HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-08-28 - ORDINANCES - AMEND OFFICIAL ZONING MAP (2)F4
ORDINANCE NO. 90-23
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
(Zone Change Case No. 90-001)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and
determine as follows:
a. An application for a zone change was filed with the City
of Santa Clarita Department of Community Development on by
Palmdale 160 ("the applicant"). The purpose of the zone
change application is to facilitate the establishment of
161 single family lots, five open space lots, and one park
site at the westerly terminus of Green Mountain Drive, and
further described in the attached Legal Description and
shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A"). which was
approved by the Planning Commission (Ordinance P90-25).
b. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing
on the application on June 19, 1990, and July 3, 1990, at
the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa
Clarita, at 6:30 p.m. The Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. P90-25 recommending approval to the City
Council of the requested zone change.
c. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the
rezoning application on August 14, 1990 at the City
Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita,
at 6:30 p.m.
SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence
received at the public hearing, and upon studies and investigation
made by the Planning Commission and the City Council and on their
behalf, the City Council further finds and determines as follows:
a. The subject property is a 82.2 acre parcel located at the
southerly terminus of Green Mountain Drive.
b. The request is for a change of zone from A-2-1 (Heavy
Agricultural) to RPD -9000-2U (Residential Planned
Development) for 161 single lots, five open space lots,
and one park site on the site.
c. The subject property is of a size and shape which lends
itself to the proposed uses that would be established as a
result of this request.
d. The subject property is located in a residential area and
is a planned development area.
ri
e. The City is proceeding in a timely manner with the
preparation of a general plan. There is a reasonable
probability that this project will be consistent with the
future general plan.
f. The recommended change of zone from A-2-1 to RPD -9000-2U
will not result in a significant environmental effect.
g. The project has received a Negative Declaration pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public
Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
SECTION 3. In acting on the rezoning application, the
City Council has considered certain principles and standards, and
finds and determines as follows:
a. That modified conditions warrant a revision in the zoning
plan as it pertains to the subject property;
b. That a need for the proposed zone classification exists
within the area of the subject property;
c. That the subject property is a proper location for the
Residential Planned Development Zone classification; #`
d. That the placement of the proposed zone at the subject
property will be in the interest of public health, safety
and general welfare, and in conformity with good zoning
practice;
e. That rezoning the subject property will not result in a
need for greater water supply for adequate fire
protection; and,
f. That the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of a general plan. There is a reasonable
probability that this rezoning will be consistent with the
general plan proposal which will be studied within a
reasonable time. There is little or no probability of
substantial detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if this rezoning is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan. This rezoning complies with
all other applicable requirements of state law and local
ordinance.
SECTION 4. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council
does hereby ordain that the application for a zone change is
approved, and that the official zoning map of the City of Santa
Clarita is hereby amended so that the subject property is rezoned
from A-2-1 to RPD -9000-2U.
SECTION 5. The City of Santa Clarita City Council has
reviewed and considered the environmental information contained in
the Initial Study, which was considered by the Planning Commission,
and determines that it is in compliance with CEQA and the proposed
project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A
mitigated negative declaration was prepared for this project. Based
upon the findings stated above, the City Council hereby approves the
mitigated negative declaration.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage
of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner
prescribed by law.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 28th day of Augusstt� 1990.
MAYOR
MrT:
CITY CLE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) as
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA)
I, Donna M. Grindey , City Clerk of the City of Santa
Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 90-23
was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of August ,
1990. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed
at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 28th day
of August , 1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boyer, Heidt, Klajic, McKeon, Darcy
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CITY CL RR a
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 44893
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The Montezuma Placer Mining Claim described as the West half of
the northwest quarter, the west half of Lot 1 and the west half
of Lot 4 of Section 32, Township 4 North, Range 15 West, San
Bernardino Meridian, according to the Official Plat of said land
on file in the District land Office.
r -A
w
PROJECT PROXIMITY MAP
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 48893
ZONE CHANGE 90-001
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-003
OAR TREE PERMIT 90-007