefits of investing in our local infrastructure and commercial core. They've brought new life and activity to our streets, and this development promises to do the same. It's an important step forward in making Old Town Newhall a well-rounded community that can support its businesses every day of the week. I strongly encourage the approval of this project. It will bring lasting benefits to the local economy, support existing businesses, and help our neighborhood continue to grow in thoughtful and sustainable ways. Best Regards, Packet Pg. 123 1.i Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 April 10, 2025 Dear City Council, As the owner of a boutique shop in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. Thoughtful growth and revitalization efforts have made a visible difference in our community, and this project is a continuation of that positive momentum. It offers an exciting opportunity to bring even more residents, businesses, and energy into our district. One of the biggest challenges retail businesses face in Old Town Newhall is maintaining consistent foot traffic throughout the week. While weekends have become lively and well - attended, weekdays can be much quieter. The addition of 78 new residential units will help address this issue by increasing the number of people who live nearby and engage with the area on a daily basis. More residents mean more potential customers walking by my storefront, popping in regularly, and becoming familiar faces in the neighborhood. This project will also bring 5,300 square feet of new retail space to the area, allowing more small businesses to take root and grow here. That not only strengthens the commercial landscape but enriches the experience for residents and visitors alike. A thriving, diverse collection of businesses is part of what makes Old Town Newhall so special —and this development will help ensure that continues. Previous projects, such as Newhall Crossings, have already demonstrated the benefits of investing in our local infrastructure and commercial core. They've brought new life and activity to our streets, and this development promises to do the same. It's an important step forward in making Old Town Newhall a well-rounded community that can support its businesses every day of the week. I strongly encourage the approval of this project. It will bring lasting benefits to the local economy, support existing businesses, and help our neighborhood continue to grow in thoughtful and sustainable ways. Best Reg avo Packet Pg. 124 April 10, 2025 Dear City Council Members, I am writing as the owner of a salon in Old Town Newhall to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at Market St. and Main St. This project offers a valuable opportunity to support small businesses and continue the thoughtful revitalization of our district. Personal service businesses like salons rely heavily on steady, local clientele. While Old Town Newhall enjoys a vibrant weekend crowd, weekdays often lack the consistent foot traffic needed to keep appointment books full. By introducing 78 new residential units into the area, this project will help bring in more customers who are nearby throughout the week —not just on weekends. The additional 5,300 square feet of retail space included in the plan is another great asset. It will alloXa- new businesses to enter the community and add even more reasons for people to live, shop, and spend time in Old Town. A more diverse mix of offerings supports all of us and strengthens the sense of place that makes this area special. We've seen successful models of this kind of growth before. Newhall Crossings helped usher in a new era of vitality for the district, proving that smart development leads to real benefits for local businesses. This project builds on that success and shows a clear commitment to the long- term economic health of the community. I fully support the approval of this development and am excited to see how it will further strengthen Old Town Newhall as a place to live, work, and thrive. 7; Warm regards, Lip Packet Pg. 125 1.i Friday March 28, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Dear City Officials, As someone who grew up in Santa Clarita and has watched this city evolve. I am thrilled to support the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street. Now in my 30s. I see firsthand how important it is to continue investing in our community's growth, both in housing and local business opportunities. Newhall has transformed over the years, and projects like this one are essential to maintaining that momentum. By adding 78 apartment units, this development will provide much -needed housing for young professionals and families who want to stay and build their futures here. Additionally, the 5.300 square feet of retail space will create exciting opportunities for local businesses to thrive. The success of Newhall Crossings has already demonstrated the positive effects of mixed -use developments, and this new project will build on that success. More residents mean more foot traffic, more customers for businesses, and a more vibrant local economy. The Western Victorian design ensures that the character of Newhall remains intact while bringing fresh energy to the area. As someone who has always been proud to call Santa Clarita home, I fully support this development and encourage its approval. Sincerely, Michael Case Packet Pg. 126 My husband and I have been proud residents of Santa Clarita for the past 50 years. Recently, because of controversial and questionable projects that do not appear to conform to the applicable environmental and planning laws, our lives may be negatively impacted. I am referring to the recent proposal of a new 5-Story apartment building with 5,200 square feet of retail space in Downtown Newhall with a gross lack of necessary parking for a project of its size. The proposed projects coming in front of the City Council and Planning Commission in Santa Clarita seem to have similar issues: LACK OF PARKING. This trend which is similar to Santa Clarita Plaza's Promenade Flats Project where the state wants to build apartments at any cost. According to Assembly Bill 2097, zero parking spaces are required for residential or commercial space that is built close to a Metrolink Station. It does not appear that this law applies to this project, and we query whether application of this law would be practical or realistic. Even if it is near a rapid transit station, most people still own vehicles. With zero parking spaces allocated, where are they supposed to park? Would this not have a negative impact on parking within the area of the project site, particularly given the other businesses in the area? Additionally impacted, is KHTS our longstanding "hometown radio station". They will not be able to broadcast local news due to construction noise which would likely put them out of business. What happens to our city if we allow outside developers whose primary motive is financial to construct buildings where the parking is inadequate? We are entrusting you, our Mayor and City Council Members, to make good decisions that are beneficial to our city. We ask that you please give through consideration to the totality of the proposed projects and their collective compliance with applicable laws and impact on our city. Yours truly, Reena Newhall Tiana Brad From: Kirsten Lindgreen Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 10:20 AM To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: The Parking in downtown Newhall From: Naomi Stenson <naomi.stenson@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 5:54 PM To: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-clarita.com> Subject: re: The Parking in downtown Newhall CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. I am on the Board of Directors of the Canyon Theatre Guild. I have directed several plays at CTG and The Main Theatre. The biggest complaint I and other performers have received was about the. parking. There were several people that came to see my plays, but could not find any parking spaces unless it was down the street almost to Lyons Ave, and around the corner and they were elderly so they went home. With the new development, the parking is going to be worse because 26 or parking spaces will be taken away. Downtown Main Street is a fun area for people of all ages and so many activities throughout the year for all of the communities of Santa Clarita. Without ample parking there will be a decrease of elderly people as well as others. Please take the parking situation in consideration for many. Sincerely, Naomi Pryor-Stenson � Tiana Bradley Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 10:29 AM To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: Newhall ----- Original Message --' From:hormonbhttU8@8muiicom«hannon.brittU9@gmaiiconn> Sent: Tuesday, April ZZ,ZOZSO:11AyN To: City Council <CityCnunci|@sonta'darita.com» Subject: Newhall CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Towhom it may concern, | oppose the building ofadditional apartments inthe middle ofMain Street inNewhall. Downtown Newhall does not need more apartments itneeds its businesses tothrive, can't dothat ifnoone can find parking tovisit them. They also can't dothat with construction that disrupts the entire block. B.Hannon Tiana Bradley From: Kirsten Lindgreen — Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 10:29 AM ' To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: Letter regarding five story apartment/condo and retail complex with subterranean parking in Old Town Newhall -----Original Message ----- From: Deanna Hanashiro <deannahanashiro@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 8:14 AM To: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-clarita.com> Subject: Letter regarding five story apartment/condo and retail complex with subterranean parking in Old Town Newhall CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. April 22, 2025 > Dear Santa Clarita Council Members, > Please do not build a five -story apartment/condo and retail complex with subterranean parking in the middle of Old Town Newhall (OTN). > The current apartment/condo complex on the north end of OTN is at the edge of town so it does not jarringly disrupt the view and ambience. > My understanding is that the public will not be able to use the parking within the new development and there are not enough spaces for the prospective residents. > The OTN long term plans for called for any new development of this size to be done on an entire block. This proposed plan is for half a block. > When the Golden Valley extension was being built, I recall the nearby furniture store owner upset with structural damage to his building caused by the extension which was not as close as the KHTS building will be to this proposed OTN development. > Instead of razing the former Newhall Courthouse, make it a destination. Create a historical walking tour of OTN. Place placards with permanent photos where Newhall Hardware used to be. Which of those two bungalows was the Signal office? Hart Park and the Newhall Elementary Auditorium could be included along with other structures that remain. For those that are no longer standing, permanent photos and explanations can be where they once were. > Old Town Pasadena lost its cachet when they became just like every mall with large chains taking over local businesses. > KHTS should be embraced. Not harassed. Save them as the City saved the Ice Rink. If the city insists on building this apartment/condo complex, the city and developer should make sure KHTS' broadcasts are not disrupted. The city and developer should pay for KHTS' relocation and guarantee their building not be damaged by construction. > The Alcoholic Anonymous group should also receive relocation help if the Courthouse is razed. Would they be allowed to meet at the Newhall Library without charge? > One would hope that Mayor Pro Tern Laurene Weste will recuse herself from voting on this proposal since she owns property nearby. It seems out of character for her to work to demolish the historic courthouse. Thought she was a promoter of Santa Clarita history. > Were any laws broken when Mayor Pro Tern Weste met privately with the developer and set up the plan to demolish the Courthouse for $750,000? > I only became aware of the details by reading recent commentary from the Signal, former Councilmember Timben Boydston and KHTS owners Jeri and Carl Goldman. Please follow their suggestions, advice and requests if the Council approves this development. > I am hoping the development will not be approved. > Sincerely, > Deanna Hanashiro > Santa Clarita resident representing myself > Sent from my iPad Tiana Brad E 1 - From: Kirsten Lindgreen Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 10:34 AM To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: Newhall Development Plan From: Nicole Chun <mrschunsclass@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 9:11 AM To: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-clarita.com> Cc: Canyon Theatre Guild CTG <ctgboxoffice@yahoo.com> Subject: Newhall Development Plan CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Dear Santa Clarita City Council Members, I am writing to you today as a deeply concerned community member, parent, and a strong advocate for the arts and local businesses in our community. My child's participation in productions at the Canyon Theatre Guild (CTG) has allowed me to witness firsthand the invaluable contribution that CTG, alongside The Main and the many small businesses and restaurants, makes to the unique character of Old Town Newhall. Both CTG and The Main are vital cultural fixtures that contribute significantly to the vibrancy and character of the Old Town Newhall area of our city as well as the city at large. In a city that sometimes struggles with its identity, these cultural hubs provide a much -needed positive light and a sense of community. I am deeply troubled by the proposed development that threatens to exacerbate the already challenging parking situation in Old Town Newhall. As many of us who frequent this area know, securing a parking space for CTG shows or even a meal at one of the local restaurants can often be a frustrating endeavor. The prospect of losing 26 existing parking spaces to a development that may create a deficit of up to 125 spaces is deeply concerning. This reduction in available parking will undoubtedly create significant hardship for patrons of the theaters, diners at our local eateries, shoppers at our small businesses, and visitors seeking to enjoy the unique ambiance of Old Town Newhall. Forcing everyone to compete for an even more limited number of street and lot spaces will not only inconvenience individuals but actively discourage them from supporting the very places that give Old Town Newhall its distinct appeal. We must protect this unique area where culture and theater arts can flourish. The arts are essential to a well-rounded community, and they contribute to the economic vitality of Old Town Newhall. The arts draw visitors who then patronize local restaurants and shops, and the presence of vibrant businesses enhances the overall appeal of Old Town Newhall as a cultural and social destination. Discouraging patrons from attending performances due to parking issues will have a ripple effect, negatively impacting the theaters, restaurants, and other businesses that depend on a thriving arts scene. I urge the City Council to carefully consider the long-term consequences of this development and prioritize the needs of our community, especially the cultural institutions that enrich our lives. Please ensure that any development in Old Town Newhall includes adequate parking solutions that will support the continued success of CTG, The Main, and the entire area. Ensuring adequate parking is not just a matter of convenience; it is a fundamental requirement for the continued success of CTG, The Main, our local restaurants, our unique small businesses, and the overall appeal of this historic district. We must ensure that any development in this area includes comprehensive parking solutions that will support and sustain the flourishing arts scene and the diverse array of businesses that make Old Town Newhall a truly special place in Santa Clarita. strongly encourage each of you to spend an evening in Old Town Newhall — attend a show, enjoy a meal at a local restaurant, and browse the unique shops. Experience firsthand the energy and charm that make this area so valuable to our city. Let us work together to protect and nurture this vital cultural and economic hub. Thank you for your time, your consideration, and your commitment to the well-being of our entire community. April 18, 2025 Santa Clarita City Councilmembers Santa Clarita City Hall 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear Members of the City Council, As you consider the proposed development on Main Street in Newhall, I would like to voice my support for our local radio station, KHTS. have had the honor for many years to support some of the City's many non -profits, including serving as a board member for many of them. I currently serve on the board of Fostering Youth Independence and am on the advisory board for Carousel Ranch. KHTS has a long and passionate history of serving our Valley, providing its listeners and readers with important news and information, and supporting Santa Clarita's many nonprofits. I understand that the anticipated two years of construction for this project is expected to create hardships for KHTS, and it seems like a reasonable request for the developer to limit some of the most disruptive construction during certain hours, as well as to help KHTS to relocate during this time. I respectfully ask that the Council consider the requested accommodations for the studio so they can continue to do their good work in the community while the construction project is underway. appreciate your service our community, and thank you for considering my views. Best regards, Julie Benson Krumrine 4/22/25, 8:14 AM Gmail - Letter regarding five story apartment/condo and retail complex with subterranean parking in Old Town Newhall GmallJeri Seratti-Goldman <jeriseratti@gmaiLcom> Letter regarding five story apartment/condo and retail complex with subterranean parking in Old Town Newhall Deanna Hanashiro <deannahanashiro@gmail.com> Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:13 AM To: Santa Clarita City Council <citycouncil@santaclarita.gov> r: April 22, 2025 i , . _ .., ' Gi.......... > Dear Santa Clarita Council Members, > Please do not build a five -story apartment/condo and retail complex with subterranean parking in the middle of Old Town Newhall (OTN). > The current apartment/condo complex on the north end of OTN is at the edge of town so it does not jarringly disrupt the view and ambience. > My understanding is that the public will not be able to use the parking within the new development and there are not enough spaces for the prospective residents. > The OTN long term plans for called for any new development of this size to be done on an entire block. This proposed plan is for half a block. > When the Golden Valley extension was being built, I recall the nearby furniture store owner upset with structural damage to his building caused by the extension which was not as close as the KHTS building will be to this proposed OTN development. > Instead of razing the former Newhall Courthouse, make it a destination. Create a historical walking tour of OTN. Place placards with permanent photos where Newhall Hardware used to be. Which of those two bungalows was the Signal office? Hart Park and the Newhall Elementary Auditorium could be included along with other structures that remain. For those that are no longer standing, permanent photos and explanations can be where they once were. > Old Town Pasadena lost its cachet when they became just like every mall with large chains taking over local businesses. > KHTS should be embraced. Not harassed. Save them as the City saved the Ice Rink. If the city insists on building this apartment/condo complex, the city and developer should make sure KHTS' broadcasts are not disrupted. The city and developer should pay for KHTS' relocation and guarantee their building not be damaged by construction. > The Alcoholic Anonymous group should also receive relocation help if the Courthouse is razed. Would they be allowed to meet at the Newhall Library without charge? > One would hope that Mayor Pro Tern Laurene Weste will recuse herself from voting on this proposal since she owns property nearby. It seems out of character for her to work to demolish the historic courthouse. Thought she was a promoter of Santa Clarita history. > Were any laws broken when Mayor Pro Tern Weste met privately with the developer and set up the plan to demolish the Courthouse for $750,000? > I only became aware of the details by reading recent commentary from the Signal, former Councilmember Timben Boydston and KHTS owners Jeri and Carl Goldman. Please follow their suggestions, advice and requests if the Council approves this development. > I am hoping the development will not be approved. > Sincerely, > Deanna Hanashiro > Santa Clarita resident representing myself https://mail.google. com/mail/u/0/?ik=d975449570&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1830116218657051264&simpl=msg-f:1830116218657051264 112 Tiana Bradley From: Kirsten Lindgreen Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 9:51 AM To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: Newhall Parking CLERKS OF-o- -----Original Message ----- From: Roberta Harris <roberta@myquesters.com> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 6:31 AM To: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-clarita.com> Subject: Newhall Parking CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Allowing the building of a 5 story development, which will seriously impact parking for all the businesses on Main Street, will result in destroying this wonderful area. As a long time supporter of the Canyon Theatre Guild, we will no longer be able to attend their performances or patronize the nearby restaurants if close by parking is not available. Old Town Newhall will join the ranks of long streets with closed stores if there is not convenient parking. Roberta Harris Tiana Bradley From: Kirsten Lindgreen Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 9:51 AM To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: Parking in downtown Newhall -----Original Message ----- From: Judy Schoenfeld <dentaljudy@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 9:29 AM To: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-clarita.com> Subject: Parking in downtown Newhall CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Sent from my iPhone Existing businesses and cultural venues can not succeed when there is not enough parking! I!!! Tiana Bradley ro: Kirsten Lindgreen Subject: RE: Proposed Project Threatens Canyon Theatre Guild And Downtown Newhall Businesses From: Carol <cfkoof@aol.com> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 2:55 PM __y.r ,_i;c To: City Council <Cit\/Council@santa-clarita.com> _ Subject: Proposed Project Threatens Canyon Theatre Guild And Downtown Newhall Businesses i nHi:i.. CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Dear City Council Members: We are writing in support of TimBen Boydston's objections to the proposed project by Serrano Development Co. which will increase congestion in Old Town Newhall while reducing available parking. As long time patrons and supporters of the Canyon Theatre Guild, we've been pleased to see the expansion of business around the theatre in recent years. This expansion requires more parking, not less. As mobility impaired seniors, most of the alternate parking options in the area are too far from the theatre for us. Thank you for your consideration, Carol Kopf & Dorinda Gardner 23430 Via Barra Valencia, CA 91355 1 Tiana Bradley From: Kirsten Lindgreen Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 1:51 PM To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: Downtown parking Fri -----Original Message ----- From: Lauren Stuart <lauren.young.stuart@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 1:19 PM To: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-clarita.com> Subject: Downtown parking CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. As a prompt from a local business and a resident near downtown living on Market St., I ask the city council to consider parking enforcement of appropriate spaces be placed for the growth and traffic in downtown Newhall. Thanks, Lauren Tiana Bradley From: Kirsten Lindgreen Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 1:51 PM To: Tiana Bradley Subject: FW: Canyon Theater Guild -parking issue ,2 _ -5 - `rife _''_ F'fq From: Lisa Welland <lisawellandlmft@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 1:18 PM To: City Council <CityCouncil@santa-clarita.com> Subject: Canyon Theater Guild -parking issue CITY WARNING: This email was sent from an external server. Use caution clicking links or opening attachments. Hello, I recently learned that the Canyon Theater Guild and old Town Newhall will lose valuable parking spots due to a new development on Main Street. Although I am in support of new development and commerce, please consider the parking needs of the area before you implement any changes. We can't lose any more parking and expect our businesses to not be negatively impacted. Thank you in advance, Lisa Welland Community member and patron of Canyon Theater Guild T Iri 1- ADAMSKI MOROSKI MADDEN CUMBERLAND & GREEN LLP: ATTORNEYS AT LAW Post Office Box 3835 • San Luis Obispo, California 93403-3835 - T 805-543-0990 • F 805-543-0980 • momarnrneglaw.coin April 22, 2025 [VIA EMAIL AND PERSONAL DELIVERY] The Honorable Bill Miranda Mayor of City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 300 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 bmiranda(- ,santa-c lari ta. com Re: In re the Matter of Serrano Development Group Construction Project City of Santa Clarita Master Case Number 24-134 ("24-134") Request for Postponement of any Decision concerning 24-134. Request that the Attached Report dated April 18, 2025 from Progressive Design, Inc., be made part of the Administrative Record Dear Mayor Miranda: Yesterday, I advised you of my representation of KHTS. My firm has not had time to request, let alone review, the voluminous records of this project because of our recent retention. As you know, KHTS is severely affected by this project. KHTS requests a minimum of an additional 15 days upon which to comment and present substantive responses to the project. Moreover, we believe that, given the scope and complexity of this project, special circumstances exist to exceed the maximum review period or any time constraints relative thereto. We therefore request that the review period be extended to allow for KHTS to comment, and produce additional reports and experts to opine on the Project. Attached and enclosed to my letter is the report dated April 18, 2025, from Progressive Design, Inc. Brad Keeler opines that the noise from the construction will exceed the limits established in Santa Ctarita's ordinances. I submit, as stated in my previous correspondence, that the construction noise will also exceed applicable County Ordinances. The report supports KHTS request for Conditions of Approval restricting coring and drilling between 7 a.m. and 8 a.m. and for 30 minutes during the lunch hour is not optimal but KHTS can work with that. Paso Robles Office: 1948 Spring Street • Paso Robles, CA 93446-1620 • T 805-238-2300 • F 805-238-2322 Letter to the Honorable Bill Miranda Mayor, City of Santa Clarita Page 2 April 22, 2025 We appreciate the Council's consideration. Please include this letter and report as part of the administrative record. Very truly yours, ADAMSKI MOROSKI MADDEN CUMBERLAND AND GREEN, LLP By: JEFFREY A. HACKER, ESQ. cc: Client Ty Green, Esq. Apr 22, 2025 City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 By email: BMIRAN DApsantaclarita.gov; Iweste(asantaclarita.gov; Iwesterasantaclarita.gov; -jai bbs santaclarita.aov; mmcleancasantaclarita.gov Cc: kstriplin santaclarita.gov; cmagana rasantaclarita.gov; KRAWFORDasantaclarita.gov; imontesobwslaw.com Re: Proposed Amendments to the City's Accessory Dwelling Unit and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations Dear Santa Clarita City Council, The California Housing Defense Fund ("CaIHDF") submits this letter as a public comment concerning item 2 on the agenda for the Council meeting scheduled for April 22, 2025. This comment specifically concerns the amendments to the City's regulations for ADUs and JADUs. CaIHDF applauds the City for making changes to its ADU regulations to keep pace with changes in state law. However, the proposed ordinance fails to comply with state law in a few ways, and the City should address these problems before approving the ordinance. Ca1HDF notes that the California Department of Housing and Community Development brought up many of the below deficiencies in its letter dated March 24, 2023. Background The law gives local governments authority to enact zoning ordinances that implement a variety of development standards on ADUs. (Gov. Code, § 66314.) The standards in these local ordinances are limited by state law so as not to overly restrict ADU development. (See id.) Separately from local ADU ordinances, Government Code section 66323 establishes a narrower set of ADU types that local governments have a ministerial duty to approve. "Notwithstanding Sections 66314 to 66322 ... a local agency shall ministerially approve" these types of ADUs. (Id. at subd. (a).) This means that ADUs that satisfy the minimal requirements of section 66323 must be approved regardless of any contrary provisions of the local ADU ordinance. (ibid.) Local governments may not impose their own standards on such ADUs. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subd. (b) L"A local agency shall not impose any objective development or 360 Grand Ave #323, Oakland 94610 hi@calhdf.org design standard that is not authorized by this section upon any accessory dwelling unit that meets the requirements of any of paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive, of subdivision (a)"].) In addition, ADUs that qualify for the protections of Government Code section 66323, like other ADUs, must be processed by local governments within 60 days of a complete permit application submittal. (Gov. Code, § 66317, subd. (a).) State law also prohibits creating regulations on ADU development not explicitly allowed by state law. Government Code Section 66315 states, "No additional standards, other than those provided in Section 66314, shall be used or imposed, including an owner -occupant requirement, except that a local agency may require that the property may be used for rentals of terms 30 days or longer." Impermissible Limitation on ADUs in High Fire Hazard Severity Zones Code section 17.57.040(L)(1)(b) limits impose additional standards on ADUs developed in high fire hazard severity zones as defined by the Los Angeles County Fire Department. Specifically, these standards require two distinct means of vehicular access to a highway and each access road must be 24 feet in width. However, this regulation is not permitted for ADUs that qualify for the provisions of Government Code section 66323 subdivision (a) (See Gov. Code, § 66323, subd. (b)). From page 20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook "A local agency may not impose development or design standards, including both local standards and standards found in State ADU Law, on 66323 Units that are not specifically listed in Government Code section 66323. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subds. (a), (b).) This includes, but is not limited to, parking, height, setbacks, or other zoning provisions (e.g., lot size, open space, floor area ratio, etc.)" Requirements regarding road width and access are undoubtedly development standards, and the City therefore may not impose them on section 66323 ADUs. Impermissible Maximum Unit Size Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(a)(ii) limits ADUs to 850 square feet if they are up to one bedroom and 1000 square feet if they are up to two bedrooms. While the code may limit the size of new construction, detached ADUs in conjunction with a single family home pursuant to Government Code section 66314, the City may not impose any size limitations developed on multifamily properties and eligible for the protections of Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a)(4). Seepages 18-20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook for more information on section 66323 ADUs. 2of8 Impermissible Front Setback Requirement Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(c) requires new detached ADUs to obey underlying front setback regulations as well as corner and reverse corner setbacks. However, Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a) does not permit any imposition of front setback requirements if the ADUs qualify for the protections of that section of law. There are many policy reasons for this. For instance, a homeowner may prefer to preserve a private backyard space while redeveloping the less useful front yard. While children may play in the backyard, the front yard is closer to the street and less safe for a variety of activities. The City therefore must allow front yard ADUs that comply with the standards in Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a) both on single family and on multifamily properties. HCD has issued guidance under its authority in Government Code section 66327 (that guidance is located in the January 2025 HCD ADU [-12ndbcok, page 18) affirming the duty of local agencies to allow ADUs protected by Government Code section 66323 in the front setback under all circumstances. This applies whether the property is a single family home or a multifamily building. Impermissible Parking Requirements Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(f) imposes parking requirements on all ADUs, less certain exceptions. However, as discussed supra, the City cannot require parking for ADUs that conform to the requirements of Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a), as section 66323, subdivision (b) specifically exempts such ADUs from all local requirements. From page 20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook (emphasis added): A local agency may not impose development or design standards, including both local standards and standards found in State ADU Law, on 66323 Units that are not specifically listed in Government Code section 66323. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subds. (a), M.) This includes, but is not limited to, parking, height, setbacks, or other zoning provisions (e.g., lot size, open space, floor area ratio, etc.). Separately, Code section 17.57.040(L)(3)(b)(ii) requires replacement of required parking on multifamily buildings if the parking has been converted to an ADU. However, Government Code section 66314, subdivision (d)(11) plainly states, "When a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit or converted to an accessory dwelling unit, the local agency shall not require that those offstreet parking spaces be replaced" the City therefore may not require replacement of this parking. 3of8 Impermissible Design Regulations Code sections 17.57.040(L)(2)(g) and (i) imposes design requirements on ADUs, including color, materials, roof incline, the City's design guidelines, and construction materials, including a prohibition on metal siding. However, the City may not impose any design requirements on Section 66323 ADUs. From page 20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook (emphasis added): A local agency may not impose development or design standards, including both local standards and standards found in State ADU Law, on 66323 Units that are not specifically listed in Government Code section 66323. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subds. (a), M.) This includes, but is not limited to, parking, height, setbacks, or other zoning provisions (e.g., lot size, open space, floor area ratio, etc.). Impermissible Rear Yard Coverage Regulation Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(h) imposes rear yard coverage regulations on ADUs. However, the City may not impose any such lot coverage requirements on Section 66323 ADUs. From page 20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook (emphasis added): A local agency may not impose development or design standards, including both local standards and standards found in State ADU Law, on 66323 Units that are not specifically listed in Government Code section 66323. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subds. (a), (b).) This includes, but is not limited to, parking, height, setbacks, or other zoning provisions (e.g., lot size, open space, floor area ratio, etc.). Impermissible Distance Between Structures Requirements Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(k) a six foot distance between structures regulation on ADUs. While the City may regulate building to building separation for ADUs subject only to its local standards pursuant to Government Code section 66314, it may not regulate building to building separation for ADUs eligible for the protections of Government Code section 66323, as discussed supra. Impermissible Owner Occupancy Requirement Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(n)(i) requires owner occupancy as a condition of ADU development for ADUs developed after Janaury 1, 2025. This requirement is plainly unlawful. As discussed supra, Government Code section 66315 states (emphasis added), "No additional standards, other than those provided in Section 66314, shall be used or imposed, including an owner -occupant requirement, except that a local agency may require that the property may be used for rentals of terms 30 days or longer." The fact that owner -occupancy requirements are prohibited by state law is discussed on pages 16, 22, 34, and 48 of the January 2025 ADU Handbook. From page 34 of the handbook: "Can local agencies require owner -occupancy for an ADU? No. A local agency cannot impose an owner -occupancy requirement on any ADU (Gov. Code, § 66315)" Impermissible Open Space Requirement Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(o) imposes open space replacement regulations on ADUs. However, the City may not impose any such requirements on Section 66323 ADUs. From page 20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook (emphasis added): A local agency may not impose development or design standards, including both local standards and standards found in State ADU Law, on 66323 Units that are not specifically listed in Government Code section 66323. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subds. (a), M.) This includes, but is not limited to, parking, height, setbacks, or other zoning provisions (e.g., lot size, open space, floor area ratio, etc.). Impermissible Tree Preservation Requirement Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(p) imposes oak tree preservation requirements on ADUs. However, the City may not impose any such requirements on Section 66323 ADUs. From page 20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook (emphasis added): A local agency may not impose development or design standards, including both local standards and standards found in State ADU Law, on 66323 Units that are not specifically listed in Government Code section 66323. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subds. (a), M.) This includes, but is not limited to, parking, height, setbacks, or other zoning provisions (e.g., lot size, open space, floor area ratio, etc.). Impermissible Ecological Area Regulation Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(q) imposes the requirements of the significant ecological area overlay zone on ADUs. However, the City may not impose any such requirements on Section 66323 ADUs. 5of8 From page 20 of the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook (emphasis added): A local agency may not impose development or design standards, including both local standards and standards found in State ADU Law, on 66323 Units that are not specifically listed in Government Code section 66323. (Gov. Code, § 66323, subds. (a), M.) This includes, but is not limited to, parking, height, setbacks, or other zoning provisions (e.g., lot size, open space, floor area ratio, etc.). Impermissible Ban on Separate Conveyance Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(r) imposes a blanket ban on all separate conveyance of ADUs. However, Government Code section 66341 allows for such separate conveyance under certain circumstances, and the City must allow such conveyance under those circumstances. Code section 17.57.040(L)(2)(s) requires a deed restriction to be placed on the property as a condition of developing an ADU. This is a clear violation of Government Code section 66323, which prohibits any standards not explicitly authorized in that section. Deed restrictions are also not permitted by Government Code section 66315, which forbids standards not listed in section 66314. The California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") has communicated that such deed restrictions are unlawful. The January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook specifically forbids deed restrictions as a condition of ADU development (see page 22). Additionally, such deed restrictions imposed on ADUs (or on other accessory structures) are unenforceable. This is due to the absence of horizontal privity between the City and the applicant. In other words, since the City does not own the applicant's property at the time of the application, and does not own a neighboring property to whose benefit the proposed restriction(s) redound, black letter property law bars the restrictions from binding future property owners. (See, e.g., Scuringe v. J. C. C. Enters (1988) 205 Cal.App.3d 1536 [describing the types of privity relationship between covenanting parties that allow enforcement of a deed restriction]; see also Civ. Code, § § 1460 et seq.) The City should therefore amend the proposed ordinance to remove the deed restriction Requirement. 6ofs Impermissible Restrictions on Multifamily ADUs Code section 17.57.040(L)(3)(b) imposes impressible restrictions on ADUs developed on multifamily parcels. First, the code restricts new construction ADUs to 16 feet in height. However, Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a)(4)(i) plainly allows ADUs to take advantage of the "height limitation in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 66321, as applicable..." This means that such ADUs could be up to 20 feet in height in some circumstances. Second, code section 17.57.040(L)(3)(b) only allows a multifamily property to have either conversion ADUs or multifamily ADUs, not both. This disregards the plan language of Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a) (emphasis added): "Notwithstanding Sections 66314 to 66322, inclusive, a local agency shall ministerially approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixed -use zone to create any of the following., And from the January 2025 HCD ADU Handbook, page 19: "The local agency must allow the four categories of ADUs [referencing the four types of section 66323 ADUs] listed above to be combined as allowed by the site and lot conditions" The City must amend its code to allow a multifamily development to have both conversion ADUs and new construction ADUs pursuant to Government Code section 66323, subdivision (a). Duty to Exempt Certain ADUs from Impact Fees Code section 17.57.040(L)(5) states that impact fees shall be levied on ADUs as established by City Council resolution. However, Government Code section 66324, subdivision (c)(1) obligates the City to not charge impact fees on ADUs smaller than 750 square feet in size. Ca1HDF appreciates the City's thorough effort to implement state law governing ADU construction. However, the City should amend its ordinance to ensure that it complies with state law. Ca1HDF is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels, including low-income households. You may learn more about CalHDF at www.calhdf, . 7of8 Sincerely, Dylan Casey Ca1HDF Executive Director 9VII-V v-k - W James M. Lloyd CalHDF Director of Planning and Investigations 8of8 M 4iH DF Apr 22, 2025 City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 By email: BMIRANDA(asantcaclarita.aaov; lweste(asantaclarita.go'✓; lweste@santaclarita.as�v; ' i'o"os@santrjcicaritca.c3o_v; a nrac9eanpsanYacBariia.aov Cc: kstriplin(asantcaclaritca.; -ma ana(asantcacicaritca.gov; JCRAINFORD(asantaciariia.go,/; irnontes(abwslaw.com Re: Proposed Amendments to the City Parking Requirements to Implement AB 2097 Dear Santa Clarita City Council, The California Housing Defense Fund ("Ca1HDF") submits this letter as a public comment concerning item 2 on the agenda for the Council meeting scheduled for April 22, 2025. This comment specifically concerns the amendments to the City's parking requirements to implement AB 2097. Ca1HDF applauds the City for making changes to its municipal code to keep pace with changes in state law. However, the proposed ordinance fails to comply with state law, and the City should address these problems before approving the ordinance. Background Code section 17.51.060(N)(4)(a) requires that projects that take advantage of AB 2097 must provide a parking demand study showing that "there is not a negative impact and identify the amount of on -site parking required to prevent a negative impact. The parking demand study is a requirement of the City's entitlement submittal checklists, and a project application may not be deemed complete until a satisfactory parking demand study is submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development" Requiring a parking study to show that there is not a negative impact is tantamount to requiring enough off-street parking to guarantee that there will be no impact. This subverts the intent and plain language of AB 2097. Government Code, section 65863.2, subdivision (i) (emphasis added): "The Legislature finds and declares that the imposition of mandatory parking minimums can increase the cost of housing, limit the number of available units, lead to an oversupply of parking spaces, and increased greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, this section shall be interpreted in favor of 360 Grand Ave #323, Oakland 94610 hi@calhdf.org the prohibition of the imposition of mandatory parking minimums as outlined in this section" Required Exceptions While it is true that under certain circumstances the City may make findings in order to impose parking requirements on projects otherwise eligible for AB 2097. (Gov. Code, § 65863.2, subd. (b)(3.) However, there are other circumstances under which the City is absolutely prohibited from imposing any offstreet parking requirements. Government Code, section 65863.2, subdivision (c): For a housing development project, subdivision (b) shall not apply if the housing development project satisfies any of the following: (1) The development dedicates a minimum of 20 percent of the total number of housing units to very low, low-, or moderate -income households, students, the elderly, or persons with disabilities. (2) The development contains fewer than 20 housing units. (3) The development is subject to parking reductions based on the provisions of any other applicable law. The City may not subject such housing development projects to offstreet parking requirements, regardless of what the required parking study shows. As an example, a project that takes advantage of the state Density Bonus Law (Gov. Code, § 65915; "DBL") is entitled to a parking reduction (Id. at subd. (p)). This means that the City may not impose any parking requirement on DBL projects that are eligible for AB 2097, regardless of whether or not a parking study demonstrates negative impacts. 444 Ca1HDF appreciates the City's thorough effort to implement state law governing offstreet parking. However, the City should amend its ordinance to ensure that it complies with state law. Ca1HDF is a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation whose mission includes advocating for increased access to housing for Californians at all income levels, including low-income households. You may learn more about CaIHDF at www.calhdforg. 2of3 Sincerely, Dylan Casey CalHDF Executive Director pNev vt-k- W James M. Lloyd Ca1HDF Director of Planning and Investigations 3of3 Mayor Bill Miranda City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 April 18, 2025 Dear Mr. Mayor, The recently approved Serrano Development in Newhall promises to enhance the downtown area in many ways —by supporting local businesses, improving aesthetics, and providing much -needed housing options. While the project has received general support from the community, concerns have emerged surrounding the role of Mayor Pro Tern Laurene Weste and what many view as a "backdoor deal." However, this may only scratch the surface. The layers of behind -the -scenes maneuvering are complex. Consider the following: • The City of Santa Clarita once designated the old courthouse building as a historic site. • Yet, no comprehensive analysis has ever been made public confirming whether the building truly qualifies as historic. • Ivan Volschenk, President of the Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce, also serves on the Board of Directors for the SCV Historical Society. • Mr. Volschenk' s husband, John Musella, sits on the Historical Society's advisory board while also leading The Musella Group —a firm that represents a number of housing and commercial development projects in the SCV, and is also a registered lobbyist. • Hunt Braly, an SCV land use attorney, is representing the Serrano Development Group in support of the Newhall project. • Hunt Braly, again, a local land use attorney, chairs the SCV Chamber Government Affairs Committee with Mr. Musella and Mr. Volschenk. • Mr. Volschenk and Mr. Musella operate the SCV Political Action Committee, which endorses and donates to the campaigns of elected officials throughout Santa Clarita. The alleged back -door deal involving Mayor Pro Tern Laurene Weste is deeply troubling and wholly inappropriate. However, this incident appears to be just one part of a broader and more concerning pattern —one characterized by a network of political insiders wielding influence over land use decisions and development approvals. At the heart of this system are questionable financial arrangements, apparent nepotism, and close coordination between lobbyists, attorneys, and elected officials meant to maintain access to power and money. These connections often result in favorable agreements, endorsements, and campaign contributions that raise serious concerns about transparency, accountability, and public trust It is time to shine a light on these practices. The residents of Santa Clarita deserve full transparency, genuine accountability, and a local government that puts the public interest ahead of personal or political gain. The cycle of insider dealing must end. Anonymous CC: Mayor Pro Tern Weste Patsy Ayala Jason Gibbs Marcia Mayeda Mary Cusick, City Clerk Ken Striplin, City Manager 04/14/2025 Dear Representative of the City of Santa Clarita Community, First, I am pro progress for the upcoming Newhall expansion. However, I feel the impact without intervention to assist KHTS Radio Station will have devastating effects on the community. I believe that between the Developer and the City's help to mitigate the chaos of the upcoming construction, and aid in the Stations relocation to the far side of the building will ensure KHTS with its daily function and help with the regular scheduled broadcasting needs, thus ultimately saving the Stations livelihood. The radio station is an integral part of the Santa Clarita's informational outlet. I personally utilize the broadcast to inform others of upcoming community events. I don't feel it unreasonable to ask for your support and intervention and help to regulate their continued success. KHTS encompasses the pulse point of the city'slocals, this Radio Station has always had Santa Clarita community members welfare first and foremost. Having stated this, I feel it a fair and reasonable request of the aforementioned aide. It would be devastating for all involved if they were interrupted or dismantled due to lack of broadcasting availability or help from our City of Santa Clarita members. Respectfully, Mary Ackerman Marvcmoore@vahoo.com 661-414-6553 DR.AAKASH AHUJA to me, Carl Respected City Council Members, 5:28 PM (28 minutes ago) I am writing this letter to express my support for KHTS and its owners, Jeri Serrati- Goldman and Carl Goldman. The ownership of KHTS by Carl and Jeri has significantly enriched the Santa Clarita Valley. As widely recognized, they have transformed the community's only local radio station into a vital platform for news, entertainment, and civic engagement. Their efforts extend far beyond broadcasting; they have been instrumental in supporting local non- profits and spearheading initiatives such as the Michael Hoefflin Foundation for Pediatric Cancer, the Santa Clarita Coalition, and Homes for Heroes with Habitat for Humanity. Through these efforts, they have demonstrated their dedication to assisting disaster victims and underserved families, enhancing the quality of life for Santa Clarita residents. Carl and Jeri have also organized impactful community events such as the KHTS Home & Garden Show, Emergency Expo, and advocacy trips to Sacramento, all of which foster civic engagement and strengthen our community bonds. Additionally, their tireless work with local charities and their use of KHTS to amplify non-profit initiatives have made them pillars of Santa Clarita's civic and charitable landscape. It has come to my attention that a developer has submitted a plan to the City Council to construct a 5-story apartment/retail complex with subterranean parking. Based on my understanding, this project's wall will be located very close to the offices and studios of KHTS. While I recognize that such development projects may offer certain benefits to our city, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on KHTS during the two -plus years of construction. I respectfully request that the developer and the City Council consider placing a moratorium on blasting and coring activities between the hours of 6:00-9:00 AM, Monday through Friday, as well as a 30-minute break during lunch hours. These specific times are critical for KHTS to broadcast their highest -revenue programs. During these hours, other construction activities could still proceed without disruption. Additionally, I would ask the developer to consider compensating KHTS for relocating their studios and offices to another part of their building that would better buffer construction noise. This would help ensure that KHTS can continue its vital operations without interruption. While this development project may bring value to our city in the long term, it is essential to mitigate its short-term impact on KHTS. The station's potential closure due to construction disruptions would be a significant loss for Santa Clarita's residents and its vibrant community fabric. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Dr. Aakash Ahuja Trustee, William S. Hart School Board Sent from my Phone OWN April 7, 2025 City of Santa Clarita City Council Re: KHTS Dear City Councilmembers, As a former Santa Clarita Man of the Year, and volunteer for dozens of our valleys non-profit, I have witnessed the critical role KHTS has on Santa Clarita. Not only have they been a vital news source and invaluable during our many emergencies, KHTS has also assisted many dozens of our local non -profits and individuals in need. I have partnered with KHTS on many non-profit projects over the years. I've witnessed the radio station's positive impact. We need our radio station to continue to be an anchor in Santa Clarita. I appeal to you to assist with their very reasonable mitigation request to allow them to stay in business. Thank you in advance for your consideration Sincerely, Greg Amster Proprietor, Salt Creek Grille 24415 Town Center Drive • Suite 115 • Valencia, CA 91355 • (661) 222-9999 • Fax (661) 222-9981 www.saltcreekgrille.com From: Fred Arnold <fred.arnold@affloans.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 5:08:15 PM To: Jeri@ hometownstation.com <Jeri@hometownstation.com>; ieriseratti@gmail.com <ieriseratti@gm ail.com> Cc: Fred Arnold <fred.arnold@affloans.com> Subject: Letter of Support for KHTS April 16, 2025 To The Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing in strong support of Carl Goldman, Jeri Seratti Goldman, and KHTS Radio, as they face challenges due to the construction planned next door to their radio station. While I believe that creating new opportunities downtown is exciting and important for the continued growth of our community, I also understand the very real impact such development can have —particularly when it comes to noise, vibration, and disruption to neighboring businesses. The nature of the planned construction, with its pounding and heavy equipment, could severely hinder KHTS's ability to operate effectively. KHTS has been a vital part of the Santa Clarita Valley for over 30 years, going back to its early days as KBET. Long before we had access to smartphones or Google, they were the primary source for local news, emergency updates, and traffic information. During times of crisis, they were —and continue to be —a reliable voice for our city. On a personal note, KHTS played a major role in the development of my own business and community outreach efforts. Thanks to Carl and Jeri, I was given the opportunity to host a radio show that spotlighted over 1,200 local entrepreneurs and nonprofits over nearly a decade. That platform not only helped those businesses grow, but also allowed me to give back to the community in a meaningful way. I owe much of my local success to the support and mentorship of Carl and Jeri. KHTS is not just a business —they are a cornerstone of this community. I respectfully urge the City Council to do everything in its power to help mitigate the construction -related disruptions to KHTS. Supporting this station means supporting a lifeline of information, connection, and emergency communication for Santa Clarita residents. Sincerely, Fred Arnold, Owner 360 Suites SCV Community Philanthropist Thursday, April 10, 2025 Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I'm writing today to express concern over the proposed Serrano development project at Market and Main Streets, and its direct impact on KHTS Radio. Before I continue, I want to acknowledge the long-standing relationship I've had with each of you and with the city we serve. In my last 6 years at KHTS, I've either watched, attended, or edited articles on nearly all of the City Council meetings that occurred during that time. I've spoken to each of you personally. We've shared laughter, frank conversations, and the occasional glass of wine. Some of you I've known personally for over a decade. I mention this to remind you that your decisions affect not just businesses and properties on paper, but real people — your neighbors and fellow residents like me. Many of us young people had the option to move elsewhere, to take positions out of state for better pay and more affordable homes. I chose to stay because I love Santa Clarita. My family is here, my career is here, and I believe in this community. This new Mixed -Use Newhall development project presents a complex challenge, and I do not envy your position in having to debate it. But as someone working for a business directly adjacent to the proposed construction, I urge you to consider the very real consequences it will have on KHTS Radio. The reality is that we will be at best inconvenienced, if not outright unable to operate for the entire length of the construction. Based on my experience during the Newhall Crossings construction — when noise from over 600 feet away was disruptive even indoors — I am deeply concerned about our ability to operate, given that this new project directly borders our building. KHTS needs clear, actionable support from both the City and the developer, whether in the form of financial assistance, logistical accommodations, or help with relocation, to ensure we can continue to serve our community without shuttering. Outside of concerns for my continuing employment, I also speak as a 28-year resident who grew up in Santa Clarita and deeply values its history. I'm saddened by how often unique historical sites have been lost to short-sighted development plans. The rushed demolition of the Bonelli Cabins at the Saugus Speedway — a famous example of architectural and cultural significance — is a reminder of what we've lost. Though not a city decision, I find this example especially illustrative of some of the decisions that brought us to this meeting. In this case, I find it troubling that the process leading to the planned demolition of the Old Courthouse has not appeared transparent or consistent with the city's standards for historical evaluation. I sincerely hope that the individuals involved acted in good faith, and I trust the City Council will examine whether proper procedures were followed. Our community deserves a decision rooted in integrity and public accountability. Whether or not the Old Courthouse can be saved is beside the point. The issue at hand is not just preservation but process. History remains, whether buildings stand or not —but our city's respect for its own procedures and values is what defines our legacy today. Thank you for your time and consideration. Yours, Jade Aubuchon April 9, 2025 Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community Dear City of Santa Clarita council members, My name is Olivia, and I am writing to you to request that you please don't disrupt business at KHTS radio as they are my weekly resource for getting al the emergency information in and around the city, especially during fire season. In addition to getting emergency information I am an avid listener to their Senior Hour show on Wednesdays and I look forward to the show every week and the topics that I have been able to relate to and learn from. KHTS has always been a valuable asset to the community and I know many who would be affected if they were to be taken off the air even just temporarily. Thank you for reading. Saugus, CA Aubree Barnett 10:43 AM (4 hours ago) to me To the Santa Clarita City Council Members, I am writing concerning the debated Serrano development in Newhall on Main Street. As a member of the staff at KHTS Radio, I am deeply concerned about the negative impact it will have on our business — a business that has been around for decades and has worked alongside the city of Santa Clarita for the benefit of our Hometown for years. KHTS Radio has been a long-standing institute of news, advertisement, and support of all things Santa Clarita. We operate with a willingness to aid non -profits, Santa Clarita events, local businesses, popular radio shows, and more. However, this new project threatens our ability to continue to serve Santa Clarita organizations, the residents, and you, the City Council. The noise levels would be intolerable and work conditions in our building and others around us on Main Street would decrease in quality, making it difficult for all businesses surrounding the project to operate at their normal rate, if at all. The project does not have a limited projection, but with the size of it, it could take two or more years even to complete. Which means we at the radio station and all the other companies surrounding it will suffer. People will likely lose their jobs and owners will go out of business. Main Street is already short on parking and struggles getting business during the weekdays. This project would decrease the foot traffic even more. Besides the concern to my employment and continuation of the radio station, and survival of surrounding businesses on Main Street, I also express sorrow over the apparent overlooking of the historical courthouse that is going to be destroyed by the making of this project. I hope the City will re-evaluate the historical significance of this building in its history of our great town and give it a fair chance at preservation. It is unfortunate so much of this debate is on your shoulders, and I know the council will take great care in evaluating this situation and what is best for the Santa Clarita residents. As a born - and -raised Santa Clarita resident, I love this city and hope for the best for our local hometown station. Thank you for your consideration and for taking time to read this. Sincerely, Aubree Barnett Regards, Aubree Barnett KHTS Radio - Graphics Dept. hometown station.com aubree.khts(Ebamail.com Santa. Clare "'21 ,oKY.T 'AMolt20welm' 98.1 HOMETOWNSTATION.COM April 11, 2025 Dear City Council Members, I am writing to you on behalf of KHTS Radio to respectfully urge the City of Santa Clarita to reconsider the proposed construction project on Main Street. While we understand and appreciate the importance of infrastructure improvements, this particular project poses a significant challenge to our station and our ability to continue serving the community from our current location. KHTS has been a vital part of the Santa Clarita Valley's media landscape for decades. We have consistently provided timely, accurate, and potentially life-saving information to residents, most notably during the recent Hughes Fire and in past emergencies such as the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Our local news coverage, community engagement, and real-time updates are an essential resource for Santa Clarita residents. Relocating our operations due to construction would come at a substantial financial cost —one that may be too much for us to bear without assistance. Should the City decide to proceed with the project, we respectfully request that support be provided to help KHTS mitigate the cost and impact of relocation. With the City's help, we can continue our mission uninterrupted and remain a cornerstone of the community's communication infrastructure. We hope the City will recognize the critical role KHTS plays in public safety, local news, and community cohesion. We are open to discussing possible solutions and partnerships that would allow the project to move forward while also preserving our ability to serve the people of Santa Clarita. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Steven Barrera KHTS Radio April 11, 2025 To whom it may concern: I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the potential changes to KHTS Radio. As a dedicated listener and supporter, I have greatly valued the unique programming and community connection that this station provides. KHTS Radio has been a vital source of our local news, music, cultural programming and its presence enriches our community in ways that go beyond mere entertainment. The loss of this station would be a significant blow to the diversity and richness of our local media landscape. I urge you to consider the impact that these changes may have on the community and to explore all possible avenues to keep KHTS Radio operational. Whether through fundraising efforts, community partnerships, or other creative solutions, I believe we can find a way to ensure that this invaluable resource continues to serve us all. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing about the steps being taken to preserve KHTS Radio for our community. Sincerely, Sara Coddington 661-803-6982 Avid Listener and Supporter 04/ 12/2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita: I am writing to express my strong support for KHTS — Santa Clarita Radio, a community resource that has been instrumental in being a vital link for reliable, instantaneous news and information in regards to our community and surrounding areas. As a longtime resident of Santa Clarita , I have witnessed firsthand the positive influence this organization has had on our community over the years. KHTS provides essential services such as specialty talk shows on all news, families, health, finance and local characters, a website for latest local news and traffic both of which have helped countless individuals access necessary resources in our community, fostered the sense of community through many events such as "Home and Garden Show", supported local youth development by broadcasting our community college and high school sports. The loss of this organization would create a significant void in our community. I urge you to consider the profound impact KHTS Radio has had in the development of Santa Clarita and to explore all possible avenues to ensure its continued operation. Whether through City Council providing assistance through city funding, community partnerships or helping obtain donations or resources for them to continue business, I believe we can work together to preserve this invaluable resource. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am confident that with collective effort, we can ensure that KHTS continues to serve and enrich our community for years to come. Respectfully, John & Laura Bischop laurabischop@sbcglobal.net 4-14-25 Honorable Councilmembers, The beauty of KHTS is that it is a community partner. It is our radio station! We only have ONE. They step up during natural disasters to give us real time info, share local traffic updates, report on local fires, carry championship high school sporting events, promote our non profits and produce community events. Over the years, Carl and Jeri, KBET and KHTS, have been a powerful force as a business and as community leaders. In the late 90's when Clear Channel purchased the station and left the local format to simulcast LA stations KIIS and XTRA Sports, we missed our hometown station. Several years later the Goldmans had the opportunity to bring it back, so they invested, risked and rebuilt. Now before you is a situation that can involuntarily put them out of business and silence KHTS forever. As elected decision makers, you've been tasked to make sound decisions for us. You've probably heard this sage advice; Never give up an old friend for a new friend, or the grade school song- make new friends but keep the old, one is silver and the other gold. In the name of "progress"you risk the loss of a good business. Please come up with a good compromise that doesn't put one business out so another can come in. Be supportive of both of these businesses. As a business friendly city, please accommodate both ventures fairly. Sincerely, Sharon Bronson Dear Councilmembers, I am a 50 plus year resident of the Santa Clarita Valley. Along with my neighbors, friends and former business associates find the emergency coverage on KHTS vital. Not only has their information always been immediate and accurate, their behind -the - scenes assistance for so many organizations has made them one of the most critical foundations of our valley. It is crucial for our valley to continue to have a radio station. Please find a better arrangement in solving the disruption 2 plus years of construction will cause on the radio station's broadcasts. Thanks for your attention. Sincerely, Monika Bucknall llovepets8@hotmail.com Nancy T. Carnahan to me To the Santa Clarita City Council, 2:42 PM (2 minutes ago) It was brought to my attention that construction will soon begin on a 5-story apartment/retail complex with subterranean parking 1/8 of an inch against the KHTS offices and studios. While that's fantastic news and exciting for the city, I'm shocked that the Radio Station was not given more consideration (and guard rails) before this project was approved. Further, why has the reasonable request to place a moratorium on blasting and coring between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m., Monday through Friday, and 30 minutes for lunch during the station's highest revenue programs fallen on deaf ears? It's pretty apparent to me that the proximity of this construction project would negatively impact a working studio. KHTS has been a model community team player and should be included in the discussions about scheduling activities that would impede the business's operation, which is vital to the community. This is about loyalty, courtesy, and creating a win for all. Thank you to KHTS for years of community leadership. I'm hoping the city will work with the developer to ensure the studio is not impacted any more than it already will be once the construction is completed. It's essential to be a good neighbor. What a terrible and disappointing position the City has put itself in. Nancy T. Carnahan Real Estate Broker To the Santa Clarita City Council, I'm writing as both a resident and a business owner in Santa Clarita to strongly support KHTS and urge the Council to help find a reasonable solution that allows the station to continue operating during the planned construction. KHTS has been part of this community for so many years —my kids grew up with them on the air. They've organized Sacramento and Washington lobbying trips, supported countless local events, and have always gone above and beyond for our city. It would be devastating to even imagine Santa Clarita without our local radio station. KHTS is more than media —it's a pillar of our community. Frankly, I believe most people here would rather keep KHTS than gain another apartment building. I hope you'll take this into serious consideration and do what's necessary to ensure they can stay on the air and continue serving all of us. Sincerely, Inessa Chavez All American Bail Bonds From: Peter Clancey <pclancey(a)pacbell.net> Date: April 15, 2025 at 6.32.40 PM PDT To: info(a)hometownstation.com Subject: Proposed construction I am in favor of the developer of the downtown Newhall project to accede to the requests made by KHTS. This valley needs a local radio voice and KHTS has done a wonderful job in filling that need. I am not saying stop the project, just ensure that KHTS is able to survive the construction period. Respectfully, Peter Clancey April 11, 2025 To whom it may concern: I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the potential changes to KHTS Radio. As a dedicated listener and supporter, I have greatly valued the unique programming and community connection that this station provides. KHTS Radio has been a vital source of our local news, music, cultural programming and its presence enriches our community in ways that go beyond mere entertainment. The loss of this station would be a significant blow to the diversity and richness of our local media landscape. I urge you to consider the impact that these changes may have on the community and to explore all possible avenues to keep KHTS Radio operational. Whether through fundraising efforts, community partnerships, or other creative solutions, I believe we can find a way to ensure that this invaluable resource continues to serve us all. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to hearing about the steps being taken to preserve KHTS Radio for our community. Sincerely, Sara Coddington 661-803-6982 Avid Listener and Supporter 04/ 12/2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita: I am writing to express my strong support for KHTS — Santa Clarita Radio, a community resource that has been instrumental in being a vital link for reliable, instantaneous news and information in regards to our community and surrounding areas. As a longtime resident of Santa Clarita , I have witnessed firsthand the positive influence this organization has had on our community over the years. KHTS provides essential services such as specialty talk shows on all news, families, health, finance and local characters, a website for latest local news and traffic both of which have helped countless individuals access necessary resources in our community, fostered the sense of community through many events such as "Home and Garden Show", supported local youth development by broadcasting our community college and high school sports. The loss of this organization would create a significant void in our community. I urge you to consider the profound impact KHTS Radio has had in the development of Santa Clarita and to explore all possible avenues to ensure its continued operation. Whether through City Council providing assistance through city funding, community partnerships or helping obtain donations or resources for them to continue business, I believe we can work together to preserve this invaluable resource. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I am confident that with collective effort, we can ensure that KHTS continues to serve and enrich our community for years to come. Respectfully, John & Laura Bischop laurabischop@sbcglobal.net DATE: 4-15-25 TO: Santa Clarita City Counsil FROM: Dave Cutchall To Whom it may concern, I am a resident of Santa Clarita since 1986 and KHTS is very important part of my daily life for information. I listen to KHTS every morning while preparing to go to work. The valuable information on community traffic issues, emergencies, and activities in city is unique for a city such as ours. This radio station is a staple of the community and needs to be in operation during construction. As a contractor, I have done many projects over the decades in this city. Compromises are always worked out on projects as far as the construction goes. The City of Santa Clarita planning and building and safety departments are always dictating when construction can be done. I feel the City Counsil should have a say in working out this development with KHTS. This radio station does a lot for the overall wellbeing on behalf of the city. KHTS should be given the respect it deserves in regards to this matter! Thank you for your time. Regards, Dave Cutchall Support for KHTS FM 98.1 & AM 1220 — Our Community Station Deserves Protection and Respect Dear Mayor Miranda and Esteemed Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the treatment of our beloved hometown radio station, KHTS FM 98.1 & AM 1220, particularly in light of recent developments involving Serrano Development Group, Inc. and their new five -story project in Old Town Newhall that is set to displace KHTS from its long-standing location. This move represents more than just a physical relocation —it's a potential blow to one of Santa Clarita's most dedicated community institutions. KHTS has been a trusted voice in our valley for decades, delivering local news, emergency alerts, coverage of nonprofit events, school happenings, small business highlights, and countless community -driven programs. Their role is irreplaceable, and their roots in Old Town Newhall are both historic and meaningful. The fact that a development project is moving forward in a way that could push out such a valued local voice, without a clear, public effort to protect or support them, is deeply troubling. This situation gives the appearance that corporate interests are being prioritized over community interests, and that local legacy institutions like KHTS are being overlooked. I urge the City Council to intervene, mediate, and advocate on behalf of KHTS. Whether that means assisting them in securing a comparable and visible new location, providing financial or logistical support during their transition, or reevaluating how future development affects cornerstone local businesses —something must be done to ensure KHTS is not left behind or pushed out. Santa Clarita has always prided itself on being a close-knit, community -first city. If we truly value that identity, then we must show it in how we treat the institutions that have served and uplifted our community for so long. Thank you for your time and for considering the very real concerns of residents who stand behind KHTS and the vital role they play in our city. Sincerely, Andrew Delgado Proud Santa Clarita Resident Support for KHTS FM 98.1 & AM 1220 — A Valued Voice in Our Community Dear Mayor and Esteemed Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing as a concerned resident and passionate supporter of local media to bring to your attention the growing concerns surrounding the treatment of our local radio station, KHTS FM 98.1 & AM 1220. KHTS is more than just a radio station. It is a pillar of the Santa Clarita community, serving as a reliable source for local news, emergency updates, community events, and hometown stories that rarely make it to larger media outlets. Their commitment to uplifting small businesses, nonprofits, schools, and community voices is something that sets them apart in an increasingly disconnected media landscape. KHTS has consistently gone above and beyond for Santa Clarita—broadcasting critical updates during wildfires, championing local heroes, and giving air time to issues that directly affect our families and neighborhoods. Their presence helps keep our city informed, connected, and proud. Local media is a community lifeline, and KHTS has proven time and time again that they are committed to Santa Clarita. It's time we show that commitment back. Thank you for your time, your service to our city, and your attention to this matter. Respectfully, Gil & Margaret Delgado Proud Resident of Santa Clarita April 14, 2025 Dear Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express the importance of maintaining a dedicated local radio station in Santa Clarita which is being threatened by the plans to construct more apartments and retails store on Main Street in Newhall. With the upcoming construction, this could put a huge strain on our business and affect how we push out our radio frequencies to the people of our community. As our city continues to grow and thrive, the need for a trusted, centralized source of local news, emergency updates, community events, and cultural programming becomes ever more essential. KHTS serves as a vital communication hub. In times of emergency — such as wildfires, earthquakes, or other natural disasters — real-time, localized information can make the difference between safety and tragedy. National or regional broadcasters cannot provide the same timely, specific information like we can and do. Beyond emergencies, KHTS offers a platform for the many voices of our community - from local artists and musicians to business owners, nonprofits, and civic leaders. We promote local culture and create a deeper sense of connection among residents. College students could gain valuable experience through internships and volunteer opportunities, developing skills in journalism, broadcasting, and public speaking. In an era when so much media is distant and disconnected, a local voice is more important than ever. I respectfully urge you to prioritize and support KHTS Radio if this construction project is approved. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Louie Diaz April 14, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council, this is Tom Dierckman. With regard to construction of the 5 story building abutting the spaces occupied by our local radio station, KHTS, I respectfully request that you give careful consideration to and agree to require the developer of the 5 story building to mitigate the impact of construction on the station's ability to broadcast quality programming as the station has requested. KHTS provides an essential service to our community, one that is widely relied upon by so many of our city's residents. Thank you for your support of this request. Sent from my Phone GENE DORIO, M.D. Geriatric & Internal Medicine 23823 Valencia Blvd., Suite 230 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 661 254-5554 (fax) 661 254-0017 April 2, 2025 Dear City Council I am writing on behalf of KHTS Radio in Santa Clarita to support their efforts in being a vital part of our community. For over two decades, as co -host of The Senior Hour, our voice for older adults has resonated from the KHTS studio microphones, advising seniors on health and financial matters, as well as providing emergency information to the community during times affected by fires and earthquakes. A proposal to build a 5-story apartment and retail complex with underground parking next to the KHTS studios is currently under review by the City Council. Unfortunately, this will impact daily broadcast operations, hindering Santa Clarita's main voice. This will affect not only The Senior Hour but also other voices that should be heard, which unite us as a community. Certainly, a project like this is needed in Santa Clarita, but it should not negatively impact a vital asset, driving it out of the community it serves. Please find a viable alternative allowing KHTS to continue contributing as the heart and soul of our community. Thankyou. Gene Dorio, M.D. Michael R Dougherty <mikeandmary7@hotmail.com> 8:01 AM (8 hours ago) to info@hometownstation.com Hello KHTS: Just read the editorial about the new development in downtown Newhall. Given all that KHTS has done, and is doing for the City of Santa Clarita, it's so sad to learn that the City is willing to sacrifice KHTS for a new development. Having to move your studio and add soundproofing because of construction noise. Traffic and parking issues as well. KHTS relocated to downtown Newhall at a time when the city was working to upgrade that part of town. How quickly they forget. We support you, and wish you all the best, Mike and Mary Dougherty From: kc6esw(cDaol.com Date: April 16, 2025 at 1.55.08 PM PDT To: jeriseratti(a�gmail.com Subject: letter As a resident of Santa Clarita, My wife and I have been listeners of KHTS for many years. 98.1 FM - 1220 AM has always been the voice of Santa Clarita and a huge souce for local news, traffic conditions and weather and sports. During emergencies, such as fired and such, KHTS is the local go -to for residents during evacuations, road closures and other important news. KHTS Radio has been a huge assist getting the word out about our many non profit organizations here in the Santa Clarita Valley as well as being available for city sponsored events. Our schools also depend on KHTS for airing local high school football games. KHTS is Santa Clarita's Hometown Station and the only local station here. Residents of Santa Clarita have depend on it for local programing. Michael Dowler To the Santa Clarita City Council, As the founder of Finally Family Homes, a nonprofit organization serving youth experiencing homelessness and those who have aged out of foster care in the Santa Clarita Valley, I want to express my strong support for KHTS and the vital role they play in our community. KHTS has been a generous sponsor and supporter of our mission, consistently uplifting local nonprofits, small businesses, and families through their broadcasting and community engagement. Their ability to operate without disruption is crucial —not just for their survival, but for the many local organizations and residents who rely on them as a trusted voice in Santa Clarita. While we understand the value of development, we believe reasonable accommodations must be made to preserve essential local institutions like KHTS. We respectfully urge the City Council to support a compromise that allows construction to continue while also ensuring KHTS can operate during their key broadcast hours. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Christina Dronen Executive Director _ Finally Family Homes FINALLY FAMILY 661-347-8502 H O M E S https://finallVfamilVhomes.org Nam "aid ro, o Fam Partnering with Young Adults to Overcome Adversity and Achieve Success To the City Council of Santa Clarita; KHTS radio has given us tremendous minute by minute updates on local Santa Clarita news for years. They have been incredible partners to me as a President of Top Entertainment, providing support by keeping the community aware of events like Summer Breeze Music Festival. KHTS role in the growth of my business has been significant. I fully support any efforts offered that would allow Carl and Jeri Goldman to continue their operation without any disruptions from the new construction. Please give this request your consideration. We need KHTS in Santa Clarita. Thank you Sincerely, Terrell Edwards/ Top Entertainment Www.terrelledwardsmusic.com 4-15-25 Support our Local Radio Station. KHTS under the leadership of Carl and Jeri have for decades been there for the Santa Clarita community. I first met them on January 18, 1994, as we were all trying to figure out what to do after the Northridge Earthquake. The radio station was the only source of reliable information for emergency services. I began working for FEMA as a volunteer lawyer. Carl and Jeri promoted the services Santa Clarita local lawyers (there were only a hand full of us then) were doing so thousands of our neighbors could get help. When there's been fires and freeway closures, our local radio station, KHTS and Carl and Jeri have been there as the only resource for news. When the economy collapsed in 2008, Carl and I collaborated to do a radio show providing our neighbors with reliable information and where to find the resources to get through the economic crisis. I was offering and continue to offer bankruptcy information and filings for people. I've helped thousands in our community with Carl and Jeri's support in doing so. Carl and Jeri and their radio station, not any developer, have been there for Santa Clarita. It's time we thank them by supporting them against the Newhall developer and their surrogates on the Santa Clarita City Council. Thank you Carl and Jeri and KHTS. Lou Esbin Sent from my Phone From: Nancy Fairbanks <nwfairbanks(a)gmail.com> Date: April 15, 2025 at 9.19.52 PM PDT To: Ken Striplin<kstriplin(a�santa-clarita.com>, City Council <citycouncil(c�santa- clarita.com>, Jeri Seratti-Goldman <leriseratti(a)gmail.com>, carl(a)hometownstation.com, Frank Oviedo <foviedo(a�santa- clarita.com> Subject: The Goldman's Noise Concern Dear Santa Clarita Officials, Carl and Jeri, would first like to address the Goldmans' concerns regarding a perceived 'backdoor deal' involving City Councilwoman Laurene Weste's negotiation of a $750,000 fee with Serrano Development Group for the demolition of the 1931 courthouse. This matter deserves a respectful and factual discussion, as outlined below: Legal Compliance: Weste's actions align with California law: Political Reform Act of 1974 (Gov. Code § 87100 et seq.): This prohibits officials from making decisions for personal financial gain. Weste negotiated the fee for public benefit — possibly to fund preservation or community projects —not personal gain, and no evidence suggests a conflict of interest. Brown Act (Gov. Code § 54950 et seq.): This allows closed - session negotiations for real property or contracts, a common practice to protect the city's position. Weste's discussions with the developer fall within this exception. There is no indication of legal violations or personal benefit. The $750,000 fee appears to be a strategic effort to secure public value, not an illicit deal. While moral and ethical perspectives are subjective and individual choices, transparency concerns are valid. Absent legal violations, I respectfully suggest that this issue need not remain a focal point of criticism, allowing focus to shift to the project's direct impacts on KHTS. I also submitted an article to The Signal hoping to resolve the community's concerns. Addressing Concerns Regarding the Newhall Mixed -Use Project and Its Impact on KHTS Radio Station The Goldmans, as property owners and business operators, have several legal rights under California law and municipal regulations such as: the right to quiet enjoyment. Under California property law, tenants and property owners have the right to quiet enjoyment, meaning they cannot be subjected to unreasonable interference that disrupts their use of the property. Excessive construction noise that disrupts broadcasting could violate this right, especially if it exceeds municipal noise limits. The city's noise ordinance is codified in Chapter 11.44 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code, The ordinance is current through Ordinance 24-4, passed on June 25, 2024. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, residents are encouraged to contact the City Clerk's Office at (661) 284-1405. This table summarizes the base decibels limit. More information is accessible online at Santa Clarita Municipal Code. Residential zone Day 65 Residential zone Night 55 Commercial and manufacturing Night 80 Commercial and manufacturing Day 70 Anyone can file complaints with the city and the Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff Station, which handles non -emergency reports like loud noises (contact number: (661) 260- 4000, as per city resources). The city has the authority to approve development projects under its zoning laws, building codes, and general plan. The Newhall Crossings project, if compliant, can proceed, as evidenced by its listing on the planning division's website (City of Santa Clarita Planning Division - Major Development Projects). The city must enforce its noise ordinance to protect residents and businesses from excessive noise. If construction violates the ordinance, the city can impose penalties, require mitigation, or halt activities until compliance is achieved. The city must balance the rights of developers to build approved projects with the rights of existing businesses like KHTS. This includes considering environmental impacts, such as noise, through public hearings and environmental reviews, as part of its duty to promote public welfare. The city must weigh the developer's rights against those of existing businesses, ensuring impacts like noise are mitigated per environmental review processes (e.g., California Environmental Quality Act, CEQA). Santa Clarita must ensure the project complies with zoning laws, building codes, and the noise ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 11.44). This is information for Jerry Tolleson of the Serrano Development Group Inc. The Newhall Metrolink Station, over 300 feet from KHTS, generates typical train noise of approximately 64-70 decibels at that distance, within the city's 70-decibel daytime limit for commercial zones. Horns may reach 91 decibels but are less frequent and directional. Based on this information, the law appears to favor Carl and Geri Goldman, as construction noise (90-114 decibels) likely exceeds Santa Clarita's noise ordinance (70 decibels for office buildings), potentially violating their right to quiet enjoyment under California law. Serrano Development needs to work with the City of Santa Clarita to mitigate noise impacts to avoid litigation, fines, or penalties for ordinance violations. The city must enforce its noise regulations and balance development with protecting local businesses like KHTS, potentially requiring mitigation or relocation support. For decades, the Goldmans and KHTS have been integral to Santa Clarita's local media landscape. Protecting their operations while advancing the Newhall Mixed -Use Project is both equitable and beneficial to our community. I respectfully urge the city and Serrano Development Group to implement noise mitigation measures or provide relocation support to ensure KHTS's continued success. Thank you for your consideration; I trust the city will act decisively to achieve a favorable resolution for all parties. Thank you for your consideration. I am confident the city will take appropriate steps to address these concerns and achieve a favorable outcome. Nancy Fairbanks Vicki Fayne <vicki@redsiron.com> to info Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I am asking the great City Council to reconsider this apartment building which would not only affects our beloved KHTS, a historical building, and Old Downtown Newhall. It is already a dangerous and deadly intersection for pedestrians and vehicles alike. There isn't enough parking for all the venues that we currently have. Please reconsider, as a homeowner in Newhall, we don't need another 78 apartments in downtown Newhall. Traffic is horrible as it is. Thank you, Vicki Fayne 1:59 PM (2 hours ago) 4/4/25, 4:53 AM Fwd: In Support of KHTS - carlkhts@gmail.com - Gmail Gmail Q Search mail 0 Q 11 EJ d Begin forwarded message: 'y} From: Donna Fink <donnafink661 a gmaii.corp Date: April 3, 2025 at 7:51:17 PM PDT © To: jerisera=gmail.com D Subject: In Support of KHTS To the members of the Santa Clarita City Council i� 1 of 2,424. I have lived in Canyon Country for decades. KHTS has'been an essential asset to the Santa Clarita community. For example the emergency information that KHTS aired after the Northridge Earthquake was very essential during my commute to the San Fernando Valley where I worked as a critical care nurse for Kaiser hospital in Panorama City. It was very assuring to know what was happening in Santa Clarita with the excellent local coverage that KHTS provided. On July 23rd, 2016 1 experienced the Sand Fire that burned down my home and destroyed my vehicles. Unforgettably the fire took my dearest friend and some of my pets as well. After the fire I was in a crisis and was overwhelmed with grief. The Santa Clarita Disaster Coalition (founded by KHTS in unison with the community) contacted me and was a ray of sunshine in the darkness that had encompassed me. They assisted me in finding a place to live and finding a kennel for my surviving dogs. They helped and supported me in many different ways to include with emotional and mental support and financially as well. KHTS and the Santa Clarita Disaster Coalition helped me get through the crisis. I can't imagine a Santa Clarita without KHTS. Sincerely, Donna Fink Get ' ...,-uns https://mail.google. com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzQZTzXvtBHkgCxZXgmVcCbkDvd 1 /1 412/25, 7:26 PM Gmail - Re city council meeting Re city council meeting Jasmine Foster <jasmine.foster1011 @gmail.com> To: Carl Goldman <carl@hometownstation.com>, Jeri Seratti <Jeriseratti@aol.com> Carl Goldman <carlkhts@gmaii.com> Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 4:54 PM Before retiring last January, I was employed with College of the Canyons as the Director of Community Relations for 17 years. KHTS has been a most valuable supporter of our local college helping to promote all educational programs and opportunities, cultural events, free classes, technical training and all other career paths offered by the college. They helped highlight education for first time and returning to college students! KHTS Is a vital part of this community and our residents depend on them to stay informed on local matters in good times and in uncertain times. Our community depends on KHTS and has for many decades and I trust they can continue to do so uninterrupted for many more decades. Jasmine Napoli Foster not been for their continued support and partnership. Sent from my Pad https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=0410d22d34&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1828337034111534529&simpl=msg-f:1828337034111534529 1 /1 Good Morning Mayor Miranda and Santa Clarita City Council Members, It has been recently been brought to my attention the City is considering a plan to put a new mixed use building in the Old Town Newhall area. I love what the City has done with this part of town over the last 20 years. The library is beautiful and the new restaurants , shops and bars in the area are a really great addition to the community. commend you all on a job well done for the City of Santa Clarita. I have learned there is a new mixed project the City is considering for that area. The construction of this project will potentially interfere with the operations of KHTS, one of our community's strongest partners. KHTS is our family's go -to source for Dodger games on the radio when we are in the car. KHTS, Hometown Station online is our primary source of information when we are trying to find out.what is happening in our city. In addition, KHTS is always major supporters of events like the annual Home and Garden show, the Fourth of July Parade and many other important events that happen in our community. I know from first hand experience how generous the Goldmans have been with their time and their resources for community groups like mine. The owners of KHTS have submitted a very reasonable list of requests to the City Council, that they would like to have the developer cover. These requests will help keep their business operational as this project gets underway. It is important to bring in new business opportunities to Santa Clarita, but it is just as important to be responsive to the needs to the businesses that are already here. Especially, the businesses like KHTS that have done so very much for our City! I strongly encourage you to review the Goldman's request for KHTS and do everything possible to mitigate the negative impact the new construction will have on their business. Respectfully, Karen Frost Saugus 818) 602-3625 April 8, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita council members: I'm writing to you to ask that you do not build on the site where the radio station and other historic buildings are. have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio. These days with all the technology transferring to streaming platforms only, (including local television), listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information on a daily basis. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Sincerely, Olivia G. Friendly Valley Miim, GARCIA M13miir,ri ar C;caNC,1?r8ti 3 April 2025 Dear City Councilmembers, As our former Congressman, l have personally experienced the vital impact KHTS radio has had in Santa Clarita for decades. Not only has their information been immediate and vital, through their behind -the -scenes assistance they've become one of the critical foundations of our valley. It is crucial for our Valley to continue to have a radio station. l appeal to you to create a fair solution for the radio station to solve the disruption the proposed Sorreno project will cause with their ability to broadcast. Unimpeded access and delivery of this critical media in SCV is vital. Thanks for your attention on this very special matter. Very Respectfully, Mike Garcia Former Member, US House of Representatives YAIO 1`9314 11Y MACH GA.RCIA F[?R CC3Nli ]t 6i:F dM Susan Gray <sgray003@socal.rr.com> to info Honorable council members: Tue, Apr 15, 10:52 PM (6 hours ago) I am writing you to consider not silencing KHTS radio station and take care of them so that they will be able to continue operation during this construction. They have been a value to this community during the earthquake along with every other incident that we have had out here. Was there any consideration of the historical Courthouse and if that could be moved or the impact of Old Town Newhall and how this will impact the traffic and the charm of Main Street? So sorry the people of the community cannot comment on this decision. The parking is bad enough now and with apartments in this area it will not be good. Please take care of our beloved hometown station to make sure they do not go silent and make this an easy transition for them. Listen to what they require in order to make this work for them. Thank you. S.Gray a longtime resident of Santa Clarita Sent from my iPhone March 31, 2025 Diane and Neal Green 16120 Live Oak Springs Canyon Road Canyon Country, CA 91387 Members of the City Council City of Santa Clarita City Hall 23920 Valencia Blvd #120 Valencia, CA 91355 Dear Members of the City Council: We are writing in support of KHTS, Our Hometown Station. We have been fortunate to call the Santa Clarita Valley our home for forty years, since January 1985, and business owners since 1983. KHTS has been a vital heartbeat of the Santa Clarita Valley since its inception in June 1989, providing local and national news, a calendar of local community events, newsletters, thoughtful and intelligent, controversial current affair editorials and more importantly, KHTS has provided a lifeline to residents during times of local natural disasters and personal challenges. One of the most unique qualities of KHTS is the intimate relationship this radio station, and their owners, Jeri Seratti-Goldman and Carl Goldman, have with members of the community. Decades of unwavering support, unsolicited support, for non-profit stakeholders, private individuals seeking assistance after suffering a tragedy, spearheading projects that enrich the safety, protection, and welfare for all citizens in this community by expanding critical resources in the Santa Clarita Valley and so much more. The history of their contributions to our community is too vast to enumerate in this short letter of support but rest assured that KHTS has set the bar high in terms of loyalty and selfless assistance to the residents of the Santa Clarita Valley. We are strongly concerned and disheartened, on a personal and professional level, and find it unfathomable that the future of operations for KHTS is in j eopardy and urge the members of the City Council to protect this local treasure. Respectfully, Diane Green Neal Green April 3, 2025 Dr. Neal C Green 27141 Hidaway Avenue, Suite 201 Canyon Country, CA 91351 Member of the City Council City of Santa Clarita City Hall 23920 Valencia Blvd #120 Valencia, CA 91355 Dear Members of the City Council: I opened my dental practice in the Santa Clarita Valley in July 1983. For over forty years, I have been privileged in treating thousands of patients and provided employment for members of the community as both valued dental assistants and front office employees. Additionally, I have had the honor to give back to residents by donating my time and resources to free dental clinics for those in need that originated from within KHTS. My relationship with our only local radio station spans decades. I have worked with KHTS to expand my exposure and reach within the Santa Clarita Valley to increase my new patient flow. Their expertise and guidance has been unmatched in both visibility and positive results. KHTS is an integral and irreplaceable component in the strength of the foundation of this community and I find it an unsettling sign of the times that local leaders are not working to support KHTS and their continued service to the Santa Clarita Valley. Respectfully, Dr. Neal C Green 4-15-25 Dear Santa Clarita City Council, My name is Dr. Harleen Grewal, and I am writing to express my support for allowing KHTS to continue broadcasting during the construction of the new five -story development next to their building. While I fully support the project and the positive growth it brings to our city, I respectfully ask that the developer accommodate KHTS's request for a moratorium on blasting and coring between 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM on weekdays and a short break during lunchtime. These are critical hours for their highest -revenue programming, which serves an important role in our community. Additionally, I support their request to have the developer cover the cost of relocating their studios and offices to the quieter side of the building. This seems like a fair and reasonable compromise that supports both progress and a valued local business. Sincerely, Dr. Harleen Grewal Sent from my Phone April 5, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd., #120 Valencia, CA 91355 RE: Impact of Construction Near KHTS Radio Station Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I hope this letter finds you well. My name is Bradley Grose, and I am the Executive Director of Santa Clarita Grocery Food Bank. As we celebrate our 7th year of serving our community, we are committed to alleviating food insecurity in our area. What many may not realize is that, beyond the groceries we provide, much of our day-to-day operations rely on a small but dedicated team of volunteers. This includes the staff at KHTS, who generously donate their time to help us with vital services such as website management, social media outreach, and bookkeeping. Additionally, KHTS acts as a key sponsor for our food drives and provides crucial backup storage space behind their radio station. It has come to our attention that a new development is planned on Main Street, directly adjacent to the KHTS building. Given the nature of the construction, which involves extensive digging for two levels of parking just 15 feet from the KHTS walls, we are deeply concerned about the potential impact on both KHTS's operations and, by extension, the services we are able to offer through our food bank. As a long-time listener of KHTS and a dedicated member of this community, I am at a loss as to how we will be able to maintain our services if KHTS is temporarily unable to operate due to the construction. We rely on their support for everything from outreach to storage, and this disruption would significantly hinder our ability to continue our mission of helping those in need. We would greatly appreciate any guidance or assistance the City can provide in navigating this situation and finding a solution that ensures the continued success of both KHTS and the Santa Clarita Grocery Food Bank. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to your support as we work together to serve our community. Sincerely, Bradley Grose Founder / Executive Director Santa Clarita Grocery Foodbank rYanta aa&a q" FED TAX ID#: 46-386-7801 21176 Centre Pointe Parkway, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, CA 91350 Tel 661-425-7575 Michael Guinan <portermike.guinan@gmail.com> 3:08 AM (2 hours ago) to info The radio station is of value to the community. You need the radio station during emergency like the 1994 earthquake. Also when there are wild fires or major problems on the freeways to let the citizens know how to get around the accident Please reass the choices you are doing the city. A radio station is good for everyone. This is the wrong project for the city. Michael Guinan I have lived here since 1974 Jerry Hahn <jerryhahn@gmail.com> to info Tue, Apr 15, 5:11 PM (12 hours ago) Work it out. Common sence.. In the words of Frank Lottabucks: "Why can't we all get along" BE KIND. Everyone you know or meet is fighting a battle you know nothing about. Timothy Henry 25966 Sand Canyon Road Santa Clarita, CA timhenry@turnkee.com (661)313-6198 April 14, 2025 To the City of Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my strong support for KHTS Radio (AM 1220/FM 98.1) as it continues to serve as a vital resource and unifying force for the Santa Clarita Valley community. KHTS is far more than just a radio station —it is a cornerstone of our community, providing essential news, emergency alerts, and opportunities for civic engagement. During critical events such as the Northridge Earthquake and numerous wildfires, KHTS offered life-saving information in real time. Its commitment to emergency communication is unmatched and irreplaceable, especially in a region susceptible to natural disasters. Beyond emergencies, KHTS consistently uplifts the community through local news coverage, talk shows on health, education, and public affairs, and by hosting large-scale community events like the Home & Garden Show and the Earth Day/Arbor Day celebration. These initiatives not only strengthen local businesses but also foster a sense of unity and pride among residents. The station's advocacy work —organizing annual trips to Sacramento and Washington, D.C.— demonstrates its dedication to amplifying Santa Clarita's voice at the state and national level. Furthermore, its creation of the Santa Clarita Valley Disaster Coalition proves its long-term commitment to public safety and resilience. Santa Clarita is stronger, safer, and more connected because of KHTS Radio. I urge you to support the continued operation of this invaluable station. S' cerely, f Timothy Henry Chris Hoefflin 18850 Laurel Crest Lane Canyon Country, CA 91351 661-993-0905 City Council City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Subject: Proposed Redevelopment Project in Old Town Newhall at Market and Main Streets Dear Honorable City Council Members, I am writing to express both my support for the proposed redevelopment project in Old Town Newhall and my concerns regarding potential detrimental impacts during construction. I am grateful to the City of Santa Clarita for the remarkable transformation of Old Town Newhall and I'm pleased to see that planning is underway for Market Street and Main Street. I am very concerned, however, to learn that KHTS Radio - an important business located next to the proposed construction site - could be substantially harmed during construction if mitigating measures are not provided for their operations. During the thirty-five years I have lived in Santa Clarita I have relied upon our valley's radio station for local news and entertainment. It has been a crucial resource during disasters and local tragedies. I have known the owners for virtually all of those years and have admired their commitment to, and investment in, the Santa Clarita Valley community through their radio station and personal involvement. Their continued efforts to assist and support local businesses and nonprofit organizations is vital to many, including the Michael Hoefflin Foundation for Children's Cancer. Considering that KHTS is a significant and vitally important member of our community, I feel they are deserving of your special consideration for protection should the plans for Old Town Newhall present a danger to their operations and continued success. Thank you for hearing my voice in this matter. Chris Hoefflin Creating Clients far a Lifetime A radio business, KHTS, that actively supports the community and nonprofits is more than just a source of entertainment —it is a vital lifeline that amplifies important messages, connects people, and fosters positive change. Unlike commercial stations that prioritize profit, community -focused radio provides a platform for local nonprofits, small businesses, and individuals to share their causes, events, and services. It raises awareness about critical social issues, promotes volunteer opportunities, and helps organizations gain the support they need to thrive. Without such a resource, many smaller nonprofits and grassroots efforts would struggle to reach the public, making it harder for them to fulfill their missions. Keeping a community -driven radio station, KHTS, in business ensures that important voices continue to be heard and that local stories do not get overshadowed by national or corporate -driven content. These stations create a sense of unity by featuring local talent, discussing community concerns, and offering a space for dialogue and education. Their ability to provide emergency alerts, cultural programming, and public service announcements further cements their role as an essential public service. If this station were to disappear, or be unable to continue the loss would be felt not only by nonprofits but by the entire community that depends on their advocacy, support, and engagement DR #: 01194454 WMW OF SANTA CLARITA Indepandanl Y Owned end Op—t=d April 2, 2025 Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community Dear City of Santa Clarita council members: I'm writing to you today to ask that you please reconsider the removal/re- location of KHTS Radio that may disrupt business or take them off the air. have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio. These days with all the informational technology transferring to streaming platforms only, including local television, listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Sincerely, Debby K. Saugus, CA K KELLSTROM REAL ESTATE GROUP THE COMMUNITY'S AGENTS [NextHOme> I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to express my wholehearted support for KHTS 1220 and to acknowledge the invaluable contributions the station has made to our community over years. KHTS 1220 has consistently provided a platform for local voices, fostering a sense of connection and belonging among residents. The station's commitment to covering local news, events, and issues keeps us informed and engaged in matters that affect our lives. The radio station programming not only entertains but also educates and empowers listeners, creating an informed community that is ready to take action. Moreover, I would like to highlight how KHTS has supported local initiatives and organizations. Whether it's promoting local businesses, featuring non -profits, or hosting community events, the station has played a significant role in strengthening our local economy and enhancing our community spirit. The generosity of the station's team in giving airtime and resources facilitates connections that contribute to our collective well-being. As someone who deeply appreciates KHTS's impact on our community, I also want to express my gratitude for the support you have shown me personally. Their willingness to share my story and provide a platform for my endeavors has made a profound difference in myjourney as a man, business owner, and community leader. It is this kind of support that empowers individuals to strive for their goals, knowing that they have a voice and a community behind them. Thank you for all that you do at KHTS 1220. 1 wholeheartedly endorse your continued efforts in serving our community and encourage others to recognize and support the incredible work being done at the station. Sincerely, Taylor Kellstrom Kellstrom Real Estate Group April 7, 2025 ` Santa Clarita City Council, I have been a resident of Santa Clarita since 1976. I am currently in Sand Canyon and have lived their since 1985. 1 had the pleasure meeting the Goldman's that same year. Their radio station has been instrumental in keeping me informed about the news/local news. Besides myself I have numerous friends that listen to this station. Our radio station has been critical during our 1994 earthquake, many fires and floods I've survived over the decades. I was also part of the original team that helped form the Michael Hoefflin Foundation. The Goldman's and Hoefflin's were anchors in getting that started. The radio station has been very generous and helpful with our many local non -profits. The station not only donates and gives free air time for promoting non -profits; the Goldman's also physically help where they can. It would be a tragedy for Santa Clarita to no longer have a radio station that has been part of our community for many years. Surely you can find a solution. Sincerely, 15445 Saddleback Road Santa Clarita, CA 91387 RJK <rjkdds@att.net> Tue, Apr 15, 5:55 PM (11 hours ago) to info@hometownstation.com Ive been reading of the proposed construction next door to KHTS radio and the negative affect it will be to broadcasting due to the noise which cant easily be mitigated. Some solutions to move the studio to the far side of the building seems reasonable as well as proposals to halt construction during early morning hours. Serrano Developers should cover the cost of relocating the studio and agree to the silent hours of construction The necessity of maintaining KHTS as a valuable addition and resource to Santa Clarita must be continued. A compromise has been suggested by KHTS which is a minor expense for the developer, compared to the major cost of construction by Serrano Development. implore the City Council of SCV not to silence KHTS Robert Kogen From: RJK <r!kdds() att.r.ret> Date: Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 5:58 PM Subject: Re: Construction near KHTS radio To: info(o)hometownstation.com <info(o)hometownstation.com> To: Santa Clarita Valley City Council Ive been reading of the proposed construction next door to KHTS radio and the negative affect it will be to broadcasting due to the noise which cant easily be mitigated. Some solutions to move the studio to the far side of the building seems reasonable as well as proposals to halt construction during early morning hours. Serrano Developers should cover the cost of relocating the studio and agree to the silent hours of construction The necessity of maintaining KHTS as a valuable addition and resource to Santa Clarita must be continued. A compromise has been suggested by KHTS which is a minor expense for the developer, compared to the major cost of construction by Serrano Development. implore the City Council of SCV not to silence KHTS Robert Kogen April 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita council members: As only a 15 year resident of Santa Clarita, I would like to request that you do not tear down the historic buildings in OTN to build the new apartments and parking structure, that would disrupt business at KHTS radio. discovered KHTS while on a run on Soledad Canyon Road back in 2012. saw their neon sign and tuned into AM 1220 as soon as I got home. discovered "The Cat Doctor" and "Cinema Vet" because of the ads ran on KHTS and have been taking my pets to them ever since. Advertising does work! also find out about all the local events from them such as the free Concerts In The Park, local races, and the yearly Saugus Boutique just to name a few. Also, KHTS was (and still is) my first employer since moving to Santa Clarita. Please reconsider building in that historic location. Thank you! Lori Kozik Canyon Country, CA Kim Kurowski 22164 Barbacoa Dr Santa Clarita, CA 91350 Dear Honorable Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing as a concerned and engaged member of the community for over 40 years to express my disappointment and confusion regarding the treatment of KHTS and their current position on Main St. As a business and community presence before 1994, KHTS has not only provided consistent support and service to Santa Clarita but has also played a vital role during times of crisis- most notably, during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake, when they were the only local message service able to maintain communication for our area. It is disheartening to learn that, despite their longstanding contributions and support of this city. KHTS is receiving little to no assistance in dealing with developers who appear unwilling to work with them. A business that has stood by this community for decades, through growth and hardship alike, should not be left behind or pushed aside, especially when development interests take center stage. I urge the Council to revisit this issue and find a way to support KHTS in maintaining their place in the community they have served so loyally. Collaboration between developers, city officials, and community businesses should be a cornerstone of out city's growth- not a casualty of it. Thank you for your time and continued service to our wonderful City. Sincerely, Kim Kurowski April 3, 2025 To whom it may concern: Focus Physical Therapy has been using KHTS for over four years now to help with marketing and promotion. Focus Physical Therapy opened in July 2019 as a startup new practice and utilizing new technology that was not widely known. KHTS has played a pivotal role in helping Focus Physical Therapy grow its business by providing valuable exposure to the Santa Clarita community. Through on -air interviews, digital advertising, and features on the KHTS website and social media, Focus Physical Therapy has been able to reach a broader audience and connect with potential patients who may not have discovered the clinic otherwise. This increased visibility has helped build credibility and trust within the local community, allowing the clinic to stand out in a competitive healthcare market. In addition to marketing support, KHTS has helped amplify Focus Physical Therapy's mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care while using cutting edge technology. By sharing success stories, patient testimonials, and expert advice through KHTS platforms, the clinic has positioned itself as a trusted resource for physical therapy and wellness in the Santa Clarita Valley. As a result, Focus Physical Therapy has seen a steady increase in new patient referrals and greater community engagement, both of which have been key drivers of its continued growth. I definitely recommend KHTS as a great resource for helping your business grow. Sincerely, Adam- �),PT, MSPT, CHC Owner/CEO Focus Physical Therapy April 12, 2025 To the Santa Clarita City Council, KHTS has been a staple in our community that has supported small businesses, and citizens of Santa Clarita. I myself have a small business. KHTS has been integral in helping me network within my community. I wouldn't have been able to grow and reach the number of people I was able to reach and support without the support of this Radio Station. At this time, we really need to support them. The development that is proposed is going to have negative ramifications to their ability to continue to do what they do. That is going to result in business owners and the citizens of Santa Clarita, losing a huge asset that our community needs. Well, gentrification and development is important to the continued growth of the community, we must make these decisions without harming businesses that gives so much to the community. Please help KHTS get through this development phase and get the support. They need to continue doing what they do. This way they'll continue to give back to Santa Clarita, the community, and the small businesses that make this community thrive. Thank you for supporting the gems that make our community great. Dr. Megan LeCornu Sent from my iPhone From: W. J. Lee" <m0lee4863Ca)gmail.com> Date: April 15, 2025 at 5.08.20 PM PDT To: info(a)hometownstation.com Subject: Proposed Development at Market and Railroad TO: Santa Clarita City Council I am writing to state my opposition to the proposed 5-story development at Market Street and Railroad Avenue. My concerns are: 1) 5-stories is too high for the area. 2) The impact on local businesses, especially KHTS - Santa Clarita - Hometownstation, will be devastating. The developer refuses to offset the cost of their internal move. If the project is approved the City should pay that or work with the developer to offset the cost. This local radio station is far too valuable to the community to force them into silence. 3) Parking is already a huge problem. So much so that I avoid Old Town Newhall whenever possible. 4) Closing a lane on Railroad Avenue for the duration of construction is not acceptable. It's too congested as it is. 5) Destroying the historic courthouse is not acceptable. There must be an alternative to destruction. 6) Given the unscrupulous backroom deals by Laurene Weste, that alone, should render this project not qualified for approval. Thank you, M. J. Lee 04/16/2025 To the Santa Clarita City Council, My name is Sophia Lesseos, and I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the potential impact of the Serrano Development Group's proposed construction project adjacent to KHTS Radio in Old Town Newhall. I've been a journalist for over six years and have seen firsthand the vital role that local news plays in building strong, informed, and connected communities. KHTS Radio is a shining example of that. I began my journey with the station as an intern back in 2019, and today, I am proud to serve as a News Reporter. This station is more than just a job to me, it's a place where I've grown, and more importantly, a platform that brings real, meaningful value to Santa Clarita. KHTS is a cornerstone of this community. Whether it's breaking news, emergency updates, traffic and weather alerts, or highlighting the people and events that make Santa Clarita special, this station is always there. I've witnessed the incredible impact local news coverage has during fires, floods, or even just when promoting a community fundraiser. That connection, that trust, is something you can't manufacture. It's earned through years of consistency, credibility, and care. The current development proposal puts that all at risk. With construction scheduled to take place less than an inch from our building, the station faces serious operational challenges, especially during critical live broadcasting hours. We are not asking for the project to be stopped, but simply to be done responsibly. Our requests, to pause drilling and blasting from 6:00 to 9:00 a.m. and for 30 minutes during lunch on weekdays, and for the developer to cover the cost of relocating our studios within our building, are more than reasonable, especially considering the scale and impact of the construction. The City Council should carefully consider the consequences this development will have on a business that has served the Santa Clarita community for over 30 years. KHTS has been there for residents through every major moment, good and bad, offering critical information, comfort, and a sense of community. Silencing that voice, even temporarily, would be a disservice to the people who rely on it every single day. KHTS is doing its part to adapt. We've planned soundproofing, moving our studios, and working around the challenges of a two-year construction timeline. We're simply asking for the same consideration and support to ensure that this essential local voice isn't silenced in the name of development. I respectfully urge the City Council to take these concerns seriously. Development can and should coexist with preservation and community support. Please help us continue to serve Santa Clarita without interruption. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, Sophia Lesseos News Reporter, KHTS Radio Dear City Councilmembers, Re: Mixed -use Development in the Heart of Historic Newhall As a former Santa Clarita Valley resident of 30 years and executive director with Providence Holy Cross Foundation, I have personally experienced the vital impact KHTS radio has had in Santa Clarita for decades. They are the only on -the -spot disaster information resource during fires and other SCV area catastrophes, as well as, the best source for local news, traffic and activities. In addition, KHTS has provided countless hours of free advertising for numerous local nonprofits including Providence Holy Cross Medical Center. Jeri Seratti Goldman was instrumental in co -leading many significant fundraising drives which included the new hospital Tower, NICU, Cancer Center and many other projects. It is crucial for our valley to continue to have a radio station. Please find a viable compromise in solving the disruption that two plus years of construction will cause on the radio station's broadcasts. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, S. Brigette Loden sbloden@gmail.com Dear City Councilmembers, Re: Mixed -use Development on Main Street in Old Town Newhall As a former Santa Clarita resident, the emergency coverage on KHTS was vital. Not only has their information always been immediate and accurate, their behind -the -scenes assistance for so many organizations has made them one of the critical foundations of our valley. Their continued services are critical to the health of SCV. Please find a reasonable concession in solving the disruption 2 plus years of construction will cause on the radio station's broadcasts. Thanks for your attention. Regards, Jay Loden jmloden@gmail.com 04/04/2025 Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community Dear City of Santa Clarita council members: I'm writing to you to ask that you do not build on the site where the radio station and other historic buildings are. have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio. These days with all the informational technology transferring to streaming platforms only, (including local television), listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information on a daily basis. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Sincerely, Kathy M. Canyon Country, CA Gary R. Martin 25325 Via Oriol Valencia, CA 91355 April 6, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Subject: Letter of support for KHTS Radio Dear City Council Members, My name is Gary Martin. I have been a resident of the Santa Clarita Valley since 1978 and currently reside in the City of Santa Clarita. I am writing this letter in support of KHTS Radio and their efforts to avoid and / or mitigate the negative impacts to their business at 24320 Main Street in Newhall of the proposed 5- story apartment / retail complex planned for the lot immediately adjacent to their offices and studios. The proposed project would include subterranean parking, requiring subsurface excavation and foundation work during business hours. As proposed, this work would occur during the hours that KHTS broadcasts live programming from its studios. The resulting noise and vibrations may make it difficult or even impossible for KHTS to continue broadcasting during its highest revenue hours. KHTS has been an important member of our community givingvoice to community leaders, non -profits, elected officials, representatives of the faith community, political candidates, and many others. As an elected member of the SCV Water Board, KHTS has been a valuable partner in helping to educate our community on water issues in the SCV. It is my understanding that KHTS is requesting modest and reasonable accommodations from the builder which would allow the proposed work to be completed without serious impact to KHTS's business operations. I respectfully request that the City Council consider these requests and incorporate them into the conditions of approval where appropriate. Sincerelyyours, Gary R. Martin E`1 EDMASTERSON LIFE COACH KINDNESS I TRUST I CONFIDENTIALITY April 8, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Attn: City Councilmembers 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 RE: KHTS AM 1220 — Request for Mitigation during Construction Dear City Councilmembers, Thankyou for the opportunity to provide this letter of support. As a former Santa Clarita Valley Man of the Year, and a volunteer for dozens of non-profit organizations since 1999, 1 have witnessed firsthand the critical role that KHTS has played in serving our community. Not only has the station been a vital news source providing real-time, invaluable updates throughout our many emergencies, but KHTS has also assisted many dozens of our local non-profit organizations and individuals in need. I have participated in every one of the KHTS Sacramento Bus Trip events, as well as several of the KHTS organized Washington DC trips on behalf of our community, all of which have had an undeniable and positive impact on our community. I believe we need our local radio station, KHTS, to continue serving our community as they have for decades, and I respectfully request that you assist with the very reasonable mitigation request by KHTS, to allow them to stay in business during construction and beyond. Thank you for your time, consideration and kindness. Sincerely, (661) 510-5333 (m) ed.masterson.sos@gmail.com 4/2/25, 7:56 PM Gmail - KHTS Z� KHTS Ed Masterson<edmasterson@sosentertainment.com> To: Carl Goldman <earlkhts@gmail.com> Hi, Carl, Carl Goldman <carlkhts@gmail.com> We are travelling out of town for a memorial service so I'm not sure I can do a proper letter. Hopefully the comments below will suffice: To Whom it May Concern, Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 1:20 PM I am aware of a proposed project in Downtown Newhall, which will be built over a two year period in close proximity to the KHTS AM 1220 station building. My understanding is that KHTS has asked for assistance from the developer in providing specific blocks of time for suspension of certain construction activities, which if not granted would impact the station's ability to broadcast its regularly scheduled shows, due to noise caused by the construction activity. My additional understanding is that another request has been made by KHTS to the developer, seeking assistance or consideration to possibly move the on -air studio to a different section of the existing KHTS building, in an effort to help distance the on -air studio from the construction noise as much as possible. Throughout my time working in Santa Clarita since 1999, 1 have always known KHTS to be one of our community's mainstay organizations, providing support and contributions in a variety of significant ways. If there is any way to assist with the accommodations that KHTS is requesting, in order to allow them to continue normal business operations during construction and to remain solvent, I think it would be a great tribute to our community if a way could be found to accomplish that, in an effort to keep KHTS successful and functional as one of our community's great assets. Thank you so much for your time, consideration and kindness. Best regards, Ed Masterson Certified Life Coach 661-510-5333 (m) ed.masterson.sos@mail.com [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?i k=0410d22d34&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1828323593320160827&simpl=msg-f:1828323593320160827 1 /1 SCV Senior Center at BellaVida Independence * Dignity + Quality of Life 27180 Golden Valley Road Santa Clarita, CA 91350 April 3, 2025 Dear Friends, On behalf of the SCV Senior Center, we want to express our support for KHTS and their efforts to continue programming during building construction adjacent to their studio. KHTS plays a critical role in our community and the combination of daily news coverage for the Santa Clarita Valley and their radio broadcasts are vital. Each week, the Senior Hour airs on KHTS and plays a significant role in sharing information that Seniors need and want. KHTS also supports the non-profit community by publicizing events and activities throughout the year. We need KHTS's programming to continue without interruption and anything that can be done in terms of this construction project — should be done. We appreciate this opportunity to share our support for KHTS and its future. Sincerely, Kevin MacDonald Chief Executive Officer Phone: 661-259-9444 email: admin(a)scv-seniorcenter.org www.MySCVCOA.org DBA: Meals on Wheels Santa Clarita Valley, Meals on Wheels Antelope Valley Barb Messina <bbmessina@gmail.com> 6:53 AM (43 minutes ago) to Info Dear Santa Clarita City Council: I am writing today to encourage you to make the right decision and authorize the relocation of KHTS Radio AT THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE or, at the very least, adhere to their modest requests. It is NOT too much to ask. It would be a SMART decision. Don't let the citizens of Santa Clarita down! April 14, 2025 To whom It May Concern, I have lived in Sand Canyon for over thirty years and have depended on HOMETOWNSTATION for my daily commute, for community activities and for trusted information about devastating events; our 1993 earthquake, our fires, traffic accidents, the list goes on. They have always been there for myself, my family and most of all our growing community. When power was lost, we all would have been in the dark, had it not have been for HOMETOWNSTATION. Let's keep the light on. Cathy Miller 4/2/25, 7:52 PM Gmail - Development Development Norb Moniz <norb@ars-email.com> To: Carl Goldman <carlkhts@gmail.com> To whom it may concern, Carl Goldman <carlkhts@gmail.com> Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 8:22 AM am writing to tell you how much I support the small businesses in Santa Clarita, particularly KHTS Radio and the Goldman family. Having conducted business with KHTS for over 30 years, I can attest to their vital role in our community's fabric. The potential loss of this Esteemed establishment would be devastating, not only to my operations but to the larger community we serve. Our relationship with KHTS spans over three decades, a testament to its enduring importance. Over the past 47 years of running my local business and having lived in Santa Clarita for over 60 years, I have come to rely heavily on KHTS for local news and emergency information. Their absence would leave a significant void in our community. The presence of such a local radio station is imperative for maintaining a well-informed community and supporting local businesses. I urge you to consider the significant impact that KHTS's loss would have on our community. The urgency of this situ6tion cannot be overstated. Our collective ability to stay informed and engaged depends on the continued existence of local assets such as KHTS. Thank you for your attention to this critical matter. Sincerely, https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=0410d22d34&view=pt&search=al I&perm msgid=msg-f:1828304858203519541 &simpl=msg-f:1828304858203519541 1 /2 4/2/25, 7:52 PM Norbert Moniz A Royal Suite Home Furnishings Gmail - Development https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=041 Od22d34&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1 828304858203519541 &simpl=msg-f: 1828304858203519541 2/2 4/2/25, 7:49 PM w ail KHTS Greg Morin <gregleem@gmail.com> To: Carl Goldman <carlkhts@gmail.com> Hi Carl let me know if you want it in a different format. Greg Morin 8055513376 (cell) To Whom It May Concern, Carl Goldman <carlkhts@gmail.com> Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 8:32 AM I wanted to take a moment to personally recommend KHTS Hometown Station as a great resource for both entertainment and vital community engagement. As a longtime advertiser and listener, I've experienced firsthand the incredible value they bring to our area. KHTS is more than just a station —they are an active presence in the community, supporting local events, businesses, and important causes. One of their standout events is the annual Home and Garden Show, which provides invaluable insights and connections for homeowners, professionals, and businesses alike. As we connect with other businesses and homeowners at the garden show we keep tax dollars within our city. Beyond that, their commitment to keeping us informed during emergencies is truly commendable. Whether it's severe weather updates, fires, or other urgent news, I know I can count on them to provide timely and accurate information when it matters most. The station's active involvement in the community sets it apart. It not only entertains and informs but also supports local businesses and initiatives, making it an essential part of our daily lives. The reach and impact of KHTS have greatly benefited my business, and I have no hesitation in recommending it to others looking to connect with an engaged and loyal audience. It would truly be a shame if they were to leave our community. Sincerely, Greg Morin CFO Kathys Landscaping On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:06 PM Carl Goldman <carlkhts a@@gmail.com> wrote: [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=0410d22d34&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1828305498118266694&sim pl=msg-f:1828305498118266694 1 /1 Greg Moser Retired Owner, Consumers Furniture Gallery April 08, 2025 To the Honorable Members of the City Council, My name is Greg Moser, retired owner of Consumers Furniture Gallery, and I've had the pleasure of knowing Carl and Jeri Goldman, owners of KHTS, for over 30 years. KHTS has been an invaluable part of both my business and our greater Santa Clarita community. Their radio and website advertising were instrumental in helping us grow and connect with local residents, and their unwavering commitment to local news and support has made a lasting impact on this city. For that reason, I respectfully ask the Council to consider placing a moratorium on blasting and coring between the hours of 6:00 AM-9:00 AM, Monday through Friday, as well as a 30-minute break during the lunch hour. Additionally, I encourage you to explore the possibility of compensating KHTS to relocate their studio and offices to the opposite side of their building to help mitigate the construction noise. These measures would go a long way in preserving the station's ability to serve the community without interruption. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Greg Moser Retired Owner, Consumers Furniture Gallery 7 k 1 do w mr ' ood ur w, 7, mu ■ �u« ai ■ ■ April 15, 2025 To the Honorable Members of the Santa Clarita City Council, I'm writing in support of KHTS and their request for reasonable accommodations during the construction of the proposed project adjacent to their studio. KHTS has long been a vital part of Santa Clarita, providing trusted local news, emergency updates, and a consistent voice that connects and informs our community. Their morning broadcasts are especially important to many of us who rely on timely and accurate information. Having worked in the nonprofit sector for over 20 years, I've seen firsthand how KHTS supports local organizations, amplifies community voices, and helps drive awareness and action. The loss of their ability to operate effectively during peak hours would be a loss for the entire valley. I respectfully urge the City Council and the developer to work collaboratively with KHTS to ensure they can continue to serve the community during the construction period. Sincerely, Matthew Nelson Santa Clarita Resident 'Jerrynewbold' via Info to info Tue, Apr 15, 8:19 PM (13 hours ago) Please force the construction crews to work around the hours requested by KHTS. Please have them pay for their move. Or better yet, the city council should approve funds to help them move. I was a Deputy Sheriff at Santa Clarita Station for 16 years and always thought this radio station was fair and unbiased toward law enforcement. Not always the case with the other news in print. The editorials and opinion sections are my favorites to read. I hope this construction doesn't negatively impact KHTS where they can no longer serve this community. I remember when the hi -chick curve , old San Fernando rd, was straightened and we lost our beloved burger joint. Don't let this happen again. Jerry a Newbold Sent from my iPad April 15, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council: As a longtime resident of Santa Clarita I have appreciated the value and community outreach that KHTS has provided. As a lifetime member of the radio industry I know how critical the morning drive revenue is to a station's survival. I would hope that City Council would seriously consider withholding any construction that would cause any disruption in KHTS' ability to produce and air programming during this time period. Respectfully, Nick Nickson Sent from my Phone KHTS has been our primary support for this community since they started broadcasting here. I have been here during many emergencies, at least two of them major. Why the city would hinder them in anyway is beyond me. Greg Nutter, former Santa Clarita Man of the Year Sent from my Phone 0 Ile FOSTERING YOUTH WDEPENDENCE April 14, 2025 Santa Clarita City Councilmembers Santa Clarita City Hall 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear Honorable Members of the City Council: I am writing in support of our local radio station, KHTS. Fostering Youth Independence (FYI) began a strong partnership with KHTS in 2017, when we were first interviewed about our organization on one of their programs. Since then, I have been invited back to speak many times, and these opportunities have raised community awareness about the challenges faced by our local foster youth and the ways we can all help. KHTS has also published countless press releases about FYI and provides daily free advertising about our mission. I respectfully ask that the Council consider the requested accommodations for the studio so they can continue to do their good work in the community while the construction project is underway. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, ��Atv"� 6_4k�� Carolyn Olsen Executive Director/Co-Founder P.O. Box 801604 1 Santa Clarita, CA 91380 661.360.1500 www.fyifosteryouth.org 4-15-25 Dear Honorable Councilmembers, We respectfully urge the City of Santa Clarita to support KHTS in their request to mitigate the significant disruptions expected from the Serrano Development Group project. Specifically, we ask that the City require the developer to curtail blasting, drilling, and coring between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Monday through Friday, as well as for 30 minutes during lunch each day. Additionally, the developer should be held responsible for all costs associated with the relocation and soundproofing of the KHTS studios to ensure the station can continue its essential operations without disruption. We are also deeply concerned about the lack of transparency surrounding the agreement between Serrano Development Group and Councilwoman Laurene Weste, which was reportedly conducted behind closed doors and outside of a public forum — depriving the community of the opportunity to provide input or raise concerns. Of particular concern is that the anticipated project includes the demolition of the historic courthouse building currently housing KHTS, a decision made without public discussion or community engagement. I respectfully request that the Council act in the interest of transparency, local business protection, and public trust. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Richard and Charmin Ortega GREGORY J. OWEN` SUSAN A. OWEN* *Professional Corporation Tel: 661.799.3899 Fax: 661.799.2774 www.opolaw.com info@owenpatterson.com 4/2/2025 OWEN, PATTERSON & OWEN LLP Attorneys at Law 23822 West Valencia Boulevard, Suite 303 Valencia, California 91355 Santa Clarita Valley City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd, 1st Floor Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Subject: Support for KHTS Radio and Its Role in Bettering Our Community Dear Members of the Santa Clarita Valley City Council, TAMIKO B. HERRON J. CODY PATTERSON' BEAU M. GOODRICK+ *Also licensed in Utah -Also licensed in the District of Columbia We, OPO Law Injury Lawyers, are writing as long-standing Santa Clarita business and community members, to express our strong support for KHTS Radio. KHTS has been an invaluable resource for businesses, nonprofits, and residents, providing a trusted voice in local news, emergency updates, and community engagement. We ask for your continued recognition of KHTS as an essential pillar of Santa Clarita Valley. As a law firm that has been serving this community for decades, OPO Law has relied on KHTS as a critical partner in reaching those in need of our services. The station's reach and credibility have significantly impacted our business, helping us connect with clients and establish ourselves as a trusted legal resource. Their ability to deliver important information to residents has been instrumental in our firm's success, and we value their ongoing contributions to the local economy and public awareness. Thank you for your time and consideration. We appreciate your commitment to our community and look forward to your continued support of KHTS. Sincerely, Joseph P. Ancewicz Office Manager of Owen, Patterson & Owen LLP 661-799-3899 Jancewicz@opolaw.com April 7, 2025 Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community Dear City of Santa Clarita council members: I'm writing to you today to ask that you please reconsider the removal/re- location of KHTS Radio that may disrupt business or take them off the air. I have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio. These days with all the internet news transferring to streaming platforms only, including local television, listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Sincerely, Stephen P. Saugus, CA To Whom It May Concern, I would like to express to you how vital it is that the City give every consideration to KHTS during the construction of the mixed -use project at the corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall. Although we support the project, along with the Goldmans and KHTS, there may be some aspects of the construction that will be detrimental to the radio station. My family, the Parrs, and my company, AV Party Rentals, have been associated with Jeri and Carl Goldman for over 30 years. The Goldmans and KHTS have been an asset to this community by highlighting and participating in community events and promoting not only local businesses, but also hundreds of non-profit organizations. For several months in early 1994, KHTS (then KBET) was the eyes and ears of Santa Clarita immediately following the Northridge Earthquake. Personally, KHTS has helped my business for decades, and we have teamed up for many community events over the years. Please, when approving the project at Main & Market, give KHTS the consideration it deserves due to its exceptionally close proximity. Sincerely, Rusty Parr, President AV Party Rentals 4-16-25 Dear Carl, I sent a letter directly to the City Council members expressing our gratitude for the services that you and Jeri have provided to the citizens of Santa Clarita. Lynn and I have had the pleasure of working with you on many committees helping our community for the last 25 years. As a long time resident, we feel very strong that our local radio station continues to provide our local citizens with community updates and emergency information which has been extremely helpful and necessary. It is essential that there is a fair solution to allow KHTS to continue to broadcast during the upcoming construction next to their current facility. Thank you, Janice France Pettit Sent from my iPhone Q, Stephen Petzold 3:21 AM (4 hours ago) to citycouncil, City, bcc: me Dear City Council, I support the effort of KHTS and its owners Carl and Jeri Goldman to secure compensation for the extreme hardship imposed upon them due to the proposed development by Serrano Development. Certainly, most of you are aware of the massive subsidies made to the auto body shops, Serrano, and Laemmle as an incentive to encourage development in downtown Newhall. I still have memories of your assistance in compensating a tattoo shop next to the Newhall library. As I remember you made an extremely generous to purchase Roger Dunn golf shop to relocate SCVTV to downtown Newhall. We still remember your assistance in securing a new location for the Santa Clarita Soccer Facility when disgruntled neighbors who had purchased property next to it I am puzzled why you seem to be reluctant to respond to the request of KHTS to provide a plan for financial assistance from the developer for a project that threatens the future of a beloved and vital community media outlet. Certainly, there is precedent for you to use the power and influence of your local agency to assist the Goldman's and KHTS find a reasonable solution to the situation at hand. I urge you to mediate and use your power to keep KHTS in business, providing valuable information to the SCV for years ahead. Rest assured that we are watching from Douglas County, GA as we still own real estate in Santa Clarita and remain very concerned about its future. Regards to All, Steve Petzold Open Government Advocate Civil Rights Activist Concerned Citizen 661-609-1739 Cell ALpf's 7 A, 56 31 ■i Cmp r§V'MMh# Wd L hwa Lvrd In 5rr.L;L4 WjW ITqJ, vxmqcm-c 1 6* Nppr"v 11 I7 LY PRWR C M ft LP4M rwi a ig i IMW DLj dWA m. Lv Ina py YAM I iwAd l0t7 '62911 I Ot C Ira W4 IRk a k*isTi rum *a h+ rq z' cmb h I I U&I CWrff&jA4r i°l 1 WIA "M IM ml:l OCIr' vm jwm comkmff uraw jo, ( F" pj,�j MAO r+I wdb im rI Ies w Ii I%-q ma m Fl y ftz wirm m . im April 15, 2025 To the Santa Clarita City Council, As a local healthcare provider and business owner, I strongly support KHTS in their efforts to continue broadcasting during nearby construction. Their request for a brief morning moratorium and relocation support is reasonable and essential to preserve a vital community voice during peak hours. I urge the City Council to ensure that KHTS can continue serving Santa Clarita without disruption. Respectfully, Dr. Thomas Polucki Upper Cervical Chiropractor, Santa Clarita Sent from my Phone April 8, 2025 I've been a fan of KHTS for decades. I fully support their concerns regarding the new project and the parking issues that go along with it. The parking situation in Old Town Newhall is already a nightmare. While we were seated and ready to order brunch at Eat Real On Main, our friends who were trying to join us could not find parking in the parking structure and circled the streets of old town for 25 minutes before finding a place to park. Sincerely, Toni Polucki 20 Year Santa Clarita Resident Sent from my Phone 04/02/2025 Subject: Petition to keep KHTS Radio in Our Community Dear City of Santa Clarita council members: Please reconsider building in historic Old Town Newhall which would disrupt the local businesses such as KHTS. As a long time resident of Santa Clarita I have come to rely on KHTS to get all the local news, weather and traffic information via listening to them on the radio, as well as visiting their website and getting their daily e-mails with all the local stories. They have been an integral part of our community for years. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Carol R. Valencia, CA 4/2/25, 7:33 PM Gmail - Main ST Santa Clarita Main ST Santa Clarita Larry Rasmussen <LarryR@spiritholding.com> To: Jason Gibbs <gibbsforcitycouncil@gmail.com> Carl Goldman <carlkhts@gmail.com> Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 2:10 PM Jason , I think /know building a five story apt building on Main ST without adequate parking is the wrong thing to do ...And I think you should agree. Vote NO on this broken project.. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=0410d22d34&view=pt&search=all&permmsqid=msq-f:1828326749519989036&simol=msa-f-182832R74959 A4RomF; 11, Ccrrousel RanA W�0-rO dope goes -roun,1an01'roun,1 April 2, 2025 Santa Clarita City Councilmembers Santa Clarita City Hall 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear Members of City Council, Board of D;re.ter MI„y Ca te,,, p JGrt Ste a��e StJri,e , VCe p­Ilrt C ar N:­CG te, T­ UU Marione CGJer ird, Secretary Y orre R.CI. ll, Im J. Pat Pe,. V/oyre Crawford Prima Kocker Skarre r Mee Stay Noc6e—or D—ir'— egm� er �rya� Ste��er De��y T`w�99 Tayle ALA; Executive DI—t— pee�y G k—, P, q a DII—t— Deri,e Redmerd Cx. Dr Cme It — Ali er C:Airet juke Pe —or Jekr Cke ee,�y Jean. Cr F—J Tkere=e EJ.01 s I am contacting you today on behalf of Carl and Jeri Goldman and KHTS Radio as Jeff Hl k� ee6 Kellar in hopes that you will consider setting perameters on the upcoming construction Ck,,, Li- Kreiger of the apartment/retail complex next door to their studio in downtown Newhall. Am L� yrr JaWYe J-1 Sere-QoUd r I know that you are all aware of the many things that Carl and Jeri Goldman and S ,;e Skeee KHTS Radio bring to this community. As a non-profit that has worked with them for Greg Spencer 20+ years, we have been priviledged to benefit from their on -going support of Carousel C ;c St ek Yvenne V/a A Ranch, our events and helping us get the word out to the Santa Clarita community. These are not small things for us (or the other organizations and businesses in this valley). On top of that, their news coverage is imperative especially when it comes to emergencies in this valley - such as earthquakes, fires, etc. While the development will likely be a good thing for the community, the thought of a two year project that would make it impossible for them to continue their operations (which include live radio programming) seems unfair and would essentially drive them out of business. I think we can all agree that would be a terrible shame for the entire Santa Clarita Valley. With this said, I truly hope that you will take these concerns into consideration and find a way to work with the Goldmans, KHTS and the developers to find a solution that could work for everyone. Sincerely, Denise Redmond Founder/Executive Director Emeritus 3428q Boding �orse RooJ 9 Aguo Culce, CA g13QO 0 (661) 268-8010 W W W. coi,ro u se l,ro n c k. o-re Scott Schauer <schauerscott@gmail.com> 12:29 PM (56 minutes ago) to info I write this to express my appreciation for the incredible work our local radio station does in our community and to encourage support from our City leaders. Local radio is more than just a platform for music or news; it serves as a vital connection among community members. Their dedication to highlighting local events, artists, businesses and nonprofits creates a sense of belonging and brings us all closer together. I have personally benefited both in business and in working with local non profits for over 35 years with assistance from both Carl and Jeri Goldman and the staff at KHTS.. In a time when many people turn to national media, it's essential to remember the unique value of local voices. Their programs not only entertain but also inform and inspire. Whether it's through interviews with local leaders, coverage of community events, or showcasing local talent, KHTS plays a crucial role in celebrating our community diversity. I urge our local leaders to consider supporting and finding a solution for the construction going to take place adjacent to the studio that informs our community on a daily basis. Let's help our local station thrive and serve as a beacon for our community. I understand growth and the upgrading of our buildings but as I personally fought my business having to relocate because of the growth of home building on Soledad Canyon. This great city worked with the developer and myself to find a resolution that saved my business, the Santa Clarita Soccer Center and satisfied our local neighbors. I am hopeful you do the same for our local radio station. Scott Schauer President Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff Foundation Charity Silvers <charitysilvers@gmail.com> 1:27 PM (3 hours ago) to info To the Council Members of the City of Santa Clarita, Please listen to the voice of your constituents, the residents of our fine city, and take into account what is best for the residents and not what is best for the large outside business conglomerate that wants to come in and do what they think is best for the SCV. Old Town Newhall has been redeveloped in a very nice way to maintain the small, old town feel that was the original setting when the town was first established. The plans that are in place right now to build the 5 story structure do NOT seem in line with anything that would keep the small town feel of Main Street and the downtown area. There are other places in the city where such a structure would be better placed and where the construction of such would not displace historical buildings nor disrupt long time businesses, like KHTS, from continuing to serve our community. Please do not silence our beloved radio station who has served the SCV for decades! Sincerely, Charity Silvers � DEL D4 EST. 1980 p � C 1 j al` Nealth CORPORATE OFFICE 25115 Avenue Stanford Suite A-104 Valencia, CA 91355 (661) 257-2339 Main Office (661) 257-2384 Fax www.sdthc.org Chief Executive Officer PHILIP SOLOMON, MPA Board of Directors Chairperson GLORIA MERCADO-FORTINE CEO, Global Education Solutions, Inc. Vice -Chairperson MIKE FISHER Insurance Adjuster Treasurer CAROLINA OROZCO HERNANDEZ Dental Office Manager ANTHONY McKINNIES Health Care - Logistics MIKE THOMAS Printer, Small Business Owner PAUL LOWE Journalist CHRIS HERMOSURA Student LAURA KIRCHHOFF Program & Event Manager Bruce Fortine Business Owner Board Members Emeritus ELIJAH CANTY' JO ANNE DARCY' EDWARD BOLDEN, JR Honorary Board of Directors REVEREND SAMUEL DIXON, FOUNDER' EVELYN DIXON' EVON DIXON-MONTGOMERY, JD' JOYCE (DIXON) HIGHTOWER, MD SAMUEL DIXON III, MD FAITH (DIXON) JOHNSON TIMOTHY DIXON, MD 'deceased Dear Honorable Members of the City Council, I am writing to express my wholehearted support for KHTS who has been an incredible asset to our community, specifically for the support they have provided Samuel Dixon Family Health Center (SDFHC) over the years. When I first became the CEO of SDFHC, both Jeri and Carl were very supportive of my transition into my new role and offered valuable guidance on how we can improve on informing Santa Clarita residents of the vital resources we provide to vulnerable individuals and families of our community. Over the years, KHTS has demonstrated an unwavering commitment to SDFHC and has played a vital role in advancing the work we do, helping us reach wider audiences and inspire action on critical issues. Whether it's through public service announcements, event promotions, or interviews, KHTS has created a space for us to communicate our impact and engage with the community in meaningful ways. KHTS plays an important role in empowering local nonprofits such as SDFHC. This station is more than just a media outlet —it is a true partner in fostering a thriving, compassionate, and connected community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Philip Solomon, MPA Chief Executive Officer Samuel Dixon Family Health Center, Inc. Val Verde Health Center (661)257-4008 1 Canyon Country Health Center (661)424-1220 Newhall Health Center (661)291-1777 1 Behavioral Health Program (661)468-7405 1 Dental (661)402-2319 Suzan Solomon to me 3:42 PM (2 hours ago) Dear Mayor, Honorable City Council Members and Santa Clarita Planning Manager Leclair, As you know KHTS Radio is a major voice and pillar of the community. Our residents rely on KHTS for the news, live communication during emergencies and disasters, insights into the Santa Clarita Valley, access to enriching opportunities for our residents, healthcare support for children and youth, as well as support for our local education community, among other humanitarian efforts. We need KHTS to continue broadcasting in the SCV Community! It is essential to have construction refrain from coring between the hours of 6:OOam-9:OOam and in the noon hour, so our Hometown Station continues broadcasting and broadcasting during peak times that bring in high revenue which supports station operation, and contributions to our community. I can attest to KHTS's impact on our parent organizations in schools, and students across the school districts in our valley. Please help mitigate a construction schedule that meets the needs of our Hometown Radio Station, our residents, and the builder. Being a good neighbor and community partner is the SCV way! Thank you, Sue Solomon 4-14-25 Dear Santa Clarita City Council Members, I am writing to express my appreciation for and support of KHTS and HomeTownStation. com. They have been very impactful in advertising our events over the past many years. People in this city listen to and read from their publications. They are a significant and well-informed voice that should be protected. The proposed development next to their broadcast facility will make it impossible for them to do business as usual unless they are granted compensation to move, or construction noise is mitigated during their critical hours of operation. Being a good neighbor to me means respecting the right of this vital and valuable institution to continue their service. Losing this source of current and well -presented local news would have negative consequences around the city. Sincerely, Scott L Stratton The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints April 14, 2025 To The Santa Clarita City Councilmembers, I've known Carl Goldman, Jeri Seratti-Goldman and KHTS radio since the early 1990's. As a former member of the William S. Hart School Board, Head of the Santa Clarita Arts Commission, and Field Representative for then Assemblyman, Cameron Smyth I have been very aware of the critical role KHTS has played in Santa Clarita over the decades. My understanding is their request for minor accommodation during construction so they can continue broadcasting, seems extremely reasonable. KHTS has been stellar as it has served Santa Clarita for decades. Please assist in allowing them to continue to broadcast. Respectfully Paul Strickland, Sr. ■ JJULIE M. STURGEON certified public accountant A Professional Corporation 3344 Cherry Jack Lane Thompsons Station, TN 37179 (661) 251-6031 Fax: (661) 295-0692 Julie@cpasturgeon.com April 3, 2025 Honorable City Council Members, KHTS is the voice of Santa Clarita. In 1990 Carl Goldman and Jeri Seratti Goldman purchased KBET radio out of bankruptcy and ran it out of a trailer on Sierra highway. Along with partners they sold the station to Clear Channel and then repurchased it without partners in 2003 rebranding it to KHTS. The history is important because the radio station was part of the City's history even before the City became one in 1987. To say that KHTS is a historical piece of the Santa Clarita Valley is an understatement. To name just a few historical events you have the 1991 Northridge earthquake, along with numerous fires, along with elections and day to day sporting events like the Los Angeles Dodgers. Although support for the developments in Old Town Newhall is widely welcomed and particularly by the radio station, it is important to note the impact it will have during the daytime broadcasting. Interrupting broadcasting at these critical hours is not beneficial to anyone and not good business. Please reconsider your stance on this ongoing issue and thank you for your attention. Julie M. Sturgeon 04/03/2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita council members: I'm writing to you to ask that you do not build on the site where the radio station and other historic buildings are. have been getting the latest news, weather, traffic and local event information from KHTS for years the old school way, by listening to the radio. These days with all information transferring to streaming platforms only, (including local television), listening to the radio and reading the local paper are the only way myself and many of my friends in the area get this important information on a daily basis. Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. Sincerely, Robert U. Newhall, CA Umeck, Judith Ann E<JudithAnn.Umeck@providence.org> Mon, Apr 7, 10:24 PM (5 hours ago) to me, judy.eganumeck@gmail.com To Whom it may concern: Hello, I would like to express my concern over the construction issues facing the businesses on Main St. in Newhall. During my years at Providence High School, we as an educational institution worked through the environmental and sound concerns as the Disney Company expanded their lot in Burbank. After appearances before Burbank City Council, compromises and concessions, Sr Lucille Dean, SP and Michael Eisner were able to come to agreements that allowed the school to flourish. Three decades later, I ask you to make the same considerations for SCV and our beloved radio station, so that they too may continue to provide the quality information our community needs. We have all come to rely on KHTS and expect new developers who will benefit from this neighborhood to support the quality of our environment for existing businesses as well. My years on the Saugus Union School Board provided insight into the need to balance quality of life and business and the challenges of construction. Please support the longevity of KHTS by considering the needs of their building and the tradition of a hometown station. Sincerely in Providence, Judy Egan Umeck, PA Office of Legacy and Heritage Providence St. Joseph Health C- 661-993-9846 iudithann.umeck@providence.org As expressions of God's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of Jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable. Know me, care for me, ease my way 4/12/25 Dear Mr. Goldman, I have been following the development of continued upgrades to old town Newhall. It sounds as though there are some exciting things in the works that will continue to strengthen this area as a local attraction, residential community, and focal business point for the Santa Clarita Valley. I know that you are very involved in advocating for small businesses located in old town Newhall. And as the retired chancellor from the Santa Clarita community college district where we worked with the city to develop a small business development center locally funded when the mall was being built and then acquire state funding for a permanent center that serves not only in Santa Carita Valley but the region, I too am committed to a structure that maximizes the ability of local businesses to function, to thrive, to grow, and to serve their customer base. When I was leading College of the Canyons for over three and a half decades, before social media and the Internet, the college district relied on KHTS to be a vehicle for it to get the word out about what was going on at the college, what was coming up at the college, and to open the door for people in our service to engage with the college to meet their personal and professional needs. Furthermore, when KHTS was the only local radio channel, listeners at least had a familiar voice that they recognized and could interact with as callers phoned in to ask questions. As the radio station's capabilities developed, KHTS supported the college to introduce itself to businesses and residents, as well as to develop working relationships with hundreds of partners and users that otherwise would not have been as easy to accomplish. I want to thank you for working hard to ensure that during the construction of the expansion project for Newhall that KHTS will be afforded an opportunity to operate in designated time zones minus the noise of construction during a specific timeframe. Loud noise would be distracting and make effective communications on the part of the broadcasters and visitors very challenging and could, in my opinion, impede the communication strategies of the users of KHTS. With knowledge doubling in a matter of days, local and world conditions changing daily, and new information being interjected into the perspective of how local agencies work to get the word out about their work to the public, this continued access, is, in my mind pivotal. Thank you for being such a persistent fighter for what is right for the users and the listeners of KHTS. Dianne Van Hook To: Santa Clarita City Council From: Ryan C. Van Wie Date: April 13', 2025 Subject: Letter in support of KHTS Radio Dear City Council Members, I am writing to express my support for KHTS's reasonable petition to restrict construction hours near their Newhall station. I was raised in Santa Clarita and grew up watching my parents, Jeri Seratti and Carl Goldman, dedicate their time and effort to the city and its residents. From their first few years as Santa Clarita residents, as the owners and managers of KBET AM1220, my parents prioritized public service as core aspect of the station's mission. This was evident in their response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake, where the station worked around the clock with its counterparts in City Hall and emergency services to provide accurate and timely updates to the community during that public emergency. Their dedication to public service continued as the station transitioned and grew under the new KHTS banner. Whether it's been keeping the city updated on serious fires, evacuations, significant traffic, or civic engagement opportunities, KHTS and its staff have been there providing reliable news to Santa Clarita and its residents through it all. Now, as KHTS requires City Hall's assistance for this reasonable request to restrict nearby heavy drilling to regular business hours, I hope that you all will weigh the Station's past and future service to the city as you make your decisions. I appreciate you considering this perspective and for your service to Santa Clarita. /C�, V, �,/, Sincerely, Ryan Van Wie PROJECT SEBASTIAN A RARE DISEASE FOUNDATION April 3rd, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council To whom it may concern: I am writing this letter in strong support of KHTS as they face imminent threats due to the planned construction project in Santa Clarita. This station has been an integral part of our community, providing essential local news, weather updates, and coverage of important events that impact residents and businesses alike. As the founder of Project Sebastian, I have personally witnessed the invaluable role this station has played —not only in promoting charitable organizations like mine but also in fostering a sense of unity within our city. For years, KHTS has generously supported numerous foundations, including mine, by raising awareness, fundraising, and offering guidance. Their dedication to serving Santa Clarita extends far beyond entertainment; they are a cornerstone of our local identity and a lifeline for many organizations and residents. It is deeply concerning that the city has not taken meaningful action to assist them in relocating or ensuring their continued operation, instead prioritizing financial gain over the well-being of the community. The planned construction poses a severe risk to the station's ability to function. The disruption from blasting— during peak broadcasting times —threatens their profitability and sustainability. Furthermore, the destruction of a historic building for the sake of development disregards the cultural and historical significance it holds for Santa Clarita. It is unacceptable that the developer has not cooperated in finding a solution, nor has the city intervened to protect this vital institution. I strongly urge the city and developers to halt construction or take appropriate measures to ensure KHTS is properly relocated without jeopardizing its operations. This station is not just another business —it is a voice for the people, a trusted resource, and a force for good in our community. Allowing this project to proceed unchecked would be a disservice to the very residents the city is meant to serve. I appreciate your time and consideration in this urgent matter. Please do what is right for Santa Clarita and take action to preserve this essential institution. Sincerely, Christopher Velona Director www. projectsebastian.orq 501 c3 #81-4325865 'LINDA VISER' via Info Tue, Apr 15, 8:00 PM (13 hours ago) to info@hometownstation.com To Whom it May Concern, KHTS is a very important part of our city. I don't oppose development but we have to be respectful of businesses which cannot thrive if development is allowed to blast, drill, and core during business hours. KHTS is asking for quiet between 6 and 9 am, Monday through Friday, and 30 minutes during lunch. Considering how disruptive this will be for them even if that request is granted, please amend Serrano Development's working hours to avoid blasting, drilling, and coring during those times. Thank you. Linda Viser Yahoo Mail: Search. Oraanize. Conauer March 29, 2025 To whom it may concern, I write this letter in support of KHTS radio and its owners, Carl and Jeri Seratti-Goldman. KHTS is a vital media outlet serving the Santa Clarita Valley region with up to the minute news, traffic, weather, and entertainment. But today they are facing an existential threat, as a major construction project will soon interrupt their broadcasting capabilities. Throughout their history, KHTS has been the outlet that Santa Clarita goes to in times of crisis. Be it fires, earthquakes, pandemic, or other tragedy, KHTS is the source that our community turns to for immediate information. As a 45 year resident of the Santa Clarita Valley, I remember listening to our local radio station often. Specifically, I recall sitting on my front lawn with a portable radio listening to KHTS for updates and information immediately following the 1994 Northridge earthquake. In 2019, when wildfires were threatening multiple locations in the valley, it was KHTS that we all turned to for important information. the same was true following the Saugus high school shooting that same year. shortly thereafter, with the beginning of the pandemic, KHTS was the station that our community turned to for up-to-date information. Not only are they an important media outlet, but KHTS and the Goldmans have been an important source of community service and support for decades. They volunteer their time and resources to support local nonprofit organizations, and the community at large. This philanthropy has been recognized on multiplications, as both Carl and Jeri have been honored with the title of Man/Woman of the Year in our community. Our school organization, SCVi and LEAD Schools, has benefited from their goodwill and support since before our founding in 2008. KHTS has become an important part of our marketing strategy. If this construction interrupts their broadcasting capabilities, we will lose a vital source of advertising, as we run regular commercials, as well as host a live educational show at the station on Friday mornings. Santa Clarita needs KHTS. I urge you to consider alternative construction plans that mitigate the impact on KHTS's broadcasting capabilities. Matthew Watson Executive Director of Development, LEAD California Schools Trustee, Saugus Union School District kljm� 1 J�HVI"l ii . - WML &M I Law bow IL . I iiii:'L.I "I I Wes' i� �;�■*����.,� ' "' Andy Winchester <andrewbwinchester@gmail. com> 6:25 AM (2 hours ago) to info To whom it may concern, I believe this construction company should not only pay for the move of the radio station but also compensate them for the inconvenience. Also, keep in mind that some things are left untouched or maybe renovated vs. leveling something and building huge structures that leave the area unrecognizable. -Andrew Winchester Elliott Wolfe to me 10:38 AM (9 minutes ago) To the Santa Clarita City Council Members: This memo is to incicate my concern about the pending matter before the council to allow a large residential project to be built in downtown Newhall. I am certain that most of you will recall that I and my wife, Judith, were the founders of the SCV Veterans' Collaborative, and we also supported many of you during your re -elections, etc. During our time serving the veteran population. we were given a huge amount of help by Jeri and Carl Goldeman of KHTS, for which we are totally indebted, and I wish to express my concern over the extent to which their damages have, and will continue to result, unless specific assistance is given to lessen their business plight. Thank you for your consideration. Elliott S. Wolfe 'Denise Youngwood' via Info Tue, Apr 15, 11:05 PM (10 hours ago) to info@hometownstation.com To: The Santa Clarita City Council, Re: Request for the Serrano Development Group to help KHTS by curtailing blasting, drilling or coring during weekday early mornings and lunch time. Our local radio station, Hometown Station, aka KHTS and formerly known as KBET has been a vital part of our Santa Clarita community for close to 35 years. They do a phenomenal job of keeping residents informed with local news, events, traffic and weather. I remember during the 1994 earthquake they immediately mobilized and were the central communication hub for our city, taking live calls from the city officials, local businesses and residents, and then disbursing important information to their listeners. They were our lifeline. I was so proud to live in a city that had such a great radio station. KHTS must not be silenced, not even temporarily. Our businesses and residents need their reporting to be live on a daily basis and especially if there should be another local disaster we would need them to be here for us. Their live broadcasting would be critical for our recovery. I urge you to please consider KHTS's request to mitigate the Serrano Development Group's proposal by having them curtail blasting, drilling or coring between 6am-9am Monday through Friday and 30 minutes during lunch time. Thank you for your consideration on this very important issue. Warm regards, Denise L Youngwood 'Eileen Zierhut' via Info to info 3:12 AM (6 hours ago) To Whom It May Concern: We need to keep Santa Clarita's hometown radio station running and serving this community. No more big business backdoor deals. I am asking the city to intervene and represent the people you serve by curtailing blasting, drilling or coring for the new proposed adjacent building to between 6am-9am Monday through Friday and 30 minutes during lunch. They can blast the remaining hours of the week. Thank you, Dr Eileen Zierhut 40 year resident of this community Sent from my Phone O Agenda Item: 1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA 41) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS PLANNING MANAGER APPROVAL: DATE: March 18, 2025 SUBJECT: NEWHALL MIXED USE (MASTER CASE 24-134) APPLICANT: Serrano Development Group LOCATION: 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street And 22505 Market Street CASE PLANNER: Emily Rubalcava RECOMMENDED ACTION Planning Commission: 1. Conduct the public hearing; 2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and will comply with all mitigation measures established by the FEIR; Adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending that the City Council approve Master Case 24- 134 (Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24- 005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012) for the construction of a new five -story mixed -use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); and 4. Take additional, related action that may be desirable. REQUEST The applicant, Serrano Development Group, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Architectural Design Review (ADR), and Development Review (DR) for the redevelopment of the project site into a new five -story mixed - Page 1 Packet Pg. 8 O use project and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building located at 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-022 through -026), within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). BACKGROUND Project Setting The project site consists of five parcels within the OTNSP area, totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. There are three existing buildings on -site: Mac's Pool Supply commercial building — 24316 Main Street (APNs 2831-012-025 and - 026). The existing pool supply business occupied the building in 2016. 2. Horseshoe on Main commercial building — 24300 and 24308 Main Street (APNs 2831- 012-023 and -024). On May 21, 2023, the property was entitled for the construction of a new outdoor food court use, but halted its progress for the proposed project. The property is currently being used seasonally for holiday events. Before this, the property was known as Soundsations, a car stereo installation shop. Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building — 22505 Market Street (APN 2831-012-022). This building is identified on the Historic Preservation list of potentially historic structures located in the OTNSP. The existing building was constructed using repurposed material from the Mayhue building, a former dance hall dating back to the late 1800s. In 1932, the ground floor was occupied as the Courthouse, while the second floor was occupied by the Masonic Lodge. In 1968, the Court relocated to Valencia and the building has been used as offices since then. Project Submittal On April 17, 2024, the applicant submitted a One Stop Preliminary Plan Review to the Planning Division for a new five -story mixed -use building on the Mac's Pool Supply and Horseshoe on Main properties. The review was completed on June 6, 2024. On June 28, 2024, the applicant submitted an application to develop the project, including 51 units, 3,400 square feet of ground floor commercial space, and two levels of parking, one subterranean and one at street level. In response to the One Stop comments, the application identified the proposed architectural style for the building as Western Victorian, and included architectural elements in line with this style. The project was deemed complete on August 12, 2024. On November 27, 2024, the applicant revised the project scope, expanding the project site footprint to include the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse property and incorporating additional architectural enhancements in response to comments from City of Santa Clarita (City) staff and the City's architectural consultant. The revised project included additional units, for a total of 78, and additional commercial floor area, for a total of 5,223 square feet. Page 2 Packet Pg. 9 O PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development Proposal The applicant is proposing the demolition of the Mac's Pool Supply, Horseshoe on Main, and Masonic Lodge/Courthouse buildings for the full -block development of a new mixed -use building consisting of 78 apartments and approximately 5,200 square feet of commercial. The proposed building would be five -stories, 52 feet in height, over one subterranean level of parking. Commercial store fronts are located at the ground level facing Main Street, with ground - level parking behind, within the building footprint. Apartment units are located on the upper levels and oriented around an internal courtyard located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via two new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. In addition, one existing driveway on Main Street would be closed, allowing for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. The project site and surrounding areas are shown in the attached Aerial and Zoning Map. Entitlement Summary Implementation of the project will require the approval of the following entitlements: Conditional Use Permit 24-007 Required to increase the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) above 200 percent of the structure's first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. Minor Use Permit 24-015 Required for the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building with City Council approval; and required for the export of 18,972 cubic yards of dirt. Adjustment Permit 24-005 Required to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20 percent from OTNSP standards, from 13,650 square feet to 10,929 square feet. Development Review 24-012 and Architectural Design Review 24-017 Required to ensure that the project, site plan, and architecture complies with all of the provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC), the General Plan, and OTNSP. Amenity Areas Each unit has a balcony to provide private outdoor space. Balconies range in size from 75 square feet to 100 square feet. In addition, the proposal includes 10,929 square feet of shared residential amenity space, providing an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and a bike room for residents to do bike maintenance. Page 3 Packet Pg. 10 O Architecture The OTNSP prescribes Craftsman, Main Street Commercial, Mediterranean, Monterey, and Western Victorian as appropriate architectural styles. The proposed project is designed in the Western Victorian architectural style and draws inspiration from both the historic and newer buildings in Old Town Newhall, including the Southern Hotel building and the Old Town Newhall Library. Through the design process, the project was reviewed for compliance by the City's architectural consultant, and City staff worked with the applicant through multiple iterations to refine key architectural elements. This included emphasizing the building's corners and enhancing the roofline to diversify the building's massing. The Western Victorian architectural style is accomplished through features such as cornices with decorative brackets, wood siding on the building's entrance and corner towers, and awnings along the commercial storefronts. Additionally, the applicant has proposed to incorporate two murals along the North Elevation; the murals would pay homage to the Western character of Old Town Newhall. The proposed architecture would be complementary to the existing surrounding architecture and is consistent with the OTNSP. Parking A total of 122 parking stalls for the residential units are provided on -site, within ground floor and subterranean parking levels. Residential guest parking will use public parking stalls, and the applicant will utilize the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement. Changes to California law (AB 2097) limits the City's ability to impose minimum parking requirements within one-half mile of transit stations unless there is a negative impact on residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site. A parking demand study was prepared by the applicant demonstrating parking will be adequate as proposed in compliance with AB 2097. Additional discussion is provided in the Analysis portion of this report. Removal of Masonic Lodge/Courthouse The project proposal includes the demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. The City Council, in the adoption of the OTNSP and the Historic Preservation Ordinance, designated a list of structures, including this building as historic resources. Section 17.64.090 of the UDC empowers the City Council to approve, approve with modifications and/or conditions, or deny a request for demolition of a historic resource. The applicant has requested an MUP to delist the building as a historic resource and to demolish it. The Planning Commission will hear the request for the MUP, and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council has the ultimate decision -making authority for the MUP to delist and demolish the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse. To address potential impacts to historic resources, the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measures related to the demolition of historic resources. Mitigation measure (MM) CUL-1 provides a path forward to remove any City Council designated historic structures. The applicant has provided a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, finding that the historical integrity of the building was severely compromised by a remodel in 1968, that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse, and that it would be infeasible to relocate the building to another location. In addition, to fulfill MM- Page 4 Packet Pg. 11 O CUL-1, the applicant has been conditioned to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse by: (1) recording the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, (2) installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, (3) placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and (4) making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES The project site is located within the OTNSP and has a General Plan designation of Specific Plan. The project site has a zoning designation of AE under the OTNSP, which is the zoning designation applied to the central portions of Old Town Newhall generally aligned with Main Street. This zone contemplates commercial uses, arts and entertainment uses, and mixed -use development with housing. Ground floor uses are intended to accommodate art galleries, theaters, performance venues, specialty retail and restaurants, while upper floors accommodate offices or housing (OTNSP Table 4.2-4). The zone intends to promote a mixed -use walkable neighborhood and activation of Main Street as a lively and engaging public space. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, west, and south, and the Metrolink station to the east. Table 1 summarizes the Specific Plan designations, zoning, and land uses for the project site and adjacent properties. Table 1: Specific Plan and Zoning Land Use Designation Project Site OTNSP-AE Proposed Mixed Use Building North OTNSP-AE Specialty Retail (Earth Baby Boutique) and KHTS Radio Station South OTNSP-AE Restaurant (El Trocadero), Indoor Entertainment (The Main) West OTNSP-AE Liquor Store (Bonanza Liquor Market) East OTNSP-N Jan Heidt Metrolink Station Key: AE = Arts & Entertainment; N = Neighborhood ANALYSIS General Plan Compliance The proposed project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation: Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth. Page 5 Packet Pg. 12 O Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed -use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed -use zoning. Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels. The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed -use building in a walkable and transit -friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes. OTNSP Compliance New developments within the OTNSP area must comply with the design standards of the zone and building type. The proposed project is a Stacked Dwelling building type combined with a Commercial building type, which is defined as a vertically stacked structure that accommodates housing above commercial uses. The Stacked Dwelling building type includes thresholds for building massing by establishing a certain allowable FAR for the upper floors of the building. The total square footage of a building may exceed 200 percent, or an FAR of 2.0, of the structure's first -floor footprint, with the approval of a CUP. The proposed project would have a FAR of 4.76. The proposed project is consistent with this standard as a CUP has been requested to increase the FAR of the project as allowed by the OTNSP. The Stacked Dwelling building type has private outdoor space requirements for the residential portion of projects. Projects must provide private residential outdoor space, which is defined as a balcony, yard, or other private space. The private outdoor space requirement is 75 square feet for one -bedroom units, and 100 square feet for two or three -bedroom units. As proposed, each unit provides the required balcony space in compliance with the OTNSP standard for private outdoor space. In addition, there are requirements for shared residential amenity space, which is defined as shared recreational facilities such as a park, pool, fitness facility, etc. The requirement for shared residential amenity space is 150 square feet for one -bedroom units and 200 square feet for two or three -bedroom units. As proposed, the project would require 13,650 square feet of shared residential amenity space; the applicant is seeking an ADJ to reduce the shared amenity space requirement by 20 percent, and would provide a total of 10,929 square feet of shared residential amenities, including a pool and spa within a central courtyard, clubhouse/lounge, and garden corridor with herb garden. As discussed in the project description above, the applicant has invoked AB 2097, which prohibits the City from requiring parking minimums on projects within a half mile of transit, unless the project would have a negative impact on the existing parking supply. While the OTNSP development standards would require two parking spaces per residential unit, half a space per unit of guest parking, and one parking space for the first 1,500 square feet of new commercial development, plus one space per every additional 350 square feet, the parking demand study prepared by the applicant demonstrates that sufficient parking would be provided Page 6 Packet Pg. 13 O by the project to avoid a substantially negative impact on existing parking. Table 2 shows the required parking under the OTNSP, the proposed parking to be provided by the project, and the state baseline per AB 2097. Table 2: OTNSP Requirement Proposed State Baseline Residential 156 spaces 122 on -site spaces 0 spaces Guest 39 spaces 20 public spaces 1 0 spaces Commercial 12 spaces (OTNSP in -lieu fee) OTNSP in -lieu fee 0 spaces 1 e.g. street or public garage parking The OTNSP identifies five architectural styles that define the character of Old Town Newhall. As outlined in the project description above, the project has been reviewed by the City's architectural consultant and is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. In addition, the project meets all other design standards of the OTNSP for the Stacked Dwelling building type, including requirements for setbacks and height. The height of the project is consistent with existing buildings in Old Town Newhall, such as Newhall Crossings and the Old Town Newhall Library. ENVIRONMENTAL The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR. As described, the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. NOTICING All notices as required by law were completed. Property owners within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing by mail (106 notices). A public notice was placed in The Signal on February 25, 2025, and a sign was posted on the project site on March 4, 2025. As of the publishing of this agenda, the Planning Division has received one letter of support in regards to the project (attached). CONCLUSION The Newhall Mixed -Use Project is consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, SCMC, and OTNSP. Therefore, City staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution P25-03, recommending that the City Council approve Master Case 24-134 (CUP24- 007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012) for the construction of a new five - story mixed -use building and demolition and delisting of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse Page 7 Packet Pg. 14 O building at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A); ATTACHMENTS Resolution P25-03 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval (MC24-134) Exhibit A Attachment #1 (Market Street Striping) Exhibit A Attachment 92 (Parks Planning Fee Estimate) Aerial and Zoning Map Site & Floor Plans Elevations & Renderings Notice of Determination Public Hearing Notice Letter From Historical Society Comment Letters Page 8 Packet Pg. 15 1.a RESOLUTION P25-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE MASTER CASE 24-134, CONSISTING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW FIVE -STORY MIXED USE BUILDING AND DEMOLITION AND DELISTING OF THE MASONIC LODGE/COURTHOUSE BUILDING LOCATED AT 24300, 24308, 24316 MAIN STREET AND 22505 MARKET STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 2831-012-022 THROUGH -026), IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. The Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. On June 28, 2024, the applicant (Serrano Development Group) initiated Master Case 24-134, consisting of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 24-007, Minor Use Permit (MUP) 24-015), Adjustment Permit (ADJ) 24-005, Architectural Design Review (ADR) 24-017, and Development Review (DR) 24-012. The properties affected by the initial application were Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 2831-012-023 through -026; B. On November 27, 2024, the application was revised to include an additional property which is APN 2831-012-022; C. The application was deemed complete on November 27, 2024; D. The project site consists of five parcels totaling three-quarters of an acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station. The project proposes to demolish three existing buildings on -site: Mac's Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Soundsations (24300 and 24308 Main Street), and the City Council designated historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street); E. The project site is located within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP); F. The applicant proposes to demolish the existing structures on -site to construct a new five - story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area and 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and first -floor parking level. The project includes the closure of one driveway on Main Street and would allow for the addition of three public parking spaces on Main Street. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via new driveways from both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requests relief from the Page 1 of 7 Packet Pg. 16 1.a Resolution P25-03 Master Case 24-134 March 18, 2024 requirements of the OTNSP to include a 20-percent reduction from the shared residential amenity space and to increase the allowable floor area ratio (FAR) above 200 percent of the structure's first floor footprint; G. In compliance with AB 2097, the applicant is proposing to provide residential and on -street guest parking to avoid a negative impact on commercial and residential parking within one- half mile of the project site, as demonstrated in the parking demand study on file with the Planning Division. Specifically, the study proposes to provide a 1.56 residential parking ratio on -site instead of the 2.0 ratio required by the OTNSP. The study also proposes a 0.25 per unit ratio for guest parking to be accommodated on -street instead of the required 0.5 per unit ratio. The proposed development is utilizing the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement; H. The project proposes to demolish a building included on the OTNSP's Historic Preservation list and designated as historic by the City Council under the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) includes mitigation measure CUL-1, which governs the demolition of historical structures. The applicant has submitted a letter from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, which states that this structure is no longer historically significant, and would fulfill the requirements of mitigation measure CUL-1 by recording the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, installing a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, placing a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and making a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts; I. On March 18, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) Planning Commission at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; J. At this public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the staff report, staff presentation, applicant's presentation, and public testimony; and K. This Resolution and its findings are made based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at its March 18, 2025, public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 24-134. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the Planning Commission hereby finds as follows: A. The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. In particular, the applicant would fulfill the requirements of mitigation measure CUL-1. As demonstrated by the letter on file from the Santa Clarita Historical Society, the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse has been substantially altered and no further action under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is required. Consequently, a Notice of Determination was prepared for this project in compliance with CEQA; Packet Pg. 17 1.a Resolution P25-03 Master Case 24-134 March 18, 2024 B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the Planning Commission is based is the Master Case 24-134 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development Department in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the Planning Commission hereby finds the Notice of Determination for this Project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 24-134. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission determines as follows: A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The proposed project would be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation: The proposed project would be consistent with the following policies of the General Plan Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth. Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed -use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed -use zoning. Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels. The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed -use building in a walkable and transit -friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes. B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Unified Development Code (UDC) and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP); The proposed project would be consistent with the following findings of the OTNSP: OTNSP-1: That the proposed use or project is consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. OTNSP-2: That the proposed use or project meets the development requirements for the Packet Pg. 18 1.a Resolution P25-03 Master Case 24-134 March 18, 2024 Zone within which it is located including parking, architecture, and ground -floor uses. A Stacked Dwelling building type is permitted by right in the AE zone of the OTNSP only as part of a vertical mixed -use project with upper floor residential. Any future tenants in the new commercial spaces constructed by the project will be subject to the requirements of OTNSP Table 4.2-1, the permitted use chart for the AE zone. A CUP is requested to increase the allowable FAR above 200 percent of the structure's first floor footprint for the Stacked Dwelling building type of the OTNSP. An ADJ is requested to reduce the shared residential amenity space requirement up to 20-percent from OTNSP standards. The building is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. The proposed project complies with all other development standards for the AE zone and Stacked Dwelling building type. With the conditions of approval, the project will with Title 16 and 17 of the SCMC and the OTNSP C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and The proposed project is not located on a hazardous site and would not include any hazardous materials. Standard construction materials and methods would be utilized to ensure safety during construction. The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, and regulations, including, without limitation: the California Building Standards Code and Fire Code. Sufficient access for firefighting purposes has been provided and verified by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LACFD), and the applicant must comply with all LACFD requirements. D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use; The subject site includes existing commercial development and surface parking. The parking demand study for the project demonstrates that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed building. The proposed building complies with the City's standards for mixed -use development, including compliance with setbacks, building height, drive aisle width, and landscaping. 2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are ofsufcient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such proposal would generate; The project is accessed via Market Street and Railroad Avenue, and improvements to the roadway will be required for the proposed building. The applicant must comply with all Packet Pg. 19 1.a Resolution P25-03 Master Case 24-134 March 18, 2024 City -imposed engineering requirements when constructing any improvements in the right-of-way, such as sewer laterals, parkway tree installation, and ADA paths of travel at the driveways. The project will not have a significant effect on vehicle miles traveled or traffic, and existing driveway ingress and egress from the site will be maintained. With the proposed improvements along the project's frontage, the project will be in compliance with all requirements of the City's Department of Public Works. 3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriprotectiorl, etc.) are readily available; and The project will have public protection services provided by both the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) and Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACFD), and will not require any additional resources or services from those organizations as a result of its operation. The proposal would also be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the LACFD and LASD. 4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, schools. Solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.) is adequate to serve the site. The proposed use would be located within an existing commercial area, which is located within a developed urbanized area with available and adequate utilities to serve the site. The proposed project would connect to this existing infrastructure on -site. SECTION 4: ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FOR THE RELOCATION OR DEMOLITION OF A HISTORIC RESOURCE. As required by Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section 17.64.100, the City Council must approve the relocation or demolition of a property or structure that has been designated as a historic resource. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council determine as follows: A. That the City Council must make findings to relocate a historic structure. Alternatively, upon completion of environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition. As identified in the letter provided by the Santa Clarita Historical Society, relocation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building is not feasible. In addition, the historical integrity of the building has been severely compromised by a remodel in 1968. No interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse. As described above, the project is consistent with the previously prepared EIR for the OTNSP, including MM-CUL-1. The applicant will record the building in accordance with Historic Architectural Building Survey, install a commemorative plaque on the exterior of the new building, place a dedicatory art installation within the residential lobby, and make a monetary contribution of $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. Therefore, the requirements of the SCMC and Packet Pg. 20 1.a Resolution P25-03 Master Case 24-134 March 18, 2024 the OTNSP for the delisting and demolition of a building designated as a historic resource have been met. SECTION 5: FINDINGS FOR ADJUSTMENT PERMIT. As required by Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) Section 17.24.100, based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 24-134, the Planning Commission determines as follows: 1. That the adjustment does not authorize a use or activity that is not allowed in the zone; The ADJ is consistent with the development standards of the OTNSP and will not authorize a use or activity that is prohibited under the zone. All proposed uses and activities remain within the scope of the OTNSP. The proposed project furthers the goal of creating a vibrant and active Main Street, and would further enliven the area by providing street -level retail space along with additional residential density in this urban environment. 2. That granting an adjustment is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone which would otherwise be denied to the property for which the adjustment is sought; and The proposed project meets the intent and goals of the OTNSP, as described above, and provides meaningful shared amenity space as required by the specific plan. The applicant is providing 10,929 square feet of amenity space, 20 percent less than the 13,560 square feet required by the OTNSP. The provided amenities include an outdoor courtyard with pool and spa, a residential clubhouse/lounge, lobby, garden corridor, and bike room for residents of the proposed development. The provided amenities meet the intent of the OTNSP and the provided square footage is appropriate given the compact, high -density nature of the development, while remaining within the height requirements of the OTNSP 3. That the granting of the adjustment will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. As described above, the development, including the grating of the ADJ, will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to the property as it is providing a reduction to a development standard that has been evaluated and reviewed and all appropriate agencies. SECTION 6: DETERMINATION, APPROVALS. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council takes the following actions: Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 24-134, Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24- 017, and Development Review 24-012, for the construction of a new five -story mixed - use building at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue and the delisting and demolition of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, subject to the conditions of approval (Exhibit A). Packet Pg. 21 1.a Resolution P25-03 Master Case 24-134 March 18, 2024 SECTION 7: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the Planning Commission in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 8: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact. SECTION 9: NOTICE. The Secretary is directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the Planning Commission and any other person requesting a copy. SECTION 10: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the Planning Commission's final decision made on March 18, 2025. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of March, 2025. LISA EICHMAN, CHAIRPERSON PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: RACHEL CLARK, SECRETARY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF SANTA CLARITA I, Rachel Clark, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of March, 2025, by the following vote of the Planning Commission: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Packet Pg. 22 1.a Resolution P25-03 Master Case 24-134 March 18, 2024 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSION SECRETARY Packet Pg. 23 1.b EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION P25-03 MASTER CASE 24-134 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of th permittee agrees to comply with the following Clarita's (City) approval of Master Case 24-134. GENERAL CONDITIONS Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the provisions as conditions for the City of Santa GC1. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC. GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval must be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre -commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of sixty (60) calendar days or more must terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use must not be re-established or resumed after the sixty (60) day period. Discontinuation must include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume. GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally -approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration. GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term "permittee" includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys' fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee. GCS. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspection requirements as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director (Director). Packet Pg. 24 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 15 GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the plans date -stamped on file, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein. GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon permittee's successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC. GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval. GC9. When Exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail. GC10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed. GC 11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020. GC12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the City Council. GC13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director. GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval. GC15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all 1.b Packet Pg. 25 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 15 requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated. GC16. The City will not issue a final certificate of occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions. GC 17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the permittee. PLANNING DIVISION PL1. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Newhall Mixed -Use Project, including a five -story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 5,223 square feet of first -floor commercial space, 78 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 24-134. PL2. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans, elevations, colors, materials, and other elements on file with the Planning Division. Any modification to the approved project and plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director. PL3. The building is approved at the heights shown on the approved elevations and cannot exceed 55 feet in height. Architectural enhancements extending above the roofline are permitted only as shown on the approved plans and may not exceed an additional 12 feet in height. PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 122 parking stalls on -site (1.56 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 20 public on -street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio). PL5. In lieu of constructing 12 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $70,261.20 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid PL6. Before any permit is issued including, without limitation, a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, the permittee must complete all required recordation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, as required by the OTNSP Environmental Impact 1.b Packet Pg. 26 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 15 Report Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and the permittee's commitments to preserving the building's history as approved by the City Council. PL7. Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit, the permittee must donate $750,000 to support local historic preservation efforts. PL8. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install a commemorative plaque on the building exterior and provide an art installation within the lobby to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. PL9. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must obtain a Temporary Use Permit and install two murals on the North Elevation as shown on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division. PL10. The uses in the commercial building are subject to the permitted use chart for the AE zone of the OTNSP. PL11. All roof -mounted and ground -mounted equipment must be screened from public view PL12. No signage is approved by this permit. All future signage requires a sign permit application in accordance with the OTNSP. Exposed neon is not permitted. Landscaping Conditions LR1. Before the City Engineer issues grading permit(s), the permittee must provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans (Landscape Document Package) for the Director's review and approval. The Landscape Document Package must be prepared by a California -registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20' to 30' F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105' F to 110' F). The Landscape Document Package must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other SCMC requirements. LR2. The permittee is required to pay all associated fees to the City before the release of the approved Landscape Document Package for the project. LR3. The permittee must coordinate with the Director of Administrative Services regarding any landscaping installed on City right-of-way. The Director of Administrative Services must review the landscape and irrigation plans when submitted, and all such landscaping must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services before installation. The permittee must receive final approval for the installed landscape before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy. LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection. 1.b Packet Pg. 27 Exhibit A 1. b Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 15 LR5. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved Landscape Document Package. ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION General Requirements EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide an approval letter from Southern California Edison (Distribution Division and/or Transmission Division, as appropriate) and from all other affected utilities for the proposed grading and improvements adjacent to their existing facilities, as required by the City Engineer. EN2. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site must be installed underground by the permittee. Certificate of Compliance Requirements EN3. Before the Building Official issues any building permit, a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment encompassing all parcels within the boundaries of this project prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California must be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; in compliance with applicable law Grading and Geology Requirements EN4. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a grading plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. The grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations, including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction. ENS. Before the Building Official issues building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee. EN6. This project anticipates export of 18,972 CY of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation. A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation: i. Obtain an encroachment pennit for the work. Packet Pg. 28 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 15 ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee. C. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route. EN7. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Letter of Permission for review and approval for grading over easements/outside of the property lines from the affected easement holder/adjacent property owner(s). Drainage Requirements EN8. Before the City Engineer, or designee issues a grading permit, the permittee must have the site drainage study approved by the City Engineer demonstrating that post - development flows from the site will not be increased from pre -development flows, or mitigate for the increase. Water Quality Requirements EN9. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan. Street Light Relocation Requirements EN10. Before street plan approval, the permittee must submit a revised Street Light Plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must relocate the existing street light along Railroad Avenue per the approved revised plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 1.b Packet Pg. 29 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 15 Street Improvement Requirements EN11. Before the revised street plan approval and any construction within public street right-of- way, the permittee must submit to the City Engineer or designee a revised street improvement plan for review and approval to obtain encroachment permits from the City Engineer, or designee. EN12. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee is required to dedicate a portion of its property to City for public right-of-way to meet the requirements of SCMC Section 17.55, creating a clear sight triangle ensuring unobstructed views for drivers. Permittee may, but is not required to, reserve property rights to include all projections, such as awnings, within the airspace of the dedicated public right-of-way. Such reservation must be approved as to form by the City Attorney. EN13. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee must submit a street tree location plan to the Urban Forestry Administrator for review and approval. The plan must include proposed sewer lateral locations, storm drain infrastructure, and trees must not conflict with the proposed infrastructure. EN14. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant Curb Ramp (per the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) along the property frontage corner at the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street and dedicate necessary easement to the City, as directed by the City Engineer. EN15. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an ADA compliance Curb Ramp (per SPPWC Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) at all three other corners of the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street per the State of California DOT Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-06 and as directed by the City Engineer. Railroad Avenue is designated as a State Route and any modification at the intersection, requires existing nonstandard curb ramps to be reconstructed to current standards per DIB 82-06. EN16. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must dedicate sidewalk easements sufficient to encompass ADA requirements for sidewalks installed with drive approaches per the current SPPWC Standard Plan 110-2, Type C, or equivalent. EN17. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must replace the abandoned driveway(s) with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement in accordance with SPPWC standards and in compliance with OTNSP, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A revised street plan and encroachment permit is required. 1.b Packet Pg. 30 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 15 EN18. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets abutting the project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sewer Improvement Requirements EN19. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the proposed building(s) lateral line(s) must connect to the existing public sewer main in Market Street (8" sewer per PC CI2520), and the permittee must coordinate with the Building & Safety Division regarding payment of additional annexation fees, if required, to annex the property into the County Sanitation District. EN20. The on -site sewer is a privately maintained. Before grading plan approval, the permittee must submit an "on -site sewer plan." The "on -site sewer plan" are designed per the California Plumbing Code and approved by the Building Official before Grading Plan approval. EN21. Before the Building Official issues Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. EN22. The permittee must also obtain a permit from LA County Building Official to install a new saddle on the existing public sewer by LA County Sewer Maintenance Division, if the wye does not exist on the existing public sewer. Bond, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements EN23. Before City Engineer, or designee issue encroachment permits for public improvements (Street), the permittee, by agreement with the City Engineer, must guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means in a form approved by the City Attorney. Certificate of Occupancy/Occupancies are withheld if the improvements are not completed. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TEL Before the City Engineer issues street plan approval, the permittee must show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110- 2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details will be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum. TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulb - out on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach. 1.b Packet Pg. 31 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 15 TE3. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must restripe Market Street per the attached exhibit (Striping Exhibit — Market Street) to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. TE4. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee will pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Via Princessa B&T District. The current rate for this District is $22,710. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment. Standard B&T Fee Calculation: Apartments = the number of units (78) x the district rate ($22,710) x 0.7 = $1,239,966 B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division must be calculated as follows: Retail Commercial = 5,223 sf x $22,710 x 5 = $36,306 16,335 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FD1. All fire lanes must be clear of all encroachments and must be maintained in accordance with Section 503 of County of Los Angeles Fire Code, Title 32, as adopted by the SCMC, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. FD2. Main Street, Market Street & Railroad Avenue serve as the Fire Apparatus Access roads for this project. For buildings where the vertical distance between the access roadway and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet from the lowest level of the Fire Apparatus Access Road, provide a minimum unobstructed width of 28 feet, exclusive of shoulders and an unobstructed vertical clearance "clear to sky" Fire Apparatus Access Roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. At least one required access route meeting this condition must be located such that the edge of the Fire Apparatus Access Roadway, not including shoulders, that is closest to the building being served, is between 10 feet and 30 feet from the building, as determined by the fire code official, and must be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the Fire Apparatus Access Road is positioned must be approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.1.1; 503.2.1.2; 503.2.1.2.2 & 503.2.1.2.2.1). FD3. The dimensions of the approved Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be maintained as originally approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.2.2.1). FD4. Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing 75,000 pounds and must be surfaced to provide all- 1.b Packet Pg. 32 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 15 weather driving capabilities (Fire Code 503.2.3). FD5. A minimum 5-foot-wide approved firefighter access walkway leading from the Fire Department Access Road to all required openings in the building's exterior walls must be provided for firefighting and rescue purposes (Fire Code 504.1). FD6. Security barriers, visual screen barriers or other obstructions must not be installed on the roof of any building in such a manner as to obstruct firefighter access or egress in the event of fire or other emergency. Parapets must not exceed 42 inches from the top of the parapet to the roof surface on more than two sides. These sides should face an access roadway or yard sufficient to accommodate ladder operations (Fire Code 504.5). FD7. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4N 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD8. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 3500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 3 hours. Three public fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow (Fire Code 507.3 & Appendix B). FD9. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed buildings within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval before installation. FD10. Install 1 public fire hydrant as noted by the Fire Department. All required public fire hydrants must be installed, tested and accepted before beginning construction. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4N 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD11. A digital copy of the Water Plans for the required public fire hydrant must be submitted to the Fire Department's Land Development Unit for review and approval. Compliance is required before project construction. Submittal must be provided through EPIC -LA using the following Plan Type: Fire Land Development —Water Plan & System Review. BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION Plans and Permits BSI. Construction drawings must be prepared and submitted to the Building & Safety Division for plan review and building permit issuance. Supporting documents; such as structural and energy calculations, and geotechnical reports must be included with the plan submittal. BS2. The submitted site plan must show all parcel/lot lines, easements, fire separation distances, restricted use areas, etc. Any construction proposed in an easement must obtain the easement owner's written permission or the easement must be removed. Parcel lines 1.b Packet Pg. 33 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 15 that overlap any proposed buildings must be removed (lot line adjustment) before the Building Official issues a building permit. BS3. Construction drawings must incorporate mitigation measures identified by a noise study prepared by a qualified noise engineer. Electric Vehicle Parking Spaces for the residential portion of the project per CalGreen BS4. EV Ready parking spaces with receptacles for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles at the rate of 40% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. For the receptacle power source and configuration see CalGreen 4.106.4.2.2. BSS. Additionally, EV Ready parking spaces with EV chargers for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with Level 2 EV chargers at the rate of 10% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. At least 50% of these EV chargers must be equipped with J1772 connectors. Accessibility for the residential portion of the project BS6. All applicable disabled access requirements of California Building Standards Code (CBSC) Chapter 11A, as adopted by the SCMC, must be shown on the architectural plans versus civil plans. BS7. If the project receives any public funds such as tax credits, incentives or similar programs the multi -family project must comply with the public housing requirements of the California Building Code, Chapter 11B. Soil Reports and Grading BS8. A complete soils and geology investigation report will be required for this project. The report must be formally submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The recommendations of the report must be followed and incorporated into the plans for the proj ect. Hazard Zones BS9. Indicate on the cover sheet of the plans this project IS NOT LOCATED in a Fire Hazard Zone, IS NOT LOCATED in the Flood Hazard Zone, and IS NOT LOCATED in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Additional Information BS10. Separate Demolition Permit will be required to raze any building to be removed on the site. Clearances from the City Planning Division, City Environmental Services (for construction demolition deposit) and AQMD will be required before the Building Official issues a demolition permit. 1.b Packet Pg. 34 Exhibit A 1. b Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 12 of 15 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ES1. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must demonstrate appropriate, detailed safety measures for resident access to organics bins as well as to bins with chute connections. ES2. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide confirmation to utilize "push -out" service provided by the waste hauler, to avoid the need for a bin staging area along Market Street. ES3. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide elevations and/or site plans for the chute system that identify the correct location and placement of both chutes and corresponding bins within the trash rooms. ES4. Before a building, demolition, or grading permit is issued, the permittee must submit a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) and receive approval from the Environmental Services Manager or Designee if the project meets the parameters below (S.C.M.C.§15.46.300): A. All demolition projects (regardless of valuation), all commercial projects of new construction or additions over 1,000 square feet and all tenant improvements, alterations or new construction valued greater than $200,000, all new residential construction projects and all residential additions and improvements that increase building area, volume, or size must comply with the City's Construction and Demolition Materials (C&D) Recycling Ordinance. S.C.M.C.§15.46.200 B. A minimum of 65% of the entire project's inert (dirt, rock, bricks, etc.) waste and 65% of the remaining C&D waste must be recycled or reused rather than disposing in a landfill. S.C.M.C.§15.46.610 and CALGreen sections 4.408, 5.408, 301.1.1 and 301.3 C. For renovation or tenant improvement projects and new construction projects, a deposit of 2% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. For demolition projects, a deposit of 10% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. The full deposit will be returned to the permittee upon proving that 65% of the inert and remaining C&D waste was recycled or reused. S.C.M.C.§15.46.400 ES5. All projects within the City that are not self -hauling waste materials must use one of the City's franchised haulers for temporary and roll -off bin collection services. S.C.M.C.§15.44.220 Packet Pg. 35 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 13 of 15 PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION PR1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must pay the required Park Dedication Fee equal to the value of the amount of land established per the City's General Plan, "Parks and Recreation Element." The permittee may be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Final Parkland dedication obligation calculation to be based on current density per dwelling and fair market value rates at time of payment. An estimate is attached. TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DIVISION TS1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a Grading Permit, the permittee must demonstrate compliance with SCMC Section 17.51.007 (Connected City Infrastructure Program) requiring conduit from a location to be determined in the public right-of-way to the Minimum Point of Entry (MPOE) or similar location within the project area that serves as the main telecommunications closet. Conduit for this condition must be reflected on development plans. TRANSIT DIVISION TR1. The current Transit Impact Fee is $216 per residential unit. Permittee must pay the fee in place at the time of building permit issuance. SPECIAL DISTRICTS SD1. This permittee is required to protect and preserve in place all existing Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) landscape located within the public right of way along Main Street and Market Street. For this project, landscape includes without limitation, trees, shrubs, irrigation, lighting, electrical outlets, pilasters with Trex / wood cross rails, decking, brick pavers, brick planters, raised planters, wrought iron, potted plants on city irrigation, and any other amenity items located within the existing landscape planters and walkways. SD2. This project is located within the Downtown Newhall Corridor and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. As a result, all required landscape improvements must be consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plans and design guidelines. SD3. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to install full landscape improvements along Main Street where the current drive approach to Mac's Pool supply is located. These improvements must close the gap, and connect the two existing planters located on opposite sides of the drive approach. The current preliminary plan is showing a Schinus molle "California pepper" tree as a proposed tree in this area. Schinus molle is not an approved tree and must be replaced with an approved species. 1.b Packet Pg. 36 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 14 of 15 SD4. New landscape includes without limitation: connecting to and extending the brick pavers (walkway), existing planters, irrigation, and the installation of new planters consisting of trees shrubs, lighting and other landscape features similar to those in the existing planters. SD5. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit final landscape plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect and receive approval by LMD SD6. Existing parkway trees and landscape along Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue are required to be protected and preserved in place. This may include having to install approved temporary protective fencing around the edge of the planters to protect trees, shrubs, irrigation and other landscape amenities located within the planter during construction. SD7. Unless waived by the Director of Administrative Services, the planter located at the back edge of the sidewalk shared by both Mac's Pool Supply and the adjacent KHTS building must be protected and preserved in place. If this planter cannot be protected in place, the permittee will be required to repair and / or replace this planter to the satisfaction of the Director of Administrative Services. SD8. Full parkway landscape improvements will be required along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. These landscape improvements must be consistent with the improvements currently along Railroad Avenue and 5th Street fronting the Hotel Lexen. This includes installing amenities such as bollard / hitching post, and protected electrical outlets. SD9. If at any time during the project, the irrigation to any existing landscape is turned off, the permittee and their contractors will be responsible to provide supplemental irrigation / water to all trees and shrubs throughout the duration of the project by any means necessary at no cost to the City. Trees and shrubs which die, or decline to a condition unacceptable by Director of Administrative Services, must be replaced by the permittee at no cost to the City. SD 10. The permittee is responsible for replacing any missing landscape shrubs in the planters fronting the project site. SDI 1. The permittee is responsible for replacing or repairing any damaged or missing pavers or decking located within the public right-of-way fronting the project on both Main Street and Market Street. SD12. The permittee is required to show all existing landscape which fronts the project on Main Street to scale on all future sets of site plans including, without limitation; demolition, grading, construction and landscape plans (preliminary and final). SDI 3. At no time is any construction material, equipment or vehicles permitted to be stored or placed within a landscape planter where trees and shrubs exist. At no time is any form of hazardous material including runoff water from washing and cleaning of tools and equipment be permitted to enter any existing or proposed landscape planter. 1.b Packet Pg. 37 Exhibit A Master Case 24-134: CUP24-007, MUP24-015, ADJ24-005, ADR24-017, and DR24-012 Draft Conditions of Approval Page 15 of 15 SD14. The permittee is advised that parkway trees are maintained by the City's LMD. At no time will any parkway tree be pruned for sign visibility. This information must be included with all paperwork for all future tenants. SD15. Any impacts to root system of an existing City maintained tree must be approved by the City Arborist. Work completed within the "Tree Protected Zone" (TPZ) must be completed by hand in the presence of a qualified consulting arborist with documented experience with monitoring trees during construction. The permittee will be required to retain the services of a qualified consulting arborist to perform all required monitoring. This will be completed at no cost to the City of Santa Clarita. Landscape Maintenance Districts SD16. These parcels are located within LMD Zone 28, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscapes located in the Newhall area. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to LMD Zone 28 in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. SD17. These parcels are located within LMD Areawide Zone 2008-1, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscaped medians on major thoroughfares located throughout the City of Santa Clarita. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to the Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. Streetlight Maintenance District SD18. These parcels were originally annexed by County of Los Angeles into a Lighting District with a maximum assessment of $12.38 per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Unit) without a cost of living index/escalator. The permittee will be required to annex all parcels into the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (SCLLD), Street -lighting Zone B. The District funds the operation and maintenance of various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District. SDI 9. As part of any required street improvements, the permittee may be required to add, relocate, or update streetlights along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. All streetlights and their locations must be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District (SMD). 1.b Packet Pg. 38 BishLaw-California Personal Injury N ers on 1, 'A d�A tS � t - Maikiii a ,ElTrocaderu , .Kitchen &bar Mexican 22W8 The Sinatr RE/K C Imagery ©2025 Google, Imagery ©2025 Airbus, Map data ©2025 20 ft 1.c Packet Pg. 39 1.d City of Santa Clarita Park Dedication Fee Requirement Project Description: Old Town Newhall Mixed -Use Tract/MC#: 24-134 Housing Density / Units Dwelling 5 Acres **FMV Per 1000 Sub Total 20% Off Site Improvements In Lieu Fee 2.870 0.005 $880,000 $984,984 $196,997 $1,181,981 Total Density 224 Total Acres due 1.11930 30% Max. Park Credit 0.33579 With Park Credit 0.78351 $689,489 $137,898 $827,387 Potential Private Park Total Total Max. Credit Credit SQ. FT. Acres 30% $354,594 14,627 0.33579 0.33579 TOTAL FEES DUE WITH 30% CREDIT= $827,387 TOTAL FEES DUE WITHOUT CREDIT= $1,181,981 Estimate Reviewed by: Katie Knybel Date: 2/6/2025 **The applicant will be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the Fair Market Value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Method of calculation per the City of Santa Clarita General Plan - Parks and Recreation Element: DU X Population X 5 acres per X "FMV = Subtotal X 1.2 = In Lieu Fee per DU 1000 people Buildable acre 2/6/2025 Packet Pg. 40 W W U) a W U) 0 w X J J a w z 1.e AERIAL AND ZONING MAP Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Aerial Map Packet Pg. 41 1.e Zoning Map ZONING KEY AE (OTNSP) I — Old Town Newhall Specific Plan — Arts & Entertainment N (OTNSP) 1- Old Town Newhall Specific Plan — Neighborhood S:\CD\!PLANNING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2024\MC24-134 (ADJ, ADR, DR, CUP, MUP Market & Main Mixed-Use)\5. Planning Commission\3. MC24-134 Aerial and Zoning Map.doc Packet Pg. 42 1.f SITE & FLOOR PLANS Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Packet Pg. 43 UTILI TIES - ---- _ - -- --- UTILITIES - -1 III III11 STAIRS lily_ Llli-lii.l�ll. II IILII Lill.III.. IIIr.IIIr_II_III_Ii.Illlll W ° ® i 3 RAMP UP II_II EXIT TO RAILROAD �- -I 71- �I ILII��ILI -IH�I �LI ll I H-n- I I ��I�-LI I) � 1111� II III II I�-II�III =dICl-ld ld�---CCI-1I II II a x� �rc �!Urx _ w RESIDENTIAL PARKING -I 67STALLS _III III 1 11 M E € 12 Q Q 12 STAIRS it � � I 12 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.f PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES - 27 EV CHARGING SPACES -7 ACCESSIBLE EVCS -I ACCESS BLE SPACES -I VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - I TANDAM SPACES - 52 (X SINGLE SPACE - 15 TOTAL BASEMENT PARKING - 67 STALLS �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submitta. BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN packet Pg. 44 PARKING ENTRY/EXIT (RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT ONLY) S, SERRANO 4SAE Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development DEVELOPMENT GROUP aoa Santa Clarita, CA 1.f PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES -22 EV CHARGING SPACES -6 ACCESSIBLE EVCS - 1 ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 TANDEM SPACES - 36 (1& SINGLE SPACES - 19 TOTALGARAGE PARKING -55STALLS TOTAL RETAIL SQ. FT. - 5,223 SF �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 14 1 60' Planning Submftta FIRST FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 45 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.f PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (2ND FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 8 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 18 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal SECOND FLOOR PLAN packet pg. 46 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.f PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (3RD FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal THIRD FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 47 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.f PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION WTH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal FOURTH FLOOR PLAN packet pg. 48 no Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development GSERRANO ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP Santa Clarita, CA nnEaoas 1.f PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (5TH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 10 2 BEDROOM UNITS - 9 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 20 �y SCALE: 1"=30-0" 0' 15' 30' 60' Planning Submittal FIFTH FLOOR PLAN Packet Pg. 49 1.g ELEVATIONS & RENDERINGS Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Packet Pg. 50 WEST ELEVATION MAIN ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER is. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III; 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SGSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.g SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION - MAIN STREET (WEST) SOUTH ELEVATION MARKET ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER is. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III; 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SGSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.g 4 SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. ELEVATION - MARKET STREET (SOUTH) Planning Submftta EAST ELEVATION RAILROAD AVE EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER 1S. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III; 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) SGSERRANO 4ME DEVELOPMENT GROUP — Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.g a SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION - RAILROAD AVE (EAST) EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE III) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM 4. SIDING (TYPE W 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE W 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER 1S. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE I) 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III; 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE W 26. SIDING (TYPE I) 27. PAINTED WALL MURAL S6sERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.g VA SCALE: 1" 20-0" 0. 10, 20• 1. Planning Submftta ELEVATION (NORTH) PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA Main Street Elevation Elevations a �_- SERRANO Ism CTITECTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP INTERIORS Packet F PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA Railroad Avenue Eleavtion Elevations SERRANO Um ARCHITECT RE DEVELOPMENT GROUP INTERIORS Packet F PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA Market Street Elevation Elevations �aSERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP Ism �RORITECTURE INTERIOR Packet F SY0.,'S Stii`�C'+CLt�4 _ .. .� uz I cdf�� 6 L W .r PROJECT CONCEPT Newhall Mixed Use Main Street, Newhall, CA North Elevation Elevations �O-SERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP a SAE ARCHITECTURE INTERIOR Packet F 1.h NOTICE OF DETERMINATION a° asxtA �< � t4 [X] County Clerk [ ] State Clearinghouse County of Los Angeles 1400 Tenth Street • 12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 1007 Sacramento, CA 95815 Norwalk, CA 90650 PROJECT Newhall Mixed -Use Project: Master Case 24-134 NAME: PROJECT 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) 2831-012- LOCATION: 022 through -026) PROJECT The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit DESCRIPTION: (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the Mac's Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Horseshoe on Main (24300 Main Street), and the potentially historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street) buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full -block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five -story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground -level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first -floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the on - site potentially historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20-percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The proj ect was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. PROJECT Serrano Development Group APPLICANT: This is to advise that the City of Santa Clarita has made the following determinations regarding the project described above: 1) The project was approved by the [] Director of Community Development [ ] Planning Commission [X] Mayor and City Council on the following date: April 22, 2025. 2) [X] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {a}). 3) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {b I). 4) [ ] An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 5) [ ] An Addendum to the Final EIR was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6) The project [ ] WILL [X] WILL NOT have a significant impact on the environment. 7) Mitigation measures [ ] WERE [X] WERE NOT made a condition of project approval. 8) A Statement of Overriding Considerations [ ] WAS [X] WAS NOT adopted for this project. This is to certify that the [X] NEGATIVE DECLARATION [ ] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [ ] ADDENDUM with record of project approval is available for public review at: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 (661) 255-4330 Contact Person/Title: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I Signature: Packet Pg. 59 1.i CITY OF SANTA CLARITA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ' 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION: Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017 PROJECT APPLICANT: Serrano Development Group PROJECT LOCATION: 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the Mac's Pool Supply (24316 Main Street), Horseshoe on Main (24300 Main Street), and the historical Masonic Lodge/Courthouse (22505 Market Street) buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full -block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five -story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground -level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first -floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the on -site historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20- percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on this matter on the following date DATE: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m. LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers 23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor Santa Clarita, CA 91355 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the EIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings. If you wish to have written comments included in the materials the Planning Commission receives prior to the public hearing, it must be submitted to the Community Development Department by Friday, March 7, 2025. For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Telephone: (661) 255-4330. Website: www.santaclarita.gov/planning. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I, erubalcava(�santaclarita.gov. Patrick Leclair Planning Manager Published: The Signal, February 25, 2025 Packet Pg. 60 1.i PROJECT SITE Request for a new mixed -use building 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) Packet Pg. 61 1.j SANTA CLA TT A."Al HISTORY CENTER February 28, 2025 To whom it may concern As a longtime supporter of the goals of the City of Santa Clarita's Downtown Newhall Specific Plan, and after careful consideration, the Board of Directors of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society ("the Board") voted unanimously on February 24, 2025, to support the redevelopment of the area of Newhall bounded by Railroad Avenue, Market Street, Main Street, and the building at 24316 Main Street (the former location of Mac's Pool Supply). To that end, the Board unanimously recorded its non -opposition to the removal of the building at 24307 Railroad Avenue/22505 Market Street, commonly known as "Ye Olde Courthouse." The building is listed as one of the City of Santa Clarita's Historic Resources. The City's Historic Preservation Ordinance (17.03.145 UDC) states that upon a finding that the removal of a Historic Resource is necessary to proceed with a development project consistent with and supportive of identified goals and objectives of the General Plan, ... the City Council shall direct the property owner to relocate the designated historic struc- ture to a site within the City of Santa Clarita and approved by the City Council. Such relo- cation may include the assistance of the developer, the City of Santa Clarita, the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society, or other entity as appropriate. Alternatively, upon comple- tion of appropriate environmental review, if any, and upon making the determination that relocation is infeasible and there are no feasible alternatives to demolition, the City Council may direct the Building Official to issue the permit for demolition. The Board suspects it would be infeasible to relocate the building, whose historical integrity was severely compromised by an unfortunate 1968 remodel. Upon review, the Board is aware that no interior features remain from its use as a County Courthouse (1932-1971). Should the City deem it necessary to issue a demolition permit, the Board believes it appropriate for the City to exact an impact fee from the applicant comparable in amount to the estimated cost of relocating and restoring the building to its original historical condition, such fee revenue to be restricted to the advancement of historical preservation goals within the City of Santa Clarita. Further, the Board urges the City to require the developer to cooperate with the City and the His- torical Society to add plaques in several locations throughout the project to identify the historical uses of the property. c�� l Alan Pollack President, Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society I PO Box 221925, Newhall CA 91322-1925 1 scvhs.org Packet Pg. 62 1.k Tuesday, March 11, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As a citizen of Santa Clarita who cares about downtown Newhall as one of the centers of vitality in our city, I am thrilled to hear developers are going forward with proposing the mixed -use project on the corner of Market Street and Main Street. This proposed project bears remarkable resemblance to Newhall Crossings a mere two blocks away, and Newhall Crossings is a staple in the fabric of downtown Newhall, providing foot traffic and vitality to the area as well as some very cool businesses and public spaces. Combining its proximity to all the attractions of Main Street and to the transit hub of the Metrolink station, it's very much somewhere I and many others would love to live. I think more development of the same type could only possibly make downtown Newhall, and Santa Clarita as whole better, so I would love to see this project go through a smooth approval process. Thank you for your consideration, Ashe Mahoney Packet Pg. 63 1.k March 10, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. As a longtime resident of this city, I have witnessed its remarkable growth and believe that well -planned projects like this one contribute significantly to our community's economic and social prosperity. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 20 years, raising my family here and seeing firsthand the need for additional housing and commercial space. Newhall, in particular, holds historical and cultural significance within our city, and its continued development is essential for maintaining its vibrancy. This project presents an opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while preserving its charm. The introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining, and essential services. This is crucial in sustaining economic growth and creating a more self-sufficient local economy. The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian architectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence while incorporating modern functionality. This blend of old and new will ensure that the area remains an inviting and attractive destination. We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants, and retail shops have flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in foot traffic and local engagement has proven that thoughtful development leads to positive economic and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further establishing Newhall as a central hub within Santa Clarita. For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. The benefits of increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced community appeal cannot be overstated. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and the continued success of Newhall. Sincerely, Beth Wageman Packet Pg. 64 1.k Friday, March 7, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 9135 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, On behalf of Care Tucker Style House on Main Street, we are writing to express our support for the Proposed Mixed -Use Development on the Comer of Market St and Main St. We are a women's fashion brand and retailer trying to bring contemporary fashion and elevated home and gifts to the Santa Clarita community. As a growing community, Newhall needs continued revitalization and development to sustain its economic momentum. The addition of 78 residential units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will bring more residents and businesses to Old Town Newhall, increasing foot traffic and driving economic growth. This will directly benefit our business as well as the many other existing businesses along Main Street and the Newhall area by expanding their customer base while also providing opportunities for new businesses to establish themselves in the area. In addition to the residential and retail space, the project includes two levels of parking, which will address the area's need for adequate parking and improve the overall functionality of the development, making it more accessible for residents. Parking remains one of the most talked about concerns among the community, and our clientele, this addition alone would be more than welcomed. Sincerely, Care and Jonny Tucker Owners of Care Tucker Style House on Main St. Packet Pg. 65 1.k Christine Munoz Newhall Refinery 24258 Main st Old Town Newhall, CA 91321 March 11, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita. The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community. Additionally, the inclusion of much -needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer. With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go -to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region. I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita. Respectfully, Christine Munoz Newhall Refinery chris@newhallrefinery.com Packet Pg. 66 1.k RE/MAX` SANTA CLARITA I VALENCIA I GATEWAY Dear City of Santa Clarita: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 As a local business owner in Old Town Newhall, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. Having operated my business in this community for 24 years, I have seen firsthand the positive impact that thoughtful growth and development can have on the local economy. This project represents an exciting opportunity to continue that progress by bringing more residents, businesses, and energy to our vibrant district. One of the biggest challenges for businesses in Old Town Newhall is maintaining consistent foot traffic. The addition of 78 residential units will help address this by increasing the number of people living in and engaging with the area daily. More residents mean more customers, not only for my business but for all the shops, restaurants, and services that make Old Town Newhall unique. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will allow new businesses to join our community, further strengthening the commercial landscape and providing opportunities for entrepreneurs looking to invest in this growing district. The continued investment in Old Town Newhall demonstrates a commitment to the long-term success of our local economy. As more people choose to live, work, and shop here, the sense of community and economic vitality will continue to flourish. This project will not only provide much -needed housing and retail space but will also encourage further improvements to infrastructure, public spaces, and community engagement —ensuring that Old Town Newhall remains a premier destination for residents and visitors alike. We have already seen how projects like Newhall Crossings have revitalized the area by attracting new businesses and increasing community engagement. This development will build upon that success, ensuring continued growth and sustainability for businesses like mine. As a business owner, I welcome any opportunity that supports the local economy, brings in new customers, and fosters a thriving, self- sufficient community. For these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. I look forward to seeing the positive impact it will have on Old Town Newhall and am excited to continue being part of this growing, dynamic community. RRenda ,l<er/Owner 25129 The Old Road Suite 114, Santa Clarita, CA 91381 - 661.255.2650 Packet Pg. 67 1.k Florinda Delgado Newhall Refinery 24258 Main st Old Town Newhall, CA 91321 March 11, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita. The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community. Additionally, the inclusion of much -needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer. With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go -to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region. I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita. Respectfully, Florinda Delgado Newhall Refinery Flor@newhallrefinery.com Packet Pg. 68 1.k Wednesday March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, 1 am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has beer.. a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the ,growti? of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will paring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housi-1:, .. ile the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in Ine area, With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanved the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and indlvidu :s see!<ing .•.�elcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 69 1.k February 26, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in Newhall. As a longtime resident of Santa Clarita for over 40 years and a dedicated branch manager at Escrow Advantage, I have seen our community grow and evolve in incredible ways. Having raised my son here, I deeply value the sense of community and the opportunities that continued growth brings to our area. One of my favorite weekend traditions is visiting the Newhall Farmers Market on Saturdays, where I get to connect with local vendors and enjoy fresh, locally sourced goods. Additionally, I love experiencing the vibrant shops and restaurants in Newhall Crossings, which have added so much character and energy to our neighborhood. The addition of new businesses has not only created a lively atmosphere but has also contributed to the economic success of our city. This new mixed -use development is an exciting next step in Newhall's revitalization. The project's 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide opportunities for new businesses to thrive, further enhancing the appeal of our community. The Western Victorian architectural design will blend beautifully with Newhall's existing charm, creating a welcoming environment for both residents and visitors. With the continued success of Newhall Crossings, I am eager to see more businesses and residents drawn to the area. More housing means more people shopping, dining, and supporting local businesses, boosting our economy and making our community even stronger. This project represents smart, thoughtful growth that will benefit both current and future generations. For all these reasons, I fully support this exciting development and encourage others to do the same. Thank you for your time and consideration. SinrPrPly Escrow Advantage Inc. Branch Manager jseyfert@e-scrowadvantage.com Packet Pg. 70 1.k Jordan Pereyra 15625 Burt Court Santa Clarita CA 91387 Jordan.pereyra@yahoo.com 661-476-7694 3/10/2025 Project Review Committee City of Santa Ctarita Dear Members of the Planning Review Committee, I am writing to express my strong support for the new development project located at the corner of Market St. and Main St. in Newhall, just two blocks south of the Newhall Crossings project. This project, which will replace the current Mac Pool Supply, the Horseshoe, and the office building on the corner, is a valuable addition to the community. The proposed development, which includes 78 apartment units above 5,300 square feet of ground floor retail space, will bring much -needed housing and vibrant commercial opportunities to the area. The integration of residential and retail spaces will help activate the street, create more foot traffic, and contribute positively to the local economy. Furthermore, the location of this project is ideal, as it is situated in close proximity to existing infrastructure, making it easily accessible for residents and visitors alike. It also complements the ongoing revitalization of the Newhall area, supporting the vision of creating a dynamic and thriving community. I believe this project will enhance the neighborhood, provide housing options for a diverse range of residents, and attract businesses that will serve both the local population and newcomers. I wholeheartedly support this project and encourage its approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, -- I -/- Jordan Pereyra Packet Pg. 71 1.k February 26, 2025 25129 The Old Road Santa Clarita, CA 91381 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in Newhall. As a mother who has called Santa Clarita home for the last 14 years, I have seen firsthand how much this city has grown and evolved while still maintaining its family -friendly charm. My family loves living here, and I want to see continued smart growth that makes our community even better for future generations. One of the things I appreciate most about Santa Clarita is the sense of connection that comes from supporting local businesses and enjoying community spaces. Whether it's spending a Saturday morning at the Newhall Farmers Market or grabbing a bite to eat with my family at one of the great restaurants on Main Street, I love seeing our local economy thrive. The success of these businesses has made Newhall a more vibrant, walkable place, and I am excited about the opportunities this new development will bring. This project is an exciting step forward for our community. By adding new housing options and expanding retail space, it will help create a more dynamic environment where families, professionals, and small businesses can flourish together. More housing means more people who can live and work locally, and more businesses mean greater convenience and variety for � residents like me who love to shop and dine in town. With its thoughtful design and focus on = community growth, this development will continue to enhance Newhall's charm while ensuring w its long-term success. z As a mother, I care deeply about the future of Santa Clarita, and I believe projects like this will L help create an even more vibrant, welcoming city for families. For all these reasons, I fully r support this development and encourage its approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. E E 0 U Best Regards, r E 0 r r Kaylie Capra-Hofinann RE/MAX SANTA CLARITA I VALENCIA I GATEWAY Manager of Agent Services kayliecapra@remax.net Packet Pg. 72 1.k Monday March 3, 2025 Santa Clarity City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd # 120, Valencia, CA 91355 Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development project in Newhall. I have been a proud resident of Santa Clarita for over 10 years, and as a parent, I am deeply invested in seeing the area grow in a way that benefits families like mine. Newhall is an area that has always been close to my heart. It's a place that feels like home, and I want to see it continue to thrive. The addition of 78 new apartments will provide more housing options for our growing city, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will create new opportunities for local shops, restaurants, and businesses. As a resident, this development means more convenience for me and my family, with new places fa shop and dine close to home. The impact of Newhall Crossings on Old Town Ne,,,hall has been overwhelmingly positive, with new businesses opening a�- the area. The increase in foot traffic has made the neighborhoo�: _:_Ore ac:`, e and inviting, and I'm excited to see how this new development will continue that trend. The mix of residential and retail spaces will make the area more vibrant, c �afing a more walkable and connected community. For these reasons, I fully support the prc, ect and ,-, ,cc_rage others to do the same. I believe it will have a lasting, posit,v= 'impact - u�_r community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 73 1.k Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Monday March 3, 2025 RE: Letter of Support for Proposed Project on the Corner of Market and Main Street Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Team, I am thrilled to express my enthusiastic support for the mixed -use project on Main Street in Newhall! As someone who has lived in Santa Clarita for over a decade, I am deeply invested in the community's grovith and believe this development will bring exciting opportunities to our neighborhood. Newhall is more than just a location; it is the heart of our city. It has a unique blend of history, culture, and modern charm that makes it a special place to live, work, and visit. The proposed development at 24300 Main Street will contribute to this charm by introducing additional housing and retail options that will enhance our quality of life. One of the most exciting features of this project is the addition of 78 new apartment units. As our city continues to expand, it is essential to provide diverse housing options for families, young professionals, and individuals looking tc make Santa Clarita their home. More housing means a stronger community, with residents who can live, shop, and dine locally. The 5,300 square feet of retail space is another highlight of this development. Small businesses are the backbone of our community, and creating new opportunities for them to thrive is a step in the right direction. A bustling commercial environment means more choices for residents and more job opportunities for locals. Looking at the success of Newhall Crossings, we can see how a well -executed project can breathe new life into a neighborhood. With new businesses, increased foot traffic, and an inviting atmosphere, the area has become a destination for both residents and visitors. The Main Street project will build upon this success, further revitalizing Newhall. For all these reasons, I wholeheartedly support this development and encourage others to do the same. I am excited to witness the continued growth of our city and the positive impact this project will bring. Best regards ReA* J104C. Packet Pg. 74 Monday March 3, 2025 1.k Dear City of Santa Clarita, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in Old Town Newhall. I have lived in Santa Clarita since 1974, growing up in this wonderful city and later raising my family here. Over the years, I have watched Santa Clarita evolve from a quiet suburban town into a thriving community filled with opportunities, businesses, and spaces that bring people together. I am proud to call this city my home and am always excited to see new projects that will contribute to its continued success. One of my favorite things to do is spend time in Old Town Newhall with friends. Whether it's enjoying a meal at one of the many fantastic restaurants, shopping at local boutiques, or attending community events, Newhall has become a lively and inviting place for residents of all ages. The transformation of this area in recent years has been remarkable, and I know this new development will only add to its charm and appeal. The addition of more shops and restaurants will provide even more reasons for people to visit and support local businesses. Having lived here for decades, I know how important it is to invest in projects that strengthen our local economy while maintaining the character and history that make Santa Clarita so special. This development will create new opportunities for small businesses to thrive and for residents like me to enjoy an even more dynamic and walkable Main Street. Beyond the economic benefits, I believe this project will help foster an even greater sense of community. More retail and residential space means more people gathering, dining, and connecting with one another in a setting that embraces both progress and tradition. It is exciting to think about how future generations will continue to experience and enjoy all that Newhall has to offer, thanks to thoughtful developments like this one. For all these reasons, I fully support this project and took forward to seeing how it will enhance Old Town Newhall. I encourage its approval and appreciate the effort to keep Santa Clarita moving forward while preserving the qualities that make it such a wonderful place to live. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best Regards, Laurie Rendalt Laurierendalt@hotmaiL.com 24868 Carbon Lane, Valencia, CA 91354 Packet Pg. 75 1.k March 7, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project on Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to offer my full support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 50 years. I have watched Newhall thrive and develop over the years and it has been a wonderful community in which to raise my family. I have witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita and firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Projects like this one are vital to ensure that it continues to thrive and meet the needs of current and future residents. I am truly excited about this project and the addition of 78 new apartment units which will provide much needed housing. The 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area while providing the opportunity for new local jobs and services. This will be very beneficial to our community. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings, I have seen firsthand how revitalizing an area can create a stronger community with increased foot traffic and business activity. It has made the area more appealing to both families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood in which to live. It has shown that smart development can drive economic growth while keeping the current charm of the neighborhood. I wholeheartedly support the mixed -use development project. It can bring continued growth, opportunities, and prosperity for current residents as well as new families and individuals. I look forward to watching the future of our community as it expands and creates a wonderful environment for all who reside here. Thank you for your time and consideration. i 18620 Brigadoon Court Canyon Country, CA 91351 (661) 478-9963 CO r N W Q U W Q w 0 w x J J Q 2 w z Packet Pg. 76 1.k Lindsay and Brian Schlick Letter of Support Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, We are writing to offer our full support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As local business owners in the area and residents living just a mile away from the development, we understand the importance of continued growth in ensuring our community remains vibrant and economically strong. We have lived in Santa Clarita for over 15 years, and throughout that time, we have watched Newhall transform into a thriving area. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide critical support to local businesses like ours by attracting more residents and visitors to the area. With more people living and working in Newhall, we will see an increase in foot traffic, which is essential for local businesses to succeed. The retail spaces in this development offer incredible potential for new businesses, and we are excited to see what will open up in the area. Newhall has become a destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment, and this project will only enhance that appeal. Moreover, the successful revitalization seen with Newhall Crossings shows that smart development can drive economic growth while maintaining the unique charm of the neighborhood. This new development is the kind of project that can bring positive change, not just for businesses, but for residents as well. We wholeheartedly support the project and look forward to the continued prosperity it will bring to Newhall. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Lindsay and Brian Schlick SchlickArt - A Visual Marketing Company 661-313-3907 1 Lindsay@SchlickArt.com Packet Pg. 77 1.k ( 0", VO MATRIMONY • F I L M S• 818.262.5402 March 10, 2025 matrimonypictures@gmail.com Santa Clarita City Planning Commission 21774 Redwood Cyn PI 23920 Valencia Blvd Santa Clarita, CA 91390 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Subject: Letter of Support for the Serrano Development Group Project Dear Santa Clarita City Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development by Serrano Development Group. As a business owner and resident of Santa Clarita, I have seen firsthand how well -designed developments contribute to the vibrancy of our community, and I believe this project will be a tremendous asset to the Santa Clarita Valley. Serrano Development Group has a proven track record of creating visually stunning, functional, and community -focused developments. Their projects enhance the character of our city and attract new businesses. This particular project, with its combination of residential living on the top four levels and commercial spaces on the ground level, is exactly the type of thoughtful urban planning that benefits our growing community. One of the highlights of this development is the inclusion of the Horseshoe Bar on the ground level. The Horseshoe Bar has long been a cherished gathering place, bringing people together in a positive and lively environment. Its continued presence within this new development ensures that Santa Clarita retains a sense of familiarity and community while embracing growth and modernization. This project not only meets the needs of residents by providing high -quality housing but also strengthens local commerce, drawing in both new businesses and visitors. It promotes walkability, fosters a thriving local economy, and adds to the aesthetic appeal of the area. I firmly believe that approving this development would be a significant step forward for Santa Clarita's future. I urge the Planning Commission to support this project and allow Serrano Development Group to bring their vision to life in a way that benefits both current and future residents of our city. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Matthew Sutherland Matrimony Films Packet Pg. 78 1.k February 26, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development project in Newhall. I am a Branch Manager at Escrow Advantage Inc and have called the Santa Clarita Valley home for the past 14 years. I have seen how our community has grown, and I am excited about the continued development that will benefit both my family and future generations. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. The combination of 78 new apartments and 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide more housing options for families like mine while supporting local businesses. As a grandmother, I'm excited about the convenience this will bring to my family, with new places to shop, dine, and enjoy being closer to home. Over the years, I've watched Newhall undergo positive changes, particularly with the revitalization of Old Town Newhall through projects like Newhall Crossings. The influx of new businesses has energized the area, making it more inviting and vibrant. I am confident that this new development will continue to build on that success, creating a more connected and walkable community for all of us. For all these reasons, I wholeheartedly support this project and encourage others to do the same. I believe it will have a lasting, positive impact on our community, enriching the lives of both current and future residents. Thank you for your consideration. Mercedes Fernandez Escrow Advantage Inc. Branch Manager mfernandez@escrowadvantage.com Packet Pg. 79 1.k Rafael Gonzalez Newhall Refinery 24258 Main st Old Town Newhall, CA 91321 March 11, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita. The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community. Additionally, the inclusion of much -needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer. With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go -to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region. I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita. Respectfully, Rafael Gonzalez Newhall Refinery Ralph@newhallrefinery.com Packet Pg. 80 1.k February 28, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in Newhall. As a longtime resident and local photographer, I have always been drawn to the charm and character of Old Town Newhall. The historic streets, unique storefronts, and vibrant community spaces make it one of my favorite places to capture the essence of Santa Clarita through my lens. I am excited to see this new development continue to support and enhance the culture and history that make Newhall so special. Newhall has transformed in incredible ways over the years while staying true to its roots. The addition of Newhall Crossings has brought new life to the area, with locally owned shops, restaurants, and entertainment venues that celebrate our community's creativity and entrepreneurial spirit. It's become a place where artists, small business owners, and families gather —a place that tells the story of our city's past while embracing its future. What makes this new project so exciting is that it will build upon this momentum while maintaining the character that makes Newhall unique. With its Western Victorian design, this development will blend seamlessly with the historic aesthetic of Old Town Newhall, preserving the authenticity that so many of us cherish. The addition of new housing and retail space means more opportunities for residents and businesses to thrive, ensuring that Newhall continues to be a place where people want to live, work, and create. As someone who has spent years capturing the beauty of this community, I am thrilled to see growth that respects the culture and history of Newhall while paving the way for new opportunities. For all these reasons, I fully support this development and encourage its approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best Regards, Renee Bowen Photographer, Life & Biz Coach renee@reneebowen.com Packet Pg. 81 1.k March 10, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita Building and Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 30 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thankyou foryour time and consideration. Sincerely, Renee I. DeWolf 24262 Cross Street Newhall, CA 91321 Packet Pg. 82 1.k February 27, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street; Santa Clarita. As a longtime resident of this city, I have witnessed its remarkable growth and believe that well -planned projects like this one contribute significantly to our community's economic and social prosperity. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 20 years, raising my family here and seeing firsthand the need for additional housing and commercial space. Newhall, in particular, holds historical and cultural significance within our city, and its continued development is essential for maintaining its vibrancy. This project presents an opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while preserving its charm. The introduction of 78 apaf(iibcnt units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining; and essential senAices. This is crucial in sustaining economic growth and creating a more self-sufficient local economy. The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian architectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence while incorporating modern functionality. This blend of old and new will ensure that the area remains an inviting and attractive destination. We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants, and reta l Shops ::ave flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in foot traffic and local engagement proven that thoughtful development leads to positive economic and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further establ'!, Newhall as central hub within Santa Clarita. For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. The benefits of increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced commui-:2v appeal cannot be overstated. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and ;.-- :ontinued success of Newhall. SinceI117 %, �l D �C)W� i,nUeS�C 1�l (�' ? �O 1K �14 (a �O Packet Pg. 83 1.k W FA FA_ AX SANTA CLARITA I VALENCIA I GATEWAY February 26, 2025 25129 The Old Road Santa Clarita, CA 91381 Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in Newhall. As someone who has lived in Santa Clarita for over 55 years and raised my daughter here, I have had the privilege of watching our community grow into the vibrant and thriving place it is today. In my role as the Director of Operations for RE/MAX of Santa Clarita, I understand firsthand the importance of smart development that supports both our residents and local businesses. One of the most exciting aspects of living in Santa Clarita has been seeing the transformation of Newhall in recent years. The addition of Newhall Crossings has brought an incredible energy to the area, with new restaurants, cafes, and shops creating a dynamic gathering place for the community. As a strong supporter of local businesses, I am thrilled to see how these investments have strengthened our economy and enhanced the character of our city. What makes this new development so important is its ability to provide a balance between growth and community. By adding thoughtfully designed residential and retail spaces, it will not only bring new energy to the area but also create opportunities for small businesses to thrive. Having seen firsthand how demand for housing and commercial space has increased, I know this project will help meet the needs of both new and longtime residents. It will further establish Newhall as a destination where people can live, work, and support local entrepreneurs —all while maintaining the charm and history that make it unique. This continued growth is essential to maintaining the vitality of our community. More housing and businesses mean a stronger local economy, increased property values, and a more connected, walkable neighborhood for residents and visitors alike. I am excited to see how this project will contribute to the ongoing success of Newhall and bring even more opportunities to our City. For all these reasons, I fully support this development and encourage its approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Q � Robin Castagnola, Director of Operations robincastagnola@remax.net Packet Pg. 84 1.k Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 February 27, 2025 Subject: Support for the Proposed Newhall Mixed -Use Project on Main Street Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in on Main Street. I moved to Santa Clarita in the 1980s in search of new opportunities for my family. At the time, the city was still growing —there wasn't even a mall yet —but I knew it was going to be a wonderful place to raise my children. It was a community full of promise, where families could put down roots, and I am proud to say that my decision to move here all those years ago was one of the best I ever made. My kids grew up in Santa Clarita, finished high school here, and eventually started their own families in this very community. Now, 1 have the joy of watching my grandchildren experience the same safe and welcoming environment that made this city such a great place for my own children. Santa Clarita will always hold a special place in my heart, and I am excited to see how it continues to grow and provide opportunities for future generations. One of the most exciting transformations I've seen over the years has been the revitalization of Old Town Newhall. The city has done an incredible job turning it into a cultural and entertainment hub, bringing in new businesses while still preserving its history. From the incredible local restaurants to community events like SENSES Block Party and the holiday celebrations, Newhall has become a true gathering place for residents of all ages. This new development by Serrano Development Group will only add to the positive momentum we've seen in Newhall. With new retail space and housing, it will attract even more people to the area, strengthening local businesses and increasing foot traffic. Thoughtful projects like this help create a thriving, walkable community while ensuring that Newhall remains a place where families want to live, work, and spend time together. Looking at the success of Newhall Crossings, I have no doubt that this project will not only thrive but will continue to contribute to the greatness of Santa Clarita. Developments like these make our city stronger by providing more opportunities for small businesses and ensuring that future generations have an even better place to call home. For all these reasons, I fully support this development and encourage its approval. Santa Clarita has come a long way since I first moved here, and I am excited to see how this project will contribute to the city's bright future. Thank you for your time and consideration" Sincerely, Sharon an Roger Rendall v M T N w U) Q U w U) Q w U) 0 w x J J Q x w z U) d Y Y d J c m E E 0 U Y m E R all Packet Pg. 85 1.k Ruben Delgado Newhall Refinery 24258 Main st Old Town Newhall, CA 91321 March 11, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As a business owner in Old Town Newhall, I want to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. This project represents an exciting opportunity to further establish Old Town Newhall as the premier entertainment and cultural destination within the City of Santa Clarita. The continued growth and revitalization of Old Town Newhall are essential to attracting more visitors, increasing foot traffic, and supporting local businesses. The addition of new residential units and retail space will bring more activity to the area, creating a lively atmosphere that benefits restaurants, shops, and entertainment venues alike. More people living and spending time in the district means more economic success for the entire community. Additionally, the inclusion of much -needed parking will improve accessibility and enhance the overall experience for visitors. As our district continues to grow, having convenient parking options will encourage more people to explore and enjoy everything Old Town Newhall has to offer. With its thoughtful design that blends historic character with modern development, this project aligns perfectly with the vision of making Old Town Newhall a vibrant entertainment hub for Santa Clarita. More visitors, more businesses, and more opportunities for community engagement will help solidify our district as the go -to destination for dining, arts, and nightlife in the region. I strongly encourage the approval of this project, as it will contribute to the long-term success of Old Town Newhall and further establish it as a thriving cultural and entertainment center for Santa Clarita. Respectfully, Ruben Delgado Newhall Refinery info@newhallrefinery.com Packet Pg. 86 1.k Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd # 120, Valencia, CA 91355 February 28, 2025 Support for the Proposed Newhall Mixed -Use Project on Main Street To Whom, We are writing to express our strong support for the new mixed -use development in Old Town Newhall. Our family has lived in Santa Clarita for 18 years, and we have loved watching this city grow and evolve while still keeping its close-knit community feel. One of our favorite things to do as a family is spend time in Newhall, enjoying the incredible restaurants, unique shops, and lively events that make this area so special. The revitalization of Old Town Newhall has created a wonderful space for families like ours to gather, dine, and support local businesses. From weekend outings to trying new restaurants and shopping at locally owned stores, we have seen firsthand how this area has flourished. With this new development, even more businesses will have the opportunity to thrive, bringing exciting new options for both residents and visitors. The addition of new retail space and housing will only help our community continue to grow in a positive way. More businesses mean more opportunities to shop and dine locally, and more residents mean a stronger economy and a more vibrant, bustling Newhall. We love seeing investments like this that contribute to the long-term success of our city while still maintaining the charm and character that make Santa Clarita such a great place to live. Newhall Crossings has already proven how successful thoughtful development can be, and we have no doubt that this project will continue that momentum. Having more businesses and residents in the area will enhance the experience for everyone, creating an even more dynamic and thriving community. For all these reasons, we fully support this development and encourage its approval. We look forward to seeing how it will positively impact Newhall and Santa Clarita as a whole. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, �_Sf' a ! �__ (� &UC Ca&A�r Sean and Heidi Chidsey M N w Cn Q U w Cn Q w U) 0 B. W CX , G J J Q x w z k' L m r r J c p' 0) 6 E 0 U � c m t c� r �Q Packet Pg. 87 1.k Wednesday March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasfing relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that iv continues tc thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses co,-res more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appeaiing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time ante consideration. Sincerely, 5 J-*A r 6..- 60' cod —3 F6d' Packet Pg. 88 1.k Thursday March 6, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd 9120, Valencia, CA 91355 Dear Santa Clarita Council Members, I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As a young adult who grew up in Santa Clarita, I have always appreciated the charm of our city, but I'm especially excited to see Newhall continue to evolve into a lively and thriving destination. Newhall Crossings was a game -changer for the area, bringing incredible restaurants and shops like Maginn's Irish Pub that have made Main Street more vibrant and engaging. Seeing how that project transformed the neighborhood makes me even more excited about what this new development will bring. More housing options mean that people like me, who want to stay in Santa Clarita, will have better opportunities to find a place to live. The addition of 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses and entertainment options, making Newhall an even more exciting place to visit, shop, and hang out with friends. It's amazing to see our community embrace growth while still maintaining its unique character. This project will help strengthen the local economy, create jobs, and give young professionals and families more reasons to stay and invest in the area. I truly believe this development is a step in the right direction for Newhall, and I look forward to seeing the positive impact it will have. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Sydney Tow Packet Pg. 89 1.k Tamara Moller Newhall Refinery Old Town Newhall, CA March 11, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As an employee in Old Town Newhall, I see every day how important it is to bring more people into our district to support local businesses. The proposed mixed -use development at Market St. and Main St. will do exactly that —attract more residents and visitors, increasing foot traffic and bringing more customers into the establishment where I work. More people living and spending time in the area means more opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive. With additional retail space and improved parking, this project will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment. I strongly support this development because it will help ensure the long-term success of businesses like the one I work for, while also making Old Town Newhall a more vibrant place for everyone to enjoy. Sincerely, Tamara Moller Newhall Refinery Packet Pg. 90 1.k Wednesday March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main. Street in Newhall. l have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community, This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area ca:7 cry,:.<e a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made. the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to 'ive in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Packet Pg. 91 1.k March 4, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am excited about the new proposed project in downtown Newhall and to offer my full support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street. As a resident of Santa Clarita for almost 30 years, I have seen firsthand how our city has grown evolved, and I believe this new development will play a crucial role in the next chapter of Newhall and in shaping its future. Newhall has always been a central part of our community. With its rich history and charm, it serves as a cornerstone for Santa Clarita. That's why it's so important to invest in its growth. The addition of 78 new apartments will offer more housing for families, while the new retail space will inject vitality into our local economy, supporting both new businesses and long-established ones. The success of Newhall Crossings has already shown us the positive impact that development can have. It's drawn people back into the area, boosted business activity, and transformed Old Town Newhall into a thriving hub. With more foot traffic, more residents will have greater access to restaurants, shops, and services —ultimately benefiting everyone who calls Newhall home. I would love to see and am excited to see this project move forward. I am confident that this project will bring continued prosperity and positive growth to the neighborhood and ultimately SCV as a whole. Thank you for considering my support. Sincerely, Cathy Craig ccatgo@gmail.com / 310-710-3664 Packet Pg. 92 1.k Bre Johnson Newhall Refinery Old Town Newhall, CA March 5, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As an employee in Old Town Newhall, I see every day how important it is to bring more people into our district to support local businesses. The proposed mixed -use development at Market St. and Main St. will do exactly that —attract more residents and visitors, increasing foot traffic and bringing more customers into the establishment where I work. More people living and spending time in the area means more opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive. With additional retail space and improved parking, this project will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment. I strongly support this development because it will help ensure the long-term success of businesses like the one I work for, while also making Old Town Newhall a more vibrant place for everyone to enjoy. Sincerely, Bre Johnson Newhall Refinery Packet Pg. 93 1.k Michelina Payetta - Newhall Refinery Old Town Newhall, CA City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, As an employee in Old Town Newhall, I see every day how important it is to bring more people into our district to support local businesses. The proposed mixed -use development at Market St. and Main St. will do exactly that —attract more residents and visitors, increasing foot traffic and bringing more customers into the establishment where I work. More people living and spending time in the area means more opportunities for businesses to grow and thrive. With additional retail space and improved parking, this project will make Old Town Newhall an even more inviting destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment. I strongly support this development because it will help ensure the long-term success of businesses like the one I work for, while also making Old Town Newhall a more vibrant place for everyone to enjoy. Sincerely, Michelina Payetta - Newhall Refinery Packet Pg. 94 Monday March 3, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to offer my full support for the mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. As a local business owner in the Newhall area, I understand the importance of continued growth and development in ensuring our community remains vibrant and economically strong. The addition of 78 apartment units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will provide critical support to local businesses like mine by attracting more residents and visitors to the area. With more people living and working in Newhall, we will see an increase in foot traffic, which is essential for local businesses to succeed. The retail spaces in this development offer incredible potential for new businesses, and I'm excited to see what will open up in the area. Newhall has become a destination for dining, shopping, and entertainment, and this project will only enhance that appeal creating a hub for communal gatherings. Moreover, the successful revitalization seen with Newhall Crossings shows that smart development can drive economic growth while maintaining the unique charm of the neighborhood. This new development is the kind of project that can bring positive change, not just for businesses, but for residents as well. I wholeheartedly support the project and look forward to the continued prosperity it will bring to Newhall. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Adriana Farrell Cruz's Bridal Boutique 661-263-2990 cruzsbridal.info@gmail.com Tuesday March 11, 2025 Dear Santa Clarita City Council, Having grown up in Santa Clarita, I have always loved the sense of community and connection that this city offers. One of my favorite ways to spend the weekend is heading down to Old Town Newhall to explore the shops, grab a bite to eat at one of the amazing restaurants, catch a movie at Laemmle, and stroll through the Farmers Market on Saturday mornings. Newhall has become a true destination, filled with energy, local charm, and a vibrant mix of businesses that make it such a special place. The growth and revitalization of Newhall over the years has been incredible to witness, and I know this new development will only add to its success. Bringing in more retail and restaurants means even more opportunities for residents and visitors to shop local and enjoy everything this area has to offer. It's exciting to think about the new businesses that will open and the way this project will continue to enhance the community atmosphere that makes Newhall so unique. Beyond just creating new spaces for businesses to thrive, this development will strengthen Newhall's role as a gathering place for our city. More people living and working in the area will bring even more energy to Main Street, helping local restaurants and shops flourish while making Newhall an even more dynamic and inviting destination. Santa Clarita has always done a great job of balancing growth with preserving the character of its neighborhoods, and this project is a perfect example of that. It will build upon the success of Newhall Crossings while maintaining the charm and history of Old Town Newhall. I have no doubt that it will be a great addition to the community and provide lasting benefits for residents, business owners, and visitors alike. I am excited to see this project come to life and fully support its approval. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best Regards, WA I M4911 ft -1 MII Wednesday, March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to strongly support the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have had business in Santa Clarita for over seventeen years, and it has been a wonderful place to build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed Santa Clarita's growth, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. More businesses come with more opportunities for local jobs and services, which our community can significantly benefit from. Having watched Newhall Crossings' success firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have enhanced the local economy and made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring our community continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Amer Nackoud 24301 Main St, Newhall, CA 91321 amernackououd@gmail.com Wednesday March 12, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I'm writing in support of the proposed mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall, CA. I've been a Los Angeles resident for nearly 20 years, and I recently became the owner and operator of a business on Main Street in Newhall. As a business owner who has come to know everything that Santa Clarita has to offer, I fully believe that development projects such as this one are vital in ensuring that the community has renewed and centralized spaces as the Newhall and wider Santa Clarita Valley continue to grow. This project brings with it the addition of 78 new apartment units, an essential addition to local housing options, as well as 5,300 square feet of retail space that will welcome new businesses a chance to move in and thrive. Attracting more businesses to the community is essential for the growth of opportunities in localjobs, services, and amenities. This will bring an immediate return to both long-time residents and newer members of the community. It's easy to see the potential of Newhall with continued growth, and the results of some of the more recent projects like Newhall Crossings have had immediate beneficial impacts on the community, both as a business owner and regular visitor. I give my full support to the mixed -use development project on Main Street, and I hope for its success and look forward to all the potential opportunities it will bring. Sincerely, Andrew Fleischer 24257 Main Street Newhall, CA 91321 andrew@newhallpressroom.com THE CART � COLLECTIVE Chris & Jesenia Pena The Cart Collective 25848 Springbrook Ave. #6 Santa Clarita, CA 91350 hello@thecartcollective.com 03/02/2025 Dear Santa Clarita City Planning Commission, I am writing to express my full support for the Serrano Development Group's proposed mixed -use project in Santa Clarita. Their developments are not only thoughtfully designed but also bring lasting value to our community by enhancing both the aesthetic and economic landscape of our city. This project, with its combination of residential and commercial spaces, is exactly the type of development that will help Santa Clarita continue to thrive. The top four levels dedicated to residential housing will provide much -needed living spaces in a growing city, while the ground level will add vibrant commercial opportunities that benefit both residents and local businesses. One of the key highlights of this project is the inclusion of the Horseshoe Bar, a beloved local gathering place. The Horseshoe Bar has long been a staple in our community during the holidays, offering a welcoming space where people can come together in a positive and lively environment. Having it as a cornerstone of this new development ensures that we maintain a strong sense of local culture while also embracing progress. The Serrano Development Group has consistently demonstrated their commitment to quality and community -focused projects, and I have no doubt that this development will add to the charm and vitality of Santa Clarita. By supporting this project, we are investing in a future that balances modern growth with the heart of what makes our city special. I strongly urge the Planning Commission to approve this development, as it will not only create a beautiful addition to our city but also stimulate local business and provide valuable residential options for our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Chris & Jesenia Pena March 12, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd. #120 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 RE: Letter of Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Officials, I have lived in Santa Clarita for nearly 40 years, raising my family here and giving back of my time and energy to make Santa Clarita a place we all are proud to call home. I have seen firsthand the need for additional housing and quality new commercial space. I have watched the remarkable success of Newhall Crossings and the revitalization of downtown Newhall. For that reason, I am writing today to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. I am a firm believer that well -planned projects like this one contribute significantly to our community's economic and social prosperity. The planned introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining, and essential services while holding true to the aesthetic appeal and charm of the project and overall fit within Old Town Newhall's Western Victorian architectural style. The City of Santa Clarita and its residents will benefit by bringing this quality mixed -use project, carefully planned by Serrano Development, to our community with a rich blend of new apartment homes and retail opportunities for all to enjoy. This proposed project will build on the momentum of the transformation of downtown Newhall, further establishing itself as the City's new vibrant central hub and destination. For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the City to approve this project. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and believe it will have a lasting, positive impact on our community. Best regards, r`- Don Kimball 25709 Holly Oak Court Valencia, CA 91381 EIGnTn M� RAIL Y U P L 1 C H O U S E Wednesday March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a business owner in Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place to build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also helped make my business flourish and attract families to the area. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Louise Castaldo Owner Eighth & Rail 22505 8th Street, Newhall, CA 91321 EighthandRailPub(cr��,gmail.com 818-802-6941 Wednesday March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project oil Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from, Having watched the Success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration Sincerely, f�` Erie Morgenstern 26077 Tampico Drive Valencia CA 91350 emorgenstern@morgensternlawgroup.com Wednesday March 5, 2025 ICE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide mucn-needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. �incereiy, f%� Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Monday March 3, 2025 Letter of Support for the Newhall Mixed -Use Project Dear Santa Clarita City Council, I am writing to express my strong support for the new mixed -use development in Old Town Newhall. As President and CEO of The Rodriguez State Farm Agency, founder of EliteX netowrk, and —most importantlya proud father of two boys, I have built my life and businesses in Santa Clarita. This city has given my family and me incredible opportunities, and I am always excited to see smart developments that will continue to foster growth for local businesses and residents alike. Newhall Crossings was a game -changer for Main Street, bringing in a wave of energy, new businesses, and a sense of community that continues to thrive today. As a business owner, I have seen firsthand how important it is to have developments that attract more foot traffic and create spaces where entrepreneurs can succeed. This new project has the potential to do just that strengthening our local economy and providing more opportunities for business owners and families in Santa Clarita. The addition of new retail and housing will only enhance the momentum we've already seen in Newhall. More businesses mean more job opportunities and more reasons for people to stay and spend their money within our community. The thoughtful design of this project ensures that it will complement the existing charm of Main Street while introducing modern conveniences that will benefit both longtime residents and newcomers. Beyond the economic benefits, this development will also contribute to the cultural and social vibrancy of Old Town Newhall. With more residents living in the heart of the city, there will be an even stronger sense of community, as people gather to enjoy the restaurants, shops, and entertainment that make Newhall such a special place. I have always believed that thriving communities are built around strong local businesses, and this project will create an environment where those businesses can flourish. As Santa Clarita continues to grow, it's important that we embrace projects that align with our city's vision for the future. Developments like this help ensure that future generations will have a place where they can live, work, and build their own legacies, just as I have had the privilege of doing. I am excited to see this project bring new energy and opportunities to Main Street, reinforcing Santa Clarita's reputation as one of the best places to live and do business. For all these reasons, I fully support this project and look forward to seeing how it will positively impact Old Town Newhall and Santa Clarita as a whole. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best Regards, Henry Rodriguez President and CEO of The Rodriguez State Farm Agency Founder of EliteX Network Henry@HenrylnsuresMe.com Tuesday March 4, 2025 Dear City Officials, I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the mixed -use development project slated for Main Street in Newhall. I've been living in Santa Clarita for the past 5 years, and as a young professional, I'm always looking for ways to grow my roots in a community that values both progress and quality of life. The Newhall area has been a vital part of Santa Clarita for generations, and it's clear that continued growth is essential to meet the needs of both current and future residents. I'm especially excited about the addition of 78 new apartment units in this project. As someone who is considering settling down in the area, having more housing options in a central location is incredibly appealing. In addition to the housing component, the 5,300 square feet of retail space is another exciting feature. This project will "help attract new businesses to the area, making it easier for residents like myself to shop, dine, and enjoy a greatervariety of services. The increased foot traffic will also l3enefit the local economy, making Newhall a more vibrant and appealing place to live. Having already seen the positive effects of Newnan Crossings, including the increased number of businesses and improved amenities, I believe this new project will only continue to build on that success. The more people who live and work in Newhall, the better it will be for everyone. Thank you for considering my thoughts. I am fully in favor of this development and look forward to seeing the continued growth of Newhall. Sincerely, Jayme Morgenstern 661-644-8861 Josh Pitts Owner, The Break Room 22620 Lyons Ave. Newhall, CA 91321 March 12, 2025 Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd, Suite 300 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Subject: Letter of Support for the Mixed -Use Project at Market St. & Main St. Dear Planning Commission, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed Mixed -Use project at the corner of Market St. and Main St. in Old Town Newhall. As the owner of The Break Room, a local business that thrives on the energy and growth of our community, I believe this development will be a significant asset to the area. This project, featuring 78 apartment units above 5,300 square feet of ground -floor retail, aligns with the ongoing revitalization of Old Town Newhall. The addition of new residential and commercial spaces will help drive foot traffic, increase business opportunities, and contribute to the vibrancy of our neighborhood. Furthermore, the inclusion of both on -grade and subterranean parking ensures that the development remains accessible to residents and visitors alike. The continued investment in Newhall's infrastructure and economy is essential for our community's growth. This project represents a thoughtful approach to mixed -use development that will complement existing businesses while fostering a thriving, walkable downtown. I fully support this project and encourage the Santa Clarita Planning Commission to approve it. I appreciate your consideration and look forward to seeing the positive impact this development will bring to our community. Sincerely, Josh Pitts Owner, The Break Room 22620 Lyons Ave. Newhall, CA 91321 \t pp�i a March 11, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120,` Valencia, CA-91355 Dear City. of Santa Clarita, We are writing on behalf of Laemmle Theatres, a proud neighbor to the Newhall Crossings project, to express' our strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at the corner of Market St. and Main St. Since opening our doors in Old Town Newhall, we have been met with a ` warn we] corn e from the community, and we are excited about the continued growth and revitalization of this historic district. This iiew project represents an incredible opportunity to bring. in more residents, businesses, and visitors, further strengthening the heart of Newhall. As a business in Old Town Newhall, we understand the importance of foot traffic and the role it plays in sustaining a vibrant and thriving main street. The. addition of 78 residential units will increase the number of people living and engaging in the area daily, directly benefiting not just our theater but also our neighboring shops, restaurants, -and services.- Furthennore, the inclusion - of 5,300 square feet of retail space will create new opportunities for businesses to join our community, adding to the diverse offerings that make Old Town Newhall unique. This project aligns with the city's long -tern vision for growth, enhancing both the economic and cultural landscape of Newhall. The continued investment in Old Town Newhall, through projects like this, helps ensure that it remains a hub for entertainment, dining, and shopping. The Western Victorian design will complement the existing charm of the area while also encouraging further infrastructure improvements, public space enhancements, and community engagement. We have already seen the transfonnative success of Newhall Crossings in attracting new businesses and creating a vibrant atmosphere. The proposed development will build upon that success by bringing in more residents and visitors, ensuring that businesses like ours and our neighbors continue to thrive. As a theatre dedicated to providing quality entertainment and enriching the local arts scene, we welcome opportunities that support the local economy and foster a dynamic, self-sufficient community. For all these reasons, we fully support this exciting development and encourage others to do the same. Respectfully, Greg;r L4 ernmle - President /day/Rei aum - Sr. Vice President Laernmle Theatres, LLC / LaernnrAle Newhall, LLC 11523 Santa Monica Blvd. Los Angeles CA 90025 February 27, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. As a longtime resident of this city, I have witnessed its remarkable growth and believe that well -planned projects like this one contribute significantly to our community's economic and social prosperity. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 20 years, raising my family here and seeing firsthand the need for additional housing and commercial space. Newhall, in particular, holds historical and cultural significance within our city, and its continued development is essential for maintaining its vibrancy. This project presents an opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while preserving its charm. The introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining, and essential services. This is crucial in sustaining economic growth and creating a more self-sufficient local economy. The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian architectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence while incorporating modern fiuictionality. This blend of old and new will ensure that the area remains an inviting and attractive destination. We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants. and retail shops have flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in foot traffic and local engagement has proven that thoughtful development leads to positive economic and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further establishing Newhall as a central hub within Santa Clarita. For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. The benefits of increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced community appeal cannot be overstated. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and the continued success of Newhall. Since ly, Lisa Morgenstern Lmov65 ,gmail.com 24346 Main St. Newhall, CA 661.259.4781 Elevate Church Wednesday, March 12, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120 Valencia, CA 91355 Subject: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear Santa Clarita City Council, On behalf of Elevate Church, I am writing to express our strong support for the proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street. As a local church that serves both the residents of Santa Clarita and visitors from beyond, we recognize the vital role Main Street plays in fostering community, commerce, and connection. Main Street has long been a gathering place for people from all walks of life, and this development presents an incredible opportunity to enhance the vibrancy of our city. By introducing 78 new apartments and 5,300 square feet of retail space, this project will not only provide much -needed housing but also support local businesses and create a more dynamic, walkable neighborhood. Many of our church members and guests frequent Main Street for shopping, dining, and community events, and we believe this development will further strengthen the area's appeal as a thriving hub for families, professionals, and entrepreneurs. We have already seen the positive impact of projects like Newhall Crossings in revitalizing Old Town Newhall. The increase in foot traffic and business activity has transformed the area into a more welcoming and lively destination. We are confident that this new project will continue that momentum, contributing to the economic growth and overall well-being of our community. For these reasons, we wholeheartedly support this project and encourage its approval. Thank you for your time and commitment to the future of Santa Clarita. Sincerely, Mauricio Ruiz Senior Pastor www.elevatechurchscv.org March 13, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to offer my full support for the mixed -use development project on 24300 Main Main Street in Newhall. I moved here almost 3 years ago from Portland, Oregon, where I again and again saw the first-hand importance of these kinds of projects for burgeoning neighborhoods. The mix of residential and commercial will help to kick start development on the street by bringing in new residents and business owners and will help to act like a shot of adrenaline and help the overall vitality of the street. As a business owner operating on Main Street, I feel the importance, and frankly, need for developments such as this one. While Main Street has seemingly come a long way, a project like this will help to keep and build the momentum. I'd love nothing more for our town to be a destination, where you can get out of the car orjump off the train and have an experience, something truly unique to Newhall. It's projects such as this one, that will make that a reality. Sincerely, Michael Miller Little Juniper info@ourlittlejuniper.com Wednesday March 13, 2025 RE: Supportfor Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321. Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 30 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Neal Weichel 25532 Morning Mist Dr. Stevenson Ranch CA 91381 (661) 313-4663 February 27, 2025 To Whom It May Concern, I any writing to express my stn.,-. -� .upport far Cic proposed mixed -use development at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita. As a lonmq reside}: , ; :!s city, I have witnessed its remarkable growth and believe that well -planned one contribute significantly to our community's economic and social prosperity. I have lived in Santa Clarita for over 20 ye,-,,--;. raising my family here and se'',-,!-, t'r -nd 1 ]rye geed for additional housing and commercial space. Newhall, in particular, holds h" - r C,: 1!: Dual significance within our city, and its continued development is essential for rig .i,:_.t.r]ing its vibrancy. This project presents an opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while preserving its charm. The introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growing demand for residential options, Additionaliv, the 5,300 square feet of retail space will attract new businesses, providing greater variety for shopping, dining, and essential services. This is crucial in sustaining economic growth and creating a more self-sufficient local economy. The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian architectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence while incorporating modem functionality. This blend of old and n,ew will ensure that the area remains an inviting and attractive destination. We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants, and retail shops have flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in toot traffic, and local engagement has proven that thoughtful development leads to positive economic and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further establishiii- Newhall as a central hub within Santa Clarita. For all these reasons, I strongly encourage the approval of this project. Th'� bw.; 1 - is CA'Increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced community appeal cannot be cN Qr4_atec,. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and the continued success oi'Newl;afl. Sincerely, Wednesday, March 5, 2025 City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission 23920 Valencia Blvd. Santa Clarita, CA 9135 Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission, On behalf of the Old Town Newhall Association (OTNA) Board of Directors, we are writing to express our support for the Proposed Mixed -Use Development on the Corner of Market St and Main St. OTNA's mission is to restore, enhance and maintain historic Downtown Newhall as a social, cultural, and economic center for the Santa Clarita Valley and we believe this project aligns with our mission and the long-term vision for the area. Our Board of Directors is comprised of a wide range of individuals vested in the success of Old Town Newhall and support for the proposed development has been approved by the OTNA Board. As a growing community, Newhall needs continued revitalization and development to sustain its economic momentum. The addition of 78 residential units and 5,300 square feet of retail space will bring more residents and businesses to Old Town Newhall, increasing foot traffic and driving economic growth. This will directly benefit existing businesses along Main Street by expanding their customer base while also providing opportunities for new businesses to establish themselves in the area. In addition to the residential and retail space, the project includes two levels of parking, which will address the area's need for adequate parking and improve the overall functionality of the development, making it more accessible for residents. Parking remains one of the most talked about concerns among the OTNA community, and this addition alone would be welcomed. This development preserves the area's unique character and introduces modern conveniences, ensuring that new growth complements the existing community identity. The proposed mixed -use development defines an architectural style specific to Newhall, with its use of Western and Victorian architectural themes. Drawing inspiration from the community's railroad, trading post, and Western movie history, the design incorporates carefully curated materials such as brick, cement plaster, wood siding, iron, and steel. This combination creates a warm, inviting aesthetic that celebrates the past while maintaining a modern architectural approach. We have seen the positive impact of mixed -use projects such as Newhall Crossings, which has successfully introduced a variety of new businesses, restaurants, and retail establishments to the area. The increased residential presence has stimulated local commerce, making Newhall a more vibrant and self-sufficient community. We anticipate similar benefits from this proposed development, further enhancing Newhall's role as a thriving destination within Santa Clarita. The benefits to Old Town Newhall and Santa Clarita more broadly are significant. The Old Town Newhall Association recommends your approval of this project, and we look forward to creating a lasting relationship between this project, the Old Town Newhall Association, and its members. Respectfully, Old Town Newhall Association Board Monday March 3, 2025 Santa Clarita City Council. 23920 Valencia Blvd # 120, Valencia, CA 91355 Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff. I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development project in Newhall. I have been a proud resident of Santa Clarita for over 10 years, and as a parent, I am deeply invested in seeing the area grow in a way that benefits famil'es like mine. Newhall is an area that has always been close to my heart. It's a place that feels like home, and I want to see it continue to thrive. The addition of 78 new apartments will provide more housing options for cur growing city, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will create new opportunities for local shops, restaurants, and businesses. As a resident, this development means more convenience for me and my family, with new places to shop and dine close to home. The impact of Newhall Crossings on Old Town Newhall has been overwhelmingly positive, with new businesses opening and revitalizing the area. The increase in foot traffic has made the neighborhood more active and inviting, and I'm excited to see how this new development will continue that trend. The mix of residential and retail spaces will make the area more vibrant, creating a more walkable and connected community. For these reasons, I fully support the project and encourage others to do the some. I believe it will have a lasting, positive impact on our community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Santa Clarita City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd #120, Valencia, CA 91355 Monday March 3, 2025 RE: Letter of Support for Proposed Project on the Corner of Market and Main Street Dear City of Santa Clarita Planning Team, I am thrilled to express my enthusiastic support for the mixed -use project on Main Street in Newhall! As someone who has lived in Santa Clarita for over a decade, I am deeply invested in the community's growth and believe this development will bring exciting opportunities to our neighborhood Newhall is more than just a location; it is the heart of our city. It has a unique blend of history, culture, and modern charm that makes it a special place to live, work, and visit. The proposed development at 24300 Main Street will contribute to this charm by introducing additional housing and retail options that will enhance our quality of life. One of the most exciting features of this project is the addition of 78 new apartment units. As our city continues to expand. it is essential to provide diverse housing options for families, young professionals, and individuals looking to make Santa Clarita their home. More housing means a stronger community, with residents who can live, shop, and dine locally. The 5.300 square feet of retail space is another highlight of this development. Small businesses are the backbone of our community, and creating new opportunities for there to thrive is a step in the right direction.: , bustling commercial environment means more choices for residents and more job opportunities for locals. Looking at the success of Newhall Crossings. we can see how a well -executed project can breathe new life into a neighborhood. With new businesses, increased foot traffic, and an inviting atmosphere, the area has become a destination for both residents and visitors. The Main Street project will build upon this success, further revitalizing Newhall. For all these reasons, I wholeheartedly support this development and encourage others to do the same. I am excited to witness the continued growth of our city and the positive impact this project will bring. qPhyllriorgenster ds, (% Wednesday March 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 IV!ain Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. 11,.v_ ueen a resident of Santa Clarita for over 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place c3 :-Gise i-�y family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, e�pr _:Ily in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. New'!; it has long been the heart of S��! -,Jta, and projects like this one are essential to ens.,., it continues to thrive and remain d flub for our community. This project excite r-. _ ` P_ - use of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The of 78 new apartment unit-: :.rovic: much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of re_' i; s-_ace will offer ncv:J�,sinesses the chance to flourish in the area, With more businesses comEs more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revita! 7 r::n ra can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot trtifi`ic and bri 3 -,C have not only enhanced the local economy bLIt have also mad = = -iore -Lo families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to iiv For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, j/� /jJ Santa Clarifies City Council 23920 Valencia Blvd # 120. Valencia, CA 9 135 5 Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed mixed -use development project in Newhall. I have been a proud resident of Santa Clarita for over 10 years, and as a paf ent, I am deeply invested in seeing the area grow In a way that benefits families like mine. Newhall is an area that has always been close to my heart. It's a place that feels like home, and I want to see it continue to thrive. The addition of 78 new apartments will provide mare housing options for our growing city, while the 5,300 square feel of retail space will create new opportunities for local shops, restaurants, and businesses. As a resident, this development means more convenience for me and my famlly, with new places to shop and dine close to home. The impact of Newhall Crossings on Old Town Newhall has been overwhelmingly positive, with new businesses opening and revitalizing the area. The increase in foot traffic has made the neighborhood more active and inviting, and I'm excited to see how this new development will continue that trend. The mix of residential and retail spaces will make the area more vibrant, creating a more walkable and connected community. For these reasons, I fully support the project and encourage others to do the some. I believe it will have a lasting, positive impact on our community. Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Ste p hataie Stattcut Stephanie Slattery 661-755-8353 Docusign Envelope ID: F482171 1 -FD4F-479E-BE4A-24BE461 El 13E March 13, 2025 Dear City of Santa Clarita, As a property and business owner, we would like to extend our support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. We live and do business in this city for over 20+ years. We have seen Old Town Newhall from what it was before and what it is today. While maintaining and giving nod to the history of this town, the recent new developments have pushed the economic and footprint growth exponentially. We see local talent of the entrepreneurial mindset be able to present their craft in the opening of new businesses. We see families come in groves to create memories by partaking in city ran events. We see couples walk hand in hand down Main St for date nights at the local eats. Main St is setting the stage for growth, community, and recreation. The stage mirrors that of live, work, play, and eat! I was on a leisurely lunch break walk the other day and I ran into a business hoping to open at the end of March. The gentleman and I shared a conversation as I asked about his business. He beamed with pride. He was full of innovative ideas to bring more people to Main St by way of old school efforts and new school marketing. I walked away excited because he was excited. It is not just a structure being built up. It is a build out for a city to be recognized for its talent, ideas, and vibrancy! For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, DOCUSigned by: Tammey Mai 821541FODB1C43B... Tammey Mai Brandolino Group February 27, 2025 To Whom It May Coy I am writing to expre.:; .:} s gong support for the proposed k2lupment at 24300 Main Street, Santa C l:_,: ' . As a longtime resident of this city, I witness-,,'. its remarkable growth and believe flh., 1 ,J.planned projects like this one contribulc� ntly to our community's economic and �)ciai ;prosperity. Clarita for over 20 years, raising my family here anO. s eing firsthand the need ti}1 1ditional :i- -< ' and commercial space. Newhall, in particular. .I.nd cultural ....__ice within our city, an:i i s continued development is essential for main E zi ning its This project presents an,opportunity to enhance the neighborhood while prc�--ruing its C -am. The introduction of 78 apartment units will provide much -needed housing, addressing the growvig demand for residential options. Additionally, the 5,1'.;.i square feet of retail space will attract new bus - s, providing grease,- vaz., sho n1. -, ing, and essential seiA,1ces. This is crucial in sllS �3i�zltlg economic1'v\Vttl uilu LI'Culiii= ;iiUrC sci-sufficient local economy. The aesthetic appeal of this project is another noteworthy aspect. The Western Victorian ar�,itectural style will complement the character of Newhall, maintaining its historical essence incorporating modern functionality. This blend of old and new will ensure that the area an inviting and attractive destination. We have seen the transformative effects of Newhall Crossings, where new businesses, restaurants, and retail shops have flourished, revitalizing the district. The increase in iloot traffic and local engagement has proven that thoughtful development leads to positive ec,:':,. ;1i1 and social outcomes. The proposed project will build on this momentum, further estahh.<:,�:L, Newhall as a central hub within Santa Clarita. For all these reasons. I strongly encourage the approval of this project. The benefits of increased housing, economic stimulation, and enhanced community appeal cannot be overstated. I look forward to seeing this development come to fruition and the continued success of Newhall. Sincerely, �e Cp (0 C ?S-7 0IZcI Wednesday Mai-ch 5, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed --use development project on Main Street in Newnaii. I have been a resident cf Santa Clarita for ove:- 20 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, (SoS-) e8 Wednesday March 12, 2025 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for over 10 years, and it has been a wonderful place to raise my family and build lasting relationships within the community. I am the owner of The Newhall Press Room, a wine bar and restaurant on Main Street. As such this project impacts the viability of our business and I am in full support. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Troy Hooper 24257 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 troy@krpusa.com 720-570-6169 RE: Support for Proposed Mixed -Use Development Project at 24300 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Dear City of Santa Clarita Staff, I am writing to express my strong support for the upcoming mixed -use development project on Main Street in Newhall. I have been a resident of Santa Clarita for almost 10 years and am raising my young kids here. It has been a wonderful place to start our family and build lasting relationships within the community. I had the pleasure of working as a sales representative for a wine distribution company and developed relationships with business owners all over this valley. Main Street has been the ideal location for so many small businesses, restaurants and retail spaces alike in the time I have been here. When the opportunity recently presented itself to become one of those business owners ON Main Street, I jumped at the chance. We took over The Newhall Press Room, a wine bar and eatery on Main Street. Our business and this community rely on the growth and continued development of this historic area. Projects like these impact the viability of our business and those around us and I am in full support. As someone who has witnessed the growth of Santa Clarita, I firmly believe that continued development, especially in Newhall, is crucial for our city's prosperity. Newhall has long been the heart of Santa Clarita, and projects like this one are essential to ensure that it continues to thrive and remain a central hub for our community. This project excites me because of the growth it will bring to Newhall. The addition of 78 new apartment units will provide much -needed housing, while the 5,300 square feet of retail space will offer new businesses the chance to flourish in the area. With more businesses comes more opportunities for local jobs and services, which is something our community can greatly benefit from. Having watched the success of Newhall Crossings firsthand, I've seen how revitalizing an area can create a stronger, more vibrant community. The increased foot traffic and business activity have not only enhanced the local economy but have also made the area more appealing to families and individuals seeking a welcoming neighborhood to live in. For these reasons, I fully support the mixed -use development project on Main Street. It promises to bring continued growth, vibrancy, and opportunities to our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Kelly Thompson 24257 Main Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 kelly@newhallpressroom.com 818-433-9098 3/17/25 Dear Patrick Leclair, KHTS radio has been an integral part of our city for decades. We have been a lifeline to our community especially during times of calamity and crisis (earthquake, fires). We are appealing to you to help us because we need your help. As you know, plans are being presented to build a FIVE story mixed use complex with underground parking butted up against and affecting our KHTS radio station located at 24320 Main Street. We've hired specialty contractors, structural engineers, and sound experts to study what, if any, impacts will occur to our radio station. All agree, the impacts are draconian: there is no way for the radio station to broadcast during construction. Not broadcasting will cripple our business. Acoustic specialist, Brad Keeler of Progressive Design Inc. visited our radio studios on March 4, 2025. He also told us it is his professional opinion that the radio station cannot broadcast from our studios while construction is taking place. In his opinion, there is no additional soundproofing that can be added to prevent the noise from overwhelming KHTS broadcasts. In other words, there is no way to mitigate construction noise to allow us to broadcast while the proposed project is being constructed. We believe the proposed project could be beneficial for the improvement of Old Town Newhall. We are asking the Commission to consider two alternative conditions of approval, mitigation measures, that would allow us to stay in business, while allowing construction to take place. Option #1: Create a moratorium on construction during the hours of Monday through Friday from 6am — 9am and Noon —1pm to allow us to broadcast our most popular revenue generating shows without interruption. We will try to work around building construction noise during all other hours. Option #2: We will temporarily move our studios and offices. The developers and/or the city will pay for the cost of the temporary move from and then back to our current building. In addition, the developer and/or the city pays our rent at the new location while we are displaced. However, we've looked at ten locations this past month. Only two are still available. One is SCV Rents, an old building on Soledad and the other, Celebrate Florist on Bouquet. Both are demanding 5-year leases and other restrictions. We will also have to remount our current satellite dish with a cherry picker together with a new pole to raise it once construction is completed. We had numerous conversations with Jason Tolleson trying to come up with solutions before approaching planning. He rejected all, including starting at 9am or moving us. The City Council, in their last meeting, directed city staff to investigate if they could place the radio station in temporary modules on city property during construction. While we appreciate this suggestion that we be moved into temporary modules, this does not appear to be feasible due to the nature of our broadcast business. We found precedents for the city assisting local businesses impacted by development. We ask for similar help now. The city assisted Consumer's Furniture in 2003, by contributing $3 million dollars to move them across the street on Soledad Canyon Road to clear the way to build a bridge for The Cross Valley Connector. The Center Pointe developer donated land to accommodate the new location for Consumer's Furniture. We know the developer has agreed to pay the Santa Clarita Historical Society $750,000.00. Why should we be treated differently? In addition, The Santa Clarita Coalition, non-profit, is headquartered in our building. Its subsidiary, Santa Clarita Grocery, stores extra pallets of canned food at the back of our building, which they pick up on a daily basis for their food distribution to feed our valley's residents who are faced with food insecurities. We are concerned that the project, in its current form and proposed conditions, results in either a taking or damaging our property and business without fair and/or just compensation. This is unfair and no way to treat us given our significant contributions and value to our city and community. We believe our requests are reasonable and will not burden the proposed project with unreasonable conditions or mitigation measures. We hope we can count on you. I would like to talk on the purposed development of Market and Railroad. The old masonic building has so much rich history that should be preserved. The original rafter are the center piece the building and in perfect condition. As well as the origional wood floors. Asking for the City to help along with the developer in moving the building to another city owned location in Newhall. After inquiries to a few building moving companies with some proper planning the main structure can be moved for around 200K . Or if the City would help with reallocation of the self help group The Rafters with over 500 members into another structure in Newhall. IE, Roger Dunn or Senior Center out building. The Rafters Group has been an instrumental asset to the community for over 50 years. Looking to continue the service for many years to come. We ask for the time needed and the conversations with the City and the developer to benefit the City as a whole. I have attached an letter for the history of the building from a SCV historian. David Doyle NEWHALL CA 661-373-6577 John Boston is the most prolific humorist/satirist in world history. He's lived in Santa Clarita since the 1950. With more than 100 major journalism awards, he's been recognized as one of America's best newspaper columnists and editors. He's also written books on SCV history, taught SCV history for 20 years and writes the Time Ranger column for The Signal newspaper, along with his Mr. SCV column. He sent this not as a representative of The Signal, but as his own viewpoint on the importance of saving from demolition, The Courthouse Building on Market Street in Newhall. We'd like to read this into the record of the council for the City of Santa Clarita... There are few times in our lives when we get a chance to right a great wrong. The demolition of the historic Courthouse Building on Market Street in Downtown Newhall would be nothing short of a major sin on the soul of Santa Clarita. It is one of the last truly historic buildings in our valley. In 1878, on its foundation was built the mercantile store by Walter S. Newhall, the son of town founder, Henry Mayo Newhall. It was an old-time Wild West Saloon for a while, then became this valley's epicenter the Hap -a -Lan Dance Hall in 1920. That was more than a century ago. Big-time Los Angeles jazz and dance bands came here to play and the hall was used for everything from community meetings (to discuss cityhood) to bake sales, movies, lectures, school pageants and emergency relief stations. It served as morgue for victims of the 1928 Great St. Francis Dam Disaster. There was so much grief surrounding the storage of 70 corpses, people avoided the place for years. In 1933, it would become our valley's courthouse where trials small to great were heard. The 10- year-hearings for the estate of William S. Hart were held here, as was the trial for Richard John Jensen, the SCV's only know serial killer. Prior to that, the Newhall Community Players would start the SCV's first community theater there and after, the beginnings of the Canyon Theatre Guild would offer plays. Today? The most -beneficial Alcoholics Anonymous 12-Step program holds daily meetings, helping thousands of the decades. Their meetings are on the top floor and is called The Rafters. The same maple dance floor from the 1920s is still used upstairs, more than a century later. Again? It would be a sin to destroy this building. I have a solution. Put together public or public/private partnership. Buy the Courthouse Building. Use part of the building to house a new St. Francis Dam Disaster Museum that would include the rich history of the great cases that were tried here, its days as a SoCal jazz nightspot, its community theater days and the glorious times of serving our community. It would be THE major anchor of the revitalization of Downtown Newhall and a go -to destination for everyone from tourists to thousands of local students. In my lifetime, we've lost not just actual physical historical buildings that should have been saved, but the memory of who we were as a community. When you rewrite, alter or forget a town's identity, you lose part of not just its soul, but your soul. We have a chance to teach, to immortilize, our Santa Clarita culture. One thing about Santa Clarita? As historian and growing up here since the 1950s, I've learned and watched that our valley is a can -do community 1876 or 2025. Generations have come and gone, but we're still a people who roll up our sleeves and get the task done. Let's save The Courthouse Building. Please accept this email as the outline for discussion points to be voiced by citizens and supporters of the "Rafters Group." First and foremost, we want to emphasize, it is NOT our intention to stand in the way of progress, nor in any way impede the pending sale of the property located at 24307 Railroad Ave. Furthermore, it is important to know that most ALL our 500 plus Members who make up the registered non-profit 501c3 group known as "The Rafters," who attend meetings at the subject building, are voting, tax -paying residents of the City of Santa Clarita. As such, we are excited to see the continued work being done on behalf of the City of Santa Clarita to continue with architectural improvements to Main Street and this area known as "Old Town Newhall." We appreciate the hard work of the planning Commission and others in the spirit of progress, to provide an area that is considered a destination for entertainment, retail commerce, and home to more Citizens of the City of Santa Clarita. For more than 50 years, the Men & Women who have quietly and peacefully met in the hall of the 2nd floor of the subject building, have done so in the spirit of anonymity, as one of the primary principals of our Group's existence. For many of us, the act of publicly standing before our fellows to expose Our Membership is a decision, we don't take lightly. However, we do so today to demonstrate our commitment to Our "Primary Purpose," to help OTHERS. We felt it of paramount importance, to stand up and be heard to ensure the preservation of a room and building that has been the centerpiece of recovery in the Santa Clarita Valley for more than 50 years. Although as we understand it, the City has not yet "officially" recognized the subject building as a "Historical" building, it is evident by several different motions and the listing of it on a list of sites "to be considered," it is and should be. Construction of the subject building began in 1931, of what would be the Newhall Courthouse (1st floor) and Masonic Lodge (2nd floor) on the site where in the 1880's, Joshua Newhall, relative of town Founder, Henry Mayo Newhall, built his general and dry goods store. Later in 1914, the building was leased to William Mayhue. It's believed that the salvaged lumber from the "Mayhue Building," was used in its construction of the building there now, including the wood floor on the 2nd floor, taken from the "Hap -A -Lan" Dance Hall, later known as "Houghton's" Community Room & Dance Hall. In 1928 it was the biggest place in town that could accommodate the bodies that kept coming from the San Francisquito Canyon tragedy for identification. These are facts, easily uncovered by the magic of google, in articles that have appeared in SCVhistory.com. Moreover, we hope to compel the Members of the City Council to consider negotiating for financial assistance from the new Owner and/or Developer of said building to divert or allocate funds that might be earmarked for some entity under the auspice of "Historical" preservation of Newhall's past.... These monies, estimated to be as much as $750,000. should be used to move and re -purpose this building. We ask, that the following recommendations are given every consideration as follows: 1. Allow the group known as "The Rafters Group," to continue meeting in said location beyond June 30, rent free, provided ample liability insurance is purchased, until such time that a location and plan for the relocation of the "core" (original structure) building can be executed. 2. Negotiate the relocation of the building cost from a portion of the funds pledged by the Developer, to the City. 3. Identify a lot, either wholly owned by the city, or otherwise, nearby the existing site. a. 22900 Market St. the property where the former Senior Center was, to be granted to the City of Santa Clarita from the County of Los Angeles, as of July 1, in combination with the adjacent Hart Park property. Or; b. An alternate location not yet identified... David Doyle NEWHALL CA 661-373-6577 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT -�' 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION: Master Case 24-134: Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24- 015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Development Review 24-012, and Architectural Design Review 24-017 PROJECT LOCATION: 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026) PROJECT APPLICANT: Serrano Development Group PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Minor Use Permit (MUP), Adjustment Permit (ADJ), Development Review (DR), and Architectural Design Review (ADR) for the redevelopment of the Mac's Pool Supply, Horseshoe on Main (formally Soundsations), and the historical Masonic Lodge/Courthouse buildings located on the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project is a full -block development consisting of the demolition of the existing structures to construct a new five -story mixed -use building at approximately 52 feet in height. The ground level includes approximately 5,300 square feet of commercial floor area and ground -level parking within the building footprint. The upper levels include 78 apartment units. A total of 122 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first -floor levels. Vehicle access to the project site would be provided from Railroad Avenue and Market Street. The project requires a CUP to increase the allowable floor area ratio. An MUP is required for dirt export exceeding 10,000 cubic yards. An MUP with City Council approval is required to demolish the on -site historic building. The applicant is requesting an ADJ for a 20-percent reduction in the amount of shared amenity space to be provided. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: On March 18, 2025, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to adopt a resolution recommending the City Council approve Master Case 24-134 including additional Conditions of Approval to address parking and construction impacts. Therefore, the City Council will conduct a public hearing on this matter on the following date: DATE: Tuesday, April 22, 2025 TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m. LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers 23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor Santa Clarita, CA 91355 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings. For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Telephone: (661) 255-4330. Website: www.santaclarita.gov/planning. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Erika Iverson, Senior Planner, eiversongsantaclarita. og_v. Mary Cusick, MMC City Clerk Published: The Signal, April 1, 2025 PROJECT SITE Request for a new mixed -use building 24300, 24308, 24316 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -026)