HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-06-13 - AGENDA REPORTS - VIA PRINCESSA BRIDGE CONST FEE (2)n
NEW BUSINESS
DATE:
June 13, 1995
AGENDA REPORT
City Manager Appro,%
Item to be presented
nn
Ajjj,p'j,�` Anthony J. Nisich t/
SUBJECT: VIA PRINCESSA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
CONSTRUCTION FEE - DISTRICT FEE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
Resolution No. 95-35
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
:: . : �117
Prior to incorporation of the City of Santa Clarita, the County of Los Angeles collected fees from
developers to pay for Bridge and Major Thoroughfare construction in the Via Princessa area.
These fees in the form of cash and letters of credit were deposited in an account to fund future
road improvements. Now that the City is incorporated and the Via Princessa B & T District is
within City boundaries, the jurisdiction to manage the fund account is with the City of Santa
Clarita.
Therefore, the County of Los Angeles is presenting the City with the Via Princessa Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee - District Fee Transfer Agreement with a district fee
account of $268,760, plus unsecured agreements. Because the County of Los Angeles provided
preliminary design work, they will deduct $28,000 from the district account, therefore
transferring to the City of Santa Clarita a balance of $240,760 plus unsecured agreements
minus any interest accumulated on the principle.
Staff has reviewed the Agreement and recommends that the Council accept the Via Princessa
Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Fee Transfer Agreement, with the
acknowledgment that the City should receive accrued interest on the principal balance and will
pursue collection of the interest from the County of Los Angeles. In addition, the City of Santa
Clarita agrees to utilize all funds for bridge and road improvements within that district
beneficial for the purpose of improving vehicular traffic, pursuant to Government Code Section
66484 and 66489.
Adopted: 6
m.Ager... Item: .3'131
RESOLUTION NO. 95-35
June 13, 1995 - Page 2
•AUT t5l 0074 •L
The City Council adopt Resolution No. 95-35, approving the Via Princessa Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Fee Transfer Agreement.
Resolution No. 95-35
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
MAM:hds
wunCMM95-35...
RESOLUTION NO. 95-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
VIA PRINCESSA BRIDGE AND
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE
DISTRICT FEE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, in the Via Princessa area in the City of Santa Clarita, there is a need for
construction of a new bridge and major thoroughfare due to new development; and
WHEREAS, before December 15, 1987, the fees have been collected by the County of
Los Angeles for said purpose; and
WHEREAS, City is now the jurisdictional successor to County of Los Angeles to expend
all funds for the sole purpose of construction in the District of Via Princessa in the City of Santa
Clarita; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita will continue to seek collection of all funds and
interest relating to the Via Princessa Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District.
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Clarita is willing to, use the funds collected by the County
of Los Angeles for the construction of bridge and major thoroughfares; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of
(1) Government code 66484; A local Ordinance may require the payment of fees as
a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building permit for the
purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing bridges over waterways,
railways, freeways, and canyons, or constructing major thoroughfares,
Section a. The ordinance refers to the circulation element of the general plan and ... in
the case of major thoroughfares, to the provisions of such circulation element which identify
those major thoroughfares whose primary purpose is to carry through traffic and provide a
network connecting to the state highway system; provided, such circulation element,
transportation or flood control provisions have been adopted by the local agency 30 days prior
to the filing of a map or application for a building permit.
(2) Government code 66489: Any local agency may establish area of benefit pursuant
to Section 66484 and may impose a reasonable charge on property within the area which in the
opinion of the legislative body, is benefited by the construction of the bridge or major
thoroughfare ... (and) may enter into a reimbursement agreement with the subdivider.
THEREFORE, the City of Santa Clarita, California does declare, determine, and resolve
to execute the Via Princessa Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District Fee
Transfer Agreement contained within "Exhibit A", for the area of benefit shown on "Exhibit B".
RESOLUTION NO. 95-35
May 23, 1995 - Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of '19—.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the day of
19_ by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
CITY CLERK
MAM:hds
munul\re95-35.mam
r
EXHIBIT A
VIA PRINCESSA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
FEE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
Detailed Accounting of fee collected by County
I. Cash Deposit
Tract/Parcel Map Developer Date Paid Amount
CPU -485
Valencia Village Church
9/18/89
17386
Valley Street Prop.
1/20/88
18224
Karop Mehterian
3/03/88
17505
Hale and Associates
6/16/88
17386
Calmark Dev. Corp.
8/26/88
BPC -9477
Golden Oaks Land Dev.
8/16/88
17386
Karns and Karabian
8/29/89
19039
James A. Boeiter
4/11/90
II. COUNTY'S preliminary design work
III. Remaining fee to transfer to CITY
IV. Unsecured Agreement
Tract/Parcel Developer
16375
Newhall
Land and Farming
43779
Newhall
Land and Farming
43593
Leisure
Technology*
44320
Leisure
Technology*
44321
Leisure
Technology*
44322
Leisure
Technology*
= $28,000
$ 3,520
27,000
4,000
4,000
97,000
5,240
124,000
4.000
$ 268,760
= Cash County Work
$268,760 - $28,000
= $240,760
Date Signed Amount
10/21/87
09/08/87
11/01/90
11/01/90
11/01/90
11/01/90
$ 33,000
136,000
$ 60,000
46,000
54,000
28.000
$357,000
*Letter of Credit from Security Pacific Bank (subsequently merged
with Bank of America) has expired and developer refused to
renew it.
JKC:aa
P-3/B25.A
5
EXf-IIE?IT "E"
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
ROAD
9 l
99 anyOn
�` �- so�EOW :3 �ountry
��O+G Valenca SANTA CLARJA
A c
0
S Newhall
NT S
C �
"5 MG LEGEND:
cou 0 - PROPOSED VIA PRINCESSA BRIDGE AND
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
VIA PRINCESSA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
FEE TRANSFER AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is entered into by and between the COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES, hereinafter termed "COUNTY", a political subdivision
of the State of California, and the City of Santa Clarita,
hereinafter termed "CITY", a municipal corporation in the County
of Los Angeles.
0
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, in certain areas of Los Angeles County such as the
Via Princessa area of the Santa Clarita Valley, there is a need,
driven by anticipated private development, to construct new
improvements to major thoroughfares to allow for proper traffic
circulation; and
WHEREAS, the formation of bridge and majorthoroughfare
construction fee districts provides a financing mechanism for
those affected areas, whereby new development is assessed for its
share of the cost of bridge and major thoroughfare facilities;
and
WHEREAS, starting in 1986 County commenced formation work
for a bridge and major thoroughfare construction fee district in
the Via Princessa area; and
WHEREAS, CITY was incorporated on December 15, 1987 and the
Via Princessa area was included within the boundaries of the
City; and
WHEREAS, upon CITY's incorporation, COUNTY ceased further
formation work for a proposed Via Princessa district; and
WHEREAS, CITY adopted the Via Princessa Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District which included the entire
- 1 -
I
Via Princessa area, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT", on
November 24, 1992 and established a separate fund account for the
deposit of fees collected in DISTRICT, hereinafter referred to as
"DISTRICT ACCOUNT"; and
WHEREAS, prior to the CITY's incorporation, COUNTY had
collected fees or commitments for fees in the form of letters of
credit, unsecured agreements and $268,760 in cash from the
proponents of new developments in the Via Princessa area to
provide for their participation in the proposed "DISTRICT"; and
WHEREAS, COUNTY expended $28,000 in staff time and other
costs for the preliminary design work of District road projects
which should be reimbursed; and
WHEREAS, the remaining fees or commitments for fees which
COUNTY had collected for the proposed DISTRICT, should be
transferred to CITY for appropriate DISTRICT uses; and
WHEREAS, CITY has agreed to utilize the fees or commitments
for fees solely for purposes authorized, for DISTRICT in
accordance with all applicable laws.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and
conditions herein contained, it is agreed as follows:
(1) COUNTY AGREES:
a. To reimburse itself $28,000 from fees previously
collected by COUNTY in the Via Princessa area
representing expenditures it made toward
preliminary design work of District road projects
prior to the incorporation of CITY.
- 2 -
b. To transfer its rights under the unsecured
agreements and to transfer the remaining cash
deposits of $240,760, as delineated in Exhibit A
to the City of Santa Clarita.
(2) CITY AGREES:
a. To deposit the $240,760 in cash transferred from
COUNTY and all funds recovered under the unsecured
agreements into City's DISTRICT ACCOUNT..
b, To expend all fees transferred from COUNTY and
recovered under the unsecured agreements solely
for the construction of designated DISTRICT
projects consistent with all applicable laws.
C. To indemnify and hold COUNTY harmless against any
claims by any parties against any fees or
commitments for fees collected by COUNTY and
transferred to CITY for DISTRICT purposes under
this Agreement and to indemnify and hold COUNTY
harmless in the event CITY is unable to recover
any or all fees under the aforementioned unsecured
agreements.
- 3 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
agreement to be executed by their respective officers, duly
authorized, by the CITY OF SANTA CLARITA on , 1994
and by the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES on 1994.
ATTEST:
JOANNE STURGES
Executive Officer -Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors
By
DEPUTY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DE WITT W. CLINTON
County Counsel.
By
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
ATTEST:
APPROVED TO FORM
CARL NEWTON
City Attorney
M
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
By
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
- 4 -
MAYOR