Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1990-07-24 - AGENDA REPORTS - MOBILE HOME PARK ZONE ORD (2)
PUBLIC -HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT: BACKGROUND 0 AGENDA REPORT 0 City Manager Approvp3% Item to be presented by: Lynn M. Harris o ann July 24, 1990 Draft Mobile Home Park Zone Ordinance Community Development The moratorium on mobile home park closures has lapsed and cannot be further extended. Until.another ordinance is adopted, closure proceedings could be initiated by mobile home park owners, and their properties could be considered for new development proposals. This ordinance is necessary if the Council wishes to regulate potential development of existing mobile home parks. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the above item on July 3, 1990 and continued the item to a date uncertain. Also, the Commission set a study session date for July 26, 1990 on this matter. In the interim, a new public hearing date has been set for the Planning Commission of August 7, 1990. The draft ordinance proposes a new zone classification entitled MHP Mobile Home Park Residential Zone. It would create a new, separate zone for mobile home parks, and would also remove "mobile home parks" from the various zones which presently permit them in the code. Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report, dated July 3, 1990 as well as the attached draft minutes (Item 4) of the Commission hearing on this matter. That the City Council adopt a minute resolution of intent to direct the Planning Commission to forward its recommendation as soon as possible. 1. Planning Commission staff report dated July 3, 1990 2. Draft ordinance 3. Draft Negative Declaration 4. Planning Commission draft minutes of its meeting of July 3, 1990 Continued To: Zliq MAR:rtt ID 93 Agenda Item: ........ ? 9 PUBLIC HEARING PROCEDURE 1. Mayor Opens Hearing a. States Purpose of Hearing 2. City Clerk Reports on Hearing Notice 3. Staff Report (City Manager) or (City Attorney) or (RP Staff) 4. Proponent Argument (30 minutes) 5. Opponent Argument (30 minutes) 6. Five-minute Rebuttal (Proponent) a. Proponent 7. Mayor Closes Public Testimony S. Discussion by Council 9. Council Decision 10. Mayor Announces Decision 0 t .. • CITY OF SANTA CLARITA • NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS ADDING, AMENDING, AND REPEALING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 22 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE CREATING A MOBILEHOME PARK RESIDENTIAL ZONE IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN: A Public Hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita to consider. a proposed ordinance to. create a Mobilehome Park Residential Zone. The proposed ordinance will be heard by the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Blvd., 1st Floor, the 24th day of June, 1990 at or after 6:30 p.m. - Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may appear and be heard on this matter at that time. Further information may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk's Office, Santa Clarita City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite 300. Dated: June 26, 1990 George Caravalho City Clerk Publish Date: July 3, 1990 00� D,bV au `t'i a"I) "o LIVV U'III I -n .In Iw VVo, VLu ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, ADDING PART 2.1 TO CHAPTER 22.20 OFr REPEALING SECTION 22.52.500 OF, AND AMENDING SECTIONS 22.20.0901 22.20.100, 22.20.200, 22.20.290, 22.20.370r 22.20.440, 22.24.1001 22.24.150r 22.28.060, 22.28.1101 22.28.160, 22.28.2001 22.28.250r 22.32.040, 22.32.100, 22.32.1601 AND 22.32.220 OFr THE SANTA CLARITA MUNICIPAL CODEr RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A MOBILEHOME PARI( RESIDENTIAL ZONE TO THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,. CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS$ SECTION 1.. :he provisions of Section 22.20.100 of the Santa Clarita Code is amended by deleting "Mobilehome parks, subject to the conditions of Part 6 of .Chapter 22.52" as an allowed use in such section. SECTION 2.. The provisions of section 22.20.090 is amended by adding "mobilehome parks, subject to the conditions of Section 22.20.164 of this Title" as a use permitted subject to Director's review and approval. SECTION 3.. Part 2.1 is added to Chapter 22.20 of the Santa Clarita Municipal Code as follows: -1- DCH/WP/ORN25278 (� 05/25/90 16:45 0213 236700 BW&S LA MAIN 0 2007/026 PART 2.1 - CHAPTER 22.20. MHP MOSILEHOME PARK RESIDENTIAL ZONE. 22.20.161. Permitted uses. Property in Zone MHP may be used for: -Adult residential facilities, limited to six or fewer persons. -Grading Projects', off-site transport, where not more than 100,000 cubic yards of material are to be transported, subject to the conditions and limitations of Sections 22.56.1700 and 22.56.1710. persons. -Foster-family homes, -Group Homes, children, limited to six or fewer -Large Family Day Care Homes. -Mobilehome Parks -Mobilehomes used as a residence of the owner and his or her family during the construction by any such owner of a permanent residence, but only while a building permit for the construction of such residence is in full force and effect and provided: 1. That the site plan submitted shall demonstrate a reasonable, practical, and economically feasible means of removing the mobilehome following completion of construction; and -2- ` DCH/WP/ORN25278 lf'�! 05/25/90 16:45 $213 236 2700 BW&S LA MAIN Q 008/026 2. That such mobilehome shall contain not more than one dwelling unit not to exceed twelve (12) feet in width and with no structural attachments; and 3. That such mobilehome shall be removed from the site prior to the end of twelve (12) months from the date of approval unless a.Conditional Use Permit has first been obtained. -Model Homes, erected on the same premises and used in conjunction with the new subdivision tract offered for sale for the First time, for a period of not to exceed two (2) years, provided: 1. That such models are on an approved lot in a tentative tract that has been filed and approved by the Commission; and 2. That such models may be used in conjunction with an approved temporary tract office but not a general real estate business; and 3. That any structure used for such purpose at the end of such two (2) years, shall either be removed or restored for a use permitted in the zone where located, except that the Director may, upon a showing of need by the owner of the property, extend the permitted time beyond two (2) years. -Real Estate Tract Offices, temporary, for the purpose of conducting the sale of lots of the tract upon -3- 11-4DCH/WP/ORN25278 05/25; 80 16:,W V213 236 2700 B6&S LA MAIN 0 which such tract office is located, for a period of not to exceed two (2) years, provided: 1. That such tract office shall not be used for conducting a general real estate business; and 2. That any structure used for such purpose at the end of such two (2) years shall either be removed or restored for a use permitted in the zone where 'Located, except that the Director may, upon showing of need by owner of the property, extend the permitted time beyond two (2) years. -Residences, single-family, subject to the standards provided in Section 22.20.105, at a density not to exceed six units per acre. -Residential Care Facilities, including adult residential facilities, group homes for children, and small, family homes for children, within three hundred (300) feet of any other licensed residential care facility, as defined by the health and Safety Code. Foster family homes and adult residential facilities for the elderly, persons over 62 years of age, shall be excluded from this requirement. -Recreation Facilities, neighborhood, not accessory to a principal use, including tennis, polo, and swimming, where operated as a non-profit corporation for the use of the surrounding residents. This provision shall not be interpreted to permit commercial enterprises. Z 009/026 -4- DCH/WP/ORN25278 V-7 05/25/90 16:46 12213 236 2700 • BNIS LA MAIN 0 -Signs as provided in part 10 of chapter 22.52. -Small Family Day Care. -Small Family Homes, Children. -Riding and Hiking Trails, excluding trails For motor vehicles. 22.20.162. Accessory Uses. Property in Zone MHP may be used for the following accessory uses: -Accessory Buildings and Structures, customarily used in conjunction with any permitted use. -Animals, domestic or wild, maintained or kept as pets or for personal use as provided in Part 3 of Chapter 22.52 of this Title. -Building materials, storage of, used in the construction of a building or building project, during the construction and thirty (30) days thereafter, including the contractor's temporary office, provided that any lot or parcel of land soused shall be a part of the building project, or on property adjoining the construction site. -Detached Living Quarters, on the same premises as, and not less than twenty (20) feet from a single-family residence for the use oftemporary guests or.servants of the occupants of such residents, provided: 1. That such quarters have no kitchen or kitchen facilities: and Z 010/026 -5- DCH/WP/ORN25278 1/_017 05/25/90 16'46 V213 236 2700 • B'WiS LA MAIN • 2. That such quarters are not rented or otherwise used as a separate dwelling; and 3. That such quarters are established on a lot or parcel of land having not less than one and one-half times the required area, except that said quarters may be established on any lot or parcel of land containing 10,000 square feet or more. -Living Quarters For Servants, employed in and by the occupants of a single family residence, attached to such residence, if no additional 'kitchen or kitchen facilities or equipment or cooking facilities or equipment are established or maintained in such attached servants quarters. -Rooms in a single-family residence may be rented to four or fewer roomers,with or without table board, unless the residence is also used as an adult residential facility or group home for children, and either use has a capacity of more than six (6) persons. Section 22.20.163. Uses Subject to Permits. Property in Zone MHP may be used for the following uses, provided a.Conditional Use Permit has first been obtained as provided in Part 1 of Chapter 22.56, and while such permit is in full force and effect in conformity with the conditiena of such permit for: -Adult Day Care Facilities. -fi- DCH/FTP/ORN2 5 27 8 a1011/026 05/25/90 16:47 0213 23400 B'A&S Lit MAIN 0 -Adult Residential Facilities, having seven (7) or more persons. -Arboretums and Horticultural Gardens. -Child Care Centers. -Churches, Temples, or other places used exclusively for religious worship, including customary incidental educational and social activities in conjunction therewith. -Communication Equipment Buildings. -Convents and Monasteries, on the same lot or parcel as a legally established church or school. -Crops: field, tree, bush, berry and row, including nursery stock. -Earth Stations. -Electrical Distribution Substations, including microwave facilities used in conjunction therewith. -Fire Stations. -Gas Metering and control stations, public utility. -Golf Courses, including the customary club house and appurtenant facilities. -Grading Projects, off-site transport, where more than 100,000 cubic yards of material are to be transported, subject to the conditions and limitations of Sections 22,56.210, and 22.56.230. Z 012/026 -7- DCH/W?/ORN 2 5 278 �� 05/25/90 16.47 $213 236:00 BW&S LA MAIN Z 013/026 -Grading Projects, on-site, but excluding projects where the Commission or the Council has previously considered such grading proposal as indicated by approval of an environmental document incorporating consideration of such grading project. children. -Group Homes, Children, having seven (7) or more -Heliports. -Helistops. -Juvenile Halls. -Land Reclamation Projects. -Landing Strips. -Libraries. -Microwave Stations. -Museums. -oil Wells. -Parks and Playgrounds with all appurtenant Facilities customarily mound in conjunction therewith. -Police Stations, -Publicly owned Uses, necessary to the maintenance of the public health, convenience, or general welfare, in addition to those specifically listed in this Section. -Radio and Television Stations and Towers, but not including studios. -8- ACH/WP/ORN25278 OW 05/25/90 16:48 $213 230 2700 BW&S LA MAIN Z014/026 i • -Residences, senior citizen, subject to the conditions listed in Section 22.56.2135. -Schools, through Grade 12, accredited, including appurtenant facilities, which offer instruction required to be taught in the public -schools by the Education Code of the State of California, in which no pupil is physically restrained, but excluding trade or commercial schools. -Sewage Treatment Plans. -Solid Fill Projects. -Storage, temporary, materials.and construction equipment used in construction or maintenance of streets and highways, sewers, storm drains, underground conduits, flood control works, pipelines and similar uses for a period not to exceed one (1) year. -Subdivision Directional Signs subject to the limitations and conditions of Part 8 of Chapter 22.56 of this title. -Telephone Repeater Stations. -Water Reservoirs, dams, treatment plants, gauging stationer pumping stations, tanks, wells, and any use normal and appurtenant to the storage and distribution of water. Section 22.20.164, Property Development Standards. The following property development standards shall apply to all land and structures in the MHP Zone. -9- DC8/WP/OAN25278 �/_M 06/25iy0 16:48 $213 236 2706 BW6S LA MAIN 2015/026 i • A. Lot area. Each lot shall have a minimum area of three (3) acres. A non -conforming lot of record under separate ownership at the time it became non -conforming may be used for or occupied by any use permitted in this zone. B. Hobilehome Space and Area. 1. Mobilehcme Space. Each mobilehome space shall have a minimum area of 1,500 square feet. 2. Mobilehome Space Dimensions. Each mobilehome space shall be not less than thirty (30) feet in width. There is no required depth. C. Population Density. The following population density standards shall apply to all mobilehome spaces in this zone: (a) There shall be a minimum of Three Thousand (3000) square feet of lot area for each mobilehome space in a mobilehome park. (b) Such lot area shall include access, mobilehome parking, automobile parking, outbuilding space, recreational areas, and other -similar uses. -10- DCB/WP/ORN25278 ��.� 05/25/90 16-48 V213 23600 8W&S LA MAIN • Z 016/026 D. Building Height. No building or structure erected in this zone shall have a height greater than two stories, not to exceed twenty-five (25) feet. E. Yards. 1. General yard requirements. Yards required by this zone are subject to the general provisions and exceptions contained in Chapter 22.48, which shall apply as specified. 2. Front yards. Each MHP zone lot which abuts a dedicated street, shall have a front yard of not leas than twenty (20) feet extending for the full width of the lot or parcel devoted to such use: 3. Corner Side Yards. Each lot or parcel of land shall have corner side yards of not less than: (a) :en (10) feet on a reversed corner lot; I -P (b) Five (5) feet on other corner lots. 4, interior Side Yards. Each lot or parcel of land shall have interior side yards of not less than five (5) feet. 5. Rear.Yards. Each lot or parcel of land shall have a rear yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet in depth. -11- DCH/WP/ORN25278� 05'26i VU 16:4y U213 236 2700 BBV&S LA MAIN Z 0 17, 026 • • F. Access and Circulation. 1. Driveway Width and Layout. Driveways within mobilehome parks shall be designed to conform to the minimum widths specified in Section 21.24.200. 2. Access. a. No site within the mobilehome park shall have direct vehicular access to a public street bordering the development. b. At least two (2) access points to a public street or highway shall. be provided which can be used by emergency vehicles. G. Vehicular Parking. Automobile parking spaces in a mobilehome park shall be provided as specified in Part 11 of Chapter 22.52 of this title. H. Screening. Public street frontages of a mobilehome park shall be screened to a height of not less than five (51 feet and not more than eight (8) feet with either a�� i, a decorative fence, an opaque hedge of shrubs or trees, or landscaped berm. Such screening shall be tapered to less than rive (5) feet where needed to provide unobstructed visibility from motorists. -12- DC8/WP/OAN25278 � �� VJ, LJi tju !b 4b 'G'G13 tab LIVIJ DMSJ LA MAIN �t11F5/�1b i. Signs. 1. Each mobilehome park may display only the following signs: (a) One (1) wall -mounted sign not exceeding twenty (20) square feet in sign area, or not more than one (1) free standing sign not exceeding twenty (20) square feet in signed area, or forty (40) square feet in total sign area to identify the mobile - home park, may be located at each principal entrance, and (b) One (1) free standing sign, not exceeding six (6) square feet in sign area or twelve (12) square feet in total sign area, advertising property for sale, lease, or rent, or indicating vacancy status, may be located at each principal entrance, (c) Temporary subdivision sales, entry and special feature signs shall be allowed as specified in Section 22.52.980, and -13- 0/4 DCH/WF/ORN25278 05/25/90 16.60 $213 `136 2 00 Bid&S LA RAIN • Q 019/026 (d) A directional or informational sign indicating the location of each residence by number shall be located at each principal entrance and in other appropriate locations for use by emergency vehicles, as well as the convenience of guests. The size, location, and number of such signs shall be established by the Director, 2. No source of illumination for any such signs shall be directly visible from adjoining streets or residential property, and no such signs shall be erected.within five (5) feet of any exterior property line. J. Local Park Space Obligations. Local park space which may be private, shall be provided to serve the mobilehome park, or a fee shall be paid in lieu thereof, as required for subdivisions by Title 21 of this Code. K. Design Principles. in addition to the required development standards contained in the preceding subsections, the mobilehome park shall be designed in keeping with the following design principles, as applicable: -14- DCH/WP/OAN25278 9 7 05/25/90 16:50 $213 236 2700 1. Access, BW&S-LA MAIN F-1 (a) Driveways shall be laid out in a manner to provide safe and convenient access to residences by automohilazi emergency vehicles, and service vehicles. (b) Principle vehicular access points shall be designed to encourage smooth traffic flow with controlled turning movements and minimum hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Mergirg and turnout lanes, traffic signals and/or traffic dividers shall be required where existing or anticipated heavy flows indicate need. In general, driveways shall be designed in such a way as to discourage substantial amounts of through traffic. 21 Walkways and Bikeways. If bikeways and pedestrian ways are provided in mobilehome parks: (a) Walkways to be used by substantial numbers of children as routes to school, bus stops, or other destinations shall be so located and safeguarded as to minimize Z ©20/026 -15- T DCH/WP/oRN25278 a 05/25/90 16!50 V213 226 2700 BWAS LA MAIN r� L contacts with normal automotive traffic. (b) If substantial bicycle traffic is anticipated and an internal walkway system is provided away from driveways, bicycle paths shall be incorporated in the walkway system. (c) Driveway crossings shall be held to a minimum on.walkways and shall be located and designed to provide safety, and shall be appropriately marked and otherwise safeguarded. (d) Ways for pedestrians.and cyclists, appropriately located, designedt and constructed may be combined with other easements and used by emergency, maintenance, or service vehicles, but shall not be used by other automotive traffic. DCH/WP/ORN25278 12021/026 05/25/90 16:51 22213 236 0700 BW&S LA MAIN • 0. Prohibitions. 1. A recreational vehicle may not be occupied in a mobile home park. 2. A mobilehome shall not be used for any commercial purpose. 3. A mobilehome shall not support a building. 4. A mobilehome park shall have no conven- tionally constructed or stud -framed residences other than one dwelling unit for the use of A caretaker or a manager responsible for maintaining or operating the property. 5. Vehicles shall not be parked within required driveways. 6. There shall be no commercial uses. except those uses approved by the Director and which are necessary to facilitate the operation of the mobilehome park. All such commercial uses shall be designed to serve only the residents and guests within the mobilehome park. There shall be.no Z 022/026 -17- ,J OCH/WP/OSN25278 I 05/25/90 16.51 %2213 236:700 BW&S LA MAZY 0 entrance to such uses, except from within the park, and no advertising matter shall be visible from the exterior of such uses, other than a sign not exceeding twenty-five (25) square feet containing the name and nature of the occupancy. P. Travel Trailer Park Prohibition, Travel trailer parks shall not be permitted within any mobilehome park. SECTION 22.20.165. Directors' Review and Approval. Before any building or structure is erected on any.lot in this zone, a site plan must first be submitted to and approved by the Director pursuant to the provisions of Part 12 of Chapter 22.56 of this Title. For the purpose of this section, a mobilehome shall be deemed a structure. In addition, each site plan for a mobilehome park shall show the provisions for lighting of interior accessways, the location of all mobilehome parking sites, and such other architectural and engineering data as may be necessary or desirable to permit the Director to make a finding that there is compliance with the provisions of this Code. Approval of a site plan for a mobilehome park shall not relieve the applicant ar his successors in interest from complying with all other applicable statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, including Title 25 of the State -18- DCH/WP/ORN25278 �� 05/25/90 16:52 =13 22700 BW&S LA MAIN 0 2024/026 Administrative.Code and Part 2.1 of Division 13 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. SECTION 4.. The provisions of Sections 22.20.200, 22.20.290, 22.20.370, 22.20.440, 22.24.100, 22.24.150, 22.28.060, 22.28.110, 22.28.160, 22.:8.200 And 22.28.250 of the Santa Clarita Kunicipal Code i,6 amended by deleting "Mooilehome parks, subject to the conditions of Part 6 of Chapter 22.52" as an allowed use in such sections. SECTION 5.. The provisions of Sections 22.32.040, 22.32.100, 22.32.160, and 22.32.220 are amended by deleting "Mobilehcme parks" as a. allowed use in such sections. SECTION 6.. Section 22.52.500 of the Santa Clarita Municipal,Code is repealed. SECT_ON 7.. This ordinance shall become effective at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first day after adaption. SECTION 8.. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of r 194 -19- DCH/WP/ORN25278 5�o4a 05/25/90 16.52 '*213 23700 BW&S LA MAIN 2025/026 ATTEST: CITY CLERK -20- DCH/WP/ORN25278� 05/25/90 16:52 13213 238 700 BW&S LA MAIN Z 026/026 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ) City Clerk'of the City of do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was regularly introduced and placed -upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 19_ That thereafter, said ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 19_, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERSi NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNC:LMEMBERS: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY -21- DCH/W?/ORN15278o(�{ • 0 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA STAFF REPORT ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 90-001 DATE: July 3, 1990 TO: Chairwoman Garasi and Members of the Planning Commission ` FROM: Lynn M. Harris, Director of Community Development ,jy �- APPLICANT: City of Santa Clarita LOCATION: Citywide REQUEST: An urgency ordinance to create and add a Mobile Home Park Residential Zone to list of existing zone classifications RECOMMENDATION: 1. Recommend approval to the City Council of the Negative Declaration. 2. Recommend approval to the City Council of the attached draft ordinance by minute action. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: The attached draft ordinance is being processed at the request of the City Council. It is a companion ordinance to ZOA-90-002 (zone change initiation), also on the Planning Commission's July 3, 1990 agenda. The purpose of the ordinance is to establish a new zone classification for mobile home parks. Subsequent to -the adoption of the new zone, it is anticipated that the City will initiate zone changes to place the various mobile home parks in the City within this zone. There are approximately 17 mobile home parks within the City, which with the exception of one which is in the process of closing, have been protected from closure by a moratorium ordinance. The moratorium ordinance is effective only .through June 27, 1990 and cannot be extended. Therefore, if further regulation of mobile home parks is desired, a permanent ordinance would be required. The adoption of a proposed Mobile Home Park Zone is the first step toward establishment of a permanent ordinance. Presently, a mobile -home park is allowed or conditionally allowed in nearly every zone in the City. Generally, a mobile home park is a conditional use in the residential and commercial zones, and a permitted use in the industrial zones. As a result, the existing 17 mobile home parks in the city are located in a variety of zone classifications. The draft ordinance proposes to remove "Mobile Home Park" as an allowed use in these zones and.create a new zone intended for mobile home parks, entitled "MHP Mobile Home Park Residential Zone.• One exception is that mobile home parks would still be allowed in the R-1 zone; however, the • ! ZOA-90-001 - 2 - July 3, 1990 draft ordinance would move this use from the conditional uses to a use requiring Director's Review. The proposed new zone has the typical components of a zone classification: permitted uses, accessory- uses, conditional uses, prohibited uses, and property development standards (including standards for signs). A summary of the major sections of the proposed zone is as follows. The most significant uses or standards in each section are listed: 1. Permitted Uses: mobile home parks, adult residential facilities, single family residences (maximum of six dwelling units per acre), residential care facilities, recreation facilities, signs, and small family day care. 2. Accessory Uses: accessory buildings, detached living quarters, and servants' quarters. 3. Conditional Uses: child care centers, churches, seniorcitizen residences, schools, and municipal facilities (police and fire stations, libraries, and public utility related uses). 4. Property Development Standards: lot area - minimum of three acres (except for legal nonconforming lots), space size - minimum of 1,500. sq. ft., building height - 25 ft., yards - generally the same as the R-1 zone, parking - 2 spaces per unit and 1 guest space per 4 units, and signs - one wall -mounted or freestanding sign maximum of 20 sq. ft. per each principal entrance. 5. Prohibitions: recreational vehicles, commercial uses, conventionally constructed residences (other than for caretaker purposes), and travel trailer parks. After adoption, implementation of the ordinance is expected to consist of a series of Council -initiated zone changes so that as many of the parks as desired can be rezoned to the Mobile Home Park Residential Zone. In addition to restricting uses to those permitted in the new zone, this would unify the zoning of mobile home parks. Rather than the present circumstance of having mobile home parks in a variety of zones, all parks would be placed in a single zone for identification and clarification. Staff met with owners of several of the local mobile home parks on Friday, June 22, 1990 to brief them on the draft ordinance and to listen to their concerns. Following is a summary list of concerns/suggestions that were discussed at. the meeting: (1) requests that not all parks be subject to the ordinance and other exceptions, (2) spot zoning, (3) affect on small business owners, (4) the owners feel that being forced to maintain the mobile home parks is a form of social welfare, (5) reduced market values, (6) owners can only afford minor maintenance --time has come for a new use of their property, (7) some parks were made for small travel trailers and no longer are feasible for current mobile home use, (8) the older the park the higher the maintenance costs, (9) some parks were built as temporary parks and the infrastructure is inadequate for current use, (10) need for replacement 0_01 0 0 ZOA-90-001 - 3 - July 3, 1990 mobile home parks, (11) need for provisions to enable the tenants to buy their own park as a co-op., (12) down -zoning and taking issues, (13) request to wait until the general plan is adopted, and (14) the impression that the ordinance is a panic reaction --the owners want additional time and may voluntarily agree in writing as a group not to close their parks for a period of six months, during which time alternatives could be discussed. LMH:CLT:MAR:r ID 83 OF E CITY OF SANTA CLARITA r N E G A T I V E D E C L A R A T I O N CERTIFICATION DATE: APPLICANT: TYPE OF PROJECT: FILE NO.: LOCATION OF THE PROJECT: City of Santa Clarita Zonine Ordinance Amendment ZOA-90-001 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: Citywide Proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance to create a Mobile Home Park Residential zone classification and amending and repealing other sections of the zoning ordinance for consistency with this new zone classification. [X] City Council It is the opinion of [ ] Planning Commission [ ] Director upon review that the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. Mitigation measures Form completed by: Michael A. Rubin, Associate Planner (Name and Title) Date of Public Notice: June 22. 1990 [X] Legal advertisement. [ ] Posting of properties. [ ] Written notice. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (Initial Study Form B) CITY OF SANTA CLARITA CASE NO. ZOA-90-001 Prepared by: Michael Rubin, Associate Planner Project Location: Citywide Project Description and Setting: The project is a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance to create and add a Mobile Home Park Residential Zone among the list of zones in the zoning ordinance with other miscellaneous sections of the zoning ordinance amended and repealed for consistentcy with this new zone classification. The new zone proposes permitted uses, accessory uses, uses subject to Director's Review, conditional uses, development standards (including provisions for signs), and prohibited uses. No particular setting is applicable, since the ordinance is applicable citywide. General Plan Designation Zoning: Applicant: Various (citywide) Various (citywide) City of Santa Clarita Environmental Constraint Areas: None A. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? .................. [ ] [ ] [XJ b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ............... [ ] [ J [X] C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ........................... [ I [ ] [XI d. The destruction, covering or modifica- tion of any unique geologic or physical features? .................................. I J [ J IXI e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either an or off the site? ....... [ ] [ ] [X] f. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ........................ [ ] L I IXI g. Changes in deposition, erosion or siltation? ................................. [ I I I IXI 4 • -2- `J YES MAYBE NO h. Other modification of a wash, channel, creek, or river? ........................... [ ] [ ] [X] i. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? ................ [ ] [ ] (X] j. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 25Z natural grade? ............ [ ] [ ] [X] k. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? ...................... [ ] [ l [X] 1. Other? [ ] [ ] [X] 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Substantial air emissions or deteriora- tion of ambient air quality? ............... [ ] I l [X] b. The creation of objectionable odors? ....... ( ] ( ] [X] C. Alteration of air movement; moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, eitherlocally or regionally? ..... [ ] [ J [X] d. Development within a high wind hazard area? ...................................... [ ] [ ] [Xl e. Other? ( l [ ] [X] 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ............................ [ l b. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? .............................. [ ] C. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ......................... [ l d. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, in-cluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? [ ] e. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ..................... [ ] f. Change in the quantity of ground waters. either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ............ [ J [ I [XI [ l [X] [ l [XI [ I [Xl [ I [Xl [ l [X] 4Ac17 E h. • -3- • YES MAYBE NO Substantial reduction in the amount of water. otherwise available for public water supplies? ............................ I l Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? .......... i. Other? restrictions to providing water to this project. [ l I l [Xl [ ] [ ] [X] 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grasses, crops, and microflora)? ......................[ ] [ ] [X] b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ...... [ ] [,] [X] C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? [ ] [ ] [X] d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ...................................... [ l I ] IX] 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish andinsects or microfauna)? ............ [ ] ( ] [X] b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? ..... [ ] [ ] [X] C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? ...... [ ] [ ] [X] d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat and/or migratory routes? ... [ ] [ ] [X] 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Increases in existing noise levels? [ ] [ ] [X] b. Exposure of people to severe or unaccep- table noise levels? ........................ [ ) [ ] [X] C. Exposure of people to severe-vibrations7 ... [ ] [ ] [X] 0109 • -4- 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce: YES MAYBE NO a. substantial new light or glare? .......... I ] [ ] (XI 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Substantial alteration of the present land use of an area? ....................... [ ] [ ] [X] b. A substantial alteration of the planned land use of an area? ....................... [ ] [ ] [X] C. A use that does not adhere to existing zoning laws? ............................... I ] I I IXI d. A use that does not adhere to established development criteria? ...................... [ ] [ ] [X] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: 8a -d This project proposes an ordinance that is intended to preserve existing mobile home parks. The adoption of this ordinance would not change existing land use. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ......................... [ ] I I [XI b. Substantial depletion of any non- renewable natural resources? ............... [ ] [ J [X] 10. Risk of Upset/Man-Made Hazards. Vill the proposal: YES MAYBE NO a. Involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, or pesticides, chemicals radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ........................ [ ] b. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ................... [ ] C. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? ...................................... [ ] d. Otherwise expose people to potential safety hazards? ............................ I l 0 -5- i 11. Population. Will the proposal: YES MAYBE NO a. Alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? ....................... [ ] [ ] [X] b. Other? ....................................... I ] I ] IX] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: ila,b This ordinance would create a mobile home park residential zone, and the adoption of the ordinance itself would not affect the location, distribution, density, or growth rate in the city. 12. Housing. YES MAYBE NO a. Remove or otherwise affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? ........................ [ ] [ ] [X] b. Other? [ ] I ] [X] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: 12a. The adoption of this ordinance would create a -mobile home park residential zone. The ultimate application of the zone on existing mobilehome park sites will - preserve the .City's existing mobilehome park sites. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ........................ [ ] [ ] [X] b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? ................. [ ] ( ] (X] C. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems, including public transportation? ............................ ( ] I ] [X] d. Alterations to present patterns of cir- culation or movement of people and/or goods? ...................................... I ] I ] IX] e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ....... [ ] [ ] [X] f. A disjointed pattern of roadway improve- ments? ................6............. [ ] [ ] IX] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: 13 a -f. Since the ordinance is intended to create a mobile home park residential zone, no changes in traffic or transportation impacts would occur, nor would existing circulation patterns change as a result of the adoption of this ordinance. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: YES MAYBE No a. Fire protection? ........................... [ ] ( ] [X] b. Police protection? ......................... [ ] [ ] [X] C. Schools? ................................... [ ] [ ] [X] d. Parks or other recreational facilities? .... [ ] [ ] [X] e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ........................... [ ] [ ] [X] f. other governmental services? ............... [ ] [ ] [X] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: 14a -e. Since the proposed ordinance would create a mobile home park residential zone, no changes in existing levels of service or demand for services would result due to the adoption of this ordinance. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in? YES MAYBE NO a. Use. of substantial amounts of fuel or energy . .................................... [ ] [ ] [X] b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? [ ] [ ] [X] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: 15a,b. Since the intent of the.ordinance is to create a mobile home park residential zone,.no increases of existing energy resources are anticipated, due to the adoption of this ordinance. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: YES MAYBE NO a. Power or natural gas? ...................... [ ] [ ] [X] 7 �' b. Communications systems? .................... [ ] [ I (XI C. Water systems? ............................. [ ] [ ] [XI d. Sanitary sever systems? .................... [ ] [ I [X] e. Storm drainage systems? .................... ( ] ( I [XJ f. Solid waste and disposal systems? .......... ( ] [ I [XJ g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed or inefficient pattern of delivery system improvements for any of the above? ......... [ ] [ I [X] 17. Human Health. Will the.proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Creation of any health hazard or potent - health hazard (excluding mental health)? ... [ J [ J [X] b. Exposure. of people to potential health hazards? ................................... I I [ I [XI 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public? ................... [ ] [ I [XI b. Will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ....................... [ ] I ] [X] C. Will the visual impact of the proposal be detrimental to the surrounding area? .... [ ] I I [X] DISCUSSION OF INPACTS: 18 a -c Since the intent of the ordinance is to create a mobile home park residential zone, no changes in views, vistas, or other aesthetic or visual aspects would change, as a.result of the adoption of this ordinance. YES MAYBE NO 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ............... [ ] [ I [XI 20. Cultural Resources. YES MAYBE NO a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? .............. [ J [ J [XJ • -8- • b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? ............... [ ) ( ) [X] C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which mould affect unique ethnic cultural values? ............. [ ] [ ] [X) d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ..................... [ ] [ ] [X] y33 • -9- 9 C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Section 15065 of the California Environmental quality Act states, in part, that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. YES= MAYBE NO 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate. important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ................. [ ] [ ] [X] 2. Does the` project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ........... ( ] [ ] [X] 3. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) [ ] [ ] [X] 4. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ... ..... [ ] [ ] [X] D. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The ordinance under consideration proposes to create a new zone classification, entitled 'Mobile Home Park Residential.* The creation of this zone in itself, would not have any impacts on the environment. It would merely add new language to text of the existing zoning ordinance. Following the adoption of this ordinance, the intent would be implemented by a series of City -initiated zone changes. Each mobile home park in the City (approximately 17 mobile home parks) could have its zone changed to this new Mobile Home Park Residential Zone. Presently, the various mobile home parks in the City are zoned differently. The existing zoning ordinance allows mobile home parks in most all zones in the City, either as a permitted or conditional use. The implementation of the proposed ordinance would serve two purposes: (1) It would provide a uniform zone classification for all mobile home parks, and (2) It would assist in preserving mobile home parks, since a zone change would then be necessary to convert a mobile home park to a subsequent land use. At such time as a zone change is proposed for a particular mobile home park, the appropriate environmental review would be required at that time, and potential impacts would be assessed accordingly. /v • 0 11. Population. Will the proposal: YES MAYBE NO a. Alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? ....................... ( ] [ ] [X] b. Other? ....................................... ( ] L ] [X] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: lla,b This ordinance would create a mobile home park residential zone, and the adoption of the ordinance itself would not affect the location, distribution, density, or growth rate in the city. 12. Housing. YES MAYBE NO a. Remove or otherwise affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? ........................ [ ] [ ] [X] b. Other? [ ] [ ] [X] DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS: 12a. The adoption of this ordinance would create a mobile home park residential zone. The ultimate application of the zone on existing mobilehome park sites will serve to preserve the .City's existing mobilehome park sites. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: f. A disjointed pattern of roadway -improve- ments? .............................. [ ] [ ] [X] YES MAYBE NO a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? ........................ [ ] [ ] [X] b. Effects on -existing parking.facilities, or demand for new parking? ................. [ j [ j [X] C. Substantial impact upon existing trans- portation systems, including public transportation? ............................ [ ] [ ] [X] d. Alterations to present patterns of cir- culation or movement of people and/or. goods? ...................................... [ ] [ ] [X] e. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ....... [ ] [ ] [Xj f. A disjointed pattern of roadway -improve- ments? .............................. [ ] [ ] [X] • -10- E. DETERMINATION On the basis of this Initial Study, it is determined that: The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED . .................................... (Xj Although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in this Initial Study have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED ..................................... The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required . ......................................... DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA June 22. 1990 Date S gnature Michael A. Rubin, Associate Planner Name and Title E. DETERMINATION On the basis of this Initial Study, it is determined that: The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED . .................................... [X] Although the proposed project COULD have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in this Initial Study have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED ..................................... [ ] The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the.environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required . ......................................... ] DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA June 22, 1990 Date MAR:r ID 79 �,/ / " M-4 I ff! i Michael A. Rubin. Associate Planner Name and Title / `3A •UTES OF REGULAR MEETING CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PLANNING COMMISSION 6:30 P.M. July 3, 1990 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita was called to order by Chairwoman Garasi at 6:35 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, First Floor, Santa Clarita, California. FLAG SALUTE Commissioner Brathwaite led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL All Commissioners were present. Also present were City Attorney, Doug Holland; Community Development Director, Lynn Harris; Parks and Recreation Director, Jeff Kolin; Principal Planner, Rich Henderson; Associate Planner, Michael Rubin; City Engineer, Jim Van Winkle; and Acting Commission Secretary, Sandy Walrath. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Worden, seconded by Modugno, to approve the Minutes of the May 29 Study Session as modified. There being no objection, the minutes were unanimously approved. ITEM 1 PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM MEETING OF JUNE 19 VESTING TENTATIVE ZONE CHANGE 90 -001; - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-003; AND OAK TREE PERMIT 90-007 It was moved by Cherrington, seconded by Modugno, to approve the Minutes of the June 5 Regular Meeting. There being no objection, the minutes were unanimously approved. - It was moved by Modugno, seconded by Worden, to approve the minutes of the June 19 Regular Meeting. There being no objection, the minutes were unanimously approved. Chairwoman Garasi opened the public hearing. Lynn Harris presented a supplemental staff report covering questions raised at the meeting of June 19. These questions included proposed paseo walkway and elimination of Lot 76; parking for the park site; the elimina- tion of Lots 85 and 86 to accommodate park building; a clarification of the transition from Green Mountain Drive as an overlook or a cul-de-sac; a description of the boundary wall; landscape plan for the buffer zone; modifica- tion of the "eyebrow" area and roadway over the crest; removal of two flag lots to improve visual impact. Ms. Harris also pointed out the density statistics and the difficulty of development because of the slope and the amount of cut and fill required for this site. 7-3-90 • PC Page 2 rroponent addressing the Commission was: Steve Krueger, Showcase Homes, 14482 Beach Blvd, Suite W, Westminster, CA. After Mr. Krueger's presentation, the Commission asked for additional information regarding paseos vs alternative means of ingress/egress; use of fast growing/drought resistant, larger than 15 gallon size trees for landscaping areas requiring camouflage planting; use of single family residences where view of such is expected. The Commission also questioned Jeff Kolin, Parks and Recreation Director, about ingress/egress and parking for the proposed park site and the proposed paseo. It was determined that Parks and Recreation would coordinate final agreement as to what method would be used. Commissioner Worden requested that Allan Seward comment on inquiries from homeowners in adjacent area as to stability of land after grading is accomplished. Mr. Seward reported that the grading would be an enhancement to the area. Chairwoman Garasi asked if there were any opponents, and receiving no response, closed the public hearing at 8:40 P.M. After a further discussion of the above, the Commission asked that the following be incorporated into the conditions for this item: The paseo plan or type of ingress/egress used for the park; Lots 85 and 86 be identified as the park site; a condition calling for enhanced architectural treatment on rear of buildings"visible from Golden Valley and the Antelope Freeway, to be documented with exhibits to be submitted to staff; park design, access and location be decided by the Department of Parks and Recreation; larger than 15 gallon size requirement for trees in buffer zone; Condition 88 be amended to properly reflect the description of the parameter wall. Mr. Krueger indicated he accepted all of the above conditions as proposed. A motion for approval of Item 1 was made by Commissioner Worden, seconded by Commissioner Cherrington, and approved unanimously by the Commission. Director Harris presented Draft Resolution 90-25 for approval. This resolution would amend the resolution to state that approval of this project improves and stabilizes the geological condition of an existing -adjacent tract to the east. Motion for approval was made by Commissioner Worden, seconded by Commissioner Brathwaite and unanimously adopted by the Commission. 7-3-90 • PC • Page 3 ITEM 2 VESTING TENTATIVE Chairwoman Garasi opened the public hearing, TRACT MAP 48403 and stepped down from the hearing due to a potential conflict of interest. Vice Chairman Brathwaite assumed the duties of the Chair. Rich Henderson, Principal Planner, reported on Item 2. This is a proposed industrial subdivision of two existing lots. Lot 2 has an existing building and one in the final stages of construction. The developer wishes to subdivide a 3.3 acre parcel into two parcels consisting of 2.3 acres and 1.0 acre. Lot 1 is 6.7 acres and developer wishes to subdivide three buildings into 21 industrial condominium units. The buildings are presently under construction and nearing completion. It was read into the record that Mr. Henderson had been contacted by the Fire Department on July 3 and was advised that the conditions set by the subdivision section for this development have been superceded by the local Fire Protection Office of the Fire Dept. According to the local Fire Protection Office, the conditions have been met and the necessary hydrants are in. The Commission requested clarification regarding the two conflicting sets of conditions prepared by the Fire Department. Mr. Van Winkle, City Engineer, was present to answer any questions concerning the conditions. Proponents addressing the Commission were: Daniel Gluck, Gluck Development Company, 21820 Burbank Blvd., Woodland Hills, CA. 91367; Robert E. Zuckerman, 23293 Ventura Blvd., Woodland Hills, CA 91364; David Osborn, 20969 Ventura Blvd., Woodland Hills, CA 91364; Joseph E. Pifko, 6338 Variel Ave., Woodland Hills, CA; Larry Mar, Engineering Service Corp., 6017 Bristol Parkway, Culver City, CA 90250. Mr. Gluck requested that Condition No. 11 be modified to reflect the Fire Dept. requirements for hydrants. He also requested modification of Conditions 12, 13 and 14, all of which relate to the above. In addition, he requested modification or deletion of the following: Condition 22 (which would prohibit occupancy of the multi -tenant buildings on Lot 1 prohibiting occupancy until final approval of the tract map); Condition 29 (agreement to dedicate right of way for bus bay - questions additional 2 ft of property on Avenue Stanford); Condition 33 (relating to sewer installation); Condition 39 (question regarding fee payment); Conditions 40 and 41 (landscape assessment district); Condition 45 (sidewalks); Condition 46 (funding for traffic signal control). Mr. Gluck submitted a letter from Donald Puente, Valencia Company, to be Exhibit to 48403. 7-3-90 • PC 0 Page 4 Robert E. Zuckerman spoke in opposition of Condition 22 as it stands. He also supported Mr. Gluck's request for modification of Condition 29. David Osborn, JDO & Associates, architects for project, requested modification on Conditions relating to landscaping and sidewalks. Joseph E. Pifko, industrial real estate broker, spoke regarding benefits of industrial condominium project. Larry Mar identified himself as available to answer any questions of a technical nature relating to engineering. Mr. Brathwaite closed the public hearing and asked for comments from the Director. Mr. Cherrington asked for comments on sidewalks, median, 40' vs 42' allowance for bus bay. Ms. Harris commented that the sidewalk condition was one that should be decided by the Planning Department, stated the bus bay easement should be 40', and recommended to the Commission that Staff should meet and present to the Commission a set of conditions which was ready for review. She recommended that this item be continued and that public testimony be accepted at the continued hearing. Commissioner Worden moved to continue this item, Modugno seconded, and the Commission voted 4-0 to continue this item to July 17. Chairwoman Garasi rejoined the Commission and declared an approximate 10 minute break at 8:45 The Commission meeting reconvened at 9:00 P.M. ITEM 3 ZONE CHANGE 89-007 The public hearing was called to order. Richard AND PLOT PLAN 89-125 Henderson presented the staff report. Proponent for this item was Mike Massoonnea, Ace Engineering, Montrose, CA. A continuance was requested in order to obtain guidance from the Commission. The Commission held a brief discussion on areas to be addressed by staff. Mr. Massoonnea indicated his willingness to redesign and work with staff to attempt a resolution of this matter. A motion for continuance of uncertain date was made by Commissioner Brathwaite, seconded by Commissioner Worden, and approved unanimously by the Commission. 7-3-90 ITEM 4 MOBILE HOME PARK ORDINANCE • PC • Page 5 Upon recommendation of the Director of Community Development, a motion for CPD zone change for the entire site was made by Commissioner Worden, seconded by Commissioner Modugno, and approved unanimously by the Commission. This is to occur in conjunction with the submission of a Conditional Use Permit proposing a revised design. The applicant will bear the cost of the CUP. The public hearing was opened at 9:40 P.M. Staff report was presented by Mike Rubin. Commissioner Worden asked Mr. Rubin to provide additional broad term explanation of the zoning ordinance, after which Chairwoman Garasi called for public presentations from persons speaking in support of this item. Proponents for this item were: Ron Bates, 16274-40 Vasquez Cyn., Canyon Country, who spoke at 9:43 P.M.; and Donald M. Wilder, 21441 Brier Way, Saugus, CA 91350, who spoke at 9:48 P.M. The Chairwoman then called for presentation by persons in opposition to this item. Opponents were Marion Clever, 3225 Longridge, Sherman Oaks, CA 91423, who spoke at 9:57 P.M.; Judith F. Porcasi, 1622 Campbell Avenue, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360, who spoke at 9:59 P.M.; David Evans, Star Rt, Box 8057, Frazier Park, CA 93225, who spoke at 10:05; Asa L. Shaw, 24833 San Fernando Rd., Newhall, CA 91321, who spoke at 10:10 P.M.; and Larry Kalvelage, 854 Hacienda Circle, Camarillo, CA, who spoke at 10:16 P.M. After hearing all speakers, the Commission held a general discussion about the appropriateness of proceeding on this item without additional information. Following consultation with legal counsel on various aspects of the ordinance as proposed, it was moved by Commissioner Brathwaite, seconded by Commissioner Modugno, and approved unanimously by the Commission to continue Item 4 to date uncertain, and to schedule a study session for July 26. ITEM 5 Chairwoman Garasi opened the public hearing on ZONE CHANGE Item 5, and upon recommendation of staff enter - INITIATION tained a motion for continuance to a date ORDINANCE uncertain, to follow the study session set for July 26. There was no person to address the Commission on Item 5. 3-90 • PC • Page 6 DIRECTOR'S Mike Rubin announced that July 17 would be the ANNOUNCEMENTS date set for Oak Tree Guideline discussion. Material was given to the Commission for an early review. COMMISSION Commissioner Worden requested a study session AGENDA on water. PUBLIC There was no indication that any person wished BUSINESS FROM THE to address the Commission from the Floor. FLOOR ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:15 P.M. RITA GARASI, Chairwoman Planning Commission ATTEST: LYNN M. HARRIS, Director Community Development City of Santa Clarita