HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-04-24 - AGENDA REPORTS - ZONE CHANGE 89-5 (2)AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Approval
Item to be presented b 4
Ken Pulskamp
PUBLIC HEARING
DATE: April 24, 1990
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 89-5 FROM A-2-2 (HEAVY AGRICULTURAL) TO R-1-11,0
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 11,000 SQ FT MINIMUM LATS) AND
00
R -2 -(DP) (TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
OVERLAY)
DEPARTMENT: Community
BACKGROUND
The applicant, Lori Johnson, requests a change of zone from the existing A-2-2
zoning to R-1-11,000 and R-2 (DP). The proposed project is located on the
east side of Bouquet Canyon Road at the southern terminus of Urbandale Avenue.
At its meeting on March 6, 1990, the Planning Commission unanimously approved
Tentative Tract Map 47320 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 89-11 and
recommended approval of the zone change to the City Council in Planning
Commission Resolution 90-12. No one testified against the project at the
Commission hearing and no negative correspondence has been received to date.
The staff report for the Commission, the negative declaration, the conditions
of approval for the tract map and the conditional use permit, and other
related material has been included in the packet for your review.
The site is 5.87 acres net in size. The tract map included five (5) lots,
four (4) for single family homes and a fifth lot for twenty (20) condominiums,
along with amenities. The (DP) Development Program overlay requires a
conditional use permit. The property includes a level pad along Bouquet
Canyon Road where the condominium development will be clustered and a plateau
with hillsides along the eastern third of the property where the single family
development is proposed. The net density of the site, if approved, would be
4.1 dwelling units (DU) per net acre and 3.5 DU per gross acre. In staff's
judgement, this project will be compatible with the future general plan once
it is completed. The staff listed its reasons for supporting the project on
the last page of the staff report to the Commission, and as indicated, the
Commission approved the project unanimously.
RECOMMENDATION
In brief, staff supports the project because: it is sensitive to the terrain
and the existing residential development; it provides a well-designed package
of recreational amenities, structures and landscaping; the project exceeds
the parking requirements established by the City; the concerns of the school
districts and other interested agencies were satisfied by the applicant, and
the Planning Commission unanimously approved the projec file• 8 5cc.rpt
henda Tem:
1
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS: ZONE CHANGE 89-5
1. Draft City Council Ordinance No. 90-7
2. Adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. P90-12
3. Exhibit "B" --Conditions of Approval adopted by the Planning Commission
4. Planning Commission Minutes, March 6, 1990 meeting, page 3.
5. Staff Memo, March 6, Revising the Conditions of Approval (adopted)
6. Staff Report to the Planning Commission, dated March 6, 1990
7. Vicinity Map
8. Land Use Map/Parcel Size Comparison, 700' radius
9. Letter of Support from the School Districts' Attorney, January 8, 1990
10. Negative Declaration
11. Initial Study Form B, with comments from City Staff & County Departments
12. Initial Study Form A
13. City Council Meeting Public Notice for April 24, 1990
14. Zone Change Application, including Record Owners & Owner's Affidavit
15. Conditional Use Permit Application
16. Tentative Subdivision Application
17. Easements of Record
18. Financial Interest Disclosure
19. Certified Property Owner's List Affidavit
20. List of Owner's Names and Mailing Addresses
21. Planning Commission Public Notice for March 6, 1990
2
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
REQUESTING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE 89-05 FROM
A-2-2 TO R-1-11,000 AND R-2 (DP) FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOUQUET CANYON ROAD OPPOSITE THE
SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF URBANDALE AVENUE
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
A Public Hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita to consider a request for approval of Zone Change 89-05. The City
Planning Commission recommended approval of the zone change to the City
Council on March 6, while approving Tentative Tract 47320 and Conditional Use
Permit 89-01 for the same site. The proposal calls for the division of a
single 5.87 acre lot into 5 lots. Four of the lots will be for single-family
residences and zoned R-1-11,000. One lot will be for twenty (20) condominiums
and zoned R-2 (DP). The condominium portion of the project will consist of
eleven residential structures, including nine duplex condominiums and two
single unit condominiums. The DP (Development Program) overlay zone for the
condominium portion requires a conditional use permit.
The item will be heard by the City Council in the Council Chambers, 23920
Valencia Blvd., 1st Floor, the 24th day of April, 1990, at or after 6:30 p.m.
Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may appear and be heard on
this matter at that time, or submit written correspondence delivered to the
City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. Further information may be
obtained by contacting the City Clerk's Office, 23920 Valencia Blvd., 3rd
Floor, Santa Clarita, CA.
Dated: March 29, 1990
George Caravalho
City Clerk
Publish Date: April ✓, 1990
file:z89 05pub.not
1
•
9
ORDINANCE NO. 90-7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
(ZONE CHANGE CASE NO. 89-5)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine as follows:
a. Applications for Zone Change 89-5, Tentative Tract Map 47320, and
Conditional Use Permit 89-11 were filed at the City of Santa
Clarita by Lori Johnson on July 18, 1989. The applications relate
to approximately 5.87 acres currently developed with one residence
and equestrian structures and located east of Bouquet Canyon Road
at the easterly terminus of Urbandale Avenue. The purpose of the
applications is to subdivide the property into five (5) lots, four
(4) for single-family residences and one (1) condominium lot for
twenty (20) condominium units. The application also requests a
change in zone from A-2-2 to R-1-11,000 for the four single family
lots and R-2 (DP) for the condominium lot. The (DP) Development
Program overlay zone requires a conditional use permit. The
Assessor's Parcel Number for the site is 2849-004-010.
b. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the
applications on Tuesday, March 6, 1990. At that time, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. P90-12 approving the tract map
and the conditional use permit and recommending approval to the
City Council of the requested zone change.
c. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider
this ordinance on Tuesday, April 24, 1990 at the City of Santa
Clarita City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa
Clarita, at 6:30 p.m.
SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received at the
public hearing, and upon studies and investigation made by the Planning
Commission and the City Council, and on their behalf, the City Council further
finds and determines as follows:
a. The City of Santa Clarita is proceeding in a timely fashion with
the preparation of a general plana There is a reasonable
probability that this project will be consistent with the general
plan proposal currently being considered or studied, that there is
little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed
ordinance is ultimately inconsistent with that plan, and that the
proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements of
state law and local ordinances.
b. The recommended zone changes will not result in a significant
negative environmental effect.
•
•
0
c. The subject property is of a size and shape which lends itself to
the proposed zone.
d. The proposed development is consistent with other zones in the
surrounding area.
e. The housing needs of the region were considered and balanced
against the public service needs of local residents.
f. The existing zoning is A-2-2. The revised zones for the project
are R-1-11,000 for the single family lots and R-2 (DP) for the
condominium portion of the project.
g. Implementation of this proposal will cause no adverse effects in
the environment which cannot be adequately mitigated through the
application of available controls. The change in zone will not
cause substantial environmental damage or substantial and avoidable
injury to fish or wild life or their habitat, since the project
site is not located in a significant ecological area.
h. There are no oak trees on the site.
i. Modified conditions warrant a revision from the existing A-2-2
(heavy agricultural) as it pertains to this area.
j. The proposed zoning of R-1-11,000 and R-2 (DP) is appropriate for
this area.
k. The subject site is a proper location for the proposed zoning
designations.
1. The placement of the proposed zones at this location will be in the
interest of public health, safety, and general welfare, and in
conformity with good zoning practice.
SECTION 3. In approving this ordinance, the City Council has
considered certain principles and standards, and finds and determines as
follows:
a. The requested change in zoning will not:
1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort, or welfare of
persons residing or working in the surrounding area; or
2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of
property of other persons located in the vicinity of the
subject property; or
3. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the
public health, safety or general welfare.
•
•
0
L�
b. The proposed site is adequately served by highways or streets of
sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and
quantity of traffic such use would generate, and by other public or
private service facilities as are required.
SECTION 4. The City of Santa Clarita City Council has reviewed and
considered the environmental information contained in the Initial Study, which
was approved by the Planning Commission, and determines that it is in
compliance with CEQA and that.the proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment. A mitigated negative declaration was prepared for
this project. Based upon the findings stated above, the City Council hereby
approves the mitigated negative declaration.
SECTION 5. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council does hereby
ordain that the application for a zone change from A-2-2 to R-1-11,000 and R-2
(DP) is approved. The zoning boundaries shall conform to the attached Exibit
"A", Tentative Tract Map 47320, with the single-family lots to be zoned R-1-
11,000 and the condominium portion of the project zoned R-2 (DP).
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of April 1990.
Jo Anne Darcy, MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ss
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA)
I, , City Clerk of the City of Santa
Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 90- was
regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the 24th day of April, 1990, at a regular meeting of the
City Council on the 24th day of April, 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL ME14BERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
z89_5.ord
CITY CLERK
iI
2.
RESOLUTION NO. P90- 12
A RESOLUTION OF 72M PLANNING CON IISSION OF THE
CITY OF SANTA CIARITA RECOMMING APPROVAL OF
ZONE CHAM 89-5 TO THE CITY COUNCIL. AND APPROVING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47320, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-11.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Planning Commission does hereby find and determine as
follows:
a. Applications for a zone change, tentative tract map, and
conditional use permit were filed at the City of Santa Clarita by
Lori Johnson on July 18, 1989. The applications relate to
approximately 5.87 acres currently developed with one residence
located east of Bouquet Canyon Road at the easterly terminus of
Urbandale Avenue. The purpose of the applications is to subdivide
the property into five (5) lots, four (4) for single-family
residences and one (1) condominium lot for twenty (20) condominium
units. The application also requests a change in zone from A-2-2
to R-1-11,000 for the four single family lots and R-2 (DP) for the
condominium lot. The (DP) Development Program overlay zone
requires a conditional use permit. The Assessor Parcel Number for
the site is 2849-004-010.
b. This project was last reviewed by the Development Review Committee
of the City of Santa Clarita on January 18, 1990, and the applicant
was provided with conditions.
c. A duly noticed public hearing was held on Tuesday, March 6, 1990 at
the City of Santa Clarita City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia
Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:30 p.m.
SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received at the
public hearing, and upon studies and investigation made by the Planning
Commission, and"on its behalf, the Commission further finds and determines as
follows:
a. The City of Santa Clarita is proceeding in a timely fashion with
the preparation of a general plan. There is a reasonable
probability that this project will be consistent with the general
plan proposal currently being considered or studied, that there is
little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed
resolution is ultimately inconsistent with that plan, and that the
proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements of
state law and local ordinances.
b. The division and development of the property in the manner set
forth on the subject tentative tract map will not unreasonably
ri
interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity
and/or public utility right-of-way and/or easements within the
vesting tentative tract map. Neither the design of the subdivision
nor the type of improvements will conflict with public easements
for access through the use of property within the proposed
subdivision, since the design and development as set forth in the
conditions of approval and on the tentative map, provides adequate
protection for easements.
c. Approval of this tentative tract map and conditional use permit
will expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval.
d. The subject property is of a size and shape which lends itself to
the proposed use.
e. The recommended subdivision will not result in a significant
negative environmental effect.
f. Implementation of this proposal will cause no adverse effects in
the environment which cannot be adequately mitigated through the
application of available controls. The design of the subdivision
and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial
environmental damage or substantial and avoidable injury to fish or
wild life or their habitat, since the project site is not located
in a significant ecological area.
g. The proposed development is consistent with other proposed and
existing developments.
h. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for
future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities given
the size and shape of the lots and their intended use.
i. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public
waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake or reservoir.
j. The housing needs of the region were considered and balanced
against the public service needs of local residents.
k. The proposed zoning of R-1-11,000 and R-2 (DP), if approved, would
allow the proposed development sub.ject to a conditional use permit.
1. The applicant has submitted a tentative map which depicts the area
proposed for the five (5) lots within the subject property, along
with building locations, parking areas, driveways, future public
streets, recreational facilities, and other typical details.
m. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not
cause serious public health problems, since sewage disposal, storm
drainage, fire protecton, and geological and soils factors are
addressed in the recommended conditions of approval. The discharge
of sewage from the subdivisioin into the public sewer system will
not violate the requirements prescribed by the California Regional
Water Qaulity Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with
Section 13000) of the Water Code.
n. Implementation of this proposal will cause no adverse effects in
the environment which cannot be adequately mitigated through the
application of available controls. The design of the subdivision
and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial
environmental damage or substantial and avoidable injury to fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
o. There are no oak trees on the site.
p. Modified conditions warrant a revision from the existing A-2-2
(heavy agricultural) as it pertains to this area.
q. The proposed zoning of R-1-11,000 and R-2 (DP) is appropriate for
this area.
r. The subject site is a proper location for the proposed zoning
designations.
s. The placement of the proposed zones at this location will be in the
interest of public health, safety, and general welfare, and in
conformity with good zoning practice.
t. The Los Angeles County Fire Department reviewed this project and
their recommendations are included in the attached conditions of
approval.
u. The development program and attached conditions of approval provide
the necessary safeguards to insure completion of the proposed
development by the applicant.
SECTION 3. In making the recommendation contained in this resolution,
the Planning Commission has considered certain principles and standards, and
finds and determines as follows:
a. Based upon a review of the submitted plan, the subject property is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development features
prescribed in the City's Municipal Code and otherwise required in
order to integrate the proposed use of the subject property with
the uses in the surrounding area. The requested uses at the
property will not:
1. Adversely affect the health, peace, comfort, or welfare of
persons residing or working in the surrounding area; or
2. Be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of
property of other persons located in the vicinity of the
subject property; or
3. Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the
public health, safety or general welfare.
b. The proposed site is adequately served by highways or streets of
sufficient width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and
quantity of traffic such use would generate, and by other public or
private service facilities as are required.
SECTION 4. The City of Santa Clarita Planning Commission has reviewed
and considered the environmental information contained in the Initial Study,
and determines that it is in compliance with CEQA and that the proposed
project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A mitigated
negative declaration was prepared for this project. Based upon the findings
stated above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the mitigated negative
declaration. Pursuant to this, the Planning Commission hereby recommends
approval of the zone change to the City Council, and approves the tentative
tract map (Exhibit A), and the conditional use permit, subject to the attached
conditions (Exhibit B), and (Exhibit C) the landscape/CUP plan, to be revised,
as specified in the conditions of approval.
SECTION 5. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall certify to
the adoption of this resolution, and shall transmit a copy to the following;
the applicant; the Departments of Public Works, Fire, and Parks and
Recreation; the City Engineer; and shall give notice of this recommendation in
the manner prescribed by Section 22.60.190 of the City's Planning and Zoning
Code.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 1990.
Rita Garasi, Chairwoman
Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting
thereof, held on the 6th day of March, 1990, by the following vote of the
Commission:
AYES: Commissioners: Modugno and Worden, -vice Chairman
Brathwaite, and Chairwoman Garasi
NOES:
ABSENT: Commissioner Sharar
Mark Scott, Director
Community Development
z89 5r.eso
3.
EXHIBIT "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ZONE CHANGE 89-05
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47320
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-11
PUBLIC WORKS'
1. The applicant shall show all easements existing at the time of
final map approval. All easements must be accounted for on
the approved tentative map. This,includes the location,
owner, purpose, and recording reference for all existing
easements.. If an easement is blanket or indeterminate in
nature, a :statement to the effect must be shown on the
tentative map in lieu of its location. If all easements have
not been accounted for, submit a corrected tentative map to
the Planning Department for approval.
2. The owner, at the time of issuance of permits or other grants
of approval agrees to "develop the property in accordance with
City Codes and other appropriate ordinances such as the
Building Code, Plumbing Code, Grading Code, Highway Permit
Ordinance, Mechanical Code, Zoning Ordinance, Undergrounding
of Utilities Ordinance, Sanitary Sewer and Industrial Waste
Ordinance, Electrical Code and Fire Code.
3. The applicant shall note all offers of dedication by
certificate on the face of the final map.
4. The applicant shall file a final map which shall be prepared
by or under the direction of a licensed land surveyor or
registered civil engineer. The map shall be processed through
the City Engineer prior to being filed with the County
Recorder.
5. The applicant shall label driveways as "Private Driveway and
Fire Lane" and delineate on the final map -to the satisfaction
of the Department.
6. The applicant shall remove existing structures prior to
acceptance of rough grade certification.
7. -The applicant shall quitclaim or relocate easements running
through proposed structures. -
8.' If signatures of record title interests appear on the final
map, the applicant shall submit a preliminary guarantee. A
final guarantee will be required. If said signatures do not
... appear,: on_....the-.final . map, ,a . title report/guarantee is needed
showing all fee owners and interest holders and this account
must remain open until the final parcel map is filed with the
County.Recorder.
CONDOMINIUM/LEASE
9. Prior to final approval of the tract/parcel map, the applicant
shall submit a notarized affidavit to the City Engineer,
signed by all owners of record at the time of filing of the
map with the County Recorder, stating that any proposed.
condominium building has not been constructed or that all
buildings have not been occupied or rented and that said
building will not be occupied or rented until after the filing
of the map with the County Recorder.
10. The applicant shall place standard condominium notes on the
final map, or shall record said notes by separate document, to
the satisfaction of the Department.
11. Deleted.
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
12. The subdivider is required to install distribution lines and
individual service lines for community antenna television
service (CATV) for all new development.
13. The applicant shall place above ground utilities including,
but not limited to, fire hydrants, junction boxes and street
lights outside sidewalk. .
14. The applicant shall install mailboxes and posts per City
standards. Secure approval of U.S. Postal Service prior to
installation.
15. Street trees are required, but this requirement may be waived
where sufficient trees have been placed within an abutting
landscaped setback. The applicant shall contact the City
Department of Parks and Recreation for.street tree location,
species, and approved method of installation and irrigation.
16. The applicant shall obtain approval of the Director of
Community Development and the City Attorney for proposed
homeowners association maintenance agreements prior to
recordation of the final map or a phase thereof.
17. The applicant shall -include a disclosure in the CC&R's to
comply with the Geologist's recommendations in the Geology
Report for restrictions on watering, irrigation, planting and
recommend types of plants,.if such restrictions are
....._recommended.by.the .Geologist,in the final approved Geology
Report.. If the Geologist's Report does not include
recommendations, no disclosure is required in the CC&R's.
18. The applicant shall provide standard property line return
radii of 13 feet at all local street intersections, including
intersection of local streets with General Plan Highways, and
27 feet where all General Plan Highways intersect, or to the
satisfaction of the Department.
19. The applicant shall construct drainage improvements and offer
easements needed for street drainage or slopes.
20. The applicant shall construct full -width sidewalk at all walk
returns. This condition only applies at the two driveway cuts
along Bouquet Canyon Road.
21. The applicant shall provide and install street name signs
prior to occupancy of building(s).
22. The applicant shall construct the following required road
improvements:
Street Curb & Base & Street Street
Name Width Gutter, Paving Lights Trees Sidewalk
A Street & B Court FT X X
Bouquet Cyn. Rd. 110 FT X X
WATER
23. The applicant shall file with the City Engineer a statement
from the water purveyor indicating that the water system will
be operated by the purveyor and that under normal operating
conditions, the necessary quantities of water will be
available, the system will meet the requirements for.the land
division, and that water service will be provided to each.
lot/parcel.
24. The applicant shall serve all lots with adequately sized water
system facilities, including fire hydrants, of sufficient size
to accommodate the total domestic and fire flows required for
the land division. Domestic flows required for the land
division are -to be determined by the City Engineer or Director
of Public Works. Fire flows required are to be determined by
the Fire Chief.
SEWERS
25. The subdivider shall install and dedicate main line sewers and
....... ... ._............. serve- each..lot/parcel- with a separate -house lateral or have
approved and bonded sewer plans on file with the Department of
Public Works.
26. Deleted.
27. The applicant. shall pay ordinance frontage charges before
filing this land division map.
28. The applicant.shall pay sewer reimbursement charges as
determined by the Director of'Public Works to the County of
Los Angeles before the filing of this land division map.
29. Easements are tentatively required, subject to review by the
Director of Public Works to determine the final locations and
requirements.
30. The applicant shall pay a deposit as required to review
documents and plans for final map clearance in accordance with
Section 21.36.010(c) of the Subdivision Ordinance.
GRADING. DRAINAGE & GEOLOGY
31. The applicant shall submit a grading plan which must be
approved prior to approval of the final map.
32. The applicant shall base grading plan on a detailed
engineering Geotechnical report which must be specifically
approved by the geologist and/or soils engineer and show all
recommendations submitted by them. It must also agree with
the tentative map and conditions as approved by the Advisory
Agency. All buttresses over 25 feet high must be accompanied
by calculations.
33. The applicant shall eliminate all geologic hazards associated
with this proposed development, or delineate a restricted use
area approved by the consultant geologist to the satisfaction
of the Geology and Soils Section and dedicate to the City the
right to prohibit the erection of buildings or other
structures within the restricted use areas.
34. The applicant shall submit drainage plans and necessary
support documents to comply with the following requirements.
These must be approved to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works prior to filing of the final map.
a. Portions of the property are subject to sheet overflow and
ponding and high velocity scouring action.
35. The applicant shall provide drainage facilities to remove the
flood hazard and dedicate and show necessary easements and/or
rights-of-way on the final map...
36. The applicant shall show on the final map the City's/Flood
Control District's right-of-way for storm drains. A permit
will be required for any construction affecting the
right-of-way or facilities.
37. The applicant shall provide for the proper distribution of
drainage.
38. The applicant shall provide for contributory drainage from
adjoining properties and return drainage to its natural
conditions or secure off-site.drainage acceptance letters from
affected property owners.
a. A hydrology study shall be submitted and approved prior to
the filing of the final map. The hydrology shall verify,
among other things, that the proposed streets and existing
downstream streets are able to carry, top -of -curb to
top -of -curb, the anticipated flow through the subdivision.
39. The applicant shall submit a detailed engineering Geotechnical
and Soil Report which must be approved prior to approval of
the final map. The report, based upon adequate test borings
or excavations, shall (1) describe any soil or geologic
condition(s) which, if not corrected might lead to structural
damage or slope failure, and (2) recommend action likely to
prevent structural damage or slope failure. A soil expansion
index test is required and shall be done in accordance with
the procedures of UBC Std. No. 29-2.
40. The applicant shall adjust, relocate, and/or eliminate lot
lines, lots, streets, easements, grading, geotechnical
protective devices, and/or physical improvements to comply
with ordinances, policies, and standards in effect at the date
the City determined the application to be complete all to the
satisfaction of this Department.
41. Prior to final approval, enter into a written agreement with
the City of Santa Clarita whereby the subdivider agrees to pay
to the City a sum (to be determined by the City Council) times
the factor per development unit for the purpose of
contributing to a,proposed Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit
District to implement the highway element of the General Plan
as a means of mitigating the traffic impact of this and other
subdivisions in the area. The form of security for
performance of said agreement -shall be as approved by the City.
The agreement shall include.the.following provisions:
Upon establishment of the District and the area of
benefit,_the fee.shall be paid to a special Department of
Public Works fund.
In the event funds are required for work prior to
formation of the District, the Director of Public Works
may demand a sum of $1,000 (or greater as determined by
the City Council), times the factor per development unit
to be credited toward the final fee established under the
District.
The subdivider may construct improvements of equivalent
value in lieu of paying fees established for the District
subject to approval of the Director -of Public Works.
The Director of Public Works may require the developer to
submit a traffic report periodically that addresses
traffic congestion and the need to mitigate the problems
prior to issuing building permits.
Factors for development units are as follows:
Development Unit
Factor
Single Family
per
unit
1.0
Townhouse
per
unit
0.8 .
Apartment
per-unit
0.7
Commercial
per
unit
5.0
Industry
per
unit
3.0
The project is in
the:
[ ] Via Princessa Bridge'and Thoroughfare District
[X] Bouquet Canyon Bridge and Thoroughfare District
[ ] Route 126 Bridge and Thoroughfare District
[ ] Valencia City Bridge and Thoroughfare District
42. Applicant shall comply with requirements for noise levels as
indicated in the Municipal Code.
TRAFFIC
43.—Modify the traffic signal system at Bouquet Canyon Road and
Urbandale Avenue to include as a signalized approach the
southerly approach -of Urbandale Avenue (project driveway) to
Bouquet Canyon Road.
Appropriate easements will be required for maintenance
purposes of any necessary traffic signal system equipment..
44. Modify the traffic striping on Bouquet Canyon Road to provide
for a westbound to southbound (Bouquet Canyon Road to project
___.driveway) Aeft. turn lane.
45. The signal system modifications and associated traffic
signing, traffic striping and pavement marking modifications
__...-(I4tems 4&--45-above) -shall-be•accompl-ished-,by-:the _.developer
and completed and operational prior to occupancy.
46. Ingress/egress for proposed "A" Street shall be limited to
"Right Turn Only" from and to Bouquet Canyon Road. An opening
.'in the median (center divider) of Bouquet Canyon.Road will not
be permitted at "A".Street..
47. The City may identify the need.for the installation of a
"protected/permissive" left turn operation and/or separate
left turn phasing operation at the intersection of Bouquet
Canyon Road and Urbandale Avenue upon, or shortly after,
occupancy of this project.
The developer shall bond for, or establish, an appropriate
mechanism which assures funding for such an installation,
including plans, specifications, inspection, equipment, and
materials; for a period of five years after completion of the
project.
If the City does not identify the need for such an
installation within five years of the completion of'the
project, this condition becomes null and void.
48. Construction signing, lighting and barricading should be
provided during construction of the project and should be in
3 accordance with State of California, Department of
Transportation, "Manual of Traffic Control for Construction
and Maintenance Work Zones" dated 1985 or subsequent editions
in force at the time of construction.
49. Install a 30 -inch octagonal "Stop" sign supplemented with a
"Right Turn Only" sign for traffic.on "A" Street approaching
Bouquet Canyon Road, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic
Engineer.
Private streets at their intersections with public streets,
shall be sign posted as such to the satisfaction of the City
Traffic Engineer.
The developer shall provide the City with an appropriate
mechanism to assure that any such aforementioned signs shall
be maintained and/or replaced as appropriate, to the
satisfaction, of the City Traffic Engineer.
PARKS AND RECREATION
50. Provide -final landscape and irrigation plans to the
1.satisfaction of the Parks and Recreation Department'and
Community Development Department.
51. The dedeloper is to pay in -lieu fees to fulfill Quimby
obligations..
_ ........:....52.- -.Final--landscape.plan to include a typical. detail which depicts
the street tree location a minimum of 15' away from the sewer
line.
53- Street --trees--are-required:..._,St•reet--arees-,.shal.l•-be--a-_.minimum..of
15 feet away from the sewer.
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
54. Specify the projected sewage flow rate.
55. `The project must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Water
Quality Control Board and the City of Santa Clarita that
wastewaters from the project will be adequately collected,
transported, and that the receiving treatment plant will have
adequate capacity to treat., and dispose of, the wastewaters in
a satisfactory manner.
56. Provide an analysis to the Water Quality Control Board and the
City of Santa Clarita of the cumulative flows generated by all
proposed, pending and approved projects within the service
area of the designated treatment plant. If expansion of the
treatment plant facilities will be required to meet projected
wastewater demand; the applicant must demonstrate that
additional capacity will be available prior to .new connections
for proposed development.
L.A. COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
57. Approved on the condition that sanitary sewers be installed
and used as the method of sewage disposal.
58. The owner's statement indicates that domestic water will be
supplied by Santa Clarita Water Company.
59. A legal entity shall be established to assume responsibility
and authority to maintain jointly owned facilities in a clean
and sanitary manner at all times.
L.A. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
60. The Sanitation Districts are empowered by the California
Health and Safety Code to charge a fee for the privilege of
connecting to the Sanitation Districts' Sewerage System. This
connection fee is required to construct an incremental
expansion of the Sewerage System.to accommodate the proposed
-projects which will mitigate the impact of these projects on
-the present Sewerage System. Payment of,a connection fee will -
be required before a permit to connect to the sewer is issued.
L.A. COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT...,
61. Provide water'mains,.fire hydrants, and fire flows As required
by the County Forester and Fire Warden for all land shown on
,the map to be recorded.
62. Provide Fire Department and City -approved street signs, and
building_..address.numbers prior to -occupancy.
63. Fire Department access shall extend to within 150 feet
distance of any portion of structures to be.built.
64. Where driveways extend further than 300 feet and are of single
access design, turnarounds suitable for fire protection
equipment use shall be provided and shown on the final map.
_Turnarounds shall be designed, constructed and maintained to
insure their integrity for Fire Department use., Where
topography dictates, turnarounds shall be provided for
driveways which extend over 150 feet.
65. The private driveways shall be indicated on the final map as
"FIRE LANES" and shall be maintained in accordance with the
Los Angeles County Fire Code.
66. All required fire.hydrants shall be installed, tested and
accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be
provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction.
67. "A" Street shall be 36 feet paved width, though 34 feet with
parking on one side only is acceptable if approved by the City.
68. Hydrants and fire flow are adequate to meet current Fire
Department requirements.
69. The required fire flow for public fire hydrants at this
location is 1500 gallons per minute at 20 psi for a duration
of 2 hours, over and above maximum daily domestic demand.
70. Fire hydrant requirements are as follows: Install 3
public fire hydrant(s).
71. All hydrants shall measure 6"x411x2k" brass or bronze,
conforming to current AM standard C503 or approved equal.
All hydrants shall be installed a minimum of 25' from a
structure or protected by a (2) two-hour fire wall.
Location: As per man on file with this office
72. All required fire hydrants shall be installed, tested and
accepted prior to construction. Vehicular access must be
provided and maintained serviceable throughout construction.
COMMUNITY•DEVELOPMENT
73. The applicant shall provide..a progress schedule,..to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Department, which
shall include all phases of development and indicate the
sequence and time period within which the improvements will be
made.
.74. No,build:ing or structure of any kind, 'except a temporary
_structure'._used:only:.in. the. developing. of -the, property
according to the program; -shall be built, erected or moved
onto any part of the property."
•
75. All improvements of any construction phase shall be completed
prior to the occupancy of any structures in that phase.
76. The existing.single family house is to be removed from the
site.
77. The subdivision directional sign is to be removed prior to any
construction and/or grading activity at the site.
78. The Homeowner's Association Agreement shall include the
condominium units and the four single-family homes, and the
homeowner's agreement shall include the maintenance of the -
slopes along Bouquet Canyon Road, Susan Circle Drive, Radfall
Court, the hillside in the southeast corner of the property,
and Street "B".
79. .The Homeowner's Association Agreement shall prohibit any
parking in those driveway garage aprons that cannot fully
contain an automobile. No cars parked in driveway garage
aprons shall overhang into Street "A The project shall
include roll -up garage doors, as opposed to.the hinge type.
80. The Homeowner's Association Agreement shall preclude the
parking on-site of RV vehicles, campers, and•other over -sized
vehicles that cannot be stored in the garage.
81. No off-site transport of dirt is permitted with this project
unless specific arrangements and required permits are obtained
from the City.
82. The amenities included on the tentative map (Exhibit A) and
the landscape plan (Exhibit C) shall be incorporated as shown
into the final project and be available for use at the time of
occupancy, including pool, spa, gazebo, clock tower, walkways,
play areas, etc.
83. Parking is to be restricted along Bouquet Canyon Road to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department. The applicant
shall coordinate with the Department regarding signage; curb
painting, and other required work and shall bear the.cost of
this work.
84. The applicant shall provide a plan, including materials,
height, and location of a sound attentuation wall to the
satisfaction of the Departments of Community Development,
'Public Works, and Parks.and Recreation. Such wall shall be
set back from the sidewalk and the public right-of-way to
allow for the placement of buffering landscaping..
85. The applicant shall modify the existing sidewalk on Bouquet
Canyon Road to an alternate cross-section to the satisfaction
..o.f.the.;_Departments of Community.Development,:Public Works, and
Parks and Recreation.
86. The applicant shall provide a plan for the retaining walls on
thea property- including -mate -rials;., and.,.shal1 -incorporate
designs that can support landscaping, to the satisfaction of
the Departments of Community Development, Public Works, and
Parks and Recreation.
87. Parking is to be prohibited on the inner -loop of "A" Street.
Parking will be permitted on the outer loop of "A" Street.
88. The applicant shall provide revised landscape and irrigation
plans to the satisfaction of the Departments of Community
Development, Public Works, and Parks and Recreation.
GENERAL
89. The approval of this Tentative Map and Conditional Use Permit
shall expire 24 months from the date of conditional approval,
should Zone Change 89-5 be approved by the City Council.
90. The applicant may file for an extension of the conditionally
Approved Tentative Tract Map and Conditional Use Permit prior
to the date of expiration for a period of time not to exceed
one (1) year. If such extension is requested, it must be
filed no later than 60 days prior to expiration.
91. The applicant shall be responsible for notifying the
Department of Community Development in writing of any change
in ownership, designation of a new engineer, or a change in
the status of the permittee, within 30 days of said change.
92. Unless otherwise apparent from the context, the term
"applicant" shall include the applicant and any other persons,
corporation, or other entity making.use of this permit. The
applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
of Santa Clarita, its agents, officers, and employees from any
claim,.action, or proceeding against the City or its agents,
officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul,
the approval of this subdivision by the City, which action is
brought within the time period provided for in Government Code
Section 66499.37. In the event the City becomes aware of any
such claim, action, or proceeding, the City shall promptly
notify the applicant and shall cooperate fully in the
defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the applicant,
or if the City fails to cooperate fully in.the defense, the
applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend,
indemnify, or hold harmless the City. Nothing contained in
this Condition prohibits the City from participating in the
defense of_ any claim, action, or proceeding, if both of the
following occur: (1) the City bears its own attorneys' fees
and costs; and (2) the City defends the action in good faith.
The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any
settlement unless the settlement is approved by the -applicant.
93. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the zoning
ordinance and the approved zoning designation for the site.
94. This grant authorizes the development of 4 single-family homes
and,20..:.condominiums to include appurtenant parking and
landscaping.
95. All conditions set forth in Conditional Use Permit 89-11 shall
apply to this grant unless expressly modified hereby.
96. This grant shall not be effective for any purpose until the
permittee has filed with the Community Development Department
their affidavit stating that they. are aware of, and agree to
accept, all of the conditions of this grant.
97. This grant will expire, unless exercised; within 2 years of
the date of approval unless the subject property is acquired
and posted within one year of date of grant as provided in.
Section 22.56.140 of the Los Angeles Planning Code, referenced
by the City of Santa Clarita. A one-year time extension may
be requested prior to the expiration date.
98. The time limits for the use of this grant shall be concurrent
with the time limits relating to Tentative Tract 47320 and
Conditional Use Permit 89-11 upon approval of Zone Change
89-05.
99. The subject property ,shall be developed, maintained and
operated in full compliance with the conditions of this grant,
with all requirements of Tentative Tract 47320 and Conditional
Use Permit 89-11 and any law,' statute, ordinance or other
regulation applicable to any development or activity on the
subject property. Failure of the permittee to cease any
development or activity not in.full compliance shall be in
violation of these conditions.
100. It is further declared and made a condition of this permit
that if any condition hereof is violated, or if any law,
statute, or ordinance is violated, the permit shall be
suspended and the privilege granted hereunder shall lapse,
provided that the applicant has been given written notice to
cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
101. That all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the
specific zoning of the subject property must be complied with
unless set forth in the permit or shown on the approved
Exhibit "A".
102. All structures shall conform with the requirements of the
Division of Building and Safety or the Department of Public
Works.
103. The subject facility shall be developed and maintained in
compliance with requirements of the Los Angeles County
Department of Health Services.
104. Deleted.
-6-90 PC 3
rA 3 �•
Chairwoman Garasi declared the public hearing open
at 8:58 p.m. Speaking in favor of the item was:
Chuck Campbell, agent for the applicant, who
requested a revision to Condition 35 of the
Conditions of Approval. Hearing no further
comments favoring or opposing the item, Chairwoman
Garasi declared the public hearing closed at 9:10
p.m. It was moved by Modugno, seconded by Worden,
and unanimously carried to approve Tentative Tract
Map 45979 and Oak Tree Permit 89-037, along with
the negative declaration prepared in conjunction
with the project, and conditions as revised.
COMMISSION Chairwoman Garasi declared a recess at 9:13
RECESS p.m.
COMMISSION Chairwoman Garasi called the meeting back to
RECONVENES order at 9:25 p.m.
ITEM 5 Mr. Michel presented this proposal for a five lot
ZONE CHANGE subdivision, four lots for single family homes and
89-5, TENTATIVE a fifth lot for twenty condominiums. Staff's
TRACT MAP 47320, recommendation is for approval. Chairwoman Garasi
AND CONDITIONAL declared the public hearing open at 9:40 p.m.
USE PERMIT 89-11 Speaking in favor of the item were: the applicant
Robert Sunset, 21023 Susan Carole; Eldon Schierman,
® E & E Engineering Assoc., Inc.; Leyan Cooksey, 50
Jody Lane, Camarillo; Mona Koerner, 7162 Cole,
Downey; and Roy Payton, 21059 Susan Carole. Plans
for landscape maintenance and a sound attenuation
wall were briefly discussed. Hearing no further
comments favoring or opposing the item, Chairwoman
Garasi declared the public hearing closed at 10:12
p.m. In conclusion, it was moved by Worden,
seconded by Modugno, and unanimously carried to
approve Tentative Tract Map 47320, Conditional Use
Permit 89-11, and the mitigated negative
declaration, and recommend approval to the City
Council of Zone Change 89-5.
ITEM 6 This item (The Colony), which was continued from
PRE -ZONE CHANGE March 1, 1990, was introduced by the Director.
90-002, VESTING Ms. Sutherland briefly reviewed the staff report,
TENTATIVE TRACT and Chairwoman Garasi declared the public hearing
MAP 45023, CONDI- open at 10:22 p.m. Speaking in favor of the item
TIONAL USE PERMIT were: Dan Palmer, G. H. Palmer Associates;
90-002, OAK TREE Johannes Van Tilburg, 1101 Broadway, Santa Monica;
PERMIT 90-006 Roger Pressburger, 4764 Park Granada, Calabasas;
Ronald Gerber, 30261 Romero Canyon, Castaic;
William Cloyd, 15656 Iron Canyon Road; and Bruce
Neft, 23418 Darcy Lane. Speaking in opposition
were: Henry Magid, 21117 Osborne Street, Canoga
Park; Bob Lathrop, 25105 Highspring. Also
commenting were: Allan Cameron, 27612 Ennismore
Avenue; and Jack Ancona, 29552 Abelia.
5�.
CITY OF SANTA ChARITA
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Rita Garasi, Chairwoman, and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Mark Scott, Director of Community Development
DATE: March 6, 1990
REGARDIIIG: Revised Conditions: Tentative Tract Map 47320
Conditional Use Permit 89-11
-Zone Change 89-5
Prior to the Planning Commission Hearing scheduled for March 6, 1990, the
staff report and proposed conditions of approval were circulated to the
applicant. The applicant had concerns regarding some of the conditions.
After consultation with staff, staff recommends that the following
modifications be made to the conditions forwarded to the Planning Commission.
The new language is in bold print. The language to be deleted is underlined.
Conditions to be completely eliminated are identified as well.
Condition No. 6:
The applicant shall remove existing structures prior to final approval
acceptance of rough grade certification.
Condition No. 10:
The applicant shall place standard condominium notes on the final map, or
shall record said notes by separate document, to the satisfaction of the
Department of Public Works.
Condition No. 11: Delete the original condition.
Condition No. 17:
The applicant shall include a disclosure in the CC&R's to comply with the
Geologist's recommendations in the Geology Report for restrictions on
watering, irrigation, planting and recommended types of plants, if such
restrictions are recommended by the Geologist in the final approved
geology report. If the Geologist's report does not include
recommendations, no disclosure is required in the CC&R's.
Condition No. 20:
The applicant shall construct full -width sidewalk at all walk returns.
This condition only applies at the two driveway cuts along Bouquet Canyon
Road.
Condition No. 26: Delete the original condition.
Condition No. 75:
All improvements of any construction phase shall be completed prior to the
occupancy of any structures in that phase.
Condition No. 104: Delete the original condition.
(06
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
STAFF REPORT
ZONE CHANGE 89-5
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47320 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-11
DATE: March 6, 1990
TO: Chairwoman Garasi and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Mark Scott, Director of Community Development 015
APPLICANT: Lori Johnson
OWNER:
LOCATION: East of Bouquet Canyon Road at the southern terminus of
Urbandale Avenue. Assessor's Parcel Number 2849-004-010.
REQUESTS Planning Commission approval of:
1. Tentative Tract Map 47320 for a five (5) lot subdivision
including four (4) single family lots and (1) condominium
lot including twenty (20) units.
2. Conditional Use Permit 89-11 for a (DP) Development
Program for the condominium portion of the project.
3. The negative declaration, with mitigation measures,
prepared in conjunction with the project, and,
Recommendation of approval to the City Council of Zone Change
89-5 changing the existing zoning from A-2-2 to R-1-11,000
and R-2 (DP).
RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map 47320,
Conditional Use Permit 89-11, and the mitigated negative
declaration. Planning Commission recommendation of approval
for Zone Change 89-5 to the City Council.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS:
The site is 5.87 acres in size and is zoned A-2-2. The applicant
proposes five (5) lots, four (4) for single family homes and a fifth lot for
twenty (20) condominiums. The existing zoning at the site is A-2-2 (Heavy
Agricultural), which the applicant proposes to rezone to R-1-11,000 for the
single family homes and R-2 (DP) for the condominium portion of the project.
The (DP) Development Program overlay requires a conditional use permit, which
the applicant has applied for.
The general plan designations for the site on the Los Angeles County Area Wide
Plan, which the City has not adopted, include 4.10 acres Urban 1 (1.1 to 3.3
du/ac) and 2.84 acres of Urban 2 (3.4.to 6.6 du/ac). The existing pattern is
5-I
summarized in the land use chart below and the land use map included in your
packets. The site is not located in a Significant Ecological Area, an area of
archaeological significance, or the Alquist-Priolo Special Study Zone for
earthquake faults. The property includes a level pad along Bouquet Canyon
Road where the condominium development will be clustered and a plateau with
hillsides along the eastern third of the property where the single family
development is proposed. There are no oak trees on the site. A subdivision
sign for an off-site development currently placed on the site will be
conditioned for removal if the project is approved. The applicant estimates,
in the initial study, that the site will require 28,800 cubic yards of cut and
14,326 of fill. The applicant has indicated that the grading will be
adjusted so that off-site transport will not be required.
The land use summary for the project and surrounding area is depicted in the
chart below:
LAND USE ZONING SCV GENERAL PLAN
aaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaa
PROJECT 1 1 single family home) A-2-2 Ul & U2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INORTH I Comm. & SF res. I C-1; R-1-6500 I C& U2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JEAST I Vacant & SF res. I R-1-6500; A-2-2 J U1 & HM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISOUTH I Vacant & SF res. I R-1-11000 I U2 & HM
I RPD -6500-7.5U
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IWEST I Commercial I C-1 & P(Parking) I U2, C, & P
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In defining what would be an appropriate density for the project, staff used
the County's SCV Area -Wide Plan as a guideline. Under the SCV Area -Wide Plan,
the permitted densities for the entire site are as follows: Low Point --14.14
units; Mid Point --23.22 units; High Point --32.27 units. The applicant's
proposal for 24 units is appropriate for the site under the SCV Area -Wide
_ guidelines. The net density of the site, if approved, would be 4.1 dwelling
units (DU) per net acre and 3.5 dwelling units per gross acre. The gross
acreage was calculated by defining the property from the centerline of Bouquet
Canyon Road. On the "Preliminary Land Use Map" under consideration by the
General Plan Committee, though not formally recommended by the GPAC to the
Commission, the site and all surrounding areas are identified as low density
residential. In staff's judgement, this project will be compatible with the
future general plan once it is completed.
Staff recommends approval based on the following:
The applicant has reached an agreement with the applicable school
district to mitigate the project's impacts on the local school districts.
The design is sensitive to the terrain and single family home owners on
Susan Carole Drive and Radfall Court. The applicant's proposal places
5_:
the single family homes along the eastern portion of the property, which
is adjacent to the front and side yards of the homes on Susan Circle
Drive and Radfall Court. The original proposal punched Susan Carole
Drive to the west, which would have required excessive grading, the -
creation of a very steep street, and the elimination of the privacy for
the residents on Susan Carole and Radfall.
The design is sensitive to the existing landform, particularly in that it
preserves the crest of the ridge located in the southeast corner of the
property, which is the prominent natural feature on the site. The slopes
along Bouquet Canyon Road and Radfall Court were manufactured in the past
to accommodate the existing road improvements.
The applicant has incorporated recreational amenities, including a pool,
spa, recreation room, play area, walkways, gazebos, etc. that exceed what
would typically be expected of a project of this magnitude. The
landscape plan, building elevations, and overall attention to detail and
design are also satisfactory.
The project exceeds the parking requirements established by the City.
Each condominium will have 2 (two) covered spaces per unit, with many of
the units also having a driveway apron capable of holding 2 (two)
vehicles. Designated visitor areas are provided. The primary driveway,
"A" street, will be 34' wide, which will allow parking on one side. "B"
street, to the single family homes, will be 36' wide, which will permit
parking on both sides of the private driveway.
The applicant will be required to provide a sound wall along Bouquet
Canyon Road, which will be set back from the sidewalk to allow for
landscaping between the sidewalk and the wall. This will alleviate the
canyon -like effect along Bouquet where walls rise directly behind the
sidewalk's edge.
Condominium development seemed appropriate in staff's judgement because:
single family homes seemed less desirable at the base of the
Urbandale/Bouquet intersection opposite the existing commercial uses
across the street; the minimization of hillside grading afforded by the
project's design; the resulting overall densities are compatible with the
surrounding area; and the quality of the project's overall design.
file:z89_5st.rpt
5-3
!►'4t-
..
VI CIN 17-Y MAP
TTM lt73 Z0
CVP 81-11
z c at- oS
5,,
SCAT E : 1"r3000'
r
z
a
z
C-
A
Zyo�
Rd`O
2
�
Z
c4L
TENTATIVE
TRACT N0. 47320
0
ti
w
u�
OBJ
LOCATION MAP
VI CIN 17-Y MAP
TTM lt73 Z0
CVP 81-11
z c at- oS
5,,
�c
cC
;Q
5-5
ALEXANDER 5OW10
JOAN G. ARNESON`d_
TERRY E. DIXON
WILLIAM J. KADI
WENDY H. WILES
PATRICIA 8. GiANNONE
ROBERT E. A.NSLOW
CAROL J. GRAHAM
KENNETH P. WEISS
TAMARA A. TRODDEN
•A swO,C»iOHAt COwPOw�TIOM
Via Fax
January 8, 1990
Mr. Rich Henderson
Planning Department
Citv of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvu., Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
REF. OUR FII,F
9,
Re: Mitigation Agreement with Lori Johnson and Bob Sunser
Tracy. No. 47320
Dear Mr. Henderson:
This firm has been authorized by the William S. Hart Union
High School District and the Saugus Union School District to
advise the planning department of the City of Santa Clarita that
Lori L;ohnson and Bob Sunset, applicants for Tract No. 471320, have
reached an agreement with the School Districts and therefcre, the
Districts wit:araw any opposition to the above -referenced
project.
If you have any questions or need any additional ir.iormation
with respect to this correspondence, please do not hesitate to
contact the Zfirm.
WHW:lo
CC. Dr. H. Clyde Smyth
Dr. Christopher wilson
Ms. Tina Toy
J I, V V V M L
Very truly yours,
BOWIE, tTRINESOIN, D_ -=L:
ti
y `
Wendy H. WilIes
NEWPORT BEACH, CALWORNIA p266,,
AREA CODE 7:A
TELEPHONE 851-1300
FAX t714) 851-2014
January 8, 1990
Mr. Rich Henderson
Planning Department
Citv of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Blvu., Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
REF. OUR FII,F
9,
Re: Mitigation Agreement with Lori Johnson and Bob Sunser
Tracy. No. 47320
Dear Mr. Henderson:
This firm has been authorized by the William S. Hart Union
High School District and the Saugus Union School District to
advise the planning department of the City of Santa Clarita that
Lori L;ohnson and Bob Sunset, applicants for Tract No. 471320, have
reached an agreement with the School Districts and therefcre, the
Districts wit:araw any opposition to the above -referenced
project.
If you have any questions or need any additional ir.iormation
with respect to this correspondence, please do not hesitate to
contact the Zfirm.
WHW:lo
CC. Dr. H. Clyde Smyth
Dr. Christopher wilson
Ms. Tina Toy
J I, V V V M L
Very truly yours,
BOWIE, tTRINESOIN, D_ -=L:
ti
y `
Wendy H. WilIes
t�
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
40 C
N E G A T I V E D E C L A R A T I O N
CERTIFICATION DATE:
APPLICANT: Lori Johnson
TYPE OF PERMIT: Conditional Use Permit 89-11
FILE NO.: Zone Change 89-05, Tentative Tract 47320
LOCATION OF THE PROJECT: The east side of Bouquet Canyon Road opposite
Urbandale Avenue.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: Zone Change from A-2-2 to R-1-11,000 and
R-2-11,000 (DP) Development Program for 4 single family homes and 20
condominiums. The project requires a conditional use permit.
[ ] City Council .
It is the opinion of [ ] Planning Commission
[X] Director of Community Development
upon review that the project will not have a significant effect
upon the environment.
Mitigation measures
Form completed by:
[X] are attached
[ ] are not attached
(Signature)
Kevin Michel, Associate Planner
(Name and Title)
Date of Public Notice: February 14, 1990
[X] Legal advertisement.
[X] Posting of properties.
[X] Written notice.
6-�3
C
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT /
(Initial Study Form B)
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Zone Change 89-05
Tentative Tract 47320
CASE NO. Conditional Use Prepared by: Kevin Michel
Permit 89-11
Project Location: On the east side of Bouquet Canyon Road at Urbandale
Avenue.
Project Description and Setting: Zone Change from A-2-2 to R-1-11,000 and
R-2-11,000 (DP - Development Program) for 4 single family homes and 20
condominiums. The project requires a conditional use permit.
General Plan Designation U1 and U2 on Santa Clarita Valley Areawide Plan
(Not Adopted).
Zoning: A-2-2 to R-2-11.000(DP) and R-1-11,000
Applicant: Lori Johnson
Environmental Constraint Areas: Hillside Management - slopes > 50Z
A. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes
in geologic substructures? .................. [ ] ( ] [X]
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil? ............... [ ] [ ] [X]
C. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? [X] [ ] [ ]
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical
features? ............................. [ ] [ ] (X]
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site? .......... [ ] [ ] [X]
f. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar
hazards? ................................... ( l [ ] (X]
g. Changes in deposition, erosion or
siltation? ................................. [ ] [ ] (X]
h. Other modification of a wash, channel,
creek, or river? ........................... [ ] [ ] (X]
2 -
YES
MAYBE NO
i.
Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000
cubic yards or more? .......................
[X]
[ ] [ ]
j.
Development and/or grading on a slope
greater than 25Z natural grade? ............
[X]
[ ] [ ]
k.
Development within the Alquist-Priolo
Special Studies Zone? ......................
[ ]
[ ] [X]
1.
Other?
[ ]
[ ] [X]
Air.
Will . the _-proposal_.._ result in:.
a.
Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? ....................
[ ]
[ ] [X]
b.
The creation of objectionable odors? .......
[ ]
[ ] [X]
C.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? ..............
[ ]
[ ] [X]
d.
Development within a high wind hazard
area? ......................................
[ ]
[ ] [X]
e.
Other?
[ ]
[ ] [X]
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff? ............................
[X]
[ ] ( ]
b.
Alterations to the course or flow of
flood waters? ..............................
[ ]
( ] [X]
C.
Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body? .........................
[ ]
[ ] [X]
d.
Discharge into surface waters, or in any
alteration of surface water quality, in-
cluding but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? .............
[ ]
[ ] [X]
e.
Alteration of the direction or rate of
flow of ground waters? .....................
[ ]
[ ] [X]
f.
Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or with-
drawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? ............
[ ]
[ ] [XJ
g.
Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies? ............................
[ ]
[ ] [X]
f
3 =
YES MAYBE NO
h.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding? ..........
[ ] [ ] [X]
i.
other?
[ ] [ J [xJ
4.
Plant
Life. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Change in the diversity of species or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grasses, crops, and microflora)? ...
[ ] [ ] [X]
b.
Reduction -of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? ......
[ ] [ J [XJ
C.
Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal re-
plenishment of existing species? ...........
[ ] [ J [X]
d.
Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? ......................................
[ ] [ J [XJ
5.
Animal
Life. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
insects or microfauna)? ....................
[ ] [ ] [X]
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? .....
[ J [ J [X]
C.
Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? ......
[ J [ J [XJ
d.
Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat and/or migratory routes? ...........
[ ] [ J [X]
6.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Increases in existing noise levels? ........
[X] [ ] [ ]
b.
Exposure of people to severe or
unacceptable noise levels? .................
[ ] [X] [ ]
C.
Exposure of people to severe vibrations? ...
[ ] [ J [XJ
7.
Light
and Glare. Will the proposal produce
substantial
new light or glare? .................
[ ] [ J [X]
8.
Land
Use. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Substantial alteration of the present
land use of an area? .......................
[ ] [ J [X]
b.
A substantial alteration of the
planned land use of an area? ...............
[ J [ ] [XJ
- 4 -
YES
MAYBE NO
C. A use that does not adhere to existing
zoning laws? ............................... [X]
[ J [ ]
d. A use.that does not adhere to established
development criteria? ...................... [ J
[ ] [X]
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? ................................. [ l
[ ] [X]
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resources? ......................... [ ]
[ J [XJ
10.
Risk of. Upset/Man-Made Hazards. Will the proposal:
a. Involve a risk of an explosion or the release
of hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions? .......................... [ ]
[ ] [X]
b. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazard-
ous or toxic materials (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)? ................................ [ ]
[ ] [X]
C. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan? ...................................... [ ]
[ ] [X]
d. Otherwise expose people to potential safety
hazards? ................................... [ ]
[ J [XJ
11.
Population. Will the proposal:
a. Alter the location, distribution,
density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area? ..................... [ ]
[ ] [X]
b. Other? [ ]
[ ] [X]
12.
Housing. Will the proposal:
a. Remove or otherwise affect existing
housing, or create a demand for
additional housing? ........................ [ ]
[ ] [X]
b. Other? [ ]
[ J [X]
13.
Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
5
vehicular movement? ........................ [ ]
[ ] [XJ
0.
5 -
YES
MAYBE
NO
b.
Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking? ................. [ ]
[ ]
[X]
C.
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems, including public
transportation? ............................ [ ]
[ ]
[X]
d.
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? .............................. [ ]
[ )
[X)
e.
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ....... [ ]
[X]
[ ]
f.
A disjointed pattern of roadway
improvements? .............................. [ )
[ )
[XJ
14. Public
Services. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered govern-
mental
services in any of the following areas:
a.
Fire protection? ........................... [ ]
[X]
[ ]
b.
Police protection? ......................... [ ]
[Xl
[ l
C.
Schools? ................................... [ l
[Xl
[ )
d.
Parks or other recreational facilities? .... [ ]
[XJ
[ )
e.
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? ........................... [ ]
[X]
[ ]
f.
Other governmental services? ............... [ J
[X]
[ )
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in?
a.
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy. .................................... [ l
[ l
[X]
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy? .. [ ]
[ ]
[X]
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need
for
new systems, or substantial alterations to
the
following utilities:
a.
Power or natural gas? ....................... [ )
[ ]
[X]
b.
Communications systems? .................... [ ]
[ ]
[X]
C.
Water systems? ............................. [ ]
[ )
[X]
d.
Sanitary sewer systems? .................... [ ]
[ ]
[X]
e.
Storm drainage systems? .................... [ ]
[ ]
[X]
6 -
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
YES MAYBE NO
f. Solid waste and disposal systems? ..........
[ ] [ ] [X]
g. Will the proposal result in a disjointed
[ ] [XJ
or,.inefficient pattern of delivery system
improvements for any of the above? .........
[ ] [ J [X]
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
[ ] [X]
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)? ...
[ J [ ] (XJ
b. Exposure of people to potential health .
[ ] [X]
hazards? ...................................
[ ] [ ] [X]
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or
[ ] [XJ
view open to the public? ...................
[ ] [ ] [XJ
b. Will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site
open to public view? .......................
[ ] [ ] [X]
C. Will the visual impact of the proposal
be detrimental to the surrounding area? ....
[ ] [ ] [X]
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? .....................
[ ] [X] [ J
20. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site? .............. [ ]
[ ] [XJ
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical
or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or object? ... [ ]
[ ] [X]
C. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? ............. [ ]
[ ] [X]
d. Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? ...................... [ ]
[ ] [XJ
-5- -9
DISCUSSION OF II-IPACT AND WAYS TO MITIGATE TITS SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
1 c,i,j Impacts: The project will involve grading and alteration to the
existing terrain. The applicant indicates that there will be
approximately 29,000 cubic yards of cut and 14,326 yards of fill,
which will be adjusted to balance on site. The site has already
been substantially altered from its natural condition by previous
grading and human activity. There is a single family residence (and
a driveway to it) on the hillside on the eastern portion of the
property. The lower elevation along Bouquet Canyon Road was used as
an equestrian facility. There will be limited grading activity on
slopes in excess of 25% natural grade. Much of the natural land
form was altered in the past to construct Bouquet Canyon Road, Susan
Cirle Drive, Radfall Court, and the single family residence and
private driveway presently on the site.
Ways to iiitigate:
The applicant will provide a soils and geology report to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department. Development will have
to proceed according to the proposed tentative map if it is approved
by the Planning Commission and City Council, the design of which
does limit the extent of hillside grading.
3. Imnacts F,dditional driveways, parking areas and structures will
decrease the area available for percolation and absorption. The
proposed grading will, to a limited degree, modify the existing
drainage pattern.
Ways to Mitigate:
The applicant twill have to furnish a drainage concept to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Yorks. The project will be
conditioned to tie into the existing sewer system.
6. Impacts There will be a temporary increase in noise during
construction. The site is adjacent to a major highway, Bouquet
Canyon Road, which will impact the new residents. Bouquet Canyon
Road will serve to muffle the incidental noise .that will arise from
the addition of 24 new residences. The natural contour of the land
and the existing sound walls on adjacent project will also serve to
minimize the impact that this project would have on surrounding
development.
I•lays to Mitigate:
The applicant provided a noise study, and will have to mitigate the
noise from Bouquet Canyon Road within the project through the use of
sound walls and other measures as specified in the Uniform Building
Code and other applicable City Ordinances. Construction hours will
be controlled via existing ordinances.
8. Impacts The proposed land use would not be permitted under the
existing rA-2-2 zoning. 5--30
i
Ha s to t-fitigate
The City Council would have to approve the zone change requested by
the applicant, which would then permit the proposed development.
13e. Impacts The project proposes 24 additional residential units, which
will not generate significant new traffic.. The location of the
primary driveway opposite the southerly terminus of Urbandale Avenue
will impact the intersection of Bouquet Canyon Road and Urbandale
Avenue.
Ways to Mitigate
See the attached memo from the City's Traffic Engineer, dated
January 4, 1990, which details the traffic mitigation measures which
will be included in the conditions of approval for the project.
14a -f Impacts The addition of 20 condominium units and 4 single family
homes will may incrementally effect Fire, Police, Schools, Parks,
Road Maintenance, etc.
Ways to Mitigate
Various agencies and departments have commented. The applicant will
have to provide improvements, make design modifications, or pay
various fees to address the impacts associated with the project.,
1. See the attached memo from the Fire Department, listing their
concerns, which will be made part of the conditions of approval.
2. The Sherif'f's Department did not raise issues regarding service
levels, but their concerns regarding the implementation of the
project, such as the signalization of Urbandale and Bouquet,
will be implemented.
3. The applicant has reached mitigation agreements with the
applicable school districts.
4. The will contribute a fee in excess of $20,000 to a Parks and
Recreation Department Fund for parks development in the City.
5. The applicant will be required to contribute to Bridge and
Thoroughfare Fees. Also, please refer to the memo on traffic
mitigation measures previously discussed.
19. Impacts Recreation. The addition of 24 new residential units may
marginally affect existing recreational facilities.
Ways to t -litigate
As discussed, the applicant will contribute Quimby fees for parks
development. The project also incorporates private recreational
amenities, including a pool, spa, tot lot, walkways, recreation
room, etc. The project will be conditioned to provide the amenities
-dicated on the site plan.
file:z89_05ng.dec
5--3/
- 9 -
C. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Section 15065 of the California Environmental Quality Act states, in
part, that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the
project may have a significant effect on the environment and an
Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared.
YES MAYBE NO
1. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self sus-
taining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory? ................. [ ] [ ] [X]
2. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment is one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the future.) ........... [ ] [ ] [X]
3. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the effect of the total
of those impacts on the environment is significant.) .. [ ] [ ] [X]
4. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly? ......... [ ] [ ] [X]
D. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this Initial Study, it is determined that:
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WILL BE PREPARED. .................................... [ ]
Although the proposed project COULD have a significant
effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a
significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described in this Initial Study
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WILL BE PREPARED ..................................... [X]
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
isrequired. ......................................... [ ]
5- 3'�
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
February 14, 1990
Date
- 10 -
Signature
Kevin Michel, Associate Planner
Name and Title
� o
�y �f
� � N
Y !�1
F 1�
I� r
rr
, �s�/°'"• � as
®A l� �36'• �`��
L
LL b •{ F
,c / _ •� � � � +� •�/�/ syr �� ® i •
i
• 4 / �®7� o a
•�* 0 k ®? q \Q��?i � � QST �'': •C.
v
• ? r 3 9 •� `� � Sp t SF`
' /L'/z! ter.• ey , ®!� �:$ .� �:.
4
ED
o� d �
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Richard A. Henderson
Principal Planner
FROM: Michael S. Murphy _ �_,,
Traffic Engineer f//.
DATE: January 4, 1990
(supersedes memo dated July 27, 1988)
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47320, ZONE CHANGE 89-005 AND CUP 89-011
In response to your inquiry regarding the subject project, we have reviewed
the project from a traffic engineering perspective and submit the following:
1. Modify the traffic signal system at Bouquet Canyon Road and Urbandale
Avenue to include as a signalized approach the southerly approach of
Urbandale Avenue (project driveway) to Bouquet Canyon Road:
Appropriate easements will be required for maintenance purposes of any
necessary traffic signal system equipment.
2. Modify the traffic striping on Bouquet Canyon Road to provide for a
westbound to southbound (Bouquet Canyon Road to project driveway) left
turn lane.
3. The signal system modifications and associated traffic signing, traffic
striping and pavement marking modifications (items nl & n2 above) shall
be accomplished by the developer and completed and operational prior to
occupancy.
4. Ingress/egress for proposed "A" Street shall be limited to "Right Turn
Only" from and to Bouquet Canyon Road. An opening in the median (center
divider) of Bouquet Canyon Road will not be permitted at "A" Street.
5. The City may identify the need for the installation of a
"protected/permissive" left turn operation and/or separate left turn
phasing operation at the intersection of Bouquet Canyon Road and
Urbandale Avenue upon, or shortly after, occupancy of this project.
The developer shall bond for, or establish, an appropriate mechanism
which assures funding for such an installation, including plans,
specifications, inspection, equipment, and materials; for a period of
five years after completion of the project.
If the City does not identify the need for such an installation within
five years of the completion of the project, this condition becomes null
and void.
5-35-
Tentative Tract Map 47320, Zone Change 89-005
and CUP 89-011
January 4, 1990
Page 2
6. Construction signing, lighting and barricading should be provided during
construction of the project and. should be in accordance with State of
California, Department of Transportation, "Manual of Traffic Control for
Construction and Maintenance Work Zones" dated 1985 or subsequent
editions in force at.the time of construction.
7. Install a 30 inch octagonal "Stop" sign supplemented with a "Right Turn
Only" sign for traffic on "A" Street approaching Bouquet Canyon Road, to
the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer.
Private streets at their intersections with public streets, shall be sign
posted as such to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer.
The developer shall provide the City with an appropriate mechanism to
assure that any such aforementioned signs shall be maintained and/or
replaced as appropriate, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Department of Community Development
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300
Santa Clarita, California 91355
(805) 255-4330
AGENCY COMMENT SHEET
Attached is a copy of: Tentative Tract Map 47320• Zone Change 89-005;
Conditional Use Permit 89-011
Project Description/Location: Subdivision of 5.87 acres (net)fo- four
single family homes and twenty condominium units; Bouquet Canyon Road near
Sutter's Pointe in Saugus-
Contact
au us.
Contact Person: Kevin Michel Date November 28, 1989
Notice is hereby given that this application has been filed with the
Department of Community Development. Please review, the attached
maps/exhibits and return this sheet with your comments and/or
recommendations by December 21 1989 1 which is the date a
Pre -Development Review Committee meeting has been tentatively scheduled.
If possible, please submit any comments prior to this date. (The
attachments may be kept for your files.)
If we have not received a reply by this date, it shall be determined your
agency will not be adversely impacted should this proposal subsequently
be approved by the City.
[ ] We have reviewed this project and have no comments at this time.
1 L T L i,.J Y e AJ h^ LJ1/ ' i i- u r t A/ G Y' /✓C: 7 �: X n u n� .
c c � �.zf ✓ioa � �+ c,✓TS
(signature
Rev. 11/7/89
(agency) (date)
'5- 37
FIRE IEpa�cT;�IT
L.ul i
Form 260
2/89 cc,%OPTIC\S CF ?IPFCV:L FGF MECIVISIC\S
Ii,,--CRPCR]ZED =—c
TRACT rnP 10.7. 0_ •�•—•
PARCEL. Pn.P N3_
CITY f AfAlI P- 6y�
[] This orccer-_J is lc= -ted within t:e are; desscribe.i tv the Fcrester and
Fire ween E-- F -re Zcne 4 and future ccns- 1cticn must calmly With
acclicatle Cwe r ':1rG aT1LS.
r-
PrcV 1Ce water n=' r--- , 14,-, h'Jcrants , and Llrer flows asr�L'1reC C ✓ the
Count-,, Forester and Ffre Warcen fcr ail lam s;nwn cn the ,non to be
reccrced.
�! The final c"-c--ct M=- vi11G. has been 5 .1 _c tc this r-a�=r`---ent fcr
review has f�1=-1 �eC t:e =ncitlCns cf .�crcval reC�encee t✓ t_^.15
Gear —,,ent fcr a' cSsS cel_
pr Fira Fe^==- c a.� Ci�J ==ve.. S eet sig. art_b`:i_cirr
address m=zersy Pr-cr
Fire De _:":L a C=SS S:_-�! 1 17 = C� C_ = =nw C-per-t
icn cf te Liuil..
F:r, iVarvnn ic: r-C+Se`.`...i:Z
WaL=r Ra`rS r firms J ^.LS ar" fire f-,cws as a CrnCi�iCn c- c Cr.^✓al fcr
t' 'S C_ S c -Viae . asentj%r ZC'eZ a -C
,`-vrocs
s:'-:1 �'"J e4- L-1 Section 10.201 Cf t_e _ �e C 1ireS
r res^ l 'neater aC=S ..c'J r-�=_re c`:_rG.
a -!--.veal. G • _—
•C.v G_ `-`''__r.� i.Y -fpr t ..'VV G_S�. are, cf: s__Lle a'
ici 1_re �i z :cn ec,=erm use c: .l l to
- �` - -.
crCv:C a i c:: t -e Lina. mz�.. ��_ r�: rS Si��T! L—e e,7i
to irsur= t eir in cam-~_-., fcr Fire Ger=r`"_;;t
use. �4 rer= _ :� cictat trr-ara r s _all c� pr(w-c fcr
driveways +rZ` c -=1� �7e= 1:17
�'%G T'he cr' :.va:' Sn=11 fe 1rjz C----; c": t final liar, as �"7:=E"7:=E_ _ -
�]� C"
and S^ _' l ::air t=i d In acC✓]Tr w ,P- t� e L. S �---celes C:,, -
F ire Code .
[] There arerc r (f- ticn�? fire hvdrants cr fire flows rewuired fcr this
Q1v151Cn Cr Rw-=1rementS fcr f_rS pr:tecticn water am aCcess
Will be (feta' -rod at t4-_, Cf tL ilci rc �- :t issuance.
�_,! rer-uir f_r= h/(fra -ts s: all be tete :? and accectw prior
to ticn. vehicular acwss mist be ;,rcvlCed and maintained
servo ceable t.rcuCncuL - c—cr-str lcticn.
- H Pccitienal f_r= prct=—icn s✓ste= s;:l
.all hz ir--tied in lies Cf
r i!-_ _ prctect 'a
icn te'_,
suitL able as___c^ � a er- fir
C=ents: 777
5,- 3
Fcr�_ 251
�/9 b W_
_RE DE? a21'7:1E,217
FIRE
z�• CT, -7., OF S,wrA
bLE�E�_
q752-0
,.-
[ and r _cw arfm a ``'.-c. F'
YiyC.^an: di
y re
sD D
-_cn c 2 i:c -_ cv_- and a c c v e ...�. _...
c _
Cy? l Cris ce minute at G^ CS =.
neCLE__'.
ars
�/' -__- •_'____r" ^--__ic) �::_..___ --_•,cam= C�—"___
ccn-�`1C� c Ctc C'-__cn S�_ C'U� C.'. -- J;C-.`-
_. _ `mac__•
a n t5 a__ -e InSza _=r ��y�� C and -
CC I
a C _ =--- - "Er. C= 7.0==�' �1:^IC,-cu- ccrstructicn.
• �_IC_C.. - ..:- ....0 rLam_
--, c _ c'- r �CCc
L
l C_
-�_�ec Iz can
�c `cr-mance w=Lh T_ --Ie
i --- -
r= -
----. _ the a__-=.
'!! - _.- L. _ N ice... _- _ ••
..:
5- 3
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE r Z+
.(Initial Study Form A)
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
23920 Valencia Boulevard
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
(805) 255-4330
To Be Completed By The Applicant
A. BACKGROUND
1.
Project Title Tentative Tract 47320
FOR OFFICE USE
Case No.
Date Recd. _
Accepted by
2. Project Location ( Street address or description) Bouquet Canyon Road
at Urbandale Drive
3. Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 2849-004-010
R-1 (11,000)
4. Zoning: Present A2-2 Proposed (if applicable) RPD -
5. Brief Project Description Develop 4 single-family lots (11,000 SF min.) ar
1 condominium lot supporting 20 condominium units.
6. Lame of Applicant Lori Johnson Phone (805) 296-7120
Address 2/026 Susan Carole Dave
City Saugus State California Zip 91350
7. Name of Preparer/Agent E & E Engineering Associates, Inc.
Address 4475 Dupont Court, nit 4 Phone 805 658-1755
City Ventura State California Zip 93003
Relation to Applicant C1ient
8. Indicate all discretionary acts requiring review and enclosures
or documents required by the City.
a. Discretionary Acts requiring review:
- General Plan Amendment
-X Rezoning/Mk)OdXILX�
-X Conditional Use Permit
- Variance
- Annexation
-1-
k Tentative Subdivision Map_
- Grading Permit
- Tentative Parcel Map
- Site Plan
- Other
b. Enclosures or documents:
Location Map
Grading Plan
Site Plan
Parcel Map
Precise Plan
Specific Plan
Architectural Elevations
Landscape Plan
X Photos of Site & Setting
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
X Tentative Subdivision Map
- Improvement Plans
X Soils Report
X Geological Study
-X Hydrological Study
- Biological Study
- Archaeological Survey
X Noise Assessment
X Oak Tree Report
- Other
1. Land Area: square footage or acreage 5.87
If land areato be__.dedi.ca.t.e.d_,.__st.at_e_ a.creage_,.an.d_purpose.
2. Fill in this section if project is RESIDENTIAL
a. Type of development: Single family X Two family
Multi -family Townhouse Condominium X
4 single-family
b. Number of structures 9 duplex condos Height 26'
2 1-plex condo, 1 swimming pool
C. Number of units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 9
3 bedrooms 11 4 bedrooms 4 Total units 24
d. Gross density (DU/total acres) 4.09
e. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) 4.0
f. Estimated project population 74
g. Estimated sale or rental price range
Condo - 31,008 SF
h. Square footage of habitable floor area(s) S.F. - 10,000 SF
TOTAL - 41,008 SF
i. Percent of lot covered by buildings or structures S.F. - 5%-10%
Condo - 20%
j. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided 52 Enclosed Park
Percent of site in road and paved surface 2 -visitor Parki
approx. 200%
3. Fill in this section if project is COMMERCIAL or INDUSTRIAL
a. Type(s) of land use N/A
b. Floor area Height of structure(s)
C. Type of construction used in the structure
d. Describe major access points -to the structures and the o.rien
tion to adjoining properties
-'7"
-2-
e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided
Percent of site in road and parking surface
f.
Estimated
number
of
employees per shift
Total
g.
Estimated
number
of
customers (per day)
and basis of estimate
h.
Estimated
range
of
service area (miles)
and basis of estimate
i. Type/Extent of operations not in enclosed buildings
j. Hours of operation
k. Type of exterior lighting
1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any
air pollutants (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.), identify
them, provide the quantities to be emitted, applicable EPA/ARF
regulations and data, or evidence to show compliance with
regulations.
4. If project is OTHER THAN residential, commercial or industrial
fill in this section.
a. Type of project
N/A
b. Type of facilities to be provided
C. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structures? Maximum:
e. Ultimate occupance load of project
Minimum:
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Average trip length
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated?
Yes
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards
of earth will be excavated? Cu-: 28,800 cu. yd. Fill: 14,326 cu.
b. How many cubic yards of fill. as emban:cment will be placed?
83 cu. yd.
c. How much area ( sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? 4.45 Acres
d. What will be the — Maximum depth of cut 25 ft,
Average depth of cut 5.77 ft.
Maximum depth of fill26 ft (Backfill to ret. s'
Average depth of fill 2,55 ft,
2. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the propo
project and the type of energy used. (Air conditioning, electric
appliance, heating equipment, etc.) Electric: Air conditioning, refri,
and dishwasher; Gas: Heater, water heater and stove.
3. Ind i_ca_te._the._.amount--.o-f.-Landsc-api.ng--a.nd.-natura-hpe_n--space- that
are part of the project ( sq. ft. or acres) . 159,000 sq. ft. or 3.65
4. If the project will result in any: -ne-w-.employment-opportuni-ties
describe the nature and type of these jobs. No.
5. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive material or substa
be used or stored within the project site? No.
6. How many trips per day will be generated by the project?
SF = 10 vtpd x 4 du = 40vtod, Condos = 8vtod x 20 du = 160 vtpd : 200 vtpd TOT
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
1. Geoloqv
Has a Geology Study been conducted on the property? Yes
(If yes, please attach)
Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? Yes
(If yes, please attach)
2. Hvdroloav
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the
site? Yes (If yes, please explain in detail)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water tab1E
No
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or
adjacent to the site? Storm Drain in Adiacent Radfall Court -and in
Bouquet Canyon Road @ Southwest corner of site.
C. If a Hydrological Study has been prepared, please attach.
3. Mineral Resources
Are there any mineral resources on the project site?
(If so, identify and rate scarcity) None known
5- Y-3
4. Land Form
Does the project site contain any distinctive natural land forms?
Specify: No
5. Air Qualitv
Is the project site near any air pollution source such as a freewz
.or uncontrolled stationary source? (If yes, describe)
No
6. Noise
Are there any generators of prominent noise levels (railroad,
industries, etc.) in the area of the project which could impact
the site? (If so, please discuss) Project is adjacent to Bounuet Canyc
Road, a primary collector surface street
7. Biologv
a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state?
Yes
b. What are the predominant plant species found on the project
site? Perennial wide grasses and pepper trees
C. Are any rare or endangered plant species found on the project
site? (Give basis for determination, and if so, list)
None Known
d. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees on the site and
which (if any) will be removed by the project. 4 existing tree,
will be m;�irtainpd the remainder will be removed and reolacEd by
extensive landscUing
e. What are the predominant animal and bird species found on
or near the project site? Unknown
f. Are any rare, endangered, or unique animal or bird species
found on or near the site? (Give basis for determination,
and if so, list) None Known
g. If a Biological Survey has been conducted, please attach.
None performed. See attached letter
h. If significant species exist on property, please attach an
8'11 x 11" map showing location on site.
i. Do oak trees exist on the site? If so, map their locations
and key the map to a complete arborist's report.
.None noted, see attached report. q
.51
-5-
8. Past Use of the Land
a. Are there any known historical, archaelogical or paleontolo-
gical resources located on the project site? (If so, describe
the resources, show location on 8%2" x 11" map, and discuss
proposed measures to conserve the resources) None
b. Are there any known historical, archaelogical or paleontolo-
gical resources within 2,000 ft. of the project site? (If
so, describe the resource and provide a map showing.the locati
in relationship to the project site.) None
c.- If any surveys have been conducted, please attach. None
9. Current Land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently.existing. _.
on the project site. One single-family resiJelltia1_hause_.and several
animal boarding corrals and barns.
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing
on adjacent property.
North Single-family residential
SouthSingle-family residential and nnPn-snacP
East
Single-family
residential
and
open -space
West
Single-family
residential
and
commercial
10. Aesthetics
Are there any features of substantial aesthetic importance on
or within 1,000 feet of the site? (If so, describe) No
11. Social
a. Are there any residents on the site? (If so, how many?)
One single-family resident
b. Are there any employment opportunities on the site?
(If so, how many and what type) No
12. Public Facilities
Sewer Indicate the size and location of all new public sewer
lines to be provided by the project and their proposed point
of connection to the existing system. 8" Vulocated at 6.0' offse
centerline of "A" Street, "B" Court and Urbanda e Ave. The proposed points d
connection to the existing sys. m are from Bouquet Canyon Road.
-6- 5-Y5
Water Indicate the size and location of all new public water
lines to be provided by the project and their proposed point
of connection to the existing system. 8" DIP and located at 6.0' offset
centerlineof "A" Street, "B" Court and Urbandale Ave. and 12.0' offset from prc
sewer line. The proposed points of connection to the existinq system are at
Bouquet Canyon Road.
Drainage
a. Describe all on- and off-site drainage facilities to be provi<
and their location. Lined drains at benches and at back of retaining
Catch basins at Southwest curb return of "A" Street and at Northwest curb
of Bouquet Canyon Road at the intersection of "A" STreet and Bouquet Canyc
18" RCP and 27" RCP are used to connect catch basinsto existing 27" RCP.
b. How will drainage improvements be maintained? On Bouquet Canyon F
the County will maintain it. Anything on-site will be maintained by the nE
formed Home Owners Association.
C. Estimated annual cost for maintenance of drainage improvement:
Not known at this point in time.
Circulation/Transportation
a. What is the current width of improved public streets adjacent
to the project site (indicate from centerline or total width)
Bouquet Canyon Road = 110' width; Radfall Court = 58' ; Susan Carole Or =
b. Indicate number of curb miles of publicly dedicated streets
to be included in the completed project. None
C. Identify cost per lineal foot and total cost of publicly
dedicated right-of-way improvement necessary to serve the
project. None
d. Is public transportation available adjacent to the project?
If so, identify system. Santa Clarita Valley local bus service
e. If public transportation is not available, what is the neares
pick-up point?
f. Can transit system maintain an acceptable level of service
while providing new service to project? XXX Yes No
13. Health and Safet
Will the proposed project represent increased health and safety
risks to the public due to any of the following:
a. Project produces significant increases in noise levels, dust,
odors, fumes, vibration, or radiation? (If yes, please expla
No
5' Y
b. Project proposes human habitation or activity in an area
identified as having the potential for natural or man-made
hazards? (If yes, please -explain.), No
C. Project uses, produces, or otherwise creates a need to transp
or store hazardous materials (including, but not limited
to, oil, pesticides, chemicals)? (If yes, please explain.)
No
E. CERTIFICATION
I,
.013 M. -
2,� L
or
Owner/ wner in escrow*
Consultant or Agent*
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statemen
and information herein contained are in all respects true and correct
and that all known information concerning the project and its setting
have been included in Parts B, C and D of this Environmental Question-
naire for determination of possible environmental impact.
DATE
*If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
5 - 40
MW E
WAY,
Y,W,W,
/3
CITY OF SANTA CLBRITA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
REQUESTING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE 89-05 FROM
A-2-2 TO R-1-11,000 AND R-2 (DP) FOR THE PROPERTY
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BOUQUET CANYON ROAD OPPOSITE THE
SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF URBANDALE AVENUE
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
A Public Hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita to consider a request for approval of Zone Change 89-05. The City
Planning Commission recommended approval of the zone change to the City
Council on March 6, while approving Tentative Tract 47320 and Conditional Use
Permit 89-01 for the same site. The proposal calls for the division of a
single 5.87 acre lot into 5 lots. Four of the lots will be for single-family
residences and zoned R-1-11,000. One lot will be for twenty (20) condominiums
and zoned R-2 (DP). The condominium portion of the project will consist of
eleven residential structures, including nine duplex condominiums and two
single unit condominiums. The DP (Development Program) overlay zone for the
condominium portion requires a conditional use permit.
The item will be -heard by the -City Council in the Council Chambers, 23920
Valencia Blvd., 1st Floor, the 24th day of April, 1990, at or after 6:30 p.m.
Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may appear and be heard on
this matter at that time, or submit written correspondence delivered to the
City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. Further information may be
obtained by contacting the City Clerk's Office, 23920 Valencia Blvd., 3rd
Floor, Santa Clarita, CA.
Dated: March 29, 1990
George Caravalho
City Clerk
Publish Date: April 3, 1990
file:z89 05pub.not
. .1 A, .., I rf ')0, r 0 0 lie
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA I
Suite 300 DEPARTMENT OF CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Santa Clarita, CA 91355 Case No.�-ce�`
12:1848019maut; ► . �►
Lori Johnson
Name of Applicant (please print)
21026 Susan Carole Drive, Saugus, CA 91350 (805) 296-7120
Address City State Zip Code Phone number
E & E Engineering Associates, Inc. R.C.E. 26383
Name of Engineer/M KX199% Re istration number
4475 Dupont Court, Unit #4, Ventura, CA 93003 (805 658-1755
Address Phone number
Bouquet Canyon Road at Urbandale Drive
Location of Project (address or vicinity)
Name of Proposed Project
-A ?- - 2 2849-4-10
Existing Zoning Assessor's Parcel Number
(The answers to the following must be made complete and full.)
1. GIVE EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERLY. Use extra sheet if necessary.
Parcel 1, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on that map
filed in Book 81, Paqes 20 and 21 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder
of said County.
2. THE PETITIONERS) REQUEST(S) THAT THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE BE AMENDED TO Q _Z
RECLASSIFY THIS PROPERTY FROM ZONE A Z - Z TO ZONE R-1 (11,000) & 'R,�(DP)
NOTt: See instructions as to the preparation of maps and other data or information
pertinent to this particular petition before filing this petition.
(For Staff Use Only)
Received by
Reference Case No._. C �� ��,� c� J ( Date Filed
red
Petition for Change of Zone (page 2 of 4)
3. Said property has/had the following deed restrictions affecting the use thereof:
(If deed restrictions have expired, state what they were originally.)
NQne Known
Said deed restrictions will/have expire(d) on N/A , 19
4. SUCH CHANGE IS WARRANTED BECAUSE: (State in detail wherein the conditions
applicable to this property establish the above statement.)
The property is surrounded by residential development and related commercial
development. The geometry of surrounding projects, along with the topography of the
site, restrict access to the lower portion of the site adjacent of Bouquet Canyon
Road. The lower portion, therefore, is somewhat isolated from the surrounding
neighborhoods.
5. SUCH CHANGE WILL BE IN THE INTEREST OF FURTHERANCE OF PUBLIC WELFARE BECAUSE:
(State in detail wherein the conditions applicable to this property establish
the above statement.)
The project will provide landscaping and beautification of existing property and
slopes which currently is, in the eyes of some people living adjacent to the site,
bordering on being a public nuisance.
6. SUCH CHANGE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PROPERTY OF OTHER PERSONS
LOCATED IN THE VICINITY THEREOF BECAUSE: (State in detail wherein the conditions
applicable to this property establish the above statement.)
Development -of the site will eliminate the weeds and trash which currently exist,
will provide for installation and maintenance of extensive landscaping, and will be
physically isolated from surrounding residential neighborhoods with access only
from Bouquet Canyon Road.
t
10
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF iuN page 3 of 4)
RECORD OWNER(S)
Lori Johnson
Name (Please print)
21026 Susan Carole Drive
Address
Saugus, California 91350 (805)296-7120
City Zip Code Phone
Name (Please print)
Address
City
Zip Code
Name (Please print)
Address
City
Zip Code
Name (Please Print)
Address
Phone City
Zip Code
Phone
Phone
PROPERTY AUTHORIZATION: THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THEY ARE THE
OWNER(S) of the property described herein and hereby give authori—
zation for the filing of this application. Further, I/WE DO BY
MY/OUR SIGNATURES) ON THIS AGREEMENT, absolve the City of Santa
Clarita of all liabilities regarding any deed restrictions that
may be applicable to the property described herein. (Signature
of all property owners needed. OWNER IN ESCROW IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Use extra sheets if needed.,) �7
Print name
Print name
Print name
natu
Signature
Signature
Print name Signature
Date
Date
Date
Date
I hereby certify that the information contained in this application is true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signed
(Applicant or Applicant's Agent)
Eldon C. Schierman
Date
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF ZONE (Page 4 of 4)
OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Suite 300 Zone Change No.
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
I/W, Lori Johnson declare under
Print Name(s)
penalty of perjury that I/fit* am/*M the ownerksi of property involved in
this application and that the foregoing statements and answers herein
contained and the information herewith submitted are in all respects true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Signed
Signed
Signed
Signed
Signed
Signed
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
19
�/PQotary Public
i' day of
OFFICIAL SEAL
JUDY MARKET
m NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My comm. expires JAN 11, 1992.
r
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Suite 300
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
. is
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Case No. N -a(
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Lori Johnson
Name of Applicant (please print
21026 Susan Carole Drive, Saugus, California 91350 (805)296-7120
Address City State Zip Code Phone Number
E & E Engineering Associates, Inc.
Name of Engineer/Architect
4475 Dupont Court, Unit #4, Ventura, California 93003 (805) 658-1755
Address Phone Number
Bouquet Canyon Road at Urbandale Drive
Location of Project address or vicinity
Name of Proposed Project
A2 -2 --
Existing Zoning Assessor's Parcel Number
--=------------------------------------- —
(The answers to the following must be made complete and full.)
1. GIVE EXACT LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. Use extra sheet if
necessary.
Parcel 1, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on that
map filed in Book 81, Pages 20 and 21 of Parcel Maps, in the office of the County
Recorder of said County.
2. A HEARING IS BEING REQUESTED TO DETERMINE THE LAND USE PROPERTY RIGHT
OF THE APPLICANT SINCE:
A. THE ZONE OR THE PROPOSED USE IN 'THIS ZONE REQUIRES A CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT. (State why the use should be considered for this
location.)
The Area's General Plan call -s for residential use of the subject property. In
addition, the property is completely surrounded by existing residential and
related urban develooments
(For Staff Use Only)
Received by
zv �
Reference Case No. Z.C. S9-605 ' 'iTHi Date Filed �— —
Conditional Use Permit Application
Page 2 of 4
B. SUCH USE WILL NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE
NOR THE PROPERTY OF OTHER PERSONS LOCATED IN THE VICINITY THEREOF
BECAUSE: (State in detail why the use of property requested will
not be detrimental to the surrounding community.)
The proposed project is a residential development. The site is surrounded by
existing single-family residential and related urban developments, therefore
no hazardous materials will be used or produced by this proposal. Nothinq
associated with the project will be materially detrimental to the public's
welfare of the surrounding community.
3. USE APPLIED FOR: (Describe in detail the nature of the business,
occupation or purpose for which the building, structure, improvement,
or premises are to be used and what is to be done on or with the
property in the way of additional improvements.)
Th.e proposed project is for residential use only and consists of four �4 single
family
in le
family units and 20 condominium units. Two (2) interior streets are provided for
circualation within the project. Water, sewer and storm drain facilities will be
provided. The proposed points of connection for these facilities are from the
existing public street, Bouquet Canyon Road.
4. Indicate other permits and approvals secured in compliance with the
provisions of other applicable ordinances.
1) Tentative Tract 47320
2) Zone Change
NOTE: See instructions as to the preparation of site plans, elevations,
or athen.....da.ta.._.or-..information_ p.er.t.inent to .this particular request.
CIiY OF SANTA CLARITA
Suite 300
;;,3920 Valencia Blvd.
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
DEPARTMENT 04JOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TRACT MAP NO.' 47320
PARCEL MAP NO.
TRACT MAP NO. (Vesting)
PARCEL MAP NO. (Vesting)
Lori Johnson (805) 296-7120
Name of Applicant (please print)
21026 Susan Carole Drive, Saugus, California - 91350 Phone number
Address -
Same
Name of Subdivider number
Address R.C. h�L� 83
tes Tnr_ (Eldon C. Schiertnan� __„ v-nneo number
E & E Engineering ASSOCIa
Name of Englneer/Surveyor
4475 Dupont Court, Unit 4,
Address
vantura. California - 93003
Name of Proposed Project
Bououet CanPoon �-rad(address Urbandale
or vicinity)
Drive
Location.or J
`` -/
r-r..:.f, 7nnina
KegI��0����r��8
Phone number
2849-004-010
Assessor's Parcel number
win information is required by the various City Departments. Failure to
The (clic 9
furnish the required information wilt delay action. i of land.) Use extra
(All. ownerships ccmprising the proposed 131"s on
essay Parcel 1 in the County of Los State
oinCalifornia,
Office of the
sheen if the ma s filed in Book 81 Paaes 20 and 21
r„nty Recorder of said County.
REQ• What is the acreage of this division: 5.87 gross acres
-►XSF
No. of lots:
. on o
ZD
A ..
Santa Clarita Water Company
DOMESTIC MATER: Source: ('Vater company)
SEWAGE: Method of Sewage Disposal Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts— —
GRADING: Show on tenta-N ve map existing contours. Yes
Is any grading of lots contemplated2
on the tentative map -
if yes, show preliminary grading design es XXX No
ntem laced: � p
STREET IMPROVEMENTS: Are standard street improvements co
(For Staff Use Only) Received by
Reference Case No. CLIE
�� S
-Z- C- `3 9
Date Filed
CITY OF SANTA CLARA DEPARTMENT•F COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
EASEMENTS OF RECORD
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 47320
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I, Eldon C. Schierman
•17
declare under penalty of
perjury that all easements of record, (as shown on Preliminary Title
Report No. 186924-08 , dated furnished this office by
(company) Investors Title Company j are shown on the
tentative map No. 47320 and that if the easements are blanket or
interdeterminate in nature that a statement of that effect has been
placed on the tentative map. The purpose and ownership of all ease-
ments are also stated.
Executed at Ventura, California this
day of May 19 89
Signature Edon C. Schierman
gwxx xi)B*ciixo�cdRr//Subdivider's Agent
Note: The use of that portion of the affidavit in brackets is optional
and may be deleted.
FINANcTaL INTERFST DISCLOSURE t
In order for members of the Planning Commission or City Council to
adequately assess the potential for conflict of interest in rendering decisions
on land use matters, the following information is required. Should the
applicant(s) in the requested action be or include a partnership,
the name of
the partnership and of all partners shall be printed below. Should the
applicant be a corporation, the name of the corporation and of all .officers of
said corporation shall be printed below. Ir there are any other business or
joint venture parties, property owners ,
wners, or individuals which have a financial
Interest in this action not otherwise covered as a partnership or corporation,
then their names shall be printed below.
PARTNERSHIP NAME CORPORATION NA�IE
President
Vice President
Secretarf
Other
PROPERTY OWNER S) OTHER
Lori Johnson
I HEREBY CERTIFY -THAT TFE-FOREGOING INFOR14ATION IS A(;CURA7E AND CC.*1LE7E 1*0 THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
Si)I urs Lo i Joh son
Printed Name QfApplicant, or Agent for Applicant
Date
Case File No.
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
•
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I, Eldon C. Schierman , hereby certify that the
attached list contains the NAMES and COMPLETE ADDRESSES and ZIP
CODES of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they
appear on the LATEST AVAILABLE ASSESSMENT ROLL OF THE LOS ANGELES
COUNTY ASSESSOR*, within the area described and for a distance
of five hundred (500) feet from the exterior boundaries of property
legally, described as:
Parcel 1 of P.M. No. 7283, as on map filed in Book 81, Pages 20 and 21 of
Parcel Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder in the County of Los Angeles,
State of California.
Signed.4TU-V-��" Date J u 4 y 17 1 S9
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1 %-e-t day of
1988.
icu�t kR z
ROSIE Z ROORIGUEZ
JIM aorMW w��uro
VENTURA COUNTY
NY CONI. EXr. JUNE 24 1!!0
i
No - y Pu lic
* Ownership rolls from other sources are NOT ACCEPTABLE
1
f�
•
2
BOUQUET CANYON
TENTATIVE TRACT 47320
OWNERSHIP MAP
ASSESSOR
OWNER'S NAMES AND
REF. NUMBER
PARCEL #
MAILING ADDRESSES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
2809-002-270
L.A. CITY DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND
POWER
P.O. BOX 111 TERMINAL ANNEX
IAS ANGELES, CA 931001
2
3244-037-003
CARLIE W. SMITH
P.O. BOX 8435
..LA.CRESENTA, CA 91214
3
2809-001-020
CARLIE W. & LILLIAN M. SMITH
P.O. BOX 8435
LA CRESENTA, CA 91214
4
2809-001-019
CARLIE W. & LILLIAN M. SMITH
P.O. BOX 8435
LA CRESENTA, CA 91214
5
2809-001-018
CARLIE W. & LILLIAN M. SMITH
P.O. BOX 8435
LA CRESENTA, CA 91214
6
2809-001-017
KILAUEA PASTURES CONSORTIUM
C/O: SOUTHLAND CORP. ADVELORUM TA
2828 N. HASKELL
BOX 719
DALLAS, TEXAS 75221
7
2809-001-016
KILAUEA PASTURES CONSORTIUM
C/O: EXXON CORP.
P.O. BOX 53
HOUSTON, TEXAS 75221
8
2809-001-900
SAUGUS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
22211 W. NEWHALL RANCH ROAD
SAUGUS, CA 91350
9
2809-007-001
MARTIN & MILDRED SHULMAN
28160 NEWBIRD DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
10
.2809-007-002
MARY L. SMITH
P.O. BOX 2211
CANYON COUNTRY, CA 91351
11
2809-007-003
JEFFERY L. ABERG
21118 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
1
2
OWNERSHIP MAP
ASSESSOR
OWNER'S NAMES AMID
REF. NUMBER
PARCEL #
MAILING ADDRESSES
-----------------------------------------------------------------
12
2809-007-004
MARTIN F & ALICE B GOODWIN
21112 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
13
2809-007-005
ERWIN A & HILDEGARD WUTTI
.21108 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
14
2809-007-006
LARRY R & LINDA K STEPP
21104 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
15
2809-007-007
BRUCE R & JANE E CHOATE
21100 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
16
2809-007-008
ALEXANDER Y & VERA DAVID,
21101 ROSEDELL DRVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
17
2809-007-009
KIRK V & KELLY A BERGLAND
21105 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
18
2809-007-010
RAMON C & LINDA B JONES
21109 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
19
2809-007-011
PATRICK D & SHARON LANPHERE
21119 ROSEDELL DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
20
2809-007-012
CARL L & ANNE L FIRM
27882 URBANDALE AVENUE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
21
2809-007-013
FRED J & ANNE M RICCILLI
27830 URBANDALE AVENUE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
22
2809-007-014
HUGH W & LINDA L MAGNESS
27836 URBANDALE AVENUE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
23
2809-007-015
JAMES H & STELLA T MEADE
27846 URBANDALE AVENUE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
24
2809-007-016
JOSEPH & LENORE A SAS
21166 CEDARFALLS DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
2
3
OWNERSHIP MAP
ASSESSOR
OWNER'S NAMES AND
REF. NUMBER
PARCEL #
MAILING ADDRESSES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25
2809-007-017
CAROLYN S. SCHULTZ
21162 CEDARFALLS DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
26
2809-007-018
PAT & SYLVIA M SANDOVAL
21158 CEDARFALLS DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
27
2809-007-019
JOSEPH B & JO ANN GIDDINGS
21150 CEDARFALLS DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
28
2809-007-020
JOHN H & SANDRA S DEUTSCH
21144 CEDARFALLS DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
29
2809-007-021
CATHERINE L REEVES
21140 CEDARFALLS DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
30
2809-007-022
CURTIS R & NORMA J WHITNEY
21132 CEDARFALLS DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
31
2809-007-023
LEE ROY V & DONEAN ANDRESEN
27821 DANDELOIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
32
2809-007-024
THOMAS P & CAROLYN M EWENS
27815 DANDELOIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
33
2809-007-025
SCOTT M WILKE
27807 DANDELOIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
34
2809-007-026
ROBERT S & CAROL C COLEMAN
27803 DANDELOIN DRIVE
.SAUGUS, CA 91350
35
2809-007-027
JAMES A & DONNA M WAGNER
27801 DANDELOIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
36
2809-007-028
JOHN H & FRANCES C DOWNING
27800 DANDELOIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
37
2809-007-029
ROSE M DILLON
27804 DANDELOIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
3
OWNERSHIP MAP
ASSESSOR
OWNER'S NAMES AMID
REF. NUMBER
PARCEL #
MAILING ADDRESSES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
38
2809-007-030
ROBERT S & LESLEY A EPPERSON
27810 DANDELION DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
39
2809-007-031
RANDY G CARPENTER
27816 DANDELION DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
40
2809-007-032
STANLEY J & DEBRA R SKABIK
27824 DANDELION DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
41
2809-007-033
JAMES A & LINDA R TRUDEAU
27828 DANDELION DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
42
2809-007-034
ROBERT C & KATHLEEN A SKELTON
27834 DANDELION DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
43
2809-007-036
SCOTT & LAURIE SCHWEITZER, AND
EDWARD & PATRICIA SCHWEITZER
-
27831 LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
44
2809-007-037
MIRIAM WARNER
.27825 LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
45
2809-007-038
MARK & VALERIE J BERGMAN
27817 LARKMAIN
NEWHALL, CA 91321
46
2809-007-039
ERIK & LAURA T EISENMAN
27811 LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
47
2809-007-040
LAURA A MORRIS
27807 LARKMAIN.DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
48
2809-007-041
JOAN E GOIO
..27801..LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
49
2809-008-001
LOUVA J & ESTHER E LINDERMAN
27800 LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
50
2809-008=002
KERRY G &'WENDY A MILLER
27806 LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
4
OWNERSHIP MAP
ASSESSOR
OWNER'S NAMES AND
REF. NUMBER
PARCEL #
MAILING ADDRESSES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
51
2809-008-003
KENNETH R & BRIGITTE D COLEMAN
27810 LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
52
2809-008-004
SHAWNELL L STILLEY
27820 LARKMAIN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
53
2809-008-014
RICHARD E REES, JR.
27801 PARKVALE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
54
2812-027-001
DANIEL F & PAMELA K MUSCARELLA
21069 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91359
55
2812-027-002
HANIF M & NAZNIN S KARIM
21063 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
56
2812-027-003
ROY & SUSANA L PAYTON
21059 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
57
2812-027-004
PHILIP A & JEAN F GAFFNEY
21051 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
58
2812-027-005
ANDY D & CATHLINE S LEE
21045 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
59
2812-027-006
MICHAEL L & DEBRA C KNIGHT
21039 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
60
2812-027-007
DONALD G & BECKY L ANDERSON
._..21033 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
61
2812-027-008
ANGELA & MARY ANN RUBANO
.21027.SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
62
2812-027-009
QUININO N & HAYDEE E TORRALBA
21021 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
63
2812-027-016
DOW C & SHERRY H HWANG
21018 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
5
OWNERSHIP MAP ASSESSOR
REF, NUMBER PARCEL #
--------------------------------
64 2812-027-017
65 2812-027-018
66 2812-027-019
67 2812-027-020
68 2812-027-021
69 2812-027-022
70 2812-027-023
71 2812-027-024
72 2812-027-025
73 2812-027-026
74 2812-027-027
75 2812-027-028
76 2812-027-029
N
OWNER'S NAMES AND
MAILING ADDRESSES
------------------------------
LORI M JOHNSON
21026 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
GARY L & CHARLOTTE K MCBROOM
21032 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
ARTHUR L & DORIS J SANTESSON
21040 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
GREGORY R & JANET E WIESE
21042 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
JACK A & PAMELA A LATRAGNA
21044 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
HIGINIO & SUSAN OLMOS
21046 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
RONALD M & SHERRY A WILKINSON
21054 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
ALBERT A & SUSAN M ALFIERI
27822 RADFALL COURT
SAUGUS, CA 91350
STEVEN R & MIRIAM S LILLEY
27816 RADFALL COURT
SAUGUS, CA 91350
SUNG G & BONG S KANG
27806 RADFALL COURT
SAUGUS, CA 91350
THOMAS J & VICKI L GRUPP
27802 RADFALL COURT
SAUGUS, CA 91350
KEVIW B & NANCEE S LARGE
20902 SUSAN CAROLE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
RICHARD J & LAURIE A THOMPSON
20906 SUSAN'CAROLE'DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
7
OWNERSHIP MAP
ASSESSOR
OWNER'S NAVIES AND
REF. NUMBER
PARCEL #
MAILING ADDRESSES
;
---------------------------------------------------
2812-009-002
DONALD HAMILTON, ET AL
7365 STAAOV AVENUE
WESTMINISTER, CA 92683
78
2849-022-093
CROCKER NATIONAL BANK
#1 MONTGOMERY STREET WEST TOWER
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
79
2849-022-061
JAMES W & GLEDA A FUIMER
G & W DEVELOPMENT
RICHARD GROMMON
21155 ELDER CREEK DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
80
2849-022-066
JAMES P & ELLEN K ROBINSON
27730 SUTTERS POINTE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
81
2849-022-067
JAMES R & NANCY J WILLIAMS
27738 SUITERS POINTE DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
82
2849-022-068
PHILIP A & MELINDA M LOPEZ
21236 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
83
2849-022-069
RICHARD A & PATRICIA A GUTWEIN
21228 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
84
2849-022-070
BRENDA J & RONALD H HAMMOND
21220 W. GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
85
2849-022-071
RICHARD W & THELMA L GRAHAM
21210 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
86
2849-022-072
. LEONARD S & LORETTA A DUNCAN
21204 W. GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
87
2849-.022-073
MAKOTO.&_YAEKO.SHINOHARA
21202 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
88
2849-022-074
SANDRA BIANCO
21201 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
7
OWNERSHIP MAP
ASSESSOR
OWNER'S NAMES AND
REF. NUMBER
PARCEL #
MAILING ADDRESSES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
89
2849-022-075
DAVID L & LAURA L SIMMONS
21205 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
90
2849-022-076
GARY A & BLONDEANE BARTLEIT
21209 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
91
2849-022-077
MANNY & ENRIQUETA DE GUZMAN
21215 W. GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
92
2849-022-078
TED L & ELISE OLSEN
21221 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
93
2849-022-079
JAMES & FLORENCE DESARIO
21225 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
94
2849-022-099
JAMES J JR. & RHONDA J DOHERTY
21233 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
95
2849-022-081
OLE V & VIRGINIA L JENSEN
21239 GEORGETOWN DRIVE
SAUGUS, CA 91350
96
2849-022-001
RICHARD GROMMON
24106 LYONS AVENUE
NEWHALL, CA 91321
97 2849-022-002 RICHARD GROMMON
24106 LYONS AVENUE
NEWHALL, CA 91321
98 2849-022-003 RICHARD GROMMON
24106 LYONS AVENUE
NEWHALL, CA 91321
F."
i
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P)
STATE OF CALIFORNTIA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
I' am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the Count, aforesaid; I am over the
age of eighteen years, and not a party to or
interested in the above -entitled matter. I am
the principal clerk of the printer of the
a newspaper of general circulation, printed and
published
in the City of '. iL :C=
County of Los Angeles, and which newspaper
has been adjudged a ne%vspaper of general
circulation by the Superior Court of the County
of Los Angeles, State of California, under the
date of 1QL
Case Number I,: = ; that the
notice, of .%,hich the annexed is a printed copy
(set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has
been published in each regular and entire issue
of said newspaper and not in any supplement
thereof on the following dates, to -wit:
all in the vear 1922--
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at CT A, -
California, this --day ,y of _ZZ x.19 90
Signature
Free copin of this bAAk form rray be wore. fran
California Newspaper Senrice Bureau, Inc.
Advertising Clearing House
P.O. Box 8022
El Monte, 91 i 3y 2322 (81,8) 288-CNSB
Pease ric es+ Gth-ERA:. ProCe o!,%bb=0r1
wnen ordering :hn torr•.:
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
ZI
Proof of Publication of
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY,,_;!;;,
DEVELOPMENT
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING .
AND ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT.
APPLICATION: Zone Change 89-005,N6 _ A..
ative Tract Map 47320, and Conditional Use,;
Permit 89-001..;
PROJECT PROPONENT: Lori Johnson;:,r ,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Sutldivision1 ..,
5.87 acres for 4 single family homes and 20 aon=
dominium units. Change of zone from A-2.2 to :
R-1-11,000 and R-2-11,000 (DP). The DP (De-
ve,opment Program) overlay zone for the con-
dominium portion requires a conditional use
permit.
PROJECT LOCATION: East side of Bouquet
Canyon Road opposite Urbandale Avenue.:'
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL: No. 2849-004-010:
A public hearing on this matter and..asso-,
ciated potential environmental impacts,•if any:
will be conducted by the City of Santa-Clairita
Planning Commission on�kt7''
DATE: March 6. 1990 x; ;
TIME: 6:30 p.m.
LOCATION: City Council Chambers,,2392fJ
Valencia Blvd., First. Floor; Santa Clarita,,CA
91355. Ais yiyp
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been pre;
pared for this proposed project and is availablE
for public review beginning at 4:00 p.m..on Fe
bruary 14, 1990 at:
Valencia Library, 23743 Valencia Boulevard
Santa Ciarita, CA 91355 & City Hall, Deparl
ment of Community Development, 23920.,.,,C,
encia Boulevard. Ste. 300,. Santa ClaritaC,
91355.
If you wish to challenge the action:taken,q
this matter in court, you may be limited toratiin
only those issues you or someone else raised;
the public hearing described in this notice; or.
written correspondence delivered to the City_
Santa Ciarita at, or prior to, the public hearin
For further information regarding this pro
osal, you may contact the City of Santa Clanl
Department of Community Developmet
23920 Valencia Blvd., Third Floor, Santa CG
ita, CA 91355; Telephone: (805) 255.4330:
vin Michel, Project Planner x xt �'
Mark Scott. t4
Director of Community,- R
:c
pevelopment ".. +A�,
Publish in Newhall Signal and Saugus Ent
prise February 14, 1990.<rr'
ATTACHMENTS
Please see the April 24, 1990
City Council Agenda Packet for:
Tentative Tract Map No. 47320