HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-06-27 - RESOLUTIONS - ONE YEAR EXTENSION TTM 45022 (2)RESOLUTION 95-77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITU
OF SANTA CLARITA DENYING VISTA TERRACE'S APPEAL
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S VOIDING OF THE ONE
YEAR EXTENSION GRANTED TO VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 45022 PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. P92-16
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Clarita duly adopted on
April 7, 1992, Resolution No. P92-16, entitled "A Resolution of the Planning Commission of
the City of Santa Clarita Amending Resolution Nos. P90-06 (VTTM 45022), P90-18 (VTTM
43145), P90-25 (VTTM 48893) and P90-33 (TTM 48892) To Modify Certain Conditions
Relating to the Construction of Golden Valley Road, To Allow A One -Year Time Extension
For Each Map, and Amending P90-33 To Designate Tentative Tract Map 48892 as Vesting";
WHEREAS, Vista Terrace Properties, Ltd. ("Vista"), Showcase Homes Inc., Watt -
Parker, Inc. and H & & Enterprises were granted one-year extensions on their VTTM Nos.
45022, 43145, 48893 and 48892, respectively, by the Planning Commission pursuant to
Resolution No. P92-16;
WHEREAS, Resolution No. P92-16 stated if one of the recipients of the extensions
collaterally attacked a Funding and Acquisition Agreement, or if a Funding and Acquisition
Agreement was otherwise invalidated by any of said recipients (except by its express terms
relating to its effectiveness), the one-year time extensions would be deemed voidable by the
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. P95-08, the Planning Commission, on May 2,
1995, voided the one-year time extensions granted to VTTM Nos. 45011, 43145, 48893, and
48892.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact
A. Vista Terrace Properties, Ltd. has collaterally attacked that certain Funding
and Acquisition Agreement dated April 8, 1992, which was referenced in
Resolution No. P92-16, by filing a cross -action in the Los Angeles County
Superior Court entitled "City of Santa Clarita vs. Vista Terrace Properties,
Ltd., et al.," (Case No. BC 090223) in or about December 1993.
SECTION 2. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the City Council hereby
determines that the one-year extensions previously granted for Vista Terrace Properties,
Ltd.'s Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 45022 were properly voided by the Planning
Commission and, therefore, Vista's appeal is denied.
RESOLUTION 95-77
June 27, 1995 - Page 2
19 95
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 27. h day of .lune
'
YOR
ATTEST:
CfWCLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Donna M. Grindey, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa
Clarita at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 27th day of June
19 95 by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
GEA:lep
counciAres95-77.gea
Pederson, Boyer, Heidt, Smyth, Darcy
None
;none
'-CITY CLERK
VICINITY MAP
GOLDEN VALLEY.
K