Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991-05-14 - RESOLUTIONS - COMMERCE CENTER PROJ 86-106 (2)RESOLUTION NO. 91-79 0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY IN SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED VALENCIA COMMERCE CENTER, PROJECT NO. 86-106, INCLUDING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-435, ZONE CHANGE 86-106, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19784, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-360, AND OAK TREE PERMIT 88-221 IN THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF THE SANTA CLARITA VALLEY AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY TO IDENTIFY AND MITIGATE TRAFFIC IMPACTS TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, AND TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE PUBLIC SERVICES ARE PROVIDED TO SERVE THIS PROJECT. WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles Regional Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors will be considering the approval of the proposed Valencia Commerce Center, which is located on a 1,436 acre parcel northwest of the intersection of Interstate 5 and California State Highway 126, and northwest of the City's northwestern boundary; and WHEREAS, the project includes approximately 12,624,000 square feet of office, industrial and commercial building space; and WHEREAS, the project applicant has requested the following entitlements; approval of Tentative Parcel Map 19784, Zone Change 86-106, General Plan Amendment 88-435, Conditional Use Permit 87-360, and Oak Tree Permit 88-221; and WHEREAS, the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for this project identifies areas of substantial environmental impact, including traffic and circulation, air quality, cultural resources, biota, scenic qualities, sewage disposal, water service, fire and police protection, environmental safety, and noise, as well as impacts related to flood hazard and geology; and WHEREAS, the traffic analysis and project conditions of approval and mitigation measures apply only to County streets and adjacent intersections, despite the City's request that project -generated and cumulative traffic impacts on the City be addressed and mitigated; and WHEREAS, the traffic study prepared for this project assumed completion of the local Los Angeles County Master Plan of Highways by the year 2010, including construction of arterials within the City such as Newhall Ranch Road to eight lanes, but did not provide mechanisms for its installation, or for other City street improvements east of the project in the City as mitigation measures; and WHEREAS, although the proposed development may create substantial new job opportunities for residents of the Santa Clarita Valley and environs, it also may have a substantial impact upon the City of Santa Clarita, and its circulation network, infrastructure and levels of service; and WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita has provided technical comments to the County of Los Angeles on June 12, 1990, and October 24, 1990; and Reso No. 91-79 WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita desires to provide formal comment and testimony to the County of Los Angeles on the proposed project and the related Environmental Impact Report, all to be a part of the official record; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND FIND AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City finds that although some of the impacts of this project may be adequately mitigated by measures in the mitigation monitoring program included in the Final EIR, project impacts on the City circulation network, infrastructure and levels of service have not been adequately addressed nor appropriate mitigation measures proposed, as addressed in the City's comments on the Draft EIR and project, dated June 12, 1990, and October 24, 1990, incorporated herein by reference as Attachment 1. The City requests that the County accept the responsibility for the identification and mitigation of the impacts of this project, and the cumulative project impacts on the City circulation network, infrastructure, and levels of service. SECTION 2. The City is concerned that the responses to City comments in the Final EIR did not recognize the City's concerns regarding traffic impacts to City streets and intersections. The City requests that further assessment be conducted on this project, including a good faith effort to evaluate potentially significant individual and cumulative impacts to traffic and circulation within the City, feasible mitigation measures which would lessen the significant environmental effects of the project; and that this evaluation, together with a response and full assessment of the environmental impacts identified in the City's comments be included in the Final EIR prior to certification and carefully considered prior to any approvals being granted for this project. SECTION 3. In light of the County's recent approval of a comprehensive amendment to the Santa Clarita Valley Areawide Plan, the City is concerned that this project requests further amendments to said plan. The City requests that no further plan amendments be granted at this time unless substantial community benefits are realized. SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and certify this record to be a full true correct copy of the action taken. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th dray of MaY 1991. Carl Boyer, Mayor ATTEST: r� ONNA GRI DEY, CITY CLE Reso No. 91-79 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of theCity of Santa Clarita, at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of May 1991, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS ID: CMK:491 Reso No. 91-79 Darcy, Beidt, Klajic, McKeon, Boyer None None -�56NNA GRINDEY, ITY CLERK IL PROJECT LOCATION Fhb �C al"o N H ob TO VENTURA 10 TO LAKE HUGHES 0 I TAIC J vAnKtn o x n 0 o t Q NASI L��NYOX r _ - + 9O MO�tA riQAp � - aTAIQ- o V: ruts ;I .. .= w� �..K 4.�y�'D'W��. �K MACK MO NWN ` A K K Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE TO LOS ANGELES LEGEND 0 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA Source: DRAFT SIR, Valencia Commerce Center, Los Angeles County Project 86-106, April 1990