HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-02-13 - AGENDA REPORTS - SOLID WASTE CMTE (2)i
Ar-RlWnA RRpnRT
CONSENT CALENDAR
DATE: February 13, 1990
6
City Manager Approvals
Item to be presentedy:
John E. Medina
SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE COMMITTEE'S JANUARY 31, 1990 REPORT TO THE CITY
COUNCIL
DEPARTMENT: Public Work/dv `
BACKGROUND V
At their September26, 19 0 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution 89-126
(modified by Resolutions 9-133 and 90-06) establishing the Citizen Advisory
Committee on Integrated Waste Management.
Resolution 89-126 laid the foundation for the Committee's structure and
specifies dates when reports are to be submitted to City Council.
Attached for Council's review and comment is the Citizen Advisory Committee on
Integrated Waste Management's January 31, 1990 interim report.
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and file
ATTACHMENT
Interim Report
Agenda Item: o�
SUBJECT: INTERIM REPORT --JANUARY, 1990
The Citi=ens Advisory Committee on Integrated Waste
Management, (Committee) is pleased to submit the following
progress report'- as required by Resolution 89-125 and liter
amending Resolutions.
�)
The Committee was formed by the City C,_-juncil Resolution
89-126 in October, 1989. The initial "Getting
Acquainted" meeting was held on November 9, 1939.
Mayor Jan Heidt, City Manager George Caravalho and
Director of Public Works John Medina spoke to the
Committee. The Committee agreed to meet the first and
third Thursdays of each month at the City facilities.
2). All five (5) scheduled meetings have been held since
then with an average committee, attendsnc«= oy �v .35
percent., even though there have been individual
scheduling concerns and conflicts.
?). The Commit ter=e naS heard sdditiQnal iniQrm3tiOn
presented by the Director of Public Worizs on the
various waste management efforts already in process by
the City as well as background information on the Wa: t.e
Disposal issues already in motion.
4). The Committee was addressed by the City Attorney's
office relative to the Brown Act. and the topic of
Conflict of Interest. This was to help individual
Committeee members understand how, they might properly
assist the City with the Committee's work.
J) The Committee requested the City Council revise the
Resolution 89-126 to eliminated the Committees concerns
about potential conflicts, and to bring the general
nomenclature within the Resolutions into conformance
with AB999 language. This was accomplished by the City
Council.
6). The Committee ex-oended (and will continue to expend)
efforts in learning of information about waste
1
®
CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA
JAN 3 0 1990
CITIZEN ADVISORY
Cl7YMI TEE
CITY'CLEWSOFFICE
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ON
INTEGRATED WASTE
MANAGEMENT
TO: CITY COUNCIL,
DATE:
January 29, 1990
CIT`,' OF SANTA
CLARITA
SUBJECT: INTERIM REPORT --JANUARY, 1990
The Citi=ens Advisory Committee on Integrated Waste
Management, (Committee) is pleased to submit the following
progress report'- as required by Resolution 89-125 and liter
amending Resolutions.
�)
The Committee was formed by the City C,_-juncil Resolution
89-126 in October, 1989. The initial "Getting
Acquainted" meeting was held on November 9, 1939.
Mayor Jan Heidt, City Manager George Caravalho and
Director of Public Works John Medina spoke to the
Committee. The Committee agreed to meet the first and
third Thursdays of each month at the City facilities.
2). All five (5) scheduled meetings have been held since
then with an average committee, attendsnc«= oy �v .35
percent., even though there have been individual
scheduling concerns and conflicts.
?). The Commit ter=e naS heard sdditiQnal iniQrm3tiOn
presented by the Director of Public Worizs on the
various waste management efforts already in process by
the City as well as background information on the Wa: t.e
Disposal issues already in motion.
4). The Committee was addressed by the City Attorney's
office relative to the Brown Act. and the topic of
Conflict of Interest. This was to help individual
Committeee members understand how, they might properly
assist the City with the Committee's work.
J) The Committee requested the City Council revise the
Resolution 89-126 to eliminated the Committees concerns
about potential conflicts, and to bring the general
nomenclature within the Resolutions into conformance
with AB999 language. This was accomplished by the City
Council.
6). The Committee ex-oended (and will continue to expend)
efforts in learning of information about waste
1
management. Start. -up learning has taken, and will
take, a great deal of time. There is a plethora of
data and information available on all of the issues
that make parts of the integrated management
topic.
7). The Committee developed a .basic mission statement and
reviewed the various areas of concern as seers by the
committee members. These areas were delineated and
prioritized for initial treatment for `.tart. -up work.
8). The Committee discussed and created a li=tter the
Director of Public Works on the Resolutions 90-7-1 and
90-7-2. This letter was made available Prior to the
FZ:ity's Forum on the Flsmere issue.
9). The Committee reevaluated the .areas of integrated waste
management and then established working groups to be
called working Sub -committees. This done to enable the
committee to Utilize e --i Sting expertise and <<xpex ience
within the committee. The Sub -committees are set as
follcwso
Landf i 13
Recycling
Transfer St.at:ions C������;,�
Source Reductio
Con, nosti.•„7
Hazardous t,Jaste
Education, as an issue, is very important to the
Committee and will be and integral nart o ac?;
committee's concern at the onset.
11") . Lastly, but Possibly the most LTRpOrtarlt at. this
juncture of the Committee, was the subtle and ongoing
process of learning about the capabilities of each
committee meniber and how best to work, together in an
optimum and effective manner. The Committee as a
whole is most pleased with the composition of the
Committee and feels it will get the most and the best
it. has to offer. Morale and cohesiveness factors are
high and should S.Sist LIS with the task at hand.
T!" Start-up Phase went slower than anticipated. The
Committee feels, that it is 7ust getting to the point where the
llnuta and bolts” wor;{ is under way.
Gene L. Green,
Chairman
2
RESOLUTION NO. 89-126
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF.SANTA CLARITA, CREATING A CITIZEN
ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of Santa Clarita finds that
the current refuse crisis faced by cities of Los Angeles County
impacts the development of a high quality of life for the
community, and causes it to be of significant concern to the
Citizens of City of Santa Clarita ("City"); and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best
interests of the City to see to it that the City Council create
a broad foundation of citizen participation and is as fully
informed as possible before establishing a Solid Waste
Management Plan for the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of formally
receiving the opinions of both the residential, commercial and
industrial communities within the City and the opinions of
experts in the field of solid waste. before establishing the
City's Solid Waste Management Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is necessary
to formalize a mechanism to insure that the suggestions and
ideas of the citizenry of the City of Santa 'Clarita are
formally incorporated into. the process of establishing the
General Plan;
.NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita, California, DOES RESOLVE as follows:
SECTION 1. Committee Structure. The Santa Clarita
Citizen Committee on Solid Waste Management (the "Committee" is
hereby established as an advisory committee to the City Council
and shall consist of eleven (11) members. Each member shall be
a citizen of the City of Santa Clarita or resident of the Santa
Clarita Valley and over the age of s eighteen.. (18).. The term of
the Committee shall be no more than one :v41j year or until the
City Council determines otherwise. The. Ccjidmittee shall be self
governing and shall conduct its meetings' in accordance with
rules which may be adopted by the Committee. At the end of the
first meeting, the Committee members shall select from among
their ranks a Chairperson whose name shall be made known to the
public and who shall have the power to address the City Council
on behalf on the Committee.
SECTION 2. Committee Appointments. The City Council.
- shall appoint eleven (11) members from the reduced applicant
pool and such additional nominees as the City Council may.
suggest (fifteen (15) applications screened for the City
Council by the City staff) to the Committee. The City Council
shall select the. eleven (11) members by any non-discriminatory
or legal selection process which, in the Council's discretion,
best insures a diversity of opinions on the Committee.
Interest representation factors to be considered in making
appointments to the Committee may include:
1. Residential Community,
2. Business community,
3. Environmental experience,
4. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts,
5. Landfill operators,
6. Refuse collection haulers,
7. Recyclers,
8. Young and elderly age groups,
9. Male and female persons; and
10. Minority and handicapped persons.
Although many members may represent special interest
groups, it is essential that each member approach and discharge
his or her duties in an objective manner to assure that the
overall goals of the community are achieved.
SECTION 3. Selection of the Reduced Applicant Pool.
The City staff shall' advertise for up to three (3) days in a
newspaper of general circulation within the City: the
availability of appointed membership positions on, the
Committee. The deadline for the submission of applications by
the citizenry for positions on the Committee shall be at least
ten (10) working days, from the last date of the aforementioned
publication. At the conclusion of the period designated for
applying for an appointment to the Committee, City staff shall
select fifteen (15) qualified applicants from among the pool of
applicants who have submitted completed applications, using any
non-discriminatory or legal selection process devised by the
City Manager or his agents for this purpose. However, in order
to insure that the suggestions and ideas of private individuals
are brought to the Council's attention, no fewer than one third
of the applicants selected by the City staff shall be comprised
of private individuals unless the cumulative number of private
individuals who apply for membership on the Committee is fewer .
than ten.,
SECTION 4. Contents of At3plication. No application
shall be considered complete at the time of the deadline for
submitting applications, unless it is accompanied by at least
three (3) independent letters of recommendation submitted in
support of the applicant. Such letters of recommendation must
r
be submitted by citizens of the City of Santa Clarita and must
contain affirmative representations that the authors of the
letters recommend the applicant's appointment on the Citizen
Committee on Solid Waste. Management. Applicants are allowed to
have=ore:= than three ( 3 ) letters of -°recommendation.. submitted;,
However, ,,any number of letters; ofa,. recommendation submitted -in.
excess, -of .three (3) shall entitle the applicant to absolutely
no._;special._consideration whatsoever:
,;SECTION 5. Duties. The duty of each member of the
Committee shall be to participate in the meetings of the
Committee as noticed by the Committee Chairperson. It shall be
the duty of each member of the Committee (including the
Chairperson) to cast his or her. vote whenever entitled to
pursuant to the Committee procedures adopted by the Committee.
SECTION 6. Scope of Work. The Citizen Committee on
Solid Waste Management will focus on specific and immediate
needs for the Santa Clarita Valley. It will undertake the
following scope of work:
1. Develop and recommend guidelines for a City
resolution announcing the City's commitment to a comprehensive
solid waste management program for the Santa Clarita Valley.
2. Review and comment on proposals for.landfill sites
in the Santa Clarita Valley.
3. Develop and recommend to Council a waste reduction
strategy with, clear and achievable goals.,- As part .of the
strategy, the Committee will study and consider various solid
waste management options:
a. Increasing a greater market for the purchase
and use of products made from recycled
(secondary) materials.
b. Pursuing packaging legislation.
C. Addressing a public education plan to
cultivate a recycling ethic in Santa Clarita.
d. Development of a household toxic waste
disposal plan for the City of Santa Clarita.
e. Analysis of waste composition for commercial
district.
f. Development of recycling program for
commercial district_..
g. Development. of a yard waste compositing
program.
h. Rail haul. rT,.
4. The Committee will incorpzbrate plans already
underway for the City's consideration of refuse collection with
existing refuse. haulers in a recycling program. The Public
Works Director will provide progress reports.to the Committee.
a
I
L
5. The Committee will also- develop and draft a
report for General Plan.element on Solid Waste Management for
review by the General Plan Advisory Committee.
SECTION 7. Committee Reports. The Committee shall
issue a written report signed by the Chairperson which shall
include comments and recommendations. The Committee is
expected to provide City Council with an interim report on
January 31, 1990 and a final report on June 1, 1990. A copy of
the report shall be delivered to the City Clerk on or before
the day the report is due.
SECTION 8. Removal of Member. Any resident of the
City of Santa Clarita may petition the City Council to remove a
member of the Committee for his or her unexcused failure to
cast a vote in less than. seventy-five percent (75%) of the
votes taken .during any one year in which the member was
entitled to cast a vote. For purposes of this Section a valid
abstention or legally necessary disqualification shall excuse
the necessity for a vote.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption
of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day
of September , 1989.
JANICE HEIDT.
MAYOR
10
ATTEST:
v a.;. n • �.a-arty
CITY CLERK
0
0
I. HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution wass
duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita,
ata .regular- meeting,--.-. thereof,. held -..on the 26th day
of September.. 1989, by the following vote _of the
Council:
AYES: COUNCIIMEMBERS:, -Boyer, Darcy, Koontz, Hekdt--
NOES : COUNCILMEMBERS None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS McKeon
GE'-A-.-CARAVALHO
CITY CLERK