HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-10-11 - AGENDA REPORTS - MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (2)AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING
DATE: October 11, 1994
City Manager
Item to be prE
Lynn M. Harris�P06,d�
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC
PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS WELLAS THE THREE
APPEALS FILED CONCERNING THE DECISION ON JUNE 21, 1994,
BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ADOPT A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION; TO CERTIFY THE FEIR AND
ADDENDUM SCH 92-041041; TO ADOPT A MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM; TO APPROVE VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP 51599 AND OAK TREE PERMIT 91-033; AND TO
RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE SPECIFIC
PLAN 91-001 AND CONSIDER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 93-003.
DEPARTMENT; Community Development
BACKGROUND
On June 29, 1994, the City Council conducted a study session regarding the Porta Bella
project, following the Planning Commission decision to approve the project on June 21, 1994.
This was an informational item only, The Council began the public hearing for the Porta
Bella project and related appeals on August 23, 1994. On August 23, Council directed staff
to combine the Porta Bella Specific Plan and Development Agreement hearings with the
appeals into a single item for future meetings. The Council also decided to conduct a field
trip to the Porta Bella project area on September 24 and to hold a joint study session with
the Planning Commission on October 4, 1994.
In addition to these hearings directly related to Porta Bella, on September 14, the Council
held a Study Session regarding the proposed General Plan Amendment to revise the
Circulation Element and Network of Arterial Highways. At this meeting, Council approved
the consultant for the project and directed staff to continue in the modelling efforts
underway, including modelling the revised Porta Bella project with Magic/Princessa and the
CTAC alternative. During this meeting, the Circle J community presented four alternative
corridors for Magic/Princessa.
Continued To: Li-_�— 9y
Agenda Item:
ANALYSIS
The following presentations will be given at the Council meeting:
1. The City's environmental consultant will give a presentation on the
Environmental Impact Report and Addendum to review the project
impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives. Particular attention will
be paid to the Addendum, which specifically addresses the
Magic/Princessa alignment which would impact designated open space of
the Circle J community, and the overall issue of toxic/ hazardous waste.
2. The California Environmental Protection Agency --Department of Toxic
Substances Control will send a representative to describe their work in
reviewing the existing condition and in managing the ongoing clean-up
of the site. The conditions and mitigation measures ;prepared in
conjunction with the project will also be reviewed.
3. The City Attorney will discuss the applicant's appeal regarding the
language of the conditions of approval and the relationship of these to the
recently decided Dolan case.
4. Staff will provide an update on the status of the appeals.
Since the initial public hearing on the project on August 23, staff has been primarily involved
in preparing for and coordinating the study session for the General Plan Amendment to the
Circulation Network on September 14, the Porta Bella site visit on September 24, and the
joint Planning Commission/CityCouncil Study Session on October 4. Because of the lead
time required to prepare the Council packet, this staff report was prepared prior to the joint
study session. Staff will continue with a more in-depth analysis following the study session
and additional direction from the Council at the next meeting on the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Receive staff report and reopen the public hearing;
2. Discuss the site visit, joint Planning Commission/City Council Study Session, and the
public testimony received to date;
3. Provide direction to staff;
4. Continue the public hearing to the November 8, 1994, City Council meeting.
current\pb_ccr03.ljm
Public Hearing Procedure
1. Mayor opens hearing
'States purpose of hearing
2. City Clerk reports on hearing notice
3. Staff report
4. Proponent Argument (30 minutes)
5. Opponent Argument (30 minutes)
6. Five-minute rebuttal (Proponent)
• Proponent
7. Mayor closes public testimony
8. Discussion by Council
9. Council decision
10. Mayor announces decision
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THE PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001, WHICH
INCLUDES AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 91-003.
THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT INCLUDES CHANGES TO THE HIGHWAY NETWORK OF THE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT (INCLUDING OFF-SITE SEGMENTS), AND CHANGING THE SITE'S
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION TO SPECIFIC PLAN IN THE LAND USE ELEMENT AND GENERAL
PLAN MAP.
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
A Public Hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita regarding Master
Case Noss 91-164 and 93.012 (Porta Bella Specific Plan), Including Specific Plan No. 91-001;
Development Agreement No. 93-003; and Final Environmental Impact Report and Addendum SCH
92-041041. Concurrently, the City Council will begin the public hearing for the appeals filed against
the Planning Commission decision to approve Vesting Tentative Tract Map 51599 and Oak Tree
Permit 91-033 for the Porta Bella site on June 21, 1994. A separate public notice regarding the
appeals will be mailed with this notice.
The property, known as the Bermite site, is located south of Soledad Canyon Road, east of Bouquet
Canyon/San Fernando Roads, north of the Circle J Ranch communities, and west of the Golden
Triangle Industrial area. The ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.'S are 2836-012-010,011,012, and 019. The
site consists of 996 acres formerly used for industrial purposes. The Specific Plan proposes 2,911
dwelling units, Including 1,244 single-family homes and 1,667 multi -family dwellings. The proposal
Includes: 449 acres of open space and parks; 300 acres of single-family uses; 85 acres of multi-
family uses; 56 acres of streets; and 106 acres of commercial, office, business park, and
Institutional uses. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map proposes to create 76 master lots to be further
subdivided in future tract maps. There are 182 oak trees on the site and the project may require
the removal of up to 109 oak trees, Including as many as five of the ten heritage oak trees. The
proposed Magic/Princessa corridor Includes an off-site segment within the designated open space
of Circle J Ranch and another extending west from the project site to San Fernando Road.
The hearing will be held by the City Council In the City Hall Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia
Boulevard, 1st Floor, Santa Clarita, the 23rd day of August, 1994, at or after 6:30 p.m.
Proponents, opponents, and any Interested persons may appear and be heard on this matter at that
time. Further Information maybe obtained by contacting the City Clerk's office, Santa Clarita City
Hall, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Santa Clarlta, California.
If you wish to challenge the action taken on this matter In court, you may be limited to raising only
those Issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described In this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Santa Clarita at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Dated: August 1, 1994
Donna M. Grindey, CMC
City Clerk
Publish Date: August 3, 1994
CURRENT1pb_ccn4.kjm
it
HILL, FARRER & BURRILL
• PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ATTORNEYS AT LAW WNI .. HILL (1881-.19531
TELEPHONE 12131 620-0460 W M. M. FA RRER 11894.19)1)
ORANGE COUNTY THIRTY-FIFTH FLOOR -UNION BANK SOUARE. STANLEY S. BURRILL (1902.1957)
TELEPHONE 17141 641-6605 445 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
TELECOPIER LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-1666
12131 624.4840 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
(213) 621-0815
October 'll, 1904-;-
L
PART _ tT
City Council of the City of Santa Clari MEETING
Planning Commission ITEM NO.
23920 Valencia Blvd, 1st Floor i
Santa Clarita, California 91355
Re: October 11, 1994 meeting, 6:30 p.m.
City Council Chambers
Proposed Porta Bella Development
Hasa, Inc.
Honorable Mayor, Council Members, and Members of the Planning
Commission:
This, firm represents Hasa, Inc., owners of the property at.
23119 Drayton Street, Saugus, California (the "Hasa Property"),
which is near portions of the Porta Bella development (the
"Development") now being considered by the City Council of the
City of. Santa Clarita (the "City"). This letter shall constitute
Hasa's submission to the City concerning the road or bridge
currently being contemplated that would connect Magic Mountain
Parkway to the Development at the top of the hill to the East of
the Hasa 'Property. The proposed road or bridge has been, and
will be in this letter, referred to as "Magic Princessa.11
As you may know, the Hasa Property is located on Drayton
Street, between San Fernando Road and Springbrook, and comprises
an essentially rectangular parcel that runs to the North from
Drayton Street along San Fernando Road.
Until July 6, 1994, the location(s) for Magic Princessa
being proposed provided that the road would run directly through
the middle of the Hasa Property, but would avoid certain critical
structures thereon. On that date, however, the Developer's
Engineer amended the location by shifting it to the South, away
from Keysor-Century. It is widely believed that the road was
moved in response to the influence being asserted by Keysor-
Century.
The new proposed location avoids some mobile homes, trailers
and an empty drum storage building on the Keysor-Century
Property. However, the new location provides that the road will
A
City Council of the City of Santa Clarita
October 11, 1994
Page 2
intersect, either above or through, Hasa's main production
building at the very location where its production takes place -
the north-east corner. In addition, the new location will also
intersect with several other businesses on Springbrook Street
that would have been avoided by the first alignment.
For several reasons, Hasa objects to the proposed road in
either of its incarnations, but more heatedly as to the most
recent, which would effectively terminate Hasa's ability to
operate its business at the Hasa property:
I. The Pr000sed Proiect Is Not Plannarl Or T,nnararl Tn T},o M.n
and Least Private Injury_
The City Planning Commission and the Developer have
indicated that there are several locations for Magic Princessa
being considered. As set forth above, the one currently being
proposed would likely result in a complete condemnation of the
Hasa Property and Hasa, Inc., as a viable entity. Other
alternatives, including the first one proposed as well as the
diversion of Magic Princessa to Drayton Street, are more
compatible with the greatest public good (avoiding fee
condemnations) and the least private injury.
II. The Hasa Property Is Not Necessary for the Proposed Project.
As there are several alternative locations for Magic
Princessa being considered that would impact the Hasa property
and neighboring landowners to a lesser degree, the location which
sends the road through Hasa's property is not necessary for the
project.
III. The Pr000sed Location for Maaic Prinresaa rrnrrantly na;nn
While at this early stage it remains unclear, the proposed
bridge or road may violate the provisions of the Environmental
Impact Report ("EIR") for the project. The EIR should be
consulted prior to a decision by the City as to the location of
Magic Princessa. It seems apparent that the only thing
considered by the Planning Commission and the Developer in
reaching the current proposal is the appeal that has been filed
by Keysor-Century pertaining to this aspect of the project.
For these reasons, Hasa urges the City to carefully consider
all of these facts when making any decisions as to the location
of Magic Princessa. Upon our review of the City and Developer's
books and records concerning their activities in this aspect of
the development, Hasa may have additional challenges to make and
City Council of the City of Santa Clarita
October 11, 1994
Page 3
concerns to express to the City. Due to time constraints and,
moreover, the fact that information from the City and the
Developer has only recently been disseminated pertaining to the
recent road alignment, we have not been able to fully investigate
the latter issues.
HILL, FARRER & BURRILL
KHB/pmp
CC: Paul M. Porter, Esq.
F 9CLIFNTS\H\H2165\01 MCITY,LTR
10/11/94
REMARKS BY CARL KANOWSKY PARS[,; �r'T
22518 JENIEL COURT
SANTA CLARITA ��'MEETING
PRESENTED TO CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 11, 1994 l ITEM NO.
I. CONCERN OVER CITY'S EXPOSURE TO LIABILITY
A. NOT LIABILITY TO CLEAN UP BERMITE
B. LIABILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE
C. EXAMPLE:
1. PHASE I DEVELOPED - SUBSEQUENT PHASES
FOUND TO BE TOXIC - EFFECT - LOSS OF
PROPERTY VALUE;
2. SOMEONE INJURED BY EXPOSURE TO TOXIC
SUBSTANCES.
D. RESULT: CITY SUED FOR NEGLIGENTLY APPROVING THIS
DEVELOPMENT.
II. WHO WILL PROTECT THE CITY?
A. NOT WHITTAKER/BERMITE - CONDITION DS -15 APPLIES ONLY
TO NORTHHOLME PARTNERS, THE APPLICANT.
B. NOT THE APPLICANT IF THE CLAIM IS FOR PROPERTY
DAMAGE OR LOSS OF PROPERTY VALUE - CONDITION
DS -15 MENTIONS JUST PERSONAL INJURY.
III.. HOW WILL THE APPLICANT PROTECT THE CITY?
A. NOT REQUIRED TO CARRY INSURANCE TO PROTECT ITSELF
OR THE CITY.
B. NOT REQUIRED TO POST A PERFORMANCE BOND.
C. WHAT ARE THE ASSETS OF NORTHHOLME PARTNERS?
ENOUGH TO PROTECT THE CITY?
DO WE EVEN KNOW WHO THE APPLICANT REALLY IS?
D. .RESULT - TAXPAYERS OF SANTA CLARITA LEFT HOLDING
THE BAG.
IV. ANOTHER CONCERN IF DEVELOPMENT IS ALLOWED ON A PHASE -BY -
PHASE BASIS.
A. CONDITION DS -9 STATES: "GRADING ACTIVITIES MAY
CROSS PHASE BOUNDARIES."
B. SCENARIO: CAL/EPA SAYS PHASE I IS CLEAN BUT SAYS
NOTHING ABOUT THE OTHER PHASES.
DEVELOPER, UNDER THESE CONDITIONS, CAN THEN
GRADE NOT ONLY PHASE I, BUT ADDITIONAL
PHASES ALSO.
C.9
z
w
w
O
lLN AIA CLARITA PARTNERS,
Cal. Ltd. Partnership
15260 Ventura Blvd.
Suite #1700
Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91403
EASTHOLME PARTNERS,
Cal. Ltd. Partnership
15260 Ventura Blvd.
Suite #1700
Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91403
(Partners same as ANDEN GROUP)
'152 60'Ventura''B l nd':_S
21515 Vanowen St.
1074 Park View Dr.
3901 Macarthur Blvd.,
2001 Windward Way
1932 E. Deere Ave.
450 Aster St. W.
16461 Sherman Way
81700—Sherman''Oaks; Cd'."' 91401
#116 Canoga Park, Ca. 91303
#201 Covina, Ca. 91722
#208 Newport Beach, Ca. 926E
#200 San Mateo, Ca.
#200 Santa Ana. Ca. 92705
Upland, Ca. 91786
#160 Van Nuys, Ca. 91406
.". }ESDEH PARTNERS,- Cale"; Ltd: Pattnership
15260 Ventura Blvd. §uie X1700 Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91403
E.S.R. CORPORATION -same address
i
r
M D4.,_ASS0CIATES...Ca1. Ltd.. Partnership]
15260 Ventura Blvd. Suite #1700 Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91403
T.M.D. CORPORATION -same address
_.H& S R
No n� -nu
--rW NPe pis t� �5-sw*&,P- A-5
SOUTHHOLME PARTNERS, Cal. Ltd. Partnership
15260 Ventura Blvd. Suite #1700 Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91403
(Partners same as ANDEN GROUP)
Cal: Ltd. Partnership
15260 Ventura Blvd.
Suite #1700
Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91403
WESTHOLME PARTNERS,
Cal. Ltd. Partnership
15260 Ventura Blvd.
Suite #1700
Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91403
(Partners same as ANDEN GROUP)
ANDEN GROUP REALTY CORPORATION ANDEN GROUP INC.
21515 Vanowen St. #116 1932 E. Deere Ave. #200
Canoga Park, Ca. 91303 Santa Ana, Ca. 92705
e IF
NORTHHOLME PARTNERS
21515 Vanowen Street
Suite 116
Canoga Park, California 91303
(818) 226-6060 Telephone - (818) 226-6061 Fax
NUN/.
---Si?ptember 12, 1993
Mr. Kevin Michel
City of Santa Clarita Community Development
23920 Valencia Boulevard
Suite 300
Santa Clarita, California 91355
Re: Porta Bella ElR
Dear Kevin:
PAf'l�PSV Jt�i/�t�a�e[�A xp
VN i DeA.)
The enclosed plan is transmitted in response to comments received at the October 19, 1993 Planning
Commission Hearing for the Porta Bella Environmental Impact Report. The plan depicts an alternative to
the road alignment(s) for Magic Mountain Parkway and Via Princessa.
Northholme Partners continues to support the alignments for these two roads as originally proposed in the
Porta Bella specific plan and vesting tentative map 51599. The original proposal is compatible with the
Citizen's Transportation Advisory Committee's recommendation for the center city circulation network.
The specific plan and CTAC recommendation are undergoing concurrent evaluation as the adoption of the
specific plan is contingent upon the resolution of the center city network.
During the Planning Commission hearing of August 17, 1993 specifically addressing the CTAC
recommendation the Chairman stated that their center city network evaluation would consider all
possibilities in spite of the current recommendation before them. Certain residents continue to disagree
with the CTAC recommendation and advocate an unimpeded route through the city which conflicts with the
Porta Bella proposal. These citizens again raised the issue at the first public hearing for Porta Bella.
The enclosed modified alignments are submitted to reflect the concerns of the dissenting citizens with the
CTAC and Porta Bella proposal. This revised alignment represents the extent to which the project may be
adjusted should the Planning Commission and EIR indicate that such is necessary.
S' cerely,
Salvatore J. Veltri
SJV/kk
Enclosure.
(michel3.doc)
122
1
(B.M.C.),BANYAN,MANAGEMENT„CORPORATION
160 'S -.."Wacker, -,Dr #290_0
ONARD G. LEVINE
BMC SANTA BARBARA,CORPORATION
150 S. Wacker Dr. #2900
Chicago, I11. 60606
E�
SMC RANCHO MALIBU CORP.
150 S. Wacker Dr. #2900
Chicago, I11. 60606
TUEONA
BMC NORTHOLME CORPORATION
150 S. Wacker Dr. #2900
Chicago, 111. 60606
Secured by:
BANYAN STRATEGIC LAND FUND
150 S. Wacker Dr. #2900
Chicago, I11. 60606
ILEUNAR
II BMC ANDEN GROUP CORPORATION
150 S. Wacker Dr. #2900
Chicago, 111._ 60606
rLE�ONARD G. LEVINE
t
I
r
■■■`` SCALE: i° = 200' E
!I
I
ExHti�rr �P.
-+ •i'
\_
n,b
o
/ `141r
nrJ/ �vr `010 i�. 1i11
111 111• tY'• �/ ♦ .f I � YGJ''y � • Y ^ �. �YOI '� / `
yl
1ETJ YI• ,1 Y -I /ly� ,1 A •�r Y`y l� :.
1 SMI .IMI • _ .IIY•j I
� •••µµµLLLyyy r�l I �� IMI I
.1Yt
a1
--pl 1 IIYt Yy .11, IIS r T
nl wif f ! --
� 1 � •'I t �•.yv •i
t _• Qi. fl 1
•IW 1a•Y•'1 .MII
IY/ � I f11 Y,t 1
I IMI 1 ..I 1
I •w 1
• � nM YYf
II. 1
11111
1 1 yy=
.tlll I M,
iYnY un>
1 Ih`
-WIP '1
`• I� i 1 ' i urge»
1 I .-
� i 1
ay,
Al
SCALA
DATE
0
N 1000 I
IMPACT
HASA
1. METAL S7
KEYSOR-CEI
1. METAL S7
2. TRAILER
A- OFFICE T:
4. TRAILER I
5. GUARD He
MULTI—TENA
1. 4M GRIND]
2. CHELSEA'
3. BOB HOLM
4.J&RWOO
5 A&KFRA
"� W—FOOTHILL
j
ra.-
10-7-94
From: Property owners and business of Drayton St
and Springbrook Ave
RECEr�� •: �
To: City of Santa Clarita' FART OF THE i=CJr;6 AT
23920 Valencia Bl PAE
Santa Clarita, CA ��-��` y/ nNG
Planning Commission — Atl n:9%N m4rhol
City Council - Attn: George Pederson, Mayor
Gentlemen:
We wish to acknowledge and support an east -west
connection in our valley via the Magic Mountain Via
Princessa route. However, the present proposal
(map of 9-19-94) impacts too many property owners
and businesses.
Business and property owners plus representatives
of the city and Porta Bella met at the site to discuss
the proposed bridge over San Fernando Rd on 10-6-94 at
1:30 p.m. (see attached list of attendees).
The result of the meeting from the view of the pro
perty owners and businesses was that the bridge could
be directed to fly over a greater portion of Keysor's!
temporary office trailers and storage building and
would not so adversely impact the small businesses on,
Springbrook and Drayton. (see map dated 10-7-94,
Exhibit "A").
Should the bridge be constructed as shown on drawing
dated 9-19-94, approximately 21 businesses and approxi-
mately 120 employees, not including Keysor, would be
affected.
Sam Veltri of Porta Bella offered to study alternatives
to the bridge alignment and present them to planning
for their consideration before the council meeting of
10-11-94.
In summation, we wish to work with the city to meet its
goals without harming our small business community. We
also wish to alert the city to the fact that a bridge
over an area can impact the lives, livelihood, retire-
ment prospects, investments already made, and well-
being of many people. Let us not let the location and
existence of the bridge be only of financial concern
planned and dictated by outside sources. Our future and
the city's future rests with your decisions.
JK/dl
Si cerely,
4JanCnd
y
Representative
bfzTA $.=`�A
MEETIN4 OF lc/)IP/94 AT SPF-IN6BR OK RE. BRkD(ic i�Aos
V E.
NAME
AIDDIZESS
IiC7RlzssrltTi�1fd
PRor�taN'
pmovis Ne,
V O/I
A
L
,>25'�3 Y SP`'�"�j 6tioo ve-
pct
� d. -mow.¢•
-fly%i
H-t'o . -
[xct-
p•oS.�s -95�oL'
2�,y1-
Lr�N�'xv s
�•l%Ilso it/Ill
� ``// --
��j//�f �r r6n S vS%/3Sa
((��
f�/y5A i'KC
ell
? f1!
/✓tea-inasr
/� X17
� $• 25'9- `'�
m
X 0"'os
r✓
���35 /��vG QooiG Aut
Dlol6 � f _
-hk(
$v5>77GSd,
f=�t HOM DEPT/TOXICS SITE MIT To 98U�2598125 ?001i0i'
'v
STATE OF CALIFORNIA — CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY... I'ki [ WILSON. Ooanu�.
DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
u IOII N.GOALE. C 912 AVENUE �.._ h�
� GLENOAIE. a ano, RE`':,U AT
MEETING
i R /
FAX TRAIL MITTAL
TO: _ I _ DATE SENT:0L ..;
RRPR ESENTING:_C._•- of $% IfZ t=[6�r1 T+ti-- •-------------- ----
FAXN 059- NUMBER OF PAGES
TELEP ONK# INCLUDING COVER:
FROM:__fc,_�LC� SFepa k _ _
REPRESENTING: CAL -EPA, DTSC, RF.GION 3
FAX# (818) 551-2874
TELEPHONEN_jjj� Zx-1 _ 459
INFORMATION
.--_ CONFIDENTIAL
— PLEASE COMMENT
COMMENTS:
_ PER YOUR REQUEST
URGENT
_ PLEASE VERIFY RECEIPT OF FAX
--------------------------------------------•-- •---------
------------------------ ------------- -- -. .--
------------------------------------. __.
2, u (,,_
t i-74 'UU.UJrX
raid1JZZI/ vAI Siic b;i I Lv aOUD[ 01a � rwciui�
PRESENTATION
to the
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
CITY COUNCIL
by
Carla Slepak
California Environmental Protection Agency
DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL
October 11, 1994
Subject:
WHITTAKER CORPORATION, BERMITE DIVISION
FORMER MANUFACTURING FACILITY
if iU'11,7+ US-.Wfm euvoi yii Li iunivo oi,u inti 10 75UJC7a61tJ
I. BACKGROUND
II. PRESENT STATUS
III. FUTURE PLANS
uJiuII
IV. COORDINATION WITH CITY PLANNERS
d - .i -J+ uJ. UJ",q rS✓lY JCrli iVA,Jlli pill 1J JQUJ4.J001L:. ,UU4; Ull
PERMITTING BACIEGROUND
14 HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT UNITS SUBJECT TO
PERMIT
Operating units required a
permit
Permit process requires
identification &remediation
additional areas of concern
0
Of
' IG -11-94 03:03PM
PROM DEPT/TOXICS SITE MIT TO 98052598125 P005/Oil
PRESENT STATUS
CLOSURE OVERSIGHT OF 14
HAZARDOUS WASTE MGMT. UNITS
13/14 CERTIFIED CLEAN CLOSED
1 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT STILL
BEING CLOSED
Soil vapor extraction
monitoring
Groundwater monitoring
IBJ-i`-94 03;03PM HOM DEPT/TOaiCS Sift Mir N y8U�2598125 euublu1i
PRESENT STATUS (CONT.)
IDENTIFIED AREAS OF CONCERN
AREAS OF KNOWN CONTAMINATION
DISPOSAL AREAS
POTENTIAL SOIL CONTAMINATION
-y4 w:usrn riuA JcrI/IuAI ru eA(/Oil
KNOWN HAZARDOUS CONTAMINANTS
(i �; r-eg� . -o dl-. a Y -e-c% S
BURN VALLEY AREA
TEMCHLOROETHYLENE (a cleaning solvent)
LEAD
,j COPPER
CHROMIUM
FORMER 317 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
TRICHLOROETHYLENE (a cleaning solvent)
FORMER LEAD AZIDE AREA
PHOSPHORUS
COPPER
uj:u3rbi r¢vh ucri iuk a wile Mit iu JluS0y�ln rUUV Ull
FUTURE PLANS
SITE INVESTIGATION
SITE CLEANUP/REMEDIATION
r iu-IrJ4 UJ:!JJ M vXUM ll t'I/NiIl J JI Ci M11 10 98052598125
?009/0] l
SITE -WIDE INVESTIGATION
I. OBJECTIVE: CHARACTERIZE
EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION
II. CONSENT ORDER WITH WHITTAKER
CORPORATION
A. Legally binding Document
B. Schedule for Submittals
C. Stipulated Penalties
III. AREAS COVERED BY THE
INVESTIGATION
A. Areas Already Identified
R. Demolished Buildings
i
C. Site -wide & Off-site Scoping
' i1-11-94 03:03H FBOM DEPTIT01IGS SITE MIT
TO 98052598125 P010I01l
TIME FRAMES
SITE INVESTIGATION - Minimum 1 year
Facility prepares workplan
Department review and approval
Sampling and Analysis
Preparation of Investigation Report
Feasability Study
SITE CLEANUP- Months to years depending on leve( of
contamination
Prepare Remedial Action Plan
Department Review
Public Review/ CF.QA
Department Approval
Site Remediation
+ 10-1i-94 03:03PM FROM DEPT/TOXICS SITE MGT TO 98082898128
P011/OII
DEPARTMENT INVOLVEMENT
WITH CITY PLANNERS
PORTA BELLA PROJECT
DEPARTMENT COMMENTED ON
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT
DEPARTMENT CONCURRED WITH
PLANNING COMMISSION CONDITIONS
DEPARTMENT AVAILABLE FOR
FURTHER ASSISTANCE