HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-04-17 - AGENDA REPORTS - TRANSIT PGM (2)a
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Approval
Item to be presented.by:
CONSENT CALENDAR John E. Medina
DATE: April 17, 1990
SUBJECT: TRANSIT PRC
DEPARTMENT: Public Worl+
BACKGROUND
At the April 4, 1990 City Council Study Session, the Council received the final
report on the Santa Clarita Valley Transit Needs Study from City staff and
representatives from the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, LACTC and
the County Public Works Department —Transit Division.
ANALYSIS
The April 4, 1990 staff report (attached), recommends the adoption of the first
phase of the Study, the lease purchase of 22 new buses and that the City take
the lead role in managing the transit system.
During the April 4 discussion, the City Council suggested that City staff
investigate the feasibility of assessing new residents a transit fee and how and
where to construct and plan for bus turnouts to reduce impediments to traffic
flow. Staff is investigating these concerns and will report back at a future
meeting.
Staff is now prepared to transition into the next phase of improving the
Valley's transit system and recommends the following:
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt the short-range program as amended by the April 4, 1990 staff report.
The amendments include City management of the transit system and the lease\
purchase of the buses.
2. Direct City staff to proceed with issuance of RFP's for acquisition of buses
and for the,procurement of bus operator service. The buses will be equipped
with exhaust emission particulate traps.
3. Defer adoption of the long-range program until an analysis of the success of
the short-range program can be provided. An accurate analysis of the
success of the short-range program could probably be provided some time
toward the end of FY 92-93.
ATTACHMENT
1990 Staff Report
IAPPRO ED
Agenda Item:
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: George Caravalho, City Manager
DATE: April 4, 1990
SUBJECT: COUNCIL STUDY SESSION - TRANSIT NEEDS STUDY
1:14% TellaI 7
COMSIS Corporation, in association with two other firms, has been contracted
to provide an evaluation of the Santa Clarita Valley'stransit operations.
This study has been funded jointly between the City of Santa Clarita, the
County of Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission
(LACTC).
The consultant's final report has been submitted and reviewed, and Staff is
prepared at this time to discuss in detail the service proposals identified.
Staff's analysis of the consultant's report has been provided as Attachment A
to this memorandum. In addition, an Executive Summary has been prepared by
the consultant, which has also been provided with this memorandum.
SYNOPSIS
The consultant's report provides for implementation of short- and long-range
transit programs.' Because of equipment procurement logistics, the short-range
program has been designed for inauguration in FY 91-92. This program has been
designed primarily to promote an increase in existing transit system usage by
revising and expanding local, commuter, and paratransit operations. In
addition, an option for implementation of a pilot general public dial -a -ride
program has been included.
Long-range service proposals have been designed to strengthen the system
implemented under the short-range program. Based on population and employment
forecasts, the consultant has designed this program to run for 5 years
commencing in FY 95-96.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council direct Staff to prepare an agenda report for the next City
Council meeting recommending:
1. Adoption of the short-range program as amended by the Staff report.
2.. That Staff proceed with issuance of RFPs for the acquisition of buses and
for the procurement of bus operator services.
3. That the long-range program not be adopted until an analysis of the
success of the short-range program can be provided. An accurate analysis
of the success of the short-range program could probably be provided some
time towards the end of FY 92-93.
Agenda Item:
ATTACF1MENT A - STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC TRANSIT NEEDS STUDY
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
1. Program Adoption: It is recommended that Council adopt only the short-
range service program proposed by the consultant.
2. Financing: It is recommended that Council direct Staff to pursue a lease -
purchase plan for financing the cost of 22 new buses for the short-range
program. This includes 13 buses for local transit service and 9 buses for
commuter service.
3. Alternative -Fuels: It is recommended that alternative -fuel buses not be
considered for the short-range.program. It is recommended that new buses
procured for the short-range program be the diesel -engine type with
particulate traps.
4. Program Management: It is recommended that Council direct Staff to pursue
the assumption of transit administration services from the County. This
task is to be phased and coordinated in a rational manner. It is
anticipated that complete assumption of transit administration functions
can easily be accomplished prior to the start of FY 92-93.
PROGRAM ADOPTION
The consultant has proposed a,short-range program and a long-range program.
The short-range program is summarized on the attached Tables 1 through 4. The
long-range program has been designed based on projected population and
employment forecasts which may change significantly after the 1990 Census is
published. The long-range program also assumes ridership increases as a
benefit from implementation of the short-range program, which should be
substantiated prior to adoption. Staff therefore recommends adoption only of
the short-range program at this time.
FINANCING
22 buses will be required for implementation of the -short-range program.
Staff has reviewed several financing options, and recommends the lease -
purchase option. Under this method of financing, Proposition A funds will be
sufficient to finance the entire short-range program until FY 93-94 without
the need to utilize TDA funds. This is important since TDA funds can be used
for roadway.purposes once unmet transportation needs are met. A complete cost
analysis for the short-range program, based on lease -purchase financing of
buses is shown on Table 5.
ALTERNATIVE FUELS
The State has mandated that all buses purchased after January 1, 1991 be
powered by alternative fuels such as propane, methanol, or compressed natural
gas. Staff's investigation of alternative fuels has determined that current
ATTACHMENT A STAFF REPORT (CONTINUED)
Id -
bus engine technology does not support this mandate. Staff has determined
that buses which run on alternative fuels are out of service more often than
conventional diesel buses. In additional, operating and maintenance costs for
alternative fuel buses are significantly higher than those for convention
diesel buses. Tables 6 through 8 summarize these findings.
For these reasons, the LACTC is opposed to alternative fuel buses at this
time. However, "particulate traps" are currently available for diesel engine
buses at a cost of approximately $15,000 each. The LACTC and Staff have
determined that this trap is currently the most effective and viable
alternative for reduction of emissions.
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Currently, administration of transit operations is being performed by Los
Angeles County Public Works Transit Operations. The City, County, and LACTC
all agree that as the short-range program will best be served if
administration functions are.performed in close proximity to the City. This
being the case, the County does not have an objection to relinquishment of
administrative duties for the program. It is anticipated that the County
would pay the City for a percentage of total program administrative costs
based on County ridership, miles driven, or other equitable formula.
J
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE
•
SHORT-TERM PROGRAM
TABLE 1 - LOCAL TRANSIT
PROPOSED SHORT-RANGE PROGRAM
7 ROUTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 ROUTES
.
8 BUSES - OPERATOR OWNED . . . . . . . . . 13 BUSES LEASED BY CITY
7 BUS SHELTERS . . . . . . . . 38 BUS SHELTERS (PHASED IN)
HOURS OF OPERATION: 7 AM - 6 PM HOURS OF OPERATION: 6 AM - 7 PM
OPERATOR IS UNDER CONTRACT . . . . . . . . OPERATOR IS UNDER CONTRACT
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE
START DATE 7/1/91
TABLE 2 - COMMUTER TRANSIT
PROPOSED SHORT-RANGE PROGRAM
1 ROUTE (LOS ANGELES) . . . . . . . . . . 2 ROUTES (LA AND CENTURY CITY)
5 BUSES - OPERATOR OWNED . . . . . . . . 9 BUSES LEASED BY CITY
OPERATOR IS UNDER CONTRACT . . . . . . . OPERATOR IS UNDER CONTRACT
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE
START DATE 7/1/91*
TABLE 3 - PARATRANSIT SERVICE
PROPOSED SHORT-RANGE PROGRAM
6 VANS - OPERATOR OWNED . . . . . . . . 6 VANS - OPERATOR OWNED
WEEKDAY SERVICES - 7 AM - 6 PM . . . . . WEEKDAY SERVICE - 6 AM - 6 PM
SATURDAY SERVICE - WHEELCHAIR ONLY . . . SATURDAY SERVICE - 9 AM - 5 PM
UCLA SHUTTLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . UCLA SHUTTLE
OLIVE VIEW MEDICAL CENTER SHUTTLE
START DATE 7/1/90
TABLE 4 - GENERAL PUBLIC DIAL -A -RIDE
EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE
PROPOSED SHORT-RANGE PROGRAM
NONE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FOUR VANS - OPERATOR OWNED
DEMAND SERVICE (60 -MINUTE RESPONSE)
WEEKDAY SERVICE: 6:30 PM - 9:30 PM
START DATE 7/1/90
* Service to Century City could start sooner depending on availabilty of
buses.
I
d
O � aO
w Q
d
ON
G..
Qi:
"4
n n
n N tT
�O N co
•--1 a0
cn cD
c0 O n
en c�1
%0--f n
�O T cn
N cn
I eni fn
p cnl cr1
I S d
m
L
m
O
a0 %O N
0o O —4
Ln
f1
n m d
en
fn
n
1 N n Ln
I
I
1
fn %O
n %O rc N
co
po .-4
rn f' II
(II
a, c0
N
I t1 en
1
I
I
to fn
n Ln -4 O
in
tn�
n I n
co
.-c�
1 c0 O c0
I f•1 f'1
1
00 fT O% N
00
I
I
1 N N
%O N rf T
O
.:
D\ 1 (7%
M Ln N
N
c0
I O O O
I
i
O\ 10 O+ (ni
nS
-I
1
1
c0 co
N �D rf d
Ln
N
fn
N v —4
00
S
.1
N
N
4
I f'f 1 f'1
I
1
I
I
I
I
m
7
L
Go
C
1
•-1
41
iJ
>
1
...
v
T.
41 >1
C/] W
t: x 0
—4
Q m 3
O < >,
0
fc
x =
< i.+
a.+
.-c I
W f0 63
w 61 G C.
O
fa
L ..�
W w
F
C] I
C F
cc OO
a 44 96 = U
I
F
M r
r r Y< �
- r � O
--- r
r r: •
r O Y
V
w
O
O
V
r Cc
O
=: r
PO
PO,w
.n0+
POOP r
00 M
OO_
-• O- :
00 O
V
a
a
NQ-�
N O w
•00
-O OP `
r= OP =
NO O C w
• V P
• r a i
• C.p
r •
O
�w i
r..
•P_V r
as-kyr
�a��_-O
•P�Oyr
'^. O.'
M <r\
r6. >
�,V y u
�r V.rP
rP.r
r�••r
] < O
• Y r
�r r
� �
O ,r y •
iwo—
c
...c.
rr
OY
?=+C9V
o.
C.7 P�=
u
_
.rigid
- O
Y C •
C7 o'e1
�OOYO
_
a
r
'O
V O P
>: V r
O z
P> C 6
• 3.
A..VV
OC L, C r
v O r- J
C
p V
-'
•. ria
- O-
--r .-�__
O O C
V O p E
Ic
- P
V - N
-- te r- -
O O 1 V] V
e Y w
- O � r C•
G O
Y
CC.
a�_Ya3Si
'
_-
3+
_
7
`_3
�••�
>=a
�a—GY=:mac
.'nam
u.-7 Vw—
C r
Y
c 3 ,. S=
E
P V o � O
N
y r< V
s V
•— �
�n j v
m o r C— P u
u
u
Z
—
r
u
u
i
�
r
r
-
=
o
FUEL
'ethanol (M-100)
PR
Colorless, od. world
ubte liquid m,nstraticns
gas, coat, or• Depend-
cative and cojving. Ccm-
als and rubbe;pected
half energy d
or diesel.
COSTS
Fuel = $1.53 gal. diesel eq.
Bus = S40,000 additional
Facility= 5750,000
Conversion cost for buses and 23
yards - S137,250,000. Additional
annual fuel cost $44,118,000.
Methanol -Avocet Similar to meJSA). De- Fuel = S1.89 gal. diesel eq.
lubricity and r. Mainly Bus = S18,000 additional
: applica- Facility = S750,000
is. None Conversion cost for bus and fa -
Is. Commer- cility = 371,250,000. Additional
:ted 1991- annual fuel cost $60,000,000.
Ethanol (Alcohol) Colorless ligihnotogy, Fuel = S2.70 gat. diesel eq.
sugar, or bioibuses, at- Bus = S40,000 additional
tive and corriould use Facility = $700,000 additional.
and rubber coige fleet Conversion cost for buses and
energy densit•s but no facility = 3136,100,000. Addi-
h their tional annual fuel cost
availab.il- 594,098,388.
ompressed Natural Gas Colorless, odie 1948 Fuel = $0.62 gat. diesel eq.
ized), lighteiA). Very Bus = $35,000 additional
natural and c: and size Facility = $1,000,000 addition -
coat, very toi.S. New at. Conversion cost bus and fa-
onstration cility = S128,000,000. No addi-
I City ex- tional annual fuel cost.
Liquified Natural Gas Same as comprideveloped,
Fuel = SO.62 gat. diesel eq.
but refrigeraimon. Very
Bus = $40,000 additional
made liquid. istrations.
Facility = S1,000,000 addition -
in 5-10
at. Conversion cost buses and
mmercially
facility = $140,000,000 addi-
tional. No annual fuel cost.
Liquified Petroleum Gas Colorless, odt convey-
Fuel = $0.62 gal. diesel eq.
odorized) heal in U.S.
Bus = $18,000 additional
Liquid at 300 ons in
Facility = S30,000 additional.
product of pelfts and
Conversion cost bus and facili-
fining. 7/8 errcial
ty = $54,690,000 additional. No
gasoline. Cann 1990-93.
annual fuel costs.
currently.
r
O r•
�
0• r .
r O V+O.
r: A rYr••-
L Y
•r0
_rO�•r V
rrO�<IOL
rO • <•
O � e +P
Cad
•oou�.! i.
wuo ao�
Yo o
o icm
g
�`• Ye
Yerp
V r
r
•
O
r.
.
� r:�
A
A O O O N
• A O J O
O 7�>
D O Y
7 Y �
G r 1 A
0
N
• C M r
-' :r i
B O O u< O r
:
.. : 0 0 V
a ria
r
o� � a
c �`
Y
iie rr
C
a�0 O E •
p+`�
o•or
_pO ~`A OIL
ea
roo
rO ~ Y
+op
r
000
•ria
�» r �
• Y u •
a •r
O
„A M Y YO
�•Cr
C• O
rOMC O^w
Y~
•10 s P
rOrC_
�+
• YO \ •
Ow )G CSO a
Y
� • Or
•v +Y COr
NO Yr
��+Cr
O
Y O •O M J
V O M J
r
+ r r 0+ ] O
ro
w 1 Y O • 1
O N Y 0 1
roN
+ rp
•r+•
•p •
..�'.+
r r
•a
rr 11%
`>C_C>YC
•oro r•n•
• + ++O LN
ro
. I•r Lr
�.)r>++
•] ] r O A1
�•>�Prr
Y C Y r O
or
�)YYC
) u C_ O
1 O u= C
..p•��O>^r
r♦r>r
..swu <r
ILu u
o.rr.0+r
o.rrw ru_ +
rr .wur u
W �.•>u i
•
v e
cera
•i
c:+
C eke
C.
i
t.
C.
1 V Y
a e 1.
~
C 9 Y o
i O
r
G r u O
C C C O •�
•>•
a]_
r
L G
.• v
• u L
u a
u 0 r G
V+] Y
0
o Y
c o
a w Y Y o
-� o> •
i o �_ •Y.
- c v a 1 e
n v
v Y r
N
<
• v c r
L r oo
• r
•-
a
A..coy
•
o. �iN
ao.�� y
r
ono
ioi
.`. iv•oo
.2 6�.
`gg
j+ -
it
c> -
_Ar
>-
i•rO_ 8
u L •o
o_OC+P
o r e i i
C- r_>
r • i a
vY c'
.e. c o r
o�� civ
r G+= Y�
j a a+ Y-
`
> V✓ r+
S r r
p r .. r
M Q 3 C r
.I � O. r Y r
.. 0 7 r Y 0
i+�V
` Y
rL .
O
@
rL+r�YCL_J
L] O
rrs YOrrp=
J = 1 Y
r G u
Y 1
+ p
p E o s
C
i s c P 1`
C __+ Y
e G r Y L L CO
•>•
J r 0+
+ 1
C7
Y
W
VI
^ O r
•• o Y O
O O ']
r
Y
L 'O Y
J�
w 0
+ O Y
cn
._ o .• y o u
i Y-
.Y. c r =-
o`
Y o i-
v .. o
• r
c<
o
c r .. v
r.> u s
o c Y o> L
_
i c Y
o�
• J�ID
vw_ G
cCZ+.-
[JrG•
iO�
uioa
�
_wiv a
ii_= Y o
.Yios
ao �u_
iYoo lL
`oa iio
Y
-Q. �
-a
ai
Jo•o>r
W ea +
> a= a or
ii- it ai
Y`, arra
rc
sv
J O'3
a
>Q My
OYr
YO
�
JY
._±
=oyL
cy�c.`IL
_`
.`I=
C L L
ou
Ga f
l u
••o+
Nva
3' 0
0 OGi
r>
u c ••
s r 1
L r
r
e
c+
y
C..
�A
a o.=
o.`'i�
i�9
Aj.
it
r
_u
�ar.o.
uv
'.
1.
.-I •
Y c d
3- ca
C CV
r
r
r _ u
ra i
• u
off+
C2
CL
O
Q v i
S � r r A+
Q +
>
O J
•+
`• w 8 a r
O]
L
r y
>�Y�Ya
>YyL�+
L G 3 G
>_�>
L D
:'e
arc
C
u
te a
L r u
Y -`_ Y
E Gr
S
J O
Y+ Z
>
.•r OL Y
M_d
'YC'
- Y
> J• >
> J- r>
v
.+ o
>
e
i •��
^ 3•'• c
•' i
`i o iY
_1
0 o
�v ar
:u•
u C> o
10
_
c
j
a 1 o r
r
c r
1c5
G •`
u�e:a
i
`o
��o=
oma..
C •• o
Y
�
+
v�
a[
- :oa
r�lG�vv
[`�
.•.cavae
e
r
•. ) C
L L 9 1 e
Y Y+ L
_ 7 0
•GYr
'•C,
AiI
a y=
Y Y 8 u
r
y G O L
1 3 Y O J r
Y
Y Y G
s a
-.0 Y S
W r
r
y
_
e
D
Y
C
O �
Y
Y
r
`
_
O.
Y
•
•
111
G.
i
Y
•c
'�
>
Y
�L
r • •
i
1
0
FO
G
O
—4
W
U3
LW
t7T
fs. r♦
y
N
d y
.d .O
k+ of
•L7
.-t G
C13
O+ u
. 4 to
A
F
a
O y
L d
u y
a)
.k
O �
G
ro G
:J
C)o�'o
y �O
O
ra
m
E
rd y
O co
u C�
O
..E+ m
X L+
� y
� z
.d
� a7
y
.--t y
G �
° a
O
1J
y
N41
%4
I y
y
y C7 U
ro +�
r -t d U
cc r4
c w •o w
L L 41
O d N r••1
z G.
� C
b b t0 O
a)
•
to
0
U
1.+
N
,-+
m
0
ca
C 7
o
1a
�
O
O
�
N
o
.0
d
b
d
a�
to
ca
fa
w
fir+
...
•o
b
C
a
m
z
^
C
L
o
w U
o
U
t�0
OO
7
C d
c
u
-4
z
o0
cc o
c.
-4 L
E
y
y
O
E
.^�
N y
w
d
y
N
O C� U
\
no
L
W
w
to 7
fs. b
E
c0
v1 w
h0
02 bo
w
N
W
>
p
to
$4 co
,4
U ....
N
w u
4 10
r--1
44
°
Cd
Z)
°
w C
o
�.
v
0
G
N
.Oi
d
C
•
°
.i G
bo tV
Q.
V -4
—4 y
O
rr \
y 41
U
O
O u
y U
G•
L03 O
%0..4
S4 U
y +a
E 3
C
...r -4
. 4 3
++
*0 O
..-+ u
U cc
c w G
$A
U
yto
C
3+
to
W
o
w
3+
a
L
L
.c
Eo
cc
w
w
00
00
00
0
aai
Q
y
in
CO
N
N
O
G.
ra w
N
O
O
O
O
O
Ls:
O
:+
$4
L
a
X
a
G
C-
1:71
L+
C
bo
cn
y o
G
C
E G
w
t+
to
t�
C
ro a)
\
t6O
o0
N
C
L v7
L+
O
O
to
O
r.+
O
a\
Z
O
N
N
O
G
O
—4
W
U3
LW
t7T
fs. r♦
y
N
d y
.d .O
k+ of
•L7
.-t G
C13
O+ u
. 4 to
A
F
a
O y
L d
u y
a)
.k
O �
G
ro G
:J
C)o�'o
y �O
O
ra
m
E
rd y
O co
u C�
O
..E+ m
X L+
� y
� z
.d
� a7
y
.--t y
G �
° a
O
1J
y
N41
%4
I y
y
y C7 U
ro +�
r -t d U
cc r4
c w •o w
L L 41
O d N r••1
z G.
� C
b b t0 O
a)
ro
U
1.+
N
,-+
m
0
ca
C 7
o
1a
�
O
O
�
N
o
cd
b
�
a�
a
fa
w
fir+
y
d
L
�
Yl
�+
a
m
z
^
C
L
o
w U
o
U
t�0
OO
7
3 G
>
U)
en
O
o0
cc o
c.
C
14
C
d
E
.^�
y
N
O C� U
\
no
ho
C] y
w
v1 w
h0
O
N
r+ o
U ....
N
N
r--1
�.
CA O1w
w
O
rr \
G•
E 3
C
U cc
c w G
$A
U
yto
C
r O
. 4 ...
O
G
O
—4
W
U3
LW
t7T
fs. r♦
y
N
d y
.d .O
k+ of
•L7
.-t G
C13
O+ u
. 4 to
A
F
a
O y
L d
u y
a)
.k
O �
G
ro G
:J
C)o�'o
y �O
O
ra
m
E
rd y
O co
u C�
O
..E+ m
X L+
� y
� z
.d
� a7
y
.--t y
G �
° a
O
1J
y
N41
%4
I y
y
y C7 U
ro +�
r -t d U
cc r4
c w •o w
L L 41
O d N r••1
z G.
� C
b b t0 O
a)
ro
U
1.+
N
,-+
m
0
ca
o
1a
�
O
O
N
o
cd
b
�
a�
a
fa
w
fir+
y
d
L
�
Yl
�+
a
m
G
^
C
L
o
w U
o
U
t�0
OO
7
3 G
>
U)
en
O
O
14
O L
d
E
y
N
G �
O
W Ucc
H
C
d L U
y 4J ..•t
p Ld u
N U
O o0 r•t
� O
V .G
d rr
U 00 u
•4 G
w ra d
t••t to >
L+
n.
3.i
es0
O
L
G
1.a
to
S+
L
a
U \
tsO
u
U O
a)
r•a
w
r••i
ro
C
O 1+
u
G
o ho
U
O
y
c0
d
E
ro
G
O
•.-r U
u -4
� u
G O
H ra
W
u s+
O d
G u
Do u
c0 O
G L
al •.+ u �
L N ca N
y G .-+
ar d 7 G t.
W aq d0 0 •„•,
u w 41 w c n.
G ° 7 37+
G y
to
o d u
++ G y r+ u•�
O y d d a) O
G y 7 L7 y
.� +t r-1 O O
G E O O ••-�
r+
a�
u
F
.r
1•i � •O G
G a, G
a � � n cc
3-i L ro
n0 ra r+ y
• d tn
O O O � C
O
M
N
F
• F
L C
M. G Gro L
00 t:0 t:0 y C
O Ln U)tw
v u
T
U
U
n C)
u c:v
a a Gro
i,.. Y+ u u •c
tsO h0 b0 y L
Q) ro
O N N � v
O
ro
L
b ro
o
r u
o w r -
Wm •� •v
G u d
O O O �Oi �
O
U
O c
u
C c,
O k
U 4
S� y
O O U
to U o
r••1 U L
r•+
>
U O E-4 L �.
93
d u
..a
+•t
•.d ed
L
w
w U
G
7
3 G
>
G �
O
W Ucc
H
C
d L U
y 4J ..•t
p Ld u
N U
O o0 r•t
� O
V .G
d rr
U 00 u
•4 G
w ra d
t••t to >
L+
n.
3.i
es0
O
L
G
1.a
to
S+
L
a
U \
tsO
u
U O
a)
r•a
w
r••i
ro
C
O 1+
u
G
o ho
U
O
y
c0
d
E
ro
G
O
•.-r U
u -4
� u
G O
H ra
W
u s+
O d
G u
Do u
c0 O
G L
al •.+ u �
L N ca N
y G .-+
ar d 7 G t.
W aq d0 0 •„•,
u w 41 w c n.
G ° 7 37+
G y
to
o d u
++ G y r+ u•�
O y d d a) O
G y 7 L7 y
.� +t r-1 O O
G E O O ••-�
r+
a�
u
F
.r
1•i � •O G
G a, G
a � � n cc
3-i L ro
n0 ra r+ y
• d tn
O O O � C
O
M
N
F
• F
L C
M. G Gro L
00 t:0 t:0 y C
O Ln U)tw
v u
T
U
U
n C)
u c:v
a a Gro
i,.. Y+ u u •c
tsO h0 b0 y L
Q) ro
O N N � v
O
ro
L
b ro
o
r u
o w r -
Wm •� •v
G u d
O O O �Oi �
O
U
O c
u
C c,
O k
U 4
S� y
O O U
to U o
r••1 U L
r•+
>
U O E-4 L �.
93
POWER SOURCE
:ethanoll
;ethanol-Avocet2
: thano I l
:ompressed Natural Gasl
.iquified Natural Gasl
.iquified Petroleum Gasl
;ynthetic Diese12
)iesel/w Computer
.ontrol and Particulate
_raps2
:onventional Trolley
Susi
,artery Electric)
:agnetic Induction)
Iuel Cells)
ALTERNATIVE FUELS
COSTS
UP FRONT*
$ 137,250,000
$ ..71,250,000
$ 136,100,000
$ 128,000,000
$ 140,0009000
$ 54,690,000
TABLE 8
ANNUAL ADDITIONAL
$ 44,.117,000
$ 60,000,000
$ 94,098,388
$ _-.O-
$ -0- .
$ -0-
NOTES
Technology not fully available
today - 1994-98 timeframe
Fuel supplies limited. Emission
Benefit Unclear
$ -0- $131,029,410 May not meet AQMP requirements
$ 45,000,000 $ -0- May not meet AQMP NOx require-
ments on retrofits. Will meet
particulate and smoke standards
$1,930,000,000 $ 31,762,000
$ 680,000,000 $ 39,766,850 Technology not available today,
1996-2000 timeframe
$6,600,000,000 $ 31,762,000 Technology not available today,
1996-2000 timeframe
$ 317,000,000 $ 64,000,000 Extremely premature/Technology
(at least) (at least) not developed. 2000-2010
timeframe
-Up front costs are based on the marginal cost of adding technology to vehicles. If it was less
expensive to add to new vehicles, those costs were assumed. If retrofit was more cost effectiv
retrofit costs have been assumed.
-Technology on if new vehicle (designed in)
=Technology retrofitted to existing vehicles