Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-05-08 - AGENDA REPORTS - ZONE CHANGE GILBERT DR (2)J AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approval Item to be presented by: UNFINISHED BUSINESS Ken Pulskamp DATE: May 8, 1990 SUBJECT: Zone Change at the southerly terminus of Gilbert Drive. APPLICANT: American Beauty Homes Inc • Jack Shine resident i DEPARTMENT: Community Development / BACKGROUND This item was on the agenda of April 24, 1990, as a public hearing to allow a change of zone from A-2-1 (Heavy Agriculture) to RPD -1-6U (Residential Planned Development 6 units per acre). This change of zone is for a 47.4 acre parcel located. at the southerly terminus of Gilbert Drive. This item, Ordinance 90-10, was introduced and passed to second reading at that meeting. RECOMMENDATION Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance 90-10 ATTACHMENTS Ordinance No. 90-10. Adopted:*- Agenda Item:. • ORDINANCE NO. 90-10 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP (Zone Change Case No. 85-503) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine as follows: a. An application for a zone change was filed with the County of Los.Angeles Department of Community Development on October 8,'1985, by American Beauty Homes.("the applicant"). The purpose of the zone change application is to facilitate the establishment of 187 single family detached condominium units on 14 lots at the southerly terminus of Gilbert Drive, and further described in the attached Legal Description (Exhibit "A") and shown on the attached map (Exhibit "B"), which was approved by the Planning Commission (Ordinance 90-08). b. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the application on February 6, 1990 at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:30 p.m. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-08 recommending approval to the City Council of the requested zone change. c. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the rezoning application on April 24, 1990 at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita," at 6:30 p.m. SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received at the public hearing, and upon studies and investigation made by the Planning Commission and the City'Council and on their behalf, the City Council further finds and determines as follows: a. The subject property is a 47.4 acre parcel located at the southerly terminus of Gilbert Drive. b. The request is for a change of zone from A-2-1 (Heavy Agricultural) to RPD -1-6U (Residential) for 187 single family detached condominium units on the site. c. The subject property is of a size and shape which lends itself-to.the.proposed uses that -would be -established as a result of this request. d. The subject property is located in a residential are.a and is a -planned development area. e. The City is proceeding in a timely manner with the preparation of.a general plan. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the future general plan. f. The recommended change of zone from A-2-1 to RPD -1-.6U will not result in a significant environmental effect. g. The project has received a Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.). SECTION 3. In acting on the rezoning application, the City Council has considered certain principles and standards, and finds and determines as follows: a. That modified conditions warrant a revision in the zoning plan as it pertains to the subject property; b. That a need for the proposed zone classification exists within the area of the subject property; c: That the subject property is a proper location for the Residential Planned Development Zone classification; d. That the placement of the proposed zone at the subject property will be in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare, and in conformity with good zoning practice; e. That rezoning the subject property will not result in a need for greater water supply for adequate fire protection; and, f. That the City.is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of a general plan. There is a reasonable probability that this rezoning will be consistent with the general plan proposal which will be studied within a reasonable time. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if this rezoning is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. This rezoning complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinance. SECTION 4. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council does hereby ordain that the application for a zone change is approved, and.that the official zoning map of the City of Santa Clarita is hereby amended so that the subject property is rezoned from A-.2-1 to RPD -1-6U: SECTION 5. The City of Santa Clarita City Council has reveiwed and considered the enviromental information contained in the Intial Study, which was considered by the Planning Commission, and determines that it is in compliance with CEQA and the proposed project will not have a'signif.icant impact on the enviroment. A mitigated negative declaration was prepared for this project. Based upon the findings stated above, the City Council hereby approves the mitigated negative declaration. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this 8th day of May , 1990. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIF6RNIA) - — - — - --- — COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES- -- CITY OF SANTA CLARITA — - -- — I, Geo a Caravalho City Clerk of the. City -of Santal- Clarita, do _-Pre `tILLy Mat Me foregoing Ordinance 90-_10_ was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 24th day of April 1990. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted.and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 8th day of May 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: --COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Heidt, McKeon, Boyer Klajic Darcy CITY CLERK