HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-01-12 - AGENDA REPORTS - B&TDIST VALENCIA BRIDGE (2)CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
AGENDA REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING City Manager Approval:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
DEPARTMENT:
Item to be presented by:
January 12, 1999
PROPOSED VALENCIA BRIDGE
CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 99-16
AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
Transportation & Engineering Services
Conduct a Public Hearing.
At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, providing there is less than 50 percent written
protest from the represented area of benefit:
a. Find that the fees and the establishment of the district do not constitute a "project"
as defined in California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guideline 15378(b)(4).
b. Adopt the resolution approving the fee analysis report establishing the fees.
c. Instruct the City Clerk to record a certified copy of the adopted resolution with the
County Recorder.
BACKGROUND
This item is a Public Hearing to consider the adoption of the Valencia Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare District. This district will provide an equitable financing mechanism for new
development to share the costs of providing the necessary roadway improvements. The
adoption of this type of funding district does not charge existing development, but rather
levies an assessment in proportion to the estimated number of vehicle trips generated by
the development.
Currently there are three Bridge and Thoroughfare districts within the City. Two of these
districts are combined City and County districts (Bouquet and Eastside Districts), and one
is entirely within the City (Via Princessa District). The only portion of the City not
currently within an existing district is that portion proposed to be within,the Valencia
District.
V E nda Item:
PROPOSED VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
January 12, 1999 - Page 2
This proposed district will be significantly different from the existing districts. The
proposed Valencia District is the first Bridge and Thoroughfare district within the
Santa Clarita Valley that provides "fall mitigation" for the cost of bridges and major
thoroughfares. The existing district charges are based on the cost of partial improvements.
The City's Transportation & Engineering Services staff has been working with Los Angeles
County Department of Public Works staff and several major developers within the proposed
Valencia District to develop the technical data for the formation of the district.
All planned major road improvements within the boundaries of the proposed district were
evaluated to determine their design parameters based on the impacts and demands created
by proposed future development within the district. Estimated costs for all of the proposed
infrastructure were developed, and then these costs were proportioned over future
development to establish an impact fee.
The estimated cost for district improvements is $118,412,490.00. The proposed fee rate to
be set is $9,787.00 per Factored Development Unit (FDU), which is equivalent to ten trips.
In contemplation of the establishment of this district, the City and County have been
collecting interim fees for several years whenever new development occurred. Once the
district is established, the fees that have been collected can be utilized to construct
improvements within the new district.
Since the formation of this district is a joint effort between the City and the County of
Los Angeles, the formation requires the mutual consent of both governing bodies. The item
is set for the January 19, 1999 County Board of Supervisors meeting.
Under CEQA guideline 15378(b)(4), the establishment of the district fee does not constitute
a "project," and therefore does not in itself create any environmental impact to be
mitigated.
The public hearing has been properly noticed.
ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS
Reject the Engineer's Report and direct staff to prepare an alternate report utilizing
changed or modified criteria to establish an impact fee, or discontinue efforts to form a
special district.
PROPOSED VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
January 12, 1999 - Page 3
FISCAL IMPACT
None proposed with this action. However, if the proposed district were to be established,
new development would fund all identified infrastructure at no cost to existing residents,
and no public funds would be required to construct the proposed infrastructure.
Resolution No. 99-16
Valencia Bridge and Thoroughfare District Map
Santa Clarita Valley B&T District Boundary Map
Engineer's Report (available in City Clerk�s reading file)
LPC:Ikl:mmn
council \valb&t02.doc
CITY OF SANTA CIARITA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF THE
VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION
FEE DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA, CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN:
A Public Hearing will be held before the City Council of the City of Santa Clarita to consider
the proposed formation of the Valencia Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee
District in the City of Santa Clarita, California. The District is bounded generally on the north
by the Angeles National Forest, on the east by the westerly line of the Bouquet Canyon Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare District, on the south by the northwesterly line of the Via Princessa
Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District, and on the west by Interstate 5 and the easterly line
of the Castaic Bridge and Major Thoroughf�xe District. The District is being formed to provide
an equitable financing mechanism by which new development within an identified area will
share the costs of providing necessary improvements. The formation of the district is in
conformance with the State Subdivision Law and Local Ordinances.
The hearing will be held by the Santa Clarita City Council in the City Hall Council Chambers,
23920 Valencia Blvd., 1st Floor, on the 12 day of January, 1999, at or after 6:30 p.m.
Proponents, opponents, and any interested persons may appear and be heard on this matter
at that time. Further information may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk's Office, Santa
Clarita City Hall, 23920 Valencia Blvd., Suite #301, Santa Clarita, CA.
If you wish to challenge this action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you
or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council, at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Dated: December 22, 1998
Sharon L. Dawson, CMC
City Clerk
Publish Date: December 25, 1998
�ms\phB&Tdis
+
+ . . . .
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + --EEE9
+ + ++4a+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ 4CA . . . . . . . . .
+ + + + . . . . . +
+ . . . . . .
+ + + + . . .
+++V9 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ . I . . .
+ Z + + +
40 + + +
U) u + +
4 -) E.4 + + + + + +
+ + +
+
> + + +
+ + _+ + + + +
+
(D +
4
+
+
-Z + +
W
+ + + +
4 + + +
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + _+ +
+
+ +
jz.�T
REPORT ON THE VALENCIA
BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
Prepared for:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
and
CITY OF SANTA CLARITA TRANSPORTATION and ENGINEERING SERVICES
January 4, 1999
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District thr Valencia
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SUMMARY ................................................................................................. I
11. THE BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE
DISTRICT................................................................................................... 4
A. AUTHORITY ......................................................................................................... 4
B. PURPOSE ............................................................................................................ 4
C. CONCEPT ........................................................................................................... 5
III. VALENCIA AREA ACCESS ..................................................................... 6
A.
BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................
6
B.
ExisTING CIRCULATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ................................
6
IV. THE VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT .........................................................
is
A.
THE AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY ..................................................................
15
B.
DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS ................................................................................
15
C.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS .....................................
16
D.
IMPROVEMENT PHASING ...................................................................................
16
E.
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ...........................................................................................
17
F.
THE CONSTRUCTION FEE ................................................................................
17
G.
PROVISIONS FOR UPDATING COSTS AND UNIT INFORMATION ........................
18
H.
CONSTRUCTION IN LIEU OF PAYING FEES .......................................................
18
1.
DISTRICT FUNDS ..............................................................................................
19
J.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS .....................................................................
19
County of Los Angeles #
C#y of Santa Clarke
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construdion Fee Ostnct for Valencia
County of Los Angeles
Cky of Santa Clants
FIGURES
FIGURE1
VALENCIA B & T DISTRICT .............................................................................................
3
FIGURE 2
CITY RoADwAy DESIGNATIONS ....................................................................................
12
FIGURE 3
COUNTY RoADwAy DESIGNATIONS .............................................................................
13
FIGURE4
LANE DESIGNATIONS ...................................................................................................
14
FIGURE 5
LINKS ExHiBrr ..........................................................................................................
C.16
FIGURE 6
INTERSECTIONsFxHerr ...........................................................................................
C.17
FIGURE 7
INTERCHANGE ExHiBrr .............................................................................................
C-18
FIGURE 8
LocAmON OF FUTURE PROJECTS WITHIN THE VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT ...........................................................................................
1�5
County of Los Angeles
Cky of Santa Clants
Report an the &idge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction F" District for Valencia
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clants
TABLES
TABLE 1
SOFT COST PERCENTAGES ..........................................................................................
16
TABLE 2
DESCRIP71ON OF ROADWAY AND BRIDGE I MPROVEMENTS ..........................................
C-1
TABLE 3
DESCRIPTION OF INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................
C-10
TABLE 4
DESCRIPTION OF INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS .....................................................
C-13
TABLE 5
LIST OF ROADwAYAND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING ASSOCIATED ESTIMATED
COSTS......................................................................................................................
1-1-1
TABLE 6
LIST OF INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING ASSOCIATED ESTIMATED CosTsH- 1
TABLE7
LIST OF INTERCHANGES INCLUDING ASSOCIATED ESTIMATED COSTS .......................
H-4
TABLE 8
RESIDENTIAL .................................................................................................................
1-1
TABLES)
NoN-RESIDENTIAL .........................................................................................................
1-1
TABLE 10
LAND USE AREA AND UNIT COUNT BREAKDOWN (FOR DEVELOPABLE RESIDEN71AL AREA
WHERE NO MAP HAS BEEN FILED) ..................................................................................
1-2
TABLE 1 1
VALENCIA BRIDGEAND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE LAND USES .......................................
1-3
TABLE 12
DISTRICT FEE CALCULATION ........................................................................................
1-6
TABLE 13
FEE RATES ACCORDING To LAND USE .........................................................................
1-6
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clants
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughtwe Construction Fee District for Valencia
ATTACHMENTS
ArrACHMENTA LEGAL DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ A-1
ATTAcHMENTEI SANTA CLARITA VALLEY BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICTS MAP. B, 1
ATrAcHMENTC
VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DjSTRIc-r
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS .....................................................
C-1
ATrAcHmENTD
VALENCIA BOULEVARD/1-5 INTERCHANGE CONCEPT EXHIBIT ............................
D-1
ArrAcHmENT E
MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY/1-5 INTERCHANGE CONCEPT EXHIBIT ....................
E-1
ATTACHMENT F
SR- 126/1-5 INTERCHANGE CONCEPT EXHIBIT ....................................................
F-1
ATTACHMENTG
MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY PHASING EXHIBIT ....................................................
G-1
ATTACHMENT H
ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COSTS .......................................................................
H-1
ATTACHMENT I
DISTRICT FEE CALCULATION ..................................................................................
1-1
ATTACHMENTJ
COUNTY/CITY CODES PERTAINING To BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE DIsTRICTSJ- 1
ATTACHMENT K
SAMPLE AGREEMENT AND WORKSHEET ...............................................................
K-1
ATTACHMENT L
SAMPLE "REQUEST FOR CREDIT FOR COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS" FORM ........
L-1
County of Los ArwjeMs
C?y of Santa Clarits /V
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughtwe Construction Fee Drstnct for VWencia
This report presents to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the Santa Clarita
City Council for approval, an area of benefit for financing specific improvements in the
Valencia area of the Santa Clarita Valley, within Los Angeles County and City of Santa
Clarita jurisdictions. Improvements include, but are not limited to new and improved
roadways, bridges, intersecfions, and interchanges.
Formation of the Valencia Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District, hereto after referred to as
the District, will provide an equitable financing mechanism by which new development within
an identified area will share the costs of providing necessary improvements.
State Subdivision Law and both the Los Angeles County and City of Santa Clarita codes
authorize the use of bridge and major thoroughfare construction fee districts for the funding
and construction of improvements, provided these facilities are identified on the local
agency's adopted transportation element of its General Plan. Based on the transportation
needs in this area of the Santa Clarita Valley, and the limitations of other funding sources,
this funding method has been determined to be the best alternative to provide needed
improvements.
This report describes the concept and mechanics of the District Information included in this
report will enable subject property owners to determine the fee to be assessed against their
property W and when it is developed.
NEED FOR DisTRICT FORMATION
Certain areas of Los Angeles County and the City of Santa Clarita have topographical
features that limit the ability to provide access. Traditionally, the County has cooperatively
assisted developers in the funding and construction of needed highway improvements.
However, gas tax revenues, the traditional source of highway funding, have not been made
available for improvements in the Santa Clarita Valley. The District shall pursue funding for
regional improvements from City, County, State, and Federal agencies, thus allowing for a
reduction in the adopted construction fee.
The current highway system in the Santa Clarita Valley is considered adequate for existing
development. However, at this time public funding resources do not adequately provide
highway improvements for the future anticipated development in the Santa Clarita Valley.
Thus, the construction of additional highway improvements would serve to directly benefit
properties subject to future development, both inside and outside the District.
The District has been designed to accommodate the needs of future development
anticipated by both the Los Angeles County and the City of Santa Clarita General Plans.
The District not only mitigates traffic anticipated by development occurring within the District,
but also mitigates traffic targeted for the District as a result of development occurring outside
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clente
Report on the Elridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
the District. Therefore, formation of the District will provide local, regional, and inter -regional
benefits. Interchange improvements will provide regional benefits that extend beyond the
District boundary and are eligible for local, state, and federal funding. The District intends to
pursue all potential sources of out -of -district funding for these improvements including, but
not limited to, State and Federal Gas Taxes, Propositions A and C sales tax, Transportation
Planning and Development Sales Tax on Gasoline, County Transportation Tax, State
Transportation Improvement Program funding, Federal Transportation Efficiency Act for the
21si Century funds, State and Federal Highway Trust Funds, special grants and other
sources that may be available. If any outside funding is received, the District costs will be
revised, and the fee will be adjusted accordingly.
A development analysis based on filed tentative maps, and where no map is filed, the land
use maps of both the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan and the City of Santa Clarita General
Plan, shows that an additional estimated 9,492 residential units and 691.9 acres of office
commercialAndustrial development are expected to be built within the Valencia District
boundary.
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clante 2
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughl'are Construction Fee Distnct for Valencia
A. AUTHORrry
The State of California Government Code Section 66484, regarding Subdivisions, gives
local agencies the authority to adopt local ordinances that "may require the payment of a fee
as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a building permit for
purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing bridges over waterways,
railways, freeways, and canyons, or constructing major thoroughfares." The local adopted
ordinance must refer to the circulation element of its general plan, provide for a public
hearing, provide for the establishment of boundaries of an area of benefit and provide for
the identification of the costs, a fair method of allocation of costs to the area of benefit and a
fair fee apportionment (to be disclosed at the public hearing). Further, the local ordinance
must provide that the payment of fees shall not be required unless the major thoroughfares
are in addition to or a reconstruction of any existing thoroughfares serving the area at the
time of district adoption, and that the planned bridge facility is an original bridge serving the
area, or an addition to any existing bridge facility serving the area, at the time of district
adoption. It must further provide that if owners of more than one-half of the area of property
to be benefited by the improvement(s) file proper written protests, the district proceedings as
proposed shall be abandoned for at least one year. The local ordinance allows acceptance
of considerations in lieu of the payment of fees, permits a local agency to advance money
from its general fund or road fund to be reimbursed from bridge and major thoroughfare
funds, permits a local agency to incur an interest bearing indebtedness for the construction
of bridge or major thoroughfare facilities, and does not preclude an agency from providing
funds for the construction of bridge or major thoroughfare facilities to defray costs not
allocated to the area of benefit.
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 82-0050 on March 2,
1982, adding Section 21.32.200 to the Los Angeles County Code, providing for the
establishment of bridge and major thoroughfare construction fees to be paid by subdivider or
building permit applicants. Within the City of Santa Clarita, payment of such fees is
established by City of Santa Clarita Subdivision Code Section 16.21.190. These codes are
consistent with the requirements and provisions of the State law (County Code Section
21.32.200 and City Code Section 16.21.190 are included in this report as Attachment J.)
B. PURPOSE
The purpose of the District is to fund improvements needed by new development in the
Santa Clarita Valley.
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clarke 4
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Vauiencia
C. CONCEPT
As authorized by statutes cited above, the adoption of a specific area of benefit permits the
County/City to levy a fee against future development located within the area of benefit. This
funding method appropriately assesses developments, which create the need for additional
improvements, for the additional public facility costs. The charge is levied in proportion to
the estimated number of trips generated by the development which is translated into
Factored Development Unit (see description of FDU on page 17 below).
The adoption of this type of funding district does not charge existing development. The
District fee is collected at the time of recordation of a final map or just prior to the issuance of a
building permit (City of Santa Clarita only).
County of Los Angeies 0
CNy of Santa CUdta 5
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
A. BACKGROUND
Historically, access to new development has been provided cooperatively by the County and
land developers. The County funded its share with Gas Tax Funds. Land development was
primarily concentrated in flatter areas, expanding away from urban centers. Public facilities
were constructed to accommodate this expansion.
In recent years, development has extended to outlying areas where topography is more
rugged and restrictive. This geographical characteristic has dictated development locations.
It has also increased the cost of providing these necessary public facilities, including
roadways.
B. EASTING CIRCULATION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The primary road network for the Valencia area consists of Interstate 5, existing and future
State Route 126, three interchanges with Interstate 5, and ten arterials which are classified
as either Major or Secondary Highways on both the City and County Highway Plans. (See
Figure 2 and Figure 3). The improvements described below generally include: full -width
grading, base, pavement, sidewalks, bus turnouts, bike lanes (where applicable), fully
improved and signalized intersections, street lighting, utility relocation, necessary drainage
structures, and full -width decking with footings for proposed bridges and interchanges.
Except for State highways, right of -way acquisition will be dedicated by individual
development projects. Please note that the descriptions provided for improvements are for
purposes of defining a scope of work for cost estimating only and are subject to change at
the improvement's final design stage.
1 . MCBEAN PARKWAY. is currently paved for 6 lanes but is striped for 4 lanes from 1-5 to
Copper Hill Drive, except between Valencia Boulevard and Magic Mountain Parkway
which is fully -improved to 8 lanes (striped for 7). Improvements proposed for this
roadway include striping for 6 lanes, full -width improvements to 6 lanes between Magic
Mountain Parkway and Newhall Ranch Road, and bridge widening from 6 to 8 lanes
over the Santa Clara River.
2. MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY (SR -126): varies from 2 to 6 lanes from 1-5 to McBean
Parkway, and is paved for 6 lanes, striped for 4, between Bouquet Canyon Road to
Valencia Boulevard. From McBean Parkway to Valencia Boulevard, Magic Mountain
Parkway varies from 6 to 8 lanes. Ultimately, the District would share responsibility for
financing the construction of a fully -improved right-of-way to 8 -lanes, from 1-5 to Valencia
Boulevard, to be completed in four phases (Phase I already complete).
3. NEwHALL RAIVCH ROAD. currently exists as a 44ane roadway from Bouquet Canyon
Road to McBean Parkway, and 6 lanes from McBean to Dickason Drive. The District Vill
fully improve Newhall Ranch Road to 8 lanes from 1-5 to Bouquet Canyon Road.
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clarita 6
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
4. VALENciA BoULEVARD: exists as a 6 -lane roadway from 1-5 to Bouquet Canyon Road.
This roadway is proposed to be improved to 8 lanes from 1-5 to McBean Parkway.
5. CoPPER HILL DRIVE: is currently paved and striped for 4 lanes between Seco Canyon
Road to San Francisquito Canyon Road. From San Francisquito Canyon Road to
McBean Parkway, Copper Hill Drive is now paved for 6 lanes but striped for 4.
Ultimately, Copper Hill Drive will be constructed as 6 lanes from the end of existing Rye
Canyon Road to Seco Canyon Road, except between Newhall Ranch Road and Decoro
Drive which will be 8 lanes. Additionally, a 6 -lane bridge will be constructed over San
Francisquito Canyon Road.
6. DEcogo DRi currently exists and will remain as a 4 -lane roadway between Seco
Canyon Road and McBean Parkway. Decoro will be fully -improved to 4 lanes between
Copper Hill Drive and McBean Parkway, including a 44ane bridge over San Francisquito
Creek.
7. RYE CANYON RoAD: is currently paved for 6 lanes but striped for 4 between The Old
Road and Avenue Scott. Rye Canyon is proposed to be fully -improved to 6 lanes from
Avenue Scoff to Newhall Ranch Road, and restriped from 4 to 6 lanes from 1-5 to
Newhall Ranch Road.
8. AvENuE Sco now exists as a 4 -lane roadway between Rye Canyon Road and
Avenue Rockefeller. District funding is proposed to extend Avenue Scott with full -width
improvements to McBean Parkway, including a bridge over San Francisquito Creek.
9. SAN FRANcisauiTo CANYON RoADIMcBEAN PARKWAY: San Francisquito Canyon now
exists as a 2 -lane roadway from Copper Hill Drive as an extension of McBean Parkway
to the northerly District boundary. This roadway is proposed to be improved to 4 lanes.
10. CASTAIC ROA now exists only on the County Master Plan of Highways and the City of
Santa Clarita Circulation Element. This thoroughfare is to be constructed as a 2 -lane
roadway from Newhall Ranch Road to the northerly District boundary.
11. VALENCIA BOULEvARDII-5 IN7-ERcHANGE,. This interchange currently exists as a two lane
overcrossing with northbound and southbound diamond off -ramps and loop on -ramps.
The District proposes to replace the overcrossing on Route 5, with a 7 lane access; to
provide the southbound diamond on-ramp augmenting the existing loop on -ramps to
complete a modified partial cloverleaf interchange; and to widen the existing southbound
ramps and the northbound off -ramp. There are no alternative designs proposed for this
interchange.' (Please see Attachment D).
12. MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY11-5 INTERCHANGE.. Currently exists as a tight diamond
configuration, with a modified northbound off -ramp providing opposite direction traffic
allowing access to Championship Way. Three alternatives for this interchange are
currently proposed in the Draft Project Study Report under review by CALTRANS.
Draft Project Report.
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clarita 7
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
Alternative 1 proposes 30uthbound hook ramps and northbound direct ramps. The Old
Road is proposed to be realigned westerly over a length of approximately 1000 meters
to provide space for the ramp configuration and provide more storage capacity for the
ramps. All existing ramps would be removed and reconstructed. The southbound off -
ramp would be a single lane off -ramp with three lanes at the terminus with The Old
Road. The southbound on-ramp would be three lanes at the intersection with The Old
Road merging to a single lane at the entrance. The intersection would be located
approximately 300 meters south of Magic Mountain Parkway. The northbound off -ramp
would be a two lane off -ramp at the diverge with four lanes at the terminus with Magic
Mountain Parkway. The northbound on-ramp would be two lanes at Magic Mountain
Parkway merging to a single lane at the freeway entrance. Alternative 2 proposes a
partial cloverleaf configuration with loop off-ramp3 (single lane) in both directions to
Magic Mountain Parkway. The existing 30uthbound off -ramp would be reconstructed to
join the new Magic Mountain Parkway profile and join the 1-5. This off -ramp would
provide only we3tbound travel on Magic Mountain Parkway. A southbound loop off -ramp
would be constructed to serve eastbound Magic Mountain Parkway. The southbound
on-ramp would be constructed as a hook on-ramp with an intersection 200 meters south
of Magic Mountain Parkway. The new southbound on-ramp would be three lanes at The
Old Road merging to a single lane at the entrance. The existing northbound off -ramp
would be replaced with a single lane off -ramp directing traffic to eastbound Magic
Mountain Parkway. The northbound on-ramp would be reconstructed around the
northbound loop off -ramp and provide three lanes at Magic Mountain Parkway merging
to a single lane at the freeway entrance. Alternative 3 proposes to improve the existing
diamond interchange configuration. The Old Road would be realigned approximately 70
meters to the west at Magic Mountain Parkway to provide better intersection spacing
with the southbound ramps and widened to provide six lanes with provisions for right and
dual left turns at Magic Mountain Parkway. Reconstruction of the interchange would
provide improved intersection spacing. The southbound off -ramp would be a single lane
off -ramp with four lanes at Magic Mountain Parkway. The southbound on-ramp would
be two lanes at Magic Mountain Parkway merging to a single lane at the entrance. The
northbound off -ramp would be a two lane off -ramp with four lanes at the terminus on
Magic Mountain Parkway. The northbound on-ramp would be two lanes at Magic
Mountain Parkway merging to a single lane at the freeway entrance2 (Please refer to
Attachment E).
13. SR -12611-5 INTERCHANGE. This interchange currently exists as a partial interchange with
a loop on-ramp and a diamond off -ramp in the southeast quadrant and directional ramps
in the northwest and southwest quadrants. The existing interchange does not provide
the westbound -northbound, or southbound -eastbound movements. Proposed
improvements consist of two alternatives. Alternative A proposes the construction of a
directional ramp in the northeast quadrant to accommodate the westbound to
2 Draft Project Study Report - April, 1998.
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clarke 8
Report on the 9idge and Major
Thoroughfare construction Fee DistrAct for Valencia
northbound movement and realignmenl1reconstruction of the southbound directional
ramps to intersect SR -126 opposite each other. The movements at this intersection on
SR -126 would then be accommodated through a three-phase traffic signal. Alternative
C proposes the construction of a directional ramp in the northeast quadrant of the I-
S/SR-126 interchange to accommodate the westbound to northbound movement. To
provide for the westbound to southbound movement, this altemative proposes the
construction of a loop on-ramp in the northwest quadrant. The loop would pass through
the end -bent of the existing 1-5/SR-126 separation before joining the southbound 1-5
mainline. The southbound off -ramp would be realigned/reconstructed to pass to the
west of the loop ramp and intersect SR -126 at a right angle. The southbound to
eastbound movement would be accommodated through a two-phase traffic signal. The
merging end of the existing southbound off -ramp would also be relocated further to the
west to allow for the construction of the southbound loop ramp. The eastbound to
southbound directional ramp would be realigned/reconstructed as a two-lane freeway to
freeway connector. At the merge to 1-5, the right lane would become an exclusive lane
off to the Rye Canyon Road raMpS.3 (Please see Attachment F).
In addition to the improvements listed above, the following intersections will be added or
improved within the existing roadway network (See Figure 6, Page C-17).
McBean Parkway and:
..... . ... ........
. ... ..
.. ...... ... . . .........
. . ........
. . . .. . .. . ..
. . . . . . . . ......
... . ....
Cal Arts
132
New 4 -way signal
Rockwell
60
3 -way signal, Signal Modification
Alegro
219
New 3 -way signal
Granary quare
220
New 4 -way signal
Orchard Village
227
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Valencia Boulevard
59
4 -way signal, SignaFM-odification
Magic MOURt in �Parkwa�y
56
4-wai signal, Signal-Wo-dification
Creekside (Auto Center)
119
4- iay signal, Signal Modification
Avenue Scott
88
New 4 -way signal
Bridgeport Entrance
New 3 -way signal -
Newhall Ranch Road
46
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Fairview
118
New 4 -may signal-
Creekside Village South
117
New 3 -way signal
3 Draft Project Study — June, 1998.
County of Los Ang"s 4%
City of Santa Oarita
9
RePort on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
Decoro Drive 41 4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Summerhill
116
New 4 -way signal
Skycrest
115
New 4 -way signal -
Sunset Hills
113
New 4 -way signal
Copper Hill Drive
43
New 4-iway signal
Creekside Village North
232
New 4 -way sigEnal
San Francisquito Canyon Road and:
Tesoro
226
1 New 3 -way signal
Avenue Scott and:
Rye Canyon Road
51
New 3 -way signal
Bridgeport Entrance
230
New 4 -way signil-
Avenue Tibbifts
72
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Copper Hill Drive and:
Smyth
102
New 3 -way signal
Lockheed (Lincoln Properties)
103
New 4 -way signal
Decoro Drive
39
New 3 -way signal
Westcreek South
104
New 4 -way signal
Westcreek Center
105
New4 -way signal
Westcreek North
1D6
New 4 -way signal
Tesoro Entrance East
229
New 4 -way signal
Tesoro Entrance West
222
New 3 -way signal
Valencia Boulevard and:
Toumey
70
New 4 -way signal -
Rockwell
71
3 -way signal, Signal Modification
Goldcrest
124
N w 4 -way signal
Magic Mountain Parkway
57
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Cinema
128
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Bouquet Canyon Road
55
4 -way signal, signal Modification
Magic Mountain Parkway and:
Toumey
33
New -way signal
County of LOS Angeles
City of Santa Clanta 10
RePort on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
South River 122 1 New 4 -way signal
River Oaks
223
1 New 4 -way signal
Citrus
231
i 3 -way signal, Signal Modification
Newhall Ranch Road and:
Castaic Road
224
i New 3 -way signal
Vanderbilt
101
New 3 -way signal
Lockheed (Uncoln Properties)
225
New 3 -way signal
Rye Canyon Road
44
New 4 -way sign al
Dickason Drive
45
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Grandview
86
4 -way signal, Signal -Mod!fication
Hillsborough
87
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Bouquet Canyon Road
47
4 -way signal, Signal Modification
Decoro Drive and:
Dickason Drive
40
New 4 -way signal
Creekside Village
108
New 4 -way signal
County of LOS Angeles V
City of Santa Clarite
11
I '- I
VALENCIA BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
City of Santa Clarita
Master Plan of Arterial Highways
LEGEND
Secondary Arterial
Major Arterial
NFreeway
Valencia B&T District Boundary
City of Santa Clarita Boundary
a
1�1
N
W+ E
2500 0 2500 5000 Feet
For Display Purposes Only
Not All Elements to Scale
M -W
0
0
6
J
I
GRANARY
SQUARE
0
Figure 2
VALENCIA BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
County of Los Angeles
Master Plan of Arterial Highways
t
LEGEND
......... ...
Secondary Arterial
Major Arterial
Freeway
Valencia B&T District Boundary
,?%,,'City of Santa Clarita Boundary
1.7
. . . . . . . . . .
0
14,
r
4
PKWY
<
X
GRANARY
SQUARE
N
W E
2500 0 2500 50M Feet
For Display Purposes Only
Not All Elements to Scale
L— Figure 3
Mis�:�g*VropcftXlO2O,3W�apN"_stpMrL3.spr (12JI71"
VALENCIA BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
LANE DESIGNATIGN EXHIBIT
>1
4
LEGEND
Number of Lanes
Street Improvement
Valencia B&T Boundary
z
z
6
10
8
8
NN
0 11
8
8
6
SOL
PKWY
J,
A
N
w
+
GRANARY
SQUARE
S
2500 0 2500 5000 Feet
6
F&D I%mP=oae,,
No J&E to S=
Figure 4
I lane 3.w.UE"M NEW
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare CDnstruction Fee Distfid for Valencia
A. THE AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY
The legal description of the area of benefit boundary is defined in Attachment A included
herewith. It encompasses those properties which have yet to be developed and which will
receive benefit from the improvements funded by the District. A map of the Area of Benefit
is shown as Figure 1. The boundaries were determined by the 1-5 freeway, topographical
features in the Valencia area, ownership/parcel lines, national forest land boundaries, and
existing and future access.
GENERAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION
West Boundary Line
The western district boundary follows the eastern section lines of Sections 20, 29 and
private property lines of Section 32, Township 5 North, Range 18 West, San Bernardino
Meridian. Further to the west, the boundary follows Interstate 5 from approximately the
Biscailuz over -crossing to just north of the McBean Parkway Interchange.
North Boundary Line
The northern portion of the District boundary is formed by the Angeles National Forest. The
northern boundary of the western area east of interstate 5 follows private property and
extends to the southern terminus of Biscailuz Drive.
East Boundary Line
The eastern boundary generally follows a major north -south ridgeline with consideration for
recorded subdivision boundaries and ownership. This boundary is shared with the Bouquet
Canyon Bridge and Major Thoroughfare District. The boundary extends south from the
National Forest boundary, east of San Francisquito Canyon Road, along private property
west of Seco Canyon Road. The boundary runs along Bouquet Canyon Road and San
Fernando Road, south of Soledad Canyon Road and then extends to the west, parallel with
the McBean Parkway interchange with 1-5.
South Boundary Lin
The south boundary line is shared with the Via Princessa Bridge and Major Thoroughfare
District. It extends from 1-5, north of the McBean Parkway interchange, along private
property across McBean to San Fernando Road.
B. DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS
The analysis in Attachment I shows that additional 9,492 residential units, 428.8 acres of
County of Los Angelies 0
CNy of Santa Clads 15
Report an the Bridge and M*r
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distdot for Valencia
commercial, 225.9 acres of industrial use, and 37.2 acres of schools are expected to be built
on land located within the Area of Benefit. The estimated number of residential units for
remaining vacant lands within the District is based on the land use categories designated in
the City of Santa Clarita General Plan and the SCVAP. In cases of projects which are
currently filed (pending projects) within the City and County, the data shown on the pending
tentative map was assumed.
C. PROPOSED IMPROVEmE NTS AND ESTIMATED COSTS
Improvements to be funded by the District are based on a determination of the traffic needs
of remaining development, and an analysis of the improvements designated on the highway
plans of the adopted City and County General Plans. Improvements and associated costs
have been estimated for purposes of determining the value of the District. Actual scope of
work and costs may change as the improvements approach the final design stage.
The proposed improvements are shown in Figures 4 through 7 and described in Attachment
C. Total costs for the improvements are estimated to be approximately $118,412,494. A
summary of estimated costs is shown in Attachment H.
Proposed costs of District improvements include construction costs based on "prevailing
wageo, cost of materials, design costs and permitting fees (considered "soft costs% shown in
Table 1 below), and administrative/management fee (5% of the total of improvement cost
plus soft cost).
TABLE I SOFT COST PERCENTAGES
D. IMPROVEMENT PHASING
Generally, the timing and phasing of construction of District improvements will be
determined by when and where development *occurs, as well as how many units. The
amount of funds received may also determine the timing of improvements.
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Cladta 16
Intersection
Storm Drain
Road I
Bridge .........................
State Hwys.
...............................
Road Interchanges
Engineering -Design
10%
8%
6%
5%
8%
8.5%
Plan Check
3%
2.5%
2%
2%
3%
3%
Engineering -Field
3%
2%
5%
4%
7%
3%
Survey
3%
4%
5%
5%
8%
3%
Soils
1 %
2%
5%
3%
7%
1 %
Geology
0%
0%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
1 0%
BondsfFees
1 %
I 8%
10%
4% I
10%
i 1 %
Erosion Control (SWPPP)
0.5%
0%
0.5%
0%
0.5%
0.5%
Army CorpslFish & Game —
I Env. Inspections
0%
i 0%
0%
1%
0%
1 0%
TOTAL: 1
21.5%
26.5%
34.0% 1
24.5%
44.0%
20%
D. IMPROVEMENT PHASING
Generally, the timing and phasing of construction of District improvements will be
determined by when and where development *occurs, as well as how many units. The
amount of funds received may also determine the timing of improvements.
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Cladta 16
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare CDnatrudion F*@ Distnd for Vallencta
TRA"ic ANALYsis
The existing highway system adequately handles the traffic generated by existing
development located within the Area of Benefit. Further, existing development would not
directly benefit from the additional highway improvements if additional development did not
occur. However, District improvements are expected to improve circulation on a Valley -wide
basis.
Based on the allowable plan densities, filed tentative maps, and past and current
development trends within the District, it is estimated that 56% of the future units will be
single-family, 23% will be townhouse -type units, and the remaining 21% will be apartment
units. Non-residential uses are projected as 62% commercial, 33% industrial, and 5%
schools. It is estimated that an additional 9,492 residential units and 691.9 acres of non-
residential area will be developed over the next twenty years within the District, and that the
current highway system cannot handle the traffic generated from this additional
development without the District improvements.
F. THE CONs-rRUCTION FEE
To ensure equitability of construction fee assignment, the proposed fee is proportionate to
the degree with which future developments benefit from the proposed improvements.
Therefore, the proportionate share is based on the number of peak -hour trips generated by
the proposed development. Trip generation is translated into factored development units
(FDUs). One factored development unit is equivalent to 10 trips and corresponds with the
generation rate of one single family dwelling unit. All other land uses are assigned a
multiplier based on the rate it generates traffic compared to a single family dwelling. This
factor is then multiplied by the Districts adopted construction fee resulting in a project's
proportionate share of fees. The multipliers are assigned as follows:
0 Condorrownhome .................. 0.8 FDU (8 trips per unit)
N Apartment ............................... 0.7 FDU (7 trips per unit)
a Commercial ............. 5.0 FDUs (50 trips per gross acre)
a Industrial ................. 3.0 FDUs (30 trips per gross acre)
The adoption of this type of funding district does not levy any fees against existing
development. Fees are collected at the time of recordation of a final map or just prior to
building permit issuance. Fees are capped upon execution of the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Agreement (a sample of which is provided as Attachment K).
FDUs for recorded subdivisions which are located within the area of benefit were not
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clarta 17
Report on the Bridge and M*r
7'horoughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
included in the fee calculation4. Instead, the revenue from units which have previously paid
fees was subtracted from the total construction cost prior to calculating the fee.
The construction fee is calculated by dividing the total cost of district improvements, minus
the fees already paid by recorded tracts, then divided by the total number of FDUs. For a
breakdown of the total number of FDLIs in the District, please see Attachment 1.
If a condition of project approval requires that a landowner dedicate a portion of its property
as right of way for a State improvement, then the landowner will receive credit at fair market
value for the property dedicated. However, if right-of-way is required to be dedicated for a
City/County improvement, as a condition of project approval, the landowner receives no
credit for the value of the dedicated property. if any local improvement requires land
acquisition from a third party, the cost of property will be added to the estimated cost of the
improvement.
G. PROVISIONS FOR UPDATING COSTS AND UNIT INFORMATION
Projections for development of the land and the cost of the improvements located within the
area of benefit may change over time. Project scope may change due to refinement and the
need to comply with requirements imposed by other agencies, including, but not limited to,
the Califomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Therefore, in order to equitably
assess future development as well as collect sufficient funds to complete the improvements,
it is necessary to periodically re-evaluate the cost of the improvements and the type of
development being constructed within the Area of Benefit and adjust the fee accordingly.
This District proposes a bi-annual evaluation of both building trends and the cost of District
projects. With this information, the District fee may be increased or decreased only so as to
match the revised District cost estimates for the remaining improvements. Any increase in
District fees will be subject to the approval of both the City of Santa Clarita and the County
of Los Angeles through the public hearing process.
H. CONSTRUCTION IN LIEU OF PAYING FEES
Cost to construct District improvements, as described in this report, will be eligible for District
credit in lieu of future fee payments. If the cost of the completed and accepted
improvements exceeds the required fees, the developer would be given a credit which can
be used to offset future bridge and thoroughfare fees of future subdivisions within the
District, or K adequate funds are available, the developer may receive a cash
reimbursement
Therefore, a developer has the following options with regard to construction of District
improvements:
4 The exception is Tract 52206, and Parcel Maps 23349 and 20795 which have B & T agreements which commit them to pay the fee
in piece at District formation. Therefore, these projects have been counted as future projects in the District as their Letters of
Credit will be released and the now fee paid at District formation.
County of Los Angeles #
CNy of Santa Clarke 18
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
9 Construct District -identified improvements for District credit
a Construct District -identified improvements and receive cash
reimbursement from the District. Implementation of "prevailing wagen
labor is required for the construction of District improvements in order
for a developer to receive cash reimbursement from the DistriCt5. This
prevailing wage requirement is only to be applied to improvement
projects that commence subsequent to the formation of the District.
Each developer will submit records of construction costs to the County. It will be the
responsibility of the County to keep track of the balance of required fees and credits. A
sample agreement is attached as Attachment K as wall as a sample uRequest for Credit for
Completed Improvementso form (Attachment Q.
1. DISTRicT FuNDS
Any fees collected by development projects within the District are to be restricted to the
construction of District -identified improvements only. Transfer of funds or loans for
improvements outside the Valencia District is prohibited. However, it would be permissible
for clevelopers/landowners to withdrawal any funds from the District once improvements are
completed and approved.
To receive credit for constructed and approved improvements, the proper documentation
must be submitted to the County. No documentation for "soft costs" is necessary as they
are already accounted for in District fees'.
Improvements Will be accepted for maintenance by either the City or the County upon
completion and field acceptance. After field acceptance of constructed improvement, credit
withdrawal of District funds is authorized. Along with the "Request for Credit for Completed
Improvements" form, copies of contracts, change orders, and purchase orders which detail
construction costs will be provided to the County. Upon submittal of a request for the
withdrawal of credits due, review and determination by the County will be completed within
30 days.
J. THE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The establishment of the District will not have a significant impact on the environment and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and incorporated as an appendix to this
document.
5 Prevailing wage In defined as the commonly accepted rate paid to workers practicing In the some or similar locality under the same
or similar circumstances.
6 Soft costs consist of fen for necessary permitting fees and Improvement design costs.
County of Los Angeles
Cily of Santa Clanta 19
Report an the filridge and Major
Thoroughfwe Construction Fee District for V&Wncia
ATTACHMEHT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE AREA OF BENEFIT KNOWN AS "VALENCIA"
BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT
THAT PORTION OF THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED
BOUNDARIES:
BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 5
NORTH, RANGE 16 WEST, S.B.M., SAID NORTHWESTERLY CORNER BEING AN ANGLE
POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF BOUQUET CANYON BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
DISTRICT, AS SAME EXISTED ON JULY 11, 1991; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG
SAID BOUNDARY AND FOLLOWING THE SAME IN ALL ITS VARIOUS COURSES AND
CURVES TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID BOUQUET CANYON BRIDGE AND
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG LAST SAID SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE VIA
PRINCESSA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG LAST SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
CENTERLINE OF VALENCIA BOULEVARD, AS SAID CENTER LINE IS SHOWN ON
COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MAP NO. B-2912 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; THENCE
SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF
BOUQUET CANYON ROAD AS SAME EXISTED ON FEBRUARY 2, 1990 THROUGH ITS
VARIOUS COURSES AND DISTANCES TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE
SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 126) OF VARYING
County of Los Angebs 0
City of Santa Clanks A-1
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
WIDTH, AS SAME EXISTED FEBRUARY 2, 1990 AND THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAN
FERNANDO ROAD (HIGHWAY 126), 90 FEET WIDE AS SAME EXISTED ON FEBRUARY
2, 1990; THENCE WESTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WESTERLY LINE OF SAN
FERNANDO ROAD TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE SANTA CLAM
RIVER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG LAST SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO
THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 36723 FILED IN BOOK 966, PAGES 77
TO 85 OF MAPS RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST SAID
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY AND THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT 36724 FILED IN BOOK 966 PAGES 86 TO 90 OF
SAID MAPS, TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF CORTINA DRIVE, 56 FEET WIDE AS SAME
EXISTED ON FEBRUARY 2, 1990; THENCE WESTERLY IN A DIRECT LINE TO THE
EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THE CENTERLINE OF ARROYO PARK DRIVE, 84 FEET WIDE
AS SAME EXISTED ON FEBRUARY 2, 1990; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG LAST SAID
CENTERLINE TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF MCBEAN PARKWAY, 100 FEET WIDE AS
SAME EXISTED ON FEBRUARY 2, 1990; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY ALONG
THE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF THOUGH ITS VARIOUS COURSES AND
DISTANCES TO THE CENTERLINE OF HIGHWAY 5 (GOLDEN STATE FREEWAY) AS
SAME EXISTED ON FEBRUARY 2, 1990; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG LAST SAID
CENTERLINE ALSO BEING THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF SANTA
CLARITA THROUGH ITS VARIOUS COURSES AND DISTANCES TO THE INTERSECTIONS
OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE GOLDEN STATE FREEWAY AND THAT CERTAIN COURSE
HAVING A BEARING AND LENGTH OF SOUTH 85033'30" EAST 36.20 FEET IN THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 8 AS SHOWN ON MAP FILED IN BOOK 27,
PAGES 27 THROUGH 31 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY TO THE EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT COURSE HAVING A
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa C44rita A-2
Report an the Bddge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distnot for Valencia
BEARING AND LENGTH
OF NORTH 7501914011
EAST 1484.21
FEET
IN SAID
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY;
THENCE EASTERLY IN A
DIRECT TO THE
MOST
WESTERLY
CORNER OF PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE EASTERLY,
SOUTHEASTERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF LAST SAID
PARCEL TO THE EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THAT COURSE HAVING A BEARING AND
LENGTH OF NORTH 86*321051' EAST 812.31 FEET, LAST SAID EASTERLY TERMINUS
ALSO BEING THE NORTHERLY TERMINUS OF THAT CERTAIN COURSE HAVING A
BEARING AND LENGTH OF SOUTH 00026140" WEST 186.13 FEET IN THE EASTERLY
BOUNDARY OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 IN DEED
TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY RECORDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1975 AS
INSTRUMENT NO. 1 IN BOOK D6814, PAGE 161 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE
OFFICE OF SAID RECORDER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY
OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DESCRIBED
IN DOCUMENT RECORDED IN BOOK 16806, PAGE 1 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID
COUNTY AND KNOWN AS THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES WAYSIDE HONOR RANCHO,
SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN ON COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MAP B-
1638 ON FILE IN SAID OFFICE THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO THE
NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE RANCHO SAN FRANCISCO AS SHOWN ON MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGES 521 AND 522, OF PATENTS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST
MENTIONED NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 4 OF
FRACTIONAL SECTION 32, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG
SAID WEST LINE TO THE EAST—WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID
FRACTIONAL SECTION 32; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION
County of Los Angeles 0
CNy of Santa Clarits A-3
Report an the Sndge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Foe Distnct for Valencia
32 TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 32; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED
SOUTH LINE TO THE NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID FRACTIONAL
SECTION 32; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SECTION
LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 32; THENCE EASTERLY
ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
FRACTIONAL SECTION 32; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION
29 AND SECTION 20, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER
OF SECTION 21, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE
EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID LAST MENTIONED SECTION TO THE
EAST LINE OF SAID LAST MENTIONED SECTION; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE
EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SECTION 22, SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE
TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LAST MENTIONED SECTION; THENCE SOUTHERLY
ALONG LAST SAID EASTERLY LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
County of Los Angelles
CNY of Santa Clanta A-4
I
Report on the Wdge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distnd for VaAancis
ATTACHMENT B SANTA CLARITA VALLEY BRIDGE AND MAJOR
THOROUGHFARE DISTRICTS MAP
County of Los Angeiss
Cky of Santa Clanta B-1
I
co
z
i�
0
G)
M
z
0
0
M
0
a
G)
M
V
M
eA a)
00
Ig ot%
1050
a
q'A s
Ogg
lksmovionsmam 0
z
M
...........
,cc
0 to
x
Z
NOR
M
0
0
r*
M
r
PEA
00 00
V.
OWN
rem:
v M
w x
0
M
0
C
z
M
A
M >
0 0
M x
z ic
M
z
i
L,
KIM I m IL
a i 0 *10
Sam.
c
4
M
...........
NOR
c
4
M
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
ATTACHMENT C VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE
CONSTRUCTION FEE DISTRICT DESCRIPTION OF
PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS
The following descriptions for District improvements were used to define a scope of work for cost
estimating purposes only. The actual project scope and associated costs may change as each
improvement reaches the final design stage.
TABLE2 DESCRIPTION OF ROADWAY AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
I
LINK NO. I IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
McIBEAN PARKWAY: 1-5 TO SAN FRANCISQUITO CANYON ROAD
1-5 to Valencia Boulevard (6 lanes; 13,000 linear feet)
36 Striping
Sandblasting
Tree removal and replacement
Valencia Boulevard to Magic Mountain Parkway (east side 4 lanes; 2,582 linear feet)
39
Striping
Magic Mountain Parkway to Santa Clara River (8 lanes; 1,390 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
Deceleration lane
Sidewalk (one side)
40
Median replacement
Oveday west side
Transition (2 lanes to 0: Creekside to northerly side of bridge)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Landscape replacement
Erosion control
McBean Parkway Bridge Widening (8 lanes; 590'long x 26'wide)
Bike trail modification, abutment protection, and retaining wall (under bridge)
Dewatering
45
i Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Environmental Mitigation
Striping
Curb and gutter
County of Los Angeles #
City of Santa Cladta
C-1
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distnct for Valencia
LINK NO.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Santa Clara River to Newhall Ranch Road (8 lanes; 2,550 linear fee
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
41
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Two bus turnouts
Storm drain system
Erosion control
I Newhall Ranch Road to Decoro Drive (6 lanes; 5,000 linear feet)
42
Sidewalk (one side)
Striping
Decoro Drive to Northerly Edison Easement (6 lanes; 5,100 linear fee
43
Sidewalk (both sides)
Striping to 6 lanes
Northerly Edison Easement to Copper Hill Drive (6 lanes; 1,900 linear feet)
43A
Median modification for left turns
Sidewalk (both sides)
Striping to 6 lanes
Copper Hill Drive to 1,500' north (6 lanes; 1,500 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
44
Sidewalk (both sides)
Retaining wall
Oak tree protection
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Erosion control
San Franclsquito Canyon Road: end of eAsting McBean to National Forest boundary (4
lanes; 15,000 linear feet)
Grading
125
Pavement and aggregate base
Striping and signage
Storm drain culverts
Erosion control
Rye Canyon Road: 1-5 to Copper Hill Drive
63
Striping from 4 to 6 lanes (4,300 linear feet)
Sandblasfing
COPPER HILL DRIVE: ExiSTING RYE CANYON ROAD TO SECO CANYON ROAD
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa 0ents C-2
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
LINK NO.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Existing Rye Canyon Road to Newhall Ranch Road (6 lanes; 1,000 linear feet)
Grading
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk (both sides)
64
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Kight-of-way acquisition
Storm drain system
CLWA water line relocation
Erosion control
Newhall Ranch Road to Decom Drive (8 lanes; 2,920 linear feet)
Grading (1 00'to 124' RNV only)
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
65
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Storm drain system
Erosion control
I Decoro Drive to westerly boundary of Tesoro (6 lanes; 6,708 linear feet)
Remove existing 2 lanes
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
66
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Storm drain system
Erosion control
Westerly to easterly boundary of Tesoro (6 lanes; 1,282 linear feet)
Remove existing 2 lanes
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
66A
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, stdping, signage.
Storm drain system
Erosion control
Easterly boundary of Tesoro to McBean Parkway (6 lanes; 1,214 linear feet)
Replace existing 2 lanes
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
194
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Storm drain system
Erosion control
County of Los Angeles 0
CNY of Santa Clente C-3
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Wencils
LINK NO.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Copper Hill Drive bridge over San Francisquito Creek (Phases 11 and III only: from 2 to 6
I lanes; 580' long x 24'wide)
Decking
194A
Bike trail
Guard rail
Sidewalk
Environmental Mitigation
McBean Parkway to Easterly District boundary (6 lanes; 2,400 linear feet)
67
Interim median removal
Striping from 4 to 6 lanes
Median modiflution for full width bridge
Easterly District boundary to Seco Canyon Road (6 lanes; 2,270 linear feet)
Oveday one lane
Curb, gutter, base
67A
Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk (one side)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Erosion control
I Castalc Road: Newhall Ranch Road to Northerly District Boundary (2 lanes; 5,500 linear
feet)
56
Grading
Pavement and aggregate base
Striping and signage
Erosion control
VALENCIA BOULEVARD: 1-5 To BOUQUET CANYON ROAD
1 1-5 to McBean Parkway (8 lanes; 5,450 linear feet)
Phase I
Acceleration/deceleration lane
Remove eAsting curb, gutter and median
Tree removal
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
97
Overlay
Sidewalk (one side)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Parkway landscape repair
Storm Drain System
Erosion control
County of Los AngWes
CNy of Santa Clads C-4
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thmught" Construction Fee District for Valencia
I
LINK NO. IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Phase 11
Additional westbound lane
Curb and gutter
Pavement and aggregate base
Striping and signage
Erosion control
Phase III
Shift median to north and add 8th lane
Remove e)dsfing median
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
Median island landscape replacement
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Oveday 7 lanes eAsting pavement
Erosion control
Widening along Little League Frontage (6 lanes; 900 linear feet)
Remove eAsting curb, gutter and median
Tree removal
Grading
Curb, gutter, base,
100
Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk removal and replacement (one side)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Erosion control
MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY* 1-5 TO VALENCIA Boul-EVARD
1-5 to Tourney Road (6 lanes; approximately 800 linear feet)
88
Pavement and aggregate base
Street lighting, Striping, signage
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clarga C-5
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construdion Fee Dstrid for Valenc4a
LINK NO.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Tourney Road to McBean Parkway (8 lanes; 6,600 linear feet — construction in five phases,
Phase I complete)
Right-of-way acquisition
Grading
Remove median island curb and gutter
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
89
Sidewalk (one side)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
One lane overlay
Edison relocation
Four bus turnouts
Storm drain system (50% financed by MTA)
Environmental mitigation/monitoring
Erosion control
McBean Parkway to Valencia Boulevard (8 lanes; 2,667 linear feet - McBean to Valencia
Boulevard)
Striping (Magic Mountain Parkway to Newhall Avenue — 520 LF)
Add 2 through lanes Newhall Avenue to Valencia
Removals/subgrade
Utilities (raise manholes, valve boxes, street light relocations, etc.)
89A
Catch basins
Curb, gutter, base
Right-of-way acquisition (south side)
Remove and replace sidewalk (one side)
Pavement and aggregate base
Landscape replacement (one side)
Striping and signage
AvENuE SCOTT: END OF ExrsTING AVENUF SCOTT TO McBF-Am PARKWAY
End of existing to McBean Parkway (4 lanes; 860 linear feet)
Grading
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
87
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Storm drain system
Erosion control
Avenue Scott Bridge over San Francisquito Creek (4 lanes; 566' long x 80' wide)
Decking and footings
87A
Dewatering
Abutment protection
Environmental Mitigation
Erosion control
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clarks C-6
Report on the BnUge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distilct for Valencia
I
LINK NO. IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
NlEwHALL RANcH ROAD: 126 TO BOUQUET CANYON ROAD
SR 126 to Vanderbilt Way (8 lanes; 950 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, bass
i Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk (both sides)
50 Drainage Including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Edison relocation
One lane overlay
Storm drain system
Demolish shoulder
Erosion control
Vanderbilt Way to easterly Parcel Map No. 19163 (8 lanes; 2,600 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk (both sides)
51 Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Edison relocation
One lane overlay
Storm drain system
Demolish shoulder
Erosion control
Easterly boundary Parcel Map No. 19163 to City boundary (8 lanes; 3,430 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
51A Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Edison relocation
Storm drain system
Demolish shoulder
Erosion control
County of Los Angeles #
City of Santa Clents
C-7
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construdion Fee District for Valencia
LINK NO.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
City boundary to Copper Hill Drive (8 lanes; 1,240 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk (both sides)
51B
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
CLWA water line relocation
Edison relocation
Storm drain structure
Demolish shoulder
Erosion control
Copper Hill Drive to Dickason Drive (8 lanes; 4,080 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
52
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Storm drain structure
Erosion control
Dickason Drive to McBean Parkway (8 lanes; 2,040 linear feet)
Grading
Curb, gutter, base
Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk (both sides)
53
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
One lane overlay
Power pole relocabon
Retaining wall demolition
Erosion control
Newhall Ranch Road Bridge over San Francisquito Creek (8 lanes; 608' long x 40' wide)
Decking and footings
53A
Tile treatment and anodized rail (per City of Santa Clarita)
Dewatering
Environmental mitigation/monitoring
McBeen Parkway to Grandview (8 lanes; 2,350 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
Sidewalk (both sides)
54
Interim median island curb and 26'wide concrete temporary median
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Erosion control
Storm drain system
Demolish ternDorary median island
County of Los Angreles 0
City of Santa Clents C-8
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee DVstnet for V"ncie
LINK NO.
I
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Grandview to Easterly District boundary (8 lanes; 1,170 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
54A
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Interim median island curb and 26'wide concrete temporary medi an
Erosion control
Demolish temporary median island
Easterly District boundary to Hillsborough (8 lanes; 400 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
54B
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Interim median island curb and 26'wide concrete temporary median
Erosion control
Demolish temporary median island
Hillsborough to Bouquet Creek (8 lanes; 1,550 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
128
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Interim median island curb and 26'wide concrete temporary median
Erosion control
Demolish temporary median island
Bouquet Creek to Bouquet Canyon Road (8 lanes; 860 linear feet)
Full -width grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
128A
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Erosion control
Pave taper
Striping
Bouquet Creek Bridge (8 lanes; 157' long x 65'wide)
Decking
128B,128C
Curb and gutter
Tile treatment and anodized rail
Bike trail on bridge
Environmental Mitigation
County of Los Ang"s
City of Santa 0anta
C-9
RePort on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
i
LINK NO. IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
Decoro Drive: Copper Hill Drive to Dickason Drive (4 lanes; 2,390 linear feet)
Grading
Curb, gutter, base,
i Pavement and aggregate base
70 Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Storm drain system
Erosion control
Decoro Drive: Dickason Drive to McBean Parkway (4 lanes; 1,700 linear feet)
Grading
Curb, gutter, base,
Pavement and aggregate base
71
Sidewalk (both sides)
Drainage including laterals and median inlets
Street lighting, striping, signage
Storm drain system
Erosion control
Decoro Drive Bridge over San Francisquito Creek (4 lanes; 580' long x 87'wide)
Decking and footings
Dewatering
71A
Abutment protection
Environmental mitigation
Erosion control
TABLE3 DESCRIPTION OF INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Intersection 1
1 IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
No.
33
I Magic Mountain Parkway and Tourney Road
New 3 -way signal
39
Copper Hill Drive and Decoro Drive
New 3 -way signal
40
I Decoro Drive Dickason Drive
New 4 -way signal
McBean Parkway and Decoro Drive (4 -way signal)
Signal modification and augmentation from a 3 -way signal to 4 -way
41
Add 2 right -turn pockets
Right -of way acquisition (for northbound free right -tum lane)
Landscape repair
43
McBean Parkway and Copper Hill Drive
New 4 -way signal and augmentation for a right -tum pocket and dual left -tum lanes
44
Copper Hill Drive/Rye Canyon Road and Newhall Ranch Road
County of Los Angeles 0
CNy of Santa Oarita C-10
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee fkatrict for V"ncia
Intersection IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
No.
New 4 -way signal and augmentation for phasing
45
Newhall Ranch Road DIckason Drive (4 -way signal)
Signal modification
McBean Parkway and Newhall Ranch Road
Signal modification and augmentation for medians,
46
Add 4 right -turn pockets
Add 4 through lanes
Add 3 left -turn pockets
47
Newhall Ranch Road and Bouquet Canyon Road (4 -way signal)
Signal modification and augmentation for a right -turn pocket and to add 2 medians
51
I Avenue Scott and Rye Canyon Road
New 3 -way signal
Valencia Boulevard and Bouquet Canyon Road (4 -way signal)
55
Signal modification and augmentation for 3 left -tum pockets, a right -turn pocket,
and 2 median modifications
Right-of-way acquisition
56
McBean Parkway and Magic Mountain Parkway
Signal modification and augmentation for striping an additional through lane
Valencia Boulevard and Magic Mountain Parkway (4 -way signal)
57
Signal modification and augmentation for a right -turn pocket and median
Landscape and monument sign
McBean Parkway and Valencia Boulevard (4 -way signal)
Signal modification and augmentation for a dght-tum pocket and 2 additional
59
through lanes
Right-of-way acquisition
Landscape repair
i
60
1 McBean Parkway and Rockwell Canyon Road (3 -way signal)
Signal modification
70
Valencia Boulevard and Tourney Road
New 4 -way signal
71
Valencia Boulevard and Rockwell (3 -way signal)
Signal modification
86
Newhall Ranch Road and Grandview (4 -way signal)
Signal modification
87
Newhall Ranch Road and Hillsborough (4 -way signal)
Signal modification
i McBean Parkway and Avenue Scoff
New 4 -way signal
County of Los Angeles #
City of Santa C(adta
C-11
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
Intersection IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
No.
101
Newhall Ranch Road Vanderbilt
New 3 -way signal
102
Copper Hill Drive and Smyth Drive
I New 3 -way signal
103
Copper Hill Drive and Lockheed
New 4 -way signal
104
Cop 11 Drive and West Creek South
New 4 -way signal
105
Copper Hill Drive and West Creek Central
i
New 4 -way signal
106
Copper Hill Drive and West Creek North
------ ---------
New 4 -way signal
4
108
: Decoro Drive and Creekside Village
New 4 -way signal
113
McBean Parkway and Sunset Hills
New 4 -way signal
115
McBean Parkway and Skycrest
New 4 -way signal
116
McBean and Summerhill
---------------
4 New 4 -way signal
117
: McBean Parkway and Creekside Village South
New 3 -way signal
118
McBean Parkway and Fairview
New 4 -way signal
119
McBean Parkway and Creekside Drive — AutoCenter (4 -way signal)
Signal modification
122
Magic Mountain Parkway and Sout
New 4 -way signal
223
1 Magic Mountain Parkway and River Oaks
New 4 -way signal
124
Valencia Boulevard and Goldcrest
New 4 -way signal
128
i Valencia Boulevard and cinema Drive (4 -way signal)
Signal modification and augmentation for a left and right -turn pocket
132
McBean Parkway and Cal Arts
New 4 -way signal
McBean Parkway and Alegro
219
New 3 -way signal
Median island landscape repair
McBean PWrKwayand Granary square
220
New 4 -way signet
Median island landscape repair
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clarita
C-12
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee 0stnot for V"ncta
Intersection 1
1 IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
No.
I
222
Copper Hill Drive and Tesoro Entrance East
New 4 -way signal
224
N Ranch Road and Castaic Road
I New 3 -way signal
225
1 Newhall Ranch Road and Lockheed
New 3 -way signal
226
San Francisquito Canyon Road and Tesoro
New 3 -way signal
McBean Parkway and Orchard Village (4 -way signal)
227
Signal modification and augmentation for a left -tum pocket and median
modification
Median island and landscape repair
228
McBean Parkway and Bridgeport Entrance
New 3 -way signal
229
Copper Hill Drive and Tesom Entrance vvest
New 3 -way signal
230
Avenue Scoff and Bridgeport Entrance
New 4 -way signal
231
Magic Mountain Parkway and Citrus (3 -way signal)
Signal modification
232
McBean Parkway and Creekside Village N
New 4 -way signal
TABLE 4 DESCRIPTION OF INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
SR- 126/1-5 INTERCHANGE:
This interchange currently exists as a partial interchange with a loop on-ramp and a
diamond off -ramp in the southeast quadrant and directional ramps in the northwest and
southwest quadrants. The existing interchange does not provide the westbound -northbound,
or southbound -eastbound movements. Proposed improvements consist of two alternatives.
Alternative A proposes the construction of a directional ramp in the northeast quadrant to
accommodate the westbound to northbound movement and realignment/reconstruction of
the southbound directional ramps to intersect SR -126 opposite each other. The movements
at this intersection on SR -126 would then be accommodated through a three-phase traffic
signal (Please see Attachment D). Alternative C proposes the construction of a directional
ramp in the northeast quadrant of the 1-5/SR-126 interchange to accommodate the
westbound to northbound movement. To provide for the westbound to southbound
movement, this alterinative proposes the construction of a loop on-ramp in the northwest
quadrant. The loop would pass through the end -bent of the existing 1-5/SR-126 separation
before joining the southbound 1-5 mainline. The southbound off -ramp would be
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clanta
C-13
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
realigned/reconstructed to pass to the west of the loop ramp and intersect SR -126 at a right
angle. The southbound to eastbound movement would be accommodated through a two-
phase traffic signal. The merging end of the existing southbound off -ramp would also be
relocated further to the west to allow for the construction of the southbound loop ramp. The
eastbound to southbound directional ramp would be realigned/reconstructed as a two-lane
freeway to freeway connector. At the merge to 1-5, the right lane would become an exclusive
lane off to the Rye Canyon Road ramps.7 (Please see Attachment D).
MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY/1-5 INTERCHANGE:
Currently exists as a fight diamond configuration, with a modified northbound off -ramp
providing opposite direction traffic allowing access to Championship Way. Three alternatives
for this interchange are currently proposed in the Draft Project Study Report under review by
CALTRANS. Alternative 1 proposes southbound hook ramps and northbound direct ramps.
The Old Road is proposed to be realigned westerly over a length of approximately 1000
meters to provide space for the ramp configuration and provide more storage capacity for the
ramps. All existing ramps would be removed and reconstructed. The southbound off -ramp
would be a single lane off -ramp with three lanes at the terminus with The Old Road. The
southbound on-ramp would be three lanes at the intersection with The Old Road merging to
a single lane at the entrance. The intersection would be located approximately 300 meters
south of Magic Mountain Parkway. The northbound off -ramp would be a two lane off -ramp at
the diverge with four lanes at the terminus with Magic Mountain Parkway. The northbound
on-ramp would be two lanes at Magic Mountain Parkway merging to a single lane at the
freeway entrance (Please refer to Attachment F). Alternative 2 proposes a partial cloverleaf
configuration with loop off -ramps (single lane) in both directions to Magic Mountain Parkway.
The existing southbound off -ramp would be reconstructed to join the new Magic Mountain
Parkway profile and join the 1-5. This off -ramp would provide only westbound travel on Magic
Mountain Parkway. A southbound loop off -ramp would be constructed to serve eastbound
Magic Mountain Parkway. The southbound on-ramp would be constructed as a hook on-
ramp with an intersection 200 meters south of Magic Mountain Parkway. The new
southbound on-ramp would be three lanes at The Old Road merging to a single lane at the
entrance. The existing northbound off -ramp would be replaced with a single lane off -ramp
directing traffic to eastbound Magic Mountain Parkway. The northbound on-ramp would be
reconstructed around the northbound loop off -ramp and provide three lanes at Magic
Mountain Parkway merging to a single lane at the freeway entrance (Please see Attachment
F). Alternative 3 proposes to improve the existing diamond interchange configuration. The
Old Road would be realigned approximately 70 meters to the west at Magic Mountain
Parkway to provide better intersection spacing with the southbound ramps and widened to
provide six lanes with provisions for right and dual left turns at Magic Mountain Parkway
(Please refer to Attachment F). Reconstruction of the interchange would provide improved
intersection spacing. The southbound off -ramp would be a single lane off -ramp with four
I Draft Project Study — June, 1998.
County of Los Angeles #
City of Santa Clanta
C-14
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
lanes at Magic Mountain Parkway. The southbound on-ramp would be two lanes at Magic
Mountain Parkway merging to a single lane at the entrance. The northbound off -ramp would
be a two lane off -ramp with four lanes at the terminus on Magic Mountain Parkway. The
northbound on-ramp would be two lanes at Magic Mountain Parkway merging to a single
lane at the freeway entrance.8
I VALENCIA BOULEVARD/1-5 INTERCHANGE:
This interchange currently exists as a two lane overcrossing with northbound and
southbound diamond off -ramps and loop on -ramps. The District proposes to replace the
overcrossing on Route 5, with a 7 lane access; to provide the southbound diamond on-ramp
augmenting the existing loop on -ramps to complete a modified partial Cloverleaf interchange;
and to widen the ex:isting southbound ramps and the northbound off -ramp. There are no
alternative designs proposed for this interchange.9 (Please see Attachment E).
Draft Project Study Report —April, 1998.
Draft Project Report.
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clanta
C-15
VALENCIA BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
LINK DESIGNATION EXHIBIT
LEGEND
Begin/End of Link
Link Segment
Valencia B&T Boundary
M/
COPD
a
E�
=9
25W 0 2500 5000
For Display Purposes Only
Not All Elements to Scale
A
LAM,
I
ho, "TT-'ZIA
0
M
Figure 5
r
VALENCIA BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
INTERSECTION DESIGNATION EXHIBIT
Z
00
LEGEND
Intersection Improvement
226
Valencia B&T Boundary
43
A
106
105
232
113
�104
39
J224 '101
103 An
225 102
108 1 r-
41
WE
0 11
41
460
0
7
lie
44
122
119 128
1 E CYN.
PKWY
A
X
59
xz
70 7
\220
GRANARY
w
\ Is
SQUARE
ffiffi
2500 0 2500 5000 Feet
227,1. -
For Display Purposes Only
Not All Elements to Scale
132 60
Figure 6
1
X.%Psvm P Int CAW
VALENCIA BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
INTERCHANGE DESIGNATION EXHIBIT
0
LEGEND
Interchange Improvement
Valencia B&T Boundary
74
1-5 MAGIC� MOUNTAk
=-M
N
W+
2500 0 2500 5000 Feet
For Display Purposes Only
Not All Elements to Scale
IN
A.
4 QLAI. UE
V�
i
GRANARY
SQUARE
0
Figure 7
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
ATTACHMUHT D VALENCIA BOULEVARD/1-5 INTERCHANGE CONCEPT
EXHIBIT
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clanta D-1
MM MR AM AM Mw Aw- AM MW -am_ —AW AW AW -mm ow -m-M Im,
1
alpa p
IqR r"
rn
.Frvl
0
m
m
x
VA
I
—.4
ta /,
. . ...........
7",
V�,
-zA
op
ril
>
til
I
—.4
N
\ICA
0
`00-.7
�L\ \ �AA-
MATCHUNE SEE SHEEr 3
m
ta /,
. . ...........
7",
-zA
N
\ICA
0
`00-.7
�L\ \ �AA-
MATCHUNE SEE SHEEr 3
m
Z3
:z
HAJO
:z
ry
Am --*—m AM --"a -on AW -Awt Aqw
.. . .........
at
30
4
sm
30
go
2 "
a
m
M
z
Am --*—m AM --"a -on AW -Awt Aqw
.. . .........
rl
.. . .........
11
rn
In
-C
30
c
MATCHUNE SEE SHEEr 2
Report on the aridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distnct for Valencia
ATTACHMENT E MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY/1-5 INTERCHANGE CONCEPT
EXHIBIT
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clarite E-1
I I I
ij
'a Ix
I
m, mQ Q t;� "� Fm- Q�*
7—
CA
t�',
Ail
rn
AF;, i
40
t vI
ca
44-
40 t*
t-- --L-j
'a Ix
I
m, mQ Q t;� "� Fm- Q�*
7—
CA
t�',
Ail
rn
AF;, i
40
t vI
le pl! b I
4
, Pr *p
rg-.,4
bob.. -
U ,a M -
p
fit
MAILimuNt. Mt ZMV I
. �qr
c14l
Lae
M
00+
—6p.
-rr—.
I
a
4 Q�. 64
- rrr��
iR
ij:
RIF-MMMOVE
0 �
44
rr *
k4
rn
CA
Lae
M
00+
—6p.
-rr—.
I
a
4 Q�. 64
- rrr��
iR
ij:
RIF-MMMOVE
0 �
44
rr *
Repolf on the alidge and Major
Thoroughfffe Construction Fee Distnct for VWencia
ATTACHmrLNTF SR -126/1-5 INTERCHANGE CONCEPT EXHIBIT
CountY of Los Angeoes
CNy of Santa Clarita
F4
z
<
Jll
r
-4
orm
Z
-0>
C-1
M
r
1
t4 0
a
M. .... .....
z
0
r
r
LA
..... .....
OA
r
M
�z
A
104
2
%
fl�
LC?
RP
C*
M>
0
M
z'n
I L-6
------- N— -
on
F-1-1 T
M. .... .....
, it
..... .....
1p
%
fl�
LC?
RP
z'n
, it
Report on the &idge and Major
Thoroughtwe Construction Fee District for Valencia
ATTACHMENT G MAGIC MOUNTAIN PARKWAY PHASING EXHIBIT
County of Los Angeles #
CRY of Santa Owits
G-1
TOWN
CENTER
DRIVE
0
z uz
OZ
W
7�
- SEE MIDDLE
0 !A
0
pt
F'o
68
0 Q
m
m S2
M ,
>
0
z
z
0 �
-0
Z!�
=MMEIM
Mail m
'o
> > > >
(1) (o (1) U)
m m m m
>
0 m
rn 0
::z
z 0
0
n z
z: Irn
0
0-4
� 0
Z, c
r, 7z,
m
<
m
0 0
c >
H q
z
3i
RIGHT
o
S;
.,U—
co
0
201
z
........... ..
0 0
�00
2 c: -j
00 1
P -:I
0 !A
0
pt
F'o
68
0 Q
m
m S2
M ,
>
0
z
z
0 �
-0
Z!�
=MMEIM
Mail m
'o
> > > >
(1) (o (1) U)
m m m m
>
0 m
rn 0
::z
z 0
0
n z
z: Irn
0
0-4
� 0
Z, c
r, 7z,
m
<
m
0 0
c >
H q
z
3i
RIGHT
AT HUNE SEE LOWER LEFT
fl�m
0
2n
z
0
........... ..
0?2'—,c)
(50>�
o3 z
j5
z
z
cc
m
0
z
-0
AT HUNE SEE LOWER LEFT
fl�m
0
2n
z
0
Report on the Sidge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Ustrict for Valencia
ATTACHMENT H ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COSTS"
The following costs for District improvements were derived from an anticipated scope of work
which is subject to change as each improvement reaches the final design stage.
TABLE5 LIST OF RoADwAy AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING ASSOCIATED
ESTIMATED COSTS
LINK No.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT COST
36,39,40,41,
42,43,43A 44
McBean Parkway: 1-5 to 1550' north of Copper Hill Drive
$6,827,903
45
97,100
Valencia Boulevard: 1-5 to Bouquet Canyon Road
$2,997,748
88,89,89A
Magic Mountain Parkway: 1-5 to Bouquet Canyon Road '1:
$14,544,206
87,87A
Avenue Scoff: Avenue Rockefeller to McBean Parkway
$8,335,022
50, 51, 51 A, I
51 B, 52, 53,
53A,54,54A, I
Newhall Ranch Road: 1-5 to Bouquet Canyon Road
$25,623,167
54B,128,128A, I
128B,128C
70,71,71A
Decoro Drive: Copper Hill Drive to McBean Parkway
$11,488,387
125 1
San Francisquito Canyon Road: End of McBean Parkway
$3,239,423
to National Forest Boundary
Castaic Road: Newhall Ranch Road to Northerly District I
$998,635
Boundary
63
Rye Canyon Road: 1-5 to Newhall Ranch Road
$74,906
64, 65, 66, 66A,
Copper Hill Drive: End of Rye Canyon Road to Seco
67,67A.194,
Canyon Road
$10,401,803
194A
Links Subtotal. I
$84,531,199
Total (including 5% project management cost):
$88,767,759
TABLE6 UsTOF INTERSECT10N IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING ASSOCIATED
r-5 I IMA I LU t-,Ut) I t�
INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION PROJECT COST
NO.
33 Magic Mountain Parkway Tourney Road $224,775
39 Copper Hill Drive and Decoro Drive $145,800
'0 Due to roundng, numbers may not exactly match to actual Improvement cost estimates.
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clanfa H-1
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
INTERSECTION
NO.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT COST
40
Dickason Drive and DecorD Drive
i $170,100
41
McBean Parkway and Decoro Drive
$285,525
43
McBean Parkway and Copper Hill Drive
$224,775
44
Copper Hill Drive and Newhall Ranch Road
$224,775
45
Dickason Drive and Newhall Ranch Road
$72,900
46
McBeen Parkway and Newhall Ranch Road
$224,775
47
Newhall Ranch Road and Bouquet Canyon Road
$567,405
51
Avenue Scoff and Rye Canyon Road
$145,800
55
Soledad Canyon Road and Bouquet Canyon Road
$1,183,410
56
McBean Parkway and Magic Mountain Parkway
$72,900
57
Valencia Boulevard and Magic Mountain Parkway
$321,975
59
McBean Parkway and Valencia Boulevard
$403,988
60
Rockwell Canyon Road and McBean Parkway
$72,900
70
Tourney Road and Valencia Boulevard
$170,100
71
Rockwell Canyon Road and Valencia Boulevard
$97,200
72
Avenue Scott and Avenue Tibbitts
$72,900
86
Grandview and Newhall Ranch Road
$145,800
87
Hillsborough and Newhall Ranch Road
$145,800
Be
McBean Parkway and Avenue Scott
$224,775
101
Newhall Ranch Road Vanderbilt
$145,800
102
Smyth Drive and Copper Hill Drive
$145,800
103
Boskovich and Copper Hill Drive
$170,100
104
Copper Hill Drive and West Creek South
$170,100
105
Copper Hill Drive and West Creek Central
$170,100
106
Copper Hill Drive and West Creek North
$170,100
108
Decom Drive and Creekside Village
$170,100
113
McBean Parkway and Sunset Hills
$170,100
115
McBean Parkway and Skycrest
$170,100
lie
McBean and Surnmerhill
$170,100
County of Los Angeles 0
Clty of Santa Clante H-2
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Foe Distrid for VNIande
INTERSECTION
No.
IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
I
PROJECT COST
117
McBean Parkway and Creekside Village
$145,800
118
McBean Parkway and Fairview
$170,100
119
McBean Parkway and Creekside Drive
$145,800
122
Magic Mountain Parkway and Fairways
$170,100
123
Magic Mountain Parkway and Town Center
$72,900
124
Valencia Boulevard Goldcrest
$170,100
128
Valencia Boulevard Cinema Drive
$218,700
132
McBean Parkway and Cal Ads
$170,100
219
McBean Parkway and Alegro
$157,950
220
McBean Parkway and Granary Square
$182,250
222
Copper Hill Drive and Tesoro Entrance East
$170,100
223
Magic Mountain Parkway and Mall East
$170,100
224
Newhall Ranch Road and Castaic Road
$145,800
225
Newhall Ranch Road and Lockheed
$145,800
226
San Francisquito Canyon Road and Tesoro
$145,800
227
McBean Parkway and Orchard Village
$109,350
228
McBean Parkway and Lago de Valencia Entrance
$145,800
229
Copper Hill Drive and Tesoro Entrance West
$145,800
230
Avenue Scoff and Lago de Valencia Entrance
$170,100
231
Magic Mountain Parkway and Citrus
$72,900
232
McBean Parkway and Creekside Village North
$170,100
Intersections Subtotal:
$10,046,228
Total (including 5% project management cost):
$10,648,639
County of Los Ange4s 0
City of Santa Clarita H-3
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
TABLE7 LIST OF INTERCHANGES INCLUDING AssocLATED ESTIMATED COSTS11
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT DESCRIPTION
VALENCIA DISTRICT'S SHARE
No.
11 Valenciall-5
$8,700,000
8 Magic Mountain Pkwy./I-S
$5,586,370
7 SIR 126/1-5
$3,910,007
Interchange Subtotal:
$18,196,377
Total (including 5% project management cost):
$19,106,196
Magic Mountain ParkwayA-5 Interchange Phase 11 and SR-12GA-6 Interchange costs assume financial assistance by public funds.
It MWIng Is not secured at time of construction, DWAct (am may have to be adjusted to absorb additional costs to provide
Improvements. Efforts to obtain federal assistance vAll continue throughout all phases of construction.
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Clarke
H-4
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distnict for Valencia
ATTACHMENT I DISTRICT FEE CALCULATION
TABLE 8 RESIDENTIAL
LAND USEu
PERCENT
UNITS
RATE I
TOTALFDUs
Single Family
56% 1
5,264
1.0
5,264.0
Townhouse/Condo
23% i
2,207
0.8 1
1,765.6
Apartment
21%
2,021
0.7
1,414.7
TOTAL:
I GO%
691.9
---
2,918.8
TOTAL:
100%
9,492
TABLE 9 NON-RESIDENTIAL
LAND USE13
PERCENT
ACRES
RATE
TOTAL FDUs
Commercial
62%
428.8
5.0
2,144.0
Industrial
33%
225.9
3.0
588.8
School
5%
37.2
5.0
TOTAL:
I GO%
691.9
---
2,918.8
12 Unit count Is based on pending and approved tentatIve maps. Whom no map Is filed, densities were assumed at the mildpoint for
the corresponding land use categories as designated by the City of santa Clarks and the County of Los Angeles.
13 Acreage Is based on pending and approved tentative maps. Where no map is filed, gross acreage was taken from assessor
parcel maps.
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Clar*a
I
Report on the EIndge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distirld for Valencia
TABLE 10 LAND USE AREA AND UNrr COUNT BREAKDOWN
(FOR DEVELOPABLE RESIDENTIAL AREA WHERE NO MAP HAS BEEN FILED)
I
Area
Southern California
i
West San
1 Franclsquito
i
East San
Francisquito
I
North of Clougherty
Description
Gas Company (5)14
Canyon Road (2)14
Canyon Road (3)14
(1)14
Land Use
S
county
HM
0-50% slope
- ---------
1/4 mile 1
within urban
1.5
1.0
1.5
6.4
1.o
6.4
19.9 1
1.0 1
19.9
beyondl/4 mile
13.3
0.5
8.6
57.4
0.5
28.7
178.7
0.5 1
89.3
60%+ slope
44.3
0.05
2.2
191.3
0.05
9.6
1595.5
0.05 1
29.8
NI
0-50% slope
212.4
0.5
1 106.2
1; 220.5 1
0.5
i 110.3
65.3 1
0.5
32.6
50%+ slope
23.6
0.05
1.2
24.5
0.05
1.2
7.3 1
0.05
0.4
W
118
0
0
0
0
0
31.0
0
0
U11
18.0 1
2.2
39.6
0
0
0
city
RE
179.8 1
0.25 45
Subtotal: 179.8
45.0
1: 413.1
1117.7
1518.11 1
195.8 1897.7
172
TOTAL ACRES:
2,008.7
TOTAL UNITS:
530.5
LEGEND:
County Land Use
HM Hillside Management (density calculated aomdng to slope)
N1 Nonurban (density calculated according to slop, riot to exceed 0.5 dulac)
W Floodway
Ul Urban (1. 1 -3.3 du(ac)
City Land U
RE Residential Estate (0.0-0.5 dulac)
14 See Figure 8 for loration of this ar".
County of Los Angeles
CNy of Santa C4&t*a
1-2
cog
z
cc
L<l
0
x
0
0
z
LLI
it
m
z
LLI
LU
16
E
0
E
-6
20
0
c 0
z D
2,
wl
a
40�
Cl
A
Pt
())
in
,
I.-
0
I,
co
Ln
ad
N
s
C4
Lq
w
I
-W
U.
C4
M
V
r-
LO
N
V
ID
VA
0
0
eq
U.
Go
to
0
(A
0
LQ
00
W)
F -ft
Go
00
ca
U.
cq
E
E
cq
LQ
(4
Do
0
Ln
N
0
U.
u
04
ol
cq
0
03
0
Ln
v
0
LO
r-
co
0
LO
v
0
Ln
N
1,
0
0
LO
U.
U.
ca
Ln
0
N
in
r-
0
co
o
Ln
0
Ln
'S
in
cm
co
r
o
in
fft
'D
co
co
to
N
0
v
I
U.
C4
C!
Ln
Ln
00
V)
00
(D
0
00
r-
C4
00
C -4
r -
CO
Ln
co
U.
m
U.
0
Ln
N
N
0
v
0
to
0
0
N
an
W
cm
C
00
cq
LO
cq
0
N
1-t
'T
vi
Sm
a
00
--t
Ln
w
0
CM
(a
D
cq
Ln
0
CO
CD
@
Z
.0
vi
'n
4)
1
00
Lon
rx
ell
v
LL
CEO
ma
2
- 0)
.2
LO
N w
+
t:
0
ICE
a.
R
z
icr �
-00
to
4")
e
c
0
al
-j
w
= I
.5 Sm
�i
4)
a
p
-
8
c
0
co
a. E
�00
a)
C
nm<w
,
'0
r_
E
0
0
a
a
M
0
0
is
0
H=
0
!a
0
z
Im
Cf)
Ln
I
It
00
0
C4
Cl)
. C14
A
W)
Cq I
(D
, I
1
tr)
10
If--
—� 100
16
E
0
E
-6
20
0
c 0
z D
2,
K,
VALENCIA B&T DISTRICT
AnWItS ?jqqqrjqltiorest
AM 324W -n
APN: 280541
-J,
LEGEND
B&T District Boundary
:3244-25
APM
Easements TR.61644
0 CLOUGHERTY RANCH
City of Santa CWMa Boundary 2 4
Numbered Location 13 AM1132"."
yf
per FDU Chart
.3244-n
k APN: 324440
...........
A
14 TT�f34900
4
CASTAIC UNCOLN PROPzRnES
B&T DISTRICT
tv
0
N: 2886-541 'h� W TT.48M
16
16
5 N� w -�TR.�
TT 52r,
17
TR.4449C
TR,444aD
TR.444W
TR TR.L7
4.
NLF ICT
ROUND MTN TT.519318
1931
105 MA3712
-k4
VIA P CESS
I I B&T 8 ICT
6 � I Ll
PM.22206
TR '44374
25
x\
COLLEGE
OF 7HE
CANYONS
(C of c Not
N
w E
TPM.Iawl,\
S I-YONSIMSEAN PKWY
2500 0 25M SIM) Feet SILT DISTRICT
For Display Purposes Only
Not All Elements to Scale
Figure 8
RePort on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
TABLE 12 DISTRICT FEE CALCULATION
COST OF IMPROVEMENTS — CASH AND SECURITIES IN DISTRICT
TOTAL FACTORED DEVELOPMENT UNITS — = DISTRICT FEE
$118,412,494 —$7,206,683 $9,787
11,363.1
TABLE 13 FEE RATES ACCORDING To LAND USE
Single Family
1 Unit
i
1 1.0 FDU
$9,787
Townhouse/Condo
1 Unit
0.8 FDU
$7,829
Apartment
I Unit
0.7 FDU
$6,851
Commercial
1 Gross Acre
5.0 FDU
$48,933
School
I Gross Acre
5.0 FDU
$48,933
Industrial
i 1 Gross Acre
3.0 FDU
$29,360
County of Los Angeles
City of Santa Cledta
1-6
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
ATTACHMENT J COUNTY/CITY CODES PERTAINING To BRIDGE AND
THOROUGHFARE DISTRICTS
COUNTYCODE:
TITLE 58 Chapter 21.23 432.32.200
21.3Z200 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEES.
A. A subdivider, as a condition of approval of a final map for property within an area benefit, or
a building permit applicant, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for property within an
area of benefit, shall pay a fee as hereinafter established to defray the cost of constructing
bridges over waterways, railways, freeways and canyons, and/or constructing major
thoroughfares.
B. Definitions.
1. Area of benerit means a specified area wherein it has been determined that the real
property located therein will benefit from the construction of a bridge and/or major
thoroughfare.
2. Bridge facility means any crossing for a highway or local road, involving a railway,
freeway, stream or canyon, which is required by the General Plan in order to accommodate
new urban development within the area of benefit.
3. Constniction means and includes preliminary studies, design, acquisition of right-of-way,
administration of construction contracts, and actual construction.
4. Major thoroughfare means those roads designated in the transportation element of the
General Plan, the primary purpose of which is to carry through traffic and provide a network
connecting to the state highway system,
5. The singular number includes the plural, and the plural the singular.
C. The provisions herein for payment of a fee shall apply only if the bridge and/or major
thoroughfare has been included in an element of the General Plan adopted by the Board of
Supervisors at least 30 days prior to the filing of a map or application for a building permit on
land located within the boundaries of the area of benefit.
D. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any major thoroughfares are in addition to or a
widening or reconstruction of any existing major thoroughfares serving the area at the time of
the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
E. Payment of Fees shall not be required unless any planned bridge facility is a new bridge
serving the area or an addition to an existing bridge facility serving the area at the time of the
adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
F.
County of Lot Angeles 0
City Of Santa ciarita
J-1
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District for Valencia
1. Action to establish an area of benefit may be initiated by the Board of Supervisors upon
its own motion or upon the recommendation of the Road Commissioner.
2. The Board of Supervisors will set a public hearing for each proposed area benefited.
Notice of the time and place of said hearing, including preliminary information related to the
boundaries of the area of benefit, estimated costs and the method of fee apportionment
shall be given pursuant to Section 65905 of the Government Code.
1. At the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors will consider the testimony, written
protests and other evidence. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of
Supervisors may, unless a majority written protest is filed and not withdrawn, determine to
establish an area of benefit. If established, the Board of Supervisors shall adopt a resolution
describing the boundaries of the area of benefit, setting forth the cost, whether actual or
estimated, and the method of fee apportionment A certified copy of such resolution shall be
recorded with the County Recorder.
2. Such apportioned fees shall be applicable to all property within the area of benefit, and
shall be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condition of issuing a
building permit for such property or portions thereof. Where the area of benefit includes
lands not subject to the payment of fees pursuant to this section, the Board of Supervisors
shall make provisions for payment of the share of improvement cost apportioned to such
lands from other sources.
3. Written protest will be received by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at any time prior
to the close of the public hearing. If written protests are filed by the owners of more than
one-half of the area of the property to be benefited by the improvement, and sufficient
protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the area represented by the protests to less than
one-half of the area to be benefited, then the proposed proceedings shall be abandoned and
the Board of Supervisors shall not, for one year from the filing of said written protests,
commence or carry on any proceedings for the same improvement under the provisions of
this section. Any protest may be withdrawn by the owner making the same, in writing, at any
time prior to the close of the public hearing.
4. If any majority protest is directed against only a portion of the improvement, then all
further proceedings under the provisions of this section to construct that portion of the
improvement so protested against shall be barred for a period of one year, but the Board of
Supervisors shall not be barred from commencing new proceedings not including any part of
the improvement so protested against. Such proceedings shall be commenced by a new
notice and public hearing as set forth in Subsection F above.
5. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Board of Supervisors, within such one-year
period, from commencing and carrying on new proceedings for the construction of an
improvement or portion of the improvement so protested against if it finds, by the affirmative
vote of four-fifths of its members, that the owners of more than one-half of the area of the
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa clanta J-2
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Distnot for Valencia
property to be benefited are in favor of going forward with such improvement or portion
thereof.
H. Fees paid pursuant to this section shall be deposited in a planned bridge facility and/or
major thoroughfare fund. A fund shall be established for each planned bridge facility project
and/or each planned major thoroughfare project. If the benefit area is one in which more than
one bridge and/or major thoroughfare is required to be constructed, a separate fund may be
established covering all of the bridge projects and/or major thoroughfares in the benefit area.
Moneys in such fund shall be expended solely for the construction or reimbursement for
construction of the improvement serving the area to be benefited and from which the fees
comprising the fund were collected, or to reimburse the County for the costs of constructing the
improvement.
1. The Board of Supervisors may approve the acceptance of considerations in lieu of the
payment of fees established herein.
J. The Board of Supervisors may approve the advancement of money from the General Fund
or Road Fund to pay the costs of constructing the improvements covered herein and may
reimburse the General Fund or Road Fund for such advances from planned bridge facility
and/or major thoroughfare funds established pursuant to this section.
K. If a subdivider, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, is required or desires to construct
a bridge and/or major thoroughfare, the Board of Supervisors may enter into a reimbursement
agreement with the subdivider. Such agreement may provide for payments to the subdivider
from the bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund covering that specific project to
reimburse the subdivider for costs not allocated to the subdivider's property in the resolution
establishing the area of benefit. If the bridge and/or major thoroughfare fund covers more than
one project, reimbursements shall be made on a prorate basis, reflecting the actual or estimated
costs of the projects covered by the fund. (Ord. 82-0240 Sec. 1, 1982; Ord. 82-0050 Sec. 1,
1982)
22.48.235. MAJOR BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEES. Except as otherwise provided in
Section 22.48.280, a building or structure shall not be used on any lot or parcel of land, any
portion of which is located within a Bridge or Major Thoroughfare District established pursuant to
Section 21.32.200, unless the required district fee has been paid as a condition of issuing a
building permit. (Ord. 85-0168, Sec. 33)
22.48.280. EXEMPTIONS - EXISTING BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES. This Part 4 does not
apply to the use, alteration or enlargement of an existing building or structure or the erection of
one or more buildings or structures accessory thereto, or both, on the same lot or parcel of land,
if the total value of such alteration, enlargement, or construction does not exceed one-half of the
current market value of all existing buildings or structures on such lot or parcel of land.
(Ord. 1494 Ch. 4 Art. 4 & 497. 1927.)
June 1987
County of Los Angeles 0
City of Santa Ciarits J-3
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Dittild for Valencia
Crry CODE
16.21.190 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEES
A. A subdivider, as a condition of approval of a final map for property within an area of benefit,
or a building permit applicant, as a condition of issuance of a building permit for property
within an area of benefo, shall pay a fee hereinafter established to defray the costs of
constructing bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, and canyons, and/or constructing
major thoroughfares.
B. The provisions herein for payment of a fee shall apply only if the bridge and/or major
thoroughfare has been included in an element of the General Plan adopted by the City
Council at least 30 days prior to filing of a map or application for a building permit on land
located within the boundaries of the area of benefit
C. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any major thoroughfares are in addition to or a
widening or reconstruction of any existing major thoroughfares serving the area at the time
of the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
D. Payment of fees shall not be required unless any planned bridge facility is a new bridge
serving the area of an addition to an existing bridge facility serving the area at the time of
the adoption of the boundaries of the area of benefit.
E.
1. Action to establish an area of benefit may be initiated by the City council upon its own
motion or upon the recommendation of the City Engineer.
2. The City Council will set a public hearing for each proposed area benefited. Notice of the
time and place of said hearing, including preliminary information related to the
boundaries of the area of benefit, estimated costs and the method of fee apportionment
shall be given pursuant to Section 65905 of the Government Code.
F.
1 . At the public hearing, the City Council will consider the testimony, written protests and
other evidence. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City council may, unless a
majority written protest is filed and not withdrawn, determine to establish an area of
benefit If established, the City Council shall adopt a resolution describing the
boundaries of the area of benefit, setting forth the cost, whether actual or estimated, and
the method of fee apportionment. A certified copy of such resolution shall be recorded
with the County Recorder.
2. Such apportioned fees shall be applicable to all property within the area of benefit, and
County of Los Angeles 0
CNy of Santa Clarta J-4
Report on the &ridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee Ostrict for Vabricte
shall be payable as a condition of approval of a final map or as a condifion of issuing a
building permit for such property or portions thereof. Where the area Of benefit includes
lands not subject to the payment of fees pursuant to this section, the city Council shall
make provision for payment of the share of improvement cost apportioned to such lands
from other sources.
3. Written protests will be received by the Clerk of the City Council at any time prior to the
dose of the public hearing. If written protests are filed by the owners of more than one-
half of On area of the property to be benefited by the improvement, and sufficient
protests are not withdrawri so as to reduce the area represented by the protests to less
than one-half of the area to be benefited, then the proposed proceedings shall be
abandoned and the City Council shall not for one year from the filing of said written
protests, commence or carry on any proceedings for the same improvement under the
provisions of this section. Any protest may be withdrawn by the owner making the
same, in writing, at any time prior to the close of the public hearing.
4. If any majority protest is directed against a portion of the improvement, the all further
proceedings under the provisions of this section to construct that portion of the
improvement so protested against shall be barred for a period of one year, but the City
Council shall not be barred from commencing new proceedings not including any part of
the improvement so protested against. Such proceedings shall be commenced by a
new notice and public hearing as set forth in Section F above.
5. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the City Council, which in such one-year period,
from commencing and carrying on new proceedings for the construction of an
improvement or portion of the improvement so protested against if it finds, by the
affirmative vote of four-fifths of its members, that the owners of more than one-half of the
area of the property to be benefited are in favor of going forward with such
improvements or portion thereof.
G. Fees paid pursuant to this section shall be deposited in a planned bridge facility and/or
major thoroughfare fund. A fund shall be established for each planned bridge facility project
and/or each planned major thoroughfare project. If the benefit area if one in which more
than one bridge and/or major thoroughfare is required to be constructed, a separate fund
may be established covering all the bridge projects and/or major thoroughfares in the benefit
area. Moneys in such fund shall be expended solely for the construction of the improvement
serving the area to be benefited and from which the fees comprising the fund were
collected, or to reimburse the City for the costs of construcUng the improvement.
H. The City Council may approve the acceptance of considerations in lieu of the payment of
fees established herein.
1. The City Council may approve the advancement of money from the General Fund or Road
County of Los AngWes 0
CNy of Santa Clarita J-5
Report on the &fdge and Major
7horoughtwe Construction Fee District for Valencia
Fund to pay the costs of constructing the improvements covered herein and may reimburse
the General Fund or Road Fund for such advances from planned bridge facility and/or major
thoroughfare funds established pursuant to this section.
J. If a subdivider, as a condition of approval of a subdivision, is required or desires to construct
a bridge and/or major thoroughfare, the City Council may enter into a reimbursement
agreement with the subdivider. Such agreement may provide for payments to the
subdivider from the bridge facility and/or major thoroughfare fund covering that specific
project to reimburse the subdivider for costs not allocated to the subdividers property in the
resolution establishing the area of benefit If the bridge and/or major thoroughfare funds
cover more than one project reimbursements shall be made on a prorate basis, reflecting
the actual or estimated costs of the project covered by the fund.
SUBDIVISION CODE
City of Santa Cladta, California 11124192
County of Los Angeles
City Of Santa ClStRa J-6
Report an the Bridge and Major
Thoroughfare Construction Fee District thr Wancla
ATTACHMENT KSAMPLE AGREEMENT AND WORKSHEET
County of Los Angabs
CNy of Santa Clarits
K-1
VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT
CREDITS IN LIEU OF FEES AGREEMENT
AGREEMENTBETWEEN
AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
REGARDING PARCEL MAP/TRACT MAP NO.
THIS AGREEMENT is between the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, hereinafter
referred to as "COUNTY", and
hereinafter referred to as "SUBDIVIDER".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, COUNTY has established an area of benefit known as the"Valencia
Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District", hereinafter referred to as the
"District", adopted by the Board of Supervisors on , 1999 to
finance the construction of highway and bridge improvements consistent with the
circulation element of the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan, hereinafter referred to as the
"District Improvements";
and WHEREAS, SUBDIVIDER is the owner of land situated in the COUNTY
described as Parcel Map/Tract Map No. —, which lies within the area of benefit,
hereinafter referred to as the "Land Division";
and WHEREAS, a final map of said Land Division has been filed with the COUNTY
by the SUBDIVIDER and approved by the COUNTY;
and WHEREAS, SUBDIVIDER has designed, bonded for, constructed, and
completed District Improvements as defined in the "Report on the Valencia Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Construction District", dated
and WHEREAS, credit for cost of said District Improvements has been approved
by the COUNTY'S Department of Public Works, hereinafter referred to as "Department of
Public Works",
THEREFORE, SUBDIVIDER hereby binds itself, its heirs, executors,
administrators, successors, or assigns to use said credits in lieu of payment of the County
established fee of $9,787/development unit, to be factored as follows:
Develooment Unit
Single Family Residential
Townhome
Apartment
Industrial Per Gross Acre
Com'l and Schools Per Gr. Ac.
I
Units/Gross Ac.
Facto
$/Dev. Uni TbtA
EAX
1.0
X $9,787
EAX
0.8
X $9,787
EAX
0.7
X $9,787
EAX
3.0
X $9,787
EAX
5.0
X $9,787
TOTAL ESTABLISHED FEE
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the approval by the COUNTY of the final
map and this Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1 If the cost of said District Improvements as approved by the Department of Public
Works exceeds the established fee, the SUBDIVIDER may transfer all or a portion
of the amount exceeding the established fee, to another Land Division within the
area of benefit for credit against past or future highway and bridge improvement
agreement obligations. If transferred as a credit toward past obligations of
SUBDIVIDER, COUNTY shall immediately release cash equal to the amount of the
transferred credit.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said COUNTY has by order of its Board of Supervisors caused
this Agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of said Board and the seal of said
Board to be hereto affixed and attested by the Clerk thereof, and SUBDIVIDER has
hereunto subscribed his name, by and through its officers hereunto duly authorized,
as of the day, hereinabove first written.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
BY:
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
JOANNESTURGES
Executive Officer -Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors
By:
DEPUTY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DE WITT W. CLINTON
County Counsel
By:
SUBDIVIDER
Cash and Securities In District: $7,206,683
Net cost of Improvements: $111,205,806
Current IFDU count*: 11,363.1
Malencua B&T fee: $9,787
FDU count includes adjusted FDU count for Lincoln Properties based on MOU
between City and Lincoln Properties that concludes the maximum fee Lincoln Properties will
pay is $4,444,000. Thus, 454.1 FDU X $9,787 = $4,444,083.
NL&Fs post District obligation (see Item B per attachment) $3,519,488
Total NL&F cash due upon formation: $5,788,151
Rev. 1/05/99
W.O. No.
1020-336-01A
"DRAFT"
FEE CALCULATION
Valencia
FOR THE VALENCIA RIST DISTRICT
(Based on a fully mitigated District)
Company's Historical Ohl'aat'ons7
1
Unsecured Agreements capped at $2,000
$7,935,240
2
Agreements secured at $3,000/FDU X 488.8 FDU
$1,466,400
3
Agreements secured at $5,000/17DU X 1587.45 FDU
$7,937,250
4
Cap Item 2 at $5,100 = 488.8 FDU X $2,100
$1,026,480
5
Cap Item 3 at $5,1100 = 1587.45 FDU X $100
$158,745
6
L.C.'s paid at capped rate of $2,000 (County)
$128,700
$18,652,815
7
Credits per Green Book estimate (see Section 7)
$17,623-557
NL&F's net County obligation:
$1,029,258
8
NL&F's pre -District costs (City) (see Item A per attachment)
NL&F's net City obligation:
$1-239-40
NL&F's pre -District cash obligation:
$2,268,663
Valeocia
B&T Cost Qf ImprQvements-
Cost of improvements per current Blue Book estimate (see Section 6)
Cash
and Securities on District-
$118,412,490
1
Combined cash and non-NLF securities in Dist.(Co., as of 4-98)(see Section 5)
$837,258
2
Cash in District (City, as of 4-30-98) (see Section 4)
$3,283,188
3
NL&F's pre -District obligation
$2,268,663
4
Known cash in District from Bouquet District Developers
$817,574
Cash and Securities In District: $7,206,683
Net cost of Improvements: $111,205,806
Current IFDU count*: 11,363.1
Malencua B&T fee: $9,787
FDU count includes adjusted FDU count for Lincoln Properties based on MOU
between City and Lincoln Properties that concludes the maximum fee Lincoln Properties will
pay is $4,444,000. Thus, 454.1 FDU X $9,787 = $4,444,083.
NL&Fs post District obligation (see Item B per attachment) $3,519,488
Total NL&F cash due upon formation: $5,788,151
—P
a
w
m
—u
Q
z
LL
_0
0
z
0
u
u
LLJ
0
X
-0
z
m
-Z
w
-i
VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE CONSTRUCTION DISTRICT
FEE AGREEMEN
AGREEMENTBETWEEN
AND THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
REGARDING PARCEL MAP/TRACT MAP NO.
THIS AGREEMENT is between the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, hereinafter
referred to as "COUNTY", and
hereinafter referred to as "SUBDIVIDER".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, COUNTY has established an area of benefit known as the "Valencia
Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Construction Fee District", hereinafter referred to as the
"District", adopted by the Board of Supervisors on . 1999 to
finance the construction of highway and bridge improvements consistent with the
circulation element of the Santa Clarita Valley Area Plan, hereinafter referred to as the
"District Improvements";
and WHEREAS, SUBDIVIDER is the owner of land situated in the COUNTY
described as Parcel Map/Tract Map No. _, which lies within the area of benefit,
hereinafter referred to as the "Land Division";
and WHEREAS, a final map of said Land Division has been filed with the COUNTY
by the SUBDIVIDER and approved by the COUNTY;
and WHEREAS, SUBDIVIDER does not have credit within the District to offset the
established fee;
THEREFORE, SUBDIVIDER hereby binds itself, its heirs, executors,
administrators, successors, or assigns to pay the County the established fee of
$9,787/development unit, to be factored as follows:
Develooment Unit
Single Family Residential
Townhome
Apartment
Industrial Per Gross Acre
Com'l and Schools Per Gr.Ac.
Units/Gross Ac.
Facto
$/Dev. Unit Total
EAX
1.0
X $9,787
EAX
0.8
X $9,787
EA X
0.7
X $9,787
EA X
3.0
X $9,787
EAX
5.0
X $9,787
TOTAL ESTABLISHED FEE
In consideration of the approval by the COUNTY of the final map and this
Agreement, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1 . The amount demanded shall be uniformly requested from all other property whose
land divisions are within the area of benefit and who have entered into a like
Agreement. Said amount shall be utilized, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY,
for the purposes described in Paragraph 2.
2. It is understood and agreed by the parties that any sum or sums paid under the
Agreement shall be used solely to implement the circulation element of the General
Plan of the COUNTY (consistent with the circulation element of the Santa Clarita
Valley Area Plan) for the area of benefit.
3. Contemporaneously with the execution hereof, SUBDIVIDER shall furnish the
COUNTY cash for payment in the amount of all of the provisions of this Agreement
either by the SUBDIVIDER, its heirs, successors, executors, or administrators.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, said COUNTY has by order of its Board of Supervisors caused
this Agreement to be subscribed by the Chairman of said Board and the seal of said
Board to be hereto affixed and attested by the Clerk thereof, and SUBDIVIDER has
hereunto subscribed his name, by and through its officers hereunto duly authorized,
as of the day, hereinabove first written.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
BY:
Chairman of the Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
JOANNESTURGES
Executive Officer -Clerk of
the Board of Supervisors
By:
DEPUTY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DE WITT W. CLINTON
County Counsel
By:
SUBDIVIDER
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES/CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE
BENEFIT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WORKSHEET
TRACTIPARCEL MAP NO. W.O.
BENEFIT DISTRICT PROPOSED
ADOPTED
INDUSTRIAL ACREAGE
COMMERCIAL # OF UNITS
RESIDENTIAL: FACTOR
SINGLE FAMILY FEE PER FACTORED UNIT
CONDO/TOWNHOME
APARTMENT
OWNER'S NAME
ESTABLISHED DISTRICTS ONLY
FEE AMOUNT DUE (100%)
PROPOSED DISTRICTS ONLY
FEE AMOUNT DUE (50%)
LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNT DUE (50%)
AGREEMENT IS ALSO REQUIRED, UNLESS 100% OF FEE IS PAID
Report on the Bridge and Major
Thoroughlare Construction Fee District for V"ncia
ATTACHMENT L SAMPLE "REQUEST FOR CREDIT FOR COMPLETED
IMPROVEMENTS" FORM
County of Los AngWes 0
City of Santa Clarita
L-1
VALENCIA BRIDGE AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
REQUEST FORM FOR COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS
Requested by:
Date:
Approved by:
Link/intemection No.
Improvement Description:
Supporting Documents:
Contracts 13
Change Orders C3
Take -offs C3
Plans C3
Field Inspectors acceptance/release 13