Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-03-27 - RESOLUTIONS - TTM 47324 CUP 89-007 APPROVAL (3)RESOLUTION NO. 90-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47324; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-007; AND OAK TREE PERMIT 89-046; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine as follows: a. An application for a tentative tract map, conditional use permit, oak tree permit and prezone were filed simultaneously with the City of Santa Clarita, May 8, 1989, by Sand Canyon Estates Ltd. ("the applicant"). The property for which these entitlements have been filed is an 137.23 -acre parcel located at 16000 Live Oak Springs Road. The purpose of the tentative tract map application submittal is to create 70 lots within the subject site for family residential units and 2 private recreation lots. The purpose of the prezone is to request the A-1-1 and A-1-2 zone prior to annexation to the City. Assessor Parcel Nos. 2840-13-13,-14,-15; 2840-14-22; and 2840-16-21,-22. b. The City of Santa Clarita Development Review Committee (DRC) met on September 14, 1989 and supplied the applicant's agent with recommended conditions of approval. C. A duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on January 16, 1990, and a decision was made on February 20, 1990, at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:30 p.m. d. On February 20, 1990, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. P90-05 conditionally approving Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 47324, Conditional Use Permit 89-006 and Oak Tree Permit 89-046. e. An appeal was filed by Mr. Hal Good on March 1, 1990 which was within the appropriate period to file an appeal. f. A duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on April 24, 1990 at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:30 p.m. SECTION 2., Based upon the testimony and other evidence received at the public hearing, and upon studies and investigation made by the City Council and on its behalf, the Council further finds and determines as follows: a. The City of Santa Clarita is proceeding in a timely fashion with ^ the preparation of a general plan. There is a reasonable probability that this project, will be consistent with the general plan proposal currently being considered or studied, that there is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed resolution is ultimately inconsistent with that plan, and that the proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. b. The division and development of the property in the manner set forth on the subject parcel map will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity and/or public utility right-of-way and/or easements within the parcel map. C. Approval of this tentative tract map will expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of approval. d. The applicant has submitted a tentative tract map which depicts the area proposed for the 72 lots within the subject site. e. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems, since sewage disposal, storm drainage, fire protection, and geological and soils factors are addressed in the recommended conditions of approval. The discharge of sewage from the subdivision into the public sewer system will not violate the requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code. f. The subject property is of a size and shape which lends itself to the proposed use. g. The recommended subdivision will not result in a significant environmental effect. h. Implementation of this proposal will cause no adverse effects in the environment which cannot be adequately mitigated through the application of available controls. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantial and avoidable injury to fish or wild life or their habitat, since the project site is not located in a significant ecological area. i. The proposed parcel sizes are consistent with surrounding parcel sizes. j. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities ^ in the subdivision given the size and shape of the lots and their intended use. k. The proposed subdivision does not contain or front upon any public waterway, river, stream, coastline, shoreline, lake or reservoir. 1. The housing needs of the region were considered and balanced against the public service needs of local residents. M. Neither the design of the subdivision nor the type of improvements will conflict with public easements for access through the use of property within the proposed subdivision, since the design and development as set forth in the conditions of approval and on the tentative map, provides adequate protection for easements. n. The subject property is in a proper location for single family residential uses. o. The City Council finds that satisfactory evidence has been provided, in accordance with Section 21.24.100 of the municipal code, that a lower street grade is not possible. The maximum street grade proposed is 14X. SECTION 3. In making the recommendation contained in this resolution, the Planning Commission has considered certain principles and standards, and finds and determines as follows: a. That modified conditions warrant a revision in the zoning plan as it pertains to the subject property; and b. That a need for the proposed zone classification exists within the area of the subject property; and C. That the subject property is a proper location for the A-1-1 and A-1-2 zone classification; and d. That placement of the proposed zone at the subject property will be in the interest of public health, safety and general welfare, and in conformity with good zoning practice. SECTION 4. The City of Santa Clarita City Council has reviewed and considered the environmental information contained in the Initial Study, and determines that it is in compliance with CEQA and that the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A negative declaration was prepared for this project. Based upon the findings stated above, the City Council hereby approves the negative declaration. SECTION 5. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council hereby approves the application for the tentative tract map, conditional use permit and oak tree permit subject to following conditions attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and "Exhibit B" and incorporated herein by reference allowing the creation of 70 lots for single family residential use and 2 lots for park purposes. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and shall transmit a copy to the applicant, the Departments of Public Works, Fire, and Parks and Recreation, and shall give notice of this recommendation in the manner prescribed by Section 22.60.190 of the City's Planning and Zoning Code. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 27 day of March, 1990. I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27 day of March, 1990, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Boyer, Heidt, Koontz, McKeon, Darcy NOES: None ABSENT: None