The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025-10-14 - AGENDA REPORTS - LMD ASMT INCREASE T44 T48 T62O Agenda Item: 1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA .` AGENDA REPORT PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY MANAGER APPROVAL: DATE: October 14, 2025 SUBJECT: SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ASSESSMENT INCREASE FOR ZONES T44 (BOUQUET CANYON), T48 (SHADOW HILLS), AND T62 (CANYON HEIGHTS) DEPARTMENT: Administrative Services PRESENTER: Andrew Adams RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing on the proposed assessment increases for the City of Santa Clarita Landscape Maintenance Districts, and open and tabulate the ballots. 2. Adopt a resolution declaring the results of the property owner protest ballot proceedings for the levy of increased assessments in Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights) within the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District. 3. If no majority protest exists, adopt a resolution for Zone T44 (Bouquet Canyon), confirming the Assessment Diagram and assessment for the zone, and authorizing the levy and collection of increased assessments, including annual consumer price index adjustments, effective Fiscal Year 2026-27. 4. If no majority protest exists, adopt a resolution for Zone T48 (Shadow Hills), confirming the Assessment Diagram and assessment for the zone, and authorizing the levy and collection of increased assessments, including annual consumer price index adjustments, effective Fiscal Year 2026-27. 5. If no majority protest exists, adopt a resolution for Zone T62 (Canyon Heights), confirming the Assessment Diagram and assessment for the zone, and authorizing the levy and collection of increased assessments, including annual consumer price index adjustments, effective Fiscal Year 2026-27. Page 1 Packet Pg. 11 O BACKGROUND The City of Santa Clarita (City) administers and manages 62 Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) zones covering over 2,300 acres of landscaped areas, including street medians, parkways, paseos, parks, monument signs, and more than 60,000 trees. These zones are funded through special assessments authorized under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. Assessment rates for LMD Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights) have remained static for over 25 years, primarily because these zones were established without annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustments in their assessment methodologies, and any increases now require property owner approval under Proposition 218. The County of Los Angeles transferred these zones to the City in Fiscal Year (FY) 2012-13. As a result of the original assessment structures, the City has been unable to automatically adjust rates to keep pace with rising costs for labor, water, equipment, and infrastructure maintenance. This funding limitation has constrained maintenance activities, including irrigation system repairs, tree trimming, upkeep of brush and plant life, and fire prevention measures in the non -irrigated areas of the zones. As shown in the following chart, there is an annual shortfall within each zone, with Zones T44 and T48 experiencing the greatest impact, as evidenced by their negative fund balances as of June 30, 2025. Without additional revenue, these shortfalls will continue, further limiting the City's ability to maintain service levels and invest in necessary infrastructure improvements. Zone Fund Balance Average Annual Shortfall (6/30/25) (Last 10 fiscal years) T44 - Bouquet Canyon $233,813 $23,300 T48 - Shadow Hills $385 449 $28,466 T62 - Canyon Heights* $128,832 1 ($7,233) 1 * Note: Zone T62, while maintaining a positive fund balance, is trending negative, as evidenced by the average annual shortfall. Over recent years, service levels have been reduced as a cost -containment measure, which has led to resident concerns about deteriorating landscaping, aging infrastructure, and inconsistent maintenance. The proposed assessment increases are necessary not only to restore service levels and address deferred maintenance, but also to prevent ongoing annual shortfalls, ensuring sustainable funding for the long-term upkeep and enhancement of landscaping improvements tailored to the unique needs of each zone. If approved, the updated assessment methodology for each zone will also incorporate an annual CPI adjustment, as reflected in the Engineer's Report, enabling rates to keep pace with rising costs over time. Outreach Efforts Beginning in March of this year, staff implemented a comprehensive outreach plan as outlined below to ensure property owners were informed and engaged: March: Citywide Press Release announced the initiative and the need for assessment increases. Page 2 Packet Pg. 12 O • April: Brochures mailed to property owners, explaining the rationale and inviting participation in outreach sessions. • April -June: Outreach sessions held, five sessions in total (three in -person, two virtual) addressing questions and providing detailed information. • June: Doorhangers disseminated to each property, encouraging participation in outreach sessions and sharing information. • June -July: Door-to-door outreach conducted two weeks prior to ballot mailing and one week after ballot mailing to facilitate discussions with property owners. Through these efforts, nearly 50 property owners from the three zones participated in the outreach meetings, raising concerns about the lack of maintenance in their communities, highlighting issues such as deteriorating landscaping and aging infrastructure. Some noted that the City should have addressed these deficiencies earlier. Feedback received also reflected a general understanding and support for an increased assessment, though many expressed dissatisfaction with current service levels and reluctance to approve significant increases. Additional concerns included the methodology used to calculate assessments, the potential discontinuation or further reduction of City maintenance in the event of a failed ballot measure, and a strong interest in sharing information with neighbors. Staff also received multiple phone calls over the past few months from residents with questions about the assessment increases, as well as numerous questions following the distribution of the ballot. Staff addressed these concerns through direct follow-up, outreach sessions, and the distribution of informational materials. In general, there was overall support for an assessment increase to address both current and future maintenance needs in each zone. Proposed Increases Below is a summary of the proposed assessment increases by zone: Zone Parcels Current Proposed Rate Rate Increase Annual Revenue Increase 302 $300 $ 600 $300 $ 90,600 T44 - Bouquet Canyon 105 $455 $1,125 T48 - Shadow Hills $670 $ 70,350 214 $600 $ 875 T62 - Canyon Heights - $275 $ 58,850 Residential T62 - Canyon Heights - 1 $600 $ 875 $275 $ 4,910 Commercial Total 622 - - - $224,710 *Note: The commercial parcel in Zone T62 (1.764 acres, APN 3244-119-054) is assessed at 3.57 Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) per acre (6.2974 EBUs total), proportionate to special benefits conferred, as detailed in the Engineer's Report. These increases will directly improve the care and safety of the landscaped slopes and trees behind and adjacent to homes in each zone. Funding would allow for increased landscaping manpower; timely response to resident requests; and replacement or repair of aging irrigation systems, pumps, enclosures, V-ditches, backflow devices, and related infrastructure. The increases would also strengthen fire prevention through brush clearance on non -irrigated slopes Page 3 Packet Pg. 13 O and improve tree care, including trimming and health monitoring. Together, these improvements would restore service levels, address deferred maintenance, and sustain the functional and aesthetic benefits, including slope stabilization, erosion control, wildfire risk reduction, and property buffering, that directly serve the assessed parcels in each zone. Special vs. General Benefit The proposed assessments have been calculated to reflect the special benefits conferred to each parcel within the zones, consistent with the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218. The Engineer's Report identifies and quantifies the improvements maintained within each zone, which include irrigated slope landscaping, trees, drought -tolerant plantings, turf areas, irrigation systems, walls and fencing, and non -irrigated areas designated for fire clearance. These improvements are typically located within public rights -of -way or landscape easements adjacent to private parcels and provide direct, measurable benefits to those parcels, including aesthetic enhancement, erosion control, slope stabilization, wildfire risk reduction, and property buffering. District funds are used solely for the maintenance and servicing of these improvements, including labor, water, electricity, materials, contracting services, and administration, ensuring that assessments are proportionate to the special benefits received by the assessed parcels and do not fund general public benefits. Legal Process 1. California's AB 2257, effective January 1, 2025, requires property owners to submit written objections to proposed assessment increases prior to the public hearing as a prerequisite for filing litigation challenging the rates. In compliance with this requirement, the City mailed ballots and informational sheets to property owners in Zones T44, T48, and T62 on July 31, 2025. The deadline for submitting written objections was September 15, 2025. The City received no timely written objection meeting the requirements of AB 2257. However, the City received one letter from a property owner expressing concerns regarding Zone T62, which is included as a reading file attachment for reference. 2. In accordance with Proposition 218 (Article XIII(D), Section 4 of the California Constitution), the City Council will provide property owners a final opportunity to submit written protests before the close of public testimony during this public hearing. The City Clerk, or designee, will tabulate the ballots received. A majority protest exists for any of the three Zones if the weighted value of ballots submitted in opposition to the proposed assessment for that Zone exceeds the value of ballots submitted in favor of the proposed assessment for that Zone. If a majority protest exists in any zone, the City Council may not approve the proposed assessment increases for that zone, and existing rates will remain in place, which will result in significant service reductions and lead the City to consider vacating the zone and transferring maintenance responsibilities to individual property owners. In such a case, staff would return to the City Council at a future date with a recommendation. If no majority protest exists in a zone, the City Council may adopt the attached resolution, ordering the levy of increased assessments for that zone, including an annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) adjustment, effective Fiscal Year 2026-27. Page 4 Packet Pg. 14 O ALTERNATIVE ACTION Other direction as determined by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT If ballots support the proposed assessment increases, Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights) will see increased revenues. These funds will ensure continued landscape maintenance and related services in these communities. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Declaring Results For All Zones Resolution - Zone T44 Resolution - Zone T48 Resolution - Zone T62 Zones T44 T48 T62 Aerial Maps Response to Resident in Zone 62 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Engineer's Report Zones T44 T48 T62 (available in the City Clerk's Reading File) Page 5 Packet Pg. 15 1.a RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER PROTEST BALLOT PROCEEDING CONDUCTED FOR THE LEVY OF INCREASED ASSESSMENTS RELATED TO LANDSCAPING ZONES T44 (BOUQUET CANYON), T48 (SHADOW HILLS), AND T62 (CANYON HEIGHTS) WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT COMMENCING IN FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 WHEREAS, on July 31, 2025, the City of Santa Clarita mailed a notice of public hearing (which included an assessment ballot) to each property owner within Landscaping Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights) (referred to collectively as Zones; and referred to individually as Zone, T44, T48, or T62) within the City of Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, consistent with the notice, and pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 being Part 2, Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Act), and the California Constitution Article XIII D (Constitution), the City Council duly held a public hearing to consider approval of (a) proposed increased assessments for the Zones, and (b) the proposed annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-27 for the improvements connected therewith; and WHEREAS, the annual levy of assessments, as presented to the affected property owners of record in this ballot proceeding, included and identified the initial maximum assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2026-27, the proportional assessment amount balloted for each benefiting property, as well as the annual inflationary adjustment applicable to future assessments and the total amount balloted for each Zone; and WHEREAS, these assessments as presented are intended to fund the special benefit costs and expenses related to the ongoing maintenance, operation, and servicing of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and dedicated landscape easements within various tracts and on individual parcels located throughout the City of Santa Clarita; and WHEREAS, as of the close of the public hearing held on October 14, 2025, the City Council directed the City Clerk to publicly unseal and tabulate all assessment ballots received from the landowner(s) of record within T44, T48, and T62, and thereafter the City Clerk determined that those landowner(s) did cast their ballots, weighted by the proportional financial obligation of each ballot, the results of which are illustrated below: Zone Total Ballots Cast Yes Total Yes % No Total No % T44 (Bouquet Canyon) T48 (Shadow Hills) T62 (Canyon Heights) Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 16 1.a NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The property owner protest ballot proceeding for the proposed increased assessments for the Zones were conducted pursuant to the provisions of California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 6, and Government Code Section 53753, with ballots presented to the affected property owner(s) for receipt by the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing on October 14, 2025, with each ballot weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. SECTION 3: The public unsealing, tabulation, and canvass of the property owner protest ballots was conducted by the City Clerk or their designee on October 14, 2025, and all timely, valid protest ballots received by the City of Santa Clarita from the affected property owners were counted, the results of which as shown herein and were presented to the City Council on this day. The City Council hereby confirms the dollar amounts of Total Ballots Cast, Yes Total, and No Total, as set forth in the recitals to this resolution. SECTION 4: The City Clerk is hereby directed to enter this resolution into the minutes of the City Council, which shall constitute the official declaration of the result of such property owner assessment protest proceeding for the Zones. SECTION 5: This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: MAYOR Page 2 of 3 2025. Packet Pg. 17 1.a STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25- was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following vote AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Page 3 of 3 CITY CLERK Packet Pg. 18 1.b RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO FOR LANDSCAPING ZONE T44 (BOUQUET CANYON) WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AND APPROVING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS COMMENCING IN FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Act, including Sections 22500 through 22679), on July 8, 2025, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita (City) adopted Resolution No. 25-44 (Resolution of Initiation) to initiate proceedings to levy proposed increased assessments for Landscaping Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights) (referred to collectively as T44, T48, and T62 or Zones; and referred to individually as Zone, T44, T48, or T62) within the City of Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Initiation also ordered the City's Assessment Engineer to prepare the report required by Streets and Highways Code Section 22622 for T44, T48, and T62 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (the Engineer's Report); and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, after fully considering the Engineer's Report, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-45 (Resolution of Intention) declaring its intention to levy and collect an increased assessment for T44, T48, and T62, preliminarily approving said Engineer's Report, calling for a property owner protest ballot proceeding for the proposed increased assessments related thereto in accordance with the relevant provisions of "Proposition 218" (California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4, as implemented through Government Code §§ 53750 through 53759.2), and the Act; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set the Public Hearing for October 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., and authorized the proceedings for a Proposition 218 ballot; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-46 (Procedural Resolution) establishing assessment setting procedures for the Zones consistent with the requirements of Proposition 218 related to the consideration of assessment protest ballots submitted by record owners, as well as the requirements of "AB 2257" (Government Code §§ 53759.1 and 53759.2) to require record owners to exhaust administrative remedies by submitting a timely written objection as a condition of filing litigation to challenge the proposed assessments for the Zones; and WHEREAS, this resolution pertains only to Zone T44 (Bouquet Canyon), as set forth herein; and Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 19 1.b WHEREAS, on July 31, 2025, the Notice of Public Hearing and protest ballot were mailed to the property owners of record in T44 regarding the levy of increased assessments and the assessment range formula pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations governing majority protest proceedings, including but not limited to Proposition 218 and AB 2257; and WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of AB 2257 and the Procedural Resolution, the Notice of Public Hearing identified a deadline of September 15, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., for the submission of timely written objections to the proposed updated assessments for the Zones; and WHEREAS, as of September 15, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., the City had received no timely written objections, and therefore, the City Council determined that no clarifications or reductions to the proposed assessments for the Zones were warranted under Government Code Section 53759.1(d); and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the City Council held the duly noticed Public Hearing not less than 45 days after the mailing of the notices and ballots, to consider all oral statements and all written protests and communications made or filed by any interested persons regarding the proposed increased assessments, and to receive and accept all protest ballots until the conclusion of the Public Hearing from the property owners of record within T44; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Clerk or their designee publicly unsealed, tabulated, and canvassed all timely, valid protests submitted to the City by property owners within T44; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, by resolution, the City Council confirmed the results of the ballot tabulation and property owner protest ballot proceeding conducted in accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218, and as more fully set forth in Section 3 of this resolution. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2: Following notice duly given, the City Council held a full and fair Public Hearing regarding the proposed increased assessments and assessment range formula, and the levy and collection of assessments for the Zone. During the Public Hearing, the City Council considered all public testimony and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons, as well as all documents identified in this resolution notably including the Engineer's Report and the Assessment Roll for T44. SECTION 3: In accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218 (as defined herein), based on the separate resolution adopted by City Council declaring the results of the protest ballot proceedings on October 14, 2025, the City Council hereby determines that a majority protest of the proposed new assessments did not exist for T44. The City Council hereby confirms the Engineer's Report, the Assessment Diagram, and the Assessment identified in the Assessment Roll. Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 20 1.b SECTION 4: City Council's adoption of this resolution shall constitute a levy of increased assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-27. A copy of the Assessment Roll, which specifies the amounts to be levied for each parcel in T44, is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and will be incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Engineer's Report and is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though fully set forth. SECTION 5: The City Council finds that the assessments as set forth in the Assessment Roll comply with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and that the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment. The City Council hereby authorizes and approves annual assessments for parcels within T44 in amounts that do not exceed the assessment range formula set forth in the Engineer's Report. Accordingly, the assessment range formula allows for annual adjustments to the maximum assessment rate based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim area, as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Specifically, the adjustment is based on the CPI figure released in March or April of each year, reflecting year - over -year inflation within the regional economy where the District/Zone is located. SECTION 6: Pursuant to applicable law, the City Manager or their designee is hereby authorized and directed to file as may be required the annual levy of assessments for T44 commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 as approved herein with the Los Angeles County Auditor/Controller along with a certified copy of this resolution; and/or other resolutions and documents as may be required by the County Auditor/Controller or County Assessor, including copies of this Engineer's Report or Assessment Diagram confirmed by this resolution. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the City Council's approval and confirmation of the increased assessments; the Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram prepared; and the establishment of the maximum assessment rates, assessment range formula, and the related maximum assessments so authorized commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 as outlined in the Engineer's Report. SECTION 8: This resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 21 1.b PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) 2025. I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 22 1.c RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO FOR LANDSCAPING ZONE T48 (SHADOW HILLS) WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AND APPROVING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS COMMENCING IN FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Act, including Sections 22500 through 22679), on July 8, 2025, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita (City) adopted Resolution No. 25-44 (Resolution of Initiation) to initiate proceedings to levy proposed increased assessments for Landscaping Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights) (referred to collectively as T44, T48, and T62 or Zones; and referred to individually as Zone, T44, T48, or T62) within the City of Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Initiation also ordered the City's Assessment Engineer to prepare the report required by Streets and Highways Code Section 22622 for T44, T48, and T62 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Engineer's Report); and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, after fully considering the Engineer's Report, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-45 (Resolution of Intention) declaring its intention to levy and collect an increased assessment for T44, T48, and T62, preliminarily approving said Engineer's Report, calling for a property owner protest ballot proceeding for the proposed increased assessments related thereto in accordance with the relevant provisions of "Proposition 218" (California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4, as implemented through Government Code §§ 53750 through 53759.2), and the Act; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set the Public Hearing for October 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., and authorized the proceedings for a Proposition 218 ballot; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-46 (Procedural Resolution) establishing assessment setting procedures for the Zones consistent with the requirements of Proposition 218 related to the consideration of assessment protest ballots submitted by record owners, as well as the requirements of "AB 2257" (Government Code §§ 53759.1 and 53759.2) to require record owners to exhaust administrative remedies by submitting a timely written objection as a condition of filing litigation to challenge the proposed assessments for the Zones; and and WHEREAS, this resolution pertains only to Zone T48 (Shadow Hills), as set forth herein; Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 23 1.c WHEREAS, on July 31, 2025, the Notice of Public Hearing and protest ballot were mailed to the property owners of record in T48 regarding the levy of increased assessments and the assessment range formula pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations governing majority protest proceedings, including but not limited to Proposition 218 and AB 2257; and WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of AB 2257 and the Procedural Resolution, the Notice of Public Hearing identified a deadline of September 15, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., for the submission of timely written objections to the proposed updated assessments for the Zones; and WHEREAS, as of September 15, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., the City had received no timely written objections, and therefore, the City Council determined that no clarifications or reductions to the proposed assessments for the Zones were warranted under Government Code Section 53759.1(d); and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the City Council held the duly noticed Public Hearing not less than 45 days after the mailing of the notices and ballots, to consider all oral statements and all written protests and communications made or filed by any interested persons regarding the proposed increased assessments, and to receive and accept all protest ballots until the conclusion of the Public Hearing from the property owners of record within T48; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Clerk or their designee publicly unsealed, tabulated, and canvassed all timely valid protests submitted to the City by property owners within T48; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, by resolution, the City Council confirmed the results of the ballot tabulation and property owner protest ballot proceeding conducted in accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218, and as more fully set forth in Section 3 of this resolution. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2: Following notice duly given, the City Council held a full and fair Public Hearing regarding the proposed increased assessments and assessment range formula, and the levy and collection of assessments for the Zone. During the Public Hearing, the City Council considered all public testimony and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons, as well as all documents identified in this resolution notably including the Engineer's Report and the Assessment Roll for T48. SECTION 3: In accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218 (as defined herein), based on the separate resolution adopted by City Council declaring the results of the protest ballot proceedings on October 14, 2025, the City Council hereby determines that a majority protest of the proposed new assessments did not exist for T48. The City Council hereby confirms the Engineer's Report, the Assessment Diagram, and the Assessment identified in the Assessment Roll. Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 24 1.c SECTION 4: City Council's adoption of this resolution shall constitute a levy of increased assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-27. A copy of the Assessment Roll, which specifies the amounts to be levied for each parcel in T48, is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and will be incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Engineer's Report and is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though fully set forth. SECTION 5: The City Council finds that the assessments as set forth in the Assessment Roll comply with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and that the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment. The City Council hereby authorizes and approves annual assessments for parcels within T48 in amounts that do not exceed the assessment range formula set forth in the Engineer's Report. Accordingly, the assessment range formula allows for annual adjustments to the maximum assessment rate based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim area, as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Specifically, the adjustment is based on the CPI figure released in March or April of each year, reflecting year - over -year inflation within the regional economy where the District/Zone is located. SECTION 6: Pursuant to applicable law, the City Manager or their designee is hereby authorized and directed to file as may be required the annual levy of assessments for T48 commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 as approved herein with the Los Angeles County Auditor/Controller along with a certified copy of this resolution; and/or other resolutions and documents as may be required by the County Auditor/Controller or County Assessor, including copies of this Engineer's Report or Assessment Diagram confirmed by this resolution. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the City Council's approval and confirmation of the increased assessments; the Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram prepared; and the establishment of the maximum assessment rates, assessment range formula, and the related maximum assessments so authorized commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 as outlined in the Engineer's Report. SECTION 8: This resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 25 1.c PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) 2025. I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Page 4 of 4 CITY CLERK Packet Pg. 26 1.d RESOLUTION NO. 25- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972, CONFIRMING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, THE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS RELATED THERETO FOR LANDSCAPING ZONE T62 (CANYON HEIGHTS) WITHIN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT, AND APPROVING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS COMMENCING IN FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (Act, including Sections 22500 through 22679), on July 8, 2025, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita (City) adopted Resolution No. 25-44 (Resolution of Initiation) to initiate proceedings to levy proposed increased assessments for Landscaping Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills), and T62 (Canyon Heights) (referred to collectively as T44, T48, and T62 or Zones; and referred to individually as Zone, T44, T48, or T62) within the City of Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Initiation also ordered the City's Assessment Engineer to prepare the report required by Streets and Highways Code Section 22622 for T44, T48, and T62 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Engineer's Report); and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, after fully considering the Engineer's Report, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-45 (Resolution of Intention) declaring its intention to levy and collect an increased assessment for T44, T48, and T62, preliminarily approving said Engineer's Report, calling for a property owner protest ballot proceeding for the proposed increased assessments related thereto in accordance with the relevant provisions of "Proposition 218" (California Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4, as implemented through Government Code §§ 53750 through 53759.2), and the Act; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention set the Public Hearing for October 14, 2025, at 6:00 p.m., and authorized the proceedings for a Proposition 218 ballot; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-46 (Procedural Resolution) establishing assessment setting procedures for the Zones consistent with the requirements of Proposition 218 related to the consideration of assessment protest ballots submitted by record owners, as well as the requirements of "AB 2257" (Government Code §§ 53759.1 and 53759.2) to require record owners to exhaust administrative remedies by submitting a timely written objection as a condition of filing litigation to challenge the proposed assessments for the Zones; and WHEREAS, this resolution pertains only to Zone T62 (Canyon Heights), as set forth herein; and Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 27 1.d WHEREAS, on July 31, 2025, the Notice of Public Hearing and protest ballot were mailed to the property owners of record in T62 regarding the levy of increased assessments and the assessment range formula pursuant to the applicable laws and regulations governing majority protest proceedings, including but not limited to Proposition 218 and AB 2257; and WHEREAS, consistent with the requirements of AB 2257 and the Procedural Resolution, the Notice of Public Hearing identified a deadline of September 15, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., for the submission of timely written objections to the proposed updated assessments for the Zones; and WHEREAS, as of September 15, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., the City had received no timely written objections, and therefore, the City Council determined that no clarifications or reductions to the proposed assessments for the Zones was warranted under Government Code Section 53759.1(d); however, the City did receive and respond to one letter from an owner expressing concerns regarding T62, which is attached to the report to City Council accompanying the Public Hearing on October 14, 2025; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the City Council held the duly noticed Public Hearing not less than 45 days after the mailing of the notices and ballots, to consider all oral statements and all written protests and communications made or filed by any interested persons regarding the proposed increased assessments, and to receive and accept all protest ballots until the conclusion of the Public Hearing from the property owners of record within T62; and WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Clerk or their designee publicly unsealed, tabulated, and canvassed all timely, valid protests submitted to the City by property owners within T62; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, by resolution, the City Council confirmed the results of the ballot tabulation and property owner protest ballot proceeding conducted in accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218, and as more fully set forth in Section 3 of this resolution. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2.: Following notice duly given, the City Council held a full and fair Public Hearing regarding the proposed increased assessments and assessment range formula, and the levy and collection of assessments for the Zone. During the Public Hearing, the City Council considered all public testimony and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons, as well as all documents identified in this resolution notably including the Engineer's Report and the Assessment Roll for T62. SECTION 3: In accordance with the provisions of Proposition 218 (as defined herein), based on the separate resolution adopted by City Council declaring the results of the protest ballot proceedings on October 14, 2025, the City Council hereby determines that a majority protest of the proposed new assessments did not exist for T62. The City Council hereby confirms Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 28 1.d the Engineer's Report, the Assessment Diagram, and the Assessment identified in the Assessment Roll. SECTION 4: City Council's adoption of this resolution shall constitute a levy of increased assessments for Fiscal Year 2026-27. A copy of the Assessment Roll, which specifies the amounts to be levied for each parcel in T62, is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and will be incorporated in the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Engineer's Report and is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though fully set forth. SECTION 5: The City Council finds that the assessments as set forth in the Assessment Roll comply with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and that the City Council has complied with all laws pertaining to the levy of an annual assessment. The City Council hereby authorizes and approves annual assessments for parcels within T62 in amounts that do not exceed the assessment range formula set forth in the Engineer's Report. Accordingly, the assessment range formula allows for annual adjustments to the maximum assessment rate based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim area, as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Specifically, the adjustment is based on the CPI figure released in March or April of each year, reflecting year - over -year inflation within the regional economy where the District/Zone is located. SECTION 6: Pursuant to applicable law, the City Manager or their designee is hereby authorized and directed to file as may be required the annual levy of assessments for T62 commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 as approved herein with the Los Angeles County Auditor/Controller along with a certified copy of this resolution; and/or other resolutions and documents as may be required by the County Auditor/Controller or County Assessor, including copies of this Engineer's Report or Assessment Diagram confirmed by this resolution. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the City Council's approval and confirmation of the increased assessments; the Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram prepared; and the establishment of the maximum assessment rates, assessment range formula, and the related maximum assessments so authorized commencing in Fiscal Year 2026-27 as outlined in the Engineer's Report. SECTION 8: This resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 29 1.d PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) day of 2025. I, Mary Cusick, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the _day of 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Page 4 of 4 CITY CLERK Packet Pg. 30 4 S' �< 'i ap LMD Zone: T44 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Legend LMD Zone Boundary LMD Zone Boundary Landscape TURF _ Slope Landscape (Irrigated) Non -Irrigated Landscape (Fire Clearance) Parcel Boundary Parcel Boundary A Feet 0 130 260 520 Parcel Data: Copyright Apri12024, ParcelQ—t & County of Loc Angel... All rights reserved. Street cenledln.. devolopod & maintained by City ofSanta Oleiila rats Q 5t NTA C< bM1 n Er ae cc+� LMD Zone: T48 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Legend LMD Zone Boundary LMD Zone Boundary Landscape Slope Landscape (Irrigated) Non -Irrigated Landscape (Fire Clearance) Parcel Boundary Parcel Boundary A Feet 0 95 190 380 I I I I I I I I Parcel Data'. Copyright April 2024, Parc. Q—t & County of Los Angeles. All rights reserved. Street centerlines devolopod & maintained by City ofSanta Oleiila rats 4 SANTq C< 'i ap 0 yy LMD Zone: T62 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Legend LMD Zone Boundary LMD Zone Boundary Landscape TURF -Slope Landscape (Irrigated) - MISC. HARDSCAPE Parcel Boundary Parcel Boundary A Feet 0 130 260 520 Parcel Data'. Copyright April 2024, P . . . Q—t & County of Los Angeles. All rights reserved. Street cenledln.. devolopod & maintained by City of Santa Oleiila tat s City of SANTA CLARITA 23920 Valencia Boulevard • Suite 300 • Santa Clarita, California 91355-2196 Phone: (661) 259-2489 • FAx: (661) 259-8125 SantaClarita.gov September 24, 2025 i . Nemeschansk Santa Clarita, CA 91390 Dear Ms. Nemeschansky, Subject: Response to Your Letter Regarding Zone T44 Thank you for sharing your concerns regarding the hillside behind your property in Zone T62 (Canyon Heights) and for taking the time to outline your perspective in detail. We understand the importance of maintaining these areas in a manner that promotes safety, aesthetics, and functionality for all residents. We want to assure you that the City takes your concerns seriously. Following receipt of your letter, staff from my team visited your property to inspect the conditions you described, including the irrigation system. During this visit, we confirmed that there were some broken irrigation components, which our contractor has since repaired. With regard to your comments about the proposed assessment increase, please note that assessment rates are determined in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218 and are based on the special benefit that properties receive. The assessment cannot be "arbitrary" or "limitless"; it is limited to the cost of providing the specific services and improvements described in the Engineer's Report, which is available for public review. We also acknowledge your broader concerns related to hillside safety, vegetation management, drainage, and fire prevention. These concerns have been documented, and City staff will continue to monitor the area to ensure that any necessary maintenance within the scope of the LMD is addressed. Should you have further questions or require additional clarification, please feel free to contact me directly at (661) 290-2210 or by email at aadams@santaclarita.gov. Concerns regarding the hillside behind the property Scren ber 24. -)0'5 Pa�oe 2 ._iliank you aumn for brinLITIL, this to ow, attention.I. I. Sincerely, Andrev,' Adanls Spccial Districts -Manager C'it. of Santa Clarita A A:lh Attachment / 2,:-Z-5 Lauren Nemeschansky Santa Cta rita CA 91390 LN APN 3244-1 14= T62 Dear Mr. Andrew Adams and to all other associated parties & City Officials I am a 04 year old recent widow and original property owner of a home on a hill which was supposed to be properly landscaped,(l was told with ground cover and small growing native trees and shrubs), watered reatrlartywith a working sprinkler system, with block and cep;ent retaining walls and drainage systems kept in repair. Avariety of large growing trees, pines among others, inappropriate for such an incline were planted. They are now overgrown, over crowded, and stapled toward the base of my hill which are a safety hazard not only for fire, dropping needles and pine cones everywhere, but also in the event of a mudstideto the neighbors atthe bottom of the hill. Inconsideration of the landscaping, irrigation and maintenance of my hillside I was required to sign an easement to the county and have been paying an assessment for services for over 25 years which have NOT been carried out. As a result of this negligence my property has been damaged. It would be very difficult and costly for me to have the easement rescinded and my property returned to me in an overgrown "mess" of large trees and invasive weeds with a damaged non operational sprinkler system and crumbling and cracked retaining wails and cement drainage channel. This would be a great financial hardship on me as a retired senior. I am 9ULM1itti1z ; this letter and email to you to protect my constitutional right to take any possible tegal action in the future against the County, City, Developer, landscaping companies and any and all otherpossibte parties associated with the hill and adjacent land behind my property. This future right to legal challenge that I am retaining by sending this email and letter maybe related to the assessments, violations, fees, grading, landscaping, hardscaping, retainingwalls, drainage, trees, fotiage, trimminglremovatof trees, weed & pest control, water connections, sprinkler system & maintenance or tack thereof associated with the hill & land behind my property. This legal right that I am retaining for possible future legal action may have to do with pursuing damages for actions and or inactions of all of the associated parties which in myopinion has led to financialand physical harm to my property covered by the easement and my property and home value adjacent to the easement property. I am retaining the right to possibly pursue specific performance to correct these damages. Alternatively, I am retaining, the right to request monetary compensation forthe damage, current &future violations and any current & future assessments. It is very unfair to destroy my hill and then threaten to return it tome after 25 years in such a bad state. Had thetand been purc�i,--,nd without the required easement or been returned to me much sooner, my husband %1, 1: i,, recently deceased now, would have been capable of landscaping it properly with easily ,,. �intained, weed choking, small shrubs, proper small trees and weed choking ground cover. He would have installed a functioning sprinkler system attached to our own water supply. Can another [rote, I do not believe that ordinary citizens are capable of Tieing responsibtefor maintaining proper foliage and drainage on the hillside. This entire situation will cause possible fire hazards and damage and possible mudslidedamage. Increased insurance costs or loss of insurance and loss of property and or value to my home may result. I am very concerned that many of my neighbors are uninformed as to the expense and requirements and time needed to properly maintain the hillsides safely. Some shared that they immeldiaLety without doing any research voted to have the land returned to them thinking they could do all sorts of changes to the hillside since it would now become"their bind." during the online meeting i recall it was mentioned that no sort of quorum was needed for a vote and it was said that4-6 people could decide the outcome for all of us. l believe that sucri a vote like that is irresponsible a -id unreasonable. Many of us are concerned that the proposed new assessments and extra fees rno , be arbitrary and Limitless possibly providing little visible improvements to our hill !:' These concerns are compounded by the lack of maintenance already seen rc,r: ar cli n� our hillsides. The City should properly maintain our hills and communitygreen Ell.. c: _::; anj immediately address and correct the maintenance issues that I have mentioned above. My hill, especially if returned to me for care should be immediately restored and in the same original and good condition as it was given to the County with groundcover, small shrubs and undamaged vvorking sprinklers which the city would need to connect to my own harkyard water source. Cement drainage channels, drainage pipes and retaining walls woutd be repaired by the c.irv. Th, overgrown pine trees and other overgrown trees which are fire and or mudslide h,i,- ii + .; �(.1 weeds would be removed bythe city. I! will however retain my right to take future l.� dal actions by my delivering this email and letter prior to September 15, 2025 to Mr. Andes--- Adams as required by the city. Respectfully, Lauren Nei-,ie5c"ransky, Homeowner City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District Landscape Maintenance Zones Zone T44 (Bouquet Canyon) Zone T48 (Shadow Hills) Zone T62 (Canyon Heights) Establishment of Increased Assessments Fiscal Year 2025/2026 Intent Meeting: July 89 2025 Public Hearing: October 14, 2025 Yy WILLDAN CITY OF SANTA CLARITA SANTA CLARITA LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT ENGINEER'S REPORT CERTIFICATE This Engineer's Report ("Report") and the enclosed budget, diagrams and descriptions outline the increased assessments proposed to be levied for Landscape Maintenance Zones T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills) and T62 (Canyon Heights) within the Landscaping and Lighting District in the City of Santa Clarita commencing in Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The proposed increased assessments are deemed necessary to adequately maintain the improvements within the Zones. The boundaries of each Zone include each lot, parcel, and subdivision of land that will receive a special benefit from the proposed improvements to be provided, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and described herein. Reference is hereby made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the Zones. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the City Council. Dated this 14th day of July , 2025. Willdan Financial Servi Assessment Engineer L0 Stacee Reynolds -- Principal Consultant District Administration Services T Dl b Peter PE # C81888 S �OQROFESS/ON q Q ONE P F co 2 w N0. m 81888 X ENG\N TFOF CALF I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the day of 12025. Mary Cusick, City Clerk City of Santa Clarita Los Angeles County, California I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, on the day of 12025. By: Mary Cusick, City Clerk City of Santa Clarita Los Angeles County, California Vy WILLDAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I BALLOT PROCEEDINGS 2 REPORT CONTENT 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 5 DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINED AND SERVICED 5 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT 7 REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT 7 SPECIAL BENEFIT 7 GENERAL BENEFITS 9 APPORTIONMENT METHODOLOGY 10 Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) 11 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 13 /V. ZONE DIAGRAMS 17 V. ASSESSMENT ROLLS 21 APPENDIX I - T44 22 APPENDIX II - T48 29 APPENDIX III- T62 32 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page ii W WILLDAN INTRODUCTION The City of Santa Clarita (the "City"), under the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the "1972 Act") and the provisions of the California Constitution Article XI I I D enacted by Proposition 218 (the "Constitution"), annually levies and collects special assessments for the City's landscape districts designated as the Santa Clarita Landscaping and Lighting District (the "District") to provide and maintain various landscaping and lighting improvements throughout the City that provide special benefits to properties within the District. This Engineer's Report (the "Report") has been prepared pursuant to Chapter 1, Article 4 and Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act, and presented to the City Council for their consideration and approval of the improvements and services to be provided within the local landscaping zones of benefit ("Zones") identified as T44 (Bouquet Canyon), T48 (Shadow Hills) and T62 (Canyon Heights); and the levy and collection of the proposed increased annual assessments related thereto to fund the costs and expenses required to service and maintain the improvements that provide special benefits to those parcels commencing in Fiscal Year 2026/2027. Landscaping Zones T44, T48, and T62 (collectively referred to as the "Zones") were originally established by the County of Los Angeles pursuant to the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911. These Zones were subsequently transferred to the jurisdiction of the City in Fiscal Year 2013/2014. Upon transfer, the City assumed full financial responsibility for the ongoing maintenance and operation of all improvements within these Zones. Annually, the City establishes the District's assessments for each Zone based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the improvements in those Zones in conjunction with available revenues including general benefit contributions and current assessment limits. In recent fiscal years, the net total direct costs and administration expenses budgeted for the Zones, has exceeded the amount that can be collected from annual assessments at the currently authorized special benefit maximum assessment rates. As a result, budget adjustments have been made including eliminating the amount being collected for operational reserves and capital improvement projects and at the discretion of the City Council, the City may have temporarily implemented service reductions. To fully fund the improvements that are considered special benefits to properties in the Zones, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate and in the public's best interest to propose increased assessments that address the estimated special benefit improvement costs within the Zone including, but not limited to the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and Zones; and the collection of funds for operational reserves and/or for periodic maintenance and improvement rehabilitation projects as authorized by the 1972 Act. This Report outlines the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the landscaping improvements within the Zones commencing in Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The annual assessments (increased maximum assessment) proposed to be levied on properties as described herein will provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of landscaping improvements that provide special benefits to the properties within the Zones. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 1 W WILLDAN The net annual cost to provide the improvements within the Zones is based on the various improvements and the types of improvements and services to be provided for the properties that are directly associated with and benefit from those improvements. This net cost of providing these improvements and services is allocated to the benefiting properties within the Zones using a weighted method of apportionment (refer to Assessment Methodology in Section II, Method of Apportionment) that calculates the proportional special benefit and assessment for each parcel as compared to other properties that benefit from those Zone improvements and services. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor's Parcel Number ("APN") by the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office. The Los Angeles County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor's Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the District assessments. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone of this Engineer's Report is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of the Engineer's Report and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, portion, zone, or subzone thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, portions, zones, or subzones might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. BALLOT PROCEEDINGS Pursuant to the provisions of Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218) and the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the City shall conduct a property owner protest ballot proceeding ("Ballot Proceeding") in connection with the proposed levy of increased assessments described in this Report. In compliance with Proposition 218, this Engineer's Report includes a detailed description of the improvements to be funded, clearly identifies the Zones affected, and provides a comprehensive analysis of the special benefits received by the assessed parcels. The Report further distinguishes between general and special benefits and outlines the methodology used to proportionally allocate assessment amounts to each parcel based on those special benefits. In conjunction with the Ballot Proceeding, the City Council will hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider oral testimony, written comments, and formal protests submitted by property owners regarding the proposed assessments. At the conclusion of the public hearing, all protest ballots received from property owners will be opened and tabulated. A majority protest shall be deemed to exist if the ballots submitted in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed those submitted in support, with each ballot weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected parcel, as required by Proposition 218. Upon completion of the ballot tabulation, the City Council will confirm the results of the proceeding. If a majority protest is determined to exist, all further actions to implement the proposed increased assessments for the Zones will be abandoned. At that point, the City may elect to transfer responsibility for maintaining the landscape improvements to the property owners. Alternatively, the City may choose to continue levying and collecting assessments at a rate equal to the previously approved and adopted maximum assessment rates. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 2 W WILLDAN If no majority protest is found and the City Council determines that the proposed assessments and methodology conform to the requirements of Proposition 218 (Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution), the Council may adopt this Report (as submitted or amended), approve the associated assessment diagrams, and confirm the increased assessment rates. The approved assessments shall then be incorporated into the Engineer's Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 and submitted to the Los Angeles County Auditor -Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll for each affected parcel. REPORT CONTENT This Report consists of five (5) parts: Part I — Plans and Specifications This section provides an overall description of the Zones and the improvements for which parcels are assessed. The proposed increased assessments as outlined in this Report are based on the local landscaping improvements and appurtenant facilities that provide a special benefit to the properties within the Zone including operational expenses authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act. The plans and specifications contained in this section of the Report describe the overall nature and extent of the improvements. In conjunction with these descriptions of the improvements a visual depiction of the landscape improvement areas is provided in the Zone Diagrams contained in Part V of this Report. Along with the Zone Diagrams. Part II — Method of Apportionment of Assessments This section includes a discussion of the general and special benefits associated with the various improvements to be provided within the Zones (Benefit Analysis), which includes a discussion of the proportional costs of the special benefits and a separation of costs considered to be of general benefit (and therefore not assessed). This section of the Report also outlines the method of calculating each property's proportional special benefit necessary to calculate the property's annual assessment. Part III — Estimate of Costs An estimate of the annual costs to operate, maintain, and service the local landscaping improvements and appurtenant facilities within the Zones. The budget for each Zone includes an estimate of the maintenance costs and incidental expenses including, but not limited to labor, materials, utilities, equipment, and administration expenses as well as the collection of other appropriate funding authorized by the 1972 Act and deemed necessary to fully support the improvements. Those improvements and/or costs determined to be of general benefit shall be funded by a City contribution. Ultimately, City staff shall make the determination of which improvements, and the extent of the services and activities that shall be provided based on available revenues. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 3 W WILLDAN Part IV — Zone Diagrams This section of the Report contains diagrams showing the boundaries of the Zones for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 which incorporate the parcels determined to receive special benefits from the various improvements to be provided in each Zone. These diagrams also provide a visual depiction of the location of the landscape improvement areas being maintained. Parcel identification, the lines and dimensions of each lot, parcel and subdivision of land within the Zones as shown on these diagrams and listed on the Assessment Roll are inclusive of such parcels shown on the Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Maps and shall include any subsequent lot line adjustments or parcel changes therein. Reference is hereby made to the Los Angeles County Assessor's Parcel Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the Zones. Part V — Assessment Rolls The Assessment Roll contains a listing of all Assessor Parcel Numbers of the properties within the Zones and each parcel's corresponding "Balloted Maximum Assessment" commencing in Fiscal Year 2025/2026. The proposed assessment amounts balloted and which may be levied and collected commencing in Fiscal Year 2026/2027 for each parcel is based on the parcel's calculated proportional special benefit as outlined in the Method of Apportionment (Part II of this Report) and the maximum assessment rate established by the estimated Zone Budgets (Part I I I of this Report). Due to the number of parcels within the Zones, the Balloted Maximum Assessments (Assessment Roll) shall be filed electronically with the City Clerk rather than displayed in this Report and by reference the listing of the Assessor's Parcel Numbers and the corresponding assessment amounts contained in that electronic file are made part of this Report. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 4 yy WILLDAN /. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS MAINTAINED AND SERVICED The improvements installed, maintained and serviced within the Landscaping Zones are generally described as improvements within public rights -of -way and dedicated landscape easements within various tracts and on individual parcels located throughout the City including, but not limited to (as applicable): landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, grass, other ornamental vegetation, irrigation systems, hardscapes and fixtures; statuary, fountains and other ornamental structures and facilities; facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities; and, park improvements, including, but not limited to, playground equipment, shade structures, play courts, public restrooms, and paseos/trails. District/Zone funds are used for the maintenance and servicing including, but not limited to, labor, electrical energy, water, materials, contracting services, administration, reserve, and other expenses necessary for the satisfactory maintenance and servicing of these improvements. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping or appurtenant facilities; providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of the landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, and treating for disease or injury; the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, other solid waste; pest control; the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity for the operation of any appurtenant facilities, water for the irrigation and control of the landscaping, and the maintenance of any of the ornamental structures, landscaping and appurtenant facilities. The following is a general description of each balloted Landscaping Zone: Zone Description Improvements Square Footage T44 Bouquet Canyon Slope Landscape — Irrigated 544,701 SF Irrigated Turf Areas 223,666 SF Non -Irrigated Non -Irrigated Landscape 5,043 SF Turf (Fire Clearance) T48 Shadow Hills Slope Landscape — Irrigated 249,850 SF Irrigated Non -Irrigated Landscape 227,245 SF Non -Irrigated (Fire Clearance) T62 Canyon Heights Slope Landscape — Irrigated 721,986 SF Irrigated Turf Areas 748 SF Turf Walls and Fencing 2,025 SF Walls & Fencing Zone T44 — Bouquet Canyon The improvements within Zone T44 consist primarily of slope landscape areas located throughout the interior of the Bouquet Canyon neighborhood. These include irrigated Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 5 * WILLDAN slopes planted with drought -tolerant groundcover and shrubs, supported by automatic irrigation systems such as drip or spray emitters. These improvements are typically situated adjacent to private parcel boundaries, following the contours of residential streets and cul-de-sacs. The landscape treatments in these areas provide direct special benefit to the adjacent parcels by enhancing curb appeal, reducing erosion, and buffering properties from neighboring homes and open spaces. In addition to irrigated areas, Zone T44 contains designated non -irrigated landscape zones intended for fire clearance. These areas, maintained to comply with local fire codes, provide fuel modification through annual brush clearance and weed abatement. Their function is to reduce wildfire risk while also protecting and stabilizing slope conditions. A small area of turf landscaping is also present, generally located near a neighborhood entry or along a parkway edge. Together, these improvements provide functional and aesthetic enhancements that directly serve and benefit the assessed parcels within the Zone. Zone T48 — Shadow Hills Zone T48 includes a combination of irrigated and non -irrigated slope landscape areas that span along the rear and side parcel boundaries within the Shadow Hills neighborhood. The irrigated slopes are planted with drought -tolerant vegetation and maintained with permanent irrigation systems. These improvements serve as a landscaped buffer between residential parcels and adjacent open space or slope terrain, providing visual enhancement, erosion control, and slope stabilization for the properties they abut. The Zone also includes extensive areas designated as non -irrigated fire clearance zones. These are primarily naturalized or minimally vegetated slopes maintained through periodic brush clearance to reduce fuel loads and protect nearby homes from wildfire risk. While these areas are not designed for public access or use, their upkeep directly benefits adjacent parcels by reducing hazards and preserving slope integrity. The layout of these improvements reflects the local terrain and serves to support the safety, stability, and livability of the assessed parcels in the Zone. Zone T62 — Canyon Heights Zone T62 features a network of irrigated slope landscapes and turf areas strategically located throughout the Canyon Heights neighborhood, including along major arterials such as Copper Hill Drive and Haskell Canyon Road. The irrigated slopes are planted with maintained ornamental plantings and groundcovers and serviced by automated irrigation systems. These landscape corridors provide a functional and visual buffer between private properties and high -volume roadways, enhancing the environment for residents while offering slope protection and erosion control. In addition to slope landscaping, Zone T62 includes a masonry block wall and a monument sign located within the public landscape easement. These improvements serve practical purposes such as slope retention and community identification. While some of the landscaping in this Zone is more publicly visible due to its location along collector and arterial streets, the walls and plantings are not intended for public use or recreational access. Collectively, these improvements provide a consistent and measurable special benefit to the assessed parcels by enhancing site conditions, reinforcing property boundaries, and mitigating environmental impacts. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 6 W'VVILLDAN //. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMEN° Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (referred to as "1972 Act"), permits the establishment of Assessment Districts by cities for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the acquisition, construction, maintenance and servicing of streetlights, traffic signals and landscaping facilities. Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that assessments be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." Furthermore, Section of the 1972 Act permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvements." Thus, the 1972 Act requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." In addition, Proposition 218 requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Proposition 218 provides that only special benefits are assessable and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefits. REASON FOR THE ASSESSMENT The assessment is proposed to be levied to defray the costs of the acquisition, installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements, as previously defined herein in Part I of this Report. SPECIAL BENEFIT In accordance with Article XII I D, Section 4 of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), assessments must be levied based solely on the proportional special benefit conferred upon each identified parcel. This Engineer's Report evaluates the specific benefits conferred by the public improvements maintained within Landscaping Zones T44, T48, and T62, ensuring that all assessments reflect the distinct and measurable value each parcel receives as a result of these improvements. The improvements maintained within these Zones include irrigated slope landscaping, non -irrigated fire clearance areas, turf, and walls or fencing where present. The geographical boundaries of each Zone are narrowly drawn so that only parcels within the Zone receive the special benefits funded by the assessment revenue, including enhanced slope stability, visual quality, direct connection to a well -designed and maintained neighborhood environment, and enhancement of long-term property value for each parcel within each Zone. The maintained improvements are not recreational in nature and are not intended for regional access or use. To determine the proportionate special benefit received by each parcel, this Engineer's Report considers the planned function and placement of improvements and their contribution to each parcel in the relevant Zone. The maintained improvements result in unique benefits to the neighborhood environment, aesthetics, and community identity; and Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 7 * WILLDAN each assessed parcel receives a special benefit from the direct connection to those maintained improvements. While adjacency to particular improvements may enhance a particular parcel's view or access, all parcels within the relevant Zone receive an equivalent special benefit. In the master -planned neighborhoods that comprise Zones T44, T48, and T62, the special benefits of the landscape improvements were designed to serve each parcel in each Zone in an equivalent manner. As such, each single-family residential parcel is determined to receive equivalent special benefit from the continued maintenance of these improvements and is accordingly assessed at one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). For example, in Zones T44, T48, and T62, there are clusters of parcels such as those north of Starwood Way in T44, between Kathleen Avenue and Darrow Avenue in T48, and in the southern portion of T62 that are not immediately adjacent to any maintained landscape areas. Nonetheless, these parcels receive tangible and distinct benefits through their connection to a cohesive and uniformly maintained neighborhood. Benefits to each parcel include the connection to a consistent aesthetic quality, and the broader functional and visual integrity of the residential environment within each Zone. The inclusion of such parcels at full assessment is consistent with Proposition 218, which supports the use of well -designed Zones, limited to only those parcels receiving special benefits from the maintained improvements, to allocate costs of a shared special benefit to every parcel in the relevant Zone. Zone T62 includes some improvements along perimeter roadways that may be visible to homes located outside the Zone boundary, particularly along Silverking Trail. While these non -assessed parcels may receive incidental aesthetic benefits, they do not receive a special benefit and are therefore not assessed. These incidental or unintended visual benefits are treated as general benefit and excluded from the special benefit analysis and assessment. In addition to the residential parcels, Zone T62 includes one commercial parcel, which is also assessed based on the proportional special benefit it receives from the maintained improvements. To maintain consistency with the assessment methodology applied to residential parcels, where all single-family parcels are assigned 1.0 Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) and the average parcel size is approximately 0.28 acres, a rate of 3.57 EBUs per acre has been applied to the commercial parcel. This rate reflects the proportional allocation of benefit and ensures the commercial parcel is assessed equitably and in compliance with Proposition 218. This approach for quantifying and allocating special benefits is supported by legal precedent. Courts have interpreted Proposition 218 to allow local agencies to use reasonable, evidence -supported methodologies for estimating special and general benefits and emphasized that rigorous mathematical precision is not required. Provided the framework is logical, consistent, and factually grounded, uniform assessments across similarly situated parcels receiving a shared special benefit are consistent with Proposition 218. (e.g., see Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Association v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (2008); and Town of Tiburon v. Bonnander (2009).) Accordingly, based on the characteristics of each Zone, a special benefit percentage of ninety-eight percent (98%) has been determined for Zones T44 and T48, and ninety-five percent (95%) for Zone T62. These percentages reflect the portion of total benefit conferred directly and exclusively to the assessed parcels and ensure that only special benefit is recovered through assessment. A full explanation and justification of how these percentages were derived, including the supporting analysis of incidental general benefit, Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 8 * WILLDAN is provided in the General Benefits section. These values form the basis for the proportional assessment allocations described in the Assessment Methodology section. GENERAL BENEFITS Proposition 218 requires that any portion of the total benefit that is conferred upon the general public or to properties not assessed within the district be separated from special benefit and funded through alternative non -assessment sources. These general benefits may include incidental aesthetic or environmental enhancements visible to non-residents or motorists traveling along public streets, or to non -assessed parcels located outside the district boundary. To determine the appropriate general benefit allocations for Zones T44, T48, and T62, this Engineer's Report conducted a zone -specific evaluation of each improvement's location, visibility, and intended function, along with the degree of public exposure and incidental benefit to non -assessed properties. In Zones T44 and T48, improvements are located entirely within interior residential areas, with limited to no exposure to regional traffic or public viewsheds. The irrigated slopes, non -irrigated fire clearance areas, and turf sections serve exclusively the parcels within each Zone. While some incidental aesthetic benefit may be conferred to passing service vehicles or occasional non-residents, the benefit is minimal. As such, only two percent (2%) of the total benefit within each of these Zones has been conservatively designated as general benefit. In contrast, Zone T62 includes several landscape areas situated along high -visibility arterials such as Copper Hill Drive and Haskell Canyon Road. These features provide passive visual benefit to the general public due to their location, even though they are maintained primarily for the benefit of the parcels within the Zone. Additionally, a small number of homes along Silverking Trail, which lie outside the Zone boundary, may derive incidental aesthetic benefit due to their proximity to maintained slopes within the Zone. However, any benefit they receive is general in nature and excluded from the assessment. This incidental benefit is included within the five percent (5%) general benefit allocation for Zone T62, which reflects both public -facing landscape exposure and limited visual benefit to adjacent non -assessed parcels. Taking these factors into account, a general benefit allocation of five percent (5%) has been assigned to Zone T62. This allocation reflects a reasonable estimate of the incidental benefit accruing to non -assessed parties, both the general public and adjacent non - assessed parcels, and ensures compliance with Proposition 218's requirement that general benefit be excluded from assessment funding. These percentages two percent (2%) for Zones T44 and T48, and five percent (5%) for Zone T62 are consistent with the legal framework set forth in Proposition 218 and the case law that has interpreted it, which allows general benefit to be estimated based on qualitative factors such as visibility and public use, rather than requiring a mathematically precise calculation. The allocations used here are conservative, evidence -based, and consistent with industry practice for similar residential assessment districts. Accordingly, the general benefit portions will be funded from non -assessment revenues. The remaining ninety-eight percent (98%) for Zones T44 and T48, and ninety-five percent (95%) for Zone T62, represent special benefit and will be proportionally assessed to the benefitting parcels using the uniform one- EBU-per-residential-parcel methodology described in the Assessment Methodology section. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 9 yy WILLDAN APPORTIONMENT METHODOLOGY The following table lists the balloted Zones within the District, their land use, assessment type, and the number of EBUs. Equivalent Benefit Units In order to allocate benefit fairly among parcels, an Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) methodology is used that equates different land use types to a standard single-family residential parcel, thereby allowing a uniform and proportional method of assessment. The EBU method uses the single-family residential parcel as the basic unit of apportionment, with one (1) Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) assigned per single-family parcel. This quantifiable measurement serves as the foundation for assigning EBUs to all other land use types, including commercial properties. For example, the EBU assignment for the commercial parcel in Zone T62 is based on a per -acre rate derived from the single-family average parcel size, ensuring consistent and proportional benefit allocation. All properties within the Zones are assigned benefit units and land use classifications based on data from the County Assessor's roll. Any inaccuracies in that data will be reviewed on a case -by -case basis as they are brought to the City's attention. A methodology has been developed to calculate EBUs for residential properties, and various apportionment approaches are used in the annual Engineer's Report. The "Method Code" in the table below identifies the specific methodology applied to the residential zones shown. The number of EBUs shown in the table above reflect the current information for the Zones and represents assignments made only to assessable parcels. Parcels that are not subject to assessment are not included in this section. These EBUs may be updated prior to submitting the final Assessment Roll to the County Auditor -Controller for placement on the property tax bills. Fluctuations in the number of parcels and related data may occur from year to year as parcels are subdivided, combined, or undergo changes in use. Method Code Definition Method 9 — The assessment is apportioned to the benefiting properties based on Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) such that a Single Family Detached Residence (SFR) is equal to one (1) EBU as follows: Note: Full method code descriptions can be found in the annual Engineer's Report. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 10 yy WILLDAN Exempt Parcels The following properties are generally considered not to benefit from the improvements and services provided and therefore may be exempt from the assessment: public streets, avenues, lanes, roads, drives, courts, alleys, public easements or rights -of -way, and Zone improvement areas that may not have an assigned Assessor's Parcel Number. Exemptions may also apply to parcels designated as railroad rights -of -way; utility easements and rights -of -way used exclusively for utility transmission; shared common areas within developments such as condominium complexes; land dedicated as public open space or parks; small parcels vacated by the City; and parcels subject to significant development restrictions, where the City or Assessment Engineer has determined the property cannot be developed or cannot be developed independently from an adjacent, commonly owned parcel. Parcels may also be exempt if they are bifurcated or remnant portions of larger parent parcels that are already being assessed, such as slivers used for driveways or landscaping that do not function as independent, assessable lots. Calculation of Assessments An assessment amount per EBU in each Zone is calculated by: Taking the "Total Direct Costs and Administration Expenses" (total budgeted costs) and subtracting the "General Benefit Expenses (City Funded)," to establish the "Balance To Levy." The amount identified as the "Balance to Levy" is divided by the total number of EBUs of parcels that benefit to establish the "Assessment Rate" or "Assessment per EBU" for the fiscal year. This Rate is then applied back to each parcel's individual EBU to calculate the parcel's proportionate special benefit and assessment for the improvements. Balance to Levy / Total EBU = Assessment per EBU (Assessment Rate) Assessment per EBU x Parcel EBU = Parcel Assessment Amount Note: As part of these proceedings to ballot property owners for increased assessments, the proposed new maximum assessments outlined in this Report are intended to fully support the costs and expenses identified as "Special Benefit Expenses." Therefore, the "Funding Adjustments/Contributions" referenced above are not applicable to the calculation of the assessments described in this Report for the Zones and the "Balance to Levy" represents the total "Special Benefit Expenses." Annual Inflationary Adjustment (Assessment Range Formula) The assessment amounts listed in this Report are estimates based on projected costs for the maintenance, operation, and administration of improvements within each Zone for the upcoming fiscal year. In accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Proposition 218, the maximum authorized assessment rate for each Zone may be adjusted annually using an inflationary formula previously identified in the original ballot proceeding. This assessment range formula allows for annual adjustments to the maximum assessment rate based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim area, as published by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Specifically, the adjustment is based on the CPI figure released in March or April of each year, reflecting year -over -year inflation within the regional economy where the District/Zone is located. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 11 * WILLDAN The inflationary adjustment ensures that assessment rates remain aligned with actual economic conditions and enables the City to maintain existing service levels without conducting new ballot proceedings each year. While the maximum authorized rate may increase annually by the CPI percentage, the actual assessments levied may be set at or below this amount based on the budgetary needs and priorities of each Zone. Any proposed increase that exceeds the CPI -based adjustment or modifies the underlying methodology would require a new assessment ballot proceeding and approval by property owners in accordance with the requirements of Proposition 218. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 12 W WILLDAN ///. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The following proposed budget outlines the estimated costs to fund, maintain, and service the landscaping improvements and related amenities that provide special benefits to properties within Zones T44, T48, and T62 for Fiscal Year 2025/2026. In recent years, the total eligible special benefit expenses required to ensure adequate and proper maintenance of these improvements have not been fully covered by the assessment revenues generated under the existing maximum assessment rates. As a result, the City has, in some cases, reduced or deferred the collection of funds intended for operational reserves, long-term repairs and replacements, or major rehabilitation efforts. In other instances, reductions may have occurred in the frequency or scope of regular maintenance activities and services associated with the improvements. These funding limitations have affected the City's ability to sustain the service levels originally intended for the Zones. Recognizing that these shortfalls are likely to continue and may increase over time due to inflationary pressures and rising maintenance costs, the City is proposing to ballot property owners within the Zones for approval of an increased maximum assessment rate. This proposed rate includes an annual inflationary adjustment (assessment range formula) and is intended to fund the estimated total eligible special benefit expenses necessary to provide and sustain the improvements described in this Report. Should the proposed assessment fail to be approved by a majority of property owners in the required protest ballot proceeding, the City may be unable to continue providing landscape maintenance and related services within the Zone(s) at the current level, or at all. In that event, responsibility for maintaining the improvements may need to be transferred to the respective property owners served by the improvements. This outcome could result in inconsistent or insufficient maintenance and may negatively impact the long-term condition, appearance, and value of the properties within the Zones. The following budget section identifies the projected expenses for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 and presents the corresponding "Proposed Maximum Assessment Rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU)," which will be submitted to property owners of record through a Proposition 218-compliant protest ballot proceeding. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 13 yy WILLDAN Definition of Budget Line Items The following definitions apply to the Zone Budget tables included in this Report. Each line item represents an eligible expense category used to calculate special benefit assessments. Landscape Services - Routine landscape maintenance including mowing, edging, pruning, irrigation checks, slope care, and basic upkeep of all landscape areas within the Zone. Tree Trimming - Scheduled and as -needed trimming of trees to maintain health, safety, property clearance, and visual appearance of the landscape. Electric - Electrical utility costs associated with operating irrigation controllers, lighting systems, and any other electrically powered components in the landscaped areas. Water - Water utility charges for irrigation of landscaped areas, including turf, slopes, and planter zones. Labor/Materials - Costs for labor and materials not otherwise captured under contract services, including minor repairs, supply purchases, and City -provided services. Weed/Pest Control - Services for weed abatement, brush clearance, pest suppression, and mitigation of invasive plant or animal species that impact the landscaped areas. District Administration - Costs for preparing the Engineer's Report, updating assessment rolls, coordinating Proposition 218 compliance, and overseeing levy administration. City Administration - Internal City staffing and overhead costs related to managing vendor contracts, maintaining landscape standards, responding to resident inquiries, and supervising Zone operations. County Administration Fee - Annual charge by the Los Angeles County Auditor - Controller for placing the assessments on the secured property tax roll and processing collections. Insurance - Cost of liability or other applicable insurance policies covering third -party landscape contractors or risks associated with maintained improvements. Operational Reserve Fund Collection/(Contribution) - Funds collected to establish and maintain a reserve that provides short-term operational stability for the Zone. Industry standards recommend a reserve target of up to 50% of annual operating costs to ensure that sufficient funds are available to sustain services prior to receipt of County apportionments and to reduce reliance on the City's General Fund. For this Report, the reserve is collected within a range of 18% to 26% of annual costs to support cash flow needs while maintaining the proposed assessment rates disclosed to property owners. Reserve percentages may vary by Zone based on available funding and historical budget needs, but all are intended to progress toward the 50% industry standard over time if needed. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 14 W WILLDAN Repair and Rehab Collection - Dedicated funding for periodic rehabilitation or replacement of infrastructure such as irrigation systems, walls, fencing, or major slope repairs beyond routine maintenance. General Benefit Contribution - Portion of the total budget that provides incidental benefit to the general public or non -assessed parcels. This amount is excluded from the assessment and funded by the City. General Fund Reimbursement - Recovery of prior -year maintenance costs advanced by the City's General Fund on behalf of the Zone during years when assessment revenue was insufficient to meet expenses. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 15 *'WILLDAN T44 DO -BOUQUETBUDGET ITEM DIRECT COSTS (Labor/Materials) Landscape Services $55,000 $40,000 $60,000 Tree Trimmng 20,808 8,000 15,000 Electric 1,121 156 312 Water 47,616 25,716 61,884 Labor/Materials 17,014 11,648 17,794 Weed/Pest Control 498 208 1,040 Total Costs ADMINISTRATIONIINDIRECT COSTS District Administration $45 $16 $32 City Administration $3,972 $2,954 $3,740 Inspections $0 $0 $0 County Administration Fee 126 76 104 Insurance 510 510 1,020 IY. Administration TOTAL DIRECT COSTS & ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES $146,709 $89,284 $160,926 LEVY ADJUSTMENTS Reserve Fund Collection/(Contribution) $28,158 $22,127 $28,092 Repair and Rehab Collection 5,202 5,475 7,803 General Benefit Contribution (2,841) (1,715) (7,802) General Fund Reimbursement Total Adjustments 3,972 2,954 3,740 BALANCE TO LEVY 00 Total EBUs 302.00 105.00 220.2974 Total Parcels Assessed 302 105 215 Total Parcels in District 304 105 215 Fiscal Year 2026127 Rate per EDU $600.00 $1,126.00 $876.00 Fiscal Year 2026127 Proposed Maximum Rate per EDU $600.00 $1,126.00 $876.00 Fiscal Year 2026126 Current Maximum Rate $300.00 $466.00 $600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 16 W WILLDAN IV. ZONE DIA GRAMS The following pages show an overview of the balloted Zones within the Landscaping and Lighting District. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 17 wGl LAMDSCA" FOUf U, I L[DA\ Landscape Maintenance District Zone T44 A Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 18 i Y I y i i LRNO9CAPE S4 FOOT Npn-rfiyated La1.114�:ai;v fF rY C:Iw:sr;�rcvJ J'71145 Slope Landscape «iyatrc, 249.85D KEY CT yy WILLDAN /�111 �"/ ----------------------- I� x . SA\'I:ACLARJ]A Landscape Maintenance District Zone T48 i...nd A i✓Fe LaMfmR ;±ngrtM1 um G�gx[C eaHx3pe [Fe(>9aV�ce] Q F]SI 1w I r„oa wanes W„. �•uloxn<ewmerr •••••�•,• i Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 19 W WILLDAN --------------- krm X101, 1419 ri�a m goreC.WVON aw 0, ,10 JIB t Popp MONO 100 "'CW IGHTS CIR 0 CON , KA MI401 LIN D9 ILI ------------- COMER hIALL-OR ------------------- ------------------- Landscape Maintenance CHstriet TO Ngwp :R7"I' 6 m KfV I IN Zone T62 On %,R� at rx INN quy iWm w", � 4 W 04 w 4 CIE', MIS 4 rww" Sd�5 M, AN QN rIA A ; m W gal �m 1 LhHD Z— O—nd�r F 7.025 MON •11. 71,1NI LwxkCaP* J��, 1�1 95s Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 20 yy WILLDAN ASSESSMENT ROLLS The Assessment Rolls identified as Appendix 1 through 3 incorporated in this Engineer's Report identify each parcel within the Zones and the balloted maximum assessment amount proposed for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. Each parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is currently shown and illustrated on the County Assessor's Roll and the County Assessor's Parcel Number Maps (APN maps). These records are, by reference, made part of this Report and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots or parcels. All assessments presented on the assessment roll are subject to change pending the outcome of the Ballot Proceedings and/or as a result of parcel changes made by the County including parcel splits, parcel merges or development changes that occur prior to the County Assessor's Office securing the final roll and generating tax bills for Fiscal year 2026/2027. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 21 *'WILLDAN APPENDIX I - T44 2812-022-031 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-032 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-033 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-034 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-035 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-036 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-037 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-038 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-022-039 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-052 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-053 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-054 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-055 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-056 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-057 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-058 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-059 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-060 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-061 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-062 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-063 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-067 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-068 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-023-069 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-005 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-006 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-007 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-008 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-009 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-010 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-011 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-012 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-013 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-014 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-015 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-016 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-017 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-018 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-019 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-020 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-021 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-022 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-023 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-024 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-025 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-026 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-027 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 22 *'WILLDAN 2812-044-029 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-030 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-031 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-032 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-033 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-034 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-035 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-036 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-037 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-038 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-049 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-050 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-051 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-054 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-055 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-056 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-057 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-058 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-044-059 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-001 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-002 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-003 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-004 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-005 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-006 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-009 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-010 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-011 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-012 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-013 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-014 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-015 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-016 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-017 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-018 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-019 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-020 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-021 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-022 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-023 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-024 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-025 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-026 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-027 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-029 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-030 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-031 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-032 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-033 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-034 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 23 *'WILLDAN 2812-045-035 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-036 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-037 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-038 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-039 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-040 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-041 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-042 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-043 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-044 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-046 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-045-047 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-001 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-002 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-003 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-004 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-005 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-006 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-007 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-008 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-009 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-010 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-011 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-012 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-013 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-014 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-015 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-016 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-017 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-018 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-019 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-020 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-021 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-022 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-023 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-024 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-025 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-026 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-027 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-029 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-030 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-031 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-032 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-033 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-034 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-035 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-046-036 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-003 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-004 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-005 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 24 *'WILLDAN 2812-047-006 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-007 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-008 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-009 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-012 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-013 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-014 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-015 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-018 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-019 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-020 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-021 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-022 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-023 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-024 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-025 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-026 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-027 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-029 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-030 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-031 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-032 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-033 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-034 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-040 T44 0.0 300.00 600.00 - 2812-047-042 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-044 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-046 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-048 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-050 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-052 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-054 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-056 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-059 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-060 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-061 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-047-062 T44 0.0 300.00 600.00 - 2812-048-001 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-002 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-003 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-004 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-005 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-006 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-007 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-008 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-009 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-010 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-011 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-012 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-013 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 25 *'WILLDAN 2812-048-014 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-015 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-016 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-017 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-018 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-019 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-020 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-021 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-022 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-023 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-024 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-025 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-026 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-027 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-029 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-030 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-031 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-032 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-033 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-034 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-035 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-036 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-037 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-038 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-039 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-040 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-041 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-042 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-043 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-044 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-045 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-046 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-047 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-048 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-049 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-050 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-051 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-052 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-053 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-054 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-048-055 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-001 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-002 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-003 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-004 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-005 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-006 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-007 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-008 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-009 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 26 *'WILLDAN 2812-049-010 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-011 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-012 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-013 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-014 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-015 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-016 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-017 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-018 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-019 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-020 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-021 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-022 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-023 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-024 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-025 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-026 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-027 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-029 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-030 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-031 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-032 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-049-033 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-001 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-002 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-003 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-004 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-005 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-006 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-007 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-008 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-009 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-010 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-011 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-012 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-013 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-014 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-015 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-016 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-017 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-018 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-019 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-020 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-021 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-022 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-023 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-024 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-025 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-026 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 2812-050-027 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 27 *'WILLDAN 2812-050-028 T44 1.0 300.00 600.00 600.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 28 *'WILLDAN APPENDIX H - T48 2812-051-001 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-002 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-003 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-004 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-005 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-006 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-007 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-008 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-009 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-010 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-011 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-012 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-013 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-014 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-015 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-016 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-017 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-051-018 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-001 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-002 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-003 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-004 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-005 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-006 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-007 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-008 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-009 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-010 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-011 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-012 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-013 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-014 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-015 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-016 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-017 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-018 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-019 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-020 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-021 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-022 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-023 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-024 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-025 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-026 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-027 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-028 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-029 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-030 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 29 *'WILLDAN 2812-052-031 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-032 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-033 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-034 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-035 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-036 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-037 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-038 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-039 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-040 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-041 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-042 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-043 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-044 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-045 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-046 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-047 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-048 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-049 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-050 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-052-051 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-001 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-002 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-003 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-004 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-005 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-006 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-007 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-008 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-009 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-010 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-011 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-012 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-013 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-014 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-015 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-016 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-017 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-018 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-019 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-020 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-021 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-022 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-023 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-024 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-025 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-026 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-027 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-028 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-029 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-030 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 30 *'WILLDAN 2812-053-031 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-032 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-033 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-034 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-035 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 2812-053-036 T48 1.0 455.00 1,125.00 1,125.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 31 *'WILLDAN APPENDIX 111- T62 3244-109-002 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-003 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-004 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-005 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-006 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-007 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-008 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-009 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-010 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-011 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-012 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-013 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-014 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-015 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-016 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-017 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-018 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-019 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-020 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-021 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-022 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-023 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-024 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-025 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-026 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-027 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-028 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-029 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-030 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-031 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-032 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-033 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-034 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-035 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-036 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-037 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-038 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-039 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-109-040 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-001 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-002 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-003 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-004 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-005 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-006 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-007 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-008 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-009 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-010 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-011 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-012 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-016 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 32 *'WILLDAN 3244-110-017 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-018 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-019 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-020 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-021 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-022 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-023 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-024 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-025 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-026 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-027 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-028 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-029 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-030 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-031 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-032 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-033 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-034 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-035 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-036 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-037 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-038 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-039 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-040 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-041 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-042 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-043 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-044 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-045 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-046 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-047 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-048 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-049 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-050 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-051 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-052 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-053 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-054 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-055 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-056 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-110-057 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-001 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-002 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-003 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-004 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-005 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-006 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-007 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-008 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-009 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-010 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-011 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-012 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-013 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-014 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 33 *'WILLDAN 3244-114-015 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-016 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-017 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-018 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-019 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-020 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-021 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-022 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-023 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-024 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-025 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-026 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-027 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-028 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-029 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-030 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-031 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-032 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-033 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-034 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-035 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-036 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-037 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-038 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-039 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-040 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-041 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-042 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-043 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-044 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-045 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-046 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-047 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-048 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-049 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-050 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-051 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-052 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-114-053 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-001 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-002 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-003 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-004 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-005 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-006 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-007 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-008 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-009 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-010 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-011 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-012 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-013 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-014 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-015 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-016 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 34 *'WILLDAN 3244-115-017 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-018 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-019 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-020 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-021 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-022 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-023 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-024 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-025 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-026 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-115-027 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-119-054 T62 6.2974 1.764 COM 600.00 875.00 5,510.23 3244-119-058 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-119-059 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-001 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-002 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-003 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-004 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-005 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-006 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-007 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-008 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-009 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-010 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-011 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-012 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-013 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-014 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-015 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-016 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-017 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-018 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-019 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-020 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-021 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-022 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-023 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-024 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-025 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-026 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-027 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-028 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-029 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-030 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-031 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-032 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-033 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-034 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-035 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-036 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-037 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-038 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 3244-121-039 T62 1.0 SFR 600.00 875.00 875.00 Note: Land use is included for all parcels to ensure consistency and transparency in EBU assignment. Fiscal Year City of Santa Clarita Engineer's Report 2025/2026 Balloted Landscape Maintenance Zones Page 35