Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-05-25 - RESOLUTIONS - MC 93-027 NEGDEC (2)P. RESOLUTION NO. 93-M A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PREPARED FOR MASTER CASE NO. 93-M (ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 93-004) WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact: A. On December 8, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-180, requesting that the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Los Angeles County Initiate annexation proceedings for the site known as "Vista del Canon" (located generally south of Sierra Highway, Via Princessa, and Vista del Canon), which became a "County Island" as a result of the Price Club annexation In May of 1991. B. The City of Santa Clarita proposes to enter Into an annexation agreement with Westholme Partners, the developer of the approximately 18.9 acre Inhabited site, to vest entitlements and permits Issued by Los Angeles County for 362 multi -family residential units (Final Tract Map 44328), thereby allowing for the completion of the remaining 29 units and facilitating the completion of Annexation No. 1990-11 to the .. City of Santa Clarha. C. This proposal Is determined to be a project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEGA) and has been reviewed pursuant to its provisions. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project based on the findings of the Initial Study, dated March 29, 1993, and the determination that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment, will not impact resources protected by the California Department of Fish and Game, and that a finding of de minimus Impact on such resources Is appropriate. SECTION 2. Based upon the above findings of fact, and upon studies and Investigations made on behalf of the City Council, the City Council further finds as follows: A. Based on the Initial Study, the project does not have the potential to adversely effect the environment or resources under the protection of the California Department of Fish and Game, and no significant Impacts are anticipated to result from the annexation agreement. B. A proposed Negative Declaration was prepared for the project based on the Initial Study findings and the determination that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. C. A notice of environmental assessment was posted and advertised, and the proposed Negative Declaration was made available for a 21 day review period In compliance with the City's adopted CEOA resolution. SECTION 3. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the City Council hereby determines that: A. The project is compatible with existing development in the area, consistent with the RM zone, and consistent with the land use designations and policies of the City of Santa Clarha General Plan. B. The project will not have a significant Impact on the environment or on resources under the protection of the California Department of Fish and Game. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, California, as follows: A. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the project. B. The City Council hereby directs that a Notice of Determination of Negative Declaration be filed with the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of 1993. ATTEST: Ity Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) § CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Donna N. Grindey, City Clerk DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarfta at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of May 1993 by the following vote of Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Hoyer, Darcy, Klajic, Pederson, Heidt NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ty Clerk rn XW27Ce kmk