HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-12-03 - AGENDA REPORTS - STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MGMT (2)CITY OF SANTA CI ARITA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Boyer, and
Members of the City Council
FROM: George Caravalho, City Manager
DATE: December 3, 1996
SUBJECT: STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SEMS)
The Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) is the system required by State
Legislation for managing response to multi -agency and multi jurisdiction emergencies in
California. The intent of this law is to improve the coordination of State and local emergency
response in California.
SEMS incorporates the use of the Incident Command System (ICS), the Master Mutual Aid
Agreement, existing mutual aid systems, the operational area concept and multi -agency
cooperation. In compliance with SEMS regulations Section 5607 of the California Government
Code, local government must use SEMS by December 1, 1996, in order to be eligible for funding
of response -related personnel costs occurring in response to an incident. All state agencies shall
use SEMS to coordinate multiple jurisdiction or multiple agency emergency and disaster
operations. Compliance with SEMS shall be documented in areas of planning, training, exercise
and performance.
There are five designated levels in the SEMS organization: Field Response, Local Government,
Operational Area, Regional, and State. Each is activated as needed.
Local government, operational area, regional and state levels shall provide for all the following
functions with SEMS: management, operations, planning/intelligence, logistics, and
fmance/administration.
Emergency response agencies shall ensure that their response personnel maintain minimum
training competencies in SEMS in accordance with the approved course of instruction. The
executive course provides basic information on the role of executives in implementing, using and
maintaining SEMS within their agency or organization. The contents of the course also applies
to those individuals that work in supporting management roles and need an orientation to basic
concepts and principles of SEMS.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve the SEMS Executive Training Course to be in
compliance with State Legislation.
AEM/DN:mdn +�•^['
prcound1\semscs1d.ses Agenda Item:
City of Santa Clarita
Executive Course to SEMS
Standardized Emergency Management System
i
A\ O 15 DECEµ�
December 1996
SAPMEMERPREP VSEMSCOV.WPD
SEMS Multiharard Functional Plan
SEMS: ORGANIZATION CHART.CP ZTl62
OPERATIONS"
—Public Works
—Water
—Building & Safety
—Fire****
—Law Enforcement**"
--Coroner
T:—MedicaVRealth'*■
—Care & Shelter
Field Units
(ICS)
City of Santa Clarita
11196
EOC DIRECTOR
MANAGEMENT
' Liaison Officer—
Agency Reps
Legislative Liaison—
PLANNING/
INTELLIGENCE
—Situation Status
—Documentation
—Damage Assessment
Advance Planning
—Recovery Planning
—Demobilization
Technical Specialist
—EOC Coordinator
—Safety Officer
—Security Officer
—Public Information*
—Legal Council
LOGISTICSI I FINANCE/
ADMINISTRATION
—Resources
—Information Systems
—Communications
—Computer Systems
Transportation
—Personnel
—Procurement
—Facilities
—Cost Recovery
Documentation
Time
—Purchasing
—Compensation/Claims
—Cost Analysis
*May be organized as a section or branch. .
'*If all elements are activated a deputy will be appointed
to pravide a manageable span of control.
** *Normally coordinated by County, but a local coordinator
may be designated ifneeded
""Contract servicefliaison position. (Identify contract
services in your organization.)
Management Section - M-36
SEMS Multihazard Functional Plan
Operations
Section
Responsibilities:
SEMS EOC RESPONSIBff:TPiES CHART (SEMS -¢/S}
EOC
DIRECTOR
Management Section
Planning/ Logistics
g
Intelligence Section
Section
Finance/ '
Administration
Section
EOC Director (Management Section)
Responsible for overall emergency management policy and coordination through the joint efforts of
+ ` governmental agencies and private organizations. The EOC Director will either activate appropriate.
t� sections or performtheirfunctions as needed.
Operations Section
Responsible for coordinating all jurisdictional operations in support of the emergency response through
implementation of the city's EOC Action Plan.
Planninentelligence Section
Responsible for collecting, evaluating and disseminating information; developing the city's EOC Action Plan in
coordination with other sections; initiating and preparation of the city's After -Action Report and maintaining
documentation.
Logistics Section
Responsible for providing communications, facilities, services, personnel, equipment, supplies and materials.
Finance/Administration Section
Responsible for financial activities and other administrative aspects.
City of Santa Clarita Management Section - M-37
11196
SEMS Multihazard Functional Plan
EOC DIRECTOR City Council
Policy Group MANAGEMENT
Dept Heads SECTION
COORDINATOR
City Manager
Liaison Officer EOC Coordinator
Parks, Rec. & Com. Emergency Prep.
Srvcs.-Dir.
Agency Rep I Safety Officer
General Services
Legislative Liaison Security Officer
Intergov. Relat. Officer General Services
Public Information
Officer
Legal Council
City Attorney
City of Santa Clarita Management Section -M-38
10196
City of Santa Clarita
SEMS TRAINING DATE RECORDS
Date of Training
Course Level
Group Name
Attendance
Number
November 7, 1995
Intro. to SEMS
Public Works
21
February 13, 1996
Intro. to SEMS
Building & Safety
16
March 11, 1996
Intro. to SEMS
Radio Group
50
May 23, 1996
Intro, to SEMS
Law Enforcement
28
June 27, 1996
Intro. to SEMS
School Districts
42
September 17, 1996
Intro. to SEMS
City Staff
35
September 23, 1996
Intro. to SEMS
City Staff
66
September 26, 1996
Intro. to SEMS
City Staff
58
November 21, 1996
EOC Course
City Staff
26
December 3, 1996
Executive Course
January 15,1997
Intro. to SEMS
January 23, 1997
EOC Course
emergeecypmp\eemsk da e
STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(SEMS)
EXECUTIVE COURSE
Student Reference Text
The term executive describes an individual that works in executive management or
elected positions but does not regularly fill command or management roles at incidents or
in the organization's Emergency Operations Center (EOC).
The executive course provides basic information on the role of executives in
implementing, using and maintaining SEMS within their agencies or organizations. The
contents of the course also applies to those individuals that work in supporting
management roles and need an orientation to basic concepts and principles of SEMS.
Topics covered in this course are:
1. Background
2. Components, organizational levels and primary functions
3. The role and responsibilities of an executive to support SEMS
4. Role of the executive to EOC managers and field incident commanders
5. Guidelines and training programs
6. Questions and answers related to SEMS implementation
I. Background
The intent of the statute effective in January 1993, is to improve the coordination of state
and local emergency response efforts in California. The statute requires the Governor's
Office of Emergency Services (OES), in coordination with other state agencies and
interested local emergency management agencies, to have a Standardized Emergency
Management System operational throughout California by December 1996.
SEMS is a management system based on proven organizational principles and concepts
that have been in use in California for over twenty years. It provides the umbrella under
which response agencies at all levels may function together effectively in an integrated
fashion. The use of SEMS will facilitate:
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 1
The coordination between agencies responding to emergencies
The flow of emergency information and resources within and between involved
agencies
The rapid mobilization, deployment, use, and tracking of resources
SEMS provides a standard organizational framework, and supporting guidance and
checklists for operations at each level of the state-wide emergency management system.
By law, state agencies must use SEMS when responding to emergencies involving
multiple jurisdictions or multiple agencies. Local governments are strongly encouraged
to use SEMS, and must use it in order to be eligible for state funding of response related
personnel costs.
H. Components, organization, and primary functions of SEMS
A. Components
SEMS integrates into a single program several of the state's primary emergency response
programs. These include: the Incident Command System (ICS) developed under the
FIRES COPE Program; (Firefighting Resources of Southern California Organized for
Potential Emergencies), a process for ensuring multi -agency or inter -agency coordination;
the State's mutual aid program; the concept and plan for use of operational areas, and the
state's Operational Area Satellite Information System (OASIS).
B. Organizational Levels
SEMS provides for a five level emergency response organization activated as needed to
provide an effective response to multi -agency and multijurisdiction emergencies. The
five organizational levels are:
• Field
• Local Government
• Operational Area
• Region
• State
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 2
C. Primary Functions
The table below describes the primary SEMS functions at the field and EOC levels.
PRIMARY
LD RESPONSE LEVEL
OTHER LEVEL
SEMS
FUNCTION
Command/
Command is responsible for the
Management is responsible for
Management
directing, ordering, and/or
overall emergency policy and
controlling of resources by virtue
coordination through the joint
of explicit legal, agency or
efforts of governmental agencies
delegated authority.
and private or anizations.
Operations
Responsible for the coordinated
Responsible for coordinating all
tactical response of all field
jurisdictional operations in
operations directly applicable to,
support of the response to the
or in support of, the missions(s)
emergency through
in accordance with the Incident
implementation of an action plan.
Action Plan.
Planning/
Responsible for the collection,
Responsible for collecting,
Intelligence
evaluation, documentation, and
evaluating, and disseminating
use of information about the
information; developing the action
incident, and the status of
plan in coordination with the other
incident resources.
functions, and maintaining
documentation.
Logistics
Responsible for providing
Responsible for providing
facilities, services, personnel,
facilities, services, personnel,
equipment, and materials in
equipment, and materials
support of the incident.
necessary to support the response
effort.
Finance/
Responsible for all financial and
Responsible for financial
Administration
cost analysis aspects of the
activities and administrative
incident, and for any
aspects not assigned to the other
administrative aspects not
functions.
handled by the other functions.
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 3
III. Role and Responsibilities of an Executive to support SEMS
Recent events in California have clearly demonstrated that emergency management can
be a complex business. Resources needed to support incident operations may be costly to
operate or be in short supply. More and more incidents require multi -discipline
responses. Because of population growth and the spread of urban areas, more and more
incidents cross over jurisdictional boundaries and require a multi -jurisdictional approach
to both the response and the recovery efforts.
It is not uncommon even on small incidents to see a mix of several disciplines resources
and a mix of jurisdictions, all of which must immediately be working together in a
cooperative mode.
Emergencies also have increasing public visibility and scrutiny. Media driven interest in
emergencies, coupled with sophisticated coverage capabilities, creates an environment
that demands immediate answers, and requires an effective response.
What is the role of the executive in Emergency Management? The organization
executive must assure that there is adequate support for planning, training and policy
direction.
A. Planning
The organization executive should provide the support and resources necessary to ensure
that the organization has put into effect adequate planning and preparedness measures.
These would include taking necessary pre -emergency mitigation measures to reduce the
hazards or level of risk exposure. The cost of taking mitigation measures can easily pay
for itself by subsequent reduction in loss, and in some cases major reductions in the cost
ofresponse.
B. Training
The organization executive should strongly support training programs and exercises
which will bring and keep both the EOC and field response organization at a high level of
operational readiness. This is a difficult challenge, as the time expended in training and
the results of training are not always evident or visible to others until an emergency
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 4
occurs. However today's multi -agency incidents demand that there be a trained and
coordinated response. The executive should encourage training which is multi -discipline
and multi -agency whenever possible.
C. Policy Direction
When an emergency does occur, the organization executive has an obligation to ensure
that field Incident Commanders (ICs) and the EOC Manager have clear policy direction.
At the field level, the Incident Commander will need to formulate objectives for his/her
incident, determine the strategies that should be used to mitigate the emergency. The
field IC must know the policies of the organization, the limits of authority which have
been delegated, and any political, environmental or financial constraints that may affect
response activities.
Often incidents which are multi -agency may be run under a Unified Command structure
in which your Incident Commander will work cooperatively with other jurisdictional ICs
to establish a set of common objectives and strategies for an incident. It is essential that
your Incident Commanders be clear on the jurisdictional authority that they have when
involved in a Unified Command. Similarly, your EOC manager must have the necessary
authority to provide the management leadership in the EOC.
IV. Role of the Executive related to EOC Directors and field Incident
Commanders
Your organization's Emergency Operations Center if activated will, be a central
coordination point and authority for your organization at the time of an emergency.
Depending upon your policy and/or your role, you:
• may function within the EOC
• may visit the EOC from time to time
• may rely on the EOC director to provide you with information
• may also, be in a position to be giving the EOC director overall policy direction
The Incident Command System which is the field level emergency management system is
designed to integrate multiple disciplines and multi -jurisdictional resources at the scene
of an emergency. The same primary functions that exist at the incident, i.e., Command or
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 5
Management, Operations, Planning/Intelligence, Logistics and Finance/Administration
are also used at all emergency operations. centers.
EOC directors and/or Incident Commanders may, depending upon your position, report
directly to you. If this is the case, you will need to ensure that your EOC directors and
Incident Commanders:
• Are properly trained and qualified
• Have (or have access to) sufficient resources to accomplish the objectives
of their action plans
• Know the organization's policies, understand any constraints or
limitations, and are properly empowered to operate
• Are given the latitude to exercise management authority in the EOC or at
the incident
V. SEMS Guidelines and Training Programs
A comprehensive set of guidelines have been developed to help agencies and
jurisdictions implement SEMS. Guidelines include:
1. A general SEMS system description
2. Guidelines for planning and developing SEMS at all organizational levels
3. Supporting documents to include a SEMS Maintenance System, Position
descriptions and checklists, action planning guidelines and after action reports.
Four approved courses of instruction have been developed for use in SEMS. They are
described in the following table.
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 6
QUESTIONS OFTEN ASKED ABOUT SEMS
The following are questions and answers related to the development, implementation, use
and compliance with SEMS.
1. How is it determined what is a "local response agency" under SEMS?
(Proposed Response) The definition in regulation is quite broad, stating that an
emergency response agency is any agency responding to an emergency or providing
mutual aid support to such an organization whether in the field, at the scene of an
incident, or to an operations center. In practical terms, if an agency routinely responds
personnel and equipment to the scene of incidents, and there is interaction with other
response agencies at the scene, then that agency should be trained in SEMS. Many
agencies become involved in emergency response in disaster situations. The SEMS
Guidelines list examples of emergency response agencies under SEMS.
2. What steps will the state take to assist agencies and local governments in
implementing SEMS?
(Proposed Response) The State has prepared extensive guidance and training materials
to assist agencies and organizations in implementing SEMS. The guidance spells out in
detail how SEMS is expected to function at each organizational level. It also provides
guidance on using and maintaining SEMS. The state also plans to support a SEMS
Maintenance System with advisory groups representing local and state agencies. The
SEMS Maintenance System will resolve issues that may arise in implementing SEMS, and
develop further guidance and training materials as needed.
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 7
3. Is there any funding available to support organizations in implementing
SEMS?
(Proposed Response) The legislature only provided start-up funds to develop guidance
and training materials. No funds were allocated by the legislature for support to
implementation of SEMS for either state agencies, counties or local governments.
4. How will a jurisdictions participation in the EMA program be tied into
SEMS?
(Proposed Response) EMA requirements are separate from, but consistent with SEMS.
EMA jurisdictions are expected to comply with SEMS as well as with any additional
requirements for EMA funding.
5. How will the OES multi -hazard functional planning process be integrated
into SEMS? Do we have to rewrite our plans? If so by when?
(Proposed Response) Part of the SEMS guidance covers the initial integration of MHFP
functions into SEMS. At a later time OES will issue more detailed planning guidance to
jurisdictions covering a fuller integration of the MHFP into SEMS. No time lfmitfor
accomplishing this has been established.
6. What is the state's position regarding very large organizations with extensive
field response units that cannot adequately train all personnel by the
December 1996 statutory deadline for using SEMS?
(Proposed Response) Because of the multi jurisdictional aspects of SEMS response
operations, it is important that all jurisdictions move forward in a timely fashion.
However, it is realized that larger organizations will take longer than the smaller ones.
If individual agencies or jurisdictions cannot meet the time requirement for full
implementation of SEMS, they should contact their OES Regional Administrator and
work with OES on a case-by-case basis.
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 8
7. What kinds of training material and or state personnel support is available to
help in implementing SEMS? When will training materials be available, and
is there a cost to obtain SEMS guidance and training materials? Can we
develop/use our own training programs?
(Proposed Response) A major part of the state's efforts toward implementing SEMS has
been the development of SEMS training materials. Four courses of instruction have been
developed. There are over 30 modules of instructional material available in the four
courses which can be used in a variety of ways. The courses include a general
orientation to SEMS, afield SEMS course, courses for four levels of EOCs, and a SEMS
Executive level course. OES region staffs have received SEMS training, and will assist
jurisdictions in SEMS orientations and in obtaining guidance and training materials.
SEMS guidance and training material will be provided to all jurisdictions as soon as it is
available which is expected to be in the first quarter of 1995. The SEMS Training and
Guidelines Working Group is examining various ways to make training materials
available. If there is any charge because of the size or make up of the training materials;
it would be on a cost recovery basis.
There is no requirement for agencies or organizations to use the SEMS training
materials. However, the SEMS training courses represent a comprehensive overview of
all aspects of SEMS. The courses define the minimum training competencies that
emergency response personnel must maintain under SEMS. Organizations are strongly
encouraged to use the state approved SEMS training materials.
8. Will CSTI offer SEMS training at San Luis Obispo and at field locations? If
so when?
(Proposed Response) CM is planning to provide SEMS training, and will be revising
their course schedules accordingly. Also other state agencies are planning to provide
SEMS training courses. Some of the training will be at MY or other state agency
training facilities and some will be conducted infield locations. A schedule of available
SEMS training courses will be prepared early in 1995.
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 9
9. How and who will determine if my. agency or organization is in compliance
with SEMS?
(Proposed Response) The Director of OES is responsible for determining compliance.
Compliance regulations are being developed and must be finalized by December 1995. It
is anticipated that applicants for reimbursement of response related personnel costs will
be required to certify their compliance with SEMS. OES may review whether the agency
has met SEMS planning and training requirements as well as its use of SEMS during the
emergency. Agencies should maintain documentation of their compliance with SEil1S.
10. If an organization does not comply with SEMS, will the state actually deny
claims for payment of personnel -related disaster response costs?
(Proposed Response) The state would examine each situation on its own merits to
determine the causes for non-compliance.
11. If my organization has attempted to comply with SEMS yet did not
effectively respond to a major emergency, will we be considered out of
compliance and personnel reimbursements be denied?
(Proposed Response) This would depend on the reasons why the response was not
effective. Compliance is accomplished by including SEMS in plans, training and
exercising response personnel in SEMS, and using SEMS in the response. If a
jurisdiction can demonstrate their efforts to implement SEMS were done in a professional
manner then it would be difficult to deny claims.
12. Will federal reimbursements to local governments be affected in any way
because of failure of an organization to comply with the use of SEMS?
(Proposed Response) At this time, there is no relationship or connection in SEMS to
federal reimbursement policy.
SEMS Executive Course
Student Reference Manual, page 10