HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-03-11 - AGENDA REPORTS - RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (2)AGENDA REPORT C
Cot Manag r Approval
Item to be presented by:
Ken Pulskamp
PUBLIC HEARING
DATE: March 11, 1997
SUBJECT: RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 95-065
DEPARTMENT: Building and Engineering Services
On June 11, 1996, the City Council approved in concept the Newhall Downtown Revitalization
Plan. A major part of this program is the reconstruction of Railroad Avenue from San Fernando
Road south of 4th Street to San Fernando Road at.11th Street. On July 9,. 1996, Council
awarded the design contract to HDR Engineering, Inc.
Staff has held three community meetings with the business and property owners along Railroad
Avenue to inform the public about the proposed. project and to gain input from the public
relating to mitigating the effects of construction. The meetings were held on September 18,
1996, November 21, 1996, and March 6, 1997.
On February 25, 1997, staff presented the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project and the
Newhall Metrolink Station Project to the City Council. Staff identified various issues related
to the projects, and received direction from Council to meet with concerned property and
business owners and present the recommended action items to the City Council at its March 11,
1997 meeting (a copy of the February 25, 1997 agenda report and presentation are available in
the City Clerk's reading file).
Since receiving this direction from Council, staff has been meeting with the business and
property owners concerned. Staff presented this project to Council on February 25, 1997 to
advise Council of the need to take action on this project at the March 11, 1997 Council meeting.
However, as staff has not had time to adequately address the issues raised at that Council
meeting, it is recommended that the public hearing be continued to April 8, 1997. This will
allow more time for property acquisition negotiations prior to adopting Resolutions of Necessity
for Orders of Immediate Possession: Taking advantage of this additional time, staff will revise
the initial study to include -the Newhall Metrolink Station. The public review period for this
revised document will be until April 8, 1997. As this project remains on a tight schedule, staff
is requesting Council's authorizati to advertise this project to obtain bids.
nr�- 3 v
count
�0� - agenda Item:.
RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 95-065
March 11, 1997 - Page 2
It is important to note that the funding for the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project will expire
after January 1998. The Economic Development Administration (EDA) grant has been
submitted for final approval. The closing date to submit an EDA grant for final approval has
passed; therefore, the grant cannot be redirected to another project. The EDA funds would be
lost should the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project be canceled due to lack of time. The
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) of $2,257,715 must also be expended by January
1998. Should the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project be canceled, the CDBG grant would
immediately be reallocated to a different project.
ANALYSIS:
Staff identified several options for this project at the February 25, 1997 Council meeting, such
as construction of Railroad Avenue with a 75 -foot right-of-way, constructing Railroad Avenue
with an 85 -foot right-of-way, constructing a future Newhall Metrolink Station, and constructing
no project at all. Staff recommends that Council take action on the following project:
Railroad Avenue Improvement Project (85 -Foot Right -of -Way)
This project proposes to realign and widen Railroad Avenue from an existing 60 -foot
right-of-way width to 85 feet. It would provide two travel lanes, one two-way left -turn lane,
parking, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, and street lighting on the east and west sides of the
street.
The improvements on the east side of Railroad Avenue would accommodate service to a future
Newhall Metrolink Station. This project would also upgrade the Market Street railroad
crossing, interconnect the Market Street railroad crossing signals with the intersection of
San Fernando Road and Market Street, and relocate an existing spur track adjacent to Railroad
Avenue.
The approved plans and specifications will be ready for advertisement to obtain bids subsequent
to the March 11, 1997 City Council Meeting. Should a Newhall Metrolink Station be approved
in the future when funding for the station is secured, the combined investment in the downtown
Newhall area would total $7,132,750.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council:
1 Open and continue the public hearing to a date certain, April 8, 1997, at which time
additional information will be presented to Council for their review and action.
2. Authorize the advertising for bids for the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project.
3. Approve a change order to the existing design contract with HDR Engineering, Inc. in
the amount of $85,000.
RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 95-065
March 11, 1997 - Page 3
ATTACHMENTS
Notices of Hearing to Property Owners
Agreement No. 2 (Contract Change Order to design contract with HDR Engineering, Inc.)
February 25, 1997 Council Agenda Report and Presentation, Eminent Domain Summary, EIS
and Traffic Study - In Reading File in City Clerk's Office
BEJ:Sjf
muncil%a 395065.bej
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Phone
Suite 300
(805) 259.2489
Santa Clarita
Fax
California 91355.2196
(805) 259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Ms. Cecelia Melanson, Manager
Real Estate Services
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
1 Gate Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90012
APN NO. 2831-026-900, 901, 904 through 913 - Right -of -Way between 4th Street
and 11th Street
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A-1,
B-1, A-2 and B-2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public
street purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement
Project No. 95-065 and Newhall Metrolink Station ("Project").
The hearing willbe held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council c.m hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
. . . .•. a .• .•;.0
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
Anthony J. Ijii i
Director of 1 ' g & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Signature
en&vi%95-M\pubhrgnL"
Telephone
EXHIBIT A-1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT OF WAY, IN THE CITY OF
SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN
ON A MAP OF THE TOWN OF NEWHALL RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND
22 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE -INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF 4TH STREET WITH
THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF RAILROAD AVENUE, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY;
THENCE S 32015'53" E 298.40 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAN FERNANDO ROAD, SAID POINT BEING
THE WESTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE WHICH BEARS
"S62030'24"E 183.80"' AS SHOWN ON STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY MAP No. P4068-1-1, SAID POINT ALSO
BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE S 62018'45" E 27.96 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO A LINE WHICH'IS
PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT NORTHEASTERLY 14.00 FEET FROM THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF RAILROAD AVENUE;
THENCE N 32015'53" W 912.52 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE
BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 509.72 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY 119.60 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 13°26'36" TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF RAILROAD
AVENUE;
THENCE S 32015'53" E 1006.81 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT B-1
SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
® AREA - 113,715 SQUARE FEET
BATA SCALE 1* - 120'
A =1376'36'
R =509.72
L =119.60
EXISTING CA SPRR R/W _ _
m c 'S9'15•F3• r PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE R/W 91252' ~i of �I 'w' 'A-45 ..
r-�F-
('
L�J_LJ I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
LL1_I_L1_I_L1_I_L1J
ROAD
=i PROPOSED RAMPAD AVFNUE CENTERLINE _
I EXISTIRG RAI OAU' AV67OEZgATM=
r r-T-I-r-T-I-rZ-I-r-f 1
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
V I I I I I I�• I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
LL1_I_L.1_I_L1J_L1J
�i ;
r -a
i
EXHIBIT A-2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RIGHT OF WAY, IN THE.CITY OF
SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN
ON A MAP OF THE TOWN OF NEWHALL RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND
22 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY,- DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY CORNER OF BLOCK 9 OF SAID TOWN OF
NEWHALL;
THENCE N 57036'57" E 60.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK TO A POINT ON
THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF RAILROAD AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF
SAID TOWN OF NEWHALL;
THENCE S 32°21'59" E 731.68 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE
TO A POINT ON A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING
A RADIUS OF 509.72 FEET,. TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS
N 71°05136" E, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHERLY 119.74.FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 13027135" TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT
14.00 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID
RAILROAD AVENUE;
THENCE N 32021159" W 896.63 FEET ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO THE
BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1394.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY 158.10 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 06029148" TO THE BEGINNING OF A REVERSE CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A.RADIUS OF 1394.35 FEET;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY 11.38 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 00028'0311 TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF RAILROAD AVENUE; SAID LINE BEARS "N 57°31'45" E '5.00"' AS
SHOWN ON STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF
WAY MAP No. P4068-1-7, TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS
S 51036'16" W;
THENCE S 57°38101" W 3.80 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO AN
ANGLE POINT ON SAID LINE;
THENCE S 32021'59" E 1184.34 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY. LINE TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SANTA CLARITA — RAILROAD AVENUE
AREA = 15,452 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS
z
�
A Itr
+
Cy
,m
1� n
1 T
N5T38'01*E
CURVE DATA
A =0'28'03"
R =1394.35
L =11.38
N57*38b1'E 3.80
1i
111u:w2mo 7:1
• •�'.:
R =1394.35
L =158.10
PR -=
------- --=--------------------
_ F
' I
I
I
I
,
,
1
, � N
I
EXHIBIT B-2
NO SCALE
A =13-27'
R =509.72
L =119.74
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Phone
Suite 300
(805) 259-2489
Santa Clarita
Fax
California 91355-2196
(805) 259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE .ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
M.4"
Robert C. and Suzette M. Crozier
15800 Condor Ridge Road
Canyon Country, CA 91351
APN NO. 2831-007-028 - Corner Cut at Railroad Avenue and 9th Street
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property'), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
No. 95-065 ("Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MIDST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
desire to be heard. Your failure to timely file a written request to appear and be hard may
result in a waiver of your right to be heard.
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
Anthony J.
UZ
Director of i i g & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLU'T'ION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Date
Signature
eV dn0&M\pubbrguL"
Telephone
EXHIBIT A
2831-7-28
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS`11 AND 12 OF BLOCK 16 OF THE TOWN OF NEWHALL
IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND 22
OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A SPANDREL SHAPED PARCEL OF LAND BOUNDED NORTHEASTERLY BY THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK, BOUNDED SOUTHEASTERLY BY THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK, AND BOUNDED WESTERLY BY THE ARC
OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.00 FEET,
BEING TANGENT TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY LINES OF
BLOCK 16.
AREA = 181 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS
EXHIBIT B SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
APN 2831-7-28
AREA = 181 SOUARE FEET MORE OR LESS
SCALE 1" = 10'
PROPOSED � RAILROAD AVE.
115.812 - -EXISTING RAILROAD AVE. -�., S 32.14'54" E - - -
EXISTING R/W
,,,,,.,-EXISTING
i
� of
V) �I
O z
Q-
0 O
LLJ
LLJ l
i
D =9000'00'
T1
18
R =29.00'
L =CWr
1
6
12
1011
1
� of
V) �I
O z
Q-
0 O
LLJ
LLJ l
i
18
5
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Suite 300
Santa Clanta
California 91355-2196
Phone
(805)259-2489
Fax
(805)259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
y�y�tTA Cf
v >
Mr. Archibald Higman, Trustee
Mr. Glen R. Phillips
P.O. Box 801569
Santa Clarita,.CA 91380
APN NO. 2831-010-038 - Comer Cut at Railroad Avenue and 9th Street
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
No. 95-065 ("Project").
The hearing will be held on. March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues whichwillbe considered are as follows:
1. Whetherornot the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
desire to be heard. Your fedlure to timely file a written rgQuest to appear and be heard may
result in a waiver of your right to be heard.
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
lq01'at'V1
Anthony J.&I i
Director of . g & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THHACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Address
Date
Signature
eugcv %W-0661pubhret.bo
Telephone
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APN No. 2831-010-038
THAT PORTION OF LOT 1 OF BLOCK 18 OF THE TOWN OF NEWHALL, IN THE CITY
OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND 22.OF MISCELLANEOUS
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE EAST CORNER OF SAID LOT;
THENCE N 32014'54" W 15.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID
BLOCK TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING
OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 14.00
FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY 11.14 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 45°34'40" TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK,
TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 12010126"E;
THENCE N 57°4-07" E 4.20 FEET ALONG SAID LINE TO THE NORTH CORNER OF
SAID BLOCK;
THENCE S 32014'54"E 10.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID
BLOCK TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
AREAL =13 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS
EXHIBIT B
APN NO. 2831-010-038 SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
AREA = 113 SQUARE FEET
SCALE 1" = 10'
PROPOSED C/L RAILROAD AVE _
S 32'14'54" E EXISTING C/L RAILROAD AVE
c
M
u$32'14'54'E
�I
EXISTING R/W
(n
PROPOSED R/Yl RAILROAD AVE
\yi
A =45'34'40"
\e?o•
\
R =14.40' 1
\se
L =11.14'
i
W
\
w
rl
18
zl
1 I
30'
I
I
�
c�
L4'
"-
W
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Suite 300
Santa Clanta
California 91355-2196
Phone
(805)259-2489
Fax
(805)259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA .CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Thomas E. Patrick, Trustee
17552 Index Street
Granada Hills, CA 91344
APN NO. 2831-010-011- Comer Cut at 8th Street and Railroad Avenue
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
No. 95-065 ("Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. . Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
desire to be heard. Your failure to timely file a written request to apnear and be heard may
result in a waiver of your right to be heard.
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
/?W"n41 A Vl . . Y
Anthony J. z i
Vz
Director of ' g & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Date
Signature
engdsf %96-M %pubbrgntM
Telephone
EXHIBIT A
2831-10-11
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS. 11 AND 12 OF BLOCK 18 OF THE TOWN OF
NEWHALL, IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND
22 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY,.DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 18;
THENCE N 32°14'54" W 10.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
SAID BLOCK 18 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING N 32014'54" W ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE,
40.00 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT;
THENCE S 57043147" W 2.85 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 11, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 435.73 FEET, THROUGH WHICH
POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 64019109"E;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY 26.35 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE BEGINNING
OF A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.00
FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 40.45 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 12;
THENCE N 57043'47" E 29.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT
CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 10.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY 15.72 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
AREA = 428 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS
PROPOSED q RAILROAD AVE.
EXISTING q RAILROAD AVE. -
b
v
EXISTING
285
EXHIBIT B SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
APN 2831-10-11
AREA = 428 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LE55
b
rn
S 3274'54" E
M.N.
I . 8
7 8 9 10 11 12
SCALE 1" = 10'
S 32'15'46" E
21 dd'J
CKJ
I . 8
7 8 9 10 11 12
SCALE 1" = 10'
S 32'15'46" E
23920 Valencia Blvd_
Phone
Suite 300
(805) 259-2489
Santa Clarita
Fax
California 91355.2196
(805) 259-8125
City ofI NOTICE OF HEARING
Santa Clarita
0031
NOTICE OF FARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Frank Maga
P.O. Box 6805
Pine Mountain Club, CA 93222
APN NO. 2831-014-005 - Comer Cut at Market Street and Railroad Avenue
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B,' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
No. 95-065 ("Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
1. Whether. or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
desire to be heard. Your failure to timely file a written request to appear and be heard may
result in a waiver of your right to be heard.
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
`„cru
Anthony J. li i
Director of g & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Date
Signature
enadri\95-M\puhhWtbq
Telephone
EXHIBIT A
APN 2831-014-005
THAT PORTION OF BLOCK 31 OF THE TOWN OF 14EWHALL IN THE. CITY OF
SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN
ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53; PAGES 21 AND 22, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A SPANDREL SHAPED PARCEL OF LAND BOUNDED NORTHWESTERLY BY THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK, BOUNDED NORTHEASTERLY BY THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK, AND BOUNDED SOUTHERLY BY THE ARC
OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.00 FEET
BEING TANGENT TO THE NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY LINES OF SAID
BLOCK.
AREA = 181 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS
EXHIBIT B SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
APN .2831-014-005
AREA = 181 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS
SCALE 1" = 10'
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVE.
L _ S 32'1546" E RAILROAD
EXISTING q RAILROAD AVE.
EXISTING R/W
PROPO ED R/Wf!TR
=90'00:29.00' 4557
I
Yf 1 i l; M f I
W
L1J
V !
Ld
Q I
C
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Suite 300
Santa Clarita
California 91355-2196
Phone
(805)259-2489
Fax
(805)259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Don Guglielmino, Trustee
P.O. Box 220849
Newhall, CA 91322
APN NO. 2831-018-009 - Comer Cut at 6th Street and Railroad Avenue
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement -Project
No. 95-065 ("Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with'the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
W939781M MIM $14067-34
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
;amu
Anthony J.I i i
Director of -1 ' g & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Name Telephone
Date
Signature
..g-m,i%95-066\pubhMgn bo
EXHIBIT A
2831-18-9
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF BLOCK 35 OF THE TOWN OF
NEWHALL IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND
22,`OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAID COUNTY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE S 32015'53" E 100.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF
SAID BLOCK TO THE EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, SAID POINT BEING
THE BEGINNING - OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY AND
HAVING A RADIUS OF 435.73 FEET, THROUGH WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE
BEARS N 57043'05" E;
THENCE NORTHERLY 76.44 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 10003'11" TO THE BEGINNING OF A'COMPOUND CURVE CONCAVE
SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY 40.45 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 79056149" TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE
OF SAID LOT 1, SAID POINT BEING LOCATED SOUTHWESTERLY 35.27 FEET
FROM THE NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1;
THENCE N 57043'05" E 35.27 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 1 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXHIBIT B
SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
APN 2831-18-9
AREA = 500 SQUARE. FEET MORE OR LESS
O \ SCALE V = 10'
.,9 O `� � 151 •�9
I
3
5
I
on
35
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Suite 300
Santa Cladta
California 91355-2196
Phone
(805) 259-2489
Fax
(805) 259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Newhall Buildings, Inc.
P.O. Bog 800
Newhall, CA 91322
APN NO. 2831-018-014, 015 - Corner Cut at 5th Street and Railroad Avenue
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
No. 95-065 (`Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will beconsideredare as follows:
1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
Yt-q
Anthony J.2
Director ofp mg & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Name Telephone
Date
Signature
a ."196486\pubir6n4b4
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
2831-18-14/15
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 11 AND 12 OF BLOCK 35 OF THE TOWN OF NEWHALL, IN
THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF IAS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND 22 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A SPANDREL SHAPED PARCEL OF LAND BOUNDED NORTHEASTERLY BY THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK, BOUNDED SOUTHEASTERLY BY THE
SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK AND BOUNDED WESTERLY BY THE ARC
OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.00 FEET, BEING
TANGENT TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY AND SOUTHEASTERLY LINES OF SAID
BLOCK.
AREA - 181 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS
EXHIBIT B
SANTA CLAR[TA - RAILROAD AVENUE
APN 2831-18-14/15
ARCA - 1181 SOUARF FEET
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE CENTERLINE SCALE 1' - 10'
I
EXISTING RAILROAD AVENUE CENTERLINE N 32'15'53' W ��-
T -�
C-
W 29.00'
i
V
W
O
I
�
l
�
ulj
z
I
i
F--
a
1
EXISTING R/W RAILROAD AVE
<n
11
12
�I
35
30'_ _
Lo
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd. Phone
Suite 300 (805) 259-2489
Santa Clarity Fax
California 91355-2196 (805) 259-8125.
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA .CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Don F. Guglielmino, Trustee
P.O. Box 220849
Newhall, CA 91322
APN NO. 2831-019-021 - Comer Cut at 5th Street and Railroad Avenue
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of SantaClaritaintends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
No. 95-065 ("Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
/A,0/dui A Y1. - . V —
Anthony J. Ilii i? "
Director of ing & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Name Telephone
Date
Signature
eng-dvi \ 96-0661 pubhrprt. bej
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
2331-19-21
THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 OF BLOCK 42 OF THE TOWN OF NEWHALL- IN
THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND 22 OF
MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
A SPANDREL SHAPED PARCEL OF LAND BOUNDED NORTHEASTERLY BY THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK, BOUNDED NORTHWESTERLY BY THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK AND BOUNDED SOUTHERLY BY THE ARC
OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 29.00 FEET, BEING
TANGENT TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY LINES OF SAID
BLOCK.
AREA =Is 1 SQ. Fr. MORt OR LESS
EXHIBIT B
SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
APN 2831-19-21
AREA = ±181 SQUARE FEET
SCALE 1' = 10' PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE CENTERLINE
30'
r -
g
EXISTING RAILROAD AVENUE
EXISTING RA RAILROAD AVE
2
0
M
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Suite 300
Santa Clarita
California 91355-2196
Phone
(805)259-2489
Fax
(805) 259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Don F. Guglielmino
Flora N. Guglielmino
24322 San Fernando Road
Newhall, CA 91321
APN NO. 2831-026-001
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street purposes
and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project No. 95-065
and Newhall Metrolink Station ("Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRIMED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
:tYu
Anthony J. i i
IZ
Director of 1 'ng & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Name Telephone
Date
Signature
en` -d l%95-MNpnbhryntbej
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
THAT PORTION OF RANCHO SAN FRANCISCO, IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, AS
SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1 PAGES 521 AND 522 OF PATENTS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED
TO SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, RECORDED ON MARCH 29, 1879, IN BOOK 67 PAGE
321 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF SAID RECORDER.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL MINERALS AND MINERAL RIGHTS INTERESTS, AND
ROYALTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITING, THE GENERALITY HEREOF, OIL, GAS
AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, AS WELL AS METALLIC OR OTHER SOLID
MINERALS, IN AND UNDER THE PROPERTY, HOWEVER, GRANTOR OR ITS
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY PURPOSE
WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE
PROPERTY IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AS.RESERVED IN THE DEED RECORDED
AUGUST I5, 1991 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 91-1294556, OFFICIAL RECORDS.
City of
Santa Clarita
TO:
23920 Valencia Blvd.
Phone
Suite 300
(805) 259-2489
Santa Clarita
Fax
California 91355-2196
(805) 259-8125
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE OF HEARING REGARDING THE INTENTION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, A
GENERAL LAW CITY, TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF
NECESSITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA,
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
Hart Family Trust
Richard T. Hart
17827 Ridgeway Road
Granada Hills, CA 91344
APN NO. 2831-010-043
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1230.010 et. Seq., that the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita intends to
consider the adoption of a Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain
of certain real property ("Property"), which is described and depicted on Exhibits A
and B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference for public street
purposes and all uses appurtenant thereto, Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
No. 95-065 ("Project").
The hearing will be held on March 11, 1997 at 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as
the City Council can hear said matter, at the City of Santa Clarita Council Chambers,
located at 23920 Valencia Boulevard, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You as a person claiming or having an interest in and to the. Property are hereby
notified that you have the right to appear and be heard on the issues to be considered
at that hearing. The issues which will be considered are as follows:
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 2
The issues which will be considered are as follows:
1. Whether or not the public interest and necessity require the Project;
2. Whether or not the Projects is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury;
3. Whether or not the Property sought to be acquired is necessary for the Project;
and
4. Whether or not the offer required by Government Code Section 7267.2 has
been made to the owner or owners of record.
If you wish to be heard at this hearing, you MUST FILE A WRITTEN REQUEST
indicating your intent to appear and be heard, within fifteen (15) days of the mailing of this
notice by filing or deliver that written request to the City Clerk, City of Santa Clarita, at
23920 Valencia Boulevard, Suite 300, Santa Clarita, California 91355.
You may use the enclosure for the purpose of notifying the City of your intent and
r -•••••:• • .• J u- 1':'.'111 '!••- •••-: !••-1'%.•u.i
MM 1 •9VVrz-Vn0"T1r#1•: 1'f
For further information, contact Bonnie Joseph at City Hall at (805) 286-4139.
Anthony J.i i
Director of '1 'ng & Engineering Services
Date: February 24, 1997
NOTICE OF HEARING
Page 3
REQUEST TO BE HEARD ON RESOLUTION OF NECESSITY
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
Name Telephone
Date
Signature
e" -w 195-065\puhhrpt.bo
EXHIBIT A
2831-10-43
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 9 AND 10 OF BLOCK 18 OF THE TOWN OF NEWHALL,
IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGES 21 AND 22
OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 10;
THENCE S 57043'47" W 2.85 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 10, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 435:73 FEET, THROUGH WHICH
POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS N 64°19'09"E;
THENCE' NORTHWESTERLY 49.80 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 18;
THENCE S 32°14154" E 49.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
AREA = 48 SQ. FT. MORE OR LESS
EXHIBIT B SANTA CLARITA - RAILROAD AVENUE
APN 2831-10-43
AREA = 48 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS
PROPOSED � RAILROAD AVE.
EXISTING CL RAILROAD AVE. ��S 274'54" E
0
EXISTING R/W--� 1%7
SCALE 1" = 10'
3�
S 32'15'46" E
R:43W,
71mil
3
0
a
g
-10
1 1�?
SCALE 1" = 10'
3�
S 32'15'46" E
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
23920 VALENCIA BOULEVARD, SUITE 300
SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA 91355
AGREEMENT NO.2
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
The City of Santa Clarita, a municipal corporation of the State of California (hereinafter "City"), and
HDR Engineering, Inc. (hereinafter "Contractor") previously entered into Agreement No. 1 on the
26th day of August 1996 (hereinafter `Basic Agreement").
This Agreement No. 2 is intended to supplement the Basic Agreement.
City and Contractor hereby agree as follows:
Agreement No. 2 supplements the Basic Agreement as follows:
SCOPE OF WORK: Contractor shall provide additional professional services per the attached
scope of work.
Additional compensation to be paid to Contractor for services provided under Agreement No. 2 shall
be time and materials not to exceed $82,430 per the attached Scope of Work/Fee Schedule. .
DATED this day of
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
HDR Engineering, Inc.
2600 Michelson Drive, Suite 1600
Irvine, CA 92715-1507
Phone: (714) 756-6800
Fax: (714)756-6895
LE
Name/Title
BEJ:
.gba%C0N72aoa.sEJ
1996
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Date City Manager
Date
Date
AGREEMENT NO.2
SCOPE OF WORK/FEE SCHEDULE
TASK 1
DESIGN SURVEY
TOTAL
Pothole
TASK 2
RIGHT OF WAY
AMOUNT
Appraisal/Title/EDA Legal
TASK 3
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Storm Drain
TASK 4
STREET DESIGN
Parkway East
Public Participation/Meetings
Spur Relocation (Coordintation)
Project Management
TASK 5
DRAINAGE DESIGN
Hydrology/Storm Drain
TASK 6
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Street Lights
Traffic Study
Credits
TASK 7
LANDSCAPEARRIGATION
L & 1 Plans
TASK 8
INITIAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ISA)
$2,000
Phase I Investigation
TASK 9
SITE INVESTIGATION (SI)
$41,520
Phase II Investigation
CURRENT
PROPOSED
TOTAL
CONTRACT
CONTRACT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
$30,840
$32,840
$2,000
$36,280
$46,280
$10,000
$7,000.
$8,380
$1,380
,
$116,520
$127,520
$1,500
$5,000
$2,500
$2,000
$8,520
$41,520
$33,000
$48,815
$55,065
$8,000
$6,650
-$8,400
$0
$10,500
$10,500
$0
$8,300
$8,300
$0
$5,850
$5,850
TOTAL = $247,975
$88,280 $336,255
Prepared by Bonnie Joseph 2/19/97 Page 1
City Manager Approval
Item to be presented by:
Ken Pulskamp
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
DATE: February 25, 1997
SUBJECT: RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 95-065
NEWHALL METROLINK STATION
DEPARTMENT: Building and Engineering Services
On June 11, 1996, the City Council approved in concept the Newhall Downtown Revitalization
Plan. A major part of this program is the reconstruction of Railroad Avenue from San Fernando
Road south of 4th Street to San Fernando Road at 11th Street (see Railroad Avenue
Reconstruction Map, Attachment A). On July 9, 1996, Council awarded the design contract to
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Staff has held two community meetings with the business and property owners along Railroad
Avenue to inform the public about the proposed project and to gain input from the public
relating to mitigating the effects of construction. The meetings were held on September 18,
1996 and November 21, 1996.
An initial study and a traffic study have been prepared for the project and a finding of a
Negative Declaration for this project has been proposed. The plans and specifications are
substantially complete and will be ready for advertisement to obtain bids on March 11, 1997.
An Encroachment Permit Application has been filed with Caltrans and a permit is expected to
be received prior to the award of the construction contract.
ANALYSIS:
This project is proposed to realign and widen Railroad Avenue from an existing 60 -foot right-of-
way width to 75 feet. It would provide two travel lanes, one two-way left -turn lane, parking on
the east and west sides of the street, and sidewalks on the west side of the street. Due to right-
of-way acquisition costs, this project would be over budget by an estimated $700,000. Two
larger partial property acquisitions would require substantial severance compensation, which
could be avoided if the entire parcels were acquired for the proposed Newhall Metrolink station.
Construction of this project must be completed by December 1997 and all funds expended,
including construction retention, by February 1998.
RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 95-065
NEWHALL METROLINK STATION
February 25, 1997 - Page 2
It is important to note that the funding for the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project will expire
after February 1998. The Economic Development Administration (EDA) grant has been
submitted for final approval. The closing date to submit for final approval of an EDA grant has
passed, and the grant cannot be directed to another project. The EDA funds would be lost
should the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project be canceled due to lack of time.
The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) of $2,257,715 must also be expended by
February 1998. Should the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project be canceled, the CDBG grant
would be immediately reallocated to a different project.
Railroad Avenue Improvement Project. Newhall M tro ink Station Site Acquisition and Off -Site
Improvements (85 -Foot Right -of -Way)
This project would include the scope identified above plus the following: an additional 10 -foot
right-of-way, for an ultimate 85 -foot right-of-way. This would provide sidewalk, landscaping,
irrigation, and street lighting on the east side of Railroad Avenue, which would be required to
service the proposed Newhall Metrolink station. This project would also upgrade the Market
Street railroad crossing, interconnect the Market Street railroad crossing signals with the
intersection of San Fernando Road and Market Street, and relocate an existing spur track
adjacent to Railroad Avenue. The property acquisitions would include the acquisition of the
Newhall Metrolink site. (This acquisition would eliminate compensation of severance costs.)
The benefits of combining the two projects would be the cost savings of reduced engineering,
design, construction administration, and construction engineering expenses, and the elimination
of severance compensation for the acquisition of two parcels. These cost savings will provide
the landscaping, irrigation, sidewalks, and street lighting .on the east side of the street
($500,000 value). Should these two projects be constructed separately, funds would not be
available in either project to provide these improvements.
Other benefits would include reduced disruption to the adjacent business and property owners
during construction, as the improvements to Railroad Avenue would be constructed at one time
and construction time would be reduced.
The investment opportunities noted above are planned to be financed with funding from a
variety of sources. Each of these sources is considered to be secured, with the exception of a
portion of the Newhall Metrolink station. Should that portion ($1,975,010) of the Metrolink
station source fail to materialize, the current Transit budget contains sufficient funds that can
be reallocated over the next two fiscal years to cover the cost. It is important to note, however,
that such use of these funds could delay some expansion of Transit services, the scope of the
planned Transit Center near the mall, and other future capital projects.
RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 95-065
NEWHALL METROLINK STATION
February 25, 1997 - Page 3
Railroad Avenue Improvement Project. Newhall Metrolink Station Off -Site and On -Site
Improvements (85 -Foot Right -of -Way)
This project includes all the improvements of the previously discussed project and also includes
the construction of the on-site station improvements. The total cost of these combined
improvements is $7,132,750.
No Project
Should the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project not be constructed, the City would lose an
EDA grant up to $601,975. The CDBG grant in the amount of $2,257,715 would be reallocated
to an overlay project in another area of the City. Additionally, the City has already incurred
approximately $400,000 in design costs, which would not be reimbursed.
The Newhall Metrolink station grant applications did not include expenses related to improving
Railroad Avenue. For the station to be constructed, the City would have to identify resources
for the additional $2,859,690 required to improve Railroad Avenue. Should these resources not
be identified, the Newhall Metrolink Station Project would also be canceled.
The loss of the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project and the Newhall Metrolink station would
greatly affect the revitalization of downtown Newhall, as this would be a loss of a $7,132,750
investment in the area.
Due to the complexity of this project, staff would like to brief Council in detail regarding the
proposed recommendation below. See the attached March 11, 1997 City Council Meeting
Recommendation Summary.
RECOMMENDATION
1. City Council accept, review, and discuss the report on the Railroad Avenue Improvement
Project No. 95-065, and the siting of the proposed Newhall Metrolink station.
2. City Council direct staff to return with recommendations for the Railroad Avenue
Improvement Project and Newhall Metrolink station off-site improvements to the March 11,
1997 City Council Meeting.
1. City Council approve the location of the Newhall Metrolink site.
2. City Council adopt a Negative Declaration pursuant to Section 15070 of CEQA.
3. City Council adopt a Resolution of Necessity for Immediate Possession of the two (2)
parcels required for the Newhall Metrolink site and the widening and reconstruction
of Railroad Avenue.
RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 95-065
NEWHALL METROLINK STATION
February 25, 1997 - Page 4
4. City Council adopt a Resolution of Necessity for Immediate Possession of the eight
partial -takes required for the widening and reconstruction of Railroad Aveaue.
5. City Council authorize the advertisement for bids for the Railroad Avenue Improvement
- Project.
6. City Council approve a change' order to the existing design contract with HDR
Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $85,000.
March 11, 1997 City Council Meeting Recommendation Summary
Railroad Avenue Improvement Vicinity Map
List of Acquisitions (full- and partial -takes)
Eminent Domain Summary
Project Schedule
EIS and Traffic Study in Reading File in City Clerk's Office
M
BEJ:Ikl
.Unca% r-N0G5bp
MARCH 11, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
RECOMMENDATION.SUMMARY
ACTION ITEMS NECESSARY AT MARCH 11, 1997 CITY COUNCIL MEETING:
Staff has identified a site for the construction of the Newhall Metrolink station. The site
is located on the east side of Railroad Avenue, north and south of Market Street. The north
parcel is currently occupied by Newhall Hardware's Garden Center. Staff has met with
MTA and SCRRA, and they have indicated that this location is the preferable site for the
platform and station. The Railroad Avenue and Market Street location was identified in
the Downtown Newhall Improvement Program as the preferred location for the Metrolink
station. On February 3, 1997, the Newhall Redevelopment Committee voted (15-1) to
recommend that the City Council authorize site acquisition and construction of the Newhall
Metrolink station.
If the site proposed for the Newhall Metrolink station is not approved by the City Council,
staff would request that the Council approve the partial acquisition of the site necessary
for the widening of Railroad Avenue. Additional funds would be necessary for the right-of-
way acquisition required for Railroad. Avenue, as these two parcels would have been
acquired by Transit funds for the station.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff will request that the City Council approve the Newhall
Metrolink site location.
An Environmental Assessment and Initial Study has been prepared for the Railroad Avenue
Improvement Project. A proposed Negative Declaration has been prepared that indicates
the project will not have a significant effect upon the environment.
Further project continuation is contingent upon this approval.
RECOMMENDATION. Staff will request that City Council adopt a Negative Declaration
pursuant to Section 15070 of CEQA.
Acquisition of the Newhall Metrolink site involves the relocation of an existing business.
A portion of the Metrolink site will be designated for Railroad Avenue road widening. In
order to reduce the costs of acquisition and eliminate costs due to severance compensation,
it would be in the City's interest to acquire the site as a whole rather than acquiring a
portion of the site needed for the widening of Railroad Avenue, and then later acquiring the
remainder of the site for the Metrolink station.
As relocation of the existing business needs to be addressed in this acquisition, the City is
required to give a 90 -day notice to vacate the property. This can only happen after an
Order of Immediate Possession is issued by the court. The federal grants received for the
Railroad Avenue Improvement Project require that the City expend all funds by
February 1998. To accomplish this, construction must begin by June 1997. The City will
need to obtain an Order of Immediate Possession on March 11, 1997 to start the business
relocation process and complete it in time for construction to begin.
If the acquisition and site proposed for the Newhall Metrolink station is not approved and
the Resolution of Necessity is not adopted by the City Council, staff would request that the
Council approve the partial acquisition of the site necessary for the widening of Railroad
Avenue. Additional funds (in excess of the CDBG and EDA grants) would be necessary for
the right-of-way acquisition required for Railroad Avenue, as these two parcels would have
been acquired by Transit funds should this be the location acquired for the station. Should
the City fail to meet the demands of this schedule, it puts the project at risk for cancellation
due to the time limitations of the funding.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff will request that after a public hearing, the City Council
adopt a Resolution of Necessity for Immediate Possession of the two parcels required for
the Newhall Metrolink site and the.widening and reconstruction of Railroad Avenue.
Due to the partial realignment of Railroad Avenue in order to reduce the existing curves
near 6th Street and 8th Street, and in order to conform with ADA (Americans with
Disabilities Act) requirements, staff will request that Council authorize the acquisition of
eight partial -takes along Railroad Avenue.
A total of ten (10) partial -takes, two of which would be included in the acquisition of the
Metrolink site, need to be acquired for the additional right-of-way necessary to construct
the Railroad Avenue Reconstruction Project. The City is currently negotiating with the
owners of the properties. Staff is requesting that Council adopt the Resolution of Necessity
so that, in the event that negotiations stall, the City will be able to obtain immediate
possession of the property prior to the start of construction_
Should Council not adopt the Resolution of Necessity for the Order of Immediate
Possession, the project would be canceled, as it cannot be constructed without obtaining the
required right-of-way.
RECOMMENDATION:: Staff will request that after a Public Hearing, the City Council
adopt a Resolution of Necessity for Immediate Possession of the eight partial -takes
required for the widening and reconstruction of Railroad Avenue.
The plans and specifications will be ready for advertisement to obtain bids for construction.
The federal grants require that we have a bid advertisement period of at least 30 days.
Due to the timing constraints of this project, staff will need to advertise and award a
contract for construction within the next three months. This process will take at least three
months and will require a decision at the Council meeting of March 11, 1997.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff will request that the City Council authorize the
advertisement for bids for the Railroad Avenue Reconstruction Project.
...• $ , "- a. .. TME
Staff has incorporated the necessary off-site public improvements that will be required for
the Newhall Metrolink Station into the construction documents for the Railroad Avenue
Improvement Project in order to expedite and reduce construction costs for the Metrolink
station. Due to this additional scope of work being added to the design of the Railroad
Avenue Improvement Project, staff recommends to increase the design contract from
$300,000 to $385,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff will request that Council approve a change order to the
existing design contract with HDR Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $85,000.
BEJ:Ikl
munch\.r-gWO.b.g
VICINITY MAP
T, S.
RAILROAD AVENUE PROPERTY ACQUISITION LIST
PROJECT NO. 95-065
The following properties will be reviewed for partial right-of-way acquisition for construction of
the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project:
1) APN 2831-007-019
NW Corner of 9th Street and Railroad Avenue
2) APN 2831-010-038
SW Corner of 9th Street and Railroad Avenue
3) APN 2831-018-015
NW Corner of 5th Street and Railroad Avenue
4) APN 2831-014-005
SW Corner of Market Street and Railroad Avenue
5) APN 2831-010-011
NW Corner of 8th Street and Railroad Avenue
6) APN 2831-026-900, 901, 904-913
MTA Right of Way East of Railroad Avenue between 4th Street and 11th Street
7) APN 2831-026-001
East side of Railroad Avenue: between 6th Street and 8th Street
(Nursery and vacant lot)
8) APN 2831-019-021
SW Corner of 5th Street and Railroad Avenue
9) APN 2831-018-009
SW Comer of 6th Street and Railroad Avenue
10) APN 2831-010-043
West side of Railroad Avenue approx. 50' North of 8th Street
BEJ:
engcivl95.06.5\acq-Lst.bej
d-
EMINENT DOMAIN SUMMARY
PROJECT NO. 95-065
Project DesignZEropedyAcquisition Requirements_
The improvements to Railroad Avenue intend to realign the existing centerline at 6th and 8th
Streets to provide a smoother transition for traffic as currently a right angle jog must be negotiated
at these two intersections. As the Newhall Metrolink Station is proposed to be constructed in this
area, realigning Railroad Avenue to provide a smoother transition will make the station accessible
to buses, and vehicle and pedestrian friendly. Other improvements include the widening of Railroad
Avenue from an existing 60 -foot width to an 85 -foot width. This new right-of-way will provide an
additional 15 feet of roadway and 10 feet of parkway to provide sidewalks, street lighting,
landscaping, and irrigation for the proposed Newhall Metrolink Station.
PropertyAcquisition Procedures
Due to the realignment and widening of Railroad Avenue, additional right-of-way must be obtained.
In order to accomplish this, the City, as a public agency, must exercise its right to use eminent
domain. This procedure involves notifying each affected property owner of the City s intent to
appraise the property. Then an appraisal is performed to establish the "fair market value" of the
property to be acquired. The appraisal also determines whether severance damages exist. Any
relocations that may be required as a part of the acquisition of the property are also identified. An
offer to purchase property is prepared and submitted to the property owner and negotiations begin.
As the City is a public agency an offer cannot be made for less than the fair market value of the
property.
If timing is not an issue, the negotiation process can go on indefinitely, but as timing is usually a
factor due to funding constraints the City usually proceeds with the next phase of the eminent
domain process, which is to adopt the Negative Declaration finding for the project, hold a public
hearing, and then adopt a Resolution of Necessity including authorization to seek an Order of
Immediate Possession of the properties. The City then files an action and seeks an Order from the
court. A deposit of the amount of the established fair market value must be made in court to obtain
an order as to each property sought.
In this case negotiations are proceeding in a "friendly" manner and the staff is meeting individually
with the affected property owners concerned, but because the relocation of a business will be
required due to this project and the future construction of a metrolink station, the Order of
Immediate Possession must be filed and the Order to Vacate must be delivered to the business
and\or property owner 90 days prior to the City's possession of the property. The Railroad Avenue
construction project is scheduled to start construction in June 1997 in order to have construction
completed, project acceptance recorded and the retention released by February 1998. Should Council
adopt the Resolution of Necessity at its March 11, 1997 Council Meeting, the earliest date that the
City could take possession of the property would be in late June 1997.
In general, property owners prefer the use of eminent domain. Eminent domain provides a tax
benefit to the property owner as the condemnation process allows the property owner three years
to reinvest the settlement amount received by the City in order to avoid capital gains tax.
Negotiations would continue throughout this process. If a settlement is reached, an agreement
would be drawn up and payment would be made for the acquisition. If a settlement is reached after
the action is filed, a stipulation for judgement would be signed and filed with the court. It is
necessary for the City to obtain an Order of Immediate Possession from the court to ensure that the
City would have possession of the property in time for construction of the project should negotiations
deteriorate.
BEJ:lk1
ane-ari\ss065kem!. b-4
RAILROAD AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT SCHEDULE
ID
1
6
Tssk Nems
MACLEARANCE
METROLINK APPROVAL
neve
3$d
260
SWI
1=7
2aW
Flnlsb
DN89T
3MI197
Ob11BW
Jan Fee Mar
Otr2196]
M Jun
Otr3199T
Jul Se
i
Otra 1691
Op -Nev Dee
Otr1 1696
Jan Fee Mer
Otr31996
A Ma Jun
ptr31996
.hd
10 ROW ACOUISITION 10x0 Lim Gn4W
18 UTILRT RELOCRFANITS 1150 tfJ]AI] 7I46]
35 DE6IONIBID/AWARD m lww SN316]
37 CONSTRUCTION 1/3d Sn"T Mew
N PROJECTCLOSEM9 46dj lzmw 91L1f65
PmIe&
D.I. VIM
Task
Pmgraas
IAI6swe ♦ Rolkb Up Task
Summary 1pmommomv R9 Upmuseumso
ROW UP Pmg.0 �
Omul0&a" �•
P/1a/67
Page 1
Railroad Avenue Street
Improvement Project
and
Newhall Metrolink Station
Railroad Avenue looking north from Lyons Avenue
Railroad Avenue looking south from Lyons Avenue
Railroad Avenue looking north from 6th Street
Railroad Avenue looking south from 6th Street
Railroad Avenue Street
Improvements
Railroad Avenue Street
Improvements
75' Right -of -Way
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
RAILROAD AVENUE
(75 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY)
Typical Section
Railroad Avenue
Railroad Avenue Street
Improvements
85' Right -of -Way
TYPICAL CROSS SECTION
RAILROAD AVENUE
(85 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY)
Typical Section
Railroad Avenue
Railroad Avenue Right -of -Way Acquisition
and
Newhall Metrolink Station Site Acquisition
$1,3641000
Railroad Avenue Construction
$337703700
Newhall Metrolink Station Construction
$139983050
NEWHALL METROLINK
STATION
Newhall Metrolink Station Platform Site (North Parcel)
Newhall Metrolink Station - Market Street crossing
®�6ro #84
a }xs es � e a me
y §
p �
dfi bPkA g
x
Asa i 3
A4F Lxea
2
p
'I 1p W
dY
Newhall Metrolink Station parking (South parcel)
3
a aw% gpe
wp +
m%
9TAA
bC) i
�®®Ayyipp
-p{�
y
w3 Sb Y
Y(
wA
x`
THE
FINANCES.
FUNDING SOURCES
CDBG Supplemental
Economic Develop Admin Grant
** Transit Capital Improve Grant
** MTA Call For Projects Grant
(Metropoiitan Transportation Authority)
Transit Funds
Total Funding
$2,257,715
$601,975
$2,136,500
$1,709,200
$427336Q
$7,132,750
FUNDING SOURCE
RESTRICTIONS
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Supplemental
$272573715
• Federal Funds
• Restricted to Earthquake Related, CDBG Eligible
Repairs
• Construction Costs .Only
• No Match Requirement
• Must be spent by February 1998
• Budgeted July 1996
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION GRANT
$601,975
• Federal Funds
• Can Be Used for Right -Of -Way Acquisition and
Construction
• Match Required - Satisfied with CDBG Supplemental
• Must be spent by February 1998
• Budgeted July 1996
TRANSIT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
GRANT
$27136,500
• State Funds
• Can be used for Rail or Multi -Modal Transportation
Projects
• Grant Award Notification 5/1/97 - (Risk Factor)
• 50/50 Match Requirement - MTA Call for Projects & Transit
Funds Satisfy
• Available for use 7/1/97 and must be spent by 7/1/99
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
(MTA) Call for Projects
$1,709,200 - 80%
• Local or Federal Funds
• Can only be used for Transit Station
• Grant Award Notification 7/1/97 - (Risk Factor)
• 80/20 Match Requirement - Transit Funds to Match
• Funds would be available July or October, 1997 depending
on type
• Must be spent within three years of award
TRANSIT FUNDS
$427,360
•Local Funds
• Can be used for Transit related Projects or
Expenses
• Currently Available
• No timeline for spending
FUNDING
PHASES
Right of Way Acquisition
TOTAL
$ 545,000 EDA Grant
(Economic Development
Administration Grant)
$ 300,000 Transit Revenues
$ 519,000
$1,364,000
TCI Grant
(Transit Capital Improvement Grant)
This
amount
needs to
be
placed in escrow on March
12th
to
begin
process
of
land
acquisition.
Railroad Avenue Construction
$232575715 CDBG Supplemental
(Community Development Block Grant)
$1)4565010 TCI Grant
(Transit Capital Improvment Grant)
$ 56,975 EDA Grant
(Economic Development Administration)
TOTAL $377703700
TOTAL
Metrolink Station
Construction
$1,709,200
$ 161,490
$ 127, 360
$1,998,050
MTA Call For Projects
TCI (Transit Capital Improvement)
Transit Revenues
Railroad Avenue
Newhall Metrolink Station
TOTAL
Project Budget
$1,364,000
$3,770,700
$1, 998, 050
$7,132,750
Property Acquisition
Railroad Avenue Const.
Metrolink Station Const.
.:,
1988 ,: .. , . a e .. � .'i�,$'�. .. , - _' •YS$& - . -'
iD-
TaskNmm
9tm ,ride 9aA SiM::Nav -0-;, Jatt Fe'15 at j+.kud 3W Rig Szp Pmt ac 9a� ab Mme^ Agap Jar' JW Septi i7d Frim i3�'C
1
ApptppUta CDD81yt3 UPPiaMtW& LDA GtAut
+ iyxxPµ���ffyyg,,��S6
u@
1
�y�faV�YiPaadR
ROWAcqu&Wmn
._
tquai�s�ityi�d����_j
y
4i
„W'����� Yy�� +yyyypp��,�{��,��syya
MKJ[(�[�Y�„4.��µµYW4
aW�ylYyAf��(Y iRQ61lMA.11t"' Y
qq*wvu
-m -&d Av* CcmIgmrfttt
Ra
;�yy yy��yy
.x
�
�4A Yiil i'i�t���aR^d #A.WYtl}Rs�fWA� % w4
v. y:i
'eJkGtfv�RropeefttS�itnlAiMiiic�
»
i
�SSO¢i9St
-
�260Y488r rfeDA10�f Clesi � is lea ''oa' <�aas �'�
x
m
r w a
<'
'
1rtCbiS°.�ORa -
•a
Y
a
� Y
�
i f a
e
i J a
tly8
n g rc -.
e 3
r
Y
y
1 ( ry f<
a
1
�
oi
.�Y
x
r
s
-?�IRJwa.a ' `a �Rc>m4S�3#k5EStaifa
pt42
�� ,.�. �tr�iap
4
9r��rY�rW�i�i�Mr {hEn��s` � t0A2�UpPtOgt�Ya�
�+.ClfaCatr$dak
�'tl�'41Rat'f�#Q�k'C55 eWWNrgI�911C "�a��a4��'�UP"GC�It�af Tst� ��ii�"t'+a��� w'aw�`� _
Noel
FUNDING SOURCES
CDBG Supplemental
Economic Develop Admin Grant
** Transit Capital Improve Grant
** MTA Call For Projects Grant
Transit Funds
TOTAL FUNDING
$2,257,715
$601,975
$2,136,500
$1,709,200
$427a360
$7,132,750
SCENARIO #1
Railroad Avenue Improvement
Project -Only
(75 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY)
► $700,000 BUDGET DEFICIT
SCENARIO #2
RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
and
N EWHALL METROLINK STATION
SITE ACQUISITION & OFF-SITE.
IMPROVEMENTS -ONLY
(85 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY)
► TCI GRANT AWARDED - MTA CALL FOR PROJECTS
GRANT NOT AWARDED
► NEED TO IDENTIFY $1,975,010 OF FUNDING
► FUNDS COULD COME FROM DELAYING FUTURE
TRANSIT CAPITAL PROJECTS, FUTURE BUS
PURCHASES, AND UTILIZING AVAILABLE FUND
BALANCES)
SCENARIO #3
RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
and
NEWHALL METROLINK STATION
FF -SITE AND ON -SIT
.IMPROVEMENTS
(85 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY)
METROLINK STATION PROJECT WOULD PROCEED
WHEN BOTH TRANSIT GRANTS ARE AWARDED AND
FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
SCENARIO #4
NO PROJECT
► Lose EDA Grant $601,975
► Reallocate CDBG Grant $2,257,715
► Project Design Costs Not Reimbursed $400,000
► Railroad Avenue Project Canceled
► Newhall Metrolink Station Project Delayed Until Other
Funding Sources Can Be Obtained
'' r. CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
[ X ] Proposed [ ] Final
PERMIT/PROJECT: Improvement of Railroad Avenue
APPLICANT: City of Santa Clarita MASTER CASE NO.: n/a
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT: The project involves the widening, realignment and
extension of Railroad Avenue from south of 4th Street to north of 11th Street. At its northern
and southern termini Railroad- Avenue would connect with San Fernando Road. When
completed, Railroad Avenue will consist of one travel lane in each direction, a two-way left turn
lane, and on -street parking. Other improvements include the installation of a storm drain to
handle surface drainage and the installation of street lights. The proposed project will occur
substantially within the existing street. However, additional right-of-way will need to be
acquired to accommodate the project.
Based on the information contained in the Initial Study prepared for this project, and pursuant
to the requirements of Section 15065 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
City of Santa Clarita
[X] City Council
[ ] Planning Commission
[ ] Director of Community Development
finds that the project as proposed or revised will have no significant effect upon the
environment, and that a Negative Declaration shall be adopted pursuant to Section 15070 of
CEQA.
Mitigation measures for this project
[ ] are not required. [ ] are attached. [X] are not attached.
Prepared by:
Reviewed
Public Review Period From: 2.7 — rV1 To: 3- 3' R%
Public Notice Given On: 2-7 _-0z7 By:
[XI Legal Advertisement. [ ] Posting of Properties. [ ] Written Notice
CERTIFICATION DATE:
GEA:current\ndrlyd.gea
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
(Initial Study Form B)
Project Title:
Improvement of Railroad Avenue from San Fernando Road Southerly to San Fernando
Road Easterly
Lead Agency:
City of Santa Clarita
Building and Engineering Services Department
City Hall
23920 Valencia Boulevard; Suite 304
Santa Clarita, CA 91355-2107
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Bonnie Joseph
(805)286-4139
Project Location: Railroad Avenue (Thomas Bros. Maps 4640, J-1; 4641, A-1)
The project area is bounded by the Metrolink railroad tracks on the east, San Fernando
Road on the south and west, and 12th Street on the north, in the City of Santa Clarita.
General Plan and Zoning Designation:
CC
Project Description:
The proposed project involves the widening, realignment and extension of Railroad
Avenue from south of 4th Street to north of 11th Street. At its northern and southern
termini Railroad Avenue would merge with San Fernando Road, thus providing an
alternative to San Fernando Road for traffic traveling through the old downtown Newhall
area. When completed, Railroad Avenue will consist of one travel lane in each direction,
a two-way left turn lane between intersections, and on -street parking. Other
improvements include the installation of a storm drain to handle surface drainage, and
the installation of street lights. The project represents the first step in implementing the
Downtown Newhall Improvement and Revitalization Program. Improvement of Railroad
Avenue provides opportunities to downplay the role of San Fernando Road in carrying
regional through -traffic through the study area, and focus on its role as a central
commercial corridor, as part of the overall plan to revitalize the old downtown core.
The proposed project will occur substantially with existing rights-of-way. However, some
additional right-of-way will be required. This additional right-of-way generally consists
of:
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment - Initial Study 1 February 3, 1997
West Side of Railroad Avenue:
• northwest corner of Railroad Avenue and 9th Street - 181 square feet
• southwest corner of Railroad Avenue and 9th Street -181 square feet
• northwest corner of Railroad Avenue and 8th Street - 429 square feet
• southwest corner of Railroad Avenue and Market Street -181 square feet
• southwest corner of Railroad Avenue and 6th Street - 500 square feet
East Side of Railroad Avenue:
• MTA right-of-way from north of 11th Street to 8th Street and from 6th Street to San
Fernando Road
• block from 8th Street to Market Street - 33,904 square feet
• block from Market Street to 6th Street - 33,904 square feet
Traffic signals are proposed at the intersections of Railroad Avenue with San Fernando
Road North, Lyons Avenue, Market Street and San Fernando Road South.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Adjacent to Railroad Avenue on the east are the Metrolink railroad tracks. The railroad
tracks lie within right-of-way presently owned by the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority (MTA). East of the railroad tracks are residential areas. West
of Railroad Avenue, between Railroad Avenue and San Fernando Road, the area is
developed in industrial and commercial uses.
In early 1996, the City of Santa Clarita completed the Downtown Newhall Improvement
Program study which identified strategies for revitalizing the old downtown core, the
capital improvements necessary to support revitalization and financing strategies for
implementation. The proposed project is among the first steps identified in this study.
Other Agencies whose approval is required:
Caltrans
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment -Initial Study 2 February3, 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on
the following pages.
EJ
Land Use and Planning
0
Population and Housing
Geologic Problems
❑
Water
0
Air Quality
❑ Transportation/Circulation
ElBiological Resources
F] Noise
Hazards
❑ Energy and Mineral
Resources
DMandatory Tests of
Significance
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment - initial Study 3
EJ
Public Services
0
Recreation
Aesthetics
❑
Cultural Resources
❑
Utilities and Service
Systems
February 3, 1997
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[ X ] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[ ] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the
environment, but at least one effect 1) has been mitigated adequately in an
earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been
addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on
attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated! An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT will be
prepared, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
[ ] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated
pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project.
Prepared By:
Approved By:
(Signature)
Catherine Hialev
Senior Planner
(NameMtle)
Glenn Adamick
Associate Planner
(NameTtfe)
February 3. 1997
(Date)
2 5 si7
(Date)
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment - Initial Study 4 February3,1997
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
the project?
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the city?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)?
e) Affect a Significant Ecological Area (SEA)?
D Other
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. would theproposal:BG
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b) Create a net loss of jobs?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
d) Other
III. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Will the proposal result in:
a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
substructures?
b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil?
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief
features?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑
❑
❑
0
E]❑
❑
❑
0
El
El
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
a
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ o ❑
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment-IniGat Study 5 February 3, 1997
d) The destruction, covering or modification of any
unique geologic or physical features?
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either
on or off site?
f) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards
such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground
failure, or similar hazards?
g) Changes in deposition, erosion or siltation?
h) Other modification of a wash, channel, creek, or
river?
I) Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic
yards or more?
j) Development and/or grading on a slope greater than
25% natural grade?
k) Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone?
1) Other
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in;
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into subsurface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen, or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
❑ ❑ F-1 ❑
El❑
Potentially
�.
❑
❑
Significant
❑
❑
Impact
ED
❑
Potentially
Unless
Less Than
0
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
o
❑
❑
a
❑
❑
❑
o
❑ ❑ F-1 ❑
El❑
�.
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
ED
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
a
❑
❑
❑
ED
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
❑
o
❑
❑
❑
0
❑ ❑ ❑
Railroad Avenue Improvements
ErrWronmenta/Assessment-inittal Study 6 Febroary3, 1997
e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction of
water movements?
f) Changes in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater
otherwise available for public water supplies?
j) Other
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Create objectionable odors?
d) Other
VI. TRANSPORTATIONICIRCULATION. would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
❑ ❑ ❑ a
❑
Potentially
❑
M
F-1
Significant
❑
a
❑
Impact
❑
❑x
Potentially
Unless
Less Than
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
❑
❑
F-1❑
❑ ❑ ❑ a
❑
❑
❑
M
F-1
❑
❑
a
❑
❑
❑
❑x
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x
011WE-11KNIM
❑ ❑ ❑ M
❑
W
513*11
❑
❑
❑
❑
a
❑ ❑ ❑ M
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
a
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment -!nidal Study 7 Febroary3, 1997
d) Insufficient parking capacity onsite or offsite?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
I) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation modes (e.g. bus stops, bicycle racks?)
g) Disjointed pattern of roadway improvements?
h) Other
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rate species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds.)
b) Oak trees
c) Welland habitat or blueline stream?
d) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
e) Other
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b) Use nonrenewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of future value to the region
and the residents of the State?
d) Other
❑ ❑X
❑
Potentially
❑
0
❑
Significant
❑
0
❑
Impact
❑
❑X
Potentially
Unless
Less Than
❑X
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
ED -
a
❑
❑
❑
o
❑ ❑X
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
"
❑
❑
❑
❑
0
Railroad Avenue Improvements .
Environmental Assessment -Initial Study 8 February 3, 1997
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including but not limited to
oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazards?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards (e.g. electrical transmission lines,
gas lines, oil pipelines)?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush,
grass, or trees?
f) Other
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result In:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels or
vibration?
c) Other
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect on, or result In a need for new or altered govemment
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Maintenance or public facilities, including roads?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
❑ ❑ ❑ a
❑
❑
❑
E
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
a
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
a
❑ ❑ ❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
E
❑
❑
❑
E
❑
❑
❑X
❑
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment -Initial Study 9 February3,1997
e) Other government services? -
XII. UTILITIES. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or
supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communication systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tank?
e) Stone water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
g) Local or regional water supplies?
h) Other
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect the scenic vista open to public view?
b) Have a negative aestheticeffect?
c) Create light or glare?
d) Other
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological or archaeological -
resources?
b) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
❑
Potentially
❑
❑
❑
Significant
❑X
❑
❑
Impact
❑
❑X
Potentially
Unless
Less Than
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact'
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑LAJ
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
E
❑
❑
❑
E
❑
❑
0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑X
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment -Initial Study 10 February 3, 1997
c) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
d) Affect a recognized historical site?
e) Other
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the
environment in one which occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
c) Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited but cumulatively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate resources
where the impact on each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is significant.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
■❑
FE -1
FE -1
01
El
n
Less Than
Potentially
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
Potentially
Unless
Significant
Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
❑ ❑
❑ ❑
■❑
FE -1
FE -1
01
El
n
Less Than
Significant
No
Impact
Impact
❑
❑X
❑
0
❑ E
❑ ❑X
F
❑X
0
0
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment -Initial Study 11 - February 3, 1997
Potentially
Significant
Impact
XVII. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINUMUS" FINDING
a) Will the project have an adverse effect either
individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife
resources? Wildlife shall be defined for the purpose
of this question as "all wild animals, birds, plants,
fish, amphibians, and related ecological
communities, including the habitat upon which the
wildlife depends for its continued viability."
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant No
Incorporated Impact Impact
a
RaltroadAvenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment-IntialStudy 12 February3, 1997
XVIII. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ANWOR EARLIER
ANALYSES:
Land Use and Planning
a, b,c. The proposed project is not in conflict with general plan designation or zoning.
The proposed improvements will occur substantially within existing Railroad
Avenue right-of-way. The surrounding area on both sides of Railroad Avenue is
designated for Community Commercial uses in both the General Plan and the
Zoning Map.
d. The proposed project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community. Immediately adjacent and parallel to the proposed
project on its east side is the Metrolink railroad tracks, separating the commercial
and industrial uses on the west side of Railroad Avenue from the residential
areas immediately east of the project area. Improving Railroad Avenue creates
an opportunity to balance roadway capacity and travel demand between San
Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue, reducing the potentially divisive effects of
a San Fernando Road, a four -lane regional highway carrying a substantial
volume of traffic, on old downtown Newhall. It also provides opportunities to
connect the old downtown with the surrounding region via a potential future
Metrolink station at Railroad Avenue and Market Street.
e. There are no Significant Ecological Areas within the project area. The proposed
project will occur substantially within the existing Railroad Avenue right-of-way.
To the extent that additional right-of-way is required, it is located in areas
presently developed in industrial or commercial nursery uses or adjacent to the
Metrolink railroad tracks.
IL Population and Housing
The proposed project will not alter the location, distribution, density or growth
rate of the human population in or around the project area, and will not
cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections.
b. The project will not result in a net loss of jobs. In order to obtain the necessary
right-of-way to implement the proposed project, property which is presently the
site of a commercial nursery will be acquired. However, the nursery will be
relocated to an alternate site within the project area, and this relocation is not
expected to significantly impact the employment base within the study area.
The proposed project will not displace any current or proposed housing.
Additionally, the project would not create a demand for additional housing.
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment - Initial Study 13 February 3. 1997
III. Geologic Problems
a,b,c. The proposed project will not result in unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures. The project site is fairly flat and the amount of additional
grading required to implement the proposed improvements will involve
approximately a 17 square foot area of fill and a 43 square foot cut area. The
widening of the roadway will result in some minor additional overcovering of soil
with asphalt. This is area which is presently used for vehicle parking and other
activities which would typically occur along a paved roadway. The project will not
result in changes in topography or ground surface relief features.
d. No unique geologic or physical features exist on or are associated with the
project area. No impacts are anticipated.
The potential for natural disasters including: seiche, tsunami, volcanism,
landslides or mudflows does not exist in the project area. However, Southern
California is a highly active seismic region. To the east of the project area, the
San Gabriel Fault, capable of generating .a 7.5 magnitude event, traverses the
the City of Santa Clarita. Splitting from the San Gabriel Fault approximately 3
miles north of the downtown core area is the Holser Fault, and approximately
miles to the south of the project area is the Santa Susanna Fault zone. The
proposed project does not increase the likely exposure of people or property to
earthquakes or events along this fault, since its function is to carry existing traffic
which is presently traveling along San Fernando Road, or traveling to/from
existing development along Railroad Avenue.
g -h. The proposed project will not result in changes in deposition, erosion or siltation,
and does not include modifications of a wash, channel, creek or river. The
proposed improvements follow the general alignment of the existing Railroad
Avenue with only minor modifications. Roadway widening along the west side
involves areas which are presently paved, generally sidewalks and parking
areas. Widening which will occur along the east side of the roadway, outside the
existing Railroad Avenue right-of-way, would involve unpaved areas within the
MTA/Metrolink right-of-way.
i j. The earth movement required to implement the proposed project involves less
than 25,000 cubic yards, including the removal of the existing pavement section.
It is estimated that the proposed project will involve a cut area of approximately
17 square feet and a fill area of approximately 43 square feet. The project site is
basically flat.
k. The project site is not within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment -Initial Study 14 February 3, 1997
IV. Water
a. The widening and realignment of Railroad Avenue may result in slight changes in
absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface
drainage. A new storm drain, tying into the area's storm drain system, is
included within the proposed project to accommodate surface drainage.
b. The proposed project will not expose people to flooding or other water related
hazards. Presently, San Fernando Road crosses Newhall Creek north of 12th
Street, at the north end of the project area. The proposed project does not
include modifications to the existing bridge over Newhall Creek.
c -d. The proposed project will not result in changes in the amount of surface water in
Newhall Creek or will it substantially alter the amount or character of discharge to
Newhall Creek surface waters or cause other alterations of surface water quality.
For most of its length, the project is separated from Newhall Creek by the
Metrolink railroad tracks. The future confluence of Railroad Avenue and San
Fernando Road is to occur north of 11th Street, south of the San Fernando Road
crossing of Newhall Creek, does not include alterations to that bridge crossing
Newhall Creek. and is not anticipated to affect the existing character and quantity
of surface water discharge.
e. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements will not be
affected by the construction of the proposed project.
f - i. The proposed project will not impact groundwater through the direct addition or
withdrawal, alternation of flow, adversely affecting water quality, or substantially
reducing the amount otherwise available for public water supplies. Although the
widening of the roadway and connections with San Fernando Road will result in
an increase in impervious surfaces within the project area, the extent of the
coverage from the project is not substantial enough to significantly affect
groundwater.
V. Air Quality
a. Short-term air quality impacts may be associated with construction of the project.
Watering of the project site will mitigate potential impacts of construction related
dust. Emissions are expected from gasoline and diesel -powered grading and
paving equipment and fugitive dust associated with earth moving activities.
However, the project involves only minimal grading, with associated impacts very
short in duration. .
b. There are a number of sensitive receptors within 400 to 600 feet of the project
area, including.
Newhall Elementary School
Newhall Community Hospital
William S. Hart Park
Railroad Avenue Improvements -
Environmental Assessment • Initial Study 15 February 3, 1997
The proposed project is intended to reduce traffic along San Fernando Road,
balancing the volume of traffic presently carried along San Fernando Road
between San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue. San Fernando Road is
located between the proposed project and each of the sensitive receptors. It is
anticipated that the proposed project will improve traffic flow and level of service
along San Fernando Road with the result that these sensitive receptors will be
exposed to the same or lesser levels of emissions than under current conditions,
as traffic shifts to Railroad Avenue and the volume of traffic and levels of
congestion along San Fernando Road decrease.
C. Short-term construction impacts may result in objectionable odors during the
installation of the asphalt roadway surface.
VI. Transportation/Circulation
a. A comprehensive traffic study (included herein as Attachment A) has been
prepared, analyzing the potential traffic related impacts of four scenarios for
Railroad Avenue and San Fernando Road. The scenarios range from the No
Build conditions (Scenario 1) with Railroad Avenue and San Fernando Road
remaining in their current configurations, to the upgrade of Railroad Avenue to a
4 -lane roadway and the downsizing of San Fernando Road to a 2 -lane roadway
(Scenario 4). The proposed project is represented by Scenario 2. For each
scenario, traffic conditions with and without the development of a Metrolink
station along the east side of Railroad Avenue at Market Street were analyzed.
The widening and improvement of Railroad Avenue will bring it into compliance
with current City standards for commercial streets. By providing a continuous
lane in each direction, on -street parking and a two-way left tum lane, a portion of
the traffic from San Fernando Road diverts to Railroad Avenue. Key
intersections within the study area are estimated to operate at acceptable levels
of service during both peak hours. In fact, the level of service along San
Fernando Road improves over existing conditions as traffic volumes decrease.
The construction and operation of a transit station in the downtown Newhall core
along Railroad Avenue at Market Street might impact intersections along San
Fernando Road. However, in no case would the impacted intersections have a
level -of -service worse than D. In fact, the intersections as represented in
scenarios would have adequate capacity to accommodate station related traffic.
The proposed project, represented by Scenario 2 in the Traffic Study, is not
expected to result in an increase in the total traffic volume through downtown
Newhall. Instead, the project is intended to increase the utilization of Railroad
Avenue through the area. This could provide the opportunity to downscale the
role of San Fernando Road as a regional travel facility, focusing instead on local
downtown traffic, without impacting the regional traffic carrying capacity of the
overall corridor. This is consistent with the concepts contained in the Downtown
Newhall Revitalization Program.
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment - Initial Study .16 Februaty3, 1997
b. The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features or
from incompatible uses. The proposed project will be designed to the standards
accepted by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the City
of Santa Clarita.
c,g. The proposed improvements to Railroad Avenue, when completed, will enhance
emergency access and access to nearby uses. As part of the project, 5th Street
is proposed to be closed east of San Fernando Road. It will continue to provide
access to properties with frontage, connecting them to the areawide -
transportation system via Railroad Avenue. Construction of the improvements
will be staged. Emergency access and access to adjacent businesses will be
maintained during construction. Once completed; the realignment and
improvement of Railroad Avenue will make it a continuous facility, linking the
area to the surrounding roadway system and providing improved through -traffic
connectivity.
Although the proposed project will eliminate approximately 121 on -street parking
spaces along Railroad Avenue, there is adequate parking remaining within the
project area to accommodate existing parking demand. Many of the parking
spaces which are to be eliminated as part of the proposed project were informal,
unpaved areas.. Once completed, sufficient paved on -street parking will be
provided to accommodate observed demand.
e.f. The improvements to Railroad Avenue, in particular, the realignment and the
shoulder improvements will facilitate travel for bicyclists and pedestrians,
compared to existing conditions. With the potential for a Metrolink station in the
future, the proposed project enhances opportunities for alternative transportation
in the area.
VII. Biological Resources
a,b. The project is not anticipated to result in changes in the diversity or number of
species of plants or animals,. nor is it expected to impact any unique, rare or
endangered species of plants or animals. The project area is substantially
developed in transportation infrastructure and industrial uses. No native
threatened or endangered vegetation or animal species presently exists within
the project area.
c -d. No oak trees will be impacted as a result of the proposed project. The project
area contains no wetland habitat or blueline streams, and is neither a wildlife
dispersal nor migration corridor.
Vlll. Energy and Mineral Resources
a. The proposed project would not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans.
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment -Initial Study 17 February$ 1997
b. The construction of the project will use non-renewable resources. However, the
amount will be negligible and they will not be used in a wasteful or inefficient
manner. The scope of the project is not substantial enough to result in any
significant impacts.
C. The proposed project is not anticipated to result in the loss of availability of
known mineral resources that would be of future value to the region and state
residents.
IX. Hazards
a,c,d. The proposed project will not contain any mechanism that would cause an
explosion or release of hazardous substances. It will not create any health
hazard or potential health hazard and will not involve the exposure of people to
existing sources of potential health hazards.
b. The proposed project does not interfere with emergency response or emergency
evacuation plans. In fact, by upgrading and improving Railroad Avenue and
providing an alternative to San Fernando Road, it is anticipated that the
proposed project will improve emergency response and evacuation options.
e. The proposed project is not anticipated to increase the fire hazard in the area.
Although landscaping will be incorporated into the project, this is not considered
to be significant as a fire hazard. Additionally, the project is not located in an
area that is considered to be a hazardous fire area.
X. Noise
a The proposed project is not anticipated to result in long-term increases in noise
levels within the project area. Some short-term increases in noise levels
associated with project construction are expected.
b. The project may result in temporary exposure of people to severe noise levels or
vibration during project construction, due to heavy construction -related .
equipment and activities. However, given the proximity of the Metrolink railroad
tracks, serving as a buffer, the construction noise is not expected to significantly
impact residents in the local vicinity.
XI. Public Services
a,c. The project would not impact or result in a need for new or altered fire protection
services, or schools.
b. Normal project operations would not require additional police facilities, personnel
or equipment. Law enforcement along the proposed project would not alter
significantly from existing provisions although the focus may change from
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment - Initial Study 18 February 3, 1997
providing security to motorists and adjacent properties to enforcing traffic laws
and regulations along the improved Railroad Avenue.
XII. Utilities
a - h The proposed project will not result in a need for new systems or supplies, or
substantial alteration to utilities. There is a 22 inch natural gas main within the
project area which will not be disturbed. Some minor.gas lines may be relocated
within the immediate area. Likewise, the overhead power lines on the west side
of Railroad Avenue will be relocated to accommodate the widening of the
roadway. These modifications will be coordinated with the City of Santa Clarita
and the appropriate utility provider. The project may also require some minor
alterations to power supplies and communication systems to accommodate
traffic control systems.
XIII. Aesthetics
a -b. The proposed project will not impact any scenic vistas, nor will it have a negative
effect on the aesthetic character and quality of the project area. In fact, the
project area is significantly developed in industrial uses fronting Railroad Avenue.
Railroad Avenue is presently unimproved on the east side, lacking curb, gutter or
sidewalks. Parking occurs along the east shoulder of the roadway in an informal,
and sometimes haphazard fashion, particularly at the north end of the project
area. The proposed improvements to Railroad Avenue will bring the roadway up
to accepted design standards and will include a landscapecomponent,
improving not only operations of the roadway, but its aesthetic character as well.
C. Additional traffic along Railroad Avenue, projected to occur with completion of
the proposed improvements, would result in increased light from automobile
headlights after daylight hours. However, the land uses abutting Railroad
Avenue are industrial and commercial uses, which would not be significantly
impacted by increased light or glare from headlights. The grade differential
between Railroad Avenue and the railroad tracks would preclude impact of light
or glare of headlights on approaching trains, or on residents to the east..
XIV. Cultural Resources
a -d The proposed project is not expected to result in the.alteration or destruction of a
prehistoric or historic archeological site, nor will it physically or aesthetically
affect a historic or prehistoric building, structure, or object in an adverse manner.
The project will result in the demolition of two structures presently in use as part
of a commercial nursery. These structures are not considered to have the
potential to be of prehistoric or historic value. No other. actions are being
proposed that would have any effect on ethnic or cultural values and there are
not existing religious or sacred uses within the project area.
Railroad Avenue Improvements
Environmental Assessment - Initial Study 19 February 3, 1997
Proposed Railroad Avenue
Improvement Project
With/Without Proposed
Newhall Metrolink Station
TRAFFIC and PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Santa Clarita, California
February 4, 1997
Prepared by: Katz, Okitsu & Associates
1200 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 140
Monterey Park, California 91754
(213)260-4703
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ..................................................... 1
I. Introduction........................................................ 3
A. AREA DESCRIPTION ........................................... 6
B. PROJECT SCENARIO DESCRIPTION ................................ 7
II. Traffic Data Collection and Analysis Methodology .............................. 9
A: TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA COLLECTION SUMMARY ................... 9
B. FORECAST TRAFFIC VOLUMES .................................. 9
C. TRIP DIVERSION METHODOLOGY ................................ 9
D. METROLINK STATION TRIP DISTRIBUTION ........................ 10
E.: IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA 11
F. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ........................... 11
III. Improvement Geometries ............................................. 31
A. SAN FERNANDO ROADIRAILROAD AVENUE S/0 4TH STREET LAYOUT 31
B. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/RAILROAD AVENUE/11TH STREET LAYOUT ...... 32
C. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/MARKET STREET STRIPING MODIFICATIONS ..... 32
D. LYONS AVENUE EXTENSION ................................... 32
IV. Intersection Level of Service Analysis Without Metrolink Station ................... 33
V. Level -of -Service With Metrolink Station and Determination of Significant Impacts ........ 35
VI. On -Street Parking Analysis
A. EXISTING ON -STREET PARKING UTILIZATION ....:......... I ..... 39
B. PARKING OBSERVATIONS AT NEARBY METROLINK
AND PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES ............................. 42
C. PARKING CONDITION WITHOUT STATION ....................... 43
D. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH PARK AND RIDE ................... 44
E. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH METROLINK ...................... 45
APPENDIX A - TRAFFIC COUNTS
APPENDIX B - BUS TRIP INFORMATION
APPENDIX C - ADJACENT METROLINK STATION PARKING OBSERVATIONS
CALTRANS PARK AND RIDE PARKING LOT OBSERVATIONS
APPENDIX D - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX E - PROPOSED INTERSECTION LAYOUTS FOR INTERIM (Scenario 2) CONDITIONS
PROPOSED TRANSIT STATION LAYOUT
APPENDIX F - LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX G - DECEMBER 12, 1996 PARKING SURVEY
Executive Summary
TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Proposed Railroad Avenue hnprovement Project With/Without Proposed Newhall Metrolink Station
Santa Clarita, California
A traffic study was conducted to analyze the impacts of the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project as
well as the proposed Newhall Metrolink Station. The study found that all study intersections currently
operate at an acceptable level -of -service during peak periods. With the improvement of Railroad
Avenue providing one lane in each direction, parking and a two-way left -turn lane, some traffic from
San Fernando Road diverts to Railroad Avenue. The level -of -service on San Fernando Road improves
over existing conditions as traffic volumes decrease. The widening of Railroad Avenue would not affect
the feasibility of the proposed Lyons Avenue extension.
A future year (1998) was studied to determine the impact of reducing San Fernando Road to one lane
in each direction (Scenario 3). With proper intersection design at the San Fernando Road/Railroad
Avenue south of 4th Street and San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street intersections, traffic
flows would redistribute between San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue and all intersections will
operate at an acceptable level -of -service. This configuration would be adequate to handle projected
traffic volumes until the year 2004 when additional lanes would be needed on either Railroad Avenue
or San Fernando Road to handle traffic growth.
Traffic volumes from the Year 2006 were analyzed on a roadway network in which San Fernando Road
was a two-lane roadway and Railroad Avenue would become the major 4 -lane north -south street and
a truck route in the project area. Railroad Avenue would be a four -lane roadway and the intersections
of San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue near 4th Street and 11th Street would be redesigned to provide
for heavy San Fernando Road to Railroad Avenue movements. All intersections under this scenario
would operate at acceptable levels -of -service.
Construction of the Metrolink Station and its parking lots will require curb and gutter on the east side
of Railroad Avenue and both sides of Market Street to adequately separate the station parking lots from
street traffic. The transit buses would be using curbside bus stops along Railroad Avenue, as is being
proposed in the latest Metrolink Station conceptual drawings. Even without reconstruction of Railroad
Avenue (Scenario 1), roadway widening would be required along the station frontage to provide the
adequate roadway width.
Acquisition of property by the City on the east side of Railroad Avenue south of Market Street provides
an opportunity to realign Railroad Avenue at 6th Street. Currently Railroad Avenue traffic must
negotiate a right-angle jog at 6th Street. Realigning Railroad Avenue to provide a smoother transition
will make the station more accessible to buses. In addition, Market Street would need to be improved
at the railroad crossing to handle station -generated traffic and pedestrian movements..
The Railroad Avenue project (Scenario 2) provides all of the necessary roadway facilities for adequate
Metrolink Station access. Traffic attracted to the transit station along Railroad Avenue at Market Street
might impact intersections along San Fernando Road. However, in no case would the impacted
intersections have a level -of -service worse than LOS D. Since the intersection layouts for each of the
Scenarios were created to handle Metrolink -generated traffic up to LOS D. the term "significantly
impacted" is theoretical. An alternative description would be that these intersections would have
adequate capacity to handle Metrolink traffic, but if the Metrolink Station is not built, these intersections
would have excess capacity.
The Railroad Avenue project under design will not result in the loss of legal parking spaces, although
the ultimate 4 -lane configuration of Railroad Avenue would require prohibition of parking on the east
side. This decrease of 120 spaces could be alleviated by the implementation of the Downtown Newhall
Improvement Program.
The latest site plan for the Newhall Metrolink Station proposes 208 off-street parking spaces. Excess
demand for station parking could be accommodated by on -street parking along Pine Street, and along
both sides of Railroad Avenue as currently designed. With the ultimate 4 -lane configuration of Railroad
Avenue, 120 on -street parking spaces along the east side of Railroad Avenue would be removed, and
demand for parking within walking distance of the Railroad Avenue/Market Street intersection could
exceed supply. This situation could be alleviated either by the construction of additional off-street
parking lots to the east of the proposed station, or by the implementation of the Downtown Newhall
Improvement Program.
2
TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Proposed Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
With/Without Proposed Newhall Metrolink Station
Santa Clarita, California
I. Introduction
The City of Santa Clarita, California is exploring options to modify the traffic flow along the San
Fernando Road (SR126) corridor between 4th Street and 11th Street. The improvement of Railroad
Avenue is the first step in implementing the revitalization of the Newhall Downtown Core. On June
11, 1996, the City of Santa Clarita approved in concept the Newhall Improvement Plan which addresses
modifications to Railroad Avenue. The City of Santa Clarita is also considering the construction and
operation of a Metrolink Station in the Newhall downtown core. The preferred station location will be
along the east side of Railroad Avenue at Market Street. Construction of a Metrolink Station along
Railroad Avenue will require some improvement to Railroad Avenue. At a minimum the roadway must
be improved with curb and gutter along the east side of the roadway, construction of driveways to serve
the Metrolink parking lots and geometry modifications to accommodate bus.service to the station.
Figure 1 shows the location of the project.
This study looks at a street system bounded by 11th Street to the north, 4th Street to the south, San
Fernando Road to the west and Pine Street to the east. Figure 2 shows a schematic plan of the proposed
Railroad Avenue street improvements and the preferred Newhall Metrolink Station location. This study
closely examines traffic impacts at the following intersections:
• San Fernando Road/4th Street
• San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue
• San Fernando Road/Market Street
• San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
• San Fernando Road/11th Street
• Railroad Avenue/Market Street
• Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
• Pine Street/Market Street
A traffic signal warrant analysis is provided for San Fernando Road at the prolongation of Railroad
Avenue south of 4th Street and the Railroad Avenue intersections with Market Street, Lyons Avenue
and 11th Street. The traffic signal warrant analysis was performed for Scenario 2 which is described
below.
A TRAFFIX traffic analysis model has been set up for this study. The TRAFFIX model was used to
determine intersection level -of -service for the following scenarios:
® Katz, Oldtsu & Associates
NEWHALL R
V� y RUCFRQ. Nps I
ST
J
�y
Ylutw s
PROJECT SITE
fAYloN HS , ' ``,� S� � �� S
Cl . I
a
AV
nzoo £ 4 JlJ r O y -fit v
F Lx
2 FLM
13 G t� oma
' 71 AF7r—•--a � S
----._----
a'S
SEC � � � x,36 m 1 A 3;�?1°w Q J•� <<
i \
60 SAS FEZ Z31� p t
MILLIAN
WT PAW 1 � ?p�
s, i .. • � 1�in0 t a�} � 7ygypo
ti Nt
i � t 4�y � �: I •�
S17, ^ 232M e 4 I
rigure 1 -Location Map
Railroad Avenue Study
Existing Existing Proposed
R/W R/W R/W
14' 11' TA R
80' MTA
License
Agreement
6' 8' 1 24' 12' 16'8' 6' Interim (Scenarios 2 & 3)
Parking Parkin I
12' 12 12' 11' 13'
Ultimate (Scenario 4)
h
Figure 2
Typical Sections
Railroad Avenue
-r. . n' .rrr .r -u.r.. •...
1 1996 Existing Geometry (4 lanes) Existing Geometry (2 lanes)
2 1996 Existing Geometry (4 lanes) Improved (2 lanes plus TWLTL)
3 1998 Modified Geometry (2 lanes plus TWLTL) Improved (2 lanes plus TWLTL)
4 2006 Modified Geometry (2 lanes plus TWLTL) Improved (4 lanes plus TWLTL)
TWLTL = Two-way left -tum lane
Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 include the closure of 5th Street at Railroad Avenue.
The study incrementally analyzes the impact of annual traffic growth on Scenario 3 above to determine
the future year at which point the critical study intersection reaches level -of -service (LOS) E. The study
briefly discusses the geometric requirements of a proposed "Lyons Avenue Flyover" in which Lyons
Avenue is extended to the east over the railroad right-of-way. The impact of this flyover is qualitatively
discussed in this report.
Finally, a parking availability and utilization study along both San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue
between 4th Street and 11th Street was conducted and summarized. The results of this study are
provided in the report.
A. AREA DESCRIPTION
The project area is in the Newhall community within the City of Santa Clarita.
San Femando Road (SR126) is a four -lane state highway running north -south through Newhall. San
Fernando Road connects the communities of Newhall, Valencia and Saugus with the Antelope Valley
Freeway (SR14). Between 4th Street and 11th Street, the land use along San Fernando Road is
commercial/retail. The City of Santa Clarita is studying a plan to reduce the number of lanes along
this segment to two lanes making the area more pedestrian friendly and more conducive to a downtown
commercial area.
Ra ma. d Avenue is currently a 2 -lane roadway which runs just east of San Fernando Road and just west
Of the MTA railroad tracks which are used by Metrolink and Union Pacific Railroad. Several service
type businesses, primarily auto repair shops, are located along the west side of the street. The
properties along the east side of Railroad Avenue include a lot used for storage and a nursery. Vehicles
park along the east side of the street facing perpendicular away from the roadway centerline. The east
side of the street does not have curbs and gutters. Parallel parking is provided along the west side of
the street where there are curbs and gutters.
Newhal_ I Avenue is a two-lane north -south local collector road which connects San Fernando Road with
Lyons Avenue to the north and then runs parallel to San Fernando Road.
Atli Stre t is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Fourth Street terminates at San Fernando Road to the west.
5di Stree[ is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Fifth Street terminates at Newhall Avenue to the west.
6th Curet is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Sixth Street terminates at Newhall Avenue to the west.
Market Stree is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within
the Study Area. Market Street terminates west of Newhall Avenue. Market Street is the only street
which crosses the railroad right-of-way within the Study Area. The railroad crossing is gated and has
one lane in each direction.
B111-Stree is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Eighth Street terminates west of Newhall Avenue.
21h Streel is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within
the Study Area. Ninth Street terminates just west of Newhall Avenue.
Lvoaa Avenu is a two-lane local street between San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
study area. Lyons Avenue is a four -lane arterial highway west of San Fernando Road and provides a
direct route to Interstate 5 to the west.
Hart Park Enron is located on the west side of San Fernando Road across from 4th Street.
M= _2= tr t is a 40 -foot local roadway just east of the railroad right -of --way providing access to the
residential area located there. Pine Street terminates at Market Street on the north and continues south
of San Fernando Road.
B. PROJECT SCENARIO DESCRIPTION
At the request of the City of Santa Clarita, the following project scenarios were studied.
Scenario 1 (With and Withnnt a M r t a
Scenario 1 assumes that the lane configurations on Railroad Avenue and San Fernando Road remain
the same as the existing condition. Existing (1996) traffic volumes were used in the analysis of this
scenario.
t_ � ,t� �. a �. •t
Scenario 2 assumes that Railroad Avenue is improved and becomes a two-lane upgraded roadway with
a two-way left -turn lane and parking on both sides of the street. Existing (1996) traffic volumes were
used in the analysis of this scenario. A cross-section of this scenario is shown on Figure 2, with
proposed lane dimensions labeled "Interim."
Scenario 3 !With and Wirhnnt a Metrolink e
Scenario 3 assumes that Railroad Avenue is improved and becomes a two-lane upgraded roadway with
a two-way left -tum lane in the median and parking on both sides of the street. In addition, San
Fernando Road is reduced to two lanes (one lane in each direction) between Newhall Avenue and Lyons
Avenue. Future (1998) traffic volumes were used in the analysis of this scenario. The lane widths for
this scenario correspond to those labeled "Interim" in Figure 2,
Scenario 4 (With and Without a Metrolink St
Scenario 4 assumes that Railroad Avenue is improved and becomes a four -lane upgraded roadway. The
intersections of Railroad Avenue with San Fernando Road south of 4th Street and at 11th Street are
modified to make the Railroad Avenue to San Fernando Road the major movement. In addition, San
Fernando Road is reduced to two lanes (one lane in each direction) between Newhall Avenue and Lyons
Avenue. Future (2006) traffic volumes were used in the analysis of this scenario. The lane widths for
this scenario correspond to those labeled "Ultimate" in Figure 2.
H. Traffic Data Collection and Analysis Methodology
A. TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA COLLECTION SUMMARY
Katz, Okitsu & Associates obtained two-hour AM and PM turning movement counts at the following
intersections:
• San Fernando Road/4th Street
• San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue/5th Street
• San Fernando Road/Market Street
• San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
• San Fernando Road/ IIth Street
• Railroad Avenue/Market Street
• Pine Street/Market Street
The AM period was counted from 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM. The PM period was counted from 4:30 to
6:30 PM.
Katz, Okitsu & Associates also obtained 24-hour volume counts on the following street segments:
• Northbound San Fernando Road south of 4th Street
• Southbound San Fernando Road north of 4th Street
• Eastbound Hart Park Driveway west of San Fernando Road
• Westbound 4th Street east of San Fernando Road
• Northbound San Fernando Road south of Lyons Avenue
• Southbound San Fernando Road north of Lyons Avenue
• Eastbound Lyons Avenue west of San Fernando Road
• Westbound Lyons Avenue east of San Fernando Road
• Northbound Railroad Avenue south of Market Street
• Southbound Railroad Avenue north of Market Street
• Eastbound Market Street west of Railroad Avenue
• Westbound Market Street east of Railroad Avenue
Traffic count data sheets are provided in Appendix A.
B. FORECAST TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The study looked at traffic conditions for Scenario 3 using forecast traffic volumes for the year 1998.
The study also analyzes traffic volumes for Scenario 4 using forecast traffic volumes for.the year 2006.
Based on discussions with City of Santa Clarita staff, it was determined that an annual growth rate of
2 % be applied to existing volumes in order to develop future traffic volumes.
C. TRIP DIVERSION METHODOLOGY
In developing traffic volumes for Scenario 2, approximately 20% of the southbound San Fernando Road
through trips were diverted from San Fernando Road to Railroad Avenue. A slightly higher percentage
of northbound San Fernando Road through trips, 35%, were diverted from San Fernando Road to
Railroad Avenue in the interim condition. The northbound right -turn movements to Railroad Avenue
are easier to make than the required left turn movements for southbound traffic from San Fernando
Road to Railroad Avenue.
In developing traffic volumes for Scenario 3, north -south trips through the project area were split to
place 50% on Railroad Avenue and 50% on San Fernando Road. Both Railroad Avenue and San
Fernando Road are two-lane roadways in this alternative. Trips were then redistributed from this first
iteration to maintain existing turning movement volumes onto Newhall Avenue and Lyons Avenue along
San Fernando Road.
Scenario 4 traffic volumes were developed assuming that the Railroad Avenue intersections with San
Fernando Road at 11th Street and 4th Street would be redesigned to make the movement to Railroad
Avenue from both directions the easiest movement to make. In addition, it is assumed that San
Fernando Road between 4th Street and 11th Street will be reduced from two lanes to one lane in each
direction. The trip distribution for Scenario 4 is based on an 80%. diversion in San Fernando Road
north -south through trips to Railroad Avenue. Again, trips were redistributed from this first iteration
to maintain existing turning movement volumes onto Newhall Avenue and Lyons Avenue.
D. METROLINK STATION TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The proposed Metrolink Station is not expected to provide the full range of express bus and van pool
commuter services provided at the existing Santa Clarita Station. However, this study assumes a limited
amount of freeway express buses and vanpools will serve the proposed Newhall Station.
Based on observations of the park and ride lots to the south on San Fernando Road and their proximity
to the Antelope Valley Freeway, it was assumed that 50 park and ride vehicles would park at the new
station and that 15 vehicles would pick up these riders for a total of 65 trips. The buses and van pools
also exit the site to continue on to their destination. One-half of these trips would occur during the peak
hour in the AM and PM. The buses and van pools would leave the station to the south during the AM
and return from the south during the PM. Trip distribution is based on the same methodology described
below for Metrolink patron trips. Bus trips were calculated based on existing bus tables and are
provided for review in Appendix B.
Vanpool, park-and-ride and Metrolink patron trips were distributed as 65% from the north via San
Fernando Road, 20 % from the west via Lyons Avenue and Market Street, 5 % from the south via San
Fernando Road, and 5 % from the east via Market Street. All trips will be into the station during the
AM peak period and all trips will be from the station during the PM peak period. It is assumed that the
peak period is two hours so one-half of the total trips will arrive at the station during .the AM and PM
peak hours. This trip distribution was used for all new trips to the Newhall site.
This study realizes that Metrolink Station usage is dependent on parking space availability and other
transit options. However, this study will use the parking demand for the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station
as a basis for Newhall Station demand (see Appendix Q and assume that 104 cars, 33 % of the existing
demand at the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station, will divert from the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station to
the Newhall Metrolink Station. The study also assumes that 50 new trips will be attracted to the site
10
during the AM peak periods and will leave the site during the PM peak period. The total number of
Metrolink trips is 154 per peak period and it is assumed half will occur during the peak hour.
No credits are given for reduced trips due to a diversion of automobile trips to transit trips.
Figures 3 through 8 are provided at the end of this chapter and show the trip distribution diagrams for
park and ride, bus and Metrolink patron trips. The trip distribution is based on the Scenario 1 lane
geometries. San Fernando Road trips from the north access the station by turning left on Lyons Avenue
and then -right on Railroad Avenue. Trips leaving the station to proceed north on San Fernando Road
first turn left from Railroad Avenue to Lyons Avenue and then right onto San Fernando Road. The
trips are redistributed in Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 to utilize the new San Fernando Road/Railroad
Avenue/11th Street intersection. A similar trip redistribution occurs at the San Fernando Road/Railroad
Avenue intersection south of 4th Street for Scenarios 2, 3 and 4.
Future transit station trips were factored by the 2% annual growth rate discussed above. Scenario 2
used 1996 station trips developed with the above methodology. Scenario 3 factors up the 1996 transit
station trips by a factor of 1.04 (2% per year compounded for two years). Scenario 4 factors up the
1996 transit station trips by a factor of 1.22 (2% per year compounded for 10 years).
E. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
Existing traffic volumes on San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue were used as the basis for this
study. Volume/capacity ratios and levels of service at signalized intersections were calculated using
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. Following the City of Santa Clarita guidelines
for traffic analysis, the volume/capacity ratios were adjusted so that no critical movement had a level
of saturation less than 0.05. Impacts are considered significant based on the following criteria:
0.00 to 0.79
0.80 to 0.89
0.90 or more
Equal to or greater than 0.04
Equal to or greater than 0.02
Equal to or greater than 0.01
Unsignalized intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual Operation Method.
Criteria used to establish significant impact was a worsening of level -of -service to LOS F.
Traffic lane configurations and volumes for all scenarios for the AM and PM peak periods are shown
in Figures 9 through 20 at the end of this chapter.
F. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS .
A traffic • signal warrant analysis was performed for Scenario 2 for the Railroad Avenue study
intersections. The traffic signal warrant calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D of this report.
The results of the signal warrant analysis are provided in Table I below.
11
Table 1
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Scenario 2
Intersection
Traffic Signal Warranted?
San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue SIO 4th Street
YES
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
NO**
Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
NO
San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
YES
Hallic SLOW ,s rmummenaea at this intersection due to the proximity of the railroad crossing to the
east.
Based on the result of the traffic signal warrant analysis using Scenario 2 traffic, traffic signals were
assumed for the following intersections in Scenarios 2, 3, and 4:
San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue SIO 4th Street
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
12
Last Revised: January 31, 1997
Figure 3
Park and Ride Vehicle Trip Distribution Railroad Avenue Stud
AM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) TAvenu eStud
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1
Last Revised: Januaiy3t, 1997
Figure 4
Park and Ride Vehicle Trip Distribution
PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1 7Yaf xAwlysLr
Last Revised: January 31, 1997
Figure 5
Bus Trip Distribution Railroad Avenue Study
AM Peak Hour (6:30AM - 7:30 AM) Volumes (Year 1996) Traffic Analysis
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1
Last Revised. January 31, 1997
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Figure 6
Bus Trip Distribution
PM Peak Hour (5:00 PM -6:OO PM) Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue study
Scenario 1 TraffkAnal3sis
Lest Revised; January 31, 1997
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Figure 7
Metrolink Patron Trip Distribution
AM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996)
Scenario 1
Railroad Avenue Study
Traffic Analysis
Last Revisad. January 37, 7997
Figure S
Bus Trip Distribution
PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1 77affcAnalysis
Last Revised, January 31, 1997
Figure 9
Lane Configuration
Scenario 1 Existing Conditions Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Traffic Analysis
Ir9201�
Q ms am i
a0 y
18151\,4,
dN-t
� 1112
s�00,
°`7 N
Ln
9
ry C)
'0 /x1012
�NMM.M.nn � \4A� 40 , S
6�31d�
e
SU% 11d ,,« • r«M. G�
t
6/4-►, 1,1;r ds
42 i4s,2s w Sang
e
As /� ��7y�9 n'anaORoav
O�s� � Ze 26j�j22
I O�OO\ Oy
O�
Last Revised. January 31, 1997 Figure 10
Scenario 1 Without Metrolink Station Railroad Avenue Study
AMI PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Traffic analysis
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
n� JJJJJ,,, �vVO R\
n
x� g11aa� � 1126110
1ro11
s lo�SP� wo O p12
l TL 2
gl N°o
rn
assesa $ do 113
g15 8� o�os> �„• -h � o�
6p11p0'�' ^ xxx.w"" O x_06+
`ro
(p '9a
d�� e��0
oj�sabs5�ee�
7�� o�
`'o �y w "x.x o
8151 .� w 'oo oo� 31p oL
0mR,p13
�i
4S Q, Sao p
as
vs�,o/so%
01 p
O�
LOW Revised. January 31, 1997
Figure 11
Scenario 1 With Metrolink
olink Station
AMI PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Traryk Analysis
Last Ravlsad: January 31, 1997
Figure 12
KA�7 Lane Configuration Scenario 2
Existing San Fernando Road, Improved 2 -Lane Railroad Avenue Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates naffuAn4*sts
u
a m� mea
m m
"naii� 0m guae�
NI -1p
$
m
'0 am
�O'o
0/py, 4yo¢'e 0 p�P
48i"' ena'
011
s � 8s�9is�?
79
Last ReH�sed; JJonjuary 31, 1997 Figure 13
Scenario 2 Without Metrolink Station Railroad Avenue Stu
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) a,wttud
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
I
alb
ZN
CPO
R''SOyO
"rnCPO
1aS10 /
10 \
q
101a� o00 �srn
yy�d2� �c.2 �ti6� 0
La k hR s
o�joa+
6811664
X01 ��\86
S3ynro
Last Revfse& January 31, 1997 Figure 14
Scenario 2 With Metrolink Station Railroad Avenue Stud
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) TAvenu eStud
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
�1
M
Kseovihhh,
r
;n
MAI
Last Revised: January 21, 1997 Figure 15
Lane Configuration Scenario 3
2 -Lane San Fernando Road, Improved 2 -Lane Railroad Avenue Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu &Associates TrajfkAnarysb
4,P
to y91
a�aOsL i 0�
p 4kw s pts
ow,.
,� 3613 7 lj
\ \ 6y1 361a
G47193g
�� o61g9
p10 � s
l6�yD,� a
36n
Vaety
t
gye�o 0 0
o�
o.1d+`y��'o
I ` �O
0/0j A?p�A�sr7s o a a�`
Aj 'COO BanFe�
antlm�
ou'9�'0 R' _ f ROaa
%9 0'p
Last Rewfwd: January 31, f 997
Figure 16
•Scenario 3 Without Metrolink Station Railroad Avenue Stu
AM
�
Katz, Okitsu &Associates
63?1999
a�a � �� jam. �►
N
h� c7
T$yg111b
3 O ? LP
0 X19
66,301 Y qqfl�
� �e dao ea`a 6y1361a.,�
s_�� o I' 10
p Q m ii � o i R.•�61t$9
poa
212a�tioa .� j 'c 013 If A o
�` aav 363y�9
6 a ao eac
6�1y96 Neta 3a �ea�
Ar
6, a 2 eq 6
o ��►i Ra �oe d
to,
0/Sj 43900
630/80/0-6.
8yi Bs � SanFe�
d � aoao
00` R�9) RSC
LastRevftmt JJ�wuary 31.1997 Figure 17
Scenario 3 With Metrolink Station
AM/ PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1998) Railroad Avenue Study
T}gBkAnalysis
Katz, Okitsu &Associates
C
It
A<
L931 ROWS&& January 31, 1997
Figure 18
Lane. Configuration Scenario 4 Railroad Avenue Study
2 -Lane San Fernando Road, Improved 4 -Lane Railroad Avenue 7Avenue Stud
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
�6+"aao Ar 616
s is
p16561� 'a���
93
p101 WHO
V
tS0° ay A�
y�aii� 0y 6�00�
o0 6S
a
a
i, R. Qla qG
1\ IOC
016 J/ A�j�0 is 4
33 sZss�� o vi Sa tr
703 o ROed
La.9f Revhear Jsnuary3f, 1DD7
Figure 19
Scenario 4 Without Metrolink Station Railroad Avenue Stud
AM I PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 2006) 7Avenue Stud
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
t
R, A1`L6,L62
LIS" waw o r1$6
3Qp16 �b� rn�
19 1122 �
/ � 13189
1QnQ
�aspd) .jp166l-
o6 9� jo 00,
6616 g "�
1312
m
apq`e'`e o 0s
�dd
a
a
i 1,5 a
to,
0 �,10,
3L �9ZSs9� 9N Sang
ss s
Lest Revked:January37, 1997 Figure 20
Scenario 4 With Metrolink Station uue S
Railroad Avenue AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 2006) atwtt ss
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
III. Improvement Geometries
Construction of the Metrolink Station and its parking lots will require curb and gutter. on the east side
of Railroad Avenue and both sides of Market Street to adequately separate the station parking lots from
street traffic. The transit buses would be using curbside bus stops along Railroad Avenue, as is being
proposed in the latest Metrolink Station conceptual drawings. Even without reconstruction of Railroad
Avenue (Scenario 1), roadway widening would be required along the station frontage to provide the
adequate roadway width.
Acquisition of property by the City on the east side of Railroad Avenue south of Market Street provides
an opportunity to realign Railroad Avenue at 6th Street. Currently Railroad Avenue traffic must
negotiate a right-angle jog at 6th Street. Realigning Railroad Avenue to provide a smoother transition
will make the station more accessible to buses.
Appendix E contains layouts of the interim (Scenario 2) intersection geometries for the San Fernando
Road/Railroad Avenue south of 4th Street and San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
intersections. Appendix E also shows a preliminary site plan for the proposed Newhall Metrolink
Station.
A. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH OF 4TH STREET LAYOUT
Existing Condition (Scenario 1)
Fourth Street currently intersects San Fernando Road and forms a T -intersection. The intersection is
STOP -sign controlled from the east. The William S. Hart Park driveway is located just across the
intersection to the west and is also STOP sign controlled. Fourth Street provides a right -tum lane and
a shared through -and -left turn lane separated by an island.
Interim Condition (Scenarios 2 and 3)
Scenarios 2 and 3 would have an interim configuration extending Railroad Avenue southward parallel
to the railroad tracks until the roadway intersects San Fernando Road. The existing San Fernando
RoadAth Street intersection would remain to provide access to the triangular parcel of land bounded
by San Fernando Road, Railroad Avenue and 4th Street.
The Railroad Avenue extension will be configured to provide for one northbound lane and two
southbound lanes with an exclusive right -tum lane for the northbound San Fernando Road to Railroad
Avenue. Railroad Avenue will be designated a truck route. The new San Fernando Road/Railroad
Avenue intersection would be signalized and would be located less than 40 feet from the intersection
of the railroad tracks with the San Fernando Road centerline. The traffic signal and train signals would
operate using standard railroad preemption.
Ultimate Condition (Scenario 4)
The ultimate configuration is similar to the interim condition (Scenarios 2 and 3) except that Railroad
Avenue would be striped to provide for two lanes in each direction. Railroad Avenue will be designated
31
a truck route. The northbound San Fernando Road approach to Railroad Avenue would provide for
one through lane, a through and right -turn lane and an exclusive right -tum lane.
B. SANFERNANDO ROAD/RAH ROAD AVENUE/11TH STREET LAYOUT
Existing Condition (Scenario I)
Railroad Avenue does not currently intersect San Fernando Road at 11th Street. Railroad Avenue
terminates in a cul-de-sac just north of Lyons Avenue.
Interim Condition (Scenarios 2 and 3)
Railroad Avenue would be extended north to intersect San Fernando Road north of Lyons Avenue.
Railroad Avenue would be widened to provide for a 68 -foot roadway with one lane in each direction
The San Fernando Road/Railroad .Avenue/11th Street intersection would be signalized and provide a
southbound left -tum pocket. The northbound movement from Railroad Avenue to San Fernando Road
would be a free movement separated from the intersection by an island. The northbound lane from
Railroad Avenue is extended north becoming the exclusive northbound right -tum lane at the San
Fernando Road/13th Street intersection.
Ultimate Condition (Scenario 4)
The ultimate condition restripes San Fernando Road to one -lane in each direction with a two-way left -
tum lane south of 11th Street. San Fernando Road striping on the southbound approach to the new
intersection would be realigned to make the north leg of San Fernando Road to Railroad Avenue the
major movement. Railroad Avenue would be striped to provide two northbound and two southbound
lanes with a two-way left -turn pocket. The realigned intersection will be signalized.
C. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/MARKET STREET STRIPING MODIFICATIONS
Currently Market Street is a 56 -foot roadway at San Fernando Road. Diagonal parking is allowed on
the south side of Market Street east of San Fernando Road and on the north side of Market Street west
of San Fernando Road. Because of the striping of an eastbound left -turn pocket at the Railroad
Avenue/Market Street intersection, the east -west through lanes are moved away from the centerline.
Due to the close proximity of San Femando Road to Railroad Avenue, a preferred striping layout would
remove all diagonal parking on Market Street east and west of San Fernando Road to provide proper
lane striping transitions.
D. LYONS AVENUE EXTENSION
The extension of Lyons Avenue east of San Fernando Road is one of the future planned roadways on
the City's General Plan. Extension of Lyons Avenue would increase east -west traffic volumes through
the study area. This study has determined that the widening of Railroad Avenue is not the constraining
parameter in the design. The vertical clearance required over the Metrolink tracks will be the design
constraint in determining the feasibility of the roadway extension. The Railroad Avenue widening may
alter column locations and span length but will not affect the feasibility of the Lyons Avenue Extension.
32
IV. Intersection Level of Service Analysis Without
Metrolink Station
Table 2 below is a summary of the level -of -service calculations for the project intersections assuming
the Newhall Metrolink Station is not in operation. Level -of -service calculations are provided in
Appendix F.
Table 2
Intersection Level of Service Calculations Without Metrolink Station
Railroad Avenue Study
Intersection Level of Service Summary Chart
NO Metrollnk Station
San Fernando Road/4th Street
Scenario 1
Existing SF Road
Existing RR Ave
1996 Counts
AM PM
Scenario 2
Existing SF Road
-Lane RR Ave
1996 Counts
AM PM-
Scenario 3
L SF Road
-Lana RR Ave
1998 Traffic
AM PM
Scenario 4
-Lane SF Road
-Lana RR Ave
006 Traffic
AM PM
C F
- -
San Fernando Road/Railroad Ave SIO 4th Street
0.561 A 0.527 A
0.580A 0.613B
0.799 C 0.6638
San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue
0.805D 0.859D
0.725 C 0.823 D
0.646 B 0.749 C
0.664 B 0.839 D
San Fernando Road/Market Street
0.706 C 0.822 D
0.499 A 0.550A
0.462 A 0.451 A
0.435 A 0.319 A
San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
0.732 C 0.660 B
0.644 B 0.673 B
0.582 A 0.551 A
0.614 B 0.586 A
San Femando Road/1I th StreettRailroad Ave
F F
0.584 A 0.583 A
0.795 C 0.709 C
0.771 C 0.804 D
Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
A A
C A
B B
C E
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
A
0.577 A 0.629 B
0.805 D 0.812 D
0.639 B 0.711 C
Market StreeUPine Avenue
A A
.1
A A
A A
A A,
The current intersections of San Fernando Road with 4th Street and 11th Street show levels -of -service
(LOS) F during certain time periods. This is because these intersections are stop -sign controlled and
left -tum movements from the side street onto San Fernando Road is difficult during peak periods.
These volumes are currently very low so the LOS F is not significant.
Scenario 2 causes some San Fernando Road traffic to divert to Railroad Avenue and level of service
improves on San Fernando Road as traffic volumes decrease.
Scenario 3 increases traffic over existing conditions by approximately 4%. In addition, traffic volumes
would balance themselves between San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue as each roadway has one
lane in each direction. With proper intersection design at the San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue
south of 4th Street and San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/l lth Street intersections, traffic flows will
balance properly and all intersections will operate at an acceptable level -of -service. Scenario 3 is
expected to remain in place until traffic growth forces any of the critical intersections to LOS E.
33
Scenario 3 provides the least number of north -south through lanes of any alternative. At the request
of the City of Santa Clarita, an incremental analysis of traffic growth impacts to Scenario 3 was
performed to determine the future year at which point the critical study intersections reach level of
service (LOS) E. The Scenario 3 level -of -service is highest for the Railroad Avenue/Market Street
intersection for AM peak hour (0.812 LOS D). The level -of -service was incrementally increased by
2 % per year to determine when the level -of -service reaches LOS E or 0.900. Based on this calculation,
all study intersections should operate at acceptable levels -of -service (LOS D or better) until the Year
2004.
Scenario 4 looks at traffic volumes ten years from now which for purposes of this study are assumes
to be 21.9% (2% annual growth compounded over 10 years) above existing volumes. All intersections
continue to operate at acceptable levels although the San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
intersection approaches LOS E.
All study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service for each of the scenarios studied.
34
V. Level -of -Service With Metrolink Station and
Determination of Significant Impacts
Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 below are summaries of the level -of -service calculations for the project
intersections with and without the Newhall Metrolink Station. A column is added in each table telling
whether Metrolink Station traffic causes a significant impact.
Table 3
Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 1
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 1
Under the existing geometric scenario, the left -turn movement from 11th Street onto San Fernando
Road is difficult during peak periods. This results in the level -of -service F calculation. The station has
no impacts on this intersection, however, since Railroad Avenue does not currently intersect San
Fernando Road at 11th Street. The station does have a significant impact on the San Fernando
Road/Lyons Avenue intersection during the PM peak period (0.041 increase while 0.040 is considered
significant): The impact is the result of vehicles leaving the station to travel northbound on San
Fernando Road or westbound on Lyons Avenue. The intersection operates at LOS C. and as a result,
no intersection improvements are recommended.
It is important to note that the above analysis for Scenario looked at intersection level -of -service based
on intersection capacities only. Construction of a Metrolink Station will require the upgrade of Railroad
Avenue with the construction of curb and gutter along the east curb. Market Street would need to be
improved at the railroad crossing to handle station -generated traffic and pedestrian movements.
35
Railroad Avenue will also need to be modified to accommodate bus trips serving the station. Bus
requirements include the ability to negotiate Railroad Avenue at 6th Street and 8th Street.
Table 4
Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 2
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 2
For Scenario 2, the only intersection significantly impacted by Metrolink Station traffic is the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/ Ilth Street intersection. Most Metrolink Station patrons come from
the north and turn onto Railroad Avenue at 11th Street. Even with Metrolink Station traffic, the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/ 11 Street intersection operates at LOS B. Since the intersection is
being designed with the intention of eventually handling Metrolink -generated traffic, no additional
capacity will be needed at this intersection.
Table 5
Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 3
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 3
For Scenario 3, the only intersection significantly impacted by Metrolink Station traffic is the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/lith Street intersection. Most Metrolink Station patrons come from
the north and turn onto Railroad Avenue at 11th Street. Even with Metrolink Station traffic, the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11 Street intersection operates at LOS D. Since the intersection is
being designed to eventually handle Metrolink -generated traffic, no additional capacity is needed at this
intersection.
37
Table 6
Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 4
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 4
Scenario 4 has a widened 4 -lane Railroad Avenue roadway. The movements from San Fernando Road
to and from Railroad Avenue are the major movements and the roadway and signal timing and phasing
are to be designed accordingly. As background traffic increases at 2% per year from existing levels,
it is assumed that so does Metrolink Station traffic. Metrolink -generated traffic causes no significant
impact to Scenario 4.
38
VI. On -Street Parking Analysis
A. EXISTING ON -STREET PARKING UTILIZATION
On Monday, September 10, 1996, the total number of parking spaces along each of the streets within
the study area was counted. The study area included San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue between
4th Street and 11th Street and the east -west streets north of 4th Street and south of 11th Street between
San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue. Pine Street was included in the parking study area from
Market Street to 4th Street.
Block lengths were measured and it was assumed that 22 feet would be required per parallel parking
space. Driveways were considered in measuring available parking. In instances where cars were
parked at an angle, parking availability was based on theoretical parallel curb parking; therefore, in
some instances utilization rates exceeded 100%.
Between 11:30 AM and 12:30 PM, a total of 489 on -street parking spaces are observed within the
project limits. A total of 255 parked cars was observed during the observation period. The observed
cars included cars parking at an angle along the railroad right-of-way. The results of this September
10, 1996 survey are provided in Table 7. The table denotes instances where cars were parked at an
angle to the curb.
A second 10 -hour parking survey was performed on December 12, 1996. The peak parking period on
December 12, 1996 was between 11AM and 1PM, consistent with the earlier survey. During the peak
period on December 12, 1996, the total number of parked cars observed ranged between 227 and 237
cars, consistent with the earlier survey. The December 12, 1996 survey summary is provided in
Appendix G.
Many of the parked cars along Railroad Avenue included cars of employees of the automobile repair
and parts stores and vehicles from car dealers. Also, the auto repair shops use the area to store vehicles
waiting for service. Five large Ryder Rental trucks were also observed along Railroad Avenue.
There was an abundance of available parking along San Fernando Road to serve the commercial
interests. One-hour parking restrictions along San Fernando Road prevent longer term parking in front
of the commercial business within the study area.
39
TABLE 7 - PARKING OBSERVATIONS
Street
Limits
St.
Side:
Available
Spaces
Spaces
Used
Utilization
%
Parking
Restriction
Adjacent
Land Use
San
Fernando
Road
Railroad Ave.
to 5th Street
East
7
0
0%
Commercial
West
17
0
0%
parr
5th Street to
6th Street
East
8
0
0%
1Hr.7A-6P
commercial
West
5
1
20%
1Ht.7A-6P
Commercial
6th Street to
Market Street
East
14
5
36%
IHr.7A-6P
Commercial
West
15
1
7%
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
Market Street
to 8th Street
East
13
10
77%
IHr.7A-6P
Commercial
West
17
8
47%
IHr.7A-6P
commercial
8th Street to
9th Street
East
10
1
10%
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
West
12
4
33%
1Ht.7A-6P
commercial
9th Street to
Lyons Avenue
East
3
0
NA
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
West
3
0
NA
-
Commercial
Lyons Avenue
to 11th Street
East
0
0
NA
Commemial
West
3
0
NA
-
Cas Station
40
Street
Limits
St.
Available
Spaces
Utilization
Parking
Adjacent
Side
Spaces
Used
%
Restriction
Land Use
Railroad
San Fernando
East
17
6 (9(°)
35%
Din/RR
Avenue
Rd. to 5th
Street
West
9
5
56%
Commercial
5th Street to
East
18
5(900)
28%
DirtIRR
6th Street
West
7
0
0%
Commercal
6th Street to
East
18
15(90%
83%
DirtIRR
Market Street
West
13
6
46%
Aum Body
Market Street
East
19
26(90%
137%
-
Dirt/Land-
to 8th Street
scape Slop
West
9
9
100%
-
Auto Repair
8th Street to
East
18
15(90-)
83%
-
DirttRR
9th Street
West
4
7
175%
-
Auto Baty
9th Street to
East
17
7(90
41%
-
Dirt/RR
Lyons Avenue
West
10
5
50%
-
Aum Repair
Lyons Avenue
East
14
19(90°)
136%
-
DirM.
to 11th Street
West
14
10(9(r)
71%
-
Auto Store
4th Street
San Fernando
North
4
0
0%
-
MurtlerShop
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
0
0
NA
-
Used Car
5th Street
San Fernando
North
7
4
57%
-
Commercial
Rd. to
South
3
3
100%
-
Commercial
Railroad
Avenue
6th Street
San Fernando
North
4
2
50%
-
Commercial
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
3.
2
67%
-
Commercial
41
Street
Limits
St.
Available
Spaces
Utilization
Parking
Adjacent
Side
Spaces
Used
%
Restriction
Land Use
Market
San Fernando
North
4
4
100%
-
Commercial
Street
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
9Diag
6
67%
-
Commercial
8th Street
San Fernando
North
7
5
71%
-
Commercial
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
5
5
100%
-
Commercial
9th Street
San Fernando
North
9
9
100%
-
Commercial
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
7
6
86%
-
Commercal
Lyons
San Fernando
North
4
4
100%
-
Commercial
Avenue
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
15
9
60%
-
Commercial
Pine
Market Street
East
15
12
80%
-
Dirt/RR
Street
to 6th Street
West
20
10
50%
-
Apartment
6th Street to
East
13
5
38%
-
Apartmems
5th Street
West
17
3
18%
Dirt/RR
5th Street to
East
12
1
8%
Residential
4th Street
West
17
0
0%
-
Dirt/RR
Parking along Pine Street within the study area was more than sufficient. Parking was concentrated in
front of the apartment building near the Pine Street/Market Street intersection and became less utilized
to the south of the apartment building.
B. PARKING OBSERVATIONS AT NEARBY METROLINK AND PARK AND RIDE
FACILITIES
Parking availability and utilization surveys were also performed at adjacent Metrolink Stations and
Caltrans Park and Ride Lots. The Metrolink Stations surveyed were the Santa Clarita Station on
Soledad Canyon Road and the Via Princessa. Station. The three Caltrans Park and Ride Lots surveyed
are located just south of the Newhall downtown core along San Fernando Road. Results of these
surveys are provided in Appendix C of this report. This data was used to determine current park and
ride and Metrolink demand in the area and to assess the adequacy of the current parking facilities.
42
C. PARKING CONDITION WITHOUT STATION
Available parking in the project area included all streets surveyed in the study area. Parking availability
by street is summarized in the table below. The table also includes available parking under the two
proposed Railroad Avenue lane configurations.
TABLE 8
PARKING SPACE AVAILABILITY UNDER RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT SCENARIOS
The demand shown above assumes no change from existing demand. Under this assumption on -
street parking availability should remain sufficient with the interim and ultimate improvements to
Railroad Avenue.
The interim Railroad Avenue geometry does not result in any loss to parking although vehicles will
be forced to parallel park next to the railroad right-of-way rather than angle -park as is currently
43
Available On -Street Parking Spaces
Street
Existing
Condition
(Scenario 1)
Interim
Condition
(Scenario 2)
Ultimate
Condition
(Scenario 4)
San Fernando Road
127
127
127
Railroad Avenue
187
187
66
4th Street
4
4
4
5th Street
10
10
10
6th Street
7
7
7
Market Street
13
13
13
8th Street
12
12
12
9th Street
16
16
16
Lyons Avenue
19
19
19
Pine Street
94
94
94
'TOTAL
489
489
368
DEMAND
255
255
255
UTILIZATION
52%
52%
69%
The demand shown above assumes no change from existing demand. Under this assumption on -
street parking availability should remain sufficient with the interim and ultimate improvements to
Railroad Avenue.
The interim Railroad Avenue geometry does not result in any loss to parking although vehicles will
be forced to parallel park next to the railroad right-of-way rather than angle -park as is currently
43
observed. Vehicles being stored or awaiting service at the adjacent auto shops will need to find
other parking.
The ultimate Railroad Avenue geometry results in the loss of 121 parking spaces along the east side
of Railroad Avenue. However, existing parking demand will still be less than available capacity.
The Downtown Newhall Improvement Program, prepared by Freedman, Tong & Bottomley in April
1996, analyzed potential parking demand with the full buildout of the Downtown Newhall core. That
study estimated a potential demand of 750 vehicles, exceeding the current capacity of 680 spaces
provided by 250 off-street parking spaces and 430 on -street spaces along San Fernando Road, Railroad
Avenue and thew cross streets. Pine Street was not included in their capacity calculation. That study
recommended that additional parking spaces could be created "if all of the surplus land area currently
devoted to outdoor automobile and light industrial -related businesses (and/or sitting vacant) were
efficiently developed for parking ... ," which would increase off-street parking from 250 to 1,020
spaces. The Downtown Newhall Improvement Program did not rely on the parking along Railroad
Avenue to serve future demand. Instead, conversion of the current auto and light -industrial businesses
to parking would serve the future increase in commercial development, which incidentally would
decrease demand for parking along Railroad Avenue. Scenario 4 of the Railroad Avenue project results
in a decrease of 120 spaces along the east side of Railroad Avenue, but this decrease would not affect
the development of the Downtown Newhall core.
D. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH PARK AND RIDE
Operation of the site for park and ride will increase parking demand in the immediate area. Parking
demand will be based on both demand for park and ride spaces and demand for parking by patrons who
drive to the station to use the bus services.
Based on the traffic methodology discussed in Chapter H, Section D, 33 park and ride spaces are
required at the station. The following express buses would serve the site during the AM commuting
period (5AM to 9AM):
Route 573 - 4 buses
Route 795 - 6 buses
Route 799 - 5 buses
Route 799 - 9 buses
TOTAL - 24 buses
For purposes of this study, it is assumed that 3 spaces are required per bus for a total of 72 parking
spaces. This station is one of several pick-up/drop off points for express buses along San Fernando
Road.
It is assumed that local buses do not generate. any parking demand.
The project site, used as a park-and-ride and bus station, is expected to have a parking demand for 105
vehicles.
44
E. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH METROLINK
In addition to the parking demand estimated above, the use of the Newhall Station as a Metrolink
Station will generate an additional parking demand of 154. The 154 space parking demand is based on
the diversion of 33% of the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station parking demand to the Newhall Station.
Adding the 105 park and ride scenario parking demand, the total additional parking demand is expected
to be 259.
The latest site plan for the Newhall Metrolink Station proposes 208 off-street parking spaces. Excess
demand for station parking could be accommodated by on -street parking along Pine Street, and along
both sides of Railroad Avenue under Scenarios 2 and 3. Under Scenario 4, 120 on -street parking
spaces along the east side of Railroad Avenue would be removed, and demand for parking within
walking distance of the Railroad Avenue/Market Street intersection could exceed supply. This situation
could be alleviated either by the construction of additional off-street parking lots to the east of the
proposed station, or by the implementation of the Downtown Newhall Improvement Program which
would convert land currently used by auto and light industrial businesses into parking lots.
45
Proposed Railroad Avenue
Improvement Project
With/Without Proposed
Newhall Metrolink Station .
TRAFFIC and PARHING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Santa Clarita, California
February 4, 1997
M
Prepared by: FUAKatz, Okitsu & Associates
1200 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 140
Monterey Park, California 91754
(213)260-4703
TABLE OF CONTENTS
' Executive Summary ..................................................... 1
I. Introduction........................................................ 3
' A. AREA DESCRIPTION ........................................... 6
B. PROJECT SCENARIO DESCRIPTION ................................ 7
' II. Traffic Data Collection and Analysis Methodology .............................. 9
A. TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA COLLECTION SUMMARY ................... 9
B. FORECAST TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......................... . ....... 9
' C. TRIP DIVERSION METHODOLOGY ................................. 9
D. METROLINK STATION TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10
E. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA ............................... I I
' F. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ........................... 11
1
1
1
1
1
III. Improvement Geometries ............................................. 31
A. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/RAILROAD AVENUE SIO 4TH STREET LAYOUT ... 31
B. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/RAILROAD AVENUE/11TH STREET LAYOUT ...... 32
C. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/MARKET STREET STRIPING MODIFICATIONS..... 32
D. LYONS AVENUE EXTENSION ................................... 32
IV. Intersection Level of.Service Analysis Without Metrolink Station ................... 33
V. Level -of -Service With Metrolink Station and Determination of Significant Impacts ........ 35
VI. On -Street Parking Analysis
A. EXISTING ON -STREET PARKING UTILIZATION .................... 39
B. PARKING OBSERVATIONS AT NEARBY METROLINK
AND PARK AND RIDE FACILITIES ............................. 42
C. PARKING CONDITION WITHOUT STATION ........................ 43
D. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH PARK AND RIDE ................... 44
E. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH METROLINK ...................... 45
APPENDIX A - TRAFFIC COUNTS
APPENDIX B - BUS TRIP INFORMATION
APPENDIX C - ADJACENT METROLINK STATION PARKING OBSERVATIONS
CALTRANS PARK AND RIDE PARKING LOT OBSERVATIONS
APPENDIX D - TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX E - PROPOSED INTERSECTION LAYOUTS FOR INTERIM (Scenario 2) CONDITIONS
PROPOSED TRANSIT STATION LAYOUT
APPENDIX F - LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS
APPENDIX G = DECEMBER 12, 1996 PARKING SURVEY
Executive Summary
' TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Proposed Railroad Avenue Improvement Project With/Without Proposed Newhall Metrolink Station
Santa Clarita, California
' A traffic study was conducted to analyze the impacts of the Railroad Avenue Improvement Project as
well as the proposed Newhall Metrolink Station. The study found that all study intersections currently
' operate at an acceptable level -of -service during peak periods. With the improvement of Railroad
Avenue providing one lane in each direction, parking and a two-way left -turn lane, some traffic from
San Fernando Road diverts to Railroad Avenue. The level -of -service on San Fernando Road improves
' over existing conditions as traffic volumes decrease. The widening of Railroad Avenue would not affect
the feasibility of the proposed Lyons Avenue extension.
t A future year (1998) was studied to determine the impact of reducing San Fernando Road to one lane
in each direction (Scenario 3). With proper intersection design at the San Fernando Road/Railroad
Avenue south of 4th Street and San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street intersections, traffic
' flows would redistribute between San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue and all intersections will
operate at an acceptable level -of -service. This configuration would be adequate to handle projected
traffic volumes until the year 2004 when additional lanes would be needed on either Railroad Avenue
' or San Fernando Road to handle traffic growth.
Traffic volumes from the Year 2006 were analyzed on a roadway network in which San Fernando Road
t was a two-lane roadway and Railroad Avenue would become the major 4 -lane north -south street and
a truck route in the project area. Railroad Avenue would be a four -lane roadway and the intersections
of San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue near 4th Street and 11th Street would be redesigned to provide
' for heavy San Fernando Road to Railroad Avenue movements.. All intersections under this scenario
would operate at acceptable levels -of -service.
' Construction of the Metrolink Station and its parking lots will require curb and gutter on the east side
of Railroad Avenue and both sides of Market Street to adequately separate the station parking lots from
street traffic. The transit buses would be using curbside bus stops along Railroad Avenue, as is being
' proposed in the latest Metrolink Station conceptual drawings. Even without reconstruction of Railroad
Avenue (Scenario 1), roadway widening would be required along the station frontage to provide the
adequate roadway width.
F
1
1
1
1
Acquisition of property by the City on the east side of Railroad Avenue south of Market Street provides
an opportunity to realign Railroad Avenue at 6th Street. Currently Railroad Avenue traffic must
negotiate a right-angle jog at 6th Street. Realigning Railroad Avenue to provide a smoother transition
will make the station more accessible to buses. In addition, Market Street would need to be improved
at the railroad crossing to handle station -generated traffic and pedestrian movements.
The Railroad Avenue project (Scenario 2) provides all of the necessary roadway facilities for adequate
Metrolink Station access. Traffic attracted to the transit station along Railroad Avenue at Market Street
might impact intersections along San Fernando Road. However, in no case would the impacted
intersections have a level -of -service worse than LOS D. Since the.intersection layouts for each of the
' Scenarios were created to handle Metrolink -generated traffic up to LOS D, the term "significantly
impacted" is theoretical. An alternative description would be that these intersections would have
' adequate capacity to handle Metrolink traffic, but if the Metrolink Station is not built, these intersections
would have excess capacity.
1
1
I
11
I
1
1
1
The Railroad Avenue project under design will not result in the loss of legal parking spaces, although
the ultimate 4 -lane configuration of Railroad Avenue would require prohibition of parking on the east
side. This decrease of 120 spaces could be alleviated by the implementation of the Downtown Newhall
Improvement Program.
The latest site plan for the Newhall Metrolink Station proposes 208 off-street parking spaces. Excess
demand for station parking could be accommodated by on -street parking along Pine Street, and along
both sides of Railroad Avenue as currently designed. With the ultimate 4 -lane configuration of Railroad
Avenue, 120 on -street parking spaces along the east side of Railroad Avenue would be removed, and
demand for parking within walking distance of the Railroad Avenue/Market Street intersection could
exceed supply. This situation could be alleviated either by the construction of additional off-street
parking lots to the east of the proposed station, or by the implementation of the Downtown Newhall
Improvement Program.
2
A
TRAFFIC AND PARKING IMPACT ANALYSIS
Proposed Railroad Avenue Improvement Project
With/Without Proposed Newhall Metrolink Station
Santa Clarita, California
' I. Introduction
' The City of Santa Clarita, California is exploring options to modify the traffic flow along the San
' Fernando Road (SR126) corridor between 4th Street and 11th Street. The improvement of Railroad
Avenue is the first step in implementing the revitalization of the Newhall Downtown Core. On June
11, 1996, the City of Santa Clarita approved in concept the Newhall Improvement Plan which addresses
modifications to Railroad Avenue. The City of Santa Clarita is also considering the construction and
operation of a Metrolink Station in the Newhall downtown core. The preferred station location will be
along the east side of Railroad Avenue at Market Street. Construction of a Metrolink Station along
' Railroad Avenue will require some improvement to Railroad Avenue. At a minimum the roadway must
be improved with curb and gutter along the east side of the roadway, construction of driveways to serve
the Metrolink parking lots and geometry modifications to accommodate bus service to the station.
' Figure 1 shows the location of the project.
This study looks at a street system bounded by I lth Street to the north, 4th Street to the south, San
' Fernando Road to the west and Pine Street to the east. Figure 2 shows a schematic plan of the proposed
Railroad Avenue street improvements and the preferred Newhall Metrolink Station location. 'Phis study
closely examines traffic impacts at the following intersections:
' San Fernando Road/4th Street
• San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue
t San Fernando Road/Market Street
• San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
• San Fernando Road/11th Street
' Railroad Avenue/Market Street
• Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
• Pine Street/Market Street
A traffic signal warrant analysis is provided for San Fernando Road at the prolongation of Railroad
Avenue south of 4th Street and the Railroad Avenue intersections with Market Street, Lyons Avenue
' and 11th Street. The traffic signal warrant analysis was performed for Scenario 2 which is described
below.
' A TRAFFIX traffic analysis model has been set up for this study. The TRAFFIX model was used to
determine intersection level -of -service for the following scenarios:
KZ Katz, Oldtsu & Associates
NEW ALL R
ST
�rurAx s
PROJECT SITE
XRT uxrox xs, s • �� SZ •t$ '�
1 4 �thr�
fxtT �,�•��
O
� ,ra . �� aa6'
y AV A f >� 5 > CI
rr
>lu,f2 FLU 9FNu�
1j ti A� �� `' iy� 14 DA i u oma
s4 �'n� sl �_ xEk�iQ `• y`0 t
LN
'----------
QAKICIN'
s N
ao �� ! r� e.AW 1 F��4' ?i�� `
ST
23200 l e
T•
r,gure 1 -Location Map
M MW M Mod M i jrM M i
Railroad Avenue Study
Existing Existing
/W R IW
I 14
24' 12' 16' wl 8'
Parkin
12' 12' 12' 11' 13'
K
MTA
License
Agreement
LJ Interim
arias 2 & 3)
I
Ultimate (Scenario 4)
Figure 2
Typical Sections
Railroad Avenue
I
1 Scenario
' 1 1996 Existing Geometry (4 lanes) Existing Geometry (2 lanes)
2 1996 Existing Geometry (4 lanes) Improved (2 lanes plus TWLTL)
' 3 1998 Modified Geometry (2 lanes plus TWLTL) Improved (2 lanes plus TWLTL)
4 2006 Modified Geometry (2 lanes plus TWLTL) Improved (4 lanes plus TWLTL)
' TWLTL = Two-way left -tum lane
Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 include the closure of 5th Street at Railroad Avenue.
' The study incrementally analyzes the impact of annual traffic growth on Scenario 3 above to determine
the future year at which point the critical study intersection reaches level -of -service (LOS) E: The study
briefly discusses the geometric requirements of a proposed "Lyons Avenue Flyover" in which Lyons
' Avenue is extended to the east over the railroad right-of-way. The impact of this flyover is qualitatively
discussed in this report.
' Finally, a parking availability and utilization study along both San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue
between 4th Street and 11th Street was conducted and summarized. The results of this study are
provided in the report.
' A. AREA DESCRIPTION
tThe project area is in the Newhall community within the City of Santa Clarita.
San Fernando Road (SR126) is a four -lane state highway running north -south through Newhall. San
Fernando Road connects the communities of Newhall, Valencia and Saugus with the Antelope Valley
Freeway (SR14). Between 4th Street and 11th Street, the land use along San Fernando Road is
commercial/retail. The City of Santa Clarita is studying a plan to reduce the number of lanes along
' this segment to two lanes making the area more pedestrian friendly and more conducive to a downtown
commercial area.
1
1
1
Railroad Avenue is currently a 2 -lane roadway which runs just east of San Fernando Road and just west
of the MTA railroad tracks which are used by Metrolink and Union Pacific Railroad. Several service
type businesses, primarily auto repair shops, are located along the west side of the street. The
properties along the east side of Railroad Avenue include a lot used for storage and a nursery. Vehicles
park along the east side of the street facing perpendicular away from the roadway centerline. The east
side of the street does not have curbs and gutters. Parallel parking is provided along the west side of
the street where there are curbs and gutters.
Newhall Avenue is a two-lane north -south local collector road which connects San Fernando Road with
Lyons Avenue to the north and then runs parallel to San Fernando Road.
4th Street is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Fourth Street terminates at San Fernando Road to the west.
I
1 5th Street is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Fifth Street terminates at Newhall Avenue to the west.
' 6th Street is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Sixth Street terminates at Newhall Avenue to the west.
' Market Street is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within
the Study Area. Market Street terminates west of Newhall Avenue. Market Street is the only street
' which crosses the railroad right-of-way within the Study Area. The railroad crossing is gated and has
one lane in each direction.
' 8th Street is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
Study Area. Eighth Street terminates west of Newhall Avenue.
' 9th Street is a two-lane local street which connects San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within
the Study Area. Ninth Street terminates just west of Newhall Avenue.
' Lyons Avenue is a two-lane local street between San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue within the
study area. Lyons Avenue is a four -lane arterial highway west of San Fernando Road and provides a
direct route to Interstate 5 to the west.
' Hart Park Entrance is located on the west side of San Fernando Road across from 4th Street.'
' Pine Street is a 40 -foot local roadway just east of the railroad right-of-way providing access to the
residential area located there. Pine Street terminates at Market Street on the north and continues south
of San Fernando Road.
' B. PROJECT SCENARIO DESCRIPTION
At the request of the City of Santa Clarita, the following project scenarios were studied.
' Scenario 1 (With and Without a Metrolink Station)
' Scenario 1 assumes that the lane configurations on Railroad Avenue and San Fernando Road remain
the same as the existing condition. Existing (1996) traffic volumes were used in the analysis of this
scenario.
1 Scenario 2 (With and Without a Metrolink Station)
' Scenario 2 assumes that Railroad Avenue is improved and becomes a two-lane upgraded roadway with
a two-way left -turn lane and parking on both sides of the street. Existing (1996) traffic volumes were
used in the analysis of this scenario. A cross-section of this scenario is shown on Figure 2, with
' proposed lane dimensions labeled "Interim."
1
I
1
Scenario 3 (With and Without a Metrolink Station)
' Scenario 3 assumes that Railroad Avenue is improved and becomes a two-lane upgraded roadway with
a two-way left -tum lane in the median and parking on both sides of the street. In addition, San
' Fernando Road is reduced to two lanes (one lane in each direction) between Newhall Avenue and Lyons
Avenue. Future (1998) traffic volumes were used in the analysis of this scenario. The lane widths for
this scenario correspond to those labeled "Interim" in Figure 2.
' Scenario 4 (With and Without a Metrolink Station)
' Scenario 4 assumes that Railroad Avenue is improved and becomes a four -lane upgraded roadway. The
intersections of Railroad Avenue with San Fernando Road south of 4th Street and at 11th Street are
modified to make the Railroad Avenue to San Fernando Road the major movement. In addition, San
' Fernando Road is reduced to two lanes (one lane in each direction) between Newhall Avenue and Lyons
Avenue. Future (2006) traffic volumes were used in the analysis of this scenario. The lane widths for
this scenario correspond to those labeled "Ultimate" in Figure 2.
1
n
1
[J
1
1
I
1
' II. Traffic Data Collection and Analysis Methodology
' A. TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA COLLECTION SUMMARY
' Katz, Okitsu & Associates obtained two-hour AM and PM turning movement counts at the.following
intersections:
• San Fernando Road/4th Street
' San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue/5th Street
• San Fernando Road/Market Street
• San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
' San Fernando Road/llth Street
• Railroad Avenue/Market Street
• Pine Street/Market Street
' The AM period was counted from 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM. The PM period was counted from 4:30 to
6:30 PM.
' Katz, Okitsu & Associates also obtained 24-hour volume counts on the following street segments:
' Northbound San Fernando Road south of 4th Street
• Southbound San Fernando. Road north of 4th Street
• Eastbound Hart Park Driveway west of San Fernando Road
' Westbound 4th Street east of San Fernando Road
• Northbound San Fernando Road south of Lyons Avenue
• Southbound San Fernando Road north of Lyons Avenue
• Eastbound Lyons Avenue west of San Fernando Road
• Westbound Lyons Avenue east of San Fernando Road
• Northbound Railroad Avenue south of Market Street
' Southbound Railroad Avenue north of Market Street
• Eastbound Market Street west of Railroad Avenue
• Westbound Market Street east of Railroad Avenue
' Traffic count data sheets are provided in Appendix A.
' B. FORECAST TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The study looked at traffic conditions for Scenario 3 using forecast traffic volumes for the year 1998.
The study also analyzes traffic volumes for Scenario 4 using forecast traffic volumes for the year2006.
Based on discussions with City of Santa Clarita staff, it was determined that an annual growth rate of
2 % be applied to existing volumes in order to develop future traffic volumes.
C. TRIP DIVERSION METHODOLOGY
' In developing traffic volumes for Scenario 2, approximately 20% of the southbound San Fernando Road
through trips were diverted from San Fernando Road to Railroad Avenue. A slightly higher percentage
I
1
1
1
I
I
1
1
of northbound San Fernando Road through trips, 35%, were diverted from San Fernando Road to
Railroad Avenue in the interim condition. The northbound right -tum movements to Railroad Avenue
are easier to make than the required left -tum movements for southbound trafficfromSan Fernando
Road to Railroad Avenue.
In developing traffic volumes for Scenario 3, north -south trips through the project area were split to
place 50% on Railroad Avenue and 50% on San Fernando Road. Both Railroad Avenue and San
Fernando Road are two-lane roadways in this alternative. Trips were then redistributed from this first
iteration to maintain existing turning movement volumes onto Newhall Avenue and Lyons Avenue along
San Fernando Road.
Scenario 4 traffic volumes were developed assuming that the Railroad Avenue intersections with San
Fernando Road at 11th Street and 4th Street would be redesigned to make the movement to Railroad
Avenue from both directions the easiest movement to make. In addition, it is assumed that San
Fernando Road between 4th Street and 11th Street will be reduced from two lanes to one lane in each
direction. The trip distribution for Scenario 4 is based on an 80% diversion in San Fernando Road
north -south through trips to Railroad Avenue. Again, trips were redistributed from this first iteration
to maintain existing turning movement volumes onto Newhall Avenue and Lyons Avenue.
D. METROLINK STATION TRIP DISTRIBUTION
1 The proposed Metrolink Station is not expected to provide the full range of express bus and van pool
commuter services provided at the existing Santa Clarita Station. However, this study assumes a limited
amount of freeway express buses and vanpools will serve the proposed Newhall Station. '
1
I
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Based on observations of the park and ride lots to the south on San Fernando Road and their proximity
to the Antelope Valley Freeway, it was assumed that 50 park and ride vehicles would park at the new
station and that 15 vehicles would pick up these riders for a total of 65 trips. The buses and van pools
also exit the site to continue on to their destination. One-half of these trips would occur during the peak
hour in the AM and PM. The buses and van pools would leave the station to the south during the AM
and return from the south during the PM. Trip distribution is based on the same methodology described
below for Metrolink patron trips. Bus trips were calculated based on existing bus tables and are
provided for review in Appendix B.
Vanpool, park-and-ride and Metrolink patron trips were distributed as 65% from the north via San
Fernando Road, 20% from the west via Lyons Avenue and Market Street, 5% from the south via San
Fernando Road, and 5 % from the east via Market Street. All trips will be into the station during the
AM peak period and all trips will be from the station during the PM peak period. It is assumed that the
peak period is two hours so one-half of the total trips will arrive at the station during the AM and PM
peak hours. This trip distribution was used for all new trips to the Newhall site.
This study realizes that Metrolink Station usage is dependent on parking space availability and other
transit options. However, this study will use the parking demand for the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station
as a basis for Newhall Station demand (see Appendix Q and assume that 104 cars, 33 % of the existing
demand at the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station, will divert from the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station to
the Newhall Metrolink Station. The study also assumes that 50 new trips will be attracted to the site
10
I
1 during the AM peak periods and will leave the site during the PM peak period. The total number of
Metrolink trips is 154 per peak period and it is assumed half will occur during the peak hour.
1 No credits are given for reduced trips due to a diversion of automobile trips to transit trips.
1 Figures 3 through 8 are provided at the end of this chapter and show the trip distribution diagrams for
park and ride, bus and Metrolink patron trips. The trip distribution is based on the Scenario 1 lane
geometries. San Fernando Road trips from the north access the station by turning left on Lyons Avenue
' and then right on Railroad Avenue. Trips leaving the station to proceed north on San Fernando Road
first turn left from Railroad Avenue to Lyons Avenue and then right onto San Fernando Road. The
trips are redistributed in Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 to utilize the new San Fernando Road/Railroad
1 Avenue/11th Street intersection. A similar trip redistribution occurs at the San Fernando Road/Railroad
Avenue intersection south of 4th Street for Scenarios 2, 3 and 4.
1 Future transit station trips were factored by the 2 % annual growth rate discussed above. Scenario 2
used 1996 station trips developed with the above methodology. Scenario 3 factors up the 1996 transit
station trips by a factor of 1.04 (2% per year compounded for two years). Scenario 4 factors up the
1 1996 transit station trips by a factor of 1.22 (2% per year compounded for 10 years).
E. IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA
1 Existing traffic volumes on San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue were used as the basis for this
study. Volume/capacity ratios and levels of service at signalized intersections were calculated using
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. Following the City of Santa Clarita guidelines
for traffic analysis, the volume/capacity ratios were adjusted so that no critical movement had a level
of saturation less than 0.05. Impacts are considered significant based on the following criteria:
11
1
1
1
0.00 to 0.79
0.80 to 0.89
0.90 or more
Equal to or greater than 0.04
Equal to or greater than 0.02
Equal to or greater than 0.01
Unsignalized intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual Operation Method.
Criteria used to establish significant impact was a worsening of level -of -service to LOS F.
Traffic lane configurations and volumes for all scenarios for the AM and PM peak periods are shown
in Figures 9 through 20 at the end of this chapter.
1 F. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
A traffic signal warrant analysis was performed for Scenario 2 for the Railroad Avenue study
1 intersections. The traffic signal warrant calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D of this report.
The results of the signal warrant analysis are provided in Table 1 below.
I
I
1
II
Table 1
Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Scenario 2
Intersection
Traffic Signal Warranted?
San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue S/O 4th Street
YES
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
NO**
Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
NO
San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
YES
**Traffic signal is recommended at this intersection due to the proximity of the railroad crossing to the
east.
Based on the result of the traffic signal warrant analysis using Scenario 2 traffic, traffic signals were
assumed for the following intersections in Scenarios 2, 3, and 4:
• San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue SIO 4th Street
• Railroad Avenue/Market Street
• San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/l lth Street
z•
12
I
1
1
1
11
1
I
Last Revised: January 31, 1997 Figure 3
Park and Ride Vehicle Trip Distribution Railroad Avenue Study
AM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Traffic Analysis
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1
Last Revised., January 3t, 1997
Figure 4
Park and Ride Vehicle Trip Distribution Railroad avenue study
\/ I PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) 71raBkAnalysis
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1
���% NIN•MW.W.WN• 1 ..... ............ .....Y•.W.,
m N.„NN.NWN'W
^7 0
D n n
O � � O
5l�eel n � 0 0
�6 "t
R,0
n�„nnnn••�•�J� �pO
P°
5 i
on r6, o
V� P„„•W••... 0�0 0
+ eel � � 0
a mom e` p
a JV,
9lr N7 Gm
�O m -
I'0 ado
0 da '%JO
0 o wi -.0 -PO
��0
�,•N• m l`egl do.
0
Ir00 egq�s "�o y�r5
4V
a
o o ma
7 p
OpX R. p l m�
I �o
01/`�
a o
0-air
Oi
00vl ��o ROaC
Bus Lines N4, o
Express - 573 -1 Local - 15 - 2
793.-050-2
795-4 55-1
798-2
799-4 NotTeBeele
Last Revised: January 31, 1997 Figure 5
Bus Trip Distribution
AM Peak Hour (6:30AM - 7:30 AM) Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue Study
1}gjJicAnatysis
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1
1]
1
0
I
1
I
0
1
1
„.... .•.•.Mt.xx.x..xm..W..x..W. w..Wnn
d� N,NN.•N •W
B� .N•••""NNO•N•.N
d7
a o
O ry
R,O
aa'"N NP 6nJa �p0
J
V� �w•.NN..x a OL �\ �
OO
e� d94 =• ppm
9XI
7 PdG p
R. 0 �d
O od e
a00 oP�d s �p0
p ANN �h 0
Oi� � x••w.,.n�• p
aNNN'G`� Mnx.NNn W.4y O� O'� .1
od
m
Od//�o �L p � qt-enve a°p 6tr
o ��\ 0 0 o oda o
3 d0,
0
0_,I
0-► o atr
0
�O Sd'Fe�ddao
o ��9 R°aa
Bus Lines 0 o
Express - 573 -0 Local -15 - 2
793-0 50-1
795-1 55-0
798-2
799-4
MettoScale
Last Revised., January 31, 1997 Figure 6
Bus Trip Distribution
PM Peak Hour (5:00 PM -6:00 PM) Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue Study
Traffic Analysis
Katz, Olcitsu &Associates Scenario 1
I
I
[1
1
1
1
1
1
I
[J
1
I
I
1
1
[1
1
1
1
Lasa Revised., January 31, 1997 Figure 7
Metrolink Patron Trip Distribution
AM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue Study
Traffic Analysis
Katz, Okitsu &Associates Scenario 1
I
11
0
1
1
1
1
1
Last ReWsea: January 31, 1997 Figure 8
Bus Trip Distribution
PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad Avenue Study
Traffic Analysis
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Scenario 1
X
I
A<
Last Revised: January 31, 1997 Figure 9
Lane Configuration Railroad Avenue Stu
Scenario 1 -Existing Conditions TYaffcAnalys�Let
Katz, Okitsu &Associates
's �92atco`
Q �0 am
vao c y��
568CpV-*-Cp/�
A6\ L
6/Qy
` 7' Ops .
o�61 V
Last Revised. January3f. 1997
Figure 10
Scenario 1 Without Metrolink Station
AM/ PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) Railroad y
Avenue nue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
'Copog
.
� ion
Syn 0
Last Revised. January 31, 1997 Figure 11
Scenario 1 With Metrolink Station Railroad Avenue Stud
AM/ PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) TAvenue Studs
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
�a7 �...m.x..mm�x..n.wnn..w.w...nw.x..x,..wnnnn'.,,"„'••.w.
N�a6 x x x• ��` R
O•
b� e•�J e
.w... n.w.,,
•'' a� as aao
�r� �aiiA� �a tr5ae°
end o0 6
e
Send
e�
KdTs calm
Lesf Revised: January 31, 1997 Figure 12
Lane Configuration Scenario 2
Existing San Fernando Road, Improved 2 -Lane Railroad Avenue Ra➢road Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates Trajfre Analysts
� R.6pOyy
�da,`ra Ir9Zg1�
o
1g10 ';K d
Last ROWS&& January 31, 1997
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
�953111p
i �f3a
a s sem.
3yt39,l�I s
6811606
R.`� 021gy
Figure 13
Scenario 2 Without Metrolink Station
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996)
Railroad Avenue Study
Traffic Analysis
z
�. ,...• "" S�c9Q c� 661/664
li Jj � `►
a�
^rn
/> 1p18J mo a'se,
5y1A2 w ,y1126,�10
91
ww...n.• fp��j `.� D� 0li,
0t
N9� Ay � j0
my $Cal
T
d��o { X010 ,a6
Nib �
01-0
106 lop
� deet wo, .�yA
et s 9�
T m
q�en` o0 6tr
e
° a
o� � �A t ccm
O 'l 010
QPOA-& p Atr.
48i �vsj2 ,� N SanF�
r, e
a�ao
Last RevlseC January 31. 1997 Figure 14
Scenario 2 With Metrolink Station Railroad Avenue Stud
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1996) 7Avenue Stats
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
\ o R
tO F"Seah
i
A<
Last Revlsed;Janvary21. 1997 Figure 15
Lane Configuration Scenario 3
2 -Lane San Fernando Road, Improved 2 -Lane Railroad Avenue RaiiroaTAvenuAvenu e Study
d :
Katz, Okitsu & Associates rtaty u
Cpd7 m„.,x.mmmn....»,.........»w»»............. .....,.....
'6° x• a°,
CL
y9C
y`
s
01
tcee�a y`
55 'N a 0si
t1'c6y136tp
R, a1oj25 W� ;
aRs�o'a
29p10b 9 •� dpI
a i0
e
9
ys 7 ej
y0 d
8.31 00
p10 01s 1 c
�,yy o�rn � 01
0/gam/ a9
g2O�iq C CI)
p�
6301,901,- 82 �gSSS i � Saa
iCo
8", nao•
ir" ROaa
r%-0, 00 i
o,
Lest RaYIW: January 31, 1997 Figure 16
Scenario 3 Without Metrolink Station stud RailroadAvenue
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1998)�a� a Stud
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
�c: 3t1�y0
�°'rn�a o it qty
Valsc' c
29p1yp,16 �
191 �
R.6 y9
c 8i10 4929�yy
0513
r $ ao.
ar
1 \,4, 016Coo
sai
�a p1Z
110
? of
3gp3 r
\ 6yt 3y�a -a
N4t�o"Jva9
36��sav I
o� ca
e�
`mapq` a3a� �5ae ,
P000 0
°a
3ti 9
o�o i Nit,
011
0/g.� ay 0
0/0�
8z �ySSS wo Sa'�
icp s�
'9170 "icP � 9�i :Roar
u'� 6�QrI9 �� r
7
Last Revise& January 31, 1997
Figure 17
Scenario 3 With Metrolink Station d Avenue Stud
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1998) Railroad
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
w,ost;, 6.471999
ti ry
sai
�a p1Z
110
? of
3gp3 r
\ 6yt 3y�a -a
N4t�o"Jva9
36��sav I
o� ca
e�
`mapq` a3a� �5ae ,
P000 0
°a
3ti 9
o�o i Nit,
011
0/g.� ay 0
0/0�
8z �ySSS wo Sa'�
icp s�
'9170 "icP � 9�i :Roar
u'� 6�QrI9 �� r
7
Last Revise& January 31, 1997
Figure 17
Scenario 3 With Metrolink Station d Avenue Stud
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 1998) Railroad
Katz, Okitsu & Associates
Last Revfsed..✓anuery 31, 1997
Figure 18
Lane Configuration Scenario 4
2 -Lane San Fernando Road, Improved 4 -Lane Railroad Avenue Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates TraBk Analysis
i
R12 262
Ir1go
R0,6661� �°i
9311
Last ReWsed.' January 31, 1887 Figure 19
Scenario 4 Without Metrolink Station
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 2006) Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu & Associates 7iaJflcAnatysis
I
1
[]
1
1
Last RsvfsaC: January31, 107
Figure 20
Scenario 4 With Metrolink Station
AM / PM Peak Hour Volumes (Year 2006) Railroad Avenue Study
Katz, Okitsu &Associates TrgfjkAnalysis
I
I
1
LI
1
1
1
1
1
III. Improvement Geometries
Construction of the Metrolink Station and its parking lots will require curb and gutter on the east side
of Railroad Avenue and both sides of Market Street to adequately separate the station parking lots from
street traffic. The transit buses would be using curbside bus stops along Railroad Avenue, as is being
proposed in the latest Metrolink Station conceptual drawings. Even without reconstruction of Railroad
Avenue (Scenario 1), roadway widening would be required along the station frontage to provide the
adequate roadway width.
Acquisition of property by the City on the east side of Railroad Avenue south of Market Street provides
an opportunity to realign Railroad Avenue at 6th Street. Currently Railroad Avenue traffic must
negotiate a right-angle jog at 6th Street. Realigning Railroad Avenue to provide a smoother transition
will make the station more accessible to buses.
Appendix E contains layouts of the interim (Scenario 2)intersection geometries for the San Fernando
Road/Railroad Avenue south of 4th Street and San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
intersections. Appendix E also shows a preliminary site plan for the proposed Newhall Metrolink
Station.
A. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/RAILROAD AVENUE SOUTH OF 4TH STREET LAYOUT
Existing Condition (Scenario 1)
Fourth Street currently intersects San Fernando Road and forms a T -intersection. The intersection is
STOP -sign controlled from the east. The William S. Hart Park driveway is located just across the
intersection to the west and is also STOP sign controlled. Fourth Street provides a right -turn lane and
a shared through -and -left turn lane separated by an island.
Interim Condition (Scenarios 2 and 3)
Scenarios 2 and 3 would have an interim configuration extending Railroad Avenue southward parallel
to the railroad tracks until the roadway intersects San Fernando Road. The existing San Fernando
Road/4th Street intersection would remain to provide access to the triangular parcel of land bounded
by San Fernando Road, Railroad Avenue and 4th Street.
' The Railroad Avenue extension will be configured to provide for one northbound lane and two
southbound lanes with an exclusive right -turn lane for the northbound San Fernando Road to Railroad
Avenue. Railroad Avenue will be designated a truck route. The new San Fernando Road/Railroad
' Avenue intersection would be signalized and would be located less than 40 feet from the intersection
of the.railroad tracks with the San Fernando Road centerline. The traffic signal and train signals would
operate using standard railroad preemption.
' Ultimate Condition (Scenario 4)
' The ultimate configuration is similar to the interim condition (Scenarios 2 and 3)except that Railroad
Avenue would be striped to provide for two lanes in each direction. Railroad Avenue will be designated
31
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
a truck route. The northbound San Fernando Road approach to Railroad Avenue would provide for
one through lane, a through and right -tum lane and an exclusive right -tum lane.
B. SAN FERNANDO ROAD/RAILROAD AVENUE/11TH STREET LAYOUT
Existing Condition (Scenario 1)
Railroad Avenue does not currently. intersect San Fernando Road at 11th Street, Railroad Avenue
terminates in a cul-de-sac just north of Lyons Avenue.
Interim Condition (Scenarios 2 and 3)
Railroad Avenue would be extended north to intersect San Fernando Road north of Lyons Avenue.
Railroad Avenue would be widened to provide for a 68 -foot roadway with one lane in each direction
The San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/l lth Street intersection would be signalized and provide a
southbound left -turn pocket. The northbound movement from Railroad Avenue to San Fernando Road
would be a free movement separated from the intersection by an island. The northbound lane from
Railroad Avenue is extended north becoming the exclusive northbound tight -turn lane at the San
Fernando Road/13th Street intersection.
Ultimate Condition (Scenario 4)
The ultimate condition restripes San Fernando Road to one -lane in each direction with a two-way left -
turn lane south of 11th Street. San Fernando Road striping on the southbound approach to the new
intersection would be realigned to make the north leg of San Fernando Road to Railroad Avenue the
major movement. Railroad Avenue would be striped to provide two northbound and two southbound
lanes with a two-way left -turn pocket. The realigned intersection will be signalized.
C. SAN FERNANDO ROADIMARKET STREET STRIPING MODIFICATIONS
Currently Market Street is a 56 -foot roadway at San Fernando Road. Diagonal parking is allowed on
the south side of Market Street east of San Fernando Road and on the north side of Market Street west
of San Fernando Road. Because of the striping of an eastbound left -turn pocket at the Railroad
Avenue/Market Street intersection, the east -west through lanes are moved away from the centerline.
Due to the close proximity of San Fernando Road to Railroad Avenue, a preferred striping layout would
remove all diagonal parking on Market Street east and west of San Fernando Road to provide proper
lane striping transitions.
1 D. LYONS AVENUE EXTENSION
The extension of Lyons Avenue east of San Fernando Road is one of the future planned roadways on
1 the City's General Plan. Extension of Lyons Avenue would increase east -west traffic volumes through
the study area. This study has determined that the widening of Railroad Avenue is not the constraining
parameter in the design. The vertical clearance required over the Metrolink tracks will be the design
1 constraint in determining the feasibility of the roadway extension. The Railroad Avenue widening may
alter column locations and span length but will not affect the feasibility of the Lyons Avenue Extension.
1
1
32
IV. Intersection Level of Service Analysis Without
' Metrolink Station
Table 2 below is a summary of the level -of -service calculations for the project intersections assuming
' the Newhall Metrolink Station is not in operation. Level -of -service calculations are provided in
Appendix F.
' Table 2
Intersection Level of Service Calculations Without Metrolink Station
Railroad Avenue Study
Intersection Level of Service Summary Chart
' NO Metrolink Station
I
.� � ' • :",;�: ts.,..::x� .�r� G„_:�:,;. >;.;s . c,.;�„
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario 4
i g�,K
Existing SF Road
Existing SF Road
21. SF Road
-Lane SF Road
ucYQ9 �,
Existing RR Ave
2 -Lane RR Ave
-Lane RR Ave
-Lane RR Ave
1996 Counts
1996 Counts
1998 Traffic
2006 Traffic
Sn.fir,.at3
AM PM
AM PM
AM PM
AM PM
,r'..:<>
<:,,.
C F
-
San Femando Road/4th Street
San Fernando Road/Railroad Ave S/O 4th Street
- -
0.561 A 0.527 A
0.580 A 0.613 B
0.799C 0.663 B
San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue
0.805 D 0.859 D
0.725 C 0.823 D
0.646 B 0.749 C
0.664 B 0.839 D
San Fernando Road/Market Street
0.706 C 0.822 D
0.499 A 0.550 A
0.462 A 0.451 A
0.435 A 0.319 A
San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
0.732 C 0.660 B
0.644 B 0.673-B
0.582 A 0.551 A
0.614 B 0.586 A
San Fernando Road/11th Street/Railroad Ave
F F
0.584 A 0.583 A
0.795 C 0.709 C
0.771 C 0.804 D
Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
A A
C A
B B
C E
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
A A
0.577 A 0.629 B
0.805 D 0.812 D
0.639 B 0.711 C
Market Street/Pine Avenue
A A
A A
A A
I A I A
' The current intersections of San Fernando Road with 4th Street and 11th Street show levels -of -service
(LOS) F during certain time periods. This is because these intersections are stop -sign controlled and
left -turn movements from the side street onto San Fernando Road is difficult during peak periods.
' These volumes are currently very low so the LOS F is not significant.
Scenario 2 causes some San Fernando Road traffic to divert to Railroad Avenue and level of service
' improves on San Fernando Road as traffic volumes decrease.
Scenario 3 increases traffic over existing conditions by approximately 4%. In addition, traffic volumes
' would balance themselves between San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue as each roadway has one
lane in each direction. With proper intersection design at the San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue
south of 4th Street and San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street intersections, traffic flows will
' balance properly and all intersections will operate at an acceptable level -of -service. Scenario 3 is
expected to remain in place until traffic growth forces any of the critical intersections to LOS E.
I
1
33
I
Scenario 3 provides the least number of north -south through lanes of any alternative. At the request
of the City of Santa Clarita, an incremental analysis of traffic growth impacts to Scenario 3 was
' performed to determine the future year at which point the critical study intersections reach level of
service (LOS) E. The Scenario 3 level -of -service is highest for the Railroad Avenue/Market Street
intersection for AM peak hour (0.812 LOS D). The level -of -service was incrementally increased by
' 2 % per year to determine when the level -of -service reaches LOS E or 0.900. Based on this calculation,
all study intersections should operate at acceptable levels -of -service (LOS D or better) until the Year
2004.
' Scenario 4 looks at traffic volumes ten years from now which for purposes of this study are assumes
to be 21.9 % (2 % annual growth compounded over 10 years) above existing volumes. All intersections
' continue to operate at acceptable levels although the San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
intersection approachesLOSE.
' All study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service for each of the scenarios studied.
1,
I
1
I
1
34
I V. Level -of -Service With Metrolink Station and
' Determination of Significant Impacts
' Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5 below are summaries of the level -of -service calculations for the project
intersections with and without the Newhall Metrolink Station. A column is added in each table telling
whether Metrolink Station traffic causes a significant impact.
' Table 3
' Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 1
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
' Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 1
I
I
1
1
Under the existing geometric scenario, the left -turn movement from 11th Street onto San Fernando
Road is difficult during peak periods. This results in the level -of -service F calculation: The station has
no impacts on this intersection, however, since Railroad Avenue does not currently intersect San
Fernando Road at 11th Street. The station does have a significant impact on the San Fernando
Road/Lyons Avenue intersection during the PM peak period (0.041 increase while 0.040 is considered
significant). The impact is the result of vehicles leaving the station to travel northbound on San
Fernando Road or westbound on Lyons Avenue. The intersection operates at LOS C, and as a result,
no intersection improvements are recommended.
' It is important to note that the above analysis for Scenario looked at intersection level -of -service based
on intersection capacities only. Construction of a Metrolink Station will require the upgrade of Railroad
' Avenue with the construction of curb and gutter along the east curb. Market Street would need to be
improved at the railroad crossing to handle station -generated traffic and pedestrian movements.
' 35
Existing SF Road
Existing RR Ave
1996 Counts
With
Signi%
Wit
With
Signi%
�'�s•�Yr���y � � 3.
�..,F
about
Station Station
Station
Station
> ,.i;..::;..�.;.:.�"a:•:..,.
.:fi:
AM AM
PM
PM
C D
NO
F
F
NO
San Fernando Road/4th Street
San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue
0.805 D 0.808 D
NO
0.859 D
0.893 D
NO
San Fernando Road/Market Street
0.706 C 0.709 C
NO
0.822 D
0.824 D
NO
San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
0.732 C 0.744 C
NO
0.660 B
0.701 C
YES
San Fernando Road/11th Street/Railroad Ave
F F
NO
F
F
NO
Railroad Avenue/L ons Avenue
A A
NO
A
A
NO
Railroad Avenue Market Street
A A
NO
A
B
NO
Market Street/Pine Avenue
A A
NO
A
D
NO
Under the existing geometric scenario, the left -turn movement from 11th Street onto San Fernando
Road is difficult during peak periods. This results in the level -of -service F calculation: The station has
no impacts on this intersection, however, since Railroad Avenue does not currently intersect San
Fernando Road at 11th Street. The station does have a significant impact on the San Fernando
Road/Lyons Avenue intersection during the PM peak period (0.041 increase while 0.040 is considered
significant). The impact is the result of vehicles leaving the station to travel northbound on San
Fernando Road or westbound on Lyons Avenue. The intersection operates at LOS C, and as a result,
no intersection improvements are recommended.
' It is important to note that the above analysis for Scenario looked at intersection level -of -service based
on intersection capacities only. Construction of a Metrolink Station will require the upgrade of Railroad
' Avenue with the construction of curb and gutter along the east curb. Market Street would need to be
improved at the railroad crossing to handle station -generated traffic and pedestrian movements.
' 35
' Railroad Avenue will also need to be modified to accommodate bus trips serving the station. Bus
requirements include the ability to negotiate Railroad Avenue at 6th Street and 8th Street.
' Table 4
' Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 2
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
1
1
1
Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 2
For Scenario 2, the only intersection significantly impacted by Metrolink Station traffic is the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street intersection. Most Metrolink Station patrons come from
the north and turn onto Railroad Avenue at 11th Street. Even with Metrolink Station traffic, the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11 Street intersection operates at LOS B. Since the intersection is
' being designed with the intention of eventually handling Metrolink -generated traffic, no additional
capacity will be needed at this intersection.
1
1
I
1
0.
Scenario 2
Existing SF Road
Improved 2 -1 -ane RR Ave
1998 Counts
Without With
Slgnif7
Without
With
Signi%
rsj f g:: ti
Station Station
Station
Station
„. ''.
AM AM
PM
PM
San Fernando Road/Railroad Ave S/O 4th Street
0.561 A 0.567A
NO
0.527 A
0.523 A
NO
San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue
0.725 C 0.725 C
NO
0.823 D
0.823 D
NO
San Fernando Road/Market Street
0.499 A 0.499 A
NO
0.550 A
0.551 A
NO
San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
0.644 B 0.645 B
NO
0.673 B
0.673B
NO
San Fernando Road/11 th Street/Railroad Ave
0.584 A 0.634 B
YES
0.583 A
0.583 A
NO
Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
C C
NO
A
B
NO
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
FO. 577 A 0.587A
N:o::]l
0.629 B
0.639 B
NO
Market Street/Pine Avenue
A A
NO
A
A
NO
For Scenario 2, the only intersection significantly impacted by Metrolink Station traffic is the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street intersection. Most Metrolink Station patrons come from
the north and turn onto Railroad Avenue at 11th Street. Even with Metrolink Station traffic, the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11 Street intersection operates at LOS B. Since the intersection is
' being designed with the intention of eventually handling Metrolink -generated traffic, no additional
capacity will be needed at this intersection.
1
1
I
1
0.
Table 5
' Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 3
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
' Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 3
1
1
1
1
1
1
d
1
E
For Scenario 3, the only intersection significantly impacted by Metrolink Station traffic is the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street intersection. Most Metrolink Station patrons come from
the north and turn onto Railroad Avenue at 11th Street. Even with Metrolink Station traffic, the San
Femando Road/Railroad Avenue/11 Street intersection operates at LOS D. Since the intersection is
being designed to eventually handle Metrolink -generated traffic, no additional capacity is needed at this
intersection.
37
Scenario
-Lane SF Road
Improved 2-1ane RR Ave
1998 Forecast Traffic
Without With I
Signif9 Without With Signi%
Station iStation I
Station Station
AM AM
PM PM
San Femando Road/Railroad Ave S/O 4th Street
0.580 A 0.587 A
NO
0.613 B 0.623 B NO
San Fernando Road/Newhall Avenue
0.646 B 0.646 C
NO
0.749 C 0.769 C NO
San Femando Road/Market Street
0.462 A 0.462 A
NO
0.451 A 0.453 A NO
San Femando Road/Lyons Avenue
0.582 A 0.583A
NO
0.551 A 0.551 A NO
San Fernando Rcad/11th Street/Railroad Ave
0.795 C 0.836 D
YES
0.709 C 0.709 C NO
Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
B C
NO
B C NO
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
10.805 D 10.824 D 1
NO
0.812 D 0.823 D NO
Market Street/Pine Avenue
A A
NO
A A NO
For Scenario 3, the only intersection significantly impacted by Metrolink Station traffic is the San
Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street intersection. Most Metrolink Station patrons come from
the north and turn onto Railroad Avenue at 11th Street. Even with Metrolink Station traffic, the San
Femando Road/Railroad Avenue/11 Street intersection operates at LOS D. Since the intersection is
being designed to eventually handle Metrolink -generated traffic, no additional capacity is needed at this
intersection.
37
I
' Table 6
' Intersection Level of Service Calculations for Scenario 4
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts
' Railroad Avenue Study
Determination of Metrolink Station Impacts Under Scenario 4
1
1
1
' Scenario 4 has a .widened 4 -lane Railroad Avenue roadway. The movements from San Fernando Road
to and from Railroad Avenue are the major movements and the roadway and signal timing and phasing
are to be designed accordingly. As background traffic increases at 2% per year from existing levels,
it is assumed that so does Metrolink Station traffic. Metrolink -generated traffic causes no significant
impact to Scenario 4.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(1
N.
Scenario 4
-Lane SF
Road
Improved
4 -Lane RR
Ave
''� ��"'�'�`'"��'� ��� ��•' �?fir ..
006 Forecast Traffic
ithout With Signif7 Without Wth Signit?
I
+'�t
talion
AM
Station
AM
Station Station
PM
$!,xi.'s'?:.+.,,.:?'3'€z`Za.,,,"ELc;?'
PM
0.799 C
0.808 D
NO
0.663 B 0.667 8 NO
San Fernando Road/Railroad Ave S/O 4th Street
San Fernando Road/NewhallAvenue
0.664 B
0.6548
NO
0.839 D 0.839 D NO
San Fernando Road/Market Street
0.435 A
0.435 A
NO
0.319 A 0.322 A NO
San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
0.614 B
0.616 B
NO
0.586 A 0.611 B NO
San Fernando Road/11th Street/Railroad Ave
0.771 C
0.780 C
NO
0.804 D 0.804 D NO
Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
C
C
NO
E F NO
Railroad Avenue/Market Street
0.639 B
10.654 B I
N710.7111
C 0.715 C NO
Market Street/Pine Avenue
A
A
NO
A B NO
' Scenario 4 has a .widened 4 -lane Railroad Avenue roadway. The movements from San Fernando Road
to and from Railroad Avenue are the major movements and the roadway and signal timing and phasing
are to be designed accordingly. As background traffic increases at 2% per year from existing levels,
it is assumed that so does Metrolink Station traffic. Metrolink -generated traffic causes no significant
impact to Scenario 4.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(1
N.
'
VI. On -Street Parking Analysis
'
A. EXISTING ON -STREET PARKING UTILIZATION
On Monday, September 10, 1996, the total number of parking spaces along each of the streets within
'
the study area was counted. The study area included San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue between
4th Street and 11th Street and the east -west streets north of 4th Street and south of 11th Street between
'
San Fernando Road and Railroad Avenue. Pine Street was included in the parking study area from
Market Street to 4th Street.
'
Block lengths were measured and it was assumed that 22 feet would be required per parallel parking
space. Driveways were considered in measuring available parking. Ininstanceswhere cars were
parked at an angle, parking availability was based on theoretical parallel curb parking; therefore, in
some instances utilization rates exceeded 100%.
Between 11:30 AM and 12:30 PM, a total of 489 on -street parking spaces are observed within the
project limits. A total of 255 parked cars was observed during the observation period: The observed
'
cars included cars parking at an angle along the railroad right-of-way. The results of this September
10, 1996 survey are provided in Table 7. The table denotes instances where cars were parked at an
angle to the curb.
A second 10 -hour parking survey was performed on December 12, 1996. The peak parking period on
December 12, 1996 was between 11 AM and IPM, consistent with the earlier survey. During the peak
'
period on December 12, 1996, the total number of parked cars observed ranged between 227 and 237
cars, consistent with the earlier survey. The December 12, 1996 survey summary is provided in
Appendix G.
'
Many of the parked cars along Railroad Avenue included cars of employees of the automobile repair
and parts stores and vehicles from car dealers. Also, the auto repair shops use the area to store vehicles
'
waiting for service. Five large Ryder Rental trucks were also observed along Railroad Avenue.
There was an abundance of available parking along San Fernando Road to serve the commercial
interests. One-hour parking restrictions along San Fernando Road prevent longer term parking in front
'
of the commercial business within the study area.
I
I
1
39
I
I
11
1
11
1
1
1
TABLE 7 - PARKING OBSERVATIONS
Street
Limits
St.
Side
Available
Spaces
Spaces
Used
Utilization
%
Parking
Restriction
Adjacent
Land Use
San
Fernando
Road
Railroad Ave.
to 5th Street
East
7
0
0%
Commercial
West
17
0
0%
Park
5th Street to
6th Street
East
8
0
0%
1Hr.7A-6P
commercial
West
5
1
20%
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
6th Street to
Market Street
East
14
5
36%
1Hr.7A-6P
commercial
West
15
1
77o
lHr.7A-6P
Commercial
Market Street
to 8th Street
East
13
10
77%
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
West
17
8
47%
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
8th Street to
9th Street
East
10
1
10%
IHr.7A-6P
Commercial
West
12
4
33%
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
9th Street to
Lyons Avenue
East
3
0
NA
1Hr.7A-6P
Commercial
West
3
0
NA
-
Commercial
Lyons Avenue
to Ilth Street
East
0
0
NA
Commercial
West
3
0
NA
-
Gas station
40
H
1
I I
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
[1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Street
Limits
St.
Available
Spaces
Utilization
Parking
Adjacent
Side
Spaces
Used
%
Restriction
Land Use
Railroad
San Fernando
East
17
6 (90°)
35%
-
DirM
Avenue
Rd. to 5th
Street
West
9
5
56%
-
Commercial
5th Street to
East
18
5(90°)
28%
-
Dirt/RR
6th Street
West
7
0
0%
-
Commercial
6th Street to
East
18
15(90°)
83%
-
Dirt/RR
Market Street
West
13
6
46%
-
Auto Body
Market Street
East
19
26(90°)
137%
-
Dut7And-
to 8th Street
cape Shop
West
9
9
100%
-
Auto Repair
8th Street to
East
18
15(90-)
83%
-
DirtIRR
9th Street
West
4
7
175%
-
Auto Body
9th Street to
East
17
7(90°)
41%
-
Dirt/RR
Lyons Avenue
West
10
5
50%
-
Auto Repair
Lyons Avenue
East
14
19(90°)
136%
-
DirtIRR
to 11th Street
West
14
10(90°)
71%
-
Auto Store
4th Street
San Fernando
North
4
0
0%
-
Munlershop
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
0
0
NA
-
Used Car
5th Street
San Fernando
North
7
4
57%
-
Commercial
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
3
3
100%
-
Commercial
6th Street
San Fernando
North
4
2
50%
-
Commercial
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
3
2
67%
Commercial
41
I
I
1
1
Street
Limits
St.
Available
Spaces
Utilization
Parking
Adjacent
Side
Spaces
Used
%
Restriction
Land Use
Market
San Fernando
North
4
4
100%
Commercial
Street
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
9Diag
6
67%
Commercial
8th Street
San Fernando
North
7
5
71%
commerc at
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
5
5
100%
Commercial
9th Street
San Fernando
North
9
9
100%
-
Commercial
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
7
6
86%
Commercial
Lyons
San Fernando
North
4
4
100%
Commercial
Avenue
Rd. to
Railroad
Avenue
South
15
9
60%
Commercial
Pine
Market Street
East
15
12
80%
Dirt/RR
Street
to 6th Street
West
20
10
50%
Aparunent
6th Street to
East
13
5
38%
Apamnents
5th Street
West
17
3
18%
DNRR
5th Street to
East
12
1
8%
Res;demial
4th Street
West
1 17
0
0%
-
Dirt/RR
Parking along Pine Street within the study area was more than sufficient. Parking was concentrated in
front of the apartment building near the Pine Street/Market Street intersection and became less utilized
to the south of the apartment building.
IB. PARKING OBSERVATIONS AT NEARBY METROLINK. AND PARK AND RIDE
FACILITIES
' Parking availability and utilization surveys were also performed at adjacent Metrolink Stations and
Caltrans Park and Ride Lots. The Metrolink Stations surveyed were the Santa Clarita Station on
Soledad Canyon Road and the Via Princessa Station. The three Caltrans Park and Ride Lots surveyed
' are located just south of the Newhall downtown core along San Fernando Road. Results of these
surveys are provided in Appendix C of this report. This data was used to determine current park and
ride and Metrolink demand in the area and to assess the adequacy of the current parking facilities.
[1
42
I
C. PARKING CONDITION WITHOUT STATION
' Available parking in the project area included all streets surveyed in the study area. Parking availability
by street is summarized in the table below. The table also includes available parking tinder the two
proposed Railroad Avenue lane configurations.
TABLE 8
PARKING SPACE AVAILABILITY UNDER RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT SCENARIOS
1
1
1
I
1
h
The demand shown above assumes no change from existing demand. Under this assumption on -
street parking availability should remain sufficient with the interim and ultimate improvements to
Railroad Avenue.
The interim Railroad Avenue geometry does not result in any loss to parking although vehicles will
' be forced to parallel park next to the railroad right-of-way rather than angle -park as is currently
1
n
43
Available On -Street Parking Spaces
Street
Existing
Condition
(Scenario 1)
Interim
Condition
(Scenario 2)
Ultimate
Condition
(Scenario 4)
San Fernando Road
127
127
127
Railroad Avenue
187
187
66
4th Street
4
4
4
5th Street
10
10
10
6th Street
7
7
7
Market Street
13
13
13
8th Street
12
12
12
9th Street
16
16
16
Lyons Avenue
19
19
19
Pine Street
94
94
94
TOTAL
489
489
368
DEMAND
255
255
255
UTILIZATION
52%
52%
69%
The demand shown above assumes no change from existing demand. Under this assumption on -
street parking availability should remain sufficient with the interim and ultimate improvements to
Railroad Avenue.
The interim Railroad Avenue geometry does not result in any loss to parking although vehicles will
' be forced to parallel park next to the railroad right-of-way rather than angle -park as is currently
1
n
43
J
' observed. Vehicles being stored or awaiting service at the adjacent auto shops will need to find
other parking.
' The ultimate Railroad Avenue geometry results in the loss of 121 parking spaces along the east side
of Railroad Avenue. However, existing parking demand will still be less than available capacity.
' The Downtown Newhall Improvement Program, prepared by Freedman, Tong & Bottomley in April
1996, analyzed potential parking demand with the full build -out of the Downtown Newhall core. That
' study estimated a potential demand of 750 vehicles, exceeding the current capacity of 680 spaces
provided by 250 off-street parking spaces and 430 on -street spaces along San Fernando Road, Railroad
Avenue and their cross streets. Pine Street was not included in their capacity calculation. That study
' recommended that additional parking spaces could be created "if all of the surplus land area currently
devoted to outdoor automobile and light industrial -related businesses (and/or sitting vacant) were
efficiently developed for parking ... ," which would increase off-street parking from 250 to 1,020
spaces. The Downtown Newhall Improvement Program did not rely on the parking along Railroad
Avenue to serve future demand. Instead, conversion of the current auto and light -industrial businesses
to parking would serve the future increase in commercial development, which incidentally would
' decrease demand for parking along Railroad Avenue. Scenario 4 of the Railroad Avenue project results
in a decrease of 120 spaces along the east side of Railroad Avenue, but this decrease would not affect
the development of the Downtown Newhall core.
D. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH PARK AND RIDE
' Operation of the site for park and ride will increase parking demand in the immediate area. Parking
demand will be based on both demand for park and ride spaces and demand for parking by patrons who
drive to the station to use the bus services.
'
Based on the traffic methodology discussed in Chapter II, Section D, 33 park and ride spaces are
required at the station. The following express buses would serve the site during the AM commuting
period (5AM to 9AM):
'
Route 573 - 4 buses
Route 795 - 6 buses
'
Route 799 - 5 buses
Route 799 - 9 buses
TOTAL - 24 buses
For purposes of this study, it is assumed that 3 spaces are required per bus for a total of 72 parking
' spaces. This station is one of several pick-up/drop off points for express buses along San Fernando
Road.
'
It is assumed that local buses do not generate any parking demand.
The project site, used as a park-and-ride and bus station, is expected to have a parking demand for 105
vehicles.
I44
II
E. PARKING CONDITIONS WITH METROLINK
' In addition to the parking demand estimated above, the use of the Newhall Station as a Metrolink
Station will generate an additional parking demand of 154. The 154 space parking demand is based on
the diversion of 33 % of the Santa Clarita Metrolink Station parking demand to the Newhall Station.
' Adding the 105 park and ride scenario parking demand, the total additional parking demand is expected
to be 259.
' The latest site plan for the Newhall Metrolink Station proposes 208 off-street parking spaces. Excess
demand for station parking could be accommodated by on -street parking along Pine Street, and along
both sides of Railroad Avenue under Scenarios 2 and 3. Under Scenario 4, 120 on -street parking
' spaces along the east side of Railroad Avenue would be removed, and demand for parking within
walking distance of the Railroad Avenue/Market Street intersection could exceed supply. This situation
could be alleviated either by the construction of additional off-street parking lots to the east of the
t proposed station, or by the implementation of the Downtown Newhall Improvement Program which
would convert land currently used by auto and light industrial businesses into parking lots.
F
1
1
11
45
I
1
1
1
'J
I
11
1
I
1
I
I
0
I
I
APPENDIX A
TRAFFIC COUNTS
r
WEST COAST TRAffiC COU11E1S
818.303.6042
SAM YEBMAMDO RD. 4TM STREET SAM 111111DO ED.
Southbound Westbound Morthbonnd
Start
WILLIAM S. HART PARI
lastbound
30
0 372
0
0
0
1
1.305
0
:45
0 391
0
1
0
2
0
243
0
Cal
0 763
0
1
0
3
1
548
0
am
0 378
1
1
0
0
1
219
0
7:15
1 433
0
0
0
1
0
285
1
30
1 399
0
0
0
0
0
412
1
45
0 426
0
1
0
0
1
333
6
Hour total
2 1636
1
2
0
1
2
1249
8
1:0011
1 376
0
0
0
0
1
296
6
8:15
3 303
0
1
0
4
1
270
2
Ptal
4 679
0
1
0
4
2
566
8
and
6 3078
1
4
0
B
5
2363
16
.11 56.11
0.04
.11
0.04
.11
.11
43.14
.31
0Total
ch 1 56.31
.21
43.51
01 Apprch
.21 99.81
0.01
33.31
0.0166.7%
.21
99.11
.71
rPeak
Hoar Analysis By
Entire Intersection
for the
Period:
06:30a1 to 08:1511 on
09111196
Start
Peak Hr
.........
Wolules
.........
1 Direction
Southbound
Street Base
SAE YIRMAIDO RD.
Peak Hour
07:1511
?actor
.943
Left
3
Thru
1634
Rght
0
total
1637
Westbould
4TH STREET
.500
1
0
1 2
Morthbound
rEastbound
SAE f1111100 RD.
WILLIAM S. HART PARE
.812
2
0
1326
0
14 1341
1 1
.250
'r
1
'r
r
�r
r
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 1
0.04 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01100.01
Site Code : 00000000
Start Bate: 09/11196
file I.D.: STACU31
Page : 1
1316
600
721
813
680
5482
....... Percentages :......
Left Thr1 fight
.1 99.8 .0
50.0 .0 50.0
.1 98.8 1.0
.0 .0 100.0
f
a
I
II
Ioveaent 1
2
2 0
D
■ 0
Inbound
'Outbound
0 Total
SAX PERXAXDO RD.
0 1634 3 0
1326
1
1327
Inbound 137
Outbound 1327
Total 2964
1
2
3
Inbound 1342
Outbound 1636
Total 1978
1 2 1326
1634
1
1636
SAX 191111 0 RD.
NEST COAST TRATPIC CODITERS
818.303.6012
0
Inbound 2
Outbound 17 1
Total 19
3
0 17
14
4TH STREET
Peak Hour Analysis By Individual Approach for the Period: 06:30x1 to 08:15x1 on 09/11196
I
I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
file I.D. STICU31
Page :2
...... Percentages .......
Left Thra Ight
.1 99.8 .0
33.3 .0 66.6
1 98.8 1.0
0 0 100.0
Start
Peak Hr
......... Tolales .........
f
Direction
Street [no
Peak Hour
factor
Left
Thra
Rght
Total
Southbound
511 19111,110 RD.
07:00a1
.944
2
1636
1
1639
'
Westbound
Iorthbound
471 STREET
SAX PRRXIHDO IID.
06:3011
07:15a1
.900
.812
2
2
0
1326
4
14
6
1341
Eastbound
WILLIAM S. HART PARR
07:1931
.250
0
0
1
1
I
I
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
file I.D. STICU31
Page :2
...... Percentages .......
Left Thra Ight
.1 99.8 .0
33.3 .0 66.6
1 98.8 1.0
0 0 100.0
S
SAE 1111AXDO RD.
Southbound
3 411
2 352
3 362
0 335
8 1450
1 367
0
0
0
1
3
2
E
TEST COAST TRAFFIC COMERS
818.303.6042
4TH STREET
Westbound
3 0
5
0
5
1
0
1
1
0
4
0
0
2
1
0
12
2
0
4
0
0
1
SAX FERXAXDO RD.
Xorthboand
1 . 431 2
1 418 4
2 849 6
4 401 4
1 448 1
1 416 1
2 451 3
8 1722 9
0 338 1
0 413 3
TILLIAX S. HART PABX
Eastbound
tai
2 692 2
2 0
5
0 751 4
nd
13 2818 8
14 0
19
10 3322 19
1 of Total
,21 45.21 .11
.21 0.01
.31
,21 53.21 ,31
irch 1 45.51
.51
53.71
f Apprch.
.51 99.31 .31
42.41 0.01
57.61
.31 99.11 .61
1
' Peat Hour Analysis BT Entire Inter
r
the Period:
4:30pa to 06:15ps on 09n 09 0/96
Start ,
Peat Hr
......... Poluaes
.........
tDirection
Sonthbonnd
Street Me
SAX FERXAIDO RD.
Peat Hour
ONOpa
factor
.888
Left Thru Rght
8 1460 6
Total
IM
Westbound
4tH STREET
.475
7 0
12
19
Xorthbcund
SAX FERIAIDO RD.
941
8 1722
9
1739
' Eastbound
TILLIAX S. HART PARI
.375
0 0
3
3
1
4
i
1 0 2
1 .0 $
2 0 7
0 0 0
0 0 2
0 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 3
1 0 2
0 0 1
1 0 3
3 0 13
0.01 0.01 .21
.31
8.81 0.01 81.21
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09110196
File I.D., : S11CLA3P
Page . : 1
834
811
791
718
6239
....... Percentages .......
Left Thru Ight
.5 99.0 .4
36,8 .0 63.1
.4 99.0 .5
,0 .0 100.0
I
SAX FHRIARDO RD.
6 1460 8 0
1722
12
1734
Inbound 1 74
Outbound 1734
Total 3208
0
Inbound 3
utbound 14
Total 17
' 3
J
!IST COAST TRAFFIC COOITIRS
818.303.6042
0
Inbound 19
Outbound 17 7
Total 36
8
0 17
9
4TH STREET
Peak Hour Analysis HF Individual Approach for the Period: 04:30ps to 06:15pt on 09/10196
Inbound 1739
Outbound 1470
Peak Hr
Total 3209
9oluses .........
7 8 1111
Direction
1460
Peak Hour
3
t
.1410
Ight
SAX FERXAX 0 RD.
J
!IST COAST TRAFFIC COOITIRS
818.303.6042
0
Inbound 19
Outbound 17 7
Total 36
8
0 17
9
4TH STREET
Peak Hour Analysis HF Individual Approach for the Period: 04:30ps to 06:15pt on 09/10196
Site Code : 00000600
Start Date: 09110196
Pile I.D. ; STICI13P
Page ; 2
...... Percentages .......
Left Thrs Ight
.5 99.0 .4
45.0 .0 $5.0
.4 99.0 .5
18.1 .0 81.8
Start
Peak Hr
.........
9oluses .........
Direction
Street Bane
Peak Hour
Factor
Left
Thru
Ight
Total
Soathbonnd
SAX PIRIABDO RD.
05:00pa
.888
8
1460
6
1474
Bestboand
Borthbound
4TH STREET
SAB FRRIARDO RD.
04:45pn
05:00ps
.500
.941
9
8
0
1722
11
9
20
1739
Eastbound
IILLIAX S. BAIT PARE
04:30pa
.458
2
0
9
11
Site Code : 00000600
Start Date: 09110196
Pile I.D. ; STICI13P
Page ; 2
...... Percentages .......
Left Thrs Ight
.5 99.0 .4
45.0 .0 $5.0
.4 99.0 .5
18.1 .0 81.8
INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY
ACCUTEK
SANTA CLARITA DATE1 6.5.96
,99?K-SWTN ST1 SAN FERNANDO'RD. OAYt WEDNESDAY
rCAST -WEST $It NEWHALL AVE. PROD NO. 2130
.............................................................................................................
swim WEST NORTH EAST
BOUND SS BOUND WB BOUND NB BOUND EB ] 1St NR
TIME RT TNRU LT TOTAL IT TNRU LT TOTAL RT TNRU LT TOTAL RT THRU LT TOTAL ]TOTAL TOTAL
.............................................................................................................
AN 6t30
6:45
7100
7115
TOTAL
7330
7245
RICO
8315
TOTAL
PH 4t30
4:45
5200
5115
TOTAL
5130
5145
6100
6215
TOTAL
0 260
0 255
0 221
0 316
0 1052
0 253
O 216
0 204
0 204
0 Rn
0 122
0 163
0 196
1 204
1 68S
1 210
2 202
1 169
0 191
4 m
i AM PEAK HOUR
7:15.8315 0 989
1•�1
I
I
I
I
Ir
I
0 260
0
0
0
0
0
179
51
230
106
1
0
107
0 255
0
0
0
0
0
173
71
244
107
0
1
108
0 221
0
0
0
0
0
122
67
189
112
2
1
115
0 316
0
0
0
0
0
127
67
194
141
0
0
141
0 1032
0
0
O
0
0
601
256
AS?
466
3
2
471
0 2S3 '
0
0
0
0
0
206
122
328
161
0
0
181
0 216
0
0
0
0
0
269
140.
409
144
2
0
146
0 204
0
0
0
0
2
218
111
331
156
2
0
158
0 204
0
0
0
0
0
180
90
270
140
1
0
141
0 877
0
0
0
0
2
873
463
1338
601
S
0
6%
0 122
0 0
0 163
0 0
0 196
0 0
0 205
0 0
0 686
0 0
0 211
0 0
0 204
0 0
0 170
0 0
0 191
0 0
.....n6.........°
738
0 989
0 0
597
607
32S
651
2360
742
771
693
615
2821
0 0
0
213
85
300
123
0
1
124
546
0 0
0
299
12T
426
146
0
3
149 ]
738
0 0
2
294
138
434
185
1
0
186 ]
816
0 0
3
33T
118
458
128
3
2
133
796
0 0
S
1145
468
1618
$82
4
6
592
2896
0 0
0
319
99
418
237
1
2
260 ]
889
0 0
0
270
113
383
229
1
1
231
618
0 0
1
299
137
437
228
1
0
ZZ9
836
0 0
0
239
88
327
143
0
1
144 ]
662
0 0
.................................................................
1
1127
437
1565
657
3
4
864
3205
0 0
2
820
440
1262
602
4
0
606 (
2857
M1
ut•!
bio
]
PH PEAK HOURtip ,.vo ttq 411 .1
$115.6115 5 ,765 0 790 0 0 0 0 4 1225 467 1696 842 6 5 853 1 3339
.............................................................................................................
UST COAST TRATIIC COUNTERS
818.303.6042
SAF FSRMAMDO 10. MARIIT ST. SAS FBRSAADO RD.
Southbound westbound Northbound
MAAIII ST.
Sastbonad
6:30
16:45
1 225
2 261
1
2
3
4
6
9
5
9
2
3
114
129
1
2
Total
3 486
3
7
is
14
5
243
3
7:0041
2 254
1
5
32
11
2
122
1
7:15
3 266
2
8
16
14
3
130
2
7:30
6 230
3
9
23
15
5
174
1
3 222
5
6
33
18
6
207
3
'7:4S
lour Total
14 972
11
28
84
58
16
633
7
8:00a1
3 195
4
5
18
13
3
165
2
,815
5 114
S
9
11
10
2
147
2
Total
8 369
9
14
29
23
5
312
4
itraad
25 1827
23
49
128
95
26:1188
34
t of Total
.21 52.21
.71
1.41
3.71-
2.71
.71
34.0t
.41
Appreh t 53.61
1.81
35.11
;It of Apprch
1.31 97.41
1.21
18.01
41.11
34.91
2.1%
96.71
2.11
2
Peak lour 111l?s18 By
Entire
intersection
for
the Period:
06:30a1 to 08:1511
on
12/20/96
Start
Peak Ir
MUM
...
..... I
Direction
street Name
Peak
lour
?actor
Left
Tbru
Rght
Total
Southbound
SAN FMBNUDO
RD.
07:1511
.869
1S
913
14
942
westbound
NARFFT ST,
.781
28
90
60
178
Northbound
SAN FIRNAMDO
FD.
.811
17
616
B
701
eastbound
MABFHT $T.
.694
18
46
11
75
I
i�
I
2 5 3
S S 1
7 SO 4
3 8 2
1 7 1
6 19 3
7 11 S
17 44 11
4 10 2
6 22 3
30 76 18
.91 2.2t .51
3.51
4.21 61.31 14.51
Site Code : 00000111
Start Date: 32/20/96
File I.D.: CLAFAIAM
Page : I
3
.423
453
493
1895
424
3499
.. Percentages .......
Left Thru Mght
1.5 96.9 1.4
15.7 50.5 33.7 -
2.4 96.4 1.1
24.0 61.3 14.6
<I
Novelent 1
11
I MT "N
17
121 90
I_ 14
IS
Inbound
------Outbound
46 Total
1 11
I
SAA PUNIX RD.
14 913 13 18
676
60
134
Tnbouad 42
Outbound 754
Total 1696
75
121
196
Inbound 701
Outbound 951
Total 1653
28 li 676
913
17
.952
SAA TURAR 0 RD.
ASST CORS! TRAPPIC COUNTERS
818.303.6042
90
Inbound 178
Outbound 69 28
Total 247
15
46 69
8
IAREB! ST.
Peak lour 1:1175is If Individual Appfoach for the Period: 06:3811 to 08:15a1 on 12120196
Site Code : 00000111
Start Date: 12/20/96
Me I.D.: CLIMAX
Page :2
..... Percentages ......
Left Thru Rght
1.2 97.9 .7
15.7 50.5 33.7'
2.2 96.6 1.1
23.4 62.9 13.5
;m
Start
Peak Ar
folules .....I...
Direction
Street lane
Peak lour
factor
Left
Thru
Rght
Total
Southbound
SAN PIRRAIDO RD.
06:4511
.952
13
1011
8
1032
westbound
RARRI! ST.
07:1511
.781
28
90
60
178
Northbound
811 111111DO RD.
07:3011
.830
16
693
B
717
Sastbousd
NARRIT ST.
07:30a1
.760
19
51
11
81
Site Code : 00000111
Start Date: 12/20/96
Me I.D.: CLIMAX
Page :2
..... Percentages ......
Left Thru Rght
1.2 97.9 .7
15.7 50.5 33.7'
2.2 96.6 1.1
23.4 62.9 13.5
;m
WEST COAST T11111C COBRTEIS
818.303.6042
SAB IBRIARDO RD, XARIBT ST. SAX IERXABDO RD.
Southbound Westbound Xorthboand
BARXBT ST.
Eastbound
400pt
2 192
3
11
12
14
2
235
2
4:1S
3 239
4
10
it
16
2
238
3
4:30
3 261
4
12
13
17
3
246
2
}'45
4 264
6
12
13
15
2
235
3
,Boar Total
12 956
17
45
49
62
9
954
le
5:00pa
6 244
6
14
SS
18
2
264
3
S:15
13 219
4
16
14
21
1
263
2
5:30
8 192
3
12
19
15
3
254
2
5:45
6 151
4
11
24
10
6
221
6
Bout Total
33 806
17
53
72
64
12
1002
13
'Grand
45 1762
34
98
121
126
21
39S6
23
1 of Total
1.01 39.51 ,
.81
2.21
2.79
2.81
.5143.9%
.51
1 41.31
7.71
44.91
,Apprch
1 of Apprch
2.41 95.71
1.81
28.41
35.11
36.51
1.01
97.81
1.21
3
' Peak lour
Analysis 8y
Entire
Intersection
for
the Period:
04:00pa to 05:45pt on 12/19/96
Start
Peak Br
.........
9olunes
.........
Direction
Street Bane
Peak
lour
factor
left
Thru
Rgbt
Total
Soathbound
SAB 111111DO RD.
04:30pa
.943
26
988
20
1034
Xestbouad
BARRET ST.
.882
54
55
71
189
Borthbouad
Eaatbaaad
SAB IERXAXDO RD.
MEET ST.
.954
.812
8
51
1008
68
10
24
1026
143
I 1
9 it 2
10 13 2
13 1S 5
14 Ib 4
46 55 13
13 16 3
11 21 12
10 23 S
15 27 2
49 87 22
95 142 35
2.11 3.21 ,81
6.11
4.91 52.21 12.91
Site Me : 00000111
Start Date: 12/19/96
lilt I.D.: CLAUIPB
Page :3
5S3
594
604
597
546
4458
....... Percentages .......
Left Thru Rght
2.5 93.5 1.9
30.0 30.5 39,4
.7 98.2 ,9
35.6 47.5 16.7
c<
.1
Movement 1
i'
SAI FIEIAIDO ED,
20 988 26 91
1008
71
1130
Inbound 1.31
Outbound 1130
Total 2164
Inbound 143
--—OMound 83
68 Total 226
24
11
i'
1
1
.Inbound 1026
Outbound 1066
Total 2092
S4 8 1008
988
24
1066
SAI PIIIAN 0 RD.
HEST COAST TRAFFIC COUNTERS
818.303.6042
S9
Inbound 180
Outbound 104 54
Total 284
26
68 104
10
NAREBT ST.
Peak Roar Analysis HT Individaal Approach for the Period: 04:00pm to 05:45pm on 12/19196
$Ito Code : 00000111
Start Date: 12/19/96
Pile I.D. ; CLAIAIPN
Page :2
....... Percentages .......
Left Thru Ight
1.3 96.5 1.9
28.0 38.0 33.8
.7 98.2 .9
31.0 55.0 13.9
1
Stat
Peak Hr
... I..... Volumes .........
Direction
street Name
Peak Hour
Factor
Left
Thru
Ight
Total
Soathboand
SAN PEIIANDO RD.
04:15pm
.953
16
1008
20
1044
Nestbomad
10111 ST.
09:00pm
.926
53
72
64
189
Northbound
SAN 18110DO ED.
04:45pm
.961
8
1016
30
1034
Nastbound
Run? ST.
05:00pn
.898
49
87
22
158
$Ito Code : 00000111
Start Date: 12/19/96
Pile I.D. ; CLAIAIPN
Page :2
....... Percentages .......
Left Thru Ight
1.3 96.5 1.9
28.0 38.0 33.8
.7 98.2 .9
31.0 55.0 13.9
1
INLEE2SECTIONt 17 SAN FkiOMM ED axd 5th ST. SAMM CtARIM
C=V DATE: 09/28/94 TDM: 6:30- 8:30AM
***#1*D#*****kSQ SJ1A�?
7671 DO` wyj 0
" os► E
�. ******k#*****k* O TIVE COUNTS
F .-,+
************
TIME
R IP ZMU IMT
_
WB
R� TF03J IMT
NB
=an=TEFT
EB
RGiif THFdJ IEFT
T77II1T8
6:45
7100
0 233
0 459
0
0
1
3
1 1
1132
54
9�6
0
0
519
7:15
0 700
0
3
2 2
2 3
3
3
308
444
118
172
207
328
2
2
0
1104
7:30
7:45
0 973
0 1271
0
0
3
2 3
3
594
255
451
2
0
0
1657
2286
8:00
0 1494
0
4
5
2 3
2 3
3
761
377
619
6
0
3046
8:15
0 1734
0
6
2 4
3
4
993
1143
528
639
823
988
6
8
0
3857
8:30
0 1925
0
6
2 4
6
3,307
749
1112
8
0
1
4528
5120
k#**rD****##*#**IMMOD COUNTS*
**kk##*****k**
PERIOD
QOMISSB
####*#********
TIME
R31II' TFIliIl IEFT
WB
Reif THRU IEFT
VB
R2V TW TEFT
EB
LFII` TfiFdi TEST
TOMM
6:45
7:00
0 233
0 226
p
0
1
1.1
it
13254
96
0
0
519
7:15
0 241
0
2
0
1 1
0 1
2
0
176
136
64
111
2
0
585
7:80
0 273
0
0
0 0
0
150
54
83
121
123
0
0
0
0
553
629
7145
8:00
0 298
0 223
0
0
1
1
0 0
0'
167
122
168
4
0
760
8115
0 240
0
1
0 0
0 1
0
1
232
150
151
111
204
165
' 0
2
0
811
8:30
0 191
0
0
0 0
2
164
110
124
0
0
1
671
592
HOUR �ru
HOUR
�M
******!****#*##
TIME
E
ME TFiFE.T IEFT
MIT THEE] LEFT
Rte 7M IMT
RQiP UM IMT TOTALS
6:30
6:45
0 973
0 1038
0
0
3
2 3
3
594
255
451
2
0
2286
7900
0 1035
00
3
1 2
2
629
323
523
6
0
2527
7:15
0 1034
0
3
685
410
616
4
0
2753
7:30
0 952
0
0 1
1
699
467
660
6
0
2871
0
3
713
494
661
6
1
2834
PEAK HOUR PERIOD; 7:15AM TD 8:15AM VOL- 2871
PEAK 15 MIN PERIOD: 7145AM TO 8:OOAM WL- 811
:k -
Post -it' Fax Note
7671 DO` wyj 0
" os► E
ToA t \
F .-,+
nY1
PhOnsY Kr 7q ���t
"Iii Acd,ftew IN 95
-WAFF\4 CAVLA# M-FUtL-wewnom PR erm vr•
nnZFSB-MCN: 17 SAN FEPMW F1! and 5th ST, SANTA CIARITA
C
CURT DAM 09/27/94 TDM: 4:30- 6:30PM
**#,*�********
IjE
CCLwM
*****k******
=
SB ******
q*****Lum
TIME
S
MW UM IMT
wa
yQU MW MT
NB
r4= MW MT
EB
ni2o MM IZFT
TOTALS
16:45
17:00
1
2
158 1
299 1
1
0 2
11 265
160
170
1
0
760
17415
3.
468 1
3
3
0 4
2 4
2 519
3
318
299
1
0
1448
17;30
7
622 1
3
2 5
780
4 1027
448
611
453
592
7
7
0
2172
17145
18:00
7
7
796 1
3
3 8
4 1269
752
763
9
0
1
2881
3616
18:15
7
959 1
1118 1
3
6
3 6
3
4 1559
897
918
1
4369
18:30
8
1260 2
7
9
3 10
7 17851027
1065
17
2
5041
.
7 2017
1161
1187
13
2
5677
************** P=OD 07JMS
PERIOD CYEUM **************
TIME
Ran MW MT
�
FCC MW =T
Rme Um LEFT
Fau 'IIw IMT TM AW
16:45
17:00
1
1
158 1
141 0
1
p 2
1— 26~ g
160
17r
p
0
760
17;15
1
169 0
2
0
0 2
2 0
1 254
158
129
'154
0
0
688
4.
154 0
0
0 1
1 261
1 247
130
163
139
6
0
0
724
17:45
18:00
0
163
3
0 242
141
171
2
0
1
709
735
18;15
0
0
159 0
0
3
0
0 1
0 290
3
145
155
0
0
753
18:30
1
142 1
1
0 1
226
0 232.
130
134
147
122
2
2
1
672
0
636
*,►******* ** ** ii= Comm ****************
* * HOUR erg
EMIR
ME
SB
Few 71M IET
WB
R 2M THIN IMT
M
rKw Um LEFT
_
F42M TM LEFT 'It7=
16:30
16045
7
6
622 1
638 0
3
2
2 5
q 2027
1
59�
0
2881
3 6'
3 1004
592
593
8
1
2856
17:15
4
650 0
31
i 5
2 1040
579
619
8
1
2921
17:30
1
638 1
4
1 5
4 1005
3
579
612
4
2
2869
990
550
595
6
2
2796
PEAK iKM PERIOD: 5:OOPM TO 6:OOPM VOL- 2921
PEAK 15 MIN PERIOD: 4:30PM 717 4:45FX VOIm
760
VISI COAST TIAIIIC CODYTNIS
' 818.303.6042
' SAY YIIIAIDO ID. LIONS A9I. SAI PIIIAIDO RD.
Southbound Westbound Northbound
Start
LIONS Ms.
Nastbound
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09/10196
Pile I.D. STICLI21
Page :1
and
al
1
$89
80
1
3
1
48
240
1
88
2
28
1082
.21
DOal
1
316
52
0
0
2
17
103
0
41
2
21
555
7:15
0
332
78
0
0
0
31
122
1
44
2
15
625
30
1
2
305
109
0
0
2
70
136
2
90
3
12
731
45
4
279
140
1
2
3
72
198
1
85
14
16
815
lour Total
7
1232
379
1
2
7
190
559
4
260
21
64
2726
10011
1
309
123
1
2
1
63
151
1
89 •
4
23
769
8:15
7
278
95
1
0
1
52
93
2
85
1
23
638
11
8
587
218
2
1
2
115
245
3
174
5
46
1407
and
16 2408 677
4 7
10
353 1044
8
$21
28 138
5215
f Total
.31 46.2113.0%
.11 .11
.11
6.81 20.01
.21
10.01
.51 2.61
rch 1 59.51.41
26.91
13.21
f Ipprch
.51 77.7121.8%
19.01 33.31
47.61
25.11 74.31
.61
75.91
4.11 20.11
(Peak
Four Analysis
By Iatire
Inters ction the
Period:
05:30aa to 08:1511
on 09110196
Start
Peat Fr
......... Yolnaes .........
....... Percentages .......
Street Iaae
Peat Four
Tactor
Left The
Ight
Total
Left
The
Ight
,Direction
Soutbbound.
SAN PIINAFDO ID.
C7:30aa
.954
14 1171
467
1652
.8
70.8
18.1
Yestboand
11013 ANI.
.583
3 4
7
14
21.4
28.5
50.0
Northbound
311 PIIIAIDO.ID.
LIONS ATI.
.777
.959
257 579
349 12
6
74
842
445
30.5
78.4
68.7
4.9
.7
16.6
.'Eastbound
1
Ioveaest 1
.....
..a.
251
728 4
467
' 349
Inbound
' Outbound
22 Total
1
1
74
SAN Y111AI00 RD.
467 1171 14 349
579
7
935
Inbound 16S2
Outbound 935
Total 2587
445
728
1173
Inbound 842
Outbound 1248
Total 2090
3 257 579
1171
74
1248
SAN FBRRAR 0 RD.
NIST COAST TRAPYIC COOMBS
818.303.6042
4
Inbound 14
Outbound 42 3
Total 56
14
22 . 42
6
LTOIS AVE.
Peak Hour Analysis By Individual Approach for the Period: 05:3011 to 08:15ae on 09/10/96
11
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09110%96
Pile I.D.: STACL121
Page :2
Percentages ntaRgh.......
LeftTh
.4 72.8 26.7
21.4 28.5 50.0
27.7 71.6 .5
78.4 4.9 16.6
Start
Peak Br
.........
voluaes .........
Direction
Street Base
Peak Hoar
factor
Left
Thru
fight
Total
Southbound
SAH FBRNAIDO RD.
07:15as
.971
7
1225
450
1682
'
Iestbound
Northbound
LTOIS AVE.
SAI YBRNAIDO RD.
07:30aa
07:15as
.583
.783
3
236
4
608
7
5
14
849
Eastbound
LTOIS AVE.
07:30as
.959
349
22
74
445
11
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09110%96
Pile I.D.: STACL121
Page :2
Percentages ntaRgh.......
LeftTh
.4 72.8 26.7
21.4 28.5 50.0
27.7 71.6 .5
78.4 4.9 16.6
'
RES? CObSt 1111FIC COURSERS
818.303.6042
Site Code :
Start Date:
00000000
09/10/96
Pile I.D.:
S?1C112P
Page :
1
' SU PERIM RD.
L?ORS 1YE.
S1R PERIUDO RD.
MIS 1YE.
Soathboand
Yestbcund
Rorthboand
Eastbound
Start
muse Left ?hru A bt
Left ?hra
fl ht
left Me R
ht
Left Thru
1qbt
Total
:30 4 120 123
0 7
7
49. 239
4
132
7
33
725
4.45 2 143 115
2 6
7
40 240
4
123
0
23
705
otal 6 263 238
2 13
14
89 479
8
255
7
56
1430
:00pa 4 160 116
2 4
4
51 212
2
148
5
23
741
5:15 8 170 90
1 7
S
31. 266
2
131
6
21
738
30* 7 169 91
3 10
4
43 232
0
108
2
27
696
•
:45 2 154 92
2 4
4
60 230
1
125
2
17
703
Boor total 21 663 389
8 25
17
195 940
5
512
15
88
2878
I:00pi 4 147 81
1 7
1
59 190
2
118
10
27
657
6:15 5 119 81
1 4
8
39 215
2
126
7
28
63S
tAl 9 266 162
2 11
9
98 405
4
254
17
55
1292
_
and 36 1192 789
12 49
40
382 1824
17
1021
39
199
5600
of total .61 21.31 14.11
.21 .91
.71
6.81 32.61
.31
18.24
.71.
3.61
�prch 1 36.01
1.81
39.71
22.51
• of dpprch 1.81 59.11 39.11
11.91 48.51
39.61
17.21 82.11
.81
81.11
3.11
15.81
'
Peak Four dnalysis By Entire
Inter action for
the Period:
04:30pa to 06:15pa
oa 09110196
Start
Peak Fr
......... Yolaaes .........
....
Percentage$ .......
Direction Street Rase
Peak Hour
factor
Left tbru
Rght
total
Left
?bra Rght
Southbound SAI PEIRIRDO RD.
04:30pa
.942
18 593
444
1055
1.7
56.2 42.0
Restboand MIS Us.
.867
5 24
23
S2
9.6
46.1 44.2
Earthbound $11 P1111RDO RD.
.962
181 957
12
1150
15.7
83.2 1.0
Rastbound MIS M.
.926
534 18
100
652
81.9
2.7 15,3
II
LI
' Movement 1
1
LIONS AYE.
181
' 619 24
494
531
SAX FIRM DO ED.
444 593 18 534
957
23
1511
Inbound 155
Outbound 1514
Total 2569
Inbound 652
"atbound 619
18 Total 1301
100
Inbound 1150
Outbound 698
Total 1848
5 181 957
593
100
698
SAX FEBMAI 0 XD.
NEST COAST Wile COOXTEPS
818.303.6042
21
Inbound 52
Outbound 48 5
Total 100
18
18 48
12
LTOXS ATB,
Peak Hour Analysis By Individual Approach for the Period: 04:30pa to 06:15pm on 09/10196
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09/10196
Pile I.D. STACLUP
Page :2
....... Percentages .......
Left Thra Egkt
1.9 59.7 38.3
11.5 49.0 36.3
15.7 83.2 1.0
81.9 2.7 15.3
Start
Peak Er
.........
volumes .........
Direction
Street We
Peak lour
Factor
Left
Thra
Eght
Total
Southboaud
SAX FEXXAXDD ID.
04:45pm
.960
21
642
412
1075
Nestboand
LTOXS AVX.
04:45pm
.809
8
27
20
55
lorthbound
SAX IEPXAIDO ID.
04:30pm
.962
181
957
12
1150
Iastbound
LTOXS AVE.
01:30pm
.926
531
18
100
652
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09/10196
Pile I.D. STACLUP
Page :2
....... Percentages .......
Left Thra Egkt
1.9 59.7 38.3
11.5 49.0 36.3
15.7 83.2 1.0
81.9 2.7 15.3
' SAE FElE11DO 1D. I/1
Southbound Yestbannd
Start
MIST COAST 111II1C COOITIRS
818.303.6042
SAE 7111LIDO 1D.
lerthbound
11tH STREET
Eastbound
Site Code 00000000
Start Date: 09110196
Isle I.D.: STACUTA
Page :1
M6:30
0 289
1
0
0
0
1. 156 0
1
0
1
450
6:45
0 314
2
0
0
0
0 186 0
3
0
4
509
�otal
0 603
3
0
0
0
1 341 0
4
0
6
959
7:0011
0 328
3
0
0
0
1 ISO 0
0
0
2
484
0 372
9
0
0
0
1 164 0
2
0
5
553
IMS
7:30
0 384
11
0
0
0
1 222 0
1
0
9
628
7:45
0 410
18
0
0
0
1 181 0
0
0
8
724
Hour total
0 1494
41
0
0
0
4 813 0
3
0
24
2389
18:00at
0 428
16
0
0
0
4 243 0
1
0
10
702
8:15
0 371
7
0
0
0
5 189 0
0
0
7
579
otal
0 799
23
0
0
0
9 432 0
1
0
17
1281
rand
0 2896
67
0
0
0
14 1597 0
8
0
47
4619
of Total
0.0% 62.6%
1.4%
0.0%
0.01
0.0%
.3% 34.5% 0.01
.21
0.0%
1.0%
pprcb % 64.01
34.8t
1.2%
of Apprch
0.0% 97.7%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
.9% 99.1% 0.0%
14.5%
0.0%
85.5%
Peat Hour
analysis B7
Entire
Intersection for the Period:
06:30at to 08:1511 on
09/10196
Peak Ir
......... 9olues
.........
.......
Percentages .......
Direction
Street late
E07130ai
factor
Left Thru Sght
Total
Left
Thru
fight
't
Southbound SAI FEBIIEDO 1D.
.926
0 1593
52
1645
.0
96.8
3.1
Yestbannd
1/1
.0
0 0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Ierthbound SH FE8111DO 1D.
' Eastbound 1111 STREET
.816
818
11 941
1 0
0
34
952
36
1.1
5.5
98.8
.0
94.4
.0
1
1
I
Imovelent 1
' 2
Inbound
'--Outbound
0 total
1 34
R
SAX YIRIAXD0 RD.
92 1593 0 2
941
0
943
Inbound 145
Outbound 943
total 2588
36
63
99
Inbound 952
Outbound 1627
Total 2579
0 11 941
1593
34
1627
SAX FIRIAXD0 RD.
US? COAST tBAPFIC CODIlIRS
818.303.6042
0
Inbound 0
Outbound 0 0
Total 0
I/A
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09110/96
Ylie I.D. SlICIIII
Page :2
1
1
1
Peal Hour Analysis B7 Individual
Approach for
the Period:
06:3011 to
08:15a1
on 09110196
Start
Peal Or
.... I.... volutes .........
.......
Percentages .......
'
Direction
Street We
Peal Hour
tactor
Left
ihru
Rght
total
Left
thru
Ight
Southbound
SAX YIRIAXDO RD.
07:1911
.928
0
1594
54
1648
.0
96.7
3.2
'Xestbound
Iorthbound
I/A
SAX FIRIAIDO RD.
06:30a1
07:30ae
.0
.826
0
11
0
941
0
0
0
952
0.0
1.1
0.0
98.8
0.0
.0
Iastbound
11tH SlRIIt
07:15&1
.818
4
0
32
36
11.1
.0
88.8
1
1
1
1
BEST COAST TRATPIC CODBTIRS
1 818.303.6042
1 SAH PIRBAHDO BD. H/A SAB PIIHABDO ID. 1111 STREET
Southbound Bestbound Northbound Eastbound
Start
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09110/96
Pile I.D.: STACLAIP
Page : 1
30
0 238 2
0
0
0
1.364
0
3
0
5
613
45
0 241 2
0
0
0
6
366
0
2
0
8
625
w11
0 479 4
0
0
0
7
730
0
5
0
13
1238
OOpa
0 283 5
0
0
0
1
338
0
3
0
4
634
5:15
0 261 1
0
0
0
2
401
0
1
0
8
674
130
0 261 3
0
0
0
3
365
0
2
0
7
641
45
0 255 2
0
0
0
3
398
0
2
0
6
666
Hour total
0 1060 11
0
0
0
9
1502
0
8
0
25
2615
100pa
0 227 1
0
0
0
2
334
0
1
0
6
571
6:1S
0 209 1
0
0
0
3
348
0
0
0
2
563
lai
0 436 2
0
0
0
5
682
0
1
0
8
1134
ad
0 1975 17
0
0
0
21
2914
0
14
0
46
4987
'f
total
0.01 39.6% .31
0.01
0.01
0.01
.41
S8.4%
0.0%
.3%
0.01
.91
rch % 39.91
kf
58.9%
1.21
Apprch
0.01 99.1% .9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
.7%
99.3%
0.0%
23.31
0.0%
16.71
1Peat Hoar
Analysis 17 Entire
Iater action f r
the Period:
04:30pa to 06:15pa
ca 09/10196
Start
Peak Hr
9olaaes
.........
.......
Percentages .......
Street We
Peat Hoar
Pactor
Left
thru
Ight
total
Left
thra
Ight
IDirection
Southboand
SAH PERHAHDO RD.
05:00pa
930
0
1060
11
1071
.0
98.9
1.0
Westbound
11A
.0
0
O
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Iorthboand
IEastboand
SAB PIRBABDO RD.
1111 MU?
.937
9
R
1502
D
0
25
1511
33
.5
99.4
.0
.917
24.2
.0
75.7
1
1
1
i
1
1
_
I
'Iaveaent 1 SAI YIBAR 8D.
11 1060 0 8
1502
1510
Inbound 171
Outbound 1510
illa Stull total 2581
' 9
20, 0
11
1 8
Inbound 33
'---0ntbound 20
0 total 53
1 25
Inbound 1511
outbound 1085
Total 2596
0 9 1502
1060
25
1085
SAI FIRM 0 HD.
WEST COAST tIAYfie CODITIRS
818.303.6042
0
Inbound 0
Outbound 0 0
Total 0
0 0
0
III
1
04:30pa to 06:15pa on 09110/96
.... Yoluaes .........
Left thrn fight total
0 1060 11 1071
0 0 0 0
9 1502 0 1511
8 0 27 35
Site Cade : 00000000
Start Date: 09110/96
Pile I.D.: STICLA1P
Page : 2
Percentages ......
Left thru Ight
.0 98.9 1.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
.5 99.4 .0
22.8 .0 77.1
Peak Hoar Analysis By Individual
Approach for
the Period
Start
Peak Hr
Direction ,
Street Iaae
Peak -Hour
factor
Soathboand
SAI PIHIAIDO 8D.
05:00pa
.930
I/A
04:30pa
,0
'Iestboand
Iorthbound
SAI PIIIAIDO ID.
05:00pa
.937
Iastbound
11tH STAIIS
04:45pa
.875
1
04:30pa to 06:15pa on 09110/96
.... Yoluaes .........
Left thrn fight total
0 1060 11 1071
0 0 0 0
9 1502 0 1511
8 0 27 35
Site Cade : 00000000
Start Date: 09110/96
Pile I.D.: STICLA1P
Page : 2
Percentages ......
Left thru Ight
.0 98.9 1.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
.5 99.4 .0
22.8 .0 77.1
NEST COAST TRAFFIC COMERS
818.303.6042
RAILROAD ST. NARIS? ITS. RAILROAD 51.
Southbound Nestbound Northbound
art
Tile Left Thru Raht Left Thru Rght Left Tbru Rah
RAREST ITS.
Sastbomnd
1 10 0
1 13 0
2 13 0
0 19 2
1 13 1
2 12 1
5 23 ' 7
8 67 11
7 14 4
9 9 5
16 13 9
26 113 20
5.01 21.91 3.91
0.61
6.41 71.11 12.61
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
File I.D.: STACUTA
Page :1
62
44
106
56
72
74
70
59
129
511
....... Percentages .......
Left Thrn Rght
34.4 20.6 44.8
.0 88.9 11.0
.0 100.0 .0
16.6 68.8 14.4
30
1 1 1
0
43
5
0
0
0
:45
2 0 1
0
23
4
0
0
0
Total
3 1 2
D
56
9
0
0
0
4 0012
3 0 0
0
28
4
0
0
0
:15
4 2 2
0
49
0
0
0
0
C0 '
1 1 2
0
47
8
0
0
0
5
3 3 3
0
32
3
0
1
0
Sur Total
11 5 7
0
155
15
0
1
0
OOa2 -
2 0 6
0
25
8
0
4
0
:15
2 2 6
1
19
5
0
1
0
Total
4 2 12
1
44
13
0
5
0
,and
18 9 21
1
266
37
0
6
0
t of Total
3.51 1.71 4.11
.21
51.51
7.21
0.01
1.21
0.01
1
9.31
58.81
1.21
3
�prch
of Apprch 37.51
18.81 43.81
.31
87.51
12.21
0.01100.01
0.01
1
Peat Hour
Analysis B7 Entire
Iatersection for the Period:
06:30x2 to
08:15x2 on 09/11/96
Start
Peak Hr
.........
volumes
.........
• Direction
Street Name
Peak
Hour
Factor
Left
Thrm
Rght
Total
Southbound
RAILROAD ST.
07:15am
.806
10
6
13
29
Nestbound
RAREST ITS.
.78I
0
153
19
172
Northbound
RAILROAD ST.
.312
0
5
0
5
Eastbound
MIXT ITS.
.643
15
61
13
90
1
.
1
1 10 0
1 13 0
2 13 0
0 19 2
1 13 1
2 12 1
5 23 ' 7
8 67 11
7 14 4
9 9 5
16 13 9
26 113 20
5.01 21.91 3.91
0.61
6.41 71.11 12.61
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
File I.D.: STACUTA
Page :1
62
44
106
56
72
74
70
59
129
511
....... Percentages .......
Left Thrn Rght
34.4 20.6 44.8
.0 88.9 11.0
.0 100.0 .0
16.6 68.8 14.4
' WEST COAST THAPPIC COO[T[[S
818.303.6042
'Movelent 1 FAIL DID Sr.
13 6 10 15
5
19
39
Inbound 29
Outbound 39
IMULIT AVE. Total 68
13
0
lfi6
153
'
13
15
Peak Four analysis By Individual
Inbound 90
Outbound 166
'
62 Total 256
13
153
Inbound 112
Outbound 72 0
Total 244
Inbound 5
Outbound 19
Total 24
6 0
6
Peak Four analysis By Individual
13
'
.19
08:1511
HAIL[OAD Sr.
153
Inbound 112
Outbound 72 0
Total 244
1
1
11
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111196
Pile I.D. STaCL141
Page :2
Percentages
LeftThrat
25.3 19.3 54.8
0 88.9 11.0
.0 100.0 .0
23.4 59.1 17.3
Peak Four analysis By Individual
approach for
the Period:
06:3011 to
08:1511
on 09111196
' Direction
Street Pale
Start
Peak Hour
Peak Hr
factor
......... Voiles .........
Left Thru Hght
. Total
Southbound
RAILROAD ST.
07:3011
.775
8
6
17
31
Yestbound
HAH[HT 1Y[.
07:15au
.182
0
153
19
172
'Porthbound
HAILHOAD ST.
01:3081
.375
0
6
0
6
[astbound
BAH[ST us.
07:30a1
.700
23
58
17
98
1
1
11
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111196
Pile I.D. STaCL141
Page :2
Percentages
LeftThrat
25.3 19.3 54.8
0 88.9 11.0
.0 100.0 .0
23.4 59.1 17.3
1�
RAILROAD ST. MARKET AYE.
Southbound Bestbooud
tart
BEST COAST TRAYPIC COMERS
818.303.6042
RAILROAD ST
Northbound
NAREET AM
Bastboand
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
Pile I.D.: STICL14P
Page : 1
30 13 3 22
0
26
5
0
2 1
4
17
2
95
4:45 8 4 21
1
12
8
2
5 3
4
20
1
107
Total 21 7 43
1
48
13
1
7 4
8
45
3
201
1:OOPi 16 4 17
0
24
8
1
5 1
17
30
0
123
5:15 10 3 SS
1
31
6
5
3 0
S
17
1
97
130 17 2 18
0
34
4
5
1 1
4
22
2
110
:45 19 1 13
1
22
4
0
3 2
8
22
3
98
flour Total 62 SO 63
2
111
22
11
12 4
34
91
6
428
k00pi 16 2 14
2
25
2
1
2 4
7
10
2
97
15 14 1 14
1
22
2
1
2 3
6
19
2
87
(tal 30 3 28
3
47
4
2
4 7
13
39
4
184
and 113 20 134
5
206
39
15
23 15
55
175
13
814
% of Total 13.91 2.51 16.5%
.7%
25.3%
4.8%
1.8%
2.8% 1.8%
6.8%
21.5% 1.6%
lArch 1 32.8%
30.81
6.51
29.9%
of Apprch 42.31 73% 50.2%
1.41
82.11
15.51
28.3% 43.4%
28.3%
11.6%
72.0% 5.31
' Peak lour Analysis By Entire
Intersection
for
the Period:
04:30pa to
06:15pn on 09111195
Start
Peak Ir
.........
Volaaes
.........
.......
Percentages .......
Direction Street Base
Southbound RAILROAD ST.
Peak lour
04:45pa
factor
.912
Left
51
Thru Rght
13 71
Total
135
Left
37.7
Thru.
9.6
Rght
52.5
Bestbonnd MARKET AVE.
.914
2
111
26
139
1.4
79.8
18.7
Northbonnd RAILROAD ST.
.800
13
14
5
32
40.6
43.7
15.6
BastDonnd MARKET AVB.
691
30
97
4
131
22.9
74.0
3.0
1
' WEST COAST TWIN CODETERS
618.303.6042
Imovesent 1
11
1
13
' 195 111
71
RAILROAD ST.
711 131
' 30
Inbound 131
—Outbound 195
' 97 Total 326
4
Inbound
Outbound
Total
51 30
14
26
10
35
10
205
Inbound 32
Outbound 19
Total 51
2 13 14
13
4
-__lz
19
RAILROAD ST.
131
Inbound 139
Outbound Sf3 2
Total 292
51
9) 153
f
MEET AM
Site Cade : 00000000
Start Date: 09/11/96
Me I.D. STACLA0
Page : 2
'
Peak Hour Analysis By Individual
Approach for
the Period:
04:30pa to
06:15ps
on 09111/96
'
Direction
Street We
Start
Peak Hour
Peak Hr
factor
......... Yolases .........
Left Thra Rght
Total
.......
Left
Perceatages .......
Thra Rght
Southbound
RAILROAD ST.
04:30ps
.895
47
14
75
136
34.5
10.2
55.1
Yastbound
MEET AYH.
04:4Sps
.914
2
111
26
139
1.4
79.8
18.7
'Eorthbound
RAILROAD ST.
04:45ps
.800
13
14
S
32
40.6
43.7
iS.6
Eastbound
MEET AM
05:00pt
.691
34
91
6
131
25.9
69.4
4.5
1
1
.,.
NEST COAST TRAFFIC CWOITEIS
818.303, 6042
' PIIE ST. MAIIET BE.
Southbound westbound
Start
PIIE ST.
Iorthbound
21 . 0 1
8 0 2
17 2 0
29 1 1
12 0 0
66 3 3
18 0 0
129 3 5
29.21 .71 1.11
31.01
94.21 2.21 3.61
MAIIET BE.
Eastbound
1 19 3
1 9 12
2 10 3
0 10 1
3 6 19
6 35 35
0 6 6
0 4 3
0 10 9
7 64 47
1.6114.5110.6%
26.71
5.9154.2% 39.81
30x1 to 08:15a1 on 09111/96
......... volumes .........
Left Thra Ight Total
3 0 5 8
1 102 2 105
66 3 3 72
6 35 3S 76
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
Pile I.D.: STACI151
Page : 1
60
103
SS
67
72
48
30
78
442
....... Percentages .......
Left Thro Ight
37.5 .0 62.5
.9 97.1 1.9
91.6 4.1 4.1
7.8 46.0 46.0
z.
30
0 0
0
0
30
0
:45
0 0
1
1
14
0
CtAl
0 0
1
1
44
0
on
0 0
1
0
22
0
7:15
1 0
1
0
31
0
_
30
0 0
2
1
26
1
:45
2 0
1
0
23
1
Sour Total
3 0
5
1
102
2
1:0011
0 0
4
1
12
1
8:15
0 0
2
0
8
0
0 0
6
1
20
1
ptal
rand
3 0
12
3
156
3
Total
.71 0.01
2.71
.71
37.61
.71
$of
Arch 1
3.41
38.91
of Apprch 20.01
0.01 80.01
1.71
96.51
1.71
'
Peat Hoar
Analysis By
Entire
Intersection for
the Period:
t
Peak Br
Direction
Street Same
LPeak
Son
Factor
'
Southbound
PIIE 5T.
081
.661
Iestbonnd
MAIIET AVE.
.847
Iorthbeund
Eastbound
PIIE ST.
M111ET AFB.
.581
.679
1
1
PIIE ST.
Iorthbound
21 . 0 1
8 0 2
17 2 0
29 1 1
12 0 0
66 3 3
18 0 0
129 3 5
29.21 .71 1.11
31.01
94.21 2.21 3.61
MAIIET BE.
Eastbound
1 19 3
1 9 12
2 10 3
0 10 1
3 6 19
6 35 35
0 6 6
0 4 3
0 10 9
7 64 47
1.6114.5110.6%
26.71
5.9154.2% 39.81
30x1 to 08:15a1 on 09111/96
......... volumes .........
Left Thra Ight Total
3 0 5 8
1 102 2 105
66 3 3 72
6 35 3S 76
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
Pile I.D.: STACI151
Page : 1
60
103
SS
67
72
48
30
78
442
....... Percentages .......
Left Thro Ight
37.5 .0 62.5
.9 97.1 1.9
91.6 4.1 4.1
7.8 46.0 46.0
z.
' VEST COAST TRAFFIC COOITIRS
' 818.303.6042
'ovement 1 Pill ST.
5 0 3 6
3
11
Inbound 8
Outbound 11
[ll U1. Total 19
Inbound 72
Outbound 35
Total 108
1 66 3
0
35
' 36
PIRA ST.
I
102
Inbound 105
Outbound 41 1
Total 146
3
35 41
3
X11111 198.
Peak lour Analysis 8y Individual Approach for the Period: 06:30as to 08:15am on 09111196
66
173
102
'
5
Street lane
6
factor
Inbound 76
Outbound 173
'
35 Total 249
Inbound 72
Outbound 35
Total 108
1 66 3
0
35
' 36
PIRA ST.
I
102
Inbound 105
Outbound 41 1
Total 146
3
35 41
3
X11111 198.
Peak lour Analysis 8y Individual Approach for the Period: 06:30as to 08:15am on 09111196
I
I
1
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
File I.D. STICE151
Page ' : 2
... Percentages .......
Left Thru Ight
27.2 .0 72.7
.9 97.1 1.9
95.0 3.7 1.1
7.8 46.0 46.0
rI
Start
Peat Hr
...... Volumes .........
Direction
Street lane
Peak flour
factor
Left.
Thrn
Rght
Total
Southbound
Pill ST.
07:15a1
.688
3
0
8
11
lestboand
'lorthboand
IARIET AVE.
PIKE ST.
07:0011
07:15a1
.841
.645
1
75
102
3
2
1
105
80
Eastbound
Will AVS.
07:0011
.679
6
35
35
76
I
I
1
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09111/96
File I.D. STICE151
Page ' : 2
... Percentages .......
Left Thru Ight
27.2 .0 72.7
.9 97.1 1.9
95.0 3.7 1.1
7.8 46.0 46.0
rI
UST COAST TNAFFIC COOITIIS
818.303.6042
PINI ST. NABAIT AYI.
Sonthbound Westbound
art '
1 0 1 0 18 0
1 0 0 0 18 0
Total
2 0
1
0
36
0
11opt
1 0
0
1
25
1
5:15
0 0
1
4
25
0
�30'
0 0
0
1
21
0
:45
0 0
2
0
18
0
lour
Total
1 0
3
6
89
1
�00pt
0 0
0
3
19
1
:IS
0 0
1
0
17
0
ltat
0 0
1
3
36
1
and
3 0
5
9
161
2
1 of Total
.5k 0.01
.81
1.5126.7%
.31
'prch 1
1.31
28.51
of Apprch 37.51 0.01 62.51
5.21
93.61
1.21
Peak Bonr
Analysis By Entire
Inter ion the Perio
Start
Peak Br
Direction
' Southboaad
Street Bate
PIIS ST.
peak
04:30
Boar
Factor
.625
Westbound
NAIIIT A9I.
.793
Northbound
PINI BE.
.679
' Iastbound
NAIIIT AYI.
.809
1
PINI AYI.
Northbound
17 . 0 4
12 0 2
29 0 6
11 0 0
10 1 0
12 0 0
15 2 0
48 3 0
22 1 5
115 4 12
19.11 .71 2.01
21.71
87.81 3.11 9.21
NAIIIT ATI.
Iastbound
0 20 19
0 24 23
0 44 42
0 34 17
0 16 12
1 23 20
0 25 16
1 98 65
1 10 12
0 9 10
1 19 22
2 161 129
.31 25.71 21.41
48.41
.11 55.11 44.21
30pt to 06:15pt on 09/11/96
......... volutes .........
left Thru Bght Total
3 0 2 5
5 86 1 92
SO 1 6 57
0 94 71 155
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 0911/96
Pile I.D.: STACUSP
Page :1
80
90
-69
78
78
315
14
603
....... Percentages .......
Left Thru Nght
60.0 .0 40.0
5.4 93.4 1.0
87.7 1.7 10.5
.0 56.9. 43.0
'Savesent 1
50
338 86
2
' 0
Inbound
' outbound
94 Total
LSI
F
PIEE ST.
2 0 3 0
1
1
Inbound 5
Outbound 2
Total 7
165
136
303
Inbound 57
Outbound 76
Total 133
S 50 1
0
71
--.76
PIEE AVE.
WEST COAST TRAFFIC COWERS
818.303.6042
86
Inbound 91
Outbound 103 5
Total 195
3
94 103
6
NAEEET AVE.
Peak Hour Analysis By Individual Approach for the Period: 04:30ps to 06:15ps on 09/11196
L
I
1
1
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09/11/96
File I.D. ; STACLASP
Page . : 2
... Percentages .......
Left Thru fight
60.0 .0 40.0
6.2 92.7 1.0
87.8 4.0 B.I.
.5 57.0 42.3
71.
Start
Peak Hr
.........
Voluses .........
'
Direction
Street Sate
Peak Hour
factor
Left
Thru
Egbt
Total
Southbound
2111 51.
W30ps
.625
3
0
2
5
Westbound
WEST AVE.
05:00Ps
.818
6
89
1
96
Sorthbound
PISS AVE.
05:30ps
.651
65
3
6
74
Eastbound
EAEEET AVE.
04:45ps
.833
1
97
72
170
L
I
1
1
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date: 09/11/96
File I.D. ; STACLASP
Page . : 2
... Percentages .......
Left Thru fight
60.0 .0 40.0
6.2 92.7 1.0
87.8 4.0 B.I.
.5 57.0 42.3
71.
unted
Quer 1.
607 S. 100TRILL BLVD.
Site Code :
000000000120
♦aid f c
MOHHOVIA, CA 91016
Start Date:
09/10196
'
808.303.6042
Pile I.D.:
STACEA31
Street ease :BAT PTRTATDO RD. Cross street:SID
4TH STRTTT MOaT pun
Page :
1
agia 4 ------quarter Hour ------> Hour
22 10
74
—"
12:00 09110
90
29
24 27
130
tat*
00 .
17
19
21 15
72
tit
00
21
21
22 10
74
tit
:00
6
15
8 14
43
ti
04:00
12
21
25 40
99
tttt
00
51
61
80 112
304
aatitttitt
:00
119
157
256 258
790
tittitittttxtttittxtttxtttxttttx
07:00
211
275
415 410
1311
tttttiittxtatiititttiaitttaiitttiitiiiti:ataett
00
323
314
285 322
1244
:00
231
231
241 217
910
ittttittitiitxttiattxttittittittxtti
10:00
225
214
140 263
952
tiiittetttttitttitttittitttttetiittttt
00
211
223
142 254
930
xtttitttttttttitiattttxtttttttattit
00
0
251
255
274 249
1029
tiiatitttttttiitattaiitiittaitttasit
:00
119
265
248 272
1004
iattttttttitttittxtttttatitittitittta
00
283
283
313 304
1183
xtitittititititittitttttittitittititititittitit
00
1:00
328
335
360 358
1381
365
429
423 407
1624
tttittttittttitttitxttxttitttititttittttittttxtittttxttttitfttitt
05:00
421
442
414 423
1700
tistttaxxutiattittiiataattatttiititatiatttttttttatttttttt
00
353
372
357 344
1426
tatittitititaatitittiitttttitittitattittitittitaittt
:00
294
237
243 207
981
ttttxttaaitttittitatittittiititititt
08:00
193
163
162 141
659
ittittittitittittittittitt .
00
134
154
120 132
540
tititititatattitttit
:00
113
90
96 87
386
taitttitttittt
11:00
73
51
61 58
243
attiiatt
ital .
19025
IX Peak
The
AM peak hour
began 07:30.
The
peak
volute vas
1462.
The
largest interval began 07:30,
and
contained 415
vehicles.
'
The
peak
hoar factor
vas .88
PM Peak
The
PM peat hour
began 05:00.
'
The
The
peak volute vas 1700.
largest interval began 05:15,
and
contained 442
vehicles.
The
peak
hoar factor
vas .96
'
I
I
I
I
I
mated by:
and 1
h8I
Hoar ------) Hoar
12:00 09110
59
34
39
13
145
00
15
22
9
18
64
:00
15
11
18
11
55
03:00
11
18
11
12
12
00
24
52
44
65
185
:00
111
184
187
247
729
:00
260
314
383
376
1333
00
466
458
499
489
1912
:00
478
505
416
324
1723
:00
301
237
255
228
1021
10:00
247
221
224
241
933
�00
235
132
119
287
974
:00
223
259
271
249
1002
01:00
250
223
224
197
894
235
270
241
291
1037
000
:00
309
362
313
347
1331
4:00
358
312
346
331
1347
00
366
414
347
352
1479
:00
345
332
184
269
1230
:00
280
244
230
200
954
08:00
185
222
188
163
758
00
199
207
162
147
715
:00
128
140
102
76
446
11:00
65
85
65
58
273
�tal
20612
Peak
The
ad peak hour
began 07:30.
The
peak
volute was 1971.
The
largest interval begia
08:15,
'
and
The
contained 505
peak hour factor
vehicles.
vas
.98
PH Peak
The
PH peak hour
began OSAO.
'
The
peak
volute vas 1479.
The
largest interval
began OS:15,
and
contained 414
vehicles.
The
peak
hoar factor
was
.89
[I
1
VINA41 RL f1G WUMI
607 1. FOOTHILL BLVD.
xono II, C1 91016
808.303.6042
tint:
fit
it
tit
tltftff
ittititttftttitititittfttitit
Site Code : 000000004910
Start Date: 09110196
pile I.D.: STICE13S
tlttft!!tnittR!!lifti!ltktttttfflttlf!lntftltttttlt
!!!t!t!ltftlflft!!ifti!!tlYt!lnnittttflttt!lnit!!ltl/ftt!!tf!ltttlftttt!!
lltff!lift!lttt!!!t!!!lttYlk!!tt!!!tf!!!lttflt!!tt!lttf!!!tltf!!t!t!t
sttfYlYfltxntrt!lfflsftttt!ltftkllffttft
sssttsltttYttttttftxfttflxlnttttttft
ftffxtf!lnttltftllYflttltfftftxlttlttt
xsst:flttlttlttnitnYklxlttlxxntflttet
tslf►tfttttnitftnitetsftft!lttftti
t1111tf:fnfitutltnlf!ltRktnttfflt111R
!t!ltlttflflf!ltlt!lttlt!ltftttlttt!lttftf!lttt!l1tM1
tiffitttitittti*ttttttttttlttttitilitittttittitltttitf
ttttttttttlttttitttfttltttttiftiffittiiitifttttlttitttltttt
tiftffititnittitittiltftttetttftttttitftttilttt!
tttttlttttiffitttttttfitttittitttitftt
Ottittfttltttlftnnentifltt
tnttftttttttteslntttttttttt
tttttttlmtttsttt
ttttttfttt!
;�1
anted by:
ard, 1
her
12:00 09/10
00
:00
03:00
00
:00
:00
00
:00
:00
10:00.
1:00
01:00
00
:00
1:00
00
:00
1:00
1:00 00
00
11:00
Ital
<------quarter Hour ------> Hour
0
0
0
0
4
3
3
20
24
26
27
27
15
13
8
13
0
0
0
0
188
Peak
the AX peak hour began 10:45,
The
peak volnse vas 31.
The
largest interval began 10:45,
and
contained 9 vehicles.
'
the
peak hour factor vas .86
PH Peak
the
PH peat hoar began 11:45.
the
peak volase vas 30.
'
the
largest interval began 01:00,
and
contained 11 vehicles.
'
the
peak hour factor vas .68
1
11
t
t
t
t
L VAYA LAA{{ "WAI
607 H. POOtHILL BLVD.
HOHHOVIA, CA 91016
808.303.6042
s
Site Code : 000000000000
Start Date: 09/10/96
file I.D.: STIC143Z
�annted bt: 607 B. POOtHILL BLVD.- - Site Code : 000000000110
oard 1 H01101I1, C1 91016 Start Date: 09/10/96
ther 808.303.6042 the I.D.: STIC113V
c ------Quarter Hoar ------> Hoar
i
11:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
SAD
07:00
00
:00
10:00
00'
:00
1:00
OD
:00
4:00
OS:00
DO
:00
08:00
Ital
4
0
D
0
0
3
10
28
33
33
16
40
24
31
29
29
30
25
22
4
7
1
3
382
Peak
the U peak hoar began 09:15.
the
peak Yolnse via 43.
The
largest interval began 09:15,
and
contained 12 vehicles.
The
peak hour factor was .90
PH Peak
the
PM peak hour began 12:15.
The
peak volaae was 41.
the
largest interval begin 12:45,
and
contained 14 vehicles.
'
the
peak hour factor vas .73
11
P Hated by: 607 B. FOOTHILL BLVD. Site Code : 000000000120
and t H0180VIA, CA 91016 Start Date: 09/10196
her 808.303.6042 File I.D. STACLA2M
three! nerve •tiv PFITIM on Mnee eh..f-fin !►frig I►4 TA1991ATl►T s... t
gia
to
t ------Quarter
1st 2nd
Hour ------>
3rd 4th
Hour
Total
Each t Easels 2S vehicles
12:00
09/10 48
39
17
20
124
ttttt
14
15
15
7
51
it
�DO
:00
17
13
14
19
63
tit
03:00
6
10
13
7
36
t
00
11
13
32
22
78
fit
00
42
46
61
79
228
ttttttitt
:00
96
95
160
229
580
tiitttittttitttitttttti
07:00
188
155
187
304
834
titittitttiitittititittttitttittt
00
273
204
212
188
877
tettititittititiittlitittittstttttt
:00
207
192
131
179
709
tittitttttttntittittittttit
10:00
169
130
148
181
628
ttititittttitittetittittt
16S
NO
152
148
605
tittititittitttiititttit
�00'
:00
171
178
173
174
702
itittttttttitttitittitittttt
01:00
161
iS6
185
161
663
ttttttttttttttaittttitttttt
00
200
164
198
231
793
itittitittitttiittittttttttttiti
DO
220
141
229
236
926
titttttttttttttttitttttttttttttttittt
01:00
242
253
198
299
1092
tttttttitttttttttttttttitittittttttitttttttt
00
289
322
304
324
1239
ttttttttittttttttttitttittittttttttitttttttttttttt
00
326
270
263
260
1119
ittttititttittttttiiittttittttittitttittttiit
:00
236
210
189.
178
813
ittttttttttittiiiitiittittitittit
08:00
146
159
134
121
550
titttttititittittiatit
9:00
97
112
113
93
415
t:titttittittitti
:00
90
88
72
73
323
tititttiittit
11:00
61
49
45
44
199
ttilitit
rtal
.
13657
f Peak
I
PM Peak
.1
11
The AM peak hour began 07:45.
The peak volute was 993.
The largest interval began 07:45,
and contained 304 vehicles.
The peak hoar factor was .82
The PM peak hour begaa 05:15.
The peak volute was 1276.
The largest interval began 06:00,
and contained 326 vehicles.
The peak hour factor was .98
ousted bl: 601 H. POOtHILL BLVD.... Site Code : 000000000119
oard i HOIROVIA, CA 91016 Start Date: 09130196
ther 808.303.6042 Pile I.D.: BTACLA2S
04...6 .... .eu vsnnvnn n. ----- --- - ----- .__ ____
egin
ime
(------quarter Hour ------)
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Hour
total
Tach t Ianals 29 Vehicles
12.00 09110
14 19 20 9
52
!r
12 11 11 3
37
k
41:00
2:00
7 10 6 34
37
t
3:00
8 16 23 17
64
tit
36 31 49 63
179
Mit**5:00
04:00
115 157 207 218
697
tlittttitttitttitittittttfit
6:00
219 248 307 321
1095
ttttfittititttlitttttttetttktitttktttittiti!
07:00
332 389 395 459
1575
ttttittittlitttttnttttititttttitetttttttitttfittttttittttttlit
8:00
1
458 422 323 336
1539
!t:ltittttitstttns:tfftntfattffilntn::nett:fttt!ltfttetf
9:00
235 259 241 245
980
ttl:tftl:ftfttkttt::ftftt!!!lt:ttt::kif
10:00
235 182 207 209
833
t:skttkeetfi:flkt::tet::tftttettt
1:00
228 218 232 249
921
ftlkftttttftt:ntntttit:tfaltttt:n
DD
252 225 238 239
954
ttktttitttttfitttttttitkfttlttttttftt!
1:00
224 124 249 210
901
istintlftft:tfttsffft:etat:ttfktl:
211 250 247 251
959
t:tftntlt::tftt:ftttl:tttttttun:t:t
000.
:00
237 252 283 277
1049
smtt:aftsatt::tttitittnnnttttntttt
4:00
197 241 248 225
911
tttnttnintfttttittltttttltnktitt
05:00
261 224 243 244
972
:katltiftstrut:ttti::ttkt:tttt::ttttt
6:00
212 104 188 207
Bll
ktttttntfitttttttttikttttttktti
:00
233 199 151 138
721
titttittfitlttkttimitittilt
08:00
155 102 112 134
503
tMitnttitttlttm
00
119 122 94 102
437
ittittiMittwk
:00
89 58 45 32
224
ttlittttt
11:00
38 26 26 29
119
ftttt
�tal
16592
ILI
Peat
The
AH peak hour began 07:30.
The
peak volume vas 1734.
The
largest interval began 07:45,
and
contained 459 vehicles.
The
peak hour factor vas .94
PB Peak
The
PH peak hour began 03:00.
the
peak valise vas 1049.
'
The
largest Interval began 03:30,
and
contained 283 vehicles.
'
The
peak hoar factor vas ,93
1
1]
1
1
�ard 1 HOPP0VIA, CA 91016
her 808.303.6041
Site Code : 000000000114
Start Date: 09110196
Pile I.D.: STIC112S
'gift
le
<------Quarter Hour ------>
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Hour
total
Bach t equals 25 Vehicles
12:00 09110
15 18 8 8
49
tt
00
8 11 3 6
28
t
00
6 1 6 2
15
+
:00
2 0 5 8
15
t
04:00
2 9 7 10
28
+
00
It 16 30 17
77
tit
:00
23 48 56 53
180
tttttit
07:00
82 79 113 142
416
itttititittttati
00
144 134 140 111
530
tttttttttttittitititt
:00
117 142 125 140
524
tttittittiMitittttt
10:00
112 144 139 160
555
tttitttttittitittttitt
00
147 164 167 171
650
tittttitttittttittttitttit
00
164 172 170 174
680
tttttttttttitttttttttttttti
:60
136 163 173 149
621
ttttttttttttttttttttttttt
00
151 139 163 158
611
titttitttttttttttttOM
00
182 178 168 162
690
tittttttittttittttitttttittt
:00
185 171 184 201
741
ttitttittOMOtttttitittatt
05:00
181 191 174 171
717
+++ttit++tt++tstttittttittttt
00
185 185 177 216
763
tttttttttittititttttittttittttt
:00
123 130 123 100
476
ttittiittttitttittt
08:00
122 110 96 106
434
titttttittttittit
00
82 88 74 69
313
ttititititttt
:00
43 48 38 27
156
tttttt
11:00
31 33 24 38
126
Hitt
�tal
9395
,.
Peak
the AH peak hour began 11:45.
�H
the peak voluta was 678.
The largest interval began 11:45,
and contained 172 vehicles.
The peak hour factor was .99
Pd Peak
the PH peak hour began 06:00,
The peak volute was 763.
the largest interval began 06:45,
and contained 216 vehicles.
the peak hour factor was .88
'
1
onnted by:
�oard 4
ther
•....Y YVYA.
607 6. YOOTSILL BLVD.
MO11OTI6, Ca 91016
808.303.6042
Site Code : 000000000000
Start Date: 09110196
Pile I.D.: SUCLk2Y
12:00 09110
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
00
:00
07:00
DD
:00
10:00.
00
:00
01:00
DD
:00
04:00
05:00
00
coo
08:00
00
:OD
11:00
!tai
Peat The AN peak hour began 09:45.
1
0
0
1
7
16
22
55
40
66
50
64
77
54
62
50
101
68
64
61
7
13
1
882
I
I
I
t
t
it
it
tit
it
tit
tit
it
it
it
*tit
*it
tit
it
i
r
She
peat valise was 66.
The
largest interval began 10:30,
and
contained 21 vehicles.
'The
peak hoar factor vas .79
PN Peak
The
PN peak boor began 05;00.
peak volnae was 101.
'The
The
largest interval began 05:45,
and
contained 30 vehicles.
'The
peat tont factor was .84
I
I
I
t
t
it
it
tit
it
tit
tit
it
it
it
*tit
*it
tit
it
i
r
"OAST TRAFFIC COOT HRS
607 B. FOOTHILL BLVD.
N0110vIk, CA 91016
808.303.5012
<------Quarter Hour ------> Hoar
t
1
0
0
0
2
2
7
11
18
26
39
27
26
27
18
6
5
0
2
0
0
0
0
213
r Peak The aN peak hour began 11:15.
The peak volume vas 31.
The largest interval begin 11:15,
' and contained 10 vehicles.
The peat boat factor was .93
PN Peak the PN peak hoar began 02:15.
' She peat volume van 31. .
The largest interval begin 02:15,
and contained 10 vehicles.
The peat hour factor was
I
I
I
I
Site Code : 000000000000
Start Date: 09110/96
File I.D.: STkCLk4N
.18
I
I
I
I
Site Code : 000000000000
Start Date: 09110/96
File I.D.: STkCLk4N
NAZI WADI IXAIIIG GUUI EAS
'Counted by: 607 H. P00TRILL BLVD. Site Code : 000000000118
Board t : H0810VIA Cd 91016 Start Date: 09/10/96
Other 808.303.6042 Pile I.D.: S7AOLA48
<------Quarter Hoar ------> Hour
12:00 09/10
6
6
3
0
15
X01:00
2
0
1
1
4
2:00
1
0
1
0
1
03:00
0
0
1
2
4
1
6
1
0
8
0 11:00
5:00
2
1
5
5
13
06:00
8
6
6
13
33
8
18
20
25
71
07:00
8:00
26
18
17
11
82
9:00
14
11
11
17
53
10:00.
15
12
10
19
66
1:00
18
27
27
33
105
2:00
20
29
16
15
80
01:00
21
21
15
19
77
2:00
16
25
15
19
7S
3:00
29
38
36
36
139
04:00
31
25
34
34
124
25
3S
•31
35
126
05:00
6:00
18
26
41
44
140
7:00
45
39
32
34
150
08:00
27
29
21
21
98
9:00
19
16
19
10
64
0:00
12
17
13
12
54
11:00
7
8
8
5
28
�otal . 1611
r Peat the AH peat hour began 11:30.
the peak roluae ras 109.
The largest interval began 11:451
' and contained 33 vehicles.
The peat Cont factor vas ..83
PN Peat the PM peat tour began 06:30.
' She peak valvae via 110.
the largest interval began 01:00,
and contained 45 vehicles.
The
1
1
I
t
t
t
t
tit
Ht
it
ill
*tit
its
*st
tit
t*tite
Hitt
!Hitt
tt*tt*
tittit
ttit
*it
it
t
peat boar factor vas .94
1
1
I
t
t
t
t
tit
Ht
it
ill
*tit
its
*st
tit
t*tite
Hitt
!Hitt
tt*tt*
tittit
ttit
*it
it
t
I
1
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
APPENDIX B
_ �1 1 .- § Z
N,
.cTM :°°wx arsc+w Av mw. Av.srAw Frc crx eosAa _..._
:. a rNsra loran '�in ivn •� F s`u. w s..,"...r� - , • Txh�ioko¢vY..,i:Lt'�ilk STOP LOCATIONS
SAMA C..... STOPSFOR SCiEXPRf
r.eewa ta.awwsctroa
ww�i:snv��
AkA.. r Ann. ns r. na scr+ae
rrl�r M An A'wn Ny sR SCllmo
{lenr� MLY L1FNvrYSCffpq
SnNM1/A'n�l�h SCtmU
SAN FlftX DOYALtETSTOPSFORROE
I!P.va 1k0y_fi a}YIANy
SAN FERNANOO YAU.EY STOPS FOR RM
2793 WIL ALF 6` STOPSHMEYAALEMCLI RYOI
ROOlF JSJ 5 798 bJOPS m
SAN iERMM'DO YAf1EY
Route 573. please "I 818)
arm
=.".WOWA�
Far Nun Nfominkrl eeaul
PASAJES
71 .
.3
. .
. . . . . . . . . .
PARK & RIDE
LOTS IN
:30
8
SANTA CLARITA,
SinSEND
'a
CAWMCOUNMYAREA'
FARES T
LAWIROUTE 8:
w
ARFA
'NMI'
YA.rerNEWH4U
..prrrr.r.J♦le lay
.
W/�ArA4YMP-0Spay -
r4rAr..O..wrrNOSSoN
SAIMS AREA
VAMCIA AM
amm
etay
-;7
ANORIX
& _IDW
p
J& �A a -W, PmnCESuwrAMr
Route 573. please "I 818)
arm
=.".WOWA�
Far Nun Nfominkrl eeaul
PASAJES
.3
PARK & RIDE
LOTS IN
:30
8
SANTA CLARITA,
SinSEND
'a
CAWMCOUNMYAREA'
FARES T
LAWIROUTE 8:
Route 573. please "I 818)
arm
=.".WOWA�
PASAJES
A LOOT RUM 973
PARK & RIDE
LOTS IN
SANTA CLARITA,
CAWMCOUNMYAREA'
ARFA
YA.rerNEWH4U
..prrrr.r.J♦le lay
.
W/�ArA4YMP-0Spay -
r4rAr..O..wrrNOSSoN
SAIMS AREA
VAMCIA AM
etay
8:2a 5
IL-10 1 6 9:52 trPE on
TRS
11:0111:11
rtovk LIPS =tea
3 MMOlink
3 "aS mu 4.VI
4,14 6: 8:27 "m
I
4 7 1
"3 6..39 TYPEK.
MET .41 Due
d4 hol tirnes
1128 IC
1. 44, 1 :17
sas �i I m M.,Fs. Is'eT b=s
a m 795 link pi MAWUM Metrolink TYPE
D NOM Park & FARES in
4:49 RWe kcsd� r
7.� ROUTE 7-45 EXPRESS
7:23
00 CA* off PAIKE�
?A3 by Adak. $3. OX jr
Lso IIJi'"A A
s 5�mma,rDlkabiad Lso DN WA
p•
MIAMI, and. 5
20� P� Vkkait Sfio.w m
I m C19
A�M.Mdypiwis 100O0 6�25
60.00 27 20 2 714
IA 6:33 7:aa -4
55/ft=At=p_ Dom Mo IN 6:50 6� 7:44
Tw bvwerma, 0 7:21 7:24. a -is
9:54 1,0099, 10:05 1
11:64 12'"13:05 Ll
L." 2." 7 Li2o
828
D
4 4
7
7
7 9
3
325.. 4=
FASAJES
RUTA 795 IXPRESS
Saw
XW
Milim
P
S
Rd
Minae nrYtbk.Ar b.ir. Aa. 90;
VOTE.
NOTA:
PtlM.r..roe sae.Crr.y
� ..
y Wy
8:35
10;35
1:311
251
NOTES
MP.
Al"
kou
kwm
town
Ji TM.4 Came,- Green M
w'nm tannates win, mart.
Man
ae V*n;Ren M indicates
Uleaves a
Is k' anning Metrolink
then rums �
Center, U'an
MAW=
mcouloa
�84=f VW ca
Cw Ctms
rawA
MW' IN
-Me
Lyc"s
at
as A
25.
25 ftW, 6:24
I lwi
6-31
a
fo�
LYON�5
Al D
Cmrt*,s
A
15 6:48 6;54
25 715' 7: 'T
21i
?;01 7
7 1
7.w 7 a
a
:2�
25 631
in
5 M
M
-0
rDo 6-.003 6. 7
251
NOTES
MP.
Al"
kou
kwm
town
Ji TM.4 Came,- Green M
w'nm tannates win, mart.
Man
ae V*n;Ren M indicates
Uleaves a
Is k' anning Metrolink
then rums �
Center, U'an
V"Um25loty ,
une is to Sa.10,
t: vCfA T IV. I�
40 to Bouquet Cyn
Weekdays
40 to Metrolink Weekdays 40 Schoolday Note T
M 50 to Whites Cvn/Valpnt!ia Wpi3k
aevr w Heft** Mc Red kks'
ne, waft for &"ft
0,=CM&xes to 0e
wd Apvo Sero
R conama R ft 35 We L� b
Fr w Sv—M='0cft
S lboso 6w de,4M 0 aeras HM
dd Ns ISN SL. NexheO
S: Am.'and LYWO Am.
T Me f* OPSMOS sch� ddA
kv Swvm H4� S�. caw294.aan
J287WovnMmGds VCpe S
the dayyWpawl.
URuns wschool hwAaay%Mb,
VR"40buasores v"w4Town
7 Cantor. Buses ea baw ftm
Ve, Tow, cep~
WRws direct! we S.s Cy'. Rd
WAMM sww uwmfiy. .
X Route 40 bs serves weww r~
CentxMNess
•3:g ft M�'� MWS& C~.
rear" &coam w..s ww,
fitwv w
' GM4 -- van
5:38
6:31
a
MA8 16:54
M 54
77:01
U
M.-Ol
5:55 6:01
7.M 7:24
754
7�31
8:01
4
8:26
8:33
";26 n:27,
U736,
840 8:48
P-.10 9:
1
'03
759-
8272
ANI.EV
30
Ba .
. . 12A6
AND EVERY 30'
3 3`05 T3=
M 7318
L-47 , 1,-93,
M:45
tM
3MG 3=
3
is C� 3
'4- 424:51
'..2
.
4=
4:65
�5-20 S.
f1
4:42
4
54337
All
v
&.
6:34
S;32
a 0. 7
• wj 9.
;Z1
7.11
7.
wl- V
vy
U S
1 NOTES
GAL
A Thru L b�m pre pa�u w
1.7.105f
ffL V` A'
aevr w Heft** Mc Red kks'
ne, waft for &"ft
0,=CM&xes to 0e
wd Apvo Sero
R conama R ft 35 We L� b
Fr w Sv—M='0cft
S lboso 6w de,4M 0 aeras HM
dd Ns ISN SL. NexheO
S: Am.'and LYWO Am.
T Me f* OPSMOS sch� ddA
kv Swvm H4� S�. caw294.aan
J287WovnMmGds VCpe S
the dayyWpawl.
URuns wschool hwAaay%Mb,
VR"40buasores v"w4Town
7 Cantor. Buses ea baw ftm
Ve, Tow, cep~
WRws direct! we S.s Cy'. Rd
WAMM sww uwmfiy. .
X Route 40 bs serves weww r~
CentxMNess
•3:g ft M�'� MWS& C~.
rear" &coam w..s ww,
fitwv w
6:11
6:50
7:14
Rd-
M""Bs M. D fa Dr.. Sew Ca yw Ra. fiG�iuw
F
C.,MRd..S-lededC&VwRd. WAf*tMMk ..
a
Sped$FROut.:PMNa TMP W91ASWAMASeroj,
6:38 S 6;
r7:08
5:55 6:01
Sim'
U7*08 Lr7:i
7:38 I 7 1 -
.31 6:36
655 76 _ I 7:06
8:08 &1
U7:25 77 Ce
U7:31 -
";26 n:27,
U736,
840 8:48
P-.10 9:
1
748 - 7-54;
816 8-22,
759-
8272
rTES.:.. UNTIL
SA? 853.
Ba .
. . 12A6
AND EVERY 30'
3 3`05 T3=
M 7318
L-47 , 1,-93,
1.58
W. 'to -is
2:17 2
2: U
.2:1231
'3:03'
is C� 3
'4- 424:51
'..2
.
4:65
�5-20 S.
43Y3
V317 W:23!
M:28
ffu f.
4:01 4W
4:32 4jjj'
4=
4:43
a 0. 7
• wj 9.
4:S? S�q
638 632
'
fla
7.
5:61
1
�'. 2
7)
5!30
GAL
:54 "Mi
1.7.105f
6:11
6:50
7:14
Rd-
M""Bs M. D fa Dr.. Sew Ca yw Ra. fiG�iuw
F
C.,MRd..S-lededC&VwRd. WAf*tMMk ..
a
Sped$FROut.:PMNa TMP W91ASWAMASeroj,
NO EVERY
Kwh M sMeo/ lyaj% 0* and operates Na wSu Delp 0
-So
5:35 5:41 G: a" &54 67.2
D1, Las Mane M Dl.. Cto Dr., Sero 0& ,, R,
"a SAI a," GAS M4
90wuet Canyon Rd, MwM9.'dD Rd.. Sanuab Am..
11:56
C"MS St., C8bmia Am., kawgcida Rd, BduqM
iz-56
CM)M Rd, cfn Way (S"T.8 No SMOK
-3-.50L-56
GMWPA* Dr., Rkgegvm Dr., Alamim Dr., Hod Am., •
acw� ca� ft.. Shadow valley Lane, SMV�d W^
M
W 06a, Ds Nd waY. 504uat COW RaRoad, YM Alt
GO
M
War RO 40W Meddpnk
VALENCIA TOWN CENTER
wemea ee —AIP2x,
4:06
41 1, #I
C
See Pw 19 4'r a fesac5raclaMies 0 V&Wnda
Nign Stl ' HW Hip SC . p1scern, AeAw Hlp
SM .a La Mesa Almon H;P Sctd m R" 51
til
B
usisMW-ffTt t'
F
Rwt
a
WhItes Cyn9.M
NO EVERY
444—),
-So
5:35 5:41 G: a" &54 67.2
la1.-.'ol
"a SAI a," GAS M4
1im
01
11:56
32:01
iz-56
L-01
-3-.50L-56
9:00-
EVERY -60
6:09 6:19
6:A
: 6:30 6:37 6:45 IM 7.M
6! 7MS7:07
'YI
7:2957:31ft
s3a@�as
' 2
Sao
7:58
8:58
9.01
R:58
la1.-.'ol
1030"10
1im
01
11:56
32:01
iz-56
L-01
-3-.50L-56
241
" 3:01
3.,06
3.66 A41—
4-.06
5:1S
4:06
S:u
6,47
6:52
633 6.38
'YI
7:23 7:29
s3a@�as
' 2
Sao
8318:36
-8,'4,1
9_ .31 9:36
C-43
10:31 1036
10:43
11:36
11.43
33:3112:38
MAJ
1 L21
lx36
s3a@�as
' 2
Sao
223
Bae
TAO
3du
AM
C-43
'4:56
6:52
6.-57
603
i.
SM
6:42
6:50
INUTES
&.12 649
7= 7aQ
6:41 6:48 6
,�NUTES UNTIL
)s 7:11 748 7:18 7a3 T"
rvlcel_to."a�� High aInd. P d Junior
Aff Santa Clarita Tmsit =s Mog �F6
School.
.—La
SchoWs are open to the ,,!e U2
X T!m
WT
Bus C� MEW& MEW&
mv MCBEMI
MCBEm Cm
7;2ugl 7:37 7:39 V
GVIIVNB
25 7:25 .1
5 .4 arab y:
DUffl 1-3 Lj�R AM 3: 2
-1 WW L'..& %�jk
%METRO m I Bus I'll Bus 0 IXDROM
z!;WW' PLMA = kwcw U"CREST
249
35 7:16 1 7226 7�9 2:66
60 a:w '�2 r3 3 4 1 320
7.- 744 0 1
N
3 :43 F R 3 5
25 7 3 46 3-n
5
, . i 1 7-
15 3
R&A
=T R.E FAN f%X1
•A V�
KMA w
a�r3:21 M-3
ORCIWVU -•
2:" --zwr-
"A, Vs &-00 FA9 3:00 rM Ez glgi tifig yl�j mg r— I Pso 3-20 3-35 i. E,3-43 2:"; 3--02
.2 3:26 so 7 ?Z29 2
.
A.
3:V
3= A
MOM VMMtiL,
oL a a,
YAu
3al
MEU 4 te =Wmm
&RAN I
� a--4
I 3 -As
45 1 99, 3:53 E3�
30
MtTRGUN" 6IXFAV4 SOLEOW IA MESA
0-to-fifetrorink —SChooldayvs CEVERrumb01F11V0 METRO -w rm
M., 8:20 UMGIEN
10 .411
%iIEN0.Y
MONF MIDGE 6w F%i. 6:22
'67 - %
-Service, Viloin'da
bervice to pail on High gifa us, High School -,:I
Sier,j jSer�ji;6 VA RYE m VA WTmc VME�K ME RO
Bus sa& vm H� T� & wM
1�-- J.V2 3= 3=
I -i -HIP & Arroyo Seco Jr. High SO .11 VAR m
20 YO B:W 895 20 "3. 3� 3:23
20 9;35 NZIMA= �ss
9:15 9:30 �C:� 10120
WGUS � �s ft� Rd
M�
1�4 Hl� =
? ; - a,, , ; ; , ; %
7:06 a -41 315 SKFPA
— — - -��K —, ME�
7;28 7 gg --v 'mrmm- --
.43 3:03 3:06 3-15 ME
D;� 6: 1m 2zm 3;
I
1
1
APPENDIX C
ADJACENT METROLINK STATION PARKING
' OBSERVATIONS .
' CALTRANS PARK AND RIDE PARKING LOT
' OBSERVATIONS
I
1
I
II
11
II
Santa Clarita Metrolink Station (Located at the Soledad CaD= Road/Commuter Way Intersection)
Observation Date and Time: Wednesday, September 4, 199610:30AM
Total Parking Spaces: 462
Occupied Spaces: 312
Occupancy Rate: 68%
Observation Date and Time: Wednesday, September 4, 1996 11:30AM
' Total Parking Spaces: 431
Occupied Spaces: 154
Occupancy Rate: 36%
Caltrans Park -n -Ride on San Fernando Road rust South of SR14
'
Observation Date and Time:
Wednesday, September 4, 1996 9:15 AM
Total Parking Spaces:
40 Plus On Street Parking
Occupied Spaces:
59
Occupancy Rate:
100%
'
Caltrans Park -n -Ride on San
Fernando Road Just North of SR14
Observation Date and Time:
Wednesday, September 4, 1996 9:30 AM
'
Total Parking Spaces:
103
Occupied Spaces:
98
_
Occupancy Rate:
95%
Caltrans Park -n -Ride on San Fernando Approximately th Mile North of Sierra High=
' Observation Date and Time: Wednesday, September 4, 1996 10:10 AM
Total Parking Spaces: 135
Occupied Spaces: 43
Occupancy Rate: 32%
II
IU
I
1
1
1
1
J
1
1
1 APPENDIX D
1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT CALCULATIONS 71
1
1
J
1
1
1
1
1
Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 943
1.1991
Figure 9-8
PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(� l /� (Urban) Areas) SOA of
I�QWIrogj AlPeAAj 4 fornMdo 9o0d A-tm
-::r-"JT aIM CDN IT+ a&/
600
a
500
tjx
p 400
F- a
w a
o w 300
z i
200
x
c5
z 100
V
2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR)
1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR)
& 1 LANE
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH
* NOTE:
150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
A►� Qr1
219 0 3 0 (o
YDS
I
II
Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-13
Figure 9-8
PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Urban Areas)
600
x
a
500
ru
U
cc p 400
I.- xa
y a
o w 300
z 2
So
o 200
x
i 100
0
2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR)
2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR)
OR 1. LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINORI
1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1
400' 500 600 700 800 900-1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET -TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -VPH
* NOTE:
150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
*IS213S
I�QJ� ifs
Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9.13
Figure 9-8
PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Urban Areas)
Ro.l�=o�►
Au-elit) Lyaf%� qoreA-�t
e e/ lAn 1,1ZJ *+, M
600
x
a
a 500
x
U
wx ¢ 400
N a
a
o m 300
z 2
200
x
O
= 100
A
2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) a& 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR)
2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) It 1 LANE (MINOR)
OR 1. LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINORI
1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR)
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET- TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH
* NOTE:
150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
�M P�
1� cid nlS gso 86z
.. SI o•.a1 V� a�a��
m i n o.r
Ilio 1 00
Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-13
1.1991
Figure 9-8
PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT
(Urban Areas)
z
600
a
500
U
Q0 400
a
N y
o m 300
�o200
s
z 100
7
SME
• . .. • •(MINOR)
MMc
��:..
_ ....
3101ml
OMEN
NONE
—1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR)
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES -VPH n n
1:41c„�Q� e1�cc��1 1N 1jQ
uk-n--^i'�f-`,n'J�vr,� ti.csf� -�o�►,Q.�+�e�.rt��fe.
IU ��1 3 pihQ�04a F06d �CIGrl Q1�M 1
v111.1 .
NOTE:
150 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET
APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER
THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE.
AM P�
Ah -, ('A 2,6,? mo ((��, I
KAOr JX- -Ij YVvf44�
319 412
Yfs , yn
YES
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX E
PROPOSED INTERSECTION LAYOUTS FOR
INTERIM (Scenario 2) CONDITIONS
PROPOSED TRANSIT STATION LAYOUT
I
Scenario 2 - San Fernando/RailroadAvenue south of 4th Street
pD
as
N
Scenario 2 - Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Scenario 2 - San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/11th Street
if
r
v�
LNE
6TH STREET
:�6
1�7
P 1!
7
A
m1
8TH STREET
t
1
I
1
i
1
MARKET
r
i
V
----------------
{ r
I
1
I
1
1
I
' APPENDIX F
LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
01/15/1997 23:27 Filename: SCNIAMWO.RPT Page 1
SCNIAMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:27:51 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
1!111*1f1f!*w••f•lfff if lfflRRR!•lffiffaffflfflff •f ••1•ffllffffffffal of la of lf•
Intersection #1 Railroad Ave/11th Street
a wwwwfw.aalwflfefwfwwlfaffaaffaalfaf•lfff•••••wlfl!•wfwwwweefffwlafaaaaaa off a••
Average.Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW Worst Case Level Of Service: F
ww wwww 11.1fl1wwwwwww wfffaaf socias! as of aa++++wf !!1!1!lf eeff•!a!!!!•
!ww wwww lwaeu•
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- -_-------------�
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
____________--------------- --------------- --------------- --------__---__�
Volume Module--
Base
odule:Base Vol: 11 941 0 0 1593 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 11 941 0 0 1593 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 11 941 0 0 1593 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 11 941 0 0 1593 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
___________________________ --------------- 11--------------- ------____-----�
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: D% 0% O! Ot
t Cycle/Care: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxX
t Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCS: xx,x xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Adj Vol.: 12 1035 0 0 1752 57 2 0 34 0 0 0'
------------ I--------------- II--------------- --------------- ________--_--__�
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 3.4 3.3 xxxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.6 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 xxxxx xxxxx 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx -xxxxx
--------------------------- --------------- --------------- 11---_----_----_-�
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 842 19 xxxxx xxxx 36 0 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 345 1066 xxxxx xxxx 1044 1385 1714 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cao: 0.00 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 0 1065 xxxxx xxxx 1043 1385 1714 xxxx. xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11-------------_-�
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del:xxxxx 26.5 xxxxx xxxxx 962 2.7 2.1 xxxx xxx:oc xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: f D * F • A
Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1051 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx Kxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 1029 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: P • • • • F • • • • !
ApproachDel: xxxxxx 931.9 0.1 0.0
Tra£fix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0MS\6"4L1?-tfl - Los �
SCN3AMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:27:52 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Without Metrolink .Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HUM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
wfafaa••wwwwaffffaaaf11f 1f••:1!••11.1 affa!•1f+a1aleef •••f u111ffa1u 1+1111! 1111•
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
1111111!1.111f11f••aa*•ffiif•ffw•f 11111w1Rff••wllfaifllff aRfaifiiafflRf Ylfikf a**
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A
lfaawwwlwwwwffaafafaawaafaae••1wwwlwwaa!lf++fwfafll:e•f+•a!•eef aw++a•ll:eef l:ew
Approach: North .Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- __--_____------I
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
____________ _______________ --------------- --------------- ----_-_-_-__---�
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial .Bee: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume! 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0
--------------------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- _____-________-�
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0i D% 0% 0}
4 Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xx:oc xxxx xxxx xxXx
t Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.1D
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
Adj Vol.: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- ---__----------�
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx.xxzxx
Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xx:coc
--------------------------- --------------- --------------- -----_---------�
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 1714 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1385 xxxx xxxx xxxx,
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1714 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxx 1385 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
_________________________ --------------- --------------- -----------_-_-�
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 2.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A !. f 1 • • 1 + A • * 1
Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx,,, xxxxx xxxx xx„x
Shared LOS: * • * • * + • • • • +
ApproachDel: 2.1 .0.0 2.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c).1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey <
v
VNS) 6tJ4Li2,ED -
L
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M =
01/15/1997 23:27 Filename: SCNIAMWO-RPT Paoe 3
SCNIAMWO.IN Wed.Jan IS, 1997 23:27:52 Page 3-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA,
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of -Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
.............
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/K3rket Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.7 Worst Case Level Of Servicei A
Approach3 North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementi L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L/N 11 6NAL I atj) - L o.S A
01/1511997 23- 7 Filename, SCN1AMWO.RPT Page 4
SCNIAMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23i27:52 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour A�nalysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fe rna ndo Road/Lyons Avenue
cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./cap. M� O.68S
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.4
Optimal Cycle; 48 Level Of Servins, B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --_----------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 257 S79 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 257 579 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
REP Volume: 2S7 579 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
Reduct Voli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 257 S'79 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLY Adj: 1 00 1.00 1.00 l.OD 1.00 1.00 1.0;�1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OD 1.00
Final Vol.: (20)579 6 1 1 467 ( �349 22 74 7 3
_ ____ .... __0
------------ ---------- - ------- ---- - -------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.oq I.oq 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes; 0-0 2 1 00 2,Q2 I OD 2JO 1 00 1.00 1. 01_L.L7_ 0.43
Li:: 6 1 SO( 50 145 0 CROO > 1750 175%,1LOO;0 7SO
0 1
0
Final Sat. : ��175 3
------------ --------------- ----- ------- ir -- ------ ---- ----------- ---
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Satt 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.33 0.27 0.10 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves; ....
Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.71 0.71 0.03 O.Sl D.51 O.lS O.lS 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.01
Volume/Cap: 0.6S 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.65 O.S2 0.65 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.65 O.6S
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
L,evel Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 29,7 4.0 4.9 36.6 14.2 12.8 32.6 28.5 29.5 39.4 111 125.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh; 29.7 4.0 4.9 36.6 14.2 12.8 32.6 28.5 29.5 39.4 111 125.5
Queue: 7 6 0 0 24 9 9 1 2 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc., Licensed to
01)4-1
0'21 -co L 0;
00
0. ras
C�,63Z
Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
131
- - - - - - - - - - - - I ---------------
Volume Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
Base Vol: 0
5 0
10
6
13
is 62 13
0 149
19
Growth Adj: 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
Initial Baez 0
user Adj: 1.00
5 0
1.00 1.00
10
1.00
6
1.00
13
1.00
15 62 13
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 149
1.00 1.00
19
1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
PHF Volume: 0
5 0
10
6
13
15 62 13
0 149
19
Reduct Vol� 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
Final. Vol.: a
5 0
10
6
13
15 62 13
0 149
19
------------ I --------------- 11
Adjusted Volume Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
Gradet
0%
0%
0%
0%
% cycle/Cars; XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
% Truck/Comb: XXXX
xxxx
XXXX
XXXX
Xxxx XXXX
XXXX xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10
1.10 2.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10 1,00 1.00
1.10 1.00
1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx
xxxx
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
XXXX xxxx
XXXX xxxx
Adj Vol.: 0
6 0
11
7
14
17 62 13
0 149
19
------------ I ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
MoveUp Time�xxxxx
3.3 xxxxx
3.4
3.3
2.6
2.1 xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gp:xxxxx
6.0 xxxxx
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0 xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I ---------------
Capacity Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
Cnflict Vol: xxxx
252 xxxxx
245
249
159
168 xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.s xxxx
80S xxxxx
764
$08
1151
2426 xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: xxxx
0.99 xxxxx
0.99
0.99
1.00
1.00 xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: xxxx
795 xxxxx
753
798
1151
1426 xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
Stopped Del;xxxxx
4.6 xxxxx
4.8
4.5
3.2
2.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx: xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: -
A
A
Movementl IT
- LTR - RT
LT -
LTR -
RT
IT - LTR - RT
IT - LTR -
RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx
xxxx xxxxx
xxxx:
904 Xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx xxxxx
4.1 xxxxx
xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
A
ApproachDel:
4.6
4.0
0.5
0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L/N 11 6NAL I atj) - L o.S A
01/1511997 23- 7 Filename, SCN1AMWO.RPT Page 4
SCNIAMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23i27:52 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour A�nalysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fe rna ndo Road/Lyons Avenue
cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./cap. M� O.68S
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.4
Optimal Cycle; 48 Level Of Servins, B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --_----------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 257 S79 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 257 579 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
REP Volume: 2S7 579 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
Reduct Voli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 257 S'79 6 14 1171 467 349 22 74 7 4 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLY Adj: 1 00 1.00 1.00 l.OD 1.00 1.00 1.0;�1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OD 1.00
Final Vol.: (20)579 6 1 1 467 ( �349 22 74 7 3
_ ____ .... __0
------------ ---------- - ------- ---- - -------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.oq I.oq 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes; 0-0 2 1 00 2,Q2 I OD 2JO 1 00 1.00 1. 01_L.L7_ 0.43
Li:: 6 1 SO( 50 145 0 CROO > 1750 175%,1LOO;0 7SO
0 1
0
Final Sat. : ��175 3
------------ --------------- ----- ------- ir -- ------ ---- ----------- ---
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Satt 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.33 0.27 0.10 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves; ....
Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.71 0.71 0.03 O.Sl D.51 O.lS O.lS 0.15 0.01 0.01 0.01
Volume/Cap: 0.6S 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.65 O.S2 0.65 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.65 O.6S
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
L,evel Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 29,7 4.0 4.9 36.6 14.2 12.8 32.6 28.5 29.5 39.4 111 125.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh; 29.7 4.0 4.9 36.6 14.2 12.8 32.6 28.5 29.5 39.4 111 125.5
Queue: 7 6 0 0 24 9 9 1 2 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc., Licensed to
01)4-1
0'21 -co L 0;
00
0. ras
C�,63Z
Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
131
SCNlAMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:27%52
--------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Without
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 5-1
NEWRALL CA
Metrolink AltJ
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (Sao): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.668
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.0
Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 17 676 a 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
Growth Adj i 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse� 17 676 a 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100
PHF Adj! i.ao 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 17 676 8 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 17 676 a 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1-00 1.00 2.20 1.00 I.q..0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
Final Vol. 676 8 IS ( �91 14 ka.8.;P 4 6 11 28 <95 60
------------ --------------- ------ ------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module�
Sat/Lare, 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
81 0 19 1 00 0
Lanes: 0.02 0.03 4 2 i 16 0.40
0.0' 0 0
51,
Final Sat.: 78 086 37 310, 48 1600 93. 09 3. 00 640
------------ I -U --------- 11 ----- ------- 1105 --- ---- 11 ---- ---------- I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.09
Cxit Moves: ....
Green/Cycleg 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.02 0.11 0,11 0.05 0.14 0.14
Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.65 0.65
------------- I ------- ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh� 49.1 22.7 68.4 46.4 17.1 47.9 63.8 32.3 33.8 36.0 38.1 42.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.1 22.7 68.4 46.4 17.1 47.9 63.8 32.3 33.8 36.0 38.1 41.1
Queue: 1 16 0 1 20 1 1 1 0 1 3 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o,2-19
o, 19 4- C
ro�o �s
o.o94-
r) 0
(.3 - z _R & 0
SCNlAMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 2997 23:27:52 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVENENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fe rna ndo/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (Sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W; 1.033
Loss Time (SeC): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh); 48.2
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanest 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Voli 440 $20 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
Growth Adj: 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00
Initial Bse: 440 820 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 440 820 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 440 820 2 0 989 a 0 4 602 1 a 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj:_ I-QL 1. 0 a i.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,20 1.&.00 1.00
Final Vol.: (449 820 2 0 0 0 4 <6 O'D 0 3
------------ 1�- ------------- ---------- ---- ------------ 7rT11 ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: _I-QL 1.99 0.01 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1 00 00 0.00 0.75
Final Sat.: L 16093192 a CC77DO 0 0 lioO <1'Zg.10> 4 0 0 0 1200
------------ T� ------------ 00.
Capacity Analpi odule
g
. i M
Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 o.oO 0.00
Crit Moves: ..** ....
Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.37
Volume/Cap: 1.04 0.46 0.46 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.04 1.04 0.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 72.4 10.0 40.5 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.0 15.6 63.6 814.0 0.0 IS.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00
AdjDel/Veht 72.4 10.0 40.S 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.0 15.6 63.6 814.0 0.0 15.5
Queue: 19 13 0 0 39 0 0 0 25 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995
DNS OD
6,13s-+
Dowling Assoc, Licensed to Katz, OkitSu, Monterey
01/15/2997
23,27
Filename: SCNIAMWO.RPT
Page
5
01115/1997
23,27
Filenamem SCNIAMWO.RPT
Page
6
SCNlAMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:27%52
--------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Without
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 5-1
NEWRALL CA
Metrolink AltJ
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (Sao): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.668
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.0
Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 17 676 a 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
Growth Adj i 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse� 17 676 a 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100
PHF Adj! i.ao 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 17 676 8 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 17 676 a 15 913 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1-00 1.00 2.20 1.00 I.q..0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
Final Vol. 676 8 IS ( �91 14 ka.8.;P 4 6 11 28 <95 60
------------ --------------- ------ ------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module�
Sat/Lare, 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
81 0 19 1 00 0
Lanes: 0.02 0.03 4 2 i 16 0.40
0.0' 0 0
51,
Final Sat.: 78 086 37 310, 48 1600 93. 09 3. 00 640
------------ I -U --------- 11 ----- ------- 1105 --- ---- 11 ---- ---------- I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.09
Cxit Moves: ....
Green/Cycleg 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.02 0.11 0,11 0.05 0.14 0.14
Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.65 0.65
------------- I ------- ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh� 49.1 22.7 68.4 46.4 17.1 47.9 63.8 32.3 33.8 36.0 38.1 42.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.1 22.7 68.4 46.4 17.1 47.9 63.8 32.3 33.8 36.0 38.1 41.1
Queue: 1 16 0 1 20 1 1 1 0 1 3 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o,2-19
o, 19 4- C
ro�o �s
o.o94-
r) 0
(.3 - z _R & 0
SCNlAMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 2997 23:27:52 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVENENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fe rna ndo/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (Sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W; 1.033
Loss Time (SeC): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh); 48.2
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanest 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Voli 440 $20 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
Growth Adj: 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00
Initial Bse: 440 820 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 440 820 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 440 820 2 0 989 a 0 4 602 1 a 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj:_ I-QL 1. 0 a i.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,20 1.&.00 1.00
Final Vol.: (449 820 2 0 0 0 4 <6 O'D 0 3
------------ 1�- ------------- ---------- ---- ------------ 7rT11 ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: _I-QL 1.99 0.01 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1 00 00 0.00 0.75
Final Sat.: L 16093192 a CC77DO 0 0 lioO <1'Zg.10> 4 0 0 0 1200
------------ T� ------------ 00.
Capacity Analpi odule
g
. i M
Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 o.oO 0.00
Crit Moves: ..** ....
Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.37
Volume/Cap: 1.04 0.46 0.46 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.04 1.04 0.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 72.4 10.0 40.5 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.0 15.6 63.6 814.0 0.0 IS.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00
AdjDel/Veht 72.4 10.0 40.S 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.0 15.6 63.6 814.0 0.0 15.5
Queue: 19 13 0 0 39 0 0 0 25 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995
DNS OD
6,13s-+
Dowling Assoc, Licensed to Katz, OkitSu, Monterey
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
QNSICWtALI:!�rN - LoS A
LA -W
= M = M M = M = =
01/06/1997 15:23 Filename! SCNlAMWO.RPT page
SCN1AMWO. IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 15:23:33 Page 8.1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without MetrOlink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 San Fernardo Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 2 1326 14 3 i634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
Initial Bse: 2 1326 14 3 1634 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adji 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1�00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2 1326 14 3 1634 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 2 1326 14 3 1634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
t Cycle/Cars; xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX
It Truck/Combt XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE; xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE; xxnx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX
Adj Vol.: 2 1326 14 3 1634 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Critical Gap Modulet
MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Critical OF: 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol; 1634 xxxx xxxxx 1340 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx,
Potent Cap.2 227 xxxx xxxxx 327 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 227 xxxx xxxxx 327 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 16.0 xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: C C
Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxinoc
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel; 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
UNRIUJALQ;_t� - Lol 0,-
SCNIAMWO.IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 15:23:33
Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
01/06/1997
15:23
Filename,
SCNIAMWO.RPT
7
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
QNSICWtALI:!�rN - LoS A
LA -W
= M = M M = M = =
01/06/1997 15:23 Filename! SCNlAMWO.RPT page
SCN1AMWO. IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 15:23:33 Page 8.1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without MetrOlink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 San Fernardo Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 2 1326 14 3 i634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
Initial Bse: 2 1326 14 3 1634 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adji 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1�00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2 1326 14 3 1634 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 2 1326 14 3 1634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
t Cycle/Cars; xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX
It Truck/Combt XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE; xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE; xxnx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX
Adj Vol.: 2 1326 14 3 1634 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Critical Gap Modulet
MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Critical OF: 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol; 1634 xxxx xxxxx 1340 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx,
Potent Cap.2 227 xxxx xxxxx 327 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 227 xxxx xxxxx 327 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 16.0 xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: C C
Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxinoc
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel; 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
UNRIUJALQ;_t� - Lol 0,-
SCNIAMWO.IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 15:23:33
Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
...........
Intersection #12 Pine Avenue/Market Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.4 Worst Case Level Of
Service, A
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R
L - T R
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control; Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled
---------- ---- I
Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include
Include
Lanest 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 a
0 1 0 a 0
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
---------------
Base Vol; 66 3 3 0 0 0 0 3S 35
1 102 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 66 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 35
1 102 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 66 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 35
1.00 1.00 1.00
1 102 0
Reduct Voli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
-
Final Vol.: 66 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 35
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
1 102 0
---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 01, 01;
0%
* Cycle/Carsi xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
% Truck/Comb; xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XxXX XXXX
PCEAdj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00
1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCEi XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX
Adj Vol.: 73 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 35
1 102 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Critical Gap Module;
---------------
MoveUp Time: 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
2.1 xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxrx xxxx xxxxx
5.0 xxxx xxxxx
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
---------------
Cnflict Vol: 156 156 53 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
70 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 861 904 1302 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
1588 xxxx xxioix
Adj Cap: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
1.00 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 060 903 1302 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxc
I
1588 xxxx xxxxx
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
---------------
Stopped Deli 4.5 4.0 2.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
2.3 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: -
A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT
shared Cap.; xxxx 874 xxxxx xxxx xXxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx.xxxxx
xxxx xxxx.xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 4.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: A
ApproachDel: 4.4 0.0 0.0
0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
QNSICWtALI:!�rN - LoS A
LA -W
= M = M M = M = =
01/06/1997 15:23 Filename! SCNlAMWO.RPT page
SCN1AMWO. IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 15:23:33 Page 8.1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without MetrOlink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 San Fernardo Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 2 1326 14 3 i634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
Initial Bse: 2 1326 14 3 1634 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adji 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1�00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2 1326 14 3 1634 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 2 1326 14 3 1634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
t Cycle/Cars; xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX
It Truck/Combt XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE; xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE; xxnx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX
Adj Vol.: 2 1326 14 3 1634 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Critical Gap Modulet
MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Critical OF: 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol; 1634 xxxx xxxxx 1340 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx,
Potent Cap.2 227 xxxx xxxxx 327 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 227 xxxx xxxxx 327 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 16.0 xxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: C C
Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxinoc
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel; 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
UNRIUJALQ;_t� - Lol 0,-
01/15/1997 23:34 Pilename:_SCfflPKWO.RPT_ Page I
S=PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34!41 Page 1-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without Metrodink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lIth Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW Worst Case Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
X
01115/1997 23,34 Filen&me: SCNIPMWO.RPT Page 2 r
SCNlPMWO.IX Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41 Page 2 1
........................................................................... : ...
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 RCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
........... ..........
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign stop sign
Rightst Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Modules
Base Vol: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oO 1.00 1.00
Initial Bass 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume; 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grades 0% 0% 0% ok
V Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Is Truck/Comb2 xxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX,
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXzC XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE; XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXX xxxx
Adj Vol.: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 a
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.2 sonct xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx: 2.6 xxxxx xxxz: xxxxx
Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxss scoot 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx;
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module:
Caflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxs, xxxx 0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap. : 1714 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxx 138S xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx� xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxsc
Move Cap.: 1714 Xxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxm: xxxxx xxx,, :ccsoc 1385 x,mms x,,, xxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx� xxxx 2.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move; A A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxt xxx:c xxxxx xxx� xxxx xxxxx xx,,, xx, x,,,ca
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxxx xxxxm: xxxx xxxxx xxzsxx� xxxx� xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 2.1 0.0 2.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
4
L . Z
_70-
V0�16NPcL141ED - LtS F Vt-��JPMLIIEJ) A
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9
1502 0
0
1060
11
a 0 25
0
0
0
Growth Adj, 2.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1,00
1.00
Initial Bse: 9
1502 0
0
1060
11
8 0 25
D
0
0
User Adj: 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
PHF Adj; 1.00
PHF Volume: 9
1.00 1.00
1502 0
1.00
0
1.00
1060
1.00
11
1.00 1.00 1.00
8 0 25
1.00
0
1.00
0
1.00
0
Reduct Vol: 0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
Final Vol. ; 9
1502 0
0
1060
11
a 0 25
0
0
0
------------ I ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
---------------
11
---------------
---------------
Grades
0%
0%
ow
ow
V Cycle/cars: xxxx
xxxx
XXXX
xxxx
XXXX Xxxx
XXXX
XXXX
* Trtsck/Comb: xxxx
xxxx
xxxx
XXXX
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
PCE Adj; 1.10
1.10 1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10
1.10 1.00 1.00
1�10
1.00
1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx
xxxx
XXXX
xxxx
xxxx xxxx
XXXX
Xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx
XXXX
xxxx
xxxx
XXXX XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
Adj Vol.: 10
1652 0
0
1166
12
9 0 25
0
0
0
------------ ---------------
Critical Gap Modules
---------------
---------------
---------------
MoveUp Time! 3�4
3.3 xxxxx
xxxxx
3.3
2.6
2.1 xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gp: 6.5
6.0 xxxxx xxxxx:
6.0
5.5
5.0 xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx
------------ ---------------
Capacity Modules
---------------
---------------
---------------
Cnflict Vol: 556
21 xxxxx
xxxx
33
0
0 xxxx: xxxxx
xxxx
xxxx�
xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 505
1064 XXxxx
xxxx
1048
1385
1714 xxxx xxxxx
xxxx
xxxx
xxxxx
Adj Cap: 0.00
0.99 xxxxx
xxxx
O�99
1.00
1.00 xxxx xxxxx:
xxxx
xxxx
xxxxx
Move Cap.: 0
I
1059 xxxxx
xxxss
1043
1385
1714 xxxx xxxxx
xxxx
�
xxxxx:
------------ ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
Stopped Del:xxxxx
769 xxxxx
xxxxx
99.1
2.6
2.1 xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx
xmot xxxxx
LOS by Move: -
P
F
A
Movement; LT -
LTR - RT
LT
- LTR
- RT
LT - LTR - RT
LT -
LIE,
- RT
Shared Cap.; xxx:c
xxxx xxxxx
xxxx
xxxsx
1045
xxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxx
samos
xxxxx
Shrd StpDeltxxxxx
xxxx: xxxxx xxxxx
xxxx:
108.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
xxxxx
xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: F
P
ApproachDal: XXXXXX
XXXXXX
O.S
0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
X
01115/1997 23,34 Filen&me: SCNIPMWO.RPT Page 2 r
SCNlPMWO.IX Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41 Page 2 1
........................................................................... : ...
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 RCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
........... ..........
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign stop sign
Rightst Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Modules
Base Vol: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oO 1.00 1.00
Initial Bass 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume; 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grades 0% 0% 0% ok
V Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Is Truck/Comb2 xxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX,
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXzC XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE; XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXX xxxx
Adj Vol.: 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 a
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.2 sonct xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx: 2.6 xxxxx xxxz: xxxxx
Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxss scoot 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx;
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module:
Caflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxs, xxxx 0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap. : 1714 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxx 138S xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx� xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxsc
Move Cap.: 1714 Xxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxm: xxxxx xxx,, :ccsoc 1385 x,mms x,,, xxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx� xxxx 2.7 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move; A A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxt xxx:c xxxxx xxx� xxxx xxxxx xx,,, xx, x,,,ca
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxxx xxxxm: xxxx xxxxx xxzsxx� xxxx� xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 2.1 0.0 2.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
4
L . Z
_70-
V0�16NPcL141ED - LtS F Vt-��JPMLIIEJ) A
= M
M
=
M M
M M =
M
M
=
= M = M
= M
=
01/15/1997
23:34
Filename:
SMPMWO.RPT
Page
3
01/15/1997
23,34
Filename! SCNIPMWO.RPT
page
4
SCNIPMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23i34:41 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario l -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Average Delay (aec/veh): 1.9 Worst Case Level Of Services A
Approacht North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 a a 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 13 14 5 51 13 71
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial See: 13 14 5 51 13 71
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 13 14 5 51 13 71
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 13 14 5 51 13 72
------------ I --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade; ot 0%
% cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx Xxxx xxxx
Ir Truck/Combi - xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: xxzz: xxxx XXXX XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE: XXXX XXXX XXXX: XXXX
Adj Vol.: 14 15 6 56 14 78
------------ I --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module�
30 97 4 2 110 26
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
30 97 4 2 110 26
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
30 97 4 2 110 26
0 0 0 0 0 0
30 97 4 2 110 26
ov 0%
XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
1.10 2.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx:
XXXX XXXX: XXXX xxxx
33 97 4 2 110 26
MoveUp Time: 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 S.S 6.5 6.0 5.5 5,0 xxxx xxxxx S.0 xxxx: xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 296 267 99 264 256 123 136 xxxx xxxxx 101 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.. 714 790 1234 745 801 1200 1477 xxxx: xxxzz: 1534 xxxx xxxxx
AdJ Cap: 0.91 0.98 1.00 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap. g 646 771 2234 727 782 1200 1477 xxxx xxxxx 1534 xxxx xxxxx�
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: S.7 4.8 2.9 5.4 4.7 3.2 2.S xxxx xxxxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx
DDS by Move: A . . . A
Movementt IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - AT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 756 xxxxx xxx� 919 xxxxx xxxx xxx� xxxx� xxxx xxx, xxx,x
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 5.0 xxxxx xxxxx 4.6 xuxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: A A
ApproachDel: 4.8 4.2 0.6 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (a) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Los A
00=�-
SCNIPMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I-WithOut Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. M: 0.637
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh)i 17.9
optimal Cycle; 43 Level Of Service: B
**..*** ... * ... ***.** .......... **** ........
Approach: Korth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rightsi Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
volume module�
Bass Vol; 281 957 12 18 593 444 534 is 100 5 25 23
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 l.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 181 957 12 28 593 444 534 18 100 S 25 23
User Adj; 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 181 957 12 19 593 444 S34 is 100 5 2S 23
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 a 0 D 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 9S7 12 IS S93 444 534 18 100 5 25 23
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I'Do 2.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 IU' 00 1 00 1.00 26 1.00
Final Vol.: (18D 957 12 18 ;93 Q4 1) &1 is i0o S 23
------------ p� ------------ ---- ---- - T=11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module�
Sat/Lane; 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 160D
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 l.oq 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: 1.98 O�02 1.00 2.00 1. = Z-= 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.52 0.48
Final_Sat.: L175_933456 43 l7SD_3500_(:C5E 1750 1750111750 17fl") 839
----- ------ 1� ------------- ---- ---- - ------------ ----- lwl_ ------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.17 0.25 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.03
Crit Moves: .... .... **..
Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.58 0.58 0.02 0.43 0.43 0,26 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.0S 0.05
Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.48 O�48 0.48 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.04 0.20 0,20 0.60 0.60
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 31.7 9.7 19-1 44.0 15.4 18.0 26.0 19.8 20.8 38.0 49.7 50.7
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 31.7 9.7 19.1 44.0 15.4 18.0 26.0 19.8 20.8 38.0 49.7 50.7
Queue: 5 16 0 1 11 10 13 0 2 0 1 1
............. ... ***
Traffix 6.8.1S11 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
a, I o &
6.2.5+
6. ts3 Lo� 13�
= = = M = M M = = = M M = M M = M M M
01/15/1997 2304 Filename: SCNIPMWO.RPT Page 5
SCNIPMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41 Page S-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length 10 Method (Base Volume Alternative)
.......... .......
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
............
cycle (sec): 100 critical Val./cap. (X): 0.804
LOSS Time -(sec): S Average Delay (sac/vehl; 28.7
Optimal Cycle: S3 Level Of Service: D
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 D 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 8 1008 10 26 988 20 51 68 24 S4 5S 71
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: a 1008 10 26 988 20 51 68 24 54 55 71
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 8 1008 10 26 988 20 51 68 24 54 55 71
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: a 1008 10 26 988 20 51 68 24 S4 55 71
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.51.00 1.00 1.00 1 -Da 1.00 IAO -,l . 0 0 1.00 1.00 1 Q;, 1.00
Final Vol.: 1008 10 26 20 ��l 68 24 54 kZ5.J 71
----------- --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0,4Z 1 96 0.02 0.05 I-ql 0.04 rJ 00 0174 0-26 1 00 Z�� 0.56
Final Sat.: 25>i44 31 80(3058) 62 0� 83 417 IiDO 902
------------ ........... 1-1 ------- �t� ---------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat! 0.32 0.32 0.32- 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle; 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.04 0.09 0.09 O.OS 0.10 0.20
VolUme/Cap: 0,79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.79 0 79
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 122.4 22.7 109.7 69.2 22.6 78.3 67.7 43.2 55.7 47.1 63.3 58.3
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 122.4 22.7 109.7 69.2 22.6 78.3 67.7 43.2 55.7 47.1 63.1 58.3
Queuet 1 26 1 1 25 1 2 2 1 2 2 3
................ ..............
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
10,3zo
0.3Z3 LOS
co-> - �03--C-D
C�s C) 2- 2"-
01/IS/1997 23:34 Filename, SCNIPMWO.IZPT page 6
SCNIPMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I-WithOUt Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Operations Method �Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sac): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.073
Loss Time (sec): 7-(Y+R - 4 sac) Average Delay (sec/veh): 50.6
Optimal Cyclet 180 Level Of Service:
Approacht North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - A L - I - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rightni Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume module:
Base Vol: 467 1225 4 0 785 5 5 6 842 4 3 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 467 1225 4 0 785 5 5 6 842 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 I�DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I,00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00
PET Volume: 467 1225 4 0 785 5 5 6 842 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 467 1225 4 0 785 5 5 6 842 4 3 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HIP Ad)'; !'�l. 05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1,4 1.00 1. M 1.00
Final Vol,i (16V1286 4 t�
1 11 0 5 5 6 Q �42 4 0
Saturation Flow Module: -11 11
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.85 0.98 0.98 1.00
Lanes; 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00.1-12 0.01 0 45 0 L40 a 57 0-41- O�00
[M!�788 12 f3T7D 23 S5 I "
Final Sat::_ .... ;26 1;64 C298.) 0
--------- - r ---------- ---- -- ------
Capacity Anal<sis. Modules 11 n I I
Vol/Sat: 0?1 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.01 0.01 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: - -
Green/Cycle; 0.24 0.44 0.44 0.00 0 ' 20 0.20 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.07 0.76 0.76 0.00 1.07 1.07 0.01 0.01 1.07 0.01 0.0i 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veht 81.4 16.6 16.6 0.0 73.5 73.5 8.6 9.6 64.2 8.6 8.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.0o 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh� 81�4 16.6 16.6 0.0 73.S 73.5 8.6 8.6 64.2 8.6 816 0.0
Queue; 22 31 0 0 37 1 0 0 39 0 0 0
o\fELLAP
Traffix 6.8.1511 .(c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
- � C SL-
-e3r�
0,11S L
0.S 0
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
01/15/1997 23:34 Filename: SCNIPMWO.RPT Page 7
------------ I -----------
Level Of Service Modulet
Stopped Del: 4.9 xxxx 3.0 XXXXX XXXX XXXXX xxxxx xxxxx 2.5 Kxxz�
LOS by Move: - A
Movement: IT - LTR RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.; xxxx 819 xxxxx Kxxx xxxx xxxx� xxxx Kxxx xxxxx xxxx Kxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel: xxxxx 4.7 XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX xxxxx xxxx: xxxxm: xxxxx Kxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: A
ApproachUel: 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
01/15/1997 23,34 Filename, SCNIPMWO.RPT Page
SCNIPMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41 Page 8-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHAIL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing FM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 ROM 4 -Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
cycle (sac): I Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 3.000
Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ ............... --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control! Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 0 0 7 0 0
Growth Adj! 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Beer 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 a 0 0 7 0 0
User Adjg 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 a 0 7 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 0 0 7 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 0 0 7 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 287 287 287 278 278 278 1 1 1 151 151 151
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1�00 1�00
Lars�s! 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 287 574 287 278 554 2 0 1 D 151 0 151
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 3.00 0.03 0.03 2.64 2.64 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,05 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: ... *
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 1.1 xxxx 1.1 1.1 xxxx 224S9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0
Delay Adji 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Vehi 1.1 XXXX 1.1 1.1 XXXx 22459 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0
LOS by Movei A F A A F F A
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
UN�l L 0S F
SCNlPMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 7-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis iScenario l -Without Metrolink
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 BOX Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Pine Avenue/Market Street
Average Delay (Sac/veh); 0.9 Worst Case Level Of
Servicet A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled
---------------
Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include
Include
Lanes; 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
---------------
Base Vol: so a 6 0 0 0 0 94 71
3 86 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 2.00 1.00
l.DO 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse; so 0 6 0 a 0 0 94 71
3 86 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: so 0 6 0 0 0 0 94 71
3 86 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 o
Final Vol.: 50 0 6 0 0 0 0 94 71
------------ I
3 86 0
--------------- --------------- --------------- 11
Adjusted volume Module:
---------------
Grade: 0% 0% 0%
Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx
0%
XXXX Xxxx
Truck/Ccmb� xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxxx
XXXX xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00
1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX
XXXX xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCEz � XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
XXXX xxxx
Adj Vol.: 55 0 7 0 D 0 0 94 71
3 86 0
------------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
---------------
MoveUp Time: 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
2.1 xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gp: 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
5.0 xxxx� xxxxx
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module;
---------------
Cnflict Vol: 219 xxxx 130 xxxx xxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
165 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap., 791 xxxx 1190 XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX
1430 xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx:
1.00 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 789 xxxx 1190 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
1430 xxxx xxxxx
------------ I -----------
Level Of Service Modulet
Stopped Del: 4.9 xxxx 3.0 XXXXX XXXX XXXXX xxxxx xxxxx 2.5 Kxxz�
LOS by Move: - A
Movement: IT - LTR RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.; xxxx 819 xxxxx Kxxx xxxx xxxx� xxxx Kxxx xxxxx xxxx Kxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel: xxxxx 4.7 XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX xxxxx xxxx: xxxxm: xxxxx Kxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: A
ApproachUel: 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
01/15/1997 23,34 Filename, SCNIPMWO.RPT Page
SCNIPMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:34:41 Page 8-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHAIL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing FM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 ROM 4 -Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
cycle (sac): I Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 3.000
Loss Time (sec): 0 Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW
Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ ............... --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control! Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 0 0 7 0 0
Growth Adj! 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Beer 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 a 0 0 7 0 0
User Adjg 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 a 0 7 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 0 0 7 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 8 1722 9 8 1460 6 0 0 0 7 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 287 287 287 278 278 278 1 1 1 151 151 151
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1�00 1�00
Lars�s! 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 287 574 287 278 554 2 0 1 D 151 0 151
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 3.00 0.03 0.03 2.64 2.64 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,05 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: ... *
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 1.1 xxxx 1.1 1.1 xxxx 224S9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0
Delay Adji 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Vehi 1.1 XXXX 1.1 1.1 XXXx 22459 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0
LOS by Movei A F A A F F A
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
UN�l L 0S F
01/15/1997 23:36 Filename: SCNIAMW.RPT Page I
SCNIAMW.IN wed Jan 15, 1997 23:36!45 Page 1-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and P ARK ING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
...... *.* .............
Intersection 41 Railroad Ave/lIth Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW Worst Case Level Of Service: F
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementt L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rightsi Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 is 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 11 941 0 0 1657 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Ssel 11 941 a 0 1657 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 11 941 0 a 16S7 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
Reduct Voli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Final Vol.; 11 941 a 0 1657 52 2 0 34 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% ov
% Cycle/Carsz icocc � )0= � � )0=
% Truck/Comb: c= � �x i0= 3C=
FOR Adjt 1.20 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: icacc � � 'C= )0= � � 3=x
Trck/Cmb PCE: )c= )c= 1CC30( � )C= �
Adj Vol.: 12 1035 0 0 1823 57 2 0 34 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module;
MoveUp Time! 3.4 3.3 � ictxxx 3.3 2.6 2.1 x= x=cx � iozxx xic=
Critical Gp; 9.5 6.0 � � 6.0 5.5 5.0 ic= � ioc= =tx xxz�
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Module:
CnfliCt Vol: 874 19 xx� � 36 0 0 icocx � � cc=
Potent Cap.: 330 1066 � io= 1044 1365 1714 io=x � � �
Adj.Cap: 0.00 1.00 ioc� 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxz iccpainc � �
Move Cap.t 0 1065 � ic= 1043 1385 1714 xxxx x,ocioc � � ino=
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Stopped Del:� 26.5 ic� 1072 2.7 2.1 x= iocacx x:ziocz z= xic=
LOS by Move: D F A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. t ic= � 1051
Shrd StpDel:icc= � x=ccz 1139 occx
Shared LOS: F P
ApproachDel: 1039.5 0.1 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1512 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
01/15/1997 23,36 Filename: SCNIAMW RPT Page
S CNI AMW.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:36:45 Page 2-1
-------- -------- ------ ----------- -------- ------- --
PROPOSED - RAILROAD - AVENUE - IMPROVEMENT - PROJECT,-NEWHALL-CA -------------
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
EXiSting AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 RC34 Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............. * .........
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.6 Worst Case Level Of Service; A
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control; Uncontrolled Uncontrolled stop sign stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 a 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 91 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bset 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume; 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% ot
t Cycle/Cars; =� � � )CC= )C=
t Truck/Comb: � 30= X)ODC �
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.1D 1.10 1.113 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: � c= )c=
Trck/Cmb PCE: ic= conc 300M � 30=
Adj Vol.: 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 a
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.6 =ooc zoacz �
Critical OF: 5.0 000cz iocc� 5.5 � cxcc �
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modulei
Cnflict Vol: 0 ic� � icccx 0 =z
Potent Cap. : 1714 � � =x oacx � 1385 i0= ic= �
Adj Cap; 1.00 � )ODUCK ICKKK X= x=x � xx= 1.00 `ccoc 3cMx �
Move Cap.; 1714 � � � ;c= � x= � 1385 c= icccx �
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Stopped Deli 2.2 x= 2.8
LOS by Move: A A
Movement: LT - LTR RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: � xiccz x=z o,,,
Shrd StpDel:� x,ccm x=x yoocci z,ccz
Shared LOS;
ApproachDali 2.2 0.0 2.8 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
It,
r 21�
A
� M
M
M
M M
M M M
M
01/15/1997
23,36
Filenamet
SCNIAMR.RPT
Pace
3
SCNIAMW. IN Ned Jan IS, 1997 23:36:45 Page 3-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
...... *** ... ... **..** ..............
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/market street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control; Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes� 0 0 1 0 0 a 0 11 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 13 0 10 30 13 25 62 13 0 161 17
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 0 13 0 10 30 13 29 62 13 0 161 17
user Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adjt 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 13 0 10 30 13 25� 62 13 0 161 17
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: D 13 0 10 30 13 25 62 13 0 161 17
----- -----
Adjusted Volume Module:
Gradet 0% 0% ov 0%
% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx
% Truck/Comb: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx
Trck/Cmb, PCE: XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxx XXXX XXXX
Adj Vol.: 0 14 0 11 33 14 28 62 13 D 161 17
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: xxxxx 3.3 xxxxx 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Critical Op: xxxxx 6.0 xxxxx 6.5 6.0 S.5 5.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: xxxx 272 xxxxx 270 270 170 178 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: xxxx 786 xxxxx 739 788 1136 1410 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: xxxx 0.98 xxxxx 0.97 0.98 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap. z xxxx 770 xxxxx 717 772 1136 1410 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del:xxxxx 4�8 xxxxx 5.1 4.9 3.2 2.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: - A A
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 825 xxxxx XXXX XXXX Xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDal: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 4.7 xxxxx XXXXX XXXX Xxxxx xxxxx Xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOSz A
ApproachDel: 4.8 4.5 0.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
UN31 L
= M M M = M M = M
01/15/1957 23,36 Filename, SCNIAMW.RPT page 4
SCNLAMW. IN Wed Jan 15. 1997 23z36:45 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING A NAL YSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length 1k) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
..... * ... ..........
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec)� 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.702
I,oss Time (see): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.3
Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - I - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- if ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: � Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0
Lanest I a I 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 2S9 579 6 38 1211 467 349 60 74 7 12 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 I.00
Initial See: 259 579 6 38 1211 467 349 60 74 7 22 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 259 579 6 38 1211 467 349 60 74 7 12 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 259 579 6 38 1211 467 349 60 74 7 12 3
PCE Adj: 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: !'�1.00 1.00 1.00(it 1.00 l..oD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: V_L9_,.l 5 7 9 6 __38 -------- 467 Q4,9) _ _6 0 .... 74 7 - (::2) 3
------------ --------------- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09 1.09 1.09 1,09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09
Lanes� _L.4LL 1. 98 0.02 1 00(:!5 1 00 ��O 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.80 D.20
Final Sat.: C1752,>464 36 1;50 1;50 d5DO) 1750 17SO 1750(:211> 350
------------ i --------------- --------------- ------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat. 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.02 0.35 0.27 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle� 0.22 0.6S 0.65 0.08 0.52 0.52 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.01 0.01. U.01
Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.67 0.52 0.67 0.23 0.29 0.29 0.67 0.67
---------- ;-I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of S rvice Modulei
Delay/Vehi 30.5 S.6 6.8 33.2 14.4 12.7 33.3 29.0 29.4 39.3 77.4 134.8
Delay Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 30.5 5.6 6.8 33.2 14.4 12.7 33.1 29.0 29.4 39.3 77.4 134.8
Queue; 7 7 0 1 25 9 10 1 2 0 1 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0-�44
0�3+� L
0,744-
M M M M M MM M -M M M M MM M M M M M
01/15/1997 23:36 Filenamet SmiAmw-RPT Page 5
SCNIAMW. IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:36:45 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA,
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(LoBs as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
*** .... ...............
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (XI: 0.669
Loss Time (sec); 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.1
Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B
......................
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controli Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 17 679 8 is 913 24 IS 56 11 28 90 60
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bast 17 679 a is 913 14 18 56 11 28 90 60
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 I.Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Volumet 17 679 8 15 913 14 IS 56 11 28 90 60
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a 0 a
Reduced Vol: 17 679 a 15 913 14 18 56 11 28 90 60
PCE Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1,AL 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1 1-00 1-A2 ' 1-00 1-00 1-00 INL 1.00
1 56 11 28 Q �0) 60
Final Vol.: -(17�) 679 8 IS Z25 U
----------- -------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Modulat
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 2600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.01-1 0.02 0.03 4 3 " a is 1 00 ��0.40
-�i- 51�� 0*0 0 0 i3 i
6 36 310, 48 160 7 63 1 00 640
Final Sat.: (77 ;.9,-.
------------ ------- A> --- ---- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle: 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.14 0.14
Volume/Cap: 0.65 D.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.65 0.6S
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Kodulet
Delay/Veh: 49.2 22.7 68.6 46.6 17.2 48.2 64.0 32�3 34.9 36.9 38.2 41.2
Delay Adji 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.2 22.7 68.6 46.6 17.2 48.2 64.0 32.3 34.9 36.9 38.2 41.2
Queue: 1 16 0 1 20 1 1 1 0 1 3 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o.271
0 - 7-9 '+ L -Q3 C.
010 b
-t 0, ns'o ? t:9
01/15/1997 23:36 Filename: SCNIAMW.RPT Page 6
SCNIAMW. IN Wed Jan, 15, 1997 23:36:45 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE I14PROVEMT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length t) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fe rna ndo/Newhall Avenue
... * ............. **.* .......
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.033
Loss Time (sec); 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 48.2
Optimal Cycle; 180 Level Of Service: F
..*** ....... ... .... *** ...........
Approach! Worth Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementr L - T - R L - T - R L - T - P L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 it 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volwe Module:
Base Vol: 440 923 2 0 989 a 0 4 602 1 0 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00
Initial East 440 823 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i'Do 1.00
PHF Volume: 440 823 2 0 989 0 0 4 602 1 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 440 623 2 0 989 0 0 4 6D2 1 0 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I -Q0 1 00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1�'� 1.61.00 1.00
Fins 44 ;23 2 0 0 0 4 , '0 1 0 3
------------ Q� ---------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 01� 0.00 0.00 1.00
1650 9,� 0. 00 0.75
Final Sat.t (16 3192 8 0 0 1600 0 ftD
Z�> _0_) 0 1200
------------ --------------- ---------- ---- ---- ---------- ---------------
Capacity AnalXosi Modula;.26
Vol/Sat: 0 0.26 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.37
Volume/Cap: 1.04 0.46 0.46 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.04 1.D4 0.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service module!
Delay/Veh:- 72.4 10.0 40.9 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.0 15.6 63.6 $14.0 0.0 15.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 72.4 10.0 40.9 0.0 59.3 0.0 0.0 1S.6 63.6 814.0 0.0 1S.S
Queue: 19 14 0 39 0 0 0 25 0 0 0
It rwE(LLO
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
SCNIAMW. IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 16:06;25 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Pine A:venue/Market Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.5 Worst Case Level Of.Servicei A
..........
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Controlt Stop Sign Stop Sign. Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 a 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 3S 1 107 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bses 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 3S 35 1 107 a
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 3S 35 1 107 0
Reftot Voli 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Final Vol.: 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 3S 35 1 107 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module;
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
% Cycle/Cars: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xXxX Xxxx XXX,[ xxxx
V Truck/Comb: XXXX XXXX Xxx,[ xxxx XXXX Xxx3r XXXX xxx>C
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 2.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxx2r xxx3r
Trck/Cmb PCE: XXXX XXXX Xxx:x xxxx XxrcX Xxx3r XXXX �
Adj Vol.: 78 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 35 1 107 0
------------- I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x,xxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
Critical rp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 xxxx�: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx S.0 xxx,r xxxxx
------------ 1-� ------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 161 161 53 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx�r xxxx xxxxx 70 xxxz: xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 855 899 1302 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1568 xxxz; xxxx�:
Adj Capt 1.00 1.00 1�00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: BS4 898 1302 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx,r xxxx xxxxx 1588 xxxx xxxxu�
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 4.6 4.0 2.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxx,r xxxx =xxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx
.LOS by Move: A
Movement: IT - LTR RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 867 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx,r xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel: xxxx�r 4.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx,xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOSt A
ApproachDel- 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 6,8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
WSIGV4LIZE6 - LoS A
SCNIAMW.IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 16:06:25 Page 8-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HC34 Unsignalized Method Mase volume Alternative)
.... ** ... �.*** ... ****.* ...........
Intersection #15 San Pernardo Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: D
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
controls Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 a 0 a 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Voli 2 1326 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 3.
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 2 1326 24 3 D 0 0 a a 21 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Do 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Volume: 2 1326 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol..- 2 1326 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 3
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Moduler
Grade: ot 0% 0% 0%.
1, Cycle/Cars: Xxxx XKXX xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx:
% Truck/Comb: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 2.10 1.10
Cycl./Car PCE: xxx,r xxx,r XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxM:
Trck/Cmb PCE: XXXX xxx3t XXXX: xxxx XXXX xxx2: XXXX xxx2r
Adj Vol., 2 1326 24 3 D 0 0 0 0 23 0 3
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Timer 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx� 3.4 xxx,r 2.6
Critical OP: 5.5 xxxx xxxxx� 5�5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.0 xxxx 5.5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modulez
Cnflict Vol; 0 xxxx xxxx�r 1350 xxxx� xxxxx� xxxx xxxx: xxxxx 1331 xxxx 663
Potent Cap.: 1714 Xxx,t xxxxx 323 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 149 xxxx 639
Adj Cap: 1.00 Xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx:x xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.99 xxxx 1.00
Move Cap.: 1714 xxxx xxxxx 323 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx,r 148 x:xxx 639
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 2.1 xxxx xxxx,r 11.2 xxxx xxxx,t xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 28.4 xxxx 5.7
LOS by Move : A C D B
Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: � xxxx xxxx�r xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx� xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx:c xxxx:x xxx,t xxxx� xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 11.2 0.0 25.6
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
VI&IGN4LIZeD - Lol- b
01/06/1997
16:06
Filename: SCNIAMW.RPT
page
7
01/06/1997
16,06
Filename: SCNlAMW.RPT
Page 8
SCNIAMW. IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 16:06;25 Page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Pine A:venue/Market Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.5 Worst Case Level Of.Servicei A
..........
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Controlt Stop Sign Stop Sign. Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 a 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 3S 1 107 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bses 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 3S 35 1 107 a
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 3S 35 1 107 0
Reftot Voli 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Final Vol.: 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 3S 35 1 107 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module;
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
% Cycle/Cars: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xXxX Xxxx XXX,[ xxxx
V Truck/Comb: XXXX XXXX Xxx,[ xxxx XXXX Xxx3r XXXX xxx>C
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 2.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxx2r xxx3r
Trck/Cmb PCE: XXXX XXXX Xxx:x xxxx XxrcX Xxx3r XXXX �
Adj Vol.: 78 3 3 0 0 0 0 35 35 1 107 0
------------- I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx x,xxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx
Critical rp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 xxxx�: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx S.0 xxx,r xxxxx
------------ 1-� ------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 161 161 53 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx�r xxxx xxxxx 70 xxxz: xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 855 899 1302 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1568 xxxz; xxxx�:
Adj Capt 1.00 1.00 1�00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: BS4 898 1302 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxx,r xxxx xxxxx 1588 xxxx xxxxu�
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 4.6 4.0 2.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxx,r xxxx =xxx 2.3 xxxx xxxxx
.LOS by Move: A
Movement: IT - LTR RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 867 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx,r xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel: xxxx�r 4.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx,xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOSt A
ApproachDel- 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Traffix 6,8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
WSIGV4LIZE6 - LoS A
SCNIAMW.IN Mon Jan 6, 1997 16:06:25 Page 8-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HC34 Unsignalized Method Mase volume Alternative)
.... ** ... �.*** ... ****.* ...........
Intersection #15 San Pernardo Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: D
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
controls Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 a 0 a 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Voli 2 1326 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 3.
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 2 1326 24 3 D 0 0 a a 21 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Do 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Volume: 2 1326 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol..- 2 1326 24 3 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 3
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Moduler
Grade: ot 0% 0% 0%.
1, Cycle/Cars: Xxxx XKXX xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx:
% Truck/Comb: XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 2.10 1.10
Cycl./Car PCE: xxx,r xxx,r XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxM:
Trck/Cmb PCE: XXXX xxx3t XXXX: xxxx XXXX xxx2: XXXX xxx2r
Adj Vol., 2 1326 24 3 D 0 0 0 0 23 0 3
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Timer 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx� 3.4 xxx,r 2.6
Critical OP: 5.5 xxxx xxxxx� 5�5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.0 xxxx 5.5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modulez
Cnflict Vol; 0 xxxx xxxx�r 1350 xxxx� xxxxx� xxxx xxxx: xxxxx 1331 xxxx 663
Potent Cap.: 1714 Xxx,t xxxxx 323 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 149 xxxx 639
Adj Cap: 1.00 Xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx:x xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.99 xxxx 1.00
Move Cap.: 1714 xxxx xxxxx 323 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx,r 148 x:xxx 639
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 2.1 xxxx xxxx,r 11.2 xxxx xxxx,t xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 28.4 xxxx 5.7
LOS by Move : A C D B
Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: � xxxx xxxx�r xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxx� xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx:c xxxx:x xxx,t xxxx� xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.0 11.2 0.0 25.6
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
VI&IGN4LIZeD - Lol- b
= = = = M M M M = M = M
01/15/1997 2300 Filename: SCNIPMR.RPT Page I
SCNiPMW. IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:40:15 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I�Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HC14 UnSignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lith Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW worst Case Level Of Service; F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: a I 1 0 a 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 if 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
volume module:
Base Vol: 9 1578 0 0 1060 11 a 0 25 0 0 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
Initial Bse: 9 1578 0 0 1060 11 8 0 25 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 9 1578 0 0 1060 11 a 0 25 0 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.; 9 1578 0 0 1060 11 a 0 2s 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: ow 0% 0% 01,
% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX Xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX
% Truck/Combs XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX - XXXX XXXX XXXX
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx Xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Adj[ Vol.: 10 1736 0 0 1166 12 9 0 25 0 0 0
--- ----- -- ----
Critical Cap Module:
MoveUp Timez 3.4 3.3 xxxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.6 2.1 xx�x xxxxx xxxux xxxx xxxxx:
Critical Gp; 6.5 6,0 xxxxx -xxxxx 6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx xxxzo, xxxxx xxxm: xxxxx:
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------ --------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol; SS6 22 xxxxx xxxx 33 0 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xz� xxxxx
Potent Cap.; SOS 1D64 XXXXX xxxx 1048 1385 1714 xuxx xxxxx� xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 0.00 0.99 xxxxx xxxu� 0.99 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.Z 0 1OS9 xxxxx� xxxx 1043 1385 1714 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx: xxxxx
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Delixxxxx 897 xxxxx xxxxx: 99.1 2.6 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxxx
LOS by Move: - F F A
Movement: IT - LIE. - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1045 xx;xx xx= xxxxx xxxx xxxx� xxxxx:
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxot 108.1 xx�cxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx: xxxx xxxxx�
Shared LOS: F F
Approachnelc XXXXXX XXXXXX 0.5 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
M M M M = =
SCNIPMW. IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:40:16 Page 2.1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
.......... * .... *.** ..... ... * .......
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A
.**** ... ..... ..........
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - I - R L - I - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes� 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 151 0 0 0 0 0 a a 48 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 151 0 0 0 0 0 a a 48 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol. : IS1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 a 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% Ot Ow
% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
% Truck/Comb: XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX
PCE Adj, 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx KAMM: XXXX XXXX xx3m: � XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX - XXXX XXXX XXXX
Adj Vol.: 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xxxxx XXxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxx,x
Critical Gp: S.0 xxxx xxzoac xxxxx: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 5.5 xxxxx� xxxx xxx:xx
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0 xxxx xxxx
Potent Cap. : 1714 XXXx xxxxx XxUX XXXX XXXxx xxxx xxxx 1385 Xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap! 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx� xxxx: xxxx 1.00 xxxx � xxxxx
Move Cap.: 1714 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxz: xxxxx� xxzx: xxxx 138S xxxx xm:xx xxxxx�
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del; 2.3 xxxx: xxx�x xxxxx� xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 2.7 xxxocx xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: A A
Movement; IT - LTR - RT LT - LIE. - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.i xxxx xxxm: xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxz�x xxxx xxxx xxxx�x xxxx � xxxxx
Shrd StpDelixxxxz: xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xx�x xxxoax xxxx xxxm:x xxxm:x x=x xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 2.3 .0.0 2.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
1�
UPJ�l 6/vALQED
F L os A
= M
=
= = M = =
M
M
01/15/1997
23,40
Filename: SCNIPMW.RPT
Page
3
SMPMW.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:40:16 Page 3-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
.................... .......
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.2 Worst Case Level Of Service; B
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementz L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 IL 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
- - - - - - - - - - - - I ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 13 30 5 61
Growth.Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00
Initial Bse: 13 30 5 61
user Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 13 30 S 61
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.1 13 30 5 61
-- --------- I ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
----------
23
83
---------------
30 97
, 4
---------------
2 110
26
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
23
83
30 97
4
2 110
26
1.00
1.00
1.00 2.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
2.00
23
83
30 97
4
2 110
26
0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
23
----------
83
11
30 97
---------------
4
2 110
---------------
26
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
V Cycle/Cars: xxxa, xxxx: XxxX XXXX XxZX XxxX Xxxx
% Truck/Comb: xxxo: XxxX XX3K[ XXXX XXXX Xxxx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 11.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx: Xx= � xxxx XxAX Xxxx: Xxxx:
Trck/Cmb PCE: xxxx: XxKX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxxx Xxxx
Adj Vol.i 14 33 6 67 25 91 33 97 4 2 110 26
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4
Critical Gp: 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.S
------------ I ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol, 307 267 99 272
Potent Cap.: 703 790 1234 737
Adj Cap� 0.88 0.98 1.00 0.95
Move Cap.: 622 771 1234 697
Level Of Service Module:
3.3 2.6 2.1 xxxx xxxxx: 2.1 xx� zKxxx:
6.0 5.5 5.0 xxxx: � 5.0 xx= xxxxx:
---------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
256 123 136 xxxx: xxxxx: 101 xxxx: xxxxx:
801 1200 1477 xxxx: xxxxx: 1534 x= xxxxx:
0.98 2.00 1.00 xxxx xxxxx: 1.00 xxxx: xxxxx:
782 1200 1477 xxxx xxxxx IS34 axxxx
---------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Stopped Del; 5.9
4.9 2.9
S.7
4.7 3.2
2.5 xxxx: xxxxx
2.3 xm= xxxxx:
LOS by Move: -
A , *
A
Movement: LT -
LTR - RT
LT -
LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx
752 xxxxx
xxmx:
897 xxxxx:
xxxx xx�x xxxxxt
xxxx xxxx KKKKK
Shrd StpDel; xxxxx:
5,1 XXXxxt XXXxX
4.9 xXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXxxx: xxxx: xxxxx
Shared LOS:
B
A
ApproachDeli
4.9
4.3
0.6
0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
M M M M M M M M M
01/IS/1997 23,40 Filename: SCNIPMW.RPT Page 4
SCNIPMW.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:40:19 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base volume Alternative)
............. ......
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.701
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/vehj: 21.2
Optimal Cycle: 50 Level Of Service; C
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement� L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: include include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes� 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 a 1 0 1 1 D 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 181 957 12 18 593. 444 534 Is 100 5 61 99
Growth Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 181 957 12 18 593 444 534 18 100 5 61 99
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PST Volume: 181 9S7 12 18 593 444 534 is 100 5 61 99
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 957 12 18 593 444 534 18 100 5 61 99
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: L-og-1 . 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.22,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 18T, 957 12 18 593 (�4 �d
1� �1 CU.> 18 100 5 99
------------ - ---------- -- --- ---- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: 1. 98 0.02 2 1 05 0;.12
1 0 14"o 00 17SO 3
Firal-Sat.: kl�7-5�456 41 1450 3i�O 3500 l , ',;So
.. .......... ...
-- t 0 ----------
----- ------ I - ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module�
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.17 0.25 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.09 0.09
Cyit Moves: --*- .**. ****
Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.52 0.52 0.02 0.38 0.38 0.23 0,35 0.35 0.02 0.14 0.14
Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.45 0.67 0.67 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.67 0.67
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 34.9 12.8 28.0 48.6 18.0 21.6 28.6 16.5 17.4 37.S 42.8 38.9
Delay Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Vehi 34.9 12.8 28.D 48.6 18.0 21.6 28.6 16.5 17.4 37.5 42.8 38.9
Queue: 5 18 0 1 12 11 14 0 2 0 2 3
Traffix 6.6.1511 (c)
0-10.3
0 � 2- S'+
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
+ D%M% �- 0001
L OS C.
==1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
(0 3 -Lo
o -'�Z3
L-03
o, + 4 fo. rZti
Traffix 6.8-1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc
qt�
WENLAP
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L
01/15/1997 23,40 Filename� SCNIPMW.RPT
Page 5
01/15/1997 23t4O Filename: SCNIPMW.RPT
Page
SCNIPMW.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:40;16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 5.1
SCNlPMW.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:40:16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P age
6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC
and PARKING ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour
Analysis (Scenario 1-Metmlink Alternative)
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 1 -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level
Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method �Base Volume Alternative)
ICU IfLoss as Cycle
Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
....................
........ ** .... ....
.......
Intersection #8 San Fernando
Road/Market Street
Intersection 49 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
cycle (sech 100
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
0.807
Cycle (sec): 100
critical Vol./Cap. W;
1.119
Loss Time (sec): 5
Average Delay (sec/vehh
28.9
Loss Time (sech 5
Average
Delay (sec/veh):
72.3
optimal Cycle! S3
Level Of Service�
D
optimal cycle: 180
Level Of Service;
F
Approach: North Bound
South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Approach: North Bound
South Bound
East Bound West Bound
Movement� L - T - R
L - T - R L - T - R
L
- T - R
Movement: L - T - R
L - T - A
L - T - R L
- T
- R
------------ ---------------
Control: Permitted
--------------- --------------- 11
Permitted Permitted
---------------
Permitted
------------ I ---------------
Control: Protected
--------------- 11
Permitted
--------------- ---------------
Permitted
Permitted
Rights: Include
Include Include
Include
Rights: Include
Include
Include
Include
Min. Green: D 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0
Min. Green: D 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
a
Lanes: a 1 0 1 0
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1
0 0 1 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
0 0 1 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
1 0
0 0
------------ ---------------
Volume Module:
--------------- --------------- 11
---------------
------------ I ---------------
Volume Module�
--------------- 11
--------------- ---------------
Base Vol� a 1008 10
26 988 20 51 68 24
54
57 73
Base Vol; 467 1225 4
0 785 5
5 6 842 4
3
0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Growth Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
Initial Bse: a 1008 10
26 988 20 51 68 24
54
S7 73
Initial Bse: 467 1225 4
0 785 S
5 6 842 4
3
0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 2.00 1.00
2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
PUF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PHF Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
PHF Volume: a 1008 10
26 988 20 51 68 24
54
57 73
PHF Volume: 467 1225 4
0 785 5
5 6 842 4
3
0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 a 0
0
0
Reduced Vol; 8 1008 10
26 988 20 51 68 24
54
57 73
Reduced Volz 467 1225 4
0 785 5
5 6 842 4
3
0
PCE Adj: 1.00 .1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1,00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
MLF Adj: 1.0 1 . 00 1.00
Final Vol.; (.ploos 10
1.00 "2 1.00 1.61.00 1.00
I
�81 20 68 24
1.00
54
1 1.00
73
MLP Adj: 1 1D.0 1.00 1.00
-">225 4
Final Vol. C46
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 (ZM 5
1.00 1.00 1.PA
5 1 U4
1.00
3
1.00
0
------------ I ---------------
---------- ---- --------- ----
----
----------
_7
-----------
---------------
Saturation Flo. Module:
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1600
1600 1600
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600
1600
1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
I.DD 1.00
Adjustm�ent: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
Lanes: 0.02 1.96 O.D2
Final Sat.: (75�)3144 31
0.05 X -U 0.04 ;,OQ_0.74 0.26
80 30S8 62 (16ODY183 417
1.0 0
1600
0 0.56
702 898
Lanes; IALI.99 0.01
Final Sat.. 600 1190 10
UP
0.00 IA9 0.01
0015) 20
0.45 0.55 1-M 0.43
727 873 686
0.00
0
------------ 1-� ------------
-----------
- -------
------------ I -------- --
--1- -------- 11
-------------------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat3 O�32 0.32 0.32
0.32 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.06- 0.06
0.03
0.08 0.08
Vol/Sat: -4k-2-9- 0.38 0.38
0.00 0.2S 0.2S
0.01 0.01 0.53 0.00
0.00
0.00
Crit Moves: --*-
... *
Crit Moves: ....
....
**'� *�*.
Green/Cycle; 0.40 0.40 0.40
0.41 0.41 0.41 0.04 0.09 0.09
0,05
0.10 0.10
Green/Cycle: 0.26 0.48 0.48
0.00 0.22 0.22
0.29 0.47 0.47 0.00
0.28
0.00
Volume/Cap� 0.80 0,80 0.80
0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.64 0.64
.0.64
0.80 0.80
Volume/Capt 1.13 0.80 0.80
0.00 1.13 1.13
0.02 0.01 1.13 1.13
0.02
0.00
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
--------------- ---------------
---------------
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
---------------
--------------- ---------------
Delay/Veh: 123.8 22.8 110.9
70.0 22.7 79.2 68.2 42.2 53.7
46.0
63.0 58.2
Delay/Veht 110.8 19.3 175.4
0.0 104 S01.6
19.6 11.0 94.5 S60.9
25.9
0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 l.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00
1.00
1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 123.8 22.8 110.9
70.0 22.7 79.2 68.2 42.2. 53.7
46.0
63.0 58.2
AdjDel/Veh: 110.8 19.3 175.4
0.0 104 501.6
29.6 11.0 94.5 560.9
2S.8
0.0
Queue: 1 26 1
1 25 1 2 2 1
2
2 3
Queue: 26 30 0
0 41 1
0 0 46 1
0
0
.*.**** ...... **.* ...
........... ...
.**** ... **** ... ....
* ..... ... * .......
** ....
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
(0 3 -Lo
o -'�Z3
L-03
o, + 4 fo. rZti
Traffix 6.8-1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc
qt�
WENLAP
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L
= M = M M M M M = = M M M M = I M = M =
01115/1997 23t4O Filenamet SCN1PMW.RPT Page 7
SCNIPMN.IN Wed Jan IS, 1997 23:40:16 page 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 BC14 Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Pine Avenue/Market Street
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.9 Worst Case Level Of Service; A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R I - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: Include Include include Include
Lanes: 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: so 0 6 0 0 0 0 99 76 3 86 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: so 0 6 0 0 0 0 99 76 3 86 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: so 0 6 0 0 0 0 99 76 3 86 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.; so 0 6 0 0 0 0 99 76 3 86 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
% Cycle/Cars: xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX
% Truck/Comb: xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCE: xxxx xxxx XXxX xxxx: XXXX XXXX � xxxx
Trck/Cmb PCEi xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxxx XXXX
Adj Vol.: SS 0 7 0 0 0 0 99 76 3 86 0
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module;
MoveUp Timet 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gp: 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx: xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx:
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 226 xxxx 137 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1?5 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 783 xxxx 1180 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1415 xxxx xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.: 781 xxxx 1180 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1415 xxxx xxxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del; 4.9 xxxx 3.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.5 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: - A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. : xxxx 811 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xxxxx 4.8 XXXxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shared LOS: A
ApproachDal: 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
U v:5�6i0JL12F-D L ci& A
01/15/1997 23:40 Filename: SCNIPMW.RPT Page 8
SCNIPMW.IN Wed Jan IS, 1997 23:40:16 Page 8-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Existing PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #IS San Fernando Road/Railroad Avenue/4th Street
... **.***** ..........
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1S.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: P
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Controlt Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes� 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol- 8 1722 25 8 1460 6 0 0 0 17 0 0
Growth Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.D0 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 8 1722 25 8 1460 6 0 0 0 17 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 8 1722 25 8 1460 6 0 0 0 17 0 0
Reduct Volr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 9 1722 25 9 1460 6 0 0 0 17 a 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade; 0* 0% 0% ot
% Cycle/Cars; xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx Xxxx
% Truck/Combt xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxxx�
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 i.to 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX
Trck/Cmb PCE; XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXN: XXXX XXXX XXXX Xxxx
Adj Vol.; 9 1722 25 9 1460 6 0 0 0 19 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Timez 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxx xxxxx
Critical Gpi S.S. xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.0 xxxz: xxxxx
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
CnfliCt Vol: 1466 XXxx xxxxx 1747 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 3198 xxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap.: 280 xxxx xxxxx 198 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 20 xxxx Xxxxx
Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.93 xxxx xxxxx
Move Cap.i 280 xxxx xxxxx 198 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx� xxxxx: 9 xxxx xxxxx;
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 13.2 xxxx xxxxx 19.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2687 xxxx xxxxx
LOS by Move: C C F
Movement: IT - LTR - RT IT LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. : xxxx� xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx
Shrd StpDel:xzzont xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx: xxxxx
Shared LOS:
ApproachDel: 0.1 0.1 0.0 2687.0
Traffix 6.8.1SII (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
NA L 1-16 L ct� Ir
= M M M M = M M M M
01/1511997 23:50 Filename, SCN2AMKO.RPT Page 1
SCN2AMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23;50:42 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/11th Street
.***** ............... ........... .......
cycle (sec)i 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X)i 0.854
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 24.8
Optimal Cycle: 73 Level Of Service: D
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - 7 - R L - T - R I - I - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Q�_11SWI
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 --
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 a 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 11 360 0 319 1274 52 0 0 0 0 0 581
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Baez 11 360 0 319 1274 52 0 0 0 0 0 581
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 11 360 0 319 1274 52 0 0 0 0 0 581
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
Reduced Vol: 11 360 0 119 1274 52 0 0 0 0 0 Sol
PCS Adj; I.Q0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adji 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 1.00 1.00 1.00 i..0
Final Vol.: (.Ll�) 3 6 0 a 319 ti�> 52 0 0 0 0 C58�5
------------ --------------- --------------- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustments 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: Jta 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.92 0 08 0,00 "0 0.0 0.00 0.00 J-40
Final Sat.: 06003200 0 1600 � i25 0 C1600D 00 0 0
------------ T� ----------- --------------- ------ ------- ------------ -
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.20 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves; .... ><
rreen/Cycle: 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.32 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43
volume/Cap: 0.84 0.62 0.00 0.62 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veht 14S.7 30.7 0.0 24.0 20.3 58.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2
Delay Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 145.7 30.7 0.0 24.0 20.3 58�5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2
Queue: 1 10 0 8 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 is
Traffix 6.8.1511 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz. Okitsu, Monterey
"o '-;
C�-+i + LoS A
+
01/15/1997 23:50 Filename: SCN2AMWO.RPT Page 2
SCN2AMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:50:43 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2-WithoUt Metrolink Alt.)
----- -- ------- ----------- ------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
*.*.* ... ...........
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.3 Worst Case Level Of Services
* ... .... .... ... *** ...... * .9
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movements L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R Is - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Controls uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights. Include Include Include Include
Lanes; 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 20 Sll 0 0 319 0 70 0 17 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
initial Bass 20 511 0 0 319 0 70 0 17 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 20 511 0 0 319 0 70 0 17 0 0 0
Reduct Voli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.i 20 511 0 - 0 319 0 70 0 17 0 0 0 3
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Modules
Grades 0% ov 0% 0%
1, Cycle/Cars: x3ccx )000C seems 3000C XXXsC 000,
1; Truck/Comb! 5000, x3acc Xs0Q[ X]OCK 2000, X)CDC 3CM3C
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: � :coos 2000t ]CCCK � )ODUC
Trck/C.b PCE: sc= cous XXXX X=x X300C 30CUK � sects
Adj Vol.: 22 511 0 0 319 0 77 0 19 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.1 xsocsc xsocso, � c= sc000,: 3.4 ;ccos 2.6 � :csoos c000s
Critical Gp: 5.0 scoons � :coccc 6.5 xscc� 5�5 :co*os
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 --------- -----
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 319 ocso: sc�s sc� 850 xsces� 319 xxxx
Potent Cap.t 1208 xsoos xscosx =x xtocs: xsc�x 341 ;coos 954 � xsccx
Adj Cap: 1.00 � sasna= � scc� x,c= 0.98 scoo: I.Do sc= :cacx xscsocc
Move Cap,: 1208 x,ccc xxxxx xsoos sc� � 335 %000s 954 xsocx: � xxx,sK
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service module,
Stopped Del: 3.0 soccet 13.6 sc= 3.8 scc�
LOS by Move. A . . *
Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: sc�s � sccc� xxxx zxsocc � 383 xxxsc sc�
Shrd StpDel:sc000s c=x scc� Kscoo, sc� 12.1
Shared LOS: C
ApproachDel: 0.1 0.0 11.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
V0�160ALIZEJ) c-
M
I,
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PRGJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.484
Loss Time (sec): Average Delay tsec/veh): 12.1
Optimal Cycle: 3 Level Of Service� A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bo=d West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- ------------- �-11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Voli 0 478 0 10 293 13 35 62 35 0 153 19
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 478 0 10 293 13 35 62 35 0 153 19
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 0 478 0 10 293 13 35 62 35 0 153 19
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 478 0 10 293 13 3S 62 35 0 153 19
PCE Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 16 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 &�93 13 62 35 0 19
----------- I ---------- ---- --------- ---- --------- ---- ---------------
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00-1-U 0.00 l'.Qo 0 96 0.04 (16!0 0.64 0.36 1;0 - 0.11
TCOT�,l 32 68 0��2 23
Final Sat.: 1;0<160DO 0 C1 023 577 1 00 4 177
------------ - ------------ ------ --------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.21
Crit Movest .... .... ... *
Green/Cyclei 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.01 0.67 0.67 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.24 0.24
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.29 0.29 0.46 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.46 0 46
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 0.0 6.8 0.0 46.8 5.3 6.2 38.7 21.1 21.2 0.0 26.0 30.4
Delay.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 6.8 0.0 46.8 5.3 6.2 38.7 21.1 21.2 0.0 26.0 30.4
Queue: 0 7 0 a 3 0 1 1 1 0 4 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0,7.99
ex N CO)
0. 577
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
... ****** ..... **** ...........
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec)l 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X)t - 0.601
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.1
Optimal Cycle3 40 Level Of Service:
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: include Include include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 257 78 6 0 807 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bsez 2S7 78 6 0 807 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PUP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume; 257 78 6 0 807 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
Reduct Vol� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2S7 78 6 0 $07 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
PCE Adj- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ML,F Adj: 2.ig�1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.01L DO 1.00 1.00 16 1.00
Final Vol.: C2 -57J 78 6 0 ;07 (!4167 81 74 7 3
------------ � ----------- ---- ---- ---- --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Mbdule�
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.D9 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: _1-42 1.86 0.14 1.00 2 00 00
Ctf, 2 1 'a I (jjt�) 0.23
Final Sat:: 3250 250111750 3 0 " li� I so 404
171Q 11.Q i�. 1 0
--------- - ------------- ---- ---------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.27 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: .... ..*. ..*.
Green/Cycle: 0.26 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.01
Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.48 0.56 O.S6 0.32 0.29 0.32 D.S6 0.56
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 25.6 2.6 2.6 0.0 13.7 14.9 31.8 29.8 29.6 40.5 58.6 86.9
Delay AdJs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 25.6 2,6 2.6 0.0 13.7 14.9 31.8 29.8 29.6 40�5 58.6 86.9
Queue: 6 1 0 0 is 9 7 2 2 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8,1511 (c) 1995
o. 14-1
o.267
0. f.� la'Q
44 -
Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
-t- 0drJu=-0-644-
01/15/1997 23:SO
Filename; SCN2AMWO.RPT
Page
3 01/1511997 23:50
Filename: SCN2AMWO.RPT
Page 4
SCN2AMRO.IN
Wed J= 15, 1997 23;50;43
Page 3-1
SCN2AMWO.IN
Wed Jan 25, 1997 23z5O:43
Page 4-1
M
I,
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PRGJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.484
Loss Time (sec): Average Delay tsec/veh): 12.1
Optimal Cycle: 3 Level Of Service� A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bo=d West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- ------------- �-11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Voli 0 478 0 10 293 13 35 62 35 0 153 19
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 478 0 10 293 13 35 62 35 0 153 19
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 0 478 0 10 293 13 35 62 35 0 153 19
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 478 0 10 293 13 3S 62 35 0 153 19
PCE Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 16 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00
Final Vol.: 0 0 &�93 13 62 35 0 19
----------- I ---------- ---- --------- ---- --------- ---- ---------------
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00-1-U 0.00 l'.Qo 0 96 0.04 (16!0 0.64 0.36 1;0 - 0.11
TCOT�,l 32 68 0��2 23
Final Sat.: 1;0<160DO 0 C1 023 577 1 00 4 177
------------ - ------------ ------ --------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.21
Crit Movest .... .... ... *
Green/Cyclei 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.01 0.67 0.67 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.24 0.24
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.29 0.29 0.46 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.46 0 46
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 0.0 6.8 0.0 46.8 5.3 6.2 38.7 21.1 21.2 0.0 26.0 30.4
Delay.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 6.8 0.0 46.8 5.3 6.2 38.7 21.1 21.2 0.0 26.0 30.4
Queue: 0 7 0 a 3 0 1 1 1 0 4 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0,7.99
ex N CO)
0. 577
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
... ****** ..... **** ...........
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec)l 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X)t - 0.601
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.1
Optimal Cycle3 40 Level Of Service:
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: include Include include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 257 78 6 0 807 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bsez 2S7 78 6 0 807 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PUP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume; 257 78 6 0 807 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
Reduct Vol� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2S7 78 6 0 $07 467 279 81 74 7 10 3
PCE Adj- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ML,F Adj: 2.ig�1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.01L DO 1.00 1.00 16 1.00
Final Vol.: C2 -57J 78 6 0 ;07 (!4167 81 74 7 3
------------ � ----------- ---- ---- ---- --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Mbdule�
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.D9 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: _1-42 1.86 0.14 1.00 2 00 00
Ctf, 2 1 'a I (jjt�) 0.23
Final Sat:: 3250 250111750 3 0 " li� I so 404
171Q 11.Q i�. 1 0
--------- - ------------- ---- ---------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.23 0.27 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: .... ..*. ..*.
Green/Cycle: 0.26 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.01
Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.48 0.56 O.S6 0.32 0.29 0.32 D.S6 0.56
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 25.6 2.6 2.6 0.0 13.7 14.9 31.8 29.8 29.6 40.5 58.6 86.9
Delay AdJs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 25.6 2,6 2.6 0.0 13.7 14.9 31.8 29.8 29.6 40�5 58.6 86.9
Queue: 6 1 0 0 is 9 7 2 2 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8,1511 (c) 1995
o. 14-1
o.267
0. f.� la'Q
44 -
Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
-t- 0drJu=-0-644-
1 -Ir
RE
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
----------------- -------------------- -----------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
*..* .... **.** ...... ............. **.*** ........
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle �sec)i 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.460
Loss Time (sec)t 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.0
Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: A
Apprc,ach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include include Include
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 a 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 a
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 17 293 a is 629 14 18 46 21 28 90 60
Growth Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 17 293 a 15 629 14 is 46 11 28 90 so
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume; 17 293 a 15 629 14 18 46 11 28 so 60
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 17 293 8 15 629 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1 '0A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Da 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00
Final Vol. (23) 293 8 G�p 14 4 6 11 28 �k) 60
------------ --------------- ---------- ---- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Modulet
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.11 1.84 0.05 0.05 0.04 1,AO_ 0 . 8 1 0.19 1.00 0,U 0.40
Final Sat.; C-172�t2948 81 73 68 1291 ... 309 1600_ (2j0,,) 640
------------ I ---� ------------ 6 �O ----- --- ---- ----------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves: .... * ...
Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.22 0.22
Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.43 D.43
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module t
Delay/Veh: 29.8 25.6 33.9 18.3 13.4 18.6 41.1 28.0 28.3 33.3 26.9 27.4
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh; 29.8 25.6 33.9 18.3 13.4 18.6 41.1 28.0 28.3 33.3 26.9 27.4
Queue: 0 7 0 0 12 0 1 1 0 1 2 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
010155
0. ZOG LoS A
Co 7.67S Da
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA,
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec)t 100 critical Vol./cap. (X): 0.952
LOSS Time (sec); 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.1
Optimal Cycle: 134 Level Of Service; E
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Controlg Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 it 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 440 356 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
Growth Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 440 3S6 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PST Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.ao 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumei 440 356 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 440 356 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.0 1.00 1.00 1 1.20� 1-00 1.00
1. 0 0
0 VZ12.,J 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: !Z�1�46 356 0 �d -�) a 3
------------ I ---------- ---- ---------- --------- ----- 11 ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .2.00
Lanes: I QQ 2.00 0.00 0. ogdft� 0.00 0.00 1 00 .0 O�00 0.75
Final Sat.: -(1902'>3200 0 - 0 0 - 1;00 0 1200
----------- r-� ----------- ---------- ---- ---- ---------- ----------
Capacity AnalvsifOodule:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.00 0.00 D.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:.�-M .... **,* ....
Gzeen/Cycle; 0.29 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.40
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 48.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 39,6 621.3 0.0 13.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh! 48.0. 9.7 0.0 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 621.3 0.0 13.8
Queue; 26 5 0 0 24 0 0 0 20 0 0 D
wEk-API
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
03 D9
0. Z , SS
01/15/1997 23:SO
Filename, SCN2AMWO,RPT
Page
5 01115/1997 23iSO
Filename, SCN2AMWO.RPT
Page 6
SCN2AMWO.IN
Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:50;43
Page 5-1
SCN2AMWO.IN
Wed Jan. 15, 1997 23:50:43
Page 6-1
1 -Ir
RE
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
----------------- -------------------- -----------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
*..* .... **.** ...... ............. **.*** ........
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle �sec)i 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.460
Loss Time (sec)t 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.0
Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: A
Apprc,ach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include include Include
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 a 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 a
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 17 293 a is 629 14 18 46 21 28 90 60
Growth Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 17 293 a 15 629 14 is 46 11 28 90 so
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume; 17 293 a 15 629 14 18 46 11 28 so 60
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 17 293 8 15 629 14 is 46 11 28 90 60
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1 '0A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 Da 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00
Final Vol. (23) 293 8 G�p 14 4 6 11 28 �k) 60
------------ --------------- ---------- ---- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Modulet
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.11 1.84 0.05 0.05 0.04 1,AO_ 0 . 8 1 0.19 1.00 0,U 0.40
Final Sat.; C-172�t2948 81 73 68 1291 ... 309 1600_ (2j0,,) 640
------------ I ---� ------------ 6 �O ----- --- ---- ----------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves: .... * ...
Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.22 0.22
Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.43 D.43
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module t
Delay/Veh: 29.8 25.6 33.9 18.3 13.4 18.6 41.1 28.0 28.3 33.3 26.9 27.4
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh; 29.8 25.6 33.9 18.3 13.4 18.6 41.1 28.0 28.3 33.3 26.9 27.4
Queue: 0 7 0 0 12 0 1 1 0 1 2 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
010155
0. ZOG LoS A
Co 7.67S Da
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA,
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec)t 100 critical Vol./cap. (X): 0.952
LOSS Time (sec); 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.1
Optimal Cycle: 134 Level Of Service; E
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Controlg Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 it 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 440 356 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
Growth Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 440 3S6 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PST Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.ao 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumei 440 356 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 440 356 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.0 1.00 1.00 1 1.20� 1-00 1.00
1. 0 0
0 VZ12.,J 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: !Z�1�46 356 0 �d -�) a 3
------------ I ---------- ---- ---------- --------- ----- 11 ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .2.00
Lanes: I QQ 2.00 0.00 0. ogdft� 0.00 0.00 1 00 .0 O�00 0.75
Final Sat.: -(1902'>3200 0 - 0 0 - 1;00 0 1200
----------- r-� ----------- ---------- ---- ---- ---------- ----------
Capacity AnalvsifOodule:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.00 0.00 D.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:.�-M .... **,* ....
Gzeen/Cycle; 0.29 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.40
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 48.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 39,6 621.3 0.0 13.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh! 48.0. 9.7 0.0 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 621.3 0.0 13.8
Queue; 26 5 0 0 24 0 0 0 20 0 0 D
wEk-API
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
03 D9
0. Z , SS
= = = = = = M = M = M M =
R
C14
0D
CP
rn
GO
W
01
LO
01/1711597 11,04 S=AMWO.Rpr - - Pace 7
SMAMAD.00 Fri Jan 17. 1997 1806:15, page 7-1
............ - - --- --- ---- -------- .... ...
pROPOGRD RXILROAM AVENUE IMPWVP=rr PROJECf. NEIBRALL C&
7PMFIC " PARXINKI ANALYSIS
AN Peak Hour Analysis IS"n&ri* 2'Wlth�t PAt=lifik Alt-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level of Service computation Report
1994 " UnSignAlIZIEd Method JB&os Volume Altexnatival
................................................................................
intersection #12 Pins AWM*/Market Street
......................................................... ......................
A,"rage Delay (aae/vshl� 1.4 worst came Level Of Servical A
... ......................... ................................... I ..............
App::ach: North Bound South Bound seat Sawnd Most Bound
Havemeatt L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L. - T - R
..... . - -- ---- ---- ---- ............ ------------
Contr ; I : I— Stop sign stop Sign t4wontrolled Uncontrolled
light*3 Include Include Include Include
Lorca. 43 0 1.1 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L 0 a 0 1] a 0
-- --------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Tolum Module,
said Vol.: 66 0 3 a 0 0 0 35 35 1 102 2
C4vvth A4ji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Initial ess; 4S6 a 3 a 0 0 0 35 35 1 102 2
O"T Ads; L.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00 2-00 2-00 1-00 1-00
MP AAJ-. L.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1 AO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1-00 1.00
PHY Volume; 66 0 3 0 0 0 a 3S 35 1 102 2
loduct Val. 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 a 0 0 a
Final Val. z 461 a 3 0 0 0 0 35 35 1
---------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------
justed Volume Mocl�lc�
Grade, ot DIP 01 Ot
W Cycle/Cars: xnott XXXX %3Q(x XXXZ xxxx 2:Xxx � )POEX
V TruekfCcb- xxrx sZXX ZX3[z XXIKX locet locc, cocc iouce
Fm Adj, L-10 1.10 1.10 2.10 1-20 1-10 1-20 1-00 1-00 1.10 2.90 1.00
Cycl/Car ICU; ooCr 3OCXX � X=CK
Trck/Omb PCS� xoxx xxxx o0tX =XX XN= XAcX 'QUEL
Ads Vol., 71 a 3 a 0 0 0 IS is 1 102 2
--------------- --------------- ...............
mvoqp TIM: 3.4 acocz 2.6 knocks 2.1 � xmonex
critical Gpl 6.5 Jacca 9.5 10OUCK locate x:xXxx ]POCK %XXXX S.0 ex,ca moxxxog
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
CaWity blbduk4o
Cmilict yol� 257 xXXX 53 x2occ jacot lockax xxxx 79 3vooC
p9tMat Cap.: J.Sg kkar 1301 sont soork kassor sank ascots 1598 %ocut xxxont
Ads cap. LAG 10013; 1.00 nonce: occe 'U'loac JCXXX ]GOOK XXXXIC 1.00 � xxxxx
lOnre Cap.z. 259 xxxx 1302 xx�x xxxx XXXXX X3CWX XXX XXXXX isle Juncs, rmocas.
............ I ------------- 1-11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service "Aulat
Stopped Del. 4.5 xxaX I A=xx 2OUCE xx3ocz xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.3 3000C x3caug
Lim by Movv; - A
��ct, LT - LIM - RT LT - IT& - Wr IT - LTR - RT UT - LTR - XT
shared Cap.: nonce 972 :xxXKX 10tsX XXXX 220OKZ XKaN XXXX sa 30130C )UGO, x2aclat
Shrd Stplool:XXXXX A -S XooOUC 'c'sa sacs asn"a 'coOr ssOraa
shared LOS- A
ApproachOoll 4.5 9.9 Ole 6.0
rraffi. fi.S.IS3.1 Cc) 229S Dov21ng "soc. Licensed to Kara. Okitau, Kont�*y
UN�l GrJALI-ItD L tS A
.mc�
M M M M M M
01/17131�7 19; 04 pil.oame, �AMWD-lWf ftqq� a
SX312AMMO. CND Fri Jan 17. 1957 18.111;35, page 8-1
PROPOSED RArLUOhO AVR= IMPRCVBHEIN PROJECT, KIPOWL Ch
TTA171C and PARXIYG ANALYSIS
AN Peak Hour Analysis (Sconarto 2 -Without Mctralink Klt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle rArqtb %) Method loose Vblw� Alt�ativc)
........................... * ..... .............. ...............................
Intersection MIS Sort Fernando Road/Railrcad Ue=efith Street
................................... * ............. * ..............................
cycle (A-cpt 100 critical VQIJC&P. W4 0�561
loss Tim (St,CI: S A�arase Delay [AeOvehl: 5�9
cptical Cycle� 27 Level Of Ser�vice; A
................................................................................
Approacht Vorth Bourd South Bound Cast B..d ioest Bound
Movement 1 L - T , R L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- if --------------- ---------------
Control, protected protected P&MUted pervacted
lights. Ovi Inalde Include include
Min. Green, a a 0 D 0 0 a 0 a a a
Lance L a 0 2 0 1 0 & 2 0 0 0 a a 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- ------------ �--11 -------- ------
Volume Mdulm'
Base Vol, 0 062 478 0 1328 4) 0 a 9 304 a 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 J.QD 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.09 1.06 1.00
initial Bse� a 042 479 0 1329 a a a 0 304 0 0
User ads. 1.00 I.Do 1.90 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P" Ads 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 I -ca 2.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P" Voluma� a 862 678 0 1329 a a a 9 306 a 0
Reduct Vol � 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 a
fladoced Val. a 863 $70 0 1322 a 0 0 0 306 a 0
PCs Ads 4 2.00 1.00 1.00 IAD IAG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
14MF Ads 2 I.Sg-1.00 1.00 X.to I -CA 1.00 I.oc 1.00 1.00 1_4a 1.00 1.00
rinal Vol.: Ca,7062 479 X29 a 1) a 0 306 0 0
............ --------------- --------------- A� -- - ------
sat.ratloa Plow Module:
sat/ionel 1600 16OG ISDO 1600 1600 2600 1600 1400 1600 1609 1600 1600
Adjustntnt; 1.091 1.09 1.00 2.40 1.00 1.00 2.09 1.00 k.00 IAO 1.00 1.00
Lomas. O.,Pk2. 00 I.QQ 0.00,Zep., 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01 0.00
a
Final Sat.: (_!.X200 1600 3200
----- ----- ---------------
capacity Analysis "'dais.
Vollsat, O.Da 0.21 0.30 4.40 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.2a 0.0* 2.00
Crit muvvs� .... ...
Oracn/Cyc2e: 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00
Vcaure/Cal,2 4.00 0.3S 0.39 0.40 O.S4 0,00 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.54 O -GO 0-00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of 86XViCO 1*141016-
PolarNeh, 0.0 2.4 3.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0
Valay Ads, I.00 1,00 1.00 I.Do 1.00 1.00 2.09 2.00 1.00 1.00 I.CQ 1,00
AdjPel/Vohj 0.0 2.1 3.0 0.0 3,6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0
outual 0 a a 0 Ls a 0 a 0 8 a a
.......................................... I ................... .................
Traffix 6.1.1511 IQ$ IROS Dowling Assoc. LiCeAmOd to Lots, Ckit@V. Monterey
o 0 '�) T L
0. Ot S(o I
01/15/1997 23:56 Filename; SCV2PMWO.RPT Page I
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:56:38 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVO4ENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lith Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.861
Loss Time (sec)i 7 Average Delay (seo/veh)s 25.3
Optimal Cycle: 76 Level Of'Servicez D
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control; Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include ZaaluAt --L6.
Min. Green! 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 9 896 0 212 849 11 0 0 0 a 0 606
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 896 0 212 848 12 0 0 0 0 0 606
User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 0 0 606
Reduct Vol: 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 a a 0 0 606
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 Ig 1.00 1,.Q 0, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 896 0 (L1 2 a 0 606
------------- ;i_848 .... 11 O--(�!) 0
----------- 111, 1 1 ----- --- ---- --------- ----------- ---
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/La.e: 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 O�� 0.00 I -U 1 97 0.03 0.00_LU 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.DO
Final Sat.: 2;0 0 [160phS9 42 os�� 0 1600 0 1600
------------ 1. - -I 11�1- -- --[I ---- ----- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Modulei
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38
Crit Moves; .... * ...
Green/Cyclet 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.16 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45
Volume/Cap: 0.57 0.85 0.00 0.85 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 85
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module!
Delay/Veh: 62.1 28.9 0.0 47.7 14.9 35.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.9
Delay Adj: 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjUeI/Veb: 62.1 28.9 0.0 47.7 14.9 35.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.9
Queue 0 25 0 7 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
..............
x
Traffix 6., ) 2995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, OkitBu, Monterey
Wc
bol
01/15/1997 23:56 Filename: SCN2PMWO.RPT Pao. 2
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 2997 23:56z38 page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (Sec/veh)t 0,4 Worst Case Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol- 52 598 0 0 212 0 8 0 40 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 52 598 0 0 212 0 8 0 40 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumet 52 598 0 0 212 0 a 0 40 0 a 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: S2 S98 0 0 212 a a 0 40 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: ot ot 0% 0%
1, Cycle/Cars; X�
1, Truck/Comb: XXXX
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1110 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE:
Trck/Cmb PCE: =XX
Adj Vol.: 57 598 0 0 212 0 9 0 44 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
Movet7p Time; 2. 1 � � � � � 3.4 � 2.6 � � �
Critical Gp: 5.0 � � � � � 6.5 � 5.5 � � �
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnf2ict Vol: 212 � � � 862 occx 212
Potent Cap.: 1359 � � � xxxx � 335 � 1081 occx
Adj Cap: 1,00 � � � �Occz � 0.96 � 1.00 �
Move Cap.: 1359 � � � � � 321 � 1081 �
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modules
Stopped Del: 2. 8 ooccz 11. 5 3.5 xx=
LOS by Move; A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.t m=�� ��xxx= x= 776
Shrd Stpl)el:� xx= 4.9 zooccx xxz=
Shared LOSs A
ApproachDeli 0.2 0.0 4.8 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23tS6;38 Page 3-1
------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length U Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
.... ** ... ............
Cycle (sec)s 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.560
Loss Time (sec): N-7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.2
optimal Cyclet 27 Level Of Service: A
Approacht North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; I - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 a 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
Volume Module:
Base Vol. 13 594 5 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Sees 13 594 5 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
User Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumet 13 594 S 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
Reduct. Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 13 594 5 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
PCE Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 1.00 I.Q1 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.UD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.
Final Vol.; C59*4 Al
5 (5D 90 71 (30 97 4 2 110 6
------------- - ------ --------------- ------------ ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16DO 1600 1600 1600 1600 16DO 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00
Lanes: I;.01
I �&I'. 1. 1.1 _1� 1;56 0444 I..Q-O 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.81 9-31
Final Sat.: 1 160D__94 .... 06 (160t� 1537 63 1600 1294 C30;)
------------ I ----- ------- rt� -- ----------- --------- -
Capacity Analysis Moduleg
Vol/Sat; 0.01 0.37 0.37 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.08 0.09
Crit moves: ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.70 0.70 0.06 0.70 0.70 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.16 0.16
Volume/Cap; 0.14 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.14 0.14 0.54 0.33 O.S3 0.33 O.S4 0 54
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Modulet
Delay/Veh: 34.6 6.1 35.7 39.6 3.9 3.9 43.7 27.3 32.3 47.6 32.0 37.9
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 34.6 9.1 35.7 39.6 3.9 3.9 43.7 27.3 32.3 47.6 32.0 37.9
Queue: 0 8 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 3 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L
(=29
0
SCN2PMW0.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23;56:38 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternativel
........... ..........
Intersection 47 San Fernando Road/LyOns Avenue
cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.650
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.1
optimal cycle; 44 Level Of Service: B
Approachc North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 a
Lanes; 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 181 339 12 18 363 467 534 IS 100 5 24 23
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Ese: 181 339 12 18 363 467 534 18 100 5 24 23
User Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 181 339 12 IS 363 467 534 18 100 5 24 23
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 339 12 is 363 467 534 18 100 5 24 23
PCE Adj: 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1�4 1-0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0
1.00
Final -vol.! ( Isl 339 12 IS _�63 a4gj>!� �3 3.8 100 S_ Qq 23
----- ------ --------------- ---- -- ----- 11 --------------- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lanet 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0 07 1 00 2 00 2-W- 1. 00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.49
Final Sat.: (�380 i20 Ii5O 3;00 175 1 (550OA7SO__17SO 1750_(2D 856
------------ F� -------------- 11 ---------- 0 11 - - ----- ---- ---- ----------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.27 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.03
Crit Movest .... .... .... ....
Green/Cyclei 0.17 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.2S 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.04
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.24 D.61 0.61 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.61 0.61
------------ I ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 32.2 8.7 8.8 34.7 13.6 17.7 26.5 20.2 21.2 38.1 51.9 52.4
Delay Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Vehi 32.2 8.7 8.8 .34.7 13.6 17.7 26.5 20.2 21.2 38.1 51.9 52.4
Queue: S 5 0 0 6 20 13 0 2 0 2 1
Traffix 6.9.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LtS
ooS3
C" +
01/15/1997
23:56
Filename : SCN2PMWO.RPT
Page
3
01/15/1997
23:56
Filename: SCN2PMWO.RPT
Page
4
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23tS6;38 Page 3-1
------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length U Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
.... ** ... ............
Cycle (sec)s 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.560
Loss Time (sec): N-7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.2
optimal Cyclet 27 Level Of Service: A
Approacht North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; I - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 a 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
Volume Module:
Base Vol. 13 594 5 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Sees 13 594 5 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
User Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volumet 13 594 S 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
Reduct. Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 13 594 5 51 90 71 30 97 4 2 110 26
PCE Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 1.00 I.Q1 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,.UD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.
Final Vol.; C59*4 Al
5 (5D 90 71 (30 97 4 2 110 6
------------- - ------ --------------- ------------ ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16DO 1600 1600 1600 1600 16DO 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00
Lanes: I;.01
I �&I'. 1. 1.1 _1� 1;56 0444 I..Q-O 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.81 9-31
Final Sat.: 1 160D__94 .... 06 (160t� 1537 63 1600 1294 C30;)
------------ I ----- ------- rt� -- ----------- --------- -
Capacity Analysis Moduleg
Vol/Sat; 0.01 0.37 0.37 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.08 0.09
Crit moves: ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.70 0.70 0.06 0.70 0.70 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.16 0.16
Volume/Cap; 0.14 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.14 0.14 0.54 0.33 O.S3 0.33 O.S4 0 54
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Modulet
Delay/Veh: 34.6 6.1 35.7 39.6 3.9 3.9 43.7 27.3 32.3 47.6 32.0 37.9
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 34.6 9.1 35.7 39.6 3.9 3.9 43.7 27.3 32.3 47.6 32.0 37.9
Queue: 0 8 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 3 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L
(=29
0
SCN2PMW0.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23;56:38 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternativel
........... ..........
Intersection 47 San Fernando Road/LyOns Avenue
cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.650
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.1
optimal cycle; 44 Level Of Service: B
Approachc North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 a
Lanes; 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 181 339 12 18 363 467 534 IS 100 5 24 23
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Ese: 181 339 12 18 363 467 534 18 100 5 24 23
User Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 181 339 12 IS 363 467 534 18 100 5 24 23
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 339 12 is 363 467 534 18 100 5 24 23
PCE Adj: 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1�4 1-0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0
1.00
Final -vol.! ( Isl 339 12 IS _�63 a4gj>!� �3 3.8 100 S_ Qq 23
----- ------ --------------- ---- -- ----- 11 --------------- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lanet 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: 1.00 1.93 0 07 1 00 2 00 2-W- 1. 00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.49
Final Sat.: (�380 i20 Ii5O 3;00 175 1 (550OA7SO__17SO 1750_(2D 856
------------ F� -------------- 11 ---------- 0 11 - - ----- ---- ---- ----------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.27 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.03
Crit Movest .... .... .... ....
Green/Cyclei 0.17 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.2S 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.04 0.04
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.24 D.61 0.61 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.61 0.61
------------ I ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 32.2 8.7 8.8 34.7 13.6 17.7 26.5 20.2 21.2 38.1 51.9 52.4
Delay Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Vehi 32.2 8.7 8.8 .34.7 13.6 17.7 26.5 20.2 21.2 38.1 51.9 52.4
Queue: S 5 0 0 6 20 13 0 2 0 2 1
Traffix 6.9.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LtS
ooS3
C" +
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0,1109
b.203, A
6 - �os a
0,
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:56:38 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without MetrOlink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (see): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. M: 1.070
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.6
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service; F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L .- T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 $48 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00
Initial See; 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 467 622 0 a 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 467 622 0 0 555 0 S 0 848 4 3 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Vol.: lg
��> �4b
Q67 3 0
622 0 0 a 5 0
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: LJO 2.00 0.00 0.00 a'D-0 0.0 a 0.00 1 O.AZ_0.43 0.00
160 3200 0 <32fl) 0 00 (!!.4.� 6 & 6 0
Final Sat.:_ ... 0 1 0 - -
----------- ---- ---- ---- ---------------
----------- fD- -11 1
capacity Anal! is dule.
0
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle; 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.07 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.07 1.07 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 86.4 15.5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 19.5 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 86.4 15,5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 13.5 0.0
Queue: 22 12 0 0 26 0 0 0 39 1 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc.
0
t o, ri
AP
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:56:38
Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
01/IS/1997
23:56
Filename:
SCN2PMWO.RPT
Page
5
01/15/1997
23,56
Filename: SCN2PMWO.RPT
Page
6
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0,1109
b.203, A
6 - �os a
0,
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:56:38 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without MetrOlink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (see): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. M: 1.070
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.6
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service; F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L .- T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 $48 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00
Initial See; 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 467 622 0 a 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 467 622 0 0 555 0 S 0 848 4 3 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Vol.: lg
��> �4b
Q67 3 0
622 0 0 a 5 0
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: LJO 2.00 0.00 0.00 a'D-0 0.0 a 0.00 1 O.AZ_0.43 0.00
160 3200 0 <32fl) 0 00 (!!.4.� 6 & 6 0
Final Sat.:_ ... 0 1 0 - -
----------- ---- ---- ---- ---------------
----------- fD- -11 1
capacity Anal! is dule.
0
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle; 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.07 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.07 1.07 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 86.4 15.5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 19.5 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 86.4 15,5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 13.5 0.0
Queue: 22 12 0 0 26 0 0 0 39 1 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc.
0
t o, ri
AP
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:56:38
Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis
(Scenario 2-WithoUt Metrolink AltJ
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level
Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Less as Cycle
Length %) Method (Base Volume
Alternative)
Intersection 48 San Fernando
Road/market Street
Cycle (see): 100
Critical Vol./Cap.
(X):
0.529
Loss Time (see): 5
Average Delay (sec/veh):
22.6
Optimal Cycle: 2S
Level Of Service:
A
Approach: North Bound
South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Movement; L - T - R
L - T - R L - T
- R
L
- T - R
------------ I ---------------
Control: Permitted
--------------- 11 --------------- 11
Permitted Permitted
---------------
Permitted
Rights: Include
Include Include
Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
D
0
0 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 0 1 0 1 0 a
1 0
1
0 0 1 0
------------ I ---------------
Volume Modulei
--------------- If ---------------
---------------
Base Vol: a 511 10
26 604 20 51 68
24
54
55 71
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Initial Bsei 8 511 10
26 604 20 51 68
24
54
55 71
User Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PRF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 8 512 10
26 604 20 51 68
24
54
55 71
Reduct Vol� 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0
0
a
0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 511 10
26 604 20 51 68
24
54
55 71
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I.SA,1.00 1.00
1.00 1. D.L 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
lit 1.00
Final Vol.; (.V Sll 10
26 Q 0 4�) 20 %Z0 69
24
S4
71
------------ ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
--------------- 11 ---------
----
----
----------
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
2600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1600
1600
1600 1600
Adjustment� 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Lanes� O.Sa.1.93 0.04
0.0 1-01< 1 7,4
Oill
1;10
0.56
Final Sat, s - Cj 8,�3091 60
l2kt6 98 Xi.
l_'
. 00
e6-90 902
------------ I ---------------
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat; 0.17 0.17 0.17
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.06
0.06
0.03
0.08 0.08
Crit Moves: ....
....
Green/Cycle: 0.33 0.33 0.33
0.40 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.14
0.14
0.08
0.16 0.16
Volume/Cap: 0.50 O.SO 0.50
0.50 O.SO O.SO 0.50 0.42
0.42
0.42
0.50 0.50
------------ I ------- -------
Level Of Service Module:
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Delay/Veh: 37.3 21.2 34.6
23.3 17.5 24.9 38.2 31.4
33.1
34.9
32.8 32.2
Delay Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.3 21.2 34.6
23.3 173 24.9 38.2 31.4
33.1
34.9
32.8 32.2
Queue: 0 12 0
1 13 1 1 2
1
1
2 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0,1109
b.203, A
6 - �os a
0,
SCN2PMWO.IN Wed Jan 15, 1997 23:56:38 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -Without MetrOlink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (see): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. M: 1.070
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.6
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service; F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L .- T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 $48 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00
Initial See; 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 467 622 0 a 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 467 622 0 0 555 0 S 0 848 4 3 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Vol.: lg
��> �4b
Q67 3 0
622 0 0 a 5 0
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: LJO 2.00 0.00 0.00 a'D-0 0.0 a 0.00 1 O.AZ_0.43 0.00
160 3200 0 <32fl) 0 00 (!!.4.� 6 & 6 0
Final Sat.:_ ... 0 1 0 - -
----------- ---- ---- ---- ---------------
----------- fD- -11 1
capacity Anal! is dule.
0
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle; 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.07 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.07 1.07 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 86.4 15.5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 19.5 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 86.4 15,5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 13.5 0.0
Queue: 22 12 0 0 26 0 0 0 39 1 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc.
0
t o, ri
AP
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
M M M M M
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
Ot/lIfI997 M47 FJl.na,,*F SCN3Pw*.RPT FEM
Sew"9110. 7N rri J" 11. 1997 17:47,56 Fog. 7-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVEN= IKMVDuwr VROJ=, wrivapia. CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANAIXSIS
w Peak 0=7 Analysis lacenarit, 2-Mithout Metmunk Alt.p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
te�.*I of ae�lce Comwtatim Report
1994 MCM Unalgoallaad Method gBaso VOLUM, Alternatiw)
......................
Int:mection #12 Flute AW1AJa1Maxktt Sttmet
.. ............ 0 ...................................................... I .........
kv:T996 Delay �Mec/vw t 1.0 1 Worst Case 1�1 Of Se"Leat A
................... , .......... 4*40*04 ............. I .................. * ..........
Apprimicl, t Sorth sound South bound met Sound West Sound
lb� ntt 11 - T - I L - T - R L. - I - R 1. - T - R
--------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
stop sign Stop sign Unectatrolled
Rights, include 'Include Include Include
Lares- D 0 11 0 0 0 4D 0 0 1 a 0 1 0 0 a
; ------ "-,,: - - ------------ ---------------
I --------------- ---------------
lume 91 71 6 at 0
base Volt so 0 a 0 0 4
Gro.th Ad], 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, &.00 1.00 1.04 1.00
initial Sea, so a 6 0 a 0 0 91 71 5 04 a
Deer Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00
PH? Adj, 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00
FHF volve,te so 0 6 0 a a 91 71 S at 0
R.dmt Val D 0 a a 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0
Final Vol.: so 0 6 0 9 a 91 71 5 86 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- it --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Valuate
Grade, H 01, at 0%
t Cycle/Ourm, 3COOK 1con, sVeXZ 30001; XKKIK
% TruCk1Cba&1 $000t Lotus XMOCK
PCZ Adj s 1.20 1.10 1.10 1-10 1-10 1-10 1110 2.00 1.00 1.10 1�00 1.00
Cycl/Car PCIFt JoICK 3ccax C)OCK codl 313cor
T�tk/Cmb Pcz, �txxxt Lotter 3coo, 1r,u`o` Locier toren Iorcn
AdJ fti: 1 55 9 7 0 0 0 0 91. 71 a 66 a
.- I --------------- --------------- --------------- it ---------------
Cup Module-
Cr4t
MovoUp Time, 3.4 TX)UK 2-6 233,C), 2.1 xxxor tooneem
Critical QP% 6.5 S.S nooct locat loorter, 5.9 :rmax t000n,
------------ I --------------- 11 ............... --------------- ---------------
CItpocity Module%
Chiller Vol: 213 tocto, 127 tacot ADoarx: 3000, poo, locco,: 162 upoix
P,teat cap. t 752 Locc, 115S wocto, e000t� t0000t toorm. touna, 1435 unvio, �Lxrcxx
Adj Cp: I.OD )GOor 2.00 tc,oct: ]KOOCK 3occe't MoOlux 10,13130C 1.00 oeto, �
Cap., 719 - oloo, 2195 loce, JUXUD, xxoCK 1435 vueot . )OKMtx
------ ; ..... I --------------- 11- ...... .... .... ..... .... . .. .....
f Se"Ice MdJle:
Stopped Del: 4.9 )oOCX 3.0 trCtoof tDOCNE 70cKCC 203ora Loreto, 2.5 earo, tuncre:
= by 14� :, - 6
�mtIt! . I.T - I.TR - 17 IT - �rs - 1; .*T ;a - IT LT - r;R - XT
aLared Cap. - vocct� $19 000Ot Mooet, mocia, xxooK31L xxoot Itorsex, tuou, auce: x
Sh.d. Stpl)elz ictocot 4.7 Sortoo, M ,ox)[ )VInvot 3ver"K x7ege '013010C
SUced LOS, A
AppuVA411VE1 1 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.2
TralfiX 4.0.1511 (cl 1995 Doling Assoc. UiverLand to FAts, Okit". h3htettY
U41 GOAL)-;-1-f-D - L ol
01/1711997 &7,47 r1laname, SMPWQ.Rpr Face 8
VC52PP900.111 Fri Jan 17. 1597 17,47,54 Page *-I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAIUMD Av"M XKMOVMMarr PRGMCT. VVISAM CA
TRAFFIC " MRJUM ANALYSES
YK Peak Nour Analysis t9cerarLo 2 -without Hatzolink. All.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
L�l of Service Cbmutation Report
ICU 2(1,0116 no CYCIO Lc[Igth `Wl Keth0d tDOMW VVI- Alttrnntl"l
.................................................. ...............
rntermectiou 115 son Forrando Nowd/Railroad Avanu/41th Strftt
........ I ......................... I ........... . ................................
Cycle (am) 1 100 critical Vol./Cap. Wt O.Soll
L,ovs Tim (Mic) i S ALwraq* Delay to"/vehl, 1.9
aptinal crelol 24 Lewel of servicei A
...... **,# ....................................... * ... ... 46*440 ................
Approach I vkr�h Vound South Noumd Rest Round next Bound
"o,,ametat I X, - T - I L - T - R L - 7 - It L - I - R
------------ I --------------- 11 -------------- --------------- -----------
Coatral prot,ect-d Tratected vevaitted pitvmitted
RightN4 OVI Imielude 3MIUde Include
Kim. Orment 0 a 0 a a 0 0 a 0
ran" 1 0 0 a 0 3. 0 a I a 0 0 0 9 a a 2 a 0 40 a
------------ I --------------- It --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volumm Modeleg
Base Vol- 0 1119 912 a 1396 0 a 0 a 94 0 R
Growth Ad5t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.Va 1.00 1.00 I -CC 1.00 I -VO 2-09 IL -00
Initial s-2 0 1119 612 & 1366 0 0 a a 94 0 0
Voter Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00
PW Adj: 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00
M Volume. a 1119 612 6 1366 0 a a 0 94 0 a
Iteduct Vol. 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a a 1) 0 0
Satinwood Vol, 0 1119 62.2 0 1346 a 0 0 a 94 0 0
PCX ". 1.00 2.00 L.104 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00
2w Adj t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 S.Oz- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1 1.09 1.0
Final Vol. 1 0 illy 612 0CLUS a 0 0 a 0
............. --------------- --------------- --------------- 11.0 ..........
S.turation Flow FiCtsule,
S.LeT- . 1600 ISOO 1900 )600 1400 1600 1900 1600 2600 1400 1400 140D
Adjustimact. 1-00 L.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.479 1.01)
Lancet 1 0.91) 2.0* 1.00 0. go ;-** 0.00 6.aq a.00 0.0a 2.Qu-10-00 a - 00
Final Sat. - 0 3209 1600 0 Q!2 O!::�J 0 0 0 0 (3200 ) 0
--------------- ----- --------- ........ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Hodzlog
Val/Sat; 0-00 0.33 0.38 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 4.00 O.Do 0.03 0-90 0-00
CrU K�st ... .... ....
areen/cyclo; 0.00 0.99 0 09 D.Do 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 9.00
V,lume/Cap. 0. 04D 0.39 0.43 0,00 0.48 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
level Of Ser�lce Modulat
Deloylveh, 0-0 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.4 0.0 0.0
Delay A4jz I -CU 1.00 2.00 1.00 I.OD IM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 I.tt
AdjDetl/veb4 0.0 0.$ C -y 0.0 O.t 0.9 0.0 0-9 0.0 H.4 0.0 C�C
Cut": C S 3 0 7 9 a 0 0 3 0 G
.......................... * ............. .......................................
x
Trsffix fi.s.1six (cl Jtq5 Bottling Assoc. Mcirnnod to Rate. Ckltmv. MontereY
L
o.+ 7 17 -f 0. lz�s t:> is -1�
0111611997 00:02 Filename, SCN2AMW.RPT Page I
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 OO:O2zl8 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis �Scenario 2 -With Metrolink AlterTtative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length It) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lIth Street
Cycle (sec)s 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): O.SS4
Loss Time (sec)t 7 Average Delay (sec/veh); 25.3
Optimal Cycle; 73 Level Of Service: D
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include kaLU10, sti.
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06�:
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 a 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 11 360 0 383 1274 52
Growth Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bset 11 360 0 383 2274 52
User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PUF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 11 360 0 383 1274 52
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 11 360 0 383 1274 52
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: i.s.2.1.00 1.00 1.00 1-W, 1.00
Final Vol.: CIV 360 0 383 Q274�, 52
------------ I --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lanez 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1__ak 2. 00 0.00 1.0 0 08
Final Sat.t tT600"J3200 0 lX i25
------------ r� ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Modulei
0 0 0 0 0 Sal
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0 0 0 a Sal
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0 0 0 a 581
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 581
1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.�b 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0 0 0 581
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.00-L.A 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00
OQ�00J 0 1600 0 16DD
--------------- 11 ---------------
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.24 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36
Crit Moves; .... .... * ...
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43
Volume/Cap: 0.84 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84
- ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modulet
Delay/Veh: 145.7 33.7 0.0 24.9 20.3 58.5 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 26.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 145.7 33.7 0.0 24.9 20.3 58.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2
Queue: 1 10 0 10. 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 16
Traf f is .6. ISSS Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitgu, Monterey
0 +
cc)
to, s 63
mole
r
01/16/1997 00:02 Pilename: SCN2AMW.RPT Page 2
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:02:19 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis IScenaric, 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West oun;
Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T
-------- - - - - - - - -
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop -S gn
Rightsi Include Include Include include
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 a a 0 0 11 0 0
------- - - - - - - - - - -
'Volume Module:
Base Vol: 20 511 0 0 37S 0 70 0 55 0 0 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Sse; 20 511 0 0 375 0 70 0 55 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00
PHr Volume; 20 511 0 0 375 0 70 0 55 0 0 0
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.; 20 511 0 0 375 0 70 0 SS 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module;
Grade; 0% ov 0% ok
V Cycle/Cars: XXXX )UMx � XX=
% Truck/Comb: X=X �
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1110 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: � xx= )DOCK � XX= =)UX
Trck/Cmb PCE: tau4M XXXX x=x
Adj Vol.: 22 511 0 0 375 0 77 0 61 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Cap Module;
Moveup Time: 2.1 � � x� 3.4 � 2.6
Critical Gp. 5.0 � � 6.5 � 5.5 x,c=
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity module:
Cnflict Vol: 375 � xxzc� � � � 906 xxsx 375 :cccc �cxxx xxxxx
Potent Cap. -t 1136 � :ccc= � � xm=x 316 � 894 xx� =x �
Adj Cap; 1.00 � � =K � � 0.98 � 1.00 xx= x)c,ocK
Move Cap.: 1136 � � � tcccx :coctoc 310 � 894 � � 1�
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module! NC
Stopped Del: 3.2 25.0 x= 4.3 :cctocz %.a
LOS by Move: A -N
Mc,vementr LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - L -;R - RT
Shared Cap.: xxxx 435 x:,occx xx= =z
Shrd StpDelz� 11�6 =xx
Shared LOS: C <
ApproachDel: 0.1 0.0 10.3 0.0 0 .
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I WS16rJ4 L I IED
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:02:19 Page 3-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./Cap. (X)z 0.521
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.2
Optimal Cycle; 29 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Kin. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 0 486 0 10 317 13 4S 62 35 0 153 27
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial East 0 486 0 10 317 13 4S 62 35 0 153 27
User Adj: ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 486 0 10 317 13 45 62 35 0 1S3 27
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 486 0 10 317 13 4S 62 35 0 153 27
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 zi$ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 16 1.00
Final Vol.: ---0 ---------- 0 (a 317 13 IjBI 62__ 35 0 - 27
----------- -11 --------------- --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane� 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes% 1 00
04ts 0.00 1 9 0.01 1., 0.64 0.36
'3 1.00 � �36 0 %40
0 oi�
Final Sat.: NO (� �.5� 7 60 1023 S77 16001
---------- ----
------------ I I - ------------ 6L -1111 ---------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves�
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.01 O�64 0.64 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.23 0.23
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.32 0.32 0.48 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.48 0.48
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veht 0.0 8.0 0.0 49.4 6.4 7.9 38.2 20.7 20.7 0.0 26.5 30.5
Delay Adj! 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/veht 0.0 8.0 0.0 49.4 6.4 7.9 38.2 20.7 20.7 0.0 26.5 30.5
Queue; 0 7 0 0 4 0 1 1 1 0 4 1
Traffix 6.8.1S21 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
D t�
0. cis L
0.11
01=1 5 +
M M M M M M M M M
01/16/1997 00,02 Filename, SCN2AMW.RPT Page 4
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:02;19 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............ ...... ..........
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./CaP. W: 0.602
Loss Time (sec)! 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.4
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service; B
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - P I - T - R L - I - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 259 78 6 0 807 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, 259 78 6 0 807 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
User Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PH? Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2S9 78 6 0 SD7 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 259 78 6 0 807 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.0ql.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 160 1.00
Final Vol (Z19 7 0 807 rVT 1
6 En> 119 74 7 3
11 ---- --- �.11 --------- ---- If ---- ---------- I
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
L nes: %-Do 1.86 0 14 1;0.0 2;*0 I.DO 2-00 1 00 2 00 1 000 011 7 oill
a'n
Final Sat '�3250 04
Z5,0, SO I 3_00 50 1_50 1;5
--------------- --- - -- ------ ------
Capacity Analysis Module!
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.23 O�27 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.00 0-01 0.01
Crit Moves; .... .*.* .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.14 0.15 0.1S 0.01 0.01 0.01
Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.48 0.56 0.56 0.46 0.29 0.46 O�56 0.56
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 25.5 2.6 2.6 0.0 13.8 14.9 31.8 31.0 29.4 50.6 58.8 87.3
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/veh: 2S.5 2.6 2.6 0.0 13.8 24.9. 31.8 31.0 29.4 50.6 58.8 87.3
Queue: 6 1 0 0 is 9 7 3 2 0 0 0
........... .......
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
C). 14&
o.'W
61090
'V4
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
1�1' I t�' r, -- 0. 6 4%5
01/1611997
00,02
Filename:
SCN2AMW.RPT
Page
3
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:02:19 Page 3-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./Cap. (X)z 0.521
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.2
Optimal Cycle; 29 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Kin. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 0 486 0 10 317 13 4S 62 35 0 153 27
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial East 0 486 0 10 317 13 4S 62 35 0 153 27
User Adj: ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 486 0 10 317 13 45 62 35 0 1S3 27
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 486 0 10 317 13 4S 62 35 0 153 27
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 zi$ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .00 1.00 1.00 16 1.00
Final Vol.: ---0 ---------- 0 (a 317 13 IjBI 62__ 35 0 - 27
----------- -11 --------------- --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane� 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes% 1 00
04ts 0.00 1 9 0.01 1., 0.64 0.36
'3 1.00 � �36 0 %40
0 oi�
Final Sat.: NO (� �.5� 7 60 1023 S77 16001
---------- ----
------------ I I - ------------ 6L -1111 ---------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves�
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.01 O�64 0.64 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.23 0.23
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.48 0.32 0.32 0.48 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.48 0.48
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veht 0.0 8.0 0.0 49.4 6.4 7.9 38.2 20.7 20.7 0.0 26.5 30.5
Delay Adj! 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/veht 0.0 8.0 0.0 49.4 6.4 7.9 38.2 20.7 20.7 0.0 26.5 30.5
Queue; 0 7 0 0 4 0 1 1 1 0 4 1
Traffix 6.8.1S21 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
D t�
0. cis L
0.11
01=1 5 +
M M M M M M M M M
01/16/1997 00,02 Filename, SCN2AMW.RPT Page 4
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:02;19 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............ ...... ..........
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./CaP. W: 0.602
Loss Time (sec)! 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.4
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service; B
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - P I - T - R L - I - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 259 78 6 0 807 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse, 259 78 6 0 807 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
User Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PH? Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2S9 78 6 0 SD7 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 259 78 6 0 807 467 279 119 74 7 10 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.0ql.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 160 1.00
Final Vol (Z19 7 0 807 rVT 1
6 En> 119 74 7 3
11 ---- --- �.11 --------- ---- If ---- ---------- I
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
L nes: %-Do 1.86 0 14 1;0.0 2;*0 I.DO 2-00 1 00 2 00 1 000 011 7 oill
a'n
Final Sat '�3250 04
Z5,0, SO I 3_00 50 1_50 1;5
--------------- --- - -- ------ ------
Capacity Analysis Module!
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.23 O�27 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.00 0-01 0.01
Crit Moves; .... .*.* .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.14 0.15 0.1S 0.01 0.01 0.01
Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.48 0.56 0.56 0.46 0.29 0.46 O�56 0.56
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 25.5 2.6 2.6 0.0 13.8 14.9 31.8 31.0 29.4 50.6 58.8 87.3
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/veh: 2S.5 2.6 2.6 0.0 13.8 24.9. 31.8 31.0 29.4 50.6 58.8 87.3
Queue: 6 1 0 0 is 9 7 3 2 0 0 0
........... .......
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
C). 14&
o.'W
61090
'V4
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
1�1' I t�' r, -- 0. 6 4%5
M M M M M M M M M M M M
01/16/1997 00:02 Filename: SCN2AMW-RPT Page 5
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:02;19
Page S-1
-----------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............
Intersection #8 San Fe rna ndo Road/Market Street
*****.* ... ** ..............
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X)t 0.460
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh); 20.1
Optimal Cycle; 22 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 7 - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Min. Greent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 a 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 17 293 a 15 629 14 is 56 11 28 90 60
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bsei 17 293 8 15 629 14 18 56 11 28 90 60
user Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 17 293 8 is 629 14 18 56 11 28 90 60
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 17 293 a IS 629 14 is 56 11 28 90 60
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 W.00 1.00 1.00 1-04 1.00
Final Vol.: 7 293 a 1 6 14 56 22 28 (2p 60
------------ -kLV ---------- SQP ------ 11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Modulet
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 30,1_1 1.84 0.05 0.05 1 0.0: 1 0 0 84 0 16 1 00�� 0.40
Final Sat.: 17 1 2 948 81 7 305 6 60 .;37 �63 1;00 640
------------ P-:-;, ---------- ----- loop ---------- 11 --------------- I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves� .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.17 0,17 0.07 0.22 0.22
Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.41 0.24 0.24 O�24 0.43 0 ' 43
------------ 11 --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Moddle�
Delay/Veh: 29.8 25.6 33.9 18.3 13.4 18.6 41.1 27.7 28.1 34.0 26.9 27.4
Delay Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00
AdjDel/Veh: 29.8 25.6 33.9 18.3 13.4 18.6 41.1 27.7 28.1 34.0 26.9 24.4
Queue: 0 7 0 0 12 0 1 1 0 1 2 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
2. 0(o L lu3 A
O.Ar4 9 0so 4-59
01/16/1997 00,02 Filename, SCW2AMW.RPT Page 6
SCN2AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:02:19 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1�Loss as Cycle Length W) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fe rna ndo/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec). IGO Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.932
Loas Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 35.1
Optimal Cycle: 110 Level Of Servicei E
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controli Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rightso Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
lanes; 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 it 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 440 359 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
Growth Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.oO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Best 440 359 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj-- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 440 359 0 0 722 0 0 a 606 1 0 3
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 440 359 0 0 722 0 0 0 606 1 0 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: !-Q�o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol, (14,V 359 0 0 0 0 0 (:Eog) (DI 0 3
------------ --------------- ---- ---------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1§ 2 00 0.00 0.0�� 0.00 0.00 1 00 I.0 00 0.75
Final Sat _'(�g 0 , LOO 0 0 0 lioo crro D Z!!!� 1 0 1200
--------- I --------- ---- --------------- ------------ �--ll ---------------
Capacity Ana sis dule:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0,00
Crit Moves: � .... .**. ....
Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 D.00 0.00 0.41
Volume/cap: 0.93 0,21 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.93 0.00 0.01
............ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 44.1 9.2 0.0 0.0 41.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 582.1 0.0 13.4
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.1 9.2 0.0 0.0 41.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.9 582.1 0.0 13.4
Queue: is 5 0 D 23 - 0 0 0 19 0 0 0
WER-LAP
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc.
8�4 014
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
A<
LOS "C
= M
N == mmm M
---------------
M WDISLUZ C -A
8
MILCk AlLacnati
spo�
JILl"roati"I
.............
...............
wse Laval Of "n
t Bound
T - a I.
----------
ont=1124 Ur
Include
35 35 2
!.DO 1.10 1.00
3S 35 1
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.150 I.Qd
35 35 1
0 0 a
is 35 2
3Cc1CX
200CM
1.00 1.00 1.10
31300:
XoMea
3s 35 1
----------
5.0
----------
,occ, xoreCa 70
'McCr L599
Incor L.00
,ocow IcCIout LESS
----------
2.3
A
LTR - RT LT
to IrAtz, Okitm
91.117flY97 17,lf ril*oamg,� S=AM.Apr ftsz ?
SCNZAM. M rrL Jan, 17, LOS? L7.16:50 Pa" 7-L
.......... ... ... ... .... ........ ---- ---
YFJDPOM RATUDOAD AVE= D417=121M FRI=
TRAFFIC and PARJMIQ A3=TSZ
AM Fesk Zvr AnalywiS (Scatuirio 2 -With Met
lovel Of Servic. CO.SpatatiazI
1394 RM Mwisgualized Metbod 40"a Volione
.............
Interroction, 122 Sim AveanI/Market Street
....... * ............... *..*� ............... 0 ........ .......
Avvaroga Delay famc:fvehl r 1.5 Surat A
............ ....................................... .... . ...
Approach: Sorth Bound South 6ound Zen West dound
Movement , Z - T - Z L - T - R 1, - . T - A
............. --------------- --------------- ----------
contrul: Stop sign Stop sign Unc cat�rollod
11shts: locUbda, Include nholude
L�X- a it 0 0 0 a 0 a a a a 1 0 0 a
------------ --------------- --------------- ----- -----------
Volume Mudule�
same Vol: 71 J I a 0 D a IQ7 6
Qr�h Adji 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 %.Do 1. 'Do 2.ao
initial Pat, 71 3 3 a 6 0 0 107 a
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.*0 1-00 I.DO
PW Adj. 1.00 1.00 1100 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.0 0
PW Volume: 71 3 3 0 0 0 0 107 0
Ratbuct Vol; 0 a a a 0 0 0 0 0
!iwl - Vol.z -1-- 71 ---- 3 ----- 3 0 ---- 0 ----- 0 --- 0 107 ----- 01
Adjusted Vblanwo Module:
ormulm, Ot at Ow
It Cycla/Cars: XXCCC 3C=CK Z3CCW X!CCx Sounc
t Trazk/-%� xxxx zxoIX X1CCX ZXUCX JQCICK JCICCZ
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1�10 %.%* 1.00 I.Da
CYCl/Car PCZ: occxx socc, XIMCK ICCXX Z3CCW XXICe zoatc
Trek/Cab PCZ; naca moco, )Ck30E SUCCC mcoax xoccr�
Adj Vol, Is 3 3 11 0 0 0 107 0
---------- --------------- --------------- 11 ----- -----------
itical GAP Modulet
MoVeOp Tim; 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxxxt. onnut zoacco: rearm 3QCC1,
Critical op. S.s 6.0 S.5 ourric zonex Sooner nocca X`QCK
--------------- 11 ----------- �---11 ----- --- -------
ty module:
Cuflict Vol: 161 let 53 :,ocx cau, Inoccx occr 10acx
Poteott CAp, ISE 111 1302 ocxo, zooc, Income accr 3occe
xdj CA;: 1.00 1.90 1.00 occr sncCa reoxx cacr
Mc. C&P-: IS4 499 1302 )MOCK . XXoCK
------ I ----- I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ----- ...........
L�l Of se"ice Mocule:
stopped D.I.. 4.6 4.0 2.0 ccImoI oocat cIoccr ccer, cCox �ccrec
IDS by Movet. -
Mwommunt ; LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - IT LT LTR - 717
Stared Cap.t 067 � xxx,:� � xxonce 'CoCa ocoCCx
Shrd Stp!)el:�xvecx 4.6 Io,,ocw ,ocaca con, xxoncr xxicac Inacm, occoca
Sb&rad MS: A
AWroaChDel. 4.S 0.0 1.0
Tvaffix 9.0.2SIL to) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licammed . Monterey
Vf,,81 CN4L-1-2-A)
M M M M M M M M M M
01/27/1991 17.1g: FA I Iname, SCMAM. Rpr
SCN2�.iw Fri Jan 17, 1917 17,16zso
-------------------------------------------------------------- - ---------------
RAILP.OAD AvM= LMpJOVgg,,,,gr nW=, MMS&LL CA
TAArFrC And nRIMC AXALYSis
AN Park Kounr Anlyn's (Scanarto 2-KLtk Metroling, jLlt,,nott")
------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------
1AVel of Serving computatice, X'Ver,
XCU IfLOSS am Crele Long" 1) Methad (Base, Vvi,,, Alte,coactA,
0 ........ . ......... ...... ................................. 0 .. . .............
InterSeCtim #19 "M Peralkao to'd/P411tood %,�./,th Streme
................. ............. . . . .... 11 ............. . ........ . . ....
COM16 (ASCII LOG
into Time (�] , 5 =tixaz Vol./cap. w, 0.367
Optimal cycle. :I Aware" Dolor (sachohi. V.4
** xavel of serAce. A
Approact NOrth Bound * ........
"710went I ScuLh AnOnd Zest Bound West sound
L - T - T - X 1. - 7 - It
------------ I ------------ -- if -------------- 11 --------------- T
contuol: P=t"t*d Protected
list=.- OV1 Paratitted, R=Itt&d
min. Green: Include rucluds Include
ra=&G, a 0 0 2 1 a I a I a 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 00 0 a a 0 a A 0 � I
...... I --------------- N --------------- --------------- It ---------------
VQlUIN* Module:
11Swe Tol: 0 $62 438 3 111@ 0
Grwowth Adj: 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1. 0 2 DO 1.000 0 0 127 a 3
Initial Boa. 1 1-00 X-00 Z.00 1.00 1.00
0 962 490 3 1324 0 a
User Adj; 1.00 1-00 1.00 I�vg, 1.00 1 CO 1. 3-09 1 0 327 a 3
Per Adj- DO 0 -00 1-00 1.00 2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1:00 1,00 I.CD. 1.0 1 09 1.00 X.00
P" Voluuw� 0 962 419 3 1329 0 : i27 3
Reduce Toli a 0 0 0 0
Raduced Vol. a a a 0 a 0 0 0
a sea 4*0 3 IJ2* a a 0 0 327 a 3
PCH Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 I.ae 11.00 1.90 I've 1.00 1. on
HIS Adj 2 2.00 1.170 1.00 1.00 1
.;224 1.00 2.00 1.00 1 06 1 %.Do 1.10
.0
............ 0 a a 327 0 3
Final Vol.. 1 $92 418
I--------------- ---
Satuor*tion Floe, ",&ae, 11 J1 --- .11 ---------------
Sat/T-z 1600 1460 1600 2*00 2.600 LEDO LIDO 1,00 1400 t4qq gOo
2.00 1,00 L, a 1600
Lanes: 0 a* 2 00 1 a 1-00 1-00 2.00 L.00 1.00 I.aa
a I Go 1.09 1.00 1.09
"a D"'D "o a . D
Final Sac.. a 3100 if** 140; 0 0
_ 3 SIC a 0 0 (1.04 1.00
-- - -------- I --------------- 3200 0 ISDO
Crpacity Analysis Module: if 11 --- 5S ----------
volfsat: 0.00 G.�7 0.30 0.00 o.41 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 Q.XQ 0.00 G.On
Crit M�! .... ....
Gramn/Cycle; 0.00 0.16 Q.76 0.00 0.76 0.00 ....
Solum*lCaP: 0-00 0.36 0.40 0.40 0.54 D.00 0-04 0-00 0-00 U-10 Q.QD 0.39
------------ I --------------- It --------------- 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.$4 0.00 0 go
Level Of se�cw module: 11 --------- ---- ------------
Delay/Veh: 0.0 3.2 3�4 S2.5 3.9 D -O 0.0 O.D
Delay Adj: l.00 X.UD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 0.10 29.1 0.0 25.0
00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 2.00
06djDel/Veh: 0.0 3.1 3, 52,S 3 9 0.0 ;.a 0.0 0.0 29.L D.0 15.p
2ueue , a a 5 0 is a a 0 0 a 0 0
............................... . ...... . ............................... . ......
Tr"ffgA 6-6-1511 'C' 1395 DoSling AmAcC- Licensed to Xatz, OkIt&u, MOcsroy
ID - + IS
+ 0.
SCN2PMW,IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:03t06 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length k) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/11th Street
Cycle (sec)i 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.897
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (see/veh): 27.9
Optimal Cyclez 92 Level Of Service: D
*.**** ... **** ................. ...... * ................
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rightst include Include Include T"I"A-:U
Min. Greeni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a -
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume module;
Base Volt 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 0 0 664
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 0 0 664
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.oa i.oa i.00 l.00
PHP Volume: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 0 0 664
Reftct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 a 0 664
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 )'.� 1.00 1.-Qk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1�00 1.00 1
66
Final Vol.: 9 ��6 0 QIP 848 11 0 0 0 6
------------- --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---- ---- ----
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 Z -PO D.00 1,;� 1.97 0.03 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 ;"g
Final Sat.: 160OQ32�3
0 $a,600159 41 0<n> 0 1600 0 (160-0)
------------ I ----- ------- 11 --------------- -----------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41
Crit Moves: .... .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.31 0.00 0.15 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0D D.00 0.47
Volume/Cap: 0.59 0.89 0.00, 0.89 0.59 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Oo o.sg
------------ I ------- T ------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modulet
Delay/Veh: 67.0 32.2 0.0 53.8 16.2 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.9
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.0 32.2 0.0 53.8 16.2 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.9
Queue: 0 26 0 a IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
------------------------------------------------------- -- ..... ...............
'M&Jd-e
Traffix 6.8.1511 to C" r1i.9 A .. c -Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I
Wo,
0,1-33
0 =-Oso
09 0 r- C), S'23
= M = M M M
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 19, 1997 00:05:06 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Tinsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
�Lanes- 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 88 656 0 0 212 0 8 0 42 0 0 a
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: BE 656 0 0 212 0 8 0 42 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 88 656 0 0 212 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol. : as 656 0 0 212 0 8 0 42 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- If ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module�
Grade: at 0% at at
t Cycle/Cars; '000C ZCDOC tC=
I Truck/Combt 10OCK x3occ 20DOC 3000C 500cx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: � t000t )00Dt 'c= )00=
Trok/Cmb PCE: tDODC 10=
Adj Vol.: 97 656 0 0 212 0 9 0 46 a 0 0
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module;
MoveUp Time: 2.1 � 3.4 � 2.6 �
Critical Gp: 5.0 � xt000t x,000t 6.5 � 5.5 �
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modulet
Cnflict Vol: 212 � � ooccx 956 � 212 z=
Potent Cap. ; 13S9 � � zoacx toocz x=xx 296 � 1081 toocx
Adj Cap: 1.00 )0o0C tc� � x=x to� 0.93 x=x 1.00 � to�
Move Cap.: 1359 toc= � x:,cxx ocxs t0000, 275 toccx 1081 �
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 2.8 13.5 3.5 =ot
LOS by Move: A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - AT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. : �x 736 � � � K,omo,
Shrd StpDel:� tonot tm� 5.2 � onnot
Shared LOS: B
ApproachDal: 0.4 0.0 5.1 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Ut4 6NA, ,aeb
LoS 9
zl-v
L M
0
01116/1997
00:05
Filename: SCN2PMW.RPT
Page
1
01/16/1997
00t05
SCN2PMW,IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:03t06 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length k) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/11th Street
Cycle (sec)i 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.897
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (see/veh): 27.9
Optimal Cyclez 92 Level Of Service: D
*.**** ... **** ................. ...... * ................
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rightst include Include Include T"I"A-:U
Min. Greeni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a -
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 it 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume module;
Base Volt 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 0 0 664
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 0 0 664
User Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.oa i.oa i.00 l.00
PHP Volume: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 0 0 664
Reftct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 9 896 0 212 848 11 0 0 0 a 0 664
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 )'.� 1.00 1.-Qk 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1�00 1.00 1
66
Final Vol.: 9 ��6 0 QIP 848 11 0 0 0 6
------------- --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---- ---- ----
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 Z -PO D.00 1,;� 1.97 0.03 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 ;"g
Final Sat.: 160OQ32�3
0 $a,600159 41 0<n> 0 1600 0 (160-0)
------------ I ----- ------- 11 --------------- -----------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41
Crit Moves: .... .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.31 0.00 0.15 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0D D.00 0.47
Volume/Cap: 0.59 0.89 0.00, 0.89 0.59 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Oo o.sg
------------ I ------- T ------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modulet
Delay/Veh: 67.0 32.2 0.0 53.8 16.2 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.9
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.0 32.2 0.0 53.8 16.2 40.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.9
Queue: 0 26 0 a IS 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
------------------------------------------------------- -- ..... ...............
'M&Jd-e
Traffix 6.8.1511 to C" r1i.9 A .. c -Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I
Wo,
0,1-33
0 =-Oso
09 0 r- C), S'23
= M = M M M
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 19, 1997 00:05:06 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Tinsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
�Lanes- 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 88 656 0 0 212 0 8 0 42 0 0 a
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: BE 656 0 0 212 0 8 0 42 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 88 656 0 0 212 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol. : as 656 0 0 212 0 8 0 42 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- If ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module�
Grade: at 0% at at
t Cycle/Cars; '000C ZCDOC tC=
I Truck/Combt 10OCK x3occ 20DOC 3000C 500cx
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: � t000t )00Dt 'c= )00=
Trok/Cmb PCE: tDODC 10=
Adj Vol.: 97 656 0 0 212 0 9 0 46 a 0 0
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module;
MoveUp Time: 2.1 � 3.4 � 2.6 �
Critical Gp: 5.0 � xt000t x,000t 6.5 � 5.5 �
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modulet
Cnflict Vol: 212 � � ooccx 956 � 212 z=
Potent Cap. ; 13S9 � � zoacx toocz x=xx 296 � 1081 toocx
Adj Cap: 1.00 )0o0C tc� � x=x to� 0.93 x=x 1.00 � to�
Move Cap.: 1359 toc= � x:,cxx ocxs t0000, 275 toccx 1081 �
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 2.8 13.5 3.5 =ot
LOS by Move: A
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - AT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. : �x 736 � � � K,omo,
Shrd StpDel:� tonot tm� 5.2 � onnot
Shared LOS: B
ApproachDal: 0.4 0.0 5.1 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Ut4 6NA, ,aeb
LoS 9
zl-v
L M
0
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 OD:D5:06 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and.PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
***.* .............. ... *.***** ...........
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
........... ****** ... .......
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.576
LOSS Time (sec); X1 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.4
Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound south Bound East Bound West Bound
movement L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R
-------- --------- - ------- --------- ---------
Control: Permitted P ; rmitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse! 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 .00 1.00 1'00 1.00 18$1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1-U
Final Vol.t 13 ��l 5 0 100 83 97 4 2 110 Q2
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 -------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00 9 0.0i 140 0 55 0 45 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.81 0,1�
Final Sat.: 158 1 C100 i74 ;26 �� 1537 63 1600 1294 (30-6
------------ Ili ok!b9 ------ lr� ----------- 11 = -------------- 11 ------------ �-J
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.08 0.09
Crit Moves: ... *
Green/Cycle; D.OS 0.69 0.69 0.07 0.71 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.15 0.15
Volume/Cap: 0.16 O.S5 0.55 O.SS 0.16 0.16 0.55 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.55 a ' 55
------------ I ------- 7 ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh; 3S.1 6.3 39.9 39.1 3.6 3.6 44.9 27.7 33.4 48.8 32�7 39.5
Delay Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh� 35.1 6.3 39.9 39.2 3.6 3.6 44.9 27.7 33.4 48.8 32.7 39.5
Queue: 0 9 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 3 1
...........
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
04
0.45'6
C�. 050
(0).
= M = = = M = M =
01/16/1997 00,05 Filename: SCN2PMW.RPT Page 4
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:05:06 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEW11ALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length 1) Method (Base volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
cycle (Sao): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.670
Loss Time (Sec)i 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.9
Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: B
Approach2 North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes� 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 181 341 12 18 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bae� 181 341 12 18 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
User Adj& 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PHF Volume: 181 342 12 IS 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 341 12 18 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 1.=-1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .Lo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
1 341 12 18 807 QL7�, <� 20 100 5 QD 23
Fin 6D
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes� .3�0 1.93 0 07 1 00 2 00 1�00 1;00 0.72 0.28
(175>3381 19 1 50 3 00 1�1 I
Final Sat, ;00 (t�j§fflZ 3 P�0. 1 50 1 5DC1267T� 48S
.... ....
----------- ------- ---- ---- ---------- --------------- ------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.01 D.23 0.27 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.00 O.OS 0.05
Crit Move$: .*.. ..*� * ...
Green/Cyclet 0.16 0.53 O.S3 0.05 0.42 0.42 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.02 0.07 0.07
Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.19 0.19 0.19 O.SS 0.63 0.63 0.04 0.19 0.19 0.63 0.63
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module.
Delay/Veh. 33.2 9.S 9.6 34.9 17.1 18.9 27.3 19.1 20.0 37.9 43.3 53.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veho .33.2 9.S 9.6 34.9 17.1 18.9 27.3 19.1 20.0 37.9 43.3 53.8
Queue: 5 5 0 0 17 11 14 0 2 0 2 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (0 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
a 1 -63
0�2-61)
Z'
C)"F93 j -0.100'r-
01/16/1997
00:OS
Filename, SCN2PMW.RPT
Page
3
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 OD:D5:06 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and.PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
***.* .............. ... *.***** ...........
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
........... ****** ... .......
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.576
LOSS Time (sec); X1 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.4
Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound south Bound East Bound West Bound
movement L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R
-------- --------- - ------- --------- ---------
Control: Permitted P ; rmitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse! 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 13 610 5 61 100 83 30 97 4 2 110 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 .00 1.00 1'00 1.00 18$1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1-U
Final Vol.t 13 ��l 5 0 100 83 97 4 2 110 Q2
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 -------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00 9 0.0i 140 0 55 0 45 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.81 0,1�
Final Sat.: 158 1 C100 i74 ;26 �� 1537 63 1600 1294 (30-6
------------ Ili ok!b9 ------ lr� ----------- 11 = -------------- 11 ------------ �-J
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.38 0.38 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.02 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.08 0.09
Crit Moves: ... *
Green/Cycle; D.OS 0.69 0.69 0.07 0.71 0.71 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.15 0.15
Volume/Cap: 0.16 O.S5 0.55 O.SS 0.16 0.16 0.55 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.55 a ' 55
------------ I ------- 7 ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh; 3S.1 6.3 39.9 39.1 3.6 3.6 44.9 27.7 33.4 48.8 32�7 39.5
Delay Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh� 35.1 6.3 39.9 39.2 3.6 3.6 44.9 27.7 33.4 48.8 32.7 39.5
Queue: 0 9 0 2 1 1 1 2 0 0 3 1
...........
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
04
0.45'6
C�. 050
(0).
= M = = = M = M =
01/16/1997 00,05 Filename: SCN2PMW.RPT Page 4
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:05:06 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEW11ALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length 1) Method (Base volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
cycle (Sao): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.670
Loss Time (Sec)i 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.9
Optimal Cycle: 47 Level Of Service: B
Approach2 North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes� 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 181 341 12 18 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bae� 181 341 12 18 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
User Adj& 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PHF Volume: 181 342 12 IS 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 341 12 18 807 467 534 20 100 5 60 23
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 1.=-1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 .Lo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
1 341 12 18 807 QL7�, <� 20 100 5 QD 23
Fin 6D
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 160D 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes� .3�0 1.93 0 07 1 00 2 00 1�00 1;00 0.72 0.28
(175>3381 19 1 50 3 00 1�1 I
Final Sat, ;00 (t�j§fflZ 3 P�0. 1 50 1 5DC1267T� 48S
.... ....
----------- ------- ---- ---- ---------- --------------- ------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.01 D.23 0.27 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.00 O.OS 0.05
Crit Move$: .*.. ..*� * ...
Green/Cyclet 0.16 0.53 O.S3 0.05 0.42 0.42 0.24 0.30 0.30 0.02 0.07 0.07
Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.19 0.19 0.19 O.SS 0.63 0.63 0.04 0.19 0.19 0.63 0.63
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module.
Delay/Veh. 33.2 9.S 9.6 34.9 17.1 18.9 27.3 19.1 20.0 37.9 43.3 53.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veho .33.2 9.S 9.6 34.9 17.1 18.9 27.3 19.1 20.0 37.9 43.3 53.8
Queue: 5 5 0 0 17 11 14 0 2 0 2 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (0 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
a 1 -63
0�2-61)
Z'
C)"F93 j -0.100'r-
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:OS:06 Page 5.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak He= Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (see): 100 critical Vol./cap. (x): 0.532
LOSS Time (see): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.7
Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Services A
.............. ***** ....... ****** .....
Approacht North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
............ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt a Sli 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bsei 8 511 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Vi PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: a 511 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
Reduct V012 a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 8 511 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. " 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 _Q0
1.00
Final Vol.: 511 10 68 24 54__(Sp 73
------------ --------------- --------------- ---- ---------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0,�k 1. 93 0.04 0. 0 8,,l-" 0.06 1 An 0.74 0.26 1.00 0_,AL 0.56
Final Sat.: 48 3091 60 12� 297� 98 (1607�,1183 417 1600 Q12:.) 898
------------ UV ---------- ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves; .... ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.33 0.31 0.33 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.16 0.26
Volume/Cap: 0.51 O.Sl 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 O.Sl 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.51 0 51
............ I ---------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delaylveh: 37.7 21.3 35.0 23.6 17.7 25.2 38.3 31.1 32.7 34.7 32.6 32.0
Delay Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.
AdjDel/Veh: 37.7 21.3 35.0 23.6 17.7 25.2 38.3 31.1 32.7 34.7 32.6 32.0
Queues 0 12 0 1 13 1 1 2 1 1 2 2
.******* .... ..... **** ....... * ................ * ...... * ... ...
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
Q
0
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
-r r). as�o ':'- c). S51
SCN2PMW.IN
Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:05:07
Page 6-1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length W) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
..........
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (see): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.070
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.6
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service; F
Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laness 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 D 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oG 1.00
Initial Bse! 467 622 0 0 SSE 0 S 0 848 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PUP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PHF Volume: 467 622 a 0 55S 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
PCE Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HLF Adj: 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I..0 1.61.00 2.00
Final Vol ;22 0 0 0 5 0 q4D 3 a
-- ---- 11 ---- ---------- ---- ---- -- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lenses 1,;,9,2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 00 O.Do &07 0 43 0.00
Final Sat RGOO 200 0 0 0 lioo 0 ;86 0
- -------------
---- ---------- ----------- - - ------------
Capacity Anal .
ysiEl.Module,
Vol/Satt D,,W 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 D.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves : .*** ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.07 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.07 1.07 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 86.4 15.S 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 19.S 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oO
AdJDe3./veh: 86.4 15.5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 19.5 0.0
Queue: 22 12 0 0 26 0 0 0 39 1 a 0
.......... ................
OJS40
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Ah�
Vq=7-Z7= f CL)
0, 03 J,
0 i0 4
m�
OR21
01/16/1997
00:05
Filename:
SCN2PMW.RPT
page
5
01/16/1997
00:05
Filename: SCN2PMW.RPT
page
6
SCN2PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:OS:06 Page 5.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak He= Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (see): 100 critical Vol./cap. (x): 0.532
LOSS Time (see): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.7
Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Services A
.............. ***** ....... ****** .....
Approacht North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
............ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt a Sli 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bsei 8 511 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Vi PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: a 511 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
Reduct V012 a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 8 511 10 26 604 20 51 68 24 54 57 73
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I.A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. " 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 _Q0
1.00
Final Vol.: 511 10 68 24 54__(Sp 73
------------ --------------- --------------- ---- ---------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0,�k 1. 93 0.04 0. 0 8,,l-" 0.06 1 An 0.74 0.26 1.00 0_,AL 0.56
Final Sat.: 48 3091 60 12� 297� 98 (1607�,1183 417 1600 Q12:.) 898
------------ UV ---------- ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves; .... ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.33 0.31 0.33 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.06 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.16 0.26
Volume/Cap: 0.51 O.Sl 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 O.Sl 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.51 0 51
............ I ---------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delaylveh: 37.7 21.3 35.0 23.6 17.7 25.2 38.3 31.1 32.7 34.7 32.6 32.0
Delay Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.
AdjDel/Veh: 37.7 21.3 35.0 23.6 17.7 25.2 38.3 31.1 32.7 34.7 32.6 32.0
Queues 0 12 0 1 13 1 1 2 1 1 2 2
.******* .... ..... **** ....... * ................ * ...... * ... ...
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
Q
0
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
-r r). as�o ':'- c). S51
SCN2PMW.IN
Thu Jan 16, 1997 00:05:07
Page 6-1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 2 -With Metrolink Alternative)
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length W) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
..........
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (see): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.070
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.6
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service; F
Approach: North Sound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laness 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 D 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oG 1.00
Initial Bse! 467 622 0 0 SSE 0 S 0 848 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PUP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PHF Volume: 467 622 a 0 55S 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 467 622 0 0 555 0 5 0 848 4 3 0
PCE Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HLF Adj: 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I..0 1.61.00 2.00
Final Vol ;22 0 0 0 5 0 q4D 3 a
-- ---- 11 ---- ---------- ---- ---- -- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lenses 1,;,9,2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 00 O.Do &07 0 43 0.00
Final Sat RGOO 200 0 0 0 lioo 0 ;86 0
- -------------
---- ---------- ----------- - - ------------
Capacity Anal .
ysiEl.Module,
Vol/Satt D,,W 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 D.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves : .*** ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.29 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.07 0.45 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.07 1.07 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 86.4 15.S 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 19.S 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oO
AdJDe3./veh: 86.4 15.5 0.0 0.0 87.3 0.0 24.3 0.0 69.2 484.0 19.5 0.0
Queue: 22 12 0 0 26 0 0 0 39 1 a 0
.......... ................
OJS40
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Ah�
Vq=7-Z7= f CL)
0, 03 J,
0 i0 4
m�
OR21
m m m m m m = m m m
01/27flJ97 27,47 riltru,.! OMPW�RPT Page 7
SCN2PW.IK Fri jan 17. "97 L?;47,06 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSRD RAILAM XVSKM DOOOVOMM PROJMCT. CA
TRLyyjC " FARKIIG AMUSIS
I" Peak Roar A"Ly@LS (Somnard.0 R -With Pttgallnk Altarnativel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Corgutation Report
2954 UCK U"IrAll&*d Method (BuLl- V01104 AltCXTULti1*I
lat rvactim 122 Pint Avemaelmarket St"ot.
..............................................................................
"trage Delay (Beelvah); 0.9 Worst Case lawel. Of Serwicas A
... ............................................................................
App=h; North Bound r;oUth Bound Best Bound 104st Bound
L. L - I - R L - T - R L - T - I. L - I - I
------------- --------------- ---- ---------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Stop sign S;W Sism Uncomemlled Uncontrolled
940to t Include Include Include Include
Larns, 0 0 11 0 a 0 a a 0 0 0 a 0 1 & 0 1 a a 0
zi;;;------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
JOWAUlog
Dave Vol; so 0 0 a 99 76 S 06 a
Gr�h Adj� 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.130 1.00 1.00
Initial Son: 56 0 6 0 0 0 4 96 79 5 is a
User Adj1 1.0* 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.06 3.40 1.60 I -ma 1.09
PUF Mj s 1.10 21.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.00 I.Do 1.00 3.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
PEIF Voluune - so 0 6 a 0 0 0 96 76 5 GS 0
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a a a a
Diana vol.. 50 6 6 0 0 0 a 96 76 5 of a
Z; --------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
"red Volume r4dula;
Grod.. at 0% of, At
t CyclafCr.- xxxx xcox MUCEC w`cXX
& Truck/Comb- xxtut . tQQ`X 30CCX )Qoot XXXX
PCE Adj; 2.10 2.10 1.10 1.19 1.20 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cycl/Cgr PCX; � xaxa )uccl z3orm XECK X3=
Trcklc� PM � xcxx JUVE1 . a,=g
Adj Vol. 1 $5 a 7 a a 0 0 94 76 1 16 0
.1 --- I --------------- ------------ -11 ............... ---------------
�;Jti-"-I Gap modolot
HowwUp Tice: 3.6 xxxx 2.6 toonot t000tx t000t )MOCKM 2.1 300CM
Critical OP4 6.5 - 5.5 )0oGQX 1000C X� S-0 'ougg 'cuao'
------------ I ............... 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity futdulet
Cnfli,m Vol: 225 � 114 . xg= cmtav, xxgx xxo0ot 172 tcoo, ccc,ot
Pcte0t. CDP.: 164 � 1134 � . omoct 1419 � .
A4j Cap; 1.00 � 1-60 . . xx= )=x xxz�x 1.00 3moccE
move Cap. g 721 � 1224 txxx x,xxx tc, � tocce tomocx 1419 tt000,
------------ I ................ H --------------- --------------- ---------------
La"41 at Service mudulat
Stopped Del; 4,9 xxxx 3.1 xxxtat xxt,g � t=cct tcac, xtacc, 2.5
EZS by Move: - I-
mo�twt: LT - LTR - RT L.; - A;R - 0; 1; � L';W - 1; LT - L;R . RT
Shared Cap.: - III � KAXX 3cout XWtcoC � XXIOL
Shrd StpDfil:� 4�4 sagas -X 3CCEK X� Xcrca gbOLe4 t0000t Motor gg�
Shared MS- A
ApproachDol. 4.7 1.0 0.0 0.2
Trattim 6.8.1511 Eel 1925 Dowling A&SOC. Licensed to NAtz, Okit�mu. Mentergy
C oA L llaFz� Z-02, A
-19-�
= m = m m m m m m
fl/A7/159-7 11141 SCm:IpW11.RP? rmw;v
SCM2PMW.Iff Fri Jon 17. 1997 17:47, Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPESM RAIJAW AVWX IMMVEMUrr DREAMT, NEWHALL Ch
TRAFFIC and PARK11113 AKALY313
PH Peak Hour Analysis 15canaria 2-01th VALrolink Alternativel
-------------------------------------- I -------------------- I ....................
level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Mass go Cycle Langth W) Ketbod tBase Volume Alterruttival
..... I ......................................... 0 ...........................
lfttcrgtctlm US Dan Pernando Road/RaLlroad Awarnme/4th Street
................. ..... * ............... I ........................................
Cycle tonc). log Critical Vol./Cap. 111, 0.000
loom Tim Engels S Average Delay (AW"Ns 0.0
Optimal Cycle, a xavel of Service,
.............................................................................
Approacht. North Bound South Board Is" sound West bound
Aktvament -. L - T - It L - T - R L - T .- A I. - 7 - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- If --------------- ---------------
Control. Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rightst *.I Include Include Include
Kin. Green: 4) 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 D a 0
1,&neo; 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 a 0 a 2 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- Ii ............... ---------------
Volumes, Model*:
Dome Vol: Q AID 620 8 1346 0 a 0 0 304 a 0
Crc,wtb Adj � 1.04 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Gas; 0 110 629 8 2366 0 A a 0 104 0 a
User Ad). 2.94 1.06 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
DEEP Adj: I.Da 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00
P" Voltage. a AID 921 0 2366 0 a a 0 104 0 a
RodbaCL Vol; a 0 a a b a a 0 0 a G 0
Reduc:ed Vol: a 119 428 2 2396 a a a a 104 0 0
PCZ AdJ2 1.00 1.150 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 1.00 2.00 1.00
MR Ad) z 1.00 1 00 ]_.q 1.00 2.40 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final vol�; 0 ilt (620 a 2264 a 0 0 a lot 0 a
------------ ........ ... �.[I ............... --------------- if ...............
Satu,ration Flow H�4UIe;
SAL/LdUla: 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1601D
1�00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 I.Co 1.09 1,00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lames; 0.00 0.00 po_PGA 0.00 U.00 o.co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 U.00 O.Do
Final Sat.; 03260 0 *.YZOG- 0 1 a a 0 0 0
U�o
-------- --- I;;i;WQ . IM --------------- Gn ---------
Capacity Ar.1 -i a 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 O.DD
Vol/Sat; 0.00 0.00
Wt mo�aq:
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 o.oa 9.00 ejo
vol�/C.pz O.Ga 0.00 Q.Co 0.00 0.00 0.015 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 4.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
laval. Of Scx�icc HodaIe.
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D,0 0.6 0.0 0.0 E.0 0.0 D.0
Delay A4j; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 IM
Adjoelivehm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
g4auet 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0
...... I ..... I ............................................ * ......................
TraffLx S.A.1511 Cc) 1995 Dowling Assoc. LiCensed to rats, Okitaw. Monterey
LES
4-71 -y- o. uSo � o, 523
DI/16/1997 11:01 Filena.e: SCN3AMWO.RPT Page I
SCN3AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:01:10 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
... ** ............... * ..... ... *.* ..........
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/21th Street
* ...... ............
cycle (sec)s 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 1.093
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh); 63,6
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Serviceg F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include +-4-de �LG
Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -e-
Laness 1 0 2 0 0 1 D I 1 0 D 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 11 342 0 828 829 54 0 0 0 0 0 637
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bast 11 342 a 828 829 54 0 0 0 0 0 637
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Volume; 11 342 0 828 829 S4 0 0 0 0 0 637
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 11 342 0 828 829 54 0 a 0 0 0 637
PCE Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1,00 1�.� 1.00 IDL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.� 1.00 1.00 1.00 l'all.
Final Vol.: 11 0 Q8,> 829 54 a 0 0 0 4�6 fD
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---- --
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00
lanes: 1-00 1;11 IjI2 I-OOS 0.000 1 00 0.00
O�
OX 04
Final Sat. 1 i000 3200 5 96 0 l;OO 0 r'l 6 OE)
------------ I I -- kit> .... --------------- ------ ------- ------------
capacity Analysis module;
Vol/Sats 0.01 0.11 0.00 0,52 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40
Crit Moves: ... * ....
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.10 0.00 0.47 0.55 O.SS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36
Volume/Cap; 0.50 1.10 0.00 1.10 0.50 0.50 0.00 0�00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10
------------ I ------- ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 49.8 110 0.0 81.4 10.8 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.9
Delay Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh; 49.8 110 0.0 81.4 10.8 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.9
Queue: 0 is 0 41 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 32
Traffix 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
p's �Iq L 6�
(-0- �rbj'sz
0. -'? Z5
01/16/1997 11:01 Filename: SCN3AMWO.RPT Page 2
SCN3AKWO.IN Thu Jan 26, 1997 12:01;21 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
*..**** ...... * ... ... r
Average Delay (aec/veh); 0.7 Worst Case Level Of Servicei B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign 'Stop Sign
Rights: include Include Include Include
,Lanes: 1 0 1 a 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 it 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 21 637 P
0 0 828 0 5 0 87 0 0 0
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 I.Oo 1.00 1.00
initial Has: 21 637 0 0 $28 0 5 0 87 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj; 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 21 637 0 0 828 0 5 0 87 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol. : 21 637 0 0 828 0 5 0 87 0 0 0 11-
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0%. 0% Ov 011
% Cycle/Cars:
% Truck/Comb,
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCEi ;c= � =x � 2c=
Trck/Cmb PCE: XX= Dc=
Adj Vol.; 23 637 0 0 828 a 6 0 96 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module%
MoveVp Time: 2.1 x= � xx= :c= 3.4 :ccxx 2.6
Critical GP: 5.0 :c= oc= 6.5 � 5.5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 828 x= 0000t 1486 � 828 � P
Potent Cap.: 691 � � 146 � 527 �
Adj Cap: 1.00 � � ;c= 0.97 � 1.00 �
Move Cap.: 691 x= xx= 141 :c,xx 527 x=
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- a -
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 5.4 26.4 8.2
LOS by Move: B
Movement. LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - L;R RT
Shared Cap.: xx= x=x � � 4 5 9 x=x xx�x
Shrd StpDel I �x � � 9.8
Shared LOS! B
ApproachDel: 0.2 0.0 9.2 0.0
Traffix 6.S.ISII (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Ur,Jl) O\Aw;�-CD LtR
= = = = M M M M = M
M M M
= M M M M M
01/16/1997 11,01 Filenamei SCN3AMWO,RPT
Page 3
01/16/1997 11,01 Filename: SCN3AMWO.RPT
Page 4
SCN3AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 1101ill
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 3-1
SCN3AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:01:11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink
Alt.)
AM Peak Hour Analysis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink
Alt.)
Level
Of Service Computation Report
Level
Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1 (Loss as Cycle
Length k) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
ICU l(Loss as Cycle
Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative�
**.* .............. * ................
......
.....................
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Intersection #7 San Fernando
Road/Lyons Avenue
..........
... * .......
Cycle (sec)i 100
Critical Vol./cap. Wz
0.707
Cycle.(sec)t 100
Critical Vol./Cap. (XI:
O.S39
LOSS Time (Sec): IX I
Average Delay (sec/veh)z
11.7
Loss Time (Sao): 10
Average Delay (sec/veh):
20.9
Optimal Cycle� 38
Level Of Service:
C
Optimal Cyclet 36
Level Of Service:
A
..............
..... * ... * ....
****.* .... *****
Approach; North Bound
South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Approachi North Bound
South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Movement: L - T - R
------------ ---------------
L - T - R L - T - R
--------------- 11 --------------- 11
L - T - R
---------------
Movement: L - T - R
------------
L - 7 - R L - T - R
L - T - R
Control: Permitted
Permitted Permitted
Permitted
I ---------------
Control; Protected
--------------- 11 --------------- 11
Protected Protected
---------------
Protected
Rights: Include
Include Include
include
Rights: Include
Include Include
Include
Min. Green; 0 0 0
0 0 a 0 0 0
0 0 0
Min. Green: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
---------------
1 0 a 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 1 0
Lanes: 1 0 a 1 0
1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1
1 0 a 1 0
------------
volume Module:
--------------- --------------- 11
---------------
------------ I ---------------
Volume Module�
--------------- 11 --------------- 11
---------------
Base Vol: 0 581 0
10 $22 14 36 65 36
0 159 20
Base Vol, 267 52 0
0 343 486 290 84 79
7 10 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1,00 2.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1,00
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 581 0
20 822 14 36 65 36
0 159 20
Initial B$e: 267 52 0
0 343 486 290 84 79
7 10 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PUF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PET Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 S81 0
10 822 14 36 65 36
0 159 20
PHF Volume: 267 52 0
0 343 486 290 84 79
7 10 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
Reduct Vol: a 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 0 581 0
10 822 14 36 65 36
0 159 20
Reduced Vol: 267 52 0
0 343 486 290 84 79
7 10 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1. %�'l. 00 1�00
1.00 1.0D 00 1.00
1.00 1-104 1.00
MLF Adj; 00 1.00
1.00 1 00 00 1.00
1.00 1.00
Final Vol.; U/ 581 0
------------ ---------------
10 14 65 36
---- ----- ---- ---------
0 (191 20
Final Vol 52 0
0 �b i86 84 79
LJOA
I
7 1 3
Saturation Flow Module:
-------
--------- --------- ....
Saturation Flow Modulei
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjustment: 1.09 1�09 1.09
1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 l.oq 1.09
1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: )-DQ_1.00 0.00
(1600)L600
Final Sat.; 0
------------ ------------
1.00,D-JQ 0.0 1�.Oo 64 0 36
lSOQ1-5'7P 21 1 - ; __ i 0
2 'd 30 7
---------- ---- ---- ----
1 00 �-44 0.11
1 -) 179
ZOO(1421
-----
Lanest J-" 1.00 0 00
inal Sat. 75D 1750
F : (I ' D
1 LJ_O 2 00 1 00 1 00
;00 ; 3500 1;50 1'
1 0( 175 3 OD tt) 75D
1.00 20.73, 0.23
17SO QI!3!4!6) 404
Capacity Analysis Module;
------------ r�- ---- --- -
- -
Capacity Analysis Module.
------ ----------------------
----- -------
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.00
0.01 0.52 0.52 0.02 0.06 0.06
0.00 0.11 0.11
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.03 0.00
0.00 0.20 0.14 0.08 0.05 0.05
0.00 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: --**
....
....
Crit Moves: *-**
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.74 0.00
0.01 0.76 0.76 0.03 0.19 0.19
0.00 0.16 0.16
Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.71 0.00
0.00 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.17 0.17
0.02 0.02 0.02
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.49 0.00
------------- I ------- -------
0.49 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.32 0.32
--------------- ---------------
0.00 0.69 0.69
---------------
Volume/Capt 0.49 0.04 0.00
------------
0.00 0.49 0.35 0.49 0.28 0.26
0.28 0.49 0.49
Level Of Service Module:
I ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Delaylveh: 0.0 4.3 0.0
49.8 6.0 45.6 57.3 27.0 27.3
0.0 36.3 62.1
Delay/Veht 22.0 3.2 0.0
0.0 17.6 16.1 29.4 27.9 27.8
39.1 49.5 67.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay Adj! 1.00 1�00 1.00
1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjt)el/Veh: 0.0 4.3 0.0
49.8 6.0 45.6 57.3 27.0 27.3
0.0 36.3 62.1
Adjnel/Veh� 22.0 3.2 0.0
0.0 17.6 16.1 29.4 27.9 27.8
39.1 49.5 67.5
Queue: 0 7 0
0 12 0 1 2 1
0 5 1
Queue; 6 0 0
0 7 9 7 2 2
0 0 0
.* ... .....
..... ..... *** ...
Traffix 6.8.1S12 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to
Z3
0-0
4 0.0.7c'':- oftD5
Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Traffix 6.8.1511 Cc) 1995 Dowling Assoc
(t) . IS1
6,136
a441 + 040Q�
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
a -SZL
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M = M M
01/16/1997 1101 Filename: SCN3AMWO.RPT Page 5 01/16/1997 11:01 Filename: SCN3AmWO.RPT Page 6
SCN3AMWO. IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:01:11 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. Mi 0.384
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh); 13.8
optimal cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - I - R I - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- if ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: include Include Include include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes� 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 18 324 19 16 267 is 19 48 11 29� 94 62
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 18 324 29 16 267 is 19 48 11 . 29 94 62
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 18 324 19 16 267 15 19 48 11 29 94 62
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 18 324 19 16 267 is 19 48 11 29 94 62
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.2Z 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 0
Final Vol.; is 19 -&�67 15 C19) 48 11 29 Q 1'602
------------ ---------- ---- --------- ----- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 06 "Q 9s 0.05 1 0.19 1.00 V6Q, 0.40
Final Sat.: N�oz:�� 0.89 (1160ploils 85 0 3 8 2 298 1600 Q��4 636
0
------------ I --------------- - ------------- PP --------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.28 0,18 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.10 0.10
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.61 0.61 0.03 0.60 0.60 0.03 0.21 0.21. 0.20 0.28 0.28
volume/Cap: 0.29 0.3S 0.35 O.3S 0.29 0.29 0.35 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.35 0.35
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 36.8 7-5 9.1 38.6 7.S 8.4 38.0 25.1 25.2 31.6 22.6� 22.8
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.8 7.5 9.1 38.6 7�5 8.4 38.0'25.1 25.2 31.6 22.6 22.8
Queue: 1 4 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 1 2 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to
0.,Z)4-
C'670-rz�)
1 -2 -4 QJ,
Katz, Okitsu. Monterey
L Lc�S
1�
SCN3AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:01�11 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metro2ink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec)� 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.861
Loss Time ($so): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 28.1
Optimal Cycle: 75 Level Of Service: D
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - I - R L - I - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 a 11 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Modules
Base Vol: 420 393 0 0 211 0 0 0 630 1 0 3
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 420 393 0 0 211 0 0 0 63D 1 0 3
User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adjt 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Volume: 420 393 0 0 211 0 a 0 630 1 0 3
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 420 393 0 0 211 0 0 0 630 1 0 3
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj; j-44 1.00 1.00 1.00 I�Q 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00
k� �20 3S 3 0 3
Final Vol.: �3 0 0 21 0 0 0
1
------------ I --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes; IQO 1.00 0.00 0 . DO 1-4;, 0.00 0.00 1 00(:jj2k��.00 0.75
Final Sat.: (1-60D*)1600 0 0� �00 0 0 1;00 0 1200
------------ r---� ---------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity An > .
a 0 1<S1,4odul%..O
Vol/Sat: 0 0.25 O.DO 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves
Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.47
Volume/Cap; 0.85 0.53 O�00 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.00 D.00 0.85 0.85 0.00 0,01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veh: 34.2 15.2 0.0 0.0 47.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.8 445.8 0.0 11.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh� 34.2 15.2 0.0 0.0 47.7 0.0 0.0 O.D 24.8 445.8 0.0 11.0
Queue: 13 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 17 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc . Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L
C -LW +4-
0.
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M =
lArwo RPT ____"qlL_2
CZ 01AW1991 1"3 Vg* 7-1
Ld SCMPOO.Cm FVI je, 11, loll 19.33-.34 -----------------
-------------------------- ................
........... AVMM IMOVO4fitm mw=- MIT'"
"Mr -C "a RARXIIG ANALYSIS
AN Peak Hou:r A441YPIA 19otmario 3 -Without - MstwlLnk - Alt-) ------------
- --------- -----
................... ------
...................... 7 sport
�;;;l Of Service co-potati� R
xed Method t�c V01UNS Alternative)
I ......................... ........................
........ =K,:M-M-w!gnK,1
Intersection #12 Plus A"Me/Market.Stre'et ......................................
................................... ...... worst C"* Level Of Service' A
Delay q%ec1vtb,1 2-! ..... ................ ....... . ..... I .........
"rage West 00,-d
...............................
Approach, worth awnd South BOWA East A L
L - T - P 1p - T
moee,eemt: L - T - A ------------- 11 --------------- 11 -----------
------- I trolled U',,mcrelled
11- S�,P Sig. �Ccm
0 comtrol: Sxw SX,qn
01 loeltide To J�de 1.10d.
S.Lgbts� ir.clude 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 o 1 0 a 0 11 a 0
wes, a 0 11 a a -11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
... I --------- I ----
05 0 3 36 3 1. log 3
n Mae Vol I 1 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Ile: I.Do 1.00 1.00
Crceth NIJ. 1.00 1.00 .00 0 0 0 $6 36 1 106 2
Initial Bse. so 0 3 1.00 1. Ce I.to 1.09 1-00 1.00
I CC 1, 00 1.04 1 . o: 1.00 0 0
User Adj: - 11 " 1.0 1.00 1.00 3L. 00
0 rHF ASj 1 2-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.0 0 3: 36 1 its 2
0 1 0 0
Volua@2 fig 0 0 0 0
PAI&Ct Volt 0 0 3S if I log 2
F,1rAL Vol.! 65 0 1 1 a' 0 --------------- ---------------
- ---------- I --------------- -----------
Adj"ted VIlia's "cuu", 0% to CA,
rZaAg, ot a,KX, ACCRA
cycl,fmrs. 3wXxx A,ce ,reW x:xxx
l"batcsh, WAWX Xa� x,CxX
PCE Ad� 1,10 1.10 1.16 1.10 1,30
X_
CycLICxe rCRI
TJ Wc-1, ', �X r
0 3 16 se -------
Adj vox-, -----_------ 11 ----------
............ --------------
critical cap rudgle! 2.1 x=x
H�vp Ties - ). 4 me= 2.6 S. o � xx�
Critical QlPt 6.5 onex 5.5 .1
....... .... ............... --------------- --------------- _-------------
72 � )UCKXX
cawity MdU18% S4 xx� IXAX XXXWX
01 Vol, 162 X� i3oo Wa� ,ore, L584 )OCKK 20000e
r, potent Cap. -. 8S3 AWWA cex ,re, 1.00 x,=K x
M go NOCKK isw4 x1cXXX
CC Adj Cap: 1�00 xxxx I " g:res manewS
UD Mo,� Cap-'- SS2 A,= 1;00 XCXK )ncrC -onces ............. ---------------
M - -11 ---------------
------------ I ----------
LO L'I Of Srvim, v4dulet ucmX 2.3 `EXXXX
=Del. 4.% 2.8 30 A
oZ.11 - - LT - Ln - RT LT LIR - RT IT m - xT
Movement, IT LTR - RT no,W A� xx� xa,zu, W� Ws�
01 Shazed CIP.: � 165 x,n0CX
4.5 xxx=
Shrd StPD81;70coes
63 $hexed L438. A 0.0
App'Oedwai 2 4.5 0.0 0.0
Rate, Okitm. KMLRRW
$1, le, ISDS Dowling Amove. Licensed to
C1 T"Efix 6.8.1
r,
U�
GOAL 1-?-,Elb
Fri Zan 1.7. 1997 11�33. Page I.A.
.34
----- ----------------------
----------- _AVS= r"ROVIMENT FROJ=. SUKKI'LL CA
TRAMC aski PARXIM ANALYSIS
AM Peak ROUT Analysis (Scenaric 3-Vithout Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computatim Report
ICU 3 (Loss as Cycle Length 1) �thnd Gosas Vol� AltefrAt'va)
.................... �* ................ * .............. * ..........................
Inte.emi,, Sig Sam Fernando R,,alsailroea Avemel4th Street
... I ...... * .......... * ................... * .....................................
cycle f.ec)! 100 critical Vol./c4p. (X31 0.000
S A�eragC Del&Y (goCiVehl! 0.0
Ims Tim (..c1 : 1 0
Optival Cycle: 0 TA,e E Service�
* ................................................................ .........
ArPrcacb: morrh Bound south B�d East Bound meet Rowid
Movese.t: L - -1 - R L T 9 L
------------ I ---------_---- --------------- ---------- ----------
cmtrol; Pmtect.d Protected Permit
Right 0vI Imi.de, Inclde Ilude
li 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 a
Kim. Green: 0 0 a 0 0
LOMA: 0 0 2 a 1 1 D 0
........... I --------------- it --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module!
base, Vol: 0 414 Sol 1 939 $so a 0
GroWth Adjz J.DO I.GO 1.00 1-90 1-00 1-00 "CC 1-00 "Do 1-00 1-00 1'00
Initial B., a 814 Sol 3 839 a a 0 0 159 0 0
User Adj� 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.0D 1.00 1�00 1.40 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
P97 Adj. L.*o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 3.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
Pir Volume, 914 Sol 1 839 0 0, 0 9 Ho 0 a
Red.ct Act; 0 0 a a 0 0 0
Reduced Vul: 9 $14 six 3 839 a 0 0 0 958 0 9
ECK Adj� 2.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09
" Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0a 1-00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
rimai Vol.! 0 $24 Sal 3 939 0 0 a 0 is$ a 0
.......... --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
s,t.rAtLM [1� K-t'2E:
Sat/L'.t 1600 1600 lgoo lean IEDD a"D IEDD 1600 i6oO l6co �EOD leto
Adj..�t 1.00 1.00 1.;� i.cv _Z, I.Co 3'. t,*
4.00 0.00 0.09 0�oc 0 -C
LAMA I _z 0,00 ;.00 0.00 0.00 0�00 D 00 o (o
Final set., 0:200 t4g, a 0 32,0 0 0 0 .... 0 3?0 0 0 a
............ I --------------- --------------- ---------- ---------------
r�apacity Analysis madile:
Vollset: 0.09 0.09 6.Co :.a:
.2
cat Hoveoi eo�M_5 a 00'.
Cz z>.3i - 0. 0
(brecalcyclo. 0-0 C54 �_01 o,zr .0 0. D 0.06 .0 0. .00
voluse/cap: 0.09 0.00 9.ce 0.00 D.06 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 G.Vo 0,
i;; --------- I --------------- 11 --------------- H --------------- ---------------
I of Service Module.
Delayfveb� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a,* 0.0 0.0 0-0 C.0 0.0
Delay Adj. 1.90 1.00 1-00 3-00 "o "Do "go "Co 1-00 1-00 "o 1.49
Adjftllveh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C.e 0.0 0.0 0.0
Guava! 0 a 0 a 0 0 a
........................... A. ............................. I ...... ........
Traffix 6.1.1511 (4) isgs bwling Assoc. Licensed to Satz, Okit=. ?sWt*"y
0267 -
O's 3 0 " 0. t5r.) -t cl, sea
01/16/1997 II:OS Filename: SCN3PMWO.RPT Page 1 01/16/1997 11,05 Filename: SCN3PMWO.RPT Page 2 9.)
Traffi .8. (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L c5
0, -4 0,zl 0 " Os r?09
SCN3PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 II:OSt24 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service.Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method fBase Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Services B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - I - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 a 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 54 939 0 0 551 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bast 54 939 0 0 551 0 8 0 42 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 54 939 0 0 551 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 54 939 0 0 551 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: OF, 0% 0% ot
t Cycle/Cars; Xs33C � c=
% TrUck/Combt ]C430C � �DDC
PCE Adjz 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE; cccC �
Trck/Cmb PCE: tatoos =Ot 20CCK
Adj Vol. : S9 939 0 0 551 0 9 0 46 a 0 a
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.1 � � =,00s =octt 3.4 coce 2.6 :cccos
Critical Gp: 5.0 � � 6.5 xsoot 5�5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modules
Cnflict Volt 551 � � XKXX =0t � 1544 � S51 =tot
Potent Cap. : 937 � � =,os � � 135 � 728
Adj Caps 1.00 � � =os � � 0. 94 =,ot 1.00 :ccct �
Move Cap.: 937 � � � � socccc 127 cccs: 728 � � ccocs:
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Dels 4.1 000t =x 30.4 sccc� 5.2
LOS by Move: A
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LIP. - RT
Shared Cap. : scc�os :,000t xnos 414
Shrd StpDel:� 9.9
Shared LOS: B
ApproachDel: 0.2 0.0 9.3 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I V ti S 16 tJA U
ss-r'�
SCN3PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:05:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING
ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without
Metrolink
Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level
Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle
Length V) Method
(Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/llth Street
Cycle (sec): 100
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
1.196
LOSS Time (sec): 7
Average Delay (sec/veh);
123.8
Optimal Cycle: ISO
Level
Of Service:
F
Appmachs North Bound
South Bound
East Bound
West Bound
Movement: L - 7 - R
L - T - R
L - T - R
L
- T - R
............ I ---------------
Control: Protected
---------------
Protected
11 --------------- 11
Permitted
---------------
Permitted
Rights: Include
Include
Include
-Z-�tL"
Min. Green; 0 a 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
a 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0
1 0 1 1 0
0 0 11 0 0
1
0 0 1 a
------------ I ---------------
Volume Module:
---------------
11 --------------- 11
---------------
Base Vol: 9 623 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
551 551 11
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0 0
1.00 1.00 1,00
0
1.00
0 939
1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 623 0
551 551 11
0 0 0
0
0 939
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 l.DO
PHP Volumes 9 623 a
S51 551 11
0 0 0
0
0 939
Reduct Vol: 0 D 0
0 D 0
0 0 0
0
0 0
Reduced Vol; 9 623 0
551 551 11
a 0 0
0
0 939
PCE Adj2 1.00 1100 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 l'a 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.0 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 9 Q 2,3? 0
(0) S51 11
0 0
0
0 939
------------ ---------------
Saturation Flow Module;
---------------
---------------
---------------
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600
1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1;�10 2 0 0.000
gci�;
1. Wl. 96 0.04
0.00 1,W 0.00
1.00
0.00 .1.00
Final Sat.: 1 32
6 011y 13 7 63
1-160 0
1600
0 1600
----- ----- -------
]��
!P
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat; 0.01 0.19 0.00
0.34 0.18 0.18
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.59
Crit Moves:
....
... *
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.16 0.00
0.28 0.43 0.43
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 0.48
Volume/Cap; 0.41 1.21 0.00
1.21 0.41 0.41
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
0.00 1.21
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
H ---------------
---------------
---------------
Delay/Veh: 43.7 160 0.0
158,5 15.2 20.2
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 145.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.7 160 0.0
158.5 15.2 20.2
O.D 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 145.1
Queue: 0 41 0
38 11 0
a 0 0
0
0 66
Traffi .8. (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
L c5
0, -4 0,zl 0 " Os r?09
SCN3PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 II:OSt24 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service.Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method fBase Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Level Of Services B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - I - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 a 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Vol: 54 939 0 0 551 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bast 54 939 0 0 551 0 8 0 42 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 54 939 0 0 551 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 54 939 0 0 551 0 a 0 42 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: OF, 0% 0% ot
t Cycle/Cars; Xs33C � c=
% TrUck/Combt ]C430C � �DDC
PCE Adjz 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE; cccC �
Trck/Cmb PCE: tatoos =Ot 20CCK
Adj Vol. : S9 939 0 0 551 0 9 0 46 a 0 a
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.1 � � =,00s =octt 3.4 coce 2.6 :cccos
Critical Gp: 5.0 � � 6.5 xsoot 5�5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Modules
Cnflict Volt 551 � � XKXX =0t � 1544 � S51 =tot
Potent Cap. : 937 � � =,os � � 135 � 728
Adj Caps 1.00 � � =os � � 0. 94 =,ot 1.00 :ccct �
Move Cap.: 937 � � � � socccc 127 cccs: 728 � � ccocs:
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Dels 4.1 000t =x 30.4 sccc� 5.2
LOS by Move: A
Movement: IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT IT - LIP. - RT
Shared Cap. : scc�os :,000t xnos 414
Shrd StpDel:� 9.9
Shared LOS: B
ApproachDel: 0.2 0.0 9.3 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I V ti S 16 tJA U
ss-r'�
LA
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 2 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
** ........... .......... ......
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.744
LOSS Time (Sao): x F7 Average Delay (see/veh)s 13.7
Optimal Cycles 43 Level Of Service; C
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - I - A L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controls Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Modules
Base Vol: 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00
Initial Best 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Volt 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1. 00 -L4Z 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.ag 1 00 1.00 1.00 1
d 1.00
Final Vol.; 14 8 �81 5 iOl 4 2 27
------------ ----- ------- 11-0 ------------ 11-a ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.01 5>0 - 86 5 0.15 1,2_0 0.96 0.04 1 00 42t� 0.19
Final Sat.; 1591 .9 3 2 238 (1600-)1539 61 l;0O 306
------------ 1 1;'00' dt:� ---- ------------- ---------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.55 0.55 0.03 0.31 0.31 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle; 0.02 0.76 0.76 0.05 0.78 0.78 0.03 0.14 0.24 0.00 0.22 0.12
volume/cap: 0.40 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.40 0.40 0.73 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.73 0.73
------------ I ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 40.9 6.7 103.7 56.1 2.8 3.4 66.9 31.2 48.6 68.8 43.3 65.5
Delay Adj; 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.9 6.7 103.7 56.1 2.8 3.4 66.9 31.2 48.6 68.8 43.3 65.5
Queue: 0 14 0 2 4 1 1 a 0 0 4 1
.............
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to
1+
0
0.0
0
Clz ?12.
Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
C3 b
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.529
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.3
Optimal Cycle: 3S Level Of Service; A
..... * .......... ****** .......
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement! L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Controls Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 181 42 12 19 47 486 S56 19 104 5 25 24
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 281 42 12 19 47 486 556 19 104 S 25 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 181 42 12 19 47 486 SSG 19 104 5 25 24
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 42 12 19 47 486 556 19 104 5 25 24
PCE Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -Aq 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.-u 1.00
466
Final Vol 42 12 19___47_ 0> <E5�6> 19 104 5_- Q� 24
--------- :- I --------------- ---- -- ---- --------------- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lanes 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: _L-00,0.78 0.22 1.41.1 1��100 2 I.DD 1.00 1.00 �� 0.49
Final -Sat : 4� �7SD 361 389 3 l <350 350 1750 1750 17SO 857
--------------- ----------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat; 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.14 0.16 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.03
Crit moves: --- .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.22 0.38 0.38 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.02 0.06 0.06
Volume/Capi 0.48 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.16 O�16 0.48 0.48
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 27.1 15.5 15.5 29.3 19.9 22.7 20.6 15.3 16.1 37.4 40.0 40.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oO
AdjDel/Veh: 27.1 15.5 15.5 29.3 19.9 22.7 20.6 IS.3 16.1 37.4 40.0 40.2
Queue; 4 1 0 0 1 11 22 0 2 0 1 1
................
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Kate, Okitsu, Monterey
o, i o.3
01 1 1�) Lo's A
01/16/1997 11:05
Filename, SCN3PMWO.RPT
Page
3 01/16/1997 11:05
Filename: SCN3PMWO.RPT Page 4
SCN3PMWO.IN
Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:05:24
Page 3-1
SCN3PMwO.Ix
Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:05:24 Page 4-1
LA
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 2 (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
** ........... .......... ......
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.744
LOSS Time (Sao): x F7 Average Delay (see/veh)s 13.7
Optimal Cycles 43 Level Of Service; C
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - I - A L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controls Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Modules
Base Vol: 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00
Initial Best 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Volt 14 881 5 53 424 74 31 101 4 2 114 27
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1. 00 -L4Z 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.ag 1 00 1.00 1.00 1
d 1.00
Final Vol.; 14 8 �81 5 iOl 4 2 27
------------ ----- ------- 11-0 ------------ 11-a ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.01 5>0 - 86 5 0.15 1,2_0 0.96 0.04 1 00 42t� 0.19
Final Sat.; 1591 .9 3 2 238 (1600-)1539 61 l;0O 306
------------ 1 1;'00' dt:� ---- ------------- ---------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.55 0.55 0.03 0.31 0.31 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle; 0.02 0.76 0.76 0.05 0.78 0.78 0.03 0.14 0.24 0.00 0.22 0.12
volume/cap: 0.40 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.40 0.40 0.73 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.73 0.73
------------ I ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 40.9 6.7 103.7 56.1 2.8 3.4 66.9 31.2 48.6 68.8 43.3 65.5
Delay Adj; 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.9 6.7 103.7 56.1 2.8 3.4 66.9 31.2 48.6 68.8 43.3 65.5
Queue: 0 14 0 2 4 1 1 a 0 0 4 1
.............
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to
1+
0
0.0
0
Clz ?12.
Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
C3 b
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.529
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.3
Optimal Cycle: 3S Level Of Service; A
..... * .......... ****** .......
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement! L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Controls Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 181 42 12 19 47 486 S56 19 104 5 25 24
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 281 42 12 19 47 486 556 19 104 S 25 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 181 42 12 19 47 486 SSG 19 104 5 25 24
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 42 12 19 47 486 556 19 104 5 25 24
PCE Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -Aq 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.-u 1.00
466
Final Vol 42 12 19___47_ 0> <E5�6> 19 104 5_- Q� 24
--------- :- I --------------- ---- -- ---- --------------- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lanes 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes: _L-00,0.78 0.22 1.41.1 1��100 2 I.DD 1.00 1.00 �� 0.49
Final -Sat : 4� �7SD 361 389 3 l <350 350 1750 1750 17SO 857
--------------- ----------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat; 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.14 0.16 0.01 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.03
Crit moves: --- .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.22 0.38 0.38 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.02 0.06 0.06
Volume/Capi 0.48 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.48 0.48 0.03 0.16 O�16 0.48 0.48
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 27.1 15.5 15.5 29.3 19.9 22.7 20.6 15.3 16.1 37.4 40.0 40.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oO
AdjDel/Veh: 27.1 15.5 15.5 29.3 19.9 22.7 20.6 IS.3 16.1 37.4 40.0 40.2
Queue; 4 1 0 0 1 11 22 0 2 0 1 1
................
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Kate, Okitsu, Monterey
o, i o.3
01 1 1�) Lo's A
01/16/1997 11;05 Filename.- SCN3PMWO.RPT page 5
SCN3PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:05:24 Page S-1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3-Withaut Metrolink Alt.)
Level Of Service Computation Report
Traffix 6.8.1511 (C) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
, Q Ck Los A
OK
�r' J + (3,0SO'% 0,46t)
.0
01/16/1997 11!05 Filename, SC1q3PMWO.RPT .- 6
SCN3PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:05:24 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/uewhall Avenue
Cycle (Sec)t 100 Critical Vol.JCap. (X): 1.027
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): S2.8
optimal cycles ISO Level Of Service; F
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 486 415 0 0 156 0 S 0 882 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial See: 486 415 0 0 156 0 5 0 882 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 486 41S 0 0 156 0 5 a 882 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced VoI2 486 415 0 0 156 0 S 0 882 4 3 0
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I'4Ll.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol :_J��415 0 0 0 5 0 <[D (:r> 3 0
--------- :- --------- 11 ---- ------- 7-11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Plow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanesz -�.LO 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 1 00 0.00 1 0 5 0.43 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 0 0 1 00 0 60 �14 686 0
60D (�b
-Y -------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity AnaLysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 5">C 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 o.oa o.00
Crit Moves: .... .*** ..*.
Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.32 0.00
Volume/Capi 1.03 0.67 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 1.03 1.03 0.01 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 67.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18.1 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18.1 0.0
Queue: 20 10 0 0 8 0 0 0 3S 1 0 0
wFL-AP
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LV
o' t's is
055,99 + o'0,5t,
ICU I (Loss as Cycle
Length V) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
intersection
#8 San Fernando
Road/market Street
Cycle (see):
100
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
0.463
Loss Time (see): -Z:r ;a
Average
Delay (sec/veh):
19.2
Optimal Cycle; 22
Level Of Service:
A
...............
Approach:
North Bound
South Bound
East Bound
West Bound
Movement:
L - T - R
L - T - R
L - T - R
L
- I - R
------------
ControI4
---------------
Permitted
---------------
Permitted
---------------
Permitted
If ---------------
Permitted
Rights:
Include
Include
Include
Include
Min. Greent
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 1 D
Lanes:
1 0 0 1 0
1 0 a 1 0
1 0 0 1 0
0 2.1 A 0
------------ ---------------
Volume Module:
---------------
---------------
11 ---------------
Base Vol:
8 341 10
27 78 21
53 71 25
56
57 74
growth Adj:.
1.00 1.00 1�00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Initial Bee:
8 341 10
27 78 21
53 71 2S
56
57 74
User Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PHF AdJ:
2.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PHF Volume:
6 341 10
27 78 21
53 71 2S
56
57 74
Reduct Vol:
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 a 0
0
0 0
Reduced Vol:
8 341 10
27 78 21
53 71 25
55
57 74
PCE Adj,
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
MLF Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00
I.akl.00 1.00
1.00 1..00 1.00
1.00
IAA, 1.00
Final Vol.:
8 <1�45 10
Q7�� 78 21
53 25
56
�L7� 74
------------
Saturation Flow
---------------
Module;
---------------
---------------
Sat/Lane:
1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600
1600 1600
Adjustment: .1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Lanes:
0 0 0.03
I-lD 0.79 0.21
11.00 q -1L 0.26
0.30
0. 3 0 40
Final Sat.t
'i' 46
L Ok 4)
(160"OD 1261 339
1600(1183 ?' 417
-.>Id
88 i33
------------ I
----- -------
lr-� ------------
------ �ef ------
---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
144a
Vol/sat:
0.01 0.22 0.22
0.02 0.06 0.06
0.03 0.06 0.06
0.12
0.12 0.12
Crit Moves�
... *
Green/Cyclai
0.04 0.50 0.50
0.04 0.50 0.50
0.09 0.14 0.14
0.27
0.32 0.32
Volume/Cap;
0.12 0.43 0.43
0.43 O�12 O�12
0.37 0.43 0,43
0.43
0.37 0 37
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
11 ---------------
---------------
------------
Delay/Veh:
35.7 12.4 19.4.
39.2 10.2 10.2
33.7 31.6 33,7
24.8
21.0 20.9
Delay Adjt
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh:
35.7 12.4 29.4
39.2 10.2 10.2
33.7 31.6 33.7
24.8
21.0 20.9
Queue:
0 6 0
1 1 0
1 2 1
1
1 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (C) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
, Q Ck Los A
OK
�r' J + (3,0SO'% 0,46t)
.0
01/16/1997 11!05 Filename, SC1q3PMWO.RPT .- 6
SCN3PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:05:24 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/uewhall Avenue
Cycle (Sec)t 100 Critical Vol.JCap. (X): 1.027
Loss Time (see): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): S2.8
optimal cycles ISO Level Of Service; F
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 486 415 0 0 156 0 S 0 882 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial See: 486 415 0 0 156 0 5 0 882 4 3 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 486 41S 0 0 156 0 5 a 882 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced VoI2 486 415 0 0 156 0 S 0 882 4 3 0
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I'4Ll.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol :_J��415 0 0 0 5 0 <[D (:r> 3 0
--------- :- --------- 11 ---- ------- 7-11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Plow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanesz -�.LO 1.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 1 00 0.00 1 0 5 0.43 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 0 0 1 00 0 60 �14 686 0
60D (�b
-Y -------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity AnaLysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 5">C 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 o.oa o.00
Crit Moves: .... .*** ..*.
Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.32 0.00
Volume/Capi 1.03 0.67 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 1.03 1.03 0.01 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 67.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18.1 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18.1 0.0
Queue: 20 10 0 0 8 0 0 0 3S 1 0 0
wFL-AP
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LV
o' t's is
055,99 + o'0,5t,
M M M M M M IM M M M M M IM M M � M M M
y,X jan 17, 1997 17,44,08 Page 7-t
------ -------- ----- -- - ------ - ----- ---- ---- -------- - - ------ --- ----- ----- --- ----- -
PROPOSED P'11'CRD kvlam IMPROVID(wr FROMM MERML CIL
7Rx"rC And PRAKIMKJ ANAUSIS
IF. Peak NDUE Analysis Mcenarip 1.11tt=t Metrolink Alt.) .......
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------
la�l Of Se�lcs ComPutatim Report
1994 W)4 Ussignalized Ketbod (Base Volune Altt�tiwl
.................... I ..........................................................
Intersectim 913 vim Avenualmrket street
.................. .................... ** ......................... 4 ..........
Average Delay (vccl�w : 1.0 Worst CIL" FAVOI Of SerVICS' A
....... I .................................. *.' ....................... 60* .........
Approach, MorLh Bound South sound Mat Bound West Bound
MD -event 1. - T - R 1, - T - R I - T - R L � T - A
I ........ ------------- 1-11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controli stop sign Stop Sign Umcatrelled Uncontrolled
Rights, Include include 7�lvde include
Lama; 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 a 1 0 2
--------------- --------------- it --------------- If ---------------
Base Yol! 12 0 6 0 0 is 74 5 89
Gr�h Adj, 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1-00 1.00 1�00 X.O* 1.00
Initial see- 52 0 9 a 0 0 9 95 74 5 6) 0
User Adj, 1.00 7,00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I -Do 1.00 1.00 1.00
1-00 1,00 1.00 1.00
PH7 Adj i I.co 1.00 1.0a I . Do 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00
MT vol.t 52 a 6 0 0 0 0 so it 5 0
R.d.ct nIt 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Final Vol.! S3 a 6 0 0 0 0 - 95 7t 5 at 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Adjusted VIus,s Mdult, at at
Chade, 0% at
% cycle/Cars: X� nCXX xx,zx X=X
I Truck/Cosu:t xMM7, � A:rKK
PCE Adjr 1.10 1,10 I.Lo 2.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 2.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
cvcllcar� �: �
0 0 0 95 74 6
.......... ---------------
Critical Cap Kod-le, 730PUC 2.1 z=tx zx=K
MoveUp riwe� 3.4 =zA 3-6 zzza A� xz�x
CrIti'al Gp: 4.5 � 515 X�xx x2rz
............ --------------- 11 --------------- ----- ----- -------------
Capacity �dula; 169 � IcsZxx
MUIct Volt 226 � 132
patent Cap. - 783 � 1191 1424 z=cx
Adj Cap- 1.09 � 1.00 1000, 1.00
"D,,e cap., 784 � III? X� zz=s 1424 A�
------------ I ------------ -11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
level Qf sa�lcg Modulez
Stopped Del: 4.5 3. a xtoocz 2.S ocMv
LOS by �; - A
Mcve�tt IT - LTR - AT IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT L7 - FAIR - AT
Sh.1,d Cap.: � $09 KXtKzu Ann'A � sftR
Shad GtpDeLtx,w0,z 4�8
Shared LOS: A
Approatchnal: 4.7 0.0 0-0 0.2
Trafilz 6.8.1511 ICI 1*15 D�wILM has=. LIC9PGad to Sat., OkItsu. Monterey
kjNNfjAL1j:eD
0211TA997 17,96
&Cff3PMWO.IM Fri )an 27, 3997 1784f:01 Page B-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED milkOAD AVOM IMMOVSKENT PRwZCr. FEWERIZ CA
TRA771C Red PARIMNI AWALTS19
I" peak your Analygim (Seengrio 3-Mithout KetrollT& Alt -I
-------------------------- ----- * -------------------------- --------------------
�l of ser�lce Ca"tation Report
Ica ICLOAN As Cycle Leogth to Method Me" valu.'s Altaxnati" I
.................................................... & .......... * ........
Intervaction 115 Un r9rNAF-do R*ad/Railroad Avenwe/,fith.street ...................
... "I ....... I ........... 0 .................. . .............
Cycle (rec), Ica Critical Vol./CAP. M- O.00C
LOSS TIM (feci. 6 Averne Delay (MecIvIthilt 0.0
Opti"I Cycle- 0 Leval Of Servi".
................. a ...................... * ........................ ........ 4+00"
Approachi Borth Bound Scuth Snand East Bound wear Bound
r�t, 1, - T - A L - T . R L - T - R - 7 - a
............ --------------- --------------- 11 ................ ---------------
Control. Protected Protected Pernitted Perwittod.
Rights. 011 Include Include Include
min. Orwer%Z a a 0 0 a
Ipanexi a a 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 1
............ --------------- ............... If --------------- ---------------
volups, module,
Do" Vol: 0 901 9DO 1 1031 0 a 431 a D
Growth AdJ 1 1-60 1-00 I -Oil 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.QD
initial 340- 0 101 " 0 a tell 0 a 0 0 431 0 0
Door Adj, 1_08 1-00 1.00 1.00-1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00
Pon, Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 I.On 1.09
PHP volunte, a gal 900 0 1038 a a 6 0 431 a 0
Redact VOIL 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 a
R.dhaced Vol: 0 901 900 1 1039 0 0 9 0 431 a
ME Adj: 1.06 1.00 2.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1,01) 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.60 1.00
FLY Adjs 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1-00
vinal Val" 9 901 900 1 1938 a a 0 6 421 a 0
------------ I --------------- if --------------- --------------- ---------------
S.t�ation Fl� Hodale,
Sat/C."a : Icon icon 160* 1600 1600 1600 1400 1600 Is " 1600 Loco loco
Adjustuent 1 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 D.tj 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final St.2 0 3100 )400 03700 0 a 0 0 1 200 1 --- a
----- ----- --------------- it --------------- ..... ----------- .
capacity Analysis V.402t: at D.00
Val/Sat! 0. DB -4-0 ' 0: 0 Do 0.00 0.00 0.00
CT co - 2 6_0 43
Gr 've-o-TO M.0 XBO 0.00 0.00 0.00 1).Do
volum/CapZ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M.00 0.00 CAP 0.00 0.00 a. PC
---------- ;-I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Le�el Of S �Ice Module:
Delaylycht 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 *.a 0.0 0.0 0-0 C;.O
Delay Adj, 2,60 I.UD 1.�o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdJD*I/Veht 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0-0 9-0 0'0 0-0 0.0 D�v O.b 0.0
Qu� , 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a
.............................................. . .................. .............
T,,Ifix 6.8.1521 tcl 199S Dowling Aisw- I'lCeDsed to Katz. CRUM, Mcntl"Y
0'.S 61 - 0, 13 S -' C).f Z JP
0, 5 ( .3
0 1 1 '_
M M IM M M M M = M =
01/1611997 11:10 Filename: SCN3AMW.RPT Page I
SCN3AMW.IX Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:10j44 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
............... ........
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/11th Street
Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./cap. (K): 1.134
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (see/veh): 79.3
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
movementt L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Control, Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights; Include Include Include V
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 11 342 0 895 829 54 0 a 0 0 0 637
Growth Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 11 342 0 895 829 54 0 0 0 0 0 637
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 11 342 0 895 829 54 0 0 0 a 0 637
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 11 342 0 89S 829 S4 0 0 0 0 0 637
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 11 <13� 0 �t5l 829 54 0 (D 0 0 0 637
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes; I 00(j2�t> 0.00 0.12 0.00 I -P, 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: IZOD 01��600 004 1.9611 Ct: 600 0 1600 0 1600
Modulex - --- --- ----- ---------
Capacity Analy.i
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.56 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.00 0�00 0.00 0.00 0.40
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.09 0.00 0.49 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35
Volume/Cap: 0.49 1.14 0.00 1.14 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 48.5 133 0.0 103.4 10.1 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 112.6
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
.AdjDel/Veh: 48.5 133 0.0 103.4 10.1 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 112.6
Queue: 0 20 0 52 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 36
................ ****.* ...
Traffix 6. 995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
11-71 AcT
5 L c�S
6 Fab
= M M M M M M =
SCN3AMW.IN Thu Jan 26, 1997 11;10:44 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PR=Cr, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - X
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control� uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Include
,-Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 if 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- -------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 21 637 0 0 895 0 5 0 125 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial See: 21 637 0 0 895 0 5 0 12S 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
PHF Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume- 21 637 0 0 895 0 5 0 12S 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.: 21 637 0 0 895 0 5 0 125 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: ow 0% 0% 0%
% Cycle/Cars; )DUCK
% Truck/Comb: �x
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.0D 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE:
Trck/Cmb PCE:
AdJ Vol.: 23 637 0 0 89S 0 6 0 138 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time t 2.1 =x � xx�x x=x 3.4 � 2.6 xxxxx xx=
Critical Gp: S�O � �x 6.5 � S.S
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol-. 895 � � � 1553 � 895 =x xxxx
Potent Cap. : 642 � � � 134 � 487 � �
AdJ Cap: 1.00 � x=xx xxxx 0.96 � 1.00 � �
Move Cap.: 642 � 129 � 487 � xxxx
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: S.8 29.1 9.9 xxx:zz
LOS by Move: B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. � =ccx 30OCK 440
Shrd Stpl)el:� 11.6 xxxxx
Shared LOS: C
ApproachDel: 0.2 0.0 10.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0 �J �51 C ti A L ):�E�
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
I
C)� :5
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
US
Z��-
40,1:f7c�� (),a2+
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.540
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/vah): 21.2
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service; A
Approach. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include include Include
Min. Green: a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: I a 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 269 52 0 0 343 486 290 124 79 7 10 3
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 299 52 0 0 343 466 290 124 79 7 10 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 269 52 0 0 343 486 290 124 79 7 10 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Reduced Vol: 269 52 0 D 343 466 29D 124 79 7 10 3
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj; !".�1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1 00 00 1.00 1.00 1�t 1.00
Final Vol.: 9 52 0 0 <i2) �86 ��i24 79 7 3
------------ ------------ ---- ---------- -------- ---- ---------------
Q16 V - 11 - ii
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 -1600 1900 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 l.og 1.09 1.09
Lanes; 0 0 0.00 lg�� 2-101 2, Ij00 3. 00 1 001:!I�> 0.23
Final Sat %, �750 7SO . 171 3SO_ CIEOU�l 50 IiSO 1;50 404
------------ I --------------- -------------- ir� ------ ---- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.20' 0.14 0.08 0.07 O.OS 0.00 0.01 0.02
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle; 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.02
Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.3S 0.49 0.41 0.26 0.41 0.49 0.49
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veha 22.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.1 29.5 28.7 27.6 45.3 49.7 -67.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 22.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.1 29.5 28.7 27.6 45.3 49,7 67.8
Queue; 6 0 0 0 7 9 7 3 2 a 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o. 15'�
0. 04
01 C8 L O'� 14
0. 4-83 -t 0, 1 () a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING
ANALYSIS
01/16/1997 11:10
Filename; SCN3AMW.RPT
Page 3
01/16/1997 11:10
Filename, SCN3AMW.RPT
Pace 4
SCN3AMW. IN
Thu Jan 16, 1997 IlilD:44
Page 3-1
SCN3AMW.IN
Thu Jan 16, 2997 11:10i44
Page 4-1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
I
C)� :5
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
US
Z��-
40,1:f7c�� (),a2+
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.540
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/vah): 21.2
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service; A
Approach. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include include Include
Min. Green: a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: I a 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 269 52 0 0 343 486 290 124 79 7 10 3
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 299 52 0 0 343 466 290 124 79 7 10 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 269 52 0 0 343 486 290 124 79 7 10 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Reduced Vol: 269 52 0 D 343 466 29D 124 79 7 10 3
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj; !".�1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1 00 00 1.00 1.00 1�t 1.00
Final Vol.: 9 52 0 0 <i2) �86 ��i24 79 7 3
------------ ------------ ---- ---------- -------- ---- ---------------
Q16 V - 11 - ii
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 -1600 1900 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 l.og 1.09 1.09
Lanes; 0 0 0.00 lg�� 2-101 2, Ij00 3. 00 1 001:!I�> 0.23
Final Sat %, �750 7SO . 171 3SO_ CIEOU�l 50 IiSO 1;50 404
------------ I --------------- -------------- ir� ------ ---- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.20' 0.14 0.08 0.07 O.OS 0.00 0.01 0.02
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle; 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.02
Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.3S 0.49 0.41 0.26 0.41 0.49 0.49
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veha 22.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.1 29.5 28.7 27.6 45.3 49.7 -67.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 22.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.1 29.5 28.7 27.6 45.3 49,7 67.8
Queue; 6 0 0 0 7 9 7 3 2 a 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o. 15'�
0. 04
01 C8 L O'� 14
0. 4-83 -t 0, 1 () a
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING
ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis
(Scenario 3 -With
Metrolink Alternative)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Level
Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle
Length %) Method
(Base Volume Alternative)
****.* ...........
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Cycle (sec) 100
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
0.733
LOSS Time (SeC); )�
Average Delay (sec/veh):
12.7
Optimal Cycle: 41
Level
Of Service:
C
Approachi North Bound
South Bound
East Bound
West Bound
Movement: L - I - R
L - T - R
L - T - R
L
- T - R
------------ I ---------------
Control: Permitted
---------------
Permitted
11 --------------- 11
Permitted
---------------
Permitted
Rights: Include
Include
Include
Include
Kin. Green: 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 a 0
0
0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 1 0
1
0 0 1 0
------------ I ---------------
Volume Modules
---------------
11 --------------- 11
---------------
Base Vol: 0 589 0
10 646 14
46 65 36
0
159 28
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1�00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 0 589 0
10 846 14
46 65 36
0
159 28
User AdJ: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PH? Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 0 589 0
10 846 14
46 65 36
0
159 28
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 589 0
10 846 14
49 65 36
0
159 28
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1. 00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1& .00 1.00
1.00
1.00
Final Vol.: ��;89 0
10 14
65 36
0
28
----------- -- ----
---- ----------
11 --------- ----
----
----------
Saturation Flow Module!
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600
1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Lanes: 00 0.00
Final Sat.: g�'Zoo 0
1 001�� 0.02
1;00 26
64 0 36
C1'60D.';30 ;7 0
1 00
li00
��O.ls
240
------------ I ........ ----
----- ----
---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat; 0.00 0.37 0.00
0.01 0.54 0.54
0.03 0.06 0.06
0.00
0.12 0.12
Crit Moves: ....
...
Green/Cycle; 0.00 0.74 0.00
0.01 0.75 0.75
0.04 0.20 0.20
0.00
0.16 0.16
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.50 0.00
0.50 0.72 0.72
0.72 0.31 0.31
0.00
0.72 0.72
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
Delay/Veh: 0.0 4.6 0.0
51.1 6.8 53.5
56.9 26.4 26.7
0.0
37.8 60.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh; 0.0 4.6 0.0
51.1 6.8 53.5
56.9 26.4 26.7
0.0
37.8 60.2
Queue: 0 7 0
0 13 1
2 2 1
0
5 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
I
C)� :5
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
US
Z��-
40,1:f7c�� (),a2+
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X); 0.540
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/vah): 21.2
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service; A
Approach. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - I - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include include Include
Min. Green: a 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: I a 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 269 52 0 0 343 486 290 124 79 7 10 3
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 299 52 0 0 343 466 290 124 79 7 10 3
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 269 52 0 0 343 486 290 124 79 7 10 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Reduced Vol: 269 52 0 D 343 466 29D 124 79 7 10 3
PCE Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj; !".�1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1 00 00 1.00 1.00 1�t 1.00
Final Vol.: 9 52 0 0 <i2) �86 ��i24 79 7 3
------------ ------------ ---- ---------- -------- ---- ---------------
Q16 V - 11 - ii
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 -1600 1900 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 l.og 1.09 1.09
Lanes; 0 0 0.00 lg�� 2-101 2, Ij00 3. 00 1 001:!I�> 0.23
Final Sat %, �750 7SO . 171 3SO_ CIEOU�l 50 IiSO 1;50 404
------------ I --------------- -------------- ir� ------ ---- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.20' 0.14 0.08 0.07 O.OS 0.00 0.01 0.02
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle; 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.02
Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.3S 0.49 0.41 0.26 0.41 0.49 0.49
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veha 22.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.1 29.5 28.7 27.6 45.3 49.7 -67.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 22.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.1 29.5 28.7 27.6 45.3 49,7 67.8
Queue; 6 0 0 0 7 9 7 3 2 a 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o. 15'�
0. 04
01 C8 L O'� 14
0. 4-83 -t 0, 1 () a
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
to a.
o. + 77- + 0. rzS'ch
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, OkitEu, Monterey
01/16/1997 11:10 Filenamet SCN3AMW.RPT
Page S
01/16/1997 llilO Filename: SCM3AMW.RPT
page 6
SCN3AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:10:44
Page S-1
SCN3AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:10:44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis
.(Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alte�tive)
AM Peak Hour Analysis
(Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level
Of Service Computation Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level
Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle
Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
ICU l(Loss as Cycle
Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
* ...... .......
***.* ............
...... **..* .....
..........
Intersection #8 San Fernando
Road/Market Street
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall
Avenue
Cycle (sect: 100
Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
0.384
Cycle (sect: 100
Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.861
loss Time (sec): 5
Average Delay (sec/veh):
13.7
Loss Time (sect: 7
Average
Delay (Sec/veh): 28.1
Optimal Cycle� 20
Level Of Servicet
A
Optimal Cycle: 75
Level Of Service: D
Approach: North Bound
South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Approach: North Bound
South Bound
East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R
L - T - R L - T - A
L
- T - R
Movement; L - T - R
L - T - R
L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I ---------------
Control: Permitted
--------------- 11 --------------- 11
Permitted Permitted
---------------
Permitted
------------ I ---------------
Control: Protected
--------------- 11
Permitted
--------------- 11 ---------------
Permitted Permitted
Rights; Include
Include Include
Include
Rights: Include
Include
include Include
Kin. Green; 0 0 0
0 0 0 a 0 0
0
0 0
Min. Green: 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 1 0 1 a 0 1 0
1
0 0 1 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0 1 0 0 it 0 0
------------ I ---------------
Volume Module:
--------------- --------------- 11
---------------
------------ I ---------------
Volume Modulei
---------------
--------------- ---------------
Base Vol: 18 324 19
16 297 15 19 58 11
29
94 62
Base Vol: 420 393 0
0 211 0
0 0 630 1 0 3
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
2.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
f Initial Ese: 18 324 19
16 297 is 19 58 11
29
94 62
Initial Bse: 420 393 0
0 211 0
0 0 630 1 0 3
1 User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
1.00
1.00 1.00
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
(,Fj PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD
1.00
1.00 1.00
PHP Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 18 324 19
16 297 is 19 58 11
29
94 62
PHF Volume- 420 393 0
0 211 0
0 0 630 1 0 3
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 18 324 19
16 297 is 19 56 11
29
94 62
Reduced Vol: 420 393 0
0 211 0
0 a 630 1 0 3
PCE Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0D
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 I.A.0 1.00
Final Vol, 3.8 Q2 19
1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
( �16 297 15 (109 58 11
1.00
29
1.00
(14.) 62
MLF Adj: 1'aq_ 1 00 1.00
Final Vol, r400 i93 0
1.00 M 1.00
0 2 0
1.OD 1.00 1. a 1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0 0 3
------------ ------ ------
--------------- .. ....
---------------
------------ - -------------
1
11 ---------------
--------------- 11 ---------------
Saturation Flow Modulez
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1600
1600 1600
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Adjustment� 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes; 1.06
1 0 16
1 00
0.40
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00
0.00,1'.Q-0.00
0.00 1.00 1.00 OW 1 00 0.75
Final Sat.i I 151 89
';." "", , ';"
(11600�)l 45 55
i
1 00
636
Final Sat.: 1600 1600 0
0� �00 0
0 1600 160D 0 1200
------------ I ---------------
-0 ----------- -----------
----
----------
------------ I ---------------
---------------
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.21 0.21
0.01 0.20 0.19 0.01 0.04 0.04
0.02
0.10 0.10
Capacity AnaW�odule;
Vol/Sat (30�.SP2 .25 0.00
0.00 0.13 o.00
o.00 o.00 o.00 a.00
Crit Moves:
Crit Mo -71N
... *
Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.61 0.61
0.03 0.60 0.60 0.03 0.22 0.22
0.09
0.28 0.28
Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.46 0.00
0.00 0.16 0.00
0.00 0.00 0,46 0.00 0.00 0.47
Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.35 0.35
0.35 0.32 0.32 0.35 0.20 0.20
0.20
0.35 0.35
Volume/Cap: 0.85 0.53 0.00
0.00 0.85 0.00
0.00 0.00 D.85 0�85 0.00 0.01
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
--------------- ---------------
---------------
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
---------------
--------------- ---------------
Delay/Vehi 37.5 7.S 9.1
38.6 7.6 8.9 38.0 24.6 24.8
32.4
22.6 22.8
Delay/Veh- 34.2 15.2 0.0
0.0 47.7 0.0
0.0 0.0 24.8 445.8 0.0 11.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 2.00 1.00
1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.5 7.5 9.1
38.6 7.6 8.9 38.0 24.6 24.8
32.4
22.6 22.8
AdjDel/Veh: 34.2 IS.2 0.0
0.0 47.7 0.0
0.0 0.0 24.8 44S.8 0.0 11.0
Queue: 1 4 0
0 4 0 1 1 0
1
2 1
Queue: 13 a 0
a 7 0
0 0 17 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
to a.
o. + 77- + 0. rzS'ch
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, OkitEu, Monterey
= = = = M M M = = M
4k
scff.LW-lkr PSI jan, 17, 1997 17.26L3B Page 7-2
--------------
------------------------------------ i ---------------------------- *
PROPOSED AAZ'IQW XTEWOR NPROVOWU PRWtCr. XPR"L Cla
TRWIC and PaitrING ARKLYSIS
An Peak Hour AnalyalD (sezoario 3-Vith Metrolink Alte�tiwi
------------------------------------- T ------------------------------------------
Level Of Semice Co.Put,Atign R -POM
1994 HCM LhUi"liLed Method tBase Val. AllarnatiVal
........... ...................... I .............................
Average D-lAY (FVc/V*hk LIS Worst cam Lawal of Servive; A
APP ch: Sort =--;
h South Bound last Bound ofe&L sound
At, L - T L - T - I L - T - R L - T - X
---- ---- --- ---- ------------ ------------
Control: ---- Stop - Sign top sign Decontrolled Uncontrolled
Rights: I=Iude I.Iudo Inclu& Include
0 21 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 D 0 0 11 0 a
Lan*", -----
--------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ----------
voloor Ho&uI&4
Base Volt It 0 3 0 0 0 3S 36 1 307 2
Growth A41: 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 "On "no 1.00 1.00 I.OD 2.00 2.00
Initial Beal 1, a I a a 0 0 36 3L 1 107 2
U.�r Adj: 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.0: 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
AtF Adj 1 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1-0 1. oa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
rap VGI.� 74 a I a 0 0 0 36 36 1 107 2
R.dvet Vol: a a 0 a 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0
rinal Vol., 7, a 3 0 a 0 0 36 N 1 107
----- I ------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
adjusze,d Val,ae Mndle,
Or&da-. at air at at
I Cycle/cars XXXX xxxx AA20' x=x xz�
% Trackjcwb� XZXX xxxx xzss xxxx XXXX
p4m Adj; . 1.10 LAC 1.20 1.10 1.20 2.10 1-10 1.00 I.DO 1.30 I.DO 1.04
CYCL/ca I PCs: xxzx
Trck/C-,h PCs: - -
Adj Vol it 0 1 0 0 a 36 36 L 107 2
--- ;- .- : .... I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cri Jal Gap M*&jle!
�eup It": 3.4 � 2 1 2-1
critical G;" 6.S � S.S S.0 x=x xaa,xx
---------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
pacity yoduldl
mflict Vol, 161 xzxx it � 72 � xxxxx
jlctank. Cap. ; iS3 XZ= 130D � 1584 =zx �
Ad) Cap; 1.00 � 1.00 � xxxx wx� M3301OL 1.00 xxxxx
CbP:; 151 - x=a - 1300 11 X� - - 11 1584
---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- -----
Level Of Service Module; I xs� xxs� mxx 2.3 x=xx
Stopped Del i 4 6 XXXX 2 A
LOS hy NOVO:
liavenent � IT - LTR - RT LT LTI - IT LT - LTR , RT LT - LTR - FrT
shared cap.. zxxx 661 xxxxx xxxx � xxxxx xNaCK �
Shrd StpDe1z;xxxxx 4.6 XXXXX XXKZ zs�zs xxxx
Shared LOS, - A, - ; ' 0. D.0
APPTG&ChD* I L ' 4.6 . 0 'a
Traffix 6.4.1611 (,� LISS DO.Ung ASSOO- "CaU30d to Katz. ckjts�, Monterey
M = M M M M M M M
01/17/1197 17:26 Filenaot. sm�-Rff -
SCN3AMW. IN . �i Jan. 17. 2997 17,2609 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAIIJUNUD AVENUE IMFROVSHWT FROJXCr, WISOBALL CA
I�IC and PIRKM ANALLYSIS
Am peak H� analysis (Scanariv 3�$Fith KetraLink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L.�el Of service CO.Putation Report
ICU I(Loos an cycle Length I) Netbod Ift" Volune Alternative)
.................................. .............................................
Intersection VIS Sea F*rrkvldo Rowwiroad Avenualith street
...................... * .......... I ......................... I ...... * .............
Cycle f.tC11 100 Critical Vol./Cap. Ws 0.000
boam Ties (Nec) 1 5 Average ftl4Y ;AWO/W&W 0.0
Optiml Cycle. 0 Level Or Semixe,
........ *� ......................................................................
Appr0hch. Harth Bound South sound East sound Most Bound
Kovaw,ent: L - T - R L - T - 9 L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- ----------- --------------- ---------------
control, Pmtectetd protected Patetitt ad Pernitted
Rights, OVI Include Znclode Include
Min. rreen. a a 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 a a
Lane,, 0 0 2 a I a I 1 0 a a 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
............ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
volvew
Base Vol t 0 S14 591 1 239 a 0 a 0 too a 0
Gro�th Adjg 1.00 1�60 i -OD I.UO LAO 1.00 1.00 1.00 2-40 1.00 1-60 1-00
Initial see: 0 a14 591 1 139 0 9 0 0 ISO 0 a
User Adj; I.00 I.oa I.00 I.oq 1.aa 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.04 2.00 1.00 2.00
Fw Adj. 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 2.06 2.00 1.09 1.60 2AD
YMP V.luen 1 0 114 591 1 039 a 0 0 a BID 0 0
kedut;t Vol, D 0 a a 0 0 a 6 0 a a a
Ra4u,ocd Vol, 0 014 got 3 139 a a 0 6 sea a a
PCs Adj-. 2.Oft 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,OD 1.00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 "*a 1-00
NLF Adj. 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 IAO
Final Val. g D $24 S91 3 439 0 0 a 0 too 0 a
............ --------------- ......... ............... ---------------
Saturation Fl� Mod.l.�
Satlr-� � 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16GO 2600 1604 1600 1600 160
Aajuotx�t � 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ":
Lanes; O.Do aAO G.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OAO
Final Sat.. 0.�Zoo 16t, a 03200 D a 0 0 32be 0 0
............ I---- ------- ----------- 1-11 --------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis mdle;
vgl/sat� 0 weal. -0.00 0, -A. .:a 0.00 a.:: 0.00-4�.40
crit Moves, Ls
0 13 LID oluz) w) 5D
7ru'r.-
Grem/Crol. ; OMO 4-=�0.00 d-ro-b.: :1 C 0.00 a. a 00
Vojunc/p&p: 0.00 0.00 0.00 O,OD 0.00 0.03 O.DC 0.00 9-00 0-00 O -OD 0-
............ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Mdule;
Dalay/Veh! 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 D.O 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.00 1 00 1-00 1-00 1-00 I -OC 1100 1-60 "Do 1-00 "Do
AdJW/Veh, 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 4-0 0-0 0-0 0-4 0-0 0-0 O'S 0-0
Queue; 0 0 0 a 0 0 C a a 0 0 a
....................................... I ..................... I ..................
Traffix 6-B.IS11 (el LISS �11.g Assoc. Licensed M IAtz, Okitau, Montorwy
o, 2f*l L
SCN3PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11;19:08 Page 1-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length V) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lIth Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. �X): 1.233
Loss Time (sec); 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 147.6
Optimal Cycle: IBO Level Of Service; F
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control� Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rigbtsi Include Include Include Inolde J&N
Min. Green: 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 2 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 9 623 0 551 SS1 11 0 0 0 0 0 999
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse; 9 623 0 551 551 11 0 0 0 0 , 0 999
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume� 9 623 0 551 551 11 0 0 0 0 0 999
Reduct Vol: .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 9 623 0 551 551 11 0 0 0 a 0 999
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adji 1.00 1." 1.00 J'CW'l.00 1.00 1.00 l..(L[L 1.00 1 * 00 1 * 00 1
Final Vol.: 0> 0 kE�;A 551 11 0 W 0 0 0 99
----- I ------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0 1.96 0.04 0.00 ;�04 0.00 1.00 0.0 0
0
1;0,0 160
Final Sat. ; 1 3200 3137 63 0 kili 0 1600 0 <11E6�t')
�ISP
1— 0( -------- 11 --------------- 11 ----- --------- 11 --------------- I
----------- !0>
Capacity An;ly.is Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.34 0,18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.28 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
Volume/Cap � 0.42 1.25 0.00 1.25 0.42 O�42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 25
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 44.6 189 0.0 188.2 16.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjl)el/Veh; 44.6 189 0.0 188.2 16.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.2
Queue t 0 46 0 42 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 80
Traffix - ' 3) 199S Dowling ASaOC. Licensed to rats, Okitsu, Monterey
C6
q0A+
4�' -10,
01/16/1997 11,19 Filename: SCNnPMW.RPT Page
SCN3PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:19:08 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
RM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Controls Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include include
Lanest 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 91 989 0 0 SS1 0 a 0 44 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
initial Bse; 91 989 0 0 551 0 a G 44 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF VolumeT 91 989 0 0 551 0 8 0 44 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.z 91 989 0 0 551 0 a 0 44 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ----------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Cycle/Cars:
Truck/Cozb:
PCE Adj : 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCEt
Trck/Cmb PCE: =x )OUCK
Adj Vol. : 100 989 0 0 551 0 9 0 48 0 0 a
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cri i I Gap Module:
t;;*Time.
Move - 2.1 � 3.4 2.6 xoccc
Critical Gp: 5.0 � xonacc 6.5 5.5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------- ---------------
Capacity module:
Cnflict Vol; 551 � � � � � 1631 � 551 � � �
Potent Cap. : 937 � � � � � 120 � 728 � � �
Adj Cap: 1.00 x= � � � � 0.89 � I.ao � �
Move Cap.: 937 107 728
---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ---- --- ---- ----
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 4.3 36.2 5.3
LOS by Move: A
Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 386
Shrd StpDel:� 10.8
Shared LOS: C
ApproachDel; 0.4 0.0 20.0 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I (./rj ")) w4L 110
Los C
I
J�
1-2
3
M
01116/1997
llt19
Filename: SCN3PMW.RPT
Page
1
SCN3PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11;19:08 Page 1-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length V) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lIth Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. �X): 1.233
Loss Time (sec); 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 147.6
Optimal Cycle: IBO Level Of Service; F
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control� Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rigbtsi Include Include Include Inolde J&N
Min. Green: 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 2 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 9 623 0 551 SS1 11 0 0 0 0 0 999
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse; 9 623 0 551 551 11 0 0 0 0 , 0 999
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume� 9 623 0 551 551 11 0 0 0 0 0 999
Reduct Vol: .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0
Reduced Vol, 9 623 0 551 551 11 0 0 0 a 0 999
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adji 1.00 1." 1.00 J'CW'l.00 1.00 1.00 l..(L[L 1.00 1 * 00 1 * 00 1
Final Vol.: 0> 0 kE�;A 551 11 0 W 0 0 0 99
----- I ------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0 1.96 0.04 0.00 ;�04 0.00 1.00 0.0 0
0
1;0,0 160
Final Sat. ; 1 3200 3137 63 0 kili 0 1600 0 <11E6�t')
�ISP
1— 0( -------- 11 --------------- 11 ----- --------- 11 --------------- I
----------- !0>
Capacity An;ly.is Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.34 0,18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle: 0.01 0.16 0.00 0.28 0.42 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
Volume/Cap � 0.42 1.25 0.00 1.25 0.42 O�42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 25
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 44.6 189 0.0 188.2 16.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjl)el/Veh; 44.6 189 0.0 188.2 16.0 21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 174.2
Queue t 0 46 0 42 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 80
Traffix - ' 3) 199S Dowling ASaOC. Licensed to rats, Okitsu, Monterey
C6
q0A+
4�' -10,
01/16/1997 11,19 Filename: SCNnPMW.RPT Page
SCN3PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:19:08 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
RM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario I -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Controls Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include include
Lanest 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 a 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 91 989 0 0 SS1 0 a 0 44 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
initial Bse; 91 989 0 0 551 0 a G 44 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF VolumeT 91 989 0 0 551 0 8 0 44 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.z 91 989 0 0 551 0 a 0 44 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ----------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Cycle/Cars:
Truck/Cozb:
PCE Adj : 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCEt
Trck/Cmb PCE: =x )OUCK
Adj Vol. : 100 989 0 0 551 0 9 0 48 0 0 a
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Cri i I Gap Module:
t;;*Time.
Move - 2.1 � 3.4 2.6 xoccc
Critical Gp: 5.0 � xonacc 6.5 5.5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------- ---------------
Capacity module:
Cnflict Vol; 551 � � � � � 1631 � 551 � � �
Potent Cap. : 937 � � � � � 120 � 728 � � �
Adj Cap: 1.00 x= � � � � 0.89 � I.ao � �
Move Cap.: 937 107 728
---- ----- --- ---- ----- ---- ---- ----- --- ---- --- ---- ----
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 4.3 36.2 5.3
LOS by Move: A
Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT LTR RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: 386
Shrd StpDel:� 10.8
Shared LOS: C
ApproachDel; 0.4 0.0 20.0 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I (./rj ")) w4L 110
Los C
I
J�
1-2
3
M
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc
o. -S4
C) 0 0
0,0570
C)
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LoS
.0��
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc
(o, J b3
bs1'59
0"S�?
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LoS
O.S51
01/16/1997
11:19 Filenamei SCN3PMW.RPT
Page 3
01/16/1997 11119 Filename! SCN3PMW.RPT
Pace 4
SCN3PMW.IN
Thu Jan 16, 1997 lliI9408
Page 3-1
SCN3PMK.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:19:08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
PROPOSED RAILROAD
AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH
Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
PM Peak Hour Analysis
JScenario 3 -With Metrolink
Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level
Of Service Computation Report
ICU
I(Loes as Cycle Length V) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
ICU Moss as Cycle
Length %) Method (Base Volume
Alternative)
.......... ........
... *** ...
....
Intersection
#3 Railroad Avenue/Market street
Intersection #7 San Fernando
Road/Lyona Avenue
Cycle (sec):
100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X):
0.761
Cycle (seO 100
Critical Vol./Cap.
(X�:
0.5so
-7
Loss Time (sec), Average Delay (sec/veh�:
15.8
Loss Time (sec): 10
Average Delay (sec/veh)t
23.2
Optimal Cycle:
45 Level Of Service:
C
Optimal Cycle: 36
Level Of Service:
A
Approach:
North Bound South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Approachi North Bound
South Bound East Bound
West Bound
Movement:
L - I - R L - I - R L - T - R
L - I - R
Movements L - T - R
------------ I ---------------
L - I - R L - T
--------------- ---------------
- R
L - I - R
---------------
------------
Control:
I --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Permitted Permitted Permitted
---------------
Permitted
Controlt Protected
Protected Protected
Protected
Rights:
Include Include Include
Include
Rights: Include
include Include
include
Min. Green:
0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
Min. Green: 0 0 0
0 - 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
Lanes,
1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1 0 0 1 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1
0 1
1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module;
---------------
------------ I ---------------
Volume Module:
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Base Vol:
14 897 5 63 434 66 31 161 4
2 114 27
Base Vol: 181 44 12
19 47 486 556 21
104
5 62 24
Growth Adj:.
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Growth Adj. 1,00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Sees
14 897 5 63 434 86 31 161 4
2 114 27
Initial See: 181 44 12
19 47 486 556 21
104
5 62 24
User Adj:
1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume:
14 897 5 63 434 86 31 161 4
2 114 27
PHF Volume: 181 44 12
19 47 486 556 21
104
5 62 24
Reduct Vol�
0 0 0 0 a 0 0 D 0
0 0 0
Reduct Vol: a 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
Reduced Vol;
14 897 5 63 434 86 31 161 4
2 114 27
Reduced Vol: 181 44 12
19 47 486 556 21
104
5 62 24
PCE Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
PCE Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adj;
1.00 I.S.Z 1.00 I.A 1.00 1.00 I.Qg�l 00 1.00
1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.02- 1.00
Final Vol.:
14 C 5 C6j3;> 434 86 (ZI) i6l 4
2 27
Final Vol.: 44 12
19 47 21
104
5 <0 24
------------
_7,11
I --------------- --------------- --------- ----
---- ----------
------------ ---------------
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Saturation Flow Modules
Sat/Lane:
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1600 16DO 1600
Sat/T,ne; 1600 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
1600
1600 1600 1600
Adjustment;
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjustments 1.09 1.09 1.09
1.09 1.09 1.09 1.D9 1.09
1.09
1.09 1.09 1.09
Lanes:
1.00 0.01 2. 0 1 1;111 1.12
lj%� 0.19
Lanes s jJW 0.79 0.21
1.00 1.00 2 -= -2-90- 1.00
1.00
1.00 0.2:
Final Sat.:
j�1�1 %1.7
160t: 591 9 '00 1 6 39
005 0.
1 0
)1375
Final Sat., SLLS 0 375
1750 1750 (�350 �1750
3.750
17 504:fi� 48
-----------
_Z5 ... $Z6
I----- -------- ------------ ---- ----
---------------
------------ I ---------------
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Capacity Analysis.Module:
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat:
0.01 0.56 0.56 0.04 0.32 0.33 0.02 0.10 0.10
0.00 0.09 0.09
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.03 0.03
0.01 0.03 0.14 0.16 0.01
0.06
0.00 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves:
Crit Moves: **--
.*.* ****
Green/Cycle:
0.02 0.75 0.75 0.05 0.79 0.79 0.03 0.14 0.14
0.00 0.12 0.12
-Green/CyCle: 0.21 0.36 0.36
0.12 0.28 0.28 0.32 0.40
0.40
0.02 0.20 0.10
Volume/Cap:
0.41 0.7S 0.75 0.73 0.41 0.41 0.75 0.73 0.73
0.73 0.75 0.75
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.09 0.09
O.D9 0.10 0.50 O.SO 0.03
0.15
0.15 0.50 0.50
------------
Level of Service
I --------------- --------------- ---------------
Module:
---------------
------------ I ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
--------------- ---------------
---------------
Delay/Vehz
41.6 7.2 112.9 55.5 2.8 3.4 70.4 39.2 141.7
202.8 45.0 69.4
Delay/Veh� 28.0 16.2 16.2
30.D 20.7 23.7 21.6 14.2
14.9
37.3 35.6 39.2
Delay Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh;
41.6 7,2 112.9 55.5 2.8 3.4 70.4 39.2 141.7
202.8 45.0 69.4
AdjDel/Veh: 28.0 16.2 16.2
30.0 20.7 23.7 21.6 14.2
14.9
37.3 35.6 39.2
Queue:
0 15 0 2 4 1 1 5 a
0 4 2
Queue; 5 1 0
0 1 11 13 0
2
0 2 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc
o. -S4
C) 0 0
0,0570
C)
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LoS
.0��
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc
(o, J b3
bs1'59
0"S�?
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
LoS
O.S51
SCN3PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:1908 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU IMOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.222
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.0
Optimal Cycle: 16 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control� Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green! 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
Volume Modul�:
Base Vol: 8 10 27 78 21 C33- 72 25 56 59 76
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 D 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial See: 8 34 10 27 78 21 33 71 25 56 59 76
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 8 34 10 27 78 21 33 71 25 56 59 76
Reduct Vol: a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 34 10 27 78 21 33 71 25 96 59 76
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
14LF Adj: 1.(0-0 1.00 1.00 l.AQ 1.00. 1.00 l.'Ptq_ 1 . 0 0 1.00 1.00 I.AL 1.00
Final Vol.: (a3 �& 21 C2,3) 25 56 (-� �q 76
----------- - --------------- ------- ------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Modulet
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16DO 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0
Lanes: $1>'�77 %'1�3 1.11 Q-79 0j21 1 0 1_87 4 0 26 1 00 0.44 0.66
'0� 6 39 k6l
Final Set.: IaF)(Iii> 0 i17 lioo (:Is> 901
-----------
Capacity A�;ly;i;"Z.
Vol/Satt 01"ft . " 0 O.DA�.06 0.04 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves: �X� (tk-Z) T-> * ...
Green/Cycle: 0. 03 -0-2+-V-23 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.47 0.47
Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.18
--------- 7-1 ------- r ------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Vehi 36.8 23.5 23.6 28.9,17.8 17.9 30.9 16.5 16.5 24.7 12.0 12.0
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.8 23.5 23.6 28.9 27.8 17�9 30.9 16.5 16.5 24.7 12.0 12.0
Queue: 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
b, -2-19,�
C60
A-6
SCN3PMW,IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:19:08 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./cap. w: 1.027
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (Sec/veh); 52.8
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F
........... ****** ...
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controli Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
volume module:
Base Vol; 486 415 0 0 156 0 5 0 882 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 486 415 0 0 156 0 5 0 882 4 3 a
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 l.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 486 415 0 0 IS6 0 5 0 882 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced V01� 486 415 0 0 156 0 S 0 882 4 3 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1_0_0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final - Vol :i- JSgR_415 ..... 0 11 --- 0 - �9 ---- 0 --- 5 .... 0 QDS (3,7) 3 0
----- --- --- - ----- ------- ---------------
Saturation Flo. Module2
Sat/Lane: 16DO 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1,00 l.co 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00 O.Do 0.00 I'= 0 ' 00 1 00 0 * 00 0 oj43 O.OD
160 91 86 0
Final Sat.: (1160>00 0 OCI-670D 0 li00 0 <tft; Zff)
------------ T� ------ ---- ----- - ------ --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis -Module:
Vol/Sat� 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green/Cyclet 0.30 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.32 0.00
Volume/Capi 1.D3 0.67 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 1.03 1.03 0.01 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modulet
Delay/Vehi 67.4 21,2 0.0 0�0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18�1 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18.1 0.0
Queuai 20 10 0 0 a a 0 0 35 1 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1S11 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
69 1; L
0166 C11 +
01/16/1997
11:19
Filename: SCN3PMW.RPT
Page
5
01/16/1997
11!19
Filename: SCN3PMW.RPT
Page 6
SCN3PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:1908 Page 5-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU IMOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.222
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.0
Optimal Cycle: 16 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control� Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green! 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
Volume Modul�:
Base Vol: 8 10 27 78 21 C33- 72 25 56 59 76
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 D 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial See: 8 34 10 27 78 21 33 71 25 56 59 76
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 8 34 10 27 78 21 33 71 25 56 59 76
Reduct Vol: a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 8 34 10 27 78 21 33 71 25 96 59 76
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
14LF Adj: 1.(0-0 1.00 1.00 l.AQ 1.00. 1.00 l.'Ptq_ 1 . 0 0 1.00 1.00 I.AL 1.00
Final Vol.: (a3 �& 21 C2,3) 25 56 (-� �q 76
----------- - --------------- ------- ------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Modulet
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 16DO 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
0 0
Lanes: $1>'�77 %'1�3 1.11 Q-79 0j21 1 0 1_87 4 0 26 1 00 0.44 0.66
'0� 6 39 k6l
Final Set.: IaF)(Iii> 0 i17 lioo (:Is> 901
-----------
Capacity A�;ly;i;"Z.
Vol/Satt 01"ft . " 0 O.DA�.06 0.04 0.08 0.08
Crit Moves: �X� (tk-Z) T-> * ...
Green/Cycle: 0. 03 -0-2+-V-23 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.47 0.47
Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.18 0.18
--------- 7-1 ------- r ------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Vehi 36.8 23.5 23.6 28.9,17.8 17.9 30.9 16.5 16.5 24.7 12.0 12.0
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.8 23.5 23.6 28.9 27.8 17�9 30.9 16.5 16.5 24.7 12.0 12.0
Queue: 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 1 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
b, -2-19,�
C60
A-6
SCN3PMW,IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:19:08 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 3 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./cap. w: 1.027
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (Sec/veh); 52.8
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F
........... ****** ...
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controli Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
volume module:
Base Vol; 486 415 0 0 156 0 5 0 882 4 3 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has: 486 415 0 0 156 0 5 0 882 4 3 a
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 l.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 486 415 0 0 IS6 0 5 0 882 4 3 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced V01� 486 415 0 0 156 0 S 0 882 4 3 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1_0_0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final - Vol :i- JSgR_415 ..... 0 11 --- 0 - �9 ---- 0 --- 5 .... 0 QDS (3,7) 3 0
----- --- --- - ----- ------- ---------------
Saturation Flo. Module2
Sat/Lane: 16DO 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1,00 l.co 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00 O.Do 0.00 I'= 0 ' 00 1 00 0 * 00 0 oj43 O.OD
160 91 86 0
Final Sat.: (1160>00 0 OCI-670D 0 li00 0 <tft; Zff)
------------ T� ------ ---- ----- - ------ --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis -Module:
Vol/Sat� 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green/Cyclet 0.30 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.32 0.00
Volume/Capi 1.D3 0.67 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.01 0.00 1.03 1.03 0.01 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modulet
Delay/Vehi 67.4 21,2 0.0 0�0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18�1 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.4 21.2 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 23.2 0.0 49.8 421.1 18.1 0.0
Queuai 20 10 0 0 a a 0 0 35 1 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1S11 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
69 1; L
0166 C11 +
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
02/17/lt9l 17�45 rtIonato "3pw -M Pace 7
S=MHM.Ir )let Jan 27, 1997 17:45,20 Pogs, 7-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPOMM RAILROAD AVEMIS WROVEMEXT IRWOM. W"HAII. CK
T"Yrxc Red PARKING AWLLYSIS
pm Peak Name Analysis (Scanario 3-WIth MWtKQlInk AlternativOl
............. ------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Ser%,Ica CopUt4t1,CX2 Report
I", "ON unsignalized Method ("Ge Volume Altermat'")
................................ I ...............................................
Int,"�tlon #12 Pitue Aveme/Market Street
.......................................... .......................... I ..........
Average belay tsec/veh): 0.9 Norat Cate Level of Service: A
.................................... I., ............................... ........
Approach: surth Bound South Bound Bast bound Meet Bound
Moventont! 1, T R Is - T - A L - T - R L - T - R
--------------- --------------- ---------------
Stop Sign Step Sign numtrolled uncontrolled
Rights: Inclule include Include Include
Lanex� a 0 if 0 0 a 0 0 0 V 0 0 a 1 0 a 1 0 a a
---------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
lume "odulei
Base Vol, 52 a 6 a D 0 0 lea 79 5 0
GxQwLh Adj: 100 1,00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1-00 1-00 1�00 1-00 1.00
initial ose: 52 0 9 0 a 0 0 100 71, S at a
Vaer Adj! I.00 I.to 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 I.OD I.OG 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
PU Adj1 1.00 I.Do I.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00
fz? Yoluz,cg 52 a 6 0 0 0 & too 79 5 S9 a
le'&uct VnI! a a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a a
rinal Vol-: S2 0 s a a 9 0 too 79 5 89 0
---------- I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
justed Volume module.
Grade, 0% It at ow
Cyclefcar&2 ator', J0`30t 300at )OCKM o=ca
Trxk/Coe1n: - ouctX 00CL XY30C tt)Otot 3000C
PCE Adj! 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 2.00 1.10 1.00 1.00
Cyclfc.� PCE: oL,ut X10tor t=t Xt= hoots Xa33C
�klCwb PCO7 'ot'o, 3otWt . tomopt moton, tOCtJ[ ZoRoCK
Adj V.I., S1 0 7 0 0 a 0 100 79 4, 89 V
............ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Cap hod%41e;
mo,,eip Ti. r 3.4 =x 2.6 NoMOIN oCt34oKX Intel tuCCCR 2-2 3013CX 3000CK
Critical Up-. &.5 9- 5.5 topupc 223c, � S.0 =ct
--------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
ity Module:
Cnflict V�1: 234 � 240 uc,x unt" tortoct 27? x,= xomxx
Patent Cap.; 776 � 1177 - )OConC toctocC Liot . .
Adj Capt 1.00 unct 1.99 tototL � Kout'n, X� � 1.00 x,tx,ot
Mn" C.P. t 772 muoct 1177 oumut . � aotutX X3CXX )otot)ct 14" X30Cca
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Laval of �rvlct HIdulet
Stopped Del, 5.0 mouct 3 2 XtUNC 30Ct1tv 2-C Xo3toOC
LOS hy � t - A
M�Ll LT - LTR - XT IT - L;v . 11 .*1 - L;R - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap. t 801 t=out onctot J= X)OCtPt � X)MC4
shrd Stpoel: 4.2 2000EX 13tottoC o0GcQk tot`00t 30CM3C 700CC`
shared LOS : A
"Voacbnel 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
Traffix 5.3.1511 (cl 1$93 ItOttling Axa�. Licanned to Katz. CkItew. Monterey
02/1711917 17,4S viletiomnet VCm3"-VPr P.M*
OCNI".IN TxL Uu 3.1, 1997 L7:45:20 Page 8-2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWRAM CA
TRAFFIC SF34 PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Anoly4la (Scomario 3-Mith Metmllrtk Alternative)
Level Of mervice compt.tim R"Pwt
ICU ItLoms as Cycle Umth 40 Method tBame VdIumm, Alter,tativel
.............................. * ............. * ....... * ................. ** ........
Entvroection 115 5*4 F*"U)do &venuel4th Street
....................... . ................ ** ............... * .........
Cycle (sec). 102 Critical lVol./cap. (11, 0.000
love Tlm (me:) 5 Average Delay Isee/vehlg 0.0
Optimal Cycle, I Level Of Service;
...............................................................................
Approach: North Boned South bou,, Cast bound West bound
Mov,mmment: L - 7 - R L - 7 - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- If --------- -----
C)mtml- Ponotected Protected Permitted Pemitted
Rightan, OVI Include Include rmlu&
Him. Groom 0 D a 0 0 0 0 e a 0 0 0
Ea.nev: 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 a 0 o 0 9 9 0 2 0 0 a a
............ i --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Voluee Module:
Be" Vol: 0 901 917 8 1038 0 0 4) D 441 0 a
Grc,^h Adj-. 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,09
Lniti.2 9..: 0 901 917 1 1033 0 a 0 0 441 0 a
vs� AdjI 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 I.aa 2.00 1.00 1.00 I.Oa I.cd
I" Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 ;.Do, 1.** 2.00 1,00
PRr Volt-: 0 301 917 1 1031 0 a a 0 411 a 0
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 10 a 0 0 0 a 0
Reduced Vol! 0 Sol 917 1 2039 0 a 0 0 441 0 0
PCX mj. 1.00, 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
MLr Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3-oc 1.00 1.00 1.00
F1.1 Val. 0 901 917 1 1033 0 11 0 a 441 0 0
------------ I ............... --------------- --------------- ---------------
S,mt�rati= Fine "ndulai
S't'T. : 1600 1609 3606 1606 Ifoo 1900 1600 2400 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adju*L..t; 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00
Lamel o.00 0.00 D.OD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 a.00 0-00 0.00 0.00
Final set.; a ftoo Ito* a Uto 0 0 0 32,0 0 R
............ I --------------- --------------- ----------- ---------------
capacity malywiff "dulet
Vol/Sat; .00 a .00 Q.00
Crit M�8' :*(?.a -p Qos io'o i
co`� D , 0 a MD 0.00
Gre�n/Cycl, C7 -V-00 0. .0 04-4.4v - .00 (�
voluumc/Cap: 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Do O�00 0-00 0.00
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service modul.,
Delaylveh; O.D 0.0 C.0 0.0 0-0 U.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D'o 0.0
Delay Adj: I.CD 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDeItVeht G.D 0.0 C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.8 0.0 0.0
Queuet D a 0 0 a 0 0 0 a a 0 0
............................................................ *� ... * ....
Traffix 6.4.2511 tc) 199S DOWling A213". LiMmed to rate, Okitru. Monterey
0. 5
L02 A
...........
= = = M
M M M M
M M M M M M M M M M
01/16/1997 11:27 Filename: SCN4AMWO.RPT age I
SCN4AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:27:52 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
InterSection #1 Railroad Avenue/lith street
..........
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical, Vol./Cap.-M: 1.249
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 141.2
Optimal Cycle; 180 Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: I - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 a 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 13 391 0 1066 899 63 0 0 0 0 0 1066
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Beat 13 391 0 1066 899 63 0 0 0 0 0 1066
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PHF Volume: 13 391 0 ID66 899 63 0 0 0 0 a 1066
Reduct Vol; 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol; 13 391 0 1066 899 63 0 0 0 0 0 1066
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: l-'0 1 0 1.00 '1_4 k'00- 1.00 1.00 1. A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
Final Vol, 13 �91 0 1066:) SV-� 63 0 U0 0 0 0 1066
------------ 1�� ------------ ------ -------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lanet 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 I.DO
Lanes: 1 0.00 2-W 0.93---0.07 0. 00 I -4Q, D.00 0.00 1.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 1;0" 1600 0 /3200*'�0.495 - 105 OkI600) ---- 0 0_1600__3200
------------ I --- ;±�> ---- ------ ---- ---- ----
Capacity Analysis Module;
Vol/Satt 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.33 0.60 O�60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26
Volume/Cap: 0.04 1.27 0.00 0.70 1.27 1.27 0.00 0.00 O.DO 0.00 0.00 1,27
------------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modules
Delay/Veh! 25.3 211 0.0 17.0 189 293.9 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 191.9
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 25.3 211 0,0 17.0 189 293.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 191.9
Queue: a 31 0 24 75 7 0 a 0 0 0 81
Traffix 6.8.ISII (C) 2995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o.
Ll�a Q
c) �7 + 0,
SCR4AMWO. IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:27:52 Page 2.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
... * ....... *.* .... **..* ........... *..*** ...........
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - A I - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 0 a 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 25 1066 0 0 1066 0 6 a 102 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Oo I.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 25 1066 0 0 1066 0 6 0 102 . 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 25 1066 0 0 1066 0 6 0 102 0 0 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
Final Vol.: 25 1066 0 0 1066 0 6 0 102 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade: 0% 011 0% ow
V Cycle/Cars:
t Truck/Comb:
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 I.OD 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCEz
Trck/Cmb PCE: Mocx
Adj Vol.r 28 1066 0 0 1066 0 7 0 112 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
Movetip Time: 2.1 � � 3.4 � 2.6
Critical Gp; 5.5 � � 7.0 � 3.5
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1066 � � � � � 2157 � 533 � � �
Potent Cap. : 459 � � � � � 44 � 743 � � �
Adj cap; 1.00 � � � oacm � 0.94 � 1.00 � � �
Move Cap.: 459 � � � � � 42 oocz 743 � � �
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Stopped Del: 8.3 101.1 5.6
LOS by Move: B
Movement; IT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LIE. - RT IT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: =x 384
Shrd StpDel:� =cx 13.0
Shared LOS: C
ApproachDel: 0.2 O'D 10.9 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
JV3) Gtju-):2��6
M M M M = M M M M =
01/16/1997 11:27 Filena.e: SCN4AMWO.RPT Page 3
SCN4AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:27tS2 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/market Street
Cycle (sec): IOU critical Vol./Cap. M: 0.546
Loss Time (sec): s -2 Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.6
Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R Is - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1025 0 12 1066 is 42 76 42 0 186 24
Growth Adi: 1,00 2.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1025 0 12 1066 16 42 76 42 0 186 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Volume: 0 1025 0 12 1066 is 42 76 42 0 iss 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 " 0 0 0 a a D D 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1025 0 12 1066 16 42 76 42 0 186 24
PCE Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.0 OD 1.00 1.��1.00 1,00 1.00 �� 1.00
,A-1.00 1.00 1.00 1.
Final Vol.: ('�A025 0 12<L0,66) 16 (a2�) 76 42 0 24
--------- ---- ---------------
------------ --------------- ----- --------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane� 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: U.A0 2.00 0.00 1.0 0.03 1 -QO 0 64 0.36 1 Okt!6 0.11
Final Sat.: [1600-)3200 0 160 kit) 47 (16-0'0� 1;31 569 liO 183
------------ 1� ------------ --------------- 11�- ------ .... -------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat; 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.13 0.13
Crit Moves: -*-- * ...
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.01 0.65 0.6S O.OS 0.30 0,30 O.DD 0.2S 0,25
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.51 0.52 0.52 0.52 0,24 0.24 0.00 0.52 0.52
------------ I ------- r ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 0.0 7.8 0.0 49.7 7.4 18.0 40.3 20.3 20.4 0.0 25.9 32.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Vehi 0.0 7.8 0.0 49.7 7.4 18,0 40.3 20.3 20.4 0.0 25,9 32.5
Queuei 0 is a 0 16 0 1 2 1 0 5 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
0 �(asc)
9
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu. Monterey
Lo3 B
0.070=- C),63�
M M = M =11 IM =11 IM M
01/26/1997 11:27 Filename: SCN4AMWO.RPT Page 4
SCN4AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:27:52 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length 10 Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.573
Loss Time (sec)� 10 Average Delay (sec/veh)i 22.2
Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include include Include
Min. Green: a 0 0 0 a a 0 '0 0 0 0 0
Lanes. 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- H --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- I
Volume Kodule�
Base Vol: 313 61 0 0 329 569 340 98 93 8 12 4
Growth Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
Initial Bee: 313 61 0 0 329 569 340 98 93 9 12 4
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 313 61 0 0 329 569 340 98 93 S' 12 4
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
Reduced VoI4 313 61 0 0 329 S69 340 98 93 8 12 4
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
MLF Adj: L..2.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1-0.Q 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 2.00
Final Vol.: (-313,) 61 0 O_ ��) _;69 (346) 98 93 8 - a 4
------------ I --- ------------ ----- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1660 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 i.og 1.09
Lanes: L,_QO 1.00 0.00 1 Ood� 2 00 2 = 1 00 l.OD 1.00 _$L�5 0.25
Final Sat.: 117501750 0 1;50 3;00 t1SOPI;S 0 1750 1750(!!p 437
-------- r--� ----------- --------------- IT -------------- 11 ----- ------- I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.16 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle: 0.34 0.70 O.OD 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.28 0.19 0.19 0.02 0.02 0.02
Volume/Capt 0.53 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.45 0.53 O.3D 0.28 0.30 0.53 0.53
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- I
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Vehi 21.1 3.6 0.0 0.0 20.2 19.2 29.0 27.1 27.0 39.3 51.7 70.0
Delay Adj; 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 21.1 3.6 0.0 0.0 20.2 19.2 29.0 27.1 27.0 39.3 51.7 70.0
Queue: 7 1 0 0 7 12 9 2 2 0 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0 11 r?g
01168
0.
SCN4AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:27:52 Page S-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. Wi 0.362
Loss Time (Sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.9
Optimal Cycle: 19 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Lanest 1 0 0 1 D 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 a 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 21 96 10 18 256 17 22 56 23 34 110 73
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse� 21 96 10 IS 256 17 22 56 13 34 110 73
User AdJ: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00
k,%) PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00
PHF Volume: 21 96 10 18 256 17 22 56 13 34 110 73
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 96 10 is 256 17 22 56 13 34 110 73
POE Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 151.00 1.00 1.00 I..QL 1.00 1.9.2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 96 10 18 C
156.) __17 U__56 13 3 4 C'77t) 73
----------- --------------- ----------- ----- ---------
Saturation Flow Module!
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.D0 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanest L'Q 0. 1 0 09 1 00"�Z'L'o 06 J -U 0.81 0.19 1.00 0. QL 0.40
19 52 2;OqIS62,.� iDO (16PI299 301 1600 Qa;) 638
Final Sat.: C16 9 14, i
------------ T� ----- - ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Modulet
Vol/Sat: 0.01 O.D7 0.07 0.01 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.3S 0.35
Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.33
------------ I ------- r ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 37.0 11.2 11.3 32.9 10.9 12.0 36.9 22.0 22.0 29.9.18.7 18.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.0 11.2 11.3 32.9 10.8 12.0 36.9 22.0 22.0 29.9 18.7 18,8
Queue: I 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 1 2 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1996 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
( C), ost
E�D L A
0-1-111
Cot 05-0
5. iT4-
0.3 0, C6`
SCN4AMWO.IN Thu Jan 26, 1997 11:27z52 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -without Metrolink Alt.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(LOSS as Cycle Length 0 Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.915
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.8
Optimal Cyclet 102 Level Of Service; E
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laxtes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 a 0 it 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
Growth Adit 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Oo
Initial Bse; 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
User Adj: 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 2.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 73B 1 0 4
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
PCE Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt L. -Qs' 1 . 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.�� 1.9a 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: %422.4 117 0 0 0 0 0 CZI�'
�D 0 4
------------ --------------- ----- ---- ---- - ---- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane: 1600 l600 i600 i6ao i600 i600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanest 1.00 0.00 0. 0 0 ;-Lo 0.00 0.00 1.00
0(16u) 0 0 1600
Final Sat.: - 600 a 1600 �125. 0 1 0
----------- --- -------- --------- ----- ---------------
605 ----- - <t9b
011 -
Capacity Anal i Module.
Vol/Sat : 1 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0-00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: X.01 .... .*** �.**
Green/Cycle; 0.34 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.51
Volume/Cap; 0.91 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.91 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veh: 38.1 14.0 0.0 0.0 71.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.4 545.3 0.0 9.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 38.1 14.0 0.0 0.0 71.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.4 545.3 0.0 9.2
Queue: 16 2 0 0 5 0 0 a 22 0 0 0
L 6vou-4 P
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katzi Okitsu, Monterey
�ao
+10
-� 0. a7o�-
L05
0,'664
01/16/1997
11:27
Filena.e: SCN4AMWO.RPT
Page
5
01/16/1997
Ili27
Filenamew SCTZ4AMWO-RPT
Paqe 6
SCN4AMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:27:52 Page S-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. Wi 0.362
Loss Time (Sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.9
Optimal Cycle: 19 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Lanest 1 0 0 1 D 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 a 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 21 96 10 18 256 17 22 56 23 34 110 73
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse� 21 96 10 IS 256 17 22 56 13 34 110 73
User AdJ: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 1.00
k,%) PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00
PHF Volume: 21 96 10 18 256 17 22 56 13 34 110 73
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 96 10 is 256 17 22 56 13 34 110 73
POE Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 151.00 1.00 1.00 I..QL 1.00 1.9.2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: 96 10 18 C
156.) __17 U__56 13 3 4 C'77t) 73
----------- --------------- ----------- ----- ---------
Saturation Flow Module!
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.D0 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanest L'Q 0. 1 0 09 1 00"�Z'L'o 06 J -U 0.81 0.19 1.00 0. QL 0.40
19 52 2;OqIS62,.� iDO (16PI299 301 1600 Qa;) 638
Final Sat.: C16 9 14, i
------------ T� ----- - ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Modulet
Vol/Sat: 0.01 O.D7 0.07 0.01 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.3S 0.35
Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.33 0.33
------------ I ------- r ------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 37.0 11.2 11.3 32.9 10.9 12.0 36.9 22.0 22.0 29.9.18.7 18.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.0 11.2 11.3 32.9 10.8 12.0 36.9 22.0 22.0 29.9 18.7 18,8
Queue: I 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 1 2 2
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1996 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
( C), ost
E�D L A
0-1-111
Cot 05-0
5. iT4-
0.3 0, C6`
SCN4AMWO.IN Thu Jan 26, 1997 11:27z52 Page 6-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -without Metrolink Alt.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(LOSS as Cycle Length 0 Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.915
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.8
Optimal Cyclet 102 Level Of Service; E
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights, Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laxtes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 a 0 it 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
Growth Adit 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Oo
Initial Bse; 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
User Adj: 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 2.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 73B 1 0 4
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
PCE Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adjt L. -Qs' 1 . 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.�� 1.9a 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: %422.4 117 0 0 0 0 0 CZI�'
�D 0 4
------------ --------------- ----- ---- ---- - ---- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane: 1600 l600 i600 i6ao i600 i600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanest 1.00 0.00 0. 0 0 ;-Lo 0.00 0.00 1.00
0(16u) 0 0 1600
Final Sat.: - 600 a 1600 �125. 0 1 0
----------- --- -------- --------- ----- ---------------
605 ----- - <t9b
011 -
Capacity Anal i Module.
Vol/Sat : 1 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0-00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: X.01 .... .*** �.**
Green/Cycle; 0.34 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.51
Volume/Cap; 0.91 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.91 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veh: 38.1 14.0 0.0 0.0 71.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.4 545.3 0.0 9.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 38.1 14.0 0.0 0.0 71.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.4 545.3 0.0 9.2
Queue: 16 2 0 0 5 0 0 a 22 0 0 0
L 6vou-4 P
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katzi Okitsu, Monterey
�ao
+10
-� 0. a7o�-
L05
0,'664
M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
LO
oa
Lf)
Cn
r-
Oc"ling A",,. Li"nsed to Y't" Wtaw, YAMOrey
U tJ -'S) 6L) A L,%:a ED
vilI711997 1"14 BCNAAWGIM Pmj
SCMAIM. IN rri j" iv, 1997 11,3t,35 Page 0-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROTOSED PAIIRWW XVD= IMPROVZHEIrr FRDJ=, P9WFR= M
TROFIC and MUM A)"YSIS
AN r"x Hwx Analysio fScm.aria 4-10ithoUt Metrolink AlL.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LRwl of Service CooputatiOn Report
ICU l(Wsg so cycle tength fil Method Ift" Vol� Alternativel
................................................................... I ........
jnts�s�tjce #IS S60 re�ndo R,,d/itailroad Avenv4/dth Str"t
.......................... * ....................... .... ....................
("C) ; 100 C�itlll) V�IJCAP (XI: 0.000
L�g Tim (Mt,cl ?6�ftr&qt Dtlay (&�CjVehl 3 0.0
cknisosl Cycle! Level Of Strvicc!
......................... 0 ............................ I ........... *.* ..........
Apprc,achl N�rth pc�.d S�tb BOUM East Domd geat zo�d
L - T - 9 1. - T - R I - T - R I - T - It
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
C�trol: P.rote.ctd Prot�td i.�.Lttd pe.itls,2
P ights: zvcl'.J� 2.�Lcle 1.0ede
Min. Grec-! 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
IAM 0: 2 0 1 1 0 a D D 0 a 0 2 a a 0 0
------------ ........... --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Valu,ee Nndjlg3
Dam Vol I a 609 1025 4 OS2 9 0 a 0 1179 a
Ora.th Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Qu
Mcial Bee: 0 609 102S 4 852 a 0 1 a 1119 0 a
uaer.Adj-. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 1 Do 1.00 1�00 X100
POF Adj: 1.00 I.Oc 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.01 1.00 1�00 1.00 1,00
Pur voluser 0 C09 102S 4 052 a 0 6 0 1119 0 a
Re4jct Vol: 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a a 0 9 a
RecbAced Vol-- a 909 2025 4 $52 0 9 0 0 11" 0 0
PCIC Adlj - 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
final Vol-; 0 609 1025 4 852 a 0 0 0 117� a 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Satvrati� Flo� Hod Is:
Sat/l..-. :600 16ta 1CLC 14-.0 lc.'.� 14�0 lc�' 21CO 16t -a ZEZ1. lrc� LCCO
J."r I 't -.Dft !.Cc 1.;1 I.CO I.CO 2,DD ).CD I.CO T.CO L.CD
L�es� 0,00 L )0 0.00 O.PO D.60 O.DQ O.OD 0.03 O.C-, U.00
rLMI Set. 0 V400 3ZOO 0 0 0 a 3740 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
�pa'ity A�jv.is
Vol/sat.- 9.0Z 0.0 -Z' 0 0. :0 :. 0 0 :. 00 0 -w-avve 0. 00
crit 4FR .00 .0 f-IN24 0.00
Grvea/Cycle� 0.00 0.00 . �-Iq 0. 0
vol,m1cep: 0.00 0.00 440 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ------------_
Level Of sc�ica MIddle.
Delaylveh; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay, Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDea/Veb-. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 D.0
0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
.........................................................................
Tr'ffix 6.8.1311 (cl 199S �21cg "Ron. 1plc�cd to otter. DRUM. Mmtervr
c).SB -o.39 z C�- 16S
0 Ol I
4:30 6�
4
1"T L7:S4.25
Emxwc-12t ----------------------------------- P NCKHAM
........... Av=RI& I"FRMINOM 7RWSCr
CA
OPOM, IMIMOM
arA VARXrNG AKALY5's
Tm"IC olink Alt.)
(Scmaria 4-Vithuut "at
I .......
------------
-------------------
---------------------- Z;;l Of servi" cw"tatloc Report
V.1� Altexuative)
an.
L994 HCM ..........................
.........
......................... Street
#13 pin, ..........
Intersection - ...................................
................ V,,, C,,e L*v-1 Ot
Stivlctl
2's .............
R,,raqt Delay (aecIvebl- .....................
14est BOcMAi
............... ............ "_ind
&c-' ..
L - T - K
Approach: Forth �-4 � - T
T R
so'�ntl L - T
-- ------------- �O ntrolled
---------------
�.tr.11ed
---------- Stop SI"
ig, ,
C.trol: stop S 1.�N-de
tncl'
0 0 1 0
Rig hVI: 0 11 a a o__O 0 0 0
-----------
we,: --------------------------
---------------
w.u,n-t"dule, 0 a 0 42 42
0 1.00
2 124 3
1.00 1-00 1.00
Be" Vol, 2 00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.0, 1" 50
Adj 1.00 1.00 . 42
a
2 134 3
Gr,eth
initial Bee, aL a 4 0
I Do 1.00 1,00 1 ' OR 1.00 1 Do
40 1-
1.0 00
1.00 1-00 1.0
user A31. 1.00 1.00 00 1.1013 1:00
1 1.00 3. ' 00 1.00 1,
2 124 3
I.Ca 1.00 .00 43 42
Pgr AM, 4 a 0 0 0
0 a
M VOL.! GI 0 0 0 G a 0 0
0 42
a
2 124 3
0
0 a 42
,.d=t Vol 4 a a
ILMI Vol. - 11
---- --------- it.
--- I ----------
zj�_"te-'a-voluM PW�14' at
OR
ov
oves
Crade,
r3oCK
cyclefcax&� ,,e, �
Me
j000, as 00 I.ou
1.10 1-10 10
I 'a 1-00 1 .00
PCT Adj, "I' "Jo I.ID L.10
cycalcax k�: =�� �
2 124 3
7v Qc, �: r-'� ' -, �,x a 0 17 f2
PAJ vol, bs - H_ ... : .......
-------- 11 - -------------
- ----------
I-
M-04-411, 2.5 'ccce
4 �
2.1
1 1
3
S- 5
crit ical 0 fi-S � ...... ---------
11 ---------
---------------
capacity "odule' extra
14 axes
63
C'fli't V.I. 19, R,cra xoOCK
1543
potent cap., on occa 12$6 'ooce
I. OR xrcxX
Adj CLJPI 1.03 ,,,g 1.00 XICECK
1563 �ccx
nove cap., $20 ccca 1256 ------------
------- ---------------
11
------------ ---------
ice Mdkdct
r.p�xvsrx 2.6 X3CCce o,
2.3 X3CCX
&
4-1
I'T - LTR - RT
IT LTR WT
LOS by IT LTR - RT
LT - LTR - RT
ree,x
Y"g,sant occ�
Sh.led CIP- I � 014 X�
4.6 MoOCCK
ahrd StpMI.,,,ece
A
0.0
"zed IDS.. 0.0 0.0
4.#
?v,caCbI>&l
Oc"ling A",,. Li"nsed to Y't" Wtaw, YAMOrey
U tJ -'S) 6L) A L,%:a ED
vilI711997 1"14 BCNAAWGIM Pmj
SCMAIM. IN rri j" iv, 1997 11,3t,35 Page 0-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROTOSED PAIIRWW XVD= IMPROVZHEIrr FRDJ=, P9WFR= M
TROFIC and MUM A)"YSIS
AN r"x Hwx Analysio fScm.aria 4-10ithoUt Metrolink AlL.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LRwl of Service CooputatiOn Report
ICU l(Wsg so cycle tength fil Method Ift" Vol� Alternativel
................................................................... I ........
jnts�s�tjce #IS S60 re�ndo R,,d/itailroad Avenv4/dth Str"t
.......................... * ....................... .... ....................
("C) ; 100 C�itlll) V�IJCAP (XI: 0.000
L�g Tim (Mt,cl ?6�ftr&qt Dtlay (&�CjVehl 3 0.0
cknisosl Cycle! Level Of Strvicc!
......................... 0 ............................ I ........... *.* ..........
Apprc,achl N�rth pc�.d S�tb BOUM East Domd geat zo�d
L - T - 9 1. - T - R I - T - R I - T - It
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
C�trol: P.rote.ctd Prot�td i.�.Lttd pe.itls,2
P ights: zvcl'.J� 2.�Lcle 1.0ede
Min. Grec-! 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
IAM 0: 2 0 1 1 0 a D D 0 a 0 2 a a 0 0
------------ ........... --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Valu,ee Nndjlg3
Dam Vol I a 609 1025 4 OS2 9 0 a 0 1179 a
Ora.th Adjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Qu
Mcial Bee: 0 609 102S 4 852 a 0 1 a 1119 0 a
uaer.Adj-. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 1 Do 1.00 1�00 X100
POF Adj: 1.00 I.Oc 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.01 1.00 1�00 1.00 1,00
Pur voluser 0 C09 102S 4 052 a 0 6 0 1119 0 a
Re4jct Vol: 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a a 0 9 a
RecbAced Vol-- a 909 2025 4 $52 0 9 0 0 11" 0 0
PCIC Adlj - 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
final Vol-; 0 609 1025 4 852 a 0 0 0 117� a 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Satvrati� Flo� Hod Is:
Sat/l..-. :600 16ta 1CLC 14-.0 lc.'.� 14�0 lc�' 21CO 16t -a ZEZ1. lrc� LCCO
J."r I 't -.Dft !.Cc 1.;1 I.CO I.CO 2,DD ).CD I.CO T.CO L.CD
L�es� 0,00 L )0 0.00 O.PO D.60 O.DQ O.OD 0.03 O.C-, U.00
rLMI Set. 0 V400 3ZOO 0 0 0 a 3740 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
�pa'ity A�jv.is
Vol/sat.- 9.0Z 0.0 -Z' 0 0. :0 :. 0 0 :. 00 0 -w-avve 0. 00
crit 4FR .00 .0 f-IN24 0.00
Grvea/Cycle� 0.00 0.00 . �-Iq 0. 0
vol,m1cep: 0.00 0.00 440 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ------------_
Level Of sc�ica MIddle.
Delaylveh; 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay, Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDea/Veb-. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 D.0
0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
.........................................................................
Tr'ffix 6.8.1311 (cl 199S �21cg "Ron. 1plc�cd to otter. DRUM. Mmtervr
c).SB -o.39 z C�- 16S
0 Ol I
4:30 6�
01/16/1997 11:32 Filename, SCW4PMWO.RPT Page I
SC94PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:32:56 Page 2-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4-WitlioUt Metrolink Alt.)
---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lIth Street
*.* .... ... ..........
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap, (X): 1.125
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh)t 100.7
Optimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service; F
.... *.*** ... * ..........
Approach3 North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Controlt Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes; 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 D 1 0 2
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 11 669 0 852 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 1161
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 11 669 0 852 439 0 0 0 0 0- 0 1161
User Adj: 1.DO 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 l.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume! 11 669 0 852 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 1161
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 11 669 0 852 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 1161
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLP Adj: 1.00 IU- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 1.00 1.00 1.00 L40
Final Vol.: 11 (669-) 0 852 439 0 0 & 0 0 0 C116�1�
------------ I ----- Z�� ----- 11 --------------- --------------- ---- ---- -- �.J
Saturation Flow Modulet
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1. 0 0 _X -k 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00,1-4 0.00 0.00 1 "0
Final Sat.� 1600(1600) 0 32010 2600 a d' 1600) ---- a --- 0 1;0'00(�320b
------------ I ----- ------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module: 0.2'
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.42 0.00 0.27 0. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36
Crit Movest
Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32
Volume/Cap: 0.02 1.13 0.00 1.10 1.13 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 13
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: IS.S 106 0.0 89.6 117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.3
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDellveh: 15.5 106 0.0 89.6 117 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.3
Queue: 0 37 0 41 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 61
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc
0.
Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Lo T
SCN4PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 1102tS7 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTj NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrnlink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
1994 HC14 Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Average Delay (sec/veh): 1�9 Worst Case Level Of Service; E
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include Include Inclu
Lanes; 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 217 1175 0 0 663 189 9 0 49 0 0 0
Growth Adj� 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OD 1.00
initial Baez 217 117S 0 0 663 189 9 a 49 0 a 0
User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF volume: 217 1175 0 0 663 189 9 0 49 0 a 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol, 217 1175 0 0 663 189 9 0 49 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Modulei
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
% Cycle/Cars:
% Truck/Comb:
PCE Adj: 1-10 1-00 1-00 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 I.ID 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE:
TrcklCmb PCE:
Adj Vol.: 239 2175 0 0 663 189 10 0 54 0 0 a
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Cap Module�
MoVeUp Time! 2.1 � 3.4 xxxx 2.6
Critical Gp: 5.5 � =x= 7.0 � 5.5
............ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
capacity Module:
CnfliCt Vol: 852 � � � � � 2150 � 426 � �
Potent Cap.: 598 � � � � � 43 � 842 � �
Adj Cap: 1.00 � � � � � 0.60 � 1.00 � �
Move Cap.: 598 � � � � � 27 � 842 � �
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Stopped Del: 9.4 z= 000cx 198.0 x=x 4.5 x=x
LOS by Move � B
Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.: x=�� KKKK 148 � x=x oncz �
Shrd StpDel:� XXXXX 40.0 � x=x �
Shared LOS: E
ApproachDel: 1.6 -0.0 34.6 0'0
Traffix 6.0.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, DkitSu, Monterey
UtJS)WALJ--�,F-�
L 6S
T
11
= M
M
= = M =
= M
M
M
=
M M = =
= . M M
01/16fl997
21:32
Filename; SCN4PMWO.RPT
Page
3
01/16/2997
11:32
Filename: SCN4PMWO.RPT
Paoe 4
SCN4PMWO,IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11;32!57 Page 3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length U Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market street
Cycle (Sec): 100 Critical Vol,/Cap. (X): 0.652
Lose Time ( 8 ec); -11� Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.1
Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights; Include Include Include Include
Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L,anes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Modulet
Base Vol: 16 1392 6 62 S64 87 36 118 5 2 134 32
Growth Adj1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Has:. 16 1392 6 62 S6* 87 36 218 5 2 134 32
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 16 1392 6 62 $64 87 36 118 5 2 134 32
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Volt 16 1392 6 62 564 87 36 118 5 2 134 32
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1,1LO 1.00 1. U 1 00 1.00 1. 1.00 1.00 1. 0 0 't -AZ 1.00
Final Vol.: I6Q3L5D 6 0 ;64 87 6- lie 5 2 Q_3R 32
------------ I --------------- ---- --- --- --- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Laner 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1
JjOO(t. 0.96 0.04 1 004�� 0.19
Final Sat. 0. j!� *-1141 11 1;73 0.27 i
(56�2 72 428 Q60
01535 65 1 00 308
------------ I --------------- -------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.44 0.44 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.10 0.10
Crit Moves:
Green/cycle: 0.04 0.69 0.69 0.06 0.72 0.72 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.16 0.16
Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.28 0.28 0.61 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.63 0.63
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/veh: 37.0 7.D 57.4 43.7 3.9 4.1 50.0 27.4 35.5 55.8 34.2 44.8
Delay Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.D0 I.OD
AdjDel/Vehi 37.0 7.0 57.4 43.7 3.9 4.1 50.0 27.4 35.5 S5.8 34.2 44.8
Queue: 0 22 0 2 6 1 1 3 0 0 4 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o)
C)
07t,-
SCN4PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:32:57 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loas as Cycle Length 1,1 Method (Base Volume Alternative)
........ * .... ..........
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. M: D.569
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.7
Optimal Cycle: 38 Level Of Service: A
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound Rest Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control. Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min, Green! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanest 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module;
Base Volt 59 49 14 22 59 381 651 22 122 6 218 28
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
initial Bse: 59 49 14 22 59 381 6S1 22 122 6 218 28
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 59 49 14 22 59 381 651 22 122 6 218 28
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 59 49 14 22 59 381, 651 22 122 6 218 28
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.;A�1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1�00 !AL 2.00
Final Vol :_I 9 49 141, 22 59 �N8 it 67� 22 122 6 (-21�� 28
------------ ------
Saturation Flow Modul
sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,oq 1.09
Laxtes; 1,.QA. 0. 78 0.22 1.00 1.00 2
<1� 2 1 00 1 00 1 co 0ak' 0.11
Final Sat.:_ (7-5b)1361 389 17SO 1750 ..... 1;50 1�50 I;SotT553) 199
----------- I - ------------ --------- ---� --------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.19 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves: .... .... ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.36 0.60 0.60 0.03 O�27 0.27
Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.52 0.52 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.52 O.S2
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 38.2 25.4 25.5 33.7 25.0 27.6 19.9 6.3 6.7 36.4 24.9 30.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 58.2 2S.4 25.5 33.7 25.0 27.6 19.9 6.3 6.7 36.4 24.9 30.5
Queue: .2 1 0 1 1 10 14 0 1 0 5 1
*** ..... ............ ... ****** ...... **
Traffi!:.�6.511 (C) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0so
bt�
01/1611997 11,32 Filename: SCN4PMWO.RPT Page 5
SCN4PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:32:57 Page S-1
---------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0,277
Loss Time (sea): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh); 20.1
Optimal Cycle: 17 Level Of Service; A
----------------- -- ........................... ...... -1 .......... I ....... 1.4
TraffiX 6.8.1511 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to Katz, OkitBu, Monterey
L65
, �05
0.09&
01/16/1997 11:32 Filename: SCN4PMKO.RPT Page
SCN4PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:32:57 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARXING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis �Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Femando/Nehall Avenue
cycle (sec): IDO Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.150
Lose Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 113.4
Optimal Cyclei ISO Level Of Service: F
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Greeni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Volume Modulet
Base Vol: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bast 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 D 103 5 4 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 569 127 a 0 117 0 6 0 1033 s 4 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Reduced Vol: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 s 4 0
PCE Adj: I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .0 0 1.00
" 1 0 0 k' .0; 1& 4
Final Vol -P�i.7__ 0 0 6 10343 0
--------- - --------- ---- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- 11 --------
Saturation Flo. Module;
Sat/Lane: IGOD 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00 0.00 01� 0.00 1 000 0.00 "2 0,46 0.44 0.00
Final Sat NOO 0 0 lio 0 711 0
--------------- ---- ---- - ------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat; � -' 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.00
Crit Moves ;?5z .*.* ****
Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.34 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.16 0.21 0,00 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.16 1.16 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 181 0.0 23.3 0.0 209.7 S62.9 17.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 181 0.0 23.3 0.0 109.7 562.9 17.0 0.0
Queue� 34 2 0 0 9 0 0 0 64 1 0 0
............
L --T 1E e -T LA�G 6
(�,Div-N--t� t -S
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o.03
0161+G L la3
& �Ia �5-
0'� 69
Approach;
North Bound
South Bound
East Bound
West Bound
Movement:
L - T - R
L - T
- R
L - T
- R
L
- I -
R
------------
Control;
--------------- 11
Permitted
---------------
Permitted
--------------- 11
Permitted
---------------
Permitted
Rights;
include
Include
include
Include
Min. Green:
0 0 0
0 0
a
0 0
0
0
0
0
Lanes:
1 0 0 1 0
1 a 0
1 0
1 0 0
1 0
1
0 0 1
0
------------
volume module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
---------------
Base Vol:
10 105 12
31 98
24
62 83
29
66
67
86
Growth Adj,
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Initial Bse:
10 105 12
31 98
24
62 83
29
66
67
86
User Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
PHF Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
I.OD
1.00
1.00
1.00
PHF Volume:
10 los 12
31 98
24
62 83
29
66
67
86
Reduct Vol:
0 0 0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Reduced Vol:
10 105 12
31 98
24
62 83
29
66
67
86
PCE Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
MLP Adjr
1.00'1-4D� 1.00
1.0 .00
I,OD
1. 016J. 00
1.00
1.600
16
1.00
Final Vol.:
10 %,�S 12
( !151
( �6 83
29
6
67
86
------------
Saturation Flow
---------------
Module:
---------------
---------
----
----
----------
Sat/Lane:
1600 1600 1600
1600 1600
160D
1600 1600
1600
1600
1600
1600
Adjustmentr
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
I.OD
1.00
1.00
1.00
Lanes:
0 so
0 20
74
oil
0 26
1 00
0
0.56
Final Set.:
li.'0( 543��
85
i is
86
i 14
1 00
(S
899
............ I
----- --------
10 ----------
----
----------
Capacity Analysis
Module:
Vol/Sat:
0.01 0.07 0.07
0.02 0.08
0.08
0.04 0.07
0.07
0.04
0.10
0.10
Crit Moves:
Green/Cycle:
0.03 0.31 0.31
0.08 0.36
0.36
0.16 0.35
0.35
G.21
0.40
0.40
Volume/Cap:
0.21 0.24 0.24
0.24 0.21
0.21
0.24 0.20
0.20
0.20
0.24
24
------------ I
Level Of Service
------- -------
Modulet
---------------
---------------
----------
_O
-
Delay/Veh:
36.9 20.1 20.5
33.3 17.2
17.3
28.2 17.3
17.4
25.2
15.4
15.4
Delay Adj:
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
AdjDel/Veh;
36.9 20.1 20.5
33:3 17.2
17.3
28.2 17.3
17,4
25.2
15.4
15.4
Queuel
0 2 a
1 2
0
2 2
1
2
1
2
TraffiX 6.8.1511 (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc- Licensed to Katz, OkitBu, Monterey
L65
, �05
0.09&
01/16/1997 11:32 Filename: SCN4PMKO.RPT Page
SCN4PMWO.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:32:57 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARXING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis �Scenario 4 -Without Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Femando/Nehall Avenue
cycle (sec): IDO Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.150
Lose Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 113.4
Optimal Cyclei ISO Level Of Service: F
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Greeni 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Volume Modulet
Base Vol: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
Growth Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bast 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 D 103 5 4 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 569 127 a 0 117 0 6 0 1033 s 4 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Reduced Vol: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 s 4 0
PCE Adj: I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .0 0 1.00
" 1 0 0 k' .0; 1& 4
Final Vol -P�i.7__ 0 0 6 10343 0
--------- - --------- ---- ---- ---------- ---- ---------- 11 --------
Saturation Flo. Module;
Sat/Lane: IGOD 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 00 0.00 01� 0.00 1 000 0.00 "2 0,46 0.44 0.00
Final Sat NOO 0 0 lio 0 711 0
--------------- ---- ---- - ------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat; � -' 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.00
Crit Moves ;?5z .*.* ****
Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.34 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.16 0.21 0,00 0.00 1.16 0.00 0.02 0.00 1.16 1.16 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 181 0.0 23.3 0.0 209.7 S62.9 17.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 181 0.0 23.3 0.0 109.7 562.9 17.0 0.0
Queue� 34 2 0 0 9 0 0 0 64 1 0 0
............
L --T 1E e -T LA�G 6
(�,Div-N--t� t -S
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
o.03
0161+G L la3
& �Ia �5-
0'� 69
= = = M = = I M M = =
01111/1997 Iltdd Pilewme, SCIMPM".RPT once 7
SaR40400.1N Fri aam. 17, 1997 17,44t22 rage 7-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
pwpcsn RAILAM Avwn INPROVSMINT PROJDCr. p"WHAW, CA
TRAPTIC And PARKIZU AMIGIS
PH Yeak Four Amlyzis ISCOMrLO 4-Kitbuut 0*tr*I1nk Alt -I
-- -- ------ --- --------- ---------- -------- - ---------- ---- ----- --------- -----------
lovel Of Sarvice Cw1putstion Report
1994 " Unsiquall"d Method 411a" VoIM& Alteln!Mtl"�
....................................................................... '..#
812 ri" Awaug/Karket Street
............ I ......................................................... 4 .........
co" Level of Servicav a
Averaga Delay (Zcc/�eh) 1 1.0 x0rat .......... ...........
.............. . .......................... ** .........
Approach; Korth sound South bound Rast Bound Ifeat Bound
Mo�vsant. L - 7 - R L - T - R X. - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control. Stop Sign stop sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
Righha! Include I= Lude Include Include
L&nea: a 0 11 0 0 0 D 0 a 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
............ --------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------------
volume Picaale.
Mae Vol- 61 a 7 a a a a ILI 17 4 204 a
G�h Mj2 1.00 I�OG 1.00 L-00 1-00 2-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 "no
Initial Beet fil 0 7 0 0 a 0 111 17 G 204 0
U.cr hdj-. I.CD 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 2.Co 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M Adj: I.Co 1.00 I.ou 1.00 I.Co 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1�00
= vol� 4 61 0 1 0 a a 0 111 31 6 204 0
Rtd�t voll 0 0 m 0 .1 a 0 0 0 0 0 a
Final Vol. , 61 0 7 0 a a 0 111 al 6 104 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
adjuffted vol� Modulet
grade- it ow elk
* cycle/Care: X=C
% Trucklco-b: =wx =CZ XXXX
PM Adj: 2�30 1.20 1.10 1.10 2.10 1.10 1.10 1�00 I.Do 2.10 1.00 .1.00
Cycilc� PCEZ XrXX
Trck/C.b PCE ; =XX
Adj VcL. , 67 a S 0 a a 0 ILI 17 7 Its a
------ --- -------
itical Oap Modulet
0b. up Timet 3.4 � 2.4 x=o, ccxx 3.1 � Ragout
CrItica,l rp; 6-5 xx= 5.5 5.0 zxrx x,cer,
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
cape,ity Kodcl.:
CAflict Vol, 2CS � ISS 3�6
Fot��t Cap.! 744 . 1154 � � x 13so
Adj Cap: 0-95 � 1.00 � � xxxxx 1. 0*
M� Car.; 740 � 1156 236n xrrm
------------ I-- --T .......... --------------- --------------- ---------------
L�el Of Service Module:
Stopped Dele 5.3 3.1 za� 2.6
LOS by �: - A
M�eeentl loT - I.TR - R7 IT - LTR - RT IT - I'M - Err LT - LTR - RT
shared cap., � 769 � � . �.x � � � � xcrx
Sbxd StJPD*11� S'l � uvaor � oacxx %x=
Sbared LCS� 5
ApprooChDal- S.1 0.0
TrIffla, 6.g.lSil (c) J"S bowling Assoc. �Ueenaod to Yatwo Okitau, Monterey
= M M = = = = M M
9211711197 17,44 FilreAVVI 9CW4PMWO.PFT Page a
SCIMP0000.22 Fri. 0&11 17, 2997 17.44,22 Page 8-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSID RAILROW AVOW INPROVItHm vv�cr. MfHALL CA
TRAFFIC arid FARXIPJ RNALYSIS
P14 peak Hour Analyalo (60coarlo 4-Withaut. Metrolink Alt.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lovel Of Nervice cowutation Report
ICU ItLoom Re Cycle Length U fttho4 (8884 velvae Alternative)
................................................... .........................
Intervection #15 san Fernando RoWlailroad Avenuelfth Street
........................................ * ........... ** ........................
cycle Isecli 100 Critical Vol./Cap. Ult D'Daa
Less Time jaec) 5 joner"t Delay (Secivehl 1 0.0
Optimal Cycle, a Leval Of gamic*:
* ... I .................... * ......................................... 4* ...........
Yfpromcb, worth Dound $cuth Boend Met Round Meet Sound
14�t , L - T - A L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 ----------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Ovntml, Protected rvotected Perm1tted Peradttvd
Rights: 041 Include Include Include
HiA. Greew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lance 2 D a I a 2 0 1( 0 0 0 0 0 a 2 0 13 0 6
Volume Module,
save Vol � 0 696 3424 9 Use 0 0 a 0 571 0 D
��b Adj: 1.00 2.00 1,00 2.00 2.09 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
I.itial Z4.: 0 691 1414 3 1150 0 a 0 0 572 0 D
Ua� XIJ S 1.0* 1.00 1.00 1. " l.aO 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 2.0; 2.00 I�tD
F11F Adj, 1.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
pur VaImme, a 6916 1414 9 liso 0 a a 0 671 0 0
Reduct Vol, 0 a a 0 a a 0 a 0 a 0 a
Reduced Vol, 2 SP6 1414 9 liso a 0 a 0 571 0 0
PCS Adj: I�DG 2.00 1.00 1.00 1�90 1.00 1,00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
ML,r Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.10 1.00 I.mo 2.00 1.00
Final V61.1 a 6% 2qI4 9 2150 a 0 a 0 571 0 0
------------ ............... --------------- ------ -------- ---------------
66turation Floe Module:
Sat/Lane , 1109 3600 Isom 2600 1900 lion 1600 Isom 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjua noe.t. 9.00 2.00 I.Pm 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
lance 1 0.00 0.00 0. " 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat., 0 400 3z 00 1 *.3!Ao - a 0 a a 06 a a
..........
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------
CaWity Analysis Module:
Vol/gat:
Crit mo�eat
b 0.00 C.09 0.00 0.00 0.0)
Volunic/Cap- D.00 0.00 0.00 0.�O C K 0.00 O.DO 0.00 D.00 0.00 0.00 Q.OD
---- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ...............
Len,el Of Service module,
L,eIzYfVrh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 O.D
Delay Adj: 1.00 '.00 1-10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Du 2.00
AdjUel/Veb: 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Quous: 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 D a
............................. 1.4 ........ I ....... ........... .......
Traffix G.S.IS11 M %99S Dwwl1rq Assoc. Licensed to Sara. Okitam, Monterey
0, t:�50 t: 0,
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11;43!14 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lIth street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 1.257
LOSS Time (sec)t 7 Average Delay (sec/veh)� 145.6
Cptimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementi L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes% 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
/ 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module-/
Base Vol: 13 391 0 1144 $99 63 0 0 0 D 0 1066
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OD
Initial Bsei 13 391 0 1144 899 63 0 0 0 0 0 1066
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 13 391 0 1144 899 53 0 a 0 0 0 ID66
Reduct Voli 0 0 a a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 13 391 0 1144 899 63 0 0 0 0 0 1066
PCE Adj: 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1 'AL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.9A 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.S)O
Final Vol.: 13 k3L§,I) 0 (IT44) 899 63 (.2.;p 0 0 0 (-10r:>
------------ --------------- lr� ------ ---- -----
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 16DO 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00
0 tX0j93 0.07 0.00,1-P-0- 0.00 0.00 1
95 105 Okl6oeo 3 00
Final Sat.: 549 0 0 l;.O
1.03
51
------------ I ..... --- --- ---- ----------
Capacity Analysis Ld�
Vol/Sat: a-29 0_2 00 .0.36 0 0.60 0.00 U700 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Crit Moves, .27�- 11 - 1>r!
Green/Cycle; V-70 0.20 0.00' 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26
Volume/Cap; 1.28 1.28 0.00 0.76 1.28 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 * 28
------------ I -------- ------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Ser,t,ice Modulat
Delay/Veh; 518.1 218 0.0 18.4 197 302.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 199.0
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 518.1 218 0.0 18.4 197 302.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 199.0
Queue: 2 32 0 27 76 7 0 0 0 0 0 83
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
C) � -Z-S
.S Lo C
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:43:15 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -with metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
...........
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.9 Worst Case Level Of Service; C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include include Include
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0
REP Adj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.t 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade4 011 ot 01t 0%
% Cycle/Carat 3DDD: � �x X)CCX
% Truck/Comb: X= lactut, 'C= N2= 2000' X;cxot�
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: )CCM ]COCK
Trck/Cmb PCE: ICCCC 'CCC'
Adj Vol.: 26 1066 0 0 1144 0 7 0 161 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.1 � tactooc 3.4 ;occc 2.6 �
Critical Cp: 5.5 xtacc tacCxx 7.0 � 5.5 � :ccC,:
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1144 � � x= � � 2235 � 572 tccac x= tctactoc
Potent Cap.: 417 � � � � toctux 39 � 710 � :cccc �
Adj Cap: 1.00 � tacctoc � � tactocc 0. 93 � 1.00 tacce :ccCK �
Move Cap. 417 =,; � taccc � � 37 � 710- � � ;cccCtc
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Modulat
Stopped Del: 9.2 :ccccx 116.5 6.4 :ccccx
LOS by Move: B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.; :cocz � tacccc � occoor � 413 � :cccx � �
Shrd.StpDeI:,cxoocx � to� :cctot :crxcto� zz� 13.8 � tccCx xz�
Shared LOSx C
ApproachDel: 0.2 0.0 10.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
U1'JC-1 CNAL11EID LDS Q
F5
01/16/1997
Ili43
Filename-
SCN4AMW.RPT
Page
I
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11;43!14 Page 1-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/lIth street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 1.257
LOSS Time (sec)t 7 Average Delay (sec/veh)� 145.6
Cptimal Cycle: ISO Level Of Service: F
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementi L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes% 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
/ 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module-/
Base Vol: 13 391 0 1144 $99 63 0 0 0 D 0 1066
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OD
Initial Bsei 13 391 0 1144 899 63 0 0 0 0 0 1066
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 13 391 0 1144 899 53 0 a 0 0 0 ID66
Reduct Voli 0 0 a a 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 13 391 0 1144 899 63 0 0 0 0 0 1066
PCE Adj: 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1 'AL 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.9A 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.S)O
Final Vol.: 13 k3L§,I) 0 (IT44) 899 63 (.2.;p 0 0 0 (-10r:>
------------ --------------- lr� ------ ---- -----
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 16DO 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00
0 tX0j93 0.07 0.00,1-P-0- 0.00 0.00 1
95 105 Okl6oeo 3 00
Final Sat.: 549 0 0 l;.O
1.03
51
------------ I ..... --- --- ---- ----------
Capacity Analysis Ld�
Vol/Sat: a-29 0_2 00 .0.36 0 0.60 0.00 U700 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.
Crit Moves, .27�- 11 - 1>r!
Green/Cycle; V-70 0.20 0.00' 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26
Volume/Cap; 1.28 1.28 0.00 0.76 1.28 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 * 28
------------ I -------- ------ --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Ser,t,ice Modulat
Delay/Veh; 518.1 218 0.0 18.4 197 302.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 199.0
Delay Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 518.1 218 0.0 18.4 197 302.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 199.0
Queue: 2 32 0 27 76 7 0 0 0 0 0 83
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
C) � -Z-S
.S Lo C
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:43:15 Page 2-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -with metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level of Service Computation Report
1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
...........
Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.9 Worst Case Level Of Service; C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
Rights: Include Include include Include
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
User Adji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 0
REP Adj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol.t 25 1066 0 0 1144 0 6 0 146 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjusted Volume Module:
Grade4 011 ot 01t 0%
% Cycle/Carat 3DDD: � �x X)CCX
% Truck/Comb: X= lactut, 'C= N2= 2000' X;cxot�
PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10
Cycl/Car PCE: )CCM ]COCK
Trck/Cmb PCE: ICCCC 'CCC'
Adj Vol.: 26 1066 0 0 1144 0 7 0 161 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Module:
MoveUp Time: 2.1 � tactooc 3.4 ;occc 2.6 �
Critical Cp: 5.5 xtacc tacCxx 7.0 � 5.5 � :ccC,:
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Module:
Cnflict Vol: 1144 � � x= � � 2235 � 572 tccac x= tctactoc
Potent Cap.: 417 � � � � toctux 39 � 710 � :cccc �
Adj Cap: 1.00 � tacctoc � � tactocc 0. 93 � 1.00 tacce :ccCK �
Move Cap. 417 =,; � taccc � � 37 � 710- � � ;cccCtc
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Modulat
Stopped Del: 9.2 :ccccx 116.5 6.4 :ccccx
LOS by Move: B
Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
Shared Cap.; :cocz � tacccc � occoor � 413 � :cccx � �
Shrd.StpDeI:,cxoocx � to� :cctot :crxcto� zz� 13.8 � tccCx xz�
Shared LOSx C
ApproachDel: 0.2 0.0 10.7 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
U1'JC-1 CNAL11EID LDS Q
F5
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 15, 1997 11:43;15 Page 3-1
----------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length *) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
..............
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.568
Loss Time (sec): x 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.3
Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Servicei A
Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanesi 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 a 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 0 186 34
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bsei 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 0 186 34
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD l.D0 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 0 186 34
r -J Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 a
Reduced Vol: 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 a 186 34
PCE Adj-. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.��1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.��a 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol. Z (2�1035 0 Ik..1 �95 16 (29 76 42 0 34
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600. 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: X-OA_2.00 0.00 1.0 0.03 3-a00.64 0.36 1.0 0.1s
Final Sat., (_1600-�3200 0 160 46 fl6OG_)1031 569 160 247
------------- 1:� ---------- --------------- 1� ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves: .... ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.01 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.25 0.2S
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.55 0.5S O.S5 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.55 0 55
------------ I ---------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/veh: 0.0 8.3 0.0 51.2 8.1 21.0 39.6 19.6 19,7 0.0 26.4 31.9
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
AdiDel/Vehi 0.0 8.3 0.0 51.2 8.1 21.0 39.6 19.6 19.7 0.0 26.4 31.9
Queue: a 16 0 0 17 0 2 2 1 0 5 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Azzoo. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0 X11
0 + 0.
+
= M M = = M M = =
01/16/1997 11:43 Filename: SCN4AMw.RPT Page 4
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 llt43:15 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alterttuitive)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.575
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.S
Optimal Cyclet 38 Level Of Service: A
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementt L - T - R. L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rightsi Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes� 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.D0 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
User Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1,00 1.00
PH? Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP volume: 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
PCE Adj: I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1�� 1.00
Final Vol 61 0 0 (!tb ;69 �� i44 93 8 4
----- ---- 11 --------------- --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09
Lanes; 110D. 1 00 0 0 2 0.25
Final Sat. 14. - S' ' 't750).3i'N t� 1 1,400, 1'7-5"0 11 -7 05 437
... -------------- ---------------
----------- I - ---------- -------- 19 -
Capacity Analysis Modulet
Vol/Sat; 0.18 G.D3 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.16 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01
crit moves: .... .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.34 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.02 0.02
Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.53 D.46 0.53 0.43 0.28 0.43 0.53 0.53
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
ritlay/Veh: 21.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 20.3 19.2 29.0 28.0 26.7 46.4 51.9 70.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjl)el/Veh2 21.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 20.3 19.2 29.0 28.0 26.7 46.4 51.9 70.5
Queue; 7 1 0 0 7 12 9 4 2 a 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
ca, 9
-4 cit
01/1612997
11:43
Filename: SCN4AMW.RPT
Page
3
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 15, 1997 11:43;15 Page 3-1
----------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I (Loss as Cycle Length *) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
..............
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.568
Loss Time (sec): x 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.3
Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Servicei A
Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control; Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanesi 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 a 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 0 186 34
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bsei 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 0 186 34
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD l.D0 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 0 186 34
r -J Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 a
Reduced Vol: 0 1035 0 12 1095 16 54 76 42 a 186 34
PCE Adj-. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.��1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.��a 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol. Z (2�1035 0 Ik..1 �95 16 (29 76 42 0 34
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 1600. 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: X-OA_2.00 0.00 1.0 0.03 3-a00.64 0.36 1.0 0.1s
Final Sat., (_1600-�3200 0 160 46 fl6OG_)1031 569 160 247
------------- 1:� ---------- --------------- 1� ------------ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.01 0.35 0.35 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves: .... ... *
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.01 0.64 0.64 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.25 0.2S
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.55 0.5S O.S5 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.55 0 55
------------ I ---------------- --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/veh: 0.0 8.3 0.0 51.2 8.1 21.0 39.6 19.6 19,7 0.0 26.4 31.9
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
AdiDel/Vehi 0.0 8.3 0.0 51.2 8.1 21.0 39.6 19.6 19.7 0.0 26.4 31.9
Queue: a 16 0 0 17 0 2 2 1 0 5 1
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 199S Dowling Azzoo. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
0 X11
0 + 0.
+
= M M = = M M = =
01/16/1997 11:43 Filename: SCN4AMw.RPT Page 4
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 llt43:15 Page 4-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alterttuitive)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Fernando Road/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. W: 0.575
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.S
Optimal Cyclet 38 Level Of Service: A
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movementt L - T - R. L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rightsi Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes� 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Volt 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.D0 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
User Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1,00 1.00
PH? Adj: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP volume: 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Reduced Vol: 316 61 0 0 329 569 340 144 93 8 12 4
PCE Adj: I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1�� 1.00
Final Vol 61 0 0 (!tb ;69 �� i44 93 8 4
----- ---- 11 --------------- --------- ---- ---- ----------
Saturation Flo. Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 2600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 1,09
Lanes; 110D. 1 00 0 0 2 0.25
Final Sat. 14. - S' ' 't750).3i'N t� 1 1,400, 1'7-5"0 11 -7 05 437
... -------------- ---------------
----------- I - ---------- -------- 19 -
Capacity Analysis Modulet
Vol/Sat; 0.18 G.D3 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.16 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.01
crit moves: .... .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.34 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.02 0.02
Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.53 D.46 0.53 0.43 0.28 0.43 0.53 0.53
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
ritlay/Veh: 21.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 20.3 19.2 29.0 28.0 26.7 46.4 51.9 70.5
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjl)el/Veh2 21.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 20.3 19.2 29.0 28.0 26.7 46.4 51.9 70.5
Queue; 7 1 0 0 7 12 9 4 2 a 0 0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
ca, 9
-4 cit
01116/1997 11:43 Filename, SCN4AMW.RPT Page 5
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:43:25 Page 5-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length t� Method tBase Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/Market Street
..........
Cycle (sec); 100 Critical Vol./Cap. Jx): 0.362
Loss Time (Sao): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.D
Optimal Cyclei 19 Level Of Service: A
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- ---------_--- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights; Include include Include include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0
Lanesz 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 a
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol; 21 96 10 28 256 17 22 68 13 34 110 73
Growth Ad'� 1*00 1,011 1*00 1,00 1*00 11,00 1,00 1,00 1_01 1,01, 1 ' *00 1,00
Initial Bse: 21 96 10 18 256 17 22 68 13 34 110 73
User Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 21 96 10 18 2S6 17 22 68 13 34 110 73
Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 99 10 19 256 17 22 68 13 34 110 73
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: I �qA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 �iu 1.00 I.LA-1.00 1.00 1�00 IAL 1.00
Final Vol.: U 96 10 IS ( 11 73
_L5P 17 Q2!2�) 68 13 �4
------------ --------------- ------ ------ --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: ;-4k 0.91 0.09 1.00 0�u 0.06 84 0 16 1.00 O�u 0.40
Final Sat.: (1600 ;
_)1449 151 16 0 cri-5 UD 100 43 57 1600 r9 6 D 638
------------ p� ---------- ------- --------- ------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.D1 0.17 0.17 0.01 0.05 0.05 0.02 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: .... .... .... ....
Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.48 0.48 0.08 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.12 0.35 0.35
Volume/Capt 0.33 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.33 0.33
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veh; 37.0 11.2 11.3 32.9 10.8 12.0 36.9 21.4 21.5 30.8 18.7 10.8
Delay Adj! 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.0 11.2 11.3 32.9 10�8 12.0 36.9 21.4 21.S 30.8 18.7 18.8
Queue; 1 1 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 1 2 2
Traffix 6.8.1S11 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I
0.3 IrS- -t
M M M M M M M M M
01/1611997 11,43 Filename, SCN4AMW.RPT Page 6
SCN4AMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:43:15 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
AM Peak Hour Analysis JScenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length tj Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 San Fernando/Ne.hall Avenue
Cycle.(sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.91S
Loss Time (SeO: 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.8
optimal Cycle: 1D2 Level Of Service: Z
Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West B=d
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I ------------- �-11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Control: Protected Permitted PermittecbvuttoPermitted
Rights: Include Include
Min. Green: Include
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 D
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Volume module:
Base Vol; 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 492 117 a 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
PHF Volume% 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
Reduct Vol; a 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 492 117 0 0 117 0 0 0 738 1 0 4
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: X'A4."1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 _L0 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.: (j!.2,1 117 0 0 a 0 0 r7 3 T) 0 0 4
------------ --------------- ----------- �_�l ---------------
Saturation Flow Module;
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanest
�l 00 0.00 0.00 Lao 0.00 0.00 1 0 1 0 0.00 0.80
Final Sat-: I i0o 0 0 60 0 0 ti*00 00 20 0 1280
- ---------- ------ -------- --------------- 11 ---------------
--------- 96-1 -0 -A (UP
Capacity Anal5i M d I
. <a oo u e..00
Vol/Satt .07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: .... ...
Green/Cycle� 0.34 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 o.00 0.51
Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.91 o.00 0.01
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
Level Of Service Module;
Delay/Veh: 38.1 14.0 0.0 0.0 71.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.4 545.3 0�0 9.2
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 38.1 14.0 0.0 0.0 71.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.4 545.3 0.0 9.2
Queue: 16 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 22 0 0 0
N(� LT :yrZ3 W. -K W&- (�-1
Traffix 6.8.3.511 (C) 1995 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to
J!'� P\ rilk
1
0,4-61
().1 4 t), ol o =- Ot
J LA(L�E�
Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
I
SCMAM.Iff rri Jan 17. 1997 11.32,29 Page 7-2
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------
FROP01M PAZUROhD XVIIH32 lKMOVE"gurr P�Ecr. nannumL CA
TRAMC and PARJKlM AMALYSIS
Am real $out knalysis (Scenario 4-]Uth Vatzolink kltwrnative�
Leval Of Service Cooputation R&POICt
29" " Umaignalized method (Sees voluee Altemat1w)
;A' t* e-rg' *'C'*t J W*' 116*2* gi S*t r6*"*t* ' 66 ' - 6- 4 6*66- ' ***' - -
................................... ............................................
Average, Delay 1AGeNth) i 1.5 Worst CA" Level Of Semi" t A
................................................................................
Approa h: MrLh Bound Sc'uth boUnd Best BOULMd seat Bottad
VA"Celeat � L T - R L - 7 - I L - T - R L - T - R
------------ ---------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
ODntm,14 stop sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled UnCML=I2*d
Right,, Include Irwclude Include Include
Lenes: o 0 ]1 o 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 1 0 0 a it 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Vol. Mdle:
F4" V�l - 87 0 4 0 0 0 0 42 43 1 130 3
GrcvCh Adj: 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.Do 2.00 1 On 1.00 1 00 1.06 1.00
T.i-g.l Re.! 17 0 4 0 a 0 0 42 42 2 130 3
Deer Adj; I.Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Co 2.00 2.00 I'Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.ac
l.n 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.C3 I.Do 1.3n 1. os I-" I.no 1.03 1.30
My vbl� 43 0 4 0 a 0 c 42 42 3 130 3
Reduct Vols a 0 a 0 a 0 a a 0 0 a 0
Final Vol � -- 17 0 4 0 a 0 0 42 42 2 220 3
------------ I ............... --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjnsted Values Modulet
Q�ada g ot O'k
% Cycloic"63 once Xa= Monce wzze
% �ck/cbb; X� Nocca 20cKX scone
PCE Adj; 1.10 2.10 1.20 3.10 2.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 IAC 1.00 1.60
cyclf� PCs. oocx
Trtkf� F1.-: XX= 20MCK ADQU, zause
Adj Vol.; 96 0 4 0 0 0 0 42 42 A 230 3
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Hodale�
?%,veUp Tim; 3.4 � 2.6 xecoc, scoot zenott sconce x=x nocce 2.1
Critical qP: 6.5 � 6.5 zcoocc :cxxx x,onc, acionoc nocc anonce 5.0
------------ --------------- --------- --------------- ---------
capacity Modulej
Curlia Vol, 196 6) 04 ..X.
Fot,�L Cap�: 916 1246 1561
Adj Cap; 1.60 1.00 1.00 x,occe
�e Cap. SIS 1296 xecocc acaunic 3563 xxxe �
------------ I ................ --------------- It --------------- 11 --------------- I
Lm*L Of Scml.. Modulaz
Stopped rol; 4.� 2 a acauce anconc 2�3 x=s
LOS by )�ve: - A
Mu'venent: I.T - UP - RT LT - LIR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
suamd Cap-! xonte 029 XXMX � � � . . . �
Shrd SLPD*ll 4.9 =XX XXXXX aneez eaucez JCCnLa Xa� ezz= ezzX zzeKX
Shama IMS: k
ApproaeMel - 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tr&tflx 6.0J511 to) 1996 DWILag Assoc. Licensed to Me, CkItMu, Monterey
M M M M M M M M M
01/17/1227 17-37 lane"!
SCWAM. III Fri Jan 17, My 27.37.29
page 1.1
PIOPOERD PAILROAD AVnM IMPROVOUDFT pRWJCr, MEMOULTZ CA
TRAFUC and PAMING ANKLYSIS
Am PeLk 30ur Analysis (Scenzeria 4 -With Matmlik Altzm,tj�v)
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------
Level Of Service C,.Ptati" JWp"t
ICU I C�fi am Cycle Length 1� V"�� ra .. V'lz, Alternative)
.................................................... " ........ A .................
lo"rocctlon 115 Szo Fftrr-1cd* R0ad/RMiIcGbd Avenue/Uh Street
olivy/1997
27!"
Mew", SCF4�-RFT
page
7
I
SCMAM.Iff rri Jan 17. 1997 11.32,29 Page 7-2
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------
FROP01M PAZUROhD XVIIH32 lKMOVE"gurr P�Ecr. nannumL CA
TRAMC and PARJKlM AMALYSIS
Am real $out knalysis (Scenario 4-]Uth Vatzolink kltwrnative�
Leval Of Service Cooputation R&POICt
29" " Umaignalized method (Sees voluee Altemat1w)
;A' t* e-rg' *'C'*t J W*' 116*2* gi S*t r6*"*t* ' 66 ' - 6- 4 6*66- ' ***' - -
................................... ............................................
Average, Delay 1AGeNth) i 1.5 Worst CA" Level Of Semi" t A
................................................................................
Approa h: MrLh Bound Sc'uth boUnd Best BOULMd seat Bottad
VA"Celeat � L T - R L - 7 - I L - T - R L - T - R
------------ ---------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
ODntm,14 stop sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled UnCML=I2*d
Right,, Include Irwclude Include Include
Lenes: o 0 ]1 o 0 a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 1 0 0 a it 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Vol. Mdle:
F4" V�l - 87 0 4 0 0 0 0 42 43 1 130 3
GrcvCh Adj: 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.Do 2.00 1 On 1.00 1 00 1.06 1.00
T.i-g.l Re.! 17 0 4 0 a 0 0 42 42 2 130 3
Deer Adj; I.Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.Co 2.00 2.00 I'Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.ac
l.n 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.C3 I.Do 1.3n 1. os I-" I.no 1.03 1.30
My vbl� 43 0 4 0 a 0 c 42 42 3 130 3
Reduct Vols a 0 a 0 a 0 a a 0 0 a 0
Final Vol � -- 17 0 4 0 a 0 0 42 42 2 220 3
------------ I ............... --------------- --------------- ---------------
Adjnsted Values Modulet
Q�ada g ot O'k
% Cycloic"63 once Xa= Monce wzze
% �ck/cbb; X� Nocca 20cKX scone
PCE Adj; 1.10 2.10 1.20 3.10 2.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 IAC 1.00 1.60
cyclf� PCs. oocx
Trtkf� F1.-: XX= 20MCK ADQU, zause
Adj Vol.; 96 0 4 0 0 0 0 42 42 A 230 3
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Critical Gap Hodale�
?%,veUp Tim; 3.4 � 2.6 xecoc, scoot zenott sconce x=x nocce 2.1
Critical qP: 6.5 � 6.5 zcoocc :cxxx x,onc, acionoc nocc anonce 5.0
------------ --------------- --------- --------------- ---------
capacity Modulej
Curlia Vol, 196 6) 04 ..X.
Fot,�L Cap�: 916 1246 1561
Adj Cap; 1.60 1.00 1.00 x,occe
�e Cap. SIS 1296 xecocc acaunic 3563 xxxe �
------------ I ................ --------------- It --------------- 11 --------------- I
Lm*L Of Scml.. Modulaz
Stopped rol; 4.� 2 a acauce anconc 2�3 x=s
LOS by )�ve: - A
Mu'venent: I.T - UP - RT LT - LIR - RT LT - LTR - RT IT - LTR - RT
suamd Cap-! xonte 029 XXMX � � � . . . �
Shrd SLPD*ll 4.9 =XX XXXXX aneez eaucez JCCnLa Xa� ezz= ezzX zzeKX
Shama IMS: k
ApproaeMel - 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tr&tflx 6.0J511 to) 1996 DWILag Assoc. Licensed to Me, CkItMu, Monterey
M M M M M M M M M
01/17/1227 17-37 lane"!
SCWAM. III Fri Jan 17, My 27.37.29
page 1.1
PIOPOERD PAILROAD AVnM IMPROVOUDFT pRWJCr, MEMOULTZ CA
TRAFUC and PAMING ANKLYSIS
Am PeLk 30ur Analysis (Scenzeria 4 -With Matmlik Altzm,tj�v)
----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------
Level Of Service C,.Ptati" JWp"t
ICU I C�fi am Cycle Length 1� V"�� ra .. V'lz, Alternative)
.................................................... " ........ A .................
lo"rocctlon 115 Szo Fftrr-1cd* R0ad/RMiIcGbd Avenue/Uh Street
................. ...................... a ..................................
Cycle isccl� too
critical Vol./cap. (1);
0.000
Loss Tim (sec) - 5
Average Delay (secIveh)
0.0
optim I Cycle: 0
level Of Servica,
* ................ .................................. . ..........................
Approach, North BOLWJ
Soukh eound Best found
Nast Bound
Movemat. --.I- L 7 R -If-
L T R L T.r:..R
L T
Control, P.tect.d
-If- .11-
P�otect&d pvcnitted
perwitt.d
Itigbts t OvI
Include Include
Include
Min. Ccreen% a 0 0
a 0 0 0 a
a
Lane.- 0 2 0 2
0 X7- 0 0 0 a 0 a
0
------------ I ---------------
a
2 a a 0 6
Volum Modl.:
--------------- if ---------------
It ---------------
B�44 Vol; a 609 IA37
4 652 a D
nos 0
Gr�-U. Adj l.*0 Z.9-3 1. oa
1.00 I.Ca 1.0D 2.00 1.00 I.00
1.00 2�00 1.000
initial as*; a 609 1033
4 352 0 0 0 0
1205 0 D
EA.. Adjt 1." 1.00 LAD
1.00 1.00 2.P0 1.00 1.00 1-00
1.00 1.00 1.00
WX Adj; 1.00 1-00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00
1.00 2-00 1.00
PILF Vainest 0 609 2037
4 452 a 0 0 0
120S 6 0
Redoct Vol: 6 0 0
a 0 a 0 0 0
D a a
xedoced VlZ & 609 1037
4 051 a 0 0 0
1205 0 &
PCX Adj. 1-00 1-00 I -OD
2.00 2.04 2.06 J.Co 2.00 2.0o
j.00 1.00 1.00
Mr Ad), 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.09 1.00 2.00 I.CD I.Co
1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Vol.: a 609 IC37
---- I ---------------
4 GS2 0 a 0 0
---------------
1205 0 0
Satvratinn Flov Module;
--------------- 11
---------------
SAL/Lena: 1600 "Do 1600
1600 2490 2600 1409 .1600 2090
1600 1600 Igoe
1.00 1.00 1-00
1.00 1.60 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
0.00 0.60 0.00
0.00 Cloo U.Co 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0-60
Final - an. --- a - )400 -- goo
..... ..... I - ---- ----
--- a - ;w a a 0
- ---------- OIj3
UP 0 0
capacity A.Iyziff Plodule;
--------- .....
............. I
Vol/Sat, a 0
Crit %we 0.39 3
C.P (C 0.00 O.So 0 Go
0��
1
Creez/Cycle:
'.�v D.to VAD 0.00 0.00
().
o"'se-troo 0.00
Vol�/Cap; O'Go 0,00 0.0C
a.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
------------ I ---------------
--------------- 11 --------------- If
---------------
L&,Vel Of Se"J" Module;
I
D.lay/Veh; 0.6 M.0 0-0
0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 o.c
0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay A4j; 1.00 L.DU 3.00
L.00 1.00 1.00 I.oQ I.Og 1.00
1.00 I.00 2.00
AdJDe1/V&h: 0.0 D.0 0.0
0.0 0;0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Q�o 0.0 0.0
Queue: 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
a 0 0
................................................................................
Tr&ff'x 6-6,'S" 1c) 'S95 Dow"K KS300- Licensed to Utz, OkItsu, Monterey
03st
0,29,7 L
01116/1997 11:48 Filename: SCN4PMR.RPT Page 1 01/16/1997 11,48 Filenames SCN4PMR.RPT Page 2
SCN4PMW.IN Thu.Jan 16, 1997 11:48:18 Page 1-1 SClq4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:48:18 Page 2.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative) PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Ioss as Cycle Length 10 Method [Base Volume Alternative) 1994 HCN Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative)
.......... ........... .......
Intersection #1 Railroad Avenue/llth Street Intersection #2 Railroad Avenue/Lyons Avenue
Cycle (sec): 100 critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.154 Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.6 Worst Case Level Of Servicet F
Loss Time (sec): 7 Average Delay (sec/veh): 118.8 ....... ... *** ... ... ********
Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: P Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
................ Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
Approachi North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Rights: Include Include Include Include
Controli Split Phase Split Phase Permitted Permitted Lanes: 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rightsi Include Include Include Include ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Min. Green: � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module:
Lanes: ,Gp -r 'a- 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Base Volt 261 1246 0 0 663 189 9 0 S2 0 a 0
------------ ------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00
Volume Module: Initial Bee: 261 1246 0 0 663 189 9 0 52 0 0 0
Base Vol: ll 669 0 852 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 1232 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
initial See: 11 669 0 852 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 1232 PHP Volumet 261 1246 0 0 663 189 9 0 52 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF Adj: 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 I.Oa 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 261 1246 0 0 663 189 9 0 52 0 0 0
PHF Volume; 11 669 a 852 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 1232 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Reduct Vol: 0 0 a 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Adjusted Volume Nodule:
Reduced Vol: 11 669 0 852 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 1232 Grade: 0% 0% 0% ov
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 V Cycle/Cars: � oaot =X X= =X tC=
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 00 16 1.00 1.00 lb 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-� - % TrUck/Comb: � XX= � X= t=X XXXX
Final Vol.: 12 0 ;52 0 0 D 0 0 6232�> pCr Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1,10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 2.10 1.10
----------- I ---------- ---- ---- ----- ---- .... .......... ---- ---- - Cycl/Car PCE: X)CK)t X� )c= ]c= � tcocK =,x
Saturation Flow Module: Trck/Cmb PCE: XIOCK � =DC tc= XXXIC XXXX
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adj Vol.: 287 1246 0 0 663 189 10 0 57 0 0 0
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Lanes; 0.02 _9� 0.00 2.00 1 0 0.00 0.00 1." 0.00 0.0 0 1 00 Critical Gap Module:
00
Final Sat.: 26� �74 IZ,00 32 H 0 rr600 0 0 1�00 MoveUp Time: 2.1 xz:xx � 3.4 x= 2.6
------------ I ------------ - - - ------ --------- Critical Gp: 5.5 tc� tcvot xx=x 7.0 � 5.5
Capacity Analysis Module - ------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ---------------
0.2 O.A 0.00 0.00 0.00 G.0
Vol/Satl 0.42 0.1 0.01 )o 0.00 0.00 (!O�st Capacity Module;
Crit Moves:: � 4! *d' *4..N Cnflict Vol: 852 � tc� � � tcoccx 2265 :c= 426 tct= �
Green/Cycle 0.36 36 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 Potent Cap.: 598 � xx� � =x tc� 38 � 842 zzxx � KKK=
Volume/Cap: 2.17 1.17 0.00 1.13 1417 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.17 Adj Cap: 1.00 � xz�x ]CCCz � � 0.52 � 1. 00 xxxx Ic=x. �
------------ I ------- ------- 11 --------------- --------------- --------------- I Move Cap-: S98 x=x � � x= � 20 x= 842 t=x � xx=
LevelOf Service Module: ------------ 1 --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Delay/Veh: 399.7 124 0.0 104.9 136 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 117.3 Level Of Service Modulej
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Stopped Del: 10.7 to= tc� 319.7 4.6
AdjDel/Veh: 399.7 124 0.0 104.9 136 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 117.3 LOS by Movei C
Queue. 2 41 a 45 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 Movement; LT - LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT
............ Shared Cap.: =ot tc� 117 � x= � xxzxx
Shrd StpDel:� 62.8 xm:,ccx � xx�x
Shared LOS: F
ApproachOelt 2.0 0.0 51.0 0.0
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995, Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey Traffix 6.8.1511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
A -A-'7
7-t7
t� NiR
t
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
4 o' C1 Z':- 0� I k5
D3 C
M M M M M M M M M
01/16/1997 11:48 Filename: SCN4PMW.RPT Page 4
SCN4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16. 1997 11;48:18 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Ferr�ando Road/Lyons Avenue
cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.595
Loss Time (sec)� 10 Average Delay (sec/vehl% 23.3
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R
------------
Control:
SCN4PMK.IN Thu Jan 16,
1997 11;48;18
---------------
Protected
Page 3-1
01/16/1997
11:48
Filename: SCN4PMW,RPT
Page
3
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
A -A-'7
7-t7
t� NiR
t
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
4 o' C1 Z':- 0� I k5
D3 C
M M M M M M M M M
01/16/1997 11:48 Filename: SCN4PMW.RPT Page 4
SCN4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16. 1997 11;48:18 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Ferr�ando Road/Lyons Avenue
cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.595
Loss Time (sec)� 10 Average Delay (sec/vehl% 23.3
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R
------------
Control:
SCN4PMK.IN Thu Jan 16,
1997 11;48;18
---------------
Protected
Page 3-1
Riqhts�
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
Include
Include
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
Min. Green:
0 0
0
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario
4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service
Computation Report
0
L�eS:
1 0 0
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length U Method (Base Volume Alternative)
1 0 1
..............
.........
0 1
1 0 0
Intersection #3 Railroad Avenue/Market
Street
---------------
---------------
---------------
Cycle (sec): 100
critical Vol./Cap. W:
14
0.664
381
Loss Time (sec): K-1
Average Delay (sec/veh):
6 262
11.4
Growth Adj:
Optimal Cycle: -�4
Level Of Service:
1.00 1.00
B
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
Initial Bse�
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound
West Bound
22 59
Movement: L - T - R L - I
- R L - T - R
L
- T - R
28
------------ I --------------- ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted
11 --------------- 11
Permitted
---------------
Permitted
1.00
Rights: Include Include
Include
1.00 1.00
Include
PHF Adj:
Min. Green; 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
0 0
1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
1 0 1 0 0 1 0
1
0 0 1 0
61 49
------------ I --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
---------------
---------------
651 24
122
Base Vol: 16 1412 6 74 576
102 36 118 5
2
132 32
0
Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
0 0
initial See: 16 1412 6 74 576
102 36 118 5
2
132 32
22 59
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
28
PHF Adj: 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.OD
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1�00
1.00
P14F Volume: 16 1412 6 74 576
Reduct Vol� 0 0 0 0 0
102 36 118 5
0 0 0 0
2
0
132 32
0 0
MLF Adj:
Final Vol.:
Reduced Vol: 16 1412 6 74 576
102 36 218 5
2
132 32
-'0
n6s 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 lion
'-00 l(t
li0o 1.00 1.00
1.00
D4 1.00
Final Vol.; ��1412 74
02 lis 5
1�j)
2_�
�32 32
------------ --------------- ---------
Saturation Flow Modulet
---- ---------
----
----------
Sat/Lane; 1600 1600 16DO 1600 1600
1600 1600 1600 1600
1600
1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.01
%11 1.11 0.04
1.00
0 0.20
�11
Final Sat.: I 318 14 1�
.1 65
16 00(8
312
------------ I --------------- 10-5
1(jI20_01535
---------------
-----
------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/sat� 0.01 0.44 0.44 O.OS 0.21
0.21 0.02 0.08 0.08
0.00
0.10 0.10
Crit Moves: * ...
Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.69 0.69 0.07 0.72
0.72 0.03 0.19 0.29
0.00
0.16 0.16
Volume/Cap: 0.29 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.29
0.29 0.65 0.40 0.40
0.40
0.65 0.65
------------ I -------- ------ ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
---------------
---------------
Delay/Veh: 37.2 7.3 61.9 42.8 3.8
3.9 51.5 27.9 37.0
57.9
35.1 46.6
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Vehz 37.2 7.3 61.9 42.8 3.8
3.9 51.5 27.9 37.0
57.9
35.1 46.6
Queueg 0 23 0 2 6
1 1 3 0
a
4 1
.............
******.*
Traffix 6.8.1511 (c)
A -A-'7
7-t7
t� NiR
t
1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
4 o' C1 Z':- 0� I k5
D3 C
M M M M M M M M M
01/16/1997 11:48 Filename: SCN4PMW.RPT Page 4
SCN4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16. 1997 11;48:18 Page 4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length %) method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 San Ferr�ando Road/Lyons Avenue
cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.595
Loss Time (sec)� 10 Average Delay (sec/vehl% 23.3
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R
------------
Control:
I ---------------
Protected
---------------
Protected
---------------
Protected
---------------
Protected
Riqhts�
Include
Include
Include
Include
Min. Green:
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
L�eS:
1 0 0
1 0
1 0 1
0 2
2 0 1
0 1
1 0 0
1 0
------------ I ---------------
Volume Module:
---------------
---------------
---------------
Base Volz
61 49
14
22 59
381
651 24
122
6 262
2B
Growth Adj:
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
Initial Bse�
61 49
14
22 59
381
651 24
122
6 262
28
User Adjt
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
PHF Adj:
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
PHF Volume�
61 49
14
22 59
381
651 24
122
6 262
28
Reduct Vol;
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
Reduced Vol:
61 49
14
22 59
381
651 24
222
6 262
28
PCE Adj:
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
1.00 1.00
1.00
MLF Adj:
Final Vol.:
I.M-1 . 00
Qt12 49
1�00
.14
1.00 1.00
22 59
1 0
�3 �S
-'0
n6s 24
1 00
i22
1.00 I..Pk
6 Q6,2)
1.00
28
------------ I --------------- ------------- - --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment; 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 2.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 l.oq l.oq l.og l.og
Lanes: 00 1 00 00 1 00 1 00 0.10
Final Sat.: 1140 140 750 IiSO liSO(155 169
------------ r� ----------- ---- ---- --------- ----- ---
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0,03 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.11 0.19 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.17 0.17
Crit Movesi �*.- .... ... *
Green/Cycle� 0.06 0.19 0.19 D.07 0.20 0.20 0.34 0.61 0.61 0.03 0.30 0.30
Volume/Cap; 0.55 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.55 0.55 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.55 0.55
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 39.3 26.0 26.1 34.0 25.7 28.5 21.2 6.0 6.3 36.4 23.6 31.1
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh; 39.3 26.0 26�1 34.0 25.7 28.5 21.2 6.0 6.3 36.4 23.6 31.1
Queues 2 1 0 1 1 10 15 0 1 a 6 1
Traffix G.S.L.S� (C) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitsu, Monterey
<2�- �c6b
0.1 Z9
0,196,
C), 164_
'S11
i ()'W.) *- O� 611
L6
Ely
SCN4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:48i18 Page 5-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length V) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.281
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.1
Optimal Cycle: 17 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laxtes; 1 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 a 0 1 a
------------ I --------------- --------------- If --------------- ---------------
Volume Modulet
Base Vol; 10 los 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 7D 89
Growth Adjt 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00- I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 20 105 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 70 89
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Volume: 10 105 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 70 89
Reduct Vol: 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 105 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 70 89
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.�O 1.0D 1.00 1.00 I.OD I On 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,QD, 1.00
Final Vol.: 10 kLO,7 12 C3 �65') 83 29 66--kZ0'7 89
------------ --------------- ---- ---------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: I
ljoO.I(V %10 0j:0 0j20 ;�-u 0 74 0 26 1 00 O.jj 0.56
Final Sat.: _I. (16R)l 5 IS (1600)Ii86 414 IiOO C70T� 896
T� ------------ ----------- ------ ------
------------ I ------ --------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.20 0,10
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.30 0.30. 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.16 0.36 0.36 D.21 0.41 0.41
Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.24 0 24
------------ I ------- ------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 36.9 20.3 20.8 33.4 17.5 17.7 28.4 17.1 17.1 2S.0 15.0 15.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
AdjDel/Veht 36.9 20.3 20.8 33.4 17.5 17.7 28.4 17.1 27,1 25.0 15.0 15.0
Queue: 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 2
Traffix 6.8.2511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
A
01
0, 2, rD- t,5 Tz
= M M = IM M = IM M
01/16/1997 11:48 Filename, SCN4PMW-RPT V.- 6
SCN4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:48:18 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Altexmoitive)
Intersection #9 San rernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec); 100 critical vol./Cap. W: 1.150
Loss Time (sec); 7 Average Delay (sec/veh).- 113.4
Optimal Cyclei ISO Level Of Service: P
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 ---- - --- --
Control: Protected Permitted ;�e�;;Itt; P;
,,,;nmitted
Rights: Include Include nclude
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanesi 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 569 127 a 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 669 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1. U-1. 00 1.00 1.00 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 no 1.4N.00 1.00
Final Vol.: Q! 9,� 127 D 0 0 6 0 103 4 0
----- ----- ----- ---
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 .1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanest L�U 1-00 0.00 0-00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 I-Q4L ��.f 0.44 0.00
Final Sat.t C163)1600 0 0��1606 0 1600 0 6600)(-889
_) 711 0
------------ ------------ ----- ------- ------------
Capacity Anal i Modulet
Vol/Sat: 0 0.0 8 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.00
Crit Moves: .*** ..**
Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.34 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.16 0.21 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.00, 0.02 0.00 1.16 1.16 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 181 0.0 23.3 0.0 109.7 562.9 17.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.0D 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veht 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 lal 0.0 23.3 0.0 109.7 562.9 17.0 0.0
Queue: 34 2 0 0 9 0 0 a 64 1 0 0
Traffix 6.8.IS11 (c)
C)�3
�#
2995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
-t- o'070C. O'c"'v-
01/16/1997
11i48
Filename, SCN4PMW.RPT
page
5
Ely
SCN4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:48i18 Page 5-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU I(Loss as Cycle Length V) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 San Fernando Road/market Street
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.281
Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.1
Optimal Cycle: 17 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laxtes; 1 0 0 1 a 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 a 0 1 a
------------ I --------------- --------------- If --------------- ---------------
Volume Modulet
Base Vol; 10 los 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 7D 89
Growth Adjt 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00- I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 20 105 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 70 89
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Volume: 10 105 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 70 89
Reduct Vol: 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 105 12 31 98 24 62 83 29 66 70 89
PCE Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.�O 1.0D 1.00 1.00 I.OD I On 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,QD, 1.00
Final Vol.: 10 kLO,7 12 C3 �65') 83 29 66--kZ0'7 89
------------ --------------- ---- ---------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: I
ljoO.I(V %10 0j:0 0j20 ;�-u 0 74 0 26 1 00 O.jj 0.56
Final Sat.: _I. (16R)l 5 IS (1600)Ii86 414 IiOO C70T� 896
T� ------------ ----------- ------ ------
------------ I ------ --------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.20 0,10
Crit Moves: ....
Green/Cycle: 0.03 0.30 0.30. 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.16 0.36 0.36 D.21 0.41 0.41
Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.24 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.24 0 24
------------ I ------- ------- 11 --------------- --------------- ------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 36.9 20.3 20.8 33.4 17.5 17.7 28.4 17.1 17.1 2S.0 15.0 15.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
AdjDel/Veht 36.9 20.3 20.8 33.4 17.5 17.7 28.4 17.1 27,1 25.0 15.0 15.0
Queue: 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 2 1 2 1 2
Traffix 6.8.2511 (c) 1995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, okitsu, Monterey
A
01
0, 2, rD- t,5 Tz
= M M = IM M = IM M
01/16/1997 11:48 Filename, SCN4PMW-RPT V.- 6
SCN4PMW.IN Thu Jan 16, 1997 11:48:18 Page 6-1
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, NEWHALL CA
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PM Peak Hour Analysis (Scenario 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Altexmoitive)
Intersection #9 San rernando/Newhall Avenue
Cycle (sec); 100 critical vol./Cap. W: 1.150
Loss Time (sec); 7 Average Delay (sec/veh).- 113.4
Optimal Cyclei ISO Level Of Service: P
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 ---- - --- --
Control: Protected Permitted ;�e�;;Itt; P;
,,,;nmitted
Rights: Include Include nclude
Min. Green: 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanesi 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 569 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Volume: 569 127 a 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
Reduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 669 127 0 0 117 0 6 0 1033 5 4 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1. U-1. 00 1.00 1.00 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 no 1.4N.00 1.00
Final Vol.: Q! 9,� 127 D 0 0 6 0 103 4 0
----- ----- ----- ---
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 .1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustmenti 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1�00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanest L�U 1-00 0.00 0-00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 I-Q4L ��.f 0.44 0.00
Final Sat.t C163)1600 0 0��1606 0 1600 0 6600)(-889
_) 711 0
------------ ------------ ----- ------- ------------
Capacity Anal i Modulet
Vol/Sat: 0 0.0 8 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.01 0.01 0.00
Crit Moves: .*** ..**
Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.34 0.00
Volume/Cap: 1.16 0.21 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.00, 0.02 0.00 1.16 1.16 0.02 0.00
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Module:
Delay/Veh: 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 181 0.0 23.3 0.0 109.7 562.9 17.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.0D 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veht 125.5 16.7 0.0 0.0 lal 0.0 23.3 0.0 109.7 562.9 17.0 0.0
Queue: 34 2 0 0 9 0 0 a 64 1 0 0
Traffix 6.8.IS11 (c)
C)�3
�#
2995 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to Katz, Okitau, Monterey
-t- o'070C. O'c"'v-
M M M M M M M M M M M M
0111711997 17,41 Filemse, BCW4PW.R?T page 7
Tr&ffix 4.8.1sit (Cl 2995 cowling Assoc. Licensed to Kate. cxitmu. rAntorty
UN1)6tjA1,qr,D Lr3�
M M M M M M M
01117/1997 17,43 rileTAfte, SCK4"-R
SCM PW. IS Fri. J" 27, 1997 27;42;51 Page $-I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVWM 114PROVEMBEFT FROMMI. yLvHALL CIL
TRAFFIC and PARKING JJG4LySjS
PH Pest Bout Aa4Irff1M (Scenaric, .Pith Eat,,jjmk Altermtiv,)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of service Coaputatim Repowt
ICU IqLnas as Cycle Method 4aaaa Coitus, Alts,natl")
............................ �=." .................................... I ......
Inter**CtLM MIS San Ftrna-do ROad/Failroad Awcmt?4th Street
.................................................................. &.11 ..........
Cycle (8001 100 Critical Vol./Cap. JXjz 0.000
tions Ti" (sec)x 5 Average Delay (XeC/"cM
optiml cycle, 0 14WI Of Service,
..... I ......................................................... ....... t .......
Approach: Uarth bound South Bound East 30=4 West Bound
"ovesent. L - T - R L - T A L - T - R L - T - 2
-------- --------- --------- -- ----
Control, Protected ;;;;;Ct;d Persitted Pe ;z ttod
Rights, 0"i Include rnel.dt Include
min. Green. a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Lams: 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 7- 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 D
-- -------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
V.1,tate loodule-
Base Volt A 06 1434 9 ILSO a 0 a 513 0
M�b AJJ, 1 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.�o 1.00 1.t' 1.0, -,a, _.. I -n:
Initial 9�: a 69i IQ# 91 215a 0 0 0 0 543 a 0
Mie� Mj: 1.00 1." 1 00 I.QD 1.00 2.00 '.�o 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P"p Adj: I.Do 2.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1-00 1.06
PHF V.IuPe 0 496 1434 9 1160 a 0 0 1 0 $83 0 0
Redact Vol. a a a 4 0 0 0 a 0 0 a
R-djo.d Vol: 0 fits 2434 f 1250 a 6 4 583 a 0
PCE M54 1-00 "Do 1-00 "Do 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 3.00 1.00 1. do 2AQ
mr Adji 1-00 "Do 1-00 2 -DO 1�*O 1,90 1.00 1.04 I.CD 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fina I V.I. ; a $96 1434 9 Ilse a Q 0 0 583 0 0
............ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ........
Satur-tion rlow models, 11 1
Sat/Lwac : 1600 1600 1400 1600 1600 1600 1600 Igoe 160C 1600 Igoe I6Do
MJustaentt 1-00 I -OD 1.00 2.00 1,00 2.00 1.60 I.Co 1.00 I.Vo 1.00 1,00
ta�eei 0-00 *'Do 0-00 O -Do 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0.00 0.00 DAD
rim, set., V w. 0 .3a 0 0 0 3�0` a 0 a 0 r3Itu a 0 0
..... ..... --------------- --------------- --------------- H ------------- -
capacity analysis Hodulaz
Vollsat: a. 0
Crit M,es: 44% 3.3v :0 :.co 0.00 :.Do, 0 0.00
Gr.c./Cycl.z a�5DI eo.. Do Q-7mr-G. o 0 [.00 a
ycl-lCaP� 6�00 0.00 G.CC 0,00 a .00
0-00 "a Cr0Q C.'o 0.00 Q.Q' 1.1D
............ I --------------- 11 --------------- H --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modil4t
Delay/Veh- 0.0 4.0 CA 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CIO 4.0
Delay Adj: 1-00 1-00 1-00 I -DO 1.00 IAD 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.oO 1.10
AdjDe31V.h, 6.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0
Quette: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D C
...' .................... I ............. .........................................
TraffiX 6.4.1S11 40 159S Dowling Assoc.
O�A3 e'
? t
Licensed to Kate, Okit8u, 14anteray
o' t 4 9
L
SCK4PW.1ff rri own 17. 1397 17:42s54
Page 7-1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILPOM AVENUE IKPROVEHMrr PPIOURCT, ZZWKNUL Ch
TRAFFIC and PARKING ANALYSIS
PH Pest ls� Analywin Me"ria 4 -With Metrolink Alternative)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14"2 Of Service Cosputation Report
2911 HOm ungig"Ut.d Mthod f3ass, Vol� Alrermtiv*3
................................................................................
Average Delay 9sec!"10; 1.0 Norst Case Level Of
Service: 0
............................ ...................................................
Approach; Portz, eound sottth bound Cast Bound
gas% Bound
Mvesent � L - T - R L -� 7 - R Z, - T - R
L - T - A
------------ --------------- 11- ............ --------------- 11
Control t SLOP Sign Stop sign Uncontyal-lad
---------------
Uncontrolled
Rights- Icclude Include Include
Include
Lancut 0 0 23 0 0 6 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
---------------
0 1 a 0 0
........... --------------- --------------- it
oluse PWulet
---------------
Base Vol; 41 a 7 0 0 a 0 127 77
6 104 a
Croth Mj , IAU 1. Do 1.00 100 I.CO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1-00 1.00 1.00
Initial Batt 42 0 1 D a a P 217 77
6 lot a
Uver pjjz 1.00 1.00 1.00 I -OD I CO 1.00 1.00 3.00 1 00
k.00 1.00 200
WF Adj: IAC 1�00 "a 1.00 2.00 1-00 IAD I -no 1.00
1-03 3 00 2.00
�? V*11, - it 0 7 0 a a 0 it-. 7i
104 a
rinal Vol. 41 0 7 0 0 0 0 117 77
6 lot 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- It
---------------
Adjuated volum
Credo; 01 Clk 94r
ot
cycl*/Ca�.; scuo, XaXX X`otMt
TT%,ck/CMb1 1000t =cK,,
asJ'A =XX
PCX hdj; 3.'D 1,10 2.ID 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.20 IJ10 1.00
1.10 1.00 1.00
cycitcar Pro: W. ttv"
Trck/c.b KEt X� '000,
=o0t 30CXX
Adj Vol.: 47 a a 0 0 0 9 217 77
7 204 a
let
HvveUp Tim, 3A � 2.6 � 1300C � =ctctX
2.2 � PUMout
Critical apt 6.S � S.5 � . zuncca .
I --------------- --------------- ....... -------
5-0 � laccex
---------------
------------
Capacity Modulej
Cnilict Volt 216 156
194 xtout
?�tant' Cap. '0 115S �= xxxx xx.. a.,ow, x
1)15 .
xjj Cap; 0.79 ,o,x ;.00 � x=,
1.00 . X�
H�,,* cap.t 739 � 1155 . xxKx =Xx
--------------- ............... ---------------
1386 � �
---------------
------------ I
I.evel Of Service Wdule:
Stopped Dels 5.3
2.6
LOS by �ez
A
Mavencat: Lt - UR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - WT
Lr - LTR - RT
Shar*d C.P�! . 760 X.. =tot .
Shrd St pD63 t� S. I xtot. ]cCKI �
Shared LOS; B
Approachtlel, S.1 C.D 0 .0
0.2
Tr&ffix 4.8.1sit (Cl 2995 cowling Assoc. Licensed to Kate. cxitmu. rAntorty
UN1)6tjA1,qr,D Lr3�
M M M M M M M
01117/1997 17,43 rileTAfte, SCK4"-R
SCM PW. IS Fri. J" 27, 1997 27;42;51 Page $-I
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROPOSED RAILROAD AVWM 114PROVEMBEFT FROMMI. yLvHALL CIL
TRAFFIC and PARKING JJG4LySjS
PH Pest Bout Aa4Irff1M (Scenaric, .Pith Eat,,jjmk Altermtiv,)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of service Coaputatim Repowt
ICU IqLnas as Cycle Method 4aaaa Coitus, Alts,natl")
............................ �=." .................................... I ......
Inter**CtLM MIS San Ftrna-do ROad/Failroad Awcmt?4th Street
.................................................................. &.11 ..........
Cycle (8001 100 Critical Vol./Cap. JXjz 0.000
tions Ti" (sec)x 5 Average Delay (XeC/"cM
optiml cycle, 0 14WI Of Service,
..... I ......................................................... ....... t .......
Approach: Uarth bound South Bound East 30=4 West Bound
"ovesent. L - T - R L - T A L - T - R L - T - 2
-------- --------- --------- -- ----
Control, Protected ;;;;;Ct;d Persitted Pe ;z ttod
Rights, 0"i Include rnel.dt Include
min. Green. a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
Lams: 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 7- 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 D
-- -------- I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
V.1,tate loodule-
Base Volt A 06 1434 9 ILSO a 0 a 513 0
M�b AJJ, 1 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.�o 1.00 1.t' 1.0, -,a, _.. I -n:
Initial 9�: a 69i IQ# 91 215a 0 0 0 0 543 a 0
Mie� Mj: 1.00 1." 1 00 I.QD 1.00 2.00 '.�o 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P"p Adj: I.Do 2.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1-00 1.06
PHF V.IuPe 0 496 1434 9 1160 a 0 0 1 0 $83 0 0
Redact Vol. a a a 4 0 0 0 a 0 0 a
R-djo.d Vol: 0 fits 2434 f 1250 a 6 4 583 a 0
PCE M54 1-00 "Do 1-00 "Do 1-00 1-00 1-00 1-00 3.00 1.00 1. do 2AQ
mr Adji 1-00 "Do 1-00 2 -DO 1�*O 1,90 1.00 1.04 I.CD 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fina I V.I. ; a $96 1434 9 Ilse a Q 0 0 583 0 0
............ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ........
Satur-tion rlow models, 11 1
Sat/Lwac : 1600 1600 1400 1600 1600 1600 1600 Igoe 160C 1600 Igoe I6Do
MJustaentt 1-00 I -OD 1.00 2.00 1,00 2.00 1.60 I.Co 1.00 I.Vo 1.00 1,00
ta�eei 0-00 *'Do 0-00 O -Do 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0-00 0.00 0.00 DAD
rim, set., V w. 0 .3a 0 0 0 3�0` a 0 a 0 r3Itu a 0 0
..... ..... --------------- --------------- --------------- H ------------- -
capacity analysis Hodulaz
Vollsat: a. 0
Crit M,es: 44% 3.3v :0 :.co 0.00 :.Do, 0 0.00
Gr.c./Cycl.z a�5DI eo.. Do Q-7mr-G. o 0 [.00 a
ycl-lCaP� 6�00 0.00 G.CC 0,00 a .00
0-00 "a Cr0Q C.'o 0.00 Q.Q' 1.1D
............ I --------------- 11 --------------- H --------------- ---------------
Level Of Service Modil4t
Delay/Veh- 0.0 4.0 CA 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CIO 4.0
Delay Adj: 1-00 1-00 1-00 I -DO 1.00 IAD 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.oO 1.10
AdjDe31V.h, 6.0 0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0
Quette: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D C
...' .................... I ............. .........................................
TraffiX 6.4.1S11 40 159S Dowling Assoc.
O�A3 e'
? t
Licensed to Kate, Okit8u, 14anteray
o' t 4 9
L
APPENDIX G
DECEMBER 12, 1996 PARKING SURVEY
I
I
I
I
.1
I
Parking Demand Study Data Collected December 12,1996
Street Limits Side Avail. BAM 9AM IOAM 11AM Noon IPM 2PM 313M AIPM SPM
San Fernando Road
Railroad Ave. to 5th Street
East
7
0
a
0
01
01
0
0
0
0
0
West 17 0 0 0 01 Ol 0 0 0 0
0
5th Street to 6th Street
East
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
West 5 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 1 0
0
6th Street to Market Street
East
14
0
2
4
6
6
9
8
6
6
6
West 15 0 1 2 4 6 a 3 8 7
2
Market Street to 8th Street
East
13
4
4
7
10
10
10
8
6
11
11
West 17 0 1 0 4 4 6 7 9 7
9
Sth Street to 9th Street
East
10
2
1
0
2
0
1
1
2
3
2
West 12 1 3 2 2 1 4 1 2 1
2
9th Street to Lyons Avenue
East 3 0 0 1 0 0. 0 0 0 0
0
West 3 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 1 0
0
Lyons Avenue to 1 Ith Street
East
0
0
0
0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
West 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
Railroad Avenue
San Fernando Rd. to 5th Street
East
17
1
1
4
10
5
3
1
1
2
West 9 0 4 9 10 5 0 2 3 1
0
5th Street to 6th Street
East
is
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
West 7. 2. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
2
6th Street to Market Street
East
18
0
14
17
18
20
19
17
151
15
17
West 13 1 5 8 7 7 7 6 6 7
9
Market Street to 8th Street
East
19
7
19.
19
16
20
17
16
20
16
131
West 9 5 9 10 8 8 11 8 8 5
9
Oth Street to 9th Street
East
18
0
4
6
7
71
9
8
10
9
9
West 4 1 1 3 3 31 3 3 4 4
3
9th Street to Lyons Avenue
East
17
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
West 10 0 0 2 2 2 a 2 1 1
1
Lyons Avenue to 11 th Street
East
14
5
28
28
29
29
29
30
29
28
25
West 14 4 14 10 10 a a 9 8 10
7
4th Street
San Fernando Rd. to Railroad
North
4
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
South 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
5th Street
San Fernando Rd. to Railroad
North
7
3
2
1
1
5
3
3
2
2
2
South 3 2 2 2 4 3 3 2 3 2
4
6th Street
San Fernando Rd. to Railroad
North
4
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
South 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1
1
Market Street
San Fernando Rd. to Railroad
North
4
0
2
3
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
South 9Diaq 0. 2 4 4 3 6 5 3 1
4
Oth Street
San Fernando Rd. to Railroad
North
7
1
4
3
4
4
5
5.
2.
3
4
South 5 2 2 2 4 3 4 4 4 3
4
Sth Street
San Fernando Rd. to Railroad
North
9
5
8
8
8
7
9
7
9
9
7.
South 7 2 6 4 5 4 2 2 3 5
6
Lyons Avenue
San Fernando Rd. to Railroad
North
4
p
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
South 15 4 11 11 13 13 14 14 15 11
10
Pine Street
Sth Street to 6th Street
East
15
9
11
9.
11.
12.
10
9
9
15
11
West
20
11
11
81
71
101
10
12
11
8
8
16thStreetto hStreet
East
13.
7.
6
71
7
5
5
4
7
West 171 41 3 11 5! 4 3 2 2
5
15th Street to 4th Street
East
1 121
01
0
01
01
01
2i
20i
0
0
I
West
1 171
01
0
01
01
01
0
0!
0.
0
480 88 192 206 231 227 237 215 221 210 212