The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1990-08-14 - AGENDA REPORTS - SB1332 PRESLEY SUBREGIONAL PLN (2)CONSENT CALENDAR DATE: August 14, 1990 AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approval Item to be presentedy Ken Pulskamn SUBJECT: SB -1332 (Presley) Subregional Planning - Oppose DEPARTMENT: City BACKGROUND This item is on the agenda to formally register the City of Santa Clarita's opposition to SB -1332 (Presley) relating to subregional planning. This.measure would authorize the creation of subregional planning authorities which must cover the geographic area of a county. Such authorities would be responsible for the preparation of an integrated subregional plan (ISP) designed to address growth and development in a subregion. The ISP must be submitted to each city and county in a subregion for consideration. Ratification by the Board of Supervisors and City Council of a majority of the cities with a majority of population is required before implementation of any subregional plan. The creation of this type of regional government which further oversees both the County Board of Supervisors and local agencies challenges local control of city and county governments within the state. That the City Council oppose SB -1332 and authorize staff to prepare letters of opposition to appropriate parties. ATTACHMENTS: SB -1332 Summary Letter from Supervisor Mike Antonovich Full Bill text on file in City Clerk's office :13 Agenda Item; J4 July 13, 1990 Piarb of `5ixpftiisvrs Ca>< utv of Iasi rnge.Ces MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH SUPERVISOR FIFTH DISTRICT Honorable Jo AnneDarcy Mayor City of Santa Clarita 23920 W. Valencia Blvd. Santa C%ri, CA 913:.55Dear MaV ^/ — RECEIVED JUL 1 91990 CITY kit NACIR'S OFFICE CITY CF SANTA CLARRA There /Are/ two regionalism bills now pending in the State Legislature, AB 4242 (W. Brown) and SB 1332 (Presley), which threaten local control of city and county governments in California. I urge that you join the County Board of Supervisors in vigorous opposition to these measures. AB 4242, which would create new regional governments with a wide range of powers, is currently pending a hearing date in Assembly Local Government. SB 1332, which would authorize regional planning agencies and penalize non-member local governments, has passed the Senate and is pending assignment of a hearing date in Assembly. Ways and Means. These bills could be scheduled for hearing at any time, and I urge that you write and/or call the members of these Committees as soon as possible to recommend strongly that they vote to defeat these measures. (The Committees' members and addresses are attached for ease of reference.) T nk you for your efforts.in working on these measures of mutual on ern. 1' "Sin e y, - 6ICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Supervisor, Fifth District Attachment c: George Caravalho, City Manager tns/m/r.m ROOM 869. HALL OF ADMINISTRATION. 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET, LOS ANGELES. CA 90012 TELEPHONE (213) 9745555 08./06/90 CA SB 1332 Page 1 AUTHOR: Presley TITLE: Subregional planning INTRODUCED: 03/09/89 LAST AMEND: 07/07/90 C014MITTEE: Assembly Ways and Means Committee HEARING: 08/15/90 9:30 am CODE SECTIONS: An act to add Chapter 2.1 (commencing with Section 65070) to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, relating to subregional planning. SUMMARY: Enacts -the Subregional Planning Act which would specify how a subregion, as defined, would be established by participating cities and counties, would prescribe the duties of a regional planning agency as defined, and would prescribe the duties of a subregional planning authority including the preparation of an integrated subregional plan, consisting of specified components for the growth and development of the subregion. SB 1332, as amended, Presley. Subregional planning. Existing law establishes regional planning districts.which may prepare, maintain, review and revise a regional plan which is a comprehensive long-term general plan for the physical development of the region, make or participate in studies or investigations of the resources of the region and problems of any nature related to the region, and perform other activities related to the physical growth of the region. This bill would enact the Subregional Planning Act which would specify.how a subregion, as defined, would be established by participating cities and counties, would prescribe the duties of a regional planning agency, as defined, and would prescribe the duties of a subregional planning authority including the preparation of an integrated subregional plan, consisting of specified components, for the growth and development of the subregion. The bill would require the plan to be submitted to the Office of Planning and Research for a determination that the plan is consistent with specified state laws and guidelines developed by the office. The bill would require the Director of Planning and Research to determine that the plan is qualified, as provided. The bill, if AB 2766 of the 1989-90 Regular Session of the Legislature is enacted, would prohibit a regional agency or local entity from expending funds after January 1, 1995, from the imposition on or after July 1, 1990, of a fee on motor vehicles registered within the.district unless a comprehensive regional plan has been prepared and adopted. The bill would also provide that with respect to San Diego County, procedures established by the Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board for development and approval of the regional growth management plan pursuant to Proposition C, approved by the voters of that county in November 1988, and the certification process established thereby shall be the accepted process for compliance with the proposed act. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. . �; I 3/05,1'90 VOTES: 05/10/89 Senate Local Government Committee P 6- 0 06/28/89 Senate Floor P 27- 2 06/27/90 Assembly Local Government Committee P 8- 1 Page 2 State -mandated local program: no. STATUS: 03/09/89 INTRODUCED. 03/29/89 To SENATE Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 04/27/89 From SENATE Committee on LOCALGOVERNMENT with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee. 05/10/89 From SENATE Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Do pass as amended to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. 05/17/89 In SENATE. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. 06/23/89 From SENATE Committee on APPROPRIATIONS: To second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and amend. 06/26/89 In SENATE. Read second time and amended. To third reading. 06/28/89 In SENATE. Read third time. Passed SENATE. *****To ASSEMBLY. 07/05/89 To ASSEMBLY Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 07/06/89 From ASSEMBLY Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT with author's amendments. Read second time, amended. Re-referred to Committee. 08/21/89 In ASSEMBLY. Joint Rule 61 suspended. 08/21/89 From ASSEMBLY Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT with author's amendments. Read second time, amended, Re-referred to Committee. 06/20/90 From ASSEMBLY Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee. 06/27/90 From ASSEMBLY Committee on LOCAL GOVERNMENT: Do pass as amended to Committee on WAYS AND MEANS. 07/07/90 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee on WAYS AND MEANS. VOTES: 05/10/89 Senate Local Government Committee P 6- 0 06/28/89 Senate Floor P 27- 2 06/27/90 Assembly Local Government Committee P 8- 1