HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-05-26 - RESOLUTIONS - NEGDEC PREZONE 92-001 (2)RESOLUTION N0. 92-86
�. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
PREZONE NO. 92-001
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF NEWHALL RANCH ROAD AND
BOUQUET CANYON ROAD, IN THE
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
of fact: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings
a. The City of Santa Clarita proposes to prezone approximately 7.8
acres of undeveloped land located at the northwest corner of Newhall
Ranch Road and Bouquet Canyon Road from Los Angeles County C-3 DP
(Unlimited Commercial -Development Program) zoning to City of Santa
Clarita C-3 DP (Unlimited Commercial -Development Program) zoning for
the purpose of annexation to the City of Santa Clarita.
b. This proposal is determined to be a project per the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has been reviewed pursuant to
�..., its provisions. On February 6, 1992, The Community Development
Department completed the Initial Study on this project and
determined that this
oposed would not have any
significant effect on project
the environment, nor would it impact resources
protected by the California Department of Fish and Game and that a
finding of dg minimus impact on such resources is appropriate.
SECTION 2. Based upon the above findings of fact and upon studies
and investigations made on behalf of the City Council, the City Council
further finds as follows:
a. Based on the Initial Study, the project does not have the
potential to adversely effect the environment or resources
under the protection of the California Department of Fish and
Game, and no significant impacts are anticipated resulting from
the widening of Soledad Canyon Road, between Sand Canyon Road
and Shadow Pines Boulevard.
b. A proposed Negative Declaration was prepared for the project
based on the Initial Study findings and the determination that
the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the
Environment.
C. A notice of environmental assessment was posted and advertised, and
^, the proposed Negative Declaration was made available for a 21 day
review period in compliance with the City's adopted CEQA resolution.
r
Resolution No. 92-86
Page 2
SECTION 3. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the City
Council hereby determines that;
a. The project is compatible with existing development in the area,
consistent with the Community Commercial land use designation, and
policies of the Santa Clarita General Plan.
b. The project will not have a significant impact on the environment or
on resources under the protection of the California Department of
Fish and Game.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Santa Clarita, California as follows:
a. The City Council hereby certifies the Negative Declaration prepared
for the project.
b. The City Council hereby approves that a final determination of
Negative Declaration be issued.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of May 1992.
�A•Z0111,
.-o�'.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) as
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA)
I, Donna M. Grindey, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita
at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of may 1992
by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boyer, Darcy. Pederson, Klajic
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: 9eidt
ANNX:337