HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-03-24 - RESOLUTIONS - MC 97-170 CUP 97-014 (2)RESOLUTION NO. 98-29
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA APPROVING MASTER CASE 97-170,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-014 AND ADJUSTMENT 97-008 TO DEVELOP 198
APARTMENT UNITS AND 12 TOWNHOUSE UNITS ON A 7.36 ACRE PARCEL
LOCATED GENERALLY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MAGIC MOUNTAIN
PARKWAY AND MCBEAN PARKWAY, BEHIND THE CURRENTLY DEVELOPED
SPECTRUM ATHLETIC CLUB
IN THE VALENCIA AREA OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. . The City Council does hereby make the following findings of fact:
a. An application for Master Case 97-170 was filed by the Newhall Land &
Farming Company (the "applicant") with the City of Santa Clarita on
September 12, 1997. The property for which the entitlement was filed is
generally located at the southwest corner of Magic Mountain Parkway and
McBean Parkway, behind the currently developed Spectrum Athletic Club
(Assessor's Parcel No. 2861-002-062).
b. The applicant has filed a conditional use permit and parking adjustment to
develop a 7.36 acre site with 198 apartment units and 12 townhouse units in
the CTC (Commercial Town Center) zone.
C. The project site is designated by the City's General Plan as CTC (Commercial
Town Center), and is located within the Valley Center Overlay. The multi-
family residential use proposed by the applicant is permitted with the inclusion
of a conditional use permit.
d. In addition to the conditional use permit request for developing multi -family
residential units in the CTC zone, the applicant is requesting the approval of
a building height of up to 42'-0", and approval of the installation of gates. The
inclusion of an approved conditional use permit allows for these requests.
e. The parking adjustment filed by the applicant requests a decrease in the
project's required parking by 16%, requests that 34 tandem parking spaces be
applied towards the project's total parking requirement, and requests that such
tandem parking spaces be considered covered by the use of mature shade trees
as opposed to a traditional covered carport.
f Surrounding land uses include vacant Los Angeles County agricultural land to
the north, a golf course and hotel/conference center to the south, the Valencia
Town Center regional mall to the east, and a continuation of the golf course to
the west of the project site. The unincorporated Los Angeles County territory
located north of the site is part of the North Valencia Annexation (Annexation
No. 1995-06), and is prezoned City of Santa Clarita zone SP (Specific Plan).
The North Valencia Annexation's anticipated completion date is March 15,
1998.
g. The City of Santa Clarita's Development Review Committee met on October 16,
1997 and supplied the applicant with draft conditions of approval.
h. Approximately 7.36 acres of the site will be graded. The project will require
only minimal grading, with such grading consisting of approximately two feet
of cut or fill. Additional fills from 0 to 7 feet in thickness will be required to
achieve proposed grades behind the townhouses along the southern edge of the
site. Any off-site grading will requires the approval of the affected property
owner(s). According to the project's geotechnical report, the subject site is not
considered susceptible to liquefaction.
The project proposes the extension of water, utility, and sewerage service to the
project site. Access to the site would be from two driveways on Town Center
Drive.
The project site is zoned CTC (Commercial Town Center). The CTC zone
typically permits a wide range of retail, service, and related activities which are
of a community and regional nature and are located in and around a large
regional shopping center. However, the City's General Plan allows for the
inclusion of high density residential development within and along the edges
of the Valley Center. The project site is located along the edge of the Valley
Center as defined in the General Plan. Also, the City's Unified Development
Code permits residential development in the CTC zone with the inclusion of an
approved conditional use permit.
k. The project proposes the development of 198 apartment units and 12
townhouse units over a single parcel. Twelve residential buildings will be
constructed (ten apartment buildings and two sixplex townhouse buildings).
Accessory structures include a clubhouse facility located near the project's pool
and recreational area, and a rental office located at the northern end of the
project site. The proposed density equals 29 dwelling units per acre, which is
well under the 50 units per acre permitted under the City's General Plan. No
oak trees exist on-site.
1. An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared for
the proposed project pursuant to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
in. A duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on
January 6, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia
Boulevard, Santa Clarita. During this meeting, the Commission raised
concerns regarding the project, and continued the item to the Planning
Commission meeting of January 20, 1998. The hearing was continued in order
to provide staff and the applicant time to prepare responses regarding the
Commission's concerns.
n. A continued public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on January
20, 1998 at 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard,
Santa Clarita, at which time the Commission approved the project by a 3-2
vote.
o. During the City Council meeting of January 27, 1998, the City Council by a 5-0
vote determined that an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to
approve the project was necessary.
P. A duly noticed public hearing was held by the City Council on March 10, 1998
at 6:30 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, 1st
Floor, Santa Clarita. During this meeting, the City Council opened the public
hearing for the project, considered the staff report and public testimony, and
continued the item to the meeting of March 24, 1998. The Council formally
closed the public hearing on March 10, 1998, but continued the item in order
to allow Councilmember Boyer the opportunity to consider the appeal, as
Councilmember Boyer was absent during the Council's consideration of the
item.
q. The unfinished business item was considered by the City Council on March 24,
1998, at 6:30 p.m. at the City Council Chambers, 23920 Valencia Boulevard, 1st
Floor, Santa Clarita.
SECTION 2. Based upon the above findings of fact, oral and written testimony and
other evidence received at the public hearing held for the project, and upon studies and
investigations made by the City Council and on its behalf, the Council further finds as follows:
a. At the meeting of March 10, 1998, the City Council considered the staff report
prepared for the project and received testimony on the proposal. Also
considered were the previous staff reports prepared for the Planning
Commission's consideration, and materials presented to the Commission prior
to their determination on the requested entitlements. At the meeting of March
24, 1998, the City Council continued their discussion regarding the project.
b. The project complies with the City's Unified Development Code with the
inclusion of an approved conditional use permit and an approved parking
adjustment.
c. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan. The General Plan
designation for the site is CTC (Commercial Town Center) and the zoning
category for the site is CTC. Under the City's General Plan, the CTC zone
allows for a maximum density of 50 units per acre on the subject site. The
project's density is 29 units per acre, which is well below the maximum density
permitted in the area.
d. Approximately 32% of the site will be preserved as landscaping and natural
open space. The project proposes an internal pedestrian -oriented trail system
that would allow the residents of the tract to traverse the entire length of the
property. The trail system will also provide a direct connection to Town Center
Drive, and to the Avignon multi -family residential project adjacent to the Town
Center Apartment site.
e. Significant vegetation will be incorporated into the project site, with the
addition of mature landscaping to enhance the appearance of the required
carports. The project will provide mature shade trees in lieu of covered
carports for 34 of the required parking spaces. The additional landscaping
placed throughout the site will enhance the character of the project and
maintain the project's consistency with the surrounding neighborhoods.
f. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have
been prepared for the project. The identified mitigation measures have been
incorporated into the conditions of approval.
SECTION 3. Based upon the foregoing facts and findings, the City Council hereby
determines as follows:
a. This project will not adversely affect the health, peace, comfort or welfare of
persons residing in the area; nor be materially detrimental to the use,
enjoyment, or valuation of property in the vicinity of the project site; nor
jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health,
safety, or general welfare as the project conforms with the Unified
Development Code and is compatible with surrounding land uses.
b. The project site is adequate in size to accommodate the yards, walls, parking,
landscaping and other development features.
c. The project is compatible with existing development in the area, consistent
with the City's General Plan, and complies with the standards of a multi -family
residential zone as defined in the Unified Development Code, with the inclusion
of an approved conditional use permit and an approved parking adjustment.
The applicant has substantiated the findings for approving the conditional use
permit and parking adjustment.
d. The project design will not cause substantial environmental damage to fish or
wildlife, as the project is considered infill development which is located in an
urbanized area.
e. The use will not negatively affect existing circulation with the application of the
mitigation measures incorporated into the project's conditions of approval.
f. The project is consistent with the following goals and policies of the General
Plan:
1) Goal 2, Policy 2.1 of the Land Use Element: Encourage the
development of a broad range of housing types to meet the needs of
the existing and future residents of the planning area, including, but
not limited to, the development of singe family detached homes,
condominiums, apartments, and manufactured housing.
2) Goal 3, Policy 3.6 of the Land Use Element: Locate higher density
residential development in close proximity to regional and sub -
regional centers and public transportation corridors.
SECTION 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Santa Clarita, California, as follows:
a. The City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the
project, with the finding that the project will not have a significant
effect upon the environment.
b. The City Council hereby approves Master Case 97-170 (Conditional
Use Permit 97-014 / Adjustment 97-008), subject to the attached
conditions of approval.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of March, 1998.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA )
I, Sharon L. Dawson, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Santa Clarita, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita
at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 24th _ day of March 19g$_ by the
following vote of Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Boyer, Darcy, Smyth
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: K 1. a j i c, Heid t
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
0.-�
CITY CLERK
JDR:lep
current\reso9829.app