HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-08-25 - ORDINANCES - AMEND ZONE MAP PREZONE 90 006 (2)ORDINANCE NO. 92-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
(Prezone No. 90-006)
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita has proposed and initiated
prezoning of certain property located northeast of the existing City limits,
east and vest of Haskell Canyon Road, south of Copperhill Drive, and east of
the Los Angeles Aqueduct prior to its annexation to the City of Santa Clarita
(Annexation No. 1990-06); and
WHEREAS, such zoning would become effective upon annexation, as
described in Exhibit A and designated upon the Zoning Map incorporated within
and made part of Section 22.60.190 of the City's Planning and Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita City Council did set June 14,
1992, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia
Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California, as the time and place for a public
hearing before said City Council, and notice of said public hearing was given
in the manner required by the Santa Clarita Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, testimony was received, if any, for,
and/or against the proposed prezone; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, said prezone was duly heard and
considered.
THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita as follows:
follows: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find and determine as
a. The prezone is a change to City R-1-5000 (Single Family
Residential -5,000 square foot minimum lot size) and RPD -1-6u
(Residential Planned Development, one acre minimum lot size
maximum six dwelling units per acre) zoning classifications on
the property identified in Exhibit A prior to annexation of such
property to the City.
b. The Initial Study prepared for the project has been circulated
for review and comment by affected governmental agencies and the
public, and all comments received have been considered. The
public review period was from May 13, 1992, to June 2, 1992.
Ordinance No. 92-13
Page 2
C . Public participation and notification requirements pursuant to
Sections 65090 and 65351 of the Government Code of the State of
California were duly followed.
SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence, if any,
received at the public hearing, and upon studies and investigations made by
the Planning Commission and the City Council and on their behalf, the City
Council further finds and determines as follows:
a. The project is consistent with the General Plan, and the
proposed project complies with all other applicable requirements
of State law and local ordinance.
SECTION 3. In acting on the prezoning application, the City Council
has considered certain principles and standards, and finds and determines as
follova:
a. That a need for the prezone classification to City R-1-5000
(Single Family Residential -5,000 square foot minimum lot size)
and RPD -1-6u (Residential Planned Development, one acre minimum
lot size maximum six dwelling uAts per acre) exists within the
area of the subject property; and
b. That the subject property is a proper location for the R-1-5000
(Single Family Residential -5,000 square foot minimum lot size)
and RPD -1-6u (Residential Planned Development, one acre minimum
lot size maximum six dwelling units per acre) classifications;
and
C. Public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good
planning practice justify the prezone classifications to
R-1-5000 (Single Family Residential -5,000 square foot minimum
lot size) and RPD -1-6u (Residential Planned Development, one
acre minimum lot size maximum six dwelling units per acre); and
d. The proposed prezone classifications to R-1-5000 (Single Family
Residential -5,000 square foot minimum lot size) and RPD -1-6u
(Residential Planned Development, one acre minimum lot size
maximum six dwelling units per acre) is consistent with existing
land use in the area and would not result in a substantive
change to the existing zoning of the subject site; and
e. The Annexation No. 1990-06 prezoning area consists of 210 acres
of developed land located northeast of the existing City limits
north and vest of Haskell Canyon Road, south of Copperhill
Drive, and east of the Los Angeles Aqueduct, as identified in
Exhibit A.
Ordinance No. 92-13
Page 3
SECTION 4. The City of Santa Clarita City Council has reviewed and
considered the Initial Study prepared for the project and finds and determines
as follows:
A. Said study found that no adverse impact to the existing and
future environment of the area would result from the proposal.
b. The proposed prezone would not have a significant adverse effect
on the environment and the proposed Negative Declaration was
prepared, posted, and advertised on May 13, 1992, in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
C. The City Council, based upon the determinations set forth above,
hereby finds the Negative Declaration is in compliance with CEQA
and it does certify the Negative Declaration prepared for
Prezone No. 90-006 and Annexation No. 1990-06.
SECTION 5. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council does hereby
ordain that the application for a prezoning is approved, and that the official
zoning map of the City of Santa Clarita is hereby amended so that the subject
property is R-1-5000 and RPD -1-6u .
ATTEST:
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall
become effective at 12:01
a. m. on
the thirty-first day after adoption, or
upon the effective date
of the
annexation (Annexation No. 1990-06) of the subject property
Santa Clarita, whichever occurs last.
to the
City of
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall
certify as to the
passage
of this
Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner prescribed
by lav:
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
? th day of August
1992.
MAYO
ATTEST:
Ordinance No. 92-13
Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) 98
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA)
I, Donna M. Grinder , City Clerk of the City of Santa
Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 92-13 was
regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the 14th day of July 1992. That thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council
on the 25th day of August , 1992, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boyer, Darcy, Heidt, Pederson, Klajic
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
CITY CLERK
ANNX: 383