Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-10-01 - AGENDA REPORTS - DAY LABORERS (2)CITY OF SANTA CLARITA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Boyer and Members of the City C ncil FROM:: George A. Caravalho, City Manager DATE: October 1, 1996 SUBJECT DAY LABORERS BACKGROUND At the request of the City Manager, staff has spent the previous five months researching matters relating to the day laborer population that exists in the Santa Clarita Valley, This ongoing matter encompasses a number of issues that are of interest to many residents and businesses within the community. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT As an introduction to this subject, staff believes it is appropriate to explain why this report has been prepared for the City Council. This report has been prepared to address and potentially provides solutions for three (3) specific issues of community interest. Theseissues are: Community Concerns: Santa Clarita's day laborer population tends to gather along a five mile stretch of San Fernando Road, between Magic Mountain Parkway and Sierra Highway. For a number of years, the day laborer population has caused concern for many of the businesses located along San Fernando Road, and for the residents of the community. Specifically, complaints within the community have focused upon issues ranging from littering, to the "swarming of vehicles", loitering in front of businesses, the discharge of human waste in public, intimidation, and the harassment of female pedestrians. Non -Profits Organization/Church Groups Concerns:,A number of non-profit organizations and church groups have met with City staff to discuss their concerns regarding the community's day laborer population. While these groups are also concerned with the issues addressed in the previous section, their interests also include concern for the day laborer population who want to work to provide for themselves and their families. The Revitalization of Downtown Newhall: The need to address matters relating to the day laborer population is consistent with the input received from the community concerning the City's ongoing efforts to revitalize the downtown Newhall area. Over an 18 month period,: the City facilitated a number of community meetings in the Newhall area to discuss matters relating to redevelopment. Issues relating to the day laborer population was a recurring theme throughout the course of this Agenda Item -L process, with the majority of participants agreeing that a lasting solution for this matter was required to ensure that the City redevelopment efforts would be successful. Many participants expressed that proceeding with redevelopment without first resolving this issue would impact the potential benefits which could be achieved. RESEARCH PROCESS In preparing this report, staff sought to gather input from as many residents, businesses and agencies as possible. As the following information demonstrates, staff has attempted to identify every issue that relates to this matter and contact those individuals with a vested interest in this subject. Along these lines staff has: • Contacted and met with key businesses and residents within the community. • Visited operating Day Laborer Hiring Centers. • Conducted field observations of our day laborer population. • Met with non-profit organizations and church groups interested in assisting in the development of a lasting solution concerning this matter. • Contacted and met with other government agencies to discuss their individual approaches to addressing matters relating to day laborers. • Mailed out approximately 130 letters to individual businesses and residents that have expressed an interest in this matter. These individuals were invited to attend the October 1, 1996 City Council Study Session, or to submit their written comments to staff for inclusion in this report. FINDINGS Based upon staffs research, five (5) key items of discussion relating to the day laborer population have been outlined for review by the City Council. These five items include: 1. Overview of the current day laborer situation in the Santa Clarita Valley. 2. Business community comments. 3. Information regarding existing and potential laws available to address matters relating to the solicitation of employment within the public right of way. 4. Approaches to address matters relating to day laborers utilized by other municipalities. 5. Options for the City Council's review and consideration. OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT DAY LABORER SITUATION IN THE SANTA CLARITA VALLEY Prior to discussing this item, staff believes it is important to recognize that the practice of soliciting for employment within the public right of way is presently a legal action. The same holds true for motorists stop within the public right of way in order to solicit the potential employment of those individuals seeking work. In the Santa Clarita Valley, residents seeking temporary employment tend to gather along a five (5) mile stretch of San Fernando Road between Magic Mountain Parkway and Sierra Highway. Based upon observations made by staff members during a two week period in August, the number of day laborers attempting to solicit work between 7:45 a.m. and 8:15 a.m. ranges between 85 to 130 people on any given day. After 9:00 a.m., the number of day laborers significantly declines to approximately 30 to 50. Staff has found that the majority of day laborers tend to congregate within four specific areas along San Fernando Road. These specific areas include A.V. Equipment Rental (San Fernando Road and 15th Street), Sierra Highway and San Fernando Road (the City bus stop shelter located at the northwest corner of that particular intersection), Green Thumb Nursery (San Fernando Road, just north of Vista Del Oro) and Jessup's Dairy (San Fernando Road and 2nd Street). Based upon staffs observations, some issues relating to pedestrian and vehicle safety did arise. When a motorist was observed pulling over to the side of the road, it was often a race among many of the day laborers to get there first.. These day laborers often disregarded traffic, and just ran across the street. Additionally, motorists pulling their vehicles over to the side of the road frequently did this without regard for other vehicles. Overall, the majority of day laborers observed sat or stood around waiting for work. Depending upon their location, they were observed sitting or lying in front of driveways of apartment buildings, and eating and drinking along the street. While some littering was observed, no staff member observed any incidents of harassment, consumption of alcohol, or discharging of human waste in public. BUSINESS COMMUNITY COMMENTS During the development of this report, staff met and/or spoke with several of the businesses that are directly affected by the presence of the day laborer population. The following information represents their opinion on matters relating to the day laborer population in Santa Clarita: 1. Green Thumb Nursery: Bryan Payne, manager of the Green Thumb Nursery, expressed strong concern regarding the issue of day laborers. He stated that his business has been grappling with the day laborer problem for 25 years, and he is doubtful as to any real action taking place to help him. His concerns centered upon the workers that gather in front of his business. According to Mr. Payne, day laborers block the driveways which enter the parking lot and interfere with his customers' ability to gain access to his facility. Additionally, the contractors that pick up the day laborers also tend to obstruct the entrance of vehicles into the facility. Mr. Payne hears complaints, from customers who shop at his store. Specifically, they complain of harassment and intimidation by the day laborers who approach them while they are in their cars. Mr. Payne feels that their presence hurts his business. When asked for possible solutions, Mr. Payne said he ideally would like an anti -loitering ordinance to be strictly enforced and the INS to do regular sweeps along San Fernando Road. Mr. Payne also stated that a practical solution would be to have a place where the day laborers could congregate in the morning in order to be picked up for work. 2. Newhall Paint: Tony Maric, owner of the Newhall Paint store located on Walnut Street, expressed some concern regarding the day laborer population, but reported that they had little effect upon his business. Mr. Maric reported that approximately four to five day laborers congregate near the back portion of his shop, and that their presence has only generated a few complaints from customers. Mr. Maric also stated that he would support the development of a day laborer hiring center in the Newhall area. DZ Marble: Debbie Zeile, owner of DZ Marble (also located on Walnut Street), reported that six to 12 day workers tend to gather outside the rear portion of her office on a daily basis. Ms. Zeile reports that she has observed day laborers consuming alcoholic beverages and discharging human waste products on a regular basis. Additionally, Ms. Zeile also reports that some of these people harass her staff, and make suggestive remarks in Spanish that (unbeknown to them) are understood by her staff. Ms. Zeile also indicated that she would support the development of a work center. 4. A.V. Equipment Rental: Mike Redmond, owner of A.V. Equipment Rental, reported that on some occasions, almost 100 day workers gather outside his business along 15th Street. While Mr. Redmond is not overly concerned by the presence of day laborers outside his facility, he did express his concerns regarding the issue of litter and the constant harassment of female pedestrians who walk past the day workers who gather along 15th Street. Mr. Redmond also expressed his support for the development of a work center, provided that it was accompanied by the adoption of an ordinance which would prohibit the solicitation of work within the public right of way. INFORMATION REGARDING EXISTING AND POTENTIAL LAWS AVAILABLE TO ADDRESS MATTERS RELATING TO THE SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYMENT WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY Since loitering is generally lawful, previous attempts to legislate matters relating to day workers have resulted in varying degrees of success. As stated previously, there is no provision within the City's Municipal Code which prohibits individuals from soliciting employment while within the public right of way. Previous loitering laws have improperly made the condition of poverty a crime. In the matter of Wheeler v. Goodman, it was found that idleness and poverty cannot be made the elements of crime, and one can not be punished as a vagrant on the promise that he may commit a crime in the future. because he is unemployed. Laws of this nature have been challenged and overturned based upon issues of vagueness, violation of equal protection laws, and the right to free assembly and association. In recent years, municipalities have changed their focus and are no longer attempting to regulate the individuals who gather within the right of way to seek employment. Instead, many municipalities now regulate these matters in a manner which focuses upon "vehicle solicitation." Specifically, government agencies such as the County of Los Angeles, and the Cities of Dana Point, Agoura Hills and Glendale have all adopted ordinances which make it unlawful for any person to stand on any street and solicit employment from an occupant of any motor vehicle. This type of legislation also makes it unlawful for any person in a motor vehicle to attempt to hire for employment another person. Regarding Los Angeles County's ordinance, at this time Santa Clarita Sheriffs may only enforce this ordinance in the unincorporated portions of Los Angeles County, as itis not valid within the City of Santa Clarita. As stated in the attached memorandum from the City Attorney's Office, this type of ordinance specifically addresses the problem which arises when motorists stop along San Fernando Road to hire individuals, thereby impeding the flow of traffic, causing accidents and creating a public safety hazard. This type of "content neutral" ordinance has been successfully upheld upon appeal, and is an effective method that has been utilized by other law enforcement agencies to address this concern. Further, this type of ordinance provides law enforcement agencies with the ability to encourage day workers to utilize work centers established within some communities. APPROACHES TO ADDRESS MATTERS RELATING TO DAY LABORERS UTILIZED BY OTHER MUNICIPALITIES There are several approaches which have been successfully adopted by various agencies to address matters relating to their day laborer population. For the purpose of this report, staff would like to highlight the approaches utilized by the Citiesof Los Angeles, Agoura Hills, Glendale and Brea. LOS ANGELE The City of Los Angeles was the first major city to address the day laborer issue through the creation of two hiring centers. Presently, Los Angeles maintains two (2) day laborer hiring centers in the communities of Harbor City and North Hollywood. These centers represent an alternative to the practices of gathering within the public right of way and swarming vehicles that have stopped at intersections as day laborers attempt to solicit work. The Harbor City hiring center is located in Harbor Regional Park, and attracts approximately 150 workers on a daily basis (Monday through Saturday). Their hours of operations are 6:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. These two work centers provide a place where employers can come to make arrangements for the employment of individuals. Individuals who utilize these services are required to sign in, and are prohibited from consuming alcohol, using illegal drugs, or harassing female pedestrians. Seating and portable bathroom facilities are made available, and participants are provided with services such as English as a Second Language (ESL) classes free of charge, Both the Harbor City and North Hollywood facility are facilitated by Los Angeles City employees, and provide an area where employers/contractors can make arrangements to hire individuals for employment. It is not the responsibility of the City of Los Angeles to verify any person's right to work; the City merely provides the area for the two parties to make arrangements for employment. It is the responsibility of all employers to verify any persons right to legally work in this Country. Both the Harbor City and North Hollywood Work Centers have enjoyed a great deal of success and have been instrumental in significantly reducing the number of day laborers on the street. During staff s visit to Harbor City, the Work Center coordinator provided staff with a tour of the areas where a majority of their day laborers formerly gathered. During the course of this tour, staff did not observe any individuals gathered within the public right of way, AGOURA HILLS The City of Agoura Hills has chosen to adopt a series of solicitation ordinances which prohibit solicitation of employment by individuals in the public right of way, in unauthorized locations within commercial parking areas, and any individual traveling in a vehicle along a public right of way. Regarding this last item, motorists who are cited for picking up laborers from any public or posted commercial property are subject to a fine of $271.00 This penalty is classified as a progressive infraction in the amount of $100.00, with court processing fees of an additional $171.00 The City of Agoura Hills has chosen not to develop a day laborer hiring center, and instead provides residents with a Telephone Hiring Exchange Center. In concept, the hiring exchange was designed to provide employers and employees with an opportunity to make arrangements for employment via the telephone. Agoura Hills staff coordinates this exchange, takes information from individuals seeking employment (i.e. their specific working skills) and then can offer names on a referral basis to employers seeking employees from certain classifications (i.e. landscape, cement work, etc.). In speaking with Agoura Hills staff, they report that use of this telephone hiring exchange is moderate to low, and that the primary users are individuals who provide domestic types of services. It is staffs understanding that Agoura Hills officials view this ordinance as an unenforceable paper tiger. Agoura Hills officials report limited success in their efforts to enforce this measure which is based upon the large number of day workers that continue to gather and the individuals that continue to hire them. GLENDALE In August of this year, the City of Glendale took action to create a formal hiring center and enact an ordinance outlawing solicitation on public streets by laborers or their potential employers. Construction of this hiring center began in late September 1996 and the City's Anti -Solicitation Ordinance went into effect on September 27, 1996. Through this process, Glendale envisions a program which will provide a hiring center for individuals to gather in an area where they can make arrangements for employment with potential employers. Like Harbor City's hiring center, this location also provides individuals with bathroom amenities and free English classes. The anti -solicitation ordinance works hand in hand with the future hiring center, and will allow Glendale police to site those individuals who continue to hire day laborers off the street. During the next six weeks, Glendale will facilitate a public awareness campaign designed to create awareness to the work center. Once the center is operational, those individuals that are cited will face misdemeanor charges punishable by a fine of $500.00 or six months in jail. This program represents a creative solution that has been embraced by the community of Glendale. Through this program, complaints generated by businesses and residents concerning issues of harassment, alcohol consumption, the discharging of human waste products and loitering have been addressed. This solution also provides day laborers with a place to seek employment without infringing upon their rights. The City of Brea has operated a day laborer hiring center since 1990. This hiring center is facilitated and sited upon property owned by their redevelopment agency. Brea reports that approximately 80 to 90 workers are registered to utilize the hiring center, and that city staff are responsible for day to day operations. Brea is unique in that it does not maintain any type of anti -solicitation ordinance to ensure that day laborers and employers utilize the hiring center. Brea staff reports that the hiring center was developed long before this matter ever became even a potential issue within the community. Thus, there are no ongoing issues or concerns within the community regarding loitering among day workers within the public right of way. Further, Brea will only allow residents living within the incorporated city limits to utilize this center, and requires participants to verify their residency by presenting a utility bill, copy of a rental agreement and a photo identification. The cost to operate the hiring center is budgeted at approximately $29,000 each fiscal year, and the City recovers a good portion of those funds by charging individuals a $5.00 per month fee to utilize the hiring center. Finally, concerning the use of the center and the issue of legal vs non -legal residents that utilize the. services offered, the City of Brea policy is consistent with the practices of other communities such as Harbor City. Brea staff views this hiring center as a place for individuals seeking work and employers seeking temporary employees to meet and make arrangements for employment. The City of Brea and their staff is not responsible for verifying the legal status of any individual, as that is the responsibility of the potential employer, Brea staff reports that this program has been extremely successful. As stated above, the development of the hiring center was made a priority by the community. The establishment of this hiring center came at a time when there were no day laborers present within the public right of way. This proactive measure has allowed Brea to maintain this trend. OPTIONS FOR THE CITY COUNCIL'S REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION The following information outlines options that the City Council may wish to consider as a means to address matters relating to the Santa Clarita Day Laborer population. Option #l. Table this item and take no action at this time. Option # 2. Investigate options that are available and can be provided through the Department of Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS). Staff has spoken with representatives of the INS regarding Santa Clarita's day laborer population. INS representatives have indicated that they are available to conduct sweeps within the community and will facilitate these types of actions if a formal request is made by the City. Presently the INS has a staff of only 11 agents serving the Los Angeles County Area. INS representatives indicated that if a formal request were received, they would first conduct a survey of the area, and then proceed to facilitate a series of sweeps over a staggered period of four to five weeks. The effectiveness of these sweeps depends upon the composition of our day laborer population. It is the INS's experience that 75% to 80% of the day laborers are comprised of individuals who do not have a legal right to seek employment within this country. In contrast, in three separate reports facilitated by local municipal agencies (two conducted by the City of Los Angeles, and the other conducted by the City of Glendale) it was reported that approximately 75% of the individuals who make up the day laborer population do possess a legal right to work in the United States. Option #3. Adopt an Anti -Solicitation Ordinance The City Council may wish to investigate the option of adopting an anti -solicitation ordinance as a measure to address matters relating to the day laborer population. As described above, this option has been utilized by the City of Agoura Hills in conjunction with the creation of a telephone hiring exchange program. Option #4. Develop a program that incorporates the adopt an Anti -Solicitation Ordinance in conjunction with the creation of a formal hiring center. This option appears to have yielded the greatest level of success in the communities which have taken this approach. Based upon staff's research, it appears that many of the businesses in the Newhall area would be supportive of this option. Additionally, staff has met with several non-profit organizations and church groups that have expressed an interest in teaming with the City to form a public-private partnership to create a formal hiring center. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council receive comments from the public, discuss and provide direction to staff on how Council would like to proceed. Fiho=%p\admin%daylabor.ers ATTACHMENTS City Attorney's Office Memorandum regarding Vehicle Solicitation/Day Worker Issues September 7, 1996 Los Angeles Times Article regarding Glendale's Day Laborer Program Letter from the Santa Clarita Animal Hospital regarding Day Laborers *Petition To Instate A Day Laborer Program Site In Newhall *Petition to Oppose the Development of a Day Laborer Program Site In Newhall *September 12, 1996 letter from City staff inviting interested residents to attend the October 1, 1996 City Council Study Session. *Documents on file for review in the City Clerk's Reading File To: Kevin Tonoian From: Tom Altmayer 9-25-9B 11:51am p. 2 of 3 MEMDRAMUM RE VEHICLE : • • 1 • Y[i• ISSUES This memorandum will address recent concerns over regulating vehicle based solicitation of day -workers within the City. Among the areas of concern is San Fernando Road where staff has observed dozens of individuals lining San Fernando Road seeking work as day laborers. The problem arises as motorists stop along San Fernando Road to hire these individuals, thereby impeding the flow of traffic;'causing accidents, and creating a public safety hazard At'preaent'the general practice of vehicle solicitation within the City is lawful. While there may be individual cases where the solicitor violates certain traffic laws (i.e. stopping in a "no stopping" zone, etc.), the practice of vehicle solicitation, in an of itself, is legal. Moreover, the practice of congregating by day -workers on public rights -of, -way for the purpose of soliciting work is, likewise, lawful. I. EXISTING ABILITY TO PREVENT VEHICLE SOLICITATION Under the present municipal code, little can be done to regulate vehicle solicitations along city streets. Only where a street includes a "no stopping" zone can the Sheriff's Department regulate vehicle solicitation. This would be limited to ticketing the motorist for stopping within this zone. II. VEHICLE SOLICITATION ORDINANCE A separate option available to the City to regulate the above -referenced problem would be to adopt a vehicle solicitation ordinance. The purpose of a vehicle solicitation ordinance would be to make it unlawful for (1) individuals within the public right of way -(which would include day -workers) from soliciting employment or business from vehicles; and (2)for individuals within vehicles to solicit employment or business from individuals from the public right-of-way. While this type of ordinance has been the subject of legal challenges, at least one recent court decision has approved a vehicle solicitation ordinance to be adopted by the City of Agoura Hills. Xiloj-Itzep v. Agoura Hills (1994) 24 Cal.App.4th 620. Agoura Hills recently adopted the vehicle solicitation ordinance. Among the findings presented to the City Council concerning the proposed vehicle solicitation ordinance was that up to 100 men per day were congregating and seeking work at the intersection of Kanan and Agoura Roads within the city. Also included within the findings were a series of complaints received T.AX2:161349.1 To: Kevin Tonoian From: Tom Altmayer 9-25-96 11:51am p. 3 of 3 by the city related to swarming care, littering, fighting, urination and public intoxication. To combat these problems, Agoura Hills adopted the comprehensive vehicle solicitation ordinance banning all vehicle solicitation throughout the city. As part of this process, Agoura Hills established a telephone hiring exchange for day - workers and employers to call. Despite'the`efforts made to accommodate individuals seeking day work;>°the:'Atpura Hills' vehicle solicitation ordinance was legally'chall'eriged. The Court of Appeal upheld the validity of the ordinance. Among the factors considered by the Court included the efforts made by Agoura Hills in providing the telephone hiring exchange. If the Council desires to proceed with a vehicle solicitation ordinance, it is important to recognize that any vehicle solicitation ordinance should not be targeted at one group of individuals or another. Rather, ,it is important that the ordinance be directed at both the vehicle operator as well as the individuals soliciting business within the public right-of- way. I.AX2:1 M369.1 Glendale Plan Curbs, Aids Day Laborers ■ Employment: City will build center to coordinate hiring as it outlaws solicitation on public strt:ets. BY STEVE RYFLE SPECIAL TO THE TIMES GLENDALE—As in so many other communities in Southern California, dozens of young Latino men hoping to earn a day's wage line up on Glendale street corners each morning, waiting to be se- lected by the contractors who will soon arrive. Nearby merchants and rest - dents have long complained that the day laborers have become a public nuisance. They have grown weary of the city's inabil- ity to effectively police a laundry list of infractions by the men, they say: drinking alcohol, bar. .assing,women, breaking bottles, public urination. But unlike officials in other towns, those in Glendale believe they have come up with a solution to the problems posed by disorga- nized groups of workers gathered on street corners, without in- fringing on their rights. First, the City Council moved to create a formal hiring hall for day laborers. But, in addition, the council passed an ordinance out- lawing solicitation on public streets by laborers or their em- ployers. Not even the American Civil Liberties Union opposes the plan, which is due to get underway this month. "We think this is a very fair and balanced approach," said Ja- vier Ruiz, an officer with the Glendale Police Department who helped create the program. Please see JOBS, BS Day labors scramble to accept a job otter from a truck driver. x V a.ti.�KL.At. NEFfl,,S1i3ER 19% JOBS: Day Laborer Plan Adopted Continued from B1 "There will be no negative im. pact on the day laborers, because we're not taking anything away from them—we're giving them an improved method of seeking em- ployment. And the day laborers themselves have been begging us to do something like this for a long time," Ruiz said. Late this month, construction will begin on the hiring facility, located on a leased space on San Fernando Road, across the street from a Home Depot store. The center will be a simple, open-air structure with a shaded area and chairs for the waiting men, with drinking fountains and a restroom. Though details have yet to be worked out, city officials say they envision a lottery system for doling out jobs. There will be two labor Pools—one for general workers and another for those with plumb- ing, tiling, roofing and other spe- cialty skills. Free classes in English and other job-related skills are planned for the men as they wait for work. The operation will be run by two workers from a local charity. Meanwhile, the city's new "anti - solicitation ordinance;' as it is called, takes effect Sept. 27. Police anticipate an "educational period" of about six weeks while the center is under construction, during which they will spend time inform- ing the laborers and those hiring them about the new law, and issuing warnings to those who continue to break it. Once the center opens, hiring day laborers on the street will become a misde- meanor, punishable by fines of up to $500 or six months jail time. "Right now, I can't make enough money to live in this way," said Edgardo Ugalde, 27, an immigrant from San Luis Potosi, Mexico, who was soliciting work near Home Depot last week, "I can do any kind of work, but the big guys always get picked first because they look stronger. Sometimes I Just stand here all day, and nothing. "If they make it so it's easier to get work, I would try it. I think a lot of guys would try it." Officials have acknowledged Past difficulty in responding to the problem. "You can call the police, but they can't be there every minute, so after a while they just come back and the problems start all over again;" said City Councilwoman Mary Ann Plumley, who supported the ordinance. Plumley, a Realtor who once had an office near the corner of Broad- way and Jackson Street—a popular meeting point for day laborers for more than a decade—said although the day laborers mean no harm, the problems they create are real. "When I worked there, I wouldn't even walk down that block because it was just very, very uncomfortable," she said. "They would loiter there through- out the day, and they could be very unruly when a woman walked by. "What's different now is that there's going to be a place for [the day laborers] that will actually help them find work, rather than just hanging around. And we have a law in place that has teeth in it, that says where they can and cannot be, and also goes after the people who hire them." Hiring centers have existed since the mid-1980s—the city of Los Angeles currently has two, in North Hollywood and Harbor City—but without legislation forc- ing the laborers to use the site, the competition for work keeps men out on the streets, flagging down cars. The first known anti -soliciting ordinance aimed at policing day laborers was enacted in the city of Agoura Hills in 1991. The ACLU challenged the law, saying it was racist and restricted the laborers' rights of free speech and assembly; but ultimately the law was upheld in a federal appeals court. Since then, other communities have fol- lowed with similar laws, including a county ordinance to weed out day laborer problems in Ladera Heights and La Mirada. But Agoura Hills officials now view the ordinance as a paper tiger, virtually unenforceable due to the large number of laborers who continue to gather at various Vets in the city, and the defiant people who continue to hire them. "We're disappointed in the ordi- nance," said Darlene MCBain, a former councilwoman who sup- ported the law. "It certainly hasn't done a whole loL" Glendale's two-pronged plan has drawn widespread support from area businesses and residents, in- cluding Home Depot, which has agreed to donate building materials for construction of the hiring cen- ter and money to pay for staffing. 85 The city has committed about- $75,000 toward the construction. Civil- and immigrants -rights groups that have in the past rushed to the defense of day laborers raised no objections as the plan glided through bureaucratic chan- nels in recent weeks. .Robin Toms, an attorney who has worked with the ACLU on issues affecting day laborers, said he is "cautiously optimistic" that Glendale's approach will yield Positive results. "There is tremendous value to the approach of using hiring facili- ties. That gives [the laborers] a chance to provide for themselves and their families," Toma said. "I think there is reason for concern because this approach is coupled with an anti -solicitation ordinance, which is usually just a politically expedient means to outlaw the day laborers' emstence, and it rarely works. We'll have to see what develops there." ' Backers of the plan say the hiring center will provide informa- tion on taxation and workers' com- pensation to both the laborers and the contractors. But the issue of taxes will likely take a backseat to the larger issue of managing a problem that has been allowed to grow unchecked for years. "The reality is that the com- plaints from the community about this problem are massive," said Officer Ron Gillman. "The most important thing here is that we have a problem, and we want to control it" illman said he hopes the new Program dispels some of the community's animosity toward the laborers, which he believes is both racially motivated and based on misperceptions. While most people assume the laborers are "illegal aliens and "criminals," he said, at least three studies—two by the city of Los Angeles and a third by Glendale— have shown that 75% or more are legal residents with work papers. "When I first heard that, I didn't buy it," Gillman said. "But once I started interviewing the laborers as we started researching this issue, I discovered that many of them speak English. "Many of them were laid -off from construction companies or other jobs, and a lot of them have their green cards. They're just trying to get by." Santa Clarita Animal Hospital Valencia Veterinary Group 24899 San Fernando Road Santa Clarita, CA, 91321 (805) 255-6483 9-17-96 City of Santa Clarita 23920 Valencia Blvd. Suite #300 Santa Clarita, Ca. 91355 Dear Mr. Tonian, I would like to bring to your attention what the City of Glendale is doing with regards to the issues of "Day Laborers." The City is currently attempting to find a central location on which they will errect a structure, providing bathroom facilities, benches, and cover from the elements. It is my understanding that the City of Glendale will then establish an ordinance stating that any persons soliciting day work in any area other than provided by the City, will in effect be in violation, and will be dealt with accordingly. To the best of my knowledge, there has been no legal objections to this proposal. Our business is directly affected by the "Day Laborers" that congregate around our building. We have in the past, and continue to loose clients that are afraid of being harassed by said individuals. I personally have had to put up with the degrating "cat calls" and whistles. We also have an on-going trash problem. Alcohol containers and empty food containers are continually discarded on the premises. Lately there has been a concern for public health. Several times our employees have observed them urinating in shrubs that are around our property. The City of Santa Clarita has "discussed" the issues relating to the "Day Laborers" for a number of years. It is time to stop the discussions and act on this issue. Our office will support any effort made by the City Council to help eliminate this growing nuisance. Sincerely, 9Janette Beltran Office Manager