The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-06-23 - AGENDA REPORTS - PROPOSITION C LOCAL RETURN (2)AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approval Item to be presented by Jeff Kohn a City Manager CONSENT CALENDAR DATE: June 23, 1992 SUBJECT: PROPOSITION C LOCAL RETURN ASSURANCES AND UNDERSTANDINGS AGREEMENT DEPARTMENT: Public Works On May 13, 1992, the State Supreme Court denied the petition of the Libertarian Party to review the Proposition C case. The court's decision clears the way for the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission to release Proposition C Local Return funding to cities. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission is requesting that cities execute the Assurances and Understandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Proposition C Funds (Attachment 11) in order to expedite the allocation of funds to local jurisdictions by the Los Angeles County Auditor. The Standard Assurances are essentially the same as those signed by cities for use of Proposition A funds. The City Attorney has reviewed the Standard Assurances and accepted them as to form. Cities were required to execute the Assurances and return them to their Area Team Director at LACTC by June 15, 1992 in order to receive their allocation on or about July 1, 1992. The Los Angeles County Transportation Commission indicated that they would accept the signature of the City Manager with a subsequent ratification by the City Council. The executed Assurances were submitted to the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission on June 15, 1992 with the City Manager's signature in order to ensure receipt of funds on or about July 1, 1992. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council ratify the City Manager's execution of the "Assurances and Understandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Proposition C Funds" and authorize the Mayor to execute a duplicate copy of the Assurances and Understandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Proposition C Funds. Ac ander Item: Proposition C Local Return June 23, 1992 Page 2 ATTACHMENTS Attachment I - Transmittal from Judy Hathaway -Francis and Jacld Bacharach Attachment II - Standard Assurances and Understandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Proposition C Funds Attachment III - Proposition C Local Return Program Allocations JK:gmm propc.agn RECEIVED May 27, 1992 JUN O 8 fR E C E I V E D 'Mayon JUN To: Transit Administrators PUBLIC WORK DEF Or CITY DF SANTA a CITY '_4 aF City Managers GTY DF SAMA CLARrrCt:r, From: Judy Hathaway-Franci Jacki Bacharach Subject: Proposition C Local Return On May 13, 1992, the State Supreme Court denied the petition of the Libertarian Party to review the Proposition C case. The court's decision clears the way for LACTC to release Proposition C Local Return funding to cities. F orderto expedite the allocation of funds to local isdictions by the Los Angeles County Auditor, all cities tfirst execute and return the °Assurances and erstandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Prop. C Funds° tached herewith and also included as Appendix IV in the Local Return Program Guidelines). The Standard Assurances are essentially the same as those signed by cities for use of Proposition.A funds. The Assurances must be signed and returned to the Commission before Prop. C funds can be disbursed. The auditor will disburse in one lump sum (principal plus accrued interest) the local portion of Prop. C which has been received by LACTC since June 1991 (refer to attachment). Following this initial disbursement, cities will begin receiving their Local Return allocation for FY1992-93 on a monthly basis similar to their Prop, A allocation. Cities should return the executed Assurances to the appropriate Area Team Director by June 15th, in order to receive their allocation on or about July ist. cities submitting their Assurances after June 15th will experience -a delay in receipt of their allocation. Once the money. has been allocated, cities will be allowed to submit projects for approval on a project -by -project basis. The project description for currently used Prop. A projects should also be used to submit Prop. C projects. This project - by -project review process will be used in the first year only. In the second year and thereafter, cities will be required to submit a three-year plan (please refer to the Local Return Program Guidelines, Appendix III). As with Prop. A, project descriptions must be submitted to Area Team staff for review and cities must receive an approval letter prior to expenditure of funds. Attachments ATTACHMENT I Commissioners and ARernates Michael 0. Antonovich CHAIR Supervisor County of los Angeles Kick Patsaouras, AIL Richard AWtorre VICE CHAIR Councilman City of los Angeles Non. Michael Woo, AIL Gloria Molina Supervisor Courtly of Los Angeles Gerry Hertzberg, All. Kenneth Rahe Supervisor County of Los Angeles Mas Fukal, AR. Edmund D. Edelreaa Supervisor County of Los Angeles Marvin Holes, AIL Deane Dana Supervisor County of los Angeles Can Knobs, AIL Tom Bradley Mayor City of Los Angeles Ray Remy, AIL Ray Grabinski Councilman City of Long Beach Hon. Clarence Smith, AIL Jacki Bacharack Councilwoman City of Rancho Palos Verdes Han. Harold Croyts, Alt, Judy Hathaway -Francis Councilwoman City of La Habra Heights Han. Robert White, Alt. James Tolbert Citizen Representative City of Los Angeles . Jerry B. Barter Ex -Officio Member Stale of California Well Peterson Executive Director Los Angeles County leading the Way to Greater Mobility 818 Wed Seventh Street Transportation Suite 1100 Commission Los Angeles, CA 90017 LACTC Tel 213 623-1194 c—. ,vin am, May 27, 1992 RECEIVE D ATTACHMENT Z V JUN 0 8 �11��nLMI . ,�a. o f L To: '»G' Transit Administrators �arvW° �D� ��N OF City Managers CIT roeaW"WrA=A nom: Judy Hathaway-Franci Commissioners Jacki Bacharach UJU„ and of Subject: Proposition C Local Return Slickest o. Antonosld CHAIR On May 13, 1992, the State Supreme Court denied the petition of Colarti at LosA+getes the Libertarian Party to review the Proposition C case. The Nick ftsw°ras,AIL court's decision clears the way for LACTC to release RlchardAlstmre Proposition C Local Return funding to cities. Cofor� mR Ciyof los Angeles Inorder to expedite the allocation of funds to local Has. tficlullWas, AIL isdictions by the Los Angeles County Auditor, all cities Clodsmallu t first execute and return the "Assurances and pentisor C"olLoskVft erstandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Prop. C Funds" GMKartrrr.rl,AX tached herewith and also included as Appendix IV in the NneetaNab Local Return Program Guidelines). The Standard Assurances are &Miw essentially the same as those signed by cities for use of a mks Proposition A funds. The Assurances must be signed and At rdnFak0..Ed returned to the Commission before Prop. C funds can be Elbowed Edelman disbursed. CMK4dLos Anpdes Narvla Hetes, At The auditor will disburse in one lump sum (principal plus an" Dan accrued interest) the local portion of Prop. C which has been osAnvelel; received by LACTC since June 1991 (refer to attachment) . Can Neshe.Att. "illowing this initial disbursement, cities will begin Tom Bradley ceiving their Local Return allocation for FY1992-93 on a 4 Maw onthly basis similar to their Prop. A allocation. City Los Apeles by Amy, Aft. Cities should return the executed Assurances to the a appropriate Cwxil hlasld councilman Area Team Director by June 15tb, in order to receive their CiNaLong � allocation on or about July 1st. Cities submitting their Hos. Clarence Smith. AIL Assurances after June 15th will experience a delay in receipt JaeldNacharaeh of their allocation. Counelheomm City of Rancho Palos Verdes Hos. Harold Crofts, All. Once the money has been allocated, cities will be allowed to Judy Hatharsaf-Frands submit projects for approval on a project -by -project basis. COnc'N1pR1a" The project description for currently used Prop. A project j Has.R bedWhilHabra ai.A Has. Robed ke.Att. should also be used to submit Prop. C P Projects. This project. JameRepreset by -project review � process- will be used in the first year only. Citizen Representative City of los Angeles In the second year and thereafter, cities will be required to Jerry A. Barter submit a three-year lac y p (please refer to the Local Return Ex-Micio Member Program Guidelines, Appendix III) . We of California NaIlPeterma .As with Prop. A, project descriptions must be submitted to Area E><paAive Direaar Team staff for review and cities must receive an approval letter prior to expenditure of funds. Attachments 1.2 Los Angeles$onrrtf 818West SewNSind Leading the Way to Greater Mobility IVTransportation Suitelt0g Cornrnisslon LoskWles,CAMI LACK Td 213 623-1191 C...., M. C .. ATTACHMENT II ' Page 1 of 3 APPENDIX IV ASSURANCES AND UNDERSTANDINGS REGARDING • RECEIPT AND USE OF PROPOSITION C FUNDS The undersigned, in conjunction with the receipt of funds derived from the h cent sales tax imposed by the Proposition C Ordinance of the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission (Commission), and as required by the Commission's Local Return Program Guidelines, hereby provides the following assurances and understandings. A. The Undersigned Hereby Assures the Commissions 1. That the Prop. C funds will not be substituted for property tax funds which are currently funding existing public transportation programs; 2. That Prop. C funds will be used for "public transit purposes," as defined in the Commission's Local Return Program Guidelines (Section II.A.2); 3. That the undersigned will not trade, exchange or loan Prop. C funds to other local jurisdictions; 4. That the undersigned will submit to the Commission a • three-year plan for the use of funds: a. Annually, by August 1st of each year, beginning in 1993; b. Project amendments for a service expansion or a new service: at least 60 days before encumbrance of funds; c. For all other project amendments: at least 30 days before encumbrance of funds; 5. Any proposed use of funds will not duplicate or compete with any existing publicly -funded transit or paratransit service; 6. That Prop. C funds will- be expended within the year of receipt, plus two years thereafter; 7. Unless otherwise required by the Commission, an audit, certified by a certified public accountant, will be conducted by the Commission, within 180 days of the close of the fiscal year; IV -1 1.0 • AA`1'6s:;H,KiI,%)T II Page 2 of 3 8. That the plan for the intended use of the funds, as submitted to the Commission, is an accurate depiction of the projects to be implemented; 49 9. That a 10% change in project scope or`financing (defined as: any modification to route, budget, service area, stops, frequency, fare, or market served by the project) will be submitted to the Commission at least 60 days before that change Yin scope is implemented; 10. That all projects proposed for Prop. C funding will meet the legal. requirements of the Commission's Prop. C ordinance and the Commission's Local Return Program Guidelines criteria. B. The Undersigned Further Understands and Agrees: 1. That the Commission will require the undersigned to return any Prop. C funds, and may impose interest penalties on any expenditure found to be illegal or improper, under the terms of the Commission's Prop. C ordinance or the Commission's Local Return Program Guidelines; 2. That the undersigned will assume all responsibilities for compliance with applicable Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, CEQA and NEPA requirements regarding projects to be funded, in part or in whole, with Prop. C funds; 3. That the undersigned will comply with all applicable federal, state, -and local requirements as to Affirmative Action, fair labor practices, transit accessibility, and public health and safety; 4. That the undersigned will, either utilize the state controller's Uniform System of Accounts and Records to accommodate uses and disbursements of Prop. C funds, or will establish a separate Prop. C Local Transit Assistance (PCLTA) accounting system, which will allow financial and compliance audits of the Prop. C fund transactions and expenditures to be conducted; 5. That any Prop. C funds, not expended (see A.5) within the year of receipt of funds, plus two years thereafter, will be returned to the Commission, upon request therefrom. 0 IV -2 ATTACHMENT II Page 3 of 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed these Assurances and Understandings Regarding Receipt and Use of Proposition C Funds this_r day of ly_� by its duly -authorized officer: 0 CITY OF BY (Title) DATE ATTEST: CITY CLERK DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTDRNFy IV -3 ATTACHMENT III Page 1 of 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROPOSITION C - LOCAL RETURN PROGRAM . PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ALLOCATION INCEPTION TO MAY 18, 1992 Pana 1 nt 3 TOTAL AGENCY (1) AGOURA HILLS $161,523 ALHAMBRA 656,284 ARCADIA 380,676 ARTESIA 122,318 AVALON 23,523 AZUSA 325,790 BALDWIN PARK 548,079 BELL 274,824 BELLFLOWER 489,273 BELL GARDENS 337,943 BEVERLY HILLS 252,085 BRADBURY 61508 13URBANK 748,022 CALABASAS 125,941 CARSON 656,284 CERRITOS 417,920 CLAREMONT 250,517 COMMERCE 94,875 COMPTON 713,522 COVINA 338,727 CUDAHY 179,949 CULVER CITY 303,443 DIAMOND BAR 420,273 DOWNEY 722,147 DUARTE 163,875 EL MONTE 850,738 EL SEGUNDO 119,182 GARDENA 410,079 GLENDALE 1,431,750 GLENDORA 375,971 HAWAIIAN GARDENS 107,812 HAWT HORNE 571,602 HERMOSA BEACH 143,489 HIDDEN HILLS 14,114 HUNTINGTON PARK 451,636 INDUSTRY 5,489 INGLEWOOD 875,829 • iii Amount Includes all principal arta Interest through May 18, 1992 Pana 1 nt 3 ATTACHMENT III Page 2 of 3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROPOSITION C - LOCAL RETURN PROGRAM PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ALLOCATION INCEPTION TO MAY 18. 1992 (1) Amount includes all principal and interest through May 18,19M Pace 2 of 3 C� TOTAL AGENCY (1) IRWINDALE 8,390 LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE 151,722 LA HABRA HEIGHTS 48,810 LAKEWOOD 577,091 LA MIRADA 330,494 LANCASTER 799,772 LA PUENTE 294,818 LA VERNE 243,852 LAWNDALE 216,017 LOMITA 152,506 LONG BEACH 3,444,510 LOS ANGELES CITY 27,731,718 LYNWOOD 491,625 MALIBU 90,037 MANHATTAN BEACH 252,085 MAYWOOD 223,858 MONROVIA 282,273 MONTEBELLO 469,670 MONTERREY PARK 480,648 NORWALK 745,670 PALMDALE 611,591 PALOS VERDES ESTATES 105,068 PARAMOUNT 388,909 PASADENA 1,038,136 PICO RIVERA 466,534 POMONA 1,049,113 RANCHO PALOS VERDES 325,790 REDONDO BEACH 472,607 ROLLING HILLS 14,506 ROLLING HILLS ESTATES 61,355 ROSEMEAD 409,295 SAN DIMAS 259,534 SAN FERNANDO 183,085 SAN GABRIEL 294,426 SAN MARINO 101,540 SANTA CLARITA 931,500 SANTA FE SPRINGS 121,534 (1) Amount includes all principal and interest through May 18,19M Pace 2 of 3 C� ATTACEMEtI:r 1, LOS ANGELES COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PROPOSITION C - LOCAL RETURN PROGRAM . PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ALLOCATION INCEPTION TO MAY 18,1992 ' TOTAL AGENCY (1) SANTA MONICA 681,375 SIERRA MADRE 84,682 SIGNAL HILL 65,472 SOUTH EL MONTE 166,619 SOUTH GATE 688,432 SOUTH PASADENA 188,574 TEMPLE CITY 245,028 TORRANCE 1.046,761 VERNON 1,176 WALNUT 234,835 WEST COVINA 760,568 WEST HOLLYWOOD 283,449 WESTLAKE VILLAGE 59,003 WHnrnER 618,648 . UNINCORPORATED 7,412,440 TOTAL $70,479,361 (1) Amount Includes all principal and Interest through May 18. 19M Page 3 of 3