HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-12-14 - RESOLUTIONS - MC 93-173 NEGDEC (2)RESOLUTION NO. 93-166
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PREPARED FOR MASTER CASE NO. 93-173
(ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 93-006)
WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact:
A. On July 14, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92-130, requesting that
the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of Los Angeles County Initiate
annexation proceedings for the proposed 210 acre "Copperhill Annexation" (located
generally north and east of the existing City limits, south of Copperhlll Drive, and
east and west of Haskell Canyon Road).
B. On November 10, 1993, the LAFCO approved Annexation No. 1990-06, subject to the
condition that the Certificate of Completion for the annexation not be recorded until
the City Council has passed an ordinance, approving an annexation agreement
between the City and Cucamonga Development Co., to a second reading.
C. On November 23, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-159, ordering
and approving Annexation No. 1990.06 to the City of Santa Clarita.
D. The City of Santa Clarlto proposes to enter Into an annexation agreement with
Cucamonga Development Co. to vest entitlements for the construction of 24 single-
family residences on approximately 43 acres (Vesting Tentative Tract Map 47626,
Conditional Use Permit No. 89-150, and Zone Change No. 89-150, approved by the
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in September, 1993).
E. This proposal Is determined to be a project per the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and has been reviewed pursuant to Its provisions. A Negative
Declaration has been prepared for the project based on the findings of the Initial
Study, dated October 27, 1993, and the determination that the proposed project will
not have a significant effect on the environment, will not Impact resources protected
by the California Department of Fish and Game, and that a finding of de minimus
Impact on such resources is appropriate.
SECTION 2. Based upon the above findings of fact, and upon studies and investigations
made on behalf of the City Council, the City Council further finds as follows:
A. Based on the Initial Study, the project does not have the potential to adversely effect
the environment or resources under the protection of the California Department of
Fish and Game, and no significant Impacts are anticipated to result from the
annexation agreement.
B. A proposed Negative Declaration was prepared for the project based on the Initial
Study findings and the determination that the proposed project would not have a
significant effect on the environment.
C. A notice of environmental assessment was posted and advertised, and the proposed
Negative Declaration was made available for a 21 day review period in compliance
with the City's adopted CEOA resolution.
SECTION 3. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the City Council hereby
determines that:
A. The project is compatible with existing development in the area, consistent with the
RL Zone, and consistent with the land use designations and policies of the City of
Santa Clarha General Plan.
B. The project will not have a significant Impact on the environment or on resources
under the protection of the California Department of Fish and Game.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita,
California, as follows:
A. The City Council hereby approves the Negative Declaration prepared for the project.
B. The City Council hereby directs that a Notice of Determination of Negative
Declaration be filed with the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of December
1993.
or
ATTE
ty Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk , DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarha at a regular meeting
thereof, held on the 14th day of December 1993 by the following vote of
Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
.ou.iM92166.kmk
Hoyer, Darcy, Klajic, Pederson, Heidt
h`, -M
None
Q
�
•
• awvs
>
Q
•
Q
•.
I
`11
� � I
• 1
•
2
a
s �..
b
:
Z
i•
1
:
T 1
C
m
y
,J
V
¢
r.
O
C
m
Q
LL
Q
t
C7
J
Z
o-iZoIL
__.2Q
4
W
QIc
U
a
z
LU
'
I
O
•
•
1
r
•
I
•
•
1
1
I `
•
•
1
V�
•
•
1
I
I
w-
'Otl
.� pp1YNVi_�
s� ysyfiM�
4.7
•
• awvs
1
•
O
•.
I
`11
� � I
• 1
•
L—�
a
s �..
b
:
i•
1
:
T 1
�•
a
r.
w-
'Otl
.� pp1YNVi_�
s� ysyfiM�
4.7
•f
i•
i