HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-07-14 - RESOLUTIONS - FIRE FIN PLAN NEGDEC 92-001 (2)RESOLUTION NO. 92-152
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
�- OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTING A FINANCING PLAN TO FUND FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
BY ADOPTING THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEVELOPER FEE FOR
THE BENEFIT OF THE CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY TO FUND FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
IN THE BENEFIT AREA DESIGNATED AS THE SANTA CLARITA VALLEY
AND CERTIFYING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 92-001
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of
fact:
a. The City of Santa Clarita is currently a member of the Consolidated
Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (District) and
receives fire protection and emergency medical services from the
District.
b. The revenue available to the District is insufficient to implement
and operate fire stations to address fire protection and emergency
medical services needs resulting from new development within the City.
C. In order to implement the General Plan of the County of Los Angeles
(County), the County has approved a Developer Fee Program for the
benefit of the District to fund fire stations and apparatus necessary
to deliver service to new development in urban expansion areas.
d. In order to implement the City's General Plan, the City desires to
assist and support the District in financing fire stations to address
fire protection and emergency medical service requirements within the
City that result from urban expansion and new development.
e. The District has developed a capital improvement plan which has been
adopted by County resolution and which will be annually updated and
adopted by resolution.
f. The City's fire protection requirements have been addressed by the
County's capital improvement plan.
g. New development in the City will create substantial requirements on
the District for expanded fire protection services.
h. Imposition by the City of the County's Developer Fee for the District
would provide necessary funding for the new fire stations and
apparatus required to deliver expanded fire protection services
required by development within the City.
i. The City desires to receive an appropriate level of fire projection
and emergency medical services to be provided by the District.
j. State Government Code 66000, et seq., regarding Developer Fee
requirements have been met by the County.
RESO NO. 92-152
Page 2
k. The City finds that the County's Developer Fee Plan and capital
improvement plan for fire stations are appropriate to meet the
requirements of the City.
1. The City finds that the Negative Declaration promulgated by the
County is applicable to the City.
M. The City agrees to condition building permit issuance on proof of the
applicant fulfilling the Developer Fee obligations of the County.
n. The City subscribes and endorses the regional concept of fire
protection which involves the District prioritizing the scheduling
and placement of fire stations for the best interest of the Santa
Clarita Valley Benefit Area.
SECTION 2. This financing plan is determined to be a project per the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been reviewed pursuant to
its provisions. The Initial Study prepared for the project has determined
that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and a
Negative Declaration is proposed. A notice of environmental assessment was
posted and advertised, and the proposed Negative Declaration was made
available for a 21 day review period in compliance with CEQA. No
correspondence regarding the project has been received from any agency, or
from the public, during the review period. The project will not impact
resources protected by the California Department of Fish and Game and a
finding of de minimus impact on such resources is appropriate.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 3. The City Council further finds and determines as follows:
a. The City has reviewed and hereby approves: (1) Report on a Developer
Fee Plan for the Consolidated Fire Protection District, hereinafter
referred to as the "Developer Fee Plan;" (2) capital improvement plan
titled the Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station Plan; and (3)
Resolution to adopt a Developer Fee for the Benefit of the
Consolidated Fire Protection District and to Designate Areas of
Benefit, which are incorporated herein by reference.
b. The Developer Fee Plan includes the territorial limits of the City in
the Area of Benefit designated as the Santa Clarita Valley.
C. Growth projections for the Year 2010 indicate that 50 new fire
stations will be required to deliver service to the County Designated
Areas of Benefit (known as Areas One, Two, and Three), at capital
costs of $121 million in 1989-90 dollars. Should projections of
development change, fire station requirements will be adjusted
accordingly.
RESO NO. 92-152
Page 3
d. The Developer Fee Fire Station Detailed Plan for 1990-91 through
1994-95 specifies 17 fire stations which will be required in the
three Areas of Benefit.
e. Fire station placement will be guided by the General Development
Policy Map of the Los Angeles County General Plan, and Exhibit PF -6
(Public Facilities Plan) of the City of Santa Clarita General Plan.
Annually, fire protection requirements shall be reviewed and adjusted
to address changing requirements for the forthcoming five years.
f. The Developer Fee Plan and the Developer Fee Detailed Fire Station
Plan, which serves as the capital improvement plan for fire stations
of the District, are appropriate to implement the City's General Plan
with respect to the City's fire protection service needs.
g. Developer Fee revenues generated within the City shall fund
acquisition, construction, improvement, and equipping of facilities
necessary for the District to deliver fire protection services to the
City. The City finds that there are reasonable relationships between
1) the Developer Fee's use and the type of development project on
which the fee is imposed, 2) and need for the public facility and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed; and 3) the
amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of
the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee
is imposed. Such determination is based on the Report on the
Developer Fee Plan.
h. The Developer Fee is based on a determination by the District of the
required service provision. During the City's first year of the
program (1992-93), fees will be $.1813 per square foot of the new
floor areas of buildings.
i. The Developer Fee will not be levied against any existing
development, new additions which are under 2,000 square feet, or
development on rural or public use land.
j. The Developer Fee will not be levied against projects that have
submitted a qualified building permit application on or before
September 28, 1990. However, any project with a specific condition
set upon it to participate in an appropriate fire station financing
mechanism will remain subject to the Developer Fee.
k. Collection of fees will be a condition of issuing building permits.
The City will require that building permit issuances be withheld
until proof that the Developer Fee obligation has been met by the
applicant.
1. The District will conduct annual evaluations of the Developer Fee
Program and make appropriate recommendations to the County Board of
Supervisors and the City. All proposed fee adjustments will be
reviewed by the County of Los Angeles Auditor -Controller. Cost of
the most recently constructed fire stations within the District will
RESO NO. 92-152
Page 4
be analyzed and adjusted to estimated current costs. Other factors
such as growth projections, development trends, and other appropriate
indices or measures of inflation may also be considered.
M. The District will prepare an annual capital improvement plan for
adoption by the City and the County Board of Supervisors.
n. The public's health, safety, and general welfare` require that
provisions be made for the construction, installation, and equipping
of the proposed public facilities as specified in the Developer Fee
Detailed Fire Station Plan.
o. The City Council has considered the Negative Declaration together
with all comments received during the public review process,
incorporated herein by reference, and finds that the project will not
have a significant effect on the environment, and approves the
Negative Declaration.
p. City approves and adopts the County Developer Fee for the
consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County effective
sixty (60) days from the adoption of this resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita, California as follows:
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby certifies the Negative Declaration
prepared for the project.
SECTION 5. The City Council hereby approves the agreement between the
Consolidated Fire Protection District of the County of Los Angeles and the
City of Santa Clarita to fund fire protection facilities.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of JulY 1992.
Jill lajic, Ma or
ATTEST:
ZV. 12 119
tz
inna M. Grindey, City rk
RESO NO. 92-152
Page 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) ss
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA)
I, Donna M. Grindey, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita
at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of July 1992
by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: gOYer, Darc,, He1dti Pederson, Rlajic
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
cons. M. Grindey, City Cler
MAR: 663
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
DEVELOPER FEE PLAN
FOR ANTELOPE VALLEY, SANTA CLARITA VALLEY,
AND MALIBU/SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS
PREPARED BY THE
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES AND THE
CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
MAY 1992
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
PAS
NEGATIVE DECLARATION ....................................... 1
INITIAL STUDY ................................................ 2
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CONSOLIDATED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
DEVELOPER FEE PLAN
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
The Developer Fee Plan would continue to impose a developer fee on those lands
(see "Location of Project') which will benefit from the acquisition, construction,
improvement, and equipping of fire stations. The fee is needed because existing
revenues are not adequate to provide for the acquisition, construction,
improvement, and equipping of fire stations. The developer fee will fund public
improvements when new developments require additional fire facilities and related
equipment.
An equitable fee of $0.1937 per square foot of floor area of improved property,
with provisions for periodically adjusting the fees based upon cost increases,
would be collected on new development within rapidly expanding areas.
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT
9
The Developer Fee Plan would cover designated areas of benefit, those
geographical areas known as the Malibu/Santa Monica Mountains, Santa Clarity
Valley, and the Antelope Vatley. (See Exhibit 1 to the Initial Study attached).
SIUNIFICANT EFFECTS
No mitigation measures are necessary. The Los Angeles County Code authorizes
the designation of areas which will benefit from the construction of public
improvements and. allows for imposition of developer, fees (Chapter 22.68,
Procedural Ordinance for Financing of Public Facilities).
4. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT
Based on the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project will not have a
significant effect on the physical environment.
_1.
INITIAL STUDY
DEVELOPER FEE PLAN
This Initial Study on the Developer Fee Plan was prepared by the Consolidated Fire
Protection District of Los Angeles County pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (Division 13, California Public Resources Code), the State Environmental
Impact Report Guidelines (Division 6, California Code of Regulations), and the
County's Environmental Document and Reporting Procedures.
1. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Location:
The Developer Fee Plan would be applicable to the Antelope Valley, Santa Clarita
Valley, and the Malibu/Santa Monica Mountains. (See Exhibit 1.)
Description:
The project consists of a developer fee for the acquisition, construction,
improvement, and equipping of fire stations in the location described above. The
fee would defray the costs of additional fire stations and equipment in these areas
of rapid growth.
2. COMPATIBILITY WITH GENERAL PLAN
The developer fee is consistent with the County General Pian as it implements Plan
policy regarding the provision of adequate infrastructure to serve urban growth.
The developer fee is also consistent with
Chapter 22.68 of. the Los Angeles County
fees to be paid by subdividers or building
with the intent of proper development.
3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Ordinance No. 86-0o24 which established
Code, providing for the establishment of.
permit applicants, It is thus consistent
The three areas of Los Angeles County in which a developer fee would continue to
be established are growing rapidly. The Antelope Valley lies in the northern desert,
the Santa Clarita Valley in the central mountains, and the Malibu/Santa Monica
Mountains in the coastal lowlands.
The Antelope Valley consists of desert plains, hills, buttes, and dry lake beds. The
major urban centers consist of Lancaster and Palmdale and several smaller
unincorporated areas. The majority of the area is gently sloping to the north and
contains scattered vegetation.
WI
The central mountains consist of the rugged San Gabriel and Santa Susana
Mountain ranges. Within this area exists several broad valleys, including the Santa
Clarita Valley. These valleys are covered with numerous plant species including
Valley and Coastal Live Oak trees.
The coastal lowlands is mostly urbanized except for some smaller valleys
associated with the Malibu and Santa Monica Mountains. Hillside vegetation
consists of both hard and soft chaparral species. The valleys to the north of these
mountains are also covered with soft chaparral and oak woodland species.
4. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Introduction:
As stated earlier, the developer fee is consistent with and implements the County
General Plan. The General Plan identifies areas suitable for urban development
and sets policy for appropriate infrastructure. The certified Environmental Impact
Report prepared for the General Plan analyzes the impact of potential growth. The
proposed fee should be considered a mitigation measure to minimize adverse
impacts on fire service.
The County of Los Angeles and the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los
Angeles County recognize that the developer fee will provide only the funding
necessary to provide the existing level of fire protection facilities. The increased
tax base as a result of development will provide funds for personnel, services, and
supplies.
Natural Hazards -
No significant impacts will result from the continued implementation of a developer
fee. Each development will be subject to its own initial study and environmental
impact documentation. Existing local codes and ordinances will apply to all
development projects.
The developer fee will not result in noise impact.
Natural Resources:
No significant impact on biological resources or on open space areas designated
in the Conservation and Open.Space Element of the County General Plan will
result from the creation of a developer fee.
A developer fee will not result in air or water quality problems. Developer fees will
provide financial resources for fire protection facilities in designated areas of
benefit.
all
Cultural Resources/Visual Qualities:
No impacts will result from these factors. Current California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) requirements will be applicable to new projects.
Services:
No adverse impacts on services--traffic/access, sewage disposal, education,
utilities, and fire. Fire facilities will be provided in areas of benefit by the creation of
the developer fee, thereby maintaining the existing level of service in developing
areas.
Summary:
On the basis of this initial study, the developer fee for fire facilities and equipment
will not have a significant impact on the physical environment since it will not:
(a) conflict with existing adopted ordinances or environmental plans;
(b) have a substantial, demonstrable negative aesthetic effect;
(c) substantially affect any rare or endangered species of plant or animal or the
habitat of these species;
(d) interfere substantially with the movement of any resident fish or wildlife
species, or migratory fish or wildlife species;
(e) breach published national, state, or local standards relating to solid waste or
litter control;
(f) substantially degrade water quality;
(g) contaminate a public water supply;
(h) substantially degrade or deplete ground water. recharge;
(i) interfere substantially with ground water recharge;
(j) disrupt or adversely affect prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, or a
property of historic or cultural significance to a community or ethnic or a
social group; or a paleontological site except as part of a scientific study of
the site;
(k) induce substantial growth or concentration of population;
(I) cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street system;
-4-
(m) displace a large number of people;
(n) encourage activities which result in the use of large amounts of fuel, water or
energy;
(o) use fuel, water or energy in a wasteful manner;
(p) increase substantially the ambient noise levels for adjoining areas;
(q) cause substantial flooding, erosion of siltation;
(r) expose people or structures to major geological hazards;
(s) extend a sewer trunk line with capacity to serve new development;
(t) substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or plants;
(u) disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an establishing community;
(v) create a potential public health or safety hazard; or involve the use,
production or disposal of materials which pose a hazard to people or animals
or plant population in the area affected;
(w) conflict with established recreational, educational, religious or scientific uses
of the area.
5. DISCUSSION OF WAYS TO MITIGATE SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
No mitigation measures are necessary because the continued adoption of a
developer fee will not have a significant impact on the environment.
6. INITIAL.STUDY PREPARATION
This Initial Study was prepared by the County of Los Angeles and the
Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County under the .supervision
of:
FERRARA, CHIEF, FORESTRY DIVISION
Attachment
0A:0P3:0VLP-NEG0EC
MR
EXHIBIT 1
COURTV OF LAOS ARGELES
0 MEILOPIER FEN o sam[p04 mfgas
ANTELOPE VALLEY
Am[KA :J
A CLARITA VALLEY
A [EQ 2
SAN FERNAN00
BURBANK-
GLENDALE
MALIBU/ WEST
SANTA MONICA SANOABRIEL.
MOUNTAINS VALLEY.
.-�. n a '�%a t WEST
CENTRAL
EAST
CENTRAL
SOUTHEAST
SOUTH-
WEST
SOUTH
EAST
SANOABRIEL
VALLEY
NOT T01 SCALE
BOUNDARIES OF AREAS OF BENEFIT INCLUDING
UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREAS
(Consistent with the County of Los Angeles General
Plan Regional Planning Areas)
Santa Clarita Valley Area
Beginning at a point where the Los Angeles County -Ventura County
line intersects the northerly line of Township 6 North,
S.B.B.M. This being the true point of beginning.
Thence, easterly along said township line to the easterly line
of Range 16 west.
Thence, southerly along said range line to the northwest corner
of Sec. 19, T.6N., R.15W.
Thence, easterly along the northerly line of Sections 19, 20,
21, 22, 23 and 24, T.6N., R.15W. and and continuing easterly,
southerly, and westerly along Sec. 19, T.6N.0 R.14W. to the
easterly line of Range 15 West.
Thence, southerly along said range line to Sierra Highway.
Thence, northeasterly along Sierra Highway to Davenport Road.
Thence, easterly along Davenport Road to Aqua Dulce Road.
Thence, southerly along Agua Dulce Road -to Soledad Canyon Road.
Thence, westerly along Soledad Canyon Road to the easterly line
of Sec. 17, T.4N., R..14W.
Thence, southerly along said section line and continuing
southerly along the easterly line of Sections•20, 29, and 32,
T.4N., R.14W., and continuing southerly along the easterly line
of Sections 5 and .8'to Banta Clara Divide Road.
Thence., westerly along Santa Clara Divide Road to Sand Canyon
Road.
Thence, northwesterly along Sand Canyon Road to Placerita Canyon
Road.
Thence, westerly along Sand Canyon Road to Sierra Highway.
Thence, southerly along Sierra Highway to the City of Los
Angeles boundary line in Sec. 24, T.3N., R.16W.
Thence, southwesterly along said city line to Sulphur Springs
Road.
Thence, northwesterly along Sulphur Springs Road to Oat Mountain
Motorway.
-1-
Thence, westerly along Oat Mountain Motorway to Palo Salo
Motorway.
Thence, westerly along Palo Salo Motorway to the Los Angeles
County -Ventura County boundary line.
Thence, northwesterly along said Los Angeles County line to the
point of beginning.
-2-
BOUNDARIES OF AREAS OF BENEFIT INCLUDING
UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREAS
(Consistent with the County of Los Angeles General
Plan Regional Planning Areas)
Antelope Valley Area
Beginning at a point which is the most northwesterly corner of
the Los Angeles County boundary located in Sec. 4, T.8N.,
R.19W., S.B.B.M. This being the true point of beginning.
Thence, easterly and southerly along the Los Angeles County
boundary to its intersection with the Angeles National Forest
boundary at the southerly line of Sec. 13, T.1N., R.8W.
Thence, westerly along said Forest boundary and all its various
courses to the City of La Verne boundary in Sec. 19, T.1N.,
R.8W.
Thence, northerly, westerly, and southerly along said city
boundary to the Angeles National Forest boundary at the
southwest corner of Sec. 24, T.1N., R.9W..
Thence, westerly along said Forest boundary to the City of San
Dimas boundary line at the east line of the west 1/4 of Sec. 24,
T.1N.0 R.9W.
Thence, northerly and westerly along said city boundary to the
City of Glendora boundary in Sec. 14, T.1N., R.9W.
Thence, northerly and westerly along said city boundary to the
northwest corner of Sec. 1S, T.iN., R.9W.
Thence, southerly along the West line of said Section 15 to the
southwest corner of said Section 15 and the Angeles National
Forest boundary.
Thence, westerly along said Forest boundary to the City of.
Glendora boundary at the east line of the west 1/4 of Sec. 17,
T.1N., R.9W.
Thence, northerly and westerly along said city boundary and all
its various courses to the Angeles National Forest boundary at
the south line of the west 1/4 of Sec. 19, T.1N., R.9W.
Thence, westerly along said Forest boundary to the City of
Duarte boundary at the southeast corner of Sec. 16, T.1N.,
R.10W.
Thence, northerly and westerly along said city boundary to the
City of Monrovia boundary at the northeast corner of Sec. 7,
T.1N., R.10W.
Thence, westerly and southerly along said city boundary to the
Angeles National Forest boundary at the southerly line of Seg..
10, T.1N., R.11W.
-3-
Thence, westerly along said Forest boundary and all its various
courses to the City of Pasadena boundary at the southeast corner
of Sec. 2, T.1N.., R.12W.
Thence, northerly, westerly, and southerly along said city
boundary to the power lines at the west line of the east 1/4 of
Sec. 2, T.1N., R.12W.
Thence, northwesterly along said power lines to the Angeles
National Forest boundary along the west line of said Section 2.
Thence, northerly and westerly along said Forest boundary and
all its various courses to the City of Pasadena
boundary
southeast corner of Sec. 24, T.2N., R.13W. at the
Thence, northerly, westerly, and southerly along said city
boundary to the Angeles National Forest
of the south line of said Section 24.E ry ate center
Thence, westerly along said Forest boundary and all its various
courses to the City of Los Angeles bo
corner of Sec. 17, T.2N., R.13W.��' at the southeast
Thence, northerly and westerly along said city
its various courses to the Grant Sec.
and all
boundary lira in
R.14W.in SSec. 6, T.2N.,
Thence, westerly along said Grant line to the City of Los
Angeles boundary line in Sec. 1, T.2N., R.15W.
Thence, northerly and westerly along said city boundary and all
its various courses to the south line of Sec. 25, T.U., R.15W.
Thence, westerly along the south line of said Section 25 to a
Grant boundary line in said Section 25.
Thence, northerly.and westerly along said Grant line to the
easterly line of the west 1/2'of Section 25, T.U., R.15W.
Thence, northerly along the .easterly line of the west 1/2 of
said Sec. 25 to the City of Los Angeles bo
center of Section 24,.T.3N., R,15W,' line at the
Thence, westerly along said city boundary and all its various
courses to Sierra Highway.
Thence, northerly along Sierra Highway to Placerita Canyon Road.
Thence, easterly along Placerita Canyon Road to Sand Canyon
Road.
Thence, southeasterly along Sand Canyon Road to Santa Clara
Divide Road.
-4-
Thence, easterly along Santa Clara Divide Road to the easterly
line of Sec. 8, T..3N., R.14W.
Thence, northerly along the easterly lines of Sections 8 and 5,
T.3N., R.14W., and continuing northerly along the easterly lines
of Sections 32, 29, 20, and 17, T.4N., R.14W., to Soledad Canyon
Road.
Thence, easterly along Soledad Canyon Road to Agua Dulce Road.
Thence, northerly along Agua Dulce Road to Davenport Road.
Thence, westerly along Davenport Road to Sierra Highway.
Thence, southwesterly along Sierra Highway to the easterly line
of Range 15 West.
Thence, northerly along the easterly line of Range 15 West to
the southwest corner of Section 19, T.6N., R.14W.
Thence, easterly along the southerly line, northerly along the
easterly line, and westerly along the northerly line of said
Section 19,.and continuing westerly along the southerly lines of
Sections 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, T.6N., R.15W.0, to the
easterly line of Range 16 West.
Thence, northerly along said range line to the northerly line of
Township 6 North.
Thence, westerly along said township line to the Los Angeles
County -Ventura County line.
Thence, northwesterly along said Los Angeles County boundary to
the point of beginning.
-5-
BOUNDARIES OF AREAS OF BENEFIT INCLUDING
(Consistent with CORPORRAATTEEDDyCOUN7Y AOf Los EASAngeles General
Plan Regional Planning Areas)
Malibu Monica Mountains Area
Beginning at a point where the Los Angeles County -Ventura County
boundary line meets the Pacific Ocean mean high tide line. This
being the true point of beginning.
Thence, northeasterly along said Los Angeles County boundary
line and all its various courses to the City of Los Angeles
boundary line along the southerly line of Sec. 9, T.1N., R.17W.,
S.B.B.M.
Thence, southeasterly along said city bouall its
ndary and
various courses to the pacific Ocean mean high tide line.
Thence, westerly along said mean high tide line and all its
various courses to the point of.begi=ing.
-6-