Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-02-09 - AGENDA REPORTS - NO STOPPING ZONE (2)AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approva Item to be presented Anthony J. Nisicf�ey.y/ CONSENT CALENDAR DATE: February 9, 1993 SUBJECT: WHITES CANYON ROAD FROM ASHBORO ROAD TO SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD CITY -COUNTY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT A "NO -STOPPING ZONE" Resolution No. 93-3 DEPARTMENT:. Community Development BACKGROUND On July 14,1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-147 authorizing the no -stopping zone on both sides of Whites Canyon Road between Soledad Canyon Road and the northerly City limits. Prior to this approval, staff contacted the property owners/managers of the properties that would have been Impacted by this proposal and did not receive any objections. The.City Council also directed staff to coordinate work with the County staff to Install appropriate signs and curb markings to effect the no -stopping zone. , . The estimated cost of Installing signs for the no -stopping zone is $10,000, and the County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works is willing to do the work using part of the City's available Aid -To -Cities (ATC) funds. The County Intends to Implement this project In the near future. In order fortheCounty to administer the implementation, temporary jurisdiction of Whites Canyon Road between Soledad Canyon Road and Ashboro Drive which adjoin the project must be granted. This jurisdiction would be relinquished once the project was completed. The Public Resources Code provides that this type of project, by reason of the work proposed, does not have a significant effect on the environment. Accordingly and pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1(c), of the State Guidelines for. Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the County has found that this project Is categorically exempt from the provisions of said act and the City concurs with this finding. In addition, the County Is requesting that the City execute the attached agreement (Exhibit "B') to Implement and finance this project. RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt Resolution No. 93-3 (Exhibit "A'), giving the Los Angeles County temporary jurisdiction for implementation of the "No -Stopping Zone" along both sides of Whites Canyon Road between Soledad Canyon Road and Ashboro Road. Adopted. -,,.2— 9 --9-9 Agenda Item: AGENDA - No -Stopping Zone on Whites Canyon February 9, 1992 Page 2 2. Authorize the mayor to approve and sign three original agreements (Exhibit "B") between the City and County to Implement the "No -Stopping Zone" along both sides of Whites Canyon Road between Soledad Canyon Road and Ashboro Road. ATTACHMENT Vicinity Map Exhibit "A" - Resolution No. 93.3 Exhibit "B" - Agreement between City and County of Los Angeles DLS:R&99.3.RJR A G R E E M E N T i THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY." W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, Whites Canyon Road is on the Highway Element of. CITY'S General Plan and on COUNTY'S Highway Plan; and WHEREAS, CITY and COUNTY propose to install full-time stopping prohibition signs along Whites Canyon Road from Ashboro Drive to Soledad Canyon Road, which work is hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT"; and WHEREAS, PROJECT is entirely within the jurisdictional limits of CITY; and WHEREAS, PROJECT is in the general interest -of CITY and COUNTY; and WHEREAS, COUNTY is willing to administer PROJECT using COUNTY forces; and WHEREAS, the total cost of PROJECT is currently estimated to be $10,000; and -2 - WHEREAS, CITY will 'finance the cost of PROJECT by utilizing a portion of its 1989/90 Aid -To -Cities (ATC) allocation credit in COUNTY'S Road Fund Budget; and WHEREAS, CITY'S use of its 1989/90 ATC allocation to. finance the cost of PROJECT is in compliance with the adopted COUNTY policy regarding the use of ATC funds. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by CITY and COUNTY and of the premises herein contained, it is hereby agreed as follows: (1) CITY AGREES: a. To finance the entire cost of PROJECT, based upon a final accounting of PROJECT costs. b. To utilize a portion of its available 1989/90 ATC allocation credit in COUNTY'S Road Fund Budget to finance the cost of PROJECT, currently estimated to be $10,000. C. Upon completion of PROJECT, to maintain in good condition and at CITY expense all improvements constructed as part of PROJECT within its jurisdiction. (2) COUNTY AGREES: a. To administer and perform PROJECT using COUNTY forces. -3- b. As set forth herein, to accept a portion of CITY'S available 1989/90 ATC allocation credit in COUNTY'S Road Fund Budget as payment of the estimated cost of PROJECT. C. To furnish CITY, within 120 days after completion of PROJECT, a final accounting of the actual total cost of PROJECT, including an itemization of actual labor, equipment and materials quantities for PROJECT. (3) IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS: a. The cost of PROJECT, as referred to in this Agreement, shall consist of the costs of labor, equipment, required materials and all other work necessary toadministerand perform PROJECT, and shall include currently effective percentages added to total salaries, wages and equipment costs to cover overhead, administration and depreciation in connection with any or all of the aforementioned items. b. If, for some reason, CITY'S 1989/90 ATC'allocation credit is insufficient to finance CITY'S cost of PROJECT, as set forth in paragraph (1) a., above, CITY shall deposit.bther CITY funds with COUNTY, upon demand by COUNTY, so that when combined with -4 - CITY'S available 1989/90 ATC allocation credit, the total equals CITY'S cost of PROJECT. C. This Agreement shall not take effect unless and until COUNTY, pursuant to Section 1700 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, declares the portion of Whites Canyon Road between PROJECT limits within CITY to be a COUNTY highway for the construction of improvements thereon and CITY, pursuant to Section 1701 of aforementioned Code, shall consent to said street becoming a COUNTY highway for`said purpose. d. Neither COUNTY nor any officer or employee of COUNTY, shall be responsible for any damage or liability.occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify, . defend and hold COUNTY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of CITY under or in connec- tion with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. J -5- e. Neither CITY nor any officer or employee of CITY, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code, Section 895.4, COUNTY shall fully indemnify, defend and hold CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code, Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any acts or omissions on the part of COUNTY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to COUNTY under this Agreement. f. It is understood and agreed that the provisions of any previous Assumption of Liability Agreement heretofore entered into between the parties.hereto are inapplicable to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers, duly authorized, by the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA on 1992 and by the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on 1992. ATTEST: LARRY J. MONTEILH Executive Officer -Clerk of the Board of Supervisors COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BY BY DEPUTY CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ATTEST: !Z! CITY CLE APPROVED AS TO FORM DE WITT W. CLINTON County Counsel BY COUNTY ATTORNEY CITY OF SANTA CLARITA BY MAYOR RESOLUTION NO. 93-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTINGTO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PORTION OF WHITES CANYON ROAD WITHIN SAID CITY AS A PART OF THE SYSTEM OF HIGHWAYS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES WHEREAS, the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors did on October 6, 1992 duly adopt a resolution declaring the portion of Whites Canyon Road from Ashboro Drive.to Soledad Canyon Road, within the City of Santa Clarita, to be a part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles, as provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 Inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, said Board of Supervisors by said resolution requested this Council to give Its consent to allow the County to install parking prohibition signs and/or red curb markings and perform appurtenant work within said portion of Whites Canyon Road In the City of Santa Clarita described above; and WHEREAS, pursuantto Section 15301, Class 1(c), of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Secretary of Resources designated this type of project as categorically exempt. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Consent to inclusion in the County Highway System. This City Council does hereby consent to the establishment of that portion of the Whites Canyon Road from Ashboro Drive to Soledad Canyon Road, within the City of Santa Clarita, as part of the System of Highways of the County of Los Angeles as, provided in Sections 1700 to 1704 inclusive of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said consent Is for the purpose of Installing full-time no -stopping zone signs and performing appurtenant work as may be necessary by the County of Los Angeles. SECTION 2. Finding of Categorical Exemption. This City Council does hereby find that the project is categorically exempt from the requirement for an Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1(c), of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970. SECTION 3. Finding of a Minor Nature. This City Council does hereby find that pursuant to Government Code, Section 65402(b), the aforesaid Improvements are for street Improvements of a minor nature and that, therefore, the provisions of said Section requiring the submission to and report upon said project by the City Planning Agency do not apply. Exhibit "A" RESOLUTION NO. 93-3 Page 4 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify three copies of this resolution and transmit to the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1993. Jan Heidt, Mayor ATTEST: Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) § CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Donna M. Grindey, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarlta at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of . 1993 by the following vote of Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Donna M. Grindey City Clerk DLSAE923 RJR of Santa Clarita