HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-01-11 - ORDINANCES - MC 93 173 ANNEX AGMT 93 006 (2)ORDINANCE NO. 93-21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING MASTER CASE NO. 93-173
(ANNEXATION AGREEMENT NO. 93.006
ASSOCIATED WITH ANNEXATION NO. 1990-06),
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT,
THE DEVELOPER OF APPROXIMATELY 43 ACRES LOCATED
NORTH AND EAST OF THE EXISTING CITY LIMITS
SOUTH OF COPPERHILL DRIVE, AND EAST AND WEST OF
HASKELL CANYON ROAD, IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact: ,
a. On July 14, 1992, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita adopted Resolution
No. 92.130, requesting that the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) of
Los Angeles County initiate annexation proceedings for the proposed 210 acre
"Copperhill Annexation" (located generally north and east of the existing City limits,
south of Copperhill Drive, and east and west of Haskell Canyon Road).
b. On November 10, 1993, the LAFCO approved Annexation No. 1990.06, subject to th '
condition that the Certificate of Completion for the annexation not be recorded unti
the City Council has passed an ordinance, approving an annexation agreeme
between the City and Cucamonga Development Co., to a second reading.
C. On November 23, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93.159, ordering
and approving Annexation No. 1990.06 to the City of Santa Clarita.
d. The City of Santa Ciarits proposes to enter into an annexation agreement with
Cucamonga Development Co. to vest entitlements for the construction of 24 single-
family residences on approximately 43 acres (Vesting Tentative Tract Map 47626,
Conditional Use Permit No. 89.150, and Zone Change No. 89-150, approved by the
Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in September, 1993).
e. That the project site is located within the Copperhill Annexation area, north and west
of the existing City limits, north of Pamplico Drive, south of Copperhill Drive, and
west of Kenton Lane, as Identified in Exhibit A.
f. The proposed agreement would not result in any development beyond that
Previously approved by Los Angeles County. The agreement allows for the
development of the site, subject to the conditions of the project approvals and In
accordance with the applicable rules and subsequent applicable rules outlined in the
Annexation Agreement.
g. The Planning Commission held a duty noticed public hearing on November 16,1993,
at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita.
At said public hearing, the annexation agreement was duly heard and considered
and testimony was received, if any, for, and/or against the proposal. The Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. P93.30, recommending that the City Council:
1) adopt the Resolution approving the Negative Declaration prepared for the project
with the finding that the project will not have a significant effect upon the
Ordinance No. 93-21
Page 2
environment, and 2) adopt the Ordinance approving Master Case No. 93.173
(Anflf3xation Agreement No. 93.006).
h. ThCCity of Santa Clarita City Council set December 14, 1993, at the hour of 6:30
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarlta,
California, as the time and place for a public hearing before said City Council, and
notice of said public hearing was given in the manner required by the Santa Clarita
Municipal Code.
SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence, if any, received at the
public hearing, and upon studies and Investigations made by the Planning Commission and the City
Council and on their behalf, the City Council further finds and determines that the project is
consistent with the General Plan and complies with all other applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinance.
SECTION 4. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council does hereby ordain that the
application for an annexation agreement is approved.
SECTION 3. In acting on the annexation agreement, the City Council has considered
certain principles and standards, and finds and determines as follows:
a.
The annexation agreement vests the entitlements associated with Vesting Tentative
Tract Map 47626, Conditional Use Permit No. 89-150 and Zone Change No. 89-150,
approved by the County of Los Angeles in September, 1993.
b.
j
The annexation agreement does not approve any development in addition to that
r�
approved by the County of Los Angeles In association with Vesting Tentative Tract
Map 47626, Conditional Use Permit No. 89.150 and Zone Change No. 89.150.
C.
The Initial Study prepared for the project has been circulated for review and
comment by affected governmental agencies and the public, and all comments
received have been considered. The public review period was from October 27,
1993, to November 16, 1993.
d.
Public participation and notification requirements pursuant to Sections 65090 and
65351 of the Government Code of the State of California were duly followed.
e.
That the annexation agreement Is consistent with the City's General Pian.
f.
That public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning practice
Justify the annexation agreement.
g.
That the annexation agreement will not Jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute
a menace to the public health, safety or general welfare.
h.
That the annexation agreement will not be materially detrimental to the use,
enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the
site.
SECTION 4. Based upon the foregoing, the City Council does hereby ordain that the
application for an annexation agreement is approved.
Ordinance No. 93.21 .
Page 3
SECTION 5. This ordinance shall become effective at 12:01 a.m. on the thirty-first
day after adoption, & upon the effective date of Annexation No. 1990-06 to the City of Santa Clarita,
whichever occurs last.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify as to the passage of this Ordinance and cause it
to be published in the manner prescribed by law:
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of January , 1994
W, W -01i_- _
ATTEST:
ity Clerk --
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above
and foregoing Ordinance was regularly Introduced and placed upon Its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the 14th day of December 1993
That thereafter, said Ordinance was duty adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City
Council on the 11th day of January, 1994 by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
caryauuma
BOyer, Darcy, Heidt, Klajic, Pederson