HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-07-08 - AGENDA REPORTS - RESO LEVY INCREASE LMD T44 T48 T62O
Agenda Item: 5
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
CONSENT CALENDAR
CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Lj
'
DATE: July 8, 2025
SUBJECT: RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTION TO LEVY INCREASED
ASSESSMENTS FOR LMD ZONES T44, T48, AND T62 IN FY 2026-
27, AND TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES PURSUANT TO
PROPOSITION 218 AND AB 2257
DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services
PRESENTER: Andrew Adams
RECOMMENDED ACTION
City Council:
1. Adopt a Resolution of Initiation to begin proceedings to levy increased assessments
commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 for Landscaping Zones T44 — Bouquet Canyon, T48 —
Shadow Hills, and T62 — Canyon Heights within the City of Santa Clarita Landscaping and
Lighting District, and direct the Engineer to prepare and file a report pursuant to Article 4,
Chapter 1 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
2. Adopt a Resolution of Intention declaring the City of Santa Clarita's intent to levy and
collect increased assessments for Landscaping Zones T44 — Bouquet Canyon, T48 — Shadow
Hills, and T62 — Canyon Heights within the City of Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting
District; preliminarily approve the Engineer's Report; and initiate a property owner protest
ballot proceeding for Fiscal Year 2026-27, in accordance with Article XIIID of the California
Constitution, by calling a public hearing and submitting the proposed assessments to
qualified property owners.
3. Adopt a Resolution establishing rate -setting procedures for Landscape Maintenance Districts
and Zones —including LMD Zones T44, T48, and T62—in accordance with Proposition 218
and Government Code Sections 53759.0 through 53759.2 (including AB 2257).
BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Clarita's (City) Landscape Maintenance District (LMD), established under the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act," Streets and Highways Code §§ 22500 et
Page 1
Packet Pg. 31
O
seq.), levies assessments to fund landscape maintenance services that enhance property values,
aesthetics, and community livability across 62 zones. These zones encompass over 2,300 acres of
landscaped areas, including street medians, parkways, three parks, 29 miles of paseos, 60,000
trees, and 46 miles of landscaped medians.
Landscape Maintenance District Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62
(Canyon Heights) - located on the eastern side of Copper Hill Drive and covering 622 parcels -
face ongoing funding deficits due to static assessment rates resulting from the absence of
consumer price index (CPI) adjustments in the zones' methodologies and Proposition 218
property owner approval requirements, combined with rising costs for labor, water, and
equipment. Over recent years, the City has significantly reduced service levels in these zones as
a cost containment strategy; however, this has not stemmed the funding shortfall nor delivered
the level of maintenance the community needs.
The City proposes increasing assessments in response to property owner feedback collected
through extensive outreach, which included:
• A March 2025 Citywide press release
• Brochures mailed to all 622 property owners in April 2025
• Five outreach events from April through June 2025 (three in -person, two virtual)
• Doorhangers distributed in June 2025 summarizing assessment scenarios and providing a
QR code linking to a recorded meeting and survey on the LMD website
Of the property owners we engaged through outreach efforts, there was overwhelming support
for increased assessments when tied to enhanced services. Respondents consistently prioritized
improvements such as upgraded landscaping and more reliable maintenance, as reflected in the
attached Engineer's Report. Failure of the ballot in any zone, given the unsustainable financial
conditions, would necessitate substantial reductions in services (such as tree trimming and
emergency response) or potentially require the City to consider vacating the zone entirely,
shifting maintenance responsibilities to individual property owners.
Legal Framework and Compliance
Proposition 218, approved by California voters in November 1996, amended the California
Constitution (Articles 13C and 13D) to require that assessments be proportionate to the special
benefit conferred on each parcel; not exceed the reasonable cost of that proportional special
benefit; and, for increased assessments, be approved by property owners through a mailed ballot
process, with annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments permitted if included in the
property owner -approved assessment methodology.
The City's 62 LMD zones, including T44, T48, and T62, were established under the 1972 Act,
with some predating Proposition 218 and others compliant at formation. Proposed assessment
increases must comply with both the 1972 Act and Proposition 218, supported by an Engineer's
Report quantifying special benefits and costs.
The majority of existing LMD zones already include a CPI adjustment in their assessment
methodologies, which allows rates to keep pace with inflation and maintain service levels
Page 2
Packet Pg. 32
O
without requiring a new ballot process. However, Zones T44, T48, and T62 lack CPI indexing
and must therefore go through a Proposition 218 ballot process to increase rates and add
inflationary adjustments.
Proposed Assessments and Service Enhancements
Based on feedback from property owners, staff proposes increasing assessments as follows to
generate approximately $224,710 in additional annual revenue, enabling substantial increases in
landscape maintenance and improved aesthetics:
Zone
Parcels
Current
Rate
Proposed
Rate
Increase
($)
Annual Revenue
Increase
T44 (Bouquet Canyon)
302
$300
$600
$300
$90,600
T48 (Shadow Hills)
105
$455
$1,125
$670
$70,350
T62 (Canyon Heights -
Residential)
214
$600
$875
$275
$58,850
T62 (Canyon Heights -
Commercial)*
1
$600
$875
$275
$4,910
Total
622
-
-
-
$224,710
* Note: The commercial parcel in Zone T62 (1.764 acres, APN 3244-119-054) is assessed at
3.57 Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) per acre (6.2974 EBUs total), proportionate to special
benefits conferred, as detailed in the Engineer's Report.
The increased assessments will not only provide enhanced landscape maintenance but also
ensure sustained upkeep of aging infrastructure, including v-ditches, backflow devices, and
irrigation systems.
Ballot Process and Rate -Setting Procedures
Staff recommends that Council adopt the resolution establishing Assessment Setting Procedures
to implement Assembly Bill 2257 ("AB 2257," Government Code §§ 53759.1-53759.2, effective
January 1, 2025). Under these procedures, in addition to the rights of property owners within
LMD Zones to submit a ballot in favor of or opposed to the assessment under Proposition 218
(summarized below), the property owners will be provided an opportunity to submit written
objections under AB 2257. A written objection is required to identify a substantive reason why a
property owner asserts that a proposed assessment does not comply with legal requirements, and
the City is required to provide a substantive written response at the public hearing when the
Council will consider approval of the proposed assessments. These procedures under AB 2257
are intended to provide an opportunity for the City to resolve substantive concerns from property
owners' prior approval of an assessment, and a property owner is required to "exhaust
administrative remedies" by submitting a timely written objection to the City as a condition of
filing litigation to challenge the assessment.
The adoption of the proposed resolutions will establish the procedures for a Proposition 218-
compliant property owner ballot proceeding and rate -setting framework aligned with both
Proposition 218 and AB 2257. These resolutions will direct that ballots and notices be mailed to
Page 3
Packet Pg. 33
O
the 622 property owners in Zones T44, T48, and T62; set a public hearing on October 14, 2025,
to review objections and tabulate ballots (with no majority protest if ballots favoring the increase
outweigh opposition); and, if approved, implement the new rates and CPI adjustments effective
Fiscal Year 2026-27.
ALTERNATIVE ACTION
Other action as determined by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT
If property owners approve the proposed assessment increases, the result will be increased
revenues within Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48
(Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights). These additional funds will support the continued
provision of landscape maintenance and related services within the respective communities.
ATTACHMENTS
FY 2027 LLD Initiation Resolution
FY 2027 LLD Intent Resolution
Resolution - Prop 218 AB 2257 Procedures
FY 2025-26 Engineer's Report T44 T48 T62 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File)
Page 4
Packet Pg. 34
5.a
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT
OF 1972 (SECTIONS 22500 ET. SEQ. OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS CODE) INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY A PROPOSED NEW
OR INCREASED ASSESSMENTS COMMENCING FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FOR
LANDSCAPING ZONES T44 BOUQUET CANYON, T48 SHADOW HILLS, AND
T62 CANYON HEIGHTS WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT AND ORDERING THE ENGINEER
TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4 OF
CHAPTER 1 OF SAID ACT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita (City) did form the City
of Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (District) which includes Landscaping
Zones T44-Bouquet Canyon, T48-Shadow Hills and T62-Canyon Heights (T44, T48, and
T62), pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Act), in
which assessments have been previously levied and collected; and
WHEREAS, said Act requires that proceedings for the levy of assessments shall
be initiated by resolution describing any proposed new improvements or any substantial
changes in existing improvements or assessments in accordance with Chapter 3
(commencing with Section 22620) of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California, and ordering the Engineer to prepare and file a report in
accordance with Article 4 of Chapter 1 of Said Act; and
WHEREAS, the City has approved a consulting engineer contract with Willdan,
naming Willdan as the Assessment Engineer and firm responsible for preparing the
Engineer's Report and assisting in the adjustment of the maximum assessment for parcels
within T44, T48, and T62.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California,
does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby orders that Willdan, an engineer registered
pursuant to the Professional Engineers Act (Chapter 7, commencing with Section 670, of
Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code), has been designated Assessment
Engineer for the proposed new or increased assessments for T44, T48, and T62. Willdan
is hereby ordered to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for the City Council's review,
consideration, and adoption in accordance with the Act and the laws of the State of
California.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita proposes the levy of
proposed new or increased assessments for T44, T48, and T62 within the District
commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 pursuant to the Act.
Page 1 of 3
Packet Pg. 35
5.a
SECTION 4. The proposed improvements within T44, T48, and T62 are generally
described as irrigated slope landscaping, non -irrigated landscaping, and turf. The work to
be performed may include but is not limited to (as applicable), landscaping, planting,
shrubbery, trees, grass, other ornamental vegetation, irrigation systems, hardscapes and
fixtures; statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities; facilities which
are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the
maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, clearing, removal of
debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or
water, irrigation, drainage landscaped areas, or electrical facilities; and park or
recreational improvements, including, but not limited to, playground equipment, shade
structures, play courts, public restrooms, and paseos/trails.
SECTION 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this
resolution; shall cause the same to be entered in the book of resolutions of the City and
shall make a minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings
of the City Council of the City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is
presented.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
MAYOR
Page 2 of 3
Packet Pg. 36
5.a
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 25-—
was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
Page 3 of 3
Packet Pg. 37
5.b
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE CITY' S INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT AN
INCREASED ASSESSMENT FOR LANDSCAPING ZONES T44 BOUQUET CANYON, T48
SHADOW HILLS, AND T62 CANYON HEIGHTS WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY APPROVING
AN ENGINEER'S REPORT, CALLING FOR A PROPERTY OWNER PROTEST BALLOT
PROCEEDING TO SUBMIT TO THE QUALIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS THE QUESTION
OF LEVYING INCREASED ASSESSMENTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 PURSUANT TO
THE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE XIII D AND
SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California has adopted a
Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the proposed increased assessments for T44 Bouquet
Canyon, T48 Shadow Hills, and T62 Canyon Heights (T44, T48, and T62) within the City of
Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (District) commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27,
ordering the City's Assessment Engineer to prepare and file a report regarding such matters
pursuant to Chapter 3 of Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highway Code of the State of
California; and
WHEREAS, the City's Assessment Engineer has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a
report, and the City Clerk has presented such report for the District for T44, T48, and T62 for
Fiscal Year 2025-26 (the Engineer's Report or Report); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution, the City Engineer's Report for the proposed increased
assessments for T44, T48, and T62, commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27, has been approved by
the City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa. Clarita, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. Engineer's Report, Content: The Engineer's Report as presented, consists of
the following:
The Plans and Specifications which describe the boundaries of T44, T48, and T62, and
the improvements associated therewith that provide special benefits to the parcels therein.
The Method of Apportionment details the method of calculating proportional special
benefit and the annual assessment obligation for each affected parcel.
The Estimate of Improvement Costs including the calculation of the assessments and the
estimated annual funding (Budgets) required for the annual maintenance, servicing, and
operation of landscape improvements and specifically the costs associated with the
improvements determined to be of special benefit to parcels within T44, T48, and T62
establishing the proposed increased maximum assessment rates.
Page 1 of 4
Packet Pg. 38
5.b
The proposed Maximum Assessments shall be presented to the property owner(s) of
record in a protest ballot proceeding pursuant to the California Constitution Article XIII D.
District diagrams outlining the boundaries of T44, T48, and T62.
Assessment Rolls containing the maximum assessments and proposed assessments as of
the date of the Report for each Assessor Parcel Number within T44, T48, and T62.
SECTION 2. Engineer's Report, Approval: The Engineer's Report is hereby approved on
a preliminary basis as submitted or amended by direction of this City Council and is hereby
ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to
public inspection.
SECTION 3. Intention: The City Council hereby declares its intention to ballot for an
increased assessment in the areas known as T44, T48, and T62, and to levy and collect these
increased assessments against parcels of land within T44, T48, and T62 commencing with Fiscal
Year 2026-27 in accordance with the Act and the provisions of the California Constitution
Article XIII D.
SECTION 4. Balloted T44, T48, and T62: The City Council hereby finds that T44, T48,
and T62 within the District consists of all lots, parcels, and subdivisions of land within the
existing residential areas identified as T44, T48, and T62, and that these areas include all
properties that receive special benefits from the improvements provided.
SECTION 5. Improvements: The proposed improvements and services for T44, T48, and
T62, include irrigated slope landscaping, non -irrigated landscaping and turf or maintenance of
any authorized improvements under the Act, including, but not limited to (as applicable),
landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, grass, other ornamental vegetation, irrigation systems,
hardscapes, and fixtures; statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities;
facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for
the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, clearing, removal of debris,
the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation,
drainage landscaped areas, or electrical facilities; and, park or recreational improvements,
including, but not limited to, playground equipment, shade structures, play courts, public
restrooms, and paseos/trails.
SECTION 6. Assessments: The City Council hereby determines that to provide the
improvements and necessary service level associated with improvements described in Section 5
of this resolution, it is necessary to levy and collect an increased assessment against lots and
parcels within T44, T48, and T62 commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27. The Engineer's Report
referred to in Section 1 of this resolution establishes the increased maximum assessment rates
and an estimate of maximum assessments necessary to provide for the annual operation,
administration, services, and maintenance of the improvements.
SECTION 7. Compliance with the Constitution: Pursuant to California Constitution
Article XIII D, an assessment ballot proceeding is hereby called on the matter of confirming the
proposed increased assessments for T44, T48, and T62. The ballots and notices so authorized
shall be distributed by first-class mail to the property owners of record as of the last County
Page 2 of 4
Packet Pg. 39
5.b
equalized roll, and each property owner may return the ballot by mail or in person to the City
Clerk no later than the conclusion of the public hearing for this matter.
While provisions of the California Constitution Article XIII D require that the City
conduct a public hearing not less than forty-five (45) days after mailing a notice of the proposed
assessment to record owners of each parcel which will have a special benefit conferred upon
them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, California Civil Code Section 3513 allows
any person to waive the advantage of a law intended solely for their benefit. The forty-five (45)
day mailed notice and ballot period preceding the scheduled public hearing is not established for
a public purpose, but rather for the benefit of the affected property owners.
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2257 (AB 2257), enacted in 2024, affected property owners
have an opportunity to submit any written objections to the proposed fee or assessment within
the time period identified in the mailed notice and ballot identified in Section 8 of this resolution.
To preserve the right to later challenge the assessment based on alleged noncompliance, a written
objection must be submitted by the deadline established by the City, which shall be no less than
45 days from the mailing of notice.
SECTION 8. Mailed Notice and Ballot: The City Council hereby authorizes and directs
the City Clerk or their designee to prepare and mail the Notice of Public Hearing, and in the
same or separate mailing, mail the property owner protest ballot(s) to the subject property owner
regarding the proposed levy of assessments and the assessment range formula outlined in the
Engineer's Report, for return receipt on or before the date and time of closing the public hearing
described in this resolution.
SECTION 9. Public Hearing: The City Council hereby declares its intention to conduct a
public hearing concerning Assessment Districts T44, T48, and T62, the ongoing maintenance of
previously implemented improvements, and the levy of increased assessments. Notice is hereby
given that on Tuesday, October 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., the City Council will hold a Majority
Protest Hearing for Assessment Districts T44, T48, and T62. The purpose of the hearing is to
consider the levy and collection of increased assessments for the continued maintenance of
existing improvements beginning in Fiscal Year 2026-27, or as soon thereafter as feasible. The
public hearing will be held in the City Council Chambers, located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard,
Santa Clarita, California. At this public hearing, all interested persons will be given the
opportunity to speak and be heard regarding the proposed assessments.
SECTION 10. Determination of Majority Protest: The property owner protest ballot
proceeding conducted for the T44, T48, and T62 shall constitute the property owner's approval
or rejection of the annual levy of assessments and assessment range formula. The property owner
may return the ballot by mail or in person to the City Clerk no later than the conclusion of the
public hearing on Tuesday, October 14, 2025. After the close of the public hearing, pursuant to
Section 4, Sub -Section 4 (e) of Article XIII D of the California Constitution, the City shall
tabulate the ballots returned to determine if majority protest exists. The ballots shall be weighted
according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. Majority protest exists
if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed
the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment.
Page 3 of 4
Packet Pg. 40
5.b
SECTION 11. This resolution shall take effect immediately.
SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution;
shall cause the same to be entered in the book of resolutions of the City and shall make a minute
of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of the
City in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is presented.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 25- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a
regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
Page 4of4
Packet Pg. 41
5.c
RESOLUTION NO. 25-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ASSESSMENT SETTING PROCEDURES FOR
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS AND ZONES UNDER PROPOSITION 218
AND GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 53759.0 THROUGH 53759.2
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to establish Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs)
pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code §§ 22500, et
seq.) (the Act), under which it has formed certain LMD zones. In addition, the City assumed
responsibility for other LMD zones that were originally established by the County of Los
Angeles and subsequently transferred to the City. In each case, the LMDs impose annual
assessments on property owners who receive a special benefit from maintenance and
improvements of landscaping and related facilities (as defined by the Act) performed by the City
and funded by the LMD. For the purpose of this resolution, an "LMD" may refer to either a
"district" or a "zone" within that district; and
WHEREAS, the City has established and manages 62 LMD zones as described on the
City's website, each of which confers special benefits upon properties within the geographical
boundaries of the corresponding LMD zone; collectively, those 62 LMD zones encompass over
2,300 acres of landscape areas including street medians, parkways, side -panels, three parks,
numerous monument signs, more than 29 miles of paseos, approximately 60,000 trees, and 46
miles of landscaped medians; and
WHEREAS, following voter approval in November 1996 of Proposition 218 (California
Constitution Articles XIII C and XIII D; as it is implemented through Government Code sections
53750 through 53759.2, as well as relevant judicial interpretation), the City is required to comply
with the requirements of the Act and Proposition 218 in order to establish a new or increased
assessment. Provided, however, that any LMD established prior to the effective date of
Proposition 218 is exempt from compliance with Proposition 218 if the assessment is imposed
exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for improvements
such as those funded through the City's LMDs (see California Constitution Article XIII D,
Section 5); and
WHEREAS, to the extent an existing LMD was initially established in accordance with
the Act, and is either exempt from Proposition 218 or was initially formed in compliance with
Proposition 218, the City is authorized to levy annual assessments without further compliance
with Proposition 218 so long as the amount levied does not exceed the amount of the initially
approved assessment, in accordance with the requirements of the Act (see Streets & Hwy Code
§ § 22620 — 22631); and
WHEREAS, under Proposition 218, an LMD assessment is defined as "a levy or charge
upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property," and is
subject to the requirements of California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4. In general, the
City may only establish a new LMD assessment or increase an existing one if it:
Page 1 of 4
Packet Pg. 42
5.c
(1) complies with the requirements of the Act for the preparation of a resolution of
initiation, a resolution of intention, and a resolution of formation, based on the analysis of an
Engineer's Report;
(2) calculates the proposed assessment in accordance with Proposition 218, as described
in this resolution;
(3) conducts a noticed public hearing before the City Council, as described in this
resolution; and
(4) determines that a majority protest has not resulted from the ballot proceeding
conducted in connection with the public hearing (a majority protest exists if the weighted ballots
submitted in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed the weighted ballots submitted in
favor, with the weights based on the proportional financial obligation of each property owner
who submitted a ballot); and
WHEREAS, under Government Code sections 53759.1 and 53759.2 (known as
AB 2257), the City may establish supplemental procedures for objecting property owners to
exhaust administrative remedies, also described in this resolution, by which the City will take
specified actions in response to any "timely written objection." Under this process, only an
owner who submits a timely written objection will have the right to challenge a proposed
increase in LMD assessment through a legal proceeding. (These supplemental processes were
authorized by Assembly Bill No. 2257, Chapter 561, Statutes of 2024, effective January 1,
2025.); and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this resolution is to establish and document the procedures
the City will follow when considering proposed new or increased LMD assessments, including
compliance with Proposition 218 and the administrative remedy requirements set forth in
AB 2257. These procedures are intended to provide property owners a meaningful opportunity
to submit written objections to proposed new or increased assessments early in the assessment
process and to allow the City to address or resolve those objections prior to the City Council's
final decision on whether to adopt a proposed new or increased assessment pursuant to
Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, this resolution establishes procedural steps the City will follow to
implement the administrative remedies that property owners must exhaust under Government
Code sections 53759.1 before initiating any legal action to challenge an assessment. In general,
at least 45 days prior to a public hearing on a proposed new or increased assessment, the City
will make the proposed assessment available to the public and will post the written basis for the
proposed new or increased assessment on its website. During this period (for at least 45 days
after notice of public hearing), any property owner may review the proposed assessment and
submit a written objection specifying the grounds for alleging noncompliance with Proposition
218. The City will consider each timely written objection and provide a substantive written
response before the close of the public hearing as described in section 5 of the LMD Assessment
Setting Procedures, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, for any new or increased assessment approved by the City implementing the
procedures described in this resolution, a person or entity shall be prohibited from bringing a
judicial action or proceeding alleging noncompliance with Article XIII D of the California
Page 2 of 4
Packet Pg. 43
5.c
Constitution for such new or increased assessment, unless that person or entity has timely
submitted to the City a written objection to that assessment that specifies the grounds for alleging
noncompliance with Proposition 218; and
WHEREAS, the City Council hereby intends to adopt the exhaustion of administrative
remedies procedure as outlined in Government Code section 53759.1 and the administrative
record principles contained in Government Code section 53759.2.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, does
hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby adopts the LMD Assessment Setting Procedures
attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by reference (LMD Assessment Setting
Procedures). The LMD Assessment Setting Procedures explicitly incorporate and implement the
requirements contained in the Act, Proposition 218 (including the Proposition 218 Omnibus
Implementation Act), and the procedures by which property owners are required to exhaust
administrative remedies as set forth in Government Code § 53759.1, subdivision (c).
SECTION 2. For any LMD assessment adopted or approved by the City implementing
the procedures described in this resolution, a person or entity shall be prohibited from bringing a
judicial action or proceeding alleging noncompliance with Article XIII D of the California
Constitution for that assessment unless that person or entity has timely submitted to the City a
written objection to the assessment that specifies the grounds for alleging noncompliance with
Proposition 218, as provided below.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby adopts the administrative record principles
contained in Government Code section 53759.2.
SECTION 4. This resolution will take effect immediately upon adoption and will apply to
any proposed new or increased LMD assessments of which notice is provided in accordance with
this resolution.
SECTION 5. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to take such other and
additional actions as may be reasonably necessary to implement the purpose of this resolution
and implement the exhaustion of administrative remedies procedure adopted herein.
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita is hereby directed to record
the adopted Resolution with the Los Angeles County Recorder.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025.
Page 3 of 4
Packet Pg. 44
5.c
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
DATE:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 25- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular
meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
Page 4 of 4
Packet Pg. 45
5.c
Resolution No. (Exhibit "A")
LMD Assessment Setting Procedures
These "LMD Assessment Setting Procedures" ("Procedures") describe the processes that will be
followed by the City of Santa Clarita ("City") in establishing any new or increased Landscape
Maintenance District ("LMD") assessments, as summarized in the Resolution identified in the
header of this Exhibit "A." The LMD Assessment Setting Procedures include compliance with
Proposition 218 (including the consideration of "assessment ballots" from record owners) as well
as the procedures for exhausting administrative remedies under Government Code section 53759.1
(including the consideration of "written objections" from record owners).
1. Overview of Exhaustion Procedure
If the City publishes a notice of public hearing identifying procedures for property owners to
submit written objections (described in Section 4, below),' the City will follow the "exhaustion
procedure" set forth herein, to be conducted concurrently with the Proposition 218 process, for the
City Council's consideration of any proposed new or increased LMD assessment. This exhaustion
procedure shall be conducted in accordance with "Proposition 218" (California Constitution
Article XIII D; as it is implemented by the Legislature at Government Code section 53750 et seq.,
and as it has been interpreted by judicial decisions), and the particular procedures set forth in
Government Code section 53759.1. The exhaustion procedure provides an opportunity for record
owners to submit a "timely written objection" to identify substantive bases for asserting proposed
LMD assessment do not comply with Proposition 218. A "record owner" may be referred to in
these Procedures as the "owner" or "property owner." The "record owner" shall include any tenant
who is directly liable to pay the assessment.
a. City staff will post these Procedures on the City's internet website, and the Proposition
218 public hearing notice mailed to all record owners will prominently incorporate a
notice of the internet website and these Procedures.
b. The mailed public hearing notice will identify the date and time by which timely written
objections must be submitted to the City, and the date will be no less than 45 calendar
days after the notice is mailed to record owners.
City staff will review timely written objections and prepare written responses providing
the substantive basis for retaining or altering the proposed LMD assessment in response
to the written objections. City staff will present its written responses to the City Council
prior to the close of the public hearing for the Proposition 218 protest hearing, and the
City Council will review to determine whether action is needed in response to the
written objections or written responses.
' If the City publishes a notice of public hearing that does not identify procedures for property
owners to submit written objections, the City will conduct the public hearing in compliance with
Proposition 218.
Page 1 of 8
Packet Pg. 46
5.c
d. Following the City Council's review and response to timely written objections and
written responses, it is within the discretion of the City Council to proceed with
considering assessment ballots to determine whether a majority protest was submitted
in accordance with Proposition 218; and, if there is no majority protest, to then consider
approval of the proposed LMD assessment, as described herein.
Rate Challenger Must Exhaust Administrative Remedies. No claim, suit for
damages, suit for injunctive relief, petition for writ of mandamus, or administrative or
judicial proceeding shall be brought against the City (including the City Council, or its
employees, officers, or designees) regarding a challenge to a proposed new or increased
LMD assessment unless the challenging party first exhausts its administrative remedies
by complying with these Procedures and submits to the City a timely written objection.
2. Notice of Proposition 218 Public Hearing and Initiating Exhaustion Procedure
Prior to approving or imposing any new or increased LMD assessment, the City Council will
consider and approve a resolution of initiation and a resolution of intention, supported by an
engineer's report, in accordance with the requirements of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972 (Streets and Highways Code §§ 22500, et seq.) (the "Act"). The engineer's report shall be
prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California, and it shall
provide evidence and describe how the improvements and/or services funded by the assessments
confer special benefits on parcels subject to the LMD assessment, as well as describing any general
benefits.
The resolution of intention shall include a notice of public hearing to consider the proposed LMD
assessment, and the City will mail the public hearing notice to each record owner no later than 45
days prior to the public hearing. Provided, however, if the public hearing notice incorporates the
exhaustion of administrative remedies procedure (set forth in Procedure Section 2(b)), the City
will incorporate additional time for the notice of public hearing in order to allow a reasonable time
for the City to prepare written responses to any timely written objections (as an example, if the
public hearing notice is mailed 60 days prior to the hearing date, that would allow the City 15 days
to prepare written responses prior to the close of the public hearing).
Content of Public Hearing Notice. The public hearing notice will include the
content, and be mailed to each record owner with an assessment ballot, as outlined
below. The envelope containing the notice and ballot will include, on its face, in at
least 16-point bold type and in substantially the following form, the statement:
"OFFICIAL BALLOT ENCLOSED." The notice will include:
The total proposed assessment for the entire district.
ii. The proposed assessment for the record owner's parcel.
iii. The duration of the assessment; e.g., "If approved, the assessment will be
collected annually, until the City Council determines that the assessment is
no longer necessary."
Page 2 of 8
Packet Pg. 47
5.c
iv. The reason for the assessment. This includes the improvements to be built
and/or maintained or the services to be provided.
V. The basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was
calculated. For example, provide the formula used to calculate the
assessment on each parcel, and the data specific to parcel use to calculate
its assessment.
vi. Public hearing date, time, and location. The hearing must take place no
earlier than 45 days from the date the notice is mailed.
vii. An assessment ballot that includes the City's address for receipt of the
ballot, a place where the person submitting the ballot may indicate the
person's name and sign the ballot, a reasonable identification of the parcel
subject to the assessment, and a clear indication that the ballot is submitted
either in support of or in opposition to the proposed LMD assessment. The
assessment ballot shall be in a form that conceals its contents once it is
sealed by the person submitting the ballot.
viii. A summary of the procedures for the completion, return, and tabulation of
the assessment ballots, along with an assessment ballot (See Procedures
Sections 4 and 6).
ix. A statement that the assessment shall not be imposed if the assessment
ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots
submitted in favor of the assessment, with ballots weighted according to the
proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
X. All information required for the exhaustion of administrative remedies
requirements, as set forth in Procedures Section 2(b).
xi. How members of the public may obtain additional information regarding
the proposed new or increased assessment, or any relevant procedures
(including these Procedures), including a link to information that is
available on the City's internet website or by requesting information via
email, telephone, or in person.
b. Posting Exhaustion Procedures for Written Obiections on City's Website. If
the City chooses to follow the exhaustion procedure for written objections,
concurrently with mailing the public hearing notice, the City will post on its internet
website the written basis for the proposed LMD assessment (particularly including
a copy of the Resolution of Initiation, Resolution of Intention, and Engineer's
Report) and a link to the Proposition 218 public hearing notice. The mailed public
hearing notice (under Procedures Section 2(a)) will be supplemented with the
following prominently displayed information:
Page 3 of 8
Packet Pg. 48
5.c
The "deadline" (date and time) by which a "timely written objection" must
be submitted to the City. The deadline will be no earlier than 45 days after
the City mails to property owners the notice of the public hearing.
ii. The location to which written objections must be submitted to the City via
mail, email, fax, or personal delivery.
iii. All substantive requirements for submitting a written objection. The record
owner must comply with the requirements set forth in Procedures section 3,
below, including specifying the grounds on which the owner alleges the
proposed new or increased LMD assessment does not comply with
Proposition 218.
iv. Prominently identify that any person's failure to submit a timely written
objection bars any right of that person to challenge the proposed new or
increased fee through a legal proceeding.
Mailing Public Hearing Notice. The City will mail the public hearing notice to
each record owner of a parcel that is subject to payment of the new or increased
LMD assessment. The notice shall be mailed to owner's address shown on the last
equalized property tax assessment roll.
There is a rebuttable presumption that the most recent equalized property
tax assessment roll of the Los Angeles County Recorder is sufficient
evidence of the record owner of each parcel. A person may rebut the
presumption by providing to the City written proof of ownership.
ii. The City Clerk, or designee, may certify by affidavit the proper mailing of
notices described in these Procedures, and any such affidavit shall constitute
conclusive proof of mailing in the absence of fraud.
iii. Failure of any person to receive notice shall not invalidate the hearing or its
results.
3. Requirements for Submitting Timely Written Objections
In order for a record owner to submit a timely written objection, the obj ection must:
Be received by the City at the location identified on the public hearing notice, no
later than the deadline identified on the public hearing notice. The deadline may be
no earlier than 45 days after the City mails to record owners the notice of public
hearing.
b. Be in writing submitted via mail, email, fax, or personal delivery (1) identifying the
name of the record owner, and the street address or assessor's parcel number (or
other clear identification) of the property subject to the LMD assessment; and (2)
signed by the record owner, or otherwise identifying that the record owner
submitted the written objection, subject to verification by the City.
Page 4 of 8
Packet Pg. 49
5.c
Specify the grounds for alleging the proposed LMD assessment does not comply
with Proposition 218. The grounds must identify (i) the substantive requirement of
Proposition 218, and (ii) the reason the proposed LMD assessment does not comply
with that requirement. It is not a legally sufficient written objection under these
Procedures to simply claim that a proposed LMD assessment does not comply with
Proposition 218, unless the written objection includes an explanation of the factual
basis for the claim (the relevant provision of Proposition 218, and how that
provision is not satisfied by the proposed LMD assessment). For any proposed new
or increased LMD assessment, relevant substantive requirements of Proposition
218 include:
Identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them
and upon which an assessment will be imposed.
ii. Identify the special benefit derived by each identified parcel in relationship
to the entirety of the City's costs of providing public improvements or
maintenance and operation.
iii. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable
cost of the proportional special benefit to that parcel.
iv. Only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general
benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.
V. Parcels within the geographical boundaries of a LMD that are owned by a
governmental agency are not exempt from the LMD assessment unless the
City demonstrates by clear and convincing evidence that the governmental
agency receives no special benefit.
d. Any submitted written objection shall be a public record, except to the extent the
City determines that the public interest served by not disclosing clearly outweighs
the public interest served by disclosure under Government Code section 7922.000.
As a general rule, the City finds there is a substantial public interest in not disclosing
written objections to protect the integrity of the process described herein during the
time that: (A) written objections are still being submitted and (B) prior to the time
that the Brown Act meeting agenda is posted (e.g., at least 72 hours before a regular
meeting under Government Code section 54954.2).
4. Requirements for Submitting Assessment Ballots
In order for a record owner to submit a timely assessment ballot, to be considered
as a part of the Proposition 218 protest hearing described in Section 6, below, it
must:
Be received by the City at the location identified on the public hearing
notice, no later than the close of the public testimony portion of the public
hearing. Ballots received after that deadline, even if postmarked earlier,
cannot be counted or accepted.
Page 5 of 8
Packet Pg. 50
5.c
ii. Be on the form of assessment ballot provided by the City with the public
hearing notice, with an identification of the parcel that is subject to the
assessment and the annual LMD assessment proposed for the parcel.
Provided, however, at any time prior to the close of the public hearing, any
owner may request a replacement assessment ballot from the City Clerk.
iii. Clearly identify the name of the record owner submitting the ballot, be
signed by the record owner, and clearly identify that the ballot is either (A)
in opposition to the proposed LMD assessment or (B) in favor of the
proposed LMD assessment.
iv. The assessment ballot shall be in a form that conceals its contents once it is
sealed by the person submitting the ballot to the City.
V. A record owner may withdraw a ballot only if the withdrawal is submitted
in writing by the record owner clearly indicating an intent to withdraw for
an identified property, and it is received by the City at the location (and no
later than the time) for submitting ballots. After a ballot is withdrawn, a
record owner may submit a new or replacement ballot in accordance with
the requirements of these Procedures. No other modification to a ballot may
be made.
b. Record owners of multiple parcels may submit one assessment ballot for each
parcel owned within the boundaries of the proposed LMD.
More than one record owner of the same parcel may submit an assessment ballot,
subject to an allocation of the vote for that parcel in accordance with Procedures
Section 6. A record owner may request a proportional assessment ballot from the
City Clerk to facilitate the allocation of the vote among multiple owners.
d. The City Clerk shall take custody of all submitted written objections and
assessment ballots.
Assessment ballots will remain sealed and will not be opened or tabulated before
the close of the public hearing. The assessment ballots will be public records during
and after tabulation. The assessment ballot proceeding is not an election or voting
for purposes of Article II of the California Constitution or the Elections Code.
5. City's Response to Timely Written Objections
At the close of the written objection period, City staff shall review timely written
objections and shall prepare written responses to the written objections. The City's
written response will include: (i) the grounds on which the objection is (or is not)
resulting in amendments to the proposed new or increased LMD assessment; and
(ii) an explanation of the substantive basis for retaining or altering the proposed
new or increased LMD assessment.
Page 6 of 8
Packet Pg. 51
5.c
b. City staff shall present the written responses to the City Council at the public
meeting that was specified in the public hearing notice described in Procedures
Section 2.
C. In accordance with the Brown Act, the public will be provided an opportunity to
address the City Council prior to the Council's action related to the timely written
objections and written responses. (See Government Code section 54954.3(a).).
d. In accordance with Government Code section 53759.1(d), the City Council shall:
(1) first exercise its legislative discretion in considering timely written objections
and written responses, and determine for the proposed LMD whether further
review, clarification, or reduction is needed for the proposed LMD assessment, and
then (2) determine whether to proceed with opening and counting assessment
ballots to determine if there is a majority protest under Proposition 218.
6. Conducting the Proposition 218 Protest Public Hearing
a. The City Council will open the public hearing and consider all evidence presented
during the hearing including the public hearing notice and all documents referenced
therein (particularly including the engineer's report), all written objections, written
responses, and any testimony, documents, or information presented during the
public hearing.
b. Prior to closing the public hearing, the City Council will request if there are any
additional written assessment ballots to be submitted to (or withdrawn from) the
City.
C. The City Council will then close the public hearing and request the City Clerk to
unseal and tabulate the assessment ballots in public view. The City Clerk shall
tabulate the number of ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in support of and in
opposition to the proposed LMD assessment.
In the event that more than one of the record owners of an identified parcel
submits an assessment ballot, the amount of the proposed assessment to be
imposed upon the identified parcel shall be allocated to each ballot
submitted in proportion to the respective record ownership interests or, if
the ownership interests are not shown on the record, as established to the
satisfaction of the City by documentation provided by those record owners.
ii. A majority protest exists only if the ballots submitted in opposition to the
assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In
tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the
proportional financial obligation of the affected property.
iii. If the City Clerk determines that additional time is needed to tabulate
assessment ballots, the City Council shall recess or continue the public
meeting to provide sufficient time for the City Clerk to complete the
tabulation.
Page 7 of 8
Packet Pg. 52
5.c
iv. If the City Clerk determines that there is a majority protest, the City shall
not impose the new or increased LAM assessment.
V. If the City Clerk determines that there is not a majority protest, the City
Council shall continue its deliberations and take action on the proposed new
or increased LAM assessment, including adoption of a Resolution of
Formation, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 22594.
vi. The City Clerk's determinations under these Procedures shall be the final
determination of the City subject to appropriate judicial review. This shall
include the City Clerk's determinations that: (a) the assessment ballot
complies with the requirements of these Procedures; or (b) a majority
protest has (or has not) been submitted for the proposed LMD assessment.
Page 8 of 8
Packet Pg. 53
City of Santa Clarlta
Engineer's Report
Santa Clarita
Landscaping and Lighting District
Landscape Maintenance Zones
Zone T44 (Bouquet Canyon)
Zone T48 (Shadow Hills)
Zone T62 (Canyon Heights)
Establishment of Increased Assessments
Fiscal Year 2025/2026
I ntent M eeti ng: J u ly 8, 2025
Public Hearing: October 14, 2025
yy WILLDAN
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CERTIFICATE
This Engineer's Report ("Report") and the enclosed budget, diagrams and descriptions outline
the increased assessments proposed to be levied for Landscape Maintenance Zones T44
(Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills) and T62 (Canyon Heights) within the Landscaping and
Lighting District in the City of Santa Clarita commencing in Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The proposed
increased assessments are deemed necessary to adequately maintain the improvements within
the Zones. The boundaries of each Zone include each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land that will
receive a special benefit from the proposed improvements to be provided, as the same existed at
the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and described herein. Reference is hereby
made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and
dimensions of parcels within the Zones. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed
Report as directed by the City Council.
Dated this
13
day of
Stacee Reynolds
Principal Consultant
District Administration Services
, 2025.
Willdan Financial Services
Assessment Engineer
By:
Tyrone Peter
PE # C81888
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the day of , 2025.
By:
Mary Cusick, City Clerk
City of Santa Clarita
Los Angeles County, California
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and
Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the
City of Santa Clarita, California, on the day of , 2025.
By:
Mary Cusick, City Clerk
City of Santa Clarita
Los Angeles County, California
Yy WILLDAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
I
BALLOT PROCEEDINGS
2
REPORT CONTENT
3
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
5
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINED AND SERVICED
5
A. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
7
REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT
7
SPECIAL BENEFIT
7
GENERAL BENEFITS
9
APPORTIONMENT METHODOLOGY
10
Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula)
11
M. ESTIMATE OF COSTS
13
IV. ZONE DIAGRAMS
17
V. ASSESSMENT ROLLS
/9
APPENDIX/ - T44
20
APPENDIX II - T48
27
APPENDIX III - T62
30
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page ii
Vy W I LLDAN
INTRODUCTION
The City of Santa Clarita (the "City"), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "1972
Act") and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XI II D enacted by Proposition
218 (the "Constitution"), annually levies and collects special assessments for the City's
landscape districts designated as the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (the
"District") to provide and maintain various landscaping and lighting improvements
throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District.
This Engineer's Report (the "Report") has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4
and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration
and approval of the improvements and services to be provided within the local landscaping
zones of benefit ("Zones") identified as T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills) and
T62 (Canyon Heights); and the levy and collection of the proposed increased annual
assessments related thereto to fund the costs and expenses required to service and
maintain the improvements that provide special benefits to those parcels commencing in
Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
Landscaping Zones T44, T48, and T62 (collectively referred to as the "Zones") were
originally established by the County of Los Angeles pursuant to the provisions of the
Improvement Act of 1911. These Zones were subsequently transferred to the jurisdiction
of the City in Fiscal Year 2013/2014. Upon transfer, the City assumed full financial
responsibility for the ongoing maintenance and operation of all improvements within these
Zones.
Annually, the City establishes the District's assessments for each Zone based on an
estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the improvements in those Zones
in conjunction with available revenues including general benefit contributions and current
assessment limits. In recent fiscal years, the net total direct costs and administration
expenses budgeted for the Zones, has exceeded the amount that can be collected from
annual assessments at the currently authorized special benefit maximum assessment
rates. As a result, budget adjustments have been made including eliminating the amount
being collected for operational reserves and capital improvement projects and at the
discretion of the City Council, the City may have temporarily implemented service
reductions.
To fully fund the improvements that are considered special benefits to properties in the
Zones, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the public's best
interest to propose increased assessments that address the estimated special benefit
improvement costs within the Zone including, but not limited to the estimated expenditures
for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the
operation and administration of the District and Zones; and the collection of funds for
operational reserves and/or for periodic maintenance and improvement rehabilitation
projects as authorized by the 1972 Act.
This Report outlines the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied in
connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing
of the landscaping improvements within the Zones commencing in Fiscal Year 2026/2027.
The annual assessments (increased maximum assessment) proposed to be levied on
properties as described herein will provide a funding source for the continued operation
and maintenance of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to the
properties within the Zones.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 1
Vy W I LLDAN
The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the Zones is based on the various
improvements and the types of improvements and services to be provided for the
properties that are directly associated with and benefit from those improvements. This net
cost of providing these improvements and services is allocated to the benefiting properties
within the Zones using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment
Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional
special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that
benefit from those Zone improvements and services.
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned
its own Assessor's Parcel Number ("APN") by the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office.
The Los Angeles County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor's Parcel Numbers and specific
Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District
assessments.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this
Engineer's Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision
of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions of the Engineer's Report and each section, subsection, subdivision,
sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or
subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
BALLOT PROCEEDINGS
Pursuant to the provisions of Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution
(Proposition 218) and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City shall conduct a
property owner protest ballot proceeding ("Ballot Proceeding") in connection with the
proposed levy of increased assessments described in this Report.
In compliance with Proposition 218, this Engineer's Report includes a detailed description
of the improvements to be funded, clearly identifies the Zones affected, and provides a
comprehensive analysis of the special benefits received by the assessed parcels. The
Report further distinguishes between general and special benefits and outlines the
methodology used to proportionally allocate assessment amounts to each parcel based
on those special benefits.
In conjunction with the Ballot Proceeding, the City Council will hold a duly noticed public
hearing to consider oral testimony, written comments, and formal protests submitted by
property owners regarding the proposed assessments.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, all protest ballots received from property owners
will be opened and tabulated. A majority protest shall be deemed to exist if the ballots
submitted in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed those submitted in support,
with each ballot weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected
parcel, as required by Proposition 218.
Upon completion of the ballot tabulation, the City Council will confirm the results of the
proceeding. If a majority protest is determined to exist, all further actions to implement the
proposed increased assessments for the Zones will be abandoned. At that point, the City
may elect to transfer responsibility for maintaining the landscape improvements to the
property owners. Alternatively, the City may choose to continue levying and collecting
assessments at a rate equal to the previously approved and adopted maximum
assessment rates.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 2
Vy W I LLDAN
If no majority protest is found and the City Council determines that the proposed
assessments and methodology conform to the requirements of Proposition 218 (Article
XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution), the Council may adopt this Report (as
submitted or amended), approve the associated assessment diagrams, and confirm the
increased assessment rates. The approved assessments shall then be incorporated into
the Engineer's Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 and submitted to the Los Angeles
County Auditor -Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll for each affected parcel.
REPORT CONTENT
This Report consists of five (5) parts:
Part I — Plans and Specifications
This section provides an overall description of the Zones and the improvements for which
parcels are assessed. The proposed increased assessments as outlined in this Report
are based on the local landscaping improvements and appurtenant facilities that provide
a special benefit to the properties within the Zone including operational expenses
authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this section
of the Report describe the overall nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction
with these descriptions of the improvements a visual depiction of the landscape
improvement areas is provided in the Zone Diagrams contained in Part V of this Report.
Along with the Zone Diagrams.
Part II — Method of Apportionment of Assessments
This section includes a discussion of the general and special benefits associated with the
various improvements to be provided within the Zones (Benefit Analysis), which includes
a discussion of the proportional costs of the special benefits and a separation of costs
considered to be of general benefit (and therefore not assessed). This section of the
Report also outlines the method of calculating each property's proportional special benefit
necessary to calculate the property's annual assessment.
Part III — Estimate of Costs
An estimate of the annual costs to operate, maintain, and service the local landscaping
improvements and appurtenant facilities within the Zones. The budget for each Zone
includes an estimate of the maintenance costs and incidental expenses including, but not
limited to labor, materials, utilities, equipment, and administration expenses as well as the
collection of other appropriate funding authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed necessary
to fully support the improvements. Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of
general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. Ultimately, City staff shall make the
determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that
shall be provided based on available revenues.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 3
Vy W I LLDAN
Part IV — Zone Diagrams
This section of the Report contains diagrams showing the boundaries of the Zones for
Fiscal Year 2025/2026 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special
benefits from the various improvements to be provided in each Zone. These diagrams
also provide a visual depiction of the location of the landscape improvement areas being
maintained. Parcel identification, the lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel and
subdivision of land within the Zones as shown on these diagrams and listed on the
Assessment Roll are inclusive of such parcels shown on the Los Angeles County
Assessor's Parcel Maps and shall include any subsequent lot line adjustments or parcel
changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel
Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land
within the Zones.
Part V — Assessment Rolls
The Assessment Roll contains a listing of all Assessor Parcel Numbers of the properties
within the Zones and each parcel's corresponding "Balloted Maximum Assessment'
commencing in Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The proposed assessment amounts balloted and
which may be levied and collected commencing in Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for each parcel
is based on the parcel's calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in the Method
of Apportionment (Part II of this Report) and the maximum assessment rate established
by the estimated Zone Budgets (Part III of this Report). Due to the number of parcels within
the Zones, the Balloted Maximum Assessments (Assessment Roll) shall be filed
electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the
listing of the Assessor's Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts
contained in that electronic file are made part of this Report.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 4
1I"W I LLDAN
/, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINED AND SERVICED
The improvements installed, maintained and serviced within the Landscaping Zones are
generally described as improvements within public rights -of -way and dedicated landscape
easements within various tracts and on individual parcels located throughout the City
including, but not limited to (as applicable): landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, grass,
other ornamental vegetation, irrigation systems, hardscapes and fixtures; statuary,
fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities; facilities which are appurtenant
to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or
servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, clearing, removal of debris, the installation
or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage,
or electrical facilities; and, park improvements, including, but not limited to, playground
equipment, shade structures, play courts, public restrooms, and paseos/trails.
District/Zone funds are used for the maintenance and servicing including, but not limited
to, labor, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, administration, reserve,
and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory maintenance and servicing of these
improvements.
Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual
maintenance, operation and servicing of the ornamental structures, landscaping and
appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the
ornamental structures, landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth,
health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying,
fertilizing, and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris,
other solid waste; pest control; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other
improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for
the operation of any appurtenant facilities, water for the irrigation and control of the
landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and
appurtenant facilities.
The following is a general description of each balloted Landscaping Zone:
Zone
Description
Improvements
Square Footage
T44
Bouquet Canyon
Slope Landscape — Irrigated
544,701 SF Irrigated
Turf Areas
223,666 SF Non -Irrigated
Non -Irrigated Landscape
5,043 SF Turf
(Fire Clearance)
T48
Shadow Hills
Slope Landscape — Irrigated
249,850 SF Irrigated
Non -Irrigated Landscape
227,245 SF Non -Irrigated
(Fire Clearance)
T62
Canyon Heights
Slope Landscape — Irrigated
721,986 SF Irrigated
Turf Areas
748 SF Turf
Walls and Fencing
2,025 SF Walls & Fencing
Zone T44 — Bouquet Canyon
The improvements within Zone T44 consist primarily of slope landscape areas located
throughout the interior of the Bouquet Canyon neighborhood. These include irrigated
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 5
Vy W I LLDAN
slopes planted with drought -tolerant groundcover and shrubs, supported by automatic
irrigation systems such as drip or spray emitters. These improvements are typically
situated adjacent to private parcel boundaries, following the contours of residential streets
and cul-de-sacs. The landscape treatments in these areas provide direct special benefit
to the adjacent parcels by enhancing curb appeal, reducing erosion, and buffering
properties from neighboring homes and open spaces.
In addition to irrigated areas, Zone T44 contains designated non -irrigated landscape
zones intended for fire clearance. These areas, maintained to comply with local fire codes,
provide fuel modification through annual brush clearance and weed abatement. Their
function is to reduce wildfire risk while also protecting and stabilizing slope conditions. A
small area of turf landscaping is also present, generally located near a neighborhood entry
or along a parkway edge. Together, these improvements provide functional and aesthetic
enhancements that directly serve and benefit the assessed parcels within the Zone.
Zone T48 — Shadow Hills
Zone T48 includes a combination of irrigated and non -irrigated slope landscape areas that
span along the rear and side parcel boundaries within the Shadow Hills neighborhood.
The irrigated slopes are planted with drought -tolerant vegetation and maintained with
permanent irrigation systems. These improvements serve as a landscaped buffer between
residential parcels and adjacent open space or slope terrain, providing visual
enhancement, erosion control, and slope stabilization for the properties they abut.
The Zone also includes extensive areas designated as non -irrigated fire clearance zones.
These are primarily naturalized or minimally vegetated slopes maintained through periodic
brush clearance to reduce fuel loads and protect nearby homes from wildfire risk. While
these areas are not designed for public access or use, their upkeep directly benefits
adjacent parcels by reducing hazards and preserving slope integrity. The layout of these
improvements reflects the local terrain and serves to support the safety, stability, and
livability of the assessed parcels in the Zone.
Zone T62 — Canyon Heights
Zone T62 features a network of irrigated slope landscapes and turf areas strategically
located throughout the Canyon Heights neighborhood, including along major arterials
such as Copper Hill Drive and Haskell Canyon Road. The irrigated slopes are planted with
maintained ornamental plantings and groundcovers and serviced by automated irrigation
systems. These landscape corridors provide a functional and visual buffer between private
properties and high -volume roadways, enhancing the environment for residents while
offering slope protection and erosion control.
In addition to slope landscaping, Zone T62 includes a masonry block wall and a monument
sign located within the public landscape easement. These improvements serve practical
purposes such as slope retention and community identification. While some of the
landscaping in this Zone is more publicly visible due to its location along collector and
arterial streets, the walls and plantings are not intended for public use or recreational
access. Collectively, these improvements provide a consistent and measurable special
benefit to the assessed parcels by enhancing site conditions, reinforcing property
boundaries, and mitigating environmental impacts.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 6
40/W I LLDAN
A METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMEN°
Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972 (referred to as "1972 Act"), permits the establishment of Assessment Districts by
cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the
acquisition, construction, maintenance and servicing of streetlights, traffic signals and
landscaping facilities.
Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that assessments be levied
according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be
apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all
assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each
such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Furthermore, Section of the 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within
any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and
extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from
the improvements." Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather
than a "special tax."
In addition, Proposition 218 requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the
reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Proposition
218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the
general benefits from the special benefits.
REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT
The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the acquisition, installation,
maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements, as previously defined herein in
Part I of this Report.
SPECIAL BENEFIT
In accordance with Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218),
assessments must be levied based solely on the proportional special benefit conferred
upon each identified parcel. This Engineer's Report evaluates the specific benefits
conferred by the public improvements maintained within Landscaping Zones T44, T48,
and T62, ensuring that all assessments reflect the distinct and measurable value each
parcel receives as a result of these improvements.
The improvements maintained within these Zones include irrigated slope landscaping,
non -irrigated fire clearance areas, turf, and walls or fencing where present. The
geographical boundaries of each Zone are narrowly drawn so that only parcels within the
Zone receive the special benefits funded by the assessment revenue, including enhanced
slope stability, visual quality, direct connection to a well -designed and maintained
neighborhood environment, and enhancement of long-term property value for each parcel
within each Zone. The maintained improvements are not recreational in nature and are
not intended for regional access or use.
To determine the proportionate special benefit received by each parcel, this Engineer's
Report considers the planned function and placement of improvements and their
contribution to each parcel in the relevant Zone. The maintained improvements result in
unique benefits to the neighborhood environment, aesthetics, and community identity; and
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 7
Vy W I LLDAN
each assessed parcel receives a special benefit from the direct connection to those
maintained improvements. While adjacency to particular improvements may enhance a
particular parcel's view or access, all parcels within the relevant Zone receive an
equivalent special benefit. In the master -planned neighborhoods that comprise Zones
T44, T48, and T62, the special benefits of the landscape improvements were designed to
serve each parcel in each Zone in an equivalent manner. As such, each single-family
residential parcel is determined to receive equivalent special benefit from the continued
maintenance of these improvements and is accordingly assessed at one Equivalent
Benefit Unit (EBU).
For example, in Zones T44, T48, and T62, there are clusters of parcels such as those
north of Starwood Way in T44, between Kathleen Avenue and Darrow Avenue in T48, and
in the southern portion of T62 that are not immediately adjacent to any maintained
landscape areas. Nonetheless, these parcels receive tangible and distinct benefits
through their connection to a cohesive and uniformly maintained neighborhood. Benefits
to each parcel include the connection to a consistent aesthetic quality, and the broader
functional and visual integrity of the residential environment within each Zone. The
inclusion of such parcels at full assessment is consistent with Proposition 218, which
supports the use of well -designed Zones, limited to only those parcels receiving special
benefits from the maintained improvements, to allocate costs of a shared special benefit
to every parcel in the relevant Zone.
Zone T62 includes some improvements along perimeter roadways that may be visible to
homes located outside the Zone boundary, particularly along Silverking Trail. While these
non -assessed parcels may receive incidental aesthetic benefits, they do not receive a
special benefit and are therefore not assessed. These incidental or unintended visual
benefits are treated as general benefit and excluded from the special benefit analysis and
assessment.
In addition to the residential parcels, Zone T62 includes one commercial parcel, which is
also assessed based on the proportional special benefit it receives from the maintained
improvements. To maintain consistency with the assessment methodology applied to
residential parcels, where all single-family parcels are assigned 1.0 Equivalent Benefit
Unit (EBU) and the average parcel size is approximately 0.28 acres, a rate of 3.57 EBUs
per acre has been applied to the commercial parcel. This rate reflects the proportional
allocation of benefit and ensures the commercial parcel is assessed equitably and in
compliance with Proposition 218.
This approach for quantifying and allocating special benefits is supported by legal
precedent. Courts have interpreted Proposition 218 to allow local agencies to use
reasonable, evidence -supported methodologies for estimating special and general
benefits and emphasized that rigorous mathematical precision is not required. Provided
the framework is logical, consistent, and factually grounded, uniform assessments across
similarly situated parcels receiving a shared special benefit are consistent with Proposition
218. (e.g., see Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Association v. Santa Clara County Open Space
Authority (2008); and Town of Tiburon v. Bonnander (2009).)
Accordingly, based on the characteristics of each Zone, a special benefit percentage of
ninety-eight percent (98%) has been determined for Zones T44 and T48, and ninety-five
percent (95%) for Zone T62. These percentages reflect the portion of total benefit
conferred directly and exclusively to the assessed parcels and ensure that only special
benefit is recovered through assessment. A full explanation and justification of how these
percentages were derived, including the supporting analysis of incidental general benefit,
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 8
Vy W I LLDAN
is provided in the General Benefits section. These values form the basis for the
proportional assessment allocations described in the Assessment Methodology section.
GENERAL BENEFITS
Proposition 218 requires that any portion of the total benefit that is conferred upon the
general public or to properties not assessed within the district be separated from special
benefit and funded through alternative non -assessment sources. These general benefits
may include incidental aesthetic or environmental enhancements visible to non-residents
or motorists traveling along public streets, or to non -assessed parcels located outside the
district boundary.
To determine the appropriate general benefit allocations for Zones T44, T48, and T62, this
Engineer's Report conducted a zone -specific evaluation of each improvement's location,
visibility, and intended function, along with the degree of public exposure and incidental
benefit to non -assessed properties.
In Zones T44 and T48, improvements are located entirely within interior residential areas,
with limited to no exposure to regional traffic or public viewsheds. The irrigated slopes,
non -irrigated fire clearance areas, and turf sections serve exclusively the parcels within
each Zone. While some incidental aesthetic benefit may be conferred to passing service
vehicles or occasional non-residents, the benefit is minimal. As such, only two percent
(2%) of the total benefit within each of these Zones has been conservatively designated
as general benefit.
In contrast, Zone T62 includes several landscape areas situated along high -visibility
arterials such as Copper Hill Drive and Haskell Canyon Road. These features provide
passive visual benefit to the general public due to their location, even though they are
maintained primarily for the benefit of the parcels within the Zone. Additionally, a small
number of homes along Silverking Trail, which lie outside the Zone boundary, may derive
incidental aesthetic benefit due to their proximity to maintained slopes within the Zone.
However, any benefit they receive is general in nature and excluded from the assessment.
This incidental benefit is included within the five percent (5%) general benefit allocation
for Zone T62, which reflects both public -facing landscape exposure and limited visual
benefit to adjacent non -assessed parcels.
Taking these factors into account, a general benefit allocation of five percent (5%) has
been assigned to Zone T62. This allocation reflects a reasonable estimate of the incidental
benefit accruing to non -assessed parties, both the general public and adjacent non -
assessed parcels, and ensures compliance with Proposition 218's requirement that
general benefit be excluded from assessment funding.
These percentages two percent (2%) for Zones T44 and T48, and five percent (5%) for
Zone T62 are consistent with the legal framework set forth in Proposition 218 and the case
law that has interpreted it, which allows general benefit to be estimated based on
qualitative factors such as visibility and public use, rather than requiring a mathematically
precise calculation. The allocations used here are conservative, evidence -based, and
consistent with industry practice for similar residential assessment districts.
Accordingly, the general benefit portions will be funded from non -assessment revenues.
The remaining ninety-eight percent (98%) for Zones T44 and T48, and ninety-five percent
(95%) for Zone T62, represent special benefit and will be proportionally assessed to the
benefitting parcels using the uniform one-EBU-per-residential-parcel methodology
described in the Assessment Methodology section.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 9
nr WILLDAN
APPORTIONMENT METHODOLOGY
The following table lists the balloted Zones within the District, their land use, assessment
type, and the number of EBUs.
Equivalent Benefit Units
In order to allocate benefit fairly among parcels, an Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU)
methodology is used that equates different land use types to a standard single-family
residential parcel, thereby allowing a uniform and proportional method of assessment. The
EBU method uses the single-family residential parcel as the basic unit of apportionment,
with one (1) Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) assigned per single-family parcel. This
quantifiable measurement serves as the foundation for assigning EBUs to all other land
use types, including commercial properties. For example, the EBU assignment for the
commercial parcel in Zone T62 is based on a per -acre rate derived from the single-family
average parcel size, ensuring consistent and proportional benefit allocation.
All properties within the Zones are assigned benefit units and land use classifications
based on data from the County Assessor's roll. Any inaccuracies in that data will be
reviewed on a case -by -case basis as they are brought to the City's attention.
A methodology has been developed to calculate EBUs for residential properties, and
various apportionment approaches are used in the annual Engineer's Report. The
"Method Code" in the table below identifies the specific methodology applied to the
residential zones shown.
The number of EBUs shown in the table above reflect the current information for the Zones
and represents assignments made only to assessable parcels. Parcels that are not subject
to assessment are not included in this section. These EBUs may be updated prior to
submitting the final Assessment Roll to the County Auditor -Controller for placement on the
property tax bills. Fluctuations in the number of parcels and related data may occur from
year to year as parcels are subdivided, combined, or undergo changes in use.
Method Code Definition
Method 9 — The assessment is apportioned to the benefiting properties based on
Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) such that a Single Family Detached Residence (SFR) is
equal to one (1) EBU as follows:
Note: Full method code descriptions can be found in the annual Engineer's Report.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 10
Vy W I LLDAN
Exempt Parcels
The following properties are generally considered not to benefit from the improvements
and services provided and therefore may be exempt from the assessment: public streets,
avenues, lanes, roads, drives, courts, alleys, public easements or rights -of -way, and Zone
improvement areas that may not have an assigned Assessor's Parcel Number.
Exemptions may also apply to parcels designated as railroad rights -of -way; utility
easements and rights -of -way used exclusively for utility transmission; shared common
areas within developments such as condominium complexes; land dedicated as public
open space or parks; small parcels vacated by the City; and parcels subject to significant
development restrictions, where the City or Assessment Engineer has determined the
property cannot be developed or cannot be developed independently from an adjacent,
commonly owned parcel. Parcels may also be exempt if they are bifurcated or remnant
portions of larger parent parcels that are already being assessed, such as slivers used for
driveways or landscaping that do not function as independent, assessable lots.
Calculation of Assessments
An assessment amount per EBU in each Zone is calculated by:
Taking the "Total Direct Costs and Administration Expenses" (total budgeted costs) and
subtracting the "General Benefit Expenses (City Funded)," to establish the "Balance To
Levy."
The amount identified as the "Balance to Levy" is divided by the total number of EBUs of
parcels that benefit to establish the "Assessment Rate" or "Assessment per EBU" for the
fiscal year. This Rate is then applied back to each parcel's individual EBU to calculate the
parcel's proportionate special benefit and assessment for the improvements.
Balance to Levy / Total EBU = Assessment per EBU (Assessment Rate)
Assessment per EBU x Parcel EBU = Parcel Assessment Amount
Note: As part of these proceedings to ballot property owners for increased assessments,
the proposed new maximum assessments outlined in this Report are intended to fully
support the costs and expenses identified as "Special Benefit Expenses." Therefore, the
"Funding Adjustments/Contributions" referenced above are not applicable to the
calculation of the assessments described in this Report for the Zones and the "Balance to
Levy" represents the total "Special Benefit Expenses."
Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula)
The assessment amounts listed in this Report are estimates based on projected costs for
the maintenance, operation, and administration of improvements within each Zone for the
upcoming fiscal year. In accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972 and Proposition 218, the maximum authorized assessment rate for each Zone
may be adjusted annually using an inflationary formula previously identified in the original
ballot proceeding.
This assessment range formula allows for annual adjustments to the maximum
assessment rate based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for
All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim area, as published by the
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Specifically, the adjustment is based
on the CPI figure released in March or April of each year, reflecting year -over -year inflation
within the regional economy where the District/Zone is located.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 11
Vy W I LLDAN
The inflationary adjustment ensures that assessment rates remain aligned with actual
economic conditions and enables the City to maintain existing service levels without
conducting new ballot proceedings each year. While the maximum authorized rate may
increase annually by the CPI percentage, the actual assessments levied may be set at or
below this amount based on the budgetary needs and priorities of each Zone.
Any proposed increase that exceeds the CPI -based adjustment or modifies the underlying
methodology would require a new assessment ballot proceeding and approval by property
owners in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 12
Vy W I LLDAN
///, ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The following proposed budget outlines the estimated costs to fund, maintain, and service
the landscaping improvements and related amenities that provide special benefits to
properties within Zones T44, T48, and T62 for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. In recent years, the
total eligible special benefit expenses required to ensure adequate and proper
maintenance of these improvements have not been fully covered by the assessment
revenues generated under the existing maximum assessment rates.
As a result, the City has, in some cases, reduced or deferred the collection of funds
intended for operational reserves, long-term repairs and replacements, or major
rehabilitation efforts. In other instances, reductions may have occurred in the frequency
or scope of regular maintenance activities and services associated with the improvements.
These funding limitations have affected the City's ability to sustain the service levels
originally intended for the Zones.
Recognizing that these shortfalls are likely to continue and may increase over time due to
inflationary pressures and rising maintenance costs, the City is proposing to ballot property
owners within the Zones for approval of an increased maximum assessment rate. This
proposed rate includes an annual inflationary adjustment (assessment range formula) and
is intended to fund the estimated total eligible special benefit expenses necessary to
provide and sustain the improvements described in this Report.
Should the proposed assessment fail to be approved by a majority of property owners in
the required protest ballot proceeding, the City may be unable to continue providing
landscape maintenance and related services within the Zone(s) at the current level, or at
all. In that event, responsibility for maintaining the improvements may need to be
transferred to the respective property owners served by the improvements. This outcome
could result in inconsistent or insufficient maintenance and may negatively impact the
long-term condition, appearance, and value of the properties within the Zones.
The following budget section identifies the projected expenses for Fiscal Year 2025/2026
and presents the corresponding "Proposed Maximum Assessment Rate per Equivalent
Benefit Unit (EBU)," which will be submitted to property owners of record through a
Proposition 218-compliant protest ballot proceeding.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 13
nr WILLDAN
Definition of Budget Line Items
The following definitions apply to the Zone Budget tables included in this Report. Each line
item represents an eligible expense category used to calculate special benefit
assessments.
Landscape Services - Routine landscape maintenance including mowing, edging,
pruning, irrigation checks, slope care, and basic upkeep of all landscape areas within the
Zone.
Tree Trimming - Scheduled and as -needed trimming of trees to maintain health, safety,
property clearance, and visual appearance of the landscape.
Electric - Electrical utility costs associated with operating irrigation controllers, lighting
systems, and any other electrically powered components in the landscaped areas.
Water - Water utility charges for irrigation of landscaped areas, including turf, slopes, and
planter zones.
Labor/Materials - Costs for labor and materials not otherwise captured under contract
services, including minor repairs, supply purchases, and City -provided services.
Weed/Pest Control - Services for weed abatement, brush clearance, pest suppression,
and mitigation of invasive plant or animal species that impact the landscaped areas.
District Administration - Costs for preparing the Engineer's Report, updating
assessment rolls, coordinating Proposition 218 compliance, and overseeing levy
administration.
City Administration - Internal City staffing and overhead costs related to managing
vendor contracts, maintaining landscape standards, responding to resident inquiries, and
supervising Zone operations.
County Administration Fee - Annual charge by the Los Angeles County Auditor -
Controller for placing the assessments on the secured property tax roll and processing
collections.
Insurance - Cost of liability or other applicable insurance policies covering third -party
landscape contractors or risks associated with maintained improvements.
Operational Reserve Fund Collection/(Contribution) - Funds collected to establish and
maintain a reserve that provides short-term operational stability for the Zone. Industry
standards recommend a reserve target of up to 50% of annual operating costs to ensure
that sufficient funds are available to sustain services prior to receipt of County
apportionments and to reduce reliance on the City's General Fund. For this Report, the
reserve is collected within a range of 18% to 26% of annual costs to support cash flow
needs while maintaining the proposed assessment rates disclosed to property owners.
Reserve percentages may vary by Zone based on available funding and historical budget
needs, but all are intended to progress toward the 50% industry standard over time if
needed.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 14
Vy W I LLDAN
Repair and Rehab Collection - Dedicated funding for periodic rehabilitation or
replacement of infrastructure such as irrigation systems, walls, fencing, or major slope
repairs beyond routine maintenance.
General Benefit Contribution - Portion of the total budget that provides incidental benefit
to the general public or non -assessed parcels. This amount is excluded from the
assessment and funded by the City.
General Fund Reimbursement - Recovery of prior -year maintenance costs advanced by
the City's General Fund on behalf of the Zone during years when assessment revenue
was insufficient to meet expenses.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 15
yr WILLDAN
T44 - :OSHADOW HILLS T62 - CANYON HE)IGHH
BUDGET ITEM
FY 26127 FY 26/27 F�Y26/27
DIRECT
COSTS (Labor/Materials)
Landscape Services
$55,000
$40,000 $60,000
Tree Trimmng
20,808
8,000 15,000
Electric
1,121
156 312
Water
47,616
25,716 61,884
Labor/Materials
17,014
11,648 17,794
Weed/Pest Control
498
208 1,040
Tota
ADMINISTRATIONIINDIRECT
COSTS
District Administration $45 $16 $32
City Administration $3,972 $2,954 $3,740
Inspections $0 $0 $0
County Administration Fee 126 76 104
Insurance 5101 5101 1,020
Total
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS & ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES $146,709 $89,284 $160,9, -
LEVY ADJUSTMENTS
Reserve Fund Collection/(Contribution)
$28,158
$22,127
$28,092
Repair and Rehab Collection
5,202
5,475
7,803
General Benefit Contribution
(2,841)
(1,715)
(7,802)
General Fund Reimbursement
Total Adjustments
3,972
2,954
3,740
BALANCE TO LEVY
0019
Total EBUs
302.00
105.00
220.2974
Total Parcels Assessed
302
105
215
Total Parcels in District
304
105
215
Fiscal Year 2026127 Rate per EDU
$600.00
$1,125.00
$875.00
Fiscal Year 2026/27 Proposed Maximum Rate per EDU
$600.00
$1,125.00
$875.00
Fiscal Year 2025/26 Current Maximum Rate
$300,00
$455.00
$600.00
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 16
Vy W I LLDAN
IV. ZONE DIAGRAMS
The following pages show an overview of the balloted Zones within the Landscaping and
Lighting District.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 17
F1,
LMO rull
W'WILLDAN
0 * - - S;L*,-m 40.&k rrA
Landscape Maintenance District
Zone U's
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 16
UN|����|
��� �nn���,�/�
CAROL CZt
1-4 CIAO $1A
Landscape Maintenance District
JOIN
WAll
so Pool
vp
7�L,
"
Fiscal Year City ofSanta Qarita Engineer's Report
1I"W I LLDAN
ASSESSMENT ROLLS
The Assessment Rolls identified as Appendix 1 through 3 incorporated in this Engineer's
Report identify each parcel within the Zones and the balloted maximum assessment
amount proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll
is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor's Roll and the County
Assessor's Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made
part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or
parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change pending
the outcome of the Ballot Proceedings and/or as a result of parcel changes made by the
County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to
the County Assessor's Office securing the final roll and generating tax bills for Fiscal year
2026/2027.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 19
nr WILLDAN
APPENDIX 1- T44
2812-022-031
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-032
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-033
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-034
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-035
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-036
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-037
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-038
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-022-039
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-052
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-053
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-054
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-055
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-056
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-057
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-058
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-059
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-060
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-061
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-062
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-063
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-067
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-068
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-023-069
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-005
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-006
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-007
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-008
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-009
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-010
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-011
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-012
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-013
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-014
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-015
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-016
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-017
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-018
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-019
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-020
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-021
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-022
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-023
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-024
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-025
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-026
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-027
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-028
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted
Landscape Maintenance
Zones
Page 20
yr WILLDAN
2812-044-029
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-030
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-031
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-032
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-033
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-034
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-035
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-036
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-037
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-038
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-049
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-050
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-051
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-054
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-055
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-056
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-057
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-058
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-044-059
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-001
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-002
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-003
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-004
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-005
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-006
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-009
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-010
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-011
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-012
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-013
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-014
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-015
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-016
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-017
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-018
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-019
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-020
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-021
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-022
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-023
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-024
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-025
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-026
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-027
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-028
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-029
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-030
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-031
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-032
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-033
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-034
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted
Landscape Maintenance
Zones
Page 21
yr WILLDAN
2812-045-035
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-036
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-037
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-038
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-039
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-040
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-041
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-042
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-043
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-044
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-046
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-045-047
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-001
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-002
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-003
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-004
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-005
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-006
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-007
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-008
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-009
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-010
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-011
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-012
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-013
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-014
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-015
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-016
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-017
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-018
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-019
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-020
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-021
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-022
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-023
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-024
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-025
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-026
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-027
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-028
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-029
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-030
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-031
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-032
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-033
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-034
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-035
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-046-036
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-003
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-004
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-005
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted
Landscape Maintenance
Zones
Page 22
yr WILLDAN
2812-047-006
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-007
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-008
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-009
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-012
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-013
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-014
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-015
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-018
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-019
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-020
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-021
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-022
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-023
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-024
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-025
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-026
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-027
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-028
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-029
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-030
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-031
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-032
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-033
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-034
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-040
T44
0.0
300.00
600.00
-
2812-047-042
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-044
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-046
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-048
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-050
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-052
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-054
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-056
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-059
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-060
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-061
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-047-062
T44
0.0
300.00
600.00
-
2812-048-001
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-002
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-003
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-004
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-005
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-006
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-007
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-008
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-009
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-010
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-011
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-012
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-013
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted
Landscape Maintenance
Zones
Page 23
yr WILLDAN
2812-048-014
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-015
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-016
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-017
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-018
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-019
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-020
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-021
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-022
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-023
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-024
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-025
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-026
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-027
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-028
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-029
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-030
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-031
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-032
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-033
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-034
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-035
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-036
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-037
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-038
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-039
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-040
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-041
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-042
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-043
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-044
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-045
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-046
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-047
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-048
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-049
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-050
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-051
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-052
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-053
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-054
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-048-055
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-001
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-002
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-003
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-004
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-005
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-006
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-007
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-008
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-009
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted
Landscape Maintenance
Zones
Page 24
yr WILLDAN
2812-049-010
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-011
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-012
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-013
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-014
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-015
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-016
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-017
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-018
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-019
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-020
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-021
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-022
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-023
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-024
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-025
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-026
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-027
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-028
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-029
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-030
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-031
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-032
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-049-033
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-001
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-002
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-003
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-004
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-005
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-006
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-007
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-008
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-009
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-010
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-011
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-012
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-013
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-014
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-015
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-016
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-017
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-018
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-019
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-020
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-021
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-022
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-023
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-024
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-025
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-026
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
2812-050-027
T44
1.0
300.00
600.00
600.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted
Landscape Maintenance
Zones
Page 25
yr WILLDAN
2812-050-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 26
1I'W I LLDAN
APPENDIX H - T48
2812-051-001
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-002
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-003
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-004
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-005
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-006
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-007
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-008
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-009
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-010
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-011
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-012
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-013
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-014
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-015
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-016
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-017
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-051-018
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-001
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-002
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-003
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-004
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-005
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-006
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-007
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-008
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-009
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-010
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-011
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-012
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-013
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-014
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-015
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-016
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-017
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-018
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-019
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-020
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-021
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-022
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-023
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-024
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-025
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-026
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-027
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-028
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-029
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-030
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones
Page 27
yr WILLDAN
2812-052-031
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-032
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-033
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-034
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-035
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-036
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-037
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-038
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-039
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-040
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-041
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-042
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-043
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-044
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-045
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-046
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-047
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-048
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-049
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-050
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-052-051
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-001
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-002
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-003
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-004
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-005
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-006
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-007
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-008
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-009
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-010
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-011
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-012
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-013
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-014
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-015
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-016
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-017
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-018
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-019
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-020
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-021
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-022
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-023
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-024
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-025
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-026
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-027
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-028
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-029
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
2812-053-030
T48
1.0
455.00
1,125.00
1,125.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's Report
2025/2026
Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones
Page 28
yr WILLDAN
2812-053-031 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00
2812-053-032 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00
2812-053-033 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00
2812-053-034 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00
2812-053-035 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00
2812-053-036 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 29
W'W I LLDAN
APPENDIX 111- T62
3244-109-002
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-003
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-004
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-005
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-006
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-007
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-008
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-009
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-010
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-011
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-012
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-013
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-014
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-015
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-016
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-017
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-018
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-019
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-020
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-021
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-022
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-023
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-024
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-025
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-026
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-027
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-028
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-029
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-030
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-031
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-032
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-033
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-034
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-035
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-036
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-037
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-038
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-039
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-109-040
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-001
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-002
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-003
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-004
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-005
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-006
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-007
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-008
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-009
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-010
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-011
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-012
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-016
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's
Report
2025/2026
Balloted Landscape
Maintenance
Zones
Page 30
yr WILLDAN
3244-110-017
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-018
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-019
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-020
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-021
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-022
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-023
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-024
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-025
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-026
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-027
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-028
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-029
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-030
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-031
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-032
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-033
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-034
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-035
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-036
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-037
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-038
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-039
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-040
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-041
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-042
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-043
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-044
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-045
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-046
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-047
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-048
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-049
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-050
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-051
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-052
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-053
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-054
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-055
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-056
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-110-057
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-001
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-002
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-003
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-004
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-005
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-006
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-007
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-008
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-009
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-010
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-011
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-012
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-013
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-014
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's
Report
2025/2026
Balloted Landscape
Maintenance
Zones
Page 31
yr WILLDAN
3244-114-015
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-016
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-017
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-018
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-019
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-020
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-021
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-022
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-023
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-024
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-025
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-026
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-027
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-028
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-029
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-030
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-031
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-032
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-033
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-034
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-035
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-036
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-037
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-038
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-039
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-040
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-041
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-042
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-043
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-044
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-045
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-046
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-047
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-048
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-049
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-050
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-051
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-052
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-114-053
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-001
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-002
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-003
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-004
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-005
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-006
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-007
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-008
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-009
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-010
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-011
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-012
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-013
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-014
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-015
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-016
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
Fiscal Year
City of Santa
Clarita
Engineer's
Report
2025/2026
Balloted Landscape
Maintenance
Zones
Page 32
yr WILLDAN
3244-115-017
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-018
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-019
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-020
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-021
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-022
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-023
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-024
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-025
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-026
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-115-027
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-119-054
T62
6.2974
1.764 COM
600.00
875.00
5,510.23
3244-119-058
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-119-059
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-001
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-002
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-003
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-004
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-005
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-006
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-007
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-008
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-009
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-010
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-011
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-012
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-013
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-014
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-015
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-016
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-017
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-018
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-019
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-020
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-021
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-022
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-023
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-024
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-025
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-026
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-027
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-028
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-029
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-030
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-031
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-032
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-033
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-034
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-035
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-036
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-037
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-038
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
3244-121-039
T62
1.0
SFR
600.00
875.00
875.00
Note: Land use is included for all parcels to ensure consistency and transparency in EBU assignment.
Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report
2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 33