Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-06-27 - AGENDA REPORTS - CITY ENGR AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (2)AGENDA REPORT City Manager Approve Item to be presented Anthony J. Nisich�ir NEW BUSINESS DATE: June 27, 1995 SUBJECT: CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Resolution No. 95-76 DEPARTMENT: Community Development' Staff has completed a Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey as defined in Section 627 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC). This study (copy attached) forms the basis for recommended speed limits on nearly every major, secondary and collector roadway in the City. Staff performed the study according to the provisions of the CVC and as recommended by the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) Traffic Manual. When adopted, the study establishes prima facie speed limits on every highway segment included in the study. When appropriate signs are posted according to this study, the Sheriffs Department can enforce each of these speed limits. California cities, counties and other state agencies must conduct these surveys every five years to validate the continued use of radar for enforcement. Enforcement of speed limits by radar is the safest and most effective form of speed control Without radar, they make speed enforcement more complicated, more time consuming and less safe because of the need to pace offending vehicles with a police unit. Rather than one speeding vehicle on the highway, we would have two: the offender and the police unit. An effective radar enforcement program can: • Lower prevailing vehicle speeds • Lower vehicular accident rates; and • 'Enhance overall highway safety The results of this citywide study are presented in one report. It includes individual surveys on 148 highway segments. The purpose of this presentation is to include all engineering and traffic surveys in one volume. As such, every surveyed street will have virtually the same data from which the five-year cycle would begin. Adopted: in r P=.2"c: " �� CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY June 27, 1995 - Page 2 The report contains a brief discussion regarding speed zoning principles, basic purpose and methodology of speed -zone studies. It includes a summary of recommended speed limits for each highway segment studied and a color coded City map depicting the recommended speed limits as formulated in this study. There are two tabulated summaries of traffic accident analysis and the speed survey summary and recommendations. It includes the appendices containing the detailed engineering and survey data; such as the specific speed data measurement, accident statistics, and roadway information. The report also contains a summary of significant adjustments to existing posted speed limits. Staff has recommended these adjustments based on the results of the study which are essential to the overall success of the program. The speed limit adjustments are listed as follows: 1. Increases to Existing Prima Facie Sneed Limits McBean Parkway from Valencia Boulevard to North City Limits Increase of 5 m.p.h. from 45 m.p.h. to 50 m.p.h. Shadow Pines Boulevard from Soledad Canyon Road to North City Limits Increase of 5 m.p.h. from 35 m.p.h. to 40 m.p.h. 2. Decreases to Existing Prima Facie Speed Limits • Avenue Crocker from Avenue Hall to Rye Canyon Road Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 45 m.p.h. to 40 m.p.h. • Camp Plenty Road from Soledad Canyon Road to Newhouse Street Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 35 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. • Carizo Drive from Arroyo Park to Estaban Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 35 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. • Decoro Drive from Vista Delgado to Seco Canyon Road Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 35 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. • Market Street from Newhall Avenue to Cross Street Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 35 m.p.h. to 30 m.p.h. • Sierra Highway from San Fernando Road to Placerita Canyon Road Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 55 m.p.h. to 50 m.p.h.. • Sierra Highway from Friendly Valley to North City Limit Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 50 m.p.h. to 45 m.p.h. • Soledad Canyon Road from 1500 feet east of Bouquet Canyon Road to Golden Oak Drive Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 55 m.p.h. to 50 m.p.h. • Soledad Canyon Road from Luther Drive to Sierra Highway Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 45 m.p.h. to 40 m.p.h. • Soledad Canyon Road from Anne Freda Street to Kenroy Avenue Decrease of 5 m.p.h. from 50 m.p.h. to 45 m.p.h. CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY June 27, 1995 - Page 3 3. New Established Prima Facie Speed Limits The following locations previously did not have an established Engineering and Traffic Survey. According to the CVC, in absence of an established survey, the prima facie speeds on these streets would be 55m.p.h. The new surveys are conducted to reduce the prima facie speed limits of 55 m.p.h, to an appropriate limit as outlined below: • Alta Monte Drive and Singing Hills Drive from McBean Parkway to Lockmoor Road - 30 m.p.h. • Apple Street from Cherry Street to Lyons Avenue - 25 m.p.h. • Avenue Hall from Avenue Stanford to Avenue Crocker - 40 m.p.h. • Avenue Hopkins, 300' south of Anza Drive to Avenue Stanford - 40 m.p.h. • Avenue Kearny from Avenue Scott to Avenue Mentry - 35 m.p.h. • Avenue Mentry 300' south of Anza Drive to Avenue Kearny - 35 m.p.h. • Avenue Rotella from Lyons Avenue to Avenida Ronada - 30 m.p.h. • Avenue Stanford from Avenue Hall to Route 126 (Henry Mayo Drive) - 50 m.p.h • Avenue Stanford from Avenue Scott to East City Limit - 35 m.p.h. • Championship Way from Tourney Road to Northbound Interstate -5 ramp - 25 m.p.h. • Cinema Drive from Valencia Boulevard to Bouquet Canyon Road - 35 m.p.h. • Circle J Street from Via Princessa to San Fernando Road - 40 m.p.h. • Citrus Street from Valencia Boulevard to Magic Mountain Parkway - 40 m.p.h. • Copper Hill Drive from West City Limit to Haskell Canyon Road - 45 m.p.h. and 40 m.p.h, • Dockweiler Drive from Sierra Highway to Ivy Lane - 45 m.p.h. and 35 m.p.h. • Golden Triangle Road from 600' west of Rueiher Avenue to Rainbow Glen Drive - 40 m.p.h. • Goldcrest Drive from Valencia Boulevard to Del Monte Drive - 35 m.p.h. • Haskell Canyon Road from Grove Park Drive to Copper Hill Drive - 45 m.p.h. • Magic Mountain Parkway from Interstate -5 to Bouquet Canyon Road - 40 m.p.h. and 50 m.p.h. • Pamplico Drive from Taryn Drive to Ron Ridge Drive - 30 m.p.h. • Peachland Avenue from Cherry Way to Lyons Avenue - 25 m.p.h.. • Plum Canyon Road from Bouquet Canyon Road to East City Limit - 40 m.p.h, • San Fernando Road from Magic Mountain Parkway to SR -14 - 55 m.p.h., 45 m.p.h., 40 m.p.h., 30 m.p.h., and 45 m.p.h. • Singing Hills Drive from McBean Parkway to Arroyo Park Drive - 35 m.p.h. • Soledad Canyon Road from SR -14 off -ramp to Shadow Pines Boulevard - 50 m.p.h. • Summit Place from Rockwell Canyon Road to Arroyo Park Drive - 30 m.p.h. • Valle Del Oro from San Fernando Road to Dockweiler Drive - 30 m.p.h. • Wayman Street from Lola Lane to Lyons Avenue - 25 m.p.h Staff recommends these adjustments primarily because of observed speeds on the highway segments. These observed speeds are the result of driver comfort with the roadway. The individual driver selects this comfort level, often without regard for the posted speed limit. It is not likely that these adjustments in the speed limit will result in higher prevailing speeds. In fact, these adjustments, when combined with an effective enforcement program, can result in lower prevailing speeds on the highway. CITYWIDE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY June 27, 1995 - Page 4 The Sheriffs Department has carefully reviewed each recommendation of this study and concurs with its findings. Caltrans and Los Angeles County will need to review and concur with those recommendations along state routes and street segments under joint city and county jurisdictions, respectively. A copy of the complete Report is available in the City Clerk's Office reading file. RECOMMENDATION • Adopt the attached resolution establishing prima facie speed limits on each highway segment included in the attached Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey; • Direct the City Clerk to certify the study as to the effective date of the individual surveys; • Direct staff to implement the necessary signing changes brought about by the adoption of this study; and • Request the Sheriffs Department to begin an aggressive radar enforcement program on City streets and highways covered in the study as soon as the Public Works Department makes the signing changes. ATTACHMENT One Copy of City Map Depicting Recommended Speed Limits Resolution No. 95-76 NMB:dls:lkl round]Ar 95-96.nmb RESOLUTION NO. 95-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON 149 HIGHWAY SEGMENTS WHEREAS, the California Vehicle Code (Section 22357 and 22358) permits local authorities, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey, to establish prima facie speed limits on highways within their jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, Section 40802(b) of the California Vehicle Code requires that speed limits be justified by an engineering and traffic survey every five years in order to use radar for enforcement; and WHEREAS, the effective and efficient use of radar for traffic speed enforcement can enhance highway safety within the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. That prima facie speed limits shall be established on 148 highway segments in the Citywide Engineering and Traffic Survey. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk certify the study and make copies available to the local Sheriffs Department and courts. SECTION 3. That the Public Works staff effect the necessary signing changes to implement the provisions of the study, SECTION 4. That the City's Police Department (Sheriff) conduct appropriate enforcement of the prima facie speed limits established by this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1995. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 95-76 June 27, 1995 - Page 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) § CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 1995 by the following vote of Council: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: CITY CLERK' NMB:dls:lkl counci1\re95-76.nmb Final Study Report: SURVEYS 70 UUP R7 RADAR SPEED LIM17 Eolp JRCEMEM Submitted to: CIVI June 26, 1995 TRAFFIC No. 0890 xp. 06-30-98 DATE: tli! 3_4Qt� & ASSOCIATES June 22, 1995 INWRPo"TEd SINCE 1 977 MUNICIPAL ANd 1RANSPomiiE ENC,INEERS Mr. Bahman7anka City Traffic Engineer City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Boulevard Suite 300 Santa Clarita, CA 91355-2196 Re: Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement Dear Bahman; Enclosed is the final report for the above -referenced study, addressing the comments from City staff on the final draft report dated June 20, 1995. The study has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the, "speed trap" issue contained in Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code in accordance with the guidelines contained in the Caltrans Traffic Manual. Based on the traffic surveys; traffic accident analysis, and engineering surveys, the existing speed limits for the 149 locations surveyed are recommended to be either lowered, raised, or unaltered. For the locations never before surveyed, new speed limits are recommended as well, based on the analysis conducted. Please contact me at (714) 738-3471.ifyou have any questions regarding this report. Respectfully submitted, Edwin J, Norris, P.E. Vice President EJN:ks chenElclorim11200011ejn10395.doe: n Enclosure In P901 E. IMPERIAL Hwy, SUITE A m LA HABRA, CA 90631 m 714/738-3471 m FAX: 714/738-7802 TABLE OF CONTENTS �J Page rINTRODUCTION Iu .... ___ .................................................._............................................1 SPEED ZONING PRINCIPLES....................................................................................1 STUDY METHODOLOGY............................. ........... ,.......... :.......................... ........ ..... 2 Radar Surveys.......... .. .. ...2 Traffic Accident Analysis ...._.. ......... ......... .._.......... .... ......_....2 Engineering Surveys_..........................._.:...::.......:........::........._........................3 SURVEYRESULTS............................................ ............... .............................. ........... 8 RadarSurveys.............................. ........................................ ............................... 8 Traffic Accident Analysis.............. ...................................... :............................... 8 Engineering Surveys.............................. ............. .................................. 13 SURVEY ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED SPEED ZONE CHANGES .............. 13 Speed Limit Recommendation Process.............................................:.................13 Speed Limit Recommendation Summary ......... ........................... ....................... 13 FIGURES FIGURE 1—RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS ._...,ti.:......... :_....:....::......................14 a TABLES TABLE 1—TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ANALYSIS 4 ................ ................ .................. :.......... TABLE 2—SPEED SURVEY SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................9 aAPPENDICES APPENDIX A—EXCERPTS FROM CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE AND j� f CALTRANS TRAFFIC MANUAL APPENDIX B—TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING SURVEY DATA AND SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION SHEETS cfienAcfaritai120001 Ljnr0195.doc HCity of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to document the results of an engineering and traffic survey to update the speed limits on the City of Santa Clarita's arterial and collector street systems, and one state route, at 149 locations. The overall study was conducted to comply with the appropriate State regulations concerning the lowering and raising of speed limits. To legally use radar for speed enforcement, Section 40802 of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that where limits are changed per Sections 22357 or 22358 of the CVC, the changes must be justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of an alleged violation. Speed limits are also required to be updated every five years so that they will remain reasonably current with present driving conditions, and to address the "speed trap" issue contained in CVC Section 40802. The last City-wide speed zoning survey was conducted in 1990. LJ SPEED ZONING PRINCIPLES According to the State of California (Caltrans) Traffic Manual, prima facie limits for speed zones, sections of a roadway preferably one-half mile or greater in length, should be set at or slightly below the prevailing speed traveled by motorists within the zone. The "prevailing speed; also referred to as the "critical" or "85th percentile" speed, is defined as the "speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving." The prevailing speed is determined by measuring existing speeds of motorists within the respective zone. LJ Speed limits set above the prevailing speed are generally considered unreasonable and unsafe. On the other hand, speed limits set below the prevailing speed do not provide for the orderly movement of traffic. Speed limits set according to this procedure are based on the principle that the majority of citizens drive safely, and that the top fringe of drivers tend to drive recklessly and must be controlled by law enforcement. Law enforcement officers are provided with a means of controlling drivers "who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent" when speed limits are set at or slightly below the prevailing speed. Speed limits somewhat below (5-10 mph) the prevailing speed may be warranted when traffic conflicts and unusual conditions not readily apparent to drivers exist in speed zones. Unusual conditions not readily apparent to drivers include physical characteristics of the roadway such as sight distance inadequacy, commercial driveway characteristics, truck traffic, presence of pedestrians, high on -street parking turnover, etc. These factors may provide justification for setting speed limits somewhat below the prevailing speed. Factors readily apparent to the driver, such as width, curvature, grade, and surface conditions, do not alone justify special downward speed zoning in the absence of other factors, per CVC Section 22358.5. Speed limits must be set properly by traffic and engineering surveys every five years in order for a respective law enforcement agency to legally use radar for enforcement purposes. Otherwise, the established speed limit will be subject to the "speed trap" law (CVC Section 40802[6]). Per CVC LTJ I 0 City of Santa Clarita. Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement Section 40802(b), a "speed trap" is defined as a "particular section of roadway ... which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects." Speed violations that occur within speed traps are subject to dismissal by municipal courts, resulting in the loss of revenue for the agency. For instance, a recent court case, People v. Goulet (1993), involved a motorist who was traveling along a section of roadway in Ventura County at 52 miles per hour (mph). The posted speed limit of the roadway section was 35 mph. The location at which the violation occurred was surveyed within five years prior to the infraction, and a prevailing speed of 48 mph was measured. The reduction of the speed limit to 35 mph could not be justified from the surveys, however, and the court ruled that the roadway section was, in fact, a speed trap since the 35 -mph limit was improperly set. The court subsequently dismissed the case. Appendix A contains pertinent material from the CVC regarding speed laws. STUDY METHODOLOGY The methodology for updating the existing speed limits was based on the procedure outlined in the Caltrans Traffic Manual. The individual components of the study methodology are described in detail below. Radar Surveys Radar surveys were conducted at 149 speed zone locations along one state route and City of Santa Clarita facilities in accordance with the procedures contained in the Traffic Manual. Appendix A contains an extract from the Traffic Manual outlining the regulations for conducting engineering and traffic surveys. The radar surveys involved the collection of a minimum of 100 samples at designated "high volume" locations and a minimum of 50 samples at the remainder of the 149 locations. The surveys were performed by Traffic Counts, Inc., a subcontractor to HMA on the project, during the months of March, April, and May, 1995, at the 149 locations. The radar survey data was collected through the use of Doppler radar equipment. The Doppler radar equipment was pointed at the vehicles within a 15 -degree angle to collect the speed samples. Samples were collected in both directions at each location. The direction with the lower prevailing speed was selected as the sample for each location. The samples for the "high volume" locations were collected during off- peak hours (9:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.), while the samples for the "low volume" locations were collected during peak hours (7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m.). Traffic Accident Analysis Mid -block traffic accidents for each of the 149 locations during a two-year period were researched by reviewing two years of State -Wide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) records covering the City of Santa Clarita. For the majority of the locations, the SWITRS records 2 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement for the full two-year 1993-1994 period were reviewed. SWITRS records for the full two-year 1992-1993 period were reviewed for speed zones located along the following facilities due to irregular traffic patterns on these facilities due to the 1994 Northridge earthquake: 1. Soledad Canyon Road -Entire length 2. Valencia Boulevard—Entire length 3. Lyons Avenue—Entire length 4. San Fernando Road (S.R. 126)—Entire length within the City limits 5, Sierra Highway—Entire length within the City limits 6. McBean Parkway—I-S ramps to Newhall Ranch Road 7. Via Princessa—Sierra Highway to I-15 ramps 8. Newhall Avenue—San Fernando Road to Lyons Avenue 9. Orchard Village Road—Lyons Avenue to McBean Parkway For purposes of this study, a mid -block accident is defined as a traffic accident occurring within a given speed zone beyond 50 feet of the limit line of an intersection. Table 1 shows the two-year accident totals for each speed zone location. Engineering Surveys (, Each of the 149 locations were surveyed by HMA staff for purposes of observing the physical u characteristics of each speed zone at mid -block. In accordance with the Traffic Manual, the observed characteristics included the following • Horizontal and vertical sight distance obstructions • Superelevation • Shoulder conditions • Profile conditions • Commercial driveway characteristics • Pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks • Adjacent land use • Intersection spacing and offsets • Pavement condition • Truck traffic • Channelization • Street width and alignment 3 ISI LJ L City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement TABLE 1 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ANALYSIS 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Calgrove Boulevard Calgrove Boulevard Calla Way Camp Plenty Road Camp Plenty Road Carrizo Drive Championship Way Cinema Drive Circle J Street Citrus Street Copper Hill/S. Francisquito Copper Hill Drive Cortina Drive Creekside Road Dalbey Drive Decoro Drive Del Monte Drive Magic Mountain Pkwy Soledad Canyon Road Seco Canyon Road Alamogordo Road Centurion Way Urbandale Avenue Steve Jon Street West City Limits Wiley Canyon Road Camp Plenty Road Soledad Canyon Road Delight Street Arroyo Park Drive Tourney Road Valencia Boulevard Via Princessa Valencia Boulevard West City Limit 500' E/O Tamarack Lane Arroyo Park Drive Valencia Boulevard Orchard Village Road Vista Delgado Summit Place Soledad Canyon Road 3 47502 Limits 0.12 2.14 Seco Canyon Road Accident Kates- 34110 0.89 0.27 2.14 # of 2. DIST. 0.42 0.16 No. Street From To Acc. ADT (miles) Actual Expected 1 Alta Madera Road Avenida Navarre Avenida Velarte 2 3000 0.60 1.52 1.55 2 Alta Monte/Singing Hills McBean Parkway Lochmoor Road 0 0.15 0.19 0.00 1.55 3 Apple Street Cherry Street Lyons Avenue 1 6000 0.71 0.32 1.55 4 Arroyo Park Drive Summit Place Kirstengary Way 0 7815 0.37 0.00 1.55 5 Arroyo Park Drive KirstengeryWay Cortina Drive 1 5483 0.65 0.38 1.55 6 Ashboro Drive Whites Canyon Road Ermine Street 0 0.28 0.00 1.55 7 Avenue Crocker Avenue Hall Rye Canyon Road 0 3000 0.49 0.00 1.55 8 Avenue Hall Avenue Stanford Avenue Crocker 0 0.21 0.00 1.55 9 Avenue Hopkins 300' S/O Anza Drive Avenue Stanford 0 0.39 0.00 1.55 10 Avenue Kearny Avenue Scott Avenue Mentry 0 1500 0.26 0.00 1.55 11 Avenue Men" 300'810 Anza Drive Avenue Kearny 0 1500 0.19 0.00 1.55 12 Avenue Navarre/Velarte McBean Parkway East End 0 7400 0.60 0.00 1.55 13 Avenida Rotella Lyons Avenue Avenida Ronada 0 3759 0.16 0.00 1.55 14 Avenue Scott Rye Canyon Road Southeast City Limit 0 17360 0.55 0.00 1.55 15 Avenue Stanford SR 126 Avenue Hall 0 4441 0.80 0.00 2.14 16 Avenue Stanford Avenue Hall Rye Canyon Road 0 6896 0.47 0.00 1.55 17 Avenue Stanford Rye Canyon Road Avenue Scott 1 10705 0.84 0.15 2.14 18 Avenue Stanford Avenue Scott East City Limit 0 0.28 0.00 1.55 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Calgrove Boulevard Calgrove Boulevard Calla Way Camp Plenty Road Camp Plenty Road Carrizo Drive Championship Way Cinema Drive Circle J Street Citrus Street Copper Hill/S. Francisquito Copper Hill Drive Cortina Drive Creekside Road Dalbey Drive Decoro Drive Del Monte Drive Magic Mountain Pkwy Soledad Canyon Road Seco Canyon Road Alamogordo Road Centurion Way Urbandale Avenue Steve Jon Street West City Limits Wiley Canyon Road Camp Plenty Road Soledad Canyon Road Delight Street Arroyo Park Drive Tourney Road Valencia Boulevard Via Princessa Valencia Boulevard West City Limit 500' E/O Tamarack Lane Arroyo Park Drive Valencia Boulevard Orchard Village Road Vista Delgado Summit Place Soledad Canyon Road 3 47502 0.70 0.12 2.14 Seco Canyon Road 6 34110 0.89 0.27 2.14 Alamogordo Road 2. 39687 0.42 0.16 2.14 Centurion Way 7 35735 0.67 0.40 2.14 Urbandale Avenue 8 26586 0.65 0.63 2.14 Steve Jon Street 0 16981 0.77 0.00 2.14 Northeast City Limit 1 12217 0.74 0.15 2.14 Wiley Canyon Road Creekside Dribe Canyonview Drive Newhouse Street. Nadal Street Esteban Drive 1-5 N/B Off Ramp Bouquet Canyon Road San Fernando Road Magic Mountain Pkwy 500' E/O Tamarack Lane Haskell Canyon Road Alta Madera Road McBean Parkway 0 3415 0.14 0.00 1.55 0 6078 0.72 0.00 2.14 0 0.18 0.00 1.55 1 3364 0.54 0.75 1.55 0 4500 0.33 0.00 1.55 1 3000 0.56 0.82 1.55 0 021 0.00 1.55 0 10216 0.28 0.00 1.55 0 4988 0.29 0.00 1.55 3 10000 0.30 1.37 1.55 0 4319 0.82 0.00 2.14 1 4532 0.93 0.33 2.14 0 0.37 0.00 1.55 0 11126 0.74 0.00 2.14 Newhall Avenue 0 Seco Canyon Road 0 Emerald Dove Drive 0 0 4356 0.33 0.00 1.55 18014 0.10 0.00 1.55 0.42 0.00 1.55 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement (1 TABLE 1 cont'd u TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ANALYSIS 47 EI Paseo Drive r 48 Golden Triangle Road 49 Goldcrest Drive 50 Golf Course Road 51 Haskell Canyon Road 52 Haskell Canyon Road 53 John Russell Drive 54 Lyons Avenue 55 Lyons Avenue 56 Lyons Avenue '-' 57 Market Street 58 McBean Parkway 59 McBean Parkway 60 McBean Parkway 61 McBean Parkway (j 62 McBean Parkway IL JI 63 McBean Parkway 64 Nadal Street 65 Newhall Avenue 66 Newhall Avenue 67 Orchard Village Road 68 Orchard Village Road a 69 Pamplico Drive 70 Peachland Avenue Limits Placerita Canyon Road Camp Plenty Road Whites Canyon Road Accident Rates Lyons Avenue San Fernando Road 0.41 0.00 2.14 # of 3466 DIST. 0.00 2.14 0 No Street From To Acc. ADT (miles) Actual Expected 8 43 Del Monte Drive Emerald Dove Drive McBean Parkway 0 1858 0.62 0.00 1.55 4 44 Del Monte Drive McBean Parkway Estaban Drive 0 4004 0.84 0.00 1.55 1 45 Dockweiler Drive Sierra Highway Ivy Lane 0 2390 0.44 0.00 2.14 2 46 Dockweiler Drive Ivy Lane Leonard Tree Lane 0 2390 0.38 0.00 2.14 47 EI Paseo Drive r 48 Golden Triangle Road 49 Goldcrest Drive 50 Golf Course Road 51 Haskell Canyon Road 52 Haskell Canyon Road 53 John Russell Drive 54 Lyons Avenue 55 Lyons Avenue 56 Lyons Avenue '-' 57 Market Street 58 McBean Parkway 59 McBean Parkway 60 McBean Parkway 61 McBean Parkway (j 62 McBean Parkway IL JI 63 McBean Parkway 64 Nadal Street 65 Newhall Avenue 66 Newhall Avenue 67 Orchard Village Road 68 Orchard Village Road a 69 Pamplico Drive 70 Peachland Avenue 71 Placerita Canyon Road (j 72 Placerita Canyon Road II JI 73 Plum Canyon Road 74 Railroad Avenue 75 Rainbow Glen Drive 76 Rainbow Glen Drive 77 Rainbow Glen Drive 78 Rockwell Canyon Road l 79 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) 80 Rte 126 (Magic Mt. Pkwy) i Estaban Drive Del Monte Drive 600' W/O Reuther Avenue Rainbow Glen Drive Valencia Boulevard Del Monte Drive Tournament Road Lochmoor Road Bouquet Canyon Road Grove Park Drive Cortina Drive West City Limits Wiley Canyon Road Orchard Village Road Grove Park Drive Copper Hill Drive Estaban Drive Wiley Canyon Road Orchard Village Road San Fernando Road Newhall Avenue Cross Street West City Limits Tournament Road Tournament Road Orchard Village Road Orchard Village. Road Arroyo Park Drive Arroyo Park Drive Valencia Boulevard Valencia Boulevard Magic Mountain Pkwy Magic Mountain Parkway North City Limit 1.55 1 Camp Plenty Road Whites Canyon Road 16th Street Lyons Avenue Lyons Avenue San Fernando Road Wiley Canyon Road McBean Parkway Taryn Drive Cherry Way 12th Street 2400'W/0 Sierra Hwy. Bouquet Canyon Road San Fernando Road Soledad Canyon Road Gilbert Drive Via Princessa Valencia Boulevard West City Limit 100' E/0 Tourney Road Lyons Avenue Wiley Canyon Road Ron Ridge Drive Lyons Avenue 1900' E/O 12th Street Sierra Highway East City Limits 11th Street Gilbert Drive Via Princessa Jacana Rd (End of St) McBean Parkway 100' E/O Tourney Road McBean Parkway 5 0 0.74 0.00 1.55 0 5289 0.66 0.00 2.14 1 1655 0.38 2.18 1.55 0 0.17 0.00 1.55 0 9229 0.41 0.00 2.14 0 3466 0.88 0.00 2.14 0 3000 0.49 0.00 1.55 5 28760 0.37 0.64 2.14 8 32856 1.00 0.33 1.55 6 33241 0.63 0.39 2.14 4 3686 0.56 2.65 1.55' 1 21539 0.33 0.19 2.14 1 21566 0.70 0.09 2.14 4 35526 0.67 0.23 2.14 2 36311 0.67 0.11 2.14 1 23547 0.47 0.12 2.14 0 28018 0.29 0.00 2.14 3 8314 0.53 0.93 1.55 1 7016 0.84 0.23 1.55 1 15457 0.46 0.19 1.55 2 23867 0.80 0.14 2.14 3 32956 0.55 0.23 2.14 0 2568 0.30 0.00 1.55 1 5000 0.19 1.44 1.55 0 8595 0.36 0.00 1.55 0 8940 0.45 0.00 2.14 0 2781 0.56 0.00 1.55 0 2000 0.60 0.00 1.55 0 9243 0.37 0.00 1.55 0 9243 0.42 0.00 1.55 0 0.42 0.00 1.55 3 10019 1.00 0.41 2.14 0 27806 0.38 0.00 3.30 2 27806 0.94 0.10 3.30 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement TABLE 1 cont'd TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ANALYSIS Limits Accident R51e-s # of DIST. No Street From To Acc. ADT (miles) Actual Expecte( 81 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) McBean Parkway Valencia Boulevard 1 13869 0.70 0.14 2.90 62 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) Valencia Boulevard Bouquet Canyon Road 0 11000 0.56 0.00 2.90 83 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Magic Mountain Parkway Circle J Ranch Road 16 29780 0.86 0.86 2.90 84 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Circle J Ranch Road Placerita Creek Bridge 5 32952 0.56 0.37 2.90 85 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Placenta Creek Bridge 13th Street 4 32952 0.65 0.26 3.30 86 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) 13th Street Lyons Avenue 8 30255 0.21 1.72 3.30 87 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Lyons Avenue Newhall Avenue 1 23536 0.42. 0.14 4.80 88 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Newhall Avenue South City Limit 8 32254 1.46 0.23 2.90 89 Rye Canyon Road West City Limit Northeast City Limit 1 10324 0.88 0.15 2.14 90 Sand Canyon Road Placerita Canyon Road Live Oaks Springs Cyn Rd 2 3106 2.16 0.41 2..14 91 Sand Canyon Road Live Oaks Springs Cyn Rd Lost Canyon Road 2 4505 0.65 0.94 2.14 92 Sand Canyon Road Lost Canyon Road Soledad Canyon Road 1 9099 0.47 0.32 2.14 93. Sand Canyon Road Soledad Canyon Road North City Limit 0 4985 0.57 0.00 2.14 94 Seco Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Decoro Drive 0 20593 0.72 0.00 2.14 95 Seco Canyon Road Decoro Drive Pamplico Drive 2 29185 0.55 0.17 2.14 96 Seco Canyon Road Pamplico Drive Copper Hill Drive 1 14607 0.60 0.16 2.14 97 Shadow Pines Blvd. Soledad Canyon Road North City Limit 1 7448 0.84 022 1.55 98 Sierra Highway South City Limit San Fernando Road 2 16629 1.51 0.11 2.14 99 Sierra Highway .San Fernando Road Placerita Canyon Road 2 14088 1.12 0.17 2.14 100 Sierra Highway Placerita Canyon Road Friendly Valley Parkway 11 19904 2.10 0.36 2.14 101 Sierra Highway Friendly Valley Parkway Via Princessa 0 23511 0.63 0.00 2.14 102 Sierra Highway Via Princessa Soledad Canyon Road 9 28579 0.95 0.45 2.14 103 Sierra Highway Soledad Canyon Road Scheainger Lane 2 20890 1.23 0,11 2,14 104 Sierra Highway Scheainger Lane North City Limit 4 13714 0.84 0.48 2.14 105 Singing Hills Drive Arroyo Park Drive McBean Parkway 0 2494 0.21 0.00 1.55 106 Soledad Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road 1500' FJO Bouquet Cyn Rd 7 53211 0.28 0.64 2.14 107 Soledad Canyon Road 1500' E/O Bouquet Cyn Rd Commuter Way` ,. 8 53211 0.72 0.29 2.14 108 Soledad Canyon Road Commuter Way Golden Oak Rbad 6 46781 0.81 022 2.14 109 Soledad Canyon Road Golden Oak Road Ruether Avenue 16 46373 0.88 0.54 2.14 110 Soledad Canyon Road Ruether Avenue Langside Avenue 9 40977 0.79 0.38 1.55 111 Soledad Canyon Road Langside Avenue Camp Plenty Road 1 40977 0.67 0.05 2.14 112 Soledad Canyon Road Camp Plenty Road Luther Street 21 39949 0.68 1.06 2.14 113 Soledad Canyon Road Luther Street Sierra Highway 14 41506 0.47 0.98 2.14 114 Soledad Canyon Road Sierra Highway Galeton Road 4 33777 0.47 0.35 2.14 115 Soledad Canyon Road Galeton Road Anne Freda Street 5 25203 1.00 0.27 2.14 116 Soledad Canyon Road Anne Freda Street Kenroy Avenue 4 24945 0.70 0.31 2.14 1'17 Soledad Canyon Road Rte. 14 On/Off Ramp Flowerpark Drive 6 15300 0.70 0.77 2.14 118 Soledad Canyon Road Flowerpark Drive Shadow Pines Boulevard 1 8188 1.00 0,17 2.14 119 Summit Place Arroyo Park Drive Rockwell Canyon Road 0 3347 0.15 0.00 1.55 120 Trevino Drive Tournament Road Vista Fairways 0 2000 0.37 0.00 1.55 121 Tournament Road McBean Parkway Golf Course Road 2 9104 0.51 0.59 2.14 122 Tournament Road Golf Course Road Wiley Canyon Road 0 8620 0.56 0.00 1.55 123. Tourney Road Valencia Boulevard Magic Mountain Parkway 1 1768 1,11 0.70 2.14 124 Valle Del Oro Rte. 126 Dockweiler Drive 0 3230 0.62 0.00 1.55 125 Valley Street Lyons Avenue Happy Valley Street 0 15804 0.30 0.00 1.55 6 0 0 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement TABLE 1 cont'd TRAFFIC ACCIDENT ANALYSIS 11 Limits Accident Rates No. 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 Valley Street Valley Street Valley Street Valencia Boulevard Valencia Boulevard Valencia Boulevard Valencia Boulevard Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa 140 Wayman Street 141 Whites Canyon Road 142 Whites Canyon Road 143 Whites Canyon Road 144 Whites Canyon Road 145 Wiley Canyon Road 146 Wiley Canyon Road 147 Wiley Canyon Road 148 Wiley Canyon Road 149 16th Street From Happy Valley Street Maple Street 500' SIO Alamos Lane West City Limit Rockwell Canyon Road McBean Parkway Magic Mountain Parkway Circle J Ranch Road Rainbow Glen Drive May Way Whites Canyon Road Weyerhaeuser Way Sierra Highway Price Club Entrance Lola Lane Via Princessa Soledad Canyon Road Pleasantdale Street Nadal Street Via Pacifica Orchard Village Road Lyons Avenue Powell Drive Newhall Avenue Maple Street 500' S/O Alamos Lane Creekside Drive Rockwell Canyon Road McBean Parkway Magic Mountain Parkway Bouquet Canyon Road End of Street May Way Whites Canyon Road Weyerhaeuser Way Sierra Highway Price Club Entrance East City Limit Lyons Avenue Soledad Canyon Road Pleasantdale Street Nadal Street Ashboro Drive Orchard Village Road Lyons Avenue Powell Drive Calgrove Boulevard Orchard Village Road 7 # of DIST. Acc. ADT (miles 0 2323 0.42 0.00 1.55 0 2323 0.19 0.00 1.55 0 1355 0.30 0.00 1.55 0 26492 0.52 0.00 2.14 1 31591 0.56 0.08 2.14 12 25190 0.70 0.93 2.14 10 46611 0.79 0.37 2.14 1 4988 037 0.74 1.55 0 6227 0.40 0.00 2.14 0 9009 0..19 0.00 2.14 0 23029 0.35 0.00 2.14 0 23029 0.35 0.00 2.14 0 22135 0.19 0.00 2.14 0 24040 0.19 0.00 2.14 0 0.47 0.00 1.55 0 19174 0.49 0.00 2.14 2 25154 0.35 0.31 2.14 0 16649 0.58 0.00 1.55 0 6759 0.88 0.00 2.14 0 0.33 0.00 1.55 3 14187 1.10 0.26 2.14 1 13097 0.33 0.32 1.55 0 6152 0.81 0.00 1.55 0 9290 0.31 0.00 1.55 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement • Traffic flow characteristics • Uniformity with the community • On -street parking turnover The observations were recorded for use as background data used in evaluating the various street segments to determine if physical conditions warranted consideration of the additional five -mph reduction of the recommended speed in accordance with the Traffic Manual. Appendix B contains the traffic and engineering survey and traffic accident analysis summary and speed limit support documentation sheets, raw speed data sheets, speed data statistical sheets, and engineering survey forms. SURVEY RESULTS Radar Surveys Table 2 summarizes the following measured survey statistics: • 85th percentile speed • 50th percentile speed • 10 -mph pace • Range of speeds Although both directions were surveyed at each location, the measured data of the direction containing the lower 85th percentile speed only for each location was tabulated in Table 2. Traffic Accident Analysis The number of accidents at each location was used to detet'tnine the annual accident rate for each location. The accident rates were determined through the following formula: annual accident rate = # of accidents x 106/AADT x zone distance Where: AADT = annual average daily traffic Zone Distance = length of speed zone, miles The computed annual accident rates were compared to expected accident rates for similar facilities. If the actual rate for a given location exceeded the corresponding expected rate, the given location was designated as a critical accident location. The expected accident rates were obtained from the Los Angeles County Public Works Department for Santa Clarita-owned facilities and from the "State Route 126 Speed Zone Survey Report," Makagini Corporation 1990, for State Route 126. No. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement TABLE 2 Alta Madera Road Alta Monte/Singing Hills Apple Street Arroyo Park Drive Arroyo Park Drive Ashboro Drive Avenue Crocker Avenue Hall Avenue Hopkins Avenue Kearny Avenue Mentry Avenue Navarre/Velarte Avenida Rotella Avenue Scott Avenue Stanford Avenue Stanford Avenue Stanford Avenue Stanford Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Calgrove Boulevard Calgrove Boulevard Calla Way Camp Plenty Road Camp Plenty Road Carrizo Drive Championship Way Cinema Drive Circle J Street Citrus Street Copper Hill/S. Francisquito Copper Hill Drive Cortina Drive Creekside Road SPEED SURVEY SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Limits 10 Range s a ec. 85th 50th MPH of Speed Speed From Avenida Navarre McBean Parkway Cherry Street Summit Place Kirstengary Way Whites Canyon Road Avenue Hall Avenue Stanford 300' S/O Anza Drive Avenue Scott 300' S/O Anza Drive McBean Parkway Lyons Avenue Rye Canyon Road SR 126 Avenue Hall Rye Canyon Road Avenue Scott Magic Mountain Pkwy Soledad Canyon Road Seco Canyon Road Alamogordo Road Centurion Way Urbandale Avenue Steve Jon Street West City Limits Wiley Canyon Road Camp Plenty Road Soledad Canyon Road Delight Street Arroyo Park Drive Tourney Road Valencia Boulevard Via Princessa Valencia Boulevard West City Limit 500' E/O Tamarack Lane Arroyo Park Drive Valencia Boulevard Avenida Velarte Lochmoor Road Lyons Avenue Kirstengary Way Cortina Drive Ermine Street Rye Canyon Road Avenue Crocker Avenue Stanford Avenue Men" Avenue Kearny East End Avenida Ronada Southeast City Limit Avenue Hall Rye Canyon Road Avenue Scott East City Limit Soledad Canyon Road Seco Canyon Road Alamogordo Road Centurion Way Urbandale Avenue Steve Jon Street Northeast City Limit 34 27 21-30 20-43 35 35 33 29 24-33 21-40 45 30 34 31 27-36 25-38 45 25 37 34 30-39 25-45 35 35 35 32 28-37 25-37 35 35 31 27 22-31 23-37 30 30 43 37 35-04 25-46 45 40 40 36 32-41 2947 20-27 40 41 37 32-41 30-56 3241 40 39 36 30-39 27-43 35 35 37 32 27-36 2740 42 35 37 33 29-38 25-41 35 35 33 30 24-33 24-35 45 30 44 41 37-46 32-49 45 '45 57 52 48-57 42-60 23-42 50 45 41 36-45 28-49 45 45 48 44 3948 25-53 45 45 37 32 28-37 2548 25 35 48 45 39-48 35-55 45 45 50 45 41-50. 36-52 45 45 47 43 40-49 36-53 45 45 55 53 49-58 44-58 50 50 51 46 42-51 38-55 50 50 52 49 44-53 40-55 50 50 53 48 44-53 40-58 45 45 Wiley Canyon Road 45 39 36-45 27-53 45 45 Creekside Drive 48 44 39-48 32-53 45 45 Canyonview Drive 29 26 22-31 23-31 30 30 Newhouse Street 34 30 26-35 2240 35 30 Nadal Street 31 27 22-31 20-37 30 30 Esteban Drive 31 27 23-32 22-37 35 30 1-5 N/B Off Ramp 25 23 18-27 20-27 25 Bouquet Canyon Road 42 37 3241 2945 35 San Fernando Road 41 35 29-38 2546 40 Magic Mountain Pkwy 42 39 3443 3449 40 500' E/O Tamarack 52 47 43-52 35-57 45 Haskell Canyon Road 46 43 36-45 36-50 40 Alta Madera Road 37 33 28-37 23-42 35 35 McBean Parkway 40 36 3241 28-51 35 35 40 Dalbey Drive Orchard Village Road Newhall Avenue 29 26 21-30 20-32 25 25 41 Decoro Drive Vista Delgado Seco Canyon Road 30 28 23-32 23-36 35 30 42 Del Monte Drive Summit Place Emerald Dove Drive 44 40 35-44 30-50 35 35 0 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement TABLE 2 cont'd SPEED SURVEY SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 47 EI Paseo Drive 48 Golden Triangle Road 49 Goldcrest Drive 50 Golf Course Road 51 Haskell Canyon Road 52 Haskell Canyon Road 53 John Russell Drive 54 Lyons Avenue 55 Lyons Avenue 56 Lyons Avenue 57 Market Street 58 McBean Parkway 59 McBean. Parkway 60 McBean Parkway 61 McBean Parkway 62 McBean Parkway 63 McBean Parkway 64 Nadal Street 65 Newhall Avenue 66 Newhall Avenue 67 Orchard Village Road 68 Orchard Village Road 69 Pamplico Drive 70 Limits 71 Placenta Canyon Road iu mange tstaD. rcec. 79 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) 80 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) 85th 50th MPH of Speed Speed No Street From To % °% Pace Speed Limit Limit 45 43 Del Monte Drive Emerald Dove Drive McBean Parkway 45 41 37-46 30-50 35 35 45 44 Del Monte Drive McBean Parkway Esteban Drive 40 34 30-39 2547 35 35 45 45 Dockweiler Drive Sierra Highway Ivy Lane 48 45 41-50 35-53 29 45 20-37 46 Dockweiler Drive Ivy Lane Leonard Tree Lane 35 31 28-37 25-39 36 35 47 EI Paseo Drive 48 Golden Triangle Road 49 Goldcrest Drive 50 Golf Course Road 51 Haskell Canyon Road 52 Haskell Canyon Road 53 John Russell Drive 54 Lyons Avenue 55 Lyons Avenue 56 Lyons Avenue 57 Market Street 58 McBean Parkway 59 McBean. Parkway 60 McBean Parkway 61 McBean Parkway 62 McBean Parkway 63 McBean Parkway 64 Nadal Street 65 Newhall Avenue 66 Newhall Avenue 67 Orchard Village Road 68 Orchard Village Road 69 Pamplico Drive 70 Peachland Avenue 71 Placenta Canyon Road 72 Placenta Canyon Road 73 Plum Canyon Road 74 Railroad Avenue 75 Rainbow Glen Drive 76 Rainbow Glen Drive 77 Rainbow Glen Drive 78 Rockwell Canyon Road 79 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) 80 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) Esteban Drive Del Monte Drive 600' W/O Reuther Avenue Rainbow Glen Drive Valencia Boulevard Del Monte Drive Tournament Road Lochmoor Road 37 34 29-38 20-42 35 35 42 38 33.42 29-50 40 42 36 3140 3045 35 37 32 25-34 2040 35 35 Bouquet Canyon Road Grove Park Drive 46 43 3847 31-50 45 45 Grove Park Drive Copper Hill Drive 46 43 3746 37-57 45 Cortina Drive Esteban Drive 44 38 31-40 2848 35 35 West City Limits Wiley Canyon Road Orchard Village Road Newhall Avenue West City Limits Tournament Road Orchard Village. Road Arroyo Park Drive Valencia Boulevard Magic Mountain Parkway Camp Plenty Road 16th Street Lyons Avenue Wiley Canyon Road McBean Parkway Taryn Drive Cherry Way 12th Street 240V W/O Sierra Hwy. Bouquet Canyon Road San Fernando Road Soledad Canyon Road Gilbert Drive Via Princessa Valencia Boulevard West City Limit 100' E/O Tourney Road Wiley Canyon Road Orchard Village Road San Fernando Road Cross Street Tournament Road Orchard Village Road Arroyo Park Drive Valencia Boulevard Magic Mountain Pkwy North City Limit i t' i Whites Canyon Road Lyons Avenue . San Fernando Road Lyons Avenue Wiley Canyon Road Ron Ridge Drive Lyons Avenue 1900' E/O 12th Street Sierra Highway East City Limits 11th Street Gilbert Drive Via Princessa Jacana Rd (End of St) McBean Parkway 100' E/O Tourney Road McBean Parkway 10 50 45 41-50 35-58 40 40 41 36 32-41 30-46 40 40 45 40 35-44 30-50 40 40 31 28 23-32 22-33 35 30 47 44 40-49 36-52 45 45 45 42 37-46 35-53 45 45 51 47 41-50 39-54 45 45 51 47 43-52 38-56 45 45 50 46 42-51 35-52 45 50 53 49 45-54 40-60 45 50 33 29 25-34 20-37 30 30 29 26 21-30 20-35 25 25 36 33 29-38 25-38 35 35 46 43 38-47 33-50 45 45 52 47 44-53 37-59 45 45 35 32 26-35 2541 30 28 25 20-29 20-33 25 43 38 3544 20-46 40 40 46 41 3544 30-51 40 40 42 39 32-41 2947 40 30 27 21-30 21-32 25 25 41 37 32-41 2743 35 35 39 36 32-41 2941 35 35 39 37 30-39 30-41 35 35 54 51. 45-54 42-60 45 45 42 39 34-43 29-53 55 40 50 44 40-49 33-60 55 50 I I a r I I 0 I I I D City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement TABLE 2 cont'd SPEED SURVEY SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 90 Sand Canyon Road Limits Live Oaks Springs Cyn Rd 48 45 10 Range Estab. Rec. 91 Sand Canyon Road Live Oaks Springs Cyn Rd Lost Canyon Road 85th 50th MPH of Speed Speed No Street From To % % Pace Speed Limit Limit 81 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) McBean Parkway Valencia Boulevard 52 45 40-49 34-60 50 50 82 Rte 126 (Magic Mt Pkwy) Valencia Boulevard Bouquet Canyon Road 52 45 43-52 36-55 45 50 83 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Magic Mountain Parkway Circle J Ranch Road 57 53 48-57 44-60 45 55 84 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Circle J Ranch Road Placerita Creek Bridge 55 51 47-56 40-60 45 55 85 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Placerita Creek Bridge 13th Street 47 42 35-44 32-53 45 45 86 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) 13th Street Lyons Avenue 41 38 34-43 33-06 30 40 87 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Lyons Avenue Newhall Avenue 36 32 29-38 20A0 30 30 88 Rte 126 (San Fernando Rd) Newhall Avenue South City Limit 47 43 40419 35-55 45 45 89 Rye Canyon Road West City Limit Northeast City Limit 48 44 39-48 39-52 45 45 90 Sand Canyon Road Placerita Canyon Road Live Oaks Springs Cyn Rd 48 45 4D-49 37-53 45 45 91 Sand Canyon Road Live Oaks Springs Cyn Rd Lost Canyon Road 50 46 42-51 39-55 45 45 92 Sand Canyon Road Lost Canyon Road Soledad Canyon Road 45 41 37-46 35.46 45 45 93 Sand Canyon Road Soledad Canyon Road North City Limit 48 45 40-49 37-53 45 .45 94 Seco Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road Decoro Drive 48 43 39-48 32-53 45 45 95 Seco Canyon Road Decoro Drive Pamplico Drive 50 45 41-50 36-55 45 45 96 Seco Canyon Road Pamplico Drive Copper Hill Drive 50 45 41-50 34-54 45 45 97 Shadow Pines Boulevard Soledad Canyon Road North City Limit 42 39 35-44 34-45 35 40 98 Sierra Highway South City Limit San Fernando Road 51 46 41-50 35-58 50 50 99 Sierra Highway San Fernando Road Placerita Canyon Road 52 47 43-52 36-59 55 50 100 Sierra Highway Placerita Canyon Road Friendly Valley Parkway 52 47 43-52 3450 55 50 101 Sierra Highway Friendly Valley Parkway Via Princessa 47 42 37.46 25-55 50 45 102 Sierra Highway Via Princessa Soledad Canyon Road 46 41 28-47 29-54 50 45 103 Sierra Highway Soledad Canyon Road Scherzinger Lane 46 42 3847 30-52 50 45 104 Sierra Highway Scherzinger Lane North City Limit 48 44 4049 32-57 50 45 105 Singing Hills Drive Arroyo Park Drive McBean Parkway 38 35 30-39 3D-40 35 106 Soledad Canyon Road Bouquet Canyon Road 1500' E/O Bouquet Cyn Rd 48 45 3948 36-54 45 45 107 Soledad Canyon Road 1500' E/O Bouquet Cyn Rd Commuter Way ' 49 44 4049 35-56 55 50 108 Soledad Canyon Road Commuter Way Golden Oak Road 50 45 41-50 35-59 55 50 109 Soledad Canyon Road Golden Oak Road Ruether Avenue, 50 46 41-50 3750 50 50 110 Soledad Canyon Road Ruether Avenue Langside Avenue 49 45 40-49 3450 50 50 111 Soledad Canyon Road Langside Avenue Camp Plenty Road 50 46 41-50 36-57 50 50 112 Soledad Canyon Road Camp Plenty Road Luther Street 37 33 30-39 23-40 40 40 113 Soledad Canyon Road Luther Street Sierra Highway 44 39 3443 2550 45 40 114 Soledad Canyon Road Sierra Highway Galeton Road 46 41 3746 27-52 45 45 115 Soledad Canyon Road Galeton Road Anne Freda Street 50 46 41-50 3350 50 50 116 Soledad Canyon Road Anne Freda Street Kenroy Avenue 45 41 36-45 29-55 50145 45 117 Soledad Canyon Road SR 14 On/Off Ramp Flowerpark Drive 51 47 42-51 3550 50 50 118 Soledad Canyon Road Flowerpark Drive Shadow Pines Boulevard 51 48 44-53 4050 50 50 119 Summit Place Arroyo Park Drive Rockwell Canyon Road 30 27 24-33 23-34 30 120 Trevino Drive Tournament Road Vista Fairways 33 30 25-34 25-38 25 25 121 Tournament Road McBean Parkway Golf Course Road 43 39 34-43 30-47 40 40 122 Tournament Road Golf Course Road Wiley Canyon Road 39 36 3140 31-46 35 35 123 Tourney Road Valencia Boulevard Magic Mountain Parkway 47 43 3847 3049 40 40 124 Valle Del Oro Rte. 126 Dockweiler Drive 35 30 25-34 23-38 30 125 Valley Street Lyons Avenue Happy Valley Street 37 34 29-38 29-41 35 35 11 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement TABLE 2 cont'd SPEED SURVEY SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Limits 10 Range Estalb. Rec. 85th 50th MPH of Speed Speed No.. Street From _ To % % Pace Speed Limit Limit 126 127 12B 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 Valley Street Valley Street Valley Street Valencia Boulevard Valencia Boulevard Valencia Boulevard Valencia Boulevard Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa Via Princessa 140 Wayman Street 141 Whites Canyon Road 142 Whites Canyon Road 143 Whites Canyon Road 144 Whites Canyon Road 145 Wiley Canyon Road 146 Wiley Canyon Road 147 Wiley Canyon Road 148 Wiley Canyon Road Happy Valley Street Maple Street 500' SIO Alamos Lane West City Limit Rockwell Canyon Road McBean Parkway Magic Mountain Parkway Circle J Ranch Road Rainbow Glen Drive May Way Whites Canyon Road Weyerhaeuser Way Sierra Highway Price Club Entrance Lola Lane Via Princessa Soledad Canyon Road Pleasantdale Street Nadal Street Via Pacifica Orchard Village Road Lyons Avenue Powell Drive Maple Street 35 31 26-35 25-43 25 25 500' SIO Alamos Lane 28 26 22-31 22-31 25 25 Creekside Drive 30 27 22-31 20-32 30 30 Rockwell Canyon Road 54 50 45-54 39-60 50 50 McBean Parkway 53 50 46-55 39-57 50 50 Magic Mountain Parkway 46 41 37-46 35-49 45 45 Bouquet Canyon Road 47 43 38-47 31-50 45 45 End of Street 41 34 28-37 25-44 40 40 May Way 50 46 40-49 39-54 45 45 Whites Canyon Road 48 45 40-49 40-54 45 45 Weyerhaeuser Way 59 55 51-60 46.60 50 50 Sierra Highway 57 53 47-56 44-60 50 50 Price Club Entrance 45 41 36-45 31-50 45 45 East City Limit 45 42 37-45 34-50 45 '45 Lyons Avenue 30 27 22-31 22-33 25 Soledad Canyon Road 52 45 45-54 34-54 50 50 Pleasantdale Street 48 44 39-48 30-58 40 40 Nadal Street 44 40 36-45 30-53 40 40 Ashboro Drive 54 49 43-52 40-60 45 45 Orchard Village Road 43 39 3645 2947 40 40 Lyons Avenue 45 42 3746 36-50 45 45 Powell Drive 38 35 30-39 2642 35 35 Calgrove Boulevard 39 36 31-40 28-43 35 35 149 16th Street Newhall Avenue Orchard Village Road 41 38 3241 3045 40 40 12 8 City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement If the actual computed accident rate exceeded the expected rate at a given location, justification U was provided to reduce the given speed limit an additional five mph below the prevailing speed. Table 1 summarizes the traffic accident analysis results. The locations labeled with an asterisk (") in the far -right column are the locations at which the actual rate exceeded the expected rate. Engineering Surveys During the speed limit recommendation process, the engineering survey forms were reviewed to check if any unusual conditions not readily apparent to the driver currently exist at any of the 149 locations. If any such conditions were observed at any of the locations, further consideration was n given to reducing the speed limit for the given location an additional five mph below the J prevailing speed, providing that the given location was a critical accident location, as well. SURVEY ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDED SPEED ZONE CHANGES Speed Limit Recommendation Process Generally, the recommended speed limits were determined as the first five -mph increment below the measured prevailing speed. However, in some instances, the accident analysis and engineering survey results may have provided justification for reducing the recommended speed limit by an additional five mph at a given location, Figure 1 illustrates the recommended speed limits. Table 2 provides a summary of the existing and recommended speed limits for the 149 locations. Ll Speed Limit Recommendation Summary Increases are recommended in the speed limits for the following locations: INCREASES TO EXISTING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS LJ Limits N I I lJ 111 11 III Street From McBean Parkway Valencia Boulevard Shadow Pines Boulevard Soledad Canyon Road Valley Street Avenue Stanford Happy Valley Avenue Scott To North City Limit North City Limit Maple Street East City Limit Decreases are recommended in the speed limits for the following locations: Street Avenue Crocker Camp Plenty Road Existing/ Recommended Limit 45/50 35/40 25/30 25/35 DECREASES TO EXISTING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS Limits From Avenue Hall Soledad Canyon Road 13 To Rye Canyon Road Newhouse Street Existing/ Recommended Limit 45/40 35/30 Im LE & ASSOCIATES PZI.DWG AY, s" z JqM F N O VALENCIA BLVD `O OR FS ct OR ,m c ENSIA n� DE` PASEfl s RU55 �MaoERA t a 411N oP PR0y0 i .ARRA � PT v9in In q..L U,GBEAN Jr" P'FN'tA � 6�. 9� 9 IF ONTE RN AVE y x Qpm GOLF OOVRSE 0 p I � 'Ro NDN • IN Dk A P2IQ p? t SYCnS m N lE kri $ In • � r a 1 0+ N pa Cy+-CROyF aEvro W* E S -- s SAUGUS u A 2 CANYGN SANTA CLARITA ? ACFQ�Q s P�CEPoTq CANYON 0 NE WHALL, FF RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS t CANYON COUNTRY A J LEGEND FREEWAY t £LEr+ENTrm Rc1.01 FREEWAY VNOFR CON4RUCTiON BAI A y 5) IMERSTATE HIGHWAY CLARRA INCORPORAIEO Ctt' \� CAUFORNY\ yYw'cY DISTRICT 9R UNI CORCORATCO. $iAl[ IIIGIWAY NNMUNITI ?5 MPH 30 MPH 35 MPH 40 MPH 45 MPH 50 MPH 55 MPH self Iry rvllrs os Im LE & ASSOCIATES PZI.DWG AY, s" z JqM F N O VALENCIA BLVD `O OR FS ct OR ,m c ENSIA n� DE` PASEfl s RU55 �MaoERA t a 411N oP PR0y0 i .ARRA � PT v9in In q..L U,GBEAN Jr" P'FN'tA � 6�. 9� 9 IF ONTE RN AVE y x Qpm GOLF OOVRSE 0 p I � 'Ro NDN • IN Dk A P2IQ p? t SYCnS m N lE kri $ In • � r a 1 0+ N pa Cy+-CROyF aEvro W* E S -- s SAUGUS u A 2 CANYGN SANTA CLARITA ? ACFQ�Q s P�CEPoTq CANYON 0 NE WHALL, FF RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS t CANYON COUNTRY A J r I E City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement DECREASES TO EXISTING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS cont'd Street Carrizo Drive Decoro Drive Market Street Sierra Highway Sierra Highway Soledad Canyon Road Soledad Canyon Road Soledad Canyon Road Soledad Canyon Road From Arroyo Park Vista Delgado Newhall Avenue San Fernando Road Friendly Valley Pkwy 1500' E/O Bouquet Canyon Road Commuter Way Luther Drive Anne Freda Street Limits To Estaban Seco Canyon Road Cross Street Friendly Valley Pkwy North City Limit Commuter Way Golden Oak Drive Sierra Highway Kenroy Avenue Existing/ Recommended Limit 35/30 35/30 35/30 55/50 50/45 55/50 55/50 45/40 50/45 The following locations previously did not have an established engineering and traffic survey. According to the CVC, in absence of an established survey, the prima facie speeds on these streets would be 55 mph, except for streets within business or residential districts or adjacent to schools or senior citizens facilities, where the prima facie speed would be 25 mph (CVC Section 22352). (� The new surveys were conducted to adjust the prima facie speed limits to an appropriate limit as lJ outlined below: U I I I J 11 J I Street Alta Monte Drive/ Singing Hills Drive Apple Street Avenue Hall Avenue Hopkins Avenue Kearny Avenue Mentry Avenue Rotella Avenue Stanford Avenue Stanford Championship Way Cinema Drive Circle J Street NEW ESTABLISHED PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS From McBean Parkway Cherry Street Avenue Stanford 300'S/0 Anza Drive Avenue Scott 300'S/0 Anza Drive Lyons Avenue Avenue Hall Avenue Scott Tourney Road Valencia Boulevard Via Princessa Limits To Lochmoor Road n15 Lyons Avenue Avenue Crocker Avenue Stanford Avenue Mentry Avenue Kearny Avenida Ronada Rte. 126 (Henry Mayo Drive) East City Limit N/B 1-5 Ramp Bouquet Canyon Road San Fernando Road Recommended Limit 30 40 40 35 35 30 50 35 25 35 40 CI I I I I I I ISI I I 1J LTJ City of Santa Clarita Traffic and Engineering Surveys to Support Radar Enforcement NEW ESTABLISHED PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS cont'd Street Citrus Street Copper Hill Drive Dockweiler Drive Golden Triangle Road Goldcrest Drive Haskell Canyon Road Magic Mountain Pkwy Pamplico Drive Peachland Avenue Plum Canyon Road San Fernando Road San Fernando Road San Fernando Road San Fernando Road San Fernando Road Singing Hills Drive Soledad Canyon Road Summit Place Valle Del Oro Wayman Street clien6clarita1120001 lejnr0195.do Limits From Valencia Boulevard West City Limit Sierra Highway 600' W/O Ruether Ave Valencia Boulevard Grove Park Drive Interstate 5 Taryn Drive Cherry Way Bouquet Canyon Road Magic Mountain Pkwy Placenta Creek Bridge 13th Street Lyons Avenue Newhall McBean Parkway SR14 On/Off Ramp Rockwell Canyon Road San Fernando Road Lola Lane 16 To Magic Mountain Pkwy Haskell Canyon Road Ivy Lane Rainbow Glen Drive Del Monte Drive Copper Hill Drive Bouquet Canyon Road Ron Ridge Drive Lyons Avenue East City Limit Placerita Creek Bridge 13th Street Lyons Avenue Newhall East City Limit Arroyo Park Drive Shadow Pines Blvd Arroyo Park Drive Dockweiler Drive Lyons Avenue Recommended Limit 40 45/40 45/35 40 35 45 40/50 30 25 40 55 45 40 30 45 35 50 30 30 25 APPENDIX A Excerpts from California Vehicle Code and Caltrans Traffic Manual L IL EXCERPTS FROM CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE Actions Local Authorities May Take by Resolution 32. Whenever local authorities are given the power to take action by ordinance pursuant to Division 11 (commencing with Section 21000) and Division 15 (commencing with Section 35000), they shall also have the power to take such action by resolution. Engineering and Traffic Survey n 627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by Department of Transportation for use by the state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed n necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: l� (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. l Basic Speed Law C� 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. Speed Law Violations 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway nbt in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized' in this code is lawful unless clearly provided to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place, and under the conditions then existing. aPrima Facie Speed Limits 22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized n in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof: l� I� c LJ P I I LJ r I !J P I I I I I I I ISI (a) Fifteen miles per hour. (1) When traversing a railway grade crossing if, during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways if, during the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley. (b) Twenty-five miles per hour: (1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (2) When passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical tbarrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign. (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority is not required to erect any sign pursuant to this paragraph until donations from private sources covering those costs are received and the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may, however, utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs. Increase of Local Limits 22357. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise 2 P L! I I I I P I\I r I lJ subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, or 50 miles per hour, or a maximum speed limit of 55 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. The provisions of this section do not apply to any 25 -mile -per -hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens. Decrease of Local Limits 22358. Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 55 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 55 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. Downward Speed Zoning 22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade, and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions., Boundary Line Streets 22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets nconsisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions. l Speed Trap Prohibition 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating, or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code_ n Speed Trap 1`JI 40802. A "speed trap" is either of the following: a 0 (a) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (b) A particular section of highway with a prima facie speed limit provided by this code or by local ordinance pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established pursuant to Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, which speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects. This subdivision does not apply to local streets and roads. For purposes of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and federal -aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions: (1) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet. (2) Not more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control devices as defined in Section 445. (3) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. Speed Trap Evidence 40803 (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap., (b) In any prosecution under this code of charge'involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or othdr electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. (� (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to subdivision (b) of �J Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was 1 committed on a local street or road as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 40802. 4 I (� EXCERPTS FROM CALTRANS TRAFFIC MANUAL (� Speed Zone Survey L1 • The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of the unimpeded (� traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other ` means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements. (� • Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds can be read directly from a radar lJ meter. rj • Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded �j speed of free-flowing vehicles unaffected by platoon movement may be used. Special application of devices other than radar are particularly appropriate on low-volume facilities. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be (� required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should `J be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs. f ' • Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours on weekdays. If there is difficulty uin obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free-flowing traffic. The weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is important that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous as not to affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, with a radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed so as to be able to survey traffic in both j� directions, and should not make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway centerline. f • In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, it is desirable to have a n minimum sample of 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample for any survey lJcontain less than 50 vehicles. • Short speed zones of less than half a mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.. • Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development. • Speed zoning should be in 10 -mile -per -hour increments except in urban areas where 5 -mile - per -hour increments are preferable. • Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions. H nclient1cloritol1200011ejnr0393.doc r� 5 i L I G r U 11 k P 0 H 0 U Iw, I APPENDIX B Traffic and Engineering Survey Data and Support Documentation Sheets ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Alta Madera Road between Avenida Navarre and Avenida Velarte Year of Survey 1995 PART 1: PREVAILING SPFF❑ MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%le 1.52 27 34 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 21-30 (76.0%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 1.52 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC_ AND R(iAliSlnF CHARACTFRISTIC:R Nr]T RFAnII V APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +1- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 400 feet apart, two lanes, broken -yellow striping, +/- 40 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on 85th percentile speed and roadway functional classification, recommend speed limit of 35 mph. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cAentldan[a112000 nejn 10195.x1s SPEtDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ALTA MADERA: AVENIDA NAVARRE TO AVENIDA VELARTE DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME........ 9:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......2 j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 3-' PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 23.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 43 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED.... .........28. I CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******1 90 *** 9j ** uuu 80 * 800 *L_1 70 7 60 6 50 * 5� 40 * 4L 30 * 30 20 * 2� 10 ** 10 p********************* OL 0 10 20 30 40 n 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 0 10 1 30 40 U 15 fl -u 5 L Li CUM MPH NO. PCT_ -PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 1 0.8 0.8 21 3 2.5 3.3 22 6 5.0 8.3 23 5 4.1 12.4 24 12 9.9 22.3 25 8 6.6 28.9 26 15 12.4 41.3 27 it 9.1 50.4 28 8 6.6 57.0 29 11 9.1 66.1 30 13 10.7 76.9 31 2 1.7 78.5 32 5 4.1 82.6 33 2 1.7 84.3 34 5 4.1 88.4 35 2 1.7 90.1 36 1 0.8 90.9 37 4. 3.3 94.2 38 1 0.8 95.0 39 1 0.8 95.9 40 3 2.5 98.3 41 1 0.8 99.2 42 0 0.0 99.2 43 1 0.8 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......2 j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 3-' PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 23.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 43 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED.... .........28. I CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******1 90 *** 9j ** uuu 80 * 800 *L_1 70 7 60 6 50 * 5� 40 * 4L 30 * 30 20 * 2� 10 ** 10 p********************* OL 0 10 20 30 40 n 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 0 10 1 30 40 U 15 fl -u 5 L Li Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: �/ r / Date: 7 /26 (1-5 aannderitat1200011e/no0195.x1s E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance, Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) ✓P 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 319 6_ Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at -grade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without .!O A Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet -� offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, II 600 satisfactory, poor, etc.) C 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) —� 12- Channelization (# of lanes,/ divided, undivided, (t painted, / or raised median 13. Street Width and / Alignment (width, feet -a straight or curve 1 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics '^ (heavy, moderate, light) r l 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) per! 16. Heavy On -Street Parking . Turnover (yes or no) Q aannderitat1200011e/no0195.x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Alta Monte Drive/Sin-ging Hills Drive between McBean Parkway and Lochmoor Road Year of Survey 1995 DA DT 1• DO CV All 1lk1(': CDFPrI MFAAI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 29 33 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 24-33 (81 A%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART 11• ACCInF:NT RFCORr]S Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III, HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Adequate horizontal/vertical sight distance, +/- 3% grade, intersections, other) residential driveway approximately every 100 feet, no striping, +\- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicle and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, esi entia . etc.), other conditions FAKI IV: AUDI I IVNAL KCMAKKA No characteristics not readily apparent. 30 mph c6entldantall200011e%no 1195.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ALTA MONTE DRIVE: MCBEAN PARKWAY TO LOCHMOOR ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME. ............. 9:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. [l I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2 _ 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 24 through 33 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 81.j] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................21 to444 VEHICLES OBSERVED. . ............ ..9Q1 AVERAGE SPEED........ ....29.dd] CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *********10 90 ** 9 80 ** 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ -PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 1 1.1 1.1 22 4 4.4 5.6 23 2 2.2 7.8 24 3 3.3 11.1 25 8 8.9 20.0 26 5 5.6 25.6 27 8 8.9 34.4 28 12 13.3 47.8 29 6 6.7 54.4 30 it 12.2 66.7 31 11 12.2 78.9 32 3 3.3 82.2 33 6 6.7 88.9 34 2 2.2 91.1 35 4 4.4 95.6 36 0 0.0 95.6 37 1 1.1 96.7 38 1 1.1 97.8 39 0 0.0 97.8 40 2 2.2 100.0 41 0 0.0100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 [l I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2 _ 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 24 through 33 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 81.j] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................21 to444 VEHICLES OBSERVED. . ............ ..9Q1 AVERAGE SPEED........ ....29.dd] CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *********10 90 ** 9 80 ** 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: /� C cFenWanta11200011ejno0195xts E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) L Horizontal 2. Vertical /1/p 3. Superelevation (%) �- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) AJ 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, l office, etc.) 9, Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- eet-offsets offsetsyes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, Goo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) --- 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, l��Q or raised median 1149 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - c (D straight or curved)1 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics ` (heavy, moderate, light) hr 15. Uniformity with the / Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking / Turnover (yes or no) (I o cFenWanta11200011ejno0195xts ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Apple Street between Cherry Street and Lyons Avenue Year of Survey DADT 1• DDGVAII Mr.- ADFFn MFASIIRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 06/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.32 31 34 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 27-36 (93.0%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted DADT 11• Ar1r4nMKlT DFrr1D11C Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.32 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DAFT ur ulGuweV TRAFFIr ANn RnAnSInF rNARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on east side, +/- 3% grade, residential driveway approximately every 100 feet, no striping, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicle and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions PAKI IV: AUDI I IUNAL KCMAMIXO Due to adjacent land use, unpaved shoulder on east community, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. 25 mph c#ent1clar9al1200011ejno 1295.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS APPLE STREET: LYONS AVENUE TO CHERRY STREET DIRECTION(S)....... NB/SB DATE ............... 6/20/1995 TIME ............... 2:40 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31r1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 92.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 3 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................91 AVERAGE SPEED .......................31.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **********10l 90 9 80 * 80 70 * 7GJ r1 60 20 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 1 '1.1 1.1 26 3 3.2 4.2 27 6 6.3 10.5 28 8 8.4 18.9 29 12 12.6 31.6 30 13 13.7 45.3 31 9 9.5 54.7 32 15 15.8 70.5 33 8 8.4 78.9 34 7 7.4 86.3 35 7 7.4 93.7 36 3 3.2 96.8 37 2 2.1 98.9 38 1 1.1 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31r1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 92.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 3 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................91 AVERAGE SPEED .......................31.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **********10l 90 9 80 * 80 70 * 7GJ r1 60 20 50 W 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+--- 0 10 20 30 40 8.8 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS Traffic Manual 12-1988 Figure 8 - 3 VEHICLE SPEED SURVEY SHEET FOR CITY AND COUNTY THROUGH HIGHWAYS, ARTERIALS, AND COLLECTOR ROADS. Jurisdiction SANTA C(.AFITA Date C0/2,okif Location PPLE 13FT. LYONS t�` CHERRy weather suririy Recorder �(i 5 Begin Time 3 SS End Time.� Signed %?'Q� _ .. Date , ('9tw/oib Title - N C O C U J N J 1 r ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■.• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■-■■■■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ME ■■■■�■� moss000mimmmmommmmomm ■■:■■■■■■I■�:■■■■■■■■■■I■■■■-- ■■■■■ ■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■: ■■■■:■■■■■■ ■■■■ ■I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■ ■■ ■■■ ■■■ :�■:■ ■:�■■ ■ ■ ■■■■■■■■J :. ■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■� ENE ■■■■■■■■■■:■� ■■■■� ::::■::::::_ NEON■■�■■■■I� :::::::moC ::m :ME ��':� :::: :::::C_ IN 111111110 MEMO 0 0 INS :1► i��l,s:15� /�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IIIIII ■� TIS /ii11��/�� i���iit■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�� rim MONISM ■■■■■■■■■■■::■■:■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�IIIE ■■■■■■■■■■w■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NIEMEN! ■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■� ■ M■■■■oM ■■■■■■:t■■■"■'■■■■■■�� Signed %?'Q� _ .. Date , ('9tw/oib Title - N C O C U J N J Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 3 Date: `flz V As- c5enWar#at12000 Ae%no0195.x1s E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal I ✓ 0 2. Vertical NO 3, Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) ��� n a✓f� 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 307-6 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics ow Pa n / AT 6,( Q (at rade, dustpan, etc. 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without r� Sidewalks es or no l• 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, 0 jr,� office, etc.)LIPS n 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ` offsets es or no t7 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 600 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, e or raised median 13. Street Width and f Alignment (width, feet - 3' O straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) l h } 15. Uniformity with the �� Community. (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking r Turnover (yes or no) Ill Q c5enWar#at12000 Ae%no0195.x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Arroyo Park Drive between Summit Place and Kirstengary Way Year of Survey 1995 DADT 1• DaCVAn nJr. CDFFn MFASt IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 34 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 30-39 (86.6%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph DART 11• ACCIn FAIT RFCnRn.R Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DADT 111. Ul!_UTAIAV TDACGIr AKIn RnAnC1nF ruARACTFRIRTICR NAT READILY APPARENT - Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, Partial vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 300', double -yellow stripe, +/- 30 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicle and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set-15-a-cRT- etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cflennclanta11200011efno 1395.x15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ARROYO PARK DRIVE: SUMMIT PLACE TO KIRSTENGARY WAY DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME......... ...10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .......... .......34� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................37 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 86.6 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ....... 6•, PERCENT UNDER 'PACE SPEED........... 7.1 - RANGE OF SPEEDS .............. .25 to 45 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................1T AVERAGE SPEED .......................33.a CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******1 90 * 9� 80 * 80l 70 * 7d 60 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT -PCT_ 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 2 1.8 1.8 26 4 3.6 5.4 27 0 0.0 5.4 28 1 0.9 6.3 29 1 0.9 7.1 30 10 8.9 16.1 31 13 11.6 27.7 32 7 6.3 33.9 33 11 9.8 43.8 34 16 14.3 58.0 35 12 10.7 68.8 36 14 12.5 81.3 37 5 4.5 85.7 38 7 6.3 92.0 39 2 1.8 93.8 40 5 4.5 98.2 41 1 0.9 99.1 42 0 0.0 99.1 43 0 0.0 99.1 44 0 0.0 99.1 45 1 0.9 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .......... .......34� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................37 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 86.6 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ....... 6•, PERCENT UNDER 'PACE SPEED........... 7.1 - RANGE OF SPEEDS .............. .25 to 45 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................1T AVERAGE SPEED .......................33.a CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******1 90 * 9� 80 * 80l 70 * 7d 60 50 * 40 30 20 10 0************************** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: "L J Date: / �Z G /kS denWadtal120001 {ejno0195.)ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A/J 2. Vertical e5 3. Supereievation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at -grade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without / 0 Sidewalks es or no / 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, t office, etc.)S� teh�a 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �� offsets es or no)3 10, Pavement Condition (good, 11 satisfactory, poor, etc.) Goo t 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, �adS�c divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 3 O 11 Jf straight or curved J Q C 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) 't (heavy, moderate, 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) r 16. 'Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) ,r lY b denWadtal120001 {ejno0195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Arroyo Park Drive between Kirstenaary Way and Cortina Drive Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.38 32 35 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 28-37 (89.0%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.38 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, residential/commercial drive- ways approximately every 200-300 feet, double -yellow and two-way left -turn lane striping, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicle and truck traffic. uses not apparent pa , sc oo , est entia set- ac an commercia . otns 7conad PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph dent%darirat 12000 1 Wno 1495-4s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS U ARROYO PARK DRIVE: KIRSTENGARY WAY TO MCBEAN PARKWAY DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME...............10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3: 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 894 PERCENT OVERPACESPEED............ 0.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............25 to3, VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ ...8 AVERAGE SPEED.......................32. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----t----+----+----+----t----+----+ 100 **********10 90 * 9� 80 80 70 7 ,t - 60 6I j 50 * 5b 40 41 1 30 20 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ -PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 2 2.4 2.4 26 1 1.2 3.7 27 6 7.3 11.0 28 4 4.9 15.9 29 2 2.4 18.3 30 11 13.4 31.7 31 10 12.2 43.9 32 6 7.3 51.2 33 12 14.6 65.9 34 6 7.3 73.2 35 10 12.2 85.4 36 5 6.1 91.5 37 7 8.5 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3: 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 894 PERCENT OVERPACESPEED............ 0.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............25 to3, VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ ...8 AVERAGE SPEED.......................32. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----t----+----+----+----t----+----+ 100 **********10 90 * 9� 80 80 70 7 ,t - 60 6I j 50 * 5b 40 41 1 30 20 10 * ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 10 5 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CL:ARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To Location: , / 1 ` Date: t /2 6 /`t '4enndar&a11200011e1n00195.'ds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /V/O 2. Vertical A10 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) k✓R 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 �Q 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics -1 at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without , fo Sidewalks es or no /V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, I J office, etc. e So N h 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no .2001 10. Pavement Condition (good, GOv satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) �-- 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, fl�� �r /P r' 0 or raised median / i I 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - / Ur ✓{� straight or curved) O 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics f (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) '4enndar&a11200011e1n00195.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Ashboro Drive between Whites Canyon Road and Ermine Street Year of Survey 1995 PART 1- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 27 31 10 mph pace ("/o of Veh.) 22-31 (90.2%) Posted Speed Limit 30 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 2% grade, no driveways, intersections spaced +/- 200 feet apart, no striping, curved alignment, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , esi entia set -back). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph c6enndarital1200011 ejno 1695.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ASHBORO DRIVE: WHITES CANYON ROAD TO ERMINE STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME ............... 4:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.30 MPH 70 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2'� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3i 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.71 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.�l PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to:3 , VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................51 AVERAGE SPEED.......................27 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ U ** ,t - 8J 60 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6. 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 7 13.7 13.7 24 3 5.9 19.6 25 0 0.0 19.6 26 11 21.6 41.2 27 5 9.8 51.0 28 7 13.7 64.7 29 6 11.8 76.5 30 4 7.8 84.3 31 3 5.9 90.2 32 0 0.0 90.2 33 0 0.0 90.2 34 0 0.0 90.2 35 3 5.9 96.1 36 0 0.0 96.1 37 2 3.9 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 -100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0'"100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 70 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2'� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3i 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.71 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.�l PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to:3 , VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................51 AVERAGE SPEED.......................27 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ U ** ,t - 8J 60 50 40 30 20 ** 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 6l] 5r0 41 1 30 2j 0 L1 m I fl 0 10 20 30 40 K1 �E .� CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Ask b Oro 0 r 1 Ve� Location:( From: ^- To: [ C -C -m i Date: y 17-q15 Observer: EJ—N ,w cfenWanta1120001Wno0i95jCs EJB or S/8 W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1 ,v 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical N O 1\10 3. Superelevation (°h) 4. Shoulder Conditions n n {I✓ (paved or unpaved) IY 5. Profile Conditions t 2- (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway 6. Characteristics rvci ( LO �\Q D ( W at rade, dustpan, etc.)r 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the t Roadway without r�i'v ►\.! 'O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Res n R office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - fi 2,<30 Zoo offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, g Oro a t Oa a satisfactory, poor, etc.) J 11. Truck Traffic ri to o (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, U L) f`f6 S or raised median V -t- 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - LAO iz or [ 'A Q GU 1v straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) ��- (heavy, moderate, 15. Uniformity vdth the i Y �% es Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking wo y\ Turnover (yes or no) ,w cfenWanta1120001Wno0i95jCs ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Crocker between Avenue Hall and Rve Canyon Road Year of Survey DART 1• DRFVAII mir_ CPFFD MFASI IRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 37 43 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 35-44 (68.6%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II, ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART IIP NIMMAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY:: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, infrequent driveway spacing, broken yellow stripe, straight alignment, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (iTark. school, Office park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph c6enWadtal120001Wjno 1795.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE CROCKER: AVENUE HALL TO RYE CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME...............11:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3`: 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 68.F PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3.: PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 27.5 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 46 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5j, AVERAGE SPEED .......................37.L CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l 100 *****105 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 90n LJJ * 80 * 70`f * 60�** 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0, 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 1 2.0 2.0 26 0 0.0 2.0 27 2 3.9 5.9 28 0 0.0 5.9 29 0 0.0 5.9 30 5 9.8 15.7 31 0 0.0 15.7 32 1 2.0 17.6 33 4 7.8 25.5 34 1 2.0 27.5 35 5 9.8 37.3 36 4 7.8 45.1 37 4 7.8 52.9 38 1 2.0 54.9 39 3 5.9 60.8 40 5 9.8 70.6 41 2 3.9 74.5 42 2 3.9 78.4 43 6 11.8 90.2 44 3 5.9 96.1 45 0 0.0 96.1 46 2 3.9 100.0 47 0 0.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3`: 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 68.F PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3.: PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 27.5 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 46 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5j, AVERAGE SPEED .......................37.L CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l 100 *****105 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 90n LJJ * 80 * 70`f * 60�** 50 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 10�0 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) [] ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 i 10 5 - 1 +----+----+----+----+--- 10 20 30 40 50 40J 30 ** * 20.1 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 10�0 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) [] ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 i 10 5 - 1 +----+----+----+----+--- 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: c� O Date: cNenrdanrat120001W000195-45 nI t} E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A 4/0 2. Vertical do A/0 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) ✓e I u e 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 1 n at rade, dustpan, etc. JS I toil 5 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without (V /O Al Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential; commercial, I ff tt�� Fri / office, etc. r 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - A10ne offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) o 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) i I+ j 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, �i°Ki, l4 undivided, painted, I [fa u or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the YE Community (yep or no) (p 5 16. Heavy Oa -Street Parking Tumoyer`(yes or no) cNenrdanrat120001W000195-45 nI t} ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Hall between Avenue Stanford and Avenue Crocker Year of Survey 1995 PART F PRFVAII ING SPFFn MFAStIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 36 40 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (75.9%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART II• Are inFNT RFrnRnR Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Black Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveway spacing approximately every 500 feet, broken yellow striping, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Ice pa , etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph denAdarita11200091ejno 1895.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE HALL: AVENUE STANDFORD TO AVENUE CROCKER DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE......... ... 3/20/1995 TIME..... ..... 7:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.: 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3T 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41J 10 MPH 'PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.[ PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5�1 AVERAGE SPEED....... .............36. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****100 90 * 90� 80 80 70 * 70 60 * 60, CUM MPH NO. PCT < 5 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 5 9.3 9.3 30 1 1.9 11.1 31 1 1.9 13.0 32 4 7.4 20.4 33 5 9.3 29.6 34 5 9.3 38.9 35 2 3.7 42.6 36 6 11.1 53.7 37 3 5.6 59.3 38 5 9.3 68.5 39 3 5.6 74.1 40 6 11.1 85.2 41 2 3.7 88.9 42 4 7.4 96.3 43 0 0.0 96.3 44 0 0.0 96.3 45 0 0.0 96.3 46 0 0.0 96.3 47 2 3.7 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3T 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41J 10 MPH 'PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.[ PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5�1 AVERAGE SPEED....... .............36. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****100 90 * 90� 80 80 70 * 70 60 * 60, 50 50 40 ** 40 r1 30 * 30 20 * 20j 10 * * 10�� p************************ 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: ( 6( Date: 1 12-111 cFen nda&a V 2000 11ajnoo 195.41 EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 0 /V0 /1/0 2. Vertical A/0 AJ 0 3. Superelevation(e/6) IV'mAlP- 4, Shoulder Conditions PuVe (paved or unpaved) �I I q✓f a 5. Profile Conditions ffnn 3 "/19 3'56 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics n mai /n� IJus } �1`✓ at rade, dustpan, etc. IJ 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without / /O Sidewalks es or no �V D A 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, rrp I l office, etc.)<9C tQ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - S 0 offsets yes or no)d 10. Pavement Condition (good, 1 God 1 satisfactory, poor, etc.) Goy 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) /"Dit/P 0A,(' 12. Channelization (# of lanes, I R�ojCr / Ye ffv'�/ divided, undivided, painted, I or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - S-0 strai ht or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) l r kv 15. Uniformity with the Ye Community (yes or no) f 16.Heavy On -Street Parking' or no) p Turnover (yes cFen nda&a V 2000 11ajnoo 195.41 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Hopkins between 300' S/O Anza Drive and Avenue Stanford Year of Survey PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 37 41 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (85.2%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART IIL HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontaUvertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +1- 3% grade, infrequent driveway spacing, double -yellow striping, +/- 50 feet wide, TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular and truck traffic, Land uses not apparent (park, school, Office park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph c§ennctarrta11200011eJno 1995.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS r AVENUE HOPKINS: 300' SIO ANZA DRIVE TO AVENUE STANDFORD LLL111 DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME....... ..... 7:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3"1' 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 411 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.2 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ ll.1l PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 56 VEHICLES OBSERVED....... ..............5� AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. f CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 15 10 5 20 30 .f ----+----+----+----+ *****100 *** 90 80 70 50 �" 40� 30 20J lOrl 0 I�JI ------+----+----+ 50 60 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 20 30 5 n - Ll LJ 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT <15 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 1.9 1.9 31 1 1.9 3.7 32 4 7.4 11.1 33 0 0.0 11.1 34 1 1.9 13.0 35 5 9.3 22.2 36 10 18.5 40.7 37 6 11.1 51.9 38 5 9.3 61.1 39 2 3.7 64.8 40 7 13.0 77.8 41 6 11.1 88.9 42 1 1.9 90.7 43 0 0.0 90.7 44 2 3.7 94.4 45 0 0.0 94.4 46 0 0.0 94.4 47 0 0.0 94.4 48 0 0.0 94.4 49 0 0.0 94.4 50 0 0.0 94.4 51 0 0.0 94.4 52 0 0.0 94.4 53 0 0.0 94.4 54 0 0.0 94.4 55 0 0.0 94.4 56 3 5.6 100.0 57 0 0.0 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3"1' 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 411 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.2 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ ll.1l PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 56 VEHICLES OBSERVED....... ..............5� AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. f CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 15 10 5 20 30 .f ----+----+----+----+ *****100 *** 90 80 70 50 �" 40� 30 20J lOrl 0 I�JI ------+----+----+ 50 60 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 20 30 5 n - Ll LJ 40 50 60 Street: _ From: _ Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM u k� Location: l0 Date: I� ,fimWa1bv20001%0jn00195xls EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /u/D d 2. Vertical A 3. Superelevation (%) 0Ale. 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) �� k 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics OU, t (Is k' at rade, dust an, etc. Jj 1 v 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, D�1 office, etc.) br(ir e rQ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - /'40� f offsets es or no A/O h 10. Pavement Condition (good, 6ODS satisfactory, poor, etc.) 6004 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) /}%AI A10A1Q 12. Channelization (#of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- h straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 9 S _ 16. Heavy On -Street Parking' Turnover (yes or no) ,fimWa1bv20001%0jn00195xls ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Kearny between Avenue Scott and Avenue Mentry Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 36 39 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 30-39 (87,0%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART IL• ACCIDFNT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, infrequent driveway spacing, no striping, +/- 60 feet wide.. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Lana uses not apparent (pa sc oo , Office park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph c#enttclanta11200011ejno2095.xfs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE KEARNY: AVENUE SCOTT TO AVENUE MENTRY DIRECTION(S) ....... WESTBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED..................3� DATE ............... 3/20/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............... ..3 TIME ............... 8:00 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 87.4 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.'1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED.....'...... 1.' CUM RANGE OF SPEEDS.................27 to 4� MPH NO. PCT. PCT. VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 5 ___ ___ ____ _____ AVERAGE SPEED.......................36.�� 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� 2 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ `J 3 0 0.0 0.0 100 ****10 4 0 0.0 0.0 - jl 5 0 0.0 0.0 90 *** 9LJ 6 0 0.0 0.0 - 7 0 0.0 0.0 80 * 80 8 0 0.0 0.0 - -� 9 0 0.0 0.0 70 7 10 0 0.0 0.0 - 11 0 0.0 0.0 60 * 6[l 12 0 0.0 0.0 - J 13 0 0.0 0.0 50 5 14 0 0.0 0.0 - 15 0 0.0 0.0 40 * 4n 16 0 0.0 0.0 - 17 0 0.0 0.0 30 30 18 0 0.0 0.0 - 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 2 20 0 0.0 0.0 - 21 0 0.0 0.0 10 22 0 0.0 0.0 - ** 23 0 0.0 0.0 p******t*****t***************,tt 0 24 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 25 0 0.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 (j 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 1 1.9 1.9 28 0 0.0 1.9 29 0 0.0 1.9 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 30 1 1.9 3.7 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 31 1 '1.9 5.6 15 32 2 3.7 9.3 - 33 8 14.8 24.1 - 34 6 11.1 35.2 - 35 3 5.6 40.7 - 36 10 18.5 59.3 10 37 4 7.4 66.7 - _ 38 8 14.8 81.5 - 39 4 7.4 88.9 - 1. 40 1 1.9 90.7 - 41 0 0.0 90.7 5 5 42 3 5.6 96.3 - 43 2 3.7 100.0 - Y 44 0 0.0 100.0 - 45 0 0.0 100.0 - 46 0 0.0 100.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >46 0 0.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM From: To: Observer. Location: Date: cfentldadta11200011eJn00195-)ds EJB or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1, Horizontal /V Q 2. Vertical ! /t� �Q 3. Superelevation (°%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) , 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. ll -4 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, GOD satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) �p J t/ 0 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, �Al or raised median 13, Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - / straight or curved)(J D 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) I 15. Uniformity with the \� Communita! (yes or no) N 7 �5 16. Heavy'©ril�treet Parking r Tumovel {yes'or no) cfentldadta11200011eJn00195-)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Mentry between 300' SIO Anza Drive and Avenue Kearny Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 32 37 10 mph pace (°/a of Veh.) 27-36 (84.0%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART IL• ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III' HIMMAV_ TRAFFIC_ ANn ROAnSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approx. 400 feet apart, no striping, +/- 60 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Office park. etc.), other conditions ONAL KtMAKK, not readily apparent. 35 mph dienAdarira U2000 nejn02195.X1S SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE MENTRY: 300' SIO ANZA DRIVE TO AVENUE KEARNY DIRECTION(S)....... I DATE ............... TIME ............... POSTED SPEED LIMIT.. [ORTHBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 1 3/20/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31; 8:30 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 27 through 36 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 16. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................27 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED..... .............5 1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................32. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ b' 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 9a 80 7- 6 5�1 4[] 3r01 2l00J 10 f 0� 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 2 4.0 4.0 28 1 2.0 6.0 29 5 10.0 16.0 30 4 8.0 24.0 31 9 18.0 42.0 32 5 10.0 52.0 33 7 14.0 66.0 34 3 6.0 72.0 35 4 8.0 80.0 36 2 4.0 84.0 37 1 2.0 86.0 38 2 4.0 90.0 39 3 6.0 96.0 40 2 4.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 [ORTHBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 1 3/20/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31; 8:30 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 27 through 36 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 16. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................27 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED..... .............5 1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................32. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ b' 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 9a 80 7- 6 5�1 4[] 3r01 2l00J 10 f 0� 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: / Z Date: dent% darflar120001 %ejnn0195.)ds IJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal O A10 2. Vertical /Vo AA 3. Superelevation (%) AIR .1 A/0 4. Shoulder Conditions n rr P4Je (paved or unpaved) awe 1� C 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 `}J -370 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics n 1 al rade, dustpan, etc. J) W //as r194K 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /� „ Sidewalks es or no / /v 49 B. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, % office, etc. /` 1 lQ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / offsets yes or no) / 00 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) rr V 00 it 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) r 12. Channelization (# of lanes, /q A3,✓( divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- / straight or curved) -77 Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 (heavy, moderate, light) ,1 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) ti S 16. Heavy On Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) NQ dent% darflar120001 %ejnn0195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue NavarrelVelarte between McBean Parkway and East End Year of Survey 1995 PART L PRFVAti ING SPFFn MFASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 —12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 33 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 29-38 (77.5°/x) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II• ACCInFNT RFCORnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 —12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1,55 PART In- WIr:WWAV TRAFFIC ANn RnAnslnF CWARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approx, 100 feet apart, broken -yellow stripe, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic., Lana uses not apparent (park, sc oo ,es centra set- ac . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cfiennc &da11200011ejno2295.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENIDA NAVARRE/VELARTE: MCBEAN PARKWAY TO EAST END DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME...............12:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 31- 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3U 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.p1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 18.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 41 VEHICLES OBSERVED .. ................11 1, AVERAGE SPEED ... ..................32._; CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----t----t----t----t----t----t---- 100 90 CUM MPH NO. PCT PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 5 4.5 4.5 26 8 7.2 11.7 27 4 3.6 15.3 28 3 2.7 18.0 29 3 2.7 20.7 30 7 6.3 27.0 31 14'12.6 39.6 32 9 8.1 47.7 33 10 9.0 56.8 34 13 11.7 68.5 35 10 9.0 77.5 36 7 6.3 83.8 37 5 4.5 88.3 38 8 7.2 95.5 39 2 1.8 97.3 40 1 0.9 98.2 41 2 1.8 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 31- 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3U 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.p1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 18.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 41 VEHICLES OBSERVED .. ................11 1, AVERAGE SPEED ... ..................32._; CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----t----t----t----t----t----t---- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 ** _ * 10 0************************* t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) t----+----t----t----t----t----t----t----t----t 15 10 5 6Q 561 411 30 _ f, 2 If LJ 0 10 20 30 40 _11 l -J Street: From: _ Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM too Location: Date: 7/Z� rYs c&enfldarita1120001%0000195-4s. j EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical �Q 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions � (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 %p 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without " Sidewalks es or no 8_ Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) c4rJ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / D t7 % offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) D o 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, �/I divided, undivided, painted, 1o�ti r<Jjv'✓ or raised median 13. Street Width and / Alignment (width, feet -O straight or curve f 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) S 16. Heavy On4Weet Parking Turnover (yes or no) N c&enfldarita1120001%0000195-4s. j ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenida Rotella between Lvons Avenue and Avenida Ronada Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAn ING SPFFn MFASIJRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 30 33 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 24-33 (85.2%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART IF ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- WIr:41WAV TRAFFIC ANn ROAnSInF CNARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, infrequent driveway spacing, raised median, two lanes, curved alignment, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Park (west side), residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph ckent%clanfa1120001lejno2395.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENIDA ROTELLA: LYONS AVENUE TO AVENIDA RONADA DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME ............... 3:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3Q 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED. ............... 3'( 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 24 through 3 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.2 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 14.5 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................24 to 35 VEHICLES OBSERVED ......... ..... ...8j AVERAGE SPEED.......................29. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+-- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+-- 0 10 SPEED (MPH) n --+----+----+- ** 9�J 80 t** 7� 6D5 4� 30 2e 10 0 -0 l 30 40 SPEED (MPH) 20 30 40 d 15 -u 5 CUM MPH NO. BCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 ' 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 10 12.3 12.3 25 19 23.5 35.8 26 0 0.0 35.8 27 0 0.0 35.8 28 6 7.4 43.2 29 2 2.5 45.7 30 18 22.2 67.9 31 0 0.0 67.9 32 0 0.0 67.9 33 14 17.3 85.2 34 0 0.0 85.2 35 12 14.8 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3Q 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED. ............... 3'( 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 24 through 3 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.2 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 14.5 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................24 to 35 VEHICLES OBSERVED ......... ..... ...8j AVERAGE SPEED.......................29. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+-- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+-- 0 10 SPEED (MPH) n --+----+----+- ** 9�J 80 t** 7� 6D5 4� 30 2e 10 0 -0 l 30 40 SPEED (MPH) 20 30 40 d 15 -u 5 .ia"_ Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: cienndat#a1120001 %ejno0195.;ds E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) L Horizontal Wo 2. Vertical N Ur 3. Superelevation (°k) 4. Shoulder Conditions n (paved or unpaved) (Gt Je 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 �o 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at -grade, dustpan, etc. y YKh 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no D 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �PeM office, etc.)V P At� 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) nOo� 11. Trick Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, / I �'Se� ✓1 or raised median) 13. Street Width and / Alignment (width, feet - D CUr�e� straight of curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) Y 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) NO cienndat#a1120001 %ejno0195.;ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Scott between Rye Canyon Road and Southeast City Limit Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPFFD MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 41 44 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (83.5%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance obstructions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately every 500 feet apart. raised median, four lanes, +/- 70 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, moderate vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Office par . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cfienticlarita112000I1e%no2495.xfs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE SCOTT: RYE CANYON ROAD TO SOUTHEAST CITY LIMIT DIRECTION(S)....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME...............12:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.9-I PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 15. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.......... ....32 to 49.. VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ ..121 AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) fl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l_J *****100 50 40 30 20 10 ** CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. --- < 5 --- 0 ---- 0.0 --- 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 3 2.5 2.5 33 7 5.8 8.3 34 1 0.8 9.1 35 6 5.0 14.0 36 2 1.7 15.7 37 8 6.6 22.3 38 9 7.4 29.8 39 14 11.6 41.3 40 10 8.3 49.6 41 14 11.6 61.2 42 10 8.3 69.4 43 15 12.4 81.8 44 7 5.8 87.6 45 3 2.5 90.1 46 it 9.1 99.2 47 0 0.0 99.2 48 0 0.0 99.2 49 1 0.8 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.9-I PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 15. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.......... ....32 to 49.. VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ ..121 AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) fl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l_J *****100 50 40 30 20 10 90 80 70t 60 1 50` 40�� 30LJJ 20H 10 0*t**,t****************#****** 0 ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ni 151 10 20 30 40 50 5 n ** * * ** ** 90 80 70t 60 1 50` 40�� 30LJJ 20H 10 0*t**,t****************#****** 0 ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ni 151 10 20 30 40 50 5 n Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM - Location: J �s Date: cienfkfanlaV20001b%no0195.ids .� - ' EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical d✓ 0 3. Supereievation (%) One 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 0.v 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 �/ 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan. etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without (� Sidewalks es or no A 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, (r office, etc.)/ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - C oO offsets es or no)J 10. Pavement Condition (good, Cjpo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic light) I I (heavy, moderate, /9OClerglt 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, " 2 or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 1 de, 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Healy On -Street Pard n ; " T"&er (yes'or no) ,. cienfkfanlaV20001b%no0195.ids .� - ' ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Stanford between SR 126 and Avenue Hall Year of Survey PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 52 57 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 48-57 (64.2%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART If: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 2% grade, infrequent driveway spacing, painted double -yellow stripe, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant. etc.), other conditions IV: AQUI I IVNAL KtrAAKKJ on shoulder and horizontal curve (RECOMMENDATION 150 mph speed by 5 mph diennclanta11200011ejno2595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE STANFORD: S.R. 126 TO AVENUE HALL DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................541 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 48 through 57 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 64. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................42 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................6� AVERAGE SPEED.......................51. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 100 *100 90 * 90� 80 * 80 70 * 70a 60 * 60� 50 50 40 * 40x1 30 ** 30 20 ** 20� 10 ** 10 0*************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 rl PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) [] ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 101 55 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 60 n ll CUM MPH NO. PCT <15 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 0 0.0 0.0 41 0 0.0 0.0 42 2 3.0 3.0 43 5 7.5 10.4 44 0 0.0 10.4 45 3 4.5 14.9 46 5 7.5 22.4 47 0 0.0 22.4 48 5 7.5 29.9 49 1 1.5 31.3 50 5 7.5 38.8 51 5 7.5 46.3 52 8 11.9 58.2 53 3 4.5 62.7 54 7 10.4 73.1 55 3 4.5 77.6 56 4 6.0 83.6 57 2 3.0 86.6 58 0 0.0 86.6 59 2 3.0 89.6 60 7 10.4 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................541 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 48 through 57 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 64. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................42 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................6� AVERAGE SPEED.......................51. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 100 *100 90 * 90� 80 * 80 70 * 70a 60 * 60� 50 50 40 * 40x1 30 ** 30 20 ** 20� 10 ** 10 0*************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 rl PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) [] ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 101 55 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 60 n ll Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: cid nnWawa 112ooa11ejW 195 -Ids EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1: Horizontal A10 JV 2. Vertical /Q N �D 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) JAI a JY J 5. Profile Conditions 2 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics �} 00,1 xv "�P°'� at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Q Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, / v r office, etc. V 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 'A `V O'P offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) p dp 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted. J or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the �� Community (yes or no) s 16: Heavy On -Street Parking / Turnover (yes or no) p 2 cid nnWawa 112ooa11ejW 195 -Ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Stanford between Avenue Hall and Rye Canyon Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 41 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 36-45 (72.4%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART 111: HIGHWAY- TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, infrequent driveway spacing, broken -yellow stripe, two lanes, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Office park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph ckenf%danta1120001 %ejno2695.xts SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE STANFORD: AVENUE HALL TO RYE CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME ............... 1:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72. 1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 15. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10 AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ J 100 **100 90 ** 90I 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 80 * CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 1 1.0 1.0 29 0 0.0 1.0 30 3 2.9 3.8 31 0 0.0 3.8 32 4 3.8 7.6 33 1 1.0 8.6 34 5 4.8 13.3 35 2 1.9 15.2 36 7 6.7 21.9 37 6 5.7 27.6 38 3 2.9 30.5 39 10 9.5 40.0 40 5 4.8 44.8 41 11 10.5 55.2 42 8 7.6 62.9 43 6 5.7 68.6 44 11 10.5 79.0 45 9 8.6 87.6 46 2 1.9 89.5 47 5 4.8 94.3 48 1 1.0 95.2 49 5 4.8 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72. 1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 15. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10 AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ J 100 **100 90 ** 90I 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 80 * 70a 60�* 50 * 40 ** 30 * 20J ** ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: _ Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: % Dater y lel /qs �- - - - cianncrariralf2000fVejno0195.�As EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal "/ A10 2. Vertical �� A10 3. Superelevation (%) W 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved)✓ed. /'.tvQ 5. Profile Conditions 390 (grade, %) 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics / n at rade, dust 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without %O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, {n[ Orr, e office, etc.) rp t, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - N offsets yes or no)/y 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 0 D 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) p,,/ /I/ AQ 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Kr J divided, undivided, painted, f or raised median)/ 13. Street Width and I Alignment (width, feet - �O 5 ca 111 straight or cure 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) t (� 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heayy,gi)LStreet Parking (yes or no) Tumoyer �- - - - cianncrariralf2000fVejno0195.�As ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Stanford between Rve Canyon Road and Avenue Scott Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PRFVAILING SPFFD MFA4;l1RFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.15 44 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 39-48 (73.6°/x) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.15 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2,14 PART 111: HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 500 feet apart, double -yellow stripe, four lanes, +/- 66 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, moderate truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, ice par . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph denWadtat120001Wno2795.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE STANFORD: RYE CANYON ROAD TO AVENUE SCOTT DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME ............... 2:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH / 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ...... 4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to .53 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 1 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 43.j CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) IrIl *****10 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ tr 100 90 9011 011 80 70 70a 60 50 40 4W- 30 30 20 10 0************************* +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 * * 80 * * * 60 * 5Oi� * `lj L * * 20� ** * 10 0 L, PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 1 0.8 0.8 26 0 0.0 0.8 27 0 0.0 0.8 28 0 0.0 0.8 29 0 0.0 0.8 30 0 0.0 0.8 31 0 0.0 0.8 32 1 0.8 1.6 33 0 0.0 1.6 34 1 0.8 2.4 35 3 2.4 4.8 36 7 5.6 10.4 37 4 3.2 13.6 38 1 0.8 14.4 39 10 8.0 22.4 40 7 5.6 28.0 41 6 4.8, 32.8 42 12 9.6 42.4 43 7 5.6 48.0 44 12 9.6 57.6 45 14 11.2 68.8 46 8 6.4 75.2 47 8 6.4 81.6 48 8 6.4 88.0 49 7 5.6 93.6 50 4 3.2 96.8 51 1 0.8 97.6 52 1 0.8 98.4 53 2 1.6 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 / 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ...... 4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to .53 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 1 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 43.j CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) IrIl *****10 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ tr 100 90 9011 011 80 70 70a 60 50 40 4W- 30 30 20 10 0************************* +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 * * 80 * * * 60 * 5Oi� * `lj L * * 20� ** * 10 0 L, PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: From: To: Observer. Observer. t ` z Location: Date: W2 -(As -- - dent%danra%120001Wno0195-1da EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A10 4/0 2. Vertical 4/0 ✓✓0 3. Superelevation (%) 61eA 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) A 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics V/Jst .r n 05+ nph at rade, dust an, etc. ('Rr/ 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /O �O Sidewalks es or no /V S. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, OC� DF�tQ office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- offsets yes or no)J 10. Pavement Condition (good, Goo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 0 o 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) � it r A J 01 } t 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, Ye < <° or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) L'S zr 16: Heavy On -Street Parking br Turnover (yes no) n% Q A10 -- - dent%danra%120001Wno0195-1da ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Avenue Stanford between Avenue Scott and East City Limit Year of Survey PART I- PRFVAII_ING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 32 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 28-37 (79.3%) Posted Speed Limit 25 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 500 feet apart, no striping, curved alignment, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no through traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Office park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph c6ent1cladta1120001 %&jno2895.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS AVENUE STANFORD: AVENUE SCOTT TO EAST CITY LIMIT DIRECTION(S) ....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/20/1995 TIME ............... 2:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 15 10 J 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3r] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3LI 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79.- PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................5 AVERAGE SPEED.......................33. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH), --+----+----+----+----+ l ******100 *** **** 90� * u * 80 * 70 * 60 * 50 * 40� * 30 * 20J * - 10�0 10 20 5 10 30 40 50 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 20 30 _ LJ L 5 111=n_ 40 50 it CUM MPH NO. PCT < 5 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 1 1.7 1.7 26 1 1.7 3.4 27 2 3.4 6.9 28 5 8.6 15.5 29 2 3.4 19.0 30 7 12.1 31.0 31 4 6.9 37.9 32 8 13.8 51.7 33 2 3.4 55.2 34 4 6.9 62.1 35 4 6.9 69.0 36 6 10.3 79.3 37 4 6.9 86.2 38 1 1.7 87.9 39 0 0.0 87.9 40 2 3.4 91.4 41 0 0.0 91.4 42 2 3.4 94.8 43 0 0.0 94.8 44 1 1.7 96.6 45 1 1.7 98.3 46 0 0.0 98.3 47 0 0.0 98.3 48 1 1.7 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 15 10 J 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3r] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3LI 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79.- PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................5 AVERAGE SPEED.......................33. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH), --+----+----+----+----+ l ******100 *** **** 90� * u * 80 * 70 * 60 * 50 * 40� * 30 * 20J * - 10�0 10 20 5 10 30 40 50 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 20 30 _ LJ L 5 111=n_ 40 50 it Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM In Location: / f Date: q/2(/4_S— l �l clenWarita112000110000195xls - E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) Horizontal %21. //V- . Vertical 2. 410 3. Superelevation (%) A/u.v 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) '3 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics /� A at rade, dustpan, etc. s 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without / p Sidewalks es or no / V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �ir ire office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - C 0 t offsets yes or no)J 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) p0 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) nim nQ 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, IVO or raised median F V Al 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- �� ��1Jt� straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) i t 11} 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) P S 16. Heavy On -Street Parking no) Tumovee(yes or clenWarita112000110000195xls - ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Bouquet Canyon Road between Magic Mountain Parkway and Soledad Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART 1• PRPVAH mr: CPPPn MPASI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%wile 50%ile 85%ile 0.12 45 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 39-48 (85.2%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 3 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.12 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART In- HIrHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, infrequent intersection spacing, painted two-way left -turn lane, four lanes, +/- 70' wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial (west side), vacant east side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c*en8darMa1120001Wno2995.rds SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS BOUQUET CANYON ROAD: MAGIC MOUNTAIN PKWY TO SOLEDAD CANYON RD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME...............'9:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 70 60 50 40 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4a 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.2] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED .......... ..7.7 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. .15u AVERAGE SPEED .............. . ......44.�] CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ �JI ***10 90 L1 * LJ 30 20 10 80 70H 60 50 LJ 40H30 J ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 20� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ _PCT_ <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 3 1.9 1.9 36 0 0.0 1.9 37 0 0.0 1.9 38 9 5.8 7.7 39 7 4.5 12.3 40 1 0.6 12.9 41 4 2.6 15.5 42 18 11.6 27.1 43 12 7.7 34.8 44 20 12.9 47.7 45 16 10.3 58.1 46 21 13.5 71.6 47 18 11.6 83.2 48 15 9.7 92.9 49 7 4.5 97.4 50 0 0.0 97.4 51 0 0.0 97.4 52 0 0.0 97.4 53 1 0.6 98.1 54 0 0.0 98.1 55 3 1.9 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 70 60 50 40 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4a 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.2] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED .......... ..7.7 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. .15u AVERAGE SPEED .............. . ......44.�] CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ �JI ***10 90 L1 * LJ 30 20 10 80 70H 60 50 LJ 40H30 J ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 20� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM From: To: Observer Location: Date: 7�z / /45 dent%darKa1120001Wno0195-ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /V0 2. Vertical W10- 3. Superelevation (%) 0,tA 4. Shoulder Conditions �✓p (paved or unpaved) 4J? 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3% 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dust an, etc. Os�n4e/ p 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without , ro p Sidewalks es or no /V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, CDierc I office, etc. a (Ah 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) S 510 i 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Jt 12. Channelization (# of lanes, �a Y divided, undivided, painted, i cF� Iu,� or raised median)Z 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 7 D straight or curved)/ 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics L I 14e (heavy, moderate, light) / La✓ of 15. Uniformity with the Community. (yes or no) 16.! Heavy OAStreet Parking Tumover(yes 'orno) A' dent%darKa1120001Wno0195-ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Bouquet Canyon Road between Soledad Canyon Road and Seco Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.27 45 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (69.9%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 6 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.27 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 300 feet apart, raised median, three to four lanes, +/- 100 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Vacant(north side), commercial (south side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on 10 -mph pace and commercial land uses, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c#enWanta11200011ejn03095As SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS BOUQUET CANYON ROAD: SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO SECO CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME.......... . 9:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 10 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4C 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5L 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69T, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................142 ; AVERAGE SPEED ..................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ****100 * 90 40 30 20 10 * 80 * 70 LJ 60� * 50 * CUM MPH NO. PCT -PCT <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 3 2.4 2.4 37 9 7.3 9.8 38 5 4.1 13.8 39 5 4.1 17.9 40 5 4.1 22.0 41 12 9.8 31.7 42 2 1.6 33.3 43 9 7.3 40.7 44 5 4.1 44.7 45 7 5.7 50.4 46 15 12.2 62.6 47 6 4.9 67.5 48 11 8.9 76.4 49 5 4.1 80.5 50 14 11.4 91.9 51 2 1.6 93.5 52 8 6.5 100.0 53 0 0.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 10 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4C 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5L 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69T, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................142 ; AVERAGE SPEED ..................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ****100 * 90 40 30 20 10 * 80 * 70 LJ 60� * 50 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 15 10 10� 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 5 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 * 40�* * 30 ** 20d ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 15 10 10� 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 5 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM YCiI Location: z Date: cieniidarW 120001 tejno0195.#5 EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal j N O 2. Vertical /A 3. Superelevation (e/6) /1 OK 4, Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) LZ 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 37 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics l 0051 at rade, dustpan. etc' ah/ 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without p Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, V 601 T CpM�+rr A office, etc.)N 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / offsets yes or no jD 0 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) c p p 11. Truck Traffic light) A (heavy, moderate, h 12. Channelization (# of lanes, a 3p4 divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved)d 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics �f (heavy, moderate, light) I r P�✓ 15. Uniformity with the Communfty (yes or no) \ t? 16.: Heavy,On-Street Parking Turnover (yes or no)n/0 cieniidarW 120001 tejno0195.#5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Bouquet Canyon Road between Seco Canyon Road and Alamogordo Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.16 43 47 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (89.6%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.16 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontalivertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, infrequent driveway spacing, raised median, two to three lanes, +/- 90 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no parking permitted southbound, light parking turnover northbound, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (southside), commercial nortsi e . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c6enMarila11200011ejno3195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS BOUQUET CANYON ROAD: SECO CANYON ROAD TO ALAMOGORDO ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89. 1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED... ..............15{i AVERAGE SPEED.......................43 � CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0***************************** 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 10 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 20 30 (MPH) -+----+----+ ******100 * 90 * u * 80 * 70� * 60� 50 40f 30 20� 10,1 0 I�JI 50 [1 15 - d 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 3 1.9 1.9 37 0 0.0 1.9 38 0 0.0 1.9 39 5 3.2 5.2 40 10 6.5 11.7 41 21 13.6 25.3 42 18 11.7 37.0 43 22 14.3 .51.3 44 14 9.1 60.4 45 16 10.4 70.8 46 14 9.1 79.9 47 11 7.1 87.0 48 5 3.2 90.3 49 7 4.5 94.8 50 5 3.2 98.1 51 1 0.6 98.7 52 0 0.0 98.7 53 2 1.3 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89. 1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED... ..............15{i AVERAGE SPEED.......................43 � CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0***************************** 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 10 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 20 30 (MPH) -+----+----+ ******100 * 90 * u * 80 * 70� * 60� 50 40f 30 20� 10,1 0 I�JI 50 [1 15 - d 40 50 Street: _ From: _ Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 2 2 - Date: Date: L112 5 fl cfenlldatkak12000IWOW 195x1s InI lJ EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1, Horizontal wo 2. Vertical AltO 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) aA 5. Profile Conditions y (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. JS A h 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no ✓� B. Adjacent Land Use //,Jl =: Rc5'��•1'°r �'Pt residential, commercial, (DMMetu. l KeSr J�,4, ( DFA TI •, sl .r� office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) Go 11. Truck Traffic /� (heavy, moderate, light) I Al 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Q P divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 ' (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) E 1fic Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) /VD. cfenlldatkak12000IWOW 195x1s InI lJ ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Bouquet Canyon Road between Alamogordo Road and Centurion Way Year of Survey 1995 PART h PRFVAIr min RPFFn MFARIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.40 53 55 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 49-58 (84.0%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART II• Arrnn FNT RFCCfRr)R Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 7 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.40 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 5% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, no driveways, raised median, four lanes, curved alignment, +/- 90 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no parking turnover sighted, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Vacant(south side), set -back residential and school on etc.), other conditions side street (north side). FAKI IV: AUDI I IVIVAL KrRgAKr\J Based on grade change, superelevation, and close proximity to (RECOMMENDATION 150 mph by 5 mph. client\cJanfa1120001 %ejno3295.xfs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS BOUQUET CANYON ROAD: ALAMOGORDO ROAD TO CENTURION WAY DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME...............10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 f1 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 49 through 58 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ O.Q, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 16.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................44 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1501 AVERAGE SPEED .......................51.51 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) j1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ ***100 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 CUM MPH NO. 'PCT. 90 PCT. --- <15 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ----- 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 0 0.0 0.0 41 0 0.0 0.0 42 0 0.0 0.0 43 0 0.0 0.0 44 10 6.7 6.7 45 0 0.0 6.7 46 5 3.3 10.0 47 2 1.3 11.3 48 7 4.7 16.0 49 15 10.0 26.0 50 3 2.0 28.0 51 16 10.7 38.7 52 12 8.0 46.7 53 24 16.0 62.7 54 2315.3 78.0 55 16 10.7 88.7 56 6 4.0 92.7 57 3 2.0 94.7 58 8 5.3 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 f1 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 49 through 58 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ O.Q, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 16.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................44 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1501 AVERAGE SPEED .......................51.51 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) j1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ ***100 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * * 10 ** 0**************#************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 60 �l PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 * 90 �] * 80 70J 60 r 50 * 40(1 LJ * 30 * 20 10 * * 10 ** 0**************#************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 60 �l PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM From: To: Observer.' Location: 2 3 `I Dater lyl�S - ciienndadis1120001k%no0195xis EJB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal l VCI 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) A✓e 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. on{ 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /� Sidewalks es or no /✓ 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, (ar� f V 0. (1h r office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, �00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 14e `(A or raised median)" 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 9 crvf straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) Ca✓ 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) �ps 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or noj n/p - ciienndadis1120001k%no0195xis ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Bouquet Canyon Road between Centurion Way and Urbandale Avenue Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PRFVAII_ING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.63 46 51 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 42-51 (70.7%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART II• ACCInFNT RFCORnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 8 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.63 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2,14 PAPT nlr ulr'WWAV TRAFFIC ANn RnAnSInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 500 feet apart, raised median, four lanes, curved alignment, +/- 80 feet wide, bike lanes. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, school zing, light bike traffic, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic.. Land uses not apparent (park, school,- Commercial/residential (soul side) residential (north etc.), other conditions side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cien&1ad(a11200011ejno3395.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS BOUQUET CANYON ROAD: CENTURION WAY TO URBANDALE AVE. DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ................ 3/22/1995 TIME...............11:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 42 through 51 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 70.71 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.;1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19-' RANGE OF SPEEDS.................38 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. . Fj AVERAGE SPEED .......................4541) CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ***10 70 60 50 40 30 20 * 90� 80 70[] 60r� 50` 40' 1 30 20J 10 * 10 0**************************** 0 LJ ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 j 15 1d ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT <10 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 '0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 10 6.8 6.8 39 6 4.1 10.9 40 9 6.1 17.0 41 4 2.7 19.7 42 12 8.2 27.9 43 7 4.8 32.7 44 12 8.2 40.8 45 10 6.8 47.6 46 9 6.1 53.7 47 11 7.5 61.2 48 10 6.8 68.0 49 13 8.8 76.9 50 10 6.8 83.7 51 10 6.8 90.5 52 10 6.8 97.3 53 2 1.4 98.6 54 1 0.7 99.3 55 1 0.7 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 42 through 51 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 70.71 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.;1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19-' RANGE OF SPEEDS.................38 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. . Fj AVERAGE SPEED .......................4541) CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ***10 70 60 50 40 30 20 * 90� 80 70[] 60r� 50` 40' 1 30 20J 10 * 10 0**************************** 0 LJ ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 j 15 1d ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: G�2 Date: cffenndarKa1120001Wn00195-4s EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal j //0 2. Vertical ?les 3. Superelevation (%) Avf 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) d 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 �q 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics r 0i' at rade, dust an, etc. q 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /� Sidewalks es or no tV 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, 'CcS eH� y office, etc.)R�lra. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �bD / offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) Goo 11, Truck Traffic light) / (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median)c' 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - �� straight or curved) O 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) y'i Cad 15. Uniformity with the Commun (yes or no) 16. Heavy On Veet Parking p� w F Tumove(yes or no) N[ v,.• cffenndarKa1120001Wn00195-4s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Bouquet Canyon Road between Urbandale Avenue and Steve Jon Street Year of Survey DART 1• DDPVAII nur, S:DFFn MFARI IRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 49 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 44-53 (95.8%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph DART II• ArrIn CRIT DFrnRnC Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.,14 DAOT M wr_u1AIAv TOAvvlr AAIn DnAnRInF r41ARAr.TFRI&TIr% NOT RFAmLY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, no driveways, four lanes, painted median, +/- 80 feet wide, bike lanes. TRAFFIC:. Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, school xing, light bike traffic, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions ALJLJI I IUNAL KtMAKftJ eristics not readily apparent. 50 mph client%datita1120001%ejno3495.)ds SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS BOUQUET CANYON ROAD: URBANDALE AVE. TO STEVE JON STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME...............11:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 5t_ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 44 through 53 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 95.{ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1.11 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 11(-j AVERAGE SPEED .......................48.{ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ I 100 **l0U - 90 90[ l 80 80 70 * 70Lj 60 * 60n 50 50 40 401 j * 30 30 20 20j 10 * 10 p****************k***************** 0 LJ ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 ;l PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 75 10 5 U 15 a 10 20 30 40 50 C-1 U CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 1 0.8 0.8 41 0 0.0 0.8 42 0 0.0 0.8 43 1 0.8 1.7 44 3 2.5 4.2 45 7 5.9 10.2 46 15 12.7 22.9 47 14 11.9 34.7 48 12 10.2 44.9 49 15 12.7 57.6 50 17 14.4 72.0 51 15 12.7 84.7 52 11 9.3 94.1 53 4 3.4 97.5 54 2 1.7 99.2 55 1 0.8 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 5t_ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 44 through 53 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 95.{ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1.11 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 11(-j AVERAGE SPEED .......................48.{ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ I 100 **l0U - 90 90[ l 80 80 70 * 70Lj 60 * 60n 50 50 40 401 j * 30 30 20 20j 10 * 10 p****************k***************** 0 LJ ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 ;l PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 75 10 5 U 15 a 10 20 30 40 50 C-1 U Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Dater Z5 cfenrldaoralf 200011ejnOOl95.'ds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /V/O 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) !V D✓1 4. Shoulder Conditions /7 (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 % 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. /V 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without ^ �O Sidewalks es or no ' V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Si office, etc.)C ph i 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, Gpp� satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) /✓0 VI t'. 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, Z or raised median)Z Mt 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - J r straight or curved)0 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) r A Art 15. Uniformity with the �E Community (yes or no) S 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Tumover (yes or no) Np cfenrldaoralf 200011ejnOOl95.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Bouquet Canyon Road between Steve Jon Street and Northeast City Limit Year of Survey PART[: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.15 48 53 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 44-53 (83.3%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.15 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART ul• "Ir,HWAY_ TRAFFIC. ANn ROADSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on east side, paved shoulder on west side, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 200 feet apart, two lanes, double -yellow stripe, curved alignment; +/-3 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparentpar , sc oo, Set -back residential west side) vacant east side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on sight distance restrictions, unpaved shoulder, and intersection spacing, reduce 85th percentile speed by mph. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c*enWanra11200011ejno3595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS I BOUQUET CANYON ROAD: STEVE JON STREET TO NORTHEAST CITY LIMIT J DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME...............12:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 SO MPH PACE SPEED .......... 44 through 53 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5.] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 t0 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED...................4811 AVERAGE SPEED ...................... dJJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100 90 90 80 * 80 70 * 70H ,t - 60 * 60 n 50 50 40 * 40�} 30 30 20 * 20d 10 * * 10 n 0************************* 0 +----+----+----+----+----+---- 20 30 40 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 50 60 J 15 _ Ll 20 30 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT <15 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 4 3.9 3.9 41 1 1.0 4.9 42 5 4.9 9.8 43 1 1.0 10.8 44 4 3.9 14.7 45 10 9.8 24.5 46 12 11.8 36.3 47 9 8.8 45.1 48 14 13.7 58.8 49 6 5.9 64.7 50 13 12.7 77.5 51 4 3.9 81.4 52 2 2.0 83.3 53 1110.8 94.1 54 3 2.9 97.1 55 2 2.0 99.0 56 0 0.0 99.0 57 0 0.0 99.0 58 1 1.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 SO MPH PACE SPEED .......... 44 through 53 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5.] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 t0 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED...................4811 AVERAGE SPEED ...................... dJJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100 90 90 80 * 80 70 * 70H ,t - 60 * 60 n 50 50 40 * 40�} 30 30 20 * 20d 10 * * 10 n 0************************* 0 +----+----+----+----+----+---- 20 30 40 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 50 60 J 15 _ Ll 20 30 40 50 60 Street: From: _ Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM 1 To: Location: / - 6 Dater 7/2I�S5 r 1 cfienrlGarita11200011eJnG0195.ids . n EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2 Vertical �l°5 7� j 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) olkl A' n� j'Avf� 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) -30/0 0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, o (aN+ office, eta) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 2 O d offsets yes or no 10, Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 0O 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) do h 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 1 /✓w ! �p \�p/4,,.) divided, undivided, painted, 1 or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet -� l/ur J e straight or curved)C 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the or A� Communitl( (yes no) e 16. Heavy Q Streef Paridng /160' 0 Tumover,(yes or no) . cfienrlGarita11200011eJnG0195.ids . n ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Calarove Boulevard between West City Limits and Wiley Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART h PRFVAII INr: SPFFn MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 39 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 36-45 (64.1%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II, ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART IIP 141MMAV. TRAFFIC_ AND ROAnSInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 200 feet apart, satisfactory pavement, two lanes, two-way left -tum lane, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent park, s oo , Set- ac residential (south si a commercla north etc.), other conditions side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cGenWarita1120001%ejno3695.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS I`f CALGROVE BOULEVARD: WEST CITY LIMITS TO WILEY CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME...............12:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3dl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 64. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 25.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................27 to 53_ VEHICLES OBSERVED......... .........16J1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................39.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) I� +----+----+----+----+----+---------+----+----+ l ***100 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** CUM MPH NO. PCT PCT <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 1 0.6 0.6 28 3 1.8 2.4 29 1 0.6 3.0 30 5 3.0 6.0 31 3 1.8 7.8 32 9 5.4 13.2 33 4 2.4 15.6 34 8 4.8 20.4 35 9 5.4 25.7 36 9 5.4 31.1 37 9 5.4 36.5 38 12 7.2 43.7 39 11 6.6 50.3 40 13 7.8 58.1 41 8 4.8 62.9 42 6 3.6 66.5 43 13 7.8 74.3 44 14 8.4 82.6 45 12 7.2 89.8 46 0 0.0 89.8 47 5 3.0 92.8 48 1 0.6 93.4 49 0 0.0 93.4 50 1 0.6 94.0 51 5 3.0 97.0 52 0 0.0 97.0 53 5 3.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3dl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 64. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 25.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................27 to 53_ VEHICLES OBSERVED......... .........16J1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................39.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) I� +----+----+----+----+----+---------+----+----+ l ***100 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 40rl * 30L ** 20J * 10 _ * t - L1 0k****************** 0 L1 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) [] ---------------------------------------------- 15 15__ 10 5 +----+----+----+----+-- 10 20 30 ** 90 L1 * 80 * 700 * 60[j * 50 * 40rl * 30L ** 20J * 10 _ * t - L1 0k****************** 0 L1 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) [] ---------------------------------------------- 15 15__ 10 5 +----+----+----+----+-- 10 20 30 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: + 2 Date: dienndan1a1120001 WJn00195.,ds EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal / " 2. Vertical /t/0 /— 3. Superelevation (°/V) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 CJo 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics I /l at rade, dustpan. etc. d5T tlti 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Q Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.)PS,1e 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 5J,J4 O(a 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) i { 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 2 - divided, undivided, painted, divided, q 1 or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - c straight or curved)[ 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) p epi r 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) �d 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) 0 dienndan1a1120001 WJn00195.,ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Calgrove Boulevard between Wiley Canyon Road and Creekside Drive Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAII INr; SPEED MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 44 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 39-48 (80.4%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11• Annin FNT RFrnRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART uh HIr;HWAY_ TRAFFIC_ ANn ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 3% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 300 feet apart, four lanes, two-way left - tum lane, curved, +/- 60 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions KtMAKRJ No characteristics not readily apparent. 45 mph c#enWanta 11200011ejno3795.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CALGROVE BOULEVARD: WILEY CANYON ROAD TO CREEKSIDE DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 _ 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 15. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED .. .................151 AVERAGE SPEED .......................43.? CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----------------------------------------------- 100 ****100 90 90 so 80 70 * 70 60 50 40 30 20 60 50`� 40J 30 2011 10 ** 101 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 L1 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT <10 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32_ 2 1.3 1.3 33 1 0.6 1.9 34 5 3.2 5.1 35 1 0.6 5.7 36 6 3.8 9.5 37 4 2.5 12.0 38 5 3.2 15.2' 39 1 0.6 15.8 40 3 1.9 17.7 41 18 11.4 29.1 42 12 7.6 36.7 43 9 5.7 42.4 44 22 13.9 56.3 45 18 11.4 67.7 46 15 9.5 77.2 47 9 5.7 82.9 48 20 12.7 95.6 49 1 0.6 96.2 50 2 1.3 97.5 51 0 0.0 97.5 52 1 0.6 98.1 53 3 1.9 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 _ 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 15. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED .. .................151 AVERAGE SPEED .......................43.? CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----------------------------------------------- 100 ****100 90 90 so 80 70 * 70 60 50 40 30 20 60 50`� 40J 30 2011 10 ** 101 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 L1 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 2 - Date: 7 b e�qs cfentldai#4120001 %ejno 0195.#s EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal O 2. Vertical AID 3. Superelevation 3 79 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) ~- 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade; dustpan, etc.) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �l, office, etc.)PS cit 9, Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- 30D offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 1747 p 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, _ jla0 ✓ey 1` or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curve C) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) '@ 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) I p cfentldai#4120001 %ejno 0195.#s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Calla Wav between Camp Plenty Road and Canyonview Drive Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 26 29 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 22-31 (100.0%) Posted Speed Limit 30 mph PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 150 feet apart, two lanes, no striping, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Church (southside), residential (north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent, RECOMMENDATION 30 mph cienAdantal1200011ejno3895.xfs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CALLA WAY: CAMP PLENTY ROAD TO CANYON VIEW DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.30 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2{l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2t) 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22'through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED..............100 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... O.b RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 31 VEHICLES 0BSERVED.....................4 AVERAGE SPEED. ................ ....26.[J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� ---------------------------------------------- L 100 ****************10 * 9 r' 90 9 80 80 70 7 60 * 6D 50 5f l 40 * 4L1 30 30 20 * 2j 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +--------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 4 9.3 9.3 24 5 11.6 20.9 25 9 20.9 41.9 26 5 11.6 53.5 27 2 4.7 58.1 28 7 16.3 74.4 29 5 11.6 86.0 30 4 9.3 95.3 31 2 4.7 100.0 32 0 0.0 100.0 33 0 0.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2{l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2t) 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22'through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED..............100 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... O.b RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 31 VEHICLES 0BSERVED.....................4 AVERAGE SPEED. ................ ....26.[J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� ---------------------------------------------- L 100 ****************10 * 9 r' 90 9 80 80 70 7 60 * 6D 50 5f l 40 * 4L1 30 30 20 * 2j 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +--------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: 10' W From: iP"nTTo: Chn d ay I Observer. iI J Location: T Date: 5 c#ent1darNa11200011ajn00195.)ds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) j� l r V I\j O 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical O 3. Superelevation (°%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 0 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics \ at rade, dustpan, etc. II 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without 0 �q Sidewalks es or no B. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, � V cc r-7 office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �15�� K0 Cj O� &0 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) C aWtl 11. Truck Traffic O n'Q p (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, i` U F r J •' I�O S -t rip l Al oY' '�QYk 1 n or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - t I�� �j }ter, � i� O t str, straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics l (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the 7 Community (yes or no) - 16. Heavy On -Street Parking - �\ ' V a N p Turnover (yes or no) c#ent1darNa11200011ajn00195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Camp Plenty Road between Soledad Canyon Road and Newhouse Street Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PRFVAII.ING SPFFD MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.75 30 34 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 26-35 (91.5%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART 11• ACCIDENT RFCr]RDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.75 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders (partially unpaved on west side), intersections spaced approximately 400 feet apart, two lanes, painted broken yellow, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no parking south of Stillmore Street, no school xings.. Land uses not apparent pa ,sc oo , Residential (west side), school/residential (east side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on functional classification of roadway, recommend speed of 30 mph. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph cGenWanta 11200011ejno3995.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CAMP PLENTY ROAD: SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO NEWHOUSE STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/22/1995 TIME ............... 1:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3C 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3d 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 91. -� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................22 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 125'] AVERAGE SPEED .......................30.. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----t 100 t**********1 90 9q * 80 *n 7 cul 6 �� * 5 * 4(1 * 30 2 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 1 0.8 0.8 23 0 0.0 0.8 24 1 0.8 1.6 25 5 3.9 5.4 26 8 6.2 11.6 27 17 13.2 24.8 28 7 54 30.2 29 13 10.1 40.3 30 19 14.7 55.0 31 15 11.6 66.7 32 10 7.8 74.4 33 5 3.9 78.3 34 11 8.5 86.8 35 13 10.1 96.9 36 2 1.6 98.4 37 1 0.8 99.2 38 0 0.0 99.2 39 0 0.0 99.2 40 1 0.8 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3C 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3d 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 91. -� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................22 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 125'] AVERAGE SPEED .......................30.. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----t 100 t**********1 90 9q * 80 *n 7 cul 6 �� * 5 * 4(1 * 30 2 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From:So 1 Q-A ftA VDk To: IV i'L-JKOy'>t` Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Location: it_3© Date: 2 cientWarila1120001Wno0195.x1a E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) ,,�� ft r v 0 n I v , v 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical N N fp 3. Superelevation (9/0) -- 4_ Shoulder Conditions 1P P (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 1 T Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without 0 b Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, �O a, satisfactory, poor, etc.) ✓�� 11. Truck Traffic V` (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- 4q 5fir �. straight or curve l 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics �/�/} -tAA 0 ll (heavy, moderate, light) � (� , . 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) leis 16, Heavy On -Street Parking or no) S j Turnover (yes p cientWarila1120001Wno0195.x1a ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Camp Plenty Road between Delight Street and Nadal Street Year of Survey 1995 PART h PRFVAII INr; SPFFn MFAStJRFMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 27 31 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 22-31 (79.7%) Posted Speed Limit 30 mph PART 11• APP InFNT RFf`n RnC Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1,55 PART nr HInHWAY- TRAFFIC- AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced 200-500 feet apart, two lanes, painted double -yellow stripe, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent park, school, Residential (west side), residential/school (east sI e . etc.), other conditions on , recommend speed of 30 In IRECOMMENDATION 130 mph cfienticlanta%1200011ejno4095.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CAMP PLENTY ROAD: DELIGHT STREET TO NADAL STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE. .............. 3/22/1995 TIME ............... 2:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.30 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......2� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3' 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 79*7 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 37 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................54] AVERAGE SPEED ........................27.5 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- I nn ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 3 5.1 5.1 21 1 1.7 6.8 22 1 1.7 8.5 23 3 5.1 13.6 24 4 6.8 20.3 25 8 13.6 33.9 26 4 6.8 40.7 27 11 18.6 59.3 28 2 3.4 62.7 29 4 6.8 69.5 30 8 13.6 83.1 31 2 3.4 86.4 32 1 1.7 88.1 33 1 1.7 89.8 34 2 3.4 93.2 35 0 0.0 93.2 36 1 1.7 94.9 37 3 5.1 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0100.0 41 0 0.0100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......2� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3' 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 79*7 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 37 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................54] AVERAGE SPEED ........................27.5 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- I nn ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Location: Jh 31 Date: 141240 ('O Observer. cienAdar#a V 200011ejno0195.ks EIB or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal O Iv Q 2. Vertical N p N� 3. Superelevation (%) 4- Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics No �1yV �1 aV 5+pG+n5 at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the n ' Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, ' Re 5/ sr'oo office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - a4Q'o -300 sn.0 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, rJ0 c7O satisfactory, poor, etc.) 9 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) ✓� O lti� In O h 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 'vJ PDY -llijP d 1 or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- viol �j'!"rd�q�� �A I ✓ IQ �` straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics O (a (heavy, moderate, light) N^ 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On Street Parking 60) ltio Turnover (yes or cienAdar#a V 200011ejno0195.ks ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Carrizo Drive between Arroyo Park Drive and Estaban Drive Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/22/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.82 27 31 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 23-32 (88.9) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART IIS ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.82 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance obstructions, intersections, other) unpaved shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 100 feet apart, two lanes, broken -yellow stripe, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (southside), sc oo res/ entia(north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph cfientldanfa 1120001Vefno4195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS [� CARRIZO DRIVEN ARROYO PARK TO ESTABAN DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE .............. 5/26/1995 TIME ............... 9:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................27i 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 88.9' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 10.?I PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................22 to 37 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................25qq AVERAGE SPEED .......................27.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) jl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***********10 90 * 9 d 80 * 80 70 * 7Q] * - ll 60 6f1 50 * 50 40 * 4( l 30 * 30 20 2j 10 * 1Q1 p*********************** 0 u ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+-- 0 10 20 SPEED (MPH) 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT. 0 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 1 0.4 0.4 23 19 7.5 7.9 24 22 8.7 16.7 25 30 11.9 28.6 26 30 11.9 40.5 27 30 11.9 52.4 28 30 11.9 64.3 29 24 9.5 73.8 30 20 7.9 81.7 31 12 4.8 86.5 32 7 2.8 89.3 33 9 3.6 92.9 34 9 3.6 96.4 35 4 1.6 98.0 36 4 1.6 99.6 37 1 0.4 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................27i 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 88.9' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............ 10.?I PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................22 to 37 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................25qq AVERAGE SPEED .......................27.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) jl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***********10 90 * 9 d 80 * 80 70 * 7Q] * - ll 60 6f1 50 * 50 40 * 4( l 30 * 30 20 2j 10 * 1Q1 p*********************** 0 u ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+-- 0 10 20 SPEED (MPH) 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: ,, ,3 >-- Date: Date: V/7 -(/i cienrldar9a1120001Wna0 r95 -ids EIB or S/B W/B or NB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /O A/O /4 2. Vertical 2. - 0 3. Superelevation (eh) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) �/ 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) -17b 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 00 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Sc�,oO office, etc.)oS,�eh+. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - /®O offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) G00 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, / Ib� or raised median)Y` 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - q b straight or curved)l! 14, Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) . �I 1 cienrldar9a1120001Wna0 r95 -ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Championship Way between Tourney Road and 1-5 NIB Off Ramp Year of Survey 1995 DADT I- DOCIIA11 IAI!_ RDCCn MGAAIIRFMFIdT Location of Survey 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 23 25 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 18-27 (100.0%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted DADT 11. ArrMCnlT 0C!`n0r11Z Time Period Covered 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DADT 111. ulcuwev TRAFFIC Amn RnanSmF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 300 feet apart, two lanes, double -yellow stripe, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Hotel (southside), vacant(north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS characteristics not readily apparent. 25 mph ckentWantal1200011ejno4295.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CHAMPIONSHIP WAY: TOURNEY ROAD TO I-5 OFF RAMP (NB) DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME...............12:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................24 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2� 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 18 through 27 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED..............100T PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to2 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................3 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 22.(1,,__11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ********************10 90 * 9� 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * * CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 4 11.8 11.8 21 5 14.7 26.5 22 7 20.6 47.1 23 8 23.5 70.6 24 2 5.9 76.5 25 5 14.7 91.2 26 2 5.9 97.1 27 1 2.9 100.0 28 0 0.0 100.0 29 0 0.0 100.0 30 0 0.0 100.0 31 0 0.0 100.0 32 0 0.0 100.0 33 0 0.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0:100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................24 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2� 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 18 through 27 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED..............100T PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to2 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................3 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 22.(1,,__11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ********************10 90 * 9� 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 * * * * 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 3 3 Date: ` IZ6 /T cSenWa,*a%120001 %eJno0195-)ds E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal I V 2. Vertical ,r f p /�-- 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 3G%p (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics () f OUApa-d at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without r� Sidewalks es or no �V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, T �n I Q f l t l CS'!(VO4 Tb.,Ki office, etc.)T 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no �? l?O 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) Goo Z 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, n �1 0% a y divided, undivided, painted, f J le 0'o or raised median)I l 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - / �� straight orcury 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the ( Community (yes, or no) N V 16. Heavy On-StreeGParking Turnover (yes or no) cSenWa,*a%120001 %eJno0195-)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Cinema Drive between Valencia Boulevard and Bouguet Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAn WG SPFFn MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 37 42 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (72.0°/x) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART IL ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 200 feet apart, two lanes, two-way left - turn lane, +/- 36 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking turnover, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial. etc.), other conditions on high use, reduce 85th percentile speed by IRECOMMENDATION 135 mph ck'annGadta1120001Wjno4395.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CINEMA DRIVE: VALENCIA BLVD. TO BOUQUET CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ .3i_1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4',1 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 15.a] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 12.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ......11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................36. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * 10 0 10 20 30 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) * * * 40 ***10 * g 80 X11 6 5 4� 30 2� 1� 0 Lam■ 0 10 20 30 40 1.1 5 , 1 fl L1 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 _PCT. 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 4 3.4 3.4 30 4 3.4 6.8 31 7 5.9 12.7 32 11 9.3 22.0 33 7 5.9 28.0 34 13 11.0 39.0 35 6 5.1 44.1 36 7 5.9 50.0 37 6 5.1 55.1 38 11 9.3 64.4 39 5 4.2 68.6 40 8 6.8 75.4 41 it 9.3 84.7 42 5 4.2 89.0 43 10 8.5 97.5 44 1 0.8 98.3 45 2 1.7 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ .3i_1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4',1 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 15.a] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 12.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ......11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................36. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * 10 0 10 20 30 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) * * * 40 ***10 * g 80 X11 6 5 4� 30 2� 1� 0 Lam■ 0 10 20 30 40 1.1 5 , 1 fl L1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: From: To: Date: Observer. c#ennGarila41200011eJrro0195-d5 EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1, Horizontal 410 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Kof 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3%p 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without 4/0 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �QMnuga, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - Z 00 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, G of satisfactory, poor, etc.) o 11. Truck Traffic // (heavy, moderate, light) NOn 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 2 Wa divided, undivided, painted, h or raised median)T� TT Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 6 strai ht or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics I*pr (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Unifornity:with the Community{yes or no) yl°s 16. Heavy On Street Parking (yes 'or Turnover no) I A/ c#ennGarila41200011eJrro0195-d5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Circle J Street between Via Princessa and San Fernando Road Year of Survey 1995 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 35 41 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 29-38 (73.5%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, horizontal curves, two lanes, double -yellow striping, curved alignment, +/- 36 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking sighted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant west side), residential east side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cfient%darita1120001 %ejno4495.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS U CIRCLE J STREET: VIA PRINCESSA TO SAN FERNANDO ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME...............12:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.' 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3d 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4f 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73. 1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 24. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 46 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1111 AVERAGE SPEED .......................35. 11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ******100 90 90'I 80 * 80 70 * 70 60 * 60 * 50 * 50 40 40{1 30 * 30 20 20❑ - 10 10� 0************************ 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 I� L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15f_• 10 5 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT PCT < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 2 1.7 1.7 26 0 0.0 1.7 27 0 0.0 1.7 28 0 0.0 1.7 29 5 4.3 6.0 30 8 6.8 12.8 31 5 4.3 17.1 32 14 12.0 29.1 33 9 7.7 36.8 34 13 11.1 47.9 35 6 5.1 53.0 36 7 6.0 59.0 37 12 10.3 69.2 38 7 6.0 75.2 39 5 4.3 79.5 40 5 4.3 83.8 41 3 2.6 86.3 42 1 0.9 87.2 43 7 6.0 93.2 44 2 1.7 94.9 45 5 4.3 99.1 46 1 0.9 100.0 47 0 0.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 .100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3d 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4f 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73. 1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 24. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 46 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1111 AVERAGE SPEED .......................35. 11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ******100 90 90'I 80 * 80 70 * 70 60 * 60 * 50 * 50 40 40{1 30 * 30 20 20❑ - 10 10� 0************************ 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 I� L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15f_• 10 5 10 20 30 40 Street: From: _ Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: �44 A- cfenndaritatf 20001 lajno0195.>Js E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical f 3. Superelevation (%) 4, Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) a J� 5, Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics ! at rade, dustpan, etc. L91 t a h 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - t -- offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) p� 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Noire 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 1 f (�OJ� �t l!� I�#w or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 3 6 C(rcJ2 straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) M r NO 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) S 16; Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) rf 0 cfenndaritatf 20001 lajno0195.>Js ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Citrus Street between Valencia Boulevard and Magic Mountain Parkway Year of Survey 1995 DART 1• DRFVatt ttdr, 52DFFn MFARIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 1.37 39 42 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 34-43 (89.1%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART 11- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 3 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 1.37 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DART ul• HinuWAV TRAPPic aNn RnAnSInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, four lanes, double -yellow stripe, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent par , sc oo , Vacant east side), commercial west side). etc.), other conditions VAKI IV-. characteristics not readily apparent. 40 mph c6entic/artta 1 r200011ejno4595.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CITRUS STREET: VALENCIA BLVD. TO MAGIC MOUNTAIN PKWY DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 1:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.. 100 90 80 70 60 50 U 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............. ....35_1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.,i PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to4 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................4� AVERAGE SPEED .......................38.4 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) lJ l +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ `J ******100 40 30 20 10 90 80n 70E 60� 50 11 40(I 30 20J 1011 0************xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx � ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 8 17.4 17.4 35 3 6.5 23.9 36 1 2.2 26.1 37 7 15.2 41.3 38 2 4.3 45.7 39 4 8.7 54.3 40 6 13.0 67.4 41 2 4.3 71.7 42 7 15.2 87.0 43 1 2.2 89.1 44 1 2.2 91.3 45 3 6.5 97.8 46 0 0.0 97.8 47 0 0.0 97.8 48 0 0.0 97.8 49 1 2.2 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 U 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............. ....35_1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.,i PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to4 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................4� AVERAGE SPEED .......................38.4 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) lJ l +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ `J ******100 40 30 20 10 90 80n 70E 60� 50 11 40(I 30 20J 1011 0************xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx � ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: o�zaI I / / Date: 7 (x/ A - cfenWanfa%120001teJn60195.ids E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N O 2. Vertical /� Q 3. Superelevation (°h) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) GLJe 5. Profile Conditions 3 �p (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without f (u Sidewalks es or no /✓ 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, COmcr auk office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ^� offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, rr satisfactory, poor, etc.) V 00 11, Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, /] divided, undivided, painted, z / �J of 3 •/P 1�� or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - s�D straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics ) h (heavy, moderate, light) /� 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) S 16.. Heavy.On-Street Parking Turnover' (yes or no)AIO cfenWanfa%120001teJn60195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Copper Hill/San Francisquito between West City Limit and 500' E/O Tamarack Lane Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 47 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 43-52 (64.3%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART IF ACCInFNT RECORnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART IR- WIr_WWAV TRAFFIr amn RnAnSIDF r.HARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved shoulders intersections, other) along portion of segment, +/- 3% grade, two lanes and broken -yellow stripe west of Seco Canyon (+/- 25 feet wide, four lanes and two-way left -tum lane east of Seco Canyon +/- 60 feet Wide). TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential (south side), vacant(north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cgenticlatital12000l1-ino4695.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS COPPER HILL DRIVE: WEST CITY LIMIT TO SECO CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 8:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. IBJ 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 11 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 64.�j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 24. RANGE OF SPEEDS ...... .........35 to 57l VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................14{I AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ****10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 90� * 80 ** 70 * 60 * 50Crl * J ,t - * 40J * 30 ** * 20J ** 10 0 Ll ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 -d LJ CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 1 0.7 0.7 36 6 4.3 5.0 37 4 2.9 7.9 38 4 2.9 10.7 39 6 4.3 15.0 40 8 5.7 20.7 41 3 2.1 22.9 42 2 1.4 24.3 43 9 6.4 30.7 44 10 7.1 37.9 45 12 8.6 46.4 46 5 3.6 50.0 47 8 5.7 55.7 48 15 10.7 66.4 49 9 6.4 72.9 50 6 4.3 77.1 51 11 7.9 85.0 52 5 3.6 88.6 53 2 1.4 90.0 54 5 3.6 93.6 55 2 1.4 95.0 56 1 0.7 95.7 57 6 4.3 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 IBJ 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 11 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 64.�j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 24. RANGE OF SPEEDS ...... .........35 to 57l VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................14{I AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ****10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 90� * 80 ** 70 * 60 * 50Crl * J ,t - * 40J * 30 ** * 20J ** 10 0 Ll ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 -d LJ Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: / 3 Date: 7 j /qs clennGa,. tat 120001%ejno0195.�ds tl EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions �q C"4 (paved or unpaved) V H 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 %q 6. Commercial Driveway ^� Characteristics at rade, dust an, eta 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without O Sidewalks es or no 6. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, a(a"r office, etc.)V 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - =-- offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, �11 r Sr satisfactory, poor, etc.) P,54(V, 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) (JQ -1 Q 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 13.oKr ti? divided, undivided, painted, / or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics t (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the p Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On�-StreeY arking n k_ Turnover (yes or no) A) clennGa,. tat 120001%ejno0195.�ds tl ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Copper Hill Drive between 500' E/O Tamarack Lane and Haskell Canyon Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.33 43 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 36-45 (78.8%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.33 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART Ill: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Horizontal and vertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) unpaved shoulder on north side, +1- 3% grade, no striping, +/- 25-30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential soul side), vacant Hort si e . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on sight distance restrictions and unpaved shoulder, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cienncrarita11200071e%no4895.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS COPPER HILL DRIVE: 500' E/O TAMARACK IN TO 1100' W/O KENTON DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 7:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 , 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 21. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................5f AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.1' CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1� ---------------------------------------------- 100 *101 90 ** 90� 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * * 80 7 0 * 60 50` * 40` l ** u 30 * 20H 10 p******************************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 11 5 +----+----+----+----+----+-- 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 it 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 5 9.6 9.6 37 3 5.8 15.4 38 1 1.9 17.3 39 2 3.8 21.2 40 7 13.5 34.6 41 1 1.9 36.5 42 3 5.8 42.3 43 8 15.4 57.7 44 5 9.6 67.3 45 6 11.5 78.8 46 4 7.7 86.5 47 2 3.8 90.4 48 1 1.9 92.3 49 1 1.9 94.2 50 3 5.8:100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 , 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 21. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................5f AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.1' CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1� ---------------------------------------------- 100 *101 90 ** 90� 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * * 80 7 0 * 60 50` * 40` l ** u 30 * 20H 10 p******************************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 11 5 +----+----+----+----+----+-- 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 3 Date: cie nilderN8112000 fl-in,00195-'ds E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /V(O- 2. Vertical e S 3. Superelevation (%) /j%n Q 4. Shoulder Conditions n �h (paved or unpaved) A Vf CI 1V{ 5. Profile Conditions 3 (grade, %) / 0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc.) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without , %D Sidewalks es or no /V 6. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, II II office, etc. r c� Pv } q( C a h 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) lhfl qc�(D 11. Truck Traffic AO/1-t (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted. „ /� or raised median) we 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - Z✓C S �1n h J straight or curved)I 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) l 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) $ S 16. Heavy On -Street. Parking ^/ b Turnover. (yes or no) / V cie nilderN8112000 fl-in,00195-'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Cortina Drive between Arroyo Park Drive and Alta Madera Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 33 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 28-37 (77.0°/x) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal or vertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) paved shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 250 feet apart, double -yellow stripe, two lanes, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph c6enndar#a 11200011ejno5095.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CORTINA DRIVE: ARROYO PARK DRIVE TO ALTA MADERA ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ..... .........11:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3" 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.,] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................13�] AVERAGE SPEED.......................32. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******10 * 90 ** 9 80 80 _ * 70 7j 60 * 6D 50 * 5 40 * 41(ll 1 30 * 30 20 ** 2j 10 * �� *** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 I PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ----- 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 6 4.4 4.4 24 0 0.0 4.4 25 2 1.5 5.9 26 4 3.0 8.9 27 7 5.2 14.1 28 5 3.7 17.8 29 3 2.2 20.0 30 14 10.4 30.4 31 10 7.4 37.8 32 14 10.4 48.1 33 13 9.6 57.8 34 10 7.4 65.2 35 14 10.4 75.6 36 12 8.9 84.4 37 9 6.7 91.1 38 1 0.7 91.9 39 3 2.2 94.1 40 5 3.7 97.8 41 1 0.7 98.5 42 2 1.5 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3" 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.,] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................13�] AVERAGE SPEED.......................32. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******10 * 90 ** 9 80 80 _ * 70 7j 60 * 6D 50 * 5 40 * 41(ll 1 30 * 30 20 ** 2j 10 * �� *** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 I PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: -r Dater y A2 A ciennWantaII2000r1e%no0195.xfs E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A/0 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions n (paved or unpaved) k✓£ 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 7,t 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without !O A Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, nn ff (rSfjti l office, etc. a 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / �� offsets es or no t7 10. Pavement Condition (good, Gov satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, I f or raised median)/ 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) t, 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) e M6 '.Heavy On -Street Parking .Turnover (yes or no) ciennWantaII2000r1e%no0195.xfs ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Creekside Road between Valencia Boulevard and McBean Parkway Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 36 40 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (83.5%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY:- Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, two lanes, two-way left -tum lane, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, heavy on -street parking turnover, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Auto dealerships. etc.), other conditions Based on high accident rate and turnover, (RECOMMENDATION 135 mph speed by 5 mph. cAentldanta11200011ejno5195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis 'Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS CREEKSIDE ROAD: VALENCIA BLVD. TO MCBEAN PARKWAY DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 2:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...3�] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. , PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 5 , VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED.......................37. ff CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 10 20 30 PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+- 15 10 5 SPEED (MPH) 15� L0� 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 1 0.8 0.8 29 0 0.0 0.8 30 4 3.3 4.1 31 0 0.0 4.1 32 2 1.7 5.8 33 12 9.9 15.7 34 14 11.6 27.3 35 16 13.2 40.5 36 15 12.4 52.9 37 11 9.1 62.0 38 10 8.3 70.2 39 8 6.6 76.9 40 12 9.9 86.8 41 1 0.8 87.6 42 1 0.8 88.4 43 1 0.8 89.3 44 6 5.0 94.2 45 0 0.0 94.2 46 0 0.0 94.2 47 0 0.0 94.2 48 0 0.0 94.2 49 0 0.0 94.2 50 5 4.1 98.3 51 2 1.7 100.0 52 0 0.0 100.0 53 0 0.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...3�] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. , PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 5 , VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED.......................37. ff CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 10 20 30 PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+- 15 10 5 SPEED (MPH) 15� L0� 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: 'J > LIZ From: To: Date: Observer. ::;� X/ Kst cfenWadta11z000JWno0195.a1s E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /4 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) — 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics O03 at rade, dustpan. etc. } kh 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Vo Sidewalks es or no)/ 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Avf Mu b ( I office, etc. / „ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11 G0 o C 11. Truck Traffic 1 1 U0 (heavy, moderate, light) ht 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, I I 1 2 W a� IX or raised median)/ 13. Street Width and / Alignment (width, feet- _ O straight or curved - 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) } eU1J 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) �S 16. Heavy tan -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) 2 5 cfenWadta11z000JWno0195.a1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Dalbev Drive between Orchard Village Road and Newhall Avenue Year of Survey 1995 DART 1• DRFVAII mr- CPPFn MFARI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 26 29 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 21-30 (92.0%) Posted Speed Limit 25 mph PART II- ACCInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART uo- HIr WVJAV TRAFFIC_ ANn ROAnSInE CNARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, two lanes, no striping, +1- 40 feet wide.. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, heavy on -street parking turnover on south side, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Park (southside), school (north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on 10 -mph pace and adjacent land uses, recommend speed of 25 mph. RECOMMENDATION 25 mph c(Nent%darita11200011efno5295.x15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS DALBEY ROAD: ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD TO NEWHALL AVE. DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME...............10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 30 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 92.11 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 3 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................11 AVERAGE SPEED.......................26. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) C1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L 100 ***************10 ** 90 9 80 i�l 70 60 6�]- * J 50 5(( ll 40 * 4[j 30 * 30 20 * 2j 10 O******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ -PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 4 3.6 3.6 21 6 5.4 8.9 22 1 0.9 9.8 23 14 12.5 22.3 24 10 8.9 31.3 25 12 10.7 42.0 26 16 14.3 56.3 27 9 8.0 64.3 28 11 9.8 74.1 29 13 11.6 85.7 30 11 9.8 95.5 31 1 0.9 96.4 32 4 3.6 100.0 33 0 0.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0'100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46' 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 30 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 92.11 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 3 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................11 AVERAGE SPEED.......................26. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) C1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L 100 ***************10 ** 90 9 80 i�l 70 60 6�]- * J 50 5(( ll 40 * 4[j 30 * 30 20 * 2j 10 O******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street:: From: arc-kQC V1j102 e—To: N2vJr�[� 1 Observer: EJW Location: , /.,, `7 Date: II 610 — cfenndarila U2000 MOW 195AS E/B or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal p 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (1/6) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions O (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics N ��� O o at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, ®Q (1C� �j (00 l office, etc.)1 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, g O of O 6 poor, satisfactory,l J 11. Truck Traffic �� Y\_10 �� (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, v J divided, undivided, painted, l or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet -®t Sfir,�J S t-1-- r'strai ht or curved) straight 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the �5 pp5 \, C Community (yes or no) 7 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover or no) y 5 N O Se v e ry por►c.V tS r3 6 i 91 VA In (yes o q cfenndarila U2000 MOW 195AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Decoro Drive between Vista Delgado and Seco Canyon Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 28 30 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 23-32 (97.1%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents, Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III• HIr:HWAV. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 100 feet apart, four lanes, double -yellow stripe, +/-.60 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, esi entia sout side), school (north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph cNenflclarifa i1200011ejno5395.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS DECORO DRIVE: VISTA DELGADO TO SECO CANYON DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 97.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............2. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 36 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................24 AVERAGE SPEED .......................27.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+--- 0 10 20 ** CUM MPH NO. PCT. -PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 11 4.5 4.5 24 22 9.0 13.5 25 27 11.0 24.5 26 30 12.2 36.7 27 30 12.2 49.0 28 30 12.2 61.2 29 30 12.2 73.5 30 30 12.2 85.7 31 23 9.4 95.1 32 5 2.0 97.1 33 4 1.6 98.8 34 2 0.8 99.6 35 0 0.0 99.6 36 1 0.4 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 97.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............2. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 36 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................24 AVERAGE SPEED .......................27.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+--- 0 10 20 ----+----+----+----+ 30 40 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----*----* 0 10 20 30 40 j 15 1] ** -�9 80 * 7 C� * 6 * 5 4 d� 30 * -d1 2 LUJ 1 Q, 0l�fl ----+----+----+----+ 30 40 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----*----* 0 10 20 30 40 j 15 1] Street: _ From Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM k0 Location: /'7 Date: 7 4I A cFennclarifa1120001Wjno0195-4S EIB or SIB w/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /v 2. Vertical /✓ Q 3. Superelevation--- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) of ✓f 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 yq 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics ^� at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /o Sidewalks es or no N 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, e5,�+��=u� Sc�oo� RIE, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - O offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) mo 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, fight) �/0he 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 9✓ ✓� P Xp / divided, undivided, painted, ar raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - /_' straight or cu ry �'j O 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics I d7v (heavy, moderate, light) f ft 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) . 16. Heavy On Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) A4p cFennclarifa1120001Wjno0195-4S ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Del Monte Drive between Summit Place and Emerald Dove Drive Year of Survey PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 40 44 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 35-44 (75.4%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY:. Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) paved shoulders, +/- 3% grade, residential driveways, two lanes, double -yellow stripe, curved alignment, +/- 32 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (east side), vacant west si e . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on fronting residential land use and restricted sight distance, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph clienAdanfa 11200011e/no5495.z15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS DEL MONTE DRIVE: SUMMIT PLACE TO EMERALD DOVE DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 2:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4C1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.4 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..................... 9 13 C AVERAGE SPEED......................JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+--- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 15 10 5 10 20 30 SPEED (MPH) PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---+----+ ***100 ,t* 90 L1 * 80 LJ * 70H 60 (- 50 40r 30 20� 10�0 50 10 20 30 40 50 0� CUM MPH NO. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 0.7 0.7 31 0 0.0 0.7 32 2 1.4 2.2 33 5 3.6 5.8 34 10 7.2 13.0 35 5 3.6 16.7 36 16 11.6 28.3 37 7 5.1 33.3 38 5 3.6 37.0 39 14 10.1 47.1 40 10 7.2 54.3 41 9 6.5 60.9 42 15 10.9 71.7 43 .10 7.2 79.0 44 13 9.4 88.4 45 4 2.9 91.3 46 8 5.8 97.1 47 0 0.0 97.1 48 1 0.7 97.8 49 0 0.0 97.8 50 3 2.2 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4C1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.4 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..................... 9 13 C AVERAGE SPEED......................JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+--- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 15 10 5 10 20 30 SPEED (MPH) PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---+----+ ***100 ,t* 90 L1 * 80 LJ * 70H 60 (- 50 40r 30 20� 10�0 50 10 20 30 40 50 0� Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: 1 /z61 client %darita1120001 bjn00195.1d5 EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 0 2. Vertical NO 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) ✓e 5. Profile Conditions 37p (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics nAh at rade, dustpan, etc. JSP Y 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /O Sidewalks es or no / v 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, n , office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11 6 00 C 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) —� 12. Channelization (#of lanes, 004it veil*') divided, undivided, painted, I J or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- 3�� CU(Ur straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics M I (heavy, moderate, light) j r0�ergi 15. Uniformity with the �1 Community (yes or no) S 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) Vo client %darita1120001 bjn00195.1d5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Del Monte Drive between Emerald Dove Drive and McBean Parkway Year of Survey PAPT I- DRPVAII mr_ RPPFn MFASIIRr-MFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01101/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 41 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (77.5%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph onoT 11• ArrinPnlT RPCn RnA Time Period Covered 01101/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- WirMWAV TRAPPIr ANn RAAr1SInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometdcs, access (driveways, Horizontal sight distance restriction, paved shoulders, intersections, other) grade changes, two lanes, double -yellow striping, curved alignment, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on sight distance restrictions, grade changes, and residential land use, reduce 85th percentile speed by 10 mph. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cfienWanta 120001Wjno5595..)ds SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS DEL MONTE DRIVE: EMERALD DOVE DRIVE TO MCBEAN PARKWAY DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 3:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4(1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.F PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................18f� AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ C_J 100 **100 90 * 90� 80 80 70 * 70 60 * 60� 50 * 50` 40 * 40 l 30 * 30 20 * 20r] 10 ** 10 * -a +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) u ---------------------------------------------- 15 1 a 30 40 50 d CUM MPH NO. PCT_ < 5 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 0.5 0.5 31 0 0.0 0.5 32 0 0.0 0.5 33 10 5.5 6.0 34 3 1.6 7.7 35 5 2.7 10.4 36 8 4.4 14.8 37 12 6.6 21.4 38 17 9.3 30.8 39 19 10.4 41.2 40 15 8.2 49.5 41 20 11.0 60.4 42 14 7.7 68.1 43 17 9.3 77.5 44 10 5.5 83.0 45 6 3.3 86.3 46 11 6.0 92.3 47 5 2.7 95.1 48 3 1.6 96.7 49 4 2.2 98.9 50 2 1.1100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4(1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.F PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................18f� AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ C_J 100 **100 90 * 90� 80 80 70 * 70 60 * 60� 50 * 50` 40 * 40 l 30 * 30 20 * 20r] 10 ** 10 * -a +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) u ---------------------------------------------- 15 1 a 30 40 50 d Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARiTA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 1`/I Date: #L& (q. cfenndsrXa11200011afn00195.Jda EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal MQ 2. Vertical AID 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) kv, 5. Profile Conditions 3%b (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7: Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without 10 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, II office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) v p0 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median)/ 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 3 D [ J!v{ straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) PS 16. Heavy On -Street Parking r Turnover (yes or no) N Q cfenndsrXa11200011afn00195.Jda ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Del Monte Drive between McBean Parkwav and Estaban Drive Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 34 40 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 30-39 (76.9%e) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12131/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1,55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Horizontal sight distance restrictions, paved shoulders, intersections, other) +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 100 feet apart, two lanes, broken -yellow striping, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. ROADSIDE:an uses not apparent (park, school, _r is entia . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on sight distance restrictions and adjacent land use, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cienflclan1a1120001 Wno5695.x15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS DEL MONTE DRIVE: MCBEAN PARKWAY TO ESTABAN DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE. 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 3:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4l 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76.9 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 16.�, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 4], VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. ..17�I AVERAGE SPEED ................... ..34. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *****100 90 *** 90� * 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 lei 60H 50 4OI l ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 30 20d PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT < 5 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 9 5.2 5.2 26 0 0.0 5.2 27 1 ' 0.6 5.8 28 2 1.2 6.9 29 0 0.0 6.9 30 16 9.2 16.2 31 11 6.4 22.5 32 15 8.7 31.2 33 12 6.9 38.2 34 21 12.1 50.3 35 15 8.7 59.0 36 17 9.8 68.8 37 10 5.8 74.6 38 6 3.5 78.0 39 10 5.8 83.8 40 11 6.4 90.2 41 1 0.6 90.8 42 3 1.7 92.5 43 1 0.6 93.1 44 2 1.2 94.2 45 3 1.7 96.0 46 6 3.5 99.4 47 1 0.6 .100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4l 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76.9 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 16.�, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 4], VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. ..17�I AVERAGE SPEED ................... ..34. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *****100 90 *** 90� * 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 lei 60H 50 4OI l ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 30 20d PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Y7 Date: qA 6 lcl- cienr 1GarilaU20001 fejno0195.x1s EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical A 3. Superelevation (°�) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without . /O Sidewalks es or no /V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, 1 f C r n�hl office, etc.)A 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / offsets ves or no O 10. Pavement Condition (good, �nII 600 satisfactory, poor, etc.) C 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, o Keh divided, undivided, painted, I 1 y{ I 1pu) or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 30 strai ht or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the YDS Community (yes orno)------------- 16. Heavy Ori -Street Parking qp� Turnover (yes or no) cienr 1GarilaU20001 fejno0195.x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Dockweiler Drive between Sierra Hiahwav and Ivv Lane Year of Survey 1995 PART Ir PRFVAII .INC` SPFFD MFASURFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 45 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (88.2%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART II• ACCIr1FNT RFCnRr15 Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections; other) shoulders, +/- 2% grade, no driveways, two lanes, no striping, curved alignment, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC:: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, no on -street parked vehicles sighted, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent, 45 mph cGennclar 1a112000IWno5795.xfS SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS II DOCKWEILER DRIVE: SIERRA HIGHWAY TO IVY LANE LLLLJJJI DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME.. 9.00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 88.? PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.0] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.� RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to53 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5�] AVERAGE SPEED.......................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100- 90 ** 90 LJ 80 * 80 70 ** 70H 60 50 * 60n 50 40 40l 1 * CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 20J <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 2 3.9 3.9 36 0 0.0 3.9 37 0 0.0 3.9 38 0 0.0 3.9 39 0 0.0 3.9 40 3 5.9 9.8 41 .1 2.0 11.8 42 3 5.9 17.6 43 9 17.6 35.3 44 7 13.7 49.0 45 11 21.6 70.6 46 3 5.9 76.5 47 2 3.9 80.4 48 4 7.8 88.2 49 1 2.0 90.2 50 4 7.8 98.0 51 0 0.0 98.0 52 0 0.0 98.0 53 1 '2.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 88.? PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.0] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.� RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to53 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5�] AVERAGE SPEED.......................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100- 90 ** 90 LJ 80 * 80 70 ** 70H 60 50 * 60n 50 40 40l 1 * J 30 30 20 * 20J 10 ** 10� ***** ***************** 0 L J 0*******,t ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 101 _ 1J 5 - H 11 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street:Qoc-k WE1 IPS br-tV2 Location: c From: Si To: Date: 14 1 IZ-61'1!5 Observer. dent%dadda1120001W'?00195.id5 EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal O Iv O 2. Vertical O O 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions Z (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics N O �% ti ` p ' v 'p VJ at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without p O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, V p C, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no)!!! 10. Pavement Condition (good, Ooa q O o a satisfactory, poor, etc.)J 11. Truck Traffic light) I (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 0 5'1 Y l �ing divided, undivided, painted, 1 u V or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- �5��Lv"P—a ��Lur�2d straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics �;G I, (heavy, moderate, light) J 15. Uniformity with the \t 1 Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking wt Turnover (yes or no) dent%dadda1120001W'?00195.id5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Dockweiler Drive between Ivy Lane and Leonard Tree Lane Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PRFVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Date of Survey 05/12/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 31 35 10 mph pace (% of Veh,) 28-37 (87.3%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART II• ACCIDFNT RFCDRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 -12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 150 feet apart, raised median, two lanes, +/- 62 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential.. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cfient%ciai ta1120MI1 --jno5895.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS DOCKWEILER DRIVE: IVY LANE TO LEONARD TREE LANE DIRECTION(S) EASTBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 fl DATE ............... ....... 5/12/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 J TIME............... 7:00 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.' PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 87.11 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9. CUM RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 39 MPH NO. PCT. PCT. VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................6 -== --= ==== ===== AVERAGE SPEED ................... ....31. 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 2 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----t----+----+----+----+ 3 0 0.0 0.0 100 ********1 4 0 0.0 0.0 - ** n 5 0 0.0 0.0 90 ** 991 6 0 0.0 0.0 - 7 0 0.0 0.0 80 80 8 0 0.0 0.0 - * 9 0 0.0 0.0 70 7j 10 0 0.0 0.0 - *** 11 0 0.0 0.0 60 12 0 0.0 0.0 - 13 0 0.0 0.0 50 5 14 0 0.0 0.0 - r 15 0 0.0 0.0 40 * 41 16 0 0.0 0.0 - 17 0 0.0 0.0 30 * 30 18 0 0.0 0.0 - * j 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 2 20 0 0.0 0.0 - 21 0 0.0 0.0 10 *** 1 22 0 0.0 0.0 - 23 0 0.0 0.0 0************************* 0 24 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 25 6 9.5 9.5 0 10 20 30 40 26 0 0.0 9.5 27 0 0.0 9.5 28 11 17.5 27.0 n 29 3 4.8 31.7 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) L1 30 4 6.3 38.1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 31 18 28.6 66.7 15 1,5 32 0 0.0 66.7 - 33 0 0.0 66.7 - 34 5 7.9 74.6 - 35 11 17.5 92.1 - 36 0 0.0 92.1 10 37 3 4.8 96.8 - _ 38 0 0.0 96.8 - 39 2 3.2 100.0 - +n 40 0 0.0 100.0 - 41 0 0.0 100.0 5 5 42 0 0.0 100.0 - � 43 0 0.0 100.0 - ` 44 0 0.0 100.0 ' - 45 0 0.0 100.0 - 46 0 0.0 100.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >46 0 0.0 100.0 0 10 20 30 40 -�1t0����vtwwwwtww�.��--- pp��pp� �� CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street:dJ� C 1 tLt) t✓ 1 �+{� 1 J i1 1 ve_ Location: r— _ From: t�P� To: LeQ"rc� 1 ree Date: L4 26 95 L Observer: TO cienWarka V 2000 rlejno0r95-Vs EJB or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) L Horizontal O �� 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (OA) _ — 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 0 0 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway I Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without b Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 150 r\ -O t 50, wr - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc. 11. Truck Traffic O N O (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, p� ro;sexl ra t s ed. or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 4 (0 2-1 Str, straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 l t (heavy, moderate, light) J 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) I y 16. Heavy On -Street Parting. 6 ^ C v A� Turnover (yes or no) , cienWarka V 2000 rlejno0r95-Vs ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: EI Paseo Drive between Estaban Drive and Del Monte Drive Year of Survey PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/27/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 34 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 29-38 (78.0%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 300 feet apart, two lanes, broken -yellow striping, +1- 36 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cfientictantal12000 f lejno5995.xts SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS U EL PASEO DRIVE: ESTABAN DRIVE TO DEL MONTE DRIVE DIRECTION(S)........ WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/27/1995 TIME ............... 4:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED3jj 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 12. 11 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 42 3322J VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... AVERAGE SPEED ...................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 0 10 20 30 40 (j PERCENT VS. SPEED +----+----+----+----+----+-- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----,----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 (MPH) CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 1 0.8 0.8 21 0 0.0 0.8 22 0 0.0 0.8 23 0 0.0 0.8 24 0 0.0 0.8 25 4 3.3 4.1 26 0 0.0 4.1 27 8 6.5 10.6 28 2 1.6 12.2 29 7 5.7 17.9 30 9 7.3 25.2 31 8 6.5 31.7 32 7 5.7 37.4 33 11 8.9 46.3 34 18 14.6 61.0 35 12 9.8 70.7 36 9 7.3 78.0 37 12 9.8 87.8 38 3 2.4 90.2 39 1 0.8 91.1 40 5 4.1 95.1 41 2 1.6 96.7 42 4 3.3 100.0, 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED3jj 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 12. 11 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 42 3322J VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... AVERAGE SPEED ...................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 0 10 20 30 40 (j PERCENT VS. SPEED +----+----+----+----+----+-- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----,----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 (MPH) Street: _ From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: so Date: y k G 19 S arenttdarftai1200011 ejno0195.'ds EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A/0- 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions Cn (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dust an, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without D Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, n office, etc.�t 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feett7 / offsets es or no / 1o. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) Do 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, rJtG `vry divided, undivided, painted, /t I Iw or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - f strai ht or curve tc 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) i 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) ¢S 16. Heavy On -Street Part_ting Turnover (yes or no) If p arenttdarftai1200011 ejno0195.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Golden Triangle Road between 600' W/O Reuther Avenue and Rainbow Glen Drive Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 38 42 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 33-42 (79.8%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART 11• ACCInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III* HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 400 feet apart, two lanes, rellectorized two-way left -tum lane, +/- 58 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Some pedestrians, moderate on -street parking turnover on north side, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. an uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial, residential (southside), va771 etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cFenticlanta I r200011ejno6095.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS GOLDEN TRIANGLE ROAD: 600' W/O RUETHER TO RAINBOW GLEN DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME...............11:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................38 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 33 through 4� PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. 1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED.......... .......11 AVERAGE SPEED.. •..•.......•.......37.�, CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****1D 90 * 90 n * LJ 80 80 70 ** 70d 60 * 60 . 50 * 50 40 * 40J 30 * 30 20 20d 10 * 10 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----t 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS +----+----+----+----+ 15 10 5 ---------------- 10 20 SPEED (MPH) --+----+----+----+----+ JJJ 15 =a 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT < 5 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 1 0.8 0.8 30 3 2.5 3.4 31 4 3.4 6.7 32 4 3.4 10.1 33 6 5.0 15.1 34 9 7.6 22.7 35 9 7.6 30.3 36 10 8.4 38.7 37 12 10.1 48.7 38 13 10.9 59.7 39 10 8.4 68.1 40 9 7.6 75.6 41 10 8.4 84.0 42 7 5.9 89.9 43 4 3.4 93.3 44 4 3.4 96.6 45 1 0.8 97.5 46 0 0.0 97.5 47 1 0.8 98.3 48 1 0.8 99.2 49 0 0.0 99.2 50 1 0.8 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................38 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 33 through 4� PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. 1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED.......... .......11 AVERAGE SPEED.. •..•.......•.......37.�, CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****1D 90 * 90 n * LJ 80 80 70 ** 70d 60 * 60 . 50 * 50 40 * 40J 30 * 30 20 20d 10 * 10 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----t 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS +----+----+----+----+ 15 10 5 ---------------- 10 20 SPEED (MPH) --+----+----+----+----+ JJJ 15 =a 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Go IY` Ofi - Location: J� r From:6 �*o&at_To: 1 1M Date: � J Observer. EJ N denAda&a%12000fla%n0o195xk EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal o &) 2. Vertical 0 3. Superelevation (%) ,r(\ -J 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions — I (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics H J G 1 at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without 'n10 YYO Sidewalks es or no 6. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, GprYt,) re's V 44Ci office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets(spacing,feet- offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, J satisfactory, poor, etc.).4- 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, �] 7 W LTL �� , D, �� .1 t Two-way w or raised median)J 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics r (heavy, moderate, light) IT Uniformity with the � Community (yes or no) Its 16. Heavy On Street Parking no O `' P 9Y Of� ►��r rC` r Turnover es or i z11,, denAda&a%12000fla%n0o195xk ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Gold Crest between Valencia Boulevard and Del Monte Drive Year of Survey PART F PRFVAII ING SPFFn MFAStJRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%vile 85%vile 2.18 36 42 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 31-40 (71,4%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 2.18 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 150 feet apart, no striping, curved alignment, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential, etc.), other conditions IV: AUUI I IVNAL KtMAKKS on sight distance restrictions, by 5 mph. 35 mph use, cfienWanta11200011ejno6195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS Il GOLD CREST: VALENCIA BLVD. TO DEL MONTE DRIVE LJ DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 7:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4Z] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 31 through 40 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71.E PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 21.'J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............30 to 45 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................... AVERAGE SPEED.......................36. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 **1 90 9 80 * 80 70 * 7d 60 6 0 50 ** 5 40 30 * 30 20 ** `U 10 - * i ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 3 7.1 7.1 31 5 11.9 19.0 32 1 2.4 21.4 33 4 9.5 31.0 34 2 4.8 35.7 35 5 11.9 47.6 36 2 4.8 52.4 37 1 2.4 54.8 38 4 9.5 64.3 39 2 4.8 69.0 40 ` 4 9.5 78.6 41 2 4.8 83.3 42 4 9.5 92.9 43 0 0.0 92.9 44 1 2.4 95.2 45 2 4.8 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4Z] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 31 through 40 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71.E PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 21.'J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............30 to 45 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................... AVERAGE SPEED.......................36. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 **1 90 9 80 * 80 70 * 7d 60 6 0 50 ** 5 40 30 * 30 20 ** `U 10 - * i ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING _SURVEY FORM To: Location: SZ V4, . Date: 7 4, G/9S dientldarga112000 I lo-P00195AS EIB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical r/Q 3. Superelevation (%) �- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 14✓e 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %)%b 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dust an, etc. 7_ Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, p I ' Py"�� �tok office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 150 offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, /� Goo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median)/ 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 2� l� Jeve� strai ht or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) i h 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) c 16. Heavy On -Street Parking r Turnover (yes or no) N dientldarga112000 I lo-P00195AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Golf Course Road between Tournament Road and Lochmoor Road Year of Survey PART I- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 32 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 25-34 (67.5%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART Ile ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 100 feet apart, no striping, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cFentldarita11200011olno6295.xts SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS GOLF COURSE ROAD: TOURNAMENT ROAD TO LOCHMOOR ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 8:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................355J 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3" 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 67.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 27.�� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............20 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................4Q, AVERAGE SPEED .................... :**..3'i. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ (J 100 *******1 90 * 9Q l 80 80 70 * 7 60 6 50 * 5D * -rl 40 4LJ 30 ** 30 20 * 2� 10 ** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT. 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 2 5.0 5.0 21 0 0.0 5.0 22 0 0.0 5.0 23 0 0.0 5.0 24 0 0.0 5.0 25 2 5.0 10.0 26 1 2.5 12.5 27 512.5 25.0 28 3 7.5 32.5 29 0 0.0 32.5 30 512.5 45.0 31 2 5.0 50.0 32 2 5.0 55.0 33 5 12.5 67.5 34 2 5.0 72.5 35 1 2.5 75.0 36 1 2.5 77.5 37 5 12.5 90.0 38 3 7.5 97.5 39 0 0.0 97.5 40 1 2.5 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................355J 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3" 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 67.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 27.�� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............20 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................4Q, AVERAGE SPEED .................... :**..3'i. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ (J 100 *******1 90 * 9Q l 80 80 70 * 7 60 6 50 * 5D * -rl 40 4LJ 30 ** 30 20 * 2� 10 ** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: �f 3 �1 G Date: % /� 6/I - c#enAdarifa112000 JWno0195_WS EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A/(0 2. Vertical /1/0 3. Superelevation (%) 1- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) ea V 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) dI0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 0 B. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, il �II office, etc.)P4iGehylp) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - O� offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, //� satisfactory, poor, etc.) V00 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, - r or raised median /v 0 13. Street Width and / Alignment (width, feet - O straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) I h� 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) YS 16. Heavy On -Street Parking, Turnover (yes or no) c#enAdarifa112000 JWno0195_WS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Haskell Canyon Road between Bouquet Canyon Road and Grove Park Drive Year of Survey 1995 PART P PRFVAII Mr. SPFFn MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 43 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 38-47 (83.3%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIrHWAN TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontaUvertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on west side, +/- 3% grade, infrequent intersection spacing, two lanes, double -yellow striping, curved alignment, 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Residential (set -back), etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c6ennclar ta112000nejno6395.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS HASKELL CANYON ROAD: BOUQUET CANYON ROAD TO GROVE PARK DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME...............10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT_ PCT - < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 3 2.9 2.9 32 0 0.0 2.9 33 0 0.0 2.9 34 3 2.9 5.9 35 6 5.9 11.8 36 1 1.0 12.7 37 1 1.0 13.7 38 2 2.0 15.7 39 1 1.0 16.7 40 4 3.9 20.6 41 9 8.8 29.4 42 14 13.7 43.1 43 13 12.7 55.9 44 13 12.7 68.6 45 11 10.8 79.4 46 7 6.9 86.3 47 11 10.8 97.1 48 2 2.0 99.0 49 0 0.0 99.0 50 1 1.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4' 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.7 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.<� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.� RANGE OF SPEEDS.................31 to 5Q-, VEHICLES OBSERVED ................. ...10i� AVERAGE SPEED.......................42 jjJJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***100 90 90L1 _ * 1 80 * 80n 70 * 70L 60 60� * 50 50 40 40F 30 * 30 20 * 20e 10 * 10n p********t***************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 (j PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ �5 10 5 15 H 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM, him Location: Date: c§enAd&#at 120001 Wn o0 f 95.;ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) /V 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical Al d 3. Superelevation rfd f 4. Shoulder Conditions I (paved or unpaved) (If Q ✓e Q 5. Profile Conditions 13% (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without P (� IV Sidewalks es or no 8, Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, I office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 1_ offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, GOD satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic �Pv,y (heavy, moderate, tight) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, j, J divided, undivided, painted,�/ P or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 3D C✓��>'� straight or cure 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics ^ (heavy, moderate, light) 1 i 9 15. Uniformity with the do Community (yes or no) - 16. Heavy Oq�Street Parking Tumovec(yes or no) c§enAd&#at 120001 Wn o0 f 95.;ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Haskell Canyon Road between Grove Park Drive and Copper Hill Drive Year of Survey 1995 DART b DDFV All IN(, CDFGn MFASI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 43 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (86.4%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART IP ACCInFNT RFCORnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DART III- 411PWWAY TRAFFIC ANn Rn AnSInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT, Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance clearances, +/- 5% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 3% grade, infrequent intersection spacing, two lanes, two-way left - tum lane, curved alignment, +/- 60 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. an uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cfent%danta1120001%ejno6495.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS HASKELL CANYON ROAD: GROVE PARK DRIVE TO COPPER HILL DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. CUM MPH NO. PCT_ _PCT_ <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 8 7.8 7.8 38 5 4.9 12.6 39 2 1.9 14.6 40 8 7.8 22.3 41 12 11.7 34.0 42 13 12.6 46.6 43 10 9.7 56.3 44 7 6.8 63.1 45 10 9.7 72.8 46 14 13.6 86.4 47 5 4.9 91.3 48 3 2.9 94.2 49 1 1.0 95.1 50 2 1.9 97.1 51 0 0.0 97.1 52 1 1.0 98.1 53 0 0.0 98.1. 54 0 0.0 98.1 55 0 0.0 98.1 56 1 '1.0 99.0 57 1 1.0 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4? 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4E, 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 86.4-� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................37 to 57 VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ......10fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................43. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *********10 90 * 90U _ * U 80 80 70 70 60 60 5L� * 50 0 40 40L1 * J 30 30 20 10 * ** 20� 10In� p***t****************** 0 L_1 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 5 Street: _ From: _ Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: S S Date: H den Adafits11200 1160000 195AS EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) NO 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical A10 3. Superelevation (%) gyp 4. Shoulder Conditions �tir (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 2 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no / V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, f office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 600 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) A/P;l Q 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Z ✓ y divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - f7 straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics JI r (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) \I S 16. Heavy On -Street Parting (yes or no) Tumover /1 b den Adafits11200 1160000 195AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: John Russell Drive between Cortina Drive and Estaban Drive Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 38 44 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 31-40 (65.8%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART 11- ACCInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART In- W1r14WAV TRAFFIC aNn Rnant4lnF rNARArTFRiSTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restriction, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 100 feet apart, two lanes, broken -yellow stripe, curved alignment, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential, park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on horizontal sight distance restrictions and residential land use, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cfientldanta1120001 Wna6595.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS JOHN RUSSELL DRIVE: CORTINA DRIVE TO ESTABAN DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995" TIME ........ ......11:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4U 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 31 through 40 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 65.8_ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 28.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 48 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................IT AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 ****10 ,t - 90 * 90 n * LJ So ** 80 * 70 * 70 60 * 60 n 50 ** 5A 40 * 40J 30 * 30 L� 20 * 20 10 * 10 0************************* 0 U ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 L] PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 15 10 5 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ < 5 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 1 0.9 0.9 29 1 0.9 1.7 30 5 4.3 6.0 31 6 5.1 11.1 32 4 3.4 14.5 33 9 7.7 22.2 34 3 2.6 24.8 35 8 6.8 31.6 36 8 6.8 38.5 37 11 9.4 47.9 38 7 6.0 53.8 39 10 8.5 62.4 40 11 9.4 71.8 41 4 3.4 75.2 42 3 2.6 77.8 43 3 2.6 80.3 44 7 6.0 86.3 45 5 4.3 90.6 46 8 6.8 97.4 47 1 0.9 98.3 48 2 1.7 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4U 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 31 through 40 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 65.8_ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 28.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6. J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 48 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................IT AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 ****10 ,t - 90 * 90 n * LJ So ** 80 * 70 * 70 60 * 60 n 50 ** 5A 40 * 40J 30 * 30 L� 20 * 20 10 * 10 0************************* 0 U ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 L] PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 15 10 5 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: _ Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: cJS6 11 Date: ll dent daritak1200011BJn00195.ids 1.1 EJB or S/B W/B or NJB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal //'0 2. Vertical /V/O 3. Superelevation (%) -- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 370 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at -grade, dust an, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no No 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 600 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, aa Uu K'" \�t divided, undivided, painted, / o✓ or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - COIL/( straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) J 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy.On-Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) dent daritak1200011BJn00195.ids 1.1 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Lyons Avenue between West City Limits and Wiley Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 C..nu u,n eM M ANCAO"MCKACKIT r n," . .....r.... Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.64 45 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (81.5%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph .,.-....MMS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 5 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.64 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 AOClr Aun onAmmnc rue RACTGRISTIrR NMT RFADILY APPARENT IV: AUDI I IUNAL KCNIAKnJ on width reduction at 1-5 and adjacent land uses, reduce 85th IRECOMMENDATION 140 mph by 10 mph. cGen&1adta11200011eJn06695.& Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 500 feet apart, six lanes with raised median, narrows at 1-5 approach with painted median, +1- 90 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. ROA Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Set -back residential (south side), commercial, senior etc.), other conditions citizens' home (north side). IV: AUDI I IUNAL KCNIAKnJ on width reduction at 1-5 and adjacent land uses, reduce 85th IRECOMMENDATION 140 mph by 10 mph. cGen&1adta11200011eJn06695.& SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS LYONS AVENUE: WEST CITY LIMITS TO WILEY CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 4:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4S 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5G 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 81.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8."l PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 58 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................101 AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0********************** 15 10 5 20 30 40 -+----+----+----+ 1 *******106 ** 90 LJ * 80 * 70 * 60 n * 50 L' 40d* u 30 20 10 rl 0 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1 1 50 60 j� L 20 30 40 50 T CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <15 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 1 0.9 0.9 36 0 0.0 0.9 37 2 1.9 2.8 38 0 0.0 2.8 39 5 4.6 7.4 40 3 2.8 10.2 41 6 5.6 15.7 42 1 0.9 16.7 43 8 7.4 24.1 44 12 11.1 35.2 45 18 16.7 51.9 46 9 8.3 60.2 47 13 12.0 72.2 48 7 `6.5 78.7 49 5 4.6 83.3 50 9 8.3 91.7 51 0 0.0 91.7 52 3 2.8 94.4 53 1 0.9 95.4 54 4 3.7 99.1 55 0 0.0 99.1 56 0 0.0 99.1 57 0 0.0 99.1 58 1 0.9 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4S 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5G 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 81.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8."l PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 58 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................101 AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0********************** 15 10 5 20 30 40 -+----+----+----+ 1 *******106 ** 90 LJ * 80 * 70 * 60 n * 50 L' 40d* u 30 20 10 rl 0 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1 1 50 60 j� L 20 30 40 50 T Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: S Date: dienndantal f 2000 f Wn60 j95.ids EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal/4/0 0 2. Vertical /' 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) l (J 5. Profile Conditions 3 0 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 001 fiPG at rade, dustpan, etc. t h 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Q Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, (OMr c c r office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 1 G satisfactory, poor, etc.) Oo 11, Truck Traffic I (heavy, moderate, light) I ht 12. Channelization (# of lanes, p divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) Street Width and IT37 Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) m 15. Uniformity with the \/ Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy, grMreet Parking Turnover (yes or no) /v dienndantal f 2000 f Wn60 j95.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Lyons Avenue between Wiley Canyon Road and Orchard Village Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.33 36 41 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (84.1%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 8 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.33 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, frequent driveways on the south side, four lanes, raised median, +/- 75 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking tumover, school zings Few pedestrians, no observed on -street parking, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial, set -back residential soul side), sc o0 etc.), other conditions and set -back residential (north side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph dient1datea11200011e/no6795.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS LYONS AVENUE: WILEY CANYON ROAD TO ORCHARD VILLAGE RD. DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME......... 3:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 100 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ ..... 36� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41` 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 84. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 15.0 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 46, VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................10711 AVERAGE SPEED.......................37. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rj ------------------------------------------ 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 T ********100 90 * 80 * 70 * 60 * 50 * ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----4 15 10 5 I - I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT < 5 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 0.9 0.9 31 0 0.0 0.9 32 7 6.5 7.5 33 12 11.2 18.7 34 15 14.0 32.7 35 7 6.5 39.3 36 13 12.1 51.4 37 11 10.3 61.7 38 3 2.8 64.5 39 7 6.5 71.0 40 10 9.3 80.4 41 5 4.7 85.0 42 2 1.9 86.9 43 13 12.1 99.1 44 0 0.0 99.1 45 0 0.0 99.1 46 1 0.9 100.0 47 0 0.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 100 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ ..... 36� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41` 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 84. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 15.0 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 46, VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................10711 AVERAGE SPEED.......................37. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rj ------------------------------------------ 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 T ********100 90 * 80 * 70 * 60 * 50 * ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----4 15 10 5 I - I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: S9 Date: / /Wi cienAdanta1120W1Wjn00195Jds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal �U 2. Vertical 0 3., Superelevation (%) -- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) G ✓ p 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without rp Sidewalks es or no /� 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, (OMM s f (00 office, etc.) c, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 0 0 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) , 12. Channelization (# of lanes, p divided, undivided, painted, 2 or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) I-NP4r/ 15. Uniformity with the \, Community (yes or no) 7>?S 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) cienAdanta1120W1Wjn00195Jds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Lyons Avenue between Orchard Village Road and San Fernando Road Year of Survey 1995 PART 1! PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.39 40 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 35-44 (80.7%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 6 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.39 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III_ HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced apart approximately every 100 feet, four lanes, raised median, several driveways. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, school xing, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial (fronting street), school, church. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on adjacent land uses, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cfienWantal1200011efnn6895.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS LYONS AVENUE: ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD TO SAN FERNANDO RD. DIRECTION(S).:..... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 2:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.711 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 15.E PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............30 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ ..10 AVERAGE SPEED40.fl CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 90 Ll 80 70 60 rl 50 `-' 40 f"-1 3011 20a 10�0************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+--- 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ < 5 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 0.9 0.9 31 2 1.8 2.8 32 0 0.0 2.8 33 0 0.0 2.8 34 1 0.9 3.7 35 8 7.3 11.0 36 2 1.8 12.8 37 13 11.9 24.8 38 6 5.5 30.3 39 10 9.2 39.4 40 16 14.7 54.1 41 4 3.7 57.8 42 13 11.9 69.7 43 7 6.4 76.1 44 9 8.3 84.4 45 2 1.8 86.2 46 7 6.4 92.7 47 1 0.9 93.6 48 3 2.8 96.3 49 0 0.0 96.3 50 4 3.7 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.711 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 15.E PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............30 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ ..10 AVERAGE SPEED40.fl CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 90 Ll 80 70 60 rl 50 `-' 40 f"-1 3011 20a 10�0************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+--- 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: S Y Date: cfenada nral120001 %ejnoo 195.#s E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical / " 0 3. Superelevation (%) `- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions �7 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics om at rade, dustpan, eta 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no J 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, C�mM<`ct0.l office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - -zoo offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, GO satisfactory, poor, etc.) 0 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) h 12, Channelization (# of lanes, l divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) 13, Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- �� straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics J� (heavy, moderate, light) l r(kv 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) p L 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) cfenada nral120001 %ejnoo 195.#s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Market Street between Newhall Avenue and Cross Street Year of Survey DART 1• PRFVAu INr CPFFn MFASIIRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 2.65 28 31 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 23-32 (91.9%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART 11- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 4 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 2.65 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- NIrI4WAV TRAFFIC AND ROADSInF CHARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, changing grade, infrequent at -grade driveways, two lanes, double -yellow striping, curve alignment, +/- 25 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Pedestrians observed in roadway without sidewalk, light turnover of parking on shoulders, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Lana uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (fronting), senior citizens center. etc.), other conditions YAK 1 IV. characteristics not readily apparent. 30 mph denWarita1120001*no6995.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS MARKET STREET: NEWHALL AVENUE TO CROSS STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED..............2V 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED....................3f- 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 91. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7., PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................22 to 3� VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................81 AVERAGE SPEED.......................28. JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *******t******10 90 * 9� 80 80 70 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ _PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 1 1.2 1.2 23 6 7.0 8.1 24 0 0.0 8.1 25 14 16.3 24.4 26 3 3.5 27.9 27 14 16.3 44.2 28 8 9.3 53.5 29 11 12.8 66.3 30 1517.4 83.7 31 6 7.0 90.7 32 2 2.3 93.0 33 6 7.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0100.0 37 0 - 0.0.100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED..............2V 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED....................3f- 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 91. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7., PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................22 to 3� VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................81 AVERAGE SPEED.......................28. JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *******t******10 90 * 9� 80 80 70 60 * 50 40 30 20 10 ** 0*********************** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 t- 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: C0 0 From: To: Date: y�zg/45 Observer: denndenta112000 I %ejno0195.)ds E/B or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 0 2. Vertical A 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) n U n nw to 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 a7 B. Commercial Driveway Characteristics n 6(a at rade, dustpan, etc. /T� t<P 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without \ / Sidewalks es or no 7� s 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, J office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, Goo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, ��SIFiP divided, undivided, painted, ! 11th or raised median)1 I 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 1,5 h 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) /V0 16. Heavy On -Street Parking r� Turnover (yes or no) denndenta112000 I %ejno0195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: McBean Parkway between West City Limits and Tournament Road Year of Survey 1995 PART P PRFVAII ING SPFFn MFAStIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/21/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0,19 44 47 10 mph pace (°/a of Veh.) 40-49 (86.4%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11• Af`r`InFNT RFCORn_R Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents, Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0,19 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART IIP ulruWAY_ TRAFFIC_ ANn ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 2% grade, no drivewayslintersections, six lanes, raised median, +/- 85 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking observed, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions , KtMAKKJ characteristics not readily apparent. 45 mph cfient1dadta1120001Wjno7195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS lJ MCBEAN PARKWAY: WEST CITY LIMITS TO TOURNAMENT ROAD 111 DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 4/21/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 86. � PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 52 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11dl AVERAGE SPEED.......................43 ��JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** ** +----+----+----+----+----+---- 10 20 30 40 ---+----+----+ *****10 90 ** 80 * 70 [J * 60J 50 * 40 L 3 0 �f 20� 10�0 50 E PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ Il 15 15LJ 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 10r� CUM MPH NO. PCT_ _PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 it 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 3 2.7 2.7 37 1 0.9 3.6 38 5 4.5 8.2 39 2 1.8 10.0 40 9 8.2 18.2 41 15 13.6 31.8 42 10 9.1 40.9 43 5 4.5 45.5 44 16 14.5 60.0 45 10 9.1 69.1 46 15 13.6 82.7 47 3 2.7 85.5 48 8 7.3 92.7 49 4 3.6 96.4 50 1 0.9 97.3 51 2 1.8 99.1 52 1 0.9 100.0 53 0 0.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 86. � PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 52 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11dl AVERAGE SPEED.......................43 ��JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** ** +----+----+----+----+----+---- 10 20 30 40 ---+----+----+ *****10 90 ** 80 * 70 [J * 60J 50 * 40 L 3 0 �f 20� 10�0 50 E PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ Il 15 15LJ 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 10r� Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 2 Date: � /%- dent%dadtal120001%0Jn00195.ids EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A1Q 2. Vertical 0 3. Superelevation (96) f 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 3 7l7 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without f� Sidewalks es or no � v 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial,1// CO) eye 0.(4h * office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 0006 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) —� 12. Channelization (# of lanes, coil ( f divided, undivided, painted, \/f } 0✓ or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - ��r straight or curved ' , 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 0c(Q 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) g� 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) 0 dent%dadtal120001%0Jn00195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: McBean Parkway between Tournament Road and Orchard Village Road Year of Survey 1995 DADT 1• DOM/All 1h11-` CDCCn MFACI IDFMFKIT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.09 42 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (91.4%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11• arrInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.09 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DAFT ul• ul11141MAV 'TPAFPIr amn PnenslnF rNARArTFRISTlr3 NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 2% grade, infrequent intersections, four lanes, raised median, curved alignment, +1- 78 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking observed, school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, sc oo , Hospital (west si e , set- ac res/ entia east side). etc.), other conditions PART IVe ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cfent%datita1120001 %ejno7295.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS MCBEAN PARKWAY: TOURNAMENT ROAD TO ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME .. ...........11:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 91.E PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 2. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............35 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11¢l AVERAGE SPEED .................. 41• CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) lJ +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l 100 *******100 90 90 80 * 80 n 70 * 70L 60 60r 50 * 50 40 40;LJJ1 * 30 30 20 ** 20U 10 * 10 * p************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+- 10 20 30 40 50 + J CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 1 0.9 0.9 36 2 1.7 2.6 37 8 6.9 9.5 38 10 8.6 18.1 39 10 8.6 26.7 40 10 8.6 35.3 41 15 12.9 48.3 42 8 6.9 55.2 43 16 13.8 69.0 44 10 8.6 77.6 45 9 7.8 85.3 46 10 8.6 94.0 47 1 0.9 94.8 48 2 1.7 96.6 49 3 2.6 99.1 50 0 0.0 99.1 51 0 0.0 99.1 52 0 0.0 99.1 53 1 0.9 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 91.E PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 2. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............35 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11¢l AVERAGE SPEED .................. 41• CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) lJ +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l 100 *******100 90 90 80 * 80 n 70 * 70L 60 60r 50 * 50 40 40;LJJ1 * 30 30 20 ** 20U 10 * 10 * p************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+- 10 20 30 40 50 + J Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM to Location: 63 Date: y/Ao-s— �e�ndeMevz000t>alr,00tas.,as EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal ` NiJ 2. Vertical /- 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions n (paved or unpaved) Gl J 2 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc.)✓6+P" h 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /� Sidewalks es or no A 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, f 9,031 office, etc.) e, A 1 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - Sb o offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 60 0 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) „Jo 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, a sn2 /nr� qti or raised median)�' 13. Street Width and / Alignment (width, feet - 76 straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Hre' (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16.- Heavy On -Street Parking Tumover (yes or no) �p ;. �e�ndeMevz000t>alr,00tas.,as ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: McBean Parkway between Orchard Village Road and Arroyo Park Drive Year of Survey PART 1- PRFVAII ING SPFFD MFA4;i1RFMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/21/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.23 47 51 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (77.2%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART IF ACCIDENT RFCDRDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 4 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.23 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART 111- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections; other) shoulders, two "T" intersections +/- 500 feet apart, four lanes, raised median, curved alignment, +/- 75 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking turnover observed, no school zing, heavy vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential east side), commercial west sl e . etc.), other conditions IV: AVI]I I IUNAL Kt117AKrb on curved alignment and adjacent land uses, reduce 85th percentile by 5 45 mph cfienticlaritaII200011e/no7395.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS MCBEAN PARKWAY: ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD TO ARROYO PARK DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/21/1995 TIME ............... 9:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4'l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77. PERCENT OVER 'PACE SPEED............ 15. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7.3 RANGE OF SPEEDS.. .39 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................121 AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.fl CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **106 90 * 90 ** 80 * 80 70 70 60 * 60jF 50 * 50 40 * 40 n 30 * 30 20 * 20 10 * 10 ^ * * LJI 0***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 t_ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 --------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 LJ 5 - d CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 8 6.5 6.5 40 1 0.8 7.3 41 3 2.4 9.8 42 5 4.1 13.8 43 10 8.1 22.0 44 7 5.7 27.6 45 16 13.0 40.7 46 9 7.3 48.0 47 17 13.8 61.8 48 15 12.2 74.0 49 5 4.1 78.0 50 8 6.5 84.6 51 3 2.4 87.0 52 5 4.1 91.1 53 2 1.6 92.7 54 9 7.3 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4'l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77. PERCENT OVER 'PACE SPEED............ 15. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7.3 RANGE OF SPEEDS.. .39 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................121 AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.fl CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **106 90 * 90 ** 80 * 80 70 70 60 * 60jF 50 * 50 40 * 40 n 30 * 30 20 * 20 10 * 10 ^ * * LJI 0***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 t_ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 --------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 LJ 5 - d CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Location: (y Street: Date: q /2� 145 From: To: Observer. cfenndarita1120001Wn00195.'ds EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 0 3. Superelevation-- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) J� 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dust an, etc. d5 Pah 7. Pedestrian Twin the Roadway without Af d Sidewalks es or no B. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, PSS �PM� office, etc.)�Oinmau, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 609 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) (01', Q 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, I a`u �P or raised median `'" 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 7 S CU J Q straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community. (yes or no) 16. Heavy Ori -Street Parking �pp Tumover:(yes or no) /v0 cfenndarita1120001Wn00195.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street. McBean Parkway between Arroyo Park Drive and Valencia Boulevard Year of Survey 1995 DADT I• DDCVAII 10.14- BDCCn RACACI IRCMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/21/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.67 47 51 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 43-52 (82.6%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph DADT 11• ArrIn FAIT RFrnRnC Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.67 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART In- HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, four lanes, raised median, +/- 80 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, no observed on -street parking turnover, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential east side), reservoir west side). etc.), other conditions W -MIA I I v . Based on uses, reduce 85th percentile speed by (RECOMMENDATION 145 mph denMarifa11200011 ejno7495.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS MCBEAN PARKWAY: ARROYO PARK TO VALENCIA BOULEVARD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/21/1995 TIME ............... 9:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................47 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51, 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 82.E PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.`� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.r RANGE OF SPEEDS.................38 to 56 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................11fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................46. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS +----+----+----+----+----+- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 -4---- 4--- 20 30 40 SPEED (MPH) * * +----+----+----+ �l ******10 * 90 80 ** 70E * 5011 * 40J 30 2011 10 [Ll1 0 LJ ---------------- 50 60 f L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 ------------------------------------ 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT <15 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 1 0.9 0.9 39 1 0.9 1.7 40 5 4.3 6.1 41 1 0.9 7.0 42 2 1.7 8.7 43 13 11.3 20.0 44 7 6.1 26.1 45 14 12.2 38.3 46 10 8.7 47.0 47 15 13.0 60.0 48 10 8.7 68.7 49 4 3.5 72.2 50 12 10.4 82.6 51 3 2.6 85.2 52 7 6.1 91.3 53 5 4.3 95.7 54 1 0.9 96.5 55 3 2.6 99.1 56 1 0.9 100.0 57 0 0.0 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................47 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51, 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 82.E PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.`� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.r RANGE OF SPEEDS.................38 to 56 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................11fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................46. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS +----+----+----+----+----+- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 -4---- 4--- 20 30 40 SPEED (MPH) * * +----+----+----+ �l ******10 * 90 80 ** 70E * 5011 * 40J 30 2011 10 [Ll1 0 LJ ---------------- 50 60 f L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 ------------------------------------ 20 30 40 50 Street: _ From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: (/o s Date:: q /z6 /a s cdenAdarira11200011e000195.xk EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /V11b 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (�) �- 4. Shoulder Conditions Pa,� (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions % (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. d 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without o Sidewalks es or no , r 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, P II r �PSrdvuILA office, etc. rsti� 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - j 00 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, Goo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Q divided, undivided, painted, Z 2 l' a'se MP a„ y or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics f (heavy, moderate, light) N,PaJ 15. Uniformity with the ' - Community (yes or, not. 16. Heavy On-StreetFartring. Turnover (yes or ni j AfQ cdenAdarira11200011e000195.xk ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: McBean Parkway between Valencia Boulevard and Maaic Mountain Parkway Year of Survey 1995 DART 1• DR FVAII IAIr_ RPFFn MFARI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12131/93 Date of Survey 04/21/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.12 46 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 42-51 (71.2%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II- ACCIDF_NT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12131/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.12 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART m• HIrWWAY TRAFFIC_ ANn ROAnsInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on west side, +/- 3% grade, driveways spaced approximately 300 feet apart, six lanes, raised median, curved alignment, +/- 110 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, no observed on -street parking, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial (east side), vacant west side). etc.), other conditions YAK1 IV; AUUIIIUNALKGMAMF% No characteristics not readily apparent. 50 mph cfienAdanta W 20001Wr?o7595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS MCBEAN PARKWAY: VALENCIA BLVD. TO MAGIC MOUNTAIN PKWY DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/21/1995 TIME ............... 9:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT_ -PCT <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 4 3.4 3.4 36 1 0.8 4.2 37 3 2.5 6.8 38 1 0.8 7.6 39 7 5.9 13.6 40 9 7.6 21.2 41 4 3.4 24.6 42 5 4.2 28.8 43 10 8.5 37.3 44 10 8.5 45.8 45 4 3.4 49.2 46 5 4.2 53.4 47 12 10.2 63.6 48 10 8.5 72.0 49 8 6.8 78.8 50 13 11.0 89.8 51 7 5.9 95.8 52 5 4.2 100.0 53 0 0.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 '100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 42 through 51 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.q PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 24.6 - RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 52 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................11� AVERAGE SPEED .......................45.dl CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l� 100 ****100 90 * 90 80 * 80 70 * 70d 60 60d 50 * 50 40 40d * l 30 * 30 20 * 20J 10 * 10 0************************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 l_ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 30 40 50 Lod 5 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: f A d'enridarka ll20001 %oln00195.ids E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /-I/,L 2. Vertical /VV O 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) �� PGJt L✓ 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 70 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, "era, office, etc.)v Q(aN� `gym 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 300 offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, �pp satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) D he 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 3 or raised median 13. Street Width and P Alignment (width, feet - D C ✓rte straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) Md {r 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) �!Y 16. Heavy On- Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) �0 d'enridarka ll20001 %oln00195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: McBean Parkway between Magic Mountain Parkway and North City Limit Year of Survey 1995 DADT I• DDFVAn INf: CPFFn MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/21/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 49 53 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 45-54 (77.5%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph DADT Ib ArCInFNT DPCARAS: Time Period Covered 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DADT ulr 14Ir WWAV TRAFFIC_ ANn ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on west side, +/- 3% grade, few driveways and intersections, four lanes, painted median, +/- 86 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, no observed on -street parking, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Mauses not apparent park, sc oo , ost o Ice, uslnesses east side), vacant west side . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent, RECOMMENDATION 50 mph c#enndarNa 11200011 ejn o 7695.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS MCBEAN PARKWAY: MAGIC MOUNTAIN PKWY TO NORTH CITY LIMIT Lf DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/21/1995 TIME ............... 9:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................49� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................53L 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED .......... ..8.g PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................121] AVERAGE SPEED.......................48. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****10 90 * 90 * 80 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** CUM MPH NO. PCT 70 <15 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 3 2.3 2.3 41 1 0.8 3.1 42 1 0.8 3.9 43 10 7.8 11.6 44 3 2.3 14.0 45 12 9.3 23.3 46 17 13.2 36.4 47 10 7.8 44.2 48 7 5.4 49.6 49 15 '11.6 61.2 50 12 9.3 70.5 51 4 3.1 73.6 52 2 1.6 75.2 53 13 10.1 85.3 54 8 6.2 91.5 55 5 3.9 95.3 56 2 1.6 96.9 57 1 0.8 97.7 58 0 0.0 97.7 59 0 0.0 97.7 60 3 2.3 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................49� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................53L 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 77.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED .......... ..8.g PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................121] AVERAGE SPEED.......................48. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****10 90 * 90 * 80 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 20 * 10 * * rl p************************** 0 u ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+---- 20 30 40 50 m - rl 5 J ** * 70 * 60 n * 50 `J * - 40J * 30 * 20 * 10 * * rl p************************** 0 u ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+---- 20 30 40 50 m - rl 5 J Street: _ From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 6 Date: V, t A c1entklarir8i1200011ejno0195AS EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) L, Horizontal / / 0 �/� 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) n (;A 114 1, 5. Profile Conditions 3 �b (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without f^ Sidewalks es or no V �f 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 1(� satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) l 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, Me � R �7 or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 8 / straight or curve U �P 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) rizq 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) /r V c1entklarir8i1200011ejno0195AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Nadal Street between Camp Plenty Road and Whites Canyon Road Year of Survey PART P PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.93 29 33 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 25-34 (85.1%) Posted Speed Limit 30 mph PART 11• ACCInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 3 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.93 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DAFT W. L41e'WWAV TRAFFIC ANn Pn AnSInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT. Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders on north side along portion of segment (remainder unpaved), driveways along south side spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart, two lanes, painted broken yellow striping, curved alignment, +/- 42 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Several pedestrians observed crossing street, heavy parking turnover along shoulders on north side, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, High school soul side), vacant and set -back etc.), other conditions residential (north side). PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph clentldafitall200011-jno7795.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS NADAL STREET: CAMP PLENTY ROAD TO WHITES CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 8:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2' 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 10 'MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.11 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS ... .............20 to 37 VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ....... 9�1 AVERAGE SPEED.......................28 fl CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 100 90 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 1 1.1 1.1 21 1 1.1 2.1 22 1 1.1 3.2 23 2 2.1 5.3 24 5 5.3 10.6 25 9 9.6 20.2 26 8 8.5 28.7 27 11 11.7 40.4 28 6 6.4 46.8 29 10 10.6 57.4 30 7 7.4 64.9 31 10 10.6 75.5 32 7 7.4 83.0 33 5 5.3 88.3 34 7 7.4 95.7 35 1 1.1 96.8- 6.8.36 36 1 1.1 97.9 37 2 2.1 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2' 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 10 'MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.11 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10. RANGE OF SPEEDS ... .............20 to 37 VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ....... 9�1 AVERAGE SPEED.......................28 fl CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 100 90 * 80 70 * 60 * 50 * 40 30 20 10 (MPH) ***********1 ** 9� 80 7d 6�j 5 4Q l 30 2d 1 0********************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street:L�#_'✓ 1VI S+reeyt Location: O From:r_ c� 1- IC✓L To: Wl' i+F,S CQjA=)tDyf Date: 2i 2% 95 .. 11 Observer: E110 CAMWaata%120001Wjn00195.)ds i E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal i\j O Vj o 2. Vertical 00 O 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions 112- P G v (paved or unpaved) 0 V\'Pxav 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics d vSt�Qf15 N o �/� (at -grade. dustpan, etc. 7: Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without �p ye-5Settee F\ (5h Sc1,001 Si enls (Mf a �" c1 R 5 Sidewalks es or no) 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, SC�OO� VaG�r� office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- -'F 1600, nc -t\00o' y\o offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, o O d 00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) V\nMR— V\<Z'Y ' 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, A0>a a Y 0t3Y or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- �'L� t-ut-ved �� 1 o'cuw-cL straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics t� ea 'Y QQV �J [r�igqhSChoo�,j{�°n Qi'lxan (heavy, moderate, light) / 15Q'A COMI 15. Uniformity with the e s Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Tumover (yes or no) * ` /p 'v ( 9 g � MyiA l�Q 1- J CAMWaata%120001Wjn00195.)ds i ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Newhall Avenue between 16th Street and Lyons Avenue Year of Survey PART I! PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01101/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.23 26 29 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 21-30 (93.0%) Posted Speed Limit 25 mph PART W ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01101/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.23 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III* HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart, two lanes, double -yellow stripe, +1- 40 feet wide, driveways front street. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Some pedestrians observed, some observed on -street parking turnover, school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparentlpark, school, Fronting rest entia east side), schools west side). etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on 85th percentile speed and 10 -mph pace, recommend speed of 25 mph. RECOMMENDATION 25 mph c5enWa&aU2000 jWno7895.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS NEWHALL AVENUE: 16TH STREET TO LYONS AVENUE LLLJJJ DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE.......... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 2:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2E� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................26 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 30 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 93.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.f� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 35 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................25. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 40 30 20 * 9 l� * 80 n 7d 10 * ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT. 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 3 3.0 3.0 21 6 6.0 9.0 22 6 6.0 15.0 23 12 12.0 27.0 24 8 8.0 35.0 25 14 14.0 49.0 26 6 6.0 55.0 27 8 8.0 63.0 28 16 16.0 79.0 29 7 7.0 86.0 30 10 10.0 96.0 31 0 0.0 96.0 32 2 2.0 98.0 33 0 0.0 98.0 34 1 1.0 99.0 35 1 1.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2E� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................26 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 30 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 93.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.f� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 35 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................25. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 40 30 20 * 9 l� * 80 n 7d 10 * ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 61 Dale: �/29'/�� ckenAdadtal12000 A-jn00195.#s EJB or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal No 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions n (paved or unpaved) d /a✓ Q 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) > �p 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dust an, etc. s+ih 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without „ / O Sidewalks es or no)1V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, L I I office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 6004 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) -� 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, ' (CJD�S�f y1 �Irr✓ or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 11 h 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) p 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover or no) (yes ckenAdadtal12000 A-jn00195.#s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Newhall Avenue between Lyons Avenue and San Fernando Road Year of Survey 1995 DAOT I• oDC\Tell IAIB CPFFn MFARI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.19 33 36 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 29-38 (90.3%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART 11• Arr1nFNT RFrnRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.19 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 onoT III wr-ulAIAV TPAPPIr ANn 17nAnS1nF rHARArTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, fronting driveways, intersections spaced approximately 200 feet apart, two lanes, painted broken - yellow stripe, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential rooting) park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph c6ent%danta1120001Wno7995.xts SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS NEWHALL AVENUE: LYONS AVENUE TO SAN FERNANDO ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME ............... 1:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ......... ........3fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.31 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 38 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. ..10fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................32 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **********1 90 * 9� 80 * 80 70 7 fl 60 * 61] 50 5 40 4�_1 30 * 30 20 2 10 ** 10 11 p************************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+--- 0 10 20 30 40 1� 5 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24` 0 0.0 0.0 25 2 1.9 1.9 26 1 1.0 2.9 27 6 5.8 8.7 28 1 1.0 9.7 29 5 4.9 14.6 30 11 10.7 25.2 31 6 5.8 31.1 32 16 15.5 46.6 33 12 11.7 58.3 34 17 16.5 74.8 35 6 5.8 80.6 36 10 9.7 90.3 37 8 7.8 98.1 38 2 1.9 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ......... ........3fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.31 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 38 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. ..10fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................32 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **********1 90 * 9� 80 * 80 70 7 fl 60 * 61] 50 5 40 4�_1 30 * 30 20 2 10 ** 10 11 p************************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+--- 0 10 20 30 40 1� 5 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM -- Street: I v t VJ 6 /'t Ve-nye' Location:–* 70 ic^ From: Ly D yl S To: C� Fe-(-rt4rtA0 Date: Observer. ETN c#Wdarita%12000 JWno0195.#S EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal ! V O 2. Vertical I J O N Q 3. Superelevation (%) r- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 0 O (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics % at rade, dustpan, etc. / 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without A Y v Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �26 O_) 31 fl �jOJ r-\,_ offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, g satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic light) (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, I v) P F:? y r or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - rj strai ht or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics W\ o d VV O (heavy, moderate, light) + 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) C T6— Pit -Street Parking r J I p t A - f Turnover (yes or no) 0 c#Wdarita%12000 JWno0195.#S ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Orchard Village Road between Wiley Canyon Road and Lyons Avenue Year of Survey 1995 .Anr1. noCVAlIIAIn CRCCn AACAS!IRERAFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0,14 43 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 38-47 (75.2%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph nwnr n. wrnlm=kfl M=lnonc Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0,14 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 nAnT 111 U!I U%Afj To AGCY` Anon RnenstnF CNARACTFRlRT1CS NOT READILY APPARENT PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph clienWantac1200011ejno 8095.x1s Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately one- quarter mile apart, four lanes, raised median, +/- 64 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential east side), Christmas tree farm etc.), other conditions (west side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph clienWantac1200011ejno 8095.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD: WILEY CANYON TO LYONS AVENUE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME...............12:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............... ..4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............... ..4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 75.2f PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............33 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................loll AVERAGE SPEED.......................42. CUMULATIVE ---------------- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) LJ ---+----+----+----+----+----+ L **100 ** CUM MPH NO. PCT < 5 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 1 1.0 1.0 34 3 2.9 3.8 35 6 5.7 9.5 36 8 7.6 .17.1 37 2 1.9 19.0 38 4 3.8 22.9 39 1 1.0 23.8 40 6 5.7 29.5 41 3 2.9 32.4 42 13 12.4 44.8 43 10 9.5 54.3 44 17 16.2 70.5 45 13 12.4 82.9 46 7 6.7 89.5 47 5 4.8 94.3 48 2 1.9 96.2 49 3 2.9 99.0 50 1 1.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............... ..4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............... ..4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 75.2f PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............33 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................loll AVERAGE SPEED.......................42. CUMULATIVE ---------------- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) LJ ---+----+----+----+----+----+ L **100 90 80 70 60 50 40 rl 30 20d 10 * 10 p***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 -+----+----+--- 10 20 30 40 50 �f l 0 ** * ** ** 90 80 70 60 50 40 rl 30 20d 10 * 10 p***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 -+----+----+--- 10 20 30 40 50 �f l 0 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: V/Z 0A y, cfenlldadtal120001Wjn00195Jds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 0 2. Vertical A10 3. Superelevation (°h) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Q J� 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) .370 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dust an, etc. J 5 4h 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without . /O Sidewalks es or no �V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, « 13 {" `S Tt*o office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, n 60vv satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic 11 (heavy, moderate, light) h+ 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 'L or raised median 13. Street Width and ✓a„4) /p Alignment (width, feet - -32 /YIo a Ka sr� „ `' strai ht or curved)2 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) ea'jy 15. Uniformity with the % Community (yes or no) PS 16. Heavy On -Street Parking r ! W Turnover (yes or no) cfenlldadtal120001Wjn00195Jds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Orchard Village Road between McBean Parkway and Wiley Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART 1- PRFVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.23 47 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 44-53 (70.9%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11• aCCIr1FNT RFCr)RDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 3 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.23 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HInHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, no driveways, four lanes, raised median, +/- 80 feet wide. TRAFFIC:. Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking turnover, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. S an uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential, commercial, an nursery school etc.), other conditions rO (west side).. IV: AUDI I IVNAL KLMAKRS on unprotected median openings and adjacent land use, 45 mph mph, cfienndanta11200011ejn08195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS t ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD: MCBEAN PARKWAY TO WILEY CANYON ROAD lJ DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME...............12:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................47I 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......52. 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 44 through 53 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 70.9 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.1[, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS..................37 to 59 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................127 AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.7 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100 90 * 90 80 * 80 f l 70 ** 70 �1 60 60 * 50 * 50 40 * 40 LJ 30 * 30 LJ 20 ** 20 e 10 * 10 0*******t***************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) u ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 1 0.8 0.8 38 1 0.8 1.6 39 1 0.8 2.4 40 12 9.4 11.8 41 1 0.8 12.6 42 10 7.9 20.5 43 2 1.6 22.0 44 12 9.4 31.5 45 8 6.3 37.8 46 14 11.0 48.8 47 11 8.7 57.5 48 17 13.4 70.9 49 2 1.6 72.4 50 11 8.7 81.1 51 2 1.6 82.7 52 10 7.9 90.6 53 3 2.4 92.9 54 2 1.6 94.5 55 4 3.1 97.6 56 1 0.8 98.4 57 1 0.8 99.2 58 0 0.0 99.2 59 1 0.8 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................47I 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......52. 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 44 through 53 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 70.9 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.1[, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS..................37 to 59 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................127 AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.7 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100 90 * 90 80 * 80 f l 70 ** 70 �1 60 60 * 50 * 50 40 * 40 LJ 30 * 30 LJ 20 ** 20 e 10 * 10 0*******t***************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) u ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM M Location: ( ?— Date: Date: q/Z6 A cienAdaAta %12000 nejn00195.'dS EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /1/0- 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (�) -- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 7v 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without , /O Sidewalks es or no)/v 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - t-{ O offsets es or no l C9 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) GO O 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 4iSt� /�eiuh divided, undivided, painted, Z or raised median)2 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - if7D straight or curve Z�55 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes, or no) Is 16. Heavy On -Street Parking or Turnover,(yes no) cienAdaAta %12000 nejn00195.'dS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Pamplico Drive between Tarvn Drive and Ron Ridge Drive Year of Survey 1995 DART I• DRFVAII INr: SDFFn MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 32 35 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 26-35 (84.5%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted OADT 11• ArrInC11T DCrrtPnQ Time Period Covered 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DADT III- u1r_uwev TaAPRIr ANn RnAnSinF r.NARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal and vertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) paved shoulders, +/- 3% grade, two lanes, broken -yellow stripe, curved alignment, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on restricted sight distance, reduce IRECOMMENDATION 130 mph 5 mph. c6ennclanra1120001Wno 8295.x/s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS PAMPLICO DRIVE: TARYN DRIVE TO RON RIDGE DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/28/1995 TIME. .............. 9:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3f 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84.5) PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13.£ PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 41 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5�, AVERAGE SPEED .......................31.0 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ********1 90 ** 9d� 80 * 80n 70 * 7d 60 6Q 50 * 50) 40 4L] 30 30 20 * 2 10 * 1Q 0************************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----t----t----i- 0 10 20 30 40 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ----- 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0( 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 1 1.7 1.7 26 6 10.3 12.1 27 2 3.4 15.5 28 2 3.4 19.0 29 4 6.9 25.9 30 6 10.3 36.2 31 6 10.3 46.6 32 6 '10.3 56.9 33 8 13.8 70.7 34 4 6.9 77.6 35 5 8.6 86.2 36 2 3.4 89.7 37 1 1.7 91.4 38 3 5.2 96.6 39 1 1.7 98.3 40 0 0.0 98.3 41 1 1.7 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3f 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84.5) PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13.£ PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 1. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 41 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................5�, AVERAGE SPEED .......................31.0 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ********1 90 ** 9d� 80 * 80n 70 * 7d 60 6Q 50 * 50) 40 4L] 30 30 20 * 2 10 * 1Q 0************************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----t----t----i- 0 10 20 30 40 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: _ Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: / 73 // Date: 4/(/-1S denWantal1200011eJno019Dds EJB or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal ! p� 2. Vertical yP S 3. Superelevation (96) / /V0 4. Shoulder Conditions I c (paved or unpaved) Q o P 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 39>0 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without V Sidewalks es or no B. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, V0C0.n`I' ✓ACGtn` office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 11 G00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) C 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Ng�1 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, / / 1610 641 11a4j or raised median) yp 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- 34l /� JNA I strai ht or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics f (heavy, moderate, light) I 1 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16.''a Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) A 10 denWantal1200011eJno019Dds I ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Peachtand Avenue between Cherry Way and Lyons Avenue Year of Survey 1995 PART L PRFVAn tNr SPFFn MFAstJREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/28/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 1.44 25 28 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 20-29 (97.6%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 1.44 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART 111• ulruwAY_ TRAFFIC_ ANn ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, no striping/channelization, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No pedestrians or on -street parking observed, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential, commercial. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 25 mph ctienWanta11200011 ejno8395.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS LJ PEACHLAND: CHERRY WAY TO LYONS AVENUE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE. .............. 3/28/1995 TIME .............. 3:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.` 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................25r 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................28111 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 20 through 29 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 97.6( PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.4ii PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............20 to33_� VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................8 AVERAGE SPEED.......................24. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ 100 90 * 9 fl 80 * SQJ 70 60 * 6 50 50 40 4G l 30 30 20 * 2� 10 * 10 0 n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ II 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 it 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 10 11.8 11.8 21 7 8.2 20.0 22 12 14.1 34.1 23 8 9.4 43.5 24 3 3.5 47.1 25 13 15.3 62.4 26 7 8.2 70.6 27 4 4.7 75.3 28 .11 12.9 88.2 29 8 9.4 97.6 30 1 1.2 98.8 31 0 0.0 98.8 32 0 0.0 98.8 33 1 1.2 100.0 34 0 0.0 '100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0100.0 38 0 0.0100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................25r 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................28111 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 20 through 29 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 97.6( PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.4ii PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............20 to33_� VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................8 AVERAGE SPEED.......................24. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ 100 90 * 9 fl 80 * SQJ 70 60 * 6 50 50 40 4G l 30 30 20 * 2� 10 * 10 0 n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ II 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM in Location: Date: c*enWariraV 20001Wno 0195.x1s EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal ��O 2. Vertical /✓ 3. Superelevation (%) — 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) tyQ� 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics �J 1"�h at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without r(� Sidewalks es or no / 8. Adjacent Land Use q (residential, commercial, lies,�n�,a office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, �% or raised median ' " g 1/1 E 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - / straight or curved b 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 0 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) if c*enWariraV 20001Wno 0195.x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Placerita Canyon Road between 12th Street and 1900' E/O 12th Street Year of Survey 1995 De DT I. DRF\/Alt imez CDFFn MFACI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85°kite 0.00 38 43 10 mph pace (°k of Veh.) 35-44 (70.1%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph DADT 11• A! PinCRIT DGCnDnC Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DART III- ulr WWAV TRAFFIC' Anln RnAnSInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, at -grade driveways, two lanes, painted double - yellow striping, +/- 22 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians observed, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential and public use soul side), set -back etc.), other conditions residential and industrial (north side). KAKI IV: AUUIIIUNAL characteristics not readily apparent. 40 mph ch'entWanta11200011ejno8495.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS PLACERITA CANYON ROAD: 12TH STREET TO 19001 E/O 12TH STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE.. .......... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 9:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31r1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 70:k PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6.L} PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23.g RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 46 - VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11711 AVERAGE SPEED .......................37.5 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) r7 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 100 *****100 90 * 90 I I 80 * 80 70 70 60 * 60 �l 50 * 50 40 * 4011 30 * 30 LJ 20 * 20 10 * 10 0****************** 0 ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 n r PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ < 5 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 1 0.9 0.9 21 0 0.0 0.9 22 0 0.0 0.9 23 2 1.7 2.6 24 0 0.0 2.6 25 0 0.0 2.6 26 0 0.0 2.6 27 0 0.0 2.6 28 0 0.0 2.6 29 0 0.0 2.6 30 8 6.8 9.4 31 5 4.3 13.7 32 3 2.6 16.2 33 7 6.0 22.2 34 2 1.7 23.9 35 6 5.1 29.1 36 10 8.5 37.6 37 7 6.0 43.6 38 10 8.5 52.1 39 8 6.8 59.0 40 5 4.3 63.2 41 14 12.0 75.2 42 6 5.1 80.3 43 10 8.5 88.9 44 6 5.1 94.0 45 2 1.7 95.7 46 5 4.3 100.0 47 0 0.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31r1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 70:k PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6.L} PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23.g RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 46 - VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11711 AVERAGE SPEED .......................37.5 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) r7 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 100 *****100 90 * 90 I I 80 * 80 70 70 60 * 60 �l 50 * 50 40 * 4011 30 * 30 LJ 20 * 20 10 * 10 0****************** 0 ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 n r PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 TOTALS TOT^LS FIC COUNTS INC- CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street P ` 6 C 'ln -�4 l_A 4 on1 ko O A Location: From: 02 7 � _ �yT�o: O, E 1 zlls+ Date: Li Z6 5 Observer: _ � _+ denAdanta %120001 Wn00195.x(s E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal n 1 /fw` 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions � > (paved or unpaved) V 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics / A( G f I G at rade, dust / 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without j O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, L 1 office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, 5Q �S CACI J c� S� satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes; divided, undivided, painted, ' 1 ' v� P Q Y t v) PDY or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 01Z sfir -. OIZaI 5fr: straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics YL (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16.. Heavy On -Street Parking (yes or no) P Turnover denAdanta %120001 Wn00195.x(s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Placerita Canyon Road between 2400' W/O Sierra Highway and Sierra Highway Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%wile 85%ile 0.00 41 46 10 mph pace ('/a of Veh.) 35-44 (72.6%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC, AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/venical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) unpaved shoulders, few at -grade driveways, two lanes, painted double -yellow striping, +(_ 25 feet wide, TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Lana uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant(south side), oil field(north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on roadway closure 2,400 feet west of Sierra Highway, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cfiennc1anlaV 20001Wjno8595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS PLACERITA CANYON ROAD: 2400' W/O SIERRA HIGHWAY TO SIERRA HWY DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 9:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 3 4.8 4.8 31 0 0.0 4.8 32 0 0.0 4.8 33 1 1.6 6.5 34 0 0.0 6.5 35 5 8.1 14.5 36 2 3.2 17.7 37 3 4.8 22.6 38 7 11.3 33.9 39 4 6.5 40.3 40 2 3.2 43.5 41 7 11.3 54.8 42 4 6.5 61.3 43 2 3.2 64.5 44 9 14.5 79.0 45 1 1.6 80.6 46 3 4.8 85.5 47 1 1.6 87.1 48 5 8.1 95.2 49 0 0.0 95.2 50 1- 1.6 96.8 51 2 3.2 100.0 52 0 0.0 100.0 53 0 0.0'100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 21. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.5 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to5 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................6 AVERAGE SPEED.......................41. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *****100 90 90� 80 ** 80f 70 70l 60 50 40 * 30 20 10 60( 50 4 O lI 30f 20� l ***** 0******************** ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 10D 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+---- 10 20 30 40 50 5 iii■��■�a�Wmaa� CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM �f Street: at�X 1-i-cl �V�10✓l �cca"� Location: From:ZIft1 WYOSier^rraHwyTo: Sle f Y� KW� Date: 2 5 Observer: 6en Wadtai12W01%ejn00195-)d5 E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) t 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions U V (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions Q (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at -grade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without p t N b Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, V V nc' office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- 1 \�� fv s / lv A offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 5 Q"r, sa 1i satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic light) t t (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, Dy L)�) Y or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - ^ ^ G yr straight or curve 14. Traffic Flaw Characteristics light) y (heavy, moderate, 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) 6en Wadtai12W01%ejn00195-)d5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Plum Canyon Road between Bouquet Canyon Road and East City Limits Year of Survey PART P PRFVAILING SPFFD MFASLIREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 39 42 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (76.5%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced +/- 1,000 feet apart, four lanes, raised median, +/- 70 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cdent%danta V 20001 %ejn o 6695. xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS 11 PLUM CANYON ROAD: BOUQUET CANYON ROAD TO EAST CITY LIMITS CCCL���1 DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 8:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT." 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 76.F PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............19. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 47 VEHICLES OBSERVED..................5fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ------------------------------------------ --- 100 *****10 9090 _ * u 80 * 80 70 * 70� 60 60 n 50 50 11 40 40j * L 30 * 30 20 20 10 * 10 *** 0************************ 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 (� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 ' 10 5 10 20 30 40 15� 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. --- < 5 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ---- 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 2 3.9 3.9 30 0 0.0 3.9 31 0 0.0 3.9 32 4 7.8 11.8 33 2 3.9 15.7 34 4 7.8 23.5 35 1 2.0 25.5 36 2 3.9 29.4 37 3 5.9 35.3 38 6 11.8 47.1 39 9 17.6 64.7 40 3 5.9 70.6 41 5 9.8 80.4 42 3 5.9 86.3 43 1 2.0 88.2 44. 3 5.9 94.1 45 0 0.0 94.1 46 2 3.9 98.0 47 1 2.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 76.F PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............19. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 47 VEHICLES OBSERVED..................5fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ------------------------------------------ --- 100 *****10 9090 _ * u 80 * 80 70 * 70� 60 60 n 50 50 11 40 40j * L 30 * 30 20 20 10 * 10 *** 0************************ 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 (� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 ' 10 5 10 20 30 40 15� 50 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: j Date: 7 /Z ( 14J �cienrdarit811200011ejn00195.ids W/B or NIB Notes �S. �ra atq f 2 1�gSa� �a�iih �cienrdarit811200011ejn00195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Railroad Avenue between San Fernando Road and 11th Street Year of Survey PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03129/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 27 30 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 21-30 (89.2%) Posted Speed Limit 25 mph PART IL• ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART 111• HIRFIWAY TRAFFIC ANn ROAnSIDF CHARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Horizontal sight distance restrictions, unpaved shoulders intersections, other) on east side, dustpan driveways on south side, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, two lanes, painted double -yellow striping, +/- 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Pedestrians observed crossing street to reach their vehicles parked on north side dirt shoulder, heavy on - street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, sc oo ,n ustrla west Side), railroad east side). etc.), other conditions YAK( IV: AUDI I[UNAL KCMAKKA Based on horizontal sight distance limitations, pace, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. curves, (RECOMMENDATION 125 mph I I c6enWa6t81120001;gjno8795.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS RAILROAD AVENUE: SAN'FERNANDO ROAD TO 11TH STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 4:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .......... 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................23 J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 3 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.?� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................21 to 32 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................31] AVERAGE SPEED.......................26. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ***************1 90 * 9(j 80 80 70 * 7� 60 6�1 50 40 4�J 30 * 30 20 * 2� 10 * 10 0********************* 0H ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 H 15 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) II +----+----+---------+----+---------t----'F----+ L1 I h15 10 5 ----------- 0 10 fl 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 _PCT. 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 3 8.1 8.1 22 2 5.4 13.5 23 0 0.0 13.5 24 2 5.4 18.9 25 4 10.8 29.7 26 6 16.2 45.9 27 3 8.1 54.1 28 6 16.2 70.3 29 2 5.4 75.7 30 5 13.5 89.2 31 3 8.1 97.3 32 1 2.7 100.0 33 0 0.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .......... 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................23 J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 21 through 3 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.?� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................21 to 32 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................31] AVERAGE SPEED.......................26. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ***************1 90 * 9(j 80 80 70 * 7� 60 6�1 50 40 4�J 30 * 30 20 * 2� 10 * 10 0********************* 0H ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 H 15 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) II +----+----+---------+----+---------t----'F----+ L1 I h15 10 5 ----------- 0 10 fl 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: 1 -�u-t 1 I �Jukk nv c y l y �� II From: S Cw. _ �YLIY�D To: Observer: E v Ks Location: # 7`8 Date: L4 Z(o i cEenAdanta1120001kjn00195.x1s E/B or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? sh Q f.. Q ) 91Do t (yes or no) 1. Horizontal es. Gurv25 2. Vertical ►\ J O / �' 0 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions O (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics �(� D/T 1 No D/tA) at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the pe estrlan5�t orl2ostside Roadway without Sidewalks es or no N� C2Gt I a� B. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, G SaS�O� 1 S� satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic light) 11 (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and d i Scor f n U 0416 Alignment(width,feet- 30)S}r 3�.5'rr �ny1Y`2tg CUrvfS straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 1' (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 1 7 16. Heavy On -Street Parking no) or Turnover (yes or es Y . Empkl yl Y Pari- ON 4e ost.QF Jtr"lho0A"C cEenAdanta1120001kjn00195.x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Rainbow Glen Drive between Soledad Canyon Road and Gilbert Drive Year of Survey 1995 DART 1• DDPVAII INa RDPPn MPACI IRPMPNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 37 41 10 mph pace (°/a of Veh.) 32-41 (72.7%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART Ile ArrinFNT RFCnRnR Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DART III- 411G44wev TDAPPIr ANn RnAnRMF rNARACTFRIRTICR NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 5% changing grade, intersections spaced approximately 400 feet apart, two lanes, reflectorized double -yellow channelization with left -tum pockets, curved alignment, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking tumover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential set- ac . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on restricted vertical sight distance, changing grade, and adjacent land use, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cfienndada11200011ejno8895.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS RAINBOW GLEN DRIVE: SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO GILBERT DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE....... .•••.. 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 8:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................:3;1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72.7j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.11 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........ .., 18. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................27 to 43 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................71 AVERAGE SPEED.......................36. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- 6- 100 ****1 90 80 70 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT. 0 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 00 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 1 1.3 1.3 28 1 1.3 2.6 29 1 1.3 3.9 30 7 9.1 13.0 31 4 5.2 18.2 32 6 7.8 26.0 33 1 1.3 27.3 34 8 10.4 37.7 35 1 1.3 39.0 36 5 6.5 45.5 37 6 7.8 53.2 38 8 10.4 63.6 39 7 9.1 72.7 40 6 7.8 80.5 41 8 10.4 90.9 42 5 6.5 97.4 43 2 2.6 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................:3;1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72.7j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.11 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........ .., 18. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................27 to 43 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................71 AVERAGE SPEED.......................36. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- 6- 100 ****1 90 80 70 60 50 40 ** 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: gay )oi ) G earr� _� r 1 �e Location: -75 From: �5r�1 fi.Q� C n— To: l7 I I hP� �' Date: Ll --4-0-'95 Observer: a LT1\� cfienndan1a11200011ejn00195-1ds E/B or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal Q ` 2. Vertical /V p n 1� /V o 3. Superelevation (%) l 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions T f (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics v s i Oyl S du SVOs15 at rade, dustpan, etc. of 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without N p /V t7 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, e5 office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - r pQ /)o 0 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, G OO G v0d satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, U, oY DYR or raised median W/ t -T- Io�kr t t 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - Qi c urvPd p� G V I-Ve straight or curved)r 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Y Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy; OnStreet Parking 1 /) t� Turnover (yes or no) 1l/ cfienndan1a11200011ejn00195-1ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Rainbow Glen Drive between Gilbert Drive and Via Princessa Year of Survey PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 36 39 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (94.1%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 5% grade, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced +/- 400 feet apart, two lanes, double -yellow refiectorized channelization, curved alignment, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Lana uses not apparent (park, school, Residential set- ac . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cffent%dadta 1120001Wno8995.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS RAINBOW GLEN DRIVE: GILBERT DRIVE TO VIA PRINCESSA DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 7:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 94.7 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.�] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to41 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................801 AVERAGE SPEED .......................36.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) {j +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L, 100 *******10 90 9 80 80 70 * 7 ICCCJJJ) 60 6Q 50 * 50 40 * 4fl 30 30 20 * 2� 10 ** u 0***************t************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 0 ----+----+--- +----+----+----+----+----+----+0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ----------- 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ----- 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 1 1.2 1.2 30 3 3.5 4.7 31 1 1.2 5.9 32 2 2.4 8.2 33 6 7.1 15.3 34 2 2.4 17.6 35 18 21.2 38.8 36 10 11.8 50.6 37 13 15.3 65.9 38 9 10.6 76.5 39 14 16.5 92.9 40 4 4.7 97.6 41 2 2.4 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 94.7 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.�] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to41 VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................801 AVERAGE SPEED .......................36.1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) {j +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L, 100 *******10 90 9 80 80 70 * 7 ICCCJJJ) 60 6Q 50 * 50 40 * 4fl 30 30 20 * 2� 10 ** u 0***************t************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 0 ----+----+--- +----+----+----+----+----+----+0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ----------- 0 10 20 30 40 7C_T�s _- _ _ � �_ �� CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: ' Q 1 A b 0 u) r <<P An D C l V2— Location: * So From: C-> 1 h f/ ± To: Vin Pr l 1/l C tzo Date: `i /2 O/ T6 Observer. FISO c#enAdarita1120001%ejn00195-'d5 EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal b o 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) _ 4, Shoulder Conditions p (paved or unpaved) I 5. Profile Conditions 3 J (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics IUs , p ply 11 1 d Uh 5 at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without p NO Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent land Use (residential, commercial, �y office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - fi u 'z o NO ^I �� IIU V O offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, O O Cr 00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) L 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, Q (01,01 1 V a or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - r S Q l G J (Y r 50 1 c u ry straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the y Q 5 �5 Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking i,a O Turnover (yes or no) V1 c#enAdarita1120001%ejn00195-'d5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Rainbow Glen Drive between Via Princessa and Jacana Road (End of Street) Year of Survey 1995 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 37 39 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 30-39 (89.7°/x) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 4% grade, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, two lanes, no striping, curved alignment, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park. school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent.. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph c5ennclanta I1200011e/no9095.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS RAINBOW GLEN DRIVE: VIA PRINCESSA TO JACANA ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 7:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3'l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.71 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 4�_ VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................3r� AVERAGE SPEED .................. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ 100 ******10 80 * 7 o 70 60 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 --- 0 ---- 0.0 --- 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 2.6 2.6 31 3 7.7 10.3 32 2 5.1 15.4 33 1 2.6 17.9 34 3 7.7 25.6 35 6 15.4 41.0 36 3 7.7 48.7 37 8 20.5 69.2 38 3 7.7 76.9 39 5 12.8 89.7 40 1 2.6 92.3 41 3 7.7 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3'l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.71 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 4�_ VEHICLES OBSERVED .....................3r� AVERAGE SPEED .................. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ 100 ******10 80 * 7 o 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+-_--+----+----+----+----+ 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM L1 Street: R (\i)a hn l i r- e VL- p f- t Ve, Location: #_0 From: \) 1a Pri yx CLS S. _\ To: � I o Sj"� Date: I a OT Observer, t-- SN cienf%danfa11200011ejn00195.#S EJB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal �J 6 00 2. Vertical N m p 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions "l (grade, %) B. Commercial Driveway Characteristics dus�`Jp"15 �US'1�0+n5 at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without N N O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, pe office, etc. office, 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �jQp, jJ9 t3�00' I)o offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, G O O A ` G OOC satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic light) (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization 0 of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, r wo or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - -} 5 O I W ry 01 c- L,, r J straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) In i l t Jr' (heavy, moderate, 15. Uniformity with the � Q.5 Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) Y�fl r.0 cienf%danfa11200011ejn00195.#S ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Rockwell Canyon Road between Valencia Boulevard and McBean Parkway Year of Survey PART I- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.41 51 54 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 45-54 (70.5%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II- ACCIDFNT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 3 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.41 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART 111• 411r t4WAV TRAFFIC AND ROADSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontailvertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) paved shoulders, +/- 3% grade, dustpan driveways, four lanes, two-way left -tum lane, curved alignment, +/- 65 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, no observed on -street parking, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential east side), college west side). etc.), other conditions FAKI IV: AVUI I IUNAL KGIVIAKKJ Based on sight distance restrictions and adjacent land uses, 45 mph dienndadta11200011ejno9195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROCKWELL CANYON ROAD: VALENCIA BOULEVARD TO MCBEAN PARKWAY DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME. .............. 3:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 70.°j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12.-�y PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS........... ...42 to 6? VEHICLES OBSERVED ............... .....12.� AVERAGE SPEED .......................50.i CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----t----+----+----+----+----+----+ l� *100 ** 90 80 ** 70J 60 n * jul * 50 40 rl * iJ ** 30 ** 20d 10� 0*************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 u 15j ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 D�j LJ L1 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <15 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 0 0.0 0.0 41 0 0.0 0.0 42 6 4.9 4.9 43 3 2.5 7.4 44 12 9.8 17.2 45 2 1.6 18.9 46 9 7.4 26.2 47 4 3.3 29.5 48 1 0.8 30.3 49 4 3.3 33.6 50 17 13.9 47.5 51 11 9.0 56.6 52 14 11.5 68.0 53 9 7.4 75.4 54 15 12.3 87.7 55 1 0.8 88.5 56 5 4.1 92.6 57 2 1.6 94.3 58 1 0.8 95.1 59 2 1.6 96.7 60 4 3.3 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 70.°j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12.-�y PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS........... ...42 to 6? VEHICLES OBSERVED ............... .....12.� AVERAGE SPEED .......................50.i CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----t----+----+----+----+----+----+ l� *100 ** 90 80 ** 70J 60 n * jul * 50 40 rl * iJ ** 30 ** 20d 10� 0*************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 u 15j ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 D�j LJ L1 Street: From: _ Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 82 Date: l_1 Notes lJ LJ lJ L_7 u LJ IeFa- Tv,, atie denrldai#a1120001 bjno0195-)ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal / V 2. Vertical A/0 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) I a✓t C 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 07e 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics I nn at rade, dustpan, etc. oSTY4h 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /0 Sidewalks es or no / 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, CO I �t esr office, etc.)3f A 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, �^ satisfactory, poor, etc.) t90 o 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) —' 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 2 i,✓py divided, undivided, painted, 2 2 or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - / / rve straight or curve fps vr' 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with thenity Commu.,(yes or no) ks 16. Heavy'Dn7Street Parking Q Tumover (yes or no) Notes lJ LJ lJ L_7 u LJ IeFa- Tv,, atie denrldai#a1120001 bjno0195-)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (Magic Mountain Parkway) between West City Limit and 100' E/O Tourney Road Year of Survey PART L PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 2,100 feet east of west city limit Date of Survey 06/2/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 39 42 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 34-43 (85.9%) Posted Speed Limit 55 mph PART It- ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 3.30 PART III: HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, two lanes, painted double -yellow stripe, +/- 35 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular and truck traffic. an uses not apparent (park, school,— Vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS readily apparent. 40 mph cfeaWadta11200011ejno9295.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS H ROUTE 126 (MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY): LOCATION 1 BEGINNING OF CURVE DIRECTION(S)....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 6/ 2/1995 TIME...............1O:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................39� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................42 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.9r PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.3 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED......... ........277j� AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS +----+----+----+----+----+- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+----+- 10 20 30 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 10 SPEED (MPH) t� --+----+----+----+ ********100 90 * 80 * 70 Ll * 60 * 50 40 30 20 10 0 --+----+----+----+ 40 50 SPEED 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 2 0.7 0.7 30 2 0.7 1.4 31 3 1.1 2.5 32 10 3.6 6.1 33 10 3.6 9.7 34 12 4.3 14.1 35 16 5.8 19.9 36 26 9.4 29.2 37 27 9.7 39.0 38 27 9.7 48.7 39 27 9.7 58.5 40 27 9.7 68.2 41 26 9.4 77.6 42 25 9.0 86.6 43 25 9.0 95.7 44 3 1.1 96.8 45 0 0.0 96.8 46 0 0.0 96.8 47 2 0.7 97.5 48 3 1.1 98.6 49 0 0.0 98.6 50 2 0.7 99.3 51 1 0.4 99.6 52 0 0.0 99.6 53 1 0.4 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................39� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................42 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.9r PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4.3 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED......... ........277j� AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS +----+----+----+----+----+- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+----+- 10 20 30 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 10 SPEED (MPH) t� --+----+----+----+ ********100 90 * 80 * 70 Ll * 60 * 50 40 30 20 10 0 --+----+----+----+ 40 50 SPEED 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 93 Date: `HA2 A denh9antA12000 J%ejno0195_)ds EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /VO 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (°h) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) n On Yaq 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3O>p 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan. etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, + office, etc.)Q 1 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 50-k,,�et4( satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) H-eajq 12. Channelization (# of lanes, ��a5j� le ��o✓ divided, undivided, painted, J I or raised median)/ 13. Street Width and j Alignment (width, feet- 3S straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) P0.v 15. Uniformity with the .1 Community (yes or no) N 0 16. Heavy On -Street Parking. Turnover (yes or no) do denh9antA12000 J%ejno0195_)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (Magic Mountain Parkway) between 100' E/O Tourney Road and McBean Parkway Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 2,640 feet east of west city limit Date of Survey 06/2/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.10 44 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (68.6%) Posted Speed Limit 55 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.10 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 3,30 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometncs, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, no driveways, two lanes, painted double - yellow stripe, +/- 35 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, scant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. Post horizontal curve at 35 mph. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph (35 mph curve) c6enWanta11200011 ejno7095.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROUTE 126 (MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY): LOCATION 2 END OF CURVE DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 6/ 2/1995 TIME ............... 10:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................441 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5( 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 68.6' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 18.( PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 12.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................33 to 6C VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................209 AVERAGE SPEED .......................44.} CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ****100 90 * 90 80 * 80 70 * 70 * - 60 * 60[j 50 * 50 40 * 40 30 30 20 * 20 10 *** IL p******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) u ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 2 1.0 1.0 34 2 1.0 2.0 35 2 1.0 2.9 36 3 1.5 4.4 37 3 1.5 5.9 38 7 3.4 9.3 39 7 3.4 12.7 40 14 6.9 19.6 41 14 6.9 26.5 42 15 7.4 33.8 43 20 9.8 43.6 44 16 7.8 51.5 45 14 6.9 58.3 46 16 7.8 66.2 47 12 5.9 72.1 48 9 4.4 76.5 49 10 4.9 81.4 50 11 5.4 86.8 51 6 2.9 89.7 52 6 2.9 92.6 53 2 1.0 93.6 54 2 1.0 94.6 55 2 1.0 95.6 56 3 1.5 97.1 57 1 0.5 97.5 58 0 0.0 97.5 59 2 .1.0 98.5 60 3 1.5 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................441 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5( 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 68.6' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 18.( PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 12.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................33 to 6C VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................209 AVERAGE SPEED .......................44.} CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ****100 90 * 90 80 * 80 70 * 70 * - 60 * 60[j 50 * 50 40 * 40 30 30 20 * 20 10 *** IL p******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) u ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 93 Date: `6 i cienrlclanral120001%eMo0r95-lds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal / V O 2. Vertical A10 3. Superelevation (°k) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) n in 1'a✓t 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 30>0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without es or no A10Sidewalks B. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, r satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic �faJ (heavy, moderate, light) I 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 1e I)w divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 35 straight or curved) T47 Traffic Flow Characteristics I (heavy, moderate, light) 1 I Pqv 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) N0 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) cienrlclanral120001%eMo0r95-lds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (Magic Mountain Parkwavl between McBean Parkway and Valencia Boulevard Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey Half -way between Newhall Avenue and Citrus Street Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.14 45 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (73.1%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.14 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.90 PART In- HIrNWAY. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 1,700 feet apart, four lanes, raised median, +/- 86 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Lana uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph ckenWarffa V 20001 tejno9395.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROUTE 126 (MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY): MCBEAN PARKWAY TO VALENCIA BOULEVARD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 2:45 POSTED SPEEDLIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................40 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5� SO MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 73.fi-j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 20.�j PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 6. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. .11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *100 90 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 `0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 1 0.8 0.8 35 2 1.7 2.5 36 1 0.8 3.4 37 4 3.4 6.7 38 0 0.0 6.7 39 0 0.0 6.7 40 9 7.6 14.3 41 9 7.6 21.8 42 11 9.2 31.1 43 10 8.4 39.5 44 8 6.7 46.2 45 12 10.1 56.3 46 5 4.2 60.5 47 12 10.1 70.6 48 3 2.5 73.1 49 8 6.7 79.8 50 3 2.5 82.4 51 2 1.7 84.0 52 5 4.2 88.2 53 1 0.8 89.1 54 3 2.5 91.6 55 1 0.8 92.4 56 4 3.4 95.8 57 0 0.0 95.8 58 0 0.0 95.8 59 0 0.0 95.8 60 5 4.2 100.0 >60 0 0.0 .100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................40 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5� SO MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 73.fi-j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 20.�j PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED ........... 6. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. .11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *100 90 * ** 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 **** 90l! 8011 70U 60F 50 40n 30 20U 10 10 0******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM From: To: Observer: _;- Location: O Date: `- AVC, S cEenndariral120001%ejri60795ads E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal p (V v 2. Vertical (� 0 3. Superelevation (°k) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) owt- 5. Profile Conditions °70 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics �^ at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Omrc office, etc. 9, Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, �Op satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic A/0 (heavy, moderate, light) i,\ Q 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) 13. Street Width and ^� Alignment (width, feet - !S// strai ht or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) Ye S - 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) cEenndariral120001%ejri60795ads ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (Magic Mountain Parkway) between Valencia Boulevard and Bouquet Canyon Road Year of Survey DART I• DRC%/All IN[] SPCCn MFASI IRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey West end of Santa Clara River Bridge Date of Survey 05/12/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 45 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 43-52 (62.7%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II• ACCInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 -12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.90 DART III- UMMIAIAV TRAFFIr. aNn RnAnslnF rl4ARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, driveways along south side, four lanes, raised median, +/- 60 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent par , sc oo , Residential and commercial soul side). vacant(nort etc.), other conditions side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph ckenticlaritak l200011ejno9495.)ds SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROUTE 126 (MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY): VALENCIA BLVD. TO BOUQUET CANYON RD. DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 5/12/1995 TIME ....... ......10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 4 2.6 2.6 37 8 5.2 7.8 38 1 0.7 8.5 39 4 2.6 11.1 40 12 7.8 19.0 41 10 6.5 25.5 42 7 4.6 30.1 43 15 9.8 39.9 44 12 7.8 47.7 45 8 5.2 52.9 46 6 3.9 56.9 47 8 5.2 62.1 48 13 8.5 70.6 49 4 2.6 73.2 50 7 4.6 77.8 51 10 6.5 84.3 52 13 8.5 92.8 53 2 1.3 94.1 54 6 3.9 98.0 55 3 2.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................45� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................52 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 62.7 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.2�� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 30.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............36 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................153fI,I AVERAGE SPEED .......................45.5LI CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �j +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l� 100 **100` ** 90 90 111 80 * 80 70 ** 70 60 * 60 50 * 50 40 * 40 lJ 30 * 30 LJ * 20 * 20 10 *** 10 * 0************************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+--- 10 20 30 _3F1 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM U Street: S5PL l 0?1 C-1 Location: (5-5 From: Vcr [ e y,c.I CY AA To: U + C V ) u Date W�cZ ��95 Observer. ��I\ I C c#enndarrrai120001Wno0195.As n E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) a r V 1. Horizontal O 2. Vertical OG N o 3. Superelevation (%) -- — 4. Shoulder Conditions P (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions O Q (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics f� D/n o 0/w n (at rade, dustpan, etc.)Y 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without �� ^ r t V Sidewalks es or no 6 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial,�� \ !n office, etc. �` `-4 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - N /� v /A "/A A offsets es or no ! 10. Pavement Condition (good, O O c, JI O Oa satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic light) 11 1 (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 1 �DJroiS&Q ��,ralsel or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 6 O� 5 ( r -d l j� �pQ� s t-rQ 13%t straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) Mod e ci t` 1� Vv-'�o deAr'Q r C 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover N Q t /P es or no ! c#enndarrrai120001Wno0195.As n ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (San Fernando Road) between Magic Mountain Parkway and Circle J Ranch Road Year of Survey 1995 DART 1. DD CVA II InIG SDP Fn RAP ASI IRPM F MT Location of Survey Approximately 2,180 feet north of Circle J Ranch Road Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.86 53 57 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 48-57 (83.0%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph DART II• ArrInFNT RPrnRns Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 16 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.86 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.90 DART M u1r-u1AJAV TDAPPIf` AMn RnenSlnP ruARArTFRISTICs NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, no driveways, four lanes, painted median, 80 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (Fark, school, Railroad (east side), some commercial west side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 55 mph cAenAda6ta11200011ejno9595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROUTE 126 (SAN FERNANDO ROAD): MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY TO CIRCLE J RANCH DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 1 DATE............... 3/29/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 TIME............... 3:15 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 48 through 57 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.6 CUM RANGE OF SPEEDS.................44 to 6 MPH NO. PCT. PCT. VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................101 ___ ___ ____ _____ AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 53. J <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) a 16 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 17 0 0.0 0.0 100 *100 18 0 0.0 0.0 - - 19 0 0.0 0.0 90 *** 90 20 0 0.0 0.0 - * - 21 0 0.0 0.0 80 80 22 0 0.0 0.0 - 23 0 0.0 0.0 70 * 70 24 0 0.0 0.0 - * - 25 0 0.0 0.0 60 26 0 0.0 0.0 - 27 0 0.0 0.0 50 * 50� 28 0 0.0 0.0 - 29 0 0.0 0.0 40 * 40U 30 0 0.0 0.0 - 31 0 0.0 0.0 30 30 32 0 0.0 0.0 - 33 0 0.0 0.0 20 ** 20 34 0 0.0 0.0 - 35 0 0.0 0.0 10 * 10 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 O****************************** 0 38 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 39 0 0.0 0.0 20 30 40 50 60 40 0 0.0 0.0 41 0 0.0 0.0 42 0 0.0 0.0 43 0 0.0 0.0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 44 1 0.9 0.9 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 45 4 3.8 4.7 15 15� 46 1 0.9 5.7 - 47 1 0.9 6.6 - 48 49 3 11 2.8 10.4 9.4 19.8 - - - -ALJ 50 2 1.9 21.7 10 1 51 6 5.7 '^27.4 - - 52 16 15.1 42.5 - 53 10 9.4 51.9 - 54 14 13.2 65.1 - 55 7 6.6 71.7 5 5 n 56 12 11.3 83.0 - Il J1 57 7 6.6 89.6 - 58 3 2.8 92.5 - - 59 0 0.0 92.5 - 60 8 7.5 100.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >60 0 0.0 100.0 20 30 40 50 60 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: §6 Date: !( `% 14i cfenndarita11200011e%no0195.,ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal �(� 2. Vertical A] p 3. Superelevation (°k) 4. Shoulder Conditions lj (paved or unpaved) q Jt 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 7 r26 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. ?. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without J Sidewalks es or no ( V r7 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) t aN+ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) � hc�p 11. Truck Traffic light) (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curve O D 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, lil pad. 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heav0il-Street Parking Heavy. Turnover (yes or no) �f cfenndarita11200011e%no0195.,ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (San Fernando Road) between Circle J Ranch Road and Placerita Creek Bridge Year of Survey 1995 DART 1• PRFVAn INr: CPFFn MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey Approximately 1,000 feet south of Circle J Ranch Road Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.37 51 55 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 47-56 (71.5%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART IL• ACCInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 5 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.37 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.90 PART III- Wlr_41WAV 'TRAFFIC ANn ROAnsInF CNARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders and four lanes approximately half of segment and two lanes with unpaved shoulders along remainder, painted median, curved alignment, 30-60 feet wide (varies). TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, al roa east side), industrial and commercial west etc.), other conditions side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 55 mph cLenndarita 11200011 ejno9695.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver.'2.0OA/McTRANS U ROUTE 126 (SAN FERNANDO ROAD): CIRCLE J RANCH ROAD TO 16TH STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 3:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51(1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................55[11 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 47 through 56 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71.5[ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.2L] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 60C VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13q AVERAGE SPEED .......................50.91 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) LJ +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ J *100 50 40 30 20 10 ** +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----4 20 30 40 50 6C 15 10 90 80 70 60 (, 50 IuI 40 30 20 10 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 5 15j ------------------------------------------ 20 30 40 50 60 "0' CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 1 0.8 0.8 41 2 1.5 2.3 42 8 6.2 8.5 43 4 3.1 11.5 44 2 1.5 13.1 45 6 4.6 17.7 46 2 1.5 19.2 47 2 1.5 20.8 48 8 6.2 26.9 49 4 3.1 30.0 50 10 7.7 37.7 51 18 13.8 51.5 52 11 8.5 60.0 53 15 11.5 71.5 54 8 6.2 77.7 55 14 10.8 88.5 56 3 2.3 90.8 57 1 0.8 91.5 58 1 0.8 92.3 59 2 1.5 93.8 60 8 6.2 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51(1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................55[11 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 47 through 56 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71.5[ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.2L] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 60C VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13q AVERAGE SPEED .......................50.91 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) LJ +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ J *100 50 40 30 20 10 ** +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----4 20 30 40 50 6C 15 10 90 80 70 60 (, 50 IuI 40 30 20 10 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 5 15j ------------------------------------------ 20 30 40 50 60 "0' ■■■■■■■■■s�� �.■■■■.■■■■ Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 87 Date: c//Z/ Iq Cf nttdanta112oo01WJno0195.x/s EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 3 �� 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) a✓ 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) —' 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /v /O Sidewalks es or no / 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, a (5,1 office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - L offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) po 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - O C vt straight or curve LI -t 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 4 5 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) d17 Cf nttdanta112oo01WJno0195.x/s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (San Fernando Road) between Placerita Creek Bridge and 13th Street Year of Survey 1995 DeRT 1• PRCVAII INr RPFFII MFARIIRFMFNT Location of Survey Approximately 315 feet south of 15th Street Date of Survey 04/21/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.26 42 47 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 35-44 (75.9%) Posted Speed Limit 45 PART IL• ACCIDFNT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 4 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.26 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 3.30 PART III- 14Ir14WAV. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, at -grade driveways along west side, intersections spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart, two lanes, painted median, +/- 32 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Some pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, ommercla in ustna . etc.), other conditions I PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cGenticianta 1 / 200011ejno9795.xts SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROUTE 126 (SAN FERNANDO ROAD): 16TH STREET TO 13TH STREET DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE .............. 4/21/1995 TIME...............10:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED...........4d} 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ......... ......: ...... 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 20. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 5? VEHICLES OBSERVED ................. ...11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................41. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 11 ----+----+----+ ****100 *** n * 901 * 80 * 0 60 * 50 40� 30 200 10u 0 30 40 50 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----------- 10 20 30 I 15j 10�-f u 5-----------------0 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT -PCT <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 1 0.9 0.9 33 0 0.0 0.9 34 3 2.6 3.4 35 9 7.8 11.2 36 3 2.6 13.8 37 1 0.9 14.7 38 5 4.3 19.0 39 12 10.3 29.3 40 7 6.0 35.3 41 15 12.9 48.3 42 10 8.6 56.9 43 13 11.2 68.1 44 13 11.2 79.3 45 5 4.3 83.6 46 1 0.9 84.5 47 2 1.7 86.2 48 7 6.0 92.2 49 2 1.7 94.0 50 4 3.4 97.4 51 0 0.0 97.4 52 1 0.9 98.3 53 2 1.7 .100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED...........4d} 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ......... ......: ...... 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 20. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 5? VEHICLES OBSERVED ................. ...11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................41. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 11 ----+----+----+ ****100 *** n * 901 * 80 * 0 60 * 50 40� 30 200 10u 0 30 40 50 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----------- 10 20 30 I 15j 10�-f u 5-----------------0 40 50 iii ■s■ mi■■■■..����------- - CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: From: I (Ott J To: Observer: �zJ 'v Location:U Q? Date: 4) L(0 l5 dent%darrta 1120001 Vejno0195-)ds . E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 0 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical O N 6 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions U (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 0 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics A h G � G at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the pe_ a esi-c ions s;.C� Roadway without�% j \I r j y� b 0*- d i�1C_+x o 11 , r, n a� P 4 Stn 1 Sidewalks es or no W 1 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, CQ W�yvx . C6 MOO office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �" } lf! O O) ri0 600 P\ -a offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, i satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic TT Irt (heavy, moderate, lighq 1 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 10 t� J M �-r 1 p) v 1 �M or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - �3 2) �j) {_ , 1 , �3 Z 15tr, straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 7 15. Uniformity with the O . ll N'0 U h r Si regi �nrk� Community (yes or no) N o n- 16. Heavy On -Street Parking N �p 1 Turnover es or no dent%darrta 1120001 Vejno0195-)ds . ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (San Fernando Road) between 13th Street and Lyons Avenue Year of Survey 1995 MAOI 1. DO Cl/e11 1�I!_ AOFFn MFACI IRFMFNT Location of Survey At 12th Street Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 1,72 38 41 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 34-43 (91.3%) Posted Speed Limit 30 mph nAOT 11. APf11nChIT OC!`n RnC Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 8 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 1,72 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 3.30 oenT ub 14le t4WAY TRnFFIr. Amn RnAnslnF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, at -grade driveways, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, two lanes southbound, two lanes merge into one lane northbound, painted double - yellow stripe, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. ROADSIDE:an uses not apparent (Fark, school, Railroad, commercial. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph c4'en(%dadta 11200011ejno9695.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS I ROUTE 126 (SAN FERNANDO ROAD): 13TH STREET TO LYONS AVENUE LLL111 DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE............ 3/29/1995 TIME .............. 3:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.30 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3E� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 91.? PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5.;, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.5 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................33 to 46 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................111 AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l� 100 ******100 90 * 90 a 80 80 70 * 70� 60 60d * 50 50 40 40� 30 30 20 * 20J 10 * 10 p**************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 L 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+ 10 20 CUM MPH NO. PCT < 5 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 4 3.5 3.5 34 9 7.8 11.3 35 15 13.0 24.3 36 12 10.4 34.8 37 12 10.4 45.2 38 14 12.2 57.4 39 12 10.4 67.8 40 8 7.0 74.8 41 12 10.4 85.2 42 4 3.5 88.7 43 7 6.1 94.8 44 1 0.9 95.7 45 4 3.5 99.1 46 1 0.9 100.0 47 0 0.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3E� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 91.? PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5.;, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.5 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................33 to 46 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................111 AVERAGE SPEED.......................38. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l� 100 ******100 90 * 90 a 80 80 70 * 70� 60 60d * 50 50 40 40� 30 30 20 * 20J 10 * 10 p**************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 L 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+ 10 20 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Fc �lU�5�c�1p �04d- Location: U From: l 3�: S -- To: 1-)l'UY s Ave, Date:H112 &[1 Observer: cffenndanfa11200011e%n00195AS E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) ^ , 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 0 4. Shoulder Conditions V U (paved or unpaved) 5, Profile Conditions Q (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics Allam at rade, dustpan, etc. 7.. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without A 11A`�1 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, CO Ca office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - _ A 0 �1 Z 2_(:1 ±)-31:0 offsets es or no)/ 1 10. Pavement Condition (good, l `J O satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11, Truck Traffic light) (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, C) or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 54� St( 50) straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 hQ a V y U e- J t? (heavy, moderate, light) I rj 15. Uniformity with the , o ,A `` Iv O S/13, Y11mA r`OY Stio�l elm Community (yes or no) N 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover -or no) (yes cffenndanfa11200011e%n00195AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (San Fernando Road) between Lvons Avenue and Newhall Avenue Year of Survey 1995 PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey South of 8th Street Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.14 32 36 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 29-38 (75.9%) Posted Speed Limit 30 mph PART 11• ACCIr1FNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.14 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 4.80 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways on east side, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, four lanes, painted double -yellow striping, +/- 52 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, heavy on -street parking turnover, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa ; sc oo , Commercial (fronting street). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on heavy on -street parking turnover, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph cfienrdanta11200011ejn09995.)ds SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROUTE 126 (SAN FERNANDO ROAD): LYONS AVENUE TO'NEWHALL AVENUE DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE...............3/29/1995 TIME ............... 4:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.30 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 75.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.�- PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1011 AVERAGE SPEED .......................31.i CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *********10 90 9 80 80 * IL 70 60 * 6n 50 * 50 40 4 30 * 30 20 ** 10 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. 0 --- 0 ---- 0.0 --- 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 1 0.9 0.9 21 0 0.0 0.9 22 2 1.9 2.8 23 0 0.0 2.8 24 1 0.9 3.7 25 8 7.4 11.1 26 8 7.4 18.5 27 1 0.9 19.4 28 4 3.7 23.1 29 10 9.3 32.4 30 11 10.2 42.6 31 8 7.4 50.0 32 10 9.3 59.3 33 6 5.6 64.8 34 10 9.3 74.1 35 10 9.3 83.3 36 11 10.2 93.5 37 1 0.9 94.4 38 5 4.6 99.1 39 0 0.0 99.1 40 1 0.9 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 75.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.�- PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1011 AVERAGE SPEED .......................31.i CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *********10 90 9 80 80 * IL 70 60 * 6n 50 * 50 40 4 30 * 30 20 ** 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Sart FQ-rYld N do t foa-C Location:, / 4 1 p From: L ��O t�S r ppilo: � V e— ka1 1' "'71 Date: �J9S Observer. CJ_'v cienedarira112000110000195.Jds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal l N 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (^/o) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 1 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics N DIS at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without N o ! V O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Co yyn,.,,VN GQ VA Vvk, office, etc. g. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, r� ] S- cC cto r satisfactory, poor, etc.) 50'+ 11. Truck Traffic 1 Ilk I (heavy, moderate, light) 1 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, I U P DY `' r� 21)') P p\f or raised median J 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- - `6j E) s straight or curved)J 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics kcri 1 _ 0\1 (heavy, moderate, light) Vte 15. Uniformity with the v�S T es Community, (yes or no) l 16. - Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover or no) �5 L 7 (yes cienedarira112000110000195.Jds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Route 126 (San Fernando Road) between Newhall Avenue and South City Limit Year of Survey 1995 DART I• DDFVAII IN(_ ADFFn MFABIIRFMFNT Location of Survey South of railroad tracks Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.23 43 47 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (87.9%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II• ArrinFNT RFrnRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 8 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.23 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.90 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulder along north side, one-half of shoulder unpaved on south side between Newhall and Valle Del Oro, dust- pan driveways, four lanes, painted two-way left -tum lane, +/- 72 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted in some areas, light on -street parking turnover in other areas, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school. Commercial, residential set- ac , church. etc.), other conditions PART IV! ADDITIONAL REMARKS not readily apparent. 45 mph client%danta U200011 ejn 10095.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS ROUTE 126 (SAN FERNANDO ROAD): NEWHALL AVENUE TO VALLE DEL ORO DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 4:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 87.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 5S VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................101 AVERAGE SPEED.......................43. JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ t 100 **100 90 * 90� 80 80 70 ** 70L 60 60n * L� 50 * 50 40 40J 30 * 30 20 * 20U 10 * 10r **** ILJI p************************* 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l 10 20 30 40 50 I�fl PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 1 10 14J 5 5 ---------------------------------------------- 1 l 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 4 3.7 3.7 36 0 0.0 3.7 37 1 0.9 4.7 38 1 0.9 5.6 39 3 2.8 8.4 40 10 9.3 17.8 41 12 11.2 29.0 42 20 18.7 47.7 43 10 9.3 57.0 44 1211.2 68.2 45 7 6.5 74.8 46 10 9.3 84.1 47 2 1.9 86.0 48 5 4.7 90.7 49 6 5.6 96.3 50 0 0.0 96.3 51 1 0.9 97.2 52 0 0.0 97.2 53 0 0.0 97.2 54 1 0.9 98.1 55 2 1.9 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 87.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 3. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 5S VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................101 AVERAGE SPEED.......................43. JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ t 100 **100 90 * 90� 80 80 70 ** 70L 60 60n * L� 50 * 50 40 40J 30 * 30 20 * 20U 10 * 10r **** ILJI p************************* 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ l 10 20 30 40 50 I�fl PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 1 10 14J 5 5 ---------------------------------------------- 1 l 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Location: -� -11 Date: 14 1A c*enrlclafda%120001WJn00195Jds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical O f V 3. Superelevation (ek) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) P V IrZ P 0 J ) Vz' C d E f 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics D �/ at rade, dustpan, etc. 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, C<5 rv,\ VV l -A Wl_ office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - (��Q no �� Q r'.0 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, OO d Oq satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic 1 t 1 t (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 2-) , JMY, t772-) S strai ht or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the. - Community." orno) Q,�j �5 16. Heavy On -Street Parking r c N Q Turnover (yes or no) 'v Q c*enrlclafda%120001WJn00195Jds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Rye Canyon Road between West City Limit and Northeast City Limit Year of Survey 1995 oADT 1• oomimi ING QDGFn MPASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.15 44 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 39-48 (89.8%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph DART u. Art IMMK1T DCrn DnQ Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.15 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DADT M ul!_uwAV TRAFFIC Amn RnanclnF r.NARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced approximately 1,320 feet apart, four lanes, raised median with openings, +/- 80 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking turnover, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Office park. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics no readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cfienWaritA1200011ejn 10295.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS J RYE CANYON ROAD: WEST CITY LIMIT TO NORTHEAST CITY LIMIT DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 2:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 10 15 10 5 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................48 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 8N i PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.. .39 to5 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................9 1 AVERAGE SPEED ...................... J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) -----+----+----+ *****100 ** 90 L ** _ Ll 80 * 70 60� 50 * 4011 30 J * 20� ,t - 10 0 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----------- 10 20 -+----+----+----+----+----+ 30 40 50 [l I CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 2 2.0 2.0 40 11 11.2 13.3 41 8 8.2 21.4 42 14 14.3 35.7 43 1010.2 45.9 44 17 17.3 63.3 45 11 11.2 74.5 46 8 8.2 82.7 47 2 2.0 84.7 48 5 5.1 89.8 49 2 2.0 91.8 50 5 5.1 96.9 51 1 1.0 98.0 52 2 2.0 100.0 53 0 0.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 10 15 10 5 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................48 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 8N i PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.. .39 to5 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................9 1 AVERAGE SPEED ...................... J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) -----+----+----+ *****100 ** 90 L ** _ Ll 80 * 70 60� 50 * 4011 30 J * 20� ,t - 10 0 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----------- 10 20 -+----+----+----+----+----+ 30 40 50 [l I Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: f 3 Date: cienndanfatr20001Wn00195.ids EJB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) L Horizontal �Q 2. Vertical / V 3. Superelevation (%) -- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) e 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 rla 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics %� 1 at rade, dustpan, etc. Lis 1 A 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without / Sidewalks es or no /V - 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / offsets yes or no)3�O 10. Pavement Condition (good, 1 r Satis", satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) I �t 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Mee k""J divided, undivided, painted, 2 or raised median 13. Street Width and r Alignment (width, feet - n straight or curve U 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics II (heavy, moderate, light) /�%pCerakt 15. Uniformity with the t/ Community (yes or no) G s 16. Heavy On -Street Parking n Turnover (yes or no) f V p cienndanfatr20001Wn00195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sand Canyon Road between Placerita Canyon Road and Live Oaks Springs Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 DART I• PRFVAII INr; SPFFn MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.41 45 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (89.4%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph DART 11• ArrInFNT RFrnRnC Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.41 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III' HlruwAV TRAFFIC- AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Horizontal sight distance restrictions, unpaved shoulders, intersections, other) at -grade driveways, frequent intersection spacing, two lanes, painted double- and broken -yellow striping, left - tum pockets at intersections, curved alignment, +/- 25 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking, school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent par , sc oo , Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions VNAL KtMAKll5 not readily apparent. 45 mph cNen&1arita11200011e%n 10395.zk SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS C] SAND CANYON ROAD: PLACERITA CYN RD TO LIVE OAKS SPRINGS DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.'J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.3 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................37 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................124 AVERAGE SPEED .......................44.6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100 90 * 900 80 * 8011(�ll * 70 60 * 60� 50 * 50 40 * 40E 30 * 30 20 20H 10 * lOn * ` J1 p***************************** 0 n ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L� 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) LJ' ---------------------------------------------- 1� -+----+----+----+----+----+ •-- 30 40 50 ni CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 2 1.6 1.6 38 1 0.8 2.4 39 1 0.8 3.3 40 10 8.1 11.4 41 6 4.9 16.3 42 17 13.8 30.1 43 14 11.4 41.5 44 9 7.3 48.8 45 16 13.0 61.8 46 12 9.8 71.5 47 6 4.9 76.4 48 16 13.0 89.4 49 4 3.3 92.7 50 7 5.7 98.4 51 0 0.0 98.4 52 1 0.8 99.2 53 1 0.8 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.'J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.3 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................37 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................124 AVERAGE SPEED .......................44.6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ******100 90 * 900 80 * 8011(�ll * 70 60 * 60� 50 * 50 40 * 40E 30 * 30 20 20H 10 * lOn * ` J1 p***************************** 0 n ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L� 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) LJ' ---------------------------------------------- 1� -+----+----+----+----+----+ •-- 30 40 50 ni CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: � aAA 0 Location: ly From:P-locpfl+a Canyon- To: Live. 6nkS Sprm5S Coen -Pt- Date: 4,19 5 Observer: GJ 'N cion nclanfa1120001 WW0195.-d. E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? -rme's q r\ d 0}-i1N (yes or no) p bS ee't-s a h qjtt� t1 1. Horizontal y41? S 1 eS 'Pa ' f_y^ b bOOG 2. Vertical O Y\C) 3. Superelevation (%) -- 4. Shoulder Conditions U 1 `` V (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. res. D /0-1 rP 5 • �� (� S 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without N p %i o Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, OAU 0 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 1 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) Y\o we- 12. Channelization # of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median T pay h e Y15 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - oZ�r LVP �^ l 0�5 1 ti straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics l 1 (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On=Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) VVD fit% I cion nclanfa1120001 WW0195.-d. ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sand Canyon Road between Live Oaks Springs Canyon Road and Lost Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 DART 1• DRFVAII IMM ADFFn M1=Ag1IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.94 46 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 42-51 (92.4°/x) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART IL• ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.94 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DART III- WrHWAV TRAFFIC ANn ROAnSInF rHARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, Horizontal sight distance restrictions, unpaved shoulders, intersections, other) at -grade driveways, few intersections, two lanes, painted broken -yellow striping with left -tum pockets, curved alignment, +/- 25 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians observed in roadway, light on -street parking turnover, school zings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on sight distance restrictions, pedestrians, adjacent land use, 10 -mph pace, and consistency, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cfien6dan1a11200011efn 10495.z1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SAND CANYON ROAD: LIVE OAKS SPRINGS TO LOST CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME...............10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4'1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 ff 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 42 through 51 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 92.,r - PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.�j PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED ............... .....11l AVERAGE SPEED.......................46. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- u 100 ****100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 90H * 80 * 70 ** 60J 50 40Uf 1 * 30 * 20U ,t * - - lOr l * * ILJI 0****************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 2 1.7 1.7 40 1 0.8 2.5 41 3 2.5 5.1 42 11 9.3 14.4 43 3 2.5 16.9 44 10 8.5 25.4 45 13 11.0 36.4 46 19 16.1 52.5 47 11 9.3 61.9 48 16 13.6 75.4 49 8 6.8 82.2 50 11 9.3 91.5 51 7 5.9 97.5 52 2 1.7 99.2 53 0 0.0 99.2 54 0 0.0 .99.2 55 1 0.8 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4'1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 ff 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 42 through 51 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 92.,r - PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.�j PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED ............... .....11l AVERAGE SPEED.......................46. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- u 100 ****100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 90H * 80 * 70 ** 60J 50 40Uf 1 * 30 * 20U ,t * - - lOr l * * ILJI 0****************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Location: 4 IS Date: a Zo dientldadta112000f lejno0195ads EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? -t" re.r_g (tvt d 10 -ke- (yes or no) 01"Jjjf-c i -'S a6\j 1. Horizontal v l � ��✓ ,1 v extn?1L tb of— vo j sitoi Ji 2. Vertical �O �0 3. Superelevation�-- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) j 5. Profile Conditions °%) + _ 1 l (grade, 6. Commercial Driveway fA+_ q {.4 a� J p Characteristics C -es' vlws )r25. D/VJ S at rade, dustpan. eta 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Q `' y e5 r -e. J erlestricins c�y� f{ I ri S7 r eiai- t Sidewalks es or no a. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, rQS office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 0Oct 4j 00 C\r satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic p, (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, , V r P BY of Fey or raised median) W1 LT fUtW'501 LT cke15 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- ` straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community. (yes or no) 16. Heavy On=Street Parking �t3 Turnover (yes or no) dientldadta112000f lejno0195ads ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sand Canyon Road between Lost Canyon Road and Soledad Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAII Mr SPFFn MFASIIRFMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.32 41 45 10 mph pace (0/, of Veh.) 37-46 (85.7%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph DART II• &"_i DFNT RFrnPnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.32 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART In- HICNWAY- TRAFFIC- ANn ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontallvertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, two lanes, painted double -yellow striping, painted two-way left -tum lane extending from Soledad Canyon 300 feet south, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking observed, school zing, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school. Commercial, vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph denndantai120001Wjn 10595.xfs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SAND CANYON ROAD: LOST CANYON RD. TO SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE.. 3/29/1995 TIME...............11:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.7,1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13 AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u *****100 100 _ * 90 90 �] 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * 80 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 12 9.0 9.0 36 7 5.3 14.3 37 9 6.8 21.1 38 12 9.0 30.1 39 15 11.3 41.4 40 10 7.5 48.9 41 14 10.5 59.4 42 11 8.3 67.7 43 14 10.5 78.2 44 6 4.5 82.7 45 14 10.5 93.2 46 9 6.8 100.0 47 0 0.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.7,1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 14. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13 AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u *****100 100 _ * 90 90 �] 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * l 10 p****************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- is 10 5 +----+----+--- 10 20 15� 30 40 * 80 * 70 L1 (l * 6011 * 50 l * 401J * 301nJ * 20( * l 10 p****************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- is 10 5 +----+----+--- 10 20 15� 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: S O..n r C f ,t vnn R 0 0A Location: *- 9b From: LOST" Cwt^kVC To: Oi rL Date: q ?O rte_ Observer: clenAdarka112000110000196.x1s EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal Q {� S 1 V D 2. Vertical N O 3. Superelevation (%) -- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions ✓ I I (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics a J St u c YP a416 X300 r 5/0 Sc l e d a d C yrs at rade, dust an, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Dy' f aES -r r 1 Oki Roadway without ,p bye yid Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, (10VAMI VOL VOC/ COMWL i r 1 office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- 1 210 1 YtO 13 20, ►ti D offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 9 0 0 I 1 Cl d satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) v 12. Channelization (# of lanes,v divided, undivided, painted, ()1 �� 1 U 1 Q DY T wLT 1"e -t3Oo iqo 601"4d CYN or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- i40 S *Y-. O 1 StC straight or curved) l 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics V1/�a a, vv\Oct (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformfty with the I Community (yes or no) y 16. Heavy On -Street Parking n Q Q Turnover (yes or no) clenAdarka112000110000196.x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sand Canyon Road between Soledad Canyon Road and North City Limit Year of Survey PART 1- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 45 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (88.6%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11- ACCIDFNT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DART III- NIrNWAV TRAPPir ANn RnAnRMF rHARArTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on east side, +/- 2% grade, few driveways, intersections spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart, four lanes, painted two-way left -turn lane, +/- 45 feet wide, one horizontal curve, TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking, no school xings,, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back), vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cdenhda&a11200011ejn 10695.x75 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS C, SAND CANYON ROAD: SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO NORTH CITY LIMITS DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE......... ... 3/29/1995 TIME...............11:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED..4fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .......... ........ 88.Q� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED........ 7. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.8 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................37 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10 AVERAGE SPEED.......................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** CUM MPH NO. PCT <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 2 1.9 1.9 38 1 1.0 2.9 39 1 1.0 3.8 40 7 6.7 10.5 41 5 4.8 15.2 42 2 1.9 17.1 43 16 15.2 32.4 44 13 12.4 44.8 45 17 16.2 61.0 46 14 13.3 74.3 47 10 9.5 83.8 48 7 6.7 90.5 49 2 1.9 92.4 50 5 4.8 97.1 51 0 0.0 97.1 52 1 1.0 98.1 53 2 1.9 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED..4fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .......... ........ 88.Q� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED........ 7. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.8 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................37 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10 AVERAGE SPEED.......................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---+ Ll ****100 90 80 7011 5[] 0 40� 30 20H 10n 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 ** * * * * ** * ** ---+ Ll ****100 90 80 7011 5[] 0 40� 30 20H 10n 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: -+ k -A" i v v LA W From: SoiaKyo► - To: No r*LuaJl iw,11' Observer:. Location: #_ 9 7 Date: 4 20 95 den°Ganta112000flejn00195.'ds E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal a'�J p rwCG 2. Vertical p t v p 3. Superelevation (eh) 4. Shoulder Conditions U (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions _2 _ 1-2- { - _ (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics YlO �It� d V S'i pa clr vee c+y at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the 0 n, Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, R 5 Rf 51 \J L office, etc. 9, Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ��� 000i r\0 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 9000 c( q-00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic i i 0 r1 No ✓`(2- (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 0J r'0 ri CJ ;LD,0 i vl divided, undivided, painted, or raised median) OL 2\N vT g VJ LT tae - 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - =4 Lk5 151 tai S-1' N straight or curved l c r V a- 0 5 .G u t v 5•� 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the yam` s 1er Community (yes or no) -PQ�1C 16. Heavy On -Street Parking O Turnover (yes or no) den°Ganta112000flejn00195.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Seco Canyon Road between Bouquet Canyon Road and Decoro Drive Year of Survey 1995 PART P PRFVAII ING SPFFn MFAStIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 43 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 39-48 (69.2%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II* ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 03/29/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, no driveways on west side, four lanes, double -yellow striping, +/- 60 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, parking on east side, school zing at Decoro, heavy vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, scoo , Set -back residential east side), set -back commercial etc.), other conditions (west side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c&enrda dta 11200011ejn f 0795.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SECO CANYON ROAD: BOUQUET CANYON ROAD TO DECORO DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME .. ............12:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4U 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69." PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.1 1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 53_ VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10 1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.1,11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) it +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ tJ 100 ***100 90 ** 901 80 * 80 70 * 7Oi_1 60 60;' 1 50 * 50 40 40J 30 * 30 20 ** 201 10 p***************t****** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 n L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 15� 10 20 30 40 50 j 5 CUM MPH NO. PCT <10 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 3 2.9 2.9 33 2 1.9 4.8 34 2 1.9 6.7 35 1 1.0 7.7 36 7 6.7 14.4 37 3 2.9 17.3 38 2 1.9 19.2 39 2 1.9 21.2 40 10 9.6 30.8 41 2 1.9 32.7 42 13 12.5 45.2 43 7 6.7 51.9 44 13 12.5 64.4 45 6 5.8 70.2 46 10 9.6 79.8 47 5 4.8 84.6 48 4 3.8 88.5 49 2 1.9 90.4 50 4 3.8 94.2 51 1 1.0 95.2 52 2 1.9 97.1 53 3 2.9 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4U 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69." PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.1 1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 53_ VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10 1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.1,11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) it +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ tJ 100 ***100 90 ** 901 80 * 80 70 * 7Oi_1 60 60;' 1 50 * 50 40 40J 30 * 30 20 ** 201 10 p***************t****** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 n L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 15� 10 20 30 40 50 j 5 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: dent dadfa1120001Wn00195.rds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal �/v 2. Vertical O 3. Superelevation (%) ^/0n Q 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Pew,* 5. Profile Conditions 3 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics /O at rade, dust 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no /L/� 6. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, IAC office, etc.)l r a 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - '%� d� offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, Goo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic VOL,(heavy, moderate, light) Oe 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, rY v rp IlO`" or raised median)�0v� 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - / straight or curved)i9 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Y P 5 Community (yes or no) 16.. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) /liq dent dadfa1120001Wn00195.rds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Seco Canyon Road between Decoro Drive and Pamplico Drive Year of Survey 1995 PART F PRFVAII ING SPFFD MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.17 45 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (72.5°/x) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.17 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, few driveways, four lanes with two-way left -tum lane, +/- 70 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, school xings at Decoro and Guadalamar, moderate vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential east side), school, pa west side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on partially constructed sidewalk, school, school xings, and 10 -mph pace, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cfienAdarka 1120001 Wjn 10895. x15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SECO CANYON ROAD: DECORO DRIVE TO PAMPLICO DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE .............. 3/29/1995 TIME... ..... ....12:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 C 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 72. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............36 to 5@ VEHICLES OBSERVED ............. •••'.:410d1� AVERAGE SPEED ...................... 11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ *100 **** * 90� 80 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 1 0.9 0.9 37 1 0.9 1.8 38 1 0.9 2.8 39 6 5.5 8.3 40 10 9.2 17.4 41 12 11.0 28.4 42 7 6.4 34.9 43 11 10.1 45.0 44 2 1.8 46.8 45 7 6.4 53.2 46 13 11.9 65.1 47 5 4.6 69.7 48 4 3.7 73.4 49 7 6.4 79.8 50 11 10.1 89.9 51 3 2.8 92.7 52 5 4.6 97.2 53 0 0.0 97.2 54 0 0.0 97.2 55 3 2.8 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 100 C 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 72. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............36 to 5@ VEHICLES OBSERVED ............. •••'.:410d1� AVERAGE SPEED ...................... 11 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ *100 **** * 90� 80 70 60 50 ** 40 30 20 10 * 80 70n 60� 50 40� 30n 2001 _ 10 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARiTA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM 1110, Location: q �/ Date: Qq5 cfienndada V 20M I W000195.'ds EIB or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /L/O 2. Vertical A/0 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) (GI 5. Profile Conditions 3 (grade, %) (� 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 00, ran at rade, dust an, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without / 11/19 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, D kc t1P office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 1 satisfactory, poor, etc.) DOG 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 2 2 �oF� T� �r or raised median lJa 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 1771, 15. Uniformity with the \1f Community (yes or no) 75 16. Heavy On=Street Parking Tumover-(yes or no) -r /V cfienndada V 20M I W000195.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Seco Canyon Road between Pamplico Drive and Copper Hill Drive Year of Survey PART P PRFVAII INr SPFFn MFASLIRFMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.16 45 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (84.6°/x) Posted Speed Limit 45 PART It- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.16 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART w- ulrNWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal/sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, few driveways, four lanes, painted two-way left -turn lane, +/- 70 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, no on -street parking, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent park, school, Residential set- ac , etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on horizontal sight distance limitations, partially unconstructed sidewalk, and 10 -mph pace, reduce 85th percentile by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c6enncladta112000flejn r0995.x1s. SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SECO CANYON ROAD: PAMPLICO DRIVE TO COPPER HILL DRIVE DIRECTION(S)....... DATE ............... TIME ............... POSTED SPEED 'LIMIT. CUM MPH NO. PCT _PCT_ <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 1 1.0 1.0 35 0 0.0 1.0 36 0 0.0 1.0 37 0 0.0 1.0 38 2 1.9 2.9 39 0 0.0 2.9 40 3 2.9 5.8 41 4 3.8 9.6 42 16 15.4 25.0 43 9 8.7 33.7 44 6 5.8 39.4 45 15 14.4 53.8 46 6 5.8 59.6 47 5 4.8 64.4 48 10 9.6 74.0 49 9 8.7 82.7 50 8 7.7 90.4 51 3 2.9 93.3 52 5 4.8 98.1 53 0 0.0 98.1 54 2 1.9 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 OUTHBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......4ff 3/29/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5"( 1:00 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9. , PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................10fl AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ****10 90 * 901 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 80 70L 60 50 40i 30 20J 10 * 10� *** ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: /L/vy From: To: Date: Observer. c1enrldarifa1120001Wno0195.ids E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 4 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 7 �b (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /O Sidewalks es or no !V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ' offsets yes or no) loofa 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) G 00 1 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) )t/oh� 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 2 1 Z wad �e�� Tv,4 or raised median)1 13, Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - Tv straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light)10,9411114r 15. Uniformity with the Y� 5 Community (yes or no) 16. ° Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover no) (yes or c1enrldarifa1120001Wno0195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Shadow Pines between Soledad Canyon Road and North City Limit Year of Survey 1995 PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/29/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.22 39 42 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 35-44 (93.8%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II- ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.22 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight dist. restrictions, +/- 1% grade, intersections, other) paved shoulders, four lanes with raised median south of Begonias Lane, +/- 62 feet wide, unpaved shoulders, two lanes with painted broken -yellow striping and curved alignment north of Begonias Lane, +/- 25 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, no on -street parking, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. an uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential east side). flood control channel, etc.), other conditions set -back residential (west side). rAKI IV. AQUI I IVIVAL KrMARINA No characteristics not readily apparent. 40 mph c6enAdanta11200011ejn 11095.x1S SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SHADOW PINES: SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO NORTH CITY LIMITS DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/29/1995 TIME ............... 1:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3$1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 93.�] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... I. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 t3991J VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. AVERAGE SPEED ...................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) L� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L 100 **10 90 ** 9u 80 * 80 70 * -7 60 * T50 * 40 4(j 30 30 20 2 10 * 1 p*********************************** 0`-' ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 nn ij PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 15 10 20 30 40 11 5 fl CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 10.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 1 1.0 1.0 35 7 7.3 8.3 36 14 14.6 22.9 37 10 10.4 33.3 38 15 15.6 49.0 39 10 10.4 59.4 40 15 15.6 75.0 41 4 4.2 79.2 42 10 10.4 89.6 43 2 2.1 91.7 44 3 3.1 94.8 45 5 5.2 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3$1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 35 through 44 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 93.�] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... I. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 t3991J VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. AVERAGE SPEED ...................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) L� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L 100 **10 90 ** 9u 80 * 80 70 * -7 60 * T50 * 40 4(j 30 30 20 2 10 * 1 p*********************************** 0`-' ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 nn ij PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 15 10 20 30 40 11 5 fl mo an CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: *— (o I From: SO teal ctA C1To: [ To: N oriL G FY 1-I rn 1 { Date: y /2-0/cmObserver. F—J r`r cfenAdanTa 112000 f %ejno0195.x 5 EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) Y v p 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical p n, r` 1 y p 3. Superelevation (%) 4 4. Shoulder Conditions 'Fc4e-A St Q A `'�• (paved or unpaved) (cif, oto r o5 Ln. 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) - 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics RO at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway Iv without N O O Sidewalks es or no 6. Adjacent Land Usee 5 ide►�+� M (residential, commercial, V ac. Res Gife S10$f�ortia5 office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - } 1000 1 No t t O 101 / Y�-o offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, d satisfactory, poor, etc.) O O g c o 11. Truck Traffic `t 9 k� t 1 q kt (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, V, ?%Y � q 1 Vj �� iL]y [�� raiscb t,.�e.b is � :,:1. S�� PjeOJo n kxs �-(x - or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- 3�tCVr'Jed + ±al;,C-Orwrl- r straight or curved)p 5/m t3 n 5 L n. 14. Traffic .tom oderate,lilight) ght) 15. Uniformity with the v e5 \' 7 Community (yes or no) 1 16. Heavy On -Street Parking r to Turnover (yes or no) cfenAdanTa 112000 f %ejno0195.x 5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sierra Highway between South City Limit and San Fernando Road Year of Survey 1995 PART L PREVAILING SPEED MEASLIREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.11 46 51 10 mph pace (°% of Veh.) 41-50 (75.1%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART IL ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.11 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PAPT III- NIrHWAY TRAFFIC amn RnanslnF CIaARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT - Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, +/- 3%grade, paved shoulders, few driveways, four lanes, raised and reflectorized double - double -yellow median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, few on -street parked vehicles, no school xings, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant, commercial east side), cemetery, vacant west etc.), other conditions side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cienndanta 11200011eJn i 1195.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SIERRA HIGHWAY: SOUTH CITY LIMIT TO SAN FERNANDO ROAD DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME ............... 3:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 D 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 2 0.9 0.9 36 0 0.0 0.9 37 2 0.9 1.8 38 2 0.9 2.7 39 7 3.2 5.9 40 7 3.2 9.0 41 15 6.8 15.8 42 15 6.8 22.6' 43 14 6.3 29.0 44 17 7.7 36.7 45 17 7.7 44.3 46 18 8.1 52.5 47 18 8.1 60.6 48 18 8.1 68.8 49 17 7.7 76.5 50 17 7.7 84.2 51 12 5.4 89.6 52 7 3.2 92.8 53 5 2.3 95.0 54 5 2.3 97.3 55 3 1.4 98.6 56 2 0.9 99.5 57 0 0.0 99.5 58 1 0.5 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 u 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75.' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 15.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 5F:_ VEHICLES OBSERVED....................22� AVERAGE SPEED.......................46. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� ---------------------------------------------- 100 ----+----+--- +----+----+----+----+----+----+100 ******100 90 * 90[] 80 80 70 ** 70 60 * 60 L(1 50 * 50 40 40 Li _ * 30 * 30 20 2Q 10 * 10 a 0*********************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 15t 10 5 ---------------- 20 30 I 40 50 60 ll ��/�n���r���� �������r����� ���������t���rvvwvv�ooi CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: C 1 From: SO 04. �.�� LiTwttt.nTo: Sn.2XYltlA A6 ki Observer. e3_0 0 Location: -#-noZ U Date: u 'Agl.1 c6eniWarNa%120001%ejn00195x1s EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal ( ► V O p 1��\ O 2. Vertical Q r �.1 o 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions A. r (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without o ^ r Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use commercial,t1LlCo M (residential, office, etc.) V d C� 9. intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 13 20, l!�O 320 r� o offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, o, o o ootid satisfactory, poor, etc.) J 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channeliization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, ] Y 01SP t 2D, t'o �s�d I�2 rd Ib2d� llZ m4 WcC r %Ze-�( or raised median RD�Y RDQY do�l�le,-tlo 1B 4ti�/ 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 7�, t;u Wa C�J r �eci straight or curved I& Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) �5 V 1 16, Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) c6eniWarNa%120001%ejn00195x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sierra Highway between San Fernando Road and Placerita Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 DADT I• DDPVAII IN!_ CDPPn MPACIIRPMPNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.17 47 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 43-52 (78.8%) Posted Speed Limit 55 mph PART Ile ACCInFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.17 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DADT ul• ulcuweY TRAPPIr amn RnAnSInF CFIARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 2% changing grade, few driveways, four lanes, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, few parked vehicles north of San Fernando Road, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. an uses not apparent (park, sc oo , ommercla vacant east side), vacant west side). etc.), other conditions FAKI IV: AUUI I IUNAL KCMAKKA No characteristics not readily apparent.. 50 mph cGenticladta V 200011e%n 11295.zls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SIERRA HIGHWAY: SAN FERNANDO ROAD TO PLACERITA CANYON RD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME ............... 2:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................47 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.1] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 34_ AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 47. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *******100 90 * 90 80 80 70 ** 70 a 60 * 60 rl 50 * 50 4040 * _ u 30 30 20 * 20H 10 * 10E ** p************************ 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 ----+----+----+----t----+- t----+----+----+20 30 40 50 60 J PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) t_J +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 15a 40 50 5 a 60 ll CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 1 0.3 0_3 37 3 0.9 1.2 38 2 0.6 1.7 39 4 1.2 2.9 40 11 3.2 6.1 41 12 3.5 9.6 42 12 3.5 13.0 43 12 3.5 16.5 44 28 8.1 24.6 45 28 8.1 32.8 46 30 8.7 41.4 47 30 8.7 50.1 48 30 8.7 58.8 49 30 8.7 67.5 50 30 8.7 76.2 51 27 7.8 84.1 52 27 7.8 91.9 53 9 2.6 94.5 54 11 3.2 97.7 55 4 1.2 98.8 56 3 0.9 99.7 57 0 0.0 99.7 58 0 0.0 99.7 59 1 0.3 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................47 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.1] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 34_ AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 47. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *******100 90 * 90 80 80 70 ** 70 a 60 * 60 rl 50 * 50 4040 * _ u 30 30 20 * 20H 10 * 10E ** p************************ 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 ----+----+----+----t----+- t----+----+----+20 30 40 50 60 J PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) t_J +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 15a 40 50 5 a 60 ll uu�a���■����s�� CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: V t From: Sa.rL Fernay\_6 To: P1aCAX +a C AIDA- Observer Location: *_ (0.3> Date:. c6enWada11200011ejn00195.;d5 EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical N O IV 3. Superelevation (%) d Q 4, Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions ?I (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway 6. Characteristics j�p o1w N O at rade, dust an, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Q 0 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �r VOL �aG office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ,1z7 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 9 O O 9 00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic ` (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (ff of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 1 �0J V, CA i Se p r n 1ST "LO) or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- 7 to cu r Vtd- -7-76 C V r t� straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics` M O A O (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the J Community (yes „or, 9) C 16. Heavy On -Street Parking O " 1 1 V b Turnover (yes or no c6enWada11200011ejn00195.;d5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sierra Highway between Placerita Canyon Road and Friendly Valley Parkway Year of Survey PART I- PRFVAn ING SPFFD MFASItRFMENT 1995 Location of Survey South of Rainbow Glen Drive Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.36 47 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 43-52 (78.2%) Posted Speed Limit 55 mph PART IL ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Numberof Accidents Intersection 0 11 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.36 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 3% changing grade, few driveways, four lanes, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. : Lana uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant.. etc.), other conditions AUUI I IVNAL KtNIAKKS 50 mph cffentkdanfa 11200011ejn 11395.xrs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SIERRA HIGHWAY: PLACERITA CANYON ROAD TO FRIENDLY VALLEY IIIJJJ DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME ............... 2:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4g1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5' 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11.4" RANGE OF SPEEDS... ............34 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................36j� AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 47 � CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *****10 90 ** 90 80 80 70 ** 70� 60 * 60 n 50 * 50 L11 40 40rji 30 30 20 ** 20-1 10 *** 10� **** p********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 (� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 -+----+----+- 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 2 0.5 0.5 35 4 1.1 1.6 36 4 1.1 2.7 37 5 1.4 4.1 38 5 1.4 5.4 39 5 1.4 6.8 40 5 1.4 8.2 41 5 1.4 9.5 42 7 1.9 11.4 43 27 7.4 18.8 44 30 8.2 27.0 45 30 8.2 35.1 46 30 8.2 43.3 47 30 8.2 51.5 48 30 8.2 59.7 49 30 8.2 67.8 50 30 8.2 76.0 51 30 8.2 84.2 52 20 5.4 89.6 53 10 2.7 92.4 54 10 2.7 95.1 55 5 1.4 96.5 56 4 1.1 97.5 57 4 1.1 98.6 58 2 0.5 99.2 59 1 0.3 99.5 60 2 0.5 100.0 >60 0 0.0 300.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4g1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5' 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11.4" RANGE OF SPEEDS... ............34 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................36j� AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 47 � CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *****10 90 ** 90 80 80 70 ** 70� 60 * 60 n 50 * 50 L11 40 40rji 30 30 20 ** 20-1 10 *** 10� **** p********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 (� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 -+----+----+- 20 30 40 50 'ff E'., CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: S l e -r ra W 1 a A w N Location: 1 y From: P IQrp r'i at -Cyr To: �V1' MST Date: o Observer. E -y W cienrrdanra1120001Wn00195Jds EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 1'3 p Q 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) I �I 4. Shoulder Conditions (1 t 7 Y (paved or unpaved) �✓ 5. Profile Conditions t 3 y'AG.A.0 r � (y,,dnwrl- (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway i. yea 0 tvJ ID/W S Characteristics 1 i { f e +o .moo OSQ at rade, dustpan. etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without V\,0 In O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, \- Q G V OC - Goffice, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - N/� nO N�A K0 t 1 offsets yes or no 1D. Pavement Condition (good, a satisfactory, poor, etc.) J J 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, ` 2. V r iso CI divided, undivided, painted, 2 p t.rq is QA t o or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - -7 C ry 7 b straight or curved -v 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics Via \ s 4 (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the `[ Community (yes or no) 7 16. Heavy On -Street Parking y�o.ne P Turnover (yes or no) cienrrdanra1120001Wn00195Jds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sierra Hiahwav between Friendly Valley Parkway and Via Princessa Year of Survey 1995 DADT I• DDCVAII IAI!_ QoOFn MFACIIDFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 42 47 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (81.4%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART 11• ACrInFNT RFrORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DADT ul• LUM4WAV TDAFFIr` An1n RnnnslnF r.HARAr.TFR11;TlCs NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 4% grade south of Whispering Leaves, driveways spaced approximately every 500 feet, four lanes, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment south of Whispering Leaves. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. ROADSIDE: Land uses not apparent((park, school, Set -back residential, vacant. etc.), other conditions AUDI I IVNAL KLMAKRJ characteristics not readily apparent. 45 mph denAclanta 11200011ejn 11495.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00AJMcTRANS SIERRA HIGHWAY: FRIENDLY VALLEY TO VIA PRINCESSA DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME ............... 1:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4 U 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 18. ] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................34 AVERAGE SPEED.......................42 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****10 90 * 90[ 80 * 80 70 * 7 0 L] 60 * 60j j 50 * 50`'' 40 * 40(] * l 30 30 20 * 20� 10 * 10� 0********************* 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 SPEED (MPH) ----------------------- 15 - d -+----+----+----+----+15d 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 1 0.3 0.3 26 0 0.0 0.3 27 0 0.0 0.3 28 2 0.6 0.9 29 2 0.6 1.4 30 1 0.3 1.7 31 0 0.0 1.7 32 3 0.9 2.6 33 6 1.7 4.3 34 6 1.7 6.0 35 4 1.1 7.2 36 4 1.1 8.3 37 20 5.7 14.0 38 20 5.7 19.8 39 22 6.3 26.1 40 26 7.4 33.5 41 30 8.6 42.1 42 30 8.6 50_.7 43 30 8.6 59.3 44 30 8.6 67.9 45 30 8.6 76.5 46 19 5.4 81.9 47 19 5.4 87.4 48 16 4.6 92.0 49 6 1.7 93.7 50 6 1.7 95.4 51 5 1.4 96.8 52 3 0.9 97.7 53 3 0.9 98.6 54 3 0.9 99.4 55 2 0.6 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4 U 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 18. ] PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 55 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................34 AVERAGE SPEED.......................42 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 ****10 90 * 90[ 80 * 80 70 * 7 0 L] 60 * 60j j 50 * 50`'' 40 * 40(] * l 30 30 20 * 20� 10 * 10� 0********************* 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS --------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 SPEED (MPH) ----------------------- 15 - d -+----+----+----+----+15d 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: t Yt`C W Location: w From: c� LTUh �. To: Urfa P r i V% Le z a Date: 2 o 4 Observer:y "� diennda18a1120001%e%n00195.115 E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 1\3 m �I-D 2. Vertical N p %{ 3. Superelevation (°%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 1 5. Profile Conditions ��" =-,� P— Soo Whjsperin5 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics D`W n0 �O at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - Cj 00, V'O :J 5 b 0 r tiw offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, A satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11, Truck Traffic L t' }k+ -� I l 3 (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, ZDIro%se.d- ZDfrQ'sej� or raised median 13. Street Width and feet- 5-j'cu" Voi CU 76,S+r CliYv S+t^Q�ght N �o Alignment (width, Wti� �;N Les�ve5 straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics MID (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking �Q, ,C1lM �' r Tuover (yes or no rn diennda18a1120001%e%n00195.115 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sierra Hiuhway between Via Princessa and Soledad Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART P PRFVAII ING SPFFn MFASURFMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%Ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.45 41 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 38-47 (68.3%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART n- ArrInFIJT RFrnRnC Time Period Covered 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 9 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.45 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +1- 1% grade, dustpan driveways, three lanes southbound, two lanes northbound, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Lana uses not apparent par , sc oo , Set -back residential, commercial east side), commercial etc.), other conditions (west side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cienriclantali2000 rlejn r r595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SIERRA HIGHWAY: VIA PRINCESSA TO SOLEDAD CANYON DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH L�J 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fj 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 68.11 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23. RANGE OF SPEEDS..............,...29 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. .40fl AVERAGE SPEED......................:41. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *****10 90 * 90 LJ 80 * 80 70 70 60 * 60 50 * 5011 40 40x1 * u 30 * 30 20 * 20� 10 ** 10� 0******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 10r� 5 10 -+----+--- 20 30 5 40 50 n CUM MPH NO. PCT <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 6 1.5 1.5 30 6 1.5 3.0 31 6 1.5 4.5 32 9 2.2 6.7 33 9 2.2 8.9 34 13 3.2 12.1 35 14 3.5 15.6 36 14 3.5 19.1 37 17 4.2 23.3 38 23 5.7 29.0 39 29 7.2 36.1 40 30 7.4 43.6 41 30 7..4 51.0 42 30 7.4 58.4 43 30 7.4 65.8 44 30 7.4 73.3 45 30 7.4 80.7 46 26 6.4 87.1 47 18 4.5 91.6 48 12 3.0 94.6 49 8 2.0 96.5 50 3 0.7 97.3 51 3 0.7 98.0 52 3 0.7 98.8 53 3 0.7 99.5 54 2 0.5 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 L�J 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fj 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 68.11 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23. RANGE OF SPEEDS..............,...29 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. .40fl AVERAGE SPEED......................:41. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 *****10 90 * 90 LJ 80 * 80 70 70 60 * 60 50 * 5011 40 40x1 * u 30 * 30 20 * 20� 10 ** 10� 0******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 n PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 10r� 5 10 -+----+--- 20 30 5 40 50 n CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: �1 �V a- �-A t Location: � k�U1 From: V 1Ct Pf 'W\CCSSCLTo: SOW0A 1y6M 1y6Date: q2A S Observer. ciednGanral120001WJn00195-& EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) t 1 v 0 0 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical N p N p 3. Superelevation (%) V 4. Shoulder Conditions r( (paved or unpaved) r 5. Profile Conditions 1 1 -1 l I (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics o USt�iw5 G V S / at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without N 0 Sidewalks es or no 6. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, GOTYI f e S,� C OMft1, office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- t 1320 No 3? oo VSO offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 1 r� 'v p satisfactory, poor, etc.) o C)8- 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) l ► } 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 3 D� (n�S� a � �3 rp 1 Spm" or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width. feet- 7 S -t r; 76 straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) 1'\FA V 1 vt�V (heavy, moderate, 15. Uniformity with the y y Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) rrne' ciednGanral120001WJn00195-& ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sierra Highway between Soledad Canyon Road and Scherzinger Lane Year of Survey PART!: DRFVAII Ird(] CDFFn MFARI IRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.11 42 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 38-47 (74.9%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph DART 11• Af r 1nFnlT RFf`nRnA Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.11 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DART in. HIr,Hwnv_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY:. Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on west side, +/- 1 % grade, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart, four lanes, painted two-way left -tum lane, +/- 76 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no heavy on -street parking turnover, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Commercial, apartments. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph ckent%clarita%1200011ejn 11695.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SIERRA HIGHWAY: SOLEDAD CANYON RD. TO SCHERZINGER LANE DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 8:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 741 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 52 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..... ..... ... 3 AVERAGE SPEED ............. .....411.l CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ******100 90 * 90 a 80 * 80 70 * 70E 60 60� 50 ** 50 40 * 40n 30 30 20 20 10 * 10� ** 0*********************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 1 10 1� 5 10 20 30 40 50 m LJ CUM MPH NO. PCT. <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 0.3 0.3 31 2 0.6 0.9 32 5 1.5 2.4 33 7 2.1 4.5 34 8 2.4 6.9 35 10 3.0 9.9 36 10 3.0 12.9 37 15 4.5 17.4 38 25 7.5 24.9 39 26 7.8 32.6 40 26 7.8 40.4 41 26 7.8 48.2 42 26 7.8 56.0 43 26 7.8 63.8 44 26 7.8 71.6 45 24 7.2 78.7 46 24 7.2 85.9 47 21 6.3 92.2 48 8 2.4 94.6 49 8 2.4 97.0 50 3 0.9 97.9 51 4 1.2 99.1 52 3 0.9 100.0 53 0 0.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 741 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 52 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..... ..... ... 3 AVERAGE SPEED ............. .....411.l CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ******100 90 * 90 a 80 * 80 70 * 70E 60 60� 50 ** 50 40 * 40n 30 30 20 20 10 * 10� ** 0*********************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 1 10 1� 5 10 20 30 40 50 m LJ CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: S1PX V-C1G 1 From: SOLeA%& C4rlV0Yt To: 5ckv-,rZtn _ Observer. Location: *–(()7 Date: `{ 12aiQ5 cient%darka1120001 %ejno0195.�ds E/B or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal p N p 2. Vertical rJ p (� p 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) v 5. Profile Conditions V I (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics dJ51 �4+LS d est Pans at rade, dustpan, etc: 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without nO (VID Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, CQYv\-YY\ . C0 office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �d� I f'Lp 1CYJQf Yt0 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, � a Ob a satisfactory,rJOd poor, etc.) J 11. Truck Traffic k"r 11 (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, o2D, or raised median 13. Sheet Width and Alignment (width, feet - % 2 St 1 — / t 7 Z stT. / straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the S (mss Community (yes or no) d 16. Heavy On -Street Parking �Qo Turnover (yes or no) cient%darka1120001 %ejno0195.�ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sierra Highway between Scherzinger Lane and North City Limit Year of Survey PART I• PRFVAII ING SPFFD MFASIrRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.48 44 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (71.0%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART 11• Af`rInFNT RFrfIRnC Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 4 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.48 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HICNwAY_ TRAFFIr_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontaVvertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) intermittent unpaved shoulder sections on the west side, +/- 2% grade, dustpan driveways, four lanes, painted two- way left -tum lane, +/- 54 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial. etc.), other conditions UNAL KLFVIAKr Z3 45 mph cfent%darita11200011ein 11795.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SIERRA HIGHWAY: SCHERZINGER LANE TO NORTH CITY LIMIT DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 8:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED4fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71. fl PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 5j, VEHICLES OBSERVED....................38� AVERAGE SPEED.......................43 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (j ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u *******100 * 90 * 80 * 7D 60 l - I 50 40n 30 20H 10� 0******************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+- 20 30 15� 2 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT <15 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 2 0.5 0.5 33 5 1.3 1.8 34 9 2.3 4.1. 35 9 2.3 6.4 36 10 2.6 9.0 37 17 4.4 13.4 38 17 4.4 17.7 39 17 4.4 22.1 40 22 5.7 27.8 41 28 7.2 35.0 42 28 7.2 42.2 43 30 7.7 49.9 44 30 7.7 57.6 45 30 7.7 65.3 46 30 7.7 73.0 47 30 7.7 80.7 48 27 6.9 87.7 49 21 5.4 93.1 50 7 1.8 94.9 51 4 1.0 95.9 52 3 0.8 96.7 53 3 0.8 97.4 54 4 1.0 98.5 55 3 0.8 99.2 56 2 0.5 99.7 57 1 0.3 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED4fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71. fl PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 22.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................32 to 5j, VEHICLES OBSERVED....................38� AVERAGE SPEED.......................43 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (j ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u *******100 * 90 * 80 * 7D 60 l - I 50 40n 30 20H 10� 0******************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 10 5 +----+----+----+- 20 30 15� 2 40 50 60 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: S (re-rY-a �41Q��W4y - From: SCJ-'e—iZ�Ny//To: K)0f-+)- ei'W Ltwtrt- Observer. GT� Location: - — 10 ? Date: 4 .2OI IT cienAdantat12000 1WJno0 195As EIB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 0 2. Vertical 1v / v to 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions I— v r\ Sl-'-U%Aer sech (paved or unpaved) Povtdi 5. Profile Conditions 2 Z (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics d dS-r OAS, 1 st?Gxs at rade, dustpan, etc. Y 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, C.O YY\yyL C O V^- W` office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 320, K0 X32 0> ►` o offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, OOC1 90p satisfactory, poor, etc.) J 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, n Zy)L n ir't e b �-, iW LT L o�-�l or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics ' (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the y \� QS Community (yes or no) 7 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) cienAdantat12000 1WJno0 195As ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sinning Hills Drive between Arroyo Park Drive and McBean Parkway Year of Survey 1995 Door 1. DDCV All Inl!_ COCCn MCACIIDGMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 35 38 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 30-39 (97.3%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted DADT 11• ArP1nFNT DFrn RnC Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 nAor ur. UIRU%A/AV rOACCIr Aran DnAnCInr ru ARArTFRISTICS NnT RFAnILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 03/31/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 300 feet apart, two lanes, no striping, +/- 36 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent park, sc oo ,esl entla . etc.), other conditions PART IV: No characteristics not readily apparent. 35 mph cRant%danta11200011e%n 11895.xrs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SINGING HILLS DRIVE: ARROYO PARK DRIVE TO MCBEAN PARKWAY DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 1:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.' 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 97.q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.61 RANGE OF SPEEDS ................. 30 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................3 AVERAGE SPEED.......................34. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- J 100 90 * 9� 80 80 70 * 7fl 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 2.7 2.7 31 3 8.1 10.8 32 4 10.8 21.6 33 4 10.8 32.4 34 4 10.8 43.2 35 5 13.5 56.8 36 5 13.5 70.3 37 5 13.5 83.8 38 2 5.4 89.2 39 3 8.1 97.3 40 1 2.7 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3j 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 97.q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.61 RANGE OF SPEEDS ................. 30 to 40 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................3 AVERAGE SPEED.......................34. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- J 100 90 * 9� 80 80 70 * 7fl 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: /Q! // Date: / ! 4/q S cfenhAarkaI1200011ejrm019 AS EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A//J 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) --. 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) ,c✓e �) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 o-% 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without / O Sidewalks es or no / V 8, Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, II office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets es or no)3 00 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 600 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, ��n� or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 6 Ve straight or curved)G i 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 1 r 11 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) / Yl 16.. Heavy,On-Street Parking Turnover (yes 'or no) Q cfenhAarkaI1200011ejrm019 AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Bouquet Canyon Road and 1500' E/O Bouquet Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 De RT 1• DRDVAII ime- SiDFFn MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.64 45 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 39-48 (86.0%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph nADT 11• A!` MCHIT DCrnRnC Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 7 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.64 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DART uL ulr_uwnv TRAFFIr &T -in RnAnSInP CHARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY; Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, six lanes, raised median, +/- 90 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school'xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial, vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cSentldarita 11200011eja 11995.x1s SPEEDPLOT'2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS U SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: BOUQUET CANYON RD TO 1500' E/O BOUQUET DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4rd 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 86.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ........ ....11. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 2.� RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ " . 4.47jj AVERAGE SPEED.................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) j� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ b ****10 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 CUM MPH NO. PCT * <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 1 0.4 0.4 37 1 0.4 0.7 38 6 2.2 2.9 39 15 5.4 8.2 40 15 5.4 13.6 41 15 5.4 19.0 42 15 5.4 24.4 43 30 10.8 35.1 44 30 10.8 45.9 45 30 10.8 56.6 46 30 10.8 67.4 47 30 10.8 78.1 48 30 10.8 88.9 49 10 3.6 92.5 50 10 3.6 96.1 51 4 1.4 97.5 52 3 1.1 98.6 53 3 1.1 99.6 54 1 0.4 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4rd 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 86.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ........ ....11. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 2.� RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ " . 4.47jj AVERAGE SPEED.................... CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) j� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ b ****10 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 40� 30 * 20 * 10 o _ * Ll ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+-- 10 20 30 40 50 101 - LJ 5(r -J ** 90 n * 80 70� 60 50 40� 30 * 20 * 10 o _ * Ll ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+-- 10 20 30 40 50 101 - LJ 5(r -J CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM From: To: Observer:. Location: //D Date: q/ % /9,5- dent1dadta1120001 %ejno0195.'ds EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal Nb 2. Vertical A10 3. Superelevation (%)_ 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) a 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics �Q5 at rade, dustpan, etc. eh 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without N0 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, f office, etc.)COMmetr,4 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) l 11. Truck Traffic light) (heavy, moderate, I 12, Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 3 t or raised median)A `st 4 ti 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - ! t straight or curved)5 a 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) Pau - 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover. (yes or no) iV dent1dadta1120001 %ejno0195.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between 1500' E/O Bouquet Canyon Road and Commuter Way Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PREVAILING SPFED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.29 44 49 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 4049 (79.3°/x) Posted Speed Limit 55 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 8 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.29 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART Illi HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT' Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontalIvertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, six lanes, raised median with left -tum protection, +/- 90 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant, set -back commercial, raceway. etc.), other conditions :I PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on functional classification of roadway section and minor land use activity, recommend speed limit of 50 mph. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cfiennc1anta11200011ejn 12095.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: 1500' E/O BOUQUET CYN RD. TO COMMUTER WY DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME...............12:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.55 MPH 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ .....4ddJJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79.3 - PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10,(1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.. .35 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................35� AVERAGE SPEED.......................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) fl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ ********100 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 90 * 80 ^l ** 7011 60J 50 407 30 20a 10� 0********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 CI PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15r 1 _ LJ 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT. <15 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 4 1.1 1.1 36 5 1.4 2.5 37 6 1.7 4.2 38 10 2.8 7.0 39 11 3.1 10.1 40 27 7.6 17.6 41 30 8.4 26.1 42 30 8.4 34.5 43 30 8.4 42.9 44 30 8.4 51.3 45 30 8.4 59.7 46 30 8.4 68.1 47 26 7.3 75.4 48 25 7.0 82.4 49 25 7.0 89.4 50 19 5.3 94.7 51 4 1.1 95.8 52 4 1.1 96.9 53 4 1.1 98.0 54 3 0.8 98.9 55 3 0.8 99.7 56 1 0.3 100.0 57 0 0.0100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ .....4ddJJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79.3 - PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10,(1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.. .35 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................35� AVERAGE SPEED.......................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) fl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ ********100 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 90 * 80 ^l ** 7011 60J 50 407 30 20a 10� 0********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 CI PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15r 1 _ LJ 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: /0 From: To: y/ Date: ` A Observer: dent%darital1200011ejno0195.lds EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N 2. Vertical N (� 3. Superelevation (eh) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) J 5. Profile Conditions O �j b (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 1� at rade, dustpan, etc. 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the NO Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial; office, etc.) a (A'n 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 60 t? iJ 11. Truck Traffic 1, h+ (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, �j 3 �" �'S e or raised median)✓ 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - �O/ / JI✓� strai ht or curved)1 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics jj (heavy, moderate, light) f -/-W ✓ 15. Uniformity with the yP 5 Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking041 Turnover (yes or no) dent%darital1200011ejno0195.lds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Commuter Way and Golden Oak Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.22 45 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (73.5%) Posted Speed Limit 55 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 6 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.22 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, six lanes, raised median, +/- 90 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic, Land uses not apparent (park, school, Metrolink station, railroad soul side), vacant(port etc.), other conditions side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cfient%danra1f20001Wn 12195.xrs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: COMMUTER WAY TO GOLDEN OAK ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME...............12:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.55 MPH LJ 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................40 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5d 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73.j1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. I PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 59 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................40 AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. I CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----+----t----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******10 90 * 90a 80 80 70 * 70 60 60 * 50 L1 * 50 40 * 40n * lJ 30 30 * 20 * 20� 10 * 10 0********************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15n 10 10� III 5 20 30 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <15 0 0.0 _PCT. 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 3 0.7 0.7 36 6 1.5 2.2 37 7 1.7 3.9 38 7 1.7 5.6 39 25 6.1 11.8 40 25 6.1 17.9 41 30 7.4 25.2 42 30 7.4 32.6 43 30 7.4 40.0 A4 30 7.4 47.3 45 30 7.4 54.7 46 30 7.4 62.0 47 30 7.4 69.4 48 30 7.4 76.7 49 30 7.4 84.1 50 30 7.4 91.4 51 7 1.7 93.1 52 7' 1.7 94.9 53 6 1.5 96.3 54 6 1.5 97.8 55 3 0.7 98.5 56 3 0.7 99.3 57 1 0.2 99.5 58 0 0.0 99.5 59 2 0.5 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 LJ 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................40 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5d 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73.j1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. I PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 17. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 59 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................40 AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. I CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----+----t----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******10 90 * 90a 80 80 70 * 70 60 60 * 50 L1 * 50 40 * 40n * lJ 30 30 * 20 * 20� 10 * 10 0********************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15n 10 10� III 5 20 30 40 50 60 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: From: To: Observer: Location: r �///2- Date: '7 ` Z 1 (� c*enWarrtal120001WjW0195.#5 E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /YO 2. Vertical / 3. Superelevation (%} 4. Shoulder Conditions rt, (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 3 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 0(14 rah(at7grade, dust an, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, /a (0.� office, etc. V 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) p� 11, Truck Traffic 11 (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 3 Q S+ I /V?c or raised median)G 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - o l straight or curved LA00 c/ 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics l (heavy, moderate, light) �lYa 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) p 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover. (yes or no) A16 c*enWarrtal120001WjW0195.#5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Golden Oak Road and Ruether Avenue Year of Survey DADT I- ODCVAn IN(_ SDFFn MFACIIRFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.54 46 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (83.6%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART 11- ACCIDFNT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 16 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.54 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 DART Iu- 411r_41WAY TRAFFIC ANn ROAnsInF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, six lanes, raised median, +/- 86 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, moderate truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Railroad, vacant(south side), commercial (north side). etc.), other conditions 1'AKI IV: AQUI I IUIVAL KLIVIAKKD No characteristics not readily apparent. 50 mph c6enndarifa1120001Wn 12295.x15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: GOLDEN OAK ROAD TO RUETHER AVENUE DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME .......... ...12:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.55 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. -PCT <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 4 1.2 1.2 38 7 2.1 3.3 39 8 2.4 5.7 40 12 3.6 9.3 41 25 7.5 16.7 42 25 7.5 24.2 43 26 7.8 31.9 44 27 8.1 40.0 45 27 8.1 48.1 46 30 9.0 57.0 47 30 9.0 66.0 48 30 9.0 74.9 49 30 9.0 83.9 50 30 9.0 92.8 51 3 0.9 93.7 52 3 0.9 94.6 53 3 0.9 95.5 54 4 1.2 96.7 55 0 0.0 96.7 56 3 0.9 97.6 57 3 0.9 98.5 58 2 0.6 99.1 59 2 0.6 99.7 60 1 0.3 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7. 1 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................37 to 6 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................331 AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. 1 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u loo *****100 90 90 L J 80 * 70E so 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 15 10 60 n 50L' 40LI 30 20H ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 5 10� 0 IIj Ll -------------------------- 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Location: "t"t- I 13 Date: q Iae> lc� Observer: dienWadtal120001Wn00195.:ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N N O 2. Vertical p �� 3, Superelevation (%) "- 4. Shoulder Conditions p l (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions O O 1 J (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without ^ ` t v Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use vnt✓ #A (residential, commercial, Cp yA /vim office, etc.)i 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - VSO tL i IJ y-'-0 offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, it ct �O11. satisfactory, poor, etc.)� Truck Traffic1 ' 1 _ n Ln `iD6' (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, `r or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet -straight 1 or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking or no) Turnover (yes dienWadtal120001Wn00195.:ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Sotedad Canyon Road between Ruether Avenue and Lanaside Avenue Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.38 45 49 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (73.4%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 9 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.38 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 03/31/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways on north side, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, six lanes, raised median, +/- 86 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street packing not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Railroad, vacant soul side), set -back residential, etc.), other conditions commercial (north side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on 85th percentile speed and consistency, recommend speed limit of 50 mph. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph c#enticlarital1200011ejn 12395.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.0oA/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: RUETHER TO LANGSIDE DIRECTION(S)....... EASTBOUND DATE....... 5/26/1995 TIME...............10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH �I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73. -, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ..••.36TI AVERAGE SPEED.. _ ...................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *****10 90 ** 90 * Lll 80 * 80� 70 * .70 I Jf 60 * 60 50 50 40 * 40 (� 30 * 30 u 20 ** 20 10 * 10 0******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 ----+----+----+ +----+----+----+----+----+20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--- +----+15 15 10 5 +----+----+---- 20 30 10� 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT <15 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 4 1.1 1.1 35 6 1.6 2.7 36 7 1.9 4.6 37 7 1.9 6.5 38 12 3.3 9.8 39 12 3.3 13.0 40 20 5.4 18.4 41 24 6.5 24.9 42 24 6.5 31.4 43 28 7.6 39.0 44 27 7.3 46.3 45 29 7.9 54.2 46 29 7.9 62.1 47 30 8.1 70.2 48 30 8.1 78.3 49 30 8.1 86.4 50 15 4.1 90.5 51 7 1.9 92.4 52 7 1.9 94.3 53 5 1.4 95.7 54 3 0.8 96.5 55 2 0.5 97.0 56 3 0.8 97.8 57 3 0.8 98.6 58 2 0.5 99.2 59 1 0.3 99.5 60 2 0.5 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 �I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 73. -, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 13.J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ..••.36TI AVERAGE SPEED.. _ ...................44. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *****10 90 ** 90 * Lll 80 * 80� 70 * .70 I Jf 60 * 60 50 50 40 * 40 (� 30 * 30 u 20 ** 20 10 * 10 0******************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 ----+----+----+ +----+----+----+----+----+20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--- +----+15 15 10 5 +----+----+---- 20 30 10� 40 50 60 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: ;n IP�(1d CCfa��/o(L��J� Location:(Ll From: &P_At r ,A 1lTo: � gS1U� Date: Observer: denndanra112000 nejno0195AS E/B or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal I J O I N O 2. Vertical \J o /N O 3. Superelevation (eh) 6 /J 4. Shoulder Conditions ^ (paved or unpaved) 9f J 5. Profile Conditions %) O (grade, 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics pl P (at -grade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without N Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, r \1 J office, etc.)` 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 11.0 _} Y offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, O satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, '30.) or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) (heavy, moderate, VLP 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) �j L J 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Tumover (yes or no) N P denndanra112000 nejno0195AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Lanaside Avenue and Camp Plenty Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.05 46 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (75.3%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.05 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, no driveways, six lanes, raised medians, +/. 82 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, schoo , scant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph dent1dai 112000ilejn 12495.)ds SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: LANGSIDE.AVENUE TO CAMP PLENTY ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME...............11:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 100 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4Q� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 14. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10.f RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............36 to 5�{ VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................35Q� AVERAGE SPEED ................ ....45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) a +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ******100 I 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 90� 80 70� 60 n 5 0 LJ 40j1 30 20� - 10� ** 0********************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 7 2.0 2.0 37 7 2.0 3.9 38 7 2.0 5.9 39 7 2.0 7.9 40 8 2.2 10.1 41 14 3.9 14.0 42 30 8.4 22.5 43 30 8.4 30.9 44 30 8.4 39.3 45 30 8.4 47.8 46 30 8.4 56.2 47 30 8.4 64.6 48 30 8.4 73.0 49 30 8.4 81.5 50 14 3.9 85.4 51 14 3.9 89.3 52 14 3.9 93.3 53 12 3.4 96.6 54 3 0.8 97.5 55 3 0.8 98.3 56 3 0.8 99.2 57 3 0.8 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4Q� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 75. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 14. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 10.f RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............36 to 5�{ VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................35Q� AVERAGE SPEED ................ ....45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) a +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ******100 I 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 90� 80 70� 60 n 5 0 LJ 40j1 30 20� - 10� ** 0********************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: CJIKA-IN rt11 lL144&1f� ! V -^'.4 From: L%YI To: iy Observer. F TT ) Location: I LS Date:. cienWsrffa1120001WJno0195-ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal A 1 V n \ Q 2. Vertical 1 V� 1 V Q 3. Superelevation (%) 0 Q 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions O (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics J t� t'3 D1 J O v ( Mo r at rade, dustpan, etc.)/ 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without fjo Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, v Q_L v Q G office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 20 OOH i� O J: 2'o0KC� offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 00 Cl 9 W satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted,DJ Yi11S� _a 31D or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - Z�CV I' Yp� 82-)C-Orqed straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) II (heavy, moderate, 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover or no) P N (yes cienWsrffa1120001WJno0195-ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Camp Plenty Road and Luther Street Year of Survey 1995 PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 1.06 33 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 30-39 (80.0%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART 11: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 21 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 1.06 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical Sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced +/- 700 feet apart, six lanes, raised median west of Whites Canyon, painted two-way left -tum lane and bike lane east of Whites Canyon. +/- 84-88 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial, set -back residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on functionality of roadway, recommend speed limit of 40 mph. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph denWantal12000 I %&jn 12595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS U SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: CAMP PLENTY ROAD TO WHITES CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME...............11:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3�� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3" 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 4QQ VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................30Q] AVERAGE SPEED .......................32.i CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 *** 10 ** 0 10 20 30 15 10 5 * PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 0 10 20 * 9 * 80 * 7U * 6ji5� 4� 30 2� 1� 0 ---------- 40 ---+----+40 L� L 30 40 I 1 l 5 7 N1 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 it 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 7 2.3 2.3 24 7 2.3 4.7 25 10 3.3 8.0 26 10 3.3 11.3 27 10 3.3 14.7 28 9 3.0 17.7 29 6 2.0 19.7 30 6 2.0 21.7 31 30 10.0 31.7 32 30 10.0 41.7 33 30 10.0 51.7 34 30 10.0 61.7 35 30 10.0 71.7 36 30 10.0 81.7 37 30 10.0 91.7 38 .12 4.0 95.7 39 12 4.0 99.7 40 1 0.3 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3�� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3" 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 19. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 4QQ VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................30Q] AVERAGE SPEED .......................32.i CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 *** 10 ** 0 10 20 30 15 10 5 * PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 0 10 20 * 9 * 80 * 7U * 6ji5� 4� 30 2� 1� 0 ---------- 40 ---+----+40 L� L 30 40 I 1 l 5 7 N1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Gole-bra(Ao4U/� From: ) To: whr des C&AyotL Observer l TN Location: *—) 1 KJ Date: LJ Cien WarNa11200011eP00195.ids ll EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal !' V 0 2. Vertical p 3. Superelevation (%) --- r 4. Shoulder Conditions p (paved or unpaved) v 5. Profile Conditions Q (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics rAs U 5r{ ON\S at rade, dustpan, etc. U 7, Pedestrian Traffic in the N N o Roadway without d Sidewalks es or no 8, Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, C 01VV%M,. Cp vvrvy& . office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- ±700) yl -'o ��6©j ►`� offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) f 11. Truck Traffic light) \�` SP_44AY'uGlc (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Z:) 0) r Q 5 3 Q Q iSC11 divided, undivided, painted. or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) y JC1Je. 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16', Heavy On -Street Parking or r Turnover (yes no) LJ Cien WarNa11200011eP00195.ids ll ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Luther Street and Sierra Highway Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.98 39 44 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 34-43 (71.6%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 14 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.98 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced +/- 1,000 feet apart, six lanes, painted two-way left -tum lane with bike lane, +/- 88 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential, commercial. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cAFenAdarital l2000lle/n l2795.)ds SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: LUTHER STREET TO SIERRA HIGHWAY DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME...............11:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3�1 -85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 20. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 6Q, VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................41st AVERAGE SPEED.......................39 ��JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ,t,t****,t***=100 90 * 90 60 50 40 30 20 10 80 rl 70 L 60 50 40n 301�� 20H 10� p*t*********** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 15 10 5 11 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) Cl ---------------------------------------------- +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--------- 20 30 40 50 `, 60 15U 5 H CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <15 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 2 0.5 0.5 26 3 0.7 1.2 27 3 0.7 1.9 28 3 0.7 2.6 29 4 1.0 3.6 30 5 1.2 4.8 31 5 1.2 6.0 32 5 1.2 7.2 33 5 1.2 8.4 34 30 7.2 15.5 35 30 7.2 22.7 36 30 7.2 29.8 37 30 7.2 37.0 38 30 7.2 44.2 39 30 7.2 51.3 40 30 7.2 58.5 41 30 7.2 65.6 42 30 7.2 72.8 43 30 7.2 80.0 44 25 6.0 85.9 45 25 6.0 91.9 46 9 2.1 94.0 47 8 1.9 95.9 48 8 1.9 97.9 49 2 0.5 98.3 50 1 0.2 98.6 51 2 0.5 99.0 52 2 0.5 99.5 53 0 0.0 99.5 54 0 0.0 99.5 55 0 0.0 99.5 56 0 0.0 99.5 57 0 0.0 99.5 58 0 0.0 99.5 59 0 0.0 99.5 60 2 0.5 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3�1 -85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 71.0 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 20. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 6Q, VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................41st AVERAGE SPEED.......................39 ��JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ,t,t****,t***=100 90 * 90 60 50 40 30 20 10 80 rl 70 L 60 50 40n 301�� 20H 10� p*t*********** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 15 10 5 11 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) Cl ---------------------------------------------- +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+--------- 20 30 40 50 `, 60 15U 5 H CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Ax - s Observer: Location: Date: '4/2_01% c1enrlcl r&at120001Wn00195.1ds EIB or SIB W1B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) Horizontal L 2. Vertical 6 O 3. Superelevation (eh) l 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 1 —` _I (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics t at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without O Sidewalks es or no 8, Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Cit? NMr4\- C© t^nW\ office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- tn_0 � ��4 (�_O offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, q a 1 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic light) 1 ` ct 1 (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, d P2�LTJ, �ZWL-TL_ divided, undivided, painted, I or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking or p Turnover (yes no) c1enrlcl r&at120001Wn00195.1ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Sierra Hiahwav and Galeton Road Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.35 41 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (69.9%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92- 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 4 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.35 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced +/- 700 feet apart, four lanes, raised median, painted two-way left -turn lane along portion of segment, +/- 80 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, heavy on -street parking turnover in eastbound direction, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school,- t -back residential, commercial. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph dent1dantal12000IWn 12895.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: SIERRA HIGHWAY TO GALETON ROAD DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE...............3/31/1995 TIME...............10:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH di 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 69. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 20.8 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............27 to 52 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 381111 AVERAGE SPEED .......................40.6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED 100 90 80 70 60 50 * 40 30 * 20 10 ** 0******************* * (MPH) ----------- *******100 ** * 90 80 7A 60J 50 40� 30 201 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 15 I 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) iu 10 20 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. <10 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 4 1.0 1.0 28 4 1.0 2.1 29 4 1.0 3.1 30 4 1.0 4.1 31 6 1.5 5.7 32 11 2.8 8.5 33 11 2.8 11.3 34 11 2.8 14.1 35 11 2.8 17.0 36 15 3.9 20.8 37 16 4.1 24.9 38 16 4.1 29.0 39 30 7.7 36.8 40 30 7.7 44.5 41 30 7.7 52.2 42 30 7.7 59.9 43 30 7.7 67.6 44 30 7.7 75.3 45 30 7.7 83.0 46 30 7.7 90.7 47 14 3.6 94.3 48 12 3.1 97.4 49 3 0.8 98.2 50 3 0.8 99.0 51 2 0.5 99.5 52 2 0.5 100.0 53 0 0.0 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 di 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4�� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 69. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 20.8 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............27 to 52 VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 381111 AVERAGE SPEED .......................40.6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED 100 90 80 70 60 50 * 40 30 * 20 10 ** 0******************* * (MPH) ----------- *******100 ** * 90 80 7A 60J 50 40� 30 201 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 15 I 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) iu 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: 50Ie-<40-d CL 'y6Y1_ TzOQ-d Location: ";7-I 19 From: S ie rrb "W) `` To: G a 1 �%o Date: � Z o !01.5 Observer: E rYy o �tGG cienWa nta 11200011 ejno0 f 95xrs EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal O ^ ` ► �J O , V 2. Vertical O f v 0 3. Superelevation (%) 4_ Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions b (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics - �US} J 5+voyi5 at rade, dustpan, etc. �qn 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without 9 N p Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, TK j office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no Q I h0 10. Pavement Condition (good, 11 J O CL O O satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11: Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, ��) r'015ect n or -11) P a -n e - iY\, i m I oT or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved)f 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics ` 1�QQ 1 t/�gav (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the \t eS y Community (yes or no) I 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) �res+aPPr� o't" o �tGG cienWa nta 11200011 ejno0 f 95xrs ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Galeton Road and Anne Freda Street Year of Survey 1995 PART F PRFVAII Mr SPFFD MFASURFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.27 46 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 41-50 (84.3%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph oeaT 11- AcrInFNT RFrf1RnS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 5 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.27 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIr;HWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight sight distance restrictions, paved shoulders, +/- 1% intersections, other) grade, no driveways, four lanes, raised median, bike lanes, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking observed, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, commercial, vacant(south side), set -back residential etc.), other conditions (north side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cfienticlanta11200011ejn 12995.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: GALETON ROAD TO ANNE FREDA STREET DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME...............10:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 JJ1 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................33 to 6 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................35 AVERAGE SPEED.......................46. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L ****100 **** *** 90 Ll 80� 70 u 60r1 50 LJ 40� 30 20U 10 * 10 * 0************************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 L� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 n L1 10 40 50 60 5 CUM MPH NO. PCT. -PCT <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 1 0.3 0.3 34 0 0.0 0.3 35 0 0.0 0.3 36 0 0.0 0.3 37 0 0.0 0.3 38 0 0.0 0.3 39 0 0.0 0.3 40 11 3.1 3.4 41 30 8.4 11.8 42 30 8.4 20.2 43 30 8.4 28.7 44 30 8.4 37.1 45 30 8.4 45.5 46 30 8.4 53.9 47 30 8.4 62.4 48 30 8.4 70.8 49 30 8.4 79.2 50 30 8.4 87.6 51 8 2.2 89.9 52 8 2.2 92.1 53 6 1.7 93.8 54 4 1.1 94.9 55 4 1.1 96.1 56 4 1.1 97.2 57 3 0.8 98.0 58 3 0.8 98.9 59 3 0.8 99.7 60 1 0.3 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 JJ1 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 41 through 50 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................33 to 6 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................35 AVERAGE SPEED.......................46. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ L ****100 **** *** 90 Ll 80� 70 u 60r1 50 LJ 40� 30 20U 10 * 10 * 0************************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 L� PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 n L1 10 40 50 60 5 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Ll Street: Location: A- k 2.0 From: Gc1P— 0r'- Rd, To: ne; E20—a Date: Z4 yo �5 Observer. r -_JW c§enrkra1ftat1200011ejn00195Jds I 1 EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N o SS l u O 2. Vertical N o N O 3. Superelevation (%) --- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics n j�j •O OIt,J N O �I'^� at rade, duan etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without 0 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, R X2,5 office, etc.)j� 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - (� OQI >tio y"p offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, p a satisfactory, poor, etc.) t 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) l i 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, D rlaN5 _ 2� ra�seci or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment(width,feet- 7 cur vj a, 55 7(o1 �ur.r2O straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 4 15. Uniformity with the Comriunity. (yes or no) \1 16. Heavy OnStreet Parking Turnover (yes or no �O Q c§enrkra1ftat1200011ejn00195Jds I 1 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Anne Freda Street and Kenroy Avenue Year of Survey 1995 PART 1- PRFVAII.Mr SPFFD MFASLIREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.31 41 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 36-45 (76.0%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 4 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.31 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2,14 PART IIF HIrHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ ANI] ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, no driveways west of Kenroy, intersections spaced approximately 400 feet apart, four lanes, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential west of Kenroy, commercla east etc.), other conditions of Kenroy. PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph c#enWanta11200011ejn 13095.x15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: ANNE FREDA STREET TO KENROY AVENUE DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................411 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 14.9 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 5�_1 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................37a AVERAGE SPEED .......................40.b CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ********100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 2 0.5 0.5 30 5 1.3 1.9 31 5 1.3 3.2 32 4 1.1 4.3 33 5 1.3 5.6 34 5 1.3 6.9 35 8 2.1 9.1 36 27 7.2 16.3 37. 27 7.2 23.5 38 27 7.2 30.7 39 30 8.0 38.7 40 30 8.0 46.7 41 30 8.0 54.7 42 30 8.0 62.7 43 29 7.7 70.4 44 28 7.5 77.9 45 27 7.2 85.1 46 27 7.2 92.3 47 15 4.0 96.3 48 12 3.2 99.5 49 0 0.0 99.5 50 1 0.3 99.7 51 0 0.0 99.7 52 0 0.0 99.7 53 0 0.0 99.7 54 0 0.0 99.7 55 1 0.3 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................411 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4f 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 14.9 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 5�_1 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................37a AVERAGE SPEED .......................40.b CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ********100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 60 r 50 .� 40(1 30 LJ 20� 10� p********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) J +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 15 - - j 10 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 5 _ P h * 90 F v * _ * 80 _ F * 70 60 r 50 .� 40(1 30 LJ 20� 10� p********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 LJ PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) J +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 15 15 - - j 10 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 5 _ P h CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM igyjCff—&5Ma] 11111111My7;&ZJAWJ 11111W�-- _ • 1 R . - .• • Location: Date:�2� 9 5 C60ntldanta V 20001Wn00195.)ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) y� , I V Q � O 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical G q 3. Superelevation (°�) 4. Shoulder Conditions t� (paved or unpaved) T 5. Profile Conditions �, ` I (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics NO WLl) �% 1 KJ10 (lJ at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without I V O YV o Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, ` office, etc.)I 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet -��` n a offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, q0 1 t� O O� 9 satisfactory, poor, etc.) J 11. Truck Traffic light) (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, n Zo , r'0 ',sea (� 42 ,Df Q or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - rye d �`�o cu r ved strai ht or curve Icy 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics I r ` a VQa J (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the yn Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking, Tumover(yes 'orno) VloYte_�QXnrM1' 1non� ►Y1. .71 C60ntldanta V 20001Wn00195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between 14 On/Off Ramp and Flowerpark Drive Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.77 47 51 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 42-51 (71.3%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 6 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.77 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 2% grade, no driveways, four lanes, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no observed on -street parking, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Vacant south side), set -back residential (north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph client%danta11200011ejn 13295.& SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: 14 ON/OFF RAMP TO FLOWERPARK DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 9:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT. 100 70 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4'l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 42 through 51 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............."71.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12.1, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 16.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 6 VEHICLES OBSERVED .. ................38.1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.a-- CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ `J *****100 ,t** - * 90 * 80 70 60 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 2 0.5 0.5 36 2 0.5 1.0 37 5 1.3 2.3 38 8 2.1 4.4 39 7 1.8 6.3 40 17 4.4 10.7 41 21 5.5 16.2 42 21 5.5 21.7 43 21 5.5 27.2 44 25 6.5 33.7 45 30 7.8 41.5 46 30 7.8 49.3 47 30 7.8 57.2 48 30 7.8 65.0 49 30 7.8 72.8 50 30 7.8 80.7 51 26 6.8 87.5 52 10 2.6 90.1 53 10 2.6 92.7 54 10 2.6 95.3 55 7 1.8 97.1 56 5 1.3 98.4 57 2 0.5 99.0 58 2 0.5 99.5 59 0 0.0 99.5 60 2 0.5 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 100 70 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4'l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 42 through 51 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............."71.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12.1, PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 16.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 6 VEHICLES OBSERVED .. ................38.1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................46.a-- CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ `J *****100 ,t** - * 90 * 80 70 60 50 40 30 * 20 ** 10 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 20D 10E 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 10� 5 20 30 40 50 j 5 60 n 11 60 * 50 * 40r1 * J 30 10 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 20D 10E 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 10� 5 20 30 40 50 j 5 60 n 11 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM ZI&rwsk 111 �] i • ig�: • ►• Location, it- 123 Date: dlenrldarot12000 1lejno0195.x1s EJB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 0p 3. Superelevation (%) �, L 4. Shoulder Conditions (p i (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions Z 2 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics t at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the 4 Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, v CJ c office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 1,�JA /k V1-0 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, tt 4 ` OA satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic v� l (heavy, moderate, light) 12. ChannelizatiW T of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, -\ �l r 0:1sea ��I `(015 or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - Cu fV `d 1 L ur straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics ` }\^06 Vim - (heavy, moderate, light) - 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) f 16. Heavy On -Street Parking V\ O G Turnover (yes or no) dlenrldarot12000 1lejno0195.x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Soledad Canyon Road between Floweraark Drive and Shadow Pines Boulevard Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.17 48 51 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 44-53 (91.8%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.17 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 2% grade, no driveways, four lanes, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant soul side), set -back residential (north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cGenrldadtal1200011 jn 13395.xfs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed ,Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS L1 SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD: FLOWERPARK TO SHADOW PINES BOULEVARD DIRECTION(S)....... DATE ............... TIME ............... POSTED SPEED LIMIT. CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 O 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 1 0.6 0.6 41 0 0.0 0.6 42 1 0.6 1.3 43 2 1.3 2.5 44 18 11.3 13.8 45 18 11.3 25.2 46 18 11.3 36.5 47 19 11.9 48.4 48 19 11.9 60.4 49 17 10.7 71.1 50 17 10.7 81.8 51 it 6.9 88.7 52 6 3.8 92.5 53 3 1.9 94.3 54 2 1.3 95.6 55 2 1.3 96.9 56 2 1.3 98.1 57 0 0.0 98.1 58 1 0.6 98.7 59 1 0.6 99.4 60 1 0.6 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 WESTBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4fl 3/31/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................51A 9:15 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 44 through 53 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 91. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 2.5 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 6Q VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. ..15dy� AVERAGE SPEED .......................48.6 100 90 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u *****100 ** 90G 80 70 60� 50 40� 30 30 20 20 10 10 0**************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 J PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� I 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+- 20 30 40 50 60 5 E 80 70 60 50 40 ** 90G 80 70 60� 50 40� 30 30 20 20 10 10 0**************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 J PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� I 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+- 20 30 40 50 60 5 E CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: ' ) PADA C-Wq 0 ri \cia'A Location: From: ,o ¢.Y rr k. TO: P �n\QAnt.1 P t nP5 Date: LiZo 5 Observer: Fes,) Gent%darita11200011000195x1s E/B or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) L� t5 �,t` p V 0 L Horizontal 1 v 2. Vertical a O 3. Superelevation (°/a) ,- Z 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions Z (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics D/W V 1') h O r'p at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without h0 Yl Q Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, v4� office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 17jZD I yip 'j- l3ZOt Y`O offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, O O 9 C] g satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic 1 t5 t (heavy, moderate, light) J 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 1 g.9�YoiSPA r� tr�� o2Y' rC� or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 7�, C ur.lQ d 7cu ,rveA_ straight or cure 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the. p Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On Street Parking Turnover (yes or Y1 Gent%darita11200011000195x1s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Summit Place between Arroyo Park Drive and Rockwell Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART 1- PRFVAI1 ING SPEED MEASl1REMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 27 30 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 24-33 (92.9%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART IP ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, two lanes, raised median, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent.. RECOMMENDATION 30 mph c6&nticladta 11200011ejn 13495.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS SUMMIT PLACE: ARROYO PARK DRIVE TO ROCKWELL CANYON RD. DIRECTION(S) ....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 2:15 POSTED SPEED 'LIMIT. 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 �I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ ..... 2- 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ ..... 3fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 24 through 33 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 92.9-, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............3.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 34 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................2 AVERAGE SPEED ..................... .27. _ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS 0 10 20 F3 . SPEED (MPH) ---+----+----+----+ �] t 9� * 80 7� * 6 * _D5 4E 30 2E 10 -0 J -+----+----+----+ 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 , ■ 20 30 40 E 15 1 5 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 1 3.6 3.6 24 1 3.6 7.1 25 3 10.7 17.9 26 5 17.9 35.7 27 5 17.9 53.6 28 3 10.7 64.3 29 4 14.3 78.6 30 2 7.1 85.7 31 0 0.0 85.7 32 1 3.6 89.3 33 2 7.1 96.4 34 1 3.6 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 �I 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ ..... 2- 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............ ..... 3fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 24 through 33 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 92.9-, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............3.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................23 to 34 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................2 AVERAGE SPEED ..................... .27. _ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS 0 10 20 F3 . SPEED (MPH) ---+----+----+----+ �] t 9� * 80 7� * 6 * _D5 4E 30 2E 10 -0 J -+----+----+----+ 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 15 , ■ 20 30 40 E 15 1 5 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM kn Location: Date: cBenAdanra112000 rlejn00195Jds EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N0 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) — 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) PJe 5, Profile Conditions (grade, %) 37 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no / 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, ( 1 office, etc.)PS'd<h�tq� 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median)/ 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - S D straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) S 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover -or no) MQ (yes cBenAdanra112000 rlejn00195Jds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Trevino Drive between Tournament Road and Vista Fairways Year of Survey PART P PRFVAII ING SPFFD MFASURFMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 30 33 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 25-34 (90.5%) Posted Speed Limit 25 mph PART It., ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, two lanes, broken -yellow striping, +/- 40 feet wide, curved alignment_ TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Golf course(south side), residential north side). etc.), other conditions KtMAKKb on adjacent land uses, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. 25 mph cAennclanta1120001Wn 13595.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS TREVINO DRIVE: TOURNAMENT ROAD TO VISTA .FAIRWAYS DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE... ......... 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 3:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED3fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT 'IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.00 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.�j PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 3$, VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ .....7ddl AVERAGE SPEED.. ..................30. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **********10 90 * 9 80 * 80, 70 * 7L CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 5 6.8 6.8 26 6 8.1 14.9 27 7 9.5 24.3 28 8 10.8 35.1 29 8 10.8 45.9 30 9 12.2 58.1 31 9 12.2 70.3 32 6 8.1 78.4 33 6 8.1 86.5 34 3 4.1 90.5 35 3 4.1 94.6 36 2 2.7 97.3 37 1 1.4 98.6 38 1 1.4 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED3fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT 'IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.00 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 9.�j PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 3$, VEHICLES OBSERVED ................ .....7ddl AVERAGE SPEED.. ..................30. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 100 **********10 90 * 9 80 * 80, 70 * 7L * 10 0************************* ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 60 50 * 40 30 * 20 * 10 0************************* ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 12,6 Dale: y/L 6 c*enrldanra11200011ejn00195.1ds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal �Q 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 31q 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �A 1f (W(S P S office, etc. 1a 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 4 offsets yes or no I 0 10. Pavement Condition (good, 6o0 satisfactory, poor, etc.) G 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, O divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- y(U V CUr✓f straight or curve 14. Traffic Flaw Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) r 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) P 5 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) O c*enrldanra11200011ejn00195.1ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Tournament Road between McBean Parkway and Golf Course Road Year of Survey 1995 PART F PRFVAIIJNG SPFFD MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 03/31/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.59 39 43 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 34-43 (83.4%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART IF ACCIDFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.59 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restriction, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, four lanes, two-way left - tum lanes,+/ 65 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, some observed on -street parking, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial (east side), vacant west side). etc.), other conditions PART IV_- ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cf"enWanta1120001 fajn 13695.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS TOURNAMENT ROAD: MCBEAN PARKWAY TO GOLF COURSE ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE. 3/31/1995 TIME ............... 3:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 100 :, 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31F 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.4 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.2 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 47 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................181 AVERAGE SPEED .......................38.6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ ******100 90 1 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 80 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. --- < 5 --- 0 ---- 0.0 --- 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 3 1.7 1.7 31 4 2.2 3.9 32 3 1.7 5.5 33 7 3.9 9.4 34 9 5.0 14.4 35 9 5.0 19.3 36 13 7.2 26.5 37 15 8.3 34.8 38 15 8.3 43.1 39 19 10.5 53.6 40 19 10.5 64.1 41 18 9.9 74.0 42 18 9.9 84.0 43 16 8.8 92.8 44 5 2.8 95.6 45 5 2.8 98.3 46 2 1.1 99.4 47 1 0.6 100.0 48 0 0.0 .100.0 49 0 0.0100.0 50 0 0.0.100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 100 :, 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31F 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 34 through 43 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.4 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.2 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 47 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................181 AVERAGE SPEED .......................38.6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ ******100 90 1 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 0*t*****************t****** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 v PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 10 20 30 40 50 _1 5 80 EI 70 60 n * u 50 * 40f1 * L; 30 * 20 * lOr-i ** 0*t*****************t****** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 v PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 10 20 30 40 50 _1 5 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 12? Date: c5entldanra 1120001 %ejn00195.xfs EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1, Horizontal A10 2. Vertical /1/Q 3. Superelevation (%) 4, Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) c(/ 5. Profile Conditions 3 g (grade, %) ii 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7: Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without O Sidewalks es or no S. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, /�� L�+r,, office, etc. (a -N 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �1 offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) Goo 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Z j ✓r ✓.Y divided, undivided, painted, 2 IpFj Iv,h or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - /: S straight or curved)l( 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics r✓/ �4r,t' (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) yP j 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) N10 c5entldanra 1120001 %ejn00195.xfs ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Tournament Road between Golf Course Road and Wiley Canyon Road Year of Survey PART L PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 36 39 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 31-40 (91.3%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93- 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1,55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, two lames, double -yellow striping, +/- 30 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, some on -street parking, mid -block pedestrian zing, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (set -back). etc.), other conditions No characteristics not readily apparent. 35 mph c6enPc1ar fa11200011e%n 13795.X1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS TOURNAMENT ROAD: GOLF COURSE ROAD TO WILEY CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S)....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............. 8:00 POSTED SPEED.LIMIT.35 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT -PCT < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 6 6.5 6.5 32 5 5.4 12.0 33 9 9.8 21.7 34 14 15.2 37.0 35 9 9.8 46.7 36 13 14.1 60.9 37 8 8.7 69.6 38 11 12.0 81.5 39 4 4.3 85.9 40 5 5.4 91.3 41 0 0.0 91.3 42 1 1.1 92.4 43 3 3.3 95.7 44 1 1.1 96.7 45 1 1.1 97.8 46 2 2.2 100.0 47 0 0.0 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3C�� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED .............. ...3ccff 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 31 through 40 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 91. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. .. ..........31 to 4q VEHICLES OBSERVED....................9 AVERAGE SPEED........................36. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n --+----+----+----+ u ******100 *** 90 * 80 * 7 0 (( 11 * 60 r 5 0 ���� * 40{I * !JJ 30[1 * 20H lOn 0 ' JI 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+----+-- 10 20 30 15 10 5 10 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 40 50 20 30 40 Ir 50 11 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: 2a Date: ` l-? i �41 denWarka11200011c/no0195.)ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /V 2. Vertical /0 I---- 3. Superelevation (°k) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) _J 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 °Je 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /� Sidewalks es or no // 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, n rr office, etc.)litS`rph a 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) Gp0 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, / / 00 J \/ j or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - -3o o straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) �� } 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) a t> 16. Heavy On=Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) ^r Ivo denWarka11200011c/no0195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Tourney Road between Valencia Boulevard and Maclic Mountain Parkway Year of Survey 1995 PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 1.11 43 47 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 38-47 (72.2%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART II: ACCIDFNT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 1.11 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART 111: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, dustpan driveways, two lanes, two-way left.tum lane, +/- 50 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Golf course east side), office west side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on horizontal sight distance restrictions, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph, RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cNent%clarita ll2000l;zjn l3895.xts SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS TOURNEY ROAD: VALENCIA BLVD. TO 2600' SIO MAGIC MTN PK DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......43�_ DATE .......... 4/ 4/1995 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......47L111111 TIME................ . 7:30 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 72.x2`,1� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.4j PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 20.4 cum RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to4 , MPH NO. PCT. PCT. VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................5 === === ==== ===== AVERAGE SPEED..................... .41.1' < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 6 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+-- 7 0 0.0 0.0 100 ***100 8 0 0.0 0.0 - D 9 0 0.0 0.0 90 90 10 0 0.0 0.0 - ** 80 11 0 0.0 0.0 80 12 0 0.0 0.0 - 70 13 0 0.0 0.0 70 14 0 0.0 0.0 - * 60�� 15 0 0.0 0.0 60 16 0 0.0 0.0 - * 50 17 0 0.0 0.0 50 18 0 0.0 0.0 - ** 19 0 0.0 0.0 40 40 20 0 0.0 0.0 - 21 0 0.0 0.0 30 * 30 22 0 0.0 0.0 - 23 0 0.0 0.0 20 * 20 24 0 0.0 0.0 - ***** 25 0 0.0 0.0 10 10D 26 0 0.0 0.0 - 27 0 0.0 0.0 0**************k*,t***ak**** 0 28 0 0.0 0.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 29 0 0.0 0.0 10 20 30 40 50 30 4 7.4 7.4 31 2 3.7 11.1 32 1 1.9 13.0 33 1 1.9 14.8 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 34 0 0.0 14.8 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 35 0 0.0 14.8 15 15i� 36 0 0.0 14.8 - _ 37 3 5.6 20.4 - _ 38 5 9.3 29.6 - 39 2 3.7 33.3 - 10 40 5 9.3 42.6 10 41 2 3.7 46.3 - 42 2 3.7 50.0 43 6 11.1 61.1 - 44 3 5.6 66.7 - 45 7 13.0 79.6 5 5 46 1 1.9 81.5 - a 47 6 11.1 92.6 - _ 48 3 5.6 98.1 - 49 1 1.9 100.0 _ - 50 0 0.0 100.0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ >50 0 0.0 100.0 10 20 30 40 50 n lJ CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM From: //// To: Observer. � `Z - Location: �7 Location; /21 Date: T/Z6 Ay ;- cientkladtal120001Wn00195.7ds EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal ��ll A/v 2. Vertical /0 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) �✓C 5. Profile Conditions (grade, °k) 3 % 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 11 at rade, dustpan, etc. �StPah 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without %� Sidewalks es or no)A 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial,office. I etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �--� offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) (j 0 p 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) (A)V,e- 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 1 I or raised median)I I 13. Street Width and / Alignment (width, feet - �O ridgy straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) c �� 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) cientkladtal120001Wn00195.7ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valle Del Oro between S.R. 126 and Dockweiler Drive Year of Survey 1995 RAPT I- RRPvnu ��I2 cRGGn MFARI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 30 35 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 25-34 (76.5%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted RAPT II- Ar`rInGNT PFrnRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents I Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- ulr-uWAV TPAFFir Akin PnenSlnF rt4ARAr.TFRISTIC4; NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, intersections spaced approximately 600 feet apart, two lanes, no striping, +/- 40 feetwide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Residential (fronting). etc.), other conditions IV: AVUI I IUNAL KLMAKnJ on adjacent land use and 10 -mph pace, reduce (RECOMMENDATION 130 mph mph. cNenWadta1120001Wn 14095.a1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS II VALLE DEL ORO: STATE ROUTE 126 TO DOCKWEILER DRIVE LLLJJJ DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE.. .......... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 9:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.' 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 19. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............23 to 38 VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ....... 5�1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................30.' CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *********1 90 ** 9U I 80 * 80 70 * 7Q_, 60 6 50 * 5 40 4 30 * 30 20 ** 2fl 10 D************************ ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 1 2.0 2.0 24 1 2.0 3.9 25 4 7.8 11.8 26 5 9.8 21.6 27 3 5.9 27.5 28 1 2.0 29.4 29 4 7.8 37.3 30 7 13.7 51.0 31 2 3.9 54.9 32 5 9.8 64.7 33 2 3.9 68.6 34 6 11.8 80.4 35 4 7.8 88.2 36 1 2.0 90.2 37 2 3.9 94.1 38 3 5.9 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 25 through 34 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 76. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 19. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............23 to 38 VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ....... 5�1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................30.' CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *********1 90 ** 9U I 80 * 80 70 * 7Q_, 60 6 50 * 5 40 4 30 * 30 20 ** 2fl 10 D************************ ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: `v d- `'e' ()Q'L O co Location: �' ),3[ From: SR �2-G To: O.Cikwe.t lex-- Date: �T Observer: 5" l VJ denndanfe112000 ftjno0195-dS EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal t\ Q O 2. Vertical N p N �% 3. Superelevation (%) ' 4. Shoulder Conditions (� {� (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions _-5 1 '2 'C (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics Ngfi N/A at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, IQe s rO office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - _j00, A0 �j O offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 9 cC C 9Ob satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) hd ✓t 1�o re - 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 1 U ' ` , V Y- l t vQJJ or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 40Cu rye 0 straight or curve T47 Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Q SQ5 Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking or N.6 1 Ivo Turnover (yes no) denndanfe112000 ftjno0195-dS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valley Street between Lyons Avenue and Haonv Valley Street Year of Survey 1995 DART 1• DRFVAII Mr.- RDFFn MFARI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 34 37 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 29-38 (93.8%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART II• ArrinFNT RFCORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DART ul• uIGNWAV TRAFFIC ANn RnnnSlnF ruARACTFRISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulder on west side, +/- 3% grade, driveways, two lanes, brokdn-yellow striping, +/- 40 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or heavy on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions FAKI IV: AUDI IIVINAL characteristics not readily apparent. 35 mph rUenWanta11200011ejn 14195.x15 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VALLEY STREET: LYONS AVENUE TO HAPPY VALLEY STREET DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3` 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 93.�j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 41 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................8 C AVERAGE SPEED .......................34.�� CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) -----+----+--------------+----t----+---------t �I 100 ******1 90 * 9� 80 80 * _ n 70 7 60 * 6� 50 5tr 40 4E�1 30 * 30 20 * 2� 10 1Q 0*r**************************** 0�-� 0 10 20 30 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) --------------------- 0 10 20 40 D 30 40 15 5 1� CUM MPH NO. PCT_ _PCT. 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 1 1.3 1.3 30 11 13.8 15.0 31 3 3.8 18.8 32 11 13.8 32.5 33 11 13.8 46.3 34 11 13.8 60.0 35 3 3.8 63.8 36 11 13.8 77.5 37 11 13.8 91.3 38 2 2.5 93.8 39 1 1.3 95.0 40 0 0.0 95.0 41 4 5.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3` 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 29 through 38 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 93.�j PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 6. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................29 to 41 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................8 C AVERAGE SPEED .......................34.�� CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) -----+----+--------------+----t----+---------t �I 100 ******1 90 * 9� 80 80 * _ n 70 7 60 * 6� 50 5tr 40 4E�1 30 * 30 20 * 2� 10 1Q 0*r**************************** 0�-� 0 10 20 30 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) --------------------- 0 10 20 40 D 30 40 15 5 1� Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: ( S Date: L��2 VA - cient%danta1i200011ejno0195.ids E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1_ Horizontal 2. Vertical A10 3. Superelevation (eh) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) (J/✓ (o(�t �i avt 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) i0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics n ds +P at rade, dustpan, etc. /TT %,a cl 5 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without P Sidewalks es or no 8, Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, j office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, Go satisfactory, poor, etc.) Q 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, (� divided; undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved)t/ l 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) I h (heavy, moderate, M 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) �s 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) ( N cient%danta1i200011ejno0195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valley Street between Happy Valley Street and Maple Street Year of Survey PART P PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 31 35 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 26-35 (85.5°/x) Posted Speed Limit 25 mph PART II• ArrInFNT RFrnRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 DArrr uL Hlnuwav TRAFFIr amn RnAMInF rHARACTFRIRTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, at -grade driveways, intersections spaced approximately 1,000 feet apart, two lanes, broken -yellow striping, +f: 30 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Pedestrians observed in roadway, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Lana uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on adjacent land use, unpaved shoulders, and pedestrians, reduce 85th percentile by 10 mph. RECOMMENDATION 25 mph cHenndanfa11200011e%n 14295.X!5 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VALLEY STREET: HAPPY VALLEY TO MAPLE DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 5/26/1995 TIME ............... 9:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31(l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 3fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.31 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 43 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................124(; AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 31.dJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******10 90 ** 9� 80 * 80 70 * 74J 60 6Q� 50 56 40 * 41J 30 30 20 * 2� 10 * 1� ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+--------------+--- +----+----+----+----+---- 0 10 20 Biel CUM MPH NO. PCT_ 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 4 3.2 3.2 26 4 3.2 6.5 27 7 5.6 12.1 28 7 5.6 17.7 29 11 8.9 26.6 30 15 12.1 38.7 31 15 12.1 50.8 32 15 12.1 62.9 33 14 11.3 74.2 34 10 8.1 82.3 35 8 6.5 88.7 36 4 3.2 91.9 37 4 3.2 95.2 38 1 0.8 96.0 39 0 0.0 96.0 40 2 1.6 97.6 41 2 1.6 99.2 42 0 0.0 99.2 43 1 0.8 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................31(l 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 3fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 26 through 35 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 85.5 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.31 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 3.2 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................25 to 43 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................124(; AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 31.dJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *******10 90 ** 9� 80 * 80 70 * 74J 60 6Q� 50 56 40 * 41J 30 30 20 * 2� 10 * 1� ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+--------------+--- +----+----+----+----+---- 0 10 20 Biel Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: ! /53 / Date: `r' Z919S` cientldanta11200011ejno0195-�ds EIB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /V 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 �p 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics n Gla �f at rade, dust an, etc. r 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - Zd D offsets yes or no) 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 000 11. Truck Traffic �^ (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, oo ) Kith divided, undivided, painted, vr0 or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 3 p straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics l i (heavy, moderate, light) t 11 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) /t% 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) Alo cientldanta11200011ejno0195-�ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valley Street between Maple Street and 500' SIO Alamos Lane Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAu ING SPFFn MFAStIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 26 28 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 22-31 (100.0%) Posted Speed Limit 25 mph PART II• APMnFNT PFrn RnC Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART 111- HIGHWAY, TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, at -grade driveways, two lanes, raised median, +1- 35 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or heavy on -street packing turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions . 11 not 25 mph cfienWanla 11200011e%n 14395.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VALLEY STREET: MAPLE STREET TO 500' SIO ALAMOS LANE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 8:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH CUM MPH NO. PCT. -PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 3 6.4 6.4 23 1 2.1 8.5 24 6 12.8 21.3 25 10 21.3 42.6 26 5 10.6 53.2 27 7 14.9 68.1 28 9 19.1 87.2 29 3 6.4 93.6 30 1 2.1 95.7 31 2 4.3 100.0 32 0 0.0 100.0 33 0 0.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................26f 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................28 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED..............100.0�� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.q PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0. RANGE OF SPEEDS.................22 to 31 VEHICLES OBSERVED ..................... 47 - AVERAGE SPEED .......................26.2, CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) rl +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ J 100 t***************1 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 -+----+----+ 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: J/ 3c( Date: / 2 gkf` 7 c6anrklarfra1120001Wn00195.;ds EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal j�Q 2. Vertical A10 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) ()h raV-e 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) �6T0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics �T G at rade, dustpan, etc. (a 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without po Sidewalks es or no A 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, I I, office, etc.)P5 C fin„ 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �O offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) ^� 12. Channelization (# of lanes, p 'la`s° divided undivided, painted, ) mf or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 3 straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics {� it (heavy, moderate, light) h l 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) do c6anrklarfra1120001Wn00195.;ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valley Street between 500' S/O Alamos Lane and Creekside Drive Year of Survey 1995 nwnr �. An C\/AII Iwln Qn=n RACAC"OCNACAIT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0,00 27 30 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 22-31 (93.9%) Posted Speed Limit 30 mph DADT 11. A!`!`1nCIdT DGen DnR Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0,00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 nAoT m. utr_uu1Av TDnrmf, Akin DnAnCInF cu APACTFRI3TICS NOT RFAmLY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries; access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restriction, paved intersections, other) shoulders, two lanes, double -yellow striping, +/- 25 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or heavy on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. ROADSIDE: Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent RECOMMENDATION 30 mph cAentlo1adta1120001Wn 14495.0s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Vera 2.00A/McTRANS VALLEY STREET: 500' SIO ALAMOS LANE TO CREEKSIDE DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 8:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.30 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................27i1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................30LJJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 93.9' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.0[� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 32 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................49 AVERAGE SPEED .......................26.50 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ****************10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 6�i CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 2 4.1 4.1 21 0 0.0 4.1 22 2 4.1 8.2 23 7 14.3 22.4 24 4 8.2 30.6 25 5 10.2 40.8 26 1 2.0 42.9 27 9 18.4 61.2 28 3 6.1 67.3 29 4 8.2 75.5 30 9 18.4 93.9 31 2 4.1 98.0 32 1 2.0 100.0 33 0 0.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0 100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................27i1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................30LJJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 22 through 31 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 93.9' PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2.0[� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................20 to 32 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................49 AVERAGE SPEED .......................26.50 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ****************10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * 6�i 5 4G� 1 * 30 * 2� ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 1 1 10 5 ---------------- ----------- 0 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: /35 Date: `/ Aq fiefs` cfienfklafitA120001 %ejn00195.)ds E/B or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal (0 /V0 2. Vertical AJ 0 3. Superelevation (%) �. 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 6, Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without / Sidewalks es or no A 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.)RPS.�ew�i 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Do+lir divided, undivided, painted, I l ye or raised median lie� 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - / IJIu straight or curved)25 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) J I 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) A% 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) No cfienfklafitA120001 %ejn00195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valencia Boulevard between West City Limit and Rockwell Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 DADT 1. DDC\/Alf 1111!`- CDCCn RACACI IDCMCR7T Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12131/93 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 50 54 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 45-54 (83.8%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART IF ACCinFNT RFPnRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12131/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 oAPT m• uicuwev TRAPRIr ARIn PnanslnF CNARArTFRMT[rR NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways; Slight horizontal and vertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) paved shoulders, six lanes, raised median, +/- 86 feet wide, curved lalignment TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park. school, College soul side), vacant(north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cfient%darUat12000 rlejn14595.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS (� VALENCIA BOULEVARD: WEST CITY LIMIT TO ROCKWELL CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME...............11:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................50� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................54 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.8,1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10.0 I PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.2� RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................. 130(1 AVERAGE SPEED.......................49 6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 **10�-, :t 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 --------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 6C 90 1 80 (� 7 o F1 60 50 40 r� 30 u 20 10 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 5 - E CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <15 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 4 3.1 3.1 40 0 0.0 3.1 41 0 0.0 3.1 42 3 2.3 5.4 43 1 0.8 6.2 44 0 0.0 6.2 45 10 7.7 13.8 46 8 6.2 20.0 47 13 10.0 30.0 48 10 7.7 37.7 49 16 12.3 50.0 50 12 9.2 59.2 51 14 10.8 70.0 52 8 6.2 76.2 53 10 7.7 83.8 54 8 6.2 90.0 55 5 3.8 93.8 56 4 3.1 96.9 57 0 0.0 96.9 58 0 0.0 96.9 59 3 2.3 99.2 60 1 0.8 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................50� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................54 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 83.8,1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10.0 I PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.2� RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 60 VEHICLES OBSERVED ................. 130(1 AVERAGE SPEED.......................49 6 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) n +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 **10�-, :t 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 --------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 6C 90 1 80 (� 7 o F1 60 50 40 r� 30 u 20 10 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 20 30 40 50 60 5 - E Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: Date: denndarllaW20001 %0000195x15 EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal �� 5 2. Vertical 7P5 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions �Q (paved or unpaved) f vy 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3749 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, I �� u(a� office, etc.)�O 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- —� offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, etc.) /' 1 satisfactory, poor, �9t7© C 11. Truck Traffic l (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, V 3 1 u'Sr c ✓ P or raised median / ° 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - strai ht or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) �pd✓� 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking". (yes 00 Turnover or no) 1 denndarllaW20001 %0000195x15 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valencia Boulevard between Rockwell Canyon Road and McBean Parkway Year of Survey 1995 PART I- PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/04195 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.08 50 53 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 46-55 (80.3%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART II- ACCIDFNT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.08 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART IIP HIr;HWAV_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal and vertical sight distance restrictions, intersections, other) paved shoulders, six lanes, raised median, +/- 86 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, no on -street parking permitted, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent par ; sc oo , Residential (southside).-vacant(north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph c6enW1adta1120001Wn 14695.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS II VALENCIA BOULEVARD: ROCKWELL CANYON ROAD TO MCBEAN PARKWAY LLL111 DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME...............11:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............. ....50� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................53', 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 46 through 55 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.3 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ........ ....1.4,� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 18.3` RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 57 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................14 AVERAGE SPEED.......................48. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+--- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+----+-- 20 30 40 15 10 5 20 SPEED (MPH) * PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) -+----+----+ ******100 90 LJ * LJ * 80 * 70H * 60 CJ * 50 L 4011 30 u 20H 10�0 50 60 n 15 30 40 50 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 4 2.8 2.8 40 1 0.7 3.5 41 5 3.5 7.0 42 6 4.2 11.3 43 2 1.4 12.7 44 5 3.5 16.2 45 3 2.1 18.3 46 7 4.9 23.2 47 15 10.6 33.8 48 12 8.5 42.3 49 10 7.0 49.3 50 14 9.9 59.2 51 12 8.5 67.6 52 15 10.6 78.2 53 12 8.5 86.6 54 13 9.2 95.8 55 4 2.8 98.6 56 1 0.7 99.3 57 1 0.7 100.0 58 0 0.0 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............. ....50� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................53', 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 46 through 55 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.3 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ........ ....1.4,� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 18.3` RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 57 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................14 AVERAGE SPEED.......................48. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+--- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+----+-- 20 30 40 15 10 5 20 SPEED (MPH) * PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) -+----+----+ ******100 90 LJ * LJ * 80 * 70H * 60 CJ * 50 L 4011 30 u 20H 10�0 50 60 n 15 30 40 50 60 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: /_37 From: To: Date: / A (�yS Observer. cienndanta1120001bjno0195.ids EIB or SB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal NO 2. Vertical as 3. Superelevation (°k) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no �V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �r � / office, etc. P I,(� 1A(tan 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) rj fJ 11. Truck Traffic I (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 3 or raised median) 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - straight or curved)�j to 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) Pu,/ 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) p 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) /V0 cienndanta1120001bjno0195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valencia Boulevard between McBean Parkway and Maqic Mountain Parkway Year of Survey 1995 DAPT 1• DRPVAn Me' CPFFn MPAAI IRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.93 41 46 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (79.3%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph DART II• ArrInGNIT RFrn RnC Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 12 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.93 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART nr HIr "WAY- TRAFFIC- ANn ROAnstDr CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, six lanes, raised median, +/- 86 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, no observed on -street parking, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant, office soul side), commercial nort s1 e . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cgent%datita %l2000llejn l4795.xis SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VALENCIA BOULEVARD: MCBEAN PARKWAY TO MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME...............12:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......41�] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................46 SO MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79.3 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13.81 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 49 VEHICLES OBSERVED...................."116 AVERAGE SPEED.......................41. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***100 90 * 90 I I 80 * 80 70 * 70 60 60 _ ** �] 50 50 40 * 40 30 30 20 * 20 10 10 ** p*t**************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 C 10� 30 40 50 5 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. --- < 5 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ----- 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0:0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 6 5.2 5.2 36 2 1.7 6.9 37 8 6.9 13.8 38 11 9.5 23.3 39 11 9.5 32.8 40 10 8.6 41.4 41 11 9.5 50.9 42 7 6.0 56.9 43 10 8.6 65.5 44 6 5.2 70.7 45 8 6.9 77.6 46 10 8.6 86.2 47 7 6.0 92.2 48 8 6.9 99.1 49 1 0.9 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ........... ......41�] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................46 SO MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 79.3 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13.81 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................35 to 49 VEHICLES OBSERVED...................."116 AVERAGE SPEED.......................41. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***100 90 * 90 I I 80 * 80 70 * 70 60 60 _ ** �] 50 50 40 * 40 30 30 20 * 20 10 10 ** p*t**************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 C 10� 30 40 50 5 Street From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM 11" Location: /�132 Date: % /2-1 /15 S dienrldadte 1720001 kjne0I95.ais EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1, Horizontal 0 2. Vertical �Q 3. Superelevation (%) —� 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) �!0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /u Sidewalks es or no)/1) 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, a(QM+ pp office, eta) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- 3 D� offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 000j 11. Truck Traffic light) "� (heavy, moderate, A&IA. 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, �rAh or raised median)ai St c"'� 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - strai ht or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics j (heavy, moderate, light) (Pally 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 03 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) dienrldadte 1720001 kjne0I95.ais ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Valencia Boulevard between Magic Mountain Parkway and Bouquet Canyon Road Year of Survey PART 1: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.37 43 47 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 38-47 (82.4°/x) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 10 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.37 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/21/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics,, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, six lanes, raised median, +!- 86 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Commercial, vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph dienWantal 12000 Aep 14895.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VALENCIA BOULEVARD: MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY TO BOUQUENT CYN DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............. 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............ ..12:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................43n 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................47L 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 82.4n PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.2 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................31 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1251 AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.7LLJJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �J +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ J 100 **100 9 ** 90 0 80 * 80 70 * 70 60 * 60 * 50 * 50 40 40 * 30 30 20 * 20 10 10 n p***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+-- 10 20 30 40 50 0L CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0�0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 2 1.6 1.6 32 0 0.0 1.6 33 0 0.0 1.6 34 2 1.6 3.2 35 0 0.0 3.2 36 0 0.0 3.2 37 4 3.2 6.4 38 9 7.2 13.6 39 15 12.0 25.6 40 10 8.0 33.6 41 13 10.4 44.0 42 7 5.6 49.6 43 5 4.0 53.6 44 8 6.4 60.0 45 13 10.4 70.4 46 10 8.0 78.4 47 13 10.4 88.8 48 9 7.2 96.0 49 4 3.2 .99.2 50 1 0.8 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................43n 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................47L 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 38 through 47 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 82.4n PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 11.2 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.4 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................31 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................1251 AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.7LLJJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) �J +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ J 100 **100 9 ** 90 0 80 * 80 70 * 70 60 * 60 * 50 * 50 40 40 * 30 30 20 * 20 10 10 n p***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+-- 10 20 30 40 50 0L CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: Location: 1� From: To: Date: Y /Z ( let -r— Observer. ,Sent da&a1120001b/no0195.ids E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal /1/0- V2. 2. Vertical /4/0 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Q ✓-t 5. Profile Conditions v� 3 (grade, %) / b 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 0)3 at rade, dustpan, etc. Ah 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without ' _ /0 A/0 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, l RCah r (QMH ipCtt� office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - -- offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) G f 11. Truck Traffic I A (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, i ui3i` Allo or raised median 13. Street Width and n� Alignment (width, feet strai ht or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) Qa 15. Uniformity with the f Community (yes or no) Q 16. Heavy On -Street Parking 1(,� Turnover (yes or no) rjfF� ,Sent da&a1120001b/no0195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Via Princessa between Circle J Ranch Road and End of Street Year of Survey 1995 PART F PRFVAII_ING SPFFn MFASURFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.74 34 41 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 28-37 (69.2%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.74 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III' HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/04/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 2% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, no driveways, intersections Spaced approximately 500 feet apart, four lanes, raised median, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment, TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school zings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. Lana uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph c6entldarfa11200011ejn14995.xfs SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS VIA PRINCESSA: CIRCLE J RANCH ROAD TO END OF STREET DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 3:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................3�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED................:4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69.5] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 25.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............25 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED. ...................10 AVERAGE SPEED .......................34.� CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) "I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ 100 ****10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0;.0 20 0 0.0 0-.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 2 1.9 1.9 26 0 0.0 1.9 27 4 3.7 5.6 28 6 5.6 11.2 29 4 3.7 15.0 30 10 9.3 24.3 31 6 5.6 29.9 32 5 4.7 34.6 33 8 7.5 42.1 34 11 10.3 52.3 35 9 8.4 60.7 36 6 5.6 66.4 37 9 8.4 74.8 38 2 1.9 76.6 39 3 2.8 79.4 40 4 3.7 83.2 41 7 6.5 89.7 42 2 1.9 91.6 43 7 6.5 98.1 44 2 1.9 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................3�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED................:4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 28 through 37 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69.5] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 25.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............25 to 4� VEHICLES OBSERVED. ...................10 AVERAGE SPEED .......................34.� CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) "I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ LJ 100 ****10 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: V l a Pr i n c-eSs CL- -Location: I O ^' 4 zto q5 From: C � 1'Y ��., Fdl�tT� To: T2/0 Sfi f 2� 1_r Date: Observer: 6JJ 1J cientldantaU200017 lino0195.id5 EJB or SIB W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal © VQ 2. Vertical N O I V 0 3. Superelevation (%) Z C� 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics N U at rade, dustpan, etc.) 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without ' IN O ` O N Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, 4P office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - + 50017,-0 offsets yes or no)1 10. Pavement Condition (good, r % c7 rJC! 00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 7 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channeliization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 2.D, ro j sect o2.D/ rot se.& or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment(Wdth,feet- ��Curved 11 t-%p3"izA straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics t Vx+ ` k� ` (heavy, moderate, light) 9 15. Uniformity with the Community. (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking (f 1 ( 1 Turnover (yes or no) cientldantaU200017 lino0195.id5 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Via Princessa between Rainbow Glen Drive and May Way Year of Survey PART 1! PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 46 50 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (78.4%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART II- ACCInFNT RFCORns Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accidept Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 1-3% grade, no driveways, four lanes, reflectorized median, +/- 60 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, school zing at May Way, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential (north side), set- ac residential, etc.), other conditions school (south side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL KEMAKK5 Based on school xing and 10 -mph pace, reduce 85th 45 mph cfien ndanta 11200011ejn 15095.x75 SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VIA PRINCESSA: RAINBOW GLEN DRIVE TO MAY WAY DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 3:10 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4J 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5d] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.�� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 17. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12� AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***100 90 ** 90� 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * * 80 * 70� * 60 j * 50 L * 40� * CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. X10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0'.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 5 4.0 4.0 40 8 6.4 10.4 41 6 4.8 15.2 42 12 9.6 24.8 43 9 7.2 32.0 44 10 8.0 40.0 45 12 9.6 49.6 46 10 8.0 57.6 47 10 8.0 65.6 48 7 5.6 71.2 49 14 11.2 82.4 50 7 5.6 88.0 51 5 4.0 92.0 52 5 4.0 96.0 53 2 1.6 97.6 54 3 2.4 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4J 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5d] 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.�� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 17. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............39 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12� AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***100 90 ** 90� 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 * * 80 * 70� * 60 j * 50 L 10f 0***********************t***** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 * 40� * 30 * 20 10f 0***********************t***** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 10 20 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: J 1Qi t)1 \ AC,65 SO Location: ` ` I From: 1�al f&O Li Gs PPTo: MQ Date: 20 Observer: E - J 0 cfienWadta1120001Wn00195.xra EIB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal q fv O 2. Vertical N O N C 3. Superelevation (%) — 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway � o d l W Characteristics N a Cif W at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the ped X l ✓� 4 t Roadway withoet n/ i' v p r ► v 0 w Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, n office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - J1 votoci/ AD offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, q 00 �L D qct satisfactory, poor, etc.) l It Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 1 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - (oGu ry &0, C J r V straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics light) , (heavy, moderate, u,,�xA– 15. Uniformity with the ''y Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking WO pami�q mo porklhl 1 Turnover (yes or no) VJM-I cfienWadta1120001Wn00195.xra ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC.. 627) Street: Via Princessa between May Way and Whites Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART L• PRFVAILING SPEED MFASt1REMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile ' ' 85%ile 0.00 45 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 40-49 (90.0%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART 111- HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 2% grade, no driveways, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, four lanes, partially reflectorized and raised median, +/- 60 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover; school xings Few pedestrians, no on -street parking observed, school xing at May Way, light vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, scant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45mph d&nWa6ta11200011ejn 15195.#S SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VIA PRINCESSA: MAY WAY TO WHITES CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 3:20 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 100 90 80 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 9U] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 5`� VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. ..14�I AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----t----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ *****100 40 30 20 10 * 90 80 70 * 60 L� 50 40� 30 * 20 - 10� p****************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+---- 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 _PCT_ 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0` 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0;.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 A 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 10 7.1 7.1 41 15 10.7 17.9 42 13 9.3 27.1 43 9 6.4 33.6 44 15 10.7 44.3 45 16 11.4 55.7 46 14 10.0 65.7 47 15 10.7 76.4 48 14 10.0 86.4 49 5 3.6 90.0 50 10 7.1 97.1 51 1 0.7 97.9 52 0 0.0 97.9 53 2 1.4 99.3 54 1 0.7 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 .100.0 100 90 80 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 JJ 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 40 through 49 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 9U] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 10. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 0.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 5`� VEHICLES OBSERVED .................. ..14�I AVERAGE SPEED.......................45. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----t----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ *****100 40 30 20 10 * 90 80 70 * 60 L� 50 40� 30 * 20 - 10� p****************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+---- 10 20 30 40 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: V L d P' f 1 Al P� Location: 4- 1 q 2— From: 0 if, To: Wk"+t5 Date: 14il 20 5 Observer: CV ry cienWarir81120001Wn00195AS EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal �a IVa 2, Vertical N O 3. Superelevation (eh) — — 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions C (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics Y1 ibo , [� `W y\ Q Q LA.) at rade, dust an, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic irl the Roadway withokt - , Y�O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, V Qom' . v 0C/ office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - Soot Ko 5 00f vw offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 11 o,00� satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic ► (heavy, moderate, light) t 12. Channelization (# of lanes, yZ f.41ec' 1%7- r-e'� divided, undivided, painted, �p t 291 yZrO;s� or raised median Yzrn�sed 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - -} 0� t V rY I_ t bc)f c V 'r- V straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 11 (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the \lQ S V-5 Community (yes or no) l 16. Heavy On -Street Parking V\ -43o Turnover (yes or no) cienWarir81120001Wn00195AS ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Via Princessa between Whites Canyon Road and Weyerhaeuser Way Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 55 59 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 51-60 (88.3%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART It: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY:; Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight vertical sight distance restriction, paved shoulders, intersections, other) +1- 6% grade, no driveways, four lanes, reflectorized median, +/-76 feet wide, slightly curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school. Metrolink station east side), golf course west side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on vertical curve, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph c#entlalanta V 200011ejn 15295.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS u I VIA PRINCESSA: WHITES TO WEYERHAEUSER WAY DIRECTION(S)....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 3:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 51 through 60 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 88.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.( PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............46 to 6P VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11�, AVERAGE SPEED .......................54.t CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 * 100 _ 90 * 90 80 * 80 70 * 70P * - 60 60( * �l 50 * 50� * 40 40' iJ * 30 30 * �I 20 20� 10 ** 100 ** 0******************************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- 20 30 40 50 60 t PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 60 �I IN CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 '0.0 W.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 0 0.0 0.0 41 0 0.0 0.0 42 0 0.0 0.0 43 0 0.0 0.0 44 0 0.0 0.0 45 0 0.0 0.0 46 2 1.8 1.8 47 4 3.6 5.4 48 1 0.9 6.3 49 2 1.8 8.1 50 4 3.6 11.7 51 12 10.8 22.5 52 10 9.0 31.5 53 7 6.3 37.8 54 12 10.8 48.6 55 6 5.4 54.1 56 10 9.0 63.1 57 7 6.3 69.4 58 13 11.7 81.1 59 10 9.0 90.1 60 .11 9.9 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 51 through 60 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 88.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 0.( PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............46 to 6P VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................11�, AVERAGE SPEED .......................54.t CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 * 100 _ 90 * 90 80 * 80 70 * 70P * - 60 60( * �l 50 * 50� * 40 40' iJ * 30 30 * �I 20 20� 10 ** 100 ** 0******************************** 0 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----- 20 30 40 50 60 t PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 60 �I IN U CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: V lCL Prn �CR-55a- Location: l 1� c� c, From: W't6+e5 Cv r\ . To: W �� per( �pVSCf Date: Observer: denAdadta1120001Wn00195.xrs EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) y 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical O YV o 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 1p (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics h0 (at -grade, dustpan. etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without ry, O 1r\ Q Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �01-F coocSe porkivn Iv -i office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet- $%Ot tnO S'Pol V\ -O offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, 1 satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic kA— 9k� (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, Z b I{ a' 2 D r c�2C7� or raised median 13. Street Width and ,/y cwrit cufV Alignment (width, feet - '7 (o3 St. 7 314 si'. strai ht or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics y`r\o CA, 1 (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Y \' r Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking nO YL 9— per' �' ne per,Turnover, (yes or no) f denAdadta1120001Wn00195.xrs ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Via Princessa between Weyerhaeuser Way and Sierra Highway Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAII INr; SPFFn MFASIJRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 53 57 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 47-56 (74.6%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accidept Rate 2.14 PART 111• HIMMAY_ TRAFFIC. ANn ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 3% grade, no driveways, no pedestrians, mostly raised median, partially reflectorized median,. four lanes, +/- 76 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on vertical curve, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cfientidanla 11200011ejn i5395.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VIA PRINCESSA: WEYERHAEUSER WAY TO SIERRA HIGHWAY DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 3:40 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 47 through 56 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 74.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 17. J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................44 to 6 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13 AVERAGE SPEED.......................52. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *100 90 * 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 80 * 70 60 * * 50tt11 * 40II * u 30 * * 20 *** 10 n 0****************************** O ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 1 'J PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 II 20 30 40 50 60 r lJ CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <15 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0:1.0 34 0 0.0 , 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 0 0.0 0.0 41 0 0.0 0.0 42 0 0.0 0.0 43 0 0.0 0.0 44 3 2.2 2.2 45 8 5.8 8.0 46 0 0.0 8.0 47 6 4.3 12.3 48 8 5.8 18.1 49 10 7.2 25.4 50 11 8.0 33.3 51 9 6.5 39.9 52 11 8.0 47.8 53 13 9.4 57.2 54 8 5.8 63.0 55 12 8.7 71.7 56 15 10.9 82.6 57 5 3.6 86.2 58 6 4.3 90.6 59 9 6.5 97.1 60 4 2.9 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5�1 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 47 through 56 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 74.� PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 17. J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.0 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................44 to 6 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13 AVERAGE SPEED.......................52. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 *100 90 * 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 80 * 70 60 * * 50tt11 * 40II * u 30 * * 20 *** 10 n 0****************************** O ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 1 'J PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15 10 5 II 20 30 40 50 60 r lJ U CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM 1/� u Street: V L(3— P lYLC�s5 a Location: 'ft- 1y From: \A) QCkl1US To: S1PXrU Rv) Date: 14ACJQ5 Observer: E(TN / h c6enndanta112W001rejno0195.)ds r] EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical N p N rJ 3. Superelevation (%) + 1- 4. Shoulder Conditionsp t y ho v 1 Aer (paved or unpaved) l to +'k S 1 des 5. Profile Conditions ,F iEl (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway / 1 Characteristics Y (at -grade, dustpan, gtc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without P, Y\ Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, V C V0 office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets(spacing,feet- 7001 tn0 's'7DOI v\.o offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, d satisfactory, poor, etc.) J� 11. Truck Traffic l t r 0 � k -w sq-y^\— 2m\"(heavy, (heavy,moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, 1/3 T4)tc. 1/-, t 2{(et divided, undivided, painted, 3 AO's or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - -7 l C t) `N 7(p, G v" strai ht or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics y�o ( Ci Vv/La t O (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the e Gi 5 Community. (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Tumover jyes or no) lf� o ne tAr(- r' n c6enndanta112W001rejno0195.)ds r] ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Via Princessa between Sierra Highway and Price Club Entrance Year of Survey 1995 PART P PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 41 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 36-45 (82.6%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART 11- ACCInFNT RFroRDS Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restrictions, 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 1-2% grade, dustpan drivgways on north side, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, six lanes, raised median with left -tum pockets, +/- 84 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, set -back residential soul side), set -back commercial etc.), other conditions (north side). FAKI IV: AUDI I IUNAL KtMAKKJ No characteristics not readily apparent. 45 mph c#en0clanta11200011ejn 15495.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.O0A/McTRANS VIA PRINCESSA: SIERRA HIGHWAY TO PRICE CLUB ENTRANCE DIRECTION(S)....... WESTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 3:50 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 82.@ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.' PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............31 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................11� AVERAGE SPEED .......................40.61 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 ** 10 ** +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 10 20 30 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 40 ***100 ** 901 80 70L 60j 50 4011 30 LLLJJJ f 20 10� 0 50 J L 1511 30 40 50 CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. --- < 5 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ----- 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0'.0 24 0 0.0 , 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 1 0.9 0.9 32 0 0.0 0.9 33 0 0.0 0.9 34 1 0.9 1.7 35 8 7.0 8.7 36 4 3.5 12.2 37 8 7.0 19.1 38 6 5.2 24.3 39 11 9.6 33.9 40 15 13.0 47.0 41 12 10.4 57.4 42 9 7.8 65.2 43 15 13.0 78.3 44 4 3.5 81.7 45 11 9.6 91.3 46 0 0.0 91.3 47 7 6.1 97.4 48 2 1.7 99.1 49 0 0.0 99.1 50 1 0.9 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 82.@ PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.' PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 8.7 RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............31 to 5 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................11� AVERAGE SPEED .......................40.61 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 ** 10 ** +----+----+----+----+----+----+--- 10 20 30 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 40 ***100 ** 901 80 70L 60j 50 4011 30 LLLJJJ f 20 10� 0 50 J L 1511 30 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: V 1Q ?'r" V\Ce,SSa- Location: +� t45 \_ 20 c From:. � (' �itJ T¢ �/'� CieC `ub Date: 15 Observer. �F_ 1:S_0 c ianAdadtal120001Wn00195.'ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N 'D 2. Vertical O NO 3. Superelevation (%) 1 4. Shoulder Conditions P P (paved or unpaved) 1 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway p( « c (rUh Characteristics u SA�>af\ D/kJ SeMi dvstPn at rade, dust an, etc. vet, cle 5 owi n dower obi. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway witholit O Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, rQ S ( V QC_ Co YArn_ office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ±4<)o r h a l 1 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) t OOtl q 11. Truck Traffic o bsc (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, v •ra + s e.� divided, undivided, painted, 3 I `Q 5 3 I or raised median) tky I L oEAk Y of Ci 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- Gu t -v J�241 Gvry strai ht or curve I 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics rno V^ C> d (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Q 5 Y Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) W6 YJ2i V\ d hQr c ianAdadtal120001Wn00195.'ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Via Princessa between Price Club Entrance and East City Limit Year of Survey 1995 DART h PRFVAII INr. SPFFn MFASNRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 42 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (84.7%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PAPT n. ArrIn FNT PFrnRnC Time Period Covered 01/01/92 - 12/31/93 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART ur HIr;HWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 2% grade, dustpan driveways on,north side, six lanes, raised median with left -tum pockets, +/- 84 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular and truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park. school, Vacant soul side), parking lot(north sl e . etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph dienticlada11200011ejn 15595.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS VIA PRINCESSA: PRICE CLUB ENTRANCE TO EAST CITY LIMIT DIRECTION(S) ....... EASTBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME. .............. 4:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 84." PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 5Q-� VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................131 AVERAGE SPEED.......................41. JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1 ----------------------------------------------- _j 100 **100 90 80 70 60 50 40 *,t - CUM MPH NO. PCT_ < 5 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0,.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 7 5.3 5.3 35 2 1.5 6.9 36 1 0.8 7.6 37 10 7.6 15.3 38 5 3.8 19.1 39 7 5.3 24.4 40 15 11.5 35.9 41 9 6.9 42.7 42 11 8.4 51.1 43 16 12.2 63.4 44 17 13.0 76.3 45 14 10.7 87.0 46 7 5.3 92.4 47 2 1.5 93.9 •48 4 3.1 96.9 49 1 0.8 97.7 50 3 2.3 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 J 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 84." PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 7.� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7.6 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 5Q-� VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................131 AVERAGE SPEED.......................41. JJ CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 1 ----------------------------------------------- _j 100 **100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 30 20 * 20. 10 * 10� ** p***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 15n -+----+----+----+----+----+----t----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 0J *,t - * 90 80 * 70� 60n * 50 40� 30 30 20 * 20. 10 * 10� ** p***************************** 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 15n -+----+----+----+----+----+----t----+----+ 10 20 30 40 50 0J CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: V L(1 2f'l,n C'_s�-.a Location: i�- H �) From: f-tCe_ C10b To: Post CIj�) L11M1'r Date: � O Observer: F_n G client%da&a11200011e%n00195Jds InI ll E/B or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal IV 2. Vertical p N O 3. Superelevation 4. Shoulder Conditions P (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 2- 2 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway pr.«e Civb D/lt) Characteristics n 0D f d v 5-(- n r� S �,w� _ a v 51-pp�° at rade, dustpan, etc. / c O'k �1e5 ohs.5la eq tz t 7. Pedestrian Traffic inlhe Roadway without - i\�0 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Vac P o f office, etc.)J 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - *)/A Y\ A� offsets es or no)I 10, Pavement Condition (good, 0 O� d satisfactory, poor, etc.) Of o O O 11. Truck Traffic light) ` (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, 3 D ra ised 1 3D rei 5e_& or raised median) w L�ocK1t! w ocKetS 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - $ 4 t 5 M lql� l gLA straight or curved)f 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics lMo (heavy, moderate, light) (1. 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16: Heavy On -Street Parking O 10 ' 100 mt`r�' Turnover (yes or no) /}n +i S i rl5 G client%da&a11200011e%n00195Jds InI ll ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Wavman Street between Lola Lane and Lyons Avenue Year of Survey 1995 PART 1- PRFVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 06/20/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 27 30 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 22-31 (88.0%) Posted Speed Limit None Posted PART 11• ArrIn FNT RFrnRnc Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accidept Rate 1,55 PART IIF HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, dustpan driveways, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, no striping, +/- 40 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no trucks. ROADSIDE: Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential. etc.), other conditions IV. HUUIIIVIYML RCIYIMRRJ on vertical sioht distance restr and 10 -mph pace, reduce (RECOMMENDATION 125 mph ciienrlclan1at1200011e%n 15695.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS WAYMAN STREET: LYONS AVENUE TO LOLA LANE DIRECTION(S)....... NB/SB DATE ............... 6/20/1995 TIME ............... 4:40 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.25 MPH 100 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.61 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................21 to 33 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................5 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 27.V - CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * * 9Cn * LJJ 80 * 7- 641 50J 4 30 2 10 0 40 E PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 15 5 _I CUM MPH NO. PCT 0 0 0.0 -PCT. 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0'. 0 21 1 2.0 2.0 22 2 4.0 6.0 23 2 4.0 10.0 24 2 4.0 14.0 25 9 18.0 32.0 26 6 12.0 44.0 27 4 8.0 52.0 28 3 6.0 58.0 29 9 18.0 76.0 30 4 8.0 84.0 31 3 6.0 90.0 32 3 6.0 96.0 33 2 4.0 100.0 34 0 0.0 100.0 35 0 0.0 100.0 36 0 0.0100.0 37 0 0.0 100.0 38 0 0.0 100.0 39 0 0.0 100.0 40 0 0.0 100.0 41 0 0.0 100.0 42 0 0.0 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 100 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................2fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 23 through 32 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 90.Q PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 4. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 6.61 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................21 to 33 VEHICLES OBSERVED.....................5 AVERAGE SPEED ....................... 27.V - CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 * * 9Cn * LJJ 80 * 7- 641 50J 4 30 2 10 0 40 E PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 15 5 _I Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM YCA Location: %7 Dater denWadtai120001 Wn00195.ids EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal wo 2. Vertical YP S 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3 %0 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics (at -grade, dustpan, etC.) I f' 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, I �an1 office, etc.)eS` C1 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - / O' offsets es or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) DD 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median)l' 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - � % (�r straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the +I Community (yes or no) Y �S 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) C e� denWadtai120001 Wn00195.ids ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Whites Canyon Road between Via Princessa and Soledad Canyon Road Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAII INr; SPFFD MFASIIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 45 52 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 45-54 (50.7%) Posted Speed Limit 50 mph PART 11• ArrIn FAIT PFrnPnA Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART ur HIaNwAv_'TRAFFIC AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/20/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 2% grade, dustpan driveways sbuthbound direction north of Soledad Canyon, six lanes, raised median, +/- 78 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic, Land uses not apparent pa , sc oo , Vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 50 mph cfenticlanta1120001 %ejnl5795.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS WHITES CANYON ROAD: VIA PRINCESSA TO SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 2:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.50 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4U 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 50.7, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ O.0 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 49.3] RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................13Q� AVERAGE SPEED ................... .44 �j CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+-- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 10 20 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <10 0 0.0 -PCT_ 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0,.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 b.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 4 3.0 3.0 35 6 4.5 7.5 36 9 6.7 14.2 37 12 9.0 23.1 38 6 4.5 27.6 39 8 6.0 33.6 40 6 4.5 38.1 41 4 3.0 41.0 42 1 0.7 41.8 43 1 0.7 42.5 44 9 6.7 49.3 45 7 5.2 54.5 46 2 1.5 56.0 47 5 3.7 59.7 48 12 9.0 68.7 49 2 1.5 70.1 50 5 3.7 73.9 51 6 4.5 78.4 52 10 7.5 85.8 53 7 5.2 91.0 54 12 9.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4U 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................5 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 45 through 54 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 50.7, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ O.0 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 49.3] RANGE OF SPEEDS.................34 to 54 VEHICLES OBSERVED ....................13Q� AVERAGE SPEED ................... .44 �j CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. +----+----+----+----+----+-- 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 10 20 30 SPEED (MPH) --+----+----+----+ **10 * 90 * LJ * 80 * ** 70 * 60 ** * 50 *** 40[j * J * 30 20� 10 0 --+----+----+----+ 40 50 E PERdENT VS. SPEED (MPH) 15 10 5 --------------------- 10 20 30 15 ----------------- 40 50 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM r I Street: Vi k +:""' I _ Location: l From: V I a Pr + vj C.Gt3 To: o ���tl. �>ti Date: Ll ZJ Observer. denndarfta V 20001fe/no0195.1ds E/B or S/B W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal iV o O 2. Vertical N O a 3. Superelevation (°/9) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions +n Z (grade, %) o� 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics �uS�OMS qUs Sol�doa CYC^ at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic ih the Roadway without r\_6 i� Q Sidewalks es or no 6. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, \J Q C_ C_ b r e office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ©0 0 'r\_0 �a b�J/ offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, aj ood satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Y-C divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and �c �T s'o 5tr. Alignment (width, feet - straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics a d (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the y S C Q Community (yes or no) J 16. Heavy On -Street Parking A ` t v ^\ (� I v J Turnover (yes or no) denndarfta V 20001fe/no0195.1ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Whites Canyon Road between Soledad Canyon Road and Pleasantdale Street Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAII ING SPFFD MFAStIRFMFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.31 44 48 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 39-48 (78.7%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART II: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 2 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.31 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III: HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, no driveways, intersections spaced approximately 500-600 feet apart, four lanes, 12 -foot painted median, +/- 74 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school zings, heavy vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Una uses not apparent (park, school, Residential (east side), school, commeraa west side). etc.), other conditions IV: AUDI I IUNAL KLMAKKb on adjacent land uses, reduce speed by 5 mph. (RECOMMENDATION 140 mph ckenticlanta11200011ejn 15B95.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS WHITES CANYON ROAD: SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD TO PLEASANTDALE ST. DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 2:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH imv 90 80 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.7, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13.11 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. , RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 58 VEHICLES OBSERVED ............... ..121 AVERAGE SPEED .................. ....43 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) r-} +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ***10 40 30 20 10 ******** * 90 ** 80 ** 70 J * 60f * 5 0 Ll * 40� * 30 * 20� go 0 o 0********************* ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 I I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 6C CUM MPH NO. PCT_ PCT_ X15 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 1 0.8 0.8 31 0 0.0 0.8 32 0 0.0 0.8 33 0 0.0 0,8 34 0 0.0 6.8 35 2 1.6 2.5 36 1 0.8 3.3 37 3 2.5 5.7 38 2 1.6 7.4 39 10 8.2 15.6 40 7 5.7 '21.3 41 10 8.2 29.5 42 13 10.7 40.2 43 12 9.8 50.0 44 10 8.2 58.2 45 12 9.8 68.0 46 6 4.9 73.0 47 12 9.8 82.8 48 4 3.3 86.1 49 3 2.5 88.5 50 7 5.7 94.3 51 3 2.5 96.7 52 0 0.0 96.7 53 0 0.0 96.7 54 0 0.0 96.7 55 0 0.0 96.7 56 0 0.0 96.7 57 0 0.0 96.7 58 4 3.3 100.0 59 0 0.0 100.0 60 0 0.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 imv 90 80 70 60 50 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................. 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 39 through 48 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 78.7, PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 13.11 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 7. , RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 58 VEHICLES OBSERVED ............... ..121 AVERAGE SPEED .................. ....43 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) r-} +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ ***10 40 30 20 10 ******** * 90 ** 80 ** 70 J * 60f * 5 0 Ll * 40� * 30 * 20� go 0 o 0********************* ---------------------------------------------- 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 I I +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 20 30 40 50 6C CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: h/Int lc] L-uyyV ri-- nw u" -J- From 01,aoA CONUIDK To: PIP-aS K+Aa•�, Observer. ETN Location: -4 Il - 1 Date: W ze- 5 c1enndadtai120001%eJn00195.#s EJB or S/B W/B or N/B Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N o N n 2. Vertical IVO NrJ 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (� (paved or unpaved) I- 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics (� at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic irf the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no Y 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.)r 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - ) !,-0 ±77q�' .1-1 offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, ave- 00 satisfactory, poor, etc.) J 11 • (heavyruck , raffic 1 a moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, IZD7 D DPY l O-D%T O OY or raised median)1 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - �"�l �t rj (, ',f��l straight or curved) 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Q `� Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking fJ Turnover (yes or no) c1enndadtai120001%eJn00195.#s ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Whites Canyon Road between Pleasantdale Street and Nadal Street Year of Survey DART 1• DRFVAn mr_ czPPFn MFASI IRPMFNT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 40 44 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 36-45 (80.0%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART II- ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART In- 14Ir;H1NAV. TRAFFIC. ANn ROAnStnF CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY:: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +1- 1 % grade, no driveways, intersections spaced approximately 500 feet apart, four,)anes, painted 12 -foot median, +/- 74 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings Few pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. an uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential east side), set -back res/ enba , retc other conditions school (west side). PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph c6enndanralr200011ejn 15995.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS it WHITES CANYON ROAD: PLEASANTDALE STREET TO NADAL STREET LUJ DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 2:30 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................:4U 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.01 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8•� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............30 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED ......... . .... .. .... 11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ �J 100 ********10 .. 90 * 90 a 80 80 70 * 70 Li 60 * 60 50 * 50 L 40 * 40 30 30 20 20 iJ 10 * * 10 0********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 U PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 10 20 30 10 _ L 5 - L_1 - -+- •-+ CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. <10 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 O;o0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 2 1.8 1.8 31 1 0.9 2.7 32 0 0.0 2.7 33 1 0.9 3.6 34 6 5.5 9.1 35 3 2.7 11.8 36 6 5.5 17.3 37 10 9.1 26.4 38 13 11.8 38.2 39 9 8.2 46.4 40 6 5.5 51.8 41 11 10.0 61.8 42 9 8.2 70.0 43 5 4.5 74.5 44 12 10.9 85.5 45 7 6.4 91.8 46 4 3.6 95.5 47 1 0.9 96.4 48 3 2.7 99.1 49 0 0.0 99.1 50 0 0.0 99.1 51 0 0.0 99.1 52 0 0.0 99.1 53 1 0.9 100.0 54 0 0.0 100.0 55 0 0.0 100.0 >55 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED................:4U 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED ................ 4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 80.01 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8•� PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 11. RANGE OF SPEEDS .. ..............30 to 53 VEHICLES OBSERVED ......... . .... .. .... 11� AVERAGE SPEED.......................40. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) (� +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ �J 100 ********10 .. 90 * 90 a 80 80 70 * 70 Li 60 * 60 50 * 50 L 40 * 40 30 30 20 20 iJ 10 * * 10 0********************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 U PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 10 5 10 20 30 10 _ L 5 - L_1 - -+- •-+ 40 50 U CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street:( �` k) ies Qgin`, Dh O tl`d From:j'jle-a SaVt%dn,`P- To: N4dW Observer. 5:1 N Location: TT IIE50 Date: 4 2(O l5 cien6dadz%12000 A&Jno0195.)ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) Horizontal IQ 1. 2. Vertical No 3. Superelevation (%) �1 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions �\ (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics r (f��II Iv o JI w D r N6, !I at rade, dustpan. etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic ih the ' N � �l Roadway without O I V p Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, �� G office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - b Np offsets yes or no 10, Pavement Condition (good, O Oflu satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) `\fi 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, ®� p 0 QY ��'� p a;vt he d �a -JROa-- m ed I a^ or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - 1 7 _ 1 GurJt✓ A Gll f VP�i straight or curved) J 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) SMO 6 %� o 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On=Street Parking or 1 v N I Tumover (yes no) 1 cien6dadz%12000 A&Jno0195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Whites Canyon Road between Nadal Street and Ashboro Drive Year of Survey 1995 DADT 1• oommiI min CDCCn 611GACIIR9=MFNT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 49 54 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 43-52 (69.2%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART IP ACCInFNT RFCr]RDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III, HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways. Slight horizontal sight distance restrictions, +/- 1% intersections, other) superelevation, paved shoulders, +/- 2% grade, no driveways, ,four lanes, raised median, +/- 78 feet wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians, on -street parking not permitted, no school xings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential, vacant. etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADDITIONAL REMARKS Based on horizontal sight distance restrictions and close proximity to school, reduce 85th percentile speed by 5 mph. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph ckenttdanta11200011ejn 16095.#s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS WHITES CANYON ROAD: NADAL STREET TO ASHBORO DRIVE DIRECTION(S)....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 2:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45,MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED5fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............25 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 6C VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 11J1I1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................49.} CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 100 *100 90 **** 90 80 80 70 * 70L 60 ** 60j 50 * 50 40 40� 30 30 20 ** 20� 10 10�L p************************* 0 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 30 40 50 u 5 60 1.1 CUM MPH NO. PCT_ <15 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.-.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 0 0.0 0.0 37 0 0.0 0.0 38 0 0.0 0.0 39 0 0.0 0.0 40 2 1.7 1.7 41 3 2.6 4.3 42 1 0.9 5.1 43 10 8.5 13.7 44 7 6.0 19.7 45 9 7.7 27.4 46 8 6.8 34.2 47 12 10.3 44.4 48 5 4.3 48.7 49 14 12.0 60.7 50 1 0.9 61.5 51 10 8.5 70.1 52 5 4.3 74.4 53 10 8.5 82.9 54 5 4.3 87.2 55 2 1.7 88.9 56 0 0.0 88.9 57 3 2.6 91.5 58 1 0.9 92.3 59 2 1.7 94.0 60 7 6.0 100.0 >60 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED5fl 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 43 through 52 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 69. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED ............25 PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................40 to 6C VEHICLES OBSERVED .................... 11J1I1 AVERAGE SPEED .......................49.} CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ u 100 *100 90 **** 90 80 80 70 * 70L 60 ** 60j 50 * 50 40 40� 30 30 20 ** 20� 10 10�L p************************* 0 20 30 40 50 60 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 15� 30 40 50 u 5 60 1.1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM w vol t -5 CCW\�iQ'yk- OCA Location: Street: `f q From: K)0 Ck3\ —C To: / SV14Y)O2 Dale: � 1-2-6 1 IS Observer. J cienWan[a%120001%e%n00195Jds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal N o N o 2. Vertical bj O d 3. Superelevation (%) ` } 4. Shoulder Conditions ^ r� (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) _ n L— Z 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics ` ust an, etc. at rade, dustpan l Iv O 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without A 1 � +� Q Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 0 O offsets yes or no)` 10. Pavement Condition (good, 0 O d O O satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11.. Truck Traffic light) (heavy, moderate, 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, ` n} or raised median)1 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - I 7glr C U T"� C JJ C u vved straight or curve t 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics ` (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the e y Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy_On-Street Parking NIP Turnover (yes or no) cienWan[a%120001%e%n00195Jds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Wiley Canyon Road between Via Pacifica and Orchard Village Road Year of Survey 1995 PART I• PRFVAII INr; SPFFn MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 39 43 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 36-45 (74.0%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph DAFT 11• Ar`(_1nFNT RFr(IRnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART IIP H1r14WAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, four lanes, raised median, +/- 80 feet Wide, curved alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings No observed pedestrians or on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cfiantldanta11200011efn 16195.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS WILEY CANYON ROAD: VIA PACIFICA TO ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME...............12:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............. ....3fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 74. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23. RANGE OF SPEEDS......... .....29 to 47 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED .......................38.' CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ******10 * 90 ! * LJ N 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 0************************ +----+----+----+----+----+--- 10 20 30 CUM MPH NO. PCT PCT < 5 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 4 3.1 3.1 30 2 1.6 4.7 31 4 3.1 7.9 32 3 2.4 10.2 33 5 3.9 14.2 34 7 5.5 19.7 35 5 3.9 23.6 36 13 10.2 33.9 37 6 4.7 38.6 38 11 8.7 47.2 39 5 3.9 51.2 40 12 9.4 60.6 41 10 7.9 68.5 42 15 11.8 80.3 43 6 4.7 85.0 44 6 4.7 89.8 45 10 7.9 97.6 46 1 0.8 98.4 47 2 1.6 100.0 48 0 0.0 100.0 49 0 0.0 100.0 50 0 0.0 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED ............. ....3fl 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 36 through 45 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 74. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 2. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 23. RANGE OF SPEEDS......... .....29 to 47 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED .......................38.' CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ******10 * 90 ! * LJ N 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ** 0************************ +----+----+----+----+----+--- 10 20 30 * 80 n * 70 (j * 60 n * 50 * 40�* 30 * * 20U 10�0 -+----+----+----+ 40 50 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 15 10� 10 20 30 40 50 �I Street: From: Observer. CiTY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM 110 Location: Date: denMarr1a11200011ejn00195.xra EJB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal n/" o 2. Vertical D 3. Superelevation (°k) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) A /� 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 37q 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics //JJ at rade, dustpan, etc. ds� 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no q 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, 11 ^ office, etc.) 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - --- offsets yes or no offsets 10. Pavement Condition (good, Goo satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided,, ainted p A, MY or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - D dr -',(1 straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics lie (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the yP Community (yes or no) j 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) denMarr1a11200011ejn00195.xra ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Wiley Canyon Road between Orchard Village Road and Lyons Avenue Year of Survey 1995 PART L PRFVAII ING SPFFD MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.26 42 45 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 37-46 (87.3%) Posted Speed Limit 45 mph PART IP ACrIn FNT RFCr1RnS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 3 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.26 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 2.14 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways. No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, +/- 3% grade, no driveways, four lanes, raised median, +/-,85 feet wide, curved alignment, TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians or heavy on -street parking turnover, no school zings, moderate vehicular traffic, light truck traffic, Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV- ADnITIONAt_ RFMARKS ------ -- --------------------- No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 45 mph cNenf%clanla 11200011ejn 16295.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS II WILEY CANYON ROAD: ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD TO LYONS AVENUE LLLJJJ DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 1:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.45 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4L] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 87.3 - PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4.� RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................lic AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.L CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) t----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---**1001 100 90 * 90 80 80 70 70 60 60r * IL11 50 50 40 40E 30 * 30 20 20U 10 10 ** 0******************************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 �1 L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 193 10 5 15 10 20 30 40 50 01� CUM MPH NO. PCT. PCT. --- < 5 --- 0 ---- 0.0 ----- 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0.0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0 0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 0 0.0 0.0 31 0 0.0 0.0 32 0 0.0 0.0 33 0 0.0 0.0 34 0 0.0 0.0 35 0 0.0 0.0 36 5 4.5 4.5 37 3 2.7 7.3 38 8 7.3 14.5 39 3 2.7 17.3 40 13 11.8 29.1 41 15 13.6 42.7 42 12 10.9 53.6 43 '13 11.8 65.5 44 10 9.1 74.5 45 12 10.9 85.5 46 7 6.4 91.8 47 3 2.7 94.5 48 1 0.9 95.5 49 4 3.6 99.1 50 1 0.9 100.0 >50 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4L] 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................4 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 37 through 46 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 87.3 - PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 8.J PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 4.� RANGE OF SPEEDS.................36 to 50 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................lic AVERAGE SPEED .......................42.L CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) t----+----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---**1001 100 90 * 90 80 80 70 70 60 60r * IL11 50 50 40 40E 30 * 30 20 20U 10 10 ** 0******************************* 0 ---------------------------------------------- 10 20 30 40 50 �1 L PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 193 10 5 15 10 20 30 40 50 01� Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To Location `'' Date: 112 6A c1enWadtal120001 W jn00195ads EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 3. Superelevation (°h) — 4. Shoulder Conditions n (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway withoyt . , /O Sidewalks es or no A a. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, office, etc.)l l Pl �tr 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, GOp satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - c / straight or curved)J 14, Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) PS 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) c1enWadtal120001 W jn00195ads ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Wiley Canyon Road between Lyons Avenue and Powell Drive Year of Survey PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT 1995 Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/04/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.32 35 38 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 30-39 (84.4%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART Il: ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 1 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.32 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways, two lanes, painted two-way left -tum lane, +/- 50 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school zings Few pedestrians, light on -street parking turnover, school xing at La Glorita, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. an uses not apparent par , schoo , School, set -back residential. etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cNennWadW 120001Wn 16395.x/s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/MCTRANS WILEY CANYON ROAD: LYONS AVENUE TO POWELL DRIVE DIRECTION(S) ....... NORTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 1:15 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84. ] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.8J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................26 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED.......................34. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---- 100 ******10 90 * 9� 80 * 80 70 * 7f�Jn 60 6C'-1 50 * 500 40 * 4 f 30 * 30 20 2 10 ** 0*************************** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 CUM MPH NO. PCT PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0,:0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 3 2.5 2.5 27 4 3.3 5.7 28 3 2.5 8.2 29 2 1.6 9.8 30 6 4.9 14.8 31 12 9.8 24.6 32 9 7.4 32.0 33 11 9.0 41.0 34 9 7.4 48.4 35 it 9.0 57.4 36 16 13.1 70.5 37 10 8.2 78.7 38 11 9.0 87.7 39 8 6.6 94.3 40 3 2.5 96.7 41 1 0.8 97.5 42 3 2.5 100.0 43 0 0.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 30 through 39 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 84. ] PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 9.8J RANGE OF SPEEDS.................26 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................12 AVERAGE SPEED.......................34. CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) +----+----+----+----+----+----+----+---- 100 ******10 90 * 9� 80 * 80 70 * 7f�Jn 60 6C'-1 50 * 500 40 * 4 f 30 * 30 20 2 10 ** 0*************************** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 15 10 5 0 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ----+----+----+----+----+----+----+ 10 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: SSI Date: clenWarita1120001%ejno0195.)ds EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal 2. Vertical 0 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) rn/ I AJ 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) 3%D 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics 11 at rade, dustpan, etc. JS T Gh 7, Pedestrian Traffic iri the Roadway without Sidewalks es or no / 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, JL�pp %} f j 1` e5 office, etc. c� Ph 7 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - 5, offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, Gp satisfactory, poor, etc.) D 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, Tio a/ay divided, undivided, painted, ) I or raised median) 13. Street Width and r Alignment (width, feet - SD straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the Community (yes or no) Ye S 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) o clenWarita1120001%ejno0195.)ds ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: Wiley Canyon Road between Powell Drive and Calgrove Boulevard Year of Survey 1995 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/12/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 36 39 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 31-40 (89.1%) Posted Speed Limit 35 mph PART It- ACCIDFNT RFCARDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART 111: HIGHWAY. TRAFFIC. AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/28/95 HIGHWAY: Geometrics, access (driveways, Slight horizontal sight distance restrictions, unpaved intersections, other) shoulders, two lanes, double -yellow striping, +1- 25 feet wide, curved,alignment. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, no heavy on -street parking turnover, no school xings, light vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Set -back residential, vacant., etc.), other conditions PART IV ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 35 mph cffen ticlaAta 1120001 Wn 16495.x1s SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2.00A/McTRANS WILEY CANYON ROAD: POWELL DRIVE TO CALGROVE BOULEVARD DIRECTION(S) ....... SOUTHBOUND DATE ............... 4/12/1995 TIME...............10:00 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.35 MPH 10 9 8 70 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................36 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 31'through 40 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 43 - VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ...... 10� AVERAGE SPEED.......................35. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) L ---------------------------------------------- *****10 *****10 0 ** 9M 0 * 8 * 71] * 60 CUM MPH NO. PCT. 0 0 0.0 -PCT 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0»0 20 0 0.0 ,, 0.0 21 0 0.0 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 2 2.0 2.0 29 0 0.0 2.0 30 4 4.0 5.9 31 1 1.0 6.9 32 12 11.9 18.8 33 10 9.9 28.7 34 8 7.9 36.6 35 12 11.9 48.5 36 16 15.8 64.4 37 4 4.0 68.3 38 10 9.9 78.2 39 7 6.9 85.1 40 10 9.9 95.0 41 1 1.0 96.0 42 3 3.0 99.0 43 1 1.0 100.0 44 0 0.0 100.0 45 0 0.0 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 10 9 8 70 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................36 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 31'through 40 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED .............. 89.1 PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 5. PERCENT UNDER PACE SPEED........... 5.9 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................28 to 43 - VEHICLES OBSERVED .............. ...... 10� AVERAGE SPEED.......................35. J CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) L ---------------------------------------------- *****10 *****10 0 ** 9M 0 * 8 * 71] * 60 50 40 30 20 10 0****************************** ---------------------------------------------- 0 10 20 30 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 +----+----+- 0 10 6(7 50 4 L� 20 30 40 Street: From: Observer: CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM To: Location: /S Date: 7 /2 ellq 5 c®enndanta11200011ejn00195.7Qs EIB or SIB WIB or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal Y� 5 2 Vertical 3. Superelevation (%) 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) Q 5. Profile Conditions (grade, %) n� 3 /� 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics at rade, dustpan, etc. 7. Pedestrian Traffic in the Roadway without /p Sidewalks es or no /V 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, Q(uh N office, etc. v 1 clp„ ,ad 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, GO satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, f ye it or raised median)r 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet - f straight or curve 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics (heavy, moderate, light) 1r 15. Uniforrnity with the ,) Community (yes or no) Ivo 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover (yes or no) (� c®enndanta11200011ejn00195.7Qs ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY (CVC SEC. 627) Street: 16th Street between Newhall Avenue and Orchard Village Road Year of Survey 1995 PART I: PREVAILING SPEED MEASUREMENT Location of Survey 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Date of Survey 04/12/95 15%ile 50%ile 85%ile 0.00 38 41 10 mph pace (% of Veh.) 32-41 (81.8%) Posted Speed Limit 40 mph PART IL ACCIDENT RECORDS Time Period Covered 01/01/93 - 12/31/94 Number of Accidents Intersection 0 0 Mid -Block Mid -Block Accident Rates per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Expected Mid -Block Accident Rate 1.55 PART III- HIGHWAY_ TRAFFIC_ AND ROADSIDE CHARACTERISTICS NOT READILY APPARENT Date Observations Made 04/26/95 HIGHWAY: Geometries, access (driveways, No horizontal/vertical sight distance restrictions, paved intersections, other) shoulders, dustpan driveways along north side, intersections -spaced approximately 400 feet apart, four lanes, painted double -yellow striping, +1- 62 feet wide. TRAFFIC: Pedestrians, parking turnover, school xings No observed pedestrians, heavy on -street parking turnover along south side, school xing at Newhall, moderate vehicular traffic, no truck traffic. Land uses not apparent (park, school, Residential, school (south side), apartments north side). etc.), other conditions PART IV: ADDITIONAL REMARKS No characteristics not readily apparent. RECOMMENDATION 40 mph cfenticlanta l l2000l lein l6595.xls SPEEDPLOT 2 Spot Speed Analysis Ver. 2'.00A/McTRANS 16TH STREET: NEWHALL AVENUE TO ORCHARD VILLAGE ROAD DIRECTION(S) ....... WESTBOUND DATE........... . 4/ 4/1995 TIME ............... 1:45 POSTED SPEED LIMIT.40 MPH 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3E� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 81. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. J PERCENT UNDER :PACE SPEED........... 6.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13 AVERAGE SPEED .......................37.4 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----+----+----+----t----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***10 90 *** 9 L 80 * 80 * P- 70 7 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+----+----+- 0 10 20 30 * 6L * 50 * 4"] * 30 * 2� ** M0 ---+----+----+ 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ----+----+----+----+--- 0 10 20 --U 30 40 _t� 5 f CUM MPH NO. PCT -PCT 0 0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0.0 0.0 2 0 0.0 0.0 3 0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.0 5 0 0.0 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 7 0 0.0 0.0 8 0 0.0 0.0 9 0 0.0 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 11 0 0.0 0.0 12 0 0.0 0.0 13 0 0.0 0.0 14 0 0.0 0.0 15 0 0.0 0.0 16 0 0.0 0.0 17 0 0.0 0.0 18 0 0.0 0.0 19 0 0.0 0,%0 20 0 0.0 0.0 21 0 0.0 . 0.0 22 0 0.0 0.0 23 0 0.0 0.0 24 0 0.0 0.0 25 0 0.0 0.0 26 0 0.0 0.0 27 0 0.0 0.0 28 0 0.0 0.0 29 0 0.0 0.0 30 5 3.8 3.8 31 3 2.3 6.1 32 5 3.8 9.8 33 2 1.5 11.4 34 13 9.8 21.2 35 11 8.3 29.5 36 12 9.1 38.6 37 15 11.4 50.0 38 13 9.8 59.8 39 13 9.8 69.7 40 15 11.4 81.1 41 9 6.8 87.9 42 2 1.5 89.4 43 4 3.0 92.4 44 9 6.8 99.2 45 1 0.8 100.0 46 0 0.0 100.0 >46 0 0.0 100.0 50TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................3E� 85TH PERCENTILE SPEED.................41 10 MPH PACE SPEED .......... 32 through 41 PERCENT IN PACE SPEED.............. 81. PERCENT OVER PACE SPEED............ 12. J PERCENT UNDER :PACE SPEED........... 6.1 RANGE OF SPEEDS.................30 to 4 VEHICLES OBSERVED....................13 AVERAGE SPEED .......................37.4 CUMULATIVE PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) + ----+----+----+----t----+----+----+----+----+ 100 ***10 90 *** 9 L 80 * 80 * P- 70 7 60 50 40 30 20 10 +----+----+----+----+----+----+- 0 10 20 30 * 6L * 50 * 4"] * 30 * 2� ** M0 ---+----+----+ 40 PERCENT VS. SPEED (MPH) ---------------------------------------------- 15 10 5 ----+----+----+----+--- 0 10 20 --U 30 40 _t� 5 f CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ENGINEERING SURVEY FORM Street: (n 'Str"' e1- Location: �5 From: NTo: OCC. nr-d T1lAr Date: Observer. ��rV J h r Ie1A C1enndarifa%120001Wjno0195.;ds �li EJB or SIB W/B or NIB Notes Sight Distance Obstructions? (yes or no) 1. Horizontal T\J Q 2. Vertical 0 N V 3. Superelevation (%) -- 4. Shoulder Conditions (paved or unpaved) 5. Profile Conditions 0 (grade, %) 6. Commercial Driveway Characteristics N O ��� (� D/P at rade, dust an, eta 7. Pedestrian Traffic irrthe Roadway without - N 0 N 0 Sidewalks es or no 8. Adjacent Land Use (residential, commercial, a—Sr (;G60' office, etc. 9. Intersection Spacing and Offsets (spacing, feet - �} 6fl} YtA Y'.Q offsets yes or no 10. Pavement Condition (good, satisfactory, poor, etc.) 11. Truck Traffic (heavy, moderate, light) 12. Channelization (# of lanes, divided, undivided, painted, Z V� P DY or raised median 13. Street Width and Alignment (width, feet- straight or curved 14. Traffic Flow Characteristics 1 (heavy, moderate, light) 15. Uniformity with the QS Y 25 Community (yes or no) 16. Heavy On -Street Parking Turnover or no y Q s I D �1 r J g (yes h r Ie1A C1enndarifa%120001Wjno0195.;ds �li