Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-03-14 - RESOLUTIONS - MC 95-015 GPA 95-01 (2)RESOLUTION NO. 95-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MASTER CASE NO. 95-015, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 95-01, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO, 92-226 AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: A. On June 25, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-98, approving and certifying the Environmental Impact Report on the General Plan and adopting the General Plan for the City of Santa Clarita. B. On December 8, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92- 226, adopting General Plan Amendment No. 92-001 amending the Housing Element and certifying the negative declaration of environmental impact prepared for the amendment. C. On February 7, 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita conducted a duly noticed public hearing on proposed General Plan Amendment No. 95-01. D. Following the public hearing of February 7, 1995, after duly considering all testimony and evidence presented on General Plan Amendment No. 95-001, the Planning Commission for the City of Santa Clarita adopted Resolution P95-04, recommending adopting of the negative declaration of environmental impact and recommending approval to the City Council of General Plan Amendment No. 95-01. E. On March 14, 1995, the City Council for the City of Santa Clarita conducted a duly noticed public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Blvd., First Floor, Santa Clarita, at 6:30 p.m. on proposed General Plan Amendment No. 95-01. F. The City Council fully considered all testimony and evidence regarding proposed General Plan Amendment No. 95-01. G. The City Council fully considered the initial study and negative declaration of environmental impact prepared for General Plan Amendment No. 95-01. H. Proposed General Plan Amendment No. 95-01 would amend the General Plan Housing Element to identify and appraise existing capacity for new housing development in relation to the identified regional housing needs for the planning area. I. General Plan Amendment No. 95-01 would amend the General Plan Housing Element to clarify affordable housing density bonus policies and to reflect state planning law. J. General Plan Amendment No. 95-01 would amend the General Plan Housing Element to describe the selection and solution of methods for solving housing deficiencies and providing the City and its planning area with sufficient housing at all income levels. SECTION 2. Based upon the testimony and other evidence received, and upon studies and investigations made by the City Council and on its behalf, the City Council further finds and determines that the proposed General Plan Housing Element Amendment No. 95-01 is consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan, and that the proposed amendment complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarita has reviewed and considered the environmental information contained in the initial study and determines that it is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and state and local CEQA guidelines, and the proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. A negative declaration was prepared for this project. Based upon the evidence and testimony, and upon the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby approves the negative declaration of environmental impact. SECTION 4. The City Council of the City of Santa Clarity has reviewed and considered the evidence and testimony provided at the public hearing and has reviewed and considered the proposed General Plan Amendment No. 95-01. Based upon the evidence received and the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts General Plan Amendment No. 95-01, amending Resolution 92-226, an amendment to the Santa Clarita General Plan Housing Element, as set forth in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of March 1995. ATTEST: } 4Yc- LERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ) I, Donna M. Grindey City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of— March , 1995. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Smyth, Pederson, Heidt, Boyer, Darcy NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None i y � �• crGtLGcj ii11'.�f% � TY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 95-21 EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF SANTA CLARITA March 14, 1995 —' Draft Housing Element Amendment The following page references are amendments to the previous Housing Element Amendment adopted by Council as Exhibit 1 of Resolution No. 92-226 on November 24, 1992. This previous document is being amended based upon comments received from the State Department of Housing and Community Development in their letter dated April 2, 1993, and following discussions and informal review of the draft Housing Element Amendment with HCD staff between September 1994 and January 1995. Page 4, paragraph 5 of the Inventory of Land Suitable for Residential Development, delete The maximum density allowed in each residential category is the midpoint of the density range allowed. This density can be exceeded if overriding community benefits or low/moderate income or senior housing projects are provided. And insert at the end of paragraph 5 The maximum density allowed in each residential category is the midpoint of the density range with the exception of affordable housing density bonus projects in zones RM, RMH, R11, Valley Center overlay and in specific plan zones designated for multiple family uses. For very low income, low income, and senior projects in these zones meeting state density bonus requirements for affordable housing projects, the density bonus is granted based on the maximum of the density range. A conditional use permit is required to obtain an affordable housing density bonus. In accordance with state law, the City shall provide at least one non-financial incentive or concession, such as a reduction in site development standards or a modification of zoning code requirements, to encourage affordable housing density bonus projects. No findings of significant community benefit are required to receive an affordable housing density bonus where the project meets the minimum affordability requirements per state law, the project density is consistent with zoning, adequate infrastructure exists to serve the site, and no more than one non-financial incentive or concession is requested by the developer, or where such findings are waived by the approving body. For very low income, low income, and senior affordable housing density bonus projects, a fee waiver or fee reductions may be granted where the approving body makes a finding that the project provides significant community benefits. Where findings are made that adequate services exist, the project provides significant community benefits, and higher densities would be appropriate for the site, the base density for affordable housing density bonus projects may Page I PROPOSED HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT City of Santa Clarita 3/14/95 increase to 35 DU/ac in RM, RMH, RH and appropriate specific plan zones or up to 50 Du/ac within the Valley Center overlay area. The City also offers an amenities density bonus in zones RM, RMH, RH, Valley Center overlay and in appropriate specific plan zones designated for multiple family uses with approval of a conditional use permit. The purpose of an amenities density bonus is to encourage projects which provide significant community benefits beyond the minimum required by the development code. In order to receive an amenities density bonus, the approving body must make a finding that the project provides a significant community benefit. The amenity density bonus allows up to a 25% density bonus above the midpoint of the density range for housing projects providing additional amenities such as on-site child care centers. The City's Unified Development Code identifies amenities which may be considered a significant community benefit and make a project eligible for consideration for an amenity density bonus. An amenity density bonus may be given in addition to the state density bonus where appropriate findings are made. Page 5, paragraph 1 of the Inventory of Land Suitable for Residential Development, delete The midpoint for each range has been set as the maximum development threshold for each category, however, this midpoint may be exceeded if senior, or low or moderate income housing projects with overriding community benefit are proposed. Replace previous sentence with the following The midpoint for each range has been set as the maximum development threshold for each zoning category except for projects where density bonus provisions for very low income, low income and senior affordable housing or for amenities apply as previously noted. Page 5, after paragraph 2 of the Inventory of Land Suitable for Residential Development, add An example of an affordable housing project approved by the City is the Canterbury Village, a 64 -unit all senior, all very low income project which was approved through a Conditional Use Permit. This project site is flat, encompasses 1.25 acres in the RM zone, and would allow a maximum of 13 units without density bonuses. Since the site is centrally located along a bus line, is within 2 miles of a regional hospital, and has existing services adjacent, this project became eligible for a 35 DU/ac base density which would allow a maximum of 43 units on this site. In addition to the 25% density bonus over the base for very low income projects, the City Development Code allows an additional amenities density bonus of 25%. For the Canterbury Village project, each 25% density bonus allowed an additional 10.75 units which allowed a total project density of 51 DU/ac. Since the affordability provision of the project were greater than the minimum provided by state law, the City also allowed a fee reduction for project development fees. Page 2 PROPOSED HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT City of Santa Clarita 3/14/95 Page 5, add the non -italicized portion to the end of the first sentence of the third paragraph beginning Table 1 presents a summary of the residential land inventory for the City of Santa Clarita with the dwelling unit potential based upon the midpoint of the density range of each site. Page 6, add the non -italicized portion to the end of the third sentence of the first paragraph beginning The total dwelling unit capacity of the vacant sites is estimated at 7,788 units based upon the midpoint of the density range. Page 6, insert this table and new paragraphs between the first and second paragraphs TABLE 1-A SUMMARY OF UNIT POTENTIAL ON VACANT LAND ZONED RM,RMH AND RH WITH STATE DENSITY BONUS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING Zone (Density # Acres # Units # Density Total # Suitability by Range) Sites Maximum Bonus Units Income Level Density Units RM 9 461 6,915 1,725 8,640 Low- 1,728 (6.7 - 15 DU/ac) Moderate -6912 Midpoint 11 DU/ac RMH 2 12 300 75 375 Low -75 (15.1-25 DU/ac) Moderate -300 Midpoint 20 DU/ac RH 0 0 0 0 0 0 (25-32 DU/ac) Midpoint 28 DU/ac TOTAL 11 473 7,215 1,800 9,015 Low- 1,803 Moderate 7,212 Table 1-A presents a summary of the unit capacity on vacant residential land with no proposed or approved entitlements zoned RM, RMH and RH assuming a state density bonus Page 3 PROPOSED HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT City of Santa Clarita 3/14/95 for affordable housing projects. Table A-2 in Appendix A presents this inventory. The total dwelling unit capacity of these vacant RM, RMH and RH sites based upon a state affordable housing density bonus is 9,015 units. This capacity assumes a 25% density increase over the maximum of the range of densities in accordance with state density bonus requirements for low income projects. When combined with the vacant land zoned for single family residential uses with no proposed or approved development, the City's unit capacity on vacant residentially zoned land increases to 11,560 units. Thus, when combined with vacant land with existing proposed and approved residential development, the City's 82 vacant residentially zoned sites have a potential to contain approximately 18,562 new construction dwelling units, well in excess of the City's total regional share of 6,401 new housing units. The RM, RMH and RH zones are appropriate zones to facilitate lower-income development. These zones are designed to accommodate multifamily developments at greater densities than single family residential developments. These greater densities provide opportunities for apartment and condominium development which provide rental and ownership opportunities for those with very low, low and moderate incomes. Table 1-A shows that at least 1,803 units are likely to be suitable for low income residents in the RM, RMH and RH zones assuming that an affordable housing density bonus is requested with the minimum 20% low income restriction. Based upon the information in Table 1-A, at least another 7,212 units in the RM, RMH and RH zones would be suitable for moderate income residents. Page 6, paragraph 2, sentences 1 and 2, replace the words "allowable density" and "density allowable" with the words "midpoint density." Page 7, insert this new paragraph in the second paragraph of the section titled Relationship of Residential Land Inventory and Housing Needs following the sentence "The residential land inventory indicates more than sufficient vacant land available for future residential development within the City to meet the remaining regional allocation of 4,568 units (6,401- 1,833 = 4,568 units)." The City number of existing vacant sites and existing zoning to allow for new residential unit construction to meet its regional housing needs based upon the income categories identified in the RHNA. Tables 1 and 1-A show that the City's 82 vacant residentially zoned sites have a potential to contain approximately 18,562 new construction housing units, well in excess of the City's total regional share of 6,401 new housing units. Table 1-A demonstrates that the City has the site capacity and appropriate zoning to accommodate its regional housing need for 1,562 lower-income housing units. This table also demonstrates that the City has the site capacity and appropriate zoning to accommodate its regional housing need for 992 new construction housing units for those of moderate income. Page 21, Program Lb Existing Needs Prioritization add the following after the first sentence The City recognizes affordable housing as a housing priority for the City and has adopted a Page 4 PROPOSED HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT City of Santa Clarita 3114195 formal policy for expedited review of affordable housing projects. Affordable housing projects receive one-stop review within three weeks of project submittal and receive priority scheduling for a public hearing immediately following the determination that the project application is complete. The City also has a five-year 1994-1998 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy which identified housing needs and priorities for the City and annually identifies programs to be undertaken as part of the City's Community Development Block Grant Program to address those housing needs. Page 21, Program Lc SpecifZc Plan/Planned Development add the following after the last sentence Flexible development standards are instituted through the City's Unified Development Code. Minor changes in development standards may be permitted by the Director of Community Development through granting of an adjustment. Changes in development standards of 20% or greater may be approved by the Planning Commission through approval of a standards variance. Adjustments and variances are not likely to increase residential development potential. The City's Unified Development Code provides for a relaxation in standards to facilitate and encourage new residential development in certain instances with approval of a conditional use permit or approval of a hillside permit where applicable. Clustering and reduced setback standards in hillside areas allow development which is compatible with existing neighborhoods which may otherwise have been prohibited under regular development standards. Projects requesting an affordable housing or amenity density bonus are eligible for development incentives including a reduction in development standards or fees to increase residential development potential in accordance with density bonus provisions of the City's Unified Development Code and State Density Bonus laws. Page 21, Program Lf Mixed Use add the following after the last sentence Where a mixed use development is within 1/4 mile of an identified transit center such as the Metrolink Station, the development may be eligible for a reduction in parking standards relating to the housing portion of the use in accordance with state laws encouraging congestion management. Development standards may be waived for mixed use affordable housing projects as provided for by the state under the density bonus provisions identified in Government Code Section 65915. The City has no estimated unit potential for housing units in mixed use projects. Page 22, Program 1.g Infill Loan Program add the following after the last sentence The City will encourage implementation of this program by applying for State HOME funds when available. Set-aside funds from the City's Redevelopment Agency are also a potential source of funds for infill development to implement this program. Page 5 PROPOSED HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT _ City of Santa Clarita 3/14/95 Page 22, Program 2.e Air Rights add the following after the last sentence Due to staffing constraints, the City is unlikely to undertake any proactive measures to implement this program during the current planning period other than to keep it open as a development option. However, should an air rights project be proposed by another agency or a developer, it shall be given priority status for consideration by staff. Page 22, Program 3.a Increasing Affordable Programs add the following after the last sentence The City has begun implementation of affordable housing programs in several ways. The City's Unified Development Code contains provisions for density bonus for affordable housing projects for very low income, low income and seniors. The City Council has adopted an affordable housing policy which expedites processing procedures for affordable housing projects and allows the granting of development incentives including reduced development standards and fee reductions and waivers. The City Council has also adopted procedures and guidelines for conduit financing to encourage the construction of affordable housing within Santa Clarita. Implementation of affordable housing programs includes the creation and adoption of a five- year 1994-1998 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) as part of the City's CDBG program. The CHAS identifies local housing needs, priorities, and goals as well as the short-term and long-term programs which the City will undertake to address these housing needs. The CDBG programs are targeted to assist very low and low income residents. As the City identifies and implements redevelopment project areas, redevelopment set-aside funds will become available for use in providing affordable housing opportunities within the City. A housing plan identifying types of housing programs and expenditures will be produced by the redevelopment agency once a redevelopment project area becomes functional. The timeframe, the location, the types of programs, and the extent to which redevelopment set-aside funds will become available to help meet the housing need for lower-income households is uncertain; however, it is anticipated that a redevelopment housing plan will become an important planning and funding tool for affordable housing in Santa Clarita. Add the following TABLE A-2: INVENTORY OF UNIT POTENTIAL ON VACANT LAND ZONED RM, RMH AND RH SUITABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS to Appendix A Page 6 PROPOSED HOUSING ELEMENT AMENDMENT City of Santa Clarita 3114/95 P4 O s w � y W L-- cq J)O HOlLO '-' x o c� °p m co m m m °0 co ° y m CL— N o d�..Nmm,�,- Nlap o cV ,..gym cm ,b 6F m Q a) C B N �� ro N y w o ♦�'.a � y y CC m 3 o IN 3 0 0 > y� m cD co W n co N N N N O 11D LO 00 0 q q <rmcli �ocgmLn Lncgn y z x� x ow o� o� Ao a zF m A LO o 110ko +' ¢x 00 CD-1O�o ?�o? mA oolo cq F m ca t- cv N 9 w 7' z A o �d zzp u a w ca �i¢ ° a F y m WF ytlA00 W o " d FFA y mto C) yA cOOOId N� x 00 cq LO P. zF wz o� x C9cLO00 to L-��l� z-14l zA o 0 W F zl o W a) y �fx amu] Nccgmmmmmmcmmm 9�n metra FO