Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-07-13 - AGENDA REPORTS - RESO CMP MTA (2)AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approva Item to be presented Lynn M. Harris r'/A 4A... CONSENT CALENDAR DATE: July 13, 1993 SUBJECT: Resolution to certify that the City is in conformance.with local Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements as. Identified by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). DEPARTMENT: Community Development �IdK(N:T*1IfkTT': The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) notified the City on June 17, 1993, that the 1992 Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires local jurisdictions to certify compliance with the CMP via a City Council resolution by August 1, 1993. A resolution with attachments has been prepared by staff based on the model resolution prepared by the MTA. The CMP Is mandated by state legislation, and the MTA Is the responsible agency for the CMP In Los Angeles County. The resolution prepared by staff Is based on a model drafted by the MTA. In addition, the City must complete the 1992 CMP Conformance Checklist as Attachment "A" to the resolution, attesting that the City has completed the actions required for compliance with the CMP. The City has completed these actions already, which are: 1. Adoption of a transportation demand management ordinance consistent with the MTA model ordinance. 2. Adoption and Implementation of a land use program to analyze the Impacts of new development on the CMP highway network and the associated mitigation costs. 3. Conducting annual traffic counts and calculating levels of service. The documentation related totheabove three Items are Included In the Council's reading file. Conformance with the CMP assures the continued flow of Section 2105 gas tax funds, and preserves eligibility for state and federal transportation programming funds. Local jurisdictions are subject to a loss of funding for nonconformance with the CMP. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution and direct staff to forward It to the MTA prior to August 1. LMH:KJM:II coumWcmpcwMkJm 13 Adopted:'7— =V Age ado Item: RESOLUTION NO. 93.104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1992 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PLAN AND APPROVING THE CMP CONFORMANCE CHECKLIST A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 1992 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND APPROVING THE CMP CONFORMANCE CHECKLIST. WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA") acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the Congestion Management Program on November 18, 1992; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP required submittal to the MTA of the CMP self -certification checklist by August 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this at a regularly scheduled City Council Meeting on July 13; 1993. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council for the City of Santa Ciarita does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That the City has taken all of the actions reflected on the CMP Conformance Checklist, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof, and that the City Is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1992 CMP. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. ADOPTED this day of 11993. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES .) § CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, . DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 1993 by the following vote of Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: City Clerk C MjmnveMtzIN ATTACHMENT A WRIODDW-60 OWN IN UMI MUDWATID This checklist must be submitted to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) by August 1, 1993. The address for submittal of the checklist follows: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority CMP Conformance Checklist (MS -2200) 818 West Seventh Street, Suite. 1100 Los Angeles, California 90017 This checklist is for the City [County] of: Santa Clarita A check mark in the box adjacent.to each statement below confirms that the City [Geuxty] is in conformance with the statement. n Attached is a resolution, adopted by the city [eeunty} governing board at a public hearing, approving the transmittal of this checklist to MTA. The resolution serves as evidence that the city [county} is in conformance with the CMP -and each statement found on this checklist. I] By June 15, 1993, the city [county] has conducted annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, as specified in the traffic monitoring procedures found in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter. Cities which the CMP does not require to perform this step should write "NA" (Le., not applicable) in the box adjacent to this statement. 0 The city [city] has adopted and implemented a transportation demand management ordinance. The TDM ordinance is consistent with the minimum standards identified in the CMP's TDM Element, was adopted by the city. [county] governing board by April 1, 1993 and submitted to MTA upon adoption. ® The city {county] has adopted and implemented a land use program to analyze the impacts of new development on the CMP system and the associated mitigation costs. The program is consistent with the standards identified in the CMP's Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. This program was adopted by. the city {eett governing board by April 1, 1993 and submitted to MTA upon adoption. June 15, 1993 RECEIVED Buri 1 7 1993 COMMUN,ly DEVELOI'MENi Cay OF SANTA CLARITA Los Angeles County Metropolitan To: City Managers, Planning Directors, Public Works Directors, and Transportation Transportation Directors Authority From: Judy Wilson%�� Executive7(i"lcer 818 West Seventh Street Planning and Programming Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: CMP Conformance Self -Certification Process 213.627.1194 The 1992 Congestion Management Program (CMP) requires that, by August 1, 1993, local jurisdictions self -certify that they are in conformance with local CMP requirements. Those local responsibilities are (1) adoption and implementation of a transportation demand management ordinance by April 1, 1993; (2) adoption and implementation of a land use program to analyze the impacts of new development on the CMP system and the associated mitigation costs by April 1, 1993; and (3) conducting annual traffic counts and calculating levels of service for selected arterial intersections by June 15, 1993. The self -certification process is the last local requirement for implementation of the 1992 CMP. Completion of this requirement will be accomplished by: 1. Completion of the Conformance Checklist (Attachment A); 2. Approval of the Checklist at a public hearing of your governing body (see Attachment B for sample resolution); and 3. Transmittal of the approved Checklist to MTA by August 1, 1993. The MTA must annually determine local jurisdiction conformance with the CMP. The approved Conformance Checklist plays a key role in assessing jurisdictions' adherence to CMP responsibilities. MTA staff will review the self -certification findings and present recommendations for conformance determinations to the MTA Board at its October meeting. We urge local jurisdictions to place the CMP Conformance Checklist on council agendas for action to meet the August 1, 1993 deadline. Conformance with the CMP assures the continued flow of Section 2105 gas tax funds, and preserves eligibility for state and federal transportation programming funds. CMP Conformance Self -Certification Process June 15, 1993 Page 2 Because local jurisdictions are subject to a loss of funding for nonconformance with the CMP, MTA will continue to make every effort to assist you in meeting this, and every other CMP responsibility. To accomplish this, we request that your agency contact Jody Feerst, CMP Government and Public Affairs Manager, at (213) 244-6423, to designate a contact. person. The MTA is very pleased with the high level of participation from the jurisdictions of Los Angeles. County in implementing the local requirements of the 1992 CMP. Your work in adopting and implementing the CMP Transportation Demand Management (TDM) requirements, the CMP Land Use Analysis Program, and completing CMP Highway monitoring responsibilities will help to make the CMP a success for Los Angeles County. Thank you for your continued cooperation. Attachments cc: CMP TDM Contacts CMP Land Use Contacts CMP Policy Advisory Committee Members & Alternates CMP Technical Contacts City of Santa Clarita CERTIFICATION BY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) as CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Donna M. Grindev, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the attached copy of is a complete and correct copy of the original �.l• now on file in my office and was adopted by the City Council at the City Council meeting.on oxx—A 2 Donna M. Grindey, CMC City Clerk Geri Aller -Davis Deputy City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 93.5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ADOPTING TRIP REDUCTION AND TRAVEL DEMAND MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 65089 AND 65089.3 WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has found that the lack of an Integrated transportation system and the Increase In the number of vehicles are causing traffic congestion that each day results In hundreds of thousands of hours lost in traffic, tons of pollutants released into the air, and millions of dollars of added costs to the motoring public; and WHEREAS, the Legislature has adopted legislation requiring the preparation and Implementation of a Congestion Management Program ("CMP") by county transportation commissions or other public agencies of every county that Includes an urbanized area; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA'j Is responsible for the preparation•of the CMP for Los Angeles County ("County"); and WHEREAS, the CMP must contain a trip reduction and travel demand management element that promotes alternative transportation methods, such as carpools, vanpools, transit, bicycles, walking and park-and-ride lots, Improvement in the balance between )obs and housing, and other strategies, Including flexible work hours, telecommuting and parking management programs; and WHEREAS, the County and every city within the County is required by state law to adopt and Implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ordinance as an Important element of the Congestion Management Program to Improve both congestion and air quality; and WHEREAS, MTA must determine annually whether the County and titles within the County are conforming to the CMP, Including the requirement to -adopt and Implement a TDM ordinance; and WHEREAS, because the CMP Is an evolving program which will be developed Incrementally, as experience is gained through Its Implementation, this TDM ordinance may be amended or superseded from time to time, as necessary to meet congestion and air quality goals; WHEREAS, the State Clean Air Act requires regions to attain a 1.5 vehicle occupancy during the commute period by the year 1999; WHEREAS, this ordinance Is Intended to comply with the CMP's requirements for a TDM ordinance. The requirements of South Coast Air Ouallty Management District ("District") Regulation XV, are separate from this ordinance, and administrated by the Air District. Nothing herein Is Intended, nor shall It be construed, to limit or otherwise preclude employers from offering or providing additional Inducements to use alternatives to single -occupant vehicles to their employees necessary to most Regulation XV requirements; and WHEREAS, in order to use the existing and planned transportation Infrastructure more efficiently, maintain or Improve traffic levels of service, and lower motor vehicle emissions, it Is the Policy of the City of Santa Clarita to minimize the number of peak period vehicle trips generated by additional development, promote the use of alternative transportation, Improve air quality and participate In regional and countywide efforts to Improve transportation demand management; I. "Preferential Parking" means parking spaces designated or assigned, through use of a sign or painted space markings for carpool and vanpool vehicles carrying commute passengers on a regular basis that are provided in a location more convenient to a Place of employment than parking spaces provided for single occupant vehicles. J. "Property Owner" means the legal owner of a development who serves as the lessor to a tenant. The Property Owner shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the ordinance either directly or by delegating such responsibllhy as appropriate to a tenant and/or his agent. K. "South Coast Air Quality Management District" (SCAOMD) is the regional authority appointed by the California State Legislature to most federal standards and otherwise Improve air quality In the South Coast Air Basin (the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties). L. '.Tenant" means the lessee of facility space at an applicable development project. M. "Transportation Demand Management (TDM)" means the alteration of travel behavior, usually on the part of commuters, through programs of Incentives, services, and policies. TDM addresses ahemathres to single occupant vehicles such as carpooling and vanpooling, and changes In work schedules that move trips out of the peak period or eliminate them altogether (as Is the case In telecommuting or compressed work weeks). N. "Trip Reduction" means reduction in the number of work-related trips made by single occupant vehicles. O. "Vanpool" means a vehicle carrying seven or more persons commuting together to and from work on a regular basis, usually In a vehicle with a seating arrangement designed to carry seven to fifteen adult passengers, and on a prepaid subscription basis. P. "Vehlcle" means any motorized forth of transportation, Including but not limited to automobiles, vans, buses and motorcycles. SECTION 2. REVIEW OF TRANSIT IMPACTS. Prior to approval of any development project for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Will be prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or based on a local determination, regional and municipal fixed -route transit operators providing service to the project shall be Identified and consulted. Projects for which a Notice of Preparation (NOP) for a Draft EIR has been circulated pursuant to the provisions of CEQA prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be exempted from its provisions. The "Transit Impact Review Worksheet", contained in the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Program Manual, or similar worksheets, shall be used In assessing Impacts. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, transit operators shall be sent a NOP for all contemplated EIR-3 and shall, as part of the NOP process, be given opportunity to comment on the Impacts of the project, to identify recommended transit service or capital Improvements which may be required as a result of the project, and to recommend mitigation measures which minimize automobile trips on the CMP network. Impacts and recommended mitigation measures Identified by the transit operator shall be evaluated in the Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the project. Related mitigation measures adopted shall be monitored through the mitigation monitoring requirements of CEQA. 3 2 _ Non-Residerdlal development of 50,000 square feet or more of building Improvements shall comply with Section 3.B(1) above and shall provide all of the following measures to the satisfaction of the City: a. Not less than 10% of employee parking area, shall be located as close as Is practical to the employee entrance(s), and shall be reserved for use by potential carpooUvanpool vehicles, without displacing handicapped and customer parking needs. This preferential carpool/vanpool parking area shall be Identified on the site plan upon application for building permit, to the satisfaction of City. A statement that preferential carpool/vanpool spaces for employees are available and a description of the method for obtaining such spaces must be Included on the required transportation information board. Spaces will be signed/striped as demand warrants; provided that at all times at least one space for projects of 50,000 square feet to 100,000 square feet and two spaces for projects over 100,000 square feet will be slgned/strlped for carpool/vanpool vehicles. b. Preferential parking spaces reserved for vanpools must be accessible to vanpool vehicles. When located within a parking structure, a minimum vertical Interior clearance of T2" shall be provided for those spaces and aecessways to be used by such vehicles. Adequate turning radii and parking sparse dimensions shall also be Included in vanpool parking areas. C. Bicycle racks, lockers or other secure bicycle parking shall be provided to accommodate 4 bicycles per the first 50,000 square feet of building Improvements of non-residential development and 1 bicycle per each additional 50,000 square feet of building Improvements of non-residentlal development. Calculations which result In a fraction of OS or higher shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. A bicycle parking facility may also be a fully enclosed space or locker accessible only to the owner or operator of the bicycle, which protects the bike from inclement weather. Specific facilities and location (e.g., provision of racks, lockers, or locked room) shall be to the satisfaction of the City. 3 Non-Residentlal development of 100,000 square feet or more of building Improvements shall comply with Sections 3.6(1) and 3.B(2) above, and shall Provide all of the following measures to the satisfaction of the City: a. A. safe and convenient zone In which vanpool and carpool vehicles may deliver or hoard their passengers. b. Sidewalks or other designated pathways following direct and safe routes from the external pedestrian circulation system to each building In the development. C. If determined necessary by the City to mitigate the project Impact, bus stop Improvements must be provided. The City will consult with the local bus service providers In determining appropriate Improvements. When locating bus stops and/or planning building entrances, entrances 5 SECTION & The City Cleric shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be. published as required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this 9th day of March 1993, ATT E nna M. Grind y, Clty Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) § CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) 1, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 93-(i was regularly Introduced and placed upon Its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 23rd day of February . 1993. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 9th day of 1993, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Darcy, Klajic, Pederson, Heidt NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:. Boyer Cf/y� nna M. Grin , City Clerk 7 CVIF MAR 9 1993 !ir nRM _Tt OF -ta ai,SaiTA March 8, 1993 Kevin Michelle Community Development Department 23920 Valencia Blvd. Suite 300 City of Santa Clarita Santa Clarita CA 91355 Dear Kevin: Thank you for forwarding a -copy of the "adopted" Land Use Analysis requirements implementing related Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements. The City of Santa Clarita is now in compliance with the Land Use Analysis portions of the CMP. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions, please feel free to give Kendra Morries a call at (213) 244-6579. Sincerely, iYka?Gt! /�" LGe� Bradford W. McAllester Director, Congestion Management Program attachment Los Angeles County 818 West Seventh Street Leading the Way to Greater Mobility Transportation Suite1100 Commission Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel 213 623-1194 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Applicants With Projects Requiring Environmental Impact Reports (EIR's) , FROM: Lynn M. Harris, Deputy City Manager, Community Development 17;rW" DATE: February 12, 1993 SUBJECT: CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM—LAND USE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING THE PREPARATION OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSES Resolution No. 91-50 authorizes the Community Development Director, acting as the City's Environmental Officer, to require the project applicant to supply information to assist In the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This memo, and other documents referred to within this memo, will specify the additional information that must be provided to the City to comply with the Congestion Management Program as passed by the State of California and administered In Los Angeles County by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). All projects required to prepare an EIR, and for which a Notice of Preparation (NOP) was not Issued prior to March 1, 1993, must comply with this program, except If specifically exempted In the Congestion Management Program (CMP). The Congestion Management Program Is a state mandated program to compel local and regional jurisdictions to link land use, air quality, and transportation planning. A requirement of the CMP requires the City to implement a program that is consistent with "Appendix D: Guidelines for CMP Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA)," which Is an appendix of the 1992 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County." Copies of these documents are available from the Community Development Department, and the City and project applicants must comply with them. The Information generated by this mandatory program will enable the City to analyze the impact of land use decisions on the regional transportation system, Including an estimate of the cost of mitigating associated Impacts on the system. This process will foster land use decisions that reduce trips and Improve air quality by encouraging development In proximity to transit centers and along major transit corridors. A key element of the CMP Is the CMP Roadway System, which Includes all state highways and major arterials. Within the City, the Golden State Freeway (45), Antelope Valley Freeway (SR14), the existing Route 126; and a portion of Sierra Highway are on the network (copy attached). The CMP Land Use Program will ensure that the City considers the regional transportation impacts of new development on the CMP Roadway system, in addition to the Impacts on local streets and highways. The Land Use Analysis Program, which Includes the preparation of a TIA, Is designed to build on . the existing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process that the City has In place, and which was authorized by City Council Resolution 91-50. The Land Use Analysis Program Is designed to provide consistent Information to decision makers by providing a uniform methodology for examining Impacts to the CMP Roadway System within an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Except for particular exceptions specified In Chapter 7 of the 1992 CMP, all development projects required to prepare an EIR shall be subject to the Land Use Program and shall incorporate a CMP Transportation Impact Analysis (CMP-TIA) within the EIR. The objective of this process Is to Identify site-specific Impacts of proposed projects and mitigation measures to address those Impacts within the environmental review. Page 2, Congestion Management Program Land Use Analysis Program and Transportation Impact Analysis February 12, 1993 "Appendix D of the CMP" should be consulted for the definitive requirements, but an outline of the specific requirements of a CMP-TIA are listed below: 1. The City must send a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to the MTA for all projects which require an EIR. 2. Existing traffic volumes and levels of service (LOS) on the CMP highway system within the study area must be documented. 3. A traffic generation estimate for the project must be prepared conforming to the procedures of the current edition of Trip Generation by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 4. Trip distribution by manuallassignment shall be made using the generalized trip distribution factors specified by the MTA. 5. The TIA must examine all CMP arterial monitoring Intersections, including freeway on -and -off ramps, where the proposed project will add 50 or more trips during the am or pm peaks, and mainline freeway monitoring locations where the project will add 150 or more trips, In either direction, during the am or pm peaks. If based on this criteria, no CMP facilities for study are Identified, no further transportation analysis Is required, except for consultation with transit operators. _ 6. Determine If significant Impacts occur on the CMP system as a result of the project. For purposes of the CMP, a significant Impact occurs when the proposed project causes a CMP facility to. degrade to LOS F, or Increases traffic demand within LOS F, by 2% or more. (The City may apply a more stringent criteria.) 7. Investigate measures which will mitigate significant CMP system Impacts Identified In the ,TIA, Including mitigation measures to mitigate Impacts on neighboring jurisdictions. 8. Develop cost estimates, including the fair share costs, to mitigate Impacts of the proposed project, and Indicate the responsible agency. 9. Consult with affected transit agencies with regard to the potential Impacts of the project on transit services. 10. The City selects the final mitigation measures. Implementation shall be monitored through the existing mitigation monitoring requirements of CEQA. If your project requires an EIR and Is not exempt from the provisions of this program, a CMP-TIA shall be prepared In conjunction with your project in a manner consistent with Appendix D of the 1992 CMP and City Council Resolution 91.50 adopting the local guidelines and procedures for Implementation of the provisions of CEQA. The cost of this analysis shall be borne by the project applicant consistent with the provisions of Resolution 9150 regarding the preparation of third party EIR's under the administration of the City of Santa Clarha. THE DIRECTOR OF THE LACTC CMP HAS CONFIRMED THAT THIS MEMO CONFORMS TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CMP. file: cd/currem/cmp_lu_2.kjm �F*a.wt'^.++s,+.+s.eNmr 's,wr+o+!f«i.........:.Nrrom revfuy�r,...h*.r�nrn...:°`.,an+W�?H+...cvm..^a^we'°.p,I.^'...rrtw»+ec.".MY�,srn+.r.�+a.n.^...w:.,sww.+«...••,w++m«va « �-,.:: x, RECEIVED JUN 31993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF SAVI,t C1 4RIT4 Los Angeles County May 27, 1993 _ Metropolitan Transportation Lynn M. Harris Authority Deputy City Manager Community Development 818 West Seventh Street City of Santa Clarita Suite loo 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90617 City of Santa Clarita, California 91355 213,6:7.1194 SUBJECT: 1993 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) HIGHWAY MONITORING Dear Ms. Harris: Thank you for your early transmittal of highway level of service datafor the CMP. This letter confirms that your agency has completed its 1993 highway monitoring obligation. Similar to last year, the information collected by your agency and others will be compiled and summarized in the 1993 CMP. This report will be presented for adoption by the MTA Board this fall, and will summarize 1993 congestion levels throughout the county as well as changes since 1992. Copies of. the 1993 CMP will be sent to your office when available. Please contact me at (213) 244-6237 if you have any questions. Thanks again for your. participation. Sincerely, Z� EDWARD K. SHIKADA, P.E. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM cc: Kevin Michel City of Santa Clarita Jan Heidt Mayor George Pederson Mayor Pro -Tem Carl Boyer Councilmember JoAnne Darcy Councilmember Jill Klaiic Councllmember 23920 Valencia Blvd. Suite 300 City of Santa Clarita California 91355 May 20, 1993 Phone (805) 259-2489 Fax (805) 259-8125 Mr. Ed Shikada Los Angeles County Transportation Commission 818 West 7th Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Subject: CMP/Highway Monitoring Dear Mr. Shikada: Poo f CT 6Ap TA Cl 4 7 P- Y -`YO. o.t�✓/F.I The City of Santa Clarita hereby transmits results of our annual highway monitoring, collected in accordance with requirements of the Congestion Management Program. The enclosed Level of Service calculations are summarized as follows: Intersection Date Peak Hour V/C Ratio LOS Magic Mountain Parkway 3/10/93 7:00-8:00 AM 0.62 B at Valencia Boulevard 3/9/93 7:15-8:15 AM 0.59 A AM Peak Hour Average 0.61 B 3/10/93 5:00-6:00 PM 0.83 D 3/9/93 5:00-6:00 PM 0.74 C PM Peak Hour Average 0.79 C San Fernando Road at 3/3/93 7:30-8:30 AM 0.78 C Lyons Avenue 3/4/93 7:30-8:30 AM 0.82 D AM Peak Hour Average 0.80 C 3/3/93 5:00.6:00 PM 0.94 E 3/4/93 5:15-6:15 PM 0.99 E PM Peak Hour Average 0.97 E San Fernando Road at 3/11193 6:45-7:45 AM 1.11 F Sierra Highway 3/10/93 6:45-7:45 AM 1.11 F AM Peak Hour Average 1.11 F 3/11/93 5:00.6:00 PM 0.85 D 3/10/93 4:45-5:45 PM 0.77 C PM Peak Hour Average 0.81 D C Mr. Ed Shlkada May 20, 1993 Page 2 Intersection Date Peak Hour V/C Ratio - LOS Sierra Highway at 3/16/93 6:45-7:45 AM 0.67 B Placerita Canyon Road 3/17/93 6:45.7:45 AM 0.68 B AM Peak Hour Average 0.68 B 3/16193 5:00.6:00 PM 0.72 C 3/17/93 5:15-6:15 PM 0.71 C PM Peak Hour Average 0.72 C Sierra Highway at 3/18/93 7:15-8:15 AM 0.94 E Soiedad Canyon Road 3117193 7:00-8:00 AM 0.88 D AM Peak Hour Average 0.91 E 3/18/93 5:00-6:00 PM 1.09 F 3/17/93 5:00-6:00 PM 1.08 F PM Peak Hour Average 1.09 F Please contact Mr. Rable Rahmanl at (805) 286-4057 if you have any questions regarding the monitoring program. Sincerely, LYNN M. HARRIS DEPUTY CITY MANAGER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ZGL" Bahman Jank� City Traffic Engineer BJ:RJR:hds "NeWi`e" Enclosure cc: Anthony J. Nlsich, City Engineer .Kevtn'Michel, Senior Planner