Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-12-01 - AGENDA REPORTS - LIBRARY UPDATE (2)CITY OF SANTA CLARITA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Heidt & City Council Members FROM: George Caravalho, City Manager"U DATE: December 1, 1998 SUBJECT: LIBRARY UPDATE RECOMMENDED ACTION City Council receive the report regarding library facilities, and discuss the City's role in this area. BACKGROUND At the February 24, 1998, City Council meeting, the Council discussed the need for an expanded library facility in Canyon Country. On April 8, a report was given to the Council on the issue, and at Council's direction, staff spent the next few months working with County representatives regarding the issue. City and County staff members have explored several possible sites and funding mechanisms. The Need for Library Facilities Current County library facilities in Santa Clarita include: Canyon Country Library 5,050 square feet (built in 1970) ❖ Newhall Library 4,842 square feet (built in 1957) ❖ Valencia Library 23,966 square feet (built in 1972) The total square footage of the existing facilities is 33,858. Using the County's standard rate of .35 square feet per capita, the City should have more than 50,000 square feet, and the entire Santa Clarita Valley should have more than 60,000 square feet of library facilities. By looking at these numbers and listening to residents'. concerns, there is obviously a deficiency in both the Newhall and Canyon Country communities. The County has estimated that an 18,000 — 20,000 square foot facility will accommodate the needs of the Canyon Country area, based on projected 2020 population figures. The City's Role Although this report details options whereby the City could step in and assist the County in locating a new library facility in Santa Clarita, it is important to stress the impacts of such a policy-making decision. The following six points address that issue: 1. The County receives a dedicated share of property tax, an annual parcel tax, and a development mitigation fee to build and operate libraries. Agenda Item: 2. The County does not have the funding available to build or lease a new library facility, and has even indicated that they lack the funding to stock and staff an expanded facility in Canyon Country. 3. The City has received no funding for, or role in, building or operating libraries. 4. The community has made it clear that a larger library in Canyon Country is desired, but the only way that a new library facility will be built in Canyon Country in the. near future is if the City makes a substantial financial contribution. 5. The City has limited resources, and there is already competition for funding important infrastructure needs such as roads and parks. By directing funds to a library facility, the other needs suffer. Options At the direction of the Council, staff has identified several options regarding a library facility in Canyon Country. Option #1: Weston Development. Site - located across the street from Canyon High School, on the North 'side of Nadal Street, is a 32 acre parcel that has been mentioned in the past - as a possible - library and/or park site. Pros: - Site is City -owned. Located in close proximity to the High School. Cons: County does not consider it an acceptable site for a facility. Due to the topography, grading the site for a facility would be extremely costly. Location does not facilitate ease of use by the entire Canyon Country community. Option #2: Sierra Vista Jr. High Site - the Hart School District is considering allowing the construction of a new Boys & Girls Club facility on what is now Sierra Vista Jr. High multi -use field. A library facility has been mentioned as a possible addition in conjunction with the Boys & Girls Club. Pros: t• Site is near the Junior High, which would promote its use among students. Location is closer to the Soledad Canyon Road corridor, and therefore more accessible to the general populace. Cons: ❖ Site is closer to Whites Canyon Road than the Weston Property, but it is still west of the population center of Canyon Country. Potential loss of athletic field space. Option #3: Existing Vacant Commercial — in the past, the Council mentioned the possibility of the County leasing a vacant commercial storefront in the area and converting it to a library. Pros: :• Several commercial centers in the area would be large enough to accommodate a library. Location chosen could be accessible to the entire Canyon Country community. Cons: <• Renovation costs, including furniture, computers, equipment, and technology infrastructure would make this an expensive option. d• Would not be able to develop an identity or long-term location. Option #4: Expand Existing Facility - renovate and expand the existing facility on Soledad Canyon Road. Pros: E• Location is in the middle of the Canyon Country area, and the property is owned by the County. Cons: Access - to the site is extremely difficult. ❖ According to the County, the site is not large enough to provide space for a facility that meets future needs. Option #5: New Commercial Center — at the Economic Development Study Session on September 29, the Council expressed an interest in working with the owner of the vacant property across from the new Edwards Complex to develop a.use complimentary to the. theater and beneficial to the Canyon Country community. Staff approached the owner with that goal, and the idea that this would be a favorable location for a new library facility. The owner is interested in making the library an anchor to the commercial complex, and has met with staff several times to discuss the possibility. Conceptual plans have the library facility as a stand alone building on the east side of the property as a tall profile, single story architecturally interesting building. Funding Since the County does not have the capital to build such a facility, and has indicated to staff that they probably would not be willing to lease, financial involvement of the City will be necessary in two. capacities: A. In order to facilitate the developer adding a library to the complex, the City would have to perform, or fund, public improvements and other fees, which may total up to $500,000. B. The City may also need to direct up to $3 million towards the project to further lower the lease rate and allow for the purchase of the library at a later date. This additional expenditure may be reimbursable through the recently passed Library Development Mitigation Fee of $566 per residential unit. Furthermore, since the facility would serve both residents of the City and the unincorporated area, County staff has indicated that development fees collected in both areas may be included in the reimbursement. Pros: Location is very accessible to Canyon Country residents. ❖ Site is centrally located, and offers the opportunity to further create a "center" of Canyon Country. ❖ Promotes livable cities concept — inclusion of a public building within commercial center. ❖ City participation in the project would facilitate the development of a high quality commercial center in Canyon Country. Cons: S• As with the other options, this would require a substantial investment on the part of the City. pez:hbrary\ccss121.doc