HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-14 - AGENDA REPORTS - EIR TICK CYN PROJECT (2)AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Approval /
Item to be presented by• (`�/�
CONSENT CALENDAR Lynn M. Harris Z W_4wZA-
DATE: August 14, 1990
SUBJECT: Authorization for City to Enter Into a Contract Agreement for the
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the "Tick
Canyon Project", ANN% No. 1989-05, P2 89-005, VTTM 47326, etal.
Resolution No. 90-157
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
BACKGROUND:
Applications for a prezone, annexation, vesting tentative tract map and related
entitlement applications have been filed by the Anden Group and were deemed
complete in March, 1990.. Community Development staff has determined, through
the initial study process, that.an Environmental Impact Report is required for
further analysis of this project. Pursuant to Section 15084, subdivision (a) of
the CEQA Guidelines, the Community Development Department solicits proposals
from environmental planning consultants for preparation of EIR's at the
applicant's expense.
Requests for proposals were sent to approximately 15 consultants, and six
responses were received. After proposal review and background checks of the
three leading consultants, the firm of Environmental Science Associates, Inc.
(ESA) was selected. The proposed cost of the.EIR is $102,000. The applicant,
The Anden Group, has been advised: and has agreed to deposit -on account the total
contract amount. Administrative costs will also be.billed by the City and
charged to the applicant.
A complete copy of the contract and exhibits is available for review in the City
Clerk's Office.
City Council approval is needed for the City to enter into a contract with a
consulting firm. Staff requests that the Council approve the attached contract
agreement.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution No. 90-157
:.3pted:
Agenda hem:.
RESOLUTION NO. 90-157
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT AGREEMENT
FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FOR THE ' TICR CANYON PROJECT'
WHEREAS, applications for a prezone, annexation, vesting tentative
tract map, and related entitlements have been filed with the City of Santa
Clarita and were deemed complete in March, 1990; and
WHEREAS, determination was made by Community Development staff that
the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment and
that an Environmental Impact Report was necessary to provide analysis of
impacts; and
WHEREAS, Section 15084(a) of the Guidelines to the California
Environmental Quality Act permits the Draft EIR to be prepared under contract
to the Lead Agency; and
WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal was sent to 15 qualified
environmental planning consultants, six proposals.were received and reviewed
by Community Development staff, and a consultant thereafter selected; and
WHEREAS, the applicant, The Anden Group, will be responsible for all
contract and administrative costs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Santa Clarita does hereby consent to enter into a contractual agreement with
Environmental Science Associates, Inc., for the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report for the Tick Canyon Project and associated
entitlement applications.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 1990.
JoAnne Darcy; Mayor
ATTEST:
Donna L Grindy, City Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof,
held on the 14th day of August, 1990, by the following vote of the Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMENBERS:
This agreement is made between the City of Santa Clarita,
(hereafter "City") and Environmental Science Associates Inc., a
California corporation (hereafter "Consultant"):
The parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Recitals. This Agreement is based upon the following facts:
(a) City desires professional assistance in preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report (the "Project") more particularly
described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein by
reference;
(b) Consultant has been selected to perform the Project, being
fully qualified and having agreed to do so subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement; and
(c) City's legislative body has determined that the public
interest, convenience and necessity require the execution of this
Agreement.
2. Services. Consultant agrees to perform all services described
in Exhibit A.
Consultant shall meet and consult with representatives of City at
all stages during the conduct of the work required pursuant to this
Agreement to assure that the City's designated representative is
fully and completely informed as to the nature and extent of the
work being performed by Consultant and as to the status and quality
of such work.
3. Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant for its services
based upon the costs set forth in Exhibit A and incorporated here by
reference. The total cost of this contract shall not exceed
$102,000.00, which represents the total compensation to be paid to
Consultant by City (the "Project Fee") for all work to be done by
Consultant pursuant hereto and includes all allowable costs. Such
costs shall be reimbursed only if approved by City as to nature,
type and amount. The Project Fee shall include the costs of
duplication for all reports and documents described in Exhibit A.
City shall make progress payments to Consultant in accordance with
the approved payment schedule identified in Exhibit A. The project
phase invoices shall include a breakdown of the number of hours
billed on each task and subtask by the authorized project staff with
an identification of the staff person(s) who performed each task and
subtask.
Within 15 days after receipt of a project phase invoice, City shall
either approve such invoice or return it to the Consultant
specifying any objections. Invoices shall be paid within 60 days
after approval. Upon submission of Consultant's final work products
under this agreement, in a scope, nature, and form satisfactory to
the City, all final monies shall be paid to the Consultant.
-1-
4. Time for Performance. Consultant shall in good faith utilize its best
efforts to perform all of the work'required under this Agreement in accordance
with the Time Schedule Summary attached as _Exhibit B and incorporated herein
by reference. During the preparation of the draft(s) of the EIR, the
consultant shall provide a complete response to all staff comments, concerns,
and corrections within 15 working days of all comments being received.
5. Consultant Staff. The Consultant Project Staff identified in Exhibit C
shall be responsible for completing the activities identified in Exhibit A.
Modifications to Consultant's staffing, including subconsultants for this
project, shall be made only with the written approval of the City.
6. Status of Consultant. Consultant shall be deemed for all purposes to be
an independent contractor in the performance of work pursuant to this
Agreement. This Agreement shall not be deemed, for any purpose, to have
created between the parties hereto a partnership, joint venture or other
relationship other than that of independent contractor insofar as Consultant
is concerned. Consultant shall be responsible for obtaining the services of
all persons required to perform the work required_by this Agreement,
including, but not limited to, such subcontractors as Consultant desires.to
employ as such. Consultant shall advise all such subcontractors that the City
bears no obligation for the payment of fees for their services or costs
incurred and that such are the exclusive obligation of Consultant.
7. Changes. The City and Consultant may make changes in the work only if
mutually agreed upon. If such changes cause an increase or decrease in the
Consultant's cost of, or time required for, performance of any services under
this agreement, whether or not changed by an order, an equitable adjustment in
compensation to Consultant shall be made and this agreement shall be
accordingly modified in writing. No such change shall be effectuated except
in writing, executed by each party hereto, expressing such changes and
reducing or increasing Consultant's compensation based upon such change or
changes.
8.. Liti ag tion. If City becomes involved in litigation regarding the Project
and desires Consultant's assistance or testimony, City shall compensate
Consultant for its services according to the normal hourly rates.
9. Ownership of Documents. All documents, studies, surveys, drawings, maps,
models, photographs and reports as prepared by Consultant, or any of its
subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be deemed for all purposes
to be the property of the City. All such materials, including originals,
shall be transmitted to the City upon completion of the work by Consultant
hereunder, or upon sooner termination of this Agreement. No person, including
Consultant, shall be permitted to utilize any of the material referred to in
this paragraph without City's prior written consent.
10. Indemnity. Consultant does hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the City of Santa Clarita and the respective appointed and elected
officers, boards and commissions, agents and employees ("Indemnified Parties")
from and against any and all claims and losses, costs or expenses for any
damage due to death or injury to a person and injury to any property
proximately resulting from any willful misconduct or negligent act or omission
of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, servants, agents, or
subcontractors in the performance of work pursuant to this Agreement.
Liability shall be limited to the amount paid under this contract. Such costs
and expenses shall include, but not be limited to, reasonable attorney fees.
-2-
Consultant does hereby agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless
Indemnified Parties from and against any damages, liability, loss, costs or
expenses which arise out of Consultant's negligent performance of the work
under this Agreement provided that such liability, loss, cost or expense is
caused by the act or omission of Consultant, or any of its officers,
employees, servants, agents, or subcontractors in performance of this
Agreement. Consultant's obligation to the Indemnified Parties shall include
reasonable attorney fees, costs and expenses incurred by the Indemnified
Parties in such defense, if Consultant is found to have been negligent.in
performance of work under this Agreement.
The provision of liability insurance coverage -as -required by Paragraph 11 of
this Agreement shall not affect Consultant's obligations under theindemnity
provisions of this Paragraph 10.
11. Insurance. Consultant shall take out and provide, contemporaneously with
the commencement of work pursuant to this Agreement, liability insurance
coverage in an amount not less than $500,000.00. Such coverage shall be
maintained in full force and effect at all times during the term of this
Agreement. Consultant.shall take out and maintain in full force and effect
during the term of this Agreement all other insurance coverage required by
law, including, but not limited to, workers' compensation coverage. All such
insurance shall expressly name the City and its agents, officers, and
employees as additional insureds.
Consultant shall supply to City upon execution of this Agreement, a valid
certificate of insurance evidencing the existence of all required insurance
coverages. Additional or replacement certificates shall be filed with City
evidencing the existence of such coverage at all times during the term of this
Agreement. The certificates of insurance shall contain a provision to the
effect that the coverage cannot be cancelled or substantially altered or
reduced except upon at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.
12. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
completion of the Project, and without cause, in accordance with the
following:
a. By City upon fifteen (15) working days written notice, mailed first
class, postage prepaid, or by personal service to Consultant; and
b. By Consultant upon fifteen (15) working days written notice, mailed
first class, postage prepaid, or by personal service to City.
Notices given pursuant to this paragraph shall be deemed to be effective on
the tenth day following the giving of notice of such termination whether
mailed or delivered. In the event of termination pursuant to this paragraph,
Consultant shall be compensated by City pro rata for work performed as of the
day of giving of such notice.
13. Notices. Noticesto be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be in
writing and shall be personally served upon the party to be notified or shall
be deposited in the United States Postal Service, postage pre -paid, certified
and registered, and addressed to the parties as follows:
-3-
A. CITY: Donald M. Williams, Contract Manager
Department of Community Development
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
cc: City Attorney
Carl Newton
Burke, Williams, and Sorenson
624 W. Grand, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
B. CONSULTANT: Environmental Science Associates, Inc.
4221 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 480
Los Angeles, CA 90010-3512
Attention: Roger Rent, Project Manager
Except as otherwise provided in Section 12 above, notices given pursuant to
this Agreement shall be deemed given on the date of personal service or the
fifth consecutive calendar day following the deposit of the same in the United
States Postal Service, or its successor.
The individuals named in this paragraph shall be deemed, for all purposes, to
be the representatives of the parties to this Agreement and empowered to act,
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, for and on behalf of that party.
Either party hereto may, in writing, change the designation of the responsible
representative for that party.
14. Construction. This Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the
State of California and shall not be construed against, or in favor of, either
party by reason of the fact that it was prepared by one party or the other.
15. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the parties and each party acknowledges that it is not relying on any prior,.
or contemporaneous, other agreements or representations, oral or written, in
entering into this Agreement.
16. Captions. Numerals. and Headings. Gender and Number. The captions,
numerals and headings used herein are for the purpose of identification and
location of the terms and for ease of reading and shall not be used to alter,
amend or otherwise change the plain meaning of the language in the text or the
intention of the parties. Wherever gender or number is used, it shall include
that gender or number which is appropriate to the context of the language
wherein such gender or number is used.
17. Attorneys Fees. Should any party hereto reasonably retain counsel for the
purpose of enforcing or preventing the breach of any provision hereof,
including but not limited to the institution of any action or proceeding to
enforce any provision hereof, for damages by reason of any alleged breach of
any provision hereof, for a declaration of such party's rights or obligations
hereunder or for any other remedy, then if said matter is adjudicated (which
term includes arbitration) the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition
to such other relief as may be granted, to be reimbursed by the losing party
for all costs and expenses incurred thereby, including but not limited to
reasonable attorney's fees and costs for the services rendered to such
prevailing party.
-4-
18. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing executed by
all of the parties.
19. Counterparts. This Agreement has been executed in two counterparts either
of which may be used as an original. One .such counterpart shall be delivered
to the Obligee when fully executed and the other to the Obligor when fully
executed.
20. Waivers. A waiver of any default of an obligation required by this
Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any subsequent default of same, or
any other obligation under this Agreement.
21. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence to this Agreement.
22. Effective Date. The effective date of this Agreement shall be August 15,
1990.
23. Severability. If any portion of this agreement is deemed to be void or is
held to be invalid, other sections, or portions thereof, of this Agreement
shall remain valid and in force, and shall be interpreted as though the void
or invalid portion(s) had not been incorporated herein.
24..Licuidated Damages. Should the Consultant fail to complete the work due
solely to the Contractor's performance within 10 days of the time provided for
in Exhibit B or within an extended period of time authorized in writing by the
City, or as may be allowed due to delays or for additional scope of work as
authorized, the City will deduct and retain, out of amounts due and owing and
any withheld monies which may be due, as liquidated damages, but not as
penalty, the sum of one hundred dollars ($100:00) per day for each and every
day that the work period exceeds the total working days allotted following the
period agreed upon the completion of the Project or as extended by the City.
Should the Consultant complete the work more than 10 days earlier than the
time provided in Exhibit B, or more than 10 days earlier than an extended
period of time authorized in writing by the City as may be allowed for
additional scope of work authorized, the City will pay, as part of the final
invoice, the sum of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per day for each and every
day that the work is completed prior to the days allotted as stated in Exhibit
B or as extended by the City. In no event shall the liquidated damages or
incentive exceed five thousand dollars ($5000.00).
This Agreement, consisting of six pages and three exhibits attached hereto,
has been executed as of the day of August, 1990.
WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
dates set opposite their names below:
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Date: By
Jo Anne Darcy, Mayor
9
ATTEST:
Donna Ll Grindey, City Clerk
Date: By
Approved as to form:
Date: By
, President
General Counsel
INC.
As an option, photomontages of anticipated development could be prepared.
The project Plan and its relationships to any urban design criteria will be discussed.
Views of anticipated development from a number of vantage points will be discussed.
The potential for anticipated development to cause light and glare in the area will be
discussed.
The Specific Plan's design relationship with the downtown core and the downtown
expansion area will be discussed.
Issues: The project will generate additional traffic in the site vicinity and nearby freeways, and
will generate a demand for transit and a demand for parking spaces. The levels of service of
nearby intersections could be affected by the project (and by cumulative traffic). During project
construction, streets in the project vicinity may experience increased truck traffic. In addition,
lane closures on streets immediately adjacent to the site and traffic rerouting may be necessary.
Feasible, realistic mitigation measures to alleviate any identified impacts should be included in
the project.
Tasks:
Task 1: Data Collection. An inventory will be made of the existing street system serving
the study area, including number of lanes, street widths, traffic control devices, and
operational characteristics. Any existing traffic volume data, including 24-hour counts and
peak hour intersection tuming'movement counts, will be identified and gathered by the
consultant, working with City of Santa Clarita and Los Angeles County staff. Any
additional pertinent data will also be collected, including previously conducted traffic
studies and information regarding planned street improvements within the study area.
The following eight locations have been tentatively identified by City staff for detailed
intersection capacity analyses:
•Soledad Canyon Road and S.R. 14 northbound ramps
•Soledad Canyon Road and S.R. 14 southbound ramps (near Shadow Pines)
•Soledad Canyon Road and Shadow Pines Boulevard
•Soledad Canyon Road and S.R. 14 southbound ramps (near Sand Canyon)
•Soledad Canyon Road and Sand Canyon Road
•Soledad Canyon Road and Sierra Highway
-Sand Canyon Road and S.R. 14 northbound ramps
-Sand Canyon Road and Sierra Highway
In addition, the following street segments have been identified for roadway capacity
analyses:
-Shadow Pines Boulevard (project site to Soledad Canyon Road)
•Soledad Canyon Road (S.R. 14 interchange near Shadow Pines to Sand
Canyon Road)
New AM and PM peak period turning movement counts will be conducted at each of the
eight intersections as part of this study. New 24-hour machine counts will be conducted at
three locations: Shadow Pines Boulevard north of Soledad Canyon Road, Soledad Canyon
Road east of Shadow Pines Boulevard, and Soledad Canyon Road west of Shadow Pines
Boulevard.
Task 2: Existing_ Traffic Conditions. An assessment will be made of existing operating
conditions and constraints within the study area. Peak hour levels of service will be
quantified at the intersections identified in Task 1. Existing traffic operational problems
and congested areas will be identified.
Task 3: Forecast Future Traffic Conditions. A series of traffic projections will then be
developed, as follows:
-Future base conditions, including background traffic growth and cumulative
developments within the study area.
-Project-generated traffic.
-Future conditions with development of the proposed project,
including background traffic growth, cumulative developments within the study
area, and traffic generated by the project.
As part of the above projections, the future traffic generation of the projected land uses
within the study area will be forecast and assigned to the street system. The future base
conditions will include traffic expected to be generated by other projects either currently
under construction or approved for development within a three mile radius of the
intersections included in the study. It is anticipated that the cumulative projects to be
included in this analysis will be identified by the EIR consultant in conjunction with staff of
the City of Santa Clarita and Los Angeles County.
Task 4: Traffic Impact Assessment. As assessment will be made of projected operating
conditions, and traffic impacts of the proposed project and of the cumulative traffic growth
will be identified. This assessment will concentrate on impacts at the major intersections
identified in Task 1 and along the major streets in the study area. Intersection levels of
service will be projected. A capcity analysis will be conducted for the street segments
identified in Task 1 to determine their ability to accommodate the projected future traffic
volumes. A traffic signal warrant analysis will be conducted for the Soledad Canyon
Road/Shadow Pines Boulevard intersection.
The internal circulation plan proposed as part of the project will be evaluated to ensure that
it is adequate to accommodate the projected traffic volumes. Issues regarding potential
traffic conflict points and constraints created by the proposed single means of access to the
project site will be included in this analysis. The potential need for a pedestrian
overcrossing at Shadow Pines Boulevard and "A" Street will also be evaluated.
Task 5: Mitigation Measures. Appropriate mitigation measures will be developed to
alleviate any negative traffic impacts thus identified. Mitigations could include such
measures as localized intersection improvements, street widenings or transportation
systems management/transportation demand management (TSM/IDM) actions. Potential
mitigations will be examined to determine their physical feasibility and effectiveness, and a
recommended plan will be developed. Recommended physical improvements will be
evaluated from a conceptual planning perspective only (preliminary engineering drawings
are not included as part of this workscope). Any unavoidable impacts will be identified.,
Those improvements which are required to mitigate a direct project -related impact will be
identified as such. For locations at which roadway improvements are suggested to mitigate
cumulative impacts (i.e. improvements not solely related to the project), the percentage
contribution of the project -generated traffic volumes relative to the total projected volumes
will be determined. This data could then be used by the City in determining the project's
financial responsibility towards implementing the improvements.
Task 6: Documentation. A technical report will be prepared which presents the
methodology, results, and recommendations of the transportation analysis. This report will
meet CEQA specifications. The significant findings of the transportation study will be
summarized in the EIR.
Issues: The project would generate incidental, short-term increases in dust and exhaust
emissions (from heavy equipment) due to grading, excavation and related activities during
construction. Such activities would increase suspended particulate concentrations in the
immediate project area, though the amount of dust and emissions would depend on the type and
scale of activity occurring, and on prevailing wind conditions. No significant impacts are
anticipated due to the localized and temporary nature of construction activity and currently
established dust control measures. The project would generate additional traffic (approximately
7,000 vehicle trips daily) and exhaust emissions, as well as emissions from natural gas
combustion for. building space and water heating.
Tasks:
- Local and regional climate, meteorology, and topography as they affect the accumulation or
dispersal of air pollutants will be briefly reviewed.
- Any air -pollution -sensitive land uses or activities that could be affected by the project or by
project -related traffic will be identified.
- Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies responsible for air quality management will be
identified, and federal, state and local air quality policies, regulations, and standards as they
pertain to the project will be briefly summarized.
- Current air quality conditions and recent trends (past five years) in the project area will be
summarized on the basis of the annual air duality monitoring data summaries published by
the Air Resources Board. Any existing major sources of air pollution in the vicinity of the
project will be identified on the basis of an inspection of the site and its environs, the South
Coast AQMD's most recent emissions inventory, discussions with SCAQMD, and other
available sources of information.
Ambient air quality standards will be identified.
SCAQMD projections of future air quality trends over the life of the project, and the
assumptions upon which the projections are based, will be discussed. Any agency policies
or goals that would apply to the project will be identified.
Air emissions resulting from anticipated construction in the project area will be
qualitatively described. The potential for project construction to cause violations of state
and federal standards will be discussed. Potential affects on any sensitive receptors in the
vicinity of the projects will be examined.
The potential for air pollutant emissions from project related activities to adversely affect
sensitive land uses or activities, or to impede attainment of air quality goals, will be
discussed in addition to conformance with the Air Quality Plan.
The potential for the combined emissions from project and cumulative development to
adversely affect air quality or impede attainment of air quality goals will be discussed.
Mitigation measures to reduce both construction -related emissions and emissions will be
identified.
NOISE
Issues: Anticipated construction will result in increased noise levels in the surrounding area.
Construction will occur over an extended period of time; noise impacts from construction
activities will occur over this time period. Upon completion of anticipated plan development,
project -related traffic could increase noise levels along streets in the project vicinity.
Tasks:
- The existing noise environment will be characterized. Any noise -sensitive land uses or
activities in the project area that could be affected by increased traffic noise will be
identified. Up to eight 15 -minute noise measurements will betaken during present peak
traffic hours.
- State and local noise policies, regulations and standards, including the Noise Element of the
General Plan, as they pertain to the project will be briefly summarized.
- Noise levels during each construction phase, including noise related to any piledriving, will
be estimated at the nearest sensitive receptors in the project vicinity. The effect of these
noise levels on people will be discussed.
- Existing and future noise levels at roadside along up to four road segments that would be
affected by motor vehicle traffic generated by the project.will be calculated, and
determination will be made as to whether the project would adversely affect adjacent
noise -sensitive land uses.
- The potential for noise from project or related activities to adversely affect any sensitive
land uses or activities, or to conflict with established City noise compatibility standards,
will be discussed in addition to conformance with the General Plan Noise Element
standards and policies.
The potential for the combined noise from the project area and cumulative development to
adversely affect any noise -sensitive land uses or activities will be discussed.
Mitigation measures to reduce construction nose levels will be identified.
GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY
Issues: The site is subject to severe groundshaking during a seismic event. Landslides are
present in the area and the underlying Mint Canyon Formation is known to be prone to landslide
activity. Grading of the site for construction of the building pads would result in disruptions,
displacements; compaction and overcovering of soils on approximately 50% of the site. Project
development will require earth movement estimated to be in excess of 7,000,000 cubic yards and
would include leveling of several knolls and low ridges in the vicinity of Tick Canyon Wash.
Erosion potential is considered high on the site and in Tick Canyon Wash. Short-term increases
in wind and water erosion will occur as a result of grading and construction activity. Potential
for long-term wind and water erosion exists on graded slope faces.
The existing natural drainage course of the project site is the Tick Canyon Wash. This is
identified with a Blueline Stream on the U.S. Geologic Survey map of this area. Implementation
of the proposed project would require substantial flood control improvements, including
construction of a Concrete channel. Development of the site would increase surface area
impervious to water and increase surface water runoff. Loss of permeable area and
channelization of the drainage courses would decrease the amount of area available for
percolation and groundwater recharge and may produce associated secondary impacts.
Construction of the proposed debris channel would decrease the amount of on-site erosion and
siltation, but would result in increased erosion downstream due to accelerated water flow.
Residential development of the site would increase the surface runoff discharge of urban
contaminants into the Santa Clara River.
Tasks:
The geologic setting of the project area and vicinity will be described, including bedrock
types, structures, geologic history and physiographic province, based on published reports
and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey and California Divisions of Mines and Geology.
The existing topography will be described.
Available soil reports will be summarized.
Any active or potentially active earthquake faults in the vicinity will be identified, and the
distance from them will be noted. The potential magnitude and frequency of earthquakes
from identified faults will be assessed.
The potential for groundshaking will be discussed and the expected bedrock acceleration
due to seismic forces will be quantified. The likelihood of secondary seismic hazards such
as liquefaction, ground lurching, lateral spreading and settlement will be examined.
Relevant information and policies in the Seismic Safety and Conservation Elements of the
General Plan will be discussed.
The depth to groundwater and the presence of any substantial aquifers will be identified.
Existing drainage will be discussed.
The findings of any current or previous geotechnical reports prepared will be summarized.
Probable project grading plans, topographic alterations and final elevations and slope
gradients will be described. The depths of cuts and.fills the volumes of excavated and
emplaced soil, and the amount of material imported to, or removed from, the project area
will be reviewed. The location of the disposal site for any materials removed from the site
will be identified.
The degrees of hazards to structures from seismic groundshaking surface rupture will be
assessed.
The potential for secondary seismic hazards be evaluated.
The project area's drainage plan will be discussed.
Feasible measures to reduce impacts, such as general design of erosion control plan,
possible relocation of structures and need for further studies will be identified.
r • .r :.tri
Issues: Project construction may result in a change in the diversity of species or number of some
species of plants and animals; and a reduction in the numbers of unique, rare or endangered
species of plants and/or animals; and the introduction of new species of plant and/or animals into
the area. Site development would require that over 60 percent of the natural vegetation be
removed. The site contains plant species from the Chaparral plant community. A Blueline
Stream traverses the site. The site ultimately drains into the Santa Clara River which is
classified as a Significant Ecological Area (SEA) in the Santa Clarita Valley Areawide General
Plan. The SEA contains the Unarmored Threespine Stickleback (UTS), a rare and endangered
species of fish, found downstream from the Tick Canyon Wash in the Santa Clara River.
The project will result in short- and long-term deterioration of existing biotic communities.
Grading of the site for construction of the levees, earthen embankment and residential
subdivision will result in the destruction of habitats and creates potential for significant
degradation of those remaining. Locally, the project would cause a decrease in wildlife
diversity, a reduction in the number of specimens, reduction in area available for future
habitation and migration, and cause temporary degradation (overburdening) of surrounding
habitats off-site. The project may impact the downstream essential habitat of the UTS.
Tasks:
- Determine to diversity of plant and/or animals species in the project area.
- Identify and unique, rare or endangered species in the project area.
- Discuss the potential introduction of new plant or animal species into the area.
- Evaluate the impact on the Unarmored Threespine Stickleback (UTS) habitat and proposed
a method of preservation for UTS habitat.
- Propose mitigation measures to protect other unique, rare and endangered plants.
IMORM
Issues: The materials of construction and construction labor for anticipated construction would
require substantial expenditures of energy, which would be non-renewable. Operations also
would consume substantial amounts of electricity, natural gas and gasoline and diesel fuel, along
with minor amounts of other energy resources. These demands on energy resources and delivery
systems may require increased exploitation of energy resources or expansion of transmission and
delivery facilities. The project alone may require new transformers and transfer stations. In
combination with other planned, approved, or anticipated development, the project could require
expansion of power generating facilities, with attendant increases in environmental impacts such
as air pollution and land conversion.
Tasks:
Utilities serving the project area and planned utility improvements will be identified.
The potential, if any, for development of energy resources (i.e., wind energy, solar energy)
will be identified.
Existing applicable federal, state (i.e., Title 24 Building Energy Conservation regulations),
and local energy conservation programs, policies, and regulations will be discussed.
On the basis of available generic energy consumption factors, the amount of energy that
would be required for construction of the projects will be estimated. Any inefficient or
unnecessary uses of energy for construction will be identified.
The types of end-use energy required by the project will be described. On the basis of
available generic energy consumption factors, the amount of energy that would be required
for construction, and the net increase in energy that would be required annually for
operation, will be estimated. Unnecessary or inefficient uses of energy proposed will be
identified.
The annual energy consumption of project -related vehicle travel will be estimated on the
basis of total daily vehicle trips, assumed trip lengths for various types of trips, and
published estimates of future average vehicle fleet fuel consumption factors.
On the basis of estimated energy consumption, the requirement for expansion of generation
capacity, or of transmission and distribution facilities, will be evaluated. If such expansion
would be required, the indirect environmental impacts of such expansion will be briefly
discussed.
The project's conformance with State Building Energy Conservation Regulations and
Standards (Title 24), and with any local energy conservation programs, policies, or
regulations will be discussed.
The potential for the combined energy demands of the project and of cumulative
development to exceed existing generation or distribution capacity will be discussed.
Measures that would reduce energy consumption will be identified.
• r : iW.5.7 :.0 yrt rr+
Issues: The Project would require extension and expansion of public services and utilities such
as fire and police protection, school facilities, water, sewer, storm drainage facilities, telephone,
natural gas and electricity
The increased demand created could exceed the current planned capacity of available service
providers in terms of resources. On-site service facilities may be included in the project. Public
utility agencies would require the project sponsors to bear the cost of the capital improvements
for a development while they bear the cost of providing service by collecting user -fees. Public
utility agencies have planned infrastructure improvements in the project vicinity. If so, these
improvements would be considered and discussed.
0—MM
Police Protection Services
The location of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's (LASD) station currently serving the
project area will be identified.
The response time for a service call will be estimated on the basis of LASD information.
The number of units that regularly patrol the area and the probable response time for a
service call to points within the project area will be determined.
The demand for police protection services associated with anticipated buildout will be
projected.
Potential public safety or security problems and emergency access concerns will be
described.
The need for additional personnel or equipment to adequately serve the project area will be
determined. Potential costs for such service expansion will be discussed on the basis of
information provided by the LASD.
- Security services planned as part of the project will be evaluated and incorporated into the
overall examinations of police protection.
Fire Protection
The location, order of response and response time of the Los Angeles County Fire
Department (LACoFD) station which currently serves the project area will be described.
Any current plans to construct new fire stations and other facilities planning
recommendations will be discussed.
- The demand for fire protection services associated with anticipated buildout will be
discussed.
Potential fire safety problems including emergency access will be discussed.
Conformance with the Safety Element of the General Plan and the Los Angeles County
Uniform Fire Code will be discussed.
- The need for additional stations, personnel, or equipment (including hydrants and water in
storage) in order to adequately serve the project area will be determined. Potential costs for
such service expansion will be discussed on the basis of information provided by the Fire
Department.
- Measures to alleviate potential impacts on fire protection services will be identified. These
measures may includes planned project fire -protection activities. These may include
landscaping with fire -retardant plant species, requirements for internal sprinkler systems,
and fire trails in open space areas.
Schools
Current enrollment and age breakdown of the School District and the location of nearby
schools will be determined.
Any current plans for expansion of the school system will be identified.
Current enrollment capacity at those schools which serve the project area will be discussed.
The demands for enrollment which anticipated development would place on the school
system and the current system's ability to absorb new students will be discussed.
The need for additional schools, teachers and other personnel that would be needed in order
to adequately provide for projected demand will be discussed.
On the basis of information to be provided by the School District, the cost of any required
improvements will be estimated.
Parks
The current total acreage of parks in the area will be determined and the ratio of park
acreage to population will be discussed.
The relationship of the project area and its proposed recreation facilities to the regional and
state recreation systems will be discussed. .
Road Maintenance
The conditions of existing road infrastructure which would be subject to increased use by
employees and visitors will be determined and the amount of increased use will be
evaluated.
The need for any new road infrastmcture will be assessed.
The costs of maintenance and repairs and the road maintenance needsmill be discussed.
Water Service
- Sources of the City's water supply will be identified.
- The capacity of the existing system to meet increased demand will be evaluated.
- Current infrastructure serving the project area will be described.
- Water consumption will be estimated.
- Proposed improvements and increases in capacity to the existing water supply network will
be discussed.
- The impact on the existing (and any proposed) water supply network will be discussed.
Storm and Sanitary Sewers
Wastewater generation from the plan will be estimated.
Plans for developing the wastewater and storm water collection system will be identified
and impacts on the proposed system will be evaluated.
The proposed storm drainage system will be described and downstream impacts will be
evaluated.
Telephone, Gas and Electric Service
Facilities currently serving the project area will be identified.
Project requirements for telephone, gas and electricity will be discussed.
Improvements necessary to serve the project will be identified, estimated costs will be
discussed on the basis of information to be provided by the service providers.
Solid Waste
- Solid waste disposal facilities currently serving the project area will be identified, and
available capacity of the service area will be discussed.
- The type and frequency of present service will be discussed.
- The current waste stream (total and per capita), and the composition of solid waste for the
City will be identified.
- Improvements necessary will be identified. Costs will be estimated on the basis of
information to be provided by the service district.
►: r1L_ • P
Issues: Project development may increase the rate of use of natural resources as fuel such as oil,
natural gas; natural materials used in construction such as wood; metals, and various rock
products.
Tasks:
Identify the types and amounts of natural resources used and determine the level of
significance.
t �A�`►IJ Iu19KOYOu_L�IUIM
Issues: Project development would directly and indirectly create many jobs. These employees
and their families will require a wide range of goods and services from the local community. It
is important to project employment characteristics (construction and operation -related) in order
to project the type and level of labor skills available within the project area to meet direct and
indirect labor requirements. Population growth resulting from anticipated development will
have major impacts on the demand for; and distribution of, housing, with associated impacts on.
the availability of affordable housing, in particular. This would affect the community's and
subregional jobs/housing balance.
Tasks:
The existing and projected housing stock within the project area, City of Santa Clarita, and
L.A. region will be characterized, including number, type, availability, distribution; and
affordability.
Trends in housing construction will be described, including amount, type, location,
planning and financing for housing needs.
Housing requirements, timing, type and distribution (location) for project employees will be
discussed, based on estimated population and income information.
The plan's impacts on housing values and rent levels will be estimated using a regional
housing filtering model now being developed for the University of Southern California's
School of Urban and Regional Planning.
The relationship of housing impacts to the recently passed growth ordinance will be
discussed.
The projects impact on local hotels and motels will be discussed.
Current employment levels and employment trends in the project area, including total
employment, employment rate, and employment by sector (e.g. office, manufacturing) and
labor category (e.g., professional, clerical) will be discussed.
Unemployment levels, including total unemployment, unemployment rate, and
unemployment by sector and labor category will be identified.
Direct project -related labor and skill requirements during construction and operation will be
characterized, including estimates of wage/income levels.
Appropriate multipliers for secondary (indirect) employment will be identified, and type
and extent of secondary employment induced by anticipated development will be
determined. (It is expected that we would use the employment multipliers generated by the
California Department of Water Resources input-output model.)
Direct and indirect employment requirements will be compared with labor availability and
appropriate mitigation measures will be recommended.
- Seasonal fluctuations in projected employment will be identified.
MIMIMOANJ
•
Issues: The project site exhibits a feature (drainage course) which indicate potential for
archaeological findings. In the event surface/sub-surface resources are discovered during
construction, mitigation measures should be implemented.
Tasks:
Visually inspect the drainage course for evidence of archaeological resources.
Review the literature for evidence of previous archaeological finds in the project area.
Identify, appropriate mitigation measures.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
Issues: An important consideration in the approval of a project development is the net fiscal
impact on local government. Fiscal analysis is complex depending upon revenues generated by
different project components, employee spending, visitor purchases, etc. Even though economic
analyses (including benefit -cost analysis) are not required under CEQA Guidelines, local
jurisdictions are justifiably interested in the projected economic impacts of proposed projects on
the public sector. The proposed fiscal analysis will provide a separate examination of 1) annual
operating revenues and costs, and 2) one-time (i.e., capital) revenues and costs. The potential
fiscal impact on the City will be the main focus of the analysis, but impacts on other
jurisdictions and agencies (e.g., school districts, park districts, etc.) will be noted.
Tasks:
Revenue/Cost Calculations
- Existing property tax revenues, if any, from the project site will be identified and the
current distribution of these revenues among local jurisdictions and agencies discussed.
- The cost of public services, if any, that are currently provided will be described.
- Major revenue impacts of the anticipated project on the City of Santa Clarita will be
discussed. These will include, at a minimum, the following categories: property tax and
tax increments, transient occupancy tax, sales tax, user charges, utility taxes, business
licenses, and state subventions: Revenue impacts will be calculated and expressed in 1990
dollars.
- Major revenue impacts will be estimated including reassessment of residential properties
and net changes in residential values.
- The revenue to be expected from one-time development fees, expressed in 1990 dollars will
be estimated.
- The annual operating costs for providing public services to anticipated development will be
calculated, based on service needs at buildout compared with existing service capacities.
- One-time, capital costs of increasing the physical capacity of service providers including
police, fire, schools, public works, and parks will be estimated.
- One-time, capital costs of increasing the physical capacity of utility providers including
sewer, solid waste, water, storm drainage will be estimated. It is assumed that annual
operating costs for these utilities are covered by user fees and need not be included
explicitly in the fiscal analysis.
- Total costs and revenues to City of Santa Clarita will be compared. These net fiscal
impacts will be calculated separately for annual and one-time costs and revenues. A.
summary table of costs, revenues and net difference between the two will be provided.
- Practical, feasible measures to mitigate any adverse fiscal impacts for each specific impact .
area (e.g., schools, public works) will be identified.
Issues; The project will generate new jobs and attract visitors in the project vicinity. Some of
the employees will become new residents of Santa Clarita and of other Southern California
communities. These employees will generate new demands for a wide variety of facilities and
services, such as schools, parks, commercial establishments, and police and fire protection.
Visitors may need temporary housing, parking, and may place added demands on services and
facilities. Both the employees and visitors will purchase goods and services from suppliers..
It is important that the City knows what to expect over time in the area surrounding the project
area; thus, the growth induction analysis should consider a relatively long time period. With this
information, the City can maximize desirable impacts and elements as well as anticipate adverse
impacts and take steps to avoid or minimize such impacts.
- The nature of induced growth, including the different elements (restaurants, hotels, motels,
shops, public facilities etc.) and anticipated distribution will be discussed. This will be
done for the project area and the surrounding area. Vacant and underdeveloped (or "soft")
sites will be identified.
- Availability of housing (and land) to meet anticipated requirements will be assessed, based
on information developed in the and Housing Population, and Employment section.
- The induced growth demands for housing (temporary and permanent), public facilities,
community and commercial services will be discussed.
The availability and capabilities of existing facilities and services (housing, schools, etc.) in
the City of Santa Clarita and in surrounding communities to meet the demand of the new
project -employee residents will be discussed.
- The impacts of any major.infrastmcture changes which appear to be necessary or desirable
to support induced growth will be discussed.
- The impacts of induced growth on present residents and businesses will be discussed.
- Strategies and measures which the City of Santa Clarita could employ to mitigate adverse
induced growth impacts and encourage positive, desirable impacts of such growth will be
identified. Mitigation plans/actions for the City to accommodate the induced growth in a
realistic, effective way will be developed.
In consultation with City's staff, ESA will identify four alternatives to the anticipated Specific
Plan buildout, including a no -plan alternative. Alternatives to be analyzed in the EIR may
include development of the project area with the existing zoning regulations; different uses
and/or different combinations of uses; lower height restrictions or greater housing uses.
Issues: Involvement of the environmental consultant as a part of the task force team will allow
for modification of the project to incorporate those mitigation measures that are feasible at the
time of the adoption of the specific plan. Additional mitigation measures that are necessary to
reduce an impact of the project below the significant level will be identified.
Pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 a mitigation monitoring program
must be prepared.
Tasks:
Mitigation measures shall be identified that reduce potentially adverse impacts.
Those mitigation measures that have been incorporated into the project shall be so
identified.
Those mitigation measures that have not been included in the project but are
necessary to reduce they impact below the significant level shall be identified.
Additional measures that could be taken to further reduce the level of impact shall be
identified, if possible.
A mitigation and monitoring program will be prepared in compliance with California
Public Resources Section 21081.6
The program shall include mitigation measures and shall identify the responsible
party for each mitigation measure.
The program shall be designed to insure compliance during the implementation of the
Specific Plan.
�r . : ►1r . �l•`�CW
ESA will attend three Public Hearings (not to exceed 15 hours of technical time.) Kaku
Associates will attend two Public Hearings (not to exceed 10 hours of technical time.
2. Schedule of Costs
Revision to Preliminary Draft EIR
(assumes responding to City Comments not to exceed 16 hours 1,400
of technical time)
Response to Comments
(assumes responding to Public Comments will not exceed 40 hours 3,000
of technical time)
Attendance at Public Hearings by
ESA and Kaku Associates (not to exceed 25 hours)a 2M
Total EIR 99,220
a. If attendance at meetings with City staff or additional public hearings were to become
necessary, it would be arranged on a time -and -materials basis in addition to the budget as
proposed above.
Project Management and Administration
15,000
Technical Tasks
Project Description
3,400
Land Use and Zoning
2,800
Aesthetics and Light and Glare
1,200
Traffic, Circulation and Parking
19,650
Climate and Air Quality
4,600
Noise
3,600
Geology and Hydrology
2,800
Plant and Animal Life
2,400
Energy
4,000
Public Services and Utilities
4,800
Natural Resources
1,200
Housing, Population and Employment
3,600
Cultural Resources
2,400
Fiscal Analysis
3,600
Growth Inducement
2,400
Alternatives
2,400
Mitigation Monitoring Program
3,000
Other CEQA Sections
1,200
Graphics and Word Processing
6,270
Preliminary DEIR Printing
2,000
Revision to Preliminary Draft EIR
(assumes responding to City Comments not to exceed 16 hours 1,400
of technical time)
Response to Comments
(assumes responding to Public Comments will not exceed 40 hours 3,000
of technical time)
Attendance at Public Hearings by
ESA and Kaku Associates (not to exceed 25 hours)a 2M
Total EIR 99,220
a. If attendance at meetings with City staff or additional public hearings were to become
necessary, it would be arranged on a time -and -materials basis in addition to the budget as
proposed above.
l"
a
�,I"[�.Y�1M[�
ESA will start work on receipt of executed contract and initiation payment.
ESA will submit the Screencheck Draft EIR to the City of Santa Clarita for review three
months following start of work assuming data is received as indicated in the attached data
request.
ESA will submit the Draft EIR to the City of Santa Clarita for publication fifteen days after
receipt of all the City's review comments.
Following the 45 day Public Comment Period, ESA will submit a Draft Response to
Comments Document to the City of Santa Clarita for review no later than six weeks after
receipt of all public comments.
ESA will submit the Final EIR to the City of Santa Clarita for publication fifteen days after
receipt of all the City's review comments.
ATTACHMENT TO EXHIBIT B
DATA REQUIREMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 47326
We need items in bold type within fourteen days of starting work. We would like the other
items within 30 days; if they are not to be provided, we need to know within 30 days.
1. Project Design:
a. Site plans, including plans for grading, drainage, utilities, infrastructure, proposed
land uses and zoning.
One fall size set and one reduced set (8S inches by 11 inches) of plans; clean black
line only (please avoid shading), pmts preferred, suitable for reproduction.
b. Statement of land uses including residential units by number, type, density and other
uses by acreage and square footage of development anticrpabed capacity of
elementary school, anticipated size and capability of fire station.
C. Elevation renderings and/or photomontages of the project, if available.
d. Statement of architectural design concept, including consideration of Santa Clarita
design guidelines, and compatibility with adjacent structures.
e. Description of facade materials and colors, glazing materials and colors, paving and
other planned surface treatments, landscaping, street lighting and pedestrian furniture.
2. Alternatives:
Alternatives to be considered include the CEQA-mandated "no project" alternative, an
alternate site alternative, an alternative meeting the existing County General Plan, an
alternative meeting the proposed City General Plan and a lower density alternative. We
will require site plans specifying acreage and land uses and the number of dwelling units.
3. Construction schodule and activities (including phasing), estimated duration in weeks o£
a. site clearance
b. mass grading
C. excavation and shoring (especially any sheet piling)
d. foundatiion preparation (especially any pdedriving)
C. framing
L exterior finishing
g. interior finishing
IL initial occupancy
i. full occupancy
4. Construction rancportation/cinnlarion/patking:
a. estimated average and maximum track round -trips to site per day daring 1) site
clearance and excavation and 2) steel erection and finishing.
b. probable size of trucks and load capacities
5. Project operation traffic:
a. site access/egress location; location,
b. delivery and loading areas for commercial and institutional uses)
C. number of paddng spaces for commercial and institutional uses
a. estimated project marimt value
b. estimated construction cost
C. estimated office lease rates per square foot per year
d. estimated retail lease rates per square foot per year
a. Total estimated construction payroll in 1990 dollars, or estimated person-years of
construction employment
b. Commercial Uses: Estimated non -tenant employment to manage and maintain the
project, and office and retail tenants (owners and employees). Estimated wages of
non -tenant employees.
C. projected retail revenues ( project amoral gross receipts of retail sales)
C. projected reins per square foot (office and retail)
f. Home prices (range and median)
8. Energy
a. connected kilowatt load for the entire project
b. anticipated peak day (by how) and annual (by month) load dism'bation carves for
electricity and natural gas (both in Btu) and any other fuels to be used
C. estimated average monthly consumption of electricity (kWh), natural gas (Btu), and
any other fuels (Btu) in both absolute amounts and per square foot of interior floor
area
C. all assumptions and calculations used to determine items a, b, c, and d (for example,
weather data used, lighting load distributions, and oft load distributions; if a
computer program was used, a copy should be attached)
f. a list of energy conservation measures considered by the project sponsor (including
those listed in item g)
Ms. Wendy Lockwood, Director of the Los Angeles Office, will be the Associate -in -Charge of
the Vesting Tentative Tract 47326 EIR. Her responsibilities will include supervision of the
consultant team, quality control and technical overview.
Mr. Roger Kent, ESA Senior Associate, will be Project Manager for the preparation of the
Vesting Tentative Tract 47326 EIR. He will review all sections of the EIRs. He will direct the
overall work program and attend meetings and hearings.
Ms. Susan Aha, ESA Associate will be Task Leader for the Physical Science sections of the EIR.
Dr. Susan O'Carroll, ESA Senior Associate, will be Task Leader for the Socio-economic
sections of the EIR.
ESA will contract with Kaku Associates to perform the Traffic and Circulation Analyses in
connection with the Vesting Tentative Tract 47326 EIR. Tom Gaul will be Kaku Associates'
Project Manager.