HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-11-23 - AGENDA REPORTS - COPPERHILL ANNEXATION MC90-153 (2)PUBLIC HEARING
DATE:
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT:
BACKGROUND
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Approval
Item to be pr ent d by
-
L
Lynn H rns
November 23, 1993
Resolution No. 93-159, Making Findings on Written Protest and Approving and
Ordering Annexation No. 1990-06 (the "Copperhlll Annexation," Master Case
No. 90.153)
Community Development
The proposal. Is a resolution to be adopted by the City Council to approve findings on written
protests and to approve and order Annexation No. 1990.06 (the "Copperhlll Annexation").
Annexation No. 1990-05 is a proposal to annex approximately 210 acres of Inhabited land located
In the Saugus area, north and east of the existing City limits, south of Copperhill Drive, and west
and east of Haskell Canyon Road. (See attached map.)
The Copperhlll Annexation was Initiated In early 1991 by Copperhili area residents seeking the
benefits, representation and services of cityhood. In addition, the City wished to form a more
logical City boundary. The City Council adopted a Resolution of Application (Resolution No. 92.180)
for this proposal on July 14, 1992, requesting that the LAFCO Initiate annexation proceedings for
the Copperhili Annexation area. Annexation No. 1990-06 was submitted to the LAFCO for
processing on August 25, 1992. On March 25, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 93-7,
approving the prezoning of the proposed annexation area to City Residential Low and Residential
Moderate; and adopting related environmental documents.
The City Is also proposing to enter Into an annexation agreement with Cucamonga Development
Co. to vest Cucamonga's permits to construct 24 single-family residential units on approximately
43 acres, approved by Los Angeles County In 1991. The annexation agreement will give
Cucamonga Development certainty that It can finish the project In the City and ensure its support
for the annexation. The LAFCO approved the annexation on November 10, 1993, subject to the
condition that an annexation agreement with Cucamonga Development Co. is pending.
ANALYSIS
The attached resolution states the direction given to Council by the LAFCO to proceed with a duly
noticed public hearing; and sets forth the reasons for the annexation, the terms and conditions
established for the annexation by the LAFCO, exhibits identifying the site, and other required
recitals.
If the annexation and associated annexation agreement proceed as scheduled, the annexation
agreement will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on November 16,1993; the
Council will review the agreement on December 14, 1993, and pass the ordinance for approval to
Adopted: / 9-n Agenda Item:______
a second reading; and the annexation will be recorded and become final on December 15, 1993.
(The first reading of the ordinance approving the annexation agreement will demonstrate a "good
faith" effort on the City's part to complete the agreement with Cucamonga Development Co.)
Annexation No. 1990-06 is "inhabited;' therefore, by State law, the City Council must approve the
annexation If protests are filed by either 1) less than 25% of the area residents or 2) owners of
property valued at less than 25% of the total assessed value of land within the area. If the
percentage of opposition of either group is greater than 50%, the City Council must deny the
annexation.
There are no known persons or organizations opposed to this proposal.
As a special note to the Council, if the annexation Is recorded by March 14, 1994, these residents
would be afforded the opportunity to vote in the April 1994 General Municipal Election.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt Resolution No. 93-159, making findings regarding written protest; and
2. If the hearing results in Insufficient written protest and the annexation is approved, then
direct staff to transmit Resolution No. 93.159 and appropriate fees to the LAFCO for final
review and certification.
Resolution No. 93.159
Vicinity Map
Location Map
Exhibit "A"
e xt"6mmkmk
Public Hearina
Procedure
1. Mayor Opens Hearing
• States purpose of hearing
2. City Clerk reports on hearing notice
3. Staff Report
• City Manager
or
• City Attorney
or
• RP Staff
4. Proponent Argument (30 minutes)
5. Opponent Argument (30 minutes)
6. Five-minute rebuttal (Proponent)
• Proponent
7. Mayor closes public testimony
8. Discussion by Council
9. Council decision
10. Mayor announces decision
0
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ANNEXATION NO. 1990-06
(COPPERHILL ANNEXATION) LOCATED NORTH AND EAST OF THE
EXISTING CITY LIMITS, WEST AND EAST OF HASKELL CANYON ROAD,
SOUTH OF COPPERHILL DRIVE, AND EAST OF THE
LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
A Public Hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita
regarding Annexation No. 1990-06 ("the Copperhill Annexation"), located north and east
of the existing City limits, west and east of Haskell Canyon Road, south of Copperhill
Drive, and east of the Los Angeles Aqueduct.
The City is proposing to annex an approximately 210 acre inhabited area (consisting of
720 existing homes and 24 proposed homes) to the City of Santa Clarita.
The purpose of the hearing will be to receive and consider all written protests of any
residents or owners of land within the territory proposed to be annexed to the City of
Santa Clarita.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proposed project and is available for
public review beginning at 4:00 p.m. on November 3, 1993 at.-
City
t:
City Hall Valencia Library .
Dept. of Community Development Reference Desk
23920 Valencia Blvd., Ste. 300 23743 Valencia Blvd.
Santa Clarita, CA .91355 Santa Clarita, CA 91355
The hearing will be held by the City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers, 23920
Valencia Blvd.,1st Floor, Santa Clarita, the 23rd day of November, 1993, at or after 6:30
p.m.
Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may appear and be heard on this
matter at that time. Further information may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk's
office, Santa Clarita City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., 3rd Floor, Santa Clarita.
If you wish to challenge this order in court, you may be limited to raising only those
issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council, at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Dated: November 1, 1993
Donna M. Grindey, CMC
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 93-159
A RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA,
MAKING FINDINGS THAT INSUFFICIENT WRITTEN PROTESTS
HAVE BEEN FILED AND APPROVING AND
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS
"ANNEXATION NO. 1990-06"
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Los Angeles adopted
Its resolution, making determinations and approving the proposed annexation to the City of Santa
Clarita of territory described in Exhibit A and mapped in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this
reference Incorporated; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Los Angeles has
directed the City of Santa Clarita to proceed with the annexation following a duly noticed public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set Tuesday, November 23, 1993, at 6:30 p.m, in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., 1st Floor, Santa Clarita, California, as the date,
time, and place for said hearing on the proposed annexation and the property owners in the said
territory were duly informed of their right to file a written protest against the annexation with the
City Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing on the proposed annexation; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was duly and regularly conducted by and before the City
Council at Its meeting of November 23,1993; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission approved this proposed annexation
subject to the following conditions:
1) The subject territory would also be annexed to the Consolidated Fire Protection
District;
2) The subject territory would be withdrawn from County Road District No. 5; and
3) The Certificate of Completion for this annexation would not be recorded until an
ordinance providing for an annexation agreement by and between the City of Santa
Clarita and the Cucamonga Development Co. has been submitted to the City Council
for a first reading and has successfully passed to a second reading pursuant to
applicable State law; and
WHEREAS, the reason for this annexation is to promote sound planning and land use
practices in the affected territory; and
WHEREAS, the regular County assessment roll Is utilized by this City; and
WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing bonded Indebtedness of this
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita,
California, as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 93-159 -
Page 2
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares said territory is found to be Inhabited and a
legal desciption of the boundaries of the annexation is set forth in Exhibit A and a map of the
boundaries Is set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof.
SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 57075 of the Government Code, it is hereby found
that written protests, If any, have been filed and not withdrawn by less than 25% of the residents.
within the territory or by owners of property valued at less than 25% of the total assessed value of
land within the territory.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby orders the territory described in Exhibits A and B
annexed and directs the City Clerk to transmit eight (8) certified copies of this resolution with
applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the Executive Officer of the
Local Agency Formation Commission of Los Angeles County.
SECTION 4. .The City Clerk shall cerify to the adoption of this resolution and certify this
record to be a full, true, correct copy of the action taken.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
1993.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
1, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was
duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the day of 1993 by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
cwncdU**93159.kmk
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE AREA
OF PREZONE 90-006
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTHERLY -LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SECTION 2•TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST S.B.B.M. WITH THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COPPER HILL DRIVE 80' WIDE, ALSO BEING A POINT IN THE
BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF SANTA' CLARITA AS SAME EXISTED ON MARCH 22, 1991:
THENCE SOUTHERLY, AND EASTERLY ALONG THE CITY BOUNDARY TO THE SOUTHERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE WESTERLY LINE AS DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT NO. 867 RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 13, 1965, OFFICIAL RECORDS. THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY
LINE TO THE. EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE AS DESCRIBED IN
DOCUMENT NO. '3250, RECORDED JULY 13, 1948, OFFICIAL RECORDS. THENCE WESTERLY
ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND WESTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE
SAID SOUTHERLY LINE TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF HASKELL CANYON ROAD. THENCE
NORTHERLY TO A POINT ON A CURVE CONCAVE TO SOUTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 25'
THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO A POINT TANGENT AND ON THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF COPPER HILL DRIVE )THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE
OF COPPER HILL DRIVE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION ONE,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO
THE CENTER OF SECTION 1 TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST, S.B.B.M. THENCE
WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 1,
TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST S.B.B.M. TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID
NORTHERLY 'LINE WITH THE NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION OF -THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF
n,
WAY LINE OF COPPER HILL DRIVE 80' WIDE SAID LINE BEING A, CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 1240.00' AND RADIAL LINE OF N 13" 25' 10" W,
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY, NORTH WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COPPER HILL DRIVE AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 16710
.RECORDED IN MAP BOOR 190 PAGES 30-32 OF MAPS'. TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 2; TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST, S.B.B.M. SAID
POINT BEING S 890 56' 07 E 146.85' FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE N 89°
56' 07 W 146:85' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING..
PARCEL CONTAINS 210 ACRES (0.33 SQUARE MILES)
WRITTEN BY:
WILLIAM WHITLATCH
DATE PREPARED; JUNE 12, 1992
I
EXHIBIT 6
S. In
K
M'ry. k TR SrTE�
MW C1
MCI/1�.1.a
rim - ------------
I
(rRITVSED)
+ xn
l
/ SEC.I
T4 M, R.mw..
r
KL4lslrj ./ �C
•�
w x �' I caw mo a
' Sl1 !/Ul o"OOC ua
JZfO !((a[O[O TIi.
O R.
NQ 1990-06
Yr uR[ ar /unr ua ¢
S7 ineuto + u•/uj
ar
IV
I
LEGEND:
.0 LL -L -u ANNEXATION BDRY
--- EXIST CITY SORY,
OF SANTA CLARITA
I coo!
WR'H THE CO. FECORDER
El
G
V
ANNEXATION NO. 1990-06
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
LEGEND
�••�••�••-• CITY LIMIT BOUNDARY
••••••••••••••••••••• PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY
---------- NATIONAL FOREST BOUNDARY
VICINITY MAP
105- ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST •••••••"••••
VVD
�VA`ENCLA 6
• LL
• 7
-
LYONS AVE.
NO.199.0-06 -j
_I
VASOUEZ CYN, RO
I
1
i
O• '
?P ..1'•t..r, ..1
$OLEDAD /♦•
C ..r
i
. ••••♦•••••••••• I ..........
• ••
ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST
t
Li