Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-04-02 - ORDINANCES - DEVAGMT 91 008 (2)....._ ..._..._.... . ORDINANCE NO. 92-7 A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 91-008 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 47324 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find: a. An application for a development agreement was filed with the City of Santa Clarita on November 20, 1991, by Sand Canyon Estates ("the applicant"). The property for which this entitlement has been filed is 137 acres located at 16000 Live Oak Springs Canyon Road. The Assessor's Parcel Numbers are 2840-13-13,-14,-15, 2840-14-22 and 2840-16-02,-21. b. The request is for a development agreement to allow seven years for the build -out of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 47324 ("the Development Agreement"). VTTM 47324 consists of 70 single-family residences and the site is currently vacant. The General Plan designation of the site is RVL and RE. C. On April 24, 1990, the. City Council adopted Resolution 90-76 conditionally approving VTTM 47324 and adopting the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the project. d. The applicant is proposing to provide public benefits, as part of the Development Agreement, in addition to those proposed under the original VTTM 47324 approval, which includes the following: 1. The applicant will record the Vesting Tract Map within eight months after the Development Agreement is recorded. 2. The applicant shall contribute the Bridge and Throughfare district fees in effect at time of issuance of building permits, for areawide highway improvements. 3. A condition of the map required the applicant to contribute $500,000 towards the construction of the Live Oak Springs Canyon flood control system. The $500,000 shall be considered the base fee as of April 1990 (when the map was approved.) This base fee shall be multiplied by the increase in the Consumer Price Index for each subsequent year after 1990 until the fee is paid. e. The Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on the Development Agreement application on Tuesday, March 3, 1992 and March 17, 1992 at the City of Santa Clarita City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 7:00 p.m. At that time, the Planning Commission received testimony both for and against the project. The Commission adopted Resolution P92-10, certifying the negative declaration and recommending approval of the Development Agreement to the City Council. Ordinance No. 92-7 Page 2 f. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this ordinance on Tuesday, September 24, 1991, at the City of Santa Clarita City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, at 6:30 p.m. SECTION 2. Based upon the above facts, oral and written testimony and Other evidence presented at the public hearing, and upon the study and investigation made by the Planning Commission and City Council, the City Council finds as follows: a. The Initial Study prepared for VTTM 47324 is applicable to this project. The Development Agreement does not alter the environmental factors previously considered for VTTM 47324 and will have a de minimus impact on the environment. b. The Development Agreement is consistent with the General Plan RE and RVL designation. C. The Development Agreement complies with zoning, subdivision and other applicable ordinances and regulations. d. The Development Agreement is consistent with the public convenience, general welfare and good land use practice, making it in the public interest to enter into the development agreement with the applicant. e. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area. f. The Development Agreement will not be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the site. 9. The Development Agreement will not jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare. SECTION 3. The City of Santa Clarita City Council has reviewed and considered the environmental information contained in the Initial study, which was approved by the Planning Commission, and determines that it is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and that the Development Agreement will not have a significant effect on the environment and will have a de minimus impact upon wildlife. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. Based upon the findings stated above, the City Council hereby approved the Negative Declaration. n the SECTION that the DevelopmentmAgreementoisgapproved and shall ecexe executed by the ordainthe Mayor on behalf of the City. SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective at 12:01 a.m. thirty-first day after adoption, or upon the recordation of a on the notice of agreement, whichever occurs last. Ordinance No. 92-7 Page 3 SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner prescribed by law and is hereby directed to cause a copy of the fully executed Development Agreement to be recorded with the County Recorder not more than 10 days following the execution by the City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2/Jd, day of April 1992 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY RK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARITA) I, Donna_ M. Gr_ i_ ndev, City Clerk of the hereby certify tCity of Santa Clarita, do hat the foregoing Ordinance No. 92-7 was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 2,4th day of March 1992. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 2nd of ril , 1992, by the following vote, to wit: day AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boyer, Darcy, McKeon NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Klajic ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Heidt CITY CLERK FLF:428