Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-04-26 - AGENDAS - REGULAR (2)ti CITY OF SANTA CLARITA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING APRIL 26, 1994 6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 23920 VALENCIA BLVD. 1ST FLOOR Santa Clarita, CA 91355 AGENDA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - No New Business COUNCIL ACTION 1 CITY CLERK ANNOUNCEMENT During the Public Participation portion of the meeting, each FF person should prepare a three (3) minute presentation. Public Participation speaker's slips must be submitted to the City Clerk before 7:00 p.m. Anyone wishing to address an Ion the agenda should fill out a speaker's slip and submit it to the City Clerk before the item is discussed. Each person addressing the Council has three minutes in which to speak, at which time the red light on the Council dias will appear. Executive Meeting (6:30 - 7.00 p.m.) This time has been set aside for Councilmembers to review the agenda and obtain any further information that may be needed. No action on public agenda items will be taken prior to 7:30 p.m. This session is open to the public except for a possible closed session. Public Participation (7:00 - 7.30 p.m.) This time has been set aside for the public to address the City Council on any item on the agenda except for the public hearings. The public may also address the Council on items not on the agenda but those items will not be acted upon by Council at this meeting other than to review and return without action or direct staff. All speakers must call or submit a speaker's slip to the City Clerk prior to 7:00 p.m. and prepare a three minute presentation. The thirty minutes allowed for public input will be divided by the number of people wishing to speak, maximum time allowed will be three minutes. 1 [ 1 INVOCATION - Boyer — mocf..,q �1, [ I LL TO ORDER - (0:36- Q' TTr% DL -1, GflLL— ALL- PR�Srct�T [ I FLAG SALUTE — b© y Q_(- .( - 11 [1A r4 ID muo ft.4y �s h APPROVAL OF Br�c F-ZA G, (No c, ,-ry Goyn, 9 e. r% cI C k CA -4-.) (] (1-M ,d era 6 -49-P. 0.6-�to CQ�s1 C,.ao.c.on_ PRESENTATION - Joe Sadera & Cytec y 143. RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING CALL TO ORDER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC PARTICIPATION - co(_� `1 : qS�, ------------------------------------------ ------------------------- ----------- UNFINISHED BUSINESS AL1 -j -j RDA1- FORMAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE [ ] Staff CONSIDERATION OF POSSIBLE IMMEDIATE c�dRd_ Cd- odd PROJECTS TO BRING ABOUT EARTHQUAKE [ ] Speeaaker� RECOVERY FOR THE CITY - RESOLUTION NO. RDA 94-8 - At its meeting of April 19th, the Council received a [ ] Motion report and list of possible immediate projects which could be undertaken over a three year period in order to bring about [ ] Discussion tRnued t"t flO^' earthquake recovery for the City. RECOMMENDED �" $O-� ACTION: Adopt Resolution RDA94-8, acknowledging its [ 1 Vole 1 consideration of possible immediate projects to bring about earthquake recovery for the City. CONSENT CALENDAR d�D-aid-• RDA2- IDENTIFICATION OF MEMBERS INTEREST [ I Motion :t�3oA D D OF REAL PROPERTY_ - This item is on the agenda to identify members interest in real property located in the [ ] Vote redevelopment project area. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Members, officers and employees who participated in DcUI. formulating the Santa Clarita Community Recovery Plan, each file their schedule listing their direct and indirect financial interests in real property from the Disclosure of Economic Interests with the City Clerk and Assistant Secretary of the Agency, and that such disclosure be entered on the minutes. ADJOURN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING � "40'r . RECONVENE CITY COUNCIL MEETING COUNCIL ACTION PUBLIC HEARING --o32Sr0 (tr Open Hearing 1. NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT - AB 3001-- 001 - RESOLUTION NO. 94-49 - AB 3001 requires [Lf/City Clerk California cities to prepare a Nondisposal Facility Element. A Nondisposal Facility is defined as any solid [tKstaff waste facility required to obtain a state solid waste facility permit other than a disposal facility or a transformation facility. The NDFE must identify all [ ] Speakers — (LDiLa existing, expansion of existing, and proposed solid waste [4Y Motion facilities which will be needed to implement local Source Reduction and Recycling Elements. _/ ['Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 94-49 to accept public comment, adopt the Nondisposal __V Vote ` Facility Element, and direct staff to submit our plan to U the California Integrated Waste Management Board. 3 Y ► 4 --Staff 2. BIN REPLACEMENT SERVICE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. 94.53 - The Bin Replacement [ �ggpeakers Service Permit entitles a limited number of refuse haulers to collect refuse from F1owo Go RaNAAt-t and recyclable residential, commercial and industrial areas. Haulers are restricted [ ] Motion to using roll -off boxes or temporary bins in this permit. Permittees will be charged a permit fee per cubic yard [I Discussion collected and disposed into landfills. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. [ ] Vote 94-53 granting Semi -Exclusive Bin Replacement Service Permits to Blue Barrel Disposal, Santa Clarita Disposal, Atlas Refuse Removal, Crown Disposal, A Trojan Disposal, Rent -A -Bin, Cal Coast Recycling, Larey Rubbish Pick -Up Service, Lopez Rubbish Disposal, AWM Disposal Service, Hi -Waste Disposal, American Waste Industries, and Empire Disposal. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by one motion unless a request is made for discussion, in which case, the item(s) will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately following this portion of the agenda. 3. FEDERAL MANDATE - AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NPDES PERMIT City is required to comply with the terms of the the; National Pollution Elimination Discharge System [ ] :Motion (NPDES) permit for storm water. The permit was issued on January 18, 1990 to all cities in the Los [ 1 Vote Angeles basin. The City became a Co -permittee with the County on June 18, 1990. As part of the permit compliance, the City is required to execute a permit implementation agreement with the County. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the Agreement, and authorize the Mayor, City Clerk and City Attorney to execute the agreement. 4. RITTER RANCH PROJECT - LEONA VALLEY [ ] Motion TOWN COUNCIL CONCERNS - At the March 22, 1994 regular City Council meeting, staff recommended [ 1 Vote that Council receive a report on this issue and direct staff to draft a letter reiterating its previous position to the City of Palmdale. Council requested staff to review Mike Antonovich's letter and reevaluate the City's previous position on the Ritter Ranch project, and place it on the April 19, 1994 regular City Council meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff recommends Council receive and file this report and direct staff to draft a letter reiterating its previous position to the Leona Valley Town Council to include: 1) improvements proposed as part of the Palmdale Southwest Planning Area traffic study may not fully mitigate the cumulative traffic impacts of all projects included in the report. The widening of Elizabeth Lake Rd. with a minimum of four lanes from Godde Hill to SR14 should be considered; 2) improve all east -west and north -south roadways between Ritter Ranch Development and SR14 to achieve acceptable levels of service and discourage traffic from using Elizabeth Lake Rd toward Santa Clarita; 3) reevaluate the proposed four -lane widening of Bouquet Canyon Rd immediately south of Elizabeth Lake Rd. The development in the area may also need to be reevaluated to make sure it is not impacting Bouquet Cyn, through Angeles Natl. Forest to an unacceptable level of service. [I Motion [ ] Vote 5. AGREEMENT WITH THE LOS ANGELES AUDITOR•CONTROLLER FOR BILLING OF DIRECT ASSESSMENTS - There are seven special assessment districts within the City. These districts were established to provide for services and continual maintenance of landscaping or facilities. The funds to provide these services are collected by the Auditor- Controller through direct assessments on the Secured Tax Roll. The funds are then disbursed to the Citv for administration of the district. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the agreement, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. 6. EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY PLAN [) Motion EARTHQUAKE REPAIRS BUDGET FY 93-94 - At (] Vote the April 19, 1994 Council meeting an item was presented which described in concept the Earthquake Recovery Plan for the City. One component of the plan discussed Earthquake Repairs which totaled an estimate of $26,291,500. This item is a follow-up to request Council to approve estimated revenues and appropriate expenditures relating to this portion of the plan. RECOMMENDED ACTION. Council approve total estimated revenues of $26,291,500. as follows: FEMA grant - $15,533,000., FHWA grant - $7,454,600 and Insurance Settlement - $3,303,900 and appropriate a total of $26,291,500 in earthquake related expenditures for FY 1993-94 to be reflected in Fund 90 - Earthquake Fund. 7. BID AWARD FOR SAN FERNANDO ROAD [ ] Motion STREET TREE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE TWO - Contractors' bids were opened April 7, [ ] Vote 1994 by the City Clerk. After review of the bids by the City Clerk and Parks, Recreation, and Community Services staff, Green Coast Landscaping was selected as contractor for the bid amount of $55,680. The engineer's estimate for this work was $63,050. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award the contract to Green Coast Landscaping in the amount of $55,680, and that the remaining portion of the EEM grant in the amount of $15,000 be reserved for potential change orders which may become necessary once construction begins. 5 L4 DUD 8. SAN FERNANDO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - (] Motion PROJECT NO. 96-36 - BID AWARD - On January 11, 1994, the City Council authorized the advertisement of [ J Vote San Fernando Road Improvements - Project No. 96-36. /� `� This project consists of two phases which were TP combined and advertised as a single contract. Phase V of the San Fernando Road improvements consists of the widening of Magic Mountain Parkway from Valencia Boulevard to San Fernando Road and the replacement of the bridge over the Santa Clara River's South Fork. Phase II of the project consists of the realignment of the intersection of Magic Mountain Parkway with San Fernando Road and the widening of San Fernando Road from Magic Mountain Parkway to Drayton Street. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Award the project to Reyes -Security, J.V., in the amount of $4,900,585.48. 9. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA [ ] Motion CLARITA AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION [ I Vote AUTHORITY FOR SUPPORT - The City and MTA coordinate services for the convenience and mobility of the public. MTA provides public information, maintains bus stops, provides interagency transfers and accepts interagency transfers on behalf of the City. This agreement will continue these support services through June 30, 1994. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the agreement pending City Attorney concurrence and authorize the City Manager to sign. 10. PARCEL MAP NO. 23349 - APPROVAL OF THE [ ] Motion MAP, ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFERS OF DEDICATION FOR CHAMPIONSHIP WAY, MAGIC [ ] Vote MOUNTAIN PARKWAY AND TOURNEY ROAD. ACCEPTANCE OF VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS TO CHAMPIONSHIP WAY, MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY AND TOURNEY ROAD - The Tentative Parcel Map was originally approved by the Planning Commission on January 5, 1993, by Resolution No. P93- 01. The offers of street dedication for Championship Way, Magic Mountain Parkway and Tourney Road were originally accepted on Parcel .Map 16050 and Tract 43752. Parcel Map No. 23349 seeks to realign Championship Way and Tourney Road for better circulation and connection with Magic Mountain Parkway. RECOMMENDEDACTION: Approve the map and accept on behalf of the public, the offers of dedications. [:i 11. AUTHORIZATION TO ALLOW THE MAY 1994 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY MONTHLY TRANSIT PASS TO BE VALID THROUGH JCtNE 30, 1994 -Seek permission to extend the validity of the May 1994 San Fernando Valley monthly transit pass through June 30, 1994. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize allowing the May 1994 San Fernando Valley Monthly Pass to be valid through June 30, 1994. E 12. ELECTION RECOUNT RESULTS-RESOLUTION NO. 94-56 - On Wednesday April 20th, the City Clerk received a request for an electronic recount of the ballots from the election of April 12, 1994 to be conducted on April 26, 1994, 9:00 a.m. Results will be presented to Council in resolution format at this meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution 94-56. 13. IDENTIFICATION OF MEMBERS INTEREST OF REAL PROPERTY - This item is on the agenda to identify members interest in real property located in the [) Vote redevelopment project area. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Members, officers and employees who participated in formulating the Santa Clarita _1 c� Community Recovery Plan, each file their schedule listing their direct and indirect financial interests in real property from the Disclosure of Economic Interests with the City Clerk and Assistant Secretary of the Agency, and that such disclosure be entered on the minutes. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 94.54 - Demand Register Nos. 14 [ 1 Motion b.�20� and 15. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution No. 94-54. [) Vote Lla-7(P NEW BUSINESS [ 7 Staff 15. COUNTY MONITORING; VALENCIA [ 1 Staff MARKETPLACE PROJECT AND DRAFT [ ] Speakers ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (COUNTY [I Speakers PROJECT NO. 92-075) - RESOLUTION NO. 94.51 - #, [ ] Motion Resolution setting forth the Council's position on the proposed Valencia Marketplace project, evaluation of Discussion the associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and [ ] Discussion appeal to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors of the Regional Planning Commissions actions on this [ ] Vote project. The commission's actions include approval of a tentative parcel map, conditional use permit, oak tree permit, certification of the EIR and recommendation of C•a �MCm�nn.A approval of a general plan amendment and zone 0.change. This proposed project is a regional commercial n G L{1 facility of 859,740 sq.ft. located on 83.7 acres immediately west of I5, north of Pico Canyon Rd., south V of McBean Pkwy. and east of the Old Rd. in the unincorporated area of the County.. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution 94-51 setting forth the �a Council's position on the marketplace proposal and submit comments stating the City's position and direct _ _` _, _ Q� �Q appealing the Regional Planning Commission's actions staff to continue working with the Valencia Company on to the Board of Supervisors with recommendations for this proposal to help achieve the General Plan goals Rmk, Don Q,S..n q ip project changes and enhancements. :;qtJLP 16. VALENCIA COMPANY'S NATURAL RIVER [ 7 Staff MANAGEMENT CONCEPT PREPARED FOR A SECTION 404 GENERAL PERMIT APPLICATION [ ] Speakers TO THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS - The proposed Natural River Management Concept is a long- #, [ ] Motion range development strategy for forty-nine projects Discussion associated with the Valencia Company s land holdings along the Santa Clara River floodplain. Project build- out is expected over a 15 to 20 year period, and includes [ ] Vote levees, bridges, side drains, and utility crossings. These projects have been identified by the Valencia Company to satisfy flood protection, water quality management, CLQ and traffic circulation needs for the future development of their riverside properties. The NRMC is the basis of the Valencia Company's request for a Section 404 General Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Express general support for the proposed concept; direct staff to prepare and submit comments stating the City's position and direct staff to continue working with the Valencia Company on this proposal to help achieve the General Plan goals and objectives applicable to the project site. #-396 17. REVISED BROWN ACT - In October, 1993, Governor [ 1 Staff Wilson signed into law four bills which have made I I Speakers substantial changes in the Brown Act. The City _ Attorney will give an overview of the revised Brown f I Motion Act. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive presentation from City Attorney. [ ] Discussion [ ] Vote COMMITTEE REPORTS (Council) STAFF COMMENTS COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS 1 O 0, SD i), CLOSED SESSION -Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - CQo Castaic Lake Water Agency vs City of Santa Clarita, et al and City of Santa Clarita vs Newhall Water Company Government Code 54956.9(a) ADJOURNMENT T h As . a 6 J # I s3 — cccwd� �,st, cx- r ,Ck- CN-bJ � I (f — C, A FC, p el q -IJ P t). S C.4) - 'cam &zaaL&4q do m15 - G t. t,),R ( -- S.G. ✓5. S.G. uDWtz-.. n3u -� a - i o - 4�ui,z an ,mango -4 C"q . GP, G _ 14 — $ a D air, Seo a� . � o � - b, vst fl F1 4/ N P,,IgilbDf �� W3 'D„_�„ AA C_,, nX.w.:�v /� ,�(�`Jy-�-�"""Y°*Lf1fJ'KDmgtD%D IEJf--S r PROOF OF POSTING BY CITY CLERK CITY OF SANTA CLARITA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARIFA ) I, Donna M. Grinder, do hereby certify that I am the duly appointed and qualified City Clerk for the City of Santa Clarita; that on April 22, 1994 between the hours of 9 o'clock a.m. and 5 o'clock p.m.; I caused to be posted in three conspicuous public places, as required by law, the following: City Council Agenda for: April 26, 1994 I hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct and that this certification was executed by me on April 22, 1994 at the City Hall, Santa Clarita, California. Santa Clarita, California