Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-08-26 - AGENDA REPORTS - MOD MC 25-089 HARTWELLO Agenda Item: 1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: Li ' DATE: August 26, 2025 SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO THE HARTWELL MIXED USE PROJECT (MASTER CASE 25-089) DEPARTMENT: Community Development PRESENTER: Erika Iverson RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council: 1. Conduct the public hearing. 2. Determine that the project is exempt from additional review under the California Environmental Quality Act as the project was contemplated and will comply with all mitigation measures established under the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. Adopt a resolution approving Master Case 25-089 (Minor Use Permit 25-014 and Development Review 25-009) for the modification of the Hartwell Mixed Use Project, located at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached revised Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). BACKGROUND Request The proposed project is a request by Serrano Development Group for a Minor Use Permit (MUP) and Development Review (DR) to modify the previously approved Master Case 24-134 known as the Hartwell Mixed Use Project (Hartwell project), located at 24300, 24308, 24316, and 24322 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through - 027), within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The modification would expand the project site to include the adjacent KHTS Radio Station property, increasing the number of apartment units to 98 and the commercial floor area to Page 1 Packet Pg. 9 O 6,300 square feet (Project), an expansion of approximately 25 percent of the originally approved proj ect. Project Setting The revised project site adds one parcel to the previously approved area, bringing the total to six parcels within the OTNSP area, covering approximately one acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Newhall Metrolink Station. Three existing buildings on -site were approved to be demolished under the original project: the Mac's Pool Supply building, the Horseshoe on Main building (previously known as Soundsations), and the historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse. This proposed modification includes the demolition of the KHTS Radio Station building adjacent to the northern edge of the original Hartwell project site. Prior Approval The original Hartwell project (Master Case 24-134), consisting of the delisting and demolition of the historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building and the construction of a new five -story mixed - use building at 52 feet in height with 78 apartment units and 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area, was approved by the City Council on May 13, 2025. Following this, the applicant has applied for a demolition permit, which is estimated to be issued by the end of August. The Rafters AA Group has begun removing items and will be given their allotted 30 days to remove any desired interior finish carpentry once the demolition permit is issued, per a condition added by the City Council. Staff have met with the applicant on site of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building and identified that the holding cell bars are limited to a window. The bars will be removed and preserved before demolition. On June 12, 2025, the City of Santa Clarita (City) received an application to modify the Hartwell project. The application was deemed complete on July 28, 2025. GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AND LAND USES The project site has a General Plan designation of Specific Plan, is located within the OTNSP, and has a zoning designation of AE zone under the OTNSP, which is applied to the central portions of Old Town Newhall, generally aligned with Main Street. The zone intends to promote a mixed -use, walkable neighborhood, with commercial uses along Main Street on the ground floor and residential units on the upper floors. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses (e.g., restaurant and retail use) to the north, west, and south, and the Metrolink station to the east. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Development Proposal The applicant is proposing to modify the Hartwell project, as shown in Table I on the following page. Page 2 Packet Pg. 10 O Table 1 - Original Approval Com ared to Proposed Modification Original Approval Proposed Modification Increase Apartment Units 78 98 +20 Commercial Square Footage 5,223 6,300 +1,077 Parking Stalls On -Site 1 122 1 158 1 +36 The building's architectural style and height would remain the same as the original approval, at five stories (52 feet) in height, with one subterranean level of parking. Commercial storefronts along Main Street would be expanded to the north, with parking behind, within the building footprint. Apartment units would be located on the upper levels and oriented around an internal courtyard located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the project site would remain via two driveways: one on Railroad Avenue and one on Market Street. Staff has reviewed the project for compliance with the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), and the project complies with all objective design standards. This project is subject to the provisions of the State Housing Accountability Act (HAA). A housing or mixed -use project that is consistent with the objective standards in the SCMC must be approved. Further, under the HAA the City must notify an applicant of any objective standards that the project does not meet within thirty days of the project application being deemed complete. If no notice is given by that deadline, the project is deemed consistent with the City's objective criteria. Parking The original Hartwell project provided less parking than required by the SCMC, as the developer invoked the provisions of Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097). Under AB 2097, the City is generally prohibited from imposing parking minimums on projects within a half -mile of a major transit stop, unless the project would have a substantially negative impact on existing residential or commercial parking. Pursuant to SCMC section 17.51.060(N)(4), a parking demand study must be provided to demonstrate that a reduction in parking below the SCMC's requirements would not create a substantially negative impact and to identify the amount of on -site parking required to prevent such an impact. The original approval demonstrated that sufficient on -site and public on -street parking was available to meet the project's demand. This proposed modification to the Hartwell project also invokes AB 2097, providing less parking than required by the SCMC. Therefore, the applicant submitted a revised parking demand study for the proposed modification. The revised parking demand analysis demonstrates that the project's on -site parking supply is adequate to accommodate the project's needs, as summarized in Table 2 below. Specifically, 1. Residential parking demand will be met through new parking spaces provided on -site. The new portion of the project would provide 1.8 parking stalls per added unit for a total per -unit ratio of 1.61 (previously 1.56); Page 3 Packet Pg. 11 O 2. Commercial parking requirements will be met through participation in the OTNSP's Parking In -Lieu Fee Program, adding three spaces to the originally approved 12 for a total of 15 spaces; and Guest parking remains proposed at a ratio of 0.25 spaces per unit, resulting in a 25-space requirement. As originally proposed, guest parking will be met using available on -street parking stalls. The study area of available on -street parking stalls was expanded to reflect the project modification, and new counts were conducted during the weekend peak hour concurrently with an event at the Canyon Theater Guild in order to capture the highest parking demand conditions. Analysis results indicate that, after incorporating the proj ect's peak -hour guest parking demand, an estimated surplus of 20 on -street spaces remained available, and, if expanded to a half -mile beyond the site, additional parking would be available. Table 2 - Project Parking Requirements Original Approval Proposed Modification Change Resident Parking Parking Stalls 122 158 +36 Stalls per Unit 1.56 1.61 +.05 Guest Parking Stalls 20 25 +5 Stalls per Unit 0.25 0.25 0 Commercial Parking Stalls' I 12 15 +3 1 Provided via OTNSP's Parking In Lieu Fee Program As described above, the City cannot require parking minimums under AB 2097 unless there are substantial negative impacts on surrounding parking based on preponderance of evidence in the record. The City conducted a parking study of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan area in 2015, and re-evaluated that study in 2022. The City's survey evaluated the available public and private parking supply within the entire 22-block OTNSP and evaluated the parking supply in the 15- block Main Street subarea. The applicant studied a 4-block area surrounding their project site. Based upon the City's own parking study and the applicant's parking study for the project modification, the requirements of AB 2097 appear to be met. Proposed Entitlements Implementation of the Project will require the approval of the following entitlements: Minor Use Permit 25-014 Required to modify a conditionally approved project involving a cumulative expansion of 10 to 50 percent of the approved building area. The approximately 25 percent expansion requires an MUP and could typically be reviewed by the director. Given the prior action by the City Council on the Hartwell project, the project is being presented to the Council for consideration. Page 4 Packet Pg. 12 O Development Review 24-009 Required to ensure that the project and site plan comply with the SCMC, the General Plan, and OTNSP. ENVIRONMENTAL The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). As described, the project will comply with all required mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. A new Notice of Determination was prepared for the Project. NOTICING All notices as required by law were completed. Property owners and occupants within a 1,000- foot radius of the project site were notified of the public hearing by mail. A public notice was placed in The Signal newspaper on August 5, 2025, and a sign was posted on the Project site on April 12, 2025. As of the writing of this agenda report and issuance of the public notice for this City Council hearing, no comment letters have been received. CONCLUSION The modification to the Hartwell project is consistent with the provisions outlined in the General Plan, SCMC, and OTNSP. The proposed modification does not include any proposed changes to the previous approval for the demolition of the historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse. Therefore, staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution approving Master Case 25-089 (MUP25- 014 and DR25-009) for the modification of the Hartwell Mixed Use Project, located at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A). ALTERNATIVE ACTION Other action as determined by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund. The applicant would be required to pay various development impact fees, without limitation, Bridge and Thoroughfare and park dedication (Quimby) fees. ATTACHMENTS Public Hearing Notice Resolution and Conditions Aerial and Zoning Map Site & Floor Plans Elevations Page 5 Packet Pg. 13 O Parking Demand Study Notice of Determination MC24-134 Final Conditions of Approval (available in the City Clerk's reading file) Page 6 Packet Pg. 14 1.a APPLICATION: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Master Case 25-089: Minor Use Permit 25-014 and Development Review 25- 009 PROJECT LOCATION: 24300, 24308, 24316, and 24322 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -027) PROJECT APPLICANT: Serrano Development Group PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Minor Use Permit (MUP) and Development Review (DR) to modify the Hartwell Mixed -Use Project (previously considered by the City Council on May 13, 2025) which consisted of the redevelopment of the Mac's Pool Supply, Horseshoe on Main (formerly Soundsations), and the historical Masonic Lodge/Courthouse buildings to construct a new five -story mixed -use building, consisting of 78 apartment units and 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. This proposed revision expands the project site to include the adjacent property (KHTS Radio Station studio) and increases the project to 98 apartment units and 6,300 square feet of commercial floor area. A total of 158 parking stalls are proposed within one subterranean and the first -floor levels. The height of the building remains at 52 feet. An MUP is required to modify a conditionally approved project involving a cumulative expansion of ten to fifty percent of the approved building area. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). The City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider the proposed modification to the Hartwell Mixed -Use Project on the following date: DATE: Tuesday, August 26, 2025 TIME: At or after 6:00 p.m. LOCATION: City Hall, Council Chambers 23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor Santa Clarita, CA 91355 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The project was contemplated under the OTNSP Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. No further action under the California Environmental Quality Act is required. If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or written correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearings. For further information regarding this proposal, you may contact the project planner at the City of Santa Clarita, Permit Center, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 140, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Telephone: (661) 255-4330. Website: www.santaclarita.gov/planning. Send written correspondence to: 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 302, Santa Clarita, CA 91355. Project Planner: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I, erubalcava(�santaclarita.gov. Mary Cusick, MMC City Clerk Published: The Signal, August 5, 2025 Packet Pg. 15 1.a PROJECT SITE Request to modify the Hartwell Mixed -Use Project 24300, 24308, 24316, and 24322 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -027) Packet Pg. 16 1.b RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING MASTER CASE 25-089, CONSISTING OF MINOR USE PERMIT 25-014 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 25-009, TO MODIFY THE HARTWELL MIXED USE PROJECT LOCATED AT 24300, 24308, 24316 AND 24322 MAIN STREET AND 22505 MARKET STREET (ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 2831-012-022 THROUGH -027), IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (EXHIBIT A). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR MASTER CASE 25-089. The City Council makes the following findings of fact and conclusions: A. An application for Master Case 25-089 (Minor Use Permit (MUP) 25-014 and Development Review (DR) 25-009) was filed by Serrano Development (applicant), with the City of Santa Clarita (City) on June 12, 2025 (project). The properties for which this application was filed is Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -027 (subject site); B. The original Hartwell Mixed Use Project (Hartwell project), Master Case 24-134, consisting of the demolition of historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building for the construction a new five -story mixed -use building with 78 apartment units, 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area, and 122 parking stalls, was approved by the City Council on May 13, 2025. C. The applicant is proposing to modify the Hartwell project by expanding into an adjacent property (KHTS Radio Station studio) and increasing the project to 98 apartment units, 6,300 square feet of commercial floor area, and 158 parking stalls. The building architectural style and height would remain the same as the original approval, at five stories (52 feet) in height, with one subterranean level of parking. Commercial storefronts along Main Street would be expanded to the north, with parking behind, within the building footprint. Apartment units would be located on the upper levels and oriented around an internal courtyard located on the second floor. Vehicle access to the project site would remain via two driveways; one on Railroad Avenue, and one on Market Street. D. The project site consists of six parcels within the OTNSP area, of approximately one -acre. It is located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, across the street from the Jan Heidt Newhall Metrolink Station. Three existing buildings on -site were proposed to be demolished under the original approval: the Mac's Pool Supply building, the Horseshoe on Main building (previously known as Soundsations), and the historic Masonic Lodge/Courthouse. This proposed modification includes the demolition of the KHTS Radio Station building adjacent to the northern edge of the original project site. E. The project site is located within the Arts & Entertainment (AE) zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP); Page 1 of 8 Packet Pg. 17 1.b F. The original Hartwell project provided less parking than required by the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) pursuant to Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097). This proposed modification to the Hartwell project also utilizes AB 2097 to provide less parking than required by the SCMC. A revised parking demand study was submitted for the proposed expansion. Specifically, the revised parking demand study proposes to provide a 1.61 residential parking ratio on -site, a 0.25 per unit ratio for guest parking to be accommodated on -street, and is utilizing the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu fee program to meet the commercial parking requirement; G. The application was deemed complete on July 28, 2025; H. On August 26, 2025, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the City of Santa Clarita (City) City Council at 6:00 p.m. at City Hall, Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita; I. At this public hearing, the City Council considered the staff report, the staff presentation, the applicant presentation, and public testimony. This Resolution, and its findings, are based upon the entire administrative record including, without limitation, the staff report, testimony, written evidence, and meeting minutes provided during the public hearing. SECTION 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF MASTER CASE 25-089. Based upon the foregoing facts and conclusions, the City Council finds as follows: A. The project was contemplated under the OTNSP FEIR and the project will comply with all mitigation measures to ensure compliance with the FEIR. Consequently, a Notice of Determination was prepared for this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); B. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision of the City Council is based is the Master Case 25-089 project file. This project file is located within the Community Development Department in the custody of the Director of Community Development; and C. Based upon the findings set forth above, the City Council hereby finds the Notice of Determination for this Project has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. SECTION 3. GENERAL FINDINGS FOR MASTER CASE 25-089. Based on the foregoing facts and findings for Master Case 25-089, the City Council determines as follows: A. That the proposal is consistent with the General Plan; The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, including, without limitation: The proposed project is consistent with the following policies of the General Plan: Objective LU 2.1: Provide adequate, suitable sites for housing, employment, business, Page 2 of 8 Packet Pg. 18 1.b shopping, public facilities, public utility facilities, and community services to meet current needs and the anticipated needs of future growth. Objective LU 2.3: Increase mixed -use development where appropriate to create more livable neighborhoods, walkable business districts, and to reduce vehicle trips, while ensuring land use compatibility, through mixed -use zoning. Policy LU 3.1.2: Provide a mix of housing types within neighborhoods that accommodate households with varied income levels. The development proposal is consistent with the intent and goals of the General Plan. The project would provide a combination of residential and commercial spaces, helping to meet the housing and business needs of both current and future residents. The project would add a mixed -use building in a walkable and transit -friendly area. The development includes a variety of unit mixes, ensuring accessibility for households of different sizes and income levels. B. The proposal is allowed within the applicable underlying zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC) and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP); The proposed project would be consistent with the following findings of the OTNSP: OTNSP-1: That the proposed use or project is consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. OTNSP-2: That the proposed use or project meets the development requirements for the Zone within which it is located including parking, architecture, and ground -floor uses. A Stacked Dwelling building type is permitted -by -right in the AE zone of the OTNSP only as part of a vertical mixed -use project with upper floor residential. Any future tenants in the new commercial spaces constructed by the project are subject to the requirements of OTNSP Table 4.2-1, the permitted use chart for the AE zone. The building is consistent with the Western Victorian architectural style of the OTNSP. The proposed project complies with all other development standards for the AE zone and Stacked Dwelling building type. With the Conditions of Approval, the project will comply with Titles 16 and 17 of the SCMC and the OTNSP. Parking will be provided in accordance with the parking demand study on file pursuant to AB 2097. C. The proposal will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, or be materially detrimental or injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and The proposed project is not located on a hazardous site and would not include any hazardous materials. Standard construction materials and methods would be utilized to ensure safety during construction. The applicant will be required to comply with all applicable laws, Page 3 of 8 Packet Pg. 19 1.b including, without limitation: the California Building Standards Code and Fire Code. Sufficient access for firefighting purposes is provided and verified by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LACFD), and the applicant must comply with all LACFD requirements. D. The proposal is physically suitable for the site. The factors related to the proposal's physical suitability for the site shall include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. The design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics are suitable for the proposed use; The subject site includes existing commercial development and surface parking. The parking demand study for the project demonstrates that sufficient parking is provided for the proposed building. The proposed building complies with the City's standards for mixed -use development, including compliance with setbacks, building height, drive -aisle width, and landscaping. 2. The highways or streets that provide access to the site are ofsufficient width and are improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of trafc such proposal would generate; The project is accessed via Market Street and Railroad Avenue, and improvements to the roadway are required for the proposed building. The applicant must comply with all City - imposed engineering requirements when constructing any improvements in the right-of- way, such as sewer laterals, parkway tree installation, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paths of travel at the driveways. The project will not have a significant effect on vehicle miles traveled or traffic, and existing driveway ingress and egress from the site will be maintained. With the proposed improvements along the project's frontage, the project will comply with all requirements of the City's Department of Public Works. 3. Public protection services (e.g. Fire protection, Sheriprotection, etc.) are readily available; and The project will have public protection services provided by both the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) and LACFD, and will not require any additional resources or services from those organizations as a result of its operation. The proposal would also be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the LACFD and LASD. 4. The provision of utilities (e.g. potable water, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc) is adequate to serve the site. The proposed use would be located within an existing commercial area, which is located within a developed urbanized area with available and adequate utilities to serve the site. The proposed project would connect to this existing infrastructure on -site. Page 4 of 8 Packet Pg. 20 1.b SECTION 4: APPROVALS. The City Council takes the following actions: Adopt this Resolution approving Master Case 25-089, Minor Use Permit 25-014 and Development Review 25-009 for the modification of the Hartwell Mixed Use Project, located at the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue, subject to the attached revised Conditions of Approval (Exhibit A) which are incorporated by reference. SECTION 5: RELIANCE ON RECORD. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole. SECTION 6: SUMMARIES OF INFORMATION. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact. SECTION 7: NOTICE. The City Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Resolution to the City Council and any other person requesting a copy. SECTION 8: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution becomes effective immediately upon adoption and memorializes the City Council's final decision made on August 26, 2025. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2025 ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) MAYOR Page 5 of 8 Packet Pg. 21 1.b I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-_ was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of August 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK Page 6 of 8 Packet Pg. 22 1.b EXHIBIT A MASTER CASE 25-089 MINOR USE PERMIT 25-014 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 25-009 DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita's (City) approval of Master Case 25-089. All conditions previously applied to the Hartwell Project (Master Case 24-134) through City Council Resolution No. 25-12 apply to this approval unless modified herein. PLANNING DIVISION PLI. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Hartwell Mixed -Use Project, including a five -story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 6,300 square feet of first -floor commercial space, 98 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 25-089. PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 158 parking stalls on -site (1.61 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 25 public on -street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio). Any future proposed revisions to the project would require an updated parking demand study demonstrating how sufficient parking is provided for the project. PL5. In lieu of constructing 15 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $87,826.50 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION EN6. This project anticipates export of 21,527 cubic yards of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation. A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation: Packet Pg. 23 1.b i. Obtain an encroachment permit for the work. ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee. C. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulb - out on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach. The permittee must upgrade all four curb ramps at said intersection to ensure ADA compliant facilities per Caltrans standards. TE4. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee will pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Via Princessa B&T District. The current rate for this District is $22,710. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment. Standard B&T Fee Calculation: Apartments = the number of units (98) x the district rate ($22,710) x 0.7 = $1,557,906 B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division must be calculated as follows: Retail Commercial = 6,328 sf x $22,710 x 5=$43,988 16,335 Packet Pg. 24 1.b LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FD12. This property is located within the area described by the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (LAFD) as a Fire Hazard Severity Zone. A final approved "Fuel Modification Plan" is required before the Building Official issues a building permit (Fire Code 4908.1). PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION PR1. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must pay the required Park Dedication Fee equal to the value of the amount of land established per the City's General Plan, "Parks and Recreation Element." The permittee may be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Final Parkland dedication obligation calculation to be based on current density per dwelling and fair market value rates at time of payment. An updated estimate is attached. SPECIAL DISTRICTS SD20. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee is required to submit a site plan which indicates existing parkway tree location and includes a Tree Preservation and Protection Plan to the City's Urban Forestry Division for review and approval. SD21. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee is required to submit a street tree location plan for proposed parkway tree installations to the Director of Administrative Services (Urban Forestry Division) for review and approval. Location of tree wells and parkway trees must be shown to scale on all required sets of site plans including grading and construction plans. Landscape plans must be prepared by a California licensed landscape architect and comply with the latest edition of the LMD landscape guidelines. SD22. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, and acceptance of trees by the Director of Administrative Services (Urban Forestry Division), permittee is required to install parkway trees within the public right of way fronting the project site along Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. SD23. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must contact the Director of Administrative Services (Urban Forestry Division) for a final inspection and approval of all parkway trees and irrigation. A mandatory 120-day plant establishment period will be required for all trees planted within the public right of way before the City considers accepting the trees. The mandatory establishment period will begin once all parkway trees have been installed, inspected, and approved by Urban Forestry. Trees which do not meet the minimum specifications or have declined to an unacceptable condition must be removed and replaced at no cost to the City. Packet Pg. 25 1.b City of Santa Clarita Park Dedication Fee Requirement Description: Hartwell TracUMC#: MC26-064 Housing Density d 5 Acres *" FFLIV [Units Dwelling Per 1000 Sub Total 20% jiff site I rn rnvements In Lieu Fee 98 2.570 D.005 W.000 $1,237.544 5`47,509 $1.485,053 Total Density5 Total Acres due 1.40630 3N. Max. Park Credit 0.42189 With Park Credit 0:86441 $800251 S173,2n6 51,039 537 TOTAL FEES DUE Wn-H 30% CREDIT= $1,039,537 TOTAL FEES DUE WITHOUT CREDIT= $1,486,053 Potential Private Park Total Total UmL anedlit Estimate Reviewed by: Katie KnyL 4 Credit Sq, FT. Acres 3M W5.516 118,37B 1 0.42109 0.4218B Date: W30=5 "The applicant will he required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the Fair Market Value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. rl-" ul e,&Ldatlan per the Cq ✓X Santa OaMa General Plan - Parts anal lReereaticn ElErne t DU X Pppdbtcn X 5 acres per X, "FMV = 5 X 12 = In (Lieu Fee per DU IDDOpeople &uidableacre Packet Pg. 26 1.c AERIAL AND ZONING MAP Master Case 25-089: Minor Use Permit 24-015, and Development Review 24-012 24300, 24308, 24316, and 24322 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -027) Aerial Map 1 Packet Pg. 27 1.c Zoning Map ZONING KEY AE (OTNSP) I — Old Town Newhall Specific Plan — Arts & Entertainment N (OTNSP) 1- Old Town Newhall Specific Plan — Neighborhood S:\CD\!PLAN NING DIVISION\CURRENT\!2025\MC25-089 (MUP DR for Modification to the Hartwell Project)\5. City Council\MC25-089 CC Attachment A - Aerial and Zoning Map.doc Packet Pg. 28 1.d SITE & FLOOR PLANS Master Case 25-089: Minor Use Permit 25-014 and Development Review 25-009 24300, 24308, 24316 and 24322 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -027) Packet Pg. 29 UTILITIES UTILITIES ,STAIRS 'il rill RAMP OF I I III II II I I TO RA LROAD AVE II I.I II 'I -I --II w z w RESIDENTIAL PARKING ® ® 97STALLS ® [a r� M 3 9 12 II 1 A nmmn F A_F�Ilj SaSERRANO Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development DEVELOPMENT GROUPAE Santa Clarita, CA 1.d PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES - 27 EV CHARGING SPACES -7 ACCESSIBLE EVCS - 1 ACCESSIBLE SPACES -1 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 TANDAM SPACES - 68 (34) SINGLE SPACE - 19 TOTAL BASEMENT PARKING - 87 STALLS J: �"I/ SCALE I'3d_6. E W L 0' 13 30' 66' V Q Planning Submltta BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN I IEEIII=III=IIEII II EIII-IIEII EIII eu-W-uel eTI-u SaSERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP nnEaioBs 164'-101/8" 35'-9" PARKING SETBACK NOTPART OFPROJECT ILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL-1I ELEC RM 40 _0�� o ® 7A ® 9A FROM RAMPDR RAILROAD AVE — — — RETAIL — — — — — — — 2949SF RESIDENTIAL PARKING 71 STALLS Q Q a Al 5 nn L3ti _ NiL Q Q RETAIL L, 460 SF ; o a =a � RETAIL 2019SF FLEX 1111E SPACE 34SSF a MARKETSTREET Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING TABULATION EV READY SPACES - 22 EV CHARGING SPACES -6 ACCESSIBLE EVCS - 1 ACCESS BLE SPACES - 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES - 1 TANDEM SPACES - 44 (22) SINGLE SPACES -27 TOTAL GARAGE PARKING - 71 STALLS TOTAL RETAIL SQ. FT. - 6,676 SF J: SCALE I'30_0• E W L 0' 15' 30' 60' V Q Planning Submftta FIRST FLOOR PLAN 4GSERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP m= m GARDEN CORRIDOR 2G 2F 2F 2E y 2F 1A 1A rlA 2H 1B IL 1A I 2A � � POOL CENTRAL COURTYARD 1A (OPEN TO SKY) SPA 1A 1A 2B LOU NGE AMENITIES 1A 2B 3A II 1A II 2C IUI 1A II 2D PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (2ND FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS - 11 2 BEDROOM UNTS - 11 Ti 3 BEDROOM UNITS - 1 TOTAL UNITS - 23 Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.d 0 0 LL �a d A "✓ SCALE I'30'_0. E 0) L 0' 13 30' 60' M Q Planning Submftta SECOND FLOOR PLAN packet pg. 32 PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION ORD FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS 2 BEDROOM UNITS 3 BEDROOM UNITS TOTAL UNITS - 25 a GSERRANO Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development ��a� DEVELOPMENT GROUP AE Santa Clarita, CA 1.d Planning Submftta N C A a `o 0 LL W N C d E a PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (4TH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS 2 BEDROOM UNITS 3 BEDROOM UNITS TOTAL UNITS - 25 SaSERRANO Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development DEVELOPMENT GROUPAE Santa Clarita, CA 1.d Planning Submftta N C A a `o 0 LL W N C d E a PROJECT INFORMATION UNIT TABULATION (5TH FLOOR) 1 BEDROOM UNITS 2 BEDROOM UNITS 3 BEDROOM UNITS TOTAL UNITS - 25 SaSERRANO Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development DEVELOPMENT GROUPAE Santa Clarita, CA 1.d Planning Submftta N C A a `o 0 LL W N C d E a 1.e ELEVATIONS Master Case 25-089: Minor Use Permit 25-014 and Development Review 25-009 24300, 24308, 24316 and 24322 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 2831-012-022 through -027) El Packet Pg. 36 WEST ELEVATION MAIN ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) L BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (-TYPE 111) 3. PRECAST CONCRETETR.IM 4. SIDING (TYPE II) 5. STONE VENEER 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER. INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE I) S. DECORA"FIVE ME EAL SCREEN 9. DECORAT VE METAL RAILING 10, STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM l 1. SIDING (TYPE IV) 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL) 13 DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE II) 14. WH.OUGH-F IRON FINIAL 5. WOOD WINDOW "TRIM 10, WOOD DOOR TRIM 11 DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER 18. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS 19 EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20 EXPOSED WOOD "FRELLS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE ( E) PE Il 22, DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE III) 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM. INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE III) 25, EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE 11) 26 SIDING ( EYPE Il �L. OSERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP RE mill moms_--� — I :w ff' Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA H 1.e 0' 10, 11 40' Q Plauuij,g Suhmitta ELEVATION - MAIN STREET (WEST) SOUTH ELEVATION MARKET ST EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE IH) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM - 4. SIDING (TYPE II; - 5. STONE VENEER - 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE C 8. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING ----- 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL; 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE IC 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM - 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER - 18. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS. 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS _ 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE C _ 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE HE 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE IIC 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE H) - 26. SIDING (TYPE C 6 GSERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP Eq AE Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.e SCALE 1' 20'-0' L m _.. o' 10' 20' 40'- Q Planning Submftta ELEVATION - MARKET STREET (SOUTH) packet Pg. 38 ' IMAX HEIGHT LEVEL 4 1 if f LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL I 1 I� EAST ELEVATION (22 (12 (I RAILROAD AVE EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE IH) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM - 4. SIDING (TYPE II; - 5. STONE VENEER - 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE C 8. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING ----- 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL; 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE IC 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM - 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER - 18. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS. 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS _ 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE C _ 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE HE 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE IIC 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE H) - 26. SIDING (TYPE C SGSERRANO DEVELC)PMENT GROUP AE n Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA a 1.e E SCALE 1" 20'-9 L 0' 10, 20' 40, Q Planning Submftta ELEVATION - RAILROAD AVE (EAST) packet Pg. 39 NORTH ELEVATION EXTERIOR FINISHES (SEE A30 FOR MATERIAL PALETTE) 1. BRICK VENEER 2. SIDING (TYPE IH) 3. PRECAST CONCRETE TRIM - 4. SIDING (TYPE IF - - 5. STONE VENEER - 6. WOOD CLADDING 7. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE C - 8. DECORATIVE METAL SCREEN 9. DECORATIVE METAL RAILING ----- 10. STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM 11. SIDING (TYPE IV; 12. SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL; 13. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE IC 14. WROUGHT IRON FINIAL 15. WOOD WINDOW TRIM 16. WOOD DOOR TRIM - 17. DECORATIVE WINDOW SHUTTER - 18. EXPOSED WOOD RAFTERS. 19. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS 20. EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS COLUMN 21. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE C _ 22. DECORATIVE WALL SCONCE (TYPE HE 23. AWNING SUNBRELLA 24. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER TRIM, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE IIC 25. EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER, INTEGRAL COLOR (TYPE H) - 26. SIDING (TYPE C 27. PAINTED WALL MURAL- -- 6 GSERRANO DEVELOPMENT GROUP Eq AE Old Town Newhall -Mixed Use Development Santa Clarita, CA 1.e rn ro V EL C v) N W U) EL 5 Q U W EL 4 ~ Q EL 3 ~ U W O EL 2 d w W 0 EL I w x Q 2 w x O H z O Q U LL O O J a c � o — — m w LLI E SCALE 1" 20'-9 L 0' 10, 20' 40, Q Planning Submftta ELEVATION(NORTH) packetPg. 4o July 24, 2025 Tai Lane Serrano Development Group 24 N. Marengo Avenue Pasadena, CA 91101 LLG Reference No. 2.24.4807.1 Subject: Parking Demand Analysis for the Downtown Newhall Mixed -Use Project Santa Clarita, California Dear Ms. Lane: As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this Parking Demand Analysis for the proposed mixed -used project development in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. The project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24320, 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue. The Project proposes to demolish three existing retail buildings to construct a 98-unit multifamily development, inclusive of 6,433 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail. Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 87 spaces, inclusive of 34 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 71 spaces, inclusive of 22 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 158 spaces. Based on our understanding, a detailed parking assessment is needed to justify a reduced parking requirement for the site when compared to the City's code parking requirements. As such, the following items have been considered. ■ Parking requirements documented in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updatedMay 2022 ■ Research of relevant parking reductions (i.e. Assembly Bill 2097, ITE, other comparable Cities, etc.) ■ Hourly off -site parking demand counts in the immediate area of the Project 1.f I%MLI-- r"o; 2 Executive Circle Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92614 949.825.6175 r 949.825.5939 F www.11gengineers.co Pasadena Irvine San Diego c David S. Shender, PE (Rat m E John A. Boorman, PE U Richard E. Barretto, PE c� r Q Ked D. Maberry, PE KC Yellapu, PE Dave Roseman, PE Shankar Ramakrishnan, P Daniel A. Kloos, PE ZawwarSai ed MS PER P Packet Pg. 41 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 2 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Location and Description The proposed Project is located on the north-east corner of Main Street and Market Street in Downtown Newhall, and is addressed at 24320, 24300, 24308 and 24316 Main Street and 24307 Railroad Avenue in the Downtown Newhall section of the City of Santa Clarita. Figure 1, located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the general location of the overall Project site in the context of the surrounding street system. The proposed Project includes the development of a five -story building, with basement, consisting of 98 apartment units, above a two -level parking structure. The Project's unit mix will consist of 50 one -bedroom units, 44 two -bedroom units, and 4 three -bedroom units, with 6,433 square -feet (SF) of ground floor retail space. Parking will be provided via a gated basement level which would take access from Railroad Avenue and would consist of 87 spaces, inclusive of 34 tandem (second access) spaces. Additional at grade parking would be provided via gated access from Market Street consisting of 71 spaces, inclusive of 22 tandem (second access) spaces, for a combined parking total of 158 spaces. Table 1, attached to this letter, provides a summary of the Project development, inclusive of the Project's proposed parking supply. Figure 2 presents the proposed Project site plan prepared by SAE Architecture Interiors. As shown on Figure 2, with the closure of the existing driveway on Main Street, an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided with the construction of the proposed Project. PARKING ANALYSIS Code Parking Requirements The code parking calculation for the residential component of the Project is based on the City's requirements as outlined in Chapter 17.42 Residential Use Types of the City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code while the commercial component of the Project is based on the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. Based on the above the City's Code specifies the following parking requirements: ■ Multifamily Residential: two (2) space per unit plus one-half (0.5) space per unit for guest parking ■ Retail: 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF Packet Pg. 42 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 3 On that basis, Table 2 presents the code parking requirements for the proposed Project. Review of the upper portion of Table 2 presents the residential component which identifies a 245-space requirement. When compared to the proposed on -site parking supply of 158 spaces, a 87-space code -calculated shortfall is indicated. It should be noted that based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Later in the letter provides further justification and recommendations. The lower portion of the Table 2 shows the commercial component which identifies that 15 spaces are required. The Old Town Newhall Specific Plan identifies a Parking In -Lieu Fee program for which the Project would be required to contribute to. The fee would be applied to the commercial parking component of the Project, as determined by the City. The fee shall be established by separate resolution of the City Council. Funds collected by the City from fee payments may be used to finance the creation or expansion of public parking through the purchase of property and the construction of new facilities, including debt service and signage that identifies the location of parking within the business district. As such, the Project's retail parking requirements will be satisfied via its contribution towards this Parking In -Lieu Fee program. Assembly Bill 2097 The City's residential parking ratio of 2.0 spaces per unit is considered high when compared to TTE, other Cities and based on empirical data. As such, it is recommended that a reduced parking ratio be applied to the residential component of the Project. Further, given the location of the Project, which is across the street from the Metrolink Train Station, Assembly Bill 2097 (AB 2097), which states the following, would be applicable to the Project. This bill would prohibit a public agency from imposing any minimum automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project, as defined, that is located within 112 mile of public transit, as defined. Due to the project's proximity to the Jan Heidt Metrolink Station, AB 2097 can be applied to the Project. However, per the City of Santa Claritia Director's Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 datedMarch 6, 2024, for AB 2097 to be applied to the Project it must demonstrate that the reduced parking requirement would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. As such, research of the following parking ratios was considered for the Project. O VMML VMEL(N"A Packet Pg. 43 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 4 The study area was defined based on the projected parking demand of the project. As demonstrated in the analysis, there is sufficient parking available within the selected radius to meet that demand. Expanding the radius would only identify additional available parking, such as the Old Town Newhall Parking Structure and the Metrolink parking area. Since the current study area already confirms that adequate parking exists to support the project, a broader one-half mile radius analysis is not necessary. TOD Multifamily Residential Parking Ratios Research of multifamily residential code requirements has been conducted. Table 3 presents the parking requirements from ITE and other cities in the region. Review of the first column from Table 3 presents the residential parking requirements for Santa Clarita. The other columns presents the TTE parking requirements and other City parking requirements for Transit Oriented Developments (TOD's). Review of Table 3 shows that multiple sources have multifamily parking ratios well below the City of Santa Clarita code ratio. As such, it can be concluded that the City's ratio is considered high and a reduced parking ratio would be appropriate. It should be noted that the City code parking requirement for resident guest of 0.5 spaces per unit is also considered high. Review of Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Shared Parking Third Edition the peak residential parking requirement for resident guest is 0.15. LLI is considered applicable for this Project based on the downtown setting and therefore it is expected for this Project to operate similar to a typical shared parking facility. Additionally, it is likely that a portion of the resident guest demand would also frequent the commercial uses in the area, resulting in a portion of their parking requirement being covered by the in -lieu fee. As such, it is conservatively recommended that a ratio of 0.25 spaces per unit be applied to the resident guest component of the Project. Empirical Parking Ratios For Multifamily Residential Individual multifamily residential projects and local settings may have unique parking characteristics that may not be well represented in typical city code requirements. There are increasing concerns among parking/traffic engineering and planning experts over City code parking ratios and parking minimums being outdated, causing multifamily developments to have either inadequate or excessive supply, and that the "one -size -fits -all" approach to estimating parking requirements inherent in city parking codes may not reflect actual, more current and realistic parking needs, operations, and management. O %ML WMM(N"A Packet Pg. 44 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 5 Notwithstanding the requirements of Santa Clarita's City code, the actual parking requirements for multifamily residential uses have been found to be less than the City's own Code requirement as illustrated by LLG's previous field studies of actual parking demand at existing sites. Table 4 presents a comparison of site development and parking ratios from the thirteen (13) apartment communities in southern California, inclusive of the source of parking survey data. Additional details for the comparable sites are also provided inclusive of the location, development summary, parking facility type, and parking supply. It should be noted that the ratios provided in Table 4 include demand related to resident and resident guest. It should be noted that sites 12 and 13 in Table 4 were included per direction of the City to include additional comparable sites that are more aligned with the size of Project. Both Edgeway and Newhall Crossings provide subterranean gated parking for their residents. Appendix A presents the parking demand count sheets for these sites. Review of the rightmost column of Table 4 presents the tenant and guest peak parking ratio (spaces per unit) for each of the comparable sites. This array of peak parking rates yields an average ratio of 1.28 spaces per unit, an 85th percentile ratio of 1.43 spaces per unit, and a 95th percentile ratio of 1.46 spaces per unit. Direct comparison between the 95th percentile ratio of 1.46 to what the Project is proposing, which is 1.61 spaces per unit shows the Project would exceed the 95th percentile by 0.15 spaces per unit. It should be noted that the 95th percentile ratio includes demand related to the resident guest component. Therefore, the projected surpluses in parking would be approximately 0.20 spaces per unit greater than what is identified. Given the above, LLG concludes that the parking ratios derived from the thirteen comparable sites are accurate representations for the unique parking characteristics of the proposed Project that are not reflected in the City code ratio and would be a good indicator of the parking demand of the proposed Project. It should also be noted that twelve (12) of the thirteen (13) sites observed were not directly across from a train station and as a result larger surpluses could occur. The thirteenth site observed is located approximately 650 feet north of the site along Main Street within walking distance to the train station. Closer inspection of the parking demand data shows that the resident component of that project is gated and does not allow for guest parking to occur within the gated areas. As such, the parking ratio for the residential component, excluding the resident guest component, of the Newhall Crossings apartment project is 1.07 spaces per units (gated demand 48 spaces divided by 45 occupied units = 1.07 spaces per unit). The ratio of 1.07 excludes any resident guest or commercial employee/guest since they park in the public parking structure. It should be noted that O FAM %IM(N"A Packet Pg. 45 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 6 Newhall Crossing was approved at a ratio of 1.5 spaces per unit, but they provided 1.85 spaces per unit. The Newhall Crossings project is considered the most appropriate site for comparison since it has a similar number of units, is located in close proximity to the site, would likely have similar resident demographics and is located in walking distance to the Metrolink Station. As such, it can be concluded that the residential component of the Project is considered to have ample parking to support its needs. Resident Guest Parking Requirements As noted above, the project will not provide on -site parking to support the resident guest component of the project and will rely on public on -street parking within the vicinity of the project. The residential guest would require 25 spaces based on the assumption of 0.25 spaces per unit. To further assess the parking requirements of the Project and the potential for the Project to utilize "off -site" parking within public on -street parking areas, parking demand surveys were conducted hourly within the vicinity of the site from 9:00 AM through 9:00 PM by AimTD on Thursday and again on Saturday (April 25 and 27, 2024). Please note that over time the Project has evolved which resulted in an increase in project size. Therefore, the Project as currently proposed would require an expansion to the on -street study area. Based on prior parking data, the peak times related to on -street demand as well as peak resident guest demand occurred on a Saturday during the late evening period (7:00 PM — 10:00 PM) while events were scheduled at the Canyon Theatre Guild. During the peak Saturday late evening period the on -street parking area was expanded as well but still falls well below the one-half mile radius. It should be noted that if the study area were expanded to one-half mile radius additional surpluses beyond what has been noted in this report would occur. As such, an expanded "off -site" parking area was assessed for weekend condition. The expanded area parking demand surveys were conducted hourly from 7:00 PM - 10:00 PM by Counts Unlimited, Inc. on Saturday (July 19, 2025). All parked vehicles during each hourly survey round were counted and recorded. In addition, the parking counts were conducted on a weekend while shows were scheduled at the Canyon Theatre Guild which would be representative of an "active evening". The expanded area was collected from 7:00 PM - 10:00 PM which spanned the duration of the show at Canyon Theatre Guild. Additionally, 7:00 PM - 10:00 PM contains the peak period observed in the original 2024 counts as well as the peak of the proposed Project. O %ML%ML(N"M Packet Pg. 46 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 7 Figure 3 presents the key parking areas which would be available for use by the Project inclusive of the expanded study area. Appendix B contains the weekday and weekend survey data. It should be noted that, according to the City of Santa Clarita Director's Policy for Assembly Bill 2097 (March 6, 2024), to apply AB 2097 to the project, the Project must demonstrate that the reduced parking requirement will not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within a half -mile radius of the project. Due to the size of the proposed Project and projected demands on - street, a reduced parking survey area has been used as this still provides sufficient evidence that the reduced parking requirements would not negatively impact parking within the half -mile radius. Tables 5 and 6 present the weekday and weekend shared parking approach for the proposed Project and compares the forecasted hourly parking demand of the Project against the available parking surplus in off -site areas, respectively. For Table 5, Column (1) presents parking survey data collected along the on -street spaces within the vicinity of the site. Column (2) presents the ULI shared parking demand of the resident guest. Column (3) presents the expected joint -use parking demand on an hourly basis, while Column (4) summarizes the hourly parking surplus/deficiency for the Project compared to the on -street parking supply of 135 based on the existing supply of 132 spaces plus 3 additional on -street spaces created by the Project as a result of closing the driveway on Main Street. Table 6 is set up similarly to Table 5, however, it contains additional columns that display the expanded study area's on - street demand and summarizes the hourly parking surplus/deficiency from 7:00 PM - 10:00 PM for the Project compared to the expanded study area on -street parking supply of 208 spaces. Appendix C presents the detailed shared parking table. As indicated in Column (4) of Table 5, the weekday evening peak parking demand with the Project totaled 118 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 17 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply of 135 spaces. As indicated in Column (5) of Table 6, the weekend evening peak parking demand with the Project and the expanded study area totaled 188 spaces at 8:00 PM, corresponding to a surplus of 20 spaces when compared to the proposed on -street parking supply with the expanded study area of 208 spaces. As such, Tables 5 and 6 shows that based on the ULI shared parking profiles for the proposed Project, the parking demand for the resident guest can be accommodated by on -street parking within the area of the Project. It should be noted that additional public parking is provided in a parking structure located along 9th Street, a surface lot located on 6ch Street and the Newhall Community Center parking lot located on Market Street. These additional parking areas would provide supplemental parking that could be used to also support the Project. Since the Project demonstrates adequate parking both on -street and off-street O 14imk I %�r',40X Packet Pg. 47 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 8 with the added demand from the Project it can be concluded that the Project satisfies the intent of the City of Santa Clarita Director's Policy for Assembly Bill 2097 (March 6, 2024). PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP) To ensure adequate parking is provided for both tenants and guests of the Project, it is recommended that when the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company deems it necessary, the following key Parking Management Strategies be implemented by the Property Owner and/or Property Management Company: ■ The PMP should identify where location of short-term parking spaces for potential tenants and use by the leasing office. ■ The PMP should restrict residents to parking in their assigned garage spaces. ■ The PMP should provide rules of conduct for tenants and guests to abide by. Strict enforcement shall be adhered to. PMP Measures The following measures are available to the Project to mitigate any parking impacts or deficiencies in the event the proposed onsite parking supply is determined to be greater than what is provided. Residential Component 1. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall assign one (1) parking space to every unit. Additional spaces may be assigned to any unit that requests additional assigned spaces dependent on the number of bedrooms provided within said unit. Residents may not park more than two (2) vehicles in the complex. The 2nd access/tandem spaces should be assigned to two -bedroom and three -bedroom units, however the Property Owner/Property Management Company has the flexibility to assign the 2nd access/tandem spaces to one -bedroom units. The Property Owner/Property Management Company shall determine the allocation of parking spaces for resident tenants, inclusive of spaces designated and signed for prospective resident tenants. 2. Residents will be provided a transponder or similar device (fob or key card, etc.) for remote access to the gated residential parking area within the Project's apartment parking structure. O %ML%ML(N%A Packet Pg. 48 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 9 3. Every resident will be required to register their vehicle. The registered owner must be a lease holding resident. No permits will be issued to non -lease holders, or vehicles not registered to a lease holder. This registration will be updated annually at the time of recertification. 4. Vehicles lacking current registration will not be issued a permit. Vehicles that have lapsed registration will be towed by the Property Owner/Property Management Company. The storage of inoperable or unregistered vehicles is prohibited. 5. Vehicles may not occupy unassigned spaces for more than twenty-four (24) hours, without contacting the leasing office in advance. Violators are subject to towing at the vehicle owner's expense. 6. If you obtain a new vehicle, you must provide new registration and will be given a new permit (transferring permits is not permissible). 7. Violation of the PMP strategies contained herein may result in the towing of the vehicle at the vehicle owner's expense. 8. The enforcement of resident on -site parking requirements summarized herein will be handled by the Property Owner/Property Management Company to ensure compliance. Through this monitoring and cooperation with the residents as a result of the annual review/monitoring, a partnership will be formed to ensure that residential tenants and retail employees and Management Company personnel on the property work together to ensure adequate parking is available. CONCLUSIONS Based on research of relevant parking reductions as well as actual demand studies for multifamily residential projects shows that the City code requirement is overstated. Review of the data supports a reduced parking ratio. It can be concluded that the proposed residential ratio provided by the Project of 1.61 can adequately support the needs for the residential component. In addition, the commercial parking requirement of fifteen (15) parking stalls will be waived via the parking in -lieu fee program identified in the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. Lastly, based on the shared parking analysis, on -street parking will provide ample parking to support the resident guest component of the Project. O 1�imk I %�r',40X Packet Pg. 49 Tai Lane July 24, 2025 Page 10 To ensure adequate parking is provided, the Project has the ability to implement a PMP, inclusive of assignment of tandem stalls for specific units, to maintain adequate parking for all residents of the Project. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Project would adhere to the City of Santa Claritia Director's Policy: Assembly Bill 2097 dated March 6, 2024, and would not negatively impact existing residential or commercial parking within one-half mile of the project. In summary, the proposed Project provides more than adequate parking to accommodate the needs of the residents, whereas the commercial users and resident guest demand is accommodated via the City's parking in -lieu fee program and on - street parking, respectively. The proposed PMP measures would help ensure adequate parking for Project residents. We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis. Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 825- 6175. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Richard E. Barretto, P.E. Principal cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., Senior Transportation Engineer Attachments O �Iilm I M %IM(N"A of ES 5t pNq � W No. 2006 0 �p ExP6/3O/27 4 qp TRAFFlC yeti OF CAS -CEO Packet Pg. 50 " > ��? .. Z:r. e"f . .............. . R i :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. } ...... J rt ........... A\ � . {. lot }� s ■: � � ■ � �, � i '_i 'jam _ ' `s. � p , � E s j slap, L J �(tNO 1%,§Ll� SCALE SOURCE: GOOGLE KEY = PROJECT SITE FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP NEWHALL MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA U) Cu 0) ^Cu (L d _ 2 a Packet Pg. 51 ME r_-__-__-_---------- __-__-_ _-_ 1 - NOT PART OF PROJECT - 1 s I • oas I 1 N 1 1 1 « — 1 ------------_------------------------- ____ � _ ------------- W cn cn � M Q 1 1 u � W rw I a ie 0 a , ' n � a w cl) = wa Q I � � 2LLI � 1 1 A 1 O z S O 0 0 I p II � 1 1 a m 1 '. a � I c oI E -- -- c m /N I �� � - MARKET ST ADDITIONAL 3 ON —STREET PARKING SPACES o PROVIDED DUEUE TO DRIVEWAY CLOSURE ------------------------ E_ LL i BASEMENT PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN w E r 1 1 (NO SCALE FIGURE 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN NEWHALL MIXED —USE PROJECT, SANTA Packet Pg. 52 x m M to w Attachment: Parking Demand Study (MODIFICATION TO THE HARTWELL MIXED USE PROJECT (MASTER CASE 25-089)) Cl TABLE 1 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY' DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Total Project Basement Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Land Use / Project Description Development ❑ Residential Component ■ 1 Bedroom -- -- 11 units 13 units 13 units 13 units 50 units ■ 2 Bedrooms -- -- 11 units 11 units 11 units 11 units 44 units ■ 3 Bedrooms -- -- 1 unit 1 unit 1 unit 1 unit 4 units Total Residential Units: -- -- 23 units 25 units 25 units 25 units 98 units ❑ Retail/Commercial Component ■ Retail Shop A -- 2,849 SF -- -- -- -- 2,849 SF ■ Retail Shop B -- 1,563 SF -- -- -- -- 1,563 SF ■ Retail Shop C -- 2,021 SF -- -- -- -- 2,021 SF Total Retail/Commercial Space: — 6,433 SF -- -- — — 6,433 SF ❑ Parking Structure Supply I" Access Space 53 spaces 49 spaces -- -- -- -- 102 spaces 21 Access (Tandem) Space 34 spaces 22 spaces -- -- -- -- 56 spaces Total Parking Supply 87 spaces 71 spaces — — -- -- 158 spaces i Source: SAE Architecture I Interiors, Site Plan dated May 20, 2025 Packet Pg. 54 TABLE 2 CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Spaces Land Use / Project Description Size Parking Ratio 2 Required Multifamily Apartments ■ One (1) Bedroom Units 50 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 100 ■ Two (2) Bedroom Units 44 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 88 ■ Three (3) Bedroom Units 4 DU 2.0 spaces per unit 8 ■ Resident Guest 98 DU 0.5 spaces per unit 49 Total 98 units 245 A. Total Residential Parking Code Requirement: 245 B. Proposed Residential Parking Supply: 158 C. Residential Parking Surplus/Deficiency (+/-) [Row B — Row A]: -87 Retail Commercial 1 space per first 1,500 SF, remaining square Retail 6,433 SF footage calculated at 1 space per 350 SF 15 Source: City of Santa Clarita Municipal Code, Chapter 17.42 —Residential Use Types. 3 Source: Old Town Newhall Specific Plan updated May 2022. 7-24-2025.doc Packet Pg. 55 TABLE 3 CITY CODE VS ITE AND DOWNTOWNITOD PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIFAMILY IN MIXED -USE SETTING DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT. SANTA CLARITA ITEParking Generation(5th Ed) Multifamily Housing(Nlid-Rise) City of Redlands City of Long Beach Cityof Santa AB 2345:amends CA No Nearby Transit No Nearby Transit Near Transit Near Transit Downtown Long Beach Blwl City of Santa Clarita Downtown, Cityof San Diego Monica (for TODs Density Bonus Law; TCRP Report 128 Cityof Los Angeles City of Sacramento Municipal Code (Average) (85th %ile) (Average) (85th %ile) Village Cur & Gen Plan Redevelopment for TODs & NlixedUse) >10%lowincome) for TODs Code for TOM (Traditional District) Project Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Multi -Family Residential Studio 1 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 0.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.25 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 2-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.75 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 3-Bedroom 2 sp/unit 1.31 sp/unit 1.47 sp/unit 1.12 sp/unit 1.27 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 2 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.5 sp/unit 1.1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit 1 sp/unit Resident Guest Parking Studio 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 1-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 2-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me 3-Bedroom 0.5 sp/unit me me me me 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit 0.25 sp/unit me 0.067 sp/ me me me me PacketPg. 56 VMMk1.f I TABLE 4 EMPIRICAL PARKING DEMAND RATIOS DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Tenant& Tenant& Development Parking Peak Parking Saturday Peak Comparable Site City Address Parking Supply Survey Period Ratio Ratio Summary Facility Spaces per DU Spaces per DU (Peak Hour) (Peak Hour) 250 Unit Apartments 580 Anton Costa 580 Anton • 5 Studio Units 440 Spaces Wednesday & 1.28 1.24 1 Boulevard Garage • Residents - 419 sp. Saturday Mesa Blvd 168 1-Bedroom Units (@ 2:00 AM) (@ 3:00 AM) Apartments [a] • Public/Guests - 21 sp. 6PM-3AM • 77 2-Bedroom Units 481 Unit Apartments 1,020 Spaces Wednesday & Main Street Main • 265 1-Bedroom Units • Residents - 847 sp. 1.42 2 Village [b] Irvine2555 Street • 200 2-Bedroom Units Structure • Public/Guests - 173 Thursday (@ 12:00 AM) • 16 3-Bedroom Units sp. lOPM-12AM Surface 700 S. 163 Unit Apartments 404 Spaces Wednesday & Paragon at Old Lot, On- 1 48 3 Town [b] Monrovia Myrtle Avenue • 82 1-Bedroom Units • 81 3-Bedroom Units Street • Residents - 329 sp. • Public/Guests - 75 sp. Thursday 6PM-12AM (@ 11.PM) Par48 king 304 Unit Apartments Surface 44 480 Spaces Wednesday & Trio 4 Pasadena s Madison on • 46 Studio Units Lot, On- • Residents - 450 sp. Thursday 1.22 Apartments [b] Avenue 141 1-Bedroom Units Street •Pubfic/Guests - 30 sp. lOPM-12AM (@12:00 AM) • 117 2-Bedroom Units Parking Wednesday & Adagio on the Mission 2660 Oso Garage, 512 Spaces Thursday 1.45 0.97 5 256 Unit Apartments Surface • Residents - 424 sp. 7PM-2AM (@ 2:00 PM & Green [c] Viejo parkway Lot • Public/Guests - 88 sp. Saturday: 12PM-3PM, (@12:00 AM) 3:00 PM) 7PM-2AM Wednesday & 284 Unit Apartments 539 Spaces Thursday Apex Laguna 6 Laguna 27960 Cabot • 32 Studio Units Garage • Residents - 461 sp. 7PM-2AM 1.28 1.13 Niguel [c] Niguel Road 161 1-Bedroom Units (@ 2:00 AM) (@ 3:00 PM) • Public/Guests - 78 sp. Saturday: 12PM-3PM, • 91 2-Bedroom Units 7PM-2AM 254 Unit Apartments • 123 1-Bedroom Units Gated 1901 E First Thursday & Saturday 1.354 1.346 7 Nineteen0l [d] Santa Ana 125 2-Bedroom Units Residential 559 Spaces St 6 3-Bedroom Structure 12AM-11:59PM (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) Units 100 E 300 Unit Apartments Gated 660 Spaces 0.643 155 1-Bedroom Units Thursday & Saturday 0.767 8 The Marke [d] Santa Ana MacArthur 131 2-Bedroom Units Residential • Residents - 600 sp. 12AM-11:59PM (@12:00 AM) (@ 2:00 PM & Blvd Structure • Public/Guests - 60 sp. 3:00 PM) • 14 3-Bedroom Units Core 1815 Thursday, Friday & 222 Unit Apartments 1.38 1.33 9 Apartments Anaheim Westside Structure 726 Spaces Saturday d e Drive . 328 Bedrooms 5PM-12AM (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) Costa 125 Baker 240 Unit Apartments Thursday, Friday & 1.30 1.24 10 Baker Block [d] Mesa Street • 349 Bedrooms Structure 466 Spaces Saturday (@12:00 AM) (@12:00 AM) 5PM-12AM 1100 363 Unit Apartments Tuesday & Saturday 1.18 1.22 11 Rize [d] Irvine Structure 564 Spaces Synergy • 511 Bedrooms 5PM-12AM (Peak Hour N/A) (Peak Hour N/A) 91 Unit Apartments 137 Spaces 9735 Oak • 52 1-Bedroom Units Thursday 1.28 12 Edgeway [fJ Bellflower Street • 31 2-Bedroom Units Structure • Residents - sp. 12AM (@12:00 AM) • Guests - 8 sp. p. • 8 3-Bedroom Units 47 Unit Apartments Newhall Santa 22551 9th • 51-Bedroom Units Thursday 1.27 13 Structure 99 Spaces Crossings [g] Clarita Street • 32 2-Bedroom Units 12AM (@12:00 AM) • 10 3-Bedroom Units Average: 1.25 -- 85th Percentile: 95th Percentile: -- Notes: [a] Source: Counts collectedhy Counts Unlimited on May 2023. [b] Source: Parking Demand Anatysisfor the Propsed Fah Avenue/Huntington Drive Nixed -Use Project City of Monrovia California prepared by LLG, (kt. 2012 [c] Source: Counts collected by LLG on December 2016. [d] Source: Revised Parking Study for Brea Plana Shopping Center, prepared by LSA, January2022. let At the tune of the surveys, 222 of the 400 units were occupied. It] At the tune of the surveys, 89 of the 91 units were occupied. [g] At the tire of the surveys, 45 of the 47 units were occupied. Packet Pg. 57 TABLE 5 WEEKDAY SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1] DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Land Use Existing On -Street Demand Resident Guest Total Shared Parking Demand Comparison w/ Parking Supply 135 Spaces [2] Size Pkg Rate 98 DU 0.25 /DU Gross Spaces 25 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) 9:00 AM 53 5 58 77 10:00 AM 58 5 63 72 11:00 AM 58 5 63 72 12:00 PM 68 5 73 62 1:00 PM 81 5 86 49 2:00 PM 69 5 74 61 3:00 PM 62 5 67 68 4:00 PM 68 5 73 62 5:00 PM 75 10 85 50 6:00 PM 85 14 99 36 7:00 PM 92 24 116 19 8:00 PM 94 24 118 17 9:00 PM 68 24 92 43 Notes: [1] Source: ULI -Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an existing on -street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided. Packet Pg. 58 TABLE 6 WEEKEND SURVEY PLUS SHARED PARKING [1] DOWNTOWN NEWHALL MIXED -USE PROJECT, SANTA CLARITA Land Use Orignal Study Area On -Street Demand Expanded Study Area On -Street Demand Resident Guest Total Shared Parking Demand Orignal Study Area Comparison w/ Parking Supply 135 Spaces [2] Expanded Study Area Comparison w/ Parking Supply 208 Spaces [3] Size Pkg Rate 98 DU 0.25 /DU Gross Spaces 25 Spc. Time of Day Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Surplus (Deficiency) Surplus (Deficiency) 9:00 AM 77 5 82 53 10:00 AM 85 5 90 45 11:00 AM 86 5 91 44 12:00 PM 87 5 92 43 1:00 PM 91 5 96 39 2:00 PM 96 5 101 34 3:00 PM 95 5 100 35 4:00 PM 95 5 100 35 5:00 PM 99 10 109 26 6:00 PM 103 15 119 17 7:00 PM 104 55 25 194 24 9:00 PM 111 52 25 199 20 9:00 PM 95 40 25 160 48 Notes: [1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Third Edition, 2020. [2] There is an existing on -street parking supply of 132 spaces. With the closure of the driveway along Main Street that will occur with the construction of the Project an additional 3 on -street parking spaces will be provided. [3] The expanded parking area consists of 73 additional parking spaces. Packet Pg. 59 1.f APPENDIX A EDGEWAY AND NEWHALL CROSSINGS PARKING COUNTS LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers N:1,4800A2244807 - Newhall Mixed -Use Project, Santa ClaritavRepow,4807 Packet Pg. 60 1.f Bellflower Edgeway Bellflower 9735 Oak Street, Bellflower, CA 90706 Friday, November 8th , 2024 Supply Demand Garage Regular 110 88 Handicap 3 2 Electric Vehicle 16 12 Subtotal 129 102 Total Occupancy 129 102 Total Percent 79% Supply Demand Guests Handicap 1 1 Guest [a] 8 Leasing / Guest 3 3 Subtotal -- 1 12 Total Occupancy I -- 1 12 Notes [a] Parking supply consists of guest parking provided in alleyway to the west of the building and on -street parking to the north and south of the building. Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 Packet Pg. 61 1.f Santa Clarita Newhall Crossings 22551 9th Street, Santa Clarita, CA 91321 Friday, November 8th , 2024 Supply Demand Garage Regular 97 48 Handicap 2 0 Subtotal 99 48 Total Occupancy 99 48 Total Percent 48% Supply Demand Guests Street Parking [a] 9 Subtotal -- 9 Total Occupancy I -- 1 9 [a] Parking supply consists of spaces in the public portion of the parking structure and on -street parking along Main Street, 9th Street, and Railroad Avenue. Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951-268-6268 Packet Pg. 62 v 0 X, m am w Attachment: Parking Demand Study (MODIFICATION TO THE HARTWELL MIXED USE PROJECT (MASTER CASE 25-089)) 1.f Santa Clarita Parking Study Thursday 4/25/2024 Prepared by AimTD LLC cs aimtd.com 2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 713 713 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Tota Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 4 4 3 4 0 0 1 0 5 0 9 0 1 2 9 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 53 10:00 AM 6 3 5 3 4 0 0 1 1 6 0 8 0 1 2 8 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 58 11:00 AM 7 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 4 2 1 7 1 1 3 9 0 0 5 2 4 0 0 2 58 12:00 PM 7 3 4 0 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 7 2 8 1 0 0 68 1:00 PM 6 3 4 1 4 0 2 0 5 9 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 0 6 2 12 1 0 1 81 2:00 PM 6 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 4 4 0 8 0 1 5 12 0 0 7 2 8 0 1 0 69 3:00 PM 4 3 2 2 2 0 1 0 2 4 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 5 0 1 1 62 4:00 PM 7 3 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 5 1 9 1 1 4 12 0 0 5 1 7 0 1 1 68 5:00 PM 6 3 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 7 1 8 1 1 3 12 0 1 6 3 12 0 3 2 75 6:00 PM 7 2 1 1 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 0 1 2 12 0 1 7 2 12 1 0 3 85 7:00 PM 6 4 1 2 5 0 3 0 6 10 1 10 0 1 3 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 1 5 92 8:00 PM 7 4 1 2 5 0 2 0 7 11 1 7 1 1 5 11 0 1 6 3 11 1 2 5 94 9:00 PM 7 4 0 1 3 0 2 0 2 8 0 6 0 1 5 8 0 0 5 3 10 1 0 2 68 Inventory 8 4 6 3 5 9 6 8 11 1 9 1 3 5 12 2 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parking 1 0 1 0 0 8 3 -1 1 0 0 -1 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 5 38 F— U LU 7 O W (L LU cn LU X J J LU Q W 2 H O H Z O F- a U 0 O 5. V) c t4 E d 0 a� c L (u CL d E (u a Packet Pg. 64 1.f Santa Clarita Parking Study Saturday 4/27/2024 Prepared by AimTD LLC cs aimtd.com 2A 2B 4 6A 6B 8 10A 10A 10B 713 713 3B 3B 1A 1B 3A 3A 3A 5A 5B 7A 7A 9A 9B Tota Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Reg Yellow Reg Reg Disabled Reg Disabled Reg Reg Reg Moto Disabled Reg Reg Reg Disabled Reg Reg 9:00 AM 7 3 3 3 5 2 2 1 2 11 0 9 0 2 2 12 0 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 77 10:00 AM 7 3 4 3 5 0 3 1 3 11 0 8 0 3 4 12 0 1 5 2 10 0 0 0 85 11:00 AM 7 4 4 3 5 0 3 0 4 11 1 9 1 2 4 12 0 1 4 2 9 0 0 0 86 12:00 PM 6 4 2 1 5 1 2 0 7 10 0 9 0 1 4 12 0 1 5 3 12 1 0 1 87 1:00 PM 5 3 1 2 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 1 2 5 91 2:00 PM 7 4 2 2 5 0 4 0 6 11 0 9 0 1 3 12 0 1 5 2 12 0 3 7 96 3:00 PM 8 4 1 1 5 0 4 0 7 11 0 8 0 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 1 7 95 4:00 PM 7 4 0 1 5 0 5 0 7 10 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 5 2 11 0 4 6 95 5:00 PM 7 3 1 3 5 1 4 0 7 11 1 8 1 1 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 0 3 6 99 6:00 PM 7 4 1 2 5 2 4 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 1 0 6 2 12 1 3 7 103 7:00 PM 6 3 0 0 5 5 5 0 7 11 1 9 0 2 4 12 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 8 104 8:00 PM 6 4 1 1 5 7 5 0 7 11 1 9 1 2 4 11 0 1 6 2 12 1 4 10 111 9:00 PM 6 4 0 1 5 5 4 0 7 9 0 8 0 1 4 10 0 0 6 2 11 1 3 8 95 Inventory 8 4 6 3 5 9 6 8 11 1 9 1 3 5 12 2 1 8 3 12 1 4 10 132 Available Parking 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 21 F— U LU 7 O W (L LU cn LU X J J LU Q W 2 H O H Z O F- a U 0 O 5. U) c t4 E d 0 a� c L (u CL d E (u a Packet Pg. 65 N N N N v N N N N N N S 5 S> < oNN Ao xI0 S No Z S D 0� D .. N N s S s s N S m o` o s O O o Ep gm yy NN Dy D_N DS Ds ti R R R R R R R R R R tiR tiR tiR tiR tiR tiR tiR tiR tiR tiR tiR R v N A R v N R v N A R v N A R v N A R v N- x R v N x R v N R v N A R v N A R v N c N , V V V V U 9 A 9 v W A 9 0 9 W 9 0 9 W 9 m 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 A S. W� W N� A� A 9 (p V o 9 o 0 o 0 C n CD rt M a a) Attachment: Parking Demand Study (MODIFICATION TO THE HARTWELL MIXED USE PROJECT (MASTER CASE 25-089)) `T Attachment: Parking Demand Study (MODIFICATION TO THE HARTWELL MIXED USE PROJECT (MASTER CASE 25-089)) 1.f App.ndix C RESIDENTIAL (StWio) WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS (11 �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaaa®®®aaa®®®® �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaaa®®®aaa®®®® �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaa®®®®aaa®®®® �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaa®®®®aaa®®®® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�om00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmm®mmm®®®®mmmm�ammmmmmmmmmmmmmm®®mmmmm®®mmmmm mmmmm®mmm®®®®mmmm�om00000000000000®®mmmmm®®mmmmm mmmmm®mmm®®®®mmmm�om00000000000000®®mmmmm®®mmmmm �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmom00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm ®m®®®®®®®mm®®®®®mmammmmmmmmmmmmmmm®®®®®®®mm®®®®® Notes [1] P,:1IS. 1 1] an land lnafitnte "ehsaed Pv'king," Thiad Hditio1 2020_ [2] Parking mtea f.1111 el land naea based on City code_ [3] Percentage of peak peaking demand factoae reflect relationships between weekday peaking demand ak parking dem— gat- ae ennun—d in Table 2-2 of the "ehamd Peaking" . —I Packet Pg. 68 1.f App.ndix C RESIDENTIAL (StWio) WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS (11 �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaaa®®®aaa®®®® �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaaa®®®aaa®®®® �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaaa®®®aaa®®®® �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaa®®®®aaa®®®® �m®aaa®®®ease®®®m�om00000000000000aaa®®®®aaa®®®® �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�om00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm®®mmmmm �mm®®®mmmmm®®mmmm�om00000000000000®®mmmmm®®mmmmm �mm®®®mmmmm®®mmmm�om00000000000000®®mmmmm®®mmmmm �mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�om00000000000000mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Notes [1] P,:1IS. 1 1] an land lnafitnte "ehsaed Pv'king," Thiad Hditio1 2020_ [2] Parking mtea f.1111 el land naea based on City code_ [3] Percentage of peak peaking demand factoae reflect relationships between weekday peaking demand ak parking dem— gat- ae ennun—d in Table 2-2 of the "ehamd Peaking" . —I Packet Pg. 69 1.g NOTICE OF DETERMINATION a° asxtA �< � t4 [X] County Clerk [ ] State Clearinghouse County of Los Angeles 1400 Tenth Street 12400 E. Imperial Hwy., Rm. 1007 Sacramento, CA 95815-.., Norwalk, CA 90650 PROJECT Newhall Mixed -Use Project (Hartwell): Master Case 25-089 NAME: PROJECT 24300, 24308, 24316 and 24322 Main Street and 22505 Market Street (Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APNs) LOCATION: 2831-012-022 through -027) PROJECT The applicant is requesting a Minor Use Permit (MUP) and Development Review (DR) to modify the DESCRIPTION: Hartwell Mixed -Use Project (previously considered by the City Council on May 13, 2025) which consisted of the redevelopment of the Mac's Pool Supply, Horseshoe on Main (formerly Soundsations), and the historical Masonic Lodge/Courthouse buildings to construct a new five -story mixed -use building, consisting of 78 apartment units and 5,223 square feet of commercial floor area located at the three-way corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. This proposed revision expands the project site to include the adjacent property (KHTS Radio Station studio) and increases the project to 98 apartment units and 6,300 square feet of commercial floor area. A total of 158 parking stalls are proposed within one subterraneanand the first -floor levels. The height of the building remains at 52 feet. An MUP is required to modify a conditionally approved project involving a cumulative expansion of ten to fifty percent of the approved building area. The subject properties are located in the Arts & Entertainment zone of the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP). PROJECT Serrano Development Group APPLICANT: This is to advise that the City of Santa Clarita has made the following determinations regarding the project described above: 1) The project was approved by the [] Director of Community Development [ ] Planning Commission [X] Mayor and City Council on the following date: August 26, 2025. 2) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {a) ). 3) [ ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA (Section 15070 {b)). 4) [X] An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 5) [] An Addendum to the Final EIR was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 6) The project [ ] WILL [X] WILL NOT have a significant impact on the environment. 7) Mitigation measures [] WERE [X] WERE NOT made a condition of project approval. 8) A Statement of Overriding Considerations [ ] WAS [X] WAS NOT adopted for this project. This is to certify that the [ ] NEGATIVE DECLARATION [X] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT [ ] ADDENDUM with record of project approval is available for public review at: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, California 91355 (661) 255-4330 Contact Person/Title: Emily Rubalcava, Assistant Planner I Signature: Packet Pg. 70 EXHIBIT A MASTER CASE 24-134 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 24-007, MINOR USE PERMIT 24-015, ADJUSTMENT PERMIT 24-005, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 24-017, AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 24-012 FINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL In addition to all applicable provisions of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code (SCMC), the permittee agrees to comply with the following provisions as conditions for the City of Santa Clarita's (City) approval of Master Case 24-134. GENERAL CONDITIONS GCI. The approval of this project will expire if the approved use is not commenced within two years from the date of this approval, unless it is extended in accordance with the SCMC. GC2. To the extent the use approved with this project is a different use than previously approved for the property, the prior approval must be terminated along with any associated vested rights to such use, unless such prior approved use is still in operation, or is still within the initial pre -commencement approval period. Once commenced, any discontinuation of the use approved with this project for a continuous period of 60 calendar days or more must terminate the approval of this use along with any associated vested rights to such use. The use must not be re-established or resumed after the 60-day period. Discontinuation must include cessation of a use regardless of intent to resume. GC3. The permittee may file for an extension of the conditionally -approved project before the date of expiration. If such an extension is requested, it must be filed not later than 60 days before the date of expiration. GC4. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term "permittee" includes the permittee and any other persons, corporation, or other entity making use of this grant. The permittee must defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this project by the City, including any related environmental approvals. In the event the City becomes aware of any such claim, action, or proceeding, the City will promptly notify the permittee. If the City fails to notify the permittee or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee is not thereafter responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in this condition prohibits the City from participating in the defense of any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the following occur: 1) the City bears its own attorneys' fees and costs; and 2) the City defends the action in good faith. The permittee is not required to pay or perform any settlement unless the settlement is approved by the permittee. GCS. The permittee and property owner must comply with all inspection requirements as deemed necessary by the Community Development Director (Director). GC6. The project site must be developed and/or used in the manner requested and must be in substantial conformity with the plans date -stamped on file, unless revisions and/or additional conditions are specifically required herein. GC7. This approval runs with the land. All rights and obligations of this approval, including the responsibility to comply with the Conditions of Approval, are binding upon permittee's successors in interest. The Conditions of Approval may be modified, terminated, or abandoned in accordance with applicable law including, without limitation, the SCMC. GC8. Any proposed deviations from the Exhibits, Project Description, or Conditions of Approval must be submitted to the Director for review and approval. Any unapproved deviations from the project approval will constitute a violation of the permit approval. GC9. When Exhibits and/or written Conditions of Approval are in conflict, the written Conditions of Approval prevail. GC 10. The effectiveness of this project will be suspended for the time period that any Condition of Approval is appealed whether administratively or as part of a legal action filed in a court of competent jurisdiction. If any Condition of Approval is invalidated by a court of law, the project must be reviewed by the City and substitute conditions may be imposed. GC 11. The permittee is responsible for ascertaining and paying all City fees as required by the SCMC. This condition serves as notice, pursuant to Government Code § 66020(d) that the City is imposing development impact fees (DIFs) upon the project in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code § 66000, et seq.) and the SCMC. The permittee is informed that it may protest DIFs in accordance with Government Code § 66020. GC 12. The permittee must sign these Conditions of Approval, to acknowledge acceptance, within 30 days from the date of approval by the City Council. GC 13. The City will only issue permits for the development when the construction documents (e.g., building plans) substantially comply with the approved plans. Substantial conformity is determined by the Director. GC14. This decision is not effective until permittee acknowledges acceptance of all project conditions and any appeal period has lapsed, or a waiver of right to appeal is filed or if there is an appeal, until a final decision has been made on the appeal. By use of the entitlements granted by a development application, the permittee acknowledges agreement with the Conditions of Approval. GC 15. Anything which is not shown on the application/plans, or which is not specifically approved, or which is not in compliance with this section, is not approved. Any application and/or plans which are defective as to, without limitation, omission, dimensions, scale, use, colors, materials, encroachments, easements, etc., will render any entitlements granted by this approval null and void. Construction must cease until all requirements of this approval are complied with. Development entitlements may be withheld until violations of the SCMC are abated. GC 16. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy until the permittee complies with all project conditions. GC 17. Permittee must reimburse the City for all attorneys' fees expended by the City that are directly related to the processing of this project. The City will not issue a Final Certificate of Occupancy or other final occupancy approval until all attorneys' fees are paid by the permittee. CITY COUNCIL CCL Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit for the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, the permittee must provide the current tenant of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse with thirty days to remove any desired interior finish carpentry, including but not limited to wood paneling, windows, and flooring. Additionally, the permittee must assist with the removal, loading and/or transportation of the building's trusses. CC2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must revise the architectural elevation to include raised planters along the frontage at Railroad Avenue for additional protection from vehicular traffic. PLANNING COMMISSION PCI. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee agrees to develop a parking management plan in a form approved by the Director for both construction and permanent parking. PC2. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must provide a plan for the Director's approval to ensure structural integrity of immediately adjacent structures during construction. PLANNING DIVISION PL1. The permittee is granted approval to construct the Newhall Mixed -Use Project, including a five -story mixed use building located on the corner of Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue. The project includes 5,223 square feet of first -floor commercial space, 78 residential units on floors two through five, and subterranean and first floor garaged parking consistent with the approved plans on file for Master Case 24-134. PL2. The construction of the project must be consistent with the approved plans, elevations, colors, materials, and other elements on file with the Planning Division. Any modification to the approved project and plans is subject to further review and approval of the Director. PL3. The building is approved at the heights shown on the approved elevations and cannot exceed 55 feet in height. Architectural enhancements extending above the roofline are permitted only as shown on the approved plans and may not exceed an additional 12 feet in height. PL4. The permittee is providing less parking than required by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan (OTNSP) pursuant to Government Code § 65863.2. To address the potential for a substantially negative impact to residential and commercial parking within one-half mile of the project site, the permittee must provide a minimum of 122 parking stalls on -site (1.56 stalls per unit residential parking ratio). Tandem stalls are permitted as shown on the approved site plan. Guest parking is satisfied with 20 public on -street stalls (0.25 stalls per unit guest parking ratio). PL5. In lieu of constructing 12 parking stalls for the commercial portion of the project, the permittee is required to pay $70,261.20 ($5,855.10 per required parking stall) into the OTNSP Parking In -Lieu Fee Program before the Building Official issues any building permit. This fee is subject to revision and the applicant will be responsible for the fee in place at the time the fee is paid PL6. Before any permit is issued including, without limitation, a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, the permittee must complete all required recordation of the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building, as required by the OTNSP FEIR MM-CUL-I and the permittee's commitments to preserving the building's history as approved by the City Council. PL7. Before the Building Official issues a demolition permit, the permittee must contribute $300,000 to the City for future public parking at the south end of Main Street as contemplated by the Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. PL8. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install a commemorative plaque on the building exterior and provide an art installation within the lobby to commemorate the Masonic Lodge/Courthouse building. PL9. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must obtain a Temporary Use Permit and install two murals on the North Elevation as shown on the approved plans on file with the Planning Division. PL10. The uses in the commercial building are subject to the permitted use chart for the AE zone of the OTNSP. PL11. All roof -mounted and ground -mounted equipment must be screened from public view. PL12. No signage is approved by this permit. All future signage requires a sign permit application in accordance with the OTNSP. Exposed neon is not permitted. Landscaping Conditions LR1. Before the City Engineer issues grading permit(s), the permittee must provide final landscape, lighting and irrigation plans (Landscape Document Package) for the Director's review and approval. The Landscape Document Package must be prepared by a California -registered landscape architect and must be designed with the plant palette suitable for Santa Clarita (Sunset Western Garden Book Zone 18, minimum winter night temperatures typically 20' to 30' F; maximum summer high temperatures typically 105' F to 110' F). The Landscape Document Package must meet the design criteria of the State Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance as well as all other SCMC requirements. LR2. The permittee is required to pay all associated fees to the City before the release of the approved Landscape Document Package for the project. LR3. The permittee must coordinate with the Director of Administrative Services regarding any landscaping installed on City right-of-way. The Director of Administrative Services must review the landscape and irrigation plans when submitted, and all such landscaping must be approved by the Director of Administrative Services before installation. The permittee must receive final approval for the installed landscape before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy. LR4. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must install all proposed irrigation and landscaping, including irrigation controllers, staking, mulching, etc., to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director may impose inspection fees for more than one landscape installation inspection. LR5. Before the Building Official issues a final Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must submit to the Director a letter from the project landscape architect certifying that all landscape materials and irrigation were installed and function according to the approved Landscape Document Package. ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION General Requirements EN1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must provide an approval letter from Southern California Edison (Distribution Division and/or Transmission Division, as appropriate) and from all other affected utilities for the proposed grading and improvements adjacent to their existing facilities, as required by the City Engineer. EN2. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, all new and existing power lines and overhead cables less than 34 KV within or fronting the project site must be installed underground by the permittee. Certificate of Compliance Requirements EN3. Before the Building Official issues any building permit, a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment encompassing all parcels within the boundaries of this project prepared by or under the direction of a person licensed to practice land surveying in the State of California must be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder; in compliance with applicable law Grading and Geology Requirements EN4. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit a grading plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. The grading plan must be based on a detailed engineering geotechnical report specifically approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer that addresses all submitted recommendations, including seismic hazards associated with liquefaction. ENS. Before the Building Official issues building permit, the permittee must construct all grading and drainage facilities within the project site, obtain rough grade certifications, and a compaction report approved by the City Engineer, or designee. EN6. This project anticipates export of 18,972 CY of dirt. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit for this project, the permittee must submit a copy of the grading permit for the receiving site and an exhibit of the proposed haul route. The permittee is responsible to obtain approval from all applicable agencies for the dirt hauling operation. A. The permittee must comply with the following requirements for the dirt hauling operation: i. Obtain an encroachment permit for the work. ii. The hours of operation must be between 8:30 am to 3:30 pm. iii. Provide non-stop street sweeping service on all City streets along the haul route during all hours of work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. iv. Provide traffic control and flagging personnel along the haul route to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. B. The permittee must pay a Haul Route Pavement Repair Security Cash Deposit (Deposit) of $75,000, which may be increased or decreased based upon an estimated cost to complete the repairs of streets damaged during the dirt hauling operation. The limits and scope of the repairs is determined by the City Engineer. To receive a refund of the Deposit, the permittee or subsequent property owners must complete the pavement repairs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer within one year from the completion of the dirt hauling operation. If the pavement repairs are not completed within one year, the City may use the Deposit to complete the repairs. Any funds remaining at the completion of the repairs will be refunded to the permittee. If the Deposit is insufficient to complete the repairs, the City will seek additional funds from the permittee. C. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any pavement damaged by the dirt hauling operation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The limits of the road repairs must be consistent with the approved haul route. EN7. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must obtain and submit to Engineering Services Division a notarized Letter of Permission for review and approval for grading over easements/outside of the property lines from the affected easement holder/adjacent property owner(s). DrainageRequirements Reuirements EN8. Before the City Engineer, or designee issues a grading permit, the permittee must have the site drainage study approved by the City Engineer demonstrating that post- development flows from the site will not be increased from pre -development flows, or mitigate for the increase. Water Quality Requirements EN9. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit to Engineering Services Division for review and approval an Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan. Street Light Relocation Requirements EN10. Before street plan approval, the permittee must submit a revised Street Light Plan to the City Engineer or designee for review and approval. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must relocate the existing street light along Railroad Avenue per the approved revised plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street Improvement Requirements EN11. Before the revised street plan approval and any construction within public street right-of- way, the permittee must submit to the City Engineer or designee a revised street improvement plan for review and approval to obtain encroachment permits from the City Engineer, or designee. EN12. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee is required to dedicate a portion of its property to City for public right-of-way to meet the requirements of SCMC Section 17.55, creating a clear sight triangle ensuring unobstructed views for drivers. Permittee may, but is not required to, reserve property rights to include all projections, such as awnings, within the airspace of the dedicated public right-of-way. Such reservation must be approved as to form by the City Attorney. EN13. Before the revised street plan approval, the permittee must submit a street tree location plan to the Urban Forestry Administrator for review and approval. The plan must include proposed sewer lateral locations, storm drain infrastructure, and trees must not conflict with the proposed infrastructure. EN14. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an Americans with Disability Act (ADA) compliant Curb Ramp (per the Standard Plans for Public Works Construction (SPPWC), Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) along the property frontage corner at the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street and dedicate necessary easement to the City, as directed by the City Engineer. EN15. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct an ADA compliance Curb Ramp (per SPPWC Standard Plan 111-5, CASE A, Type 1) at all three other corners of the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street per the State of California DOT Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 82-06 and as directed by the City Engineer. Railroad Avenue is designated as a State Route and any modification at the intersection, requires existing nonstandard curb ramps to be reconstructed to current standards per DIB 82-06. EN16. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must dedicate sidewalk easements sufficient to encompass ADA requirements for sidewalks installed with drive approaches per the current SPPWC Standard Plan 110-2, Type C, or equivalent. EN17. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must replace the abandoned driveway(s) with standard curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement in accordance with SPPWC standards and in compliance with OTNSP, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. A revised street plan and encroachment permit is required. EN18. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must repair any broken or damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk, and refurbish the half section of pavement on streets abutting the project, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Sewer Improvement Requirements EN19. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the proposed building(s) lateral line(s) must connect to the existing public sewer main in Market Street (8" sewer per PC CI2520), and the permittee must coordinate with the Building & Safety Division regarding payment of additional annexation fees, if required, to annex the property into the County Sanitation District. EN20. The on -site sewer is a privately maintained. Before grading plan approval, the permittee must submit an "on -site sewer plan." The "on -site sewer plan" are designed per the California Plumbing Code and approved by the Building Official before Grading Plan approval. EN21. Before the Building Official issues Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must construct all sewer upgrades per the approved sewer area study, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. EN22. The permittee must also obtain a permit from LA County Building Official to install a new saddle on the existing public sewer by LA County Sewer Maintenance Division, if the wye does not exist on the existing public sewer. Bond, Fees and Miscellaneous Requirements EN23. Before City Engineer, or designee issue encroachment permits for public improvements (Street), the permittee, by agreement with the City Engineer, must guarantee installation of the improvements through faithful performance bonds, letters of credit or any other acceptable means in a form approved by the City Attorney. Certificate of Occupancy/Occupancies are withheld if the improvements are not completed. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TEL Before the City Engineer issues street plan approval, the permittee must show on the street plan drive approaches using a modified commercial driveway design (APWA 110- 2, Type C or equivalent) that will provide a street/drive approach transition with a maximum algebraic grade difference of 10%. Construction details will be shown on the street plan providing a transition no greater than this maximum. TE2. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must modify the intersection of Railroad Avenue and Market Street to eliminate the curb bulb - out on the southbound (Railroad Avenue) approach. TE3. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee must restripe Market Street per the attached exhibit (Striping Exhibit — Market Street) to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. TE4. Before the Building Official issues the first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee will pay the applicable Bridge and Thoroughfare (B&T) District Fee to implement the Circulation Element of the General Plan as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this project. This project is located in the Via Princessa B&T District. The current rate for this District is $22,710. The B&T rate is subject to change and is based on the rate at the time of payment. Standard B&T Fee Calculation: Apartments = the number of units (78) x the district rate ($22,710) x 0.7 = $1,239,966 B&T District fees for non-residential uses on an under-utilized parcel that does not include a land division must be calculated as follows: Retail Commercial = 5,223 sf x $22,710 x 5 = $36,306 16,335 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT FD 1. All fire lanes must be clear of all encroachments and must be maintained in accordance with Section 503 of County of Los Angeles Fire Code, Title 32, as adopted by the SCMC, which requires all weather access. All weather access may require paving. FD2. Main Street, Market Street & Railroad Avenue serve as the Fire Apparatus Access roads for this project. For buildings where the vertical distance between the access roadway and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet from the lowest level of the Fire Apparatus Access Road, provide a minimum unobstructed width of 28 feet, exclusive of shoulders and an unobstructed vertical clearance "clear to sky" Fire Apparatus Access Roads to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. At least one required access route meeting this condition must be located such that the edge of the Fire Apparatus Access Roadway, not including shoulders, that is closest to the building being served, is between 10 feet and 30 feet from the building, as determined by the fire code official, and must be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. The side of the building on which the Fire Apparatus Access Road is positioned must be approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.1.1; 503.2.1.2; 503.2.1.2.2 & 503.2.1.2.2.1). FD3. The dimensions of the approved Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be maintained as originally approved by the fire code official (Fire Code 503.2.2.1). FD4. Fire Apparatus Access Roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed load of fire apparatus weighing 75,000 pounds and must be surfaced to provide all- weather driving capabilities (Fire Code 503.2.3). FD5. A minimum 5-foot-wide approved firefighter access walkway leading from the Fire Department Access Road to all required openings in the building's exterior walls must be provided for firefighting and rescue purposes (Fire Code 504.1). FD6. Security barriers, visual screen barriers or other obstructions must not be installed on the roof of any building in such a manner as to obstruct firefighter access or egress in the event of fire or other emergency. Parapets must not exceed 42 inches from the top of the parapet to the roof surface on more than two sides. These sides should face an access roadway or yard sufficient to accommodate ladder operations (Fire Code 504.5). FD7. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD8. The required fire flow for the public fire hydrants for this project is 3500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for 3 hours. Three public fire hydrants flowing simultaneously may be used to achieve the required fire flow (Fire Code 507.3 & Appendix B). FD9. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system is required for the proposed buildings within this development. Submit design plans to the Fire Department Sprinkler Plan Check Unit for review and approval before installation. FD10. Install 1 public fire hydrant as noted by the Fire Department. All required public fire hydrants must be installed, tested and accepted before beginning construction. All fire hydrants must measure 6"x 4"x 2-1/2" brass or bronze, conforming to current AWWA standard C503 or approved equal, and must be installed in accordance with the County of Los Angeles Fire Code, as adopted by the SCMC (Fire Code 501.4). FD11. A digital copy of the Water Plans for the required public fire hydrant must be submitted to the Fire Department's Land Development Unit for review and approval. Compliance is required before project construction. Submittal must be provided through EPIC -LA using the following Plan Type: Fire Land Development —Water Plan & System Review. BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION Plans and Permits BSI. Construction drawings must be prepared and submitted to the Building & Safety Division for plan review and building permit issuance. Supporting documents; such as structural and energy calculations, and geotechnical reports must be included with the plan submittal. BS2. The submitted site plan must show all parcel/lot lines, easements, fire separation distances, restricted use areas, etc. Any construction proposed in an easement must obtain the easement owner's written permission or the easement must be removed. Parcel lines that overlap any proposed buildings must be removed (lot line adjustment) before the Building Official issues a building permit. BS3. Construction drawings must incorporate mitigation measures identified by a noise study prepared by a qualified noise engineer. Electric Vehicle Parking Spaces for the residential portion of the project per CalGreen BS4. EV Ready parking spaces with receptacles for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with low power Level 2 EV charging receptacles at the rate of 40% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. For the receptacle power source and configuration see CalGreen 4.106.4.2.2. BSS. Additionally, EV Ready parking spaces with EV chargers for the multi -family portion of the project must be equipped with Level 2 EV chargers at the rate of 10% of the total number of parking spaces provided for the residential use. At least 50% of these EV chargers must be equipped with J1772 connectors. Accessibility for the residential portion of the project BS6. All applicable disabled access requirements of California Building Standards Code (CBSC) Chapter I IA, as adopted by the SCMC, must be shown on the architectural plans versus civil plans. BS7. If the project receives any public funds such as tax credits, incentives or similar programs the multi -family project must comply with the public housing requirements of the California Building Code, Chapter I IB. Soil Reports and Grading BS8. A complete soils and geology investigation report will be required for this project. The report must be formally submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. The recommendations of the report must be followed and incorporated into the plans for the proj ect. Hazard Zones BS9. Indicate on the cover sheet of the plans this project IS NOT LOCATED in a Fire Hazard Zone, IS NOT LOCATED in the Flood Hazard Zone, and IS NOT LOCATED in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Additional Information BS10. Separate Demolition Permit will be required to raze any building to be removed on the site. Clearances from the City Planning Division, City Environmental Services (for construction demolition deposit) and AQMD will be required before the Building Official issues a demolition permit. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION ESI. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must demonstrate appropriate, detailed safety measures for resident access to organics bins as well as to bins with chute connections. ES2. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide confirmation to utilize "push -out" service provided by the waste hauler, to avoid the need for a bin staging area along Market Street. ES3. At plan check and before a building permit is issued, the permittee must provide elevations and/or site plans for the chute system that identify the correct location and placement of both chutes and corresponding bins within the trash rooms. ES4. Before a building, demolition, or grading permit is issued, the permittee must submit a Construction and Demolition Materials Management Plan (CDMMP) and receive approval from the Environmental Services Manager or Designee if the project meets the parameters below (S.C.M.C.§15.46.300): A. All demolition projects (regardless of valuation), all commercial projects of new construction or additions over 1,000 square feet and all tenant improvements, alterations or new construction valued greater than $200,000, all new residential construction projects and all residential additions and improvements that increase building area, volume, or size must comply with the City's Construction and Demolition Materials (C&D) Recycling Ordinance. S.C.M.C.§15.46.200 B. A minimum of 65% of the entire project's inert (dirt, rock, bricks, etc.) waste and 65% of the remaining C&D waste must be recycled or reused rather than disposing in a landfill. S.C.M.C.§15.46.610 and CALGreen sections 4.408, 5.408, 301.1.1 and 301.3 C. For renovation or tenant improvement projects and new construction projects, a deposit of 2% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. For demolition projects, a deposit of 10% of the estimated total project cost or $15,000, whichever is less, is required. The full deposit will be returned to the permittee upon proving that 65% of the inert and remaining C&D waste was recycled or reused. S.C.M.C.§15.46.400 ES5. All projects within the City that are not self -hauling waste materials must use one of the City's franchised haulers for temporary and roll -off bin collection services. S.C.M.C.§15.44.220 PARKS AND RECREATION DIVISION PRI. Before the Building Official issues a building permit, the permittee must pay the required Park Dedication Fee equal to the value of the amount of land established per the City's General Plan, "Parks and Recreation Element." The permittee may be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the fair market value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. Final Parkland dedication obligation calculation to be based on current density per dwelling and fair market value rates at time of payment. An estimate is attached. TECHNOLOGY SERVICES DIVISION TS1. Before the City Engineer, or designee, issues a Grading Permit, the permittee must demonstrate compliance with SCMC Section 17.51.007 (Connected City Infrastructure Program) requiring conduit from a location to be determined in the public right-of-way to the Minimum Point of Entry (MPOE) or similar location within the project area that serves as the main telecommunications closet. Conduit for this condition must be reflected on development plans. TRANSIT DIVISION TRI. The current Transit Impact Fee is $216 per residential unit. Permittee must pay the fee in place at the time of building permit issuance. SPECIAL DISTRICTS SD 1. This permittee is required to protect and preserve in place all existing Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) landscape located within the public right of way along Main Street and Market Street. For this project, landscape includes without limitation, trees, shrubs, irrigation, lighting, electrical outlets, pilasters with Trex / wood cross rails, decking, brick pavers, brick planters, raised planters, wrought iron, potted plants on city irrigation, and any other amenity items located within the existing landscape planters and walkways. SD2. This project is located within the Downtown Newhall Corridor and Old Town Newhall Specific Plan. As a result, all required landscape improvements must be consistent with the Old Town Newhall Specific Plans and design guidelines. SD3. Before the Building Official issues first Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to install full landscape improvements along Main Street where the current drive approach to Mac's Pool supply is located. These improvements must close the gap, and connect the two existing planters located on opposite sides of the drive approach. The current preliminary plan is showing a Schinus molle "California pepper" tree as a proposed tree in this area. Schinus molle is not an approved tree and must be replaced with an approved species. SD4. New landscape includes without limitation: connecting to and extending the brick pavers (walkway), existing planters, irrigation, and the installation of new planters consisting of trees shrubs, lighting and other landscape features similar to those in the existing planters. SD5. Before the City Engineer issues a grading permit, the permittee must submit final landscape plans prepared by a licensed landscape architect and receive approval by LMD. SD6. Existing parkway trees and landscape along Main Street, Market Street, and Railroad Avenue are required to be protected and preserved in place. This may include having to install approved temporary protective fencing around the edge of the planters to protect trees, shrubs, irrigation and other landscape amenities located within the planter during construction. SD7. Unless waived by the Director of Administrative Services, the planter located at the back edge of the sidewalk shared by both Mac's Pool Supply and the adjacent KHTS building must be protected and preserved in place. If this planter cannot be protected in place, the permittee will be required to repair and / or replace this planter to the satisfaction of the Director of Administrative Services. SD8. Full parkway landscape improvements will be required along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. These landscape improvements must be consistent with the improvements currently along Railroad Avenue and 5th Street fronting the Hotel Lexen. This includes installing amenities such as bollard / hitching post, and protected electrical outlets. SD9. If at any time during the project, the irrigation to any existing landscape is turned off, the permittee and their contractors will be responsible to provide supplemental irrigation / water to all trees and shrubs throughout the duration of the project by any means necessary at no cost to the City. Trees and shrubs which die, or decline to a condition unacceptable by Director of Administrative Services, must be replaced by the permittee at no cost to the City. SD10. The permittee is responsible for replacing any missing landscape shrubs in the planters fronting the project site. SDI 1. The permittee is responsible for replacing or repairing any damaged or missing pavers or decking located within the public right-of-way fronting the project on both Main Street and Market Street. SD12. The permittee is required to show all existing landscape which fronts the project on Main Street to scale on all future sets of site plans including, without limitation; demolition, grading, construction and landscape plans (preliminary and final). SD13. At no time is any construction material, equipment or vehicles permitted to be stored or placed within a landscape planter where trees and shrubs exist. At no time is any form of hazardous material including runoff water from washing and cleaning of tools and equipment be permitted to enter any existing or proposed landscape planter. SD 14. The permittee is advised that parkway trees are maintained by the City's LMD. At no time will any parkway tree be pruned for sign visibility. This information must be included with all paperwork for all future tenants. SD15. Any impacts to root system of an existing City maintained tree must be approved by the City Arborist. Work completed within the "Tree Protected Zone" (TPZ) must be completed by hand in the presence of a qualified consulting arborist with documented experience with monitoring trees during construction. The permittee will be required to retain the services of a qualified consulting arborist to perform all required monitoring. This will be completed at no cost to the City of Santa Clarita. Landscape Maintenance Districts SD16. These parcels are located within LMD Zone 28, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscapes located in the Newhall area. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to LMD Zone 28 in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. SD17. These parcels are located within LMD Areawide Zone 2008-1, which was established to fund the construction and maintenance of landscaped medians on major thoroughfares located throughout the City of Santa Clarita. Before the Building Official issues a Certificate of Occupancy, the permittee is required to financially contribute to the Areawide Zone in a manner reflective of this zone's assessment methodology. Streetlight Maintenance District SD18. These parcels were originally annexed by County of Los Angeles into a Lighting District with a maximum assessment of $12.38 per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Unit) without a cost of living index/escalator. The permittee will be required to annex all parcels into the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (SCLLD), Street -lighting Zone B. The District funds the operation and maintenance of various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District. SDI 9. As part of any required street improvements, the permittee may be required to add, relocate, or update streetlights along both Railroad Avenue and Market Street. All streetlights and their locations must be reviewed and approved by the City of Santa Clarita Streetlight Maintenance District (SMD). City of Santa Clarita Park Dedication Fee Requirement Project Description: Old Town Newhall Mixed -Use Tract/MC#: 24-134 Housing Density/ Units Dwelling 5 Acres " FMV Per 1000 Sub Total 20% Off Site Improvements In Lieu Fee 78 2.870 0.005 $880.000 1 $984,984 5196,997 $1.181,981 Total Density 224 Total Acres due 1.11930 30% Max. Park Credit 0.33579 With Park Credit 0.78351 $689,489 $137,898 $827,387 TOTAL FEES DUE WITH 30% CREDIT= $827,387 TOTAL FEES DUE WITHOUT CREDIT= $1,181,981 Potential Private Park Total Total Max. Credit Estimate Reviewed by: Katie Knybel Credit Sip. FT. Acres 30% $354,694 14.0 0 33579 0.33579 1 Date_ W6I2025 "The applicant will be required to provide a certified MAI real estate appraisal to establish the Fair Market Value (FMV) of an acre of land within this project. vlethod of calculation per the City of Santa Clanta General Plan -Parks and Recreation Element DU X Population x 5 acres per X •'FMV = Subtotal K 1.2 = In Lieu Fee per DU 106C people Buildable acre au[:cczaawJ.rp'sigrt�ittaa�faGeui9�-3�ma]fie6.vui WE �8aJIS 19Wh - 1191H d IdIIJ1 Please complete & return to: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA Planning Division ' 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 302 Santa Clarita, CA 91355 '•.. �,. TM ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) Master Case 24-134 I, the undersigned state: I am aware of and accept all the conditions of approval for as stated in Permit Numbers Conditional Use Permit 24-007, Minor Use Permit 24-015, Adjustment Permit 24-005, Architectural Design Review 24-017, and Development Review 24-012 dated May 13, 2025. I am the (applicant/owner) (applicant) of the real property described in the above -numbered case. Executed this day of J I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Applicant/Owner: Name Address City, State Signature Applicant: Name 7a('c)y\ Address -4) H mckv � Inc' (A City, State V( Nl� Signature Signature(s) must be acknowledged by a notary public. ki ACKNOWLEDGEMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California Countyof L-0�_ .Q,Y,GUF� . On M ,y 7A before (here insert name and title of the officer) me, personally 1 appeared J0�,�'-c(,> Toi'k'G-i01 who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s} whose name(s) is/are. subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shr%hey executed the same in his/horlxheir authorized capacity4a&), and that by his/her heir signature(4 on the instrument the person(, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under the PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal <+ ",.ry. J05ELITO S. OR0ICO Signature C !may .✓ r�L ��, . F = COMM. # N26287 y / \ N $ NOTARY PUBLIC, COUNTY v L•JS ANGELS C©UN7Y S:\CD\!PLANNING DIVISTON\CURRENT\!2024\MC24-134 (ADJ, ADR, DR, CUP, MUP MARKET 3+c.rna�'* k1Y C�NM E%P GEC IO. �dP$ ` & MAIN MIXED-USF.)\10. APPROVAL\MC24-134 ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS.DOC