Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-11-12 - AGENDA REPORTS - LACO PARK RECREATION ACT 1992 (4)R AGENDA REPORT City Manager Appral/y Item to be presented by: CONSENT CALENDAR Jeff Kolin 0 DATE: November 12, 1991 SUBJECT: Letter of Support for Including the Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park Buffer Zone Project in the Proposed Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation BACKGROUND The Santa Clarita Oak Conservancy, the Santa Clarita Valley Canyons Preservation Committee and the Santa Clarita Valley Sierra Club have submitted a specific project proposal to the Mountains Recreation Conservation 'Authority for inclusion in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation ,Act of 1992. Dorothy Riley and Karen Pierson -Hall, who authored' the proposal, are requesting that the City of. Santa Clarita issue a letter supporting the inclusion of the Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park Buffer Zone in the Los Angeles County. Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. The project envisions the purchase of 425 acres of land, which represents the remaining privately -held parcels surrounding the existing Placerita Canyon State/County Park. Completion of the buffering through acquisition of these parcels would protect this park from developers' requests to permit new roads to run through it or build houses up to its present borders. The amount of funds necessary to acquire the property has not been determined at this time. The current owners of the property are: (1) the Allen Milton Trust and Atcherson and Allen Trust; (2) Santa Fe Development and Mortgage Company; (3) Rustam Mustafa; and (4) Walt Disney Productions. The existing Placerita Canyon Nature Center Park serves as a tremendous natural resource of the Santa Clarita Valley. Additional land acquisition will protect this important resource and preserve its natural character. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the attached letter -of support for the Santa Clarita Oak Conservancy, Santa Clarita Valley Canyons Preservation Committee and Santa Clarita Valley Sierra Club proposal for the Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park Buffer Zone. ATTACHMENT Letter of Support Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park Buffer Zone Proposal APPROVED Agenda Item: I Oity of Santa Clarita Carl Boyer, 3rd Mayor Jill Klallc Mayor Pro -Tem Jo Anne Darcy Councilmember Jan Heidt Councllmember award "Buck" McKeon rouncilmember I* 23920 Valencia Blvd. Suite 300 City of Santa Clarita California 91355 November 12, 1991 Phone (805)259-2489 Fax (805) 259-8125 Esther Feldman, Director Special Programs Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority 3750 Solstice Canyon Road Malibu, CA 90265 Dear Esther: a The City of Santa Clarita is in support of the Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park Buffer Zone proposal. The City has included the concept of a ring of open space and park land around the valley within its General Plan, and feels that the Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park Buffer Zone will provide an important enhancement to the existing open space and park land contained in the Placerita Canyon Nature Center State Park. The Placerita Canyon area contains extremely valuable wildlife habitat and open space. The.Placerita Canyon Nature Center, operated by the Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation Department,has thousands of visitors annually. Preservation and enhancement of this nature ,park through purchase of adjacent private lands will help .continue the Nature Center's efforts to increase our understanding of our natural environment. Ve.hope that the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and -the Mountains Recreation Conservation Authority' will share our view of the value of this project, and choose to include it in the Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992. Sincerely, Carl Boyer Mayor CB/JCK:mat.1847 Proposal for Los Angeles County Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 Placerita Canyon Natural'Area Park Buffer Zone Date: October 15, 1991 To: Joscelyn Herzberg Esther Feldman Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority 3750 Solstice Canyon Road Malibu, California 90265 For: inclusion in Los Angeles County Park, Beach, and Recreation Act of 1992 Persons To Contact Regarding This Proposal: Dorothy Riley (805) 259-3748 21224 Placerita Canyon Rd. Newhall, Ca. 91321 Treasurer, Santa Clarita Oak.Conservancy Member, Placerita Canyon Nature Center Associates Karen Pearson -Hall (805) 296-4438 26617 Gavilan Dr. Santa Clarita, Ca 91350 Vice -President Santa Clarita Valley Canyons Preservation Committee Chair, Santa Clarita Valley Sierra Club Proposal Committee: Dorothy Riley, Santa Clarita Oak Conservancy Pat Saletore, Santa Clarita Civic Association Joanna Stuart, Santa Clarita Sierra Club 2 1. DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE BUFFERED Placerita Natural' Area Park is 35 acres of scenic beauty rich in history and biotic diversity. (See Appendix A) There, under a tree still standing,, California's first gold discovery took place in 1842. The resulting mining was less "rushed" than that in Sacramento in 1848, but the discovery was validly the first. The canyon was an acorn -gathering corridor used by the Tatavlam Indians, and the park contains one identified archeological site (LAN). A year-round blue line 'stream complete with waterfall, is within the park. In a year of normal rainfall, it flows above ground from November or December through June or July. Animals such as the mountain lion can be observed crossing the road on an Invisible path which eventually can lead them through the wildlife corridor under Interstate 5 Freeway and beyond. With the exdeption of 4 parcels, National Forest land surrounds this freeway -accessible park. Completion of buffering through acquisition of these parcels.would protect this park from developers' requests to be permitted to run new roads through, It or to build houses up to its present borders. EXACT LOCATION Placerita . Canyon Natural Area Park is located in unincorporated Los Angeles County approximately 1.6 miles east of Highway 14 (Antelope Valley Freeway) on Placerita Canyon Road which is approximately 3 miles north of the Interstate 5 Freeway/Antelope Valley Freeway interchange and 35 miles from downtown. Los Angeles. (See Appendix B for more precise siting.) 3. HOW MANY ACRES? The park presently contains 351 acres. This application proposes to acquire. approximately 425 more buffering acres in addition to the approximately 1000 buffering acres already in place because they are National Forest land. The need to. buffer the park arises from present and foreseeable future efforts to develop at Its boundaries and bring roads into it and.from pressures of much growth in population since it opened in 1957 when the Santa Clarita Valley had a population of a little over 4,000. The recently (6/91) adopted General Plan for the City of Santa Clarita quoted the new valley population figure at approximately 161,000. 4. WHAT AMOUNT OF FUNDS IS NEEDED TO CARRY OUT THIS PROJECT? We currently are contacting the four property owners within the desired buffer zone to ascertain asking prices for 'their parcels and shall supply a figure for funds needed as soon as possible.. Negotiations are time consuming. 5. HOW IS THIS AMOUNT BEING DETERMINED? HAS THE PROPERTY BEEN APPRAISED? A. By asking parcel owners for what sum they would be willing to sell their property. B. Not as yet. WHAT GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY WOULD ACQUIRE THIS PROPERTY? The. acquirer would ,:.o�_?; be the County of Los Angeles for administration by its Department of Parks and Recreation which umbrellas Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park. County -officials aL �C meebI TICS text ::e a 7� to « .: cw our—p agvsa 1. r-ne't 1a51 1nABeK�:and,ar5�d..c>ur,�rcpoSpi Gndac�reed )o bEthe aCg.LA11-11S 7. DOES THE PROJECT HAVE REGIONAL USAGE AND SIGNIFICANCE? U.J enale A. This area does indeed have significant regional use. In 1990, it drew approximately 18,000 school children from the Santa Clarita (30%) and San Fernando (30%) Valleys as well as from schools in the Greater Los Angeles Area and other parts of Los Angeles County (30%). The Simi, Antelope and San Gabriel Valleys as well as Ventura and Kern Counties accounted for the rest. When 1991 figures have been compiled at year's end, it is anticipated that 20,000 to 22,000 will have participated in field trips to this park. The general public also visits in impressive numbers. There are activities such as tours for youth groups, self. guided tours and family nature walks provided. We shall try to secure statistics relative to these activities, if available, at the end of the year and forward them to you. B. There is much evidence that the project area is a significant resource. There are extensive lists of flora and fauna.documented in this Natural Area Park. (See Appendix A) The native California Oak Trees make..for great beauty. C. There is also marked historical significance. The 1892 discovery of gold in California is commemorated in National Forest land adjacent to the park. Children who come on field trips are briefed on the culture of the Tataviam Indians who once lived there.or,came to gather acorns beneath its trees. The park had its inception when the Frank Walker family, in 1957, gave its pioneer ranch to the State of California. That family's home, standing on its original site, has been restored to vintage 1930's furnishings to make that history come alive for visitors. The park has a very supportive group of volunteer docents called the Placerita Canyon Nature Center Associates. ' D. The geographical and numerical data cited under item "A" attest to the fact that the park attracts many visitors regionally. At this point, word-of-mouth extolling and Inclusion on "where-to-go'l and "what -is -going -on" columns for Southern California are functioning well as advertising. This economical policy should continue. . E. This Proiect is the only one of its kind in the region. As we know from descriptions of.other parks in the -region and visits to some in recent years, we can say with confidence that Placerita Canyon Natural' Areas Park's particular combination of natural area and gold rush, Indian and pioneer history is unique. S. WHO WILL OPERATE AND MANAGE THIS PROPERTY AFTER ACQUISITION? HAVE THEY AGREED TO DO SO? CounParks and f?ecreoiion DL'a.r7 m�ri j k->crS Ctgre cd +L c so The pr sent park administr for stat s that t e new b fferfng property, since it would b vacant land, uld re uire no addition manage nt or 7mantenance costs. Perhaps when the county toff meet next weea decis'on will made.t leave the mono ment with he presenark ad nistrato Frank ovore. We sha forward 11 decis' ns made at next. week's ounty staff me,9ting as soo as:we know them. 9. WHO ARE THE CURRENT OWNERS IN THE.PROPOSED BUFFER ZONE? ARE THEY WILLING TO SELL? The owners are: 1. Allen Milton Trust and Atcherson and Allen Trust 2. Santa_Fe Development and -Mortgage Company 3. Rus.tam Mustafa 9. Walt Disney Productions One may be willing to donate the land. Two have not yet answered their telephones, so we are researching other ways to communicate. The fourth is discussing the matter with its directors and something may evolve. Any piece of land we can acquire will be useful for protection. We shall keep you informed as negotiations continue. 10. WOULD THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE PARK OPPOSE THE PROPOSED PROJECT BEING INCLUDED IN THE DISTRICT? No, neither the National Park Department or the State of California would oppose it. 11. DOES THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUPPORT THE PROJECT AND THE DESIGNATION OF AGENCIES FOR ACQUISITION AND -MANAGEMENT?, Peter Whittingham of Supervisor Michael Antonovich's office this will Ioe Ponworcl;r,.5 o IeTTer Con44c- ,i,_J. he SL.fpor off- hhe SuPerv�Sars'� anc� The CGLin}y's W;II;n�ncSs, j -o ac�,u�cr.ancl act vrlrni.5fer -the buff(a done. ,5 question officially. We shall forward their decisions as soon as they are communicated to us. 12. DOES THE CITY COUNCIL OF SANTA CLARITA SUPPORT THE PROJECT? Yes, although the park is just outside the City of Santa Clarita boundaries, the city is much in favor of buffering this unique natural area located on its "doorstep" and has aided us in gathering some of the documentation for.this proposal. 13. WHAT LOCAL OR STATE ORGANIZATION'S SUPPORT THE PROJECT? It is widely supported by local civic organizations such as the Santa Clarita Organization for- Planning the. Environment (SCOPE), the Santa Clarita Civic Association, the Santa Clarita Oak Conservancy, Santa Clarita Canyon Preservation Committee and others. A complete formal list will be forwarded soon. 14. WHAT LOCAL OR STATE ORGANIZATIONS OPPOSE THIS PROJECT? We have encountered none and really cannot think who would oppose it. 15. HAS THERE'BEEN ANY PUBLICITY ABOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT? HAS IT BEEN POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE? Word of mouth contacts have been very positive and organizational endorsements easily secured. Our local newspaper has not yet printed a story. One story has appeared in the Daily News. Placerita was one of the canyons featured at a local "Save the Canyons Day", though not with reference to this proposal. A press release is planned after proposals have been filed. 16. GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS The County Board of Supervisors can make a commitment to a .zone change bringing the new buffering land designation into conformity with that of the present Placerita Canyon Natural Area Park only when they know money is available from Park, Beach and Recreation Act Funds. We are told there would be no problem in passing a zoning amendment once funding is'assured. ren PeArson-Hall Dorothy Rzley 296-4438 (805) 259-3748 26617 Gavilan Dr. 21224-Placerita Canyon Rd. Santa Clarita, Ca 91350 Newhall, Ca 91321 SANTA Valencia Dotr-ken ec GY'ect i g ->: p i a C A -a Area Pcxrk Saugus Newhall GRANADA HILLS NORTHRIDGE Cca nyo n Na'%u rd l CLA.RITA Canyon Country 14 Placenta C.- State eState \to SAN FERNANDO IM env E-om CORPORabon REGIONAL LOCATION I FIGURE PD -1 Date: October 15,1991 To: Joscelyn Herzberg, Coordinator Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority 3750 Solstice Canyon Road Malibu, California 90265 For. Inclusion in The Los Angeles County Park, Beach and Recreation Act of 1992 Proposal Tidv Whitney Canyon Historical Camping and Recreation Grounds Alternative Title # 1: The Tataviam Indian Historical Campground Altemative Title # 2: Early Settlers Historical Campground Person To Contact Regarding This Proposal: Karan Pearson -Hall Vice President, Santa Clarita Valley Canyons Preservation Committee. Chair, Santa Clarita valley Sierra Club 26617 Gavilan Dr., Santa Clarita, CA 91350 Phone 805-296-4438 Presenting Group: Santa Clarita Valley Canyons Preservation Committee INTRODUCTION: DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1TSSELF This is a proposal to develop Whitney Canyon into a campground with an historical theme. The visitors to the park will have an opportunity to step back in history to 500 AD when the Tataviam Indians had their village there. Historians indicate that the village was located in the approximate area of the existing ranch. Camperg will be able to hike to one of the two permanent springs in that area that were considered sacred and then to asphaltum seeps that the Indians used to weave their baskets. Stronger hikers will be able to head back over the hills using the same trail the Tataviams hiked for trade with the Indians of San Fernando --called Femandios by the Spanish Trail markers with historical narralion will be placed strategically along the way. (There will be spedal times of the year whenBoy Scouts, Girl Scouts and Indian Goides will be encouraged to do- reenactments for visitors.of,. the kind of cooking, weaving and pottery skdls that were used at the time.) Later phases of the plan will include dwellings and displays about the other early settlers who came there. For example, the Spaniards were part of the rich history of dist area as were the western ranchers who survived the hardships of those early times. An adobe home and a small log cabin are suggested for the later phases, as well as historical displays relating to those tunes. Those who visit will find that camping is an activity that relates to the life styles of the settlers who came before them and adds a bridge to this walk through history which intends to enrich by the use of experiential understanding. The project is designed to be developed in phases to hasten its accessibility for camping and hiking. It is also designed to accommodate both tents and recreational campers (the kind with beds and/or kitchens in them) as well as vans. It is intended to be a multi use campground that will have trails for hiking, mountain bicycling, and horse back riding. The last phase of its development also incorporates a swimming pool. Facilities for camping will include cookout areas which have received the sanction of the local fire department and areas for running water. These sites will be placed in such a way that the natural corridors formildlife movement both to and from what has been a relatively undisturbed canyon system will be respected. 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND TO BE ACQUIRED Whitney Canyon is a serene and lovely canyon graced with extensive oak woodlands, its own natural springs and a nonflooding riparian area. Ithes north of the San Fernando Valley, south of the Antelope Valley, and near the eastern boundary of the city of Santa Clarity On Whitney's eastern border is the Angeles National Forest. Thus, if one includes the National Forest in the amount of land available for the hikers, this area would allow acreage that rivals that of Yosemite. There are approximately 607 acres involved with this sale. This includes a ranch with ranch house, another smaller house and two other buildings. The two houses have the potential for housing administrative offices and historical displays. The rest of the land is a deep uninhabited canyon graced with lovely ridge lines and a sense of vastness which its neighbor, the Angeles National Forest invites the intrepid hiker to explore. Placenta Canyon graces Whitney's northern side and is adjacent to Whitney. Placenta Canyon is home to Placenta Canyon Park and Nature Center—a true treasure administered by Los Angeles County Parks. ( It was in Placenta Canyon Park where the first gold in California was discovered.) A campground in Whitney would help to extend the quiet serenity and scenic beauty of the trails and limited facilities of Placenta Canyon Nature Center. The Antelope Valley Freeway is adjacent to its western edge, thus making this an easily accessible campground. Though the flora and fauna of Whitney will be addressed in a later section, it is noted that Whitney is an important part of the wild life corridor between the San Gabriel and Santa Monica Mountains, and that there is indeed need for concern about the environmentally sensitive species that call Whitney their home. • A stale kmical madocf (adamintrly to Wfy removed) was plscxd on Whitney's coat caetm edge to mcogmao the Tatariant Indra that xuded m Whitney. The oakted picMM d Whitney which ate included ked aappMt to the beWthat these Indisa mw have fived in joyful sassily in this ttanqutl actlin" acomity that this land wM once again be ahk to aft as ad= to the mben maidea s of I.os Angeles County once it is developed into a Campgtlomd and pads 2. EXACT LOCATION A Verbal Deaaiphon of locadon Wlimey CWyon s located at the eatm tcmriaa of San Femamo Road, Wommatly 2.4 miles natlt of the ftwsy 14 (of Antelope Valley FMway) and Intaatate S fieeway exchange. The mouth of the canyon is at the hd=h age of the Antlopc Valley Freeway and San Femando Road See atmched map for more &aged location Thin map will show that thio campgoand provides a deafieable a&=cmcw of the already existing qm qwc fogad at Maoeata Canyon Pads. Bym of location: ---- SANTA MARITA VALLEY • 3. W)*TNEY CANYON �_ `•'•_mss, u:.: 77 tielndians tTia� 1'n�n the SC�'niia m a se to") that resembled an upside down v i G fl 1 3. HOW MANY ACRES (APPROXIMATELY)? This proposal is for parcel numbers:10, 11, 13,14,15, and 18 in Whitney Canyon. The total is approximately 60655 acres including approximately 70 acres of DWP land. 4. WHAT AMOUNT OF FUNDS IS NECESSARY TO ACQUIRE THIS PROPERTY OR CARRY OUT THIS PROJECT? Whitney Ranch Associates has indicated a definite interest in selling this property, both to me in person and in the recant 10/24/91 Daily News Article entitled "Group wants bond to pay for Whitney Canyon park." It is expected that the actual price of the property will not exceed twenty six - million dollars ($26,000,000 ) and that a written appraisal will be. forthcoming. It is estimated that approximately four million five hundred thousand ($400,000 ) will be needed to create a theme campground in Whitney Canyon with hiking trails and suitable amenities. The preliminary phase would include acquisition costs, real estate costs, and appraisal costs. The latter two are estimated at $100,000 . Phase one of the project is a simple camping and hiking establishment with primitive water and bathroom facilities (somewhat like McGill Campground up in Mount Pinos). This phase would include building 80 campsites, a parking lot, and a kiosk for receiving the camping fees. Recreational campers and all other motorized vehicles will be restricted to the canyon floor and required to be parked during visitors' stay. Specifically, there will be no motoring on trails beyond that which is needed to transport one to and from a campsite. Vehicles larger than a camper and double axle vehicles will not be allowed to utilize the trails, roads, campsites, or facilities in the campground. Camping will only be allowed withing the designated campground and afterfee payment There will be no campsite hookaps for recreational campers. Phase two would renovate the ranch house to include office space, and historical displays. Phase three would add non -motorized mountain bike trails and more trees. Phase four would add showers, and modern bathroom facilities. Phase five would build the Tataviam Indian Village and place the historical and educational markers along the trails that describe the life of the Indians. Phase six would develop an equestrian trail to connect with Placeri&s equestrian trails, providing that the buffer zone between Placenta and Whitney can be used for that purpose. The mountain bikes would take precedence over equestrians in Whitney because no mountain bikes are allowed in Placenta, but horses are allowed in Placerita. Phase seven would add a Spanish adobe but and an early settler's cabin so visitors could extend their walk through history. Phase eight would add a swimming pool with an adjacent changing area that includes showers and modem toilets. These phases are also consonant with the priorities of this project. In the event that these are cost overruns which dictate reduction of some of this projects objectives, the last phases in order from the last to the first are to be eliminated until more monies can be found It is estimated that $120,800 per year be allocated for salaried employees for the phase one through seven portions. A phase eight estimate on personnel and maintenance for a swimming pool is forthcoming. Approximately $100,000 per year would be allocated for campsite maintenance and development, and maintenance of the historical structures, trails, administrative facility, historical displays, and garbage pick up. Refinement of maintenance costs will be forthcomin& Yearly cost of utilities will also have to be estimated A budget for making this project available on a regional basis and advertising it is estimated at $20,000 per year. Fees for the use of this park, in order to reduce costs, are an option of this plan. Should the acquiring agency wish a fee -free park and and this project makes the monies available, then fees would not be charged In addition, Tree People or the City of Santa Cladds tree program might add trees on avoluntary basis. 5. HOW WERE THESE AMOUNTS DETERMINED? HAS THE PROPERTY BEEN APPRAISED? The estimate for developmental costs is derived from interviews with personnel at Placenta Nature Center and County Parks and Recreation's North Region Headquarters. An overall cost of $2,500,000 was a rough estimate given by Eiml Yamasaki at Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation North Valley Headquarters as the approximate price of a primitive campground (phase one). The request for development monies submitted by Los Angeles Parks and Recreation for developing Whitney into an Off Highway Vehicle area was used as another information source and is included in the appendix. They requested $4,682,000 for development. Though many amenities specified in their request are different from those in this request, the costs are similar. In addition, the appendix includes approximate costs of spec details involved with the project as provided by Frank Hovore, Natural Areas Administrator for Los Angeles County. All estimates will need further refining. It is expected that an updated appraisal will be forthcoming. In addition, more detailed refinements in cost analysis will be submitted in the near future. 6. WHICH GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY/AGENCIES WOULD ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY OR RECEIVE FUNDS TO CARRY OUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT? It is anticipated that the purchase and development of this property will be done by the Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation Department in conjunction with Michael Antonovich's office. This is in the discussion phase. The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy and The City of Santa Clarita are also possible acquiring agencies forthis project 7. DOES THE PROJECT HAVE REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE? WILL IT BE USED BY MANY COMMUNITIES? A. EVIDENCE THAT THE PROJECT IS A SIGNIFICANT NATURAL RESOURCE: 1. Flora and Fauna A copy of a letter included in the appendix from Frank Hovore, Natural Areas Administrator for the County of Los Angeles, to Mr. Marc Mclinkoff states, "According to the Natural Areas staff, numerous Blue List and Special Concern species which are resident in Placenta Canyon would be expected to also live in Whitney Canyon. Further, by virtue of the permanent springs in Whitney, species which do not occur in Placerita might well maintain populations there. For example, although it is not a resident species in Placenta Canyon, Least Bell's Vireo has been verified thereon several oaasions. Its oocurrencein Whitney, therefore, might be expected, and a search for it made in April and May, when it would be found in this area. Coopers Hawk, Sharp -skinned Hawk, Red -shouldered Hawk, Black - shouldered Kite, and San Diego Horned Lizard, all have been verified as resident in both canyons. Monarch Butterfly, Yellow Warbler, Black -tailed Gnatcatcher, and unidentified species of Batrachoseos, and American Badger have been seen in Placerita Canyon, the latter as recently as January, 1989. Non -listed species such as Mule Deer, Bobcat, Mountain lion and Grey Fox are also present in both canyons. It is reasonable to assume that habitat degradation in Whitney Canyon would have a significant impact upon the breeding, home, and foraging ranges of many species, and might even eradicate entire populations of less -mobile taxa Oak trees and in particular Coast lave Oak (the species which fors dense groves in the lower portions of Whitney Canyon), are considered to be "keystone" species to the maintenance of resource diversity in most southern California habitats .... Consideration should be given to design resolutions which would preserve, not remove, oaks, and protection and maintenance guidelines should be developed for those which remain Heritage trees should be given special consideration in the design process. Although a thorough archaeological study should be performed, the presence of so many oaks, plus year-round water, and natural asphaltum seeps dearly indicates a potential Tataviam Indian site. These Indians frequented Placerita Canyon, and there is a state registered archaeological site in the park." Simply knowing that Whitney is part of the Condor Range area should be motivation for anyone to keep it pristine. However, when one adds even more endangered animals to the list of possible residents there, such as the Spotted Owl and Least Bells Vires, the realization of Whitney's importance to a fragile eco -system is mightily reinforced (Please refer to the letter from Carl Wishner, Chief Biologist for Envicwm Corporation which is in the appendix.) In addition, the popularity of the small nearby Placerita Nature Center which is visited by residents representing the entire Los Angeles area, adds to the conviction that residents throughout the region will enjoy these park amenities. The fact that Whitney Canyon ajoins the extensive holdings of the Angeles National Forest adds much to its attractiveness for recreational use. 2. Historical Significance: Jerry Reynolds, well known historian of the Santa Clarita Valley and member of the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society has submitted an historical description of the Whitney area as well as an article entitled "Castaic Indians," which describes the culture of the Tataviams (see appendix). As previously described, the history of our only settlers with special emphasis on the Tataviam Indians will be the theme of the park. The last survivor of this culture passed away at the dawn of the twentieth century. This place is so alive with the history and culture of the Tataviams, it is expected that all who hike its trails will leave feeling an appreciation for those who came before. The Walt Disney. Corporation in nearby Placenta Canyon is the last remaining movie and television production company of its kind and is definitely part of the history of the area In addition the family of Andrew Jauregui has offered to lend historical western memorabilia of such significance that the developers of the Gene Autry Museum have previously indicated their desire to have it They offer this loan "for as long as you want it" in support of this project. Andrew Jauxgui, a well known rancher and rodeo star, lived in this area and is commemorated in the Western Walk of Fame that is located on the streets of Newhall. He was involved with many classic western movies and was a friend of John Wayne, Clark Gable, Harry Carey, Joel McCrae and many other movie stars of the classic westem era B. LETTERS OR STUDIES DOCUMENTING THE REGIONAL USE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES: Placenta Canyon Park and Nature Center receives thousands of visitors from all over Los Angeles County every year. The Whitney Canyon historical campground expects to experience even more county wide popularity than the limited facilities at Placerita. The many school groups from all over Los Angeles County who go to Placerita Canyon Nature Center can be expected to include Whitney's Tataviam Village and the other early settlers' homes in their tour. In 1990, Placenta Canyon Park drew 18,000 school children. Approximately 30 percent came from the Santa Clarity Valley and 30 % came from the San Fernando Valley. The rest of Los Angeles County accounted for another 30 3'o and outlying counties account for the additional 10 percent, according to figures compiled at Eaton Canyon Nature Center. In addition, the many adults who enjoyed the facilities are not included in these statistics. It's possible to get some sense of the usage that Whitney will have from these figures. According to Frank Hovore, the tent campground at Walker Ranch holds 83 campsites and is booked solid all of the times of the year thatit can be utilized—which is 50 weeks out of the year. He. said that campers come from all over Los Angeles County including Santa Monica and eastern Ventura County. In addition, Hovom reports that 10 to 12 Eagle Scout projects are taken to completion each year at Placerita. On March 23, 1991, the 20's and 30's Committee of the Sierra Club hosted a "Save The Canyons Day" at Placerita Park out of coneem for the welfare of Placenta Canyon, Whitney Canyon and Elsmew Canyon. Approximately 90 Santa Clarita citizens came to this event, and over 200 Sierra Club members and friends arrived from all over Los Angeles County from areas as far away as Torrance and even the Dana Point area Petitions were signed daring that day which demonstrate the diversity of areas represented. These will be counted in the near future. A sample of the petitions with local residents on it is enclosed There will be another "Save The Canyons Day" on November 2, 1991 sponsored by two Sierra Club groups. The first one included Hunt Braly, Administrative Aid to Senator Davis as well as Till Klajic, local city council member, who both spoke on behalf of preserving thispristine area The popularity of campgrounds across California, as demonstrated by the many waiting lines to get in, gives support for the belief that this campground will also receive full usage. C. DOCUMENTATION THAT THE PROJECT IS OR WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE OR ADVERTISED ON A REGIONAL BASIS: The administrator of this pads would be in charge of park outreach programs and park educational programs. The County of Los Angeles Parks Department is experienced in operating regional park facilities, and it is expected that the county will welcome this project and make it available on a regional basis. In addition, it is the condition of awarding the purchasing and developing agent bids that this would indeed occur. Also, dedication of the grant for acquisition of this project would be made conditional on a covenant running with the land that the trails be dedicated for non -motorized recreational use only. A budget for the purpose of advertising on a regional basis is included with this proposal. This property could notbe more ideally located for regional enjoyment. Simply looking at the map gives one a good indication of how freeway convenient it is to the entire Los Angeles area People from the Antelope Valley, Santa Cladta Valley, Simi Valley and the entire San Fernando Valley will have easy access to this site. However, it is anticipated that its uniqueness would draw campers with a more even distribution from all over Los Angeles. D. , DOCUMENTATION THAT THE PROJECT IS THE ONLY ONE OF ITS HIND IN THE SURROUNDING REGION. To my knowledge there are no other theme campgrounds of this sort in the surrounding region. 8. WHO WILL OPERATE AND MANAGE THIS PROPERTY AFTER ACQUISITION? HAVE THEY AGREED TO DO SO? Final determination of management has not yet been made. However, Los Angeles County Parks and Recreation Department is the likely agency. In addition, the property could also be, leased to a private party skilled in running campgrounds in a manner which would be protective of the historical significance of the site. 9. WHO ARE THE CURRENT OWNERS? ARE THE CURRENT OWNERS WILLING TO SELL? Whitney Ranch Associates currently own the property and have indicated that they aro willing to sell as well as provide a written offer to sell. This will be forthcoming. 10. WOULD THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS OPPOSE THE PROPOSED PROJECT BEING INCLUDED IN THE DISTRICT? The current property owners support the proposed project's inclusion. 11. DOES THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUPPORT THE PROJECT AND THE DESIGNATION OF AGENCIES FOR ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT? It is anticipated that they will be delighted to have this unique facility in Los Angeles County. This is still in the discussion phase. 12. DOES THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORT THE PROJECT AND THE DESIGNATION OF AGENCIES FOR ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT? The city that is closest to this land is the City of Santa Clarita. I have received verbal assurances of support and anticipate that a letter of support will be sent from the City of Santa Clarity In addition, they have provided personnel to assist me in the preparation of this proposal. A formal request for a letter of support is scheduled for. the November 12 , Santa Clarita City Council meeting. 13. WHICH LOCAL OR STATE ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORT THE PROJECT'? Non -motorized vehicle use is consistent with the Walt Disney Company's stand against the previous plan for an Off Highway Vehicle Park in Whitney Canyon This project will be designed so that Disney's motion picture and television production business in neighboring Placerita Canyon will be protected. No off road vehicle usage will be allowed in the park. (Note that the Angeles Chapter of the Sierra Club representing 65,000 members opposes any Off Highway Vehicle Park in Whitney Canyon as well). No vehicle larger than a camper will be allowed beyond the canyon floor unless it is specifically needed for preparation of campsites or maintenance of the campsites. The Santa Clarita Valley Oalm Conservancy has given verbal support for this project with the understanding that the beautiful oak woodlands in Whitney Canyon be preserved. That intention is a provision of this project. I am confident that letters of support from many groups will be forthcoming. At the present,' Santa Clarity Valley Canyons Preservation Committee, Santa Clanta Organization for Preservation of the Environment (SCOPE), Santa Clarita Civic Association, Placenta Canyon Nature Association, and the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society have given verbal support to this request. Letters of support from these organizations and others will follow. The City of Santa Clarita is expected to endorse this plan on November 12. To elicit that endorsement, it is the intention of this proposal that this land in Whitney Canyon will never be used for any landfill activities, either as a landfill or for transportation to a landfill. 14. WHICH LOCAL OR STATE ORGANIZATIONS OPPOSE THIS PROJECT? Thereis no known opposition However, potential opposition will be noted and further investigation will determine whether indeed problems exist in these areas. The notion of using Whitney for motorcyclists has been defused, and it is unlikely that any opposition to this project from motorcyclists will occur. AB 940legislation, currently moving through the state legislature, is designed to move the funding of research and development on Whitney Canyon as an Off Highway Vehicle Park to another location and gives further testimony to the fad that they have set their sights elsewhere. Further evidence that the desire to use Whitney for an Off Highway Vehicle park is defused is found in the 10/21/91 Daily News article entitled "Group wants bond to pay for Whitney Canyon park." The following is excerpted from the article: "`lime county Parlor and Recreation Department has suspended studies on that plan; pads planner Clyde Von Rosenberg said. 'Park officials are looking at alternative sites, including Hume Canyon near Saugus; he said." Elsmere Canyon lies to the south of Whitney. If both Los Angeles County and the City of Santa Clarity support this plan, it can be assamed that any controversy regarding Elsmere that exists will not interfere with this proposal for Whitney Canyon. 15. HAS THERE BEEN ANY PUBLICITY ABOUT THE ABOVE PROJECT? HAS TT BEEN POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE? At one time, I am told, there was publicity about the desire of the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy to purchase Whitney Canyon. The October 20,1991 S, Md in a brief article entitled, "Activists meet city leaders for 2nd time" noted the following: "Karen Pearson -Hall, head of the local chapter of the Sierra Club, wanted the city to review her request for state recreation funds to help tum part of Whitney Canyon into an Indian -themed historical campground. Response: Yes." The October 24, 1991, jay News (Santa Clarita Valley edition) had a front page article entitled "Group wants bond to pay for Whitney Canyon park,." which stated the facts of this proposal and did not slant it either positively or negatively. Publicity about this project has intentionally been kept to a minimum because negotiations are still going on. However, when Whitney Canyon was being looked at for use as an Off Highway Vehicle Park, the many groups of people who took a strong stand against that idea often mentioned how nice it would be if Whitney Canyon could become a park.. May this dream of Whitney becoming a park and campground soon become a reality! 16. FURTHER COMMENTS A. General Plan Considerations: Los Angeles County has jurisdiction over this piece of property. It is common practice to d=ge the zoning to accommodate a park at the time that the park is actually ready for approval. The County Board of Supervisors cannot make a commitment to zoning for a park in Whitney until they know the money is available for that purpose from this bill. It is my understanding that there is no problem creating a zoning amendment designating appropriate use for a campground with non - motorized trail usage once that money becomes available. The City of Santa Clarita has an interest in including Whitney Canyon in its sphere of influenoe. The General Plan of the City of Santa Clarity zoned this area (RE) which means Residential Estate or zero to one/half unit per acre. That was as low as their density designations could go without giving it an (OS) or open space designation. I was informed that an (OS) designation was not given because it would have committed them to purchasing it B. Economical Considerations: With the Angeles Forest abutting the -east boundary of Whitney Canyon, this campground will make many more acres available for the public than will actually be purchased. Thus, one could say that given all the acreage that becomes available, this is a bargain basement park ready to happen,for that purpose even though some of this acreage has been zoned commercial by Los Angeles County (thus making it more expensive, Itis anticipated that this island that would interest the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy because the placing of a park in Whitney would include protection for the wild life corridor that exists between the Santa Monica Mountains and the San Gabriel Mountains. C. Compatibility With Other Proposals: This plan is Ym compatible with the proposal to purchase buffer zone property around Placenta Canyon Park. Z _ ii .> >� c', mac• ••�I:• ',- � _ . _. - ' - J a e , l • \ Via^ ZI 14 U •" �^ taw r ���-C: ^y0 • q I 00 `• ....,ems sak"M r`) a"° ley Can we I o o /320 , • Q � - - a n <�" � .t,. a' . 10 � �1 •I, I'a, r, 2T � � i e 1799 ^Canyon' . fpFe ♦ 4 01 _Whitney _ro� O�� 5c4' Oil 'Veil "y �c Rr_ �� : _ I ♦.G, �+ - av . 14. . x2,=z : iN 011 1 Q 0.{ f Q h i IS"EOY�`CQ-i %y 9 . Well" )>4s s"aha ' _ {fir' �.y. � y `�Ij j}/ - o3e `o j Canyon e f 2-- ' G'- -- _ aRaeio o�c'a e _ _ e ..• FaeiblY 1 � ' �± 3 "•,WT2/e2 Do L errACCM 1flRP0RatX f1 REGIONAL LOCATIONI FIGURE PD -1 cr mcom Enve onrnental Research • Energy Res ume Menegement • Urben and Regoral Ple rNng March 18,1991 Karen Pearson -Hall 26617 Gavilan Dr. Santa Clarita City, CA 91350. Re: Elsmere Pictorial Dear Ms Pearson -Hall: In response to your letter of March 12 to Kathy Patey, I offer the following data regarding the plant species listed therein: • Blue oak (Quercus douglasii). Not present at Elsmere Canyon: found at Oak Flat in northwestern Los Angeles County. A few individuals have been found in the Simi Hills of eastern Ventura County. • Chaparral Manzanita(s): Bigberry Manzanita (Arctostaphylos glauca). Not recorded, probably present in Elsmere Canyon; Eastwood Manzanita (A. glandulosa) Present in Elsmere Canyon. • Our Lord's Candle (Yucca whipplei intermedia).. Common at Elsmere Canyon. • Holly -leaf Cherry (Prunus ilicifolia). Common at Elsmere Canyon. • Yerba Santa (Eriodictyon crassifolium). Present, occasionally dominating small areas. • Mojave Rubberbush (Rabbit Brush) (Chrysothamnus nauseosus mohavensis). Occurs abundantly in alluvial soils at the lower end of Elsmere Canyon (not on the project site proper), and occasionally, but not abundantly in openings in chaparral on the project site. • Mountain Mahogany (Cercocarpus betuloides). I have not seen this species at Elsmere Canyon, although it is fully expected. It may be that my sampling has not included.much of the upland habitats yet. The island subspecies (C. b. blanchae) is on the CNPS watch list (4). • Coyote Brush (Baccharis pilularis consanguinea). Occurs sparingly at Elsmere Canyon. 4764 Park Granada • Calabasas Park, CA 91302.1593 • Telephone (81 B) 340-9400 iii V co f�--i_�.T Cy'i.,✓^. Ms Pearson -Hall March 18, 1991 Page Two • Bush Tree Poppy (Dendromecan rigida). I haven't seen this species here, but it certainly is expected following a fire. • Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia). The characteristic species of the canyons and mesic slopes at Elsmere Canyon. • Black sage (Salvia mellifera). Locally dominating areas of coastal sage scrub. • Box Elder (Acer negundo). Not present. • Chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum). Occurring as pure stands or variously mixed with hoary -leaf ceanothus, together covering a large proportion of the project site. • Laurel Sumac (Rhus !aurin). Occurs sparingly at Elsmere Canyon. Oddly,, this species appears not penetrate further into the interior, being absent from nearby Placenta Canyon. • Tree Tobacco (Nicotiana glauca). Present at Elsmere, as most everywhere. • Southern California Black Walnut (Juglans californica). Some good stands of woodland dominated by this species are present at Elsmere Canyon. • Engelmann Oak (Quercus engelmannii). Does not occur: the closest location is near Pasadena. • Western Sycamore (Platanus racemosa). Present at Elsmere Canyon. • White Alder (Alnus rhombifolia). I have not seen this species, however, Kathy Patey informs me that it occurs in an upper drainage, based on her discussion and site visit with the forest ranger. None of these species are Rare, Threatened, or Endangered pursuant to state or federal endangered species legislation. The only 'sensitive' species noted thus far is Nevin's . Brickellbush (Brickellia nevinii), which is on CNPS "watch list" (4). 0 Ms Pearson -Hall March 18, 1991 Page Three Among those animals which you have listed, all are known or expected to occur at Elsmere Canyon. Your nomenclature should specify common and scientific names as follows: • striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis) • mule deer (Odocoiieus hemionus) • gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) • mountain .lion (Fel is concolor) • western gray squirrel (Sciurus griseus) • black bear (Ursus americanus) Although it is true that the (northern) spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) is a federally Threatened species, the (southern) spotted owl (S. o. occidentalis) of the Sierra, Transverse and Peninsular Ranges is a Forest Service Management Indicator Species (MIS). In this regard, the.Angeles National Forest Land and Resources Management Plan FEIS (1987) states on pp. 2-35: "The Forest will determine the number of existing spotted owl pairs, and manage.their habitat to maintain at least that population. Projects will be planned for minimum impact on the spotted owl habitat. (A)lthough not subject to the provisions of the Endangered. Species Act of 1973, as amended; will receive special management to maintain viability and to prevent their placement on Federal or State lists." Attached you will find an excerpt from a recent report in the Elsmere vicinity discussing sensitive animal species of the area. Perhaps you will find this informative. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, or if I can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, 01 Carl Wishner, Principal Biologist ;a r Canyon Country b Bl� Saugus a SANTA CLARITA Valencia Newhall 0 Z roposeda Fe flandh 14 WFffiTiE`( CYN, O6pro� \ � a GRANADA HILLS NORTHRIDGE REGIONAL LOCATION SYLIMAR \jo SAN FERNANDO 0 W-6 y ice 1S2 I IS erwr=m =ripmaawn FIGURE PD -1 Appendix G3 Sensitive Animal Species of the Project Region In the following accounts of sensitive animal species for the region, status codes are given as indicated below: CE California Endangered CT California Threatened CP California Fully Protected FE Federally Endangered FT Federally Threatened F2 Federal Candidate Category 2 FSS Forest Service Sensitive CSC California Special Concern (CDFG,1990) SA Special Animal (CDFG, 1990) S Sensitive (USDI:FWS, 1986) U considered locally uncommon by area biologists AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES Southwestern {Western) Pond Turtle (Clemmys marmorata pallida) (Status*: CSC, F2). Occurs in streams of the Los Angeles area, mostly in oak woodland and coastal sage scrub communities (Dixon, 1967). This species requires riparian habitat with reasonably deep pools for escape from predators, and for hibernation between late October and April. Habitat is marginal for this species at the project site, since the present depth and size of the pools is too shallow for them to have persisted under the pressure of predation by raccoon, coyote, and domestic dogs, and perhaps collection. Hovore (1991) reports that one individual was taken in Placerita Canyon State Park in 1974. We consider the Placerita Creek portion of the project site to be historical habitat for this species, with reasonable potential for re- introduction. Arroyo (Southwestern) Toad (Bufo microscaphus californicus) (CSC; F2). Found in arroyos and canyon bottoms in oak woodland and coastal sage scrub communities of Los Angeles County (Dixon, 1967) and elsewhere from San Luis Obispo County to Baja California (Stebbins, 1972). Habitat is present on project site, however, there are no late records of this species in the vicinity (Hovore, 1991). Therefore, the potential for the presence of species is questionable. California Red -Legged Frog (Rana aurora draytoni) (CSC, F2). Found in areas with permanent water among oak woodland communities in Los Angeles County (Dixon, 1967) and formerly elsewhere west of the Cascades -Sierra Nevada Crest from southwestern British Columbia to northwest Baja California (Stebbins, 1985). Habitat is present, and the project site is likely within the historical range for the species, although, there are no records of this species in the drainage (Hovore, 1991). Given the current declining status of this species in the range (Schoenherr, 1976), its presence is questionable. Foothill Yellow -Legged Frog (Rana boylii) (CSC). Found in streams in arroyos and canyon bottoms in the oak woodland communities of Los Angeles County (Dixon, 1967) and elsewhere throughout cismontane California (Stebbins, 1972). Species prefers slow water and wide pools. It has not been sighted since 1975, and may be extinct in southern California (Schoenherr, 1976). Habitat is present, and the project. site is likely within the historical range for the species, although, there are no records of this species in the drainage (Hovore; 1991). Given the current status of this species in the range (Schoenherr, 1976), its presence is questionable. California Coast Horned Lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum frontale) (CSC) (1,2). Found in variety of habitats (Dixon, 1967) in cismontane California from Los Angeles County to Baja California (Behler and King, 1979). This species requires loose soil for burrowing, open areas for sunning, and abundant insect prey, especially harvester ants. These factors are present throughout the upland and riparian habitats on the project site. This species has been recorded for Placerita Canyon and is a probable resident of the project site. Silvery (California) Legless Lizard (Anniella p. pulchra) (U). Found in coastal sage scrub and oak woodland communities of Los Angeles County (Dixon, 1967) and elsewhere in loose alluvial soils and beach dunes from Contra Costa County southward to Baja California (Stebbins, 1972). Prefers moist, sandy soils and surface litter buildup within oak woodland and riparian forest. This species is reported as common in Placerita Canyon (Hovore, 1991) and is a probable resident of the project site. San Bernardino (California) Mountain Kingsnake (Lampropeltis zonata parvirubra) (SA*) and San Diego Mountain Kingsnake (Lampropeltis zonata pulchra) (CSC, F2). Both taxa are found. in chaparral, yellow -pine and oak woodlands of Los Angeles County (Dixon, 1967). The location of the project site in the .San Gabriel Mountains is intermediate in the distribution of the two subspecies, and although Hovore (1991) reports that individuals in this area are generally referable to the San Diego subspecies, occasional specimens are encountered with 37 or more body triads, indicative of the San Bernardino subspecies. In either case, both subspecies are sensitive. Habitat is present at the project site, and we conclude that there is moderate potential for the presence of this species. BIRDS Great Blue Heron (Ardea herodias) (SA*). Fairly common resident throughout most of the region, breeding historically at Chatsworth and Santa Monica (Garrett 9 and Dunn, 1981). Rare occurrence throughout the year at Placerita Canyon. Potentially occurring in riparian portions of the project site. Great Egret (Casmerodius albus) (SA*). Scarce in the interior coastal district, and uncommon during spring migration in the desert district (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Reported for valley foothill riparian areas of the Angeles National Forest (USDA:USFS, 1987). Snowy Egret (Egretta thula) (SA*). Uncommon transient and summer visitant in the desert district (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Reported for valley foothill riparian areas of the Angeles National Forest (USDA:USFS, 1987). Black -Crowned Night -heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) (SA*). Uncommon transient and rare winter visitant in desert district (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Reported for valley foothill riparian areas of the Angeles National Forest (USDA:USFS, 1987). Long -Billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) (F2). Fairly common fall transient and winter visitant to the Antelope Valley, otherwise generally a rare transient through the.interior (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Reported for grassland areas of the Angeles National Forest (USDA:USFS, 1987). California Condor (Gymnogyps californianus) (FE, CE, CP). Formerly a widespread resident in the foothill and montane regions of the south coastal, transverse, and southern Sierra Nevada mountain ranges. No wild individuals are known to exist (Smollar, 1987). Currently, 40 individuals exist in captivity, with expected releases to begin within the next two years (Daily News, Jan. 20, 1991). The project site lies within the recent range; which corresponds to. the proposed recovery range for the species (USDI:FWS, 1984). Black -Shouldered Kite (Elanus caeruiea) (SA*, CP). Rare visitant and very local nester on the western edge of the desert district (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Seems to prefer a combination of open grasslands, meadows, or .marshes for foraging, primarily for meadow mice, and nearby isolated, dense -topped trees for perching and nesting. Reported as frequent during spring and summer at Placerita Canyon, and reported to have nested at Walker Ranch (Hovore, 1991). Northern Harrier (Circus cyaneus) (CSC). Fairly common winter and rare summer visitor to marshes and fields throughout (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Two individuals of this species have been observed regularly at the project site between December 1990, and February 1991. Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperi) (CSC). Resident throughout California, with nesting sites predominantly in riparian groves of deciduous trees, although live oaks are sometimes used (Grinnell and Miller, 1944). Common occurrence throughout the year at Placerita Canyon. 3 Sharp-Shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus) (CSC). Fairly common winter visitant, and locally common fall transient (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Frequent to common occurrence throughout the year at Placerita Canyon. Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni) (CT). Rare to uncommon transient and rare summer resident, with numbers greatly reduced in recent decades (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Reported at Placerita Canyon. Ferruginous Hawk (Buteo regalis) (F2). Fairly common winter visitant to grassland and agricultural regions of the desert and some valleys in the interior of the coastal district (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). A single individual was observed at the project site on January 25, 1991. Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) (CP, CSC). Uncommon year-round resident of grasslands and oak savannah of the Santa Monica Mountains, nesting on cliffs (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). A single individual has been observed at the project site on two occasions in December, 1990, and January, 1991. Prairie Falcon (Falco mexicanus) (CSC). Uncommon resident in the and interior and rare visitant to the coastal slope (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Prairie falcons are generally birds of open areas and generally shun heavily wooded areas. Occurs rarely to occasionally throughout the year at Placerita Canyon. Long-Eared Owl (Asio otus) (CSC). Uncommon resident, with some seasonal movement, primarily in riparian groves and plantings of larger trees in the desert district (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Reported as a marginal occurrence at Placerita Canyon. Short-Eared Owl (Asio flammeus) (CSC). Uncommon winter visitor and rare to casual spring and fall transient to open marshes, estuaries and grasslands. Reported as a rare to occasional occurrence throughout the year at Placerita Canyon. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) (CSC). Rare, year-round resident of grassland and open scrub (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). This species is commensal with California ground squirrel, whose burrows they utilize. Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis) (CSC, FT). Uncommon and local resident in oak and oak-conifer woodlands of the mountains, foothill canyons and coastal ranges (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Western Yellow-billed Cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis) (CE). Formerly much more common and widespread, particularly in the coastal district, where it nested in the lowland stream courses of coastal Los Angeles and Ventura Counties (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Preferred habitat of river bottomlands with dense old growth of willow, often with cottonwoods, and a tangled understory of blackberry, nettle, or wild grape (Grinnell and Miller, 1944). Historical record of nesting at San a Fernando (CDFG, 1990). An individual was taken at the nearby Magic Mountain amusement park in 1983 (Long and Hovore, 1991). Willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillfi) (SCE, .FSS). Fairly common to common transient. with the largest numbers passing through the desert. breeds in riparian woodlands, but virtually extirpated as a breeder in the region (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Reported as a rare to occasional occurrence throughout the year at Placerita Canyon. Purple Martin (Progne subis) (CSC). Rare and local summer resident in woodlands of the foothill portions of the coast and mountains, (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Declines due to competition for nesting space with European starling. For breeding, typically utilizes areas where large trees which afford large holes in their trunks or branches, created by large woodpeckers such as acorn woodpecker, Lewis' woodpecker, or northern flicker. Cactus Wren (coastal) (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegoense) (SA*). A very local resident in the coastal district north to southern Ventura County, and locally eastward through the transverse and peninsular ranges (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). This species is recorded as a marginal occurrence at all times of the year at Placerita Canyon. California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) (F2, CSC). Uncommon and local resident in and coastal sage scrub and cactus scrub habitats of the San Gabriel Mountains and Palos Verdes Peninsula southward. Formerly nesting in the Santa Clara River of Ventura County and in the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles County (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Habitat requirements are for low, fairly dense tracts of xenophilous brush on mesas and bajadas, or in dry washes. Nesting within three feet of the ground.. Typical associations preferred include coastal sagebrush, laurel sumac, sage, or cactus. Recent-recoid at Tujunga Wash (CDFG, 1990), and recorded occasionally at all times of the year at Placerita Canyon. Western Bluebird (Sialia mexicana) (S,SC) (1,2,3). Common year-round resident of oak and conifer woodlands of the coastal district, and extending locally in riparian woodlands to the western edge of the desert. Declining due to competition for nesting sites with European starling (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Common to frequently occurring at Placerita Canyon. Regularly observed at the project site in January, 1991. Loggerhead Shrike (Lanius Iudoaicianus) (S). Fairly common resident in open areas throughout southern California (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Several observations at the project site in January, 1991. Least Bell's Vireo (Vireo belli pusillus) (FE,CE) (3). Formerly a fairly common summer resident, but now a rare summer resident of willow and riparian habitats and restricted to southern California. Breeding sites are presently concentrated 5- along the Santa .Ynez, Santa Clara, Santa Ana, Santa Margarita and San Luis Rey Rivers (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Preferred habitat includes low riparian growth, either in the vicinity of water or in dry parts of river bottoms. Activity is centered within a few feet of the ground, in the fairly open twigs canopiedabove by the foliage of willow and cottonwoods. Most typical plants found are willow, mule fat, and wild blackberry, less commonly live and valley oaks, wild grape, poison oak and sumac (Grinnell and Miller, 1944). For nesting, these vireos prefer bottomland riparian conditions, where dense vegetation is unbroken for 10 meters or more, rather than narrow canyons with lesser lateral extent of vegetation (Garrett, K., personal communication). Hendricks and Reiger (1988) concluded that although this species is a generalist nester, that restoration plans for vireo habitat should incorporate a persistent low and high shrub layer and a tree canopy. Three records are reported by State Parks for this species at Walker Ranch (Hovore, 1991) Gray Vireo (Vireo vicinior) (CSC). Local and uncommon summer resident in and montane woodland and brush, formerly nesting on the northern and western foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Recorded as rare or occasional at all times of the year for Placerita Canyon. Yellow Warbler (Dendroica petechia brewsteri) (CSC). Common transient throughout and uncommon to locally common summer resident in, lowland and foothill riparian woodland. Breeds fairly commonly in riparian woodland south to Ventura County and across the foothills of the Transverse Ranges, and locally up mountain canyons, including a few desert ranges (Garrett and Dunn, 1981). Prefers riparian associations of willow, cottonwood, sycamore, and alders. Orchard and shade trees in cities are sometimes occupied, as are oaks, particularly deciduous species along stream courses (Grinnell and Miller, 1944). Recorded as rare or occasional at all times of the year for Placerita Canyon. MAMMALS Spotted Bat (Euderma maculatum) (Status•:F2). Rare, known in southern California from widely scattered records (Booth, 1968; Jameson and Peeters, 1988). Appear to roost mainly in rock crevices and females favor Ponderosa Pine forest during. reproductive season (Williams, 1986). Abundance and pattern of distribution not understood, winter range unknown (Barbour and Davis, 1969). Pale Big -Eared Bat (Plecotus. townsendf pallescens) (CSC). Occurs throughout California except the humid coastal regions of northern and central California (Williams, 1986). Roosting sites in California include limestone caves, lava tubes, mine tunnels and buildings. Habitat must include roosting maternity, and hibernacula sites free from disturbances by humans, as a single visit can cause them to abandon a roost (Williams, 1986). A late -flying species that begins foraging after dark, and is rarely taken in mist nets (Barbour and Davis, 1969). 5A. L �• Pallid Bat (Antrozous pallidus) (SA*). Ranges from the southwestern deserts in the central plateau of Mexico, north through California, and east of the coast range in Oregon and Washington, to southern British Columbia and in the low elevations of Nevada, east to the Edwards Plateau of Texas; probably a permanent resident_ throughout most of its range. Favors habitats ranging from desert scrub to oak and pine forests (Barbour and Davis, 1969). Several individuals have been found in Placerita Canyon, including the Walker Ranch, and also in Sand Canyon (Hovore, 1991). California Leaf -Nose Bat (Macrotis californicus) (CSC, F2). Ranging from sea coast through desert region of the Sonoran life _zone (Barbour and Davis, 1969). Occurring throughout southern California from southern Ventura and Los Angeles Counties to eastern San Bernardino County and southward (Jameson and Peeters, 1988). Perfers rock -walled canyons where open water is readily available (Barbour and Davis, 1969). Reported at Placerita Canyon. California Mastiff Bat (Eumops perotis californicus) (CSC, F2). Uncommon from Alameda, Tuolomne and Stanislaus Counties southward through the sierra, south coast, transverse and.peninsular ranges to Baja California (Ingles, 1965; Jameson and Peeters, 1988). Resident at low elevations in the coastal basins of California, favoring rugged, rocky areas with suitable crevices for day roosts (Williams, 1986). Occurs in rocky canyons and cliffs, using crevices as daytime retreats (Barbour and Davis, 1969). Ringtail (Bassariscus astutus) (CP). Occurs the entire length of California along the coastal ranges and Sierra Nevada (Ingles, 1965). Principal habitat requirement seem to be den sites among boulders or within hollow trees and food in the form of rodents or other small prey. Reported near Placerita Canyon this year (Hovore, 1991). American Badger (Taxidea taxus) (CSC) (1). Occurs throughout the Pacific states, except the north coastal forests (Ingles, 1965). They have been extirpated from many areas of southern California through habitat loss, deliberate killing, and secondary poisoning. They occupy a diversity of habitats, preferring friable soils, and relatively uncultivated ground of grassland, savannah and meadow, preying on gophers, ground squirrels, and kangaroo rats (Williams; 1986). Observed twice recently at the project site (Hovore, 1991). Mountain Lion (Felis concolor) (U). Occurs throughout the coastal and Sierra Nevada mountain ranges of California (Ingles, 1965). Reported at Placerita Canyon. In addition to the extensive listing above, there are additional (bird) species which have recently been identified as being of concern for southern California (USDI:FWS, 1990). In the interest of space, these will not be discussed in detail, but suffice to say that each of the following are among the list of concern and expected for the project site: belted kingfisher, hairy woodpecker, blue -gray gnatcatcher, warbling vireo; Wilson's warbler, and lazuli bunting. Additional species identified as migrants in jeopardy (Wille, 1990) and reasonably anticipated for the project site include yellow -bellied sapsucker, Swainson's thrush, Townsend's warbler, northern oriole, and black -headed grosbeak. H. March 1989 Mr. Marc Melinkoff Principal Planner Jim Hinzdel & Associates, Inc. 2554 Lincoln Boulevard, Suite 1062 Marina del Rey, CA 90291 Regarding: Letter of 9 February requesting biological information for Tentative Tract No. 45883, Santa Clarita Valley. Dear Mr. Melinkoff: Your request for information concerning the potential environmental effects on Placenta Canyon Natural Area Park of a large-scale housing development in Whitney Canyon involves a number of complex issues. Some of the information you seek will require extensive field and literature investigations to develop. Therefore, although I will address your questions overall, I strongly suggest that proper answers to the specific points in the .biotic sections may only be determined after a thorough study of the project site by your consulting team. The development as presently scoped certainly appears to have the potential for significant direct and indirect environmental impacts upon Placerita Canyon Natural Area, and all other adjacent undeveloped lands. Whitney. Canyon possesses an extensive oak woodland, two permanent springs, a non -flooding riparian -zone, and natural corridors for wildlife movement to and from a relatively undisturbed canyon system; without any field studies it would be fair to say that these elements would assure the presence of substantial wildlife diversity. Based upon the similarity of habitat to Placerita, one might also assume that the two canyons share common gene pools of most if not all free-moving organisms, and probably also common pollination systems. Both short and long term implications of habitat removal on ecological cycles, population movement, and general viability should be investigated, as per the requirements of the County's Biota guidelines. As you know, by the requirements of CEQA and the aforementioned County Biota guidelines, your staff must survey for and identify naturally - occurring flora and fauna, provide data on individuals or populations of endangered, rare, threatened, and/or unique or special concern species to local, state and federal. conservation agencies, and assess the potential effects on adjacent properties. Only after your. field, surveys have been conducted, and the composition of Whitney Canyon's resources is known to us can we knowledgeably reply to the specifics of your questions, and provide meaningful mitigation proposals. We will assist your team in obtaining answers to.these essential questions, but we cannot supply the sort of detailed analyses you request, short of performing the field studies for you. 1 WATT LAND DEVELOPMENT, INC. 2716 OCEAN PARK.BOULEVARD, SUITE 3075 P.O. BOX 2114 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90406-2114 TELEPHONE (213) 450-9779 • FAX (213) 396-2333 November 5, 1991 Mrs. Karen Pearson -Hall Vice President Santa Clarita Valley Canyons Preservation Committee 26617 Gavilan Drive Santa Clarita, CA 91350 Dear Mrs. Pearson -Hall: As you know, we are currently planning and processing plans for the development of a 537 acre residential and commercial project located east of the intersection of San Fernando Road and I-14, known as "Whitney Canyon" near Santa Clarita, California. Our current plans provide for approximately 27 acres of commercial development and 913 dwelling units of various residential product types. Although we are aggressively pursuing the acquisition of governmental entitlements enabling the development of this project, at your request, we are willing to cooperate with you and your associates in your endeavor to investigate the potential . eligibility of this property to become a future park through the program outlined in the recently passed SB569 (the "Hill Bill"). As you have requested, we shall share technical information with you concerning the Whitney Canyon property which may be requested by various governmental agencies. Further, we shall order a current appraisal.of the property to be prepared and supplied to the appropriate governmental agencies in the event that the property.is determined to meet the requirements for inclusion within the "Hill Bill" program. We shall continue to pursue permits as contemplated for development of the property in accordance with our plan for development, but shall cooperate -with you in any way practical to further your inquiries with regard to the potential for including the property within the park allocation program contemplated by SB569. Sincerely, seph Davis President JDD:td A WATT ENTERPRISES COMPANY According to Natural Areas staff, numerous Blue List and Special Concern species which are resident is Placerita Canyon would be expected to also live in Whitney Canyon. Further, by virtue of the permanent springs in Whitney, species which do not occur in Placerita might well maintain populations there:' For example, although it is not a resident species in Placerita Canyon, Least Bell's Vireo has been verified there oa several occasions. Its occurrence in Whitney, therefore, might be expected, and a search for it made in April and May, when it would be found is this area. Cooper's Hawk, Sharp -shinned Hawk, Red -shouldered Hawk, Black - shouldered Kite, and San Diego Horned Lizard, all have been verified as resident in both canyons. Monarch Butterfly, Yellow Warbler, Black -tailed Gnatcatcher, an unidentified species of Batrachosens. and American. Badger have been seen in Placerita Canyon, the latter as recently as January, 1989. Non -listed species such as Mule Deer, Bobcat, Mountain Lion and Grey Fox are also present in both canyons. It is reasonable to assume that' habitat degradation in Whitney Canyon would have a significant impact upon the breeding, home, and foraging ranges of many species, and might even eradicate entire populations of less -mobile taxa. Oak trees, and in particular Coast Live Oak (the species which forms dense groves in the lower portions of Whitney Canyon), are considered to be "keystone" species to. the maintenance of resource diversity in most southern California habitats. The wholesale removal of hundreds of these trees in Whitney Canyon would result in an overall decrease in biotic diversity of perhaps 50 - 80%, with the greatest losses occurring in species which are either directly dependent upon oaks for food, shelter, nest sites, or microclimatic modifications, or which are resident in naturally low population densities (ie. raptors). Consideration should be given to design resolutions which would preserve, not remove, oaks, and protection and maintenance guidelines 'should be developed. for those which remain. Heritage trees should be given special consideration in the design process. Also, a thorough archaeological study should be performed. The presence of so many oaks, plus year-round water, and natural asphaltum seeps clearly indicates a potential Tataviam Indian site. These Indians frequented Placerita Canyon, and there is a state -registered archaeological site in the park. The potential effects on the quality of the recreational experience in Placerita Canyon are fairly straightforward. Most visitors to our natural areas are attracted to by: the scenic, relatively wild resource values maintained therein. Changes in the park or trailway viewsheds from natural woodlands to housing or commercial development obviously will degrade the quality of the visitor experience. Recreational use of overlooking trails would be expected to decrease measurably, and in general, public perception of Placerita. Canyon as a wilderness area would be negatively affected. The most direct mitigation would be to withdraw the perimeter of -the project westward, providing a buffer of greater distance and more natural habitat between the development and the trails. Relocation of park trails would not be a particularly desirable mitigation method, as to do so would destroy additional park vegetation, increase erosion, and encumber fiscal and manpower resources beyond normal budget limits. The immediate effects on the park from approximately 2,000 new Whitney Canyon residents might create a few special problems for park facilities, but under normal circumstances, most would not be significant. Increased visitation would not present a problem, as visitation has risen steadily since the area became a park. Off-road vehicles approaching our area from the development would be in violation of Federal and County land use .policies or ordinances, and would be dealt with accordingly. As a mitigating condition of the development,: the boundaries of the park on the side adjacent to Whitney Canyon should be adequately posted against hunting, shooting, motorcycles, and other activities which are illegal within the park, and trails connecting the two areas should be secured against vehicle access. Most other general effects would appear to be manageable, given present levels of staffing and budget. I hope that these answers, brief as they are, assist you in preparing your initial documents. As mentioned above, meaningful answers to your -questions concerning the environmental impacts of the project can only be Provided after our staff biologists have reviewed adequate data from the site. If you submit this in advance of the release of the Draft EIR, we will make every attempt to respond in a timely manner. Sincerely, John A. Weber, Assistant Director North Region Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation CC. Frank Hovore Julio Guevara Etsel Yamasaki' Jim Parks