Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-01-24 - AGENDA REPORTS - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT PROCESS (2)P UNFINISHED BUSINESS DATE: January 24, 1995 SUBJECT: On -Going Citizen Involvement in the Redevelopment Process DEPARTMENT: Community Recovery Agency Background: At the Recovery Agency Board's October 25, 1994 meeting, the subject of providing for on-going citizen participation in the redevelopment process was considered and direction provided that the concept of an expanded Agency Board be further refined for possible adoption. (Other aspects of the public input provided through the Recovery Agency Community Participation Process were also discussed and are documented in the complete agenda package of that meeting for appropriate follow-up. These items are not considered here.) This Agenda Report is being prepared to conclude the public process of refining and describing the concept of an expanded Agency Board. The substance of this Report has been presented for full participation of the various interested citizen groups (including the Chamber of Commerce Redevelopment Task Force and local School officials). Concurance exists that it should be adopted for implementation., As an aside, the Chamber Redevelopment Task Force felt it was important to restate to the Council/Agency Board their stong recommendations that, in the event that the City/Recovery Agency is successful in its lawsuit with Castaic Lake Water Agency, that the compromise reduced size Project Area should be independently implemented. Attached is a complete copy of the Supplemental Agenda Report presented at the Agency Board's October 25,1994 meeting. The Board will recall that it reported on a series of meetings with schools' officials and the Chambers Redevelopment Task Force members. It documented two CRA Citizen Involvement Options: a "Coordinating Committee" Option (#2); and, an "Expanded Agency Board" Onti'" 131_ .Tky late ,)option was the one which received "compromise" acceptance by the _I1 In'�nl9fllinlll Ir� Agenda Itemajunl Gc yam} L. community participants and conceptual approval by the Agency Board. Specifically, that option was originally outlined as follows: Expanded Agcy Board Option (#3) Description: The Council/Agency Board is expanded by up to four (4) non-voting "ex -officio" members representing major community interests. This expanded Agency Board makes policy and would govern redevelopment agency operations as the Council alone currently operates. Membership: The Council/Agency Board would select one of three public individuals nominated in each of the following categories: *Business Owner/Operator (nominated by Chambers of Commerce, and Valencia Industrial Association; *Local ,Schools Official (nominated by School Trustees Association); *The General Public (2) (two members will be selected from applications submitted by interested citizens to provide balance to the Board). Term of Service: Staggered two-year terms Areas for Clarification: The below listed areas for additional clarification should be considered by all and answered. Following that; the City Attorney can prepare the appropriate implementation document for City Council/Agency Board action. Are all parties still satisfied with this option on at least an interim basis until such time as desirable changes are identified and agreed upon? 2. By how many members should the Board be expanded? (Four has been discussed) 3. Should the constituencies represented by the expanded Board members be modified from that originally described? Should more than one "general public" member be added? Should more than one 'local schools official' be added? Should each Chamber of Commerce and the Valencia Industrial Association have a separate representative or a combined single representative, perhaps nominated by their collective Redevelopment Task Force? 4. Is the suggested process of selecting the expanded Board members (three [31 individuals nominated by respective constituent groups and selected by the Council/Agency Board) acceptable? Is the suggestion of "staggered two-year terms" acceptable? 6. The City Attorney has made some additional legal/ procedural comments about the expanded Board which should be acknowledged. Included here are: Expanded members will have an "ex -officio" or non-voting status; Observation of Brown Act standards by the expanded board members will be required; Is the present meeting format of open participation by all Board members to be continued, or should expanded members' comments be agendized before voting member deliberations on any particular subject begin?; and, Physically, would the expanded members be seated at the dias? 7. Are there other clarifications that should be made prior to the drafting of appropriate implementing actions? u The current and anticipated Community Recovery Agency workload forms an important backdrop for consideration of on-going citizen involvement in the redevelopment process. This is particularly true given the unresolved status of litigation between the City and the Castaic Lake Water Agency. Given the existence of this legal controversy, Council/Board direction at the time of approval of the current budget has been that operations should be conducted at minimal General Fund cost. At the same time, optimum use of other available resources such as Economic Development Administration and Community Development Block Grants should be pursued in order to achieve shared objectives. The major departmental activities currently in process and anticipated for the near-term are of this nature and include the following: 1. Economic Assessment I EDA Grant of Earthquake Damages Economist selected with work beginning Jan., 95. Scheduled public review of analysis planned in Mar., '95 Council/Agency Board consideration thereafter. Chamber and citizen participation in economist selection. Public workshop planned in Mar., '95. Public Council/Agency Board consideration of analysis. Chamber and local business participation in consultant selection. Community strategic planning workshop format to guide entire process. Public Council/Agency Board consideration/adoption of work product necessary. Major additional follow-up activities to this data document are not anticipated. 2. Economic EDA Grant Consultant selected with data Development Target collection beginning Dec., '95. Marketing and Community strategic planning Strategy sessions being organized by Mike Haviland. Task Committee selection by Council anticipated in Jan., '95. Approximate six (6) month process anticipated. Public Council/Agency Board consideration/ adoption required for implementation. Chamber and citizen participation in economist selection. Public workshop planned in Mar., '95. Public Council/Agency Board consideration of analysis. Chamber and local business participation in consultant selection. Community strategic planning workshop format to guide entire process. Public Council/Agency Board consideration/adoption of work product necessary. .. . ..... .... ... ... .. ......... . ... H� ... ... .... I . ..... .... .... .... . . . . . . . ..... Tiv tLMeh .. .... .... ..... ... .... 3. Newhall EDA Grant/ Consultant selected with initial Mayor, Mayor Pro -Tem, Revitalization CDBG Grant community strategic planning Planning Commissioner Strategy workshop scheduled for Jan. participation in consultant 30. Approximate six (6) to selection. Community eight (8) month process with a strategic planning workshop minimum of three (3) format to guide entire community-based strategic process. Public planning workshops and one Council/Agency Board joint Planning consideration /adoption of Commission/City Council strategy action items work session. Need for necessary. redevelopment funding of community generated strategy action items as approved by Council/Agency Board. 4. Earthquake Housing CDBG Grant/ Consultant interviews Council member, Board of Rehab./ Reconstruct. HOME Grant conducted with Council Realtors, local business, Sr. loans/ Grants consideration at 1/24/95 Citizen representation meeting. Data collection interview of consultant. anticipated to begin late Jan., Community Task Committee '95. Task Committee selection to guide program, guideline by Council anticipated in Jan. development. Council/ '95. Three (3) to four (4) month Agency Board approval process planned for required before any development of CDBG/ implementation, HOME programs. Six (6) to twelve (12) month process planned for actual housing rehabilitation activities. Other programs/ activities depending upon CLWA lawsuit resolution. 5. Canyon Country General Fund Project deferred by Council for N/A Corridor and/or six (6) months to allow other Revitalization Redevelopment projects to proceed, lawsuit to Strategy Fund be resolved, and community comfort with it to grow, This item to be placed on Council/Agency Board agenda in June, 1995, for status report as to project start date. 6. Schools Task General Fund I Ongoing Regular Meetings All schools involved. Committee Project Task Committees: Each of the above major activities, except the technical economic assessment of earthquake damage; would involve a Task Committee pursuant to City Council/Agency Board action on October 25. The proposed purpose, membership, selection process, and reporting relationship for these Task Committees is described below: I. Business Revitalization Task Committee: Purpose: During conduct of the economic development target marketing and strategy project, to advise staff and consultant in organizing the various community resources in order to enhance its ability to attract/retain jobs and to strengthen the overall public/private economic development partnership. Final approval authority remains with City Council/Agency Board. Membership: 1. S.C.V. Chamber Board member (Nominated by formal Chamber action, confirmed by City Council) 2. Canyon Country Chamber Board Member (Nominated by formal Chamber action, confirmed by City Council) 3. V.I.A. Board member (Nominated by formal V.I.A. action, confirmed by City Council) 4, Gas Company Representative (Nominated by local manager, confirmed by City Council) 5. Electric Company Representative (Nominated by local manager, confirmed by City Council) 6. Commercial Real Estate Representative (Local commercial brokerages will nominate oneof their realtors, City Council to select) 7. Local Banker Representative (Local banks will nominate one of their executives, City Council to select) 8. Local Industrial Representative (Local firms will nominate an executive, City Council to select) 9. Schools Representative (School Trustees Association will nominate a professional or elected representative, City Council to confirm) 10. Small Business Development Center Representative (Small Business Development Center Board to nominate one of its members, City Council to confirm) (11-151 Five (5) Citizen Representatives (Applications/ Letters of Intent to be solicited from the community at large, each City Council member to select one) Report Consistent with Task Committee purpose, Committee may report to City Council/Agency Board separately or in consensus with consultant and staff. Process: At least two (2) community strategic planning format workshops open to anyone interested in participating in the Business Revitalization Process will be conducted and facilitated by the consultant. In addition, between 75 and 100 local "stakeholders' will be interviewed by the consultant to collect data, information, issues, and concerns. II. Newhall Revitalization Task Committee Purpose: To advise staff and consultant in the preparation of a specific five (5) to seven (7) year revitalization strategy and urban design plan for Newhall. Final approval for the Strategy/Plan would remain with the City Council/Agency Board. Membership: 1. S.C. V. Chamber Board Member (Nominated by formal Chamber action, confirmed by City Council) 2. Canyon Country Chamber Board Member (Nominated by formal Chamber action, confirmed by City Council) 3. CULTURE Representative (Nominated by organization; confirmed by City Council) 4. Newhall Business Operator (Applications/ Letters of Interest to be solicited from Newhall business operators, City Council to select one) 5. Newhall Business Owner (Applications/ Letters of Interest to be solicited from Newhall Business owners, City Council to select one) 6. Senior Citizen's Center Board Representative (Nominated by the Board, confirmed by City Council) 7. Newhall School District Representative (Newhall School Board will nominate a representative, confirmed by City Council) 8. Other Schools Representatives (School Trustees Association will nominate a professional or elected representative, confirmed by City Council) 9. United Mothers Representative (Nomination by organization, confirmed by City Council) 10. Inter faith Council Representative (Nomination by organization, confirmed by City Council) 11. Newhall Homeowner's Representative (Applications/ Letters of Interest to be solicited from among Newhall homeowners, selected by City Council) (12-171 Five (5) Citizen Representatives (Applications/Letters of Interest to be solicited from the community of Newhall, each City Council member to select one) Reporting: Consistent with Task Committee purpose, committee may report to City Council/Agency Board separately, or in consensus with consultant and staff. Process: At least three (3) Community Strategic Planning format workshops open to anyone interested in participating in the Newhall revitalization strategy will be conducted and facilitated by the consultant, III. Housing Task Committee Purpose: To advise staff and consultant in the preparation of an overall housing framework, strategy, and activity program for the community of Santa Clarita, which brings together all the various available funding sources (CDBG, HOME, MCC, Redevelopment, etc.) on both an immediate and long- range timeframe. All of the various need areas will also be addressed (single family, multi -family, mobile home, owner/non-owner occupied). Final approval to remain with the City Council/Agency Board. Membership: 1. Board of Realtors Representative (Nominated by Board of Realtors, confirmed by City Council) 7. Local Banker Representative (Local banks will nominate one of their executives, City Council to select) 3. Local Newhall Land and Farm Residential Representative (An executive with this residential development firm will be nominated by the company, confirmed by City Council) 4. Local Residential Developer (Local residential developers will be asked to nominate one of their executives for selection, final selection by City Council) 5. SCOPE Representative (Formal nomination by the organization, confirmed by City Council) 6. S.C.V. Senior Center Representative (The Board of Directors of the Senior Center to nominate a Board member or a professional, confirmed by City Council) 7. Manufactured Nome Rent Stabilization Panel Chair 8, Schools Representative (Schools Trustees Association to nominate a professional or elected representative, confirmed by City Council) 9. Church Representative (The Inter -faith Council to nominate a Representative, confirmed by City Council) 10. Neighborhood Legal Services Representative (Nomination by the organization, confirmed by the City Council) (11-15) Five (5) Citizen Representatives (Applications/ Letters of Interest to be solicited from the community at large, each City Council member to select one) Reporting: Consistent with Task Committee purpose, committee may report to City Council/Agency Board separately, or in consensus with consultant and staff. Process: Initial committee, consultant, and staff efforts will be focused on rehabilitation/ construction programs for CDBG and HOME funds. This short-term focus should extend about sixty (60) days. Longer-term, other sources of funding and community needs will be addressed.. Community Strategic Planning format workshops open to anyone interested in participating, will be conducted. IV. Santa Clarita Schools Task Committee Purpose: To establish an ongoing Forum for two-way communications between the local school districts and the City/Agency. Membership: The various public school Superintendents and the City Manager/Agency Director would meet on a regular basis to assure effective open and two-way communication. Each Task Force representative would be responsible for facilitating the involvement of their respective elected representatives. Existence of this group would not be intended to prohibit or inhibit elected official communication with the City Council/Agency Board, only to enhance the same. Reporting: Participants report through their respective organizational framework. Process: Ongoing regular meetings. V. Canyon Country Corridor Task Committee Purpose: To advise staff and consultant in the preparation of a specific five (5) to seven (7) year revitalization strategy and urban design plan for Canyon Country. Final approval for the Strategy/Plan 'would remain with the City Council/Agency Board. Membership: L S.C.V. Chamber Board Member (Nominated by formal Chamber action, confirmed by City Council) 2. Canyon Country Chamber Board Member (Nominated by formal Chamber action, confirmed by City Council) 3, CULTURE Representative. (Nominated by organization, confirmed by City Council) 4. Canyon Country Business Operator (Applications/ Letters of Interest to be solicited from Canyon Country business operators, City Council to select one) 5. Canyon Country Business Owner (Applications/ Letters of Interest to be solicited from Canyon Country business owners, City Council to select one) 6. SCOPE Representative (Formal nominated by the Board, confirmed by City Council) 7; Sulphur Springs School District Representative (Sulphur Springs School Board will nominate a representative, confirmed by City Council) S. Other Schools Representatives (School Trustees Association will nominate a professional or elected representative, confirmed by City Council) 9. Manufactured Home Rent Stabilization Panel Chair (Nomination by organization, confirmed by City Council) 10. Inter -faith Council Representative (Nomination by organization, confirmed by City Council) 11. Canyon Country Homeowner's Representative (Applications/Letters of Interest to be solicited from among Canyon Country homeowners, selected by City Council) (12-17) Five (5) Citizen Representatives (Applications/ Letters of Interest to be solicited from the community of Canyon Country, each City Council member to select one) Reporting: Consistent with Task Committee purpose, committee may report to City Council/Agency Board separately, or in consensus with consultant and staff. Process: At least three (3) Community Strategic Planning format workshops open to anyone interested in participating in the Newhall revitalization strategy will be conducted and facilitated by the consultant. Given the extended time frame of operation for the Recovery Agency, clearly additional Task Committees will be defined in the future as new needs arise and are identified, and as the City Council/Agency board desires to address them. In addition, the formation of a Canyon Country Revitalization Task Committee is anticipated within the coming six (6) months, at such time as the City Council elects to pursue the Canyon Country Corridor Revitalization Strategy. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Agency Board consider this Agenda Report, including the areas identified for additional clarification and provide staff with the desired direction. Attachment: 1, Supplemental Agenda Report, October 25,1994 DD:hlt comrecov\ar011045.1 4tD�o CITY OF SANTA CLARITA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 1�,1 TO: City Council/ Recovery Agency Board Members FROM: George A. Caravalho, City Manager/ Executive Directo DATE: January 24, 1995 SUBJECT: Possible Structure Utilizing Redevelopment Commission (CRC) In addition to the previously distributed Agenda Report regarding "On -Going Citizen Involvement in the Redevelopment Process," the following material is being submitted for City Council/ Recovery Agency Board consideration relative to the establishment of a citizens' advisory commission to advise the Board on redevelopment policy matters. This entity could be known as the Community Redevelopment Commission (CRC). Specifics of such a structure could be outlined as follows: The CRC's purpose would be: To assist the Council/Agency Board by providing input on redevelopment policies to be implemented by staff. Such a citizens' advisory body could consist of seven ('n members, who would be electors of the City, appointed by the Council/Agency Board for staggered two (2) year terms. It would be possible to limit commission members' terms of office. The CRC could provide input and recommendations to the Council/Agency Board on all matters coming before the Board, except emergency matters and matters which the Council/Agency Board, by Resolution, excludes from Commission purview. The advisory Commission would not have powers to: 1) Sue or be sued; 2) Sell property 3) Delegate authority to redevelop in Santa Clarita; 4) Contract; 5) Acquire property via purchase, lease, gift, or eminent domain; 6) Borrow money; 7 Finance housing construction or rehabilitation; 8) Authorize specific expenditures of funds; or 9) Such other exclusions as may be established from time -to -time by the Council/Agency Board by Resolution. Consistent with the CRC purpose as described above, it may report to the City Council/Agency Board separately, or in consensus with staff. It is recognized in establishing a Commission that staff reporting relationship as established in Chapter 2 of the Municipal Code is formally to the City Manager and then, in turn, to the City Council/Agency Board. It would be anticipated that the Commission, Council/Agency Board, and staff would normally operate in a consensus manner, The CRC should be provided with a stipend as provided other Santa Clarita City Commissions. The City Attorney has advised that all meetings of the CRC and conduct of its members are subject to the Brown Act and the Conflict of Interest Codes. The City Council/Agency Board would retain all legal authorities and responsibilities as established by the California Redevelopment Caw. Additionally, the City Council and Planning Commission would retain all authorities and responsibilities established by the general laws of the State.. Inasmuch as the Council/Agency Board is considering various roles within the redevelopment process it may well be proper for the City Clerk or her designee to be formally designated as Secretary of the Agency and for the Finance Director or his designee to be formally designated as the Treasurer. These designations are similar to the general City of Santa Clarita organization. It is anticipated that staffing responsibilities and activities for the CRC will be somewhat similar to those provided the Planning Commission and/or Parks and Recreation Commission. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council/Agency Board consider this information together with the previously distributed Agenda Report and provide staff with the desired direction. Attached for Council information and review is a copy of Santa Clarita's Municipal Code relative to the Parks and Recreation Commission. DRD:ll wnvec k.'012695ap cc: City Attorney Recovery Agency Director 2.28.010. Parks and Recreation Commission Established. There shall be, and there is hereby established a Commission to be known and designated as the Parks and Recreation Commission. This Commission shall formulate, subject to City Council direction and approval a parks and recreation program for the City of Santa Clarita. (Ord. 88-10, .3/24/88). 2.28.015. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the language of the provision clearly indicates some other meaning: A. "Commission" means the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of Santa Clarita. B. "City" means the City of Santa Clarita. C. "Council" or "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita. D. "City Manager" means the City Manager or Interim City Manager of the City of Santa Clarita. E. "Department" means the Parks and Recreation Department of the City of Santa Clarita. F. "Shall" signifies a mandatory term. (Ord. 88- 10, 3/24/88). 2.28.020. Members. The Parks and Recreation Commission shall consist of five (5) members, each of whom shall be a resident of the City of Santa Clarita and shall be appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the City Council, pursuant to the procedure and terms set forth be resolution of the City Council. (Ord. 88-10, 3/24/88; amend. Ord. 89-1, 1/24/89; amend. Ord. 91-49, 10/22/91). 2.28.030. Meetings. The Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting in each calendar month at such date as designated by the Commission by resolution and approved by the City Council, or on the next succeeding day which is not a holiday. Regular meetings may be adjourned by public announcement to a specific date, and any such adjourned meeting shall be deemed a regular meeting. Meeting dates may be changed by resolution adopted by the Commission and approved by the City Council. The Commission shall further determine and provide in its rules and regulations for any special meetings which shall be noticed and an agenda provided as required by State law and local ordinance. (Ord. 88-10, 3/24/88). 2.28.040. Absence from Meetings. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, any Commissioner who absents himself from any three (3) consecutive regular meetings of the Commission, unless excused from attendance by consent of such Commission expressed by action recorded in its minutes, or who is absent without such absence being excused of record, from a total of five 71 (5) regular meetings of the Commission in any six (6) months period, shall thereby automatically forfeit his or her position as a member of the Commission. In such case the name of such Commissioner shall be automatically removed from the membership of said Commission immediately after the adjournment of any such third consecutive meeting or of any such fifth meeting in a six months period, as the case may be, at which the Commissioner has ,not appeared. The Chairman of the Commission shall promptly notify both the City Council and the person so ceasing to be a Commissioner; of the action and of the fact of the vacancy, upon such notification, the City Council shall, within a reasonable time, appoint a successor for the remainder of the term of such member. (Ord. 88-10, 3/24/88). 2.28.050. Removal of Members. Notwithstanding any provision of this Chapter to the contrary, any member of the Commission may be removed from office at any time, with or without cause, by the affirmative vote of at least three members of the City Council. (Ord. 88-10, 3/24/88). 2.28.060. Duties. The Commission shall have the power and duty, except as otherwise provided by law to: A. Advise the City Council, and the Director of Parks and Recreation, or City Manager, in all matters pertaining to parks and public recreation, and to cooperate with other governmental agencies and civic groups in the advancement of sound park and recreation planning and programming. B. Formulate general policies on recreation services for approval by the City Council. C. Advise the City Council, with the Director of Parks and Recreation, or City Manager, on development of recreation areas, facilities, programs and improvement of recreation services. D. Recommend the adoption of standards on organization, personnel, areas and facilities, programs and financial support. E. Make periodic inventories of recreation services that exist or may be needed; interpret and convey the needs of the public to the City Council, and to the Director of Parks and Recreation, or City Manager. F. Aid in coordinating recreation services with programs and revenue enhancement of other governmental agencies and voluntary organizations. G. Interpret the policies and functions of the Parks and Recreation Department for the Public. 72 H. Advise the Director of Parks and Recreation, or the City Manager, in the preparation of the annual budget of the Department and the preparation of a long-range recreation capital improvement program. I. Within 90 days of first organizational meeting of the Commission, prepare a complete inventory of parkland and equipment which is to be turned over to the City from the County of Los Angeles. J. Within 180 days of first organizational meeting of the Commission, prepare an inventory of all recreational programs available within the City to include the ages and numbers of each participant in each activity, location of each activity, cost of each activity and utilization level of the resources of each activity. (Ord. 88-10, 3/24/88). 2.28.070. Records. The Commission shall cause proper records to be kept of all its official acts and proceedings and shall make reports to the City Council. (Ord. 88-10, 3/24/88). 2.28.080. Organization. The Commission shall elect a Chairman, and a Vice -Chairman from among its members, each for a term of one year at its first regular meeting after appointment, and annually elect a chairman and vice-chairman each year thereafter. The Commission may appoint such other officers as may be necessary for the administration of its business, at the same time and for one year terms. The additional officers shall enter in the duties of their office at their first regular meeting after appointment. The Commission shall adopt rules and regulations for the transaction of its business and shall keep a record of all its minutes, resolutions, actions, findings and determinations. Minutes, resolutions, and official records shall be filed with the City Clerk. (Ord. 88-10, 3/24/88). 2.28.090. Compensation and Expenses. Each member of the Commission shall receive compensation at the rate of Seventy -Five Dollars ($75.00) for each meeting of the Commission attended by such member, not to exceed a total compensation of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00) in any one month. Such compensation shall be paid on the first payroll payment date following the end of the calendar month. The -Director shall submit to the City Manager at the end of each calendar month, a statement showing the number of meetings of the Commission attended by each member during such month. No additional compensation shall be paid for expenses incurred by members of the Commission in the performance of their duties except as authorized in advance by the City Council. The City Council, may from time to time authorize in advance, expenditures for attendance at seminars, institutes, or other meetings which the City Council finds to be beneficial to the Commissioners in the performance of their duties, and in the best interest of the City. Claims for such expenses shall be filed with the City Manager on forms prescribed 73