HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-04-25 - AGENDA REPORTS - PH PORTA BELLA PLAN DEVAGMT (2)AGENDA REPORT
City M ager Approval
Item to be presented by- —, /
Lynn M. Harris } %%J �Cdkh c.0
PUBLIC HEARING
DATE: April 25, 1995
SUBJECT; Continued Public Hearing From April 11, 1995 Regarding the Porta Bella
Specific Plan and Development Agreement As Well As the Three Appeals
Filed Concerning the Decision On June 21, 1994, By the Planning
Commission
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
At the City Council meeting on April 11, 1995, the Council resumed the continued public
hearing for the Porta Bella project. At the close of the item, the Council continued the public
hearing to April 25, 1995, to take additional public testimony for 30 minutes, evenly divided
between those in support of and opposed to the project, and limited to the draft conditions of
approval. Following that, the Council indicated that the public hearing would be closed, with
the exception that the Council would allow written comments regarding the conditions until
April 28. Following that, at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on May 9, the Council
indicated that they would deliberate regarding the oral and written testimony received to date.
Up to the time of the presentation of this staff report, no letters had been received from the
public regarding the draft conditions of approval. The draft conditions prepared with the last
packet have again been included for your review, Regarding some of the discussion points at
the last meeting, staff has the following responses:
Santa Clarita Parkway: The applicant proposes that Santa Clarita Parkway replace Rio Vista
as a north -south arterial that intersects with the public portion of Placerita Canyon Road to
connect with the Placerita interchange at the Antelope Valley Freeway, which is currently
underutilized. This proposal was studied in the EIR at a General Plan level of detail --the
precise alignment would require additional environmental review and public comment prior to
any construction during a future project phase.
Some discussion has suggested that Santa Clarita Parkway should proceed to the Golden Valley
interchange rather than the Placerita Canyon interchange. The primary advocate of this idea
R vI
R_Q� Ci s y .4 m �-+� Agenda item:„
D�.d gs — to
has been the Newhall Land and Farming (Valencia) Company and others. Golden Valley is on
the existing General Plan Circulation Element as a separate north/south corridor further to the
east of the proposed Santa Clarta Parkway.- Both are important links in the ultimate highway
network, and it is less likely that both will be built in their entirety if they both proceed to the
same interchange. Freeway interchanges are vital pieces of infrastructure that should be
utilized fully, as it is unlikely that the state will fund additional ones when those that are
existing are underutilized.
Nexus Requirements and Applicant's Anueal of Condition TE-1: The General Plan Network,
both as it currently exists and as discussed in various proposed revisions, will require the
construction of many new links over the next twenty years as the vacant land in the City and
outside of it is developed.. Due to the infrastructure deficit, many new links are needed now to
support the existing built environment and projects that have already been approved by Los
Angeles County, even if no new development is approved by the City or County. Every one of
these arterial links will involve crossing private land, will be visible, will create noise, and like
the existing roads, once built, they can be positive additions to our community when properly
designed,
With this in mind, in addition to considering the various roadway proposals before the Council,
the Council should give additional consideration to the Magic/Princessa connection approved by
the Planning Commission, with particular consideration that Magic/Priocessa, along with Santa
Clarita Parkway and Via Princessa, offers impressive network enhancements, fewer signalized
intersections, and improved travel times than the current proposal for the Magic Mountain
collector within the project. Restoration of the Magic/Princessa connection restores six lanes
of capacity that have now been removed from the proposal.
The applicant appealed condition TE-1 on the basis that there was a lack of nexus between the
highway mitigations required and the impacts of the project, particularly in the first phase of
the project. Staff still supports the condition as drafted and included in the packet, rather than
the new language suggested by the Newhall Land and Farming (Valencia) Company. The
current key cases governing this are the Nolan and Dolan decisions, which mandate that there
be a direct relationship between the required mitigation and the impacts of the project.
Excessive requirements for infrastructure beyond actual project impacts may not survive a legal
challenge.
Response to Written Testimony of Newhall Land and Farming on 4/11/951: The City, with full
public participation, has been processing the Porta Bella application for more than four years.
The Draft and Final EIR's and the Addendum were open for public review. The Porta Bella
network has been tested and studied through extensive traffic studies as part of the CEQA
process. Porta Bella offers enhancements to the existing network by various improvements to
existing intersections as well as the provision of significant new roadway segments. To date,
in staffs judgment, the Porta Bella network is superior to any of the unverified network
proposals that have been offered.
Magic Mountain Extension and Keysor Century Agpeal: Staff believes that the existing
condition requiring this connection is sufficient to accomplish the City's goals. The applicant
is required to attempt to reach a friendly settlement with the affected parties, and failing that,
the City can consider the use of eminent domain. In either scenario, the affected businesses
and land owners will be compensated as required by the U.S. Constitution and applicable state
laws. The Council is not being asked to determine the exact alignment, which will require
applicable state laws. The Council is not being asked to determine the exact alignment,
which will require additional environmental work in any case. The Council can indicate a
policy preference that, failing a friendly settlement between the project applicant and affected
property owners, the City would look more favorably on an alignment that primarily affects
the secondary uses and vacant land on the Keysor-Century property rather than the
numerous small businesses. To date, Keysor has not submitted a development application
for their site. If and when they do, the City will require that the right-of-way for the Magic
Mountain extension be preserved as this is already in the General Plan, Currently, Keyser
has manufacturing, storage, and office uses on their land, and by requiring the dedication for
a General Plan roadway, the City is not prohibiting the property owner from using the site.
Additionally, the applicant may have other areas on the site where the office could work,
which staff could analyze once an application is filed.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Receive staff report, take public testimony for 30 minutes, divided
equally between project proponents and opponents and limited to the
draft conditions of approval only.: Close the public hearing. Allow
written public testimony regarding the conditions of approval until April
28, 1995.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 95-41 certifying the EIR and including a Statement
of Overriding Consideration for the Project and a Mitigation Monitoring
Program.
3. Continue Council deliberation of the Porta Bella project at the May 9,
1995, regularly scheduled City Council meeting, including (a.)
consideration of draft Resolution No, 95-42 regarding the three appeals
and the Planning Commission action on the project and (b.) consideration
of draft Ordinance No. 95-6 regarding the Porta Bella Specific Plan.
Attachments:
No. 1 City Council Draft Modified Conditions and Mitigation Measures Only
No. 2 Draft Resolution 95-41 and Draft Mitigation Measures
file:mrrent\pb_ccr16.kjm
ATTACHMENT 1: CITY COUNCIL MEETING: APREL 11, 1995
DRAFT REVISED CONDITIONS AND MITIGATION MEASURES,
PORTA BELLA PROJECT
MUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Development Services Division (DS)
DS -1 The master vesting tentative tract map shall incorporate the 44a�eeear
" the
revised network as indicated in Exhibits AA and B&
DS -2 The project land uses, densities, road network and product yields shall be as
depicted in exhibits "B" and "C" attached, and as further modified by the
City Council, as reflected in Exhibits AA and BB. The draft Porta Bella
Specific Plan is exhibit "D," the cover of which is attached. The complete draft
exhibit "D" is available in the Community Development Department. The
languageand exhibits included in the Porta Bella Specific Plan, exhibit "D,"
shall be modified to reflect the changes delineated in the previous exhibits and
the conditions of approval to the satisfaction of that Director of Community
Development.
DS -3 The Porta Bella Specific Pian, "Exhibit D" and as further modified by the
City Council, (as reflected in Exhibits AA and BB), shall be the governing
land use and planning, document for the Porta Bella site. Future tract maps,
product designs, improvements, and infirastructure must be coasiatent with the
Specific Plan, as updated in accordance with City Council modifications
of the project. during the public hearing procen. Id the Spe—eifie
Raft be adep"d by the Gisy GVaReil?
DS -9 Exhibit "E"'"tilies the phasing used for the purposes of the traffic study.
The phasing an the Master Vesting Tentative Tract Map shall be consistent
with thin. exhibits .:.Grading activities may cross phase boundaries. The
der and occpancy of residential and commercial products shall be
phased aa. Consnsistent with Exhibit "E," and as modified by exhibits AA
and BBILgITherevised Specific Plan, exhibit "D; shall include a table to the
saustacdm of.{0mmunityDevelopment summarizing the intensity of land uses
in each phase of exhibit "E" consistent with exhibits "A, B, and C," and as
modified by exhibits AA and BB.
DS 12 ThwWtigation Monitoring Plan is attached as Exhibit "F.' The applicant is
responsible for implementing the mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the
City for the life of the project. Mitigation Measures RU -1 and RU -9 are
superseded by the following language:
For the entire 998 acre site, the applicant and/or future developer shall
provide evidence for proper hazardous waste indentification and
remediation, to the satisfaction of the City, from California
City Council Draft Revised
Conditiona/MBipations 4111193 1 Attachment 1
Environmental Protection Agency/ Department of Toxic Substances
Control prior to the issuance of any grading permits. No construction
of Phase I residential, commercial, office, or office park may
commence until the entire site is cleared by Cal EPA/ DTSC.
Construction of major highway segments and other public
infrastructure may be permitted to the satisfaction of Cal EPA/ DTSC
and the City prior to the clean-up of the entire site, provided the area
in question has received clean closure from Cal EPA/ DTSC.
DS -16 Submit and implement landscape plans to the satisfaction of the City in the
vicinity of the off-site
to %ill Bl_ i _• A_ eastern - -gyp• L nl
the time 'es of this read segment eemmeseear section of Magic
Mountain Parkway that impacts the northeast corner of the Circle J
open space.
DS -19 Prior to recordation of the Final Map, modify the map, to the
satisfaction of the City, to reflect modifications as indicated in
Exhibits AA and BB.
DS -20 Determination of alignments and constructim of off-site highway
segments of Santa Clarita ParkwayMagic Mountain Parkway, and Via
Princessa, will require additional environmental review tiered to the
existing DEIR and Addendum, prior to, any construction, to the
satisfaction of the City.
DS -21 Prior to recordation of the FInai Map; update all exhibits and text in
the Specific Plan, to the satisfaction of the City, implementing all
changes mandated by the Planning Commission and the City Council,
to the satisfaction of the C1W and incorporating Exhibits AA and BB.
DS -22 Prior to recordation of the map, update number of residential units
specified in seals phase in condition T&L Update Specific Plan to be
consistent witlfr revised phasing in TE -L Phasing numbers shall
.reffectreductionsim density mandated by the Commission, as well as
aaWreductions due to the revised roadways as indicated in Exhibits
AA an&BiF,wAh as the relocation of Magic Mountain Parkway and
Vis Prinoarrri
D&23 PHU talecmdation, realign Via Princessa so that the centerline is no
dkww than 400 Beet to the southerly boundary. Obtain letter from the
HOAWthdicating whether land to the south is to be open space or
este homes. Update the map and Specific Plan prior to recordation,
t6 the satisfaction of the City, to reflect these changes. Provide a
landscape plan, Including a berm where necessary, to mitigate impacts
to the homes to the south, to the satisfaction of the City.
DS -24 Provide a landscape plan, including a berm where necessary, to
mitigate impacts of Magic Mountain Parkway when adjacent to Circle
J homes or impacting Circle J open space.
Clty Council Dtan Revised
Conditions/Mitigations 4/11/95 2 Attachment 1
DS -25 Concurrent with the opening of both Via Princessa to Rainbow Glen
Drive and Wiley Canyon Bridge, provide a gate guarded entry to Karie
Lane of the Circle J Estates to the satisfaction of the City.
DS -28 Provide equestrian crossings in at least two places under Santa
Clarita Parkway concurrently with construction of the roadway.
DS -27 A second access point to the Oak Orchard area of Placerita Canyon
will be provided to Santa Clarita Parkway concurrently with the
construction of the roadway.
DS -28 _ Prior to initiating construction of Santa Clarity Parkway in the
vicinity of the- Oak Orchard area of Placerita Canyon, provide a
drainage study to the satisfaction of the City focusing on the Oak
Orchard area. Construct required drainage improvements, to the
satisfaction of the City, concurrently with construction of Santa
Clarity Parkway.
DS -29 The project will adhere to the seismic and building codes in effect at
the time of recordation of each map.
DS -30 Construct streetscape improvements to Springbrook Avenue, north of
Drayton Street to the Keysor-Century property line, consisting of
curbs, gutters, and landscaping, to the satisfaction of the City, prior
to occupancy of Phase I of the project.
DS -31 No construction traffic will use Springbrook Avenue.
TE -1 The conditions listed below refer to the improvements that would be necessary
to be in place prior to the issuance of occupancy for each phase as outlined
below and as aperlfied in the traffic study for this project.
The design plana for the subject improvements for each phase shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to the recordation of each phase.
Any deviations f = the listed conditions may need a further traffic study and shall be
subject to the approval of•the City Traffic Engineer.
The o$ -sift improvements as indicated in the traffic study have been assumed to be in
place. concorrent with each of the three phases of this development. She eld If those
tm#U study ofPeite improvements which relate to a portion of the prgject for
which a asapti to be recorded are note -in place or otherwise provided for at the
time sucir neap is to be recorded prier te the eeeenk4sa of a finalfer asy
then the applicant shall be required to submit ars additional
traffic st"es study for such portion of the prgject prier to reewdedes of eaeh map
whiek weeld Went* This additional traffic study shall determine the need for
alternative mitigation measures, and applicant shall be required to implement those
alternative measures to- which address the impacts of this projeck
City Council Draft Revised
Condhlons/Mltlgatlons 4/11195 3 Attachment 1
The traffic improvements included in the conditions of approval are those deemed
years
the traffic study to accommodate regional traffic anticipated is horizon
years coinciding with the completion of each phase of the project Implementation er
and funding of these improvements is not the sole responsibility of the developer. The
fair share contribution by the project shall be determined based upon traffic analysts;
however, the identified improvements or other mitigations as identified to subsequent
traffic studies to be conducted prior to the recordation of a final map for any portion of
the development shall be is place or othertoise provided for to the satisfaction of the
Director of Community Development
The land use assumptions for each phase of the development as outlined in thetraffic
study is shown below. Some uses have been reduced from the values assumed in the
traffic study to reflect the reduction is the number of units proposed by the applicant
A. per.
Single Family Units
29!#
Multi Family Unita
Commercial (Square Feet)163
286
ar
Office (Square Feet)
3,350.
,3
Business Park (Square Feet)
258,485
Neighborhood Park (Acres)
'
Driving Range (Acres)
'
Recreational (Square Feet)
—
School
Church (Acres)
Hotel (Rooms)
B.
Single Family Units
Multi Family Units
419
aoy�� ( ..
uars Beet)
765
Ol (sq�
—
Bti>aisPark ( Fes)
315,632
411,850
N&gIAQZ**QdPark (Acres)
8.5
Dd°� R=W(Acres)
Remiadmni nare Feet)
3.75
25,000
One
MulFFamily Units - 930
Family Unita
510
Office
Feet) 374,939
Feet) 398,574
Business Park (Square Feet) 561,520
Neighborhood park (Acres) 22.0
shy Council Draft Revised
CondItIOWM11198tlons 41iligs
4
Attachment 1
Driving Range (Acres)
Recreational (Square Feet)
45,000
School
One
Church (Acres)
1.8
Hotel (Rooms)
140
TE -3 A minimum. of two new traffic signals (Magic Mountain Parkway/Rio vista
Road, Soledad Canyon Road/Santa Clarita Parkway) shall be in place prior to
issuance of occupancy permits for Phase 1. The applicant shall be required
to assess the need for signalization at other intersections, including
but not limited to the intersection of Magic Mountain Parkway/Via
Princessa, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer.
TE -4 Magic Mountain Parkway El &6e4Wft eeea4 shall be extended with a
minimum of four traffic lanes from San Fernando Road/Bouquet Canyon Road
to Rio Vista Road and shall be designed and constructed as a grade separated
crossing over San Fernando Road and the railroad tracks prior to issuance of
occupancy permits for Phase 1. In no event shall condition M19 be applicable
to this condition.
TE -5 Magic Mountain Parkway 44ee3a�shall: be extended with a
minimum of two traffic lanes from Rio Vista Road to Vis Princessa, and Via
Princessa shall he constructed with a minimum of two traffic lanes
from Magic Mountain Parkway to Rainbow Glen Drive prior to issuance of
occupancy permits for Phase 1. A maximum threshold of development may be
permitted within Phase 1 prior to extending this roadway subject to the
satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer...
TE -9 A minimum of three two now traffic signals (Santa Clarita Parkway/D Street,
Santa Clarita Pmkway/Via Pratcessa, and, Magic Mountain Parkway/Main
Street) shall b* in Place prior to issuance of occupancy permits for Phase 2.
The applicarit.sitali,..be required to assess the need for signalization at other
intersections;.>imehuHng but not limited to the intersection of Magic
Mosrnttain PatlliwUOVia Princessa, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic
TE 11 Magic llgonntidn Parkwar4ma&96asesse) shall be widened to six traffic
lanes from' S'Oftnando Road/Bougnet Canyon Road to Rio Vista Road place
PAW to issnsaee of occupancy permits for Phase 2 in accordance with Traffic
ZgOnse ing condition TE -1.
TE-iR MaMountaia Paz*WaY4M&&Vm
i shall be widened to four traffic
lanes from Rio Vlsta Road to Via Princessa, and Via Princes" shall be
widened to four trafae lanes from Magic Mountain Parkway to Rainbow
Glen Drive prior to issuance of occupancy permits for Phase 2 in accordance
with Traffic Engineering condition TE -1.
TE -15 A minimum of three new traffic signals (Magic Mountain Parkway/Via
Princessa, Santa Clarita Parkway/Via Porta Bella, Magic Mountain
City Council Draft Revised
Coedillons/Mltiyatlons 4/11/95 5 Attachment 1
Parkway/Via Porta Bella
to issuance of occupancy permits for Phase ) shall be in place
Mountain/Viaessamay The tragic signalPrior
Phase II, to the satisfaction of the require to be installed Phase Magic
shall be required toneed ty Tragic En ase 1 or
the satisfaction of the City Traffic Error si Engineer. The c Plicant
gnalizatioa at other intersections to
eineer.
TE -16 Magic Mountain Park,
tmffic lanes fi'om Rio Vista Road to V WOW shall be widened to include si:
be widened to include six tragic lanes &cm a°d Via Prince.. s},>
to Rainbow Glen Drive prior to issuance of occuffiMagic Mountain parkway
accordance with Trac Engineering condition TE E" permits for Phase 3 in
-1.
TE -18 Via Princesses shall be
west to extended from Magie li�Mmmtaa parkway
Fernando Road as a sin lane connect arterial wi exishg Why Canyon Road west of San
Road and the railroad track prior to issuaa e of O=as overcrossing at San of
3 is accordance with Traffic Engineering condition TE -1.
Permits for Phase
TE -20 The City may pelt the developer to enter into
or other appropriate m reimbursement agreement
of others for improvements �m for traffic a improvements constructed on behalf
which' are not included in the Bridge and
Thoroughfare District to the
Department satisfaction of the Community Development
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEP
Engineering Division `�TM�T
TENTATIVE MAP CONDITIONS
ED -11 Prior to the retardation of each
a preliminary vertical and horizontal aiof m Pr'olect the applicant shall provide
Engineer for all gamest. to the satisfaction of the Ci
M�tara r a Proposed major highways, including Via Cit
off-siitit y"96 8e and Santa Clarita Pic 'Magic
gments, as:: part of the implementation of ��y' including
,The aCz ` the General Plan
oe b credit formentff' Th applicant shalextend beyond the l Bridoundary ge and
review fees. 'this The applicant shall not be required to -Pay
Th> prior to any ag Plans being apPmed
Development Department, the City shall review by the Community
conditions. The grading plans shall demonstrate: �� for intent of tract
a. That the open space areas that will remain as natural slope$ be protected
dig grading operations. .
I- That grading activities are phased so that the exposure of unprotected areas
Clty Council Draft Revised
Cond@l0ns/Mgl9ation3 4/11/95
6
Attschmsnt 1
is limited to the areas where work is immediately undertaken especially during
the rainy season.
c. That areas which are not being built up shall not be cleared of vegetative
cover until actual grading is to be started.
d. That areas which have been cleared and could potentially be exposed to a
Practices.
storm event shall be protected by adequate source control Best Management
e. The applicant will provide a Dust Control Plan to the City Engineer
for review and approval prior to the approval of the Grading Plan for
each phase,
ED -55 The applicant shall submit a final grading pias, geologla report, and
t.
geologic certification, to the City Engineer for review and C reporoval t, each
phase prior the recordation of that phases:.;
ED -56 The applicant shall submit a drainage pian and an erosion and
sedimentation plan for review and approval prior to the recordation of each
phase of the Project The drainage plan shall Provide sufficient facilities to
of the
prevent drainage problems downstream of road right-af-Rays to the satisfaction
City Engineer.
ED -69 The applicant shall provide for contributory.
and return drains tions r secure
adjoining of -it Properties
acceptance letters from affectedpropertyco ans or secure off-site drainage
substantial down stream improvement* owners The Project will require
to eliminate the impacts to down
stream property. owners. The applicant shall construct sufficient on-site and
any needed off-site (as determined by the City) improvements to reduce
the downstream impacts with construction of each phase.
SEE NEXT PAGE FOR MOW'= MITIGATION MEASURES
fRemuTe t•pbattr.feg
City Council Draft Revised
CondttlonalMIllgations 4/11/95 y
Attachment 1
RU -1
RU -3.
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; 'TESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
EXHIBIT AA.
MODIFIED MITIGATION MEASURES
for City Council Consideration April 11, 1995
uperceded by Condition of Approval DS -12 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map.
51599.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Ret�*5ty
Grading Permits Project devetoper(s)/engineers DTSC/City Engineer
Superseded by Cortdltion
51599.
or Approval us -12 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monihxing Res-yonsibilin,
Grading Permits Project developer(s)/engineers CAL EPA /City Engineer
H4. Design and construct runoff filtering zones in large parking areas (as opposed to driveways of single family homes
or duplexes) to the satisfaction of the City. These should be located at the lower elevations of parking areas and
designed to catch runoff with relatively high oil and grease concentrations. These facilities shall be designed to
permit percolation of the runoff through the soil and underlying layers (sand and gravel), permit hydrocarbon
filtration and absorption, and encourage the degradation of hydrocarbons by naturally -occurring soil bacteria.
AL such measures shall meet WDE4 requirements.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility M o n i t o r i n g
Responsibility
Each Crading Ph"W Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
H-5. To the extent possible, incorporate settlingponds; detention basins, and vegetated swales, to slow and filter runoff
prior to discharge into the storm drain system or into natural smeamcourses. Fural design criteria will be
generated with ultimate project design and would involve percolation testing and geotechnical investigations in
proposed detention basin locations to the satisfaction of the City. All such measures shall meet NPDES
requirements.
current\pbmmp2.kjm
C1ty Council Draft Revised
Conditions/Mitigations 4/11195 8 Attachment 1
EliPpr�A' 3e,14
M
r .J .'x- 4,4
City Councll Draft Revised .00�1 �,� ...� „� 1 9 Attachment 1
Condftlons/Mftlgatlons 4111195 �F
� e-%�
V >, f yr ,,� �C I NI �C, f i)O •`� fl �'lY /! /'�, / '
UL
Bt
1C C._ ti
�tp��.. r.l!K.�. :. .� -�� ... a '''€ /.• ,' lir. �
i„.li qtr [N�{ �: '�L < J I IJ 1 S:• }� I /r
� ,V�1�4u '�ifayl. -'S�r i1 +}Z )�►,i�•:, � �i�`�/ !;rJ^��� � �,. � K,r` ••„.�'1 ,:
li � )"•f i��/ � ii r 1 � ti11MIM/j s+ >! i,•I - *1�
`` w i �I. ♦ti:k .. � I Y � • ''.•d 2�?`"�'d�¢I; ,i:� F"� %SI � I
F, � �5���`- ��� •1-`'�"i•11+1 riw'n�;�£' �'id�/l� ,C"%� fl4t' /•_,.1.�''. r'.r/
PV
CC* T '•1 ttne tti. 01N &Lx 1 i•• i�' ,�it �� • I ,_
i. f moi\ s.• 4t `"a i,L�• "1a? .. \./!� � yM. V �� rCe Lf�I'IS` 1 ,a
RESOLUTION NO. 95-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ADOPTING A
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
AND
CERTIFYING FEIR AND ADDENDUM SCH 92-041041,
FOR MASTER CASE NOS. 91-164 AND 93-012, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
51599,
OAK TREE PERMIT 91-033, AND SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001
TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 996 ACRE PROPERTY
KNOWN AS THE BERMITE SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD
AND EAST OF BOUQUET CANYON AND SAN FERNANDO ROADS
AND A ZONE CHANGE TO SPECIFIC PLAN
AND A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP AND THE
HIGHWAY NETWORK OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND ADOPTING A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact:
a. Applications for Specific Plan 91-001 and Oak Tree Permit 91-033 (Master
Case No. 91-164) were filed by Anden Corporation, (the applicant) with the
City of Santa Clarity on October 25, 1991. These applications were deemed
complete on. February 26, 1992. Subsequently, the applicant submitted
applications. for:: Vesting: Tentative Tract Map 51599 and Development
Agreement 93-003: (Master Casa No. 93-012) on February 2, 1993. On March
9, 1993 the City deemed the application complete. The City was notified in
August 1993 that Northolme Partners was the. new project applicant.
The -applicant requested a speciSc plan for a comprehensive plan of
devincluding proposed modifications to the Circulation Element of
the Generali Plawand the Unified Development Code within the project area.
The plan psopoped 1,678 single family homes and 1,560 multiple family homes
on. 399 acres; 91 acres of commercial and industrial uses; 14 acres of
institnUonal uses; 434 acres of open space and recreational uses; 58 acres of
str W:.and the provision of related infraatructurs on the site's 996 acres. A
vesting tentative tract map was requested to subdivide the 996 acre site into
7"aster lots to be further subdivided by merchant builders into future tract
:maps An oak trey --permit was requested to allow for the removal and/or
encroachment into the protected zones of up to 73 native Oak Trees, including
two heritage size oak trees. A development agreement was requested,
however, the details of the agreement are yet to be negotiated. The Specific
Plan includes a modification to the Circulation Network of the General Plan,
specifically the project proposes to substitute Santa Clarita Parkway for Rio
Draft Resolution 95-41, 4/11/95 1 Attachment 2
Vista and to extend Magic Mountain Parkway to Via Princessa through the
project area with minor impacts to a small portion of Circle J open space.
The site is known as the Bermite site located south of Soledad Canyon Road,
east of Bouquet Canyon Road/San Fernando Road; north of the Circle J Ranch
Community; and west of the Golden Triangle Industrial area. The assessor
Parcel numbers for the project are 2836-012-010, 011, 012 and 019.
b. The General Plan presently designates the project site RS with a Valley Center
Overlay on the northwest portion of the site, calling for high density
development in the areas near the rail/tranaportation center. The Genera!
Plan specifically mentions the Bermite site as an area ideal for a specific plan,
with a mix of land uses from high -to -low density and including other uses.
Zoning on the site is presently RS (Residential Suburban), BP (Business Park),
and OS (Open Space).
c. The project site is located in a hillside terrain with slopes in excess of 10%.
Significant ridgelines are on the site as identifiedon the City's Ridgeline map.
Development is proposed on some of these ridgelines and on portions of the
hillsides with slopes exceeding 25%. The site has been severely impacted by
previous industrial uses and the land form has been disturbed and altered by
previous and on-going uses.
d. The City of Santa Clarita preparedan Wtiat Study for the project which
determined that the project may have aasignificant effect on the environment
and that an environmental impact report must be prepared. A Notice of
Preparation (NOP) for the Specific Plan and Oak Tree Permit was mailed on
April 8, 1992 to affected agencies. Following submittal of the Vesting
Tentative Traci Map and Development Agreement applications, a subsequent
NOP was prepared and mailed on February 12, 1999.
e. Since 1992 the City has leased a ten acre portion of the project site for use as
the Santa Clanta Metrolink commuter rail station, park-and-ride lot, and bus
traaaf8 station. The, Specific Plan also proposes to provide corridors and
construft portions of three proposed east -west arterial (Santa Clarity
Parkwa. N%gW Mountain Parkway, and Vnt Princessa) that will provide
alternative circulation routes through the center of the City which is presently
in need ofsuc$ roadways. The Specific Plan also includes an escalator and
trail, connection between the commercial and residential areas and the
oamtmu#er rail station.
Tl (}Ity of Santa Clarita Development Review Committee met and the
applicant has been supplied with draft conditions of approval.
e. The Planning Commission held extensive hearings on the prgject, and the City
Council has reviewed the record on the project As a result of the Planning
Commission, the project was redesigned to subdivide the 996 acre parcel and
allow the following land uses; 406.95 acres open space, 41.75 acres for parks
Draft Resolution 95.41, 4111/95 2 Attachment 2
and recreation, 10 acres for schools, 56 acres for streets, 4 acres for
institutional uses, 299.8 acres for single family residential uses (1,244 units),
85 acres for multi -family residential uses (1,667 units) and 92 acres of
commercial and industrial uses. An oak tree permit to allow for the removal
of a maximum of 109 non -heritage size oak trees and up to 5 heritage size oak
trees out of the 182 oak trees (including 10 heritage size oaks) located on-site.
The redesigned project either approved or recommended for approval by the
Planning Commission included the Magic Princessa Corridor, which links
Magic Mountain Parkway to Via Princessa. A portion of this is off-site in the
designated open space of Circle J. The addendum studied the impacts of the
proposed corridor.
h. The site was previously used as an ammunition, explosives and flares
manufacturing and testing facility. These operations on the site were
terminated in 1987. The site is currently leased for film productions, the
transportation center, and for swap meet: parking. Heavy metals and other
hazardous materials contaminated the site as a result of the previous use. A
total of 14 hazardous waste clean-up sites have been identified and 13 have
been cleaned -up under the direction of the California Environmental Protection
Agency/ Department of Toxic Substances Control. (Ca EPA/ DTSC). The 13
identified sites have received clean closure certification from DISC.
Remediation efforts are continuing on the remaining site. An additional 64
sites have been identified, to be remediated prior to obtaining grading permits.
Extensive grading and landform alteration have occurred over most of the site
resulting in major surface disturbance, alteration of topographic relief, and
modification of natural drainage patterns. Since the Planning Commission
review, the California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic
Substances Control and the property owner have entered into a consent decree
mandating the investigation and clean-up of the site to the satisfaction of
CaEPA/DTSC'
i. The City's Ridgeiine Preservation and Hillside Development Ordinance (UDC,
Sem 17.80) identifies:'' significant ridgelines in the City and regulates
development on property having average slopes over 10%. The Ordinance
containei wpravision for innovative projects, which specifies that innovative
projects are exempt Brom provisions of the ordinance and may not have project
densities towered to less than 70 % of the mid -point density. The Planning
Commission found that the project was innovative and that the proposed
density eves below 70% of the mid -point.
j. Th&design of the project concentrates development within an area disturbed
b56fthe previous industrial uses. The.
prey Iop�+ grading on
approximately 603 aeres of the project site, much of which has already been
previously disturbed. The total amount of grading involves approximately 18
million cubic yards of cut and 18 million cubic yards of fill, balanced on-site.
k. An Environmental Impact Report (EkR) has been prepared for the proposed
project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Draft Resolutlon 93.41, 4!11/95 3 Attachment 2
Act. The Draft EIR has been circulated for review and comment to all affected
governmental agencies and all comments received have been considered by the
Planning Commission. The review period for the Draft EIR was from
September 27, 1993 to November 12, 1993. A Final EIR dated January 7,
1994, was prepared which included responses to corn ments"received on the
DEIR
in. As a result of public and Planning Commission comments on the project and
the Final EIR, the applicant modified his project. The Planning Commission
directed the applicant and staff to provide environmental analysis of the
modified proposal and a FEIR Addendum was prepared dated April 8, 1994.
n. The Final EIR (FEIR) and the FEIR Addendum were prepared in compliance
with CEQA.
U. The use of the FEIR Addendum is appropriatepursuant to Title 14, Chapter
3. Article 11 of the California Administrative. Code because:
(1) Changes in the project which gave rise- to the need for the FEIR
Addendum did not involve:
(a) Significant environmental impacts which were not previously
considered in the FEIR,
(b) Changed circumstances under which the project will be
undertaken which gave rise to new significant environmental impacts
not covered in the FEM- or
(c) New information of substantial importance to the project;
(2)Only minor technical changes or additions were necessary in the FEIR
Addendum to make the FEIR adequate pursuant to CEQA-, and
(3Jt T26 changes to the FEIR by the FEM Addendum do not raise important
new issues about the significant effects on the environment.
p• The City Coln& received numerous informational reports on the Porta Bella
Spic Pls&firom staff, the City's Environmental Consultant, CaEPA/DTSC,
the MWcant and his consultants. Staff provided s review of the EIR process
forth*.. onncil
FEIR and the FEIR Addendum were
• as the -decision m °eII� to the Planning
ta for
Master Case Nos. 91.164 and 93-012 Vesting Tentative Batt Map 51599City of Santa C and
Oak Tree Permit 91.033, the Commission reviewed the FEIR and the FEIR
Addendum and considered the information contained therein at several duly
noticed public hearings held at the City Council Chambers (October 19, 1993,
November 16, 1993, December 21, 1993, January 11, 1994, June'7, 1994, and.
Draft Rasolutlon 95.41, 4111195 4 Attachmsnf 2 -
June 21, 1994) a field trip to the site (November 13, 1993), and immediately
following the Northridge Earthquake, at emergency locations at the Bank of
America Building (January 18, 1994 rescheduled because of the earthquake to
February 1, 1994) and the Hart High School District Headquarters Board
Room (March 15, 1994, and April 20, 1994).
r. The City Council reviewed the Planning Commission resolution certifying the
EIR and adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration, and the City
Council concurred with the Planning Commission, while requiring project
modifications that decreased the impact to the environment. The City Council
considered all alternatives to the project as set forth in the FEIR and selected
the project as shown (with modifications) in the Specific Plan and the Vesting
Tentative Tract Map over all other alternatives analyzed because:
(a) Alternative No. 1(No Project) was not selected because this alternative
is not consistent with the City's General Plan Valley Center Concept
which envisions higher density mixed use development in the central
portion of the City near the City:Transit StationandCivic Center sites.
The No Project alternative does not recognize that this project is
proposing a re -use of the site and that this: project area has already
been significantly altered from its natural state due to past uses. Were
this project site to be developed under; the existing RS (Residential
Suburban) zoning, this project wouldnot be consistent with the General
Plan since the development allowable under this zone would not result
in higher densities around the transit center and would not provide
mixed uses as envisioned in the General Plan for the Valley Center.
(b) Alternative No. 2 (Replace Residential Uses With Additional Office and
Business Parks) was not selected because this is not consistent with the
Valley Center' Concept to provide higher density residential uses near
the City Transit. Center. This alternative is not consistent with a mux
af:uses which encourage a pedestrian environment since housing and
residential uses are not sufficiently mixed.
(c) Alternative No. 3 (Transit Oriented Development) was not selected
because this alternative only provides high density by the Transit
Station at the northern portion of the site and does not utilize the
southern portion of the site. The General Plan also called for a mix of
low and high density housing and this alternative did not include low
density housing.. Thus, this alternative does not provide for full
utilization of the site:
(d) Alternative No. 4 (Low Density/Hillside Preservation) was not selected
because, although this was the environmentally preferred alternative,
this project design encouraged strict adherence to the hillside standards
and did not allow for innovative design criteria that would allow
Draft Resolution 9541, 4/11/95 5 Attachment 2
residential density to be clustered in the steep hillside areas around the
Transit Center. Thus, low density would be placed in the northern
Portions of the site designated as part of the Valley Center which is
contrary to General Plan discussions encouraging high density in this
area.
(e) _ Alternative No. 5 (Replace Residential Uses with Increased Office and
Industrial Parks) was not selected because this alternative does not
provide for mixed use development as envisioned in the General Plan
for the Valley Center Concept which seeks uses with greater density in
the center of the city. This alternative would also be inconsistent with
providing a unique identity for the center of the City, also identified'in
the Valley Center Concept.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Ciarita does hereby make the
following findings of fact:
a. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires decision -makers
to balance the benefits of a. proposed project against its unavoidable
environmental impacts. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the
unavoidable adverse environmental effects,:, the adverse effects may be
considered "acceptable" by adopting a "Statement of Overriding
Considerations." This statement sets forth the reasons why the Lead Agency
has approved the project when there are adverse environmental impacts
identified in the Final EnvironmentalImpactReport and Addendum that
cannot be mitigated to a level less than significant.
b. CEQA requires decision -makers to adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting
program for those mitigation measures which are conditions of the project.
SECTION 3.. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does hereby find that the
FEIR and FEIR Addendum for the Porta Bella Specific Plan 91-001, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map 51599, and Oa%Trew' Permit 91-033 identify cumulative project impacts and project
specific ;impacts that are 'partially mitigated, but not to a level considered less than
signifi<ant. Adverse environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR and Addendum that
have not been mitigates! to: a level less than significant are summarized as follows:
a 1?rviect.Specific aadgum ,latiye Air Quality Impacts - Implementation of the
proposed project would generate both construction -related and operational
pcdiatant emissions. During the construction phases, emissions of reactive
organic compounds (ROC); oxides of nitrogen (NO,) and particulate matter -
10 micron (PM,,,) would unavoidably.. exceed South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. Operational
emissions generated by the proposed project would also exceed SCAQMD
thresholds of significance for carbon monoxide (CO), ROC, NOx , and PNL
The project would require the development and implementation, of TDM
Draft Resolutlon 95.41, 4111!95 6 Attachment 2
(Transportation Demand Management) measures to be considered consistent
with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) and the Air Quality Element
of the General Plan; however, these proposed measures would not reduce air
quality impacts from operational emissions to a less than significant level.
Therefore, project related air quality impacts are considered unavoidably
significant.
b. Cumulative Biotic Impacts - Project specific impacts include potential
disturbances to sensitive plants and animals. The project has the potential to
further fragment natural habitat, further reduce the site's open space resources
which support localized wildlife movement, and remove oak'trees. Mitigation
measures reduce these impacts to a level less than significant. However
ongoing, incremental loss of natural open space, loss of oak trees and oak
woodlands, and loss of wildlife is considered cumulatively significant in
conjunction with other planned development throughout the City, the Santa
Clarita Valley, and the surrounding region.:.
C. Aesthetics. Ueht and Glare Impacts - The project site.ia located in a hillside
area and contains significant ridgelines identified on. the City's Ridgeline map.
A visual analysis of the proposed development plan shows that the alterations
proposed to the significant ridgelines in the northeastern portion of the prooct
limits would be visible to a large audience of motorists along Soledad Canyon
Road, as well as nearby mobile home residents and business establishments
located north of the site along Sbledad Canyon Road. The proposed grading of
the significant ridgeline for Santa Clarita Parkway would be an unavoidable
and significant visual impact, given the importance of these landform features.
d
Risk of Unset/Heal_th Hazard Impacts - Fourteen hazardous waste sites have
been identified: on the site and have been registered as a Hazardous Waste
Management Unit (HWMU). To date, 13 of these 14 sites have been cleaned
up to .the satisfaction of the California Environmental Protection Agency,
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC). The remaining HWMU is
expected to ba- successfully remediated soon. A variety of other sites not
permitted <as 1WMUTs have been identified as containing potential
environmental contaminants. Ca1EPA is conducting investigations into these
sites, however their efforts are not complete and it is not known what health
risks these other sites present. To mitigate potential risks to construction
worked. and future site occupants from remaining contamination sites that
may east, a mitigation measure has been added that would require
90t. fication by DTSC of adequate clean-up of the other 64 sites identified prior
to'tha issuance of grading permits. All grading activity will also be monitored
" to the satisfaction of CaIEPA and DISC. The risk of upset/health hazard is
considered a significant adverse impact since the exact extent of contamination
and its effects are unknown.
Dmft Resolutlon 95-41, 4/11/95
Attachment 2
mitigation measures have been identified, the project would contribute to
unavoidable and significant cumulative impacts at eight intersections, with or
without the Wiley Canyon Bridge.
f. Solid Waste Disno al Impacts - The amount of solid wastes projected to be
produced by the project would not result in short-term adverse impact to the
Chiquita Canyon Landfill in Val Verde and/or the Sunshine Canyon Landfill
in Sylmar, provided that these landfills receive approval to expand their
capacities prior to the expiration of their current operating permits. Because
there is an existing shortage of landfill space available for long-term solid
waste disposal within the Los Angeles basin and because expansion plans for
these landfills are not guaranteed to be approved, the existing solid waste
disposal situation is considered to be in a serious capacity shortfall. Therefore,
the project and cumulative impacts on solid -waste disposal facilities would be
unavoidably significant.
SECTION 4. The FEIR and FEIR Addendum for the Porta Bella Specific Plan 91-001,
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 51599, and Oak Tree Permit 91- 033'+. identify project specific
and cumulative impacts that can be mitigated to levels consideredless than significant.
Adverse environmental impacts identified in the Final EER and Addendum that, with the
incorporation of identified mitigation measures, can be reduced to a level less than
significant are summarized as follows.
a. Geotechnical Imps R - The site contains a variety of geotechnical factors
common throughout Southern California: seismicity, loose soils, unstable
slopes, as well as surface and subsurface remnant of debris produced during
the site's history as a munitionsand explosives manufacturing and testing site.
An active trace of the San Gabriel Fault has been mapped and designated by
the State of California, Division of Mines and Geology as within an Alquist-
Priolo,Special Studies: Zone.
Routine engi=neering and construction measures will adequately mitigate the
potential, liquefaction, slope stability and other general geotechnical
constraints..: During the lifetime of the proposed project, structures and
occupants: would be subject to ground shaking of potentially severe intensity
dna to the" . proximity of various active and potentially active faults.
Implementation of proposed mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts,
but wmtd not eliminate seismic risks.
1htft+olo¢v Impacts - The project will, add impervious surfaces and direct storm
water runoff to proposed streets and a system of existing and proposed storm
drain facilities. The amount of clear water runoff is anticipated to increase,
however, the developed condition runoff in general is reduced due to smaller
debris producing areas. The high potential for debris production, however,
could cause downstream sedimentation impacts during grading and
construction. Mitigation measures can be added to the project which would
Draft Resolution 95.41, 4/11/95 8 Attachment 2
ensure that there would be no net increase in runoff or sedimentation impacts
from the project site.
C. NoiseImpacts - Short-term noise impacts may occur during the construction
phases of the project, however, these are considered a short-term nuisance and
not considered a significant impact because of the common use of construction
equipment and the relatively short time period associated with grading and
construction, and City noise control restrictions. Cumulative increases in traffic
noise would occur incrementally, over a long period of time. The cumulative
noise impacts are not anticipated to be significant because subsequent projects
will be reviewed for noise impacts and appropriate mitigation measures will
be imposed as needed at that time.
d. Land Use Im a s - The proposed project is consistent with the City of Santa
Clarita Land Use Element policies relative to the type and intensities of the
proposed land use mix. No conflict with surrounding uses is anticipated.
Development on significant ridgelines and hillsides would be in conflict with
Land Use Element policies relative to ridgeline preservation and hillside
development. The ridgeline and hillside grading impacts are related to lyses
with public benefit which may be permitted by the Planning Commission and
City Council. Encroachment upon ridgelines and grading in hillside areas'as
proposed under the specific plan and other entitlements may be found to be "an
innovative application" under the City's Ridgeline Preservation and Hillside
Development Ordinance and Guidelines. With this finding, the project's Iand
use impacts would not be considered unavoidably significant.
e. School Impacts - The Saugus Union School District and the wwiam S. Hart
Union High School District have indicated that additional facilities would be
needed to accommodate the students that would live in this development. The
developers will be required to pay a state -mandated school fee and/or dedicate
land to the satisfaction of the school districts.
f. Fire slid P lice Imnaets - The Los Angeles County Fire and Sheriffs
Departments have indicated that additional manpower, equipment, and
facilities vrm be needed to serve the proposed project. Some of the impact
to fire pro� facilities will be mitigated by payment of a fee to defray the
cost of construction and equipping fire protection facilities. It is also
anticipated that the City would continue to contract for additional Sheriffs
offlosIO as permitted by budget allowances. h itigation measures have also been
idfied such as restrictions on'iandscaping, access requirements, and
provisions for security equipment that will reduce the demand for police and
fire services. Therefore, the proposed project would not significantly affect the
Fire and Sheriffs Department service abilities.
g. Sewa¢e Diauos 1 Impacts - Given the existing and project treatment capacity
of Sanitation District No. 26, the proposed project and known cumulative
Draft Resolution 95.41, 4/11/95 9 Attachment 2
development could be served with no adverse impacts to the wastewater
treatment system; however, much of the site lies outside of the jurisdictional
boundaries of District No. 26 and would have to be annexed to the district
prior to the provision of sewer service.
h. Water Service lm2aU . The proposed and related projects within the service
area of the Santa Clarita Water Company would not have an adverse impact
on local water supplies. The project would need to be annexed to the Santa
Clarita Water Company.
i. Archaeoloeic 1 and Cultural Resource Imna s - No cultural resources have
been found on the project site, and given the widespread and prolonged site
disturbance that has occurred, none are expected to exist. Should cultural
resources of any kind be uncovered during future grading operations, however,
grading operations in that area will cease and..a qualified archaeologist will be
contacted to evaluate the finding.
SECTION 5. The City Council is approving a revised, lower density Porta Bella
Specific Plan because the benefits of the revised project outweigh the unavoidable adverse
environmental effects of the project. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects
identified in the completed FEIR and FEiR Addendum. The following overriding
considerations have been found which support adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations:
a. The project approved by the City Council implements the Valley Center
Concept and:Sermite Concept in the General Plan.
b. The project will provide: the City with the Magic Mountain Parkway connector
necessary to provide:.;.: direct access to the Civic Center and buerail
transportation access,:•':'
c The prole ctit consistent with: 1) the site's General Plan and Zoning Land Use
Classificationq„ and 2) the intensity of development allowed in the Specific
Play arem with City Council approval of the Specific Plan General Plan
amendment, approval of zone changes to SP (Specific Plan Zone) as identified
imthe $pacc Plan for this project and adoption of the Specific Plan document.
ect proposes a range of uses including residential, industrial and
recreational in support of General Plan Goals as follows:
The project supports the Land Use Element including policies promoting a
mixed-use town center, with higher density residential, in proximity to public
transportation, as follows:
Draft Resolutlon 95-41, 4/11/95 10 Attachment 2
Policy 3.1 "Promote the development of City centers where more intensive
land uses will be encouraged, including the development of...a
civic town center."
Policy 3.3 "Identify a primary town center... which encourage(s) a
pedestrian orientation and can accommodate a clustered mix of
commercial, entertainment, recreation, town square/meeting
place(s), multi -use complexes, and multi -modal transportation
activity opportunities."
Policy 3.6 "Locate higher density;, residential- development in close
proximity to regional and sub -regional centers and public
transportation corridors.'
The project supports the Air Quality Element which seeks to reduce pollution
from automobiles by relating land uses to transportation, facilitating non.
automotive travel, and encouraging a jobs/housing, balance, including the
following.
Goal 10 "To reduce vehicle emissions by cresting an urban form that
efficiently utilizes urban infrastructure and services."
Policy 10.1 "Contribute to the reduction of vehicle miles traveled by
achieving a more reasonable job/housing balance."
Policy 10.2 "Develop and encourage efficient transportation systems and
land use patterns which minimize imize total trips and vehicle miles
traveled."
Goal:12
''To seduce mobile source emissions by promoting a shift from
single Occupancy to higher occupancy vehicles."
the Circulation Element which seeks to locate major
anent centers adjacent to a multi -modal transit facility,
Fn in:
"Develop a multi -modal transit facility that is strategically
located in the City, adjacent to a potential public transit rail line
and located convenient to major local residential and
employment centers."
The project supports the Housing Element which has numerous sections
calling for mixed use projects, flexibility in standards, a mix of housing types,
and using the specific plan process, as shown in the following sections:
Policy 1.4 "Promote the development of compatible mixed use projects in
Draft Resolutlon 95-41, 4/11/95
11
Attachment 2
order to create a village concept, with various interacting
uses ... to stimulate activity."
Program La "Alternative Development Standards. Use the specific plan
process ... to permit alternative housing design where such
projects result in attractive, desirable housing types, including
affordable housing."
Program Lc "Specific Plan/Planned Development. Permit flexible
development standards in specific plans. -that encourage housing
developments which meet the needs of the community. Flexible
development standards should allow for clustering, and a variety
of site design characteristics as appropriate."
Program Lf "Mixed Use. Allow mixed-use developments and ensure that all
mixed use (housing -commercial development) plans provide the
necessary open space and paridng-and adequately buffer
residents...."
Policy 2.2
"Locate higher density residential development and housing for
the elderly in close proximity to public transportation sad
commercial land uses,...."
Policy 3.3
"Encourage a mix of housing types and densities in new large
scale development."
Policy 3.11_
.. "Consider alternative development standards where practical ... to
promote desired housing types and benefits„...”
The project supports the Community Design Element, which in the following
policies are also supportive of this theme, as follows:
Policy 2,2
>'Trovide for residential uses in proximity to busineWcommercial
centers in a manner which promotes the
nteighborhood/village/town center planning concept and
maintains... the concept of the Valley Center."
Policy 13
"Encourage the establishment of mixed use and village
commercial centers..., urban open spaces, and the effective use
of street furniture in'downtown areas.
Policy 3.4
"Encourage design and uses of commercial districts and related
housing that add pedestrian orientation and that provide for safe
and secure daytime and nighttime activities, i.e., the Newhall
historic area and the City center."
Droll Resolutlon 95.41, 4ti119s 12 Attachment 2
e. The Porta Bella project will provide various residential housing opportunities
for different economic levels with a mix of single family and multi -family
dwelling units as required by the Housing Element of the General Plan, the
Housing Allocation for the City of Santa Clarity as set forth by SCAG
(Southern California Association of Governments) in the Regional Housing
Needs Assessment (RHNA) and the City's Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy (CHAS) prepared for the Federal. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD).
f. The project approved by the City Council is an innovative design under the
criteria of the Ridgeline Preservation and Hillside Development Ordinance and
Guidelines for purposes of allowing encroachment into significant. ridgeline
areas and allowing grading on hillsides with slopes over 25%. Innovative
design concepts incorporated into the project include pedestrian pockets, new
housing types, a neo -traditional approach to town planning, modern traffic
circles, promoting sustainable cities concepts, clustering to preserve open space,
mixed uses, utilizing congestion management principals, and promoting
alternate modes of transit usage through land use patterns. Therefore, the
project approved by the City Council is consistent with the City's Land Use
Element policies regarding hillside development and the City's Ridgeline
Preservation and Hillside Development Ordinance and Guidelines
g. The project provides significant public, benefits including employment
opportunities, increased residential densities in proximity to the Metrolink
station, an improved circulation network including portions of Santa Clarita
Parkway and the Magic Mountain Parkway connector, and increased access to
the planned Civic Center:
h. The DEIR addendum extensively studied the impacts of the proposed Magic
Princessa Corridor.. The traffic study found that this road link would enhance
valley circulation >: The addendum also concluded that the noise, visual, and
aesthetic concerns would not be significant. The substitution of Santa Clarita
Parkway for:;Rio Vista provides better spacing of north -south corridors.
SECTION 6 The City Council of the City of Santa Clarity does hereby find that City
staff conducted an Initial study of the Porta Bella project which determined that the project
„
may have a agnificant;effect upon the environment and that an environmental impact report
must be prepared. A, Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Specific Plan 91-001 and an Oak
Tree:Permit 91 -OU was mailed to affected agencies. Following submittal of the Vesting
Tentative ll6ap 51599 and Development Agreement applications, a subsequent NOP was
greparecLYnailed on February 1$1993: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared
and circulated for review and comment by the affected governmental agencies. The review
period of the Draft EIR was firom September 27, 1993 to November 12, 1999. A Final EIR
dated January 7, 1994, was prepared which included responses to comments received on the
DEDt As a result of public, and Planning Commission comments on the Final EIR, as
addendum was prepared dated April 8, 1994. A mitigation monitoring and reporting plan
Draft Regolutlon 95.41, 411119s 13 AttachmeM 2
(MMRP) has been prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA The Final EIR and
Addendum address all concerns of responsible agencies, interested organizations and
individuals, and has been considered and deemed complete by the City Council of the City
of Santa Clarita
SECTION 7. Based upon the above findings of fact, oral and written testimony and
other evidence received at the public hearing held for the project, and upon studies and
investigations made by the City Council and on its beh
follows: alf; the City Council further finds as
a At the hearings, the City Council considered staff presentations, staff reports,
Planning Commission resolutions, applicant presentations, and public
testimony on the proposal, and the Final. EIR. and Addendum prepared for the
project.
b. Development may be allowed on the ridgelines because the construction of
roadways and other transportation improvements proposed as part of this
Project promotethe public health, safety and general; welfare. The proposal
meets the innovative design criteria forencroachment upon significant
ridgelines and for grading on hillside slope*in excess of 10% because
innovative
new horn concepts incorporated int*: the project include pedestrian
P rug types, a neotraditional approach to town
modern traffic circles, promoting sustainable cities con planning,
preserve open space, mixed uses, utihzin con �� clustering
and promoting alternate modes f g congestion management principals,
has also been: demonstrated. Ir=sit usage through lead use patterns. It
Addendum: fia- this though Precise illustration in the FEIR and
visual irate Project that. the proposed development will not violate the
integrity, of the significant ridgeline area
C. The design of the
project and the type of improvements will not cause serious
Public health pro6lema, since water, sewage disposal, fire protection and
material, cleanup impacts addressed in the Final EIR and
Addendum will be. addressed in the MMRP and Conditions of Atime of prol":Pprovai at the
M-
SPprovaL
d T�Pr0JW is consistent with the intent of the City's General Plan. The City's
G4*@r*Plaa identifies the Bermite site as being appropriate for a specific
& --*Following Council redesignation of the project site to SP (Specific Plan)
City's General Plan land us6" map, zone change* to SP (S
Z`oae) as identified in the Specific Play for this (Specific Plan
Specific Plan, including modifying the Highway N Network of theCirculation
la the
Element f the General Plan to add Santa Clarlta Crce of Rio
Vista Road and add the Magic Mountain Parkway connector, thisp project
of Rio
be consistent with the City's General Plan and ZoningPco]e will
Ordinance.
D►att Resolution 95.41, 4111195 14
Attachment 2
e. The Final Environmental Impact Report and Addendum identify 'cerfaih
Significant environmental effects. The Final Environmental Impact Report and
Addendum identify feasible mitigation measures for each of these impacts with
the exclusion of air quality, biological resources, aesthetics; light Ahd'gla're,
risk of upset/health hazard, transportation and circulation, and cumulative
solid waste impacts which cannot be avoided through mitigation. The identified
mitigation measures will be incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring
Reporting Plan (MMRP) and conditions of approval for the project at the time
of project approval.
THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP SANTA CLARITA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND FIND AS FOLLOWS:
a. Pursuant to Section 15090 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
City Council certifies that the Porta Bella project FEIR and FEIR Addendum
(SCH# 92-041040) has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, and was presented• to; and the information
contained therein reviewed and considered by the., City Council prior to
reaching a decision on this project.
b. The City Council has considered the unavoidable impacts to air quality, biota,
aesthetics, light and glare, risk of upsetthealth hazard, transportation and
circulation and solid waste relevant to the potential benefits which this project
will provide to the community. The City Council has determined that these
unavoidable impacts are acceptable in light of the long-term benefits to the
community that. this project will provide including employment opportunities,
a -variety of housing types suiting a range of economic levels, increased
residentialdensities in proximity to the Metrolink station, an improved City
circulation network including portions of Santa Clarity Parkway and Magic
Mountain Parkway connector, and increased access to the planned Civic
Cent
The City Cduncil of the City of Santa Clarity does hereby certify the FEIR and
FEIR Addendum (SCH# 92-041040; adopts the Statement of Overriding
Considerations set forth in Section 5 above, and adopts and approves the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto and
incorpozsted herein by this reference as Exhibit " F ".
A.
PASSED,
ity Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and certify this
to be a full and -correct copy of the action taken
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
19_
Draft Resolution 95.41, 4/11/95 15 Attachment 2
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council ofthe .City of Santa Clarita
at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of '
19_ by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
KJM:LHS
eumm�yhsenl k.
Draft Resolution 9541, 4111195 16 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTfM 51599
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
AS MODIFIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL APRIL 11, 1995
GEOTECHMCAL CONSIDERATIONS
G -L. Prior to recordation of each phase, additional investigations shall be performed to determine the presence of addi-
tional traces of the San Gabriel Fault, throughout the "expanded special studies zone" recommended by GEOLABS-
WESTLAKE VILLAGE, as shown on Figure 19 in the EIR. If additional traces are found within areas proposed
for development of habitable structures or other critical facilities, appropriate setbacks shall be delineated for all
fault traces, to prohibit development in these areas to the satisfaction of the City.
Implementation Phase Impl men •nQRCIponaibilihr " Monitoring Resmndhihw
Recordation of each Phase Master developer City Engineer
G-2. At least two all-weather routes of vehicular ingress/egress to the off-site arterial roadway system shall be provided
for all developed portions of the project site, at all times, so that emergency vehicle access can be maintained in
allooupied areas in the event of earthquake damage that results in a closure of primary routes.
Implementation Phase ImRlementinir Resoonsr lj�, MoniEngintorgte R�yorL��*hw
Recordation of each Phase Project developerCitys)/engineer(s) eer
G-3 Prior to the replacement of compacted fills, alluvial materials shall be removed to bedrock or firm underlying
alluvium. Alluvial removals in the major northerly draining canyon and previously developed portions on the
northern end of the site will be dependent uponthe proposed development for the area In general, if proposed
finished grades, roughly approximate the existing grades, removal and replacement of the upper 4 to 6 feet of
existing..soils may be necessary prior to the placement of fill. If deeper ABs are programmed, deeper
overexcavation (removals) of the 0d3t6tg;alluvW materials will be necessary. Also, depths of removals north of
the Southern Pacific right-of-way will be dictated by the results of a future deep exploration program needed to
evaluate the possible.susmptibility of the subsurface sediments to liquefaction. Mitigation shall be performed to
the satisfaction of the City Ea,mnea_
IPII�JL• II •.41141 1 1 •. s7 .1 1. 1 U 4P UI1 �: 7S411J' 1
1 1 1• V y
G4. All remaining water and oil wells shall be properly abandoned, pursuant to the requirements of the California
Water Quality Caattroi Board, Los Angeles Region $4 (water wells), and the district ofAce. of the California Depart
meat: of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (oil wells). Evidence of proper abandonment of previously
dosed wells, in accordance with State requirements, shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any
Fading'pemtity
Implementation Phases Implemen •ngResponsibility Mordipita ReMortobliM
Grading Permits Project developers)/engineer(s) City Engineer
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-1 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OT? 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
G-5. If encountered, either remove or cut and plug abandoned pipelines according to the applicable code requirements
and as property line conditions dictate. This includes water line "mains^ from the existing water tanks.
Unreinforced concrete pipelines may be crushed in-place and incorporated into the deeper fills. The applicant
shall place an applicable note on all grading plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Implementation Phac Implementing Resnnnc;h;tily MonitoringAni. lity
Each Grading Phase Project develo r(s)/e
1� Pe ngineer(s) City Engineer ,
G-6. During mass grading, special care should be exercised so as to avoid spillage and deposition of loose soil or debris
onto slope areas programmed to remain in a natural state. Any loose slough, debris or other deleterious materials
deposited or accumulated on natural slope areas will have to be removed by the grading contractor upon
completion of earth construction. The applicant shall place an applicable note on all: grading pians to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Imylementation Phase Implementln Resprrtcih;Hty> i�4niA�t9n
Each Grading Phase PEcambuty
roject developers}/engin a {s} City Engineer
G-7. Building pads beneath natural slope areas have the potential of being affected by runoff and soil slippage and
debris flow activity. Thus, it may be necessary to implement, remedial measures such as low slough walls,
diversion/impact walls or earth catchment barriers at the natural slope cDntacL Such devices shall be design'
to intercept solid debris and direct flows to paved swales which carry drainage away from proposed structia
to approved disposal areas to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.'
Implementation Phaco [mylemen'ng R���lity
Each Gradin M41111g Resan a7tility
g Phase
Project developmW/engineer(s) City Engineer
G;e. All existing: artificial fill materials'on-site within areas proposed for development must be removed in their
entirety.. Materials found to be: fief of any trash; debris or other deleterious material can be used in engineered
fills. Determinatiott: of the suitability for disposal of existing materials with respect to their toxicty and
contamination with hazardous materials will be left to environmental consultants woridng with the project
engineer and to dwsad5&,ction of the Ci and the trot, CAL EPA.
jY Department of Toxic Substance Con
G-9. Abandon and to nove
requirements. Any rer
V\�It�geq.• L_]. alt l�l�f
v _
waste consultants
underground storage tanks encountered in accordance with State and local code
ng cavilies will be filled with compacted fill to the satisfaction of the City,
1 • 41141 t i' @-74� 1.'. 4. f
mord IeP V' E. _)..ILL ].t �City asildbrg offinat CityEngineer
Project developer(s)/engineer(s)
G-10. Haul routes used by the grading contractor shall avoid disturbing terrain which is to remain in a natural state to
the satisfaction of the City.
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 comp -2 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
.MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
Implementation Phase Imnlementinp Responsibility MotdtAratg R ec h i;cv
Each Grading Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer/Building
Official
AUt QUALITY
AQ -1. Prior to engaging in demolition activities, complete all Rule 1403 procedures for the removal of asbestos materials
to the satisfaction of the SCAQMD and secure the appropriate permits allowing demolition activity.
Implementation Phase Implementing R=21l ibi &. nibring Ec=n&hty
Prior to demolition of Project developers South Coast Air Quality
remaining structures Management District and
City Building Official
AQ -2. Develop and implement a construction management plan, as approved by the City, which may include some, or
all, of the following measures recommended by the SCAQMD...;
L • 31 ' l r. t • 1 Phase Iml2temenfingH==J1J1fq Monitoring EcMm&bhjX
Prior to demolition of Project developer(s) 0� South Coast Air Quality
remaining structures Management District and
City Building Official
(a) Provide temporary traffic controls during all phases of construction activities to maintain traffic flow (e.g., flag
person).
(b) Schedule construction activities th4 affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off-peak hours (e.g., 10:00 A.M.
to 3.90 PM} "
(c) Implement a trip reduction plant ta achieve a target average vehicle ridership MR) of IS for construction
employees.
(d) Operate a shuttle service kaand from rOdservices and food establishments during lunch hotus.
(e) Prohibit truck_idiieg in 4p a of two minute&
(f)Maintain et}ttiprttatt and vel+idsanghtet in good corhdilion and in proper torte m per manufacturers! specifications
and per SE"AC?MD rules; Bans excessive emissions.
(g) If pile drivers must be »sedattlte site during construction, tree methanol fueled pile drivers.
(h) Suspend use aE al>faonhstrurdion equipment operations dtrring second stage smog alert Contact the SCAQMD
S7
(800) 242-007�fordaifyforeasb
(i) Use electricity fmszt power poles rather than temporary.diesel- or gasoBrhe-powered generators.
(p Use methanol or natural'gas-powered moblle equipment instead of diesel
(k) Use propane or btslape-powered ort -site mobile equipment instead of gasolirte
AQ -3. Implement a dust control plan to the satisfaction of the City of Santa C7arita.
n• �nelr•--�•� $.:
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95
ITnDlen, 11. t: ",-&- • \ LLVV •t14�
Project cleveloper(3)/contractors
Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES. ARE CONDITIONS TO VTI'M 51599
AQ4. Orient buildings to the north, as feasible, to augment natural cooling and include passive solar design (e.g.,
daylighting) as part of the project.
lmplementation Phases Iwfonitorar am nahili
Building Permits Project developers)/contractor City Building
AQ -5. Construct, contribute, or dedicate land,to link bicycle trails on-site to designated community -wide bicycle
Commuting routes.
AQ -6. No construction traffic related to
streets within the Circle J Ranch..
• a. .. ;a....- .. .
the Magic-Princessa connector, or any other element of the project, shall use
ImniementinJETTK
gResonns,biliw Monibrir�_Resmnsbl;w
Project developer(O/Contra tors.. City Building Official
HYDROLOGY. -
H -1. The applicant will prepare a final developed condition hydrology analysis in conjunction with ultimate projt
design, when precise engineering occurs., 'Those final calculations will verify the conditions identified in Table
13 of the EIR and/or establish additional design features to satisfy the criteria that no net increase in runoff from
the site will be permitted. All elements of the storm drain system shall conform to the policies and standards
administered by the City of Santa Clarita and de Los Angeles County Flood Control
District, as applicable.
ImnlementationPhase JIDpl an $Resod a; lite
Pro' develo M Mory &ft
Prior m recordation _ —�Y --
lect peels)/engineer(s) City Engines
Los Angeles County
H-2. debris ate project hydr luV and debsf6 production calculations will be prepared to verify the requirements for
desittittg basins tD the satisfaction of the City. Concurrent with submittal of grading plans, erosion
and sedirrtentaHon control platttt:,wiii be submitted for approval by the City of Santa Clarits.
Implementa_ tl�Phase Imolemer+tinQ-R�,spor�ibility Monibrh Remo �7:F
Grading Permrt� Project developers)/engineer(s) iii ri cv
City Engineer
H-3. Ultimate project design sbaB verify the feasibility of the proposed detention basin at the southwest comer of the
property to the satisfaction of the City.—To reduce the size of the required detention basin, and to maintain
existing. storm flows to natural streamcourses, an alternate design approach splitting discharge, from the basin
to the two natural streams in this area, shall be evaluated to the satisfaction of the City. Geotechnical feasibility
shallbe included in this evaluation to ensure that the optimum size detention basin can be property supported
by stable material during periods of prolonged saturation.
Implementation Pham Implementing RRponsibility M�i1fi R QoR�h llty
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 comp -4 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
Each Grading Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
H-4. Design and construct runoff filtering zones in large parking areas (as opposed to driveways of single family homes
or duplexes) to the satisfaction of the City. These should be located at the lower elevations of parking areas and
designed to catch runoff with relatively high oil and grease concentrations. These facilities shall be designed to
permit percolation of the runoff through the soil and underlying layers (sand and gravel), permit hydrocarbon
filtration and absorption, and encourage the degradation of hydrocarbons by nat u tilyoccurring soil bacteria.
All such measures shall meet NPDES requirements
Implementation Phase Imylementing Rc2ponsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developer(s)leng neer(s) City Engineer
H-5. To the extent possible, incorporate settling ponds, detention basins, and. vegetated swales, to slow and filter runoff
prior to discharge into the storm drain system or into natural streamcounses Final design criteria will be
generated with ultimate project design and would involve percolation: tes ft and geotechnical investigations in
proposed detention basin locations to the satisfaction of the City. Ali such measures shall meet NPDES
requirements.
Implementation P = ImylementinirRanw naibiltty
Each Grading Phase Project developers)/enghum(s) € City Engineer
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES"
B-1. Develop and implement all Native Landscape Treatments set forth in the Draft Specific Plan, in coordination with
the City of Santa Clarity and the California Departrnent of Fish and Game, to replicate the natural vegetation
communities present on the site:: The habitat needs of sensitive animal and plant species should be incorporated
into the plans
ImplementationPhase Implementing�vnsiblHev_
Grading Permits t developers) City Parks and Recreation
Deparcnettt
B-2. Prior to issuance of phi WwJI,% pemdts, the applicant shall complete focused spring surveys for the short -joint
P >twou tg.glory, and Davidson's bush mallow. If found, individuals or propagules of
tthtese species salvaged f:mpact areas shall be relocated to area proposed for natural open space on the
project site. A rdontlon and monitoring plan shall be incorporated into the proposed native landscape treatments
and other open spuott t plans, subject to approval by the California Department of Fish and Game and
the,City. Monlbeintg oferelocated individuals or propagules shall occur for a minimum of five years to ensure
Successful reestabtlahe>Bttt
mimillta_tion Phm Implementing Rgg =gbfllita_
Grading Peradq Project developer(s) City Parks and Recreation
Department
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 ramp -5 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
B-3. Preserve the major drainages as identified in the Specific Plan. Incorporate existing natural vegetation and natural
streambank conditions where feasible. If the Los Angeles Flood Control District requires structural stabilization
as part of necessary channelization efforts, use permeable materials such as "Arnwre-Flex" that include both
structural elements and open pockets through which native vegetation can be established or other mechanisms
to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department
Imylementation Phase I=1ementing Res nsibilitZ
Grading Permits Project developers)/engineer(s) CDPD/CCE/CstyEr neer
B-4. Construct wildlife guzzlers in open space areas, as specified; by the California Department of Fish and Game,
where drainage patterns will be altered by grading and development This will replace the existing water sources
for these areas.*
Ph= Implementing RcW=ibilibr
Grading Permits Project/developer(O City Parks and Recreation
Department/California
Fish & Game Department
B5. Shield natural open space from introduced light sources using native shrubs and trees.
Implementation Phase Implemen in& Rc=nsilnlibt MonitrningR=Mai
Building Permits ,Project developer(s) CDFG/City Parks and
Recreation Department
NOISE
N-1. Provide staging arras on-site t6 minimize off-siWbansnortation of heavy construction equipment Locate these
areas to maximize the distance between staging areas and residential areas to the satisfaction of the City.
IrriRlementati SWI:.' ImRJementinS RC onsibility
Grading and Construction Phases Project developer(Wormiraciors City Building Official
N-2. Ensure that oonstrutttors t i, fitted with sound -reduction equipment, per manufacturer's specifications.
1=1ementing,RRcq=ibililX
Grading and C.omsauaiosPhases Project developer(Woontractom City Building Official
N-3. Subarit acoustical aralysis reports acceptable to the City concurrently with submittal of precise development plans
for all residential area and institutional (school) facilities located adjacent to any of the four or six -lane roadways
on rhe project sites : Single family dwelling units shall be located in areas outside of the projected 60 DB(A) CNEL
noise oonEOur: with appropriate mitigation. Multi -family dwelling units and school classrooms and library
buildings shall be located in areas outside of the projected 65 dB(A) CNEL noise contour with appropriate
mitigation. Buildings at the athletic center within the Soledad District shall be located outside of the projected
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-6 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
70 dB(A) CNEL noise contour with appropriate mitigation. Interior noise levels within residential and school
facilities shall not exceed 45 dB(A) CNEL.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Hmpm ,;h1,_,
Building Permits Project developer(sVengineer(s) City Building Official
N4. Construct earth berms in the initial grading phases of the Magic-Princessa connector along the western edge of
the corridor alignment where the roadway construction is not hidden by landfiorau to the satisfaction of the City..
(This measure does not pertain to the construction of the bridge across Oakdale Canyon because of adverse
impacts on biological resources, recreational trails and drainage considerations).
Implementation Phase Implementing go=lbili Mordlortrigj =rL2bWty
Grading Phases Project developers)/Contractors City Building Official
City Engineer
AESTHETICS, LIGHT AND GLARE
AE -1. Screen the proposed water tanks on Lot 64 of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51599 by using a lower profile
tank, by establishing a landscaping buffer including, the use of vokano" berms, and by painting the tank an
eartlttone color that blends with adjacent lanciforms to the satisfaction of the City.
!1• y1141FI rTqT U1:.,
AE -2 Project Iandscaping p6
boundaries to screen: v
measures shall be indw
corner of the project sit
Building Permits
AE -3. The. Oakdale Canyon b
mxdk g R=012blity
Project developer(s3' Cornnumity Develop pent
Parks and Recreation
i shall• €siciude appropriate screening materials along the west and southern site
rs of the project site from neighboring portions of the Circle J Ranch. Additional
if needed; * screen the proposed detention basin to be constructed in the southwest
r the. satisfaction of the Qty.
U,41� 4V1� x:71-411.1 1
- W 11
design, including visual mitigation, shall be approved to the satisfaction of the
parartent Consideration shall be given to utilizing earthtone colors on the bridge
and incorporating landscaping to mitigate the appearance of the bridge to the satisfaction of the Qty.
ImIziementation Phase Implementing R=nsib;ltty
Magic-Princessa bridge design phase Project developer(s) Cou mimityDevdopment
Department
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-7 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT.
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
LAND USE
LU -1. In order to avoid potential conflicts of the development with eAsting easements, the developer will obtain written
approval from the easement holders for all proposed encroachments, or to the issuance
Final plans, construction procedures and improvements shall com 1 with all °f grading permits.
P Y requirements of such approvals.
1'I1W1 menW n Phaco imnlemen 'ng oMT,;liw
Grading Plan MonibrinL
Project developers)/contractorsRngtmb W
City Engineer
LU -2. Prior to approval of a Finals Map for that phase, prove to the satfsfactlort of the LADWP that
proposed "GG" Street
would not significantly impact the First Los Angeles Aqueduct, or revise the alignment of t or
vide
alterative access to Lots 54 and 55 to avoid encroachment into area to the LADWP aqueduct easement in this
the satisfaction of the LADWP and the City.
[mnlementation Phase Implementing_ c,•ratl�
Final Vesting Tract Map/ Prosect devetoper(s)/engineer(s) City, Engineer
Grading Permits
RISK OF UPSETMEALTH HA2rAR)€lr'
RU -1. n----
*'T�vra-
2Vi�PnPP
by Condition of Approval DS -U for Vesting Tentative Tract Map.
RU -3.
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-g
Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP S1599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
measure applies is re uper pads and baekbe— -terA and per -
in
Superceded by Condition of Approval DS -12 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map.
51599.
Implementation Pham Implementing RcWnsibilifa Morvtoitng Eca2,,,ga&W
Grading Permits Project developers)/engineer CAL EPA /City Engineer
TRANSPORTATION 6c CIRCULATION
Intersections
TC -1. Table 36 in the EIR summarizes mitigation measures and lane configurations recommended for all study
intersections for existing conditions and at full buildout of each analysis: phase. Please note that the following
considerations shall be observed in the actual implementation of these messures,
(a) For Phase 1, mitigation measures were recommended to keep the LOS at or below level of service )5. in some
cases, however, level of service was mitigated to LOS E, bemuse Ow provision of additional mitigation measures
were not feasible at this stage. Those mitigations werereemammended1br future phases where applicable.
(b) For Phase II, recommended mitigation measures should be carefully monitored since at that time (year 2004)
a number of major highway extensions and new roadways may constructed. These additional roadways may
alter commuting behaviors and specific: traffic mitigations wwrdingly.
W For Phase III, mitigation measures were reomomoded assuming that a nuurtber of other transportation elements
embodied in the City of Santa Clarita CimuiatfonEierium would be in place (please refer to Figures 10a, lob,
and 10c in the Traffic Study for network; assumptions). However, these mitigation measures should be
monitored and periodically evaluated in order to assess their treed before implementation
(d) In a few 0910, mitigation messmsa. m recommended not only based on V/C ratio, but also based on traffic
volumes.
(e) It is reeomrrtertded filar! subject n**dm be monitored on a phase by phase basis arid that the developer of
future individual peerae berrequested to provide additional traffic analysis and mitigation assessment at each
phase tentativeImplementation Ebot tract map k;b
y
jmplemen g Resnnnsibili_ty_
Prior to reeDrdatl0ll of the lhase Futtute Tract Subdivisions Cimmartity Development
Deparlmeerut
TC -2. in addition to the lnbWWtion lame amffgurations identified in Table 36 of the EER, the City will monitor the pace
of development careWy, and will not approve a level of development above the totals for each land use category
assumed dw ft,a€f c phasing analys* as shown on Table 33.
Imn)emerttation Phase Implementing Rc=n_sibtlity
Grading Permits for each "super pad" Project developers) City Traffic Engineer
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmP-9 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
TC -3 To ensure that increasing traffic volumes on the arterial network are distributed to the maximum feasible
efficiency, the City will continue to implement the planned arterial system identified in the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, at the maximum design capacities. Furthermore, the City will monitor the pace of project
development carefully, and will not approve a level of development above the totals for each land use category
assumed in the traffic phasing analysis, as shown on Table 33 in the Traffic Section, unless additional traffic
improvements are advanced.
Implementation Phase Implementine Respon ibiltty Monitoring Rcmv,ns'igty
Grading Permits for each "super pad" Project developers) City Traffic Engineer
TC4. Restripe Magic Mountain Parkway from Valencia Boulevard to San Fernando Road to six traffic lanes and upgrade
Magic Mountain Parkway to a six -lane roadway from San Fernando Road to Rio Vista Road by Phase ii of the
Traffic Study.
Implementation Phase Implementing Resor s,h,hea, MonitomrQ Resmmilxl;ty
Grading Permits for each "super pad" Fair share contribution by this Pr*cds:, City Traffic Engineer
developer(s)
Railroad ro sine, at Maeic Mountain Pa kc rgy/S Fernando Road
TC -5. Existing traffic conditions warrant signalization of the railroad crossing at Magic Mountain Parkway/San Fernando
Road. Since the Porta Bella Project wouid increase congestion at this intersection, as well as contribute to longer
delays during train crossings, this project will be required to participate in the costs of a future grade separation.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Feral Vesting Tract Map Master develo ns�ility
Pee City Traffic Engineer
TC -6. Provide a vehicular connection from Magic Mountain Parkway to Soledad Carryon Road prior to the occupancy
of any buildings is Phase L_,,,
Implementation w Implementing Respo hililX M
Grading Permit and ConstritcHgrt: Project developer(s) City Engineer/Building
period for Phasel Official
TC -7. Develop and implement mm programs as approved by the City. and SCAQMD, throughout the H&of the project,
incorporating measures such as, but not limited to, those identified in the Traffic and the Air Quality sections of
this EHL Implementation shall begin concurrently with occupancy of the first phase.
Implementation Phan Implementing REDO—moi y Mont' g &Wnssibility
Commercial and industrial occupancy Commercial and industrial' AQMD, Transit Division
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-10 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; TESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
businesses
General
TC -8. Fast food drive-through restaurants shall be prohibited within the. Town Center District of the Porta Bella site.
Implementation Phase
Approval of specific plan, then
throughout the life of the project
U UID 4O �':y11tlA � f
r ... ,.
S-1. Prior to recording Vesting Tract Map No. 51599, the master developer shall reseh. an agreer a t with the Saugus
Union School District and the William S. Hart Union High School District to Owmitls&ction of the school district.
Implementation Phase Imvlementing Rc:R= ibilhty i1 apo �hlttty
Final Vesting Tract Map Masser developer School Districts
City Developnertt Services
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-11 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP S1599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring E= mblity
Final Subdivision Maps Project developers) /builders Sheriffs Department /City
Engineer
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
SD -1. The project will be required to obtain a Trunk Sewer Connection Permit In order to directly connect to a Los
Angeles County Sanitation District trunk sewer.
Implementation Phase Implementing Res nsibility hkW!W g R=on'kli1,
Recordation of Each Phase Project builders LACSD/City Engineer
SD -2. Pay fees to the County Sanitation Districts and the City of Santa. Clarita, as required, to fund sewerage
infrastructure improvements to serve the proposed project:.
Implementation Phase ImplementingRcS=ibiliJX Motritoea�o R�orml,;l;w_
Occupancy Permits Project Builders : LACSD/City Engineer
SD -3. Annex that portion of the project site outside of the jurisdictional boundaries of County Sanitation District N
26 to the district prior to final map approval.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitorby EC4 2bih'ty
Final Vesting Tract Map Master. developer LACSD/ City Engineer
WATER SERVICE
W-1. Comply with all applicable pad_ a and ordinance requirements for construction of water mains, Fire flows, and fire
hydrants.
Implementation Phase fmplementfng R=2nsibil_ity
Final Subdivision Maps Project developer(s) City Engineer
W-2 Design and oortstttrtt lite Faopuaedwater facilities to the requirements of the State of California Regional Water
Quality Control Boant Reg[on ftthe California Department of Health Services; the California Department of
Water Resommm the State Water Resources Control Board; the City of Santa Clarita Department of Public Works;
and the Los AnSda County Department of Health Services.
lementation Phase
41}aj? Implementing Responsibility
Final Subdivision, Maps Project developer(s) City Engineer
W-3. Annex the site to the service area of the Santa Clarita Water Company prior to the recordation of each phase.
Implementation Pb_ase Implementing Rc=nsibilily monitzing E=Msbw
Final Vesting Tract Map Master developer SCWC/City Engineer
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 =P-12 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
W-4. If required, obtain written agreement from off-site property owner(s) to construct the proposed lift station along
Via Princessa.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring EgzzM&Wlx
Final Subdivision Maps Project developer City Engineer
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
SW -1. The grading contractor shall chip and mulch all greenwaste removed from the constrtxtlortsite during grading
operations. Mulched material shall be used as a fire retardant and applied on graded slopes and natural hillsides.
The contractor'shall also submit certified weights (tonnages) of the chipped and mulched materiaL
Implementation Phase Implementing RCO2mawlix mntrur
Grading Phases Project developer(s)/contractors City Solid Waste and City
Building Official
SW -2. Construct all roads with a minimum of 25 percent recyde&content (base and asphalt), where feasible, in
consultation with the City.
Implementation Phase ImylementingRRJRQU:ilnditv._
Grading Permits Project developers) City Solid Waste and
City Engineer
SW -3. Where feasible, and in consultation with the Cit)P oMwtruct aff'draitiage improvements with a minimum 15 percent
recycled bedding material. Native soils shall to used as backfill when applicable and in aeoDrdance with SB 846
Native Backiiif!
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-13 Attachment 2
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM.51599
implementation Phase Implementing ResRMibiijty Monitorin¢ RetimnahiAw
Grading Phases Project developers) City Building Official
AC -2. Prior to commencement of grading activities for the off-site segment of Magic Princessa, Phase 1 level
archaeological and cultural resources assessment shall be conducted to determine whether such resources exist
in this area and whether monitoring of grading activities by an archaeologist would be needed, and if so, in which
particular areas to the satisfaction of the City. Construction specifications for the Magio-Princessa connector shall
incorporate the recommendations of the archaeological and cultural resources assessment.
[mnlementine R=R=ibility
Project developers)/Contractrm
Draft Resolution 95-41
Mitigation Measures 4/11/95 mmp-14 Attachment 2
RESOLUTION NO. 95-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ADOPTING A
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
AND
CERTIFYING FEIR AND ADDENDUM SCH 92-041041,
FOR MASTER CASE NOS. 91-164 AND 93-012, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
51599,
OAK TREE PERMIT 91-033, AND SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001
TO ALLOW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 996 ACRE PROPERTY
KNOWN AS THE BERMITE SITE LOCATED SOUTH OF SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD
AND EAST OF BOUQUET CANYON AND SAN FERNANDO ROADS
AND A ZONE CHANGE TO SPECIFIC PLAN
AND A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE MAP AND THE HIGHWAY
NETWORK OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE DEVELOPMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact:
a. Applications for Specific Plan 91-001 and Oak Tree Permit 91-033 (Master Case
No. 91-164) were filed by Anden Corporation, (the applicant) with the City of
Santa Clarita on October 25, 1991. These applications were deemed complete on
February 26, 1992. Subsequently the applicant submitted applications for
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 51599 and Development Agreement 93-003 (Master
Case No. 93-012) on February 2, 1993. On March 9, 1993 the City deemed the
application complete. The City was notified in August 1993 that Northholme
Partners was the new project applicant.
The applicant requested a specific plan for a comprehensive plan of development,
including proposed modifications to the Circulation Element of the General Plan
and the Unified Development Code within the project area. The plan proposed
1,678 single family homes and 1,560 multiple family homes on 399 acres; 91 acres
of commercial and industrial uses; 14 acres of institutional uses; 434 acres of
open space and recreational uses; 58 acres of streets; and the provision of related
infrastructure on the site's 996 acres. A vesting tentative tract map was
requested to subdivide the 996 acre site into 76 master lots to be further
subdivided by merchant builders into future tract maps. An oak tree permit was
requested to allow for the removal and/or encroachment into the protected zones
of up to 73 native Oak Trees, including two heritage size oak trees.. A
development agreement was requested, however, the details of the agreement are
yet to be negotiated. The Specific Plan includes a modification to the Circulation
Network of the General Plan, specifically the project proposes to substitute Santa
Clarita Parkway for Rio Vista and to extend Magic Mountain Parkway to Via
Princessa through the project area with minor impacts to a small portion of
Circle J open space.
The site is known as the Bermite site located south of Soledad Canyon Road, east
of Bouquet Canyon Road/San Fernando Road; north of the Circle J Ranch
Community; and west of the Golden Triangle Industrial area. The assessor
parcel numbers for the project are 2836-012-010, 011, 012 and 019.
b. The General Plan presently designates the project site RS with a Valley Center
Overlay on the northwest portion of the site, calling for high density development
in the areas near the rail/transportation center. The General Plan specifically
mentions the Bermite site as an area ideal for a specific plan, with a mix of land
uses from high -to -low density and including other uses. Zoning on the site is
presently RS (Residential Suburban), BP (Business Park), and OS (Open Space).
C. The City of Santa Clarita prepared an Initial Study for the project which
determined that the project may have a significant effect on the environment and
that an environmental impact report must be prepared. A Notice of Preparation
(NOP) for the Specific Plan and Oak Tree Permit was mailed on April 8, 1992 to
affected agencies. Following submittal of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and
Development Agreement applications, a subsequent NOP was prepared and
mailed on February 12, 1993.
d. Since 1992 the City has leased a ten acre portion of the project site for use as the
Santa Clarita Metrolink commuter rail station, park-and-ride lot, and bus
transfer station. The Specific Plan also proposes to provide corridors and
construct portions of three proposed east -west arterials (Santa Clarita Parkway,
Magic Mountain Parkway, and Via Princessa) that will provide alternative
circulation routes through the center of the City which is presently in need of
such roadways. The Specific Plan also includes a people mover and trail
connection between the commercial and residential areas and the commuter rail
station.
e. The City of Santa Clarita Development Review Committee met and the applicant
has been supplied with draft conditions of approval.
f. The Planning Commission held extensive hearings on the project, and the City
Council has reviewed the record on the project. As a result of the Planning
Commission, the project was redesigned to subdivide the 996 acre parcel and
allow the following land uses: 406.95 acres open space, 41.75 acres for parks and
recreation, 10 acres for schools, 56 acres for streets, 4 acres for institutional uses,
299.8 acres for single family residential uses (1,244 units), 85 acres for multi-
family residential uses (1,667 units) and 92 acres of commercial and industrial
uses. An oak tree permit to allow for the removal of a maximum of 109 non -
heritage size oak trees and up to 5 heritage size oak trees out of the 182 oak
trees (including 10 heritage size oaks) located on-site. The redesigned project
either approved or recommended for approval by the Planning Commission
included the Magic Princessa Corridor, which links Magic Mountain Parkway to
Via Princessa. A portion of this is off-site in the designated open space of Circle
J. The addendum studied the impacts of the proposed corridor.
g. The site was previously used as an ammunition, explosives and flares
manufacturing and testing facility. These operations on the site were terminated
in 1987. The site is currently leased for film productions, the transportation
center, and for swap meet parking. Heavy metals and other hazardous materials
contaminated the site as a result of the previous use. A total of 14 hazardous
waste clean-up sites have been identified and 13 have been cleaned -up under the
direction of the California Environmental Protection Agency/ Department of Toxic
Substances Control (Ca EPA/ DISC). The 13 identified sites have received clean
closure certification from DTSC. Remediation efforts are continuing on the
remaining site. An additional 64 sites have been identified, to be remediated
prior to obtaining grading permits. Extensive grading and landform alteration
have occurred over most of the site resulting in major surface disturbance,
alteration of topographic relief, and modification of natural drainage patterns.
Since the Planning Commission review, the California Environmental Protection
Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control and the property owner have
entered into a consent decree mandating the investigation and clean-up of the
site to the satisfaction of CaIEPA/DTSC
h. The design of the project concentrates development within an area disturbed by
the previous industrial uses. The project proposes grading on approximately 603
acres of the project site, much of which has already been previously disturbed.
The total amount of grading involves approximately 18 million cubic yards of cut
and 18 million cubic yards of fill, balanced on-site.
i. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the proposed
project pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act. The Draft EIR has been circulated for review and comment to all affected
governmental agencies and all comments received have been considered by the
Planning Conanission. The review period for the Draft EIR was from September
27, 1993 to November 12, 1993. A Final EIR dated January 7, 1994, was
prepared which included responses to comments received on the DEIR.
j.. As a result of public and Planning Commission comments on the project and the
Final EIR, the applicant modified his project. The Planning Commission directed
the applicant and staff to provide environmental analysis of the modified
proposal and a FEIR Addendum was prepared dated April 8, 1994.
k. The Final EIR (FEIR) and the FEIR Addendum were prepared in compliance with
CEQA.
1. The use of the FEIR Addendum is appropriate pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3.
Article 11 of the California Administrative Code because:
(1) Changes .in the project which gave rise to the need for the FEIR
Addendum did not involve:
3
(a) Significant environmental impacts which were not previously
considered in the FEIR;
(b) Changed circumstances under which the project will be
undertaken which gave rise to new significant environmental impacts not
covered in the FEIR; or
(c) New information of substantial importance to the project;
(2) Only minor technical changes or additions were necessary in the FEIR
Addendum to make the FEIR adequate pursuant to CEQA; and
(3) The changes to the FEIR by the FEIR Addendum do not raise important
new issues about the significant effects on the environment. ,
in. The City Council received numerous informational reports on the Porta Bella
Specific Plan from staff, the City's Environmental Consultant, CalEPA/DTSC, the
applicant and his consultants. Staff provided a review of the EIR process for the
Council.The Council held informational meetings regarding the Porta Bella
project on September 29, 1993 and June 29, 1994. The Council held Study
Sessions on Porta Bella on September 14, 1994 (regarding the proposed General
Plan Amendment to modify the Circulation Network of the General Plan) and
October 4, 1994 (which was a joint study session with the Planning Commission)..
The Council held public hearings on the project on: August 23, 1994; September
24, 1994; October 11, 1994; November 8, 1994; November 22, 1994; January 31,
1995 (in a joint meeting with the Planning Commission); February 21, 1995 (in
a joint meeting with the Planning Commission at the site); March 28, 1995; April
11, 1995; and April 25, 1995. The staff reports, minutes, taped proceedings, and
public correspondence for the above referenced meetings are available from the
City Clerk, and are hereby incorporated by reference.
n. The FEIR and the FEIR Addendum were presented to the Planning Commission;
as the advisory body to the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita for Master
Case Nos. 91-164 and 93-012, Vesting Tentative Tract Map 51599 and Oak Tree
Permit 91-033, the Commission reviewed the FEIR and the FEIR Addendum and
considered the information contained therein at several duly noticed public
hearings held at the City Council Chambers (October 19, 1993, November 16,
1993, December 21, 1993, January 11, 1994, June 7, 1994, and June 21, 1994) a
field trip to the site (November 13, 1993), and immediately following the
Northridge Earthquake, at emergency locations at the Bank of America Building
(January 18, 1994 rescheduled because of the earthquake to February 1, 1994)
and the Hart High School District Headquarters Board Room (March 15, 1994,
and April 20, 1994).
o. The City Council reviewed the Planning Commission resolution certifying the EIR
and adopting a Statement of Overriding Consideration, and the City Council
concurred with the Planning Commission, while requiring project modifications
that decreased the impact to the environment. The City Council considered all
alternatives to the project as set forth in the FEIR and selected the project as
shown (with modifications) in the Specific Plan and the Vesting Tentative Tract
Map over all other alternatives analyzed because:
(a) Alternative No. 1(No Project) was not selected because this alternative
is not consistent with the City's General Plan Valley Center Concept
which envisions higher density mixed use development in the central
portion of the City near the City Transit Station and Civic Center sites..
The No Project alternative does not recognize that this project is
proposing a re -use of the site and that this project area has already been
significantly altered from its natural state due to past uses. Were this
project site to be developed under the existing RS (Residential Suburban)
zoning, this project would not be consistent with the General Plan since
the development allowable under this zone would not result in higher
densities around the transit center and would not provide mixed uses as
envisioned in the General Plan for the Valley Center.
(b) Alternative No. 2 (Replace Residential Uses With Additional Office and
Business Parks) was not selected because this is not consistent with the
Valley Center Concept to provide higher density residential uses near the
City Transit Center. This alternative is not consistent with a mix of uses
which encourage a pedestrian environment since housing and residential
uses are not sufficiently mixed.
c) Alternative No. 3 (Transit Oriented Development) was not selected
because this alternative only provides high density by the Transit Station
at the northern portion of the site and does not utilize the southern
portion of the site. The General Plan also called for a mix of low and high
density housing and this alternative did not include low density housing.
Thus, this alternative does not provide for full utilization of the site.
(d) Alternative No. 4 (Low Density/Hillside Preservation) was not selected
because, although this was the environmentally preferred alternative, this
project design encouraged strict adherence to the hillside standards and
did not allow for innovative design criteria that would allow residential
density to be clustered in the steep hillside areas around the Transit
Center. Thus, low density would be placed in the northern portions of the
site designated as part of the Valley Center which is contrary to General
Plan discussions encouraging high density in this area.
(e) Alternative No. 5 (Replace Residential Uses with Increased Office and
Industrial Parks) was not selected because this alternative does not
provide for mixed use development as envisioned in the General Plan for
the Valley Center Concept which seeks uses with greater density in the
center of the city. This alternative would also be inconsistent with
providing a unique identity for the center of the City, also identified in the
Valley Center Concept.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does hereby make the
following findings of fact:
a. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires decision -makers to
balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental
impacts. If the benefits of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse
environmental effects, the adverse effects may be considered "acceptable" by
adopting a "Statement of Overriding Considerations. This statement sets forth
the reasons why the Lead Agency has approved the project when there are
adverse environmental impacts identified in the Final Environmental Impact
Report and Addendum that cannot be mitigated to a level less than significant.
b. CEQA requires decision -makers to adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting
program for those mitigation measures which are conditions of the project.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does hereby find that the
FEIR and FEIR Addendum for the Porta Bella Specific Plan 91-001, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map 51599, and Oak Tree Permit 91-033 identify cumulative project impacts and project specific
impacts that are partially mitigated, but not to a level considered less than significant. Adverse
environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR and Addendum that have not been mitigated
to a level less than significant are summarized as follows:
a. Project Specific and Cumulative Air Quality Impacts - Implementation of the
proposed project would generate both construction -related and operational
pollutant emissions. During the construction phases, emissions of reactive
organic compounds (ROC), oxides of nitrogen (NOX) and particulate matter - 10
micron (PMlp) would unavoidably exceed South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance, Operational emissions generated
by the proposed project would also exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance for
carbon monoxide (CO), ROC, NOX , and Pg.. The project would require the
development and implementation of TDM (Transportation Demand Management)
measures to be considered consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP) and the Air Quality Element of the General Pian; however, these
proposed measures would not reduce air quality impacts from operational
emissions to a less than significant level. Therefore, project related air quality
impacts are considered unavoidably significant.
b. Cumulative Biotic Impacts - Project specific impacts include potential
disturbances to sensitive plants and animals. The project has the potential to
further fragment natural habitat, further reduce the site's open space resources
which support localized wildlife movement, and remove oak trees. Mitigation
measures reduce these impacts to a level less than significant. However ongoing,
incremental loss of natural open space, loss of oak trees and oak woodlands, and
loss of wildlife is considered cumulatively significant in conjunction with other
planned development throughout the City, the Santa Clarita Valley, and the
surrounding region:
C. Aesthetics, Light and Glare Impacts - A visual analysis of the proposed
development plan shows that the alterations proposed in the northeastern
portion of the project limits would be visible to a large audience of motorists
along Soledad Canyon Road, as well as nearby mobile home residents and
business establishments located north of the site along Soledad Canyon Road.
The proposed grading for Santa Clarita Parkway would be an unavoidable and
significant visual impact, given the importance of these landform features. The
project would involve numerous outdoor lighting fixtures within development
areas and along roadways, which could result in uncontrolled light spillage if not
mitigated. As part of the City's standard review process, the applicant shall
certify, to the City's satisfaction, that outdoor lighting fixtures will not glare onto
roadways or adjacent properties, or exceed the maximum illumination levels set
forth in the City's Zoning Ordinance by submitting a lighting plan for review and
approval by the Community Development Director, for each final site
development plan.
d. Risk of Upset/Health Hazard Impacts - Fourteen hazardous waste sites have
been identified on the site and have been registered as a Hazardous Waste
Management Unit (HWMU). To date, 13 of these 14 sites have been cleaned up
to the satisfaction of the California Environmental Protection Agency,
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). The remaining HWMU is
expected to be successfully remediated soon. A variety of other sites not
permitted as HWMU's have been identified as containing potential
environmental contaminants. CalEPA is conducting investigations into these
sites, however their efforts are not complete and it is not known what health
risks these other sites present. To mitigate potential risks to construction
workers and future site occupants from remaining contamination sites that may
exist, a mitigation measure has been added that would require certification by
DTSC of adequate clean-up of the other 64 sites identified prior to the issuance
of grading permits. All grading activity will also be monitored to the satisfaction
of CaIEPA and DTSC. The risk of upset/health hazard is considered a significant
adverse impact since the exact extent of contamination and its effects are
unknown.
e. Transportation and Circulation Impacts - Although traffic and circulation
mitigation measures have been identified, the project would contribute to
unavoidable and significant cumulative impacts at eight intersections, with or
without the Wiley Canyon Bridge,
Solid Waste Disposal Impacts - The amount of solid wastes projected to be
produced by the project would not result in short-term adverse impact to the
Chiquita Canyon Landfill in Val Verde and/or the Sunshine Canyon Landfill in
Sylmar, provided that these landfills receive approval to expand their capacities
prior to the expiration of their current operating permits. Because there is an
existing shortage of landfill space available for long-term solid waste disposal
within the Los Angeles basin and because expansion plans for these landfills are
not guaranteed to be approved, the existing solid waste disposal situation is
considered to be in a serious capacity shortfall. Therefore, the project and
cumulative impacts on solid waste disposal facilities would be unavoidably
significant.
SECTION 4. The FEIR and FEIR Addendum for the Porta Bella Specific Plan 91-001,
Vesting Tentative Tract Map 51599, and Oak Tree Permit 91- 033 identify project specific and
cumulative impacts that can be mitigated to levels considered less than significant. Adverse
environmental impacts identified in the Final EIR and Addendum that, with the incorporation
of identified mitigation measures, can be reduced to a level less than significant are
summarized as follows.
a. Geotechnical Impacts - The site contains a variety of geotechnical factors common
throughout Southern California: seismicity, loose soils, unstable slopes, as well
as surface and subsurface remnant of debris produced during the site's history
as a munitions and explosives manufacturing and testing site. An active trace
of the San Gabriel Fault has been mapped and designated by the State of
California, Division of Mines and Geology as within an Aiquist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone.
Routine engineering and construction measures will adequately mitigate the
potential liquefaction, slope stability and other general geotechnical constraints.
During the lifetime of the proposed project, structures and occupants would be
subject to ground shaking of potentially severe intensity due to the proximity of
various active and potentially active faults. Implementation of proposed
mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts, but would not eliminate
seismic risks.
b. Hydrology Impacts - The project will add impervious surfaces and direct storm
water runoff to proposed streets and a system of existing and proposed storm
drain facilities. The amount of clear water runoff is anticipated to increase,
however, the developed condition runoff in general is reduced due to smaller
debris producing areas. The high potential for debris production, however, could
cause downstream sedimentation impacts during grading and construction.
Mitigation measures can be added to the project which would ensure that there
would be no net increase in runoff or sedimentation impacts from the project site.
C. Noise Impacts - Short-term noise impacts may occur during the construction
phases of the project, however, these are considered a short-term nuisance and
not considered a significant impact because of the common use of construction
equipment and the relatively short time period associated with grading and
construction, and City noise control restrictions. Cumulative increases in traffic
noise would occur incrementally, over a long period of time. The cumulative
91
noise impacts are not anticipated to be significant because subsequent projects
will be reviewed for noise impacts and appropriate mitigation measures will be
imposed as needed at that time.:
d. Land Use Impacts - The proposed project is consistent with the City of Santa
Clarita Land Use Element policies relative to the type and intensities of the
proposed land use mix. No conflict with surrounding uses is anticipated.
e. School Impacts - The Saugus Union School District, Newhall Elementary School.
District, and the William S. Hart Union High School District have indicated that
additional facilities would be needed to accommodate the students that would
live in this development. The developers will be required to pay a state
mandated school fee and/or dedicate land to the satisfaction of the school
districts.
£ Fire and Police Impacts -The Los Angeles County Fire and Sheriffs Departments
have indicated that additional manpower, equipment, and facilities would be
needed to serve the proposed project. Some of the impact to fire protection
facilities will be mitigated by payment of a fee to defray the cost of construction
and equipping fire protection facilities. It is also anticipated that the City would
continue to contract for additional Sheriffs officers as permitted by budget
allowances. Mitigation measures have also been identified such as restrictions on
landscaping, access requirements, and provisions for security equipment that will
reduce the demand for police and fire services. Therefore, the proposed project
would not significantly affect the Fire and Sheriffs Department service abilities.
g. Sewage Disposal Impacts - Given the existing and project treatment capacity of
Sanitation District No. 26, the proposed project and known cumulative
development could be served with no adverse impacts to the wastewater
treatment system; however, much of the site lies outside of the jurisdictional
boundaries of District No. 26 and would have to be annexed to the district prior
to the provision of sewer service.
h. Water Service Impacts - The proposed and related projects within the service
area of the Water Company would not have an adverse impact on local water
supplies. The project would need to be annexed to the Santa Clarita Water
Company.
i, Archaeolopical and Cultural Resource Impacts -No cultural resources have been
found on the project site, and given the widespread and prolonged site
disturbance that has occurred, none are expected to exist. Should cultural
resources of any kind be uncovered during future grading operations, however,
grading operations in that area will cease and a qualified archaeologist will be
contacted to evaluate the finding.
SECTION 5. The City Council is approving a revised, lower density Porta Bella Specific
Plan because the benefits of the revised project outweigh the unavoidable adverse
environmental effects of the project. Changes or alterations have been required in, or
incorporated into, the project which mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects
identified in the completed FEIR and FEIR Addendum. The following overriding considerations
have been found which support adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations:
a. The project approved by the City Council implements the Valley Center Concept
and Bermite Concept in the General Plan.
b. The project will provide the City with the Magic Mountain Parkway connector
necessary to provide direct access to the Civic Center and bus/rail transportation
access.
c. The project is consistent with: 1) the site's General Plan and Zoning Land Use
Classifications, and 2) the intensity of development allowed in the Specific Plan
area with City Council approval of the Specific Plan General Plan amendment,
approval of zone changes to SP (Specific Plan Zone) as identified in the Specific
Plan for this project and adoption of the Specific Plan document.
d. The project proposes a range of uses including residential, industrial and
recreational in support of General Plan Goals as follows:
The project supports the Land Use Element including policies promoting a mixed-
use town center, with higher density residential, in proximity to public
transportation, as follows:
Policy 3.1 "Promote the development of City centers where more intensive
land uses will be encouraged, including the development of...a civic
town center."
Policy 3.3 "Identify a primary town center ... which encourage(s) a pedestrian
orientation and can accommodate a clustered mix of commercial,
entertainment, recreation, town square/meeting place(s), multi-
use complexes, and multi -modal transportation activity
opportunities."
Policy 3.6 "Locate higher density residential development in close proximity
to regional and sub -regional centers and public transportation
corridors."
The project supports the Air Quality Element which seeks to reduce pollution
from automobiles by relating land uses to transportation, facilitating non -
automotive travel, and encouraging a jobs/housing balance, including the
following.
10
Goal 10 "To reduce vehicle emissions by creating an urban form that
efficiently utilizes urban infrastructure and services."
Policy 10.1 "Contribute to the reduction of vehicle miles traveled by achieving
a more reasonable job/housing balance."
Policy 10.2 'Develop and encourage efficient transportation systems and land
use patterns which minimize total trips and vehicle miles
traveled."
Goal 12 "To reduce mobile source emissions by promoting a shift from
single occupancy to higher occupancy vehicles."
The project supports the Circulation Element which seeks to locate major
residential and employment centers adjacent to a multi -modal transit facility,
including rail, as shown in:
Policy 2.4 'Develop a multi -modal transit facility that is strategically located
in the City, adjacent to a potential public transit rail line and
located convenient to major local residential and employment
centers."
The project supports the Housing Element which has numerous sections calling
for mixed use projects, flexibility in standards, a mix of housing types, and using
the specific plan process, as shown in the following sections
Policy 1.4 'Promote the development of compatible mixed use projects in
order to create a village concept, with various interacting uses ... to
stimulate activity."
Program La "Alternative Development Standards. Use the specific plan
process ... to permit alternative housing design where such projects
result in attractive, desirable housing types, including affordable
housing."
Program Lc "Specific Plan/Planned Development. Permit flexible development
standards in specific plans ... that encourage housing developments
which meet the needs of the community. Flexible development
standards should allow for clustering, and a variety of site design
characteristics as appropriate."
Program Lf "Mixed Use. Allow mixed-use developments and ensure that all
mixed use (housing -commercial development) plans provide the
necessary open space and parking and adequately buffer
residents...."
11
Policy 2.2 "Locate higher density residential development and housing for
the elderly in close proximity to public transportation and
commercial land uses "
Policy 3.3 "Encourage a mix of housing types and densities in new large scale
development."
Policy 3.11 "Consider alternative development standards where practical ... to
promote desired housing types and benefits,...."
The project supports the Community Design Element, which in the following
policies are also supportive of this theme, as follows:
Policy 2.2 'Provide for residential uses in proximity to business/commercial
centers in a manner which promotes the
neighborhood/village/town center planning concept and
maintains... the concept of the Valley Center."
Policy 3.3 "Encourage the establishment of mixed use and village commercial
centers..., urban open spaces, and the effective use of street
furniture in downtown areas.
Policy 3.4 "Encourage design and uses of commercial districts and related
housing that add pedestrian orientation and that provide for safe
and secure daytime and nighttime activities, i.e., the Newhall
historic area and the City center."
e. The Porta Bella project will provide various residential housing opportunities for
different economic levels with a mix of single family and multi -family dwelling
units as required by the Housing Element of the General Plan, the Housing
Allocation for the City of Santa Clarita as set forth by SCAG (Southern California
Association of Governments) in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA)
and the City's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) prepared
for the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
f. The project provides significant public benefits including employment
opportunities, increased residential densities in proximity to the Metrolink
station, an improved circulation network including portions of Santa Clarita
Parkway and the Magic Mountain Parkway connector, and increased access to
the planned Civic Center.
g. The DEIR and Addendum extensively studied the impacts of the proposed Magic
Mountain and Via Princessa Corridors. The traffic study found that this road
link would enhance valley circulation. The addendum also concluded that the
noise, visual, and aesthetic concerns would not be significant. The substitution
of Santa Clarita Parkway for Rio Vista provides better spacing of north -south
12
corridors.
SECTION 6. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does hereby find that City
staff conducted an Initial study of the Porta Bella project which determined that the project may
have a significant effect upon the environment and that an environmental impact report must
be prepared. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Specific Plan 91-001 and an Oak Tree
Permit 91-033 was mailed to affected agencies. Following submittal of the Vesting Tentative
Tract Map 51599 and Development Agreement applications, a subsequent NOP was prepared
and mailed on February 12, 1993. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and
circulated for review and comment by the affected governmental agencies. The review period
of the Draft EIR was from September 27, 1993 to November 12, 1993. A Final EIR dated
January 7, 1994, was prepared which included responses to comments received on the DEIR.
As a result of public, and Planning Commission comments on the Final EIR, an addendum was
prepared dated April 8, 1994. A mitigation monitoring and reporting plan (MMRP) has been
prepared for this project in accordance with CEQA. The Final EIR and Addendum address all
concerns of responsible agencies, interested organizations and individuals, and has been
considered and deemed complete by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita.
SECTION 7. Based upon the above findings of fact, oral and written testimony and
other evidence received at the public hearing held for the project, and upon studies and
investigations made by the City Council and on its behalf, the City Council further finds as
follows:
a. At the hearings, the City Council considered staff presentations, staff reports,
Planning Commission resolutions, applicant presentations, and public testimony
on the proposal, and the Final EIR and Addendum prepared for the project.
b. The design of the project and the type of improvements will not cause serious
public health problems, since water, sewage disposal, fire protection and
hazardous material cleanup impacts addressed in the Final EIR and Addendum
will be addressed in the MMRP and Conditions of Approval at the time of project
approval.
C. The project is consistent with the intent of the City's General Plan. The City's
General Plan identifies the Bermite site as being appropriate for a specific plan..
Following Council redesignation of the project site to SP (Specific Plan) on the
City's General Plan land use map, zone changes to SP (Specific Plan Zone) as
identified in the Specific Plan for this project and adoption of the Specific Plan,
including modifying the Highway Network of the Circulation Element of the
General Plan to add Santa Clarita Parkway in place of Rio Vista Road and add
the Magic Mountain Parkway connector, this project will be consistent with the
City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
d. The Final Environmental Impact Report and Addendum identify certain
significant environmental effects. The Final Environmental Impact Report and
13
Addendum identify feasible mitigation measures for each of these impacts with
the exclusion of air quality, biological resources, aesthetics, light and glare, risk
of upset/health hazard, transportation and circulation, and cumulative solid
waste impacts which cannot be avoided through mitigation. The identified
mitigation measures will be incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring
Reporting Plan (MMRP) and conditions of approval for the project at the time of
project approval,
THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND FIND AS FOLLOWS:
a. Pursuant to Section 15090 of the California Environmental Quality Act, the City
Council certifies that the Porta Bella project FEIR and FEIR Addendum
(SCH# 92--041040) has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, and was presented to, and the information contained
therein reviewed and considered by the City Council prior to reaching a decision
on this project.
b., The City Council has considered the unavoidable impacts to air quality, biota,
aesthetics, light and glare, risk of upset/health hazard, transportation and
circulation and solid waste relevant to the potential benefits which this project
will provide to the community. The City Council has determined that these
unavoidable impacts are acceptable in light of the long-term benefits to the
community that this project will provide including employment opportunities, a
variety of housing types suiting a range of economic levels, increased residential
densities in proximity to the Metrolink station, an improved City circulation
network including portions of Santa Clarita Parkway and Magic Mountain
Parkway connector, and increased access to the planned Civic Center.
C. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita does hereby certify the FEIR and
FEIR Addendum (SCH# 92-041040; adopts the Statement of Overriding
Considerations set forth in Section 5 above, and adopts and approves the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference as Exhibit A ".
d. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and certify this
record to be a full and correct copy of the action taken.
14
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25 day of
April '19 95
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a
regular meeting thereof, held on the day of 19_ by
the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
KJM:lep
�n kp .Idm
15
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
RESOLUTION 95-41:, Exhibit "A"
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN: MITIGATION MONITORINGPROGRAM AS APPROVED BY THE CITY
COUNCIL APRIL 25, 1995
GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS
G-1. Prior to recordation of each phase, additional investigations shall be performed to determine the presence of
additional traces of the San Gabriel Fault, throughout the "expanded special studies zone" recommended by the
geotechnical study, as shown on Figure 19 in the FIR. If additional traces are found within areas proposed for
development of habitable structures or other critical facilities, appropriate setbacks shall be delineated for all fault
traces, to prohibit development in these areas to the satisfaction of the City.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Recordation of each Phase Master developer City Engineer
G-2. At least two all-weather routes of vehicular ingress /egress to the off-site arterial roadwaysystem shall be provided
for all developed portions of the project site, at all times, so that emergency vehicle access can be maintained in
all occupied areas in the event of earthquake damage that results in a closure of primary routes,
implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Recordation of each Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
G-3 Prior to the replacement of compacted fills, alluvial materials shall be removed to bedrock or firm underlying
alluvium. Alluvial removals in the major northerly draining canyon and previously developed portions on the
northern end of the site will be dependent upon the proposed development for the area. In general, if proposed
finished grades roughly approximate the existing grades,. removal and replacement of the upper 4 to h feet of
existing soils may be necessary prior to the placement of fill, If deeper fills are programmed, deeper
overexcavation (removals) of the existing alluvial materials will be necessary. Also, depths of removals north of
the Southern Pacific right-of-way will be dictated by the results of a future deep exploration program needed to
evaluate the possible susceptibility of the subsurface sediments to liquefaction. Mitigation shall be performed to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Implementation Phase implementing Responsibility Monitoring; Responsibility
Recordation of each Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
G-4. All remaining water and oil and gas wells shall be properly abandoned, pursuant to the requirements of the
California Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region #4 (water wells), and the district office of the
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (oil wells). Evidence of proper aban-
donment of previously closed wells, in accordance with State requirements, shall be provided to the City prior
to the issuance of any grading permits.
Implementation Phase ImplementingResponsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Permits Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
nunp -1
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC. PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-03.3 MITIGATIONMONITORING PROGRAM - ALL. MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO: VTTM 51599
G-5. If encountered, either remove or cut and plug abandoned pipelines according to the applicable code requirements
and as property line conditions dictate. This includes water line "mains" from the existing water tanks.
Unreinforced concrete pipelines may be crushed in-place and incorporated into the deeper fills. The applicant
shall place an applicable note on all grading plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developers)/engineer(s) City Engineer
G-6. During mass grading, special care should be exercised so as to avoid spillage and deposition of loose soil or debris
onto slope areas programmed to remain in a natural state. Any loose slough, debris or other deleterious materials
deposited or accumulated on natural slope areas will have to be removed by the grading contractor upon
completion of earth construction. The applicant shall place an applicable note on all grading plans to, the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developers)/engineer(s) City Engineer
G-7, Building pads beneath natural slope areas have the potential of being affected by runoff and soil slippage and
debris flow activity. Thus, it may be necessary to implement remedial measures such as low slough walls,
diversion/impact walls or earth catchment barriers at the natural slope contact. Such devices shall be designed
to intercept solid debris and direct flows to paved swales which carry drainage away from proposed structures
to approved disposal areas to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.;
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitor ng Responsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
G -R. All existing artificial fill materials on-site within areas proposed for development must be removed in their
entirety. Materials found to be free of any trash, debris or other deleterious material can be used in engineered
fills. Determination of the suitability for disposal of existing materials with respect to their toxicity and
contamination with hazardous materials will be left to environmental consultants working with the project
engineer and to the satisfaction of the City and the Department of Toxic Substance Control, CAL EPA.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Re`ponsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s)/hazardous City Engineer
waste consultants CAL EPA-DTSC
G-9. Abandon and remove any underground storage tanks encountered in accordance with State and local code
requirements. Any remaining cavities will be filled with compacted fill to the satisfaction of the City.
implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Phases Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Budding Official, City
Engineer
G-10, Haul routes used by the grading contractor shall avoid disturbing terrain which is to remain in a natural state to
the satisfaction of the City.
romp -2
PORTA SELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
.MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developers)/engineer(s) City Engineer/ Building
Official
AIR QUALITY
AQ -L. Prior to engaging in demolition activities, complete all Rule 1403 procedures for the removal of asbestos materials
to the satisfaction of the SCAQMD and secure the appropriate permits allowing demolition activity.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monihoring Responsibility
Prior to demolition of Project developers South Coast Air Quality
remaining structures Management Districtand
City Building Official
AQ -2. Develop and implement a construction management plan; as approved by the City,. which may include some, or
all, of the following measures recommended by the SCAQMD:
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Prior to demolition of Project developer(s) South Coast Air Quality
remaining structures Management District and
City Building Official
(a) Provide temporary traffic controls during all phases of construction activities to maintain traffic flow (e.g., Flag
person).
(b) Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off-peak hours (e.g., 10:00 A.M.
to 3:00 P.M.).
(c) Implement a trip reduction plan to achieve a target average vehicle ridership (AVR) of 1.5 for construction
employees.
(d) Operate a shuttle service to and from retail services and food establishments during lunch hours.
(e) Prohibit truck idling in excess of two minutes.
(f) Maintain equipment and vehicle engines in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturers' specifications
and per SCAQMD rules, to minimize excessive emissions.
(g) If pile drivers must be used at the site during construction, use methanol -fueled pile drivers.
(h) Suspend use of all construction equipment operations during second stage smog alerts. Contact the SCAQMD
at (800) 2424022 for daily forecasts,
(i) Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel- or gasoline -powered generators.
(j) Use methanol or natural gas -powered mobile equipment instead of diesel.
(k) Use propane or butane -powered on-site mobile equipment instead of gasoline.
AQ -3. Implement a dust control plan to the satisfaction of the City of Santa Clarita.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading and construction phases Project developer(s)/contractors City Building Official
mmp-3
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599 -
AQ -4. Orient buildings to the north, as feasible, to augment natural cooling and include passive solar design (e.g.,
daylighting) as parr of the project.
Implementation Phase
Building Permits
Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Project developer(s)/contractors City Building Official
AQ -5. Construct, contribute, or dedicate land to link bicycle trails on-site to designated community -wide bicycle
commuting routes.
Implementation Phase
Occupancy Permits
Implementing Responsibility
Project developer(s)
Monitoring Responsibility
City Planning Department
AQ -6. No construction traffic related to the Magic Mountain; or any other element of the project, shall use streets
within the Circle J Ranch.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading and Construction Phases Project developer(s)/Contractors City Building Official
HYDROLOGY
H-1. The applicant will prepare a final developed condition hydrology analysis in conjunction with ultimate project
design, when precise engineering occurs. Those final calculations will verify the conditions identified in Table
13 of the EIR and/or establish additional design features to satisfy the criteria that no net increase in runoff from
the site' will be permitted. All elements of the storm drain system shall conform to the policies and standards
administered by the City of Santa Clarita and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, as, applicable,
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Prior to recordation Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
Los Angeles County
H-2. Ultimate project hydrology and debris production calculations will be prepared to verify the requirements for
debris and/or desilting basins to the satisfaction of the City.Concurrent with submittal of grading plans, erosion
and sedimentation control plans will be submitted for approval by the City of Santa Clarita.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Permits Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
H-3. Ultimate project design shall verify the feasibility of the proposed detention basin at the southwest corner of the
property to the satisfaction of the City. To reduce the size of the required detention basin; and to maintain
existing storm flows to natural streamcourses, an alternate design approach splitting discharges from the basin
to the two natural streams in this area, shall be evaluated to the satisfaction of the City. Geotechnical feasibility
shall be included in this evaluation to ensure that the optimum size detention basin can be properly supported
by stable material during periods of prolonged saturation..
mmp-4
PORTA .DELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599;. OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS. TO VTTM 51599
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
H4. Design and construct runoff filtering zones in large parking areas (as opposed to driveways of single family homes
or duplexes) to the satisfaction of the City. These should be located at the lower elevations of parking areas and
designed to catch runoff with relatively high oil and grease concentrations. These facilities shall be designed to
permit percolation of the runoff through the soil and underlying layers (sand and gravel), permit hydrocarbon
filtration and absorption, and encourage the degradation of hydrocarbons by naturally -occurring soil bacteria.
All such measures shall meet NPDES requirements.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developers)/engineer(s) City Engineer
H-5. To the extent possible, incorporate settling ponds, detention basins, and vegetated swales, to slow and filter runoff
prior to discharge into the storm drain system or into natural streamcourses. Final design criteria will be
generated with ultimate project design and would involve percolation testing and geotechnical investigations in
proposed detention basin locations to the satisfaction of the City. All such measures shall meet NPDES
requirements.
Implementation Phase implementing Responsibility Monitoring Re-Tonsibility
Each Grading Phase Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Engineer
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
B-1. Develop and implement all Native Landscape Treatments set forth in the Draft Specific Plan, in coordination with
the City of Santa Clarita and the California Department of Fish and Game, to replicate the natural vegetation
communities present on the site. The habitat needs of sensitive animal and plant species should be incorporated
into the plans.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Permits Project developer(s) City Parks and Recreation
Department
B-2. Prior to issuance of phased grading permits, the applicant shall complete focused spring surveys for the short -joint
beavertail cactus, Peirsons•'s morning glory, and Davidson's bush mallow. If found, individuals or propagules of
these species salvaged from the impact areas shall be relocated to areas proposed for natural open space on the
project site. A relocation and monitoring plan shall be incorporated into the proposed native landscapetreatments
and other open space management plans, subject to approval by the California Department of Fish and Game and
the City. Monitoring of relocated individuals or propagules shall occur for a minimum of five years to ensure
successful reestablishment.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Permits Project developer(s) City Parks and Recreation
Department
mmp-5
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 515.99
B-3. Preserve the major drainages as identified in the Specific Plan. Incorporate existing natural vegetation and natural
streambank conditions where feasible. If the Los Angeles Flood Control District requires structural stabilization
as part of necessary channelizadon efforts, use permeable materials such as "Armore-Flex" that include both
structural elements and open pockets through which native vegetation can be established or other mechanisms
to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Mon toring Responsibility
Grading Permits Project developer(s)/engineer(s) CDFG/COE/City Engin cT
B4. Construct wildlife guzzlers in open space areas, as specified by the California Department of Fish and Game,
where drainage patterns will be altered by grading and development. This will replace the existing water sources
for these areas.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibilitv
Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Permits Project/developer(s)
City Parks and Recreation
Department/California
Fish & Game Department
B-5. Shield natural open space from introduced light sources using native shrubs and trees,
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Monitoring ResWnsibility
Building Permits Project developer(s)
CDFG/City Parks and
Recreation Department
NOISE
N-1. Provide staging areas on-site to minimize off-site transportation of heavy construction equipment. Locate these
areas to maximize the distance between staging areas and residential areas to the satisfaction of the City,
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Monitoring Responsibility
Grading and Construction Phases Project developers) /contractors
City Building Official
N-2. Ensure that construction equipment is fitted with sound -reduction equipment, per manufacturers specifications
Implementation Phase implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading and Construction Phases Project developer(s)/contractors City Building Official
N-3. Submit acoustical analysis reports acceptable to the City concurrently with submittal of precise development plans
for all residential areas and institutional (school) facilities located adjacent to any of the four or six -lane roadways
on the project site. Single family dwelling units shall be located in areas outside of the projected 60 DB(A) CNEL
noise contour with appropriate mitigation. Multi -family dwelling units and school classrooms and library
buildings shall be located in areas outside of the projected 65 dB(A) CNEL noise contour with appropriate
mitigation. Buildings at the athletic center within the Soledad District shall be located outside of the projected
MMP -6
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
70 dB(A) CNEL noise contour with appropriate mitigation. Interior noise levels within residential and school
facilities shall not exceed 45 dB(A) CNEL.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibilitv Monitoring Responsibility
Building Permits Project developer(s)/engineer(s) City Building Official
AESTHETICS, LIGHT AND GLARE
AE -1. Screen the proposed water tanks on Lot 64 of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51599 by using a lower profile
tank, by establishing a landscaping buffer including the use of "volcano" berms, and by painting the tank an
earthtone color that blends with adjacent landforms to the satisfaction of the City.
Implementation Phase
Building Permits
Implementing Responsibilitv
Project developer(s)
Monitoring Resroonsibility
Community Development
Parks and Recreation
Department
AE -2 Project landscaping plans shall include appropriate screening materials along the west and southern site
boundaries to screen views of the project site from neighboring portions or the Circle i Ranch. Additional
measures shall be included, if needed, to screen the proposed detention basin to be constructed in the southwest
corner of the project site to the satisfaction of the, City.
Implementation Phase
Building Permits
Implementing Responsibility,
Project developer(s)
LAND USE
Monitoring Responsibility
City Parks and Recreation
Community Development
Department
LU -1. In order to avoid potential conflicts of the development with existing easements, the developer will obtain written
approval from the easement holders for all proposed encroachments, prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Final plans, construction procedures and improvements shall comply with all requirements of such approvals.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
ty
Grading Plan Project developer(s)/contractors City Engineer
LU -2. Prior to approval of a Final Map for that phase, prove to the satisfaction of the LADWP that proposed "GG" Street
would not significantly impact the First Los Angeles Aqueduct; or revise the alignment of "GG" Street or provide
alternative access to Lots 54 and 55 to avoid encroachment into the LADWP aqueduct easement in this area to
the satisfaction of the LADWP and the City.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Resoonsbility
mmp-7
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP S1599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
Final Vesting Tract Map/ Project developers)/engineer(s) City Engineer
Grading Permits
RISK OF UPSET/HEALTH HAZARD
RU -1. Superseded by Condition of Approval DS -12 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map. 51599,
RU -2. An on-site inspector capable of identifying any possibly hazardous materials not previously detected shall be
present throughout the grading process to the satisfaction of CAL EPA-DTSC and to the City.
ImplementationPhase Implementing Responsibiiity Monitoring Resr insibility
Grading Phases Project developer(s) /contractors Building Official/
DTSC
RU -3. Superseded by Condition of Approval DS -12 for Vesting Tentative Tract Map. 51599.
TRANSPORTATION & CIRCULATION
Intersections
TC -1. Table 36 in the EIR summarizes mitigation measures and lane configurations recommended for all study
intersections for existing conditions and at full buildout of each analysis phase. Please note that the following
considerations shall be observed in the actual implementation of these measures.
(a) For Phase I, mitigation measures were recommended to keep the LOS at or below level of service D. In some
cases, however, level of service was mitigated to LOS E, because the provision of additional mitigation measures
were not feasible at this stage. Those mitigations were recommended for future phases where applicable.
(b) For Phase Il, recommended mitigation measures should be carefully monitored since at that time (year 2004)
a number of major highway extensions and new roadways may be constructed. These additional roadways may
alter commuting behaviors and specific traffic mitigations accordingly.
(c) For Phase III, mitigation measures were recommended assuming that a number of other transportation elements
embodied in the City of$anta Clarita Circulation Element would be in place (please refer to Figures 10a, 10b,
and 10c in the Traffic Study for network assumptions). However, these mitigation measures should be
monitored and periodically evaluated in order to assess their need before implementation..
(d) In a few cases, mitigation measures were recommended not only based on V/C ratio, but also based on traffic
volumes.
(e) It is recommended that subject mitigation be monitored on a phase by phase basis and that the developer of
future individual parcels be requested to provide additional traffic analysis and mitigation' assessment at each
phase tentative tract map level.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Prior to recordation of the phase Future Tract Subdivisions Community Development
Department
mmp-8
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
TC -2. In addition to the intersection lane configurations identified in Table 36 of the EIR, the City will monitor the pace
of development carefully; and will not approve a level of development above the totals for each land use category
assumed in the traffic phasing analysis, as shown on Table 33.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitorin£ Responsibility
Grading Permits for each "super pad" Project developer(s) City Traffic Engineer
TC -3 To ensure that increasing traffic volumes on the arterial network are distributed to the maximum feasible
efficiency, the City will continue to implement the planned arterial system identified in the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, at the maximum design capacities. Furthermore, the City will monitor the pace of project
development carefully, and will not approve a level of development above the totals for each land use category
assumed in the traffic phasing analysis; as shown on Table 33 in the Traffic Section, unless additional traffic
improvements are advanced.
Implementation Phase ftlementing Responsibilitv Monitoring Resvonsibility
Grading Permits for each "super pad" Project developer(s) City Traffic Engineer
TC -4. Restripe Magic Mountain Parkway from Valencia Boulevard to San Fernando Road to six traffic lanes and upgrade
Magic Mountain Parkway to a six -lane roadway from San Fernando Road to Rio Vista Road by Phase 11 of the
Traffic Study.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Permits for each "super pad" Fair share contribution by this project's City Traffic Engineer
developer(s)
Railroad Crossing at Magic Mountain Parkwav/San'Femando Road
TC -5. Existing traffic conditions warrant signaliza tion of the railroad crossing at Magic Mountain Parkway/ San Fernando
Road. Since the Porta Bella Project would increase congestion at this intersection, as well as contribute to longer
delays during train crossings, this project will be required to participate in the costs of a future grade separation.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Final Vesting Tract Map Master developer
Emergency Access
Monitoring Responsibility
City Traffic Engineer
TC -6. Provide a vehicular connection from Magic Mountain Parkway to Soledad Canyon Road prior to the occupancy
of any buildings in Phase L
Implementation Phase
Grading Perm t and Construction
period for Phase I
Implementing Responsibility
Project developer(s)
Transportation Demand Management
Monitoring Responsibility
City Engineer/ Building
Official
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-0.33 MITIGATION MONITORING .PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS. To VTTM 51599
TC -7. Develop and implement TDM programs as approved by the City and SCAQMD, throughout the life of the project,
incorporating measures such as, but not limited to, those identified in the Traffic and the Air Quality sections of
this EIR. Implementation shall begin concurrently with occupancy of the first phase.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Rea-oonsibility
Commercial and industrial occupancy Commercial and industrial AQMD, Transit Division
permits businesses Community Development
Department
General
TC -8, Fast food drive-through restaurants shall be prohibited within the Town Center District of the Porta Bella site.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Resonsibility
Approval of specific plan, then Project Developer(s), subsequent City Development Services
throughout the life of the project landowners
SCHOOLS
S-1. Prior to recording Vesting Tract Map No. 51599, the master developer shall reach an agreement with the Saugus
Union School District, Newhall Elementary School District and the William S. Hart Union High School District
to the satisfaction of the school districts. To the satisfaction of the City, the master developer shall inform all
applicable school districts that the proposed school site would exist on between 100 -to -150 feet of fill soil prior
to recording Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 51599.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Final Vesting Tract Map Master developer School Districts
City Development Services
FIRE AND POLICE PROTECTION
FP -1. Prohibit planting of highly flammable and heavy fuel volume plant species such as Eucalyptus, Pines, Junipers,
and Cyprus plant species within 50 feet of natural vegetation areas to the satisfaction of the City..
Implementation Phase
Building Permits
Implementing Responsibility
Project developer(s)/builders
Monitoring Resuonsibility
Fire Department/Gty Pa&
and Recreation
FP -2. Prior to recordation of the final maps for original and subsequent subdivisions, obtain Fire Department approval
for water systems, fire. hydrant locations., and street grades. Install required improvements to the satisfaction of
the City and the Fire Department.
MMP -10
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE .TRACT
MAP 51599T OTP91-033. MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM515.99
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibilitv Monitoring Responsibility
Final Subdivision Maps Project developer(s) Fire Department/ City
Engineer
FP -3. Prior to the approval of final tract maps, consult with the Sheriff's Department for advice on crime prevention
features appropriate to the particular tract. With this information, prepare and submit a security plan for review
to the satisfaction of the Sheriff's Department and the City of Santa Clarita Department of Community
Development.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Final Subdivision Maps Project developer(s)/builders Sheriffs Department /Gty
Engineer
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
SD -1. The project will be required to obtain a Trunk Sewer Connection Permit in order to directly connect, to a Los
Angeles County Sanitation District trunk sewer.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Recordation of Each Phase Project builders LACSD/City Engineer
SD -2. Pay fees to the County Sanitation Districts and, the City of Santa Clarita, as required, to fund sewerage
infrastructure improvements to serve the proposed project.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Occupancy Permits Project Builders LACSD/City Engineer
SD -3. Annex that portion of the project site outside of the jurisdictional boundaries of County Sanitation District No.
26 to the district prior to final map approval.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Final Vesting Tract Map Master developer
WATER SERVICE
Monitoring Responsibility
LACSD/ City Engineer
W -i. Comply with all applicable code and ordinance requirements for construction of water mains, fire flows; and fire
hydrants.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Final Subdivision Maps Project developer(s) City Engineer
W-2. Design and construct the proposed water facilities to the requirements of the State of California Regional Water
Quality Control Board, Region #4 the California Department of Health Services; the California Department of
romp -11
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
Water Resources; the State Water Resources Control Board; the City of Santa Clarita Department of Public Works;
and the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Monitoring Responsibility
Final Subdivision Maps Project developer(s)
City Engineer
W-3. Annex the site to the service area of the Santa Clarita Water Company prior
to the recordation of each phase.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Monitoring Responsibility
Final Vesting Tract Map Master developer
SCWC/City Engineer
W4. If required, obtain written agreement from off-site property owner(s) to construct the proposed lift station along
Via Princessa.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Monitoring Responsibility
Final Subdivision Maps Project developer
City Engineer
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
SW -L The grading contractor shall chip and mulch all greenwaste removed from the construction site during grading
operations. Mulched material shall be used as a fire retardant and applied on graded slopes and natural hillsides.
The contractor shall also submit certified weights (tonnages) of the chipped and mulched material.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Grading Phases Project developer(s)/contractors City Solid Waste and City
Building Official
SW -2. Construct all roads with a minimum of 25 percent recycled content (base and asphalt), where feasible, in
consultation with the City.
Implementation Phase
Grading Permits
Implementing Responsibility
Project developer(s)
Monitoring Responsibility
City Solid Waste and
City Engineer
SW -3. Where feasible, and in consultation with the City, construct all drainage improvements with a minimum 25 percent
recycled bedding material. Native soils shall be used as backfill when applicable and in accordance with SB 846
Native Backfill.
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility
Approval of storm drain plans Project developer(s)
Monitoring Responsibility
City Solid Waste and
City Engineer
SW -4. Where feasible, and in consultation with the City, all street, park and public area signs shall contain a minimum
of 25 percent recycled content.
ramp -12
PORTA BELLA SPECIFIC. PLAN 91-001; VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP 51599; OTP 91-033 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM - ALL MITIGATION
MEASURES ARE CONDITIONS TO VTTM 51599
Implementation Phase Implementing Responsibility Monitoring Responsibility
Approval of street improvement plans Project developer(s) City Solid Waste and
and vendor sign specifications City Engineer
ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
AGI. Should significant cultural resources be uncovered during future grading operations, work shall be stopped in
the affected area and a qualified archaeologist should be called in to evaluate the findings to the satisfaction of
the City.
Implementation Phase
Grading Phases
Implementing Responsibility
Project developer(s)
Monitoring Responsibility
City Building Official
AC -2. Prior to commencement of grading activities for any off-site roadway segment Phase I level archaeological and
cultural resources assessmeht shall be conducted to determine whether such resources exist in this area and
whether monitoring of grading activities by an archaeologist would be needed, and if so, in which particular areas
to the satisfaction of the City. Construction specifications for any off-site roadway segment shall incorporate the
recommendations of the archaeological and cultural resources assessment.
Implementation Phase
Magic Mountain
grading phases
s Trent/pbnvn�Wkim
Implementing Responsibility
Project developer(s)/Contractors
comp -13
Monitoring Responsibility
City Building Official