HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-03-11 - AGENDA REPORTS - PROTEST HEARING SECO CANYON (2)PUBLIC HEARING
DATE:
March 11, 1997
O UMPTHIMM
City Mana
Item to be
SUBJECT: PROTEST HEARING: DETERMINE IF SUFFICIENT PROTEST EXISTS
AND MAKE FINDINGS ON WRITTEN PROTEST AND APPROVE AND
ORDER ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03 (SECO CANYON)
RESOLUTION NO. 97-19
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
The purpose of a protest hearing is to offer property owners and registered voters within an area
proposed for annexation, a final opportunity to protest the annexation. This annexation is
termed an "inhabited" annexation, meaning that 12 or more registered voters reside within its
boundary. Therefore, by State law, the City Council must, approve the annexation unless (1)
written protests are received by 15% or more of the area property owners, who also must own
at least 16% of the assessed valuation of the property proposed for annexation, or (2) if the
number of protests range between 15% and less than 50%, an election must be held, or (3) if the
percentage of opposition of either group is greater than 50%, the City Council must deny the
annexation. In this event, a minimum of one year must lapse before the annexation could
resume.
The action before the Council is a resolution to approve findings on written protests and to
approve and order Annexation No. 1992-03 (Seco Canyon). The annexation consists of
approximately 427 acres of inhabited land located in the Saugus area, north of Copper Hill Drive
and east and west of Seco Canyon Road.
This annexation was initiated in 1992 by area residents seeking the benefits, representation,
and services of cityhood. In addition, the City wished to form a more logical City boundary. The
City Council adopted a Resolution of Application (No. 96-94) for this proposal on June 25, 1996,
requesting that the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) initiate annexation
proceedings.
The attached resolution states the direction given to Council by the LAFCO to proceed with a
duly noticed public hearing and sets forth the reasons for the annexation and the terms and
conditions established for the annexation by the LAFCO. If the annexation proceeds .as
scheduled, it will be complete within the next 10 days.
775Rgg Agenda Item: � �
Agenda Report
March 11, 1997
Page 2
1. Accept public testimony, close the public hearing and the protest period.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 97-19, making findings regarding written protest, or
3. If the hearing results in a sufficient number of written protests, continue the hearing
to a date certain to take appropriate action.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 97-19 (map included)
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA OF.425.78 ACRES OF
INHABITED TERRITORY IDENTIFIED AS ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03 ,
SECO CANYON ANNEXATION, LOCATED IN NORTH OF SECO CANYON ROAD
AND EAST AND WEST OF COPPER HILL DRIVE
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
Pursuant to Section 57025 of the Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita will
hold a Public Hearing to consider annexation to the City of Santa Clarita that inhabited territory
identified as Annexation No. 1992-03. The purpose of the hearing will be to receive and consider written
protest from registered voters and/or owners of land within the proposed annexation area.
The hearing will be held by the City Council in the City Hall Chambers, located at 23920 Valencia
Boulevard, First Floor, Santa Clarita, California, at or after 6:30 p.m. on March 11, 1997. Proponents,
opponents, and any interested persons may appear and be heard on this matter at that time.
Proceedings for the referenced proposal were initiated by the City of Santa Clarita and submitted
to the Local Agency Formation Commission for Los Angeles County on May 20, 1996.
The proposal shall be subject to all terms and conditions as specified by Resolution No. 1997-07,
adopted on February 12, 1997, by the Local, Agency Formation Commission for Los Angeles
County and reference is hereby made to said resolution for a full and complete description of the
annexation and the terms and conditions.
The reasons for the proposed annexation are to respond to property owners' requests for
municipal services from the City of Santa Clarita, for local government representation and review,
to promote sound planning and land use in the area, and to annex property within the City's
Sphere of Influence as amended by the Local Agency Formation Commission on February 12,
1997.
Any owner of land located within the territory, and/or registered voter residing within the
territory, who wishes to file a written protest against Annexation No. 1992-03 must do so by
Written Communication filed with the City Clerk, which must be filed at any time prior to the
conclusion of this hearing at the hour speed in this notice for commencement of the hearing.
Each written protest must state whether it is made by a landowner or registered voter residing
in the area and must indicate the name and address of the owner of land affected and the street
address or other description sufficient to identify the location of the land.
If you wish to challenge this matter in court, you may be limited to raising those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the
City Council, at or prior to the public hearing.
The proposal may be reviewed by the public at the City of Santa Clarita Department of Community
Development prior to the Public Hearing of March 11, 1997. For more information contact Michael
Rubin, Associate Planner, at (805) 255-4330.
By order of the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita, County of Los Angeles, State of California.
Sharon L. Dawson, CMC
City Clerk
City of Santa Clarita
sAcd\annex\923ntcpr.mar
Dated: February 18, 1997
Publish Date: February 24, 1997
Public Hearin' Procedure
♦ Mayor opens public hearing and states purpose of hearing
♦ City Clerk reports on hearing notice
♦ Staff report is presented
♦ Proponent Argument (30 minutes)
♦ Opponent Argument (30 minutes)
♦ Five - minute rebuttal by the Proponent
♦ Mayor closes the public testimony
♦ Discussion by City Council
♦ Council decision and vote
♦ Mayor announces decision
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION 1992-03
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Revised Description
Approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission
Beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly prolongation of that certain course
having a bearing and length of South 370 02' 32" East 770.90 feet in the westerly
boundary of Parcel 1 of Certificate of Compliance, recorded as Instrument No. 96-594914
of Official Records in the office of the Recorder of the County of Los Angeles and the
proposed center line of Copper Hill Drive (which lies within San Francisquito Canyon
Road) as said center line is shown on County Surveyor's Map No. B-5479, in the office of
the County Engineer of said County, said intersection being a point in the boundary of the
City of Santa Clarita as same existed on April 16, 1996; thence northwesterly along said
prolongation a distance of 34 feet to the northerly line of said San Francisquito Canyon
Road; thence North 370 02' 32" East 770.90 feet along said certain course to the
northwesterly terminus thereof, thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel 1 the
following described courses: North 78° 25' 19" West, 128.16 feet, North 370 02'32" West
153.10 feet; North 520 53' 03" East; 84.72 feet, North 270 53'22" East 94.15 feet, North
710 51' 47" East 144.97 feet, North 440 19'20" East 65.49 feet, North 250 05'49" East
89.36 feet, North 200 00' 19" West 64.03 feet, North 78° 13' 34" East 68.07 feet, North
61 ° 31'51" East 130.74 feet, South 000 07' 04" West 105.12 feet, North 760 15'51" East
202.87 feet, South 130 44' 09" East 20.00 feet, South 760 15' 51" West 200.66 feet,
South 410 34'04" East 37.35 feet, South 150 01'33" East 21.11 feet, North 71 " 51'47"
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION 1992-03
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Page 2
East 381.04 feet to the northeasterly line of Rancho San Francisco as shown on map filed
in Book 1, pages 521 and 522 of Patents, in the office of said Recorder; thence along said
northeasterly line South 330 49' 39" East 155.60 feet to an angle point in the westerly
boundary of Tract No. 43753, recorded in Book 1073, pages 1 through 33, of Maps, in the
office of said Recorder; thence North 000 16' 52" East 1241:45 feet along the westerly line
of said tract to the southwesterly corner of Tract No. 45137, recorded in Book 1094, pages
9 through 69 of said Maps; thence along the boundary of said last mentioned tract the
following described courses: N 000 27' 11" W 2768.20 feet, N 890 20' 12" E 1316.29 feet,
N 00° 13' 42" W 687.13 feet, N 890 32'57" E 1318.94 feet, N 89° 33'04" E 1104.38 feet,
S 18° 15'26" West 277.23 feet, southwesterly along a tangent curve concave easterly and
having a radius of 229.05 feet through a central angle of 210 38' 38" an arc distance of
86.53 feet, S 030 23' 12" E 1519.17 feet, southwesterly along a tangent curve concave
easterly and having a radius of 229.05 feet, a central angle of 020 55' 53" an arc distance
of 11.72 feet, S 060 19' 05" E 1518.70 feet and S 88° 27' 55" W 1268.41 feet to the
northeasterly corner of said Tract No. 43753; thence South 00° 32'55" West 2196.19 feet
along the easterly line of said Tract No. 43753 and its southerly prolongation to the center
line of Copper Hill Drive as said center line is shown on said last mentioned map; thence
westerly along said boundary of the City of Santa Clarita and following the same in all its
various courses and curves to the point of beginning.
Containing: 427.01 acres
0.667 sq. mi.
CHS:jds
CAdocumenNegasc92-03.Id
(2-12-97)
ANNEXATION 1992-03
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
EXHIBIT ."B"
RESOLUTION NO. 97-19
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA,
MAKING FINDINGS THAT INSUFFICIENT WRITTEN PROTESTS
HAVE BEEN FILED AND APPROVING AND
ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS
"ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03 (SECO CANYON)"
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Los Angeles
adopted its resolution, making determinations and approving the proposed annexation to the
City of Santa Clarita of territory described in Exhibit A and mapped in Exhibit B attached
hereto and by this reference incorporated; and
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Los Angeles has
directed the City of Santa Clarita to proceed with the annexation following a duly noticed public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set Tuesday, March 11, 1997, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., 1st Floor, Santa Clarita, California, as the
date, time, and place for said hearing on the proposed annexation and the property owners in
the said territory were duly informed of their right to file a written protest against the
annexation with the City Clerk at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing on the
proposed annexation; and
WHEREAS, the reason for this annexation is to promote sound planning and land use
practices in the affected territory; and
WHEREAS, the regular County assessment roll is utilized; and
WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing bond indebtedness of the
City of Santa Clarita; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was duly and regularly conducted by and before the City
Council at its meeting of March 11, 1997.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita,
California, as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares said territory is found to be inhabited and
a legal description of the boundaries of the annexation is set forth in Exhibit A and a map of the
boundaries is set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made apart hereof.
SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 57075.5 of the Government Code, it is hereby
found that written protests, if any, have been filed and not withdrawn by less than 15% of the
property owners owning less than 15% of the total assessed value of land within the territory.
Resolution No. 97-19
page 2
SECTION 3. The Local Agency Formation Commission approved this proposed
annexation subject to the following condition: The affected territory is withdrawn from County
Road District No. 5.
SECTION 4. The City Council hereby orders the territory described in Exhibits A and
B annexed and directs the City Clerk to transmit eight (8) certified copies of this resolution with
applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the Executive Officer of
the Local Agency Formation Commission of Los Angeles County.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and certify
this record to be a full, true, correct copy of the action taken.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of
, 1997.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Resolution No. 97-19
page 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Sharon Dawson, City Clerk, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Resolution
was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita at a regular meeting thereof,
held on the day of 1997 by the following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
City Clerk
s:\cd\annex\923reoa.m r
EXHIBIT "A"
DESCRIPTION OF ANNEXATION 1992-03
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Revised Description
Approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission
Beginning at the intersection of the southeasterly prolongation of that certain
course having a bearing and length of South 37° 02' 32" East 770.90 feet in the westerly
boundary of Parcel 1 of Certificate of Compliance, recorded as Instrument No. 96-594914
of Official Records in the office of the Recorder of the County of Los Angeles and the
proposed center line of Copper Hill Drive (which lies within San Francisquito Canyon
Road) as said center line is shown on County Surveyor's Map No. B-5479, in the office of
the County Engineer of said County, said intersection being a point in the boundary of the
City of Santa Clarita as same existed on April 16, 1996; thence northwesterly along said
prolongation a distance of 34 feet to the northerly line of said San Francisquito Canyon
Road; thence North 37° 02' 32" East 770.90 feet along said certain course to the
northwesterly terminus thereof. thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel 1 the
following described courses: North 78° 25' 19" West, 128.16 feet, North 37° 02' 32"
West 153.10 feet; North 52° 53' 03" East, 84.72 feet, North 270 53' 22" East 94.15 feet,
North 71° 51' 47" East 144.97 feet, North 440 19' 20" East 65.49 feet, North 250 05' 49"
East 89.36 feet, North 20° 00' 19" West 64.03 feet, North 780 13' 34" East 68.07 feet,
North 61° 31' 51" East 130.74 feet, South 000 07' 04" West 105.12 feet, North 760 15'
51" East 202.87 feet, South 13° 44' 09" East 20.00 feet, South 760 15' 51" West 200.66
feet, South 41° 34' 04" East 37.35 feet, South 15° 01' 33" East 21.11 feet, North 710 51'
47" East 381.04 feet to the northeasterly line of Rancho San Francisco as shown on map
filed in Book 1, pages 521 and 522 of Patents, in the office of said Recorder; thence along
said northeasterly line South 33° 49' 39" East 155.60 feet to an angle point in the westerly
boundary of Tract No. 43753, recorded in book 1073, pages 1 through 33, of Maps, in the
office of said Recorder, thence North 000 16' 52" East 1,241.45 feet along the westerly
line of said tract to the southwesterly corner of Tract No. 45137, recorded in Book 1094,
pages 9 through 69 of said Maps; thence along the boundary of said last mentioned tract
the following described courses: North 000 27' 11" West 2,139.60, to a point on the
boundary line of Parcel 1 of Certificate of Compliance No. 100-691 recorded as
Instrument No. 90-1099681 of Official Records in the Office of the Recorder of said
County, North 89° 32' 49" East 126.56 feet, North 430 57' 49" East 414.07 feet, North
23° 41' 29" West 171.50 feet, North 210 41'49" East 36.69 feet; North 81° 00' 55" East
240.44 feet, South 830 28' 59" East 142.75 feet, South 76' 43' 04" East 118.81 feet,
North 310 02' 23" East 75.06 feet, North 57° 49' 23" East 31.34 feet, North 87° 00' 07"
East 29.94 feet, South 670 09' 18" East 33.94 feet, North 540 38" 29" East 29.25 feet,
North 11° 38' 12" East 71.35 feet, to a point on the northerly boundary line of said Tract
No. 45137 North 890 20' 12" East 292.99 feet, to a point on the westerly boundary of
said Tract No. 45137, North 00° 13' 42" West 519.60 feet to a point on the southerly line
of said Parcel 1 of Certificate of Compliance No. 100.691 recorded as Instrument No. 90-
1099681 of Official Records thence along said southerly line, North 760 47' 06" East
245.10 feet, South 84° 09' 47" East 59.61 feet, South 510 34' 07" East 137.92 feet, North
360 56' 19" East 22.78 feet North 09° 33' 34" East 76.51 feet, thence leaving said
southerly line, South 340 41' 10" East 110.22 feet, South 440 13' 30" East 102.12 feet,
North 47° 00' 07" East 31.65 feet, South 690 02' 22" West, 53.21 feet, South 480 00' 58"
East 34.57 feet, South 390 13' 35" East, 48.45 feet to a point on the northerly Right of
Way of Startree Lane (60 foot wide) said point being on a curve concave to the southeast
and having a radius of 380 feet, thence easterly along the said northerly Right of Way
curve through a central angle of 14° 30' 54" an arc distance of 96.26 feet, North 66 02'
22" East 17.44 feet to a point on the centerline of Raintree Lane, thence along said
centerline North 24° 17' 00" West 8.42 feet, North 65° 47' 11" East 123.42 feet to a
point on a non tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 400.00 feet through a
central angle of 15° 50' 15" an arc distance of 110.56 feet, North 04° 32' 48" West
116.00 feet to a point on the southerly line of the northwest quarter of Section 35,
Township 5 North, Range 16 West, S.B.M. thence, North 89° 32' 57" East along said
southerly line 448.62 feet, North 890 33' 04" East 1,104.38 feet, South 18° 15' 26" West
277.23 feet, southwesterly along a tangent curve concave easterly and having a radius of
229.05 feet through a central angle of 21° 38' 38" an arc distance of 86.53 feet, South 03°
23' 12" East 1,519.17 feet, southwesterly along a tangent curve concave easterly and
having a radius of 229.05 feet, a central angle of 02° 55' 53" an arc distance of 11.72 feet,
South 06° 19' 05" East 1,518.70 feet and South 88° 27' 55" West 1,264.51 feet to the
northeasterly comer of said Tract No. 43753; thence South 00° 32' 55" West 2,195.85
feet along the easterly line of said Tract No. 43753 and its southerly prolongation to the
center line of Copper Hill Drive as said center line is shown on said last mentioned map;
thence westerly along said boundary of the City of Santa Clarita and following the same in
all its various courses and curves to the point of beginning.
Containing: 415.24 acres.
N69°32'57"E .. N89°3'04" N18°15'Bfi'E
SEE DETAIL 1318.94 1318.86 27T.23'
ON SHEET 2 r-----;
I
N00°1392"W �`�rl/ a 0=21°38'38'
g R=229.05'
68713' 4� L=86.53'
I N89°2012"�IN A V'
O
C N Y '03-25 12' W
y.ApQ' C j, W 1519.17
� u 6
P n
.O .o WW � W,
CYPRE56 PL. 0 A=02°5553"
$T 2 R=229.05'
L ON 1j 211.72'
C� i POP4PR ST i
JVP
°j 3' 1 MOREL PL• 1,106°1905'W
F
DI xTe is l9•w1]P.0 3 H 1518.70'
Dl NlT 4733•W 131.10
N N]l 5J]2•E U.16 N
05 N71 51-17-E 111.97
N Nu 19'90-E 65.19
0 D7 NU 05.40•E goal z
D' N]°°J19•W 61.Oa
D9 N761a'a1•E 66.02
010 Na n'u•e 150.71 ¢ H N88°27 SS 1264.31
011 SN 07.01•W 14$12 $j
DI! N76 lo ]01.P -�
DIl s1311m•E tam i z
D
0 u 6 916 n'S1•w 9m
sa a1 o.•P rzla ti 0
016 H71511 -11•P 2111 W O U Cf
Du NTI 51'11•E 28l w' 'N 4 ¢ F M LAY •N1
DI6 E]11Ya9'E 1550 U O w T'(, °2 AASH COURT
g W C7, C �i B FIR COURT
N C ACACIA COURT
z Al Al u a oe DASPEN COURT
SEE DETAILz y- E PEACH COURT
BELOW FL P BUCKEYE COURT
000RALWAY
u
H WHITE PINE PLACE Q M J MANDARIN LANE J
a e
a 8
N3�0 r Z
4, 32e
�
OF SANTA CLARITA
I dTN — — 1
WELT
n
LEGEND: D8 D9 DID o11RANCH054N
/���/��// D12 FflANCISCO
ANNEXATION BDRY. DI3 $
EXIST. CITY BDRY. _ __ _ D7 D13 D14
OS D6 DI6 017
Da
03 Die
DETAIL
� 1"= zoo'
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
CHECKED BY: SCALE: . TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
I11 800'
AREA: A.M.& H.N.M.
41.5.24AC. 3244-27,32, 282 H125
M-74,84-98,107 279 H 125
FILED WITH THE COUNTY RECORD SHT I OF2
al
-..^_ N 0027'11' W
-- —
628.60'
f.
'N�
�cmp
m
N
m�Fn
4
Q¢ J
r
l t
S (y
5
10
O�L
A
gr
F
N
I
i
�
N
n
N
l%p
au'_3t
y�2,3
u
Lm
m�8
Oma9
�4aN
N4�
y
4
I
Abp
n
1 N
-M-y�
CURVE TABLE
6 Rn ft GN TMGENT 7w
1 360.00 98.27 48.39 14'30 S♦
1 C2 400.00 0.57 55.5. 15'S01
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
CHECKED BY: SCALE:
1"=300'
AREA: A.M.B. H.N.M.
415.24 A.C. 3244-27,32 292 H125
FILED WITH THE COUNTY RECORD
9°'§P
o a
>,BRP
ig�"-
5N
ji8q
r
ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
SHEET 2 OF 2 OF 22
SEE DETAIL /
ON SHEET 2
N00013'42"W
68713
1 N89020'12"E I
I
P 2
4p,
4P P
N 890 32'57"E
1318.92
C
O
N
N
DI N7825'19'W 125.16
D2 N 37 0722' W 153.10 —
03 N 52 S7 03' E 61.72 •,�
DI N21 6722•E 91.15 N'
DS N 71 51'47 E 111.97
D6 N 11 19'20 E 65.19
D7 N 25 05' /9' E 69.56 z
D8 N 20 00' 19' W 61.05
D9 N 7813' 3/' E 66.07 /
D10 N6131. 51'E 150.11 l`
DII Soo Oro/•W 10512 r
Dig N76 I5'SI'E 202.67 -�
DIS S1311'09'E 20.00
D1l S7615'51'W 200.66 V
D15 5U 34'a•E 37.35 fy
DI6 SIS 0I'33•E 2111 w
D17 N7151'17'E 381." eN
DIB S331939'E 15560 N
•gip
S
z
SEE. DETAIL
BELOW
KIP
♦_ •9..J /F0.8.
O
U
N 890 31.04"
1318.86 `
J
a_
w
a
aJ
wa
a
F CLANI1n
• 1TY OF
v
I
N'ELY LINI
LEGEND: 08 D9 DID DN RANCHO!
ANNEXATION BDRY. ������ �D12 FRANCIS,
EXIST. CITY BDRY. — _ _ _ D7 DI
DI6
D5 06
04
D3
n
'N 18015'86"E
277.23'
�= 21038' 38"
R=229.05'
L- 86.53'
N 03o 2312"W
1519.17
229.05
11.72'
N06019 05"W
1518.70'
C
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
CHECKED BY: SCALE-.
1i1 = 800'
AREA: A.M.B. H.N.M.
141.5.24AC. 13244-27,32, 282 H125
70-74,84-98,10 279 H 125
FILED WITH THE COUNTY RECORE
a
DETAIL
1"= Zoo'
D14
D17
All
0
ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
P,
NN
w
N
N
z
SHT I OF2
ASH COURT
N
B FIR COURT
�
N
C ACACIA COURT
Q'
D ASPEN COURT
E PEACH COURT
.��'�
F BUCKEYE COURT
Q'
'n
C CORALWAY
"a
H WHITE PINE PLACE
M
1 MANDARIN LANE
o
11
nn
F CLANI1n
• 1TY OF
v
I
N'ELY LINI
LEGEND: 08 D9 DID DN RANCHO!
ANNEXATION BDRY. ������ �D12 FRANCIS,
EXIST. CITY BDRY. — _ _ _ D7 DI
DI6
D5 06
04
D3
n
'N 18015'86"E
277.23'
�= 21038' 38"
R=229.05'
L- 86.53'
N 03o 2312"W
1519.17
229.05
11.72'
N06019 05"W
1518.70'
C
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
CHECKED BY: SCALE-.
1i1 = 800'
AREA: A.M.B. H.N.M.
141.5.24AC. 13244-27,32, 282 H125
70-74,84-98,10 279 H 125
FILED WITH THE COUNTY RECORE
a
DETAIL
1"= Zoo'
D14
D17
All
0
ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
P,
NN
w
N
N
z
SHT I OF2
EXHIBIT "B"
T- N 0027'11' W
628.60'
i(
V a
ul
V%
Ne-om. A
o �<
G1I? �y
.pomoQ.
LASS
QA
No• .
r,
LNE
I DIRECTION
- DISTANCE
L1
N 89'32 49
E
126.55
L2
N 43'57 49
E
414.07
W
N 23'41'29'
W
171.50
L4
N 21'41 49
E
36.69
L5
N 81'00 55
E
240.44
L6
N 83'28'59'
W142.75
L7
N 76'4J 04
W
118.81
L8
N 31102 23
E
75.06
L9
N 5749 43
E
31.34
L10
N 87'0007
E
29.94
01
N 67'0918
W
33.94
L12
N4'3829
E
29.25
L13
N 11'3812
E
71.35
Li4
N76'4706
E
245.10
L15
N 84'09 47
W
59.81
L16
N 51'34 07
W
137.92
L17
N 36'5619
E
22.78
L18
N09'3334
E
76.51
L19
N 34'4110
W
110.22
L20
N 44'1J 30
W
102.12
L21
N 47'0007
E
31.65
L22
N 69'02'22"
W
53.21
L23
E48'00'58"
W
34.57
L24
N 3913'35-
W
48.45
L25
N 66'02"22'
E
17.44
L26
N 24'1700
W
8.42
L27
N 65'47 11
E
123.42
L28
N 04'32 48
W
116.00
e
Z
m
ro
0
m
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
CHECKED BY: SCALE: TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
11'=300,
AREA: A.M.B. H.N.M.
415.24 A.C. 3244-27,32 282 H125
FILED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER
J,\PRGJ\95017001\ANNEX.DWG MID' 03/11/97 16,48
SHEET 2 OF 21
1
N
_
K
C
o
zlwo
�
O N
\I
m
nl
r
m\
KA
e
Z
m
ro
0
m
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
CHECKED BY: SCALE: TO THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
11'=300,
AREA: A.M.B. H.N.M.
415.24 A.C. 3244-27,32 282 H125
FILED WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER
J,\PRGJ\95017001\ANNEX.DWG MID' 03/11/97 16,48
SHEET 2 OF 21
-4(o
March 11, 1997
To: Honorable Smyth and City Council Members: Mrs. Heidt, Ms. Klajic, Mr. Boyer,
and Mrs. Darcy
Now that we are on the cusp of becoming residents of the City of Santa Clarita,
we would like to bring to your attention a matter of great urgency to our
community. Since Mountainview Elementary School opened in April of 1996, we
haveexperienced severe speeding problems on Cypress Place, the main access to
our school and the road that crosses over the California Aqueduct.
Because of the impending annexation, the residents of that street have been
unsuccessful in their endeavor to get the County to put speed bumps in. We
have had some success with the speed bumps already in place on Tamarack Lane
and feel that this is the solution to our problem. Approximately 100 children walk
up and down Cypress every day as they travel to and from school and we believe
that it is only a matter of time before disaster strikes.
As the surrounding areas develop, specifically, the Davidon tract at Copperhill and
Haskell, which has entered its 2nd phase, and since an additional access road to
the school from Copperhill does not have to be completed for approximately 2
years, our residential streets are going to bear the burden of all of this traffic,
thereby exacerbating the problem.
We urge the City Council to direct staff to revisit the idea of speed bumps and to
continue to work with the residents of our community until such time as a
solution to the problem is reached and in place. We look forward to a new
relationship with Council members and City Staff and would appreciate immediate
action on this matter. We hope you agree that endangering the life of one child is
unacceptable. Endangering the lives of hundreds is negligent and we cannot stand
by silently waiting for tragedy to rock our community.
Thank you.
3/1,197
We, the undersigned support the attached letter, dated March 11, 1997
regarding the traffic problems in our community and join in urging City Council to
take action.
Name
6.tr>�-
Address
,3119 d Td Mn.rdCr 1-0 .
Signature
c
c.S2 y�,1
-L VJ-
a'n/ R -r AM,
—
7. � LAp y ks zz7 0 W,
e. Dcv. �ee�ner �J-Iti ��ral til:../
10,
11. C'Ak� ASct/_0 Zr737 ,SrnrTrP� t1�'
12. AMAlmy L. hao, -28)'3'2 Stdrtref-
13, ekeVV)ance e\ACK 1%b /T(!-acher
14. met
15, �JCY rtt�v 7 028775
16. +`6 g �IZI i,r6 caC L,
5/41&-
2. C
3.�\?
4,
�
j�iGinO
5.��
6.tr>�-
Address
,3119 d Td Mn.rdCr 1-0 .
Signature
c
c.S2 y�,1
-L VJ-
a'n/ R -r AM,
—
7. � LAp y ks zz7 0 W,
e. Dcv. �ee�ner �J-Iti ��ral til:../
10,
11. C'Ak� ASct/_0 Zr737 ,SrnrTrP� t1�'
12. AMAlmy L. hao, -28)'3'2 Stdrtref-
13, ekeVV)ance e\ACK 1%b /T(!-acher
14. met
15, �JCY rtt�v 7 028775
16. +`6 g �IZI i,r6 caC L,
5/41&-
17. 16[J71 N' %km��li��
S2,a8oeA c
18.
20. �l�ki �li��S Z��3Z��u� Pete Succus �cQ�. �XC�o
21. `iGift�166b}"-G!/ f5eO 226S-7 Pop(9r-%.
22.
24. �^JA,tires 2X& 2,3
25,
26,
Jn
27. \O(MIQ, GODV 3 a ni cvZ,), ttlpcb f�
28.
z9. L , � C/W l`� �Kl 2i�'� �`?\ �Z fti�Lf . �� u � S �Cf 13`SD
3 G` u
0.�
31. \i t��' .IJ�I S CC v ��e
3z. , , �'� .z�-suis ihcko� �'I• Sa-� '7'
33.
34,
35.
36.
0
ADDRESS
I/
NAME PRINT
ADDRESS_ 2 231-3 C y pec s s
j 4). �rS J. Sois�7
NAME PRINT SIG: ATIIRF
NAME PRINT SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
NAME PRINT
NAME PRINT SIGNATURE
ADDRESS a Q- 3 E/ O , . J'
NAME
am
ADDRESSLZ3Y j
NAME PRINT %EMC15�
LIZ- acK
NAME PRINT SIGRAtORE
ADDRESSc�3-5L+6 0.4- Ores -S. Sc uGi].�,e ` )-5sD
on!
NAME PRINT �fGNATURE
De -b l a Nkt?-
NAME PRINTl SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
J
ADDRESS�4j, C'fpr�eS_5 eL gn)Acflf c CA
NF .N4E PRINTI SIGNP TT�
0 s --(L Cc,K-J {p, c i? t� iat Z
NAME PRINT
_ . .SIGNATURE
ADDRESS-Vr SS CCAs
NAME PRINT AtATURE-
i ,a zs:E �
NAME PRINT SIGNATURE
GI3S
ADDRESS33S
NAME PRINT
vol / E LI� 16nJ 1
NAME PRINT
ADDRESS -2-2-4-:575 Gi
yTC�t� l
NAME PRf T SIGN , URE
M ary !�;j an k&rp(
NANM PRII,IT SI ..ATURE
ADDRESS Zf-7 � N S C',c.p C-L/A( C - Q ;79(,�O(o
ADDRESS
N11, M PRINT '� SIGNATURE
ADDRESS j9d:V CL119 G 7 6,461Z-613
6 `1,���
NANLE PRINT S D TI IRR
NAME PRINT
KfY
ADDRESS X25/2& c y,06/SS iL,
f JiAME PRINT SI-NATTJRE
NAME PRINT SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
NAME PRINT NA
L7�1 TV ltil �'J�� �il/3Pj/ %La GLv
NAI`IE PR.'I`IT SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
- � C,15
NPA IE PRI" SIGNAT
NAME PPINTT SIGNATURE
ADDRESS 2gi gh wv` Drjr, A,
NAN E PRINT SIGNATURE
-
NAME PRINT SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
NAA'IE PRINT SIGNATURE
NAME PRINT SIGNATURE
a
'790)
6 rr
CJS
397- Ii
i
i
lT7/; 1
Y -Cc
6 rr
CJS
397- Ii
We, the undersigned, support the attached letter, dated March 11, 1997
regarding the traffic problems in our community and join in urging City Council to
take action.
Name
5.T W�a
7. o L -e*
8.
9.
10,
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Address
Signature
-2181 s W. Donyan --- Jiurs Com✓ �-
Se.coQ� • �' moi, �o�i
27�b3 ?,iha�K 4AAEI SAu�us
,mac(( 7AmAP-ACK CMVE, SNquS
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
y
ADDRESS Z r% ��
CITY
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR. SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
NAME -5 f LL. LI e 0
ADDRESS 227(v3 J� f\ J ?- 2
CITY S c-- IO s �/cA 9 f 3 5 D
SIGNATURE 25�C
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
Al
CITY
SIGNATURE V �llUw J ' ` D�
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
CITY
SIGN
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
ADDRESS 2'b?3 (p 52 c -D GyA/ RJD
CITY 4SCA..0C-10S C Cf 1 ASO
SIGNATURE �TZ-,�— 6 ���
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
S
ADDRESS Z6 73 2 S
CITY . �-, , o t, C 13r . q13 �-o
611"Mr0114-!
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
L\A%VG
ADDRESS
CITY RC1.010 tf-:> , 6 CI c(1 5> 0
61K z: J:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
'fj A)167
CITY
SIGNATURE
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
23920 VALENCIA BLVD
SANTA CLARITA CA. 91355
PROTEST OF ANNEXATION NO. 1992-03
I HEREBY PROTEST THE ANNEXATION OF TRACT 1992-03 BY THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA DUE TO THE CITY'S LACK OF UNIFORM SPEED HUMP SPECIFICATIONS.
THE MOUNTAINVIEW DEVELOPMENT HAS LONG NEEDED SPEED CONTROL ON SECO
CANYON ROAD. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS BEEN INEFFECTIVE. A UNANIMOUS
PETITION FOR SPEED HUMPS ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD IS CURRENTLY UNDER
REVIEW WITH THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACT WOULD
VOID THAT PETITION. THE POSITION OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR SANTA CLARITA IS
THAT HE OPPOSES SPEED HUMPS OUTRIGHT AND WOULD NEVER APPROVE THEM
WITHIN CITY BOUNDARIES. THIS IS CLEARLY UNACCEPTABLE AS WE HAVE BEEN
LIVING WITH SPEEDING TRAFFIC FAR TOO LONG. WITH THE MAIN ROUTE TO
MOUNTAINVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ALONG SECO CANYON ROAD, ONE ONLY
WONDERS WHO'S CHILD WILL BE THE ONE TO BE HIT BY SPEEDING TRAFFIC,
PROMPTING REACTIVE MEASURES, RATHER THAN PROACTIVE ACTION.
Q/:wy