HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-01-28 - AGENDA REPORTS - RESO 92 6 GRAFFITI REWARD PGM (2)NEW BUSINESS
SUBJECT:
�ruf .r
January 28, 1992
Resolution No.
Public
City Manager Approv 4111W"Ov
Item to be presented by:
John Medina
Graffiti Reward Program
The City Council, in its meeting of November 26, 1991, directed staff to develop a City
Reward Program to supplement the City's Graffiti Abatement Program. Accordingly, staff has
researched the successful programs which have been implemented by the cities of Glendale and
Palmdale, and have modeled Santa Clarita's program along these same lines.
The implementation of a graffiti reward program, similar in nature to successful programs
already implemented by the above cities is a natural progression towards a fully developed City
graffiti program and supplements the efforts of City Ordinance 91-51.
Under the authority of California Government Code Section 53069.5, it is proposed that the
City provide for six (6) separate rewards for the amount of $500.00 each, totaling $3000.00,
for information leading to the identification, apprehension and conviction of, any person or
persons who willfully damage or destroy any public or private property in the City of Santa
Clarita. The attachment "A" outlines the proposed procedures for this progarm.
RECOMMENDATION
That City Council discuss and adopt Resolution 92-6.
JEM:Iant
GRAFRES2
Attachments
Adopted:
Agenda iaii:
RESOLUTION NO. 92-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
OFFERING TO PAY A REWARD OF ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS
FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE DETERMINATION OF THE
IDENTITY OF, THE APPREHENSION OF, AND CONVICTION
OF ANY PERSON OR PERSONS WHO WILLFULLY DAMAGE OR
DESTROY ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY IN THE CITY
OF SANTA CLARITA BY PLACING ANY GRAFFITI OR ANY
m:nt RM I► I J1 1Z M
ORDINANCE 91-51.
WHEREAS, the City, residents and merchants in the City have incurred
costs to repair damage and destruction of their privately owned permanent structures
located within such City, by removal,'where possible, of graffiti and other inscribed
material therefrom; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 53069.5 authorizes the
City of Santa Clarita to offer and pay a reward, the amount thereof to be determined by
the City Council for information leading to the determination of the identity of the
apprehension and conviction of, any person who willfully damages or destroys any
property; and
WHEREAS, the City is desirous of proceeding under the authority of
Government Code Section 53069.5 and has determined that the amount of this reward
offered shall be and not exceed one thousand dollars per incident and a sum total of three
thousand dollars for three incidents occurring on or after January 28, 1992, and that the
offer shall be subject to the terms and conditions herein contained.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Santa Clarita does hereby
resolve, determine, and order as follows:
Sion 1. That the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, pursuant to
the authorization of Government Code Section 53069.5, offers to pay a reward of one
thousand dollars cash in lawful money of the United States of America for information
leading to the identification, apprehension and conviction of, any person or persons who
willfully damage or destroy any public or private property in the City of Santa Clarita by
placing any graffiti or other inscribed material thereon in violation of Ordinance 91-51.
Section 2 The offer of reward is made to members of the public generally,
but is not made to any peace officer or employee of the City of Santa Clarita.
Section 3. Any claim for reward must be made of the City Council of the
City of Santa Clarita. In no event will the amount of a reward, nor sum or rewards in
connection with a single incident exceed the combined total sum of one thousand
dollars. In the event of a dispute, including whether a claimant or claimants for the
reward produced information leading to the determination of the identification,
apprehension and conviction of, any person or persons who willfully damage or destroy
any public or private property in the City of Santa Clarita by placing any graffiti or other
inscribed material thereon in violation of Ordinance 91-51, or the sharing of the reward
or rewards among claimants, the determinations of the City Council shall be final and
conclusive.
Section 4 This offer of reward shall remain open until exhaustion of the
sum total of three thousand dollars offered as rewards; or at earlier revocation of the
offer by the City Council prior to acceptance of the offer.
Section 5. The City Manager and his designees are authorized and directed
to give public notice of this offer of reward by posting suitable notices thereof as
authorized by law and found by the City Manager to be effective and in keeping with
good governmental practices.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of January, 1992
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
I, Donna M. Grindey, HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa.Clarita at a regular
meeting thereof, held on the day of , 199_ by the following vote
of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCHAEBIBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
JEM:kmt
GRAERESO
January 21, 1992
CITY GRAFFITI REWARD PROGRAM
STANDARD OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
i
ANY RESIDENT WHO OBSERVES A GRAFFITI INCIDENT AND HAS
INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INDIVIDUAL INVOLVED
SHOULD REPORT THIS TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
2. ANY RESIDENTS THE REWARD OFFERED BY THE CITY
MUST FILE A REPORT WITH THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT IN
ORDER TO QUALIFY FOR ONE OF THE REWARDS OFFERED.
3. IF THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE IS AN ADULT, THE SHERIFF' S
DEPARTMENT WILL, IF THEY HAVE SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE,
EFFECT AN ARREST, ISSUE A CITATION OR RELEASE ON BAIL
AND BRING THE CASE TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
FOR A POSSIBLE HEARING.
4. IF THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE IS A JUVENILE, THE
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT MUST INVESTIGATE THE CASE AND
FIND ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO FILE A DETAINED OR
NON -DETAINED PETITION WITH THE D.A.'S OFFICE IN THE
JUVENILE COURT.
5. IF THE D.A.'S OFFICE DETERMINES ENOUGH EVIDENCE EXISTS,
THEY WILL THEN TAKE THIS MATTER TO COURT, AT WHICH
TIME THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT WILL ALSO BECOME
INVOLVED.
6. IF THE COURT BRING BACKS A CONVICTION, OR THE
EQUIVALENT THEREOF FOR A MINOR; THE CITY WILL PAY THE
REWARD TO THE INDIVIDUAL.
AWACEMENP A