HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-02 - AGENDA REPORTS - ORD 92 7 PREZONE 89 003 (2)UNFINISHED BUSINESS
DATE: April 2, 1992
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Approval
Item to be presenteby 1 '
Lynn M. Harris
SUBJECT: The applicant is requesting to enter into a formal agreement to
allow for a seven year build out for the approved Vesting Tract
Map 47324, Conditional Use Permit 89-007, Pre -Zone 89-003, and
Oak Tree Permit 89-046. The applicants are Sand Canyon Estates
LTD (Stan Fargeon, General Partner), Clem and Paula Cox, Edith
Palmer and Mary Dapas, Trustee.
Ordinance 92-7
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
BACKGROUND
This item, Ordinance 92-7, was introduced and passed to second reading at the
Council meeting of March 24, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION
Waive further reading and adopt Ordinance 92-7.
ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance 92-7
Letter dated March 26, 1992 (Agreement available in the City Clerk's Office)
FLF/431
1
Agenda Item:
LAW OFFICES
BuRXE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
611 WEST SIXTH STREET, SUITE 2500
MARTIN ,^. BURKE'
ROBERT V. WADDEN
JAMES T. BRADSHAW, JR-
FRANK M. WHITEHEAD. M
MARK C ALLEN, JR!
MARYANN LINK GOOOKIND
MARTIN L BURKE'
TIMOTHY B. MCOSKER
CARL K. NEWTON'
RITA J. MUNSON
J. ROBERT FLANDRICK-
STEVEN J. DAWSON
NORMAN E G t
TERRY P. KAUFMANN
EDWARD M.FO%'
STEPHEN R. ONSTOT
DENNIS P. BURKE*
JAIME AREVALO
LEIAND C. DOLLEN
F. DANIELS CRAWFORD. S
NEIL E YEAGER'
JOHN E. CAVANAUGH
BRIAN . RIERIK'
MARK O. HENSLEY
CHARLES M. CALOEPON*
PETER D. TREMBLAY
PETER M. THORSON`
WLBERT A- TRWIUO
JERRY M. PATTERSON
GREGORY P PRIAMOS
HAROLD A. BRIDGES*
DAVID M. MCCARTHY
CHERYL J. KANE*
JOSEPH P. BUCMMAN
RAYMOND J. FUENTES'
GREGORY T. DION
BARRY S. GLASER
ANTHONY R CONOOTTI
VIRGINIA R. PESOIA
AUDREY NO
S. PAUL BRUGUERA
KAREN J. SCHULOT
S. DEREK STRAATSMA
JANET S. GARMSS
DON G. KIRCHER
PAUL C ANOERSON
MICHELE VADON-PIVERA
BRENDA L DIEDERICMS
SCOTT F. FIELD
TIMOTHY V. P. GAL4GHER
MARY REOUS GAYLE6
JOHN J. WELSH
RUFUS C YOUNG. JR.
MARY JO SHELTON-OUTCHER
STEVEN KARLTON KOP
JEFFREY KIGMTLINGER
JUDITH A. ENRIGHT
EDVIN E. MINASSIAN
KATHRYN R PETERS°
JUDITH K. ANDERSON
THOMAS C WOOD
TIMOTHY D. CAEMIN
LISA E. KRAWTZ
GREGORY D. DIAZ
KIM E MCNAU-Y
KENNEIM D. ROZELL
M. LOIS BOBAK
LAURIE E. SMERWOOO
*PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
4 FROFLSSONAL ASSOCunOH
AOMRTLD IK KANSAS i MISSOVRI
'goV, KANSAS
SAOMRTEO IN :ALIFORM^^.
NANSA3 6 MBSOUR.
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
(213) 236.0600
TELECOPIER; 1213) 236-2700
HARRY C WILLIAMS
0912.19671
ROYAL M. SORENSEN
11 91419 6 31
March 26, 1992
VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL
Mr. Fred Follstad
Associate Planner
City of Santa Clarita
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300
Santa Clarita, CA 91355
Dear Fred:
VENTURA COUNTY OFFICE
2310 PONDEROSA DRIVE
SUITE I
CAMARILLO. CALIFORNIA 93010
IBOSI 967-3966
ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE
3200 BRISTOL STREET
SUITE 640
COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626
IT19) 5 15-5559
BURKE, WILLIAMS, SORENSEN 6 GAAR
LIGMTON PLAZA
7300 COLLEGE BOULEVARD
SUITE 220
OVERLAND PARK, KANSAS 66210
(9131 339-6200
OF COUNSEL
DWIGHT A NEWELL
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
(213) 236-2832
OUR FILE NO. 02012-001
Re: Final Draft of Development Agreement 91-
008/Sand'Can von Estates, Ltd.
Enclosed with this letter is the final draft of the
Development Agreement by and between the City of Santa Clarita
and Sand Canyon Estates, Ltd., etc., et al. as modified by the
City Council on March 24, 1992. Please note that I previously
sent a proposed, final draft to the City on March 24th. The
enclosed document differs in two respects.
First, you.will see language at the bottom of page 14
regarding the eight month recordation date of the Agreement. I
have added language to clarify the result of Lynn Harris's
negotiations with the developer. The new language reads as
follows:
"Notwithstanding.any other provision of this
Agreement, including provisions regarding
modification, revocation, amendment, exten-
sion, or default, if the Developer has not
recorded the final vesting map within eight
months of the recordation date of this Agree -
10104.1
Mr. Fred Follstad
March 26, 1992
Page 2
ment, this Agreement shall be automatically
null and void."
This is a clarification of the considerationas negotiated from
the developer, recommended to the Planning Commission, and to be
adopted by the Council.
Additionally, there are two new items of consideration
on page 15. These .items were as recommended by Dorothy Riley
during the public hearing, accepted by the developer and directed
by the City Council. The language reads as follows:
"(i) All replacement of oak trees as identi-
fied by Vesting Tentative Tract Map 47324 and
Oak Tree Permit 89-046 shall be of the same
species as those removed.
"(j) All oak trees located on the Project
Site shall be monitored by the Developer's
oak tree consultant for the entire term of
this. Agreement. Said monitoring shall in-
clude, at a minimum, an annual report by the
Developer's oak tree consultant and submitted
to the City for review and approval by the
City's oak tree consultant."
With these modifications; the document is complete and
final. The ordinance may go to second reading on April 2, 1992.
If you have any comments or questions, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Si rely,
IMOTHY B: McOSKER
for.BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
TBM/sjw
Enclosure
cc: George Caravalho, City Manager
Lynn M. Harris, Deputy City Manager/
Community Development
Carl K. Newton, City Attorney
10104.1
ORDINANCE NO. 92-7
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 91-008 FOR
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47324
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find:
a. An application for a development agreement was filed with the City
of Santa Clarita on November 20, 1991, by Sand Canyon Estates ("the
applicant"). The property for which this entitlement has been 'filed
is 137 acres located at 16000 Live Oak Springs Canyon Road. The
Assessor's Parcel Numbers are 2840-13-13,-14,-15, 2840-14-22 and
2840-16-02,-21.
b. The request is for a development agreement to allow seven years for
the build -out of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 47324 ("the Development
Agreement"). ,VTTM 47324 consists of 70 single-family residences and
the site is currently vacant. The General Plan designation of the
site is RVL and RE.
C. On April 24, 1990, the City Council. adopted_ Resolution 90-76
conditionally approving VTTM 47324 and adopting the mitigated
negative declaration prepared for the project.
d. The applicant is proposing to provide public benefits, as part of
the Development Agreement, in addition to those proposed under the
original VTTM 47324 approval, which includes the following:
1. The applicant will record the Vesting Tract Map within eight
months after the Development Agreement is recorded.
2. The applicant shall contribute the Bridge and Throughfare
district fees in effect at time of issuance of building permits,
for areawide highway improvements.
3. A condition of the map required the applicant to contribute
$500,000 towards the construction of the Live Oak Springs .Canyon
flood control system. The $500,000 shall be considered the base
fee as of April 1990 (when the map was approved.) This base fee
shall be multiplied by the increase in the Consumer Price Index
for each subsequent year after 1990 until the fee is paid.
e. The Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on the
Development Agreement application on Tuesday, March 3, 1992 and
March 17, 1992 at the City of Santa Clarita City Council Chambers,
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 7:00 p.m. At that time,
the Planning Commission received testimony both forandagainst the
project. The Commission adopted Resolution P92-10, certifying the
negative declaration and recommending approval of the Development
Agreement to the City Council.
Ordinance No. 92-7
Page 2
f. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this
ordinance on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, at the City of Santa
Clarita City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa
Clarita, at 6:30 p.m.
SECTION 2. Based upon the above facts, oral and written testimony and
other evidence presented at the public hearing, and upon the study and
investigation made by the Planning Commission and City Council, the City
Council finds as follows:
a. The Initial Study prepared for VTTM 47324 is applicable to this
project. The Development Agreement does nbt alter the environmental
factors previously considered for VTTM 47324 and will have a de
minimus impact on the environment.
b. The Development Agreement is consistent with the General 'Plan RE and
RVL designation.
C. The Development Agreement complies with zoning, subdivision and
other applicable ordinances and regulations.
d. The Development Agreement is consistent with the public convenience,
general welfare and good land use practice, making it in the public
interest to enter into the development agreement with the applicant.
e. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect- the health,
peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the
surrounding area.
f. The Development Agreement will not be materially detrimental to the
use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in
the vicinity of the site.
g. The Development Agreement will not jeopardize, endanger or otherwise
constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare.
SECTION 3. The City of Santa Clarita City Council has reviewed and
considered the environmental information contained in the .Initial study.. which
was approved by the Planning Commission, and determines that it is in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act 'and that the
Development Agreement will not have a significant effect on the environment
and will have a de minimus impact upon wildlife. A Negative Declaration has
been prepared for this project. Based upon the findings stated above, the
City Council hereby approved the Negative Declaration.
SECTION 4. Based upon the foregoing, the -City Council does hereby
ordain that the Development Agreement is approved and shall be executed by the ..
Mayor on behalf of the City.
SECTION S. This ordinance shall become effective at 12:01 a.m. on the
thirty-first day after adoption, or upon the recordation of a notice of
agreement, whichever occurs last.
Ordinance No. 92-7
Page 3
SECTION 6. The' City Clerk shall certify as to the passage of this
Ordinance and cause it to be punished in the manner prescribed by law and is
hereby directed to cause a copy of the fully executed Development Agreement to
be recorded with the County Recorder not more than 10 days following the
execution by the City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of , 1992.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) as
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA)
I, Donna M. Grindev, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 92-7 was regularly introduced
and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on
the day of 1992. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly
adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day
of 1992, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
CITY CLERK
FLF:428